WEBVTT - Ask HTM - Utilizing Roth Contributions in a Pinch, SAVE Plan for High Earners, & Buying a Home to Save Money #847

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Head of Money.

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel and I am Matt.

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And today we're answering your listener questions.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right, buddy. Happy Monday to everyone out there. We

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>hope you had a wonderful weekend. We've got list of

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 2>our questions to get to. This is again more we're

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 2>able to hear directly from listeners their specific financial quandaries

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>that they find themselves in. We've got a listener asking

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>about utilizing some rough contributions in a pinch. How to

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>go about doing that? Another listener is asking about the

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>save plan for student loans, but he's also a high earner,

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>so we'll discuss that. And another listener is asking about

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>purchasing a home in order to save money every single month.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Is that even possible? Is that something that you do?

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>It's something that she has heard folks talking about, so

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to that one and more during this episode.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. It feels a different math these

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>days in twenty twenty four than it was in twenty eleven.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, and maths, the math is broken, the matha math

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Andjrol that's true. All right, We've got yeah, like you said,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot to get to on this one. But Matt,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 2>before we get to that, I just wanted to quit

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>a bit. My dad sadly was My dad and mom

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>were driving in town the other day.

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>They were rear ended. They're smashed by the truck in

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the in the back end of their car and so

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>their car like shattered glass. They are okay, they were okay.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Fortunately they were okay on the way the doctor's appointment.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>My mom was able to walk to her doctor's appointment.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 2>So what's crazy is you know how I learned about this?

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>My wife told me he didn't. He didn't tell me

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 2>about this.

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so okay, our friendship still matters, it does.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 2>But that we talk about so many different things. I

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 2>think sometimes we forget. Yeah, but it's true. So they

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 2>got shared it with me though, and I was like, wait,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>when did this happen? And she's like, no, that's why

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>he's driving a Jeep. Why is he driving a Jeep?

0:01:58.400 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Because it's a rental car.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 2>You can share that say that for some other parts.

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Will Their Toyota is being repaired, right, and so they're

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that thing's being fixed up. But the thing I talked

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to my dad about, and the thing that I think

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>most people forget is that when you're in an accident

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>like that. Well one, I mean, there's so many things

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about about, what to do in the

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of an accident, how to document things, how to

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you are getting taken care of and

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you're getting your car fixed in the way that it

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to be, that you deserve.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>What you're supposed to say is immediately you just get

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 2>out of the vehicle and you just start saying, it's

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>my fault, it's my fault. Yeah, don't worry about it.

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you get it on video.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, exactly, start recording me. Yeah, it's totally

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>my fault.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, it's all good. Say, oh, no need to involve

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>any sort of the police here, any sort of documentation.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you don't want you know what. Just kidding obviously,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, there's a lot we can say on that.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing I feel like that almost nobody

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>knows about, or a lot of people have forgotten about.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And the thing I had to remind my data is

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that something known as diminished value and the fact that

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>when your car is in an accident, the nicer, the

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>newer your car is, the more money you're gonna be

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>able to get from the offending insured person from that

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>insurance company, because not only are is the insurance company

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>responsible for fixing your car up and bringing you back

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to the state that it was, but because of the

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that car has now been in an accident, it

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.399
<v Speaker 1>is worthless by that, just by that one metric.

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 2>By the fact that it has been involved in IRAQ.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So I was like looking up to figure

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>out for my dad, Okay, how much are you owed

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>from the insurance company, and there's like a there's a

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>calculator you can find online, there's things you can do

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of try to figure out. There's not a

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>lot out there, but there's there's a little bit at least,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was like, Okay, you probably deserve somewhere in

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hundred to twenty four hundred dollars range. Push

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for something in this and if they try to say, oh,

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you five hundred bucks, well that's clearly a

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>low ball value based on the calculations you can run.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And so it's just one of those things most people

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think about that if you've been in a car

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>accident that wasn't your fault, that is a term you

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>need to know, you need to bring up with the

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>insurance company, with the agent who you're working with, so

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can get paid for the fact that your

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>car is now worth less than it was before it's

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Nebraska is the only state that maybe doesn't

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>have the minish value. In the other forty nine states,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you can ask for that and you are entitled to it.

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's one good reason to not live in Nebraska.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>This is I'm kidding, one of the other good reasons. Kidding.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 2>By the way, no hate all the Nebraska's out there

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 2>where they driving the Toyota.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>They were what, what's the other call? They both have toyos. Yeah, well,

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>yeah with a Highlander and a Prius.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh I thought they used to have they used to

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>have a rat for yes, right, a toy I don't

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>think I knew that they Hey there's other Toyota's our

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 3>words that when it comes to the hybrid drive train,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean you're looking at gas mileage, you're looking at dependability.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I kind of kicked myself that I don't have a

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>ci Na. Yeah, I've been on the ads. We've both

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 2>been on the Odyssey bandwagon now for quite a while.

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 2>But the ability to have yeah, hybrid man, I'm trying

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to find a way to reduce our fuel costs. Yea,

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 2>even though we still only have one vehicle.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Keep trying to tell you go for the EV dog,

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but or a plug.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 2>In EV well. As prices continue to drop, Yes, that

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 2>will be something I consider, because folks are there. I

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of folks are getting kind of scared

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 2>off by the idea of like, oh no, like you know,

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 2>the EV's aren't all what they're cracked up to be.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Because of that, prices are dropping, and I think there

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 2>could definitely be an opportunity there to snag some deals.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean there already have been massive deals, specifically with Tesla,

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 2>but then in the coming years more.

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>And have we talked about in China? How at their

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>like latest auto show or this is a few weeks ago,

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess at this point, but they unveiled specifically is

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 2>it bid? Is the Chinese evary.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Are kicking butt making great rides.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Twelve to thirteen hundred miles on a single charge from an.

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>EV But we're not going to see those here in

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the States anytime soon.

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 5>I know.

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's so messed up. Yeah, it just tells me

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.119
<v Speaker 2>there's more to do with I don't know, it seems

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>like there's more politics involved as opposed to like doing

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>what's green and what's best for the earth and ultimately

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 2>what's going to make consumers the happiest of right, Oh

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 2>my gosh about you. Imagine if you had a twelve

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred mile.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Charge ev adoption would soar in this country if we

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>had inexpensive, longer range EV's. But it doesn't seem like

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>any politician right now wants to fight for that.

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, what is it mile anxiety or rangings? Yeah,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 2>that would completely disappe you go completely, Yeah, and we're

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>headed in that. Actually I have more than a thousand

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>miles in one day.

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, we're headed in that direction anyway. But sadly, we

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>could be there sooner and we can have those options

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>at our disposal. And I get some of the reasons

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for productionism, but you also can't have it both ways.

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>You can't say that this is the future and we

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have to all go in this direction and then say,

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but we won't take the most low cost brand. We're

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>going to essentially prevent them, bar them from entering the market.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty messed up, yeap.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Maybe what we need to do is like ramp up

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 2>our espionage, like maybe maybe we need to steal more.

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Point more trade secrets Matt. Matt doubles as an FBI informant,

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's a side hustle.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 2>A little, the ways she makes some extra money.

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right, alright, midlistisch And the beer we're having on

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this episode, it's called Duchess Red. It's a sour cherry

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>beer that we've had before, but never on this never

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. So yeah, one of your wife's favorite beers.

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:50.559
<v Speaker 1>In fact, one of my favorite beers.

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 2>I love it as well.

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll give our thoughts at the end of

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the episode, but Matt loves it, all right. So let's

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>get to listener questions. If you have a question, a

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>money question, go to how to money dot com slash ask.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Or if you just want to know that's deepest darket secrets,

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you can record that question too and send it our

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>way they tell you, but you got to record it

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and send it over that's the only way you get

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the information. Just go to how to money dot com

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>slash ask for the simple instructions, but basically record a

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>voice memo sending it to us via email. Now let's

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>get to the first question for this episode. This one

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is about student loan payoff.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 6>Hello, Matthew and Joel Sith. This is Shakatron from Benuda, California.

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm calling in with a question about student loans. My

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 6>question is, at what point or what are the drawbacks

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 6>of the new SAVE program. I guess it's not super

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:45.239
<v Speaker 6>new anymore, especially for high income earners. I am fortunate

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 6>enough to make three hundred thousand dollars a year, but unfortunately,

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 6>to get to that point, I had to take out

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 6>a lot of student loans, and I have roughly one

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fifty thousand dollars in student loans right now

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 6>that I'm chipping away at. I have a six percent

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 6>interest on those graduate student loans. I currently am in

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 6>the pay program that PAYE program. Everyone in their mom

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 6>says that the new Save program online and that I

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 6>talk to is the best thing since sliced bread. But

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 6>when I read into the fine print, it seems like

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 6>there's no cap on the amount of payments that you'd

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 6>have every month versus my current plan, and so I

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 6>get a little bit confused with all of these different options.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 6>Is it just a gimmick? And so I think in

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 6>my situation it might not be beneficial. And I think

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 6>I'm trying to push out my student loans as much

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 6>as possible and try and get some help from Uncle

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 6>Sam with different government programs for student loan forgiveness. But

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 6>any thoughts you guys have would be much appreciated. And

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 6>thank you for your show. It is very interesting and

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 6>has kept me on the right path financially, So thank.

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 2>You for that.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Matt, you hear that you have been like the

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>bumpers in the bowling lane for I was going to

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>do which.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 2>By the way, that's it's worth mentioning. Maybe Shakatron I'm guessing,

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>isn't his birth name given to him name? He's not

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>an evil robot. No, you kind of gravitated towards it

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 2>that my real name is joelseph it is. Yeah, I

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>wanted to jump on the exact same thing that you did,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 2>which is the fact that he's I think what he

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>said was that he is on the right financial path, which, dude,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>that is one hundred percent what it's about right there. Like,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 2>you might be listening to the podcast and you might

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 2>not have much in common with Joel or I you

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>might workron, but the fact is, like, what we're trying

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 2>to do here with the show is just normalize these

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 2>conversations around personal finances and money and delaying that immediate

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>gratification and instead planning for your future. And the more

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that we're able to present that as normal and the

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>more widely accepted. And it's not ever, I don't think

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be widely accepted as this is the path forward,

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 2>not in this country. Not no, because we're constantly being

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>fed but oh no, it's owed to you, like you

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>need to live your life now, you don't need to

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 2>plan for the future. But the fact that Shakatron is

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking about his future, I love that, and I mean

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>honestly like that is like hearing that part of his

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 2>comment there may be the happiest the fact that he's

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 2>just proactively thinking about it.

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>It's going to take some willingness to be countercultural. And

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's also important to mention that that it doesn't happen overnight.

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Progress is slow and steady, but like man turning that

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>rudder just a little bit, think about how quickly that's

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>going to pivot you in a new direction over the

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>coming weeks and months. That is the goal of the show.

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Get you on the right financial path. Some of that, too,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is overarching advice, and some of it gets really specific too,

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>rit like talking about diminished value or now talking about

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>something like specific student on payment programs. Those are all

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>worth discussing, and they're all kind of part of what

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it looks like to have a healthy financial life. And

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>so let's specifically get to Chakatron's question here. Matt he

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he's got a big salary, which is huge.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's gonna help you pivot and continue along

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that healthy financial path much better than if your salary was, like,

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>got quite a bit lower. But a high salary, of

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>course doesn't mean that why choices aren't still necessary, right,

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I think some people that's the problem. As you tick

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>up the income scale, you still see a lot of

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>people in those upper echelons living paycheck to paycheck. You

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>can make more progress, but you can also continue the

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>same bad habits that led you to poor financial decisions

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>when you were making half as much. Sure, and so yeah,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but we want Chocatron to pick the right payback plan

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that gives him of the most bang for his buck,

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>because every dollar he doesn't have to put towards his

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>student loans is a dollar that he can say that

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>he can invest or that he can just spend in

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>other ways that are more fulfilling, that are more joyful.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I think that that one hundred

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand dollars of student loan debt, I don't

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>see it as an anvil weighing him down, but I

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>see it actually the reason he's able to command such

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>an income right that it's catapulted him into a higher

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>earning stratusphere. I know, of course, it's not fun to

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>owe that much, to have this a debt amount that's

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this high, But that mindset shift, I think is an

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>important one to say, Hey, listen, this was the thing

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that got me here. This isn't necessarily the thing holding

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>me back. It's propelling me. Although now I got to

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way it's kind of eradicated so I

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>can run even faster.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I guess what we don't know is how long

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 2>he's been working since he graduated, because if you let's

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 2>just say he just graduated, Hey, this seems like a

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 2>perfectly a perfectly reasonable student loan amount. Rule of thumb

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>being to not borrow more than what you earn in

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>your first year after you graduate. But maybe it's been

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>like five years. I don't know, but either way, I

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 2>think there is he's he's climbed the ladder and he's

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>doing it.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of progress that you can

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>make with an income that high. But you're asking about

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 2>a topic with some real nuance here, and for most

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>folks who aren't in your upper echelon earning stratosphere, Shakat,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 2>I think we're gonna both try to save this day

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 2>as often as possible because it's so awesome. But for

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 2>other folks out there, usnormis the Safe Plan, it really

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>will be a massive help for them, which is why

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you hear all those great headlines, you hear all that

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>that feverish support from almost everywhere.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>He specifically asked for it was a gimmick, and the

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>answer is it's not a gum not for a lot.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Of people exactly. Yeah, the average student loan netter is

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to see their payment reduced significantly

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 2>because of the Safe Plan. That's ton of folks are

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna pay zero dollars a month thanks to the like

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 2>specifically the more generous poverty line deduction. But for you shaka.

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 2>The safe plan is almost assuredly going to be a

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 2>bad idea.

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's no wonder that you're confused because the

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>details can be hard to figure out.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, it's it's it's worth noting too. That is

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>he said he's an engineer. I means he's pretty smart. Right,

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 2>he's commanding a pretty high salary. Yes, it's still really confusing, still.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Confusing, and they're I think part of it's because there's

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>these four letter acronyms. You're like, save, pay, repay, and

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I don't know, it's hard to parse the details,

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and you maybe read the it feels like reading a

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>foreign language, almost, as you're perusing the specifics of each one,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, so, how do I know which one

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of these is going to be best for me? Then?

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And we The save plan is an income driven repayment plan, right,

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>which means the higher income, the more you pay each month.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you make sixty thousand dollars, as you were

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>alluding to, let's say you made sixty thousand dollars and

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you have four kids, your payment might go from hundreds

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of dollars a month to zero dollars a Yeah, and

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a lot of people, depending on

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>their income and how their family size, they might find

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves in that position. But if you are in Shaka

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>territory and you're making hundreds of thousand dollars of dollars

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a year and you don't have like a dozen children

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to like qualify as a larger family size, which I

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't hear Shaka mention anything about having kids. If he's

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>single and has an income that high, the Save plan

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is actually going to be more harmful than helpful. Right,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So sticking with the pay plan that you're currently on

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is almost inevitably going to be the best financial decision

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to spite. Despite the laudatory things that you've heard about

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the Save plan, it just doesn't fit for your situation

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for year.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 2>You not a good plan for it. Yeah. The crux

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>of the matter is that payment cap that you mentioned,

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Because if you sign up for Save and your income

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>continues to increase, well, that payment can go up too.

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 2>And here's the thing, the sky is the limit to

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>how high it can go. Yeah, there is no cap

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>that is not true for your pay plan. So you

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 2>don't want to base your decision solely on what you're

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 2>earning now, but you also want to think about what

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>it is that you might be earning in the near future.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I think worth mentioning is that the

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>pay plan comes with a shorter timeline for forgiveness for

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>graduate student loans, which is, I believe what Chaka said

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he had right, So twenty years versus twenty five years

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with a save plan, and that might seem like forever

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a way anyway, but with the size of your balance,

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you just might find that to be another compelling reason

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to choose pay oversave. Also, I wouldn't let that be

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a deciding factor because ultimately, especially given your income, we'd

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>love to see you pay off that balance before you

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>reach that endpoint. Anyway, Forgiveness is cool, but given yeah,

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>how much money you're able to bring in the size

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of that balance, I think you should be able to

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>get rid of those loans in years rather than decades.

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But that is at least one more fact or one

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>more checkbox, and like maybe much just stick with pay

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>because if it does take me longer, I'm that much

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>closer to having at least part of my student loan

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>debt forgiven.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. For him, like we have to sort of interpret

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the question for the listener out there, because they're hearing

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty K and they're thinking, oh my gosh,

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a substantial amount of money. But for those folks,

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 2>it might only be earning you know, like sixty or

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 2>seventy K, where yes, you do probably want to extend

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the payments as long as possible and not for that forgiveness.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>In that case, it feels like a grizzly bear sitting

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on your chest, whereas yeah, in the case of Shaka,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like a baby cub, Yeah, trying to grab onto

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>your back.

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 2>It's like swatten away a fly.

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all those costs hurt even though you're a baby.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, it's still uncomfortable.

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>But there's But I think what you're saying is true

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 2>because like so Shaka he was like chipping away at

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>his student loans, and I think that's okay. It's a

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 2>big balance. You know, it can be hard to maybe

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 2>like mentally wrap your mind around that. We get it.

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>You don't I want to put other financial goals on

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the back burner at the same time, right, Like, for instance,

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to avoid investing in order to pay

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 2>it off immediately. In order to pay it off more quickly.

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of years that you might be

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>avoiding your roth irka if you made that choice.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's a good idea to try to

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 2>be doing both at the same time, eliminating that debt

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>but also building up a nest egg for your future.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 2>And then plus those contributions will actually reduce your AGI,

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 2>which reduces your required monthly payment. But the longer you

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 2>can live a lean existence, the more quickly you're going

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 2>to be able to eradicate that debt. And again, we

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 2>know this is a massive sum, but your income, it's

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty large, and it might not be worth drawing out

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 2>those payments for multiple decades, for instance, to have just

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 2>perhaps small amount forgiven by the time you reach that,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, twenty years down the road, I think you

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>might just be better off funneling money toward the debt

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of it sooner rather than later. And

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 2>there's different calculators you can check out, like the student

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 2>Loans the student Loans simulator that is up at studentaid

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 2>dot gov. I've heard folks talk about that, but simultaneously

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 2>it seems like it has limited information that it will consider. So,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 2>for instance, how long you've been paying on that, and

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 2>so given the fact that you've got more, there's the

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 2>stakes are higher here. Given the large amount of student

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 2>loans that you have, it might be worth checking in

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>with student loan planner. We actually have a review up

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 2>on the website that will link to you in the

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>show notes for this episode. But that might be a

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 2>great resource for you, just to have somebody essentially kind

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 2>of guiding you, walking you.

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Through this, like a financial planner for your student loans,

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, and as someone who's an experts specifically at

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>choosing the right payment plan and knowing the right pathwork.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and especially given the fact that the rules have changed,

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and we often talk about this. It used to be

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>where the only time we would say, hey, you should

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>probably consider hiring a professional is with a tax professional

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 2>because the fact that the rules change so frequently, and

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 2>some small mistakes on the friend and could cost you

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 2>a large amount of money. But that's it's a similar

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>pattern now that we're seeing when it comes to student

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 2>loan repayments, as the rules of change and as there

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>are different requirements. Yeah, so that might be worth your time.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll link to that review in the show notes

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.719
<v Speaker 1>in case, you do want to say, listen, I've got

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money here that I need to pay off,

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and making the wrong choice could cost me a lot

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>more than hiring the professional to help me choose the

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.479
<v Speaker 1>slam dunk best thing for me. You're in the kind

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of position chockout where that can make a lot of sense.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>But best of luck as you pay off those loans,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we hope you're not holding on to them for too long. Matt.

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>We've got more to get through on this episode, including

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about cashing out a retirement account to pay

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>off a nefarious debt. We'll talk about that and more

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>right after this.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Right man, we are back from the break, and like

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, we will talk about tapping some ROTH contributions.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>But let's now hear from a listener who's looking to

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>take a more active role when it comes to his

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 2>retirement portfolio.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Matt and Joel, this is Addie. I am a

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 5>thirty nine year old engineer living in in Southeast Michigan.

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 5>I have recently hired a financial advising firm to manage

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 5>my funds and finances. After working with them for four months,

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 5>I believe I have time and skills needed for planning

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 5>the finances by myself. However, regarding managing my investment, there

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 5>are two things that I am unable to do by myself.

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 5>They are one tax loss harvesting and two sector investing.

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 5>My question to you both is, are tax loss harvesting

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 5>and sector investing as effective as these financial advising firms

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 5>claimed to be. Hoping to hear your answers sometime soon.

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, and I appreciate what you both are doing

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 5>in terms of educating people like me. Thank you, Matt.

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>This is a perfect timing for this question, considering we

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about when to hire a financial pro

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>or not, and I feel like there's probably more weeds

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we can dive into in answer to ADDIE's question here,

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>so Ati, thank you for your question, and I love

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're ready to manage your own investments. I will

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>say we have like mixed feelings on financial advisors and

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>when it makes sense for people to bring one on

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>into their financial lives, they make very little sense for

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>people in the beginning of their wealth building endeavor.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we took a question not too long ago, Matt,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>from someone in his early twenties didn't have much save

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have much invested yet, and he's trying to figure out,

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, what it looks like to have a relationship

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>with a financial advisor. We're saying it's too soon, you're

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not ready. You need to keep funneling money towards your

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>future and less towards a pro to help you out. Right.

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But the further along you get, or the more complex

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.479
<v Speaker 1>your finances get, the more you might want to employ

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>employ the help of a pro.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>But if you're going to do that, it's crucial to

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>do it wisely because you want to make sure you

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>hire a fee only fiduciary. And you know, we prefer

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that you do business with an advisor who charges a

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>flat hourly or a one time fee, because the ongoing costs,

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the one percent ongoing fees could really eat intose compounding returns.

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>It seems on the very front end, it seems like

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>one percent. That sounds reasonable, and I'm gonna paying a

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit dribs and drabs every single year. But man,

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to have to pay like three thousand

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars to have someone help me come up with a

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>financial plan. That's so much money. But when you do

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the math, the way that one percent fee eats into

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>your returns. You'd be much better off paying three thousand

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars one time for a financial plan for a long,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>multi visit session with a financial planner. Our brains, it's

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just hard for our brains to think that that's the case,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that that one time expensive fee would be smarter. But

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for most people it's much smarter.

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially for a lot of listeners who might be

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 2>entering into some of those higher earning years of their careers.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 2>And what I also love about what Addie is saying

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 2>is that he feels like having an advisor for just

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>a period of time, that it has given him the

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 2>tools to go alone, because like, it's just awesome that

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>he's been able to learn, Because I think going through

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the planning experience, it can provide a ton of helpful insights.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Right The information that they make you gather and confront,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the goals that they help you to outline, the questions

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that they can ask are illuminating, and I think all

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of those things combined can make the task of creating

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 2>a financial plan a little less daunting. Certainly you can

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 2>do that all on your own, sure, but an advisor

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>can just prod you in different ways that maybe you

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>otherwise wouldn't. It makes me think of like hiring a

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 2>personal trainer for a period of time where you're like, oh, wow,

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize I was capable of that, or oh wow,

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I did not think to try to do this instead

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>of that because maybe you were stuck in your ways.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Or say, oh, can you read a couple of self

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>help books and work through your own mental health issues? Sure,

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but like it's the help of a licensed therapist who's

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gone through years of training can get to help you

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>get to the root of some things and help you

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:50.719
<v Speaker 1>think about things in a way you never had before.

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>And then maybe down the line, off you've done some therapy,

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like you can abandon it or at least like do

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it less often.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Professionals are going to have a deeper level of knowledge

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 2>on many fronts, which means you know, they're just going

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 2>to bring things to the service that you may not

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>have thought about.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So I do think that is one of

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the plus checks in the plus column for hiring an advisor.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But let's get to those two specific questions that you ask.

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes about tax loss harvesting, so we'll start there. Tax

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.479
<v Speaker 1>loss harvesting is great. It can be a way to

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>reduce taxes without really changing the makeup of your portfolio

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>very much. But it's not helpful when we're talking about

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>tax advantaged accounts. When you buy and sell inside of those,

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there is no taxable events, so you don't need tax

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>loss harvesting. The only way that it makes sense or

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that it can be helpful is if you've got funds,

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>significant funds, and a taxable brokerage account. So if that's

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the case, there are opportunities basically every single year to

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>reduce your tax burds. Burden buy tax loss harvesting, which

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>means selling a fund at a loss and buying a

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>very similar fund afterward, which save yourself money at tax time.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, it doesn't really affect your portfolio

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in any meaningful way. By harvesting a loss, you're able

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to offset taxes on both gains and in And so, yeah,

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>do you need your financial planner, your fancy paints financial

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>planner to help you do this? Is it worth the

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>fee or the percentage you're giving to them for this?

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say probably not. Robo advisors like Betterment can

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>help you do it for far less than that, And

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they say on Betterment site that four and five users

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>cover their Betterment fee with the savings from tax loss

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>harvesting alone. So I think if you do have a

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>substantial taxable broker's account and you like tax loss harvesting,

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you like saving potentially a few thousand dollars being able

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>to make that claim on your taxes. If that's one

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of the main selling points of your advisor, there are

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>cheaper ways to get that done.

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Sure, And I will say, of course Betterment has a

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 2>vested interest in saying on their site that hey, eighty

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 2>percent of folks other fee covered, So you know, take

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 2>that with a grain of salt. But the fact is,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>tax loss harvesting is a legitimate thing, and this is

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 2>a more affordable way to achieve that rather than maybe

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 2>paying one percent.

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It's something you DIY too, Like you can sell and

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>find the perfect times during the year, but it's easier

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>when an algorithm does it for you. Yeah, it's possible

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to screw it up, do I wy ing it too? Sure,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So you just have to realize that there are potential pitfalls.

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 2>It literally is can be as simple as I know.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 2>We talked about this during the on the show, but

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess it was right after the pandemic, like as

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 2>things were taken that I just switched a lot. I

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 2>ended up selling a bunch of VU and instead bought VTI,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 2>which from a portfolio standpoint for me, was pretty much

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the minimal exact same thing. Yeah, but it was different

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 2>enough in the eyes of the irs that hey, I

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 2>was able to harvest some losses there.

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And the cool thing is you can push You can't

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you can only claim a small amount in any given year,

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>but if you have a lot of loss in one

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>specific year, you can continue to claim that in smaller,

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>small increments moving.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Forward, roll it forward, and definitely you probably got tax

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 2>losses for the next couple decades. Yeah, So we wanted

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 2>to mention Betterment because I think that could be the

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 2>perfect happy medium place to have your taxable brokerage account

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>because you're gonna certainly save a lot more than what

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you're paying to a traditional financial advisor. But of course

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get the upside of that tax lost

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 2>harvesting alongside also some other compelling reasons to use Betterment.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 2>They've got some great tools over there as well. Like

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 2>one of the tools is, like, if you're thinking about

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 2>selling a certain number of shares of an ETF or

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 2>a stock. They'll just tell you, hey, this is what

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 2>you're going to owe in tax. That can come in

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 2>really handy if this is something that you're looking to

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 2>use less. As you know, some folks see their brokerage

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 2>account more as an additional retirement account. Some folks see

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 2>it as like, hey, I want to invest in this

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 2>within this vehicle for three to five years and then

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to pull the trigger and then I'm going

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 2>to spend that money on something that I want to

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 2>enjoy at that point in life. But like a boat, yeah,

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean particularly yeah, but that is a perfectly fine

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 2>reason I think to invest money. So yes, to invest

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 2>some money for certain number of years. But then Addie

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 2>asked about sector specific investing, and that's certainly something that

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 2>you can make a priority. But so much of it

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to depend on your specific goals. It is

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>going to depend on your risk tolerance as well. It

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 2>depends on how complicated you want to make your investments.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Because you could invest in some precious metals, you can

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 2>dabble in reads a little bit, real estate investment trusts,

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 2>you could focus on the tech sector. All this is

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 2>up to you.

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>But we just go all in on Nvidia.

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 2>You could do that if you wanted to. I would

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>rather you do all of that than consume. Right, Like,

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 2>if on one hand you're looking at just spending that

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 2>money in frivolous ways, that doesn't bring you much joy,

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.239
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, you're thinking about investing in

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 2>a more aggressive way that might be a little riskier. Okay, Well,

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 2>between the two those, I'd rather see you investing, even

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 2>if it's not something that for the vast majority of

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 2>folks I think you should be doing. Because it's not

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 2>necessary to build up a nice nest egg for retirement

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 2>by investing in these ways. You can just stick with

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the simple SMP or the total stock market indexes out there.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And some people might accuse us of over simplifying things,

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>matt and in regards to investments. They might have a point.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It's something I've thought about for sure over the years. Right,

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>are we making it just too simplistic on the investing front?

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you need kind of to to broaden your horizons

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you have your money spread out in

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>an even more diversified manner than what we recommend with

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of the simple investing approach. And I think ultimately,

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of our listeners, our goal is for

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>them to do the thing right and to get money

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>into those accounts, to start growing that money for their future,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's less about perfect and I think sometimes that

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>attempt at perfect it is the enemy of something that's

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>not even just good.

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 2>That's great, sure, yeah, but I mean, honestly, like that's

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 2>where I see the fancier, more sophisticated ways of investing

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>as being what keeps people from investing in the SMP.

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 2>And not because the SMP is sub is inferior, but truly,

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like over the past decade plus, the S

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred has outperformed even betterments this sub betterment.

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 2>They actually updated their core portfolio earlier this year to

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 2>weight heavier towards US equities because it has seen subpower

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 2>performance when you're comparing it to the S and P

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of five hundred and So does that mean that the

0:29:58.200 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 2>that the US stock market is going to continue to

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 2>out the rest of the world.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but probably not if history has anything

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to teach us about, Like we could see we see

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>times of international ow performance versus US DOX two innother decades.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's It's hard to predict, but the one thing

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I can predict is that the more complicated you make something,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the more people are gonna like say this is not

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>for me.

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeap, They're gonna throw in the towel altogether.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Yep. And so yes, addie, if you choose to do

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that and you want to complicate things a little more

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and you want diversity, more diversification through some sector specific funds,

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>more power to you. It's just not something that we

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>think is a necessity, and so we'd actually encourage you

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to go back and listen to episode seven thirty four

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>with Paul Merriman. His take is that having some small

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>cap value exposure over the long haul hasn't in recent years,

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but over the long haul will result in outsized gains.

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>But he is also about keeping it simple, so he's

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like one added step of complexity without without really overdoing it.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he advocates a simple too fund approach, and

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess we think that for most investors dollar cost

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>averaging to one or two funds is ideal. It just

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>makes it more likely that you're going to do the thing.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't complicate things too much. I would say, another

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>episode worth listening to is the one we did with

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Brian Ferraldi back in seven ninety four. He loves investing

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in single stocks, but he doesn't recommend it for everyone.

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, for most people he thinks it's not a

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>good strategy. We're fans of whatever approach though that allows

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you to stay the course and keep building wealth. And

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if some of that is investing in individual stocks, but

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>while you're doing the basic, simple thing with the majority

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of things. Just because you're interested more power, that's great

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy. But I just think for most folks that's

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>not where their head's at. Their head is like, how

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>do I build wealth in a simple, repeatable fashion, And

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what we harp on and that's where

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we put the majority of our emphasis.

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Addie, So we hope that gets you pointed

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 2>in the right direction. Joel us here from our next

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 2>listener who is in a tight spot and so he's

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 2>looking to tap some retirement funds.

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Hi, Matt and Joel, This is Terry from Jacksonville, Florida.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Been listening to you guys for a long time. Love

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 4>the podcast, Love everything that you do to spread financial

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 4>and information. Got an interesting roth Ira question for you

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 4>so I was considering cashing out an old Roth IRA

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 4>account to clear some small debt from a credit card,

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 4>And when I was doing so, I was trying to

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 4>figure out how much my original contributions to the Roth

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 4>account were versus what my gains were and what I

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 4>would be responsible for paying taxes on since it doesn't

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 4>qualify for any of the early withdrawals. The account was

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 4>from a previous employer from two thousand and eight. In

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and nine, I do not still have those

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 4>tax accounts, and the account itself has changed hands from

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 4>a number of financial institutions, from Scott Trade to tdmor

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Trade now to Charles Schwab, and they have no record

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 4>of telling me that either. My question is what's my

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 4>course of action here if I decided to go this route,

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 4>and if not, is this something that I need to

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 4>be doing with my current Roth account to keep track

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 4>of this for the future if I ever need to

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 4>tap into that for a critical time and critical time

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 4>and financial need. My wife has a similar account hasn't

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 4>worked in about ten years in an account, and that

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 4>account has been sitting there growing and we.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Just don't know how much.

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 4>The honest the starting point was versus versus what it

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 4>is now again, appreciate you taking my question. Hope you guys,

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Hope you guys can figure this one out with me.

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanks nice. So, Joel, it's worth mentioning right out of

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the gate that Terry, he said wroth Ira, but he's

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 2>also mentioning the fact that this is an employer sponsored account.

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 2>So in his email he actually referred to it as

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 2>a Roth four one K on one hand of the

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 2>now at other points he called it a roth Ira.

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm assuming because of the employer part, he's talking

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 2>about a roth for one cat.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm getting. Yeah, that's what I'm gathering too,

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's how we'll address this.

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 2>We're just clarifying the language because there are two different.

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Accounts, right, and they both have brought them the name

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in that again, is where simplicity would be awesome in

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the retirement account space. But there are a lot of

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>different accounts with different letters and numbers attached to them,

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>which can be just mind boggling for people who don't

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of their time, whether it's their job

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>or just their free time, thinking through these things. So Terry,

0:33:57.880 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we will address this as though it's a WROTH four

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>one K, and we'll actually kind of allude to the

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>roth IRA in this too. But it does sound like

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you've been jostled around to different brokerage firms that can

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 1>make a record keeping difficult. So what we would suggest

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is to reach out to the HR department of your

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>old employer to see if they have records of your

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>accounts and your contribution amounts. That's at least one stone

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>worth turning over. And if you have an old account statement,

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>you might be able to reach out to the old

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>investment firm itself, although for you in particular, it seems

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that both of those are now defunct. They've been purchased,

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the original company has been wiped off the face of

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the planet, so those records probably don't exist anymore. Those

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>are two potential ways to dig up the document you're

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>looking for, but honestly, it might.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Be a waste of your time in your essence, Yeah, yeah, no, exactly,

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 2>that's right, because we don't want you to cash out

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 2>your ROTH for one K funds the money that you've

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 2>got stashed away there to pay off what you refer

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 2>to as small credit card debt. That would be bad news.

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Bears and that's for many reasons that are worth discussing here.

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Because Joel, like you alluded to roth Ira contributions, they

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 2>can be taken out tax and penalty free, but Roth

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 2>four win k contributions don't receive the same treatment, which

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>means taking money out of that account, even if it

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.720
<v Speaker 2>were below your contribution threshold, that's going to result in taxes.

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna result in penalties, making it a in our opinion,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 2>a massive financial mistake not to mention that you'd be

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>robbing future Terry of a much bigger, tax free nest

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 2>egg if you were to pull those dollars out now

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to leaving them invested in the market.

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, think about yourself, Terry, but yourself twenty years down

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the line and you pull that money out Old Terry

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.439
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, and young Terry super satisfied because you don't

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have that debt lingering anymore. But future Terry is like

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>bawling because he realizes that there's not just like, I

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you didn't say exactly how much you're planning

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>on pulling out, but maybe it's not just fifteen thousand

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>or ten thousand dollars less, it's the compounding returns of

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that money than now future Terry doesn't have at his disposal.

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So that is I think one of the biggest reasons

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to not even consider going this route. Right, you need

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to wait until you're fifty nine and a half to

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>withdraw money in that wroth for one K to be

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>tax and penalty free. And I'm not sure how small

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this credit card debt is, but we'd much rather see

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you living on a bare bones budget for something like

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>nine to twelve months so you can eradicate it in

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>a short order, leaving every single dollar that you're thinking

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>about taking out intact in your wroth for one K.

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Because it has this double impact, right, it keeps those

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars working for you, dramatically impacting your future net worth,

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>but it also helps you feel the pain of the

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>credit card debt that you've accrued. And it's not that

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we're massacis. It's not that we want need it to

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>yeah exactly. We're not trying to like make you hate

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>your life, But tapping a retirement account it just feels

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 1>like the easy way out, which is why so many

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>people take it.

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Matt.

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>When you see the statistics about people that touch their

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>retirement accounts early. It's sad, it's awful. And what happens

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:56.919
<v Speaker 1>to as an American the average American leaves our job. Well,

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they decide, oh, you know, there's like ten thousand bucks,

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand bucks, my four one k might as well

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>just like crack the piggybank open. And the truth is

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 1>they do that, and because it's the easy way out,

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>they find themselves back in debt again, not too far

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>down the road, with a much lighter retirement account to boot.

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And so our advice is to make a plan to

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 1>cut spending YEP, to funnel more money towards that debt

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in the here and now so you can pay it

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>off quickly instead. But don't do anything with the wraw

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>four one k, leave that thing being Yeah.

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Leave your retirement nest eck alone. And I think a

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 2>part of your plan could be to consider a balance

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 2>transfer credit card. And this is especially true if the

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 2>interest that you're paying on your credit card balance is

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 2>just incredibly frustrating and slowing you down.

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I just be honest. With rising interest rates and rising

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>credit card interest rates, it probably is.

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Really, I'm sure. Yeah, even if you have righted your

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 2>ways and you're not spending recklessly on that it could

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 2>just really slow things down as those rates have ticked up.

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 2>And so I think choosing a card with a long

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 2>enough zero percent interest rate where you feel confident that

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 2>you'll be able to pay it off in full within

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 2>that window could be the way to go. You're gonna

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 2>pay a transfer fee of three to four percent, but

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 2>it's worth not having. I think you know any interest

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 2>or crew for let's say fifteen, eighteen, even twenty one months,

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 2>if you have a plan. And I do kind of

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 2>feel like we're getting outside the bounds of your original question, Terry,

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 2>but we wanted to mention this because like alarm bells

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 2>are going off in our heads when we hear folks

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 2>talk about tapping the retirement accounts early for something that

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 2>feels temporary like it. It feels like a huge deal

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to you right now, But we just feel that there

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>are better ways to proceed. There are different changes that

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>you can make and you're spending, there are different ways

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 2>you can impact your earning potential to focus on eliminating

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 2>this altogether without experiencing the permanent impacts of having withdrawn

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 2>some of your retirement funds.

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's whey who you listen to in the personal

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 1>finance based Matters MAC because there are some people who

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>would who think the debt is the worst thing since

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.439
<v Speaker 1>lif spread and whatever it takes to pay that off

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in the shortest amount of time is the most prudent

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. And again, we always take like shades

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of gray happy medium, and that is not always true,

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>because you can do a lot of harm to yourself

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>preventing future wealth building activities. Even with something as egregious

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>as credit card debt, there are better ways to handle it.

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And again, I think feeling the behavioral implications of what

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it took to get in that credit card debt, marching

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>yourself slowly and steadily out of that is going to

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 1>make you feel different at the end of the day,

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>having achieved debt payoff by buckling down instead of tapping

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the retirement account instead to get there sooner. And last, banaloigues,

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I just want to mention that you're terry, that you're

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a Schwab, and that's good. They're one of the biggest

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.439
<v Speaker 1>low cost players in the game. That means record keeping

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>should become less of an issue moving forward. It can't

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>hurt to print out annual contribution statements for your own

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>personal records just in case. So if you stick those

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in a file folder or something in a cabinet in

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>your house, then I think that can help you for

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:53.720
<v Speaker 1>future record keeping purposes.

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Cool. Well, you mentioned the forms. Done makes me think

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 2>of so one thing. So Terry, let's just say, just

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 2>in case, you were talking about Rothie IRA contributions. When

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 2>you make contributions to an IRA, the brokerage that you're

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 2>with has to issue you Form fifty four to ninety eight.

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 2>And that is a way that actually I personally have

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 2>needed to go back to previous brokerages to get some

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 2>of those forms because I was like, wait a minute, yeah,

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 2>you can tap contributions if you were in a pinch.

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:20.959
<v Speaker 2>And this was a situation where Kate and I found

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 2>ourselves in years ago where we're like, oh man, income's

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 2>looking pretty low this year. We've got some financial goals

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that we're looking to hit. Maybe let's just consider this

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 2>is just something we were considering. And I had to

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 2>reach back out to E Trade because my first roth

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 2>IRA was with E Trade and they sent me the

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 2>forms and so it takes a little bit more legwork,

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 2>but that's when you can reach out to the brokerage

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 2>directly in order to keep up with that on your own.

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 2>And I will say, prior to that, I had never

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 2>kept up with my contributions, my retirement contributions with my IRA,

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 2>and I never had a four one K before that

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 2>at that point anyway, And of course Joel, you're not

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>surprised to hear that. That's when I started my investment

0:40:59.880 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Bounce's contribute. I had a sheet that I added to

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 2>to my excel file. Yeah, sounds like you, because I

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 2>just want to be able to keep up with that

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 2>on my AM.

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's worth mentioning really quickly. If Terry

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 1>was talking about a roth Ira, well, the great thing,

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the cool thing about roth IRA's when we talk about this,

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is that you can tap those contributions tax and penalty free,

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so you could go back get that forum realized. Wait

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a second, over the last six years, I have contributed

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve thousand dollars, let's say, and I could pull all

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that out right now, pay off the credit card debt,

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>no harm, no foul, right because I didn't have to

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>pay any taxes or penalties. Matt and Joel will love

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that plan. If it's a roth Ira, you can do that.

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 2>That is more flexibility there.

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>That is a touchier subjective if we're talking about a

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>roth ira, because you're right, you don't pay taxes and penalties,

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but you're talking about money that's in a tax advantaged

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>account that you've already paid tax on the growth of

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>which you'll never pay tax on again in the future.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I still like the idea. I think of buckling down

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>if you can pay it off in short order and

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>leaving the money in the roth ira doing even though

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you could tap it without like the excessive penalties.

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the the principal soul stands that we would want

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 2>you to try to do everything else possible in order

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to find a way to eliminate that debt without touching

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 2>those retirement savings.

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt, We've got more to get to, including

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what's better renting or buying. Oh, it's a touchy subject,

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 1>but we'll talk about that right after this.

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 2>We are back from the break and it is now

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 2>time for the Facebook Question of the Week. Joel. This

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 2>is from an anonymous poster, and the question is our

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 2>mortgage payments typically cheaper than rent. I sometimes hear of

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 2>people who only made a small down payment on their home,

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 2>say five percent who say they're now paying less than

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 2>what they'd pay for rent. However, in my area, I

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 2>can't rent a three bedroom, single family home for around

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 2>two thousand dollars a month. A similar home in my

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 2>area would go for about three hundred and seventy thousand,

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and this would end up being around twenty seven hundred

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month at the moment with PMI, taxes, taxes,

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 2>and insurance after putting down a percent down payment if

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I continue renting, I am the type to invest the

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 2>difference in mutual funds and keep that down payment in

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 2>a high yield savings account where it would make about

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 2>eighteen hundred dollars a year. I'd love to buy a

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 2>home if it would save me money. And I notice

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 2>people saying that sometimes, but I don't know if they

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 2>mean they bought back when interest rates were nothing, or

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 2>they mean you can actually go out now and find

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 2>this sort of situation. I like how this poster said

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 2>back when interest rates were nothing, because that's truly what

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 2>it feels like. I'm sure for a lot of folks

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:31.319
<v Speaker 2>who are who are looking to purchase a home today.

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, timing is not on your side. It feels

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like there has been a massive shift. And if you

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>bought your home five plus years ago, you're thanking your

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>lucky stars. And if you are like weighted, you punted

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>just for a little while, you're probably feeling the eight

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>inside that you didn't pounce earlier. And really, real estate

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly dependent on timing, right if you bought, If

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you bought a house in the nine to thirteen timeframe

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're still living in it, you're locked in low

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rate combined within inexpensive sales price. It would mean

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're paying far less than anyone who's renting something

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>similar around the corner if they just signed the lease

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>last month. Right, But if you bought in twenty twenty three,

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>your mortgage amount is likely higher than what someone around

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the corner is paying. So, for example, Matt, I have

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>had a rental property that I recently sold that the

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>only rental property have ever sold because it was a

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 1>primary and I was trying to avoid tax blah blah

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. But the amount I was renting that

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>property out for was far cheaper than what the equivalent

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>mortgage is going to be for the people who just

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.720
<v Speaker 1>bought the home, So they would have been better off

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>renting the property at least from a monthly expense standpoint.

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And that is just still get the same house, right,

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's not the ownership, of course, that's true, and

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that's just the gap between rent and mortgage. That doesn't

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>take into account all the other factors too. So it's

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>significantly more expensive on a monthly basis to buy that

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>home than it was to rent it.

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and truly rates do, I mean rates and home

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 2>values are the big driver of why it's so much

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 2>more difficult today. And I think a reason why this

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 2>poster has maybe heard folks saying this is the fact

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 2>that here's a stat for you. Over eighty percent of

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 2>mortgage holders today have a rate at five percent or lower.

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 2>And so yes, folks who are buying new homes today

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.280
<v Speaker 2>are looking at seven plus percent, but the vast majority

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 2>of folks have rates that are locked in at far

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 2>lower levels. And to take a step back into like

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the macro economy a little bit, this is this is

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons why inflation has been so sticky

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>because of the fact that the biggest line item that

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 2>we experienced every single month in our budgets is what

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 2>it's housing. And when you raise interest rates, guess what

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 2>happens to your mortgage. Nothing. When you're locked in at

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 2>a thirty year mortgage, that is not an expense that

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you see go up as opposed to other countries where

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 2>mortgage is reset. That is why, for instance, that's at

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 2>least one of the reasons that we're likely only going

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:56.800
<v Speaker 2>to see one interest rate cut this year as opposed

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 2>to what was like it was the end of last

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 2>year that they're like, oh, there's gonna be three cuts

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 2>the next year. That's when the markets are off. Yeah,

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 2>that's just one of the reasons why inflation has been

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a little sticky. But enough about that. I wanted to

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 2>also mention that so much comes down to where it

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 2>is that you live, because real estate is incredibly local.

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Like it makes me think I've out in California, for instance,

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Like you would not only be hard pressed to buy

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 2>a home, but you'd also be committing a lot more

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 2>money every single month housing costs. Your mortgage could easily

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 2>be double the rent for the same or at least

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 2>a very similar home. But let's say you live in

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 2>a market like Memphis, Tennessee, or you live in Alabama,

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 2>you live in Birmingham or Cleveland out in the Midwest,

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 2>you still might find that buying a home actually makes

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 2>more financial sense. So so much of this comes down

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 2>to where it is that you live within the United States.

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, So you're asking me broad question that, but this

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is such a highly specific market where it's like, well,

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>where do you live? Because that is going to be

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a massive indicator on whether or not you're going to

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>be able to save money by buying versus renting. And

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like we've talked about before on the show, Matt Apps

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in so many locations around the country, between how expensive

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:07.919
<v Speaker 1>it is to rent relatively inexpensive in comparison and buy

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>incredibly expensive in so many markets has never been wider

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in a whole bunch of places. So at least on

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the surface, when you're talking about a macro level, it's

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be cheaper to rent than it is to

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:20.479
<v Speaker 1>buy in most places. And so yeah, payments are also,

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, dependent on how much you put down,

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 1>As this question ask or mentioned, the more money you

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 1>save to put down on that home, the lower your

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 1>monthly payment is going to be. And I mentioned the

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:32.840
<v Speaker 1>additional cost of home ownership those a balloon also in

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>recent years thanks to inflation, taxes, insurance, maintenance, costs of

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>prison significantly, all the costs, all the costs, and so

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>we're factoring in sometimes. I mean, people look at the

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 1>mortgage payment versus the rent, but there's so much more

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to take into consideration. Home Ownership can be

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a great goal, and it can be a potentially solid

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 1>financial move, but it's just not a slam dunk in

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the way ownership advocates make it sound. That's particularly true

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in our economic climate, Matt. And that is particularly true

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:01.359
<v Speaker 1>as well for listeners like this who say I would

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>be investing the difference, I would be holding onto that money,

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I would not be consuming it. Yeah, lots of times

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 1>when you're renting, you're taking the cheaper rent amount, and

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of renters are spending the access. But if

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you're going to bank the access, I think it puts

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>an even bigger check mark in the box of continuing

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to rent, save up more money so that you have

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a larger nest to get your disposal for that purchase

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 1>when you're finally ready.

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 2>You got to be a little bit more disciplined, right,

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 2>because you don't have that forced method of savings that

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 2>homeowners are faced with where you have to make your

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 2>mortgage payment if you want to stay in that house.

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 2>But one other thing I want to mention too is

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 2>that home ownership isn't just about the basic numbers. Because

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 2>if you are in a good finished position, yeah, you

0:48:40.560 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 2>got a solid down payment saved up, Sure, that's great.

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 2>But homeownership also needs to suit your lifestyle goals because like,

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 2>you can't just only look at the numbers. And it

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 2>makes me think about like making a big life decision

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 2>purely based on the numbers, Like it makes me think

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 2>about going to medical school and you're thinking, oh, I'm

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:00.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a doctor. That way I can make a

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.359
<v Speaker 2>ton of money. Okay, there's a whole lot of other

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 2>questions that you need to ask, like are you even

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 2>interested in being a doctor at the side of blood?

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Do are you smart enough to be a doctor? Can

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 2>you handle twelve years of higher education? Basically in order

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to get to that point?

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Would be a note to all those questions.

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to be on call? You no, like,

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 2>depending on the type of medicine that you're getting into.

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 2>And so there's just so much more to purchasing a

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 2>home than all, right, do the numbers. Mike sense and

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I certainly understand this is how to money, and we're

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 2>looking to optimize from a financial standpoint, but we just

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 2>like to zoom out a little bit and look at

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the whole picture, not only the whole financial picture, like

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 2>what are the additional maintenance costs, what does that look like,

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 2>but also what it looks like from a lifestyle standpoint.

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 2>If you want to be able to move, if you

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:46.759
<v Speaker 2>like exploring new places, you know, if you like to

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 2>travel it done. These are all things that kind of

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 2>point in the direction of renting to where you don't

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 2>have to maintain the home so that you can travel,

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 2>so that you can hop from city to city as

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:57.400
<v Speaker 2>opposed to being tied down to a specific location, because

0:49:57.400 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 2>that's what that's what it's going to take to ensure

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 2>that you make a smart financial move, not moving, you know,

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:03.839
<v Speaker 2>less than five years from now, if you're looking to

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 2>purchase a home in twenty twenty four.

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:07.720
<v Speaker 1>One last thing I want to say, and potentially semi

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Devil's advocate of our position, is that rent is likely

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to increase over time while your mortgage is going to

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:14.879
<v Speaker 1>roughly stay the same. We've talked about the fact that

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:18.720
<v Speaker 1>your mortgage can essentially act as a bulwark against inflation

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:22.399
<v Speaker 1>for your finances, and so there is no easy, one

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>size fits answer to this question. But that is one

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>more thing to factor in to say, Okay, if I

0:50:27.840 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>take out this mortgage, yes, it's going to cost me

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 1>more now, But ten years down the line, what's rent

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be in my town, in the place I

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 1>want to live. And if I'm planning on staying in

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this place, even though my mortgage is initially more expensive,

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it might not be a decade down the road, and

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that is at least something worth considering. So hopefully this

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 1>gives you enough food for thought to make a smart

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>decision when it comes to your own housing choice. But

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly a lot of inputs that you have to consider.

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>This is It's just a complex question, it is, man,

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the beer that you and I enjoyed

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 2>during this episode. This is the dutchess red And do

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:04.839
<v Speaker 2>they always say does it always say sweet cherry sour?

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 4>On?

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 6>There?

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 2>This isn't like a special duchess, is it? This is

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 2>like the standard duchess? I think so, I just have

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 2>never had it in a can before, which I love

0:51:11.840 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 2>because normally when you buy so back in the day,

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:15.759
<v Speaker 2>And when I say it back in the day, I'm like,

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Five years ago when you got Duchess,

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you had to buy it in like a seven to

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:22.520
<v Speaker 2>fifty bottle, or like at a minimum, like one of

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 2>those medium sized three or like five hundred millvater bottle

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:29.240
<v Speaker 2>sometimes too, which can be a lot for a sweeter

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 2>beer like this, right.

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Especially for a beer with as much flavor.

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was waiting on you to take up the

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I hate sweet beers point.

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I will say I do like this beer. I

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:41.799
<v Speaker 1>love cherry beers. But yes, this beer is a little

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sweet for my liking.

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I still like it.

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I still enjoy it, but it's not as tart or

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>funky as I want a cherry sour to be. I

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:52.759
<v Speaker 1>like those other flavors infused in there, and some of

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:55.440
<v Speaker 1>like the funky vibes that so many of the Belgian

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>breweries are able to produce. Yeah, this beer doesn't have

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:00.400
<v Speaker 1>much of that going on. It is more just straight

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>up sweet cherry.

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:52:01.920 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I still like it.

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 2>It's still really good, much less funky. But yeah, the

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 2>first thing is, I mean, you got that cherry sweetness.

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 2>It's like this dark, sweet cherry with just like the

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 2>tiniest little bit of pucker, which then kind of segues

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 2>into the oakiness that you pick up on the barrels

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that they aged this beer in. But yeah, I've never

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 2>seen it's never had this beer in this format in

0:52:22.040 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 2>a can. And I truly think this is gonna I'm

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna go out to wherever I can. I'm I'm assuming

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 2>you got this at the local bottle shop. Yeah, But

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to be able to have this in the fridge as

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 2>like a dessert beer, like Kate and I would one

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 2>split one of these like once a week. It's like

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:38.399
<v Speaker 2>a dessert in a glass. You know what I'm saying. Yeah,

0:52:38.440 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I like so good, nice cherry cordial, but

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:44.240
<v Speaker 2>in beer form. Yeah, it's like a you into cherries

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 2>or ports? Have you ever? Have you gotten those in

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:48.479
<v Speaker 2>your in your wine club? No? Have we talked about

0:52:48.520 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that on the show.

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Emily got me a wine club subscription for was it

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>my birthday, I guess or yeah, earlier this year. Yeah,

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's been fun trying some new stuff.

0:52:58.120 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 2>But have you gotten any dessert wines?

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So she knows I'm cheap, so correctly signature wines or

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I normally go to. I feel like as.

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Soon as the subscription is that, baby, well, I'm not

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 2>sure we're gonna renew it.

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, it's really kind, but it's been.

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Fun, it's been real.

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I prefer Costco Wine blog as instead of like the

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>other rating systems, are.

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Really good wines that you can you can by Costco.

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying. But I know it's a good

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 2>one and glad we got to enjoy it today. It's good.

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's gonna do it. For this episode. We'll

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>put links in the show notes to some of the

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>resources that we mentioned today. And if you haven't been

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to the website recently, go check it out. Lots of

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:31.360
<v Speaker 1>new information being published all the time at how to

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 1>money dot com to help you with your finances, to

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>help you continue on in your journey, and if you

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>just want to bite sized information every week, sign up

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>for the newsletter over at how to money dot com

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>slash newsletter.

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's gonna be it, buddy, Until next time.

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Best Friends Out, Best Friends Out.