WEBVTT - Atlas CEO Talks Regional Banks

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's stick with earnings. Zion's reporting a beat on earnings

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>with a NETT income of two hundred and twenty two

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 2>million dollars despite a fifty million dollar loss from an

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 2>alleged fraud. The former Barkley CEO Bob Diamond writes the following,

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 2>The dislocation in regional banks stems from a few single

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>bank specific issues, but doesn't change our view on the opportunity.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>We remain very bullish on regional bank consolidation. Bob. John

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>just now for more pub Good morning.

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Morning, John.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 2>It's going to see it. So a few years ago

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 2>we had some problems managing interest rate risk. Can we

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>avoid it with credit risk in this segment now, I think.

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Broadly in regional banks, as you've just quoted me, we're

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>very bolish. I think, you know, both the interest rate

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 3>dislocation that started with SVB or was recognized with SVB

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>and we were really a function of rates going from

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 3>zero to five and a half percent is in the market.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the you know, the regional bank area has

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 3>some really strong banks and some that are not as

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>well managed. So of course some have more exposure for example,

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 3>to commercial real estate than others have. And if the

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>commercial real estate is in Iowa, it might be different

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 3>than if it's in la So we look at all

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>of those things. But as a sector, this is a

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 3>really really strong sector of the banks. There's four and

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 3>a half thousand. It has the support of Secretary of

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the Treasury Vessent that consolidation is necessary. Makes the banks

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 3>more competitive, it increases the roes, it makes them just better,

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 3>better investments. And I think four and a half thousand

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 3>banks the United States of America, it's just it's the

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>wrong number. And so we see this going over the

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 3>next two to three years to closer to one thousand

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 3>or fifteen hundred. And we think, also, John, I think

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 3>this is really important. The thesis here is one of

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 3>consolidation and taking costs out. So many of these smaller

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 3>community banks are just too small to seed. They're very

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>good banks, but to get a positive ROE with technology costs,

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 3>with regulatory relation costs, virtually all of these banks have

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 3>the same technology platform. So you eliminate one technology platform.

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Many of them or all of them have regulatory relations staffs.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 3>You can eliminate one of those. You don't really need

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 3>too So if you add the cost synergies, which we've

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>proven in back testing really come out and are real,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and you add the increase in ROE. Because when a

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 3>bank buys another bank, there's purchasing accounting and you have

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>to mark to market fully through the p and L

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the bank that you're acquiring, you're putting capital in. Automatically,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the ROI goes up because the asset prices are different.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 3>So when we look at the cost savings, we look

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>at the increase in ROE, we look at four and

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>a half thousand banks, we look at too many or

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>too small to succeed. This is probably the best investment

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>we've seen where the downside is really really protect and

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 3>there's good upside.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 2>It's happening, your full cost is happening. We've seen it

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 2>with Fifth Third and Co America. You'll suggest in this

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 2>More to Come you talked about how region specific some

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 2>of these issues can be. It's there a common threat

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>in the consolidation so far.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 3>I think what we have seen is where the synergies

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 3>are most clear is in state and close to state.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>So when you have a really good front office, meaning

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 3>you have a good business around deposits and loans and

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 3>a similarity in terms of region where you're really adding

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>clients and customers in taking out costs, those are the

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 3>best opportunities, but not in terms of where in the US.

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 3>It's more that in state and close to state is

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the preference.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>There's been this fear that some of the biggest banks

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have really taken the wealthiest and the highest credit ratings

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of customer base, and then mid tier banks

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are stuck with everybody else, and that that's where the

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>credit problems have really come. Has there been anything that

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you've seen that proves that to be true.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>No, We've seen idiosyncratic issues. We've seen certain banks that

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 3>may have a specific name issue. But the truth is

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>that you know, forty to fifty percent of lending to

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 3>small businesses in the US come from the regional and

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 3>community banks. They don't come from the big banks, many

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>of the Big four, many of the larger regionals just

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 3>don't have the cost structure or the attention to service

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 3>smaller businesses. So we think the credit quality on balance

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>and lending is very very good across regional and community

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 3>banks if there's.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>No real weakness that they're seeing with respect to consumers

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>or smaller businesses. Does it make sense and does it

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>really help the case to have the Fed cutting rates

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time that inflation is still a concern.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the cutting rates. I mean, if you think

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>of the go forward environment, so let's say a regional

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 3>bank buys a community bank, you get the synergies, you

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 3>have an ROWI and now you're focused on additional acquisition,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 3>and what's the go forward? The go forward is terrific.

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Treasury, the FED, the SEC are encouraging consolidation.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>They're talking about simplifying capital rules, They're they're talking about,

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, endorsing these mergers and this consolidation. And then

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>you have rates at four to four and a quarter

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 3>percent likely coming down this month, potentially again in December.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 3>You have one hundred basis points between twos and tens.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 3>You can't make a better environment for banks going forward

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 3>than this. So if you strengthen through consolidation, and then

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>you look at the go forward obviously assuming that the

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 3>economy stays stays stable and strong, it's a great environment

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 3>for banks.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But you're forecasting at least that forty five hundred number

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to be cut in half in the next three years.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 3>More than that, more than that.

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>How is that possible?

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the situations we faced prior to

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 3>this administration is there wasn't quite the same support for

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 3>approving mergers, was it. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders a

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 3>little bit on the edge, Like, I'm very very surprised

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Anne Marie that Elizabeth Warren would come out and say

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 3>we shouldn't approve consolidation in banks. And we're talking about

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 3>putting additional capital and banks, making them stronger, making them

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 3>better competitors with JPM Morgan in City, and yet she's

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 3>against it. And that's the politics of being a liberal

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 3>and saying no, no, no to anything that looks like

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>it's positive for business and positive for profits. This administration

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 3>has been very clear it's going to make the banks stronger,

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 3>it's going to make them better competitors to the big banks.

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 3>It's going to provide more lending. In a way, it's

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 3>getting more it's kind of monetary easing, right, It's getting

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 3>more money into the market for businesses that need to

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 3>raise money, small businesses to expand their expand what they do.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, if we've got thirty seconds left with you, which

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 2>is not enough, I know, Oh come on, give me more.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>The meyoral race in New York City. Yes, the beating

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>heart of capitalism and the socialist has ahead. What's your

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>brief take of what's happening in this city?

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think the city is at the strongest

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 3>it's been since pre COVID. You know, I live in Midtown.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>We have our office in Midtown. I walk to work

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 3>in the morning for eleven blocks and I have never

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 3>seen so many people on the streets every morning as

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 3>we've seen in the last couple of months. The city

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 3>was really hit by COVID. It was really, really tough.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we all kind of, you know, struggled through,

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 3>not quite able to admit this is really bad, and

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 3>it's really good. The city's back, new restaurants, new clubs,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 3>people excited down in the village. My son and his

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 3>family who live in London are moving to Brooklyn. They're

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 3>really excited. I think the city has a lot of buzz.

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>You mightswer that question without one. He's that twelve time

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>with everyone