WEBVTT - Disney Cuts Lay Bare That 'Normal' Isn't On The Horizon

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. It is time for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>You're joined by Tara la Chapelle Entertainment, Telecommunications and deal

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>columns for Bloomberg Opinion. Uh and it really just a

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>fascinating story coming out of the Walt Disney Company, once

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>again highlighting the really difficult challenges out there for the

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>American worker. Walt Disney announcing that it's gonna slash twenty

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand workers in its slumping US parks and resorts business.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Terror Thanks so much for joining us here. Boy, the

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>pain is really being felt at the Walt Disney Company,

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>among others. Yeah. I think you know a lot of

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>companies had been holding out hope these last few months

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that you just had to get through these for a

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>few months and that they could keep their workers and

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you could kind of see normal on

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the Horizon, and I think this is Disney saying in

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a big way that we're really not there and we're

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to be there for a while, and they

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>needed to do this, and I think it's going to

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>be the start of other companies badly doing this as well.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, their theme park in California has been closed,

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've kind of Disney has kind of pointed fingers

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>at California's state government for that. But the reality is

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that even in Florida where they are opening, they're they're open,

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not seeing a lot of travelers come in because

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>people are still really weary about doing this. Not to mention,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we're in a recession, so you know, I don't know

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>how many families are willing to spend a hundred bucks

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>or more a day on each person in their household

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>to go to Disney World right now. Yeah, the head

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of the theme park send out a statement in which

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he said that many of these were part time already

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>or contract workers. In other words, they were in the

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>union employees, and they're going to trying them to some

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of an agreement with the union employees. But nevertheless,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal amount of workers that we're getting some kind

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of paycheck from Disney, right. You know, they had furloughed

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred thousand people and in kept their task

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>members um on their healthcare uh since April when they

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>had to do this, And I think now they're starting

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to realize, you know, the same parts really aren't going

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to come back for a while because they simply can't.

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's similar for the movie theater industry, which Disney

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is also typed to, where you have them reopening around

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the country, but you're not seeing people come back in

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>big numbers for a lot of different reasons. And it

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>just shows that to get the economy back on track,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we need to fix the virus first. It's just there's

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>no way to get around it. And I think this

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is what these companies are starting to realize, and unfortunately

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to cause a lot of pain for a

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of workers. Yeah, it's Terry. You know you've covered

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Disney for a long time. You know that the big

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>moves they've made uh to pivot towards their streaming business.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is most of their operating income today

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>comes from their theme parks and their cable networks and

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the filmed entertainment studio and all those businesses are really

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>being impacted by the economic infects effects of this pandemic.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Is what's the thinking do you think within Disney about

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of their strategy for dealing with this pandemic. Is

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it just to batten down the hatches and wait to

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>get together side. I mean, I guess so, but it's

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit confusing. I mean, they installed a

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>new CEO in February, which is Bob Shapeck, who came

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>from the theme park side, which I guess is a

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>good thing right now in this moment because he really

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>knows that business. However, what is Disney's future, And if

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their future is streaming, I mean, good luck to them.

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be a really difficult challenge going up

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>against Netflix and trying to make money in this industry.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, you know, the streaming business is

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>doing well and that it's growing and a lot of

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>people of interest in Disney Plus and the other products

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're coming out with. However, it doesn't generate the

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of money and won't for a long time that

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>these theme parks, the cable networks do, and all these

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>different businesses. So there's a lot of question marks around Disney.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It just makes me wonder, you know, what does Disney

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>look like in a new normal? What is the company?

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it a theme park and movie and uh cable

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>network giant or is it a streaming company? And and

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>how do they kind of what does that look like?

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just a lot of questions about, um,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>how they're kind of going to get through this, and

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>what the thinking is at the top, since they do

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>have a new CEO who really didn't come from the

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>entertainment side of this company. Yeah, and he actually went

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to half salary for the rest of the pandemic. Correct me,

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>both of you if I'm wrong, because goodness knows, nobody

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>knows Disney better than YouTube. But wasn't there a time

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>when Disney was certainly not counting on its theme parks

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>for you know, its revenue stream or for its operating income.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was almost a surprise, was it not

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that the theme parks were keeping other parts of Disney

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>aflows if you like, am I right? Pole and Tara, Well,

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's actually, you know, the theme park business has been

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of terror writes about this. It's kind of been

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>a sleepy part of the business relative to the you know,

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the movies and all the other cool stuff, the espns

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of the world. But it's always been a very deady

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>generator of profit and profit growth. And it's such a

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>good business that, as Tera knows. You know, they invested

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>over five billion dollars in their theme parks business in

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Shanghai to open a theme park business in Shanghai. So

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a business they've always liked. They've always been a

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>leader in it. What was interesting when Comcasts bought NBC Universal,

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>they didn't even really think about the Universal theme park business,

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>but that turned out to be a great business for

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Comcasts as part of that acquisition. Yeah, so I suppose

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what I mean in the sense that, you know,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's almost an unexpected gift. So therefore, can it be

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>made more boutique and still work as that unexpected gift?

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you need two hundred thousand cast members?

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you you know, do you need to change up

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>your rides every year? Can you just have it maybe

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a little less exciting, a little less full, and still

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>be generating enough income that's possible. I mean, I think

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies are having to make that calculation. Now,

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>do you operate at a smaller capacity. We saw the

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>retail industry goes through this in recent years, even before COVID,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, becoming more boutique. I think Disney can do that.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>There's just so much fascination and and love around the

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Disney brand. I mean, people are obsessed with it all

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>around the world. But how do you get all these

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>people to come back and travel again? You know, maybe

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean operating at a at a lower capacity,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>being smaller, but then how do you charge as much

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as you're charging for these things? So I think there's

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>just there's a lot that's going to change, and it's

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>going to take a lot of trial and error and

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out where do we land at the

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>end of this pandemic, What does it mean and do

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we go back to quote normal or is normal no

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>longer part of our vocab here? And what does it

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>mean for these giant companies that have operated this way

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for so long? They're really gonna have to rethink things.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Um Tera, what do we know about Shanghai? Has that reopened?

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>If so, how is you know traffic there? Yeah, they

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>reopened that. I think they actually had quite a bit

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of demands. I think it was maybe the beginning of

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the summer, um the local government there had them reduced

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>capacity again because virus cases were spiking, but I think

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been opened. I mean, I think the big problem

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>area has been California for Disney, and they really wanted

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to get that park back open, especially since I think

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the California park Disneyland gets a lot of local visitors

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to Orlando, which relies on a lot of

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people getting out a plane and coming. So I think

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they really wanted to get that one open, and obviously

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not happening anytime soon. Tara's thanks so much for

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us with all of your info there on Disney

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and of course, you know, entertainment companies in general. Tara

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Opinion columnists covers all of that media, entertainment

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and so on. And Disney today down four tenths one

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last year. It's down four point two percent,

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>so definitely not one of those docks that benefited. Pole

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>has said that without looking at the chart. Yeah, exactly right.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>They've really been hit hard and again their theme park

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>business has just effectively been shut down. Um so and

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and as Terror you know points out, you know, they

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>really full of Florida parks. They need global travel to

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>pick up because a lot of their customers come from

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of Florida, outside the United States, and they need

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>global travel to pick up. And that doesn't seem like

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it's something on the near term horizon. Yeah, it's such

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a such a difficult time for everybody involved. And of

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>course the story the other day that the Disneyland resort

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in a Hong Kong lost an option to expand its

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>side and just just headlines negative coming constantly for Disney.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It is time to talk bonds, bond market, fixed income, volatility,

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.559
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of it. We have somebody who

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>is glued to this day in day out. Bryan Whalen

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is general portfolio manager for fixed income at tc W,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>which has of course two D twelve billion dollars in

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>asss under management. Brian, thanks for joining. When you come

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>into the office the day after you know, a debate

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that was so content to contentious and so difficult, where

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>do you go to look first to see if there's

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a reaction in the marketplace. Well, well, first, thanks for

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>having me. Um. You know clearly you know we're bond managers,

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>so we look at the yield curve will look at

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the moves across the board, and honestly, this morning it's

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>just more of the same. I think that debate kind

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of with your opinion on it, you know, good bad.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it really um changed anyone's you know,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>UM expectations for the election. And you know we're seeing

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that in treasury yields, which are still confined to a

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to a very narrow range. So, Brian, where do you

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>guys at TCU, with all the assets under management you

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>guys have, where do you see opportunities given where yields

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>are here? Yeah, great question. I mean, you know, look, um,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, as a bond manager, you have

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to you have to recognize, you know, the power of

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the FED and the influence on asset prices. And you know,

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we have an opinion that the economy is you know,

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>actually you know, much worse than than it may appear,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and it feels and that has to do with what

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in terms of the fiscal uh stimulus UH,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and monetary um, you know, aggressive monetary policy

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Fed. UH. And so you know, when we're

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the marketplace today, you know, areas where the

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>FED is directly involved. I think you have to embrace that.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to kind of look at high quality assets

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>and you have to realize that, you know, the prices

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are the spread that we saw happening in in March,

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>most like, you're not going to see that again in

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>high quality assets because because the FED is not gonna

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>let it happen. And so you have to embrace that.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, maybe take maybe a little

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more risk there then you might otherwise would take

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in an environment like this. And then on the other hand,

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to be patient giving the amount of you know,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>just outright trauma the economy has incurred, uh, any amount

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of demand you know, destruction and the amount of really

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>creative destruction going on. You when we get into two

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one, you need to be patient, uh in

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>parts of the capital structure and parts of the market,

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>um that are vulnerable to all the damage and and

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the changes going on. How far down the credit stock

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>are you going by in uh, not very far to

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, you know, the errors we like

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the most, you know, Uh, Agency mortgages is one area.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>UM that's you know, the FED has bought you know,

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>in this QUEWI period over a trillion dollars of A

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and C mbs, and they've kept spread volatility incredibly muted.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>High quality investment grade corporate bonds. UM. You know, we

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>still like them. Obviously the Feds involved, maybe not to

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the same extent, uh, and that they've only bought a

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a very little amount, but just the presence

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of the FED has given that market a sense of

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a an absolute kind of cap on

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>spreads and that again the FED won't lead volatility pick

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>up too much there. But you know, outside of the UM,

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say they called the you know, the warm embrace

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of the FED, where they have kind of ring fence

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>asset classes like that. You have areas like leverage finance,

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which includes high old bonds and leverage loans. You have

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>areas like UM you know, down the capital structure, as

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you said, and in the commercial mortgage back market where

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of damage, uh and it's

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>going to take a long time to play out. So

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I mentioned before, you know, we think

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the best way to kind of spend your dollars and

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>fixed income now is in the high quality parts of

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the market and be patient and wait for better opportunities

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>or maybe I should say better price is um down

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>capital structure. Brian talked us a little bit about credit

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>quality as you look across your portfolio here, Um, we're

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>six seven months into this pandemic. I suspect you're starting

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to see some some real cracks. Yeah, I mean this

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is a you know, as as a you know, like

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in the real economy, seeing in the bond market,

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>meaning you know, we're kind of we're moving into a

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>world of the halves and the have nots. Uh. And

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>even though you know, if you look at big kind

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>of major kind of barometers for let's take corporate bonds,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like the investment Grade UH index and the spread of

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 1>that index, you know, it's around a hundred twenty five

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty basis points, which historically is about average. The

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>same thing in the high old bond market, you know,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>plus minus five hundred basis points. But um, there is

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>more dispersion under the surface, and that is reflective of

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's going on in the broader economy and

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.599
<v Speaker 1>that you know this this will take a while to

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>play out, uh, and we're going to see lots of winners,

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 1>but we're all going to see also going to see

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of losers. So you say you need to look

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for more risk, but yet not go down too far

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>into sort of the depths of you know, the corporates, ratings, issuance.

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that? How do you do both?

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you look abroad? Do you I mean, are there

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>still opportunities that people haven't seen? It's bottoms up work.

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have to have you know, you've got

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a lot of smart people um underwriting, not

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>just sectors anymore, but you know, individual credits because it's

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>not just you know, there'll be sectors that win, they'll

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>be sectors that loses. But even in the sectors that win,

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there will be companies that kind of rise

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to the top and you know they will prosper. Uh

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>when we you know, look at look at the retail

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for instance. I mean, you know, the amount of change

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen over the past six months during the pandemic

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of let's say e commerce penetration and retail sales.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've seen basically a four point jump you know,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>from about twelve to six of e commerce penetration just

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. Previously, that four point increase took about

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>five years to occur, so the change is rapid. You

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>know that. There's that old kind of Leneing quote about

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, their decades when nothing happens, and then every

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks where decades happen. We're living in the middle of

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>that right now. Yeah. Absolutely, in many many ways. Brian Will,

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and thank you so much for joining us. Brian Will

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and general portfolio manager for fixed income at tc W.

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>They have two d and twelve billion dollars firm wide

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>under management, so they see all parts of the market.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>We always like to talk to the smart folks at

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>tc W. They generally had a more conservative view of

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the market, and I think that's been born out here.

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, Brian Will and Gender portfolio manager, fixed Income.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The first presidential debate last night is in the books

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and what the debate. It was back and forth, very lively,

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, between President Trump and former Vice

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>President Joe Biden. Let's take a listen to some of

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the highlights. Everybody knows he's a liar, but I just

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to make sure and you wanted

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>last I want to make sure. Can you let him

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>finish sir, he don't know how to do that. He

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>knew it was a deadly disease. What did he do.

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>He's on tape, is acknowledging he knew it. He said

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't tell us or give people a warning of

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it because he didn't want to panic the American people.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't panic. He panicked. We've done a great job.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I haven't done a good job, and

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that's because of the fake news. No matter what you

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>say to them, they give you a bad press on

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just fake news. They had the slowest recovery since

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety economic recovery since nine. It was the slowest recovery.

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I paid thirty eight million dollars one year. I paid

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven minute. Nobody's done that. He's just he's here's

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the deal. I know a lot more about it. Let

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>him finish. The fact is that there is racial insensitivity.

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>People have to be made aware of what other people

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like. That was President Donald Trump and former Vice

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>President Joe Biden at the debates last night. Let's get

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a postmortem, if you will. Jeanie Zano title. She's a

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>political contributor for Bloomberg News and also professor of political

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>science at Iona College. Jenny, thanks so much for joining

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>us here. Boy, lots to unpack from last night. What

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>was your thirty thousand foot takeaway from the debates? Winners,

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>losers or a draw? Yeah, it's so good to talk

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to you. I think, you know, I think debate at

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this point is a generous word. It was more like

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a brawl. And um, I think you know when you

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about winners and losers, my takeaway was when it

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it is so divisive and you know, described in so

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>many ways, but certainly no Linkenant Douglas debate. This was

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, all out barbarawl. I think it's

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>hard for there to be a winner or a loser

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in that context. You know, you had the vice president

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>calling the president names, you had the President repeatedly interrupting.

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to see how many people tuned out after

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the first fifty in twenty minutes. And so from that perspective,

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a draw, and I think you

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>end up pretty much with the status quo. And unfortunately

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for the President, he went into this debate lower in

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the polls across the country and even in

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>many of the battleground states and that's a big challenge

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>for him. When you're looking at a you know, Washington

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Post ABC poll the other day with the vice president

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>nine almost double digits lead in Pennsylvania, that's a problem.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is, you know, where we find

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>ourselves the morning after Genny doesn't make a difference of

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the polls, even if someone decided to decide just a

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>non botherable thing after last night. Um, I do think,

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course, for me as a political scientists,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that is so unfortunate because of course that's

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>how we speak, that's how we express ourselves, that's how

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we have power as Americans and as citizens in the republic.

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think it is a problem, and I think

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>your point is well taken. We heard from Frank Luntz

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>after the debate that many of the undecideds that he

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>was pulling seemed like they just made tune out at

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this point, that they just didn't want to be involved,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and who can blame them? And of course we all

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>lose in that perspective. And so you know, you talk

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>about a winner a loser, I think a lot of

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>people said, and I agree, the American public is a

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>loser when you can't have a real sustained debate about this.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So many issues that are going on all around us.

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>We're waiting for a Job's report out on Friday, We're

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a pandemic, We've got a Supreme

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Court nomination. The list goes on and on, and there was,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little bit of substance one. We don't

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>want to say there was nothing, but it wasn't nearly

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>what it should have been. So, Jennie, I guess that

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>begs a question should be should there these two candidates

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>even debate any further? You know, I know this is

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I've heard so many different ideas about this, and and

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Democrats urging the president the vice president sorry

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>not to debate. I think that would be unfortunate. I'm

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>hoping this isn't the end of the presidential debates, probably

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 1>selfishly because I was so excited about yesterday. I love

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this time of year. Um. I do hope that they

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have them. Um, I have to admit that I do

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>hope that they have them, and I hope that there

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is a way that they could be done so that we,

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the American people, can benefit. Whether that means, you know,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about shutting down Mike's. But the bottom

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>line is if two people agree to debate and one

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of or both decide not to follow the rules, this

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>is what happens. And I think this was a concerted

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>strategy on the President's part to throw the vice president

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>off his game, to make it hard for him to

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, express his opinions and to you know, show

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>any strength. And I think the President may have gone

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>too far in that respect. I think, you know, quite frankly,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>had the president done a little bit of that, the

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>vice president may or may not have stumbled. But what

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the president is, he just went overboard, and he, I think,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is the one who came out the loser around this. Yeah,

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean even in terms of policy, it's not like

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we heard all that substantive. You know, policy platforms in

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>any area really just had a lot of complaints. Will

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it make it any more likely that we get stimulus

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>around four though? I mean Pelosi emotion right now are

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>chatting and they will want to distract from last night's

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>tobacco now. Absolutely, And you know that's one of the

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>things that kept occurring to me last night. You have

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have not had the stimulus package. Obviously,

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>no agreement on that we have. These offers on the

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>table are being discussed, and I'm not sure I heard,

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, more than just sort of a little, you know,

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>mention of those nothing substantive. And that again is where

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we find ourselves with unemployment where it is and people

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>suffering on the ground, over two hundred thousand dead, no

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package out of Washington, and a lot of back

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and forth. But I'm not clear at this point where

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>either the President or the Vice president stand on something

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as basic as the proposal that both sides in Congress

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>in the White House has put forward at this point. So, Jenny,

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the president needs to do to

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>close that gap that the polls are indicating right now.

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think what the president needs to do is he

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to appeal to the people who helped him win

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in twos sixteen. That is a traditional moderate, undecided Republican

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>women in the suburbs, in particular seniors, college educated voters,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and they believe they can pick up some Latinos. And

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I think to do that, he cannot repeat what he

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>did last night, and I think that's going to be

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>his big challenge. I'll just give you one quick example

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on the economy. You know, he interrupted Joe Biden talking

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about the pre COVID economy, and I was wondering why

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the pre COVID economy was very strong. Donald Trump does

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>great in all polls, and rightly so when you talk

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>about the pre COVID economy, why not let Joe Biden

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>try to take that on. And yet he sort of

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>interrupted him, and I think was a loser for the

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>president talk about the economy, especially pre COVID, because you

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>win on that. So I think he needs to, you know,

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>try to appeal to those voters by not stepping on

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the vice president in those moments and by letting the

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>vice president make his case, because I do think the president,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>on the economy and in other areas has an argument

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to make that will appeal to some of these moderates

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he needs to pull over. Genie, thank you so much

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for watching the base first of all, and for talking

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to us about is Gennie of course, is on television

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>last night on Bloomberg Television, watching the debate and commenting

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>on it and moving on balance of power again today.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Junie zy Know is political contributor for Bloomberg News, also

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 1>professor of political science at Iona College let's talk a

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>little et F action, shall we. When I think E

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>t F s, I think Vanguards, some of these huge,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>huge players in the space. I want to get a

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of the future of the E t

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>F business where some of the big players stand. We

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>can do that with Eric Valchunis, senior et F analysts

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Bloomberg Intelligence is Bloomberg's investment research business

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>staff with hundreds of world class analysts around the world. Eric,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks much for joining us here. Talk to us about

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard here. I mean, I know they are just monsters

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the space about a billion and a half I'm sorry,

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a trillion and a half bond fund business. You think

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get even bigger, don't you? I do. We

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>think they're probably going to double that number to three

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>trillion within five years perhaps um, as long as this

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>low rate environment continues. First of all, just a little

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on the one point five trillion that is double any

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>other asset manager. We were even shocked. We hadn't dug

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>dug into their bond funds in quite a while. We're

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>largely in et F, so we looked at all of

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>their bond funds and fillion of that is inactive, which

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>makes them the biggest active bond fund manager as well.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>They're just a monster in the space. And the reason

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we're so bullish is because if you have a low

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>rate environment and real yields are falling, the expense ratio

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of your bond fund, whether it's active, war passes, it's

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>going to start eating up an increasingly large chunk of

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that yield. Thus, if Vanguard has fees that are five

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to ten, perhaps twenty basis points at most, they're going

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to eat up a lot much smaller portion of the yield.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>That's going to help investors get more yield from the fund.

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>In addition, it will give them a little more breathing

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>room to take a little less risk to try to

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>go out further on the credit spectrum to increase the yield,

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which then makes a fund vulnerable to a sell off,

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and we saw Pempco get hit with that in March.

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 1>They had a much bigger draw down. So those are

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the factors that we think really aligned perfectly with Vanguard,

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, they could get much bigger. Could Vanguard learn

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>anything from the March sell off teachable moment to hedge

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>against that possibility again? Well, I would almost go and

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>flip and say, what could PIMCO learn Because if you

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the March sell off, like vanguards equivalent to

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the total return or the PIMCO income fund is the

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard bond fund v t O b X, and it

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>only went down about half as much as the PIMPCO fund.

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>That saving that much raw down becomes very huge. And

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so that fund is up nine percent in the past year,

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>whereas p m I m X, which is the largest

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>actively managed bond funds PIMCO is is only a one percent.

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the agg might be about seven. So in general,

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>if there's a real nice rally and bonds, which there

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>has been in five years prior to the sell off,

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the Pimcos of the world are going to do a

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>little better. They take on a little more risk UH,

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to beat the agg by a lot.

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But in these sell offs really hurt them. And this

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is what Vanguard is less exposed to UH than most

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>active manager. I will say all of them, but many

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of them do dip a little higher into the high

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>yield areas. So you might have PIMCO at ten percent

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>high yield and Vanguard will be maybe more three, four

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>or five. So it's interesting, Eric, you talk about the

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fun flows into uh, this one and a half trillion

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar bond fund business for Vanguard with rates so low,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of surprised that folks are thinking about, you know,

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>people putting even more money into these bond funds. Perhaps

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they should be looking elsewhere for yield. Yeah, and this

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is this is perhaps one of the head winds to

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>our call, which is just people not really being into

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>bond funds. I I just think you look at the

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>equity markets and you know that they can see them

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a little frothy too. I I still believe the sixty

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is a huge uh issue here because we do find

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that if the equity markets rally, then people will rebalance

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>into bonds to keep that allocation. So um yeah, I mean,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>if if equity markets falter and bonds keep rowling, you

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>could people have people rebalance more into equities. So there's

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>some other factors that could come into it. But I

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>do think you know, bonds from just major asset class,

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think if you look, uh, you know, the

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>stability they provide is also part of what you get

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>out of them. It's not just the yield return it's

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>also they can provide some diversification benefits, and so I

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do think that will carry the day. And I do

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's a large chunk of a portfolio and I

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>don't see that going away completely. Eric, Where is on

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Guard taking market share from or is this new money

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe perhaps made in the hecity market. Uh? Well, Vanguard

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think takes market share from everybody, um, you know

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in the bond space, which they Pimco, black Rock Capital Group,

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>all of they're all the competitors of Vanguard. And you

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>know that they have their competitors on the equity side.

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>To UM, it's they're just you know, to me, they're

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:29.479
<v Speaker 1>like Amazon. Vanguard is like Amazon is to retail, except

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to the asset management world. You just don't hear as

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>much about them because they're not couplely traded. But their

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>fees are usually four or five times lower. And we're

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just in a world where people are obsessed with cost.

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the things they trust the most now,

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and so they're going to just continue to eat market share.

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just on the bond side, the fee comes in

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>extra is extra important, perhaps because of those shrinking yields.

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, Er, let's switch gears a little bit, just

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:57.719
<v Speaker 1>real quickly, what's the most exciting thing you're looking at

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>an et F world today? We're looking at a spack

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>eks that is going to launch tomorrow. We think, yeah,

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you guess it, um and uh, there's another one filed.

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>We're calling it the spack attack. We're expecting about four

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>or five of these bad plays to launch in the

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>next couple of months. Probably two or three will survive

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years. It reminds me the blockchain

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>frenzy and the cannabis frenzy, uh recent years. So that's

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking at. Wow, I don't know what to

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>say about that. I mean, yeah, I mean, I guess

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>these ets can come and go pretty quickly, right, Yeah, Look,

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean e t s are opportunistic like a lot

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of areas, but especially when it's a new area.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Because speaking of Vanguard, these new areas I call them

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard free zones, Like Vanguard is not going to launch

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this back ets, so issuers love that can come in

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>charge a little higher fee and not get priced down

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. Right, it makes so much sense. Eric Belltoon

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is always bringing us the news stories and the new

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>at s that are out there. Thank you so much

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Eric caball Tunas of Bloomberg Intelligence is there,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>et F analysts. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn,

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio