WEBVTT - Tesla Emerging as Tariff Winner, Crypto Welcomes Paul Aktin for SEC Chair 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde, and this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 4>Coming up.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Tariff winners and losers in the EV industry as President

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Trump signs a twenty five percent.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Tariff on auto imports plus core.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>We've tests the ibo and AI appetite for brands to

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 3>cut the size of its US listening sources tell Bloomberg,

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 3>while Open Ai shows continued AI optimism, finalizing a fourteen

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar funding round led by softbankargest of all time.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 3>But first we check in on markets, which are being whiswored.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>At the moment.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>We started in the red. We're now managing to push

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>it into the green. On the Nasdaq one hundred, we're

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 3>led higher by names that I will reveal in a moment.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 3>But on the downside is AMD, for example, once again

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 3>being called out for its lack of competitive edge versus

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 3>an nvidio. You've got PDD on the downside from a

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 3>points perspective, But Moon Music trying to digest the ongoing

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>tariff narrative coming from the White House when it means

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 3>for the auto sect. And we dive into that now

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 3>because on a points perspective, the biggest drag higher Tesla.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 2>We're up by six call it seven percent.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, this is of course, it makes an awful lot

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>of the components and its cars right here in the

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 3>United States. Yes, it has exposure to Mexico, but less

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 3>than competitors we saw. We also see Rivian up by

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 3>six point three percent. Again focused on how perhaps evs

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>can manage to be owning their own supply chain in

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>this moment, unlike the likes of Ford of by two

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent, unlike the likes of gm are

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>by six point eight percent, where they are significantly exposed

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 3>to supply chains coming from Mexico and indeed from Canada.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's tie us all together with a tech perspective. Mike

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Shephard joins us for more. And it is so interesting

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 3>in the haves and the have nots. Right now, Mike,

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>just tell us the update on what is going to

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 3>be coming from the White House come April.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, Donald Trump previewed some of that yesterday as he

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 5>unfurled those auto tariffs that we were just talking about

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 5>and their various impacts, and what we can expect on

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 5>April second, what the President is calling Liberation Day is

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.839
<v Speaker 5>what he calls a round of reciprocal tariffs, and this

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 5>is to try to even out the trading relationships in

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 5>his view, with partners around the world. And these include

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 5>countries that in the US position, put American exporters and

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 5>products at a disadvantage when they are exported abroad, and

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 5>he is trying to level the playing field in his

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 5>view by imposing tariffs against those trading partners.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 6>It's some of the biggest.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Targets that we're going to see or going to be

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 5>the European Union and then other countries where there is

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 5>some sort of imbalance. And for tech, one area of

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 5>concern could of course be Taiwan. It's a key trading partner,

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 5>but it also has a huge trade surplus with respect

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 5>to the US. It also happens to be a major

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 5>source of the semiconductors that Nvidia and AMD design but

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 5>have produced by TSMC there So this is something the

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 5>tech industry is going to be watching very closely. And

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 5>I will add on semiconductors. Trump has also promised possibly,

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>but he hasn't guaranteed levees on the imports of chips

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 5>as well, possibly coming April second, but again we are

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 5>uncertain about that. The autos tariffs were supposed to come

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 5>April second, he moved them up by several days, so

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.839
<v Speaker 5>really we're in a wait and see mode there, Mike.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>I love how you broaden us out across all the

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>industries that we look to potentially be impacted in the future.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>For right here, right now, let's go back to Auto's

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting that Tesla is being seen by the market

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>as someone that has a protection from this sort of

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>a tariff Levey, but Elon Musk himself posting that they

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 3>are exposed.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Just not to the tune of a GM or a Ford.

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's right, and they do have some insulation from it,

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 5>mainly for two reasons. When you indicated at the top

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 5>and talking about the market impact, they make all of

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 5>their US sold vehicles in California and in Texas, they

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 5>really have no exposure when it comes to finished cars

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 5>and vehicles being brought into the United States, and even

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 5>on the component side, in most of their vehicles they

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 5>have at least sixty percent or up to seventy five

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 5>percent depending on the model of components that are made

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 5>here in the US. So they do have some insulation

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 5>there and that offers them some protection from the worst

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 5>of it compared to say rivals like Hyundai or GM.

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Even Mike, great, roundup, Thank you so much, bloom Meg's

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Mike Shephard.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's continue the conversation with.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Rodgers, Senior vice president at Boundary Stone Partners. It's

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a government affairs consulting firm focused on clean energy. Andrew,

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>you've got well over twenty years of expertise and transportation

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 3>in the structure and implementation of policy here. How much

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 3>of an upending is this to the business models of

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 3>evs and indeed auto makers boom broadly.

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, I don't think the effect can be

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 7>understated here. The auto industry, much like the road in

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 7>bridge building industry, relies on predictability, certainty, reliability. There's a

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 7>reason that we fund roads and bridges on five year

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 7>cycles because these are large projects that take a lot

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 7>of predictability and investment over time. With the tariffs that

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 7>were announced yesterday, you can just look across the automotive

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 7>sector and already see the ripple effect that it is

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 7>having with sales stock prices plunging across from multiple sectors,

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 7>including hitting the Tier one suppliers.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 8>Now, I'll say that the underlying goal of.

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 7>These tariffs is quite laudable to reshore domestic supply chains

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 7>to build up manufacturing the United States, and there's a

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 7>lot of policies that President Trump put in place in

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 7>his first term that continued through the Biden administration. Now

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 7>that having been said, the practical reality somewhat different. Automakers

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 7>every led on global supply chains for decades, and the

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 7>days of you know, a model T soup to nuts

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 7>rolling off an assembly line in Highland Park, Michigan, are

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 7>long gone and they're not coming back. And so, really

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 7>automakers are faced with three tough choices right now. Either

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 7>absorb these costs, pass them on to the consumers, or

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 7>begin a years long, heavily investment reliant process of reshoring

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 7>these automaker supply chains.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 3>Do they have the confidence to take the third option,

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 3>to recommit and to spend that sort of money when

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 3>terms about four years, I think the.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 8>Word of the day is uncertainty.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 7>And the fact is is that there was a reason

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 7>that the ev sector saw nearly three hundred million dollars

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 7>give me three hundred million dollars of investment in just

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 7>the last couple of years. They were getting clear signals

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 7>from Washington through the Biparson Infrastructure Law, through the investment,

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 7>through the Inflation Reduction Act, through the Chips Act, and

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 7>seventy percent of that three hundred billion dollar invest is

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 7>already specifically allocated to facilities that.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 8>Are coming online.

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 7>When you have what seems to be somewhat more reactionary

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 7>and less targeted tariffs and other trade policies coming online,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 7>it's much more difficult to have that confidence to begin

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 7>reshoring supply chains and for fears of a whipsaw in

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 7>a different direction in a couple of years.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting that, of course, the market is understanding and

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 3>trading on the idea that Tesla is more insulated, that

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Rivian is more insulated.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>But many had put.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Research out there that ultimately the price the average price

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 3>of a car is going to go up five to

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>eight thousand dollars, but for an EV it's going to

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>go up twelve thousand dollars. And I'm interested as to

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 3>how the supply chains, particularly with electric vehicles, are being

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>an issue here considering it's so dependent for magnets for

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 3>rare earths and minerals from abroad.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 8>Two points there.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 7>So the first I would just maybe put Tessela in

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 7>a slightly different category. I think it's stock is long

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 7>traded on prices, maybe untethered from fundamentals, so we'll put

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 7>that in a slightly different space. But I think the

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 7>broader points on the EV industry is it is in

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 7>many ways different than your traditional internal combustion engine manufacturers,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 7>and so the ribbeans and the tuzzles the world do

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 7>have a leg up on the legacy automakers who are

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 7>developing these these supply chains online. And that investment that

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 7>I just spoke to, the three hundred billion dollars plus

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 7>in the last couple of years, that was the legacy

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 7>automakers beginning that work. And so yes, I think that

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 7>that investment will continue. But if you're talking about raising

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 7>costs because of teriffs, which can reduce demand ultimately leave

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 7>more cars on the lots, that can impact jobs, that

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 7>can cause contraction in the industry, and that can ultimately

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 7>diminished demand, which sends the absolute wrong signal at a

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 7>time when those industries are looking to.

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Invest Andrew, You've been the Deputy Federal Highway Administrator, You've

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 3>worked within government, You've been chief counsel on Federal Highways,

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>You've been You've got such a wealth of experience here.

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you're building plenty of calls when you get

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 3>off air. What is the number one question that you're

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 3>being taken right now from the industry?

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 8>Is this real?

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 7>Is this actually going to happen? Is this the new reality?

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 7>And I think the answer is is that. Look, if

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 7>you take the president at face value, and I'm doing

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 7>that more and more in the second administration, I think

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 7>we need to look at the long term and short

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 7>term effects of these policies and plan for what is

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 7>being stated publicly to take root in some way, shape

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 7>or form. But I think the book is still being

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 7>written on exactly what form that looks like.

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Rogers trying to help us navigate this uncertainty boundary

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Stone Partners, you.

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate it now.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 3>The Trump administration is also just cut twenty million dollars

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>in funding for the agency responsible for chip export controls.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 3>That's about ten percent of the Commons Department's Bureau of

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Industry and Security budget. Democratic senators well, they've criticized the moved,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 3>warning it could undermine US efforts to stay ahead at

0:09:59.920 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 3>you and the AI race and compromise national security. Coming up,

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 3>core Weave is said to plan a reduction in its

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 3>IPO size.

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 2>We're on that next.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 4>It's a rumor technology.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Cor Weave it intends to cut the size of its

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 3>IPO to around one and a half billion dollars raised.

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 2>That's according to sources.

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, the cloud computing provider will instead offer investors about

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven and a half million shares at a forty

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 3>dollars price point. That's down from initial plans of forty

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>nine million shares at forty seven to fifty five dollars each.

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 3>For more of billiombergs, Ryan Gould joins us for more. Look,

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 3>it is about a month ago that we were talking

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 3>about a four billion dollar raise in new money for

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 3>core Weave, and now we more than half that.

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, I think I would say at the

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 9>outset that this is still a very fluid situation. You know,

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 9>Kreweve is not meant to start trading until tomorrow, so

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 9>anything can all happen. But certainly the sources that we

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 9>were talking to this morning are saying that you know,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 9>the company was considering looking and cutting the rays down

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 9>to one point five billion dollars. That would take the

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 9>fully diluted valuation back to somewhere similar to its last

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 9>public round that was reported, So that would be around

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 9>twenty three billion dollars in a fully diluted basis. That

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 9>is quite the cut when you think about what we

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 9>were talking about maybe a month or so ago, and

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 9>when there was some more exuberance in the market around

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 9>this kind of trait. This is AI, this was data centers.

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 9>These are kinds of all the tailwinds that you'd be

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 9>thinking about positively coming into an IPO that is meant

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 9>to be one of the biggest of the year.

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that.

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 3>They sort of can't stop this IPO train and a

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 3>moment where in Realdio's down twenty five percent from its high,

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 3>so we've see market valuations wiped out for Microsoft more

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>than ten percent, and ultimately in the NAS that one

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred is in correction territory, No wonder it's going to

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>struggle at this moment. Would they ever think about changing

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 3>direction because this just seems to be the wrong time.

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think, you know, based on what we understand

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 9>as of right now, and again I just do want

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 9>to preface nevers that it is still fluid, but as

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 9>of right now, we're not under the impression that they're

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 9>going to pull this thing. So I think Corey will

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 9>trade at some point, and we'll be watching tomorrow obviously

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 9>to see where it exactly trades and opens that. But

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 9>as of right now, I think one of the other

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 9>big things that they've obviously looked towards this morning is

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 9>that in Vidia, who is obviously already a big customer

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 9>relationship of kor we've is going to come in with

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 9>quite a significant anchor order. That anchor order is going

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 9>to be worth around two hundred and fifty million dollars

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 9>at forty dollars a share, And that's what we're reporting,

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 9>That's what you know some others have reported, and I

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 9>think that just gives you some kind of indication as

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 9>to exactly kind of some of the momentum that is

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 9>required to get a trade like this over the line

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 9>in this market.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 3>But it speaks in videos perhaps own anxiety that this

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 3>just feeds into some of the negative headlines the AI

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 3>bubble anxiety that's been brewing.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.479
<v Speaker 2>We've had Josi or Ali Baba.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 10>Warn about it.

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 3>You've even had TV Cowan continuing to tell us that

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft is pulling back on data center demand. Well, they're

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 3>a key customer of Corwave, right.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean seventy seven percent of the revenue was

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 9>of Corey've lost it two customers, one of which you're

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 9>the main one was Microsoft. So you know, in a

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 9>week when td cown is coming out and saying stuff

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 9>like that, I think, you know, if your core weave,

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 9>that's probably not very helpful to you. But again, you know,

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 9>investors are going to make a take of you, and

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 9>there's going to be value. They're going to be constructive

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 9>on value at certain points. And I think this indication

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 9>this morning that we've had that they're potentially considering the

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 9>downsize at forty a share, I think, you know, there's

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 9>clearly strength and so I'm sure that they're going to

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 9>feel like they can come out and get this over

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 9>the line in some shape or form.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan Goldman having to earn their money on this one,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 3>it seems wrangled. Thanks so much now sticking with going

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 3>public look social platform Discord also said to be working

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>with the likes of Goldman, Sacks and JP Morgan on

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 3>a potential IPO. It's according to sources, the company could

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 3>seek a listing as soon as this year. Discord's popularity,

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 3>of course, saw during pandemic times, and the company even

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 3>rejected a twelve billion dollar takeover from Microsoft back in

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one. I mean, while Flexport also saying it's

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 3>still aiming to go public despite missing its profitability tar

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 3>getting twenty twenty four, it's all according to The Wall

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Street Journal, Like Discord, the tech focused freight company saw

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>strong demand during the pandemic said it extended its timeline

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 3>to reach profitability. Let's get another check on AI optimism

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 3>right now, because open ai is set to be close

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 3>to finalizing a whopping forty billion dollar funding round than

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 3>by soft Bank.

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>So all.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>According to sources, the deal would set potentially the value

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>of the company of three hundred billion, almost double its

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 3>valuation back in October. For more, Bloomberg's Kate Clarks helps

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 3>break it down. It's so interesting that an IPO we're

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 3>all worrying about, well, the private market, SoftBank and others

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 3>just really committing to open Ai at this time.

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 11>Yes, there are still a lot of craziness happening on

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 11>the private markets when it comes to AI, is still

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 11>a lot of optimism, and the optimism being inflated in

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 11>many ways by the latest release coming from open Ai.

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 3>We are so fixated about their image generator, proving that

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 3>they can be accessible for business cases, personal cases, and

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 3>we've seen that their revenues have been on the up

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>and up.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 11>Right exactly, They're expected to triple revenue this year, and

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 11>they have some wild and perhaps outline projections for the

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 11>coming years. But this is exactly why investors are still very,

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 11>very very optimistic and excited about funding the company, despite

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 11>the fact that it has massive, massive expenses, including talent,

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 11>data centers of course, and the very very expensive AI chips.

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is the crossover of investor base.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Like magnetah is we understand committing more to open Ai,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>it's also an investoring call weave, but for this one,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 3>it's all about soft Bank. Well, they're going to commit

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 3>basically thirty billion of the forty billion.

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 11>Yes, exactly, So soft Bank is the major player here.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 11>They are funding a very large portion of this round.

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 11>But as you said, there are also very many hedge

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 11>funds that are participating. There are venture capital funds including

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 11>Altimeter and COO TOW, which are crossover funds, but they

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 11>are expected to participate. And then you have probably sovereign

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 11>wealth funds from all over the world that have already

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 11>funded open AI and that are expected to continue funding

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 11>open AI and give us.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 3>The ultimate view that this is a company that continues

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 3>to expand and continues to weather what is public market anxiety.

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 3>They're not thinking that this company is gonna go public

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>in the nig future.

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I think there's a lot of questions about that.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 11>But they do expect that this is the next trillion

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 11>dollar company, This is the next Google, this is the

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 11>next MATA. That is the bet that these these investors

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 11>are making, and a soft Bank the bet is also

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 11>to become one of the most influential players in global

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 11>artificial general intelligence in the race toward AGI. SoftBank wants

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 11>to have that front row seat.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 3>And we've seen them make excisions of them here and

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 3>of course they're also they're making They're making moose Massa

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 3>is always making moose Cake. Clark, we so appreciate having

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>her on technology provide a. Lumina is expanding its partnerships

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 3>beyond car makers. The developer of Liedar Hardware and Software

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 3>has a new deal with construction equipment manufacturer Caterpillar.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Luminar's CEO, Austin Russell, joins us.

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Your shares pushing higher on the news, Austin and why

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 3>make this move into industrial?

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 12>Yes, so, no, it's excited to be hearing. Thanks for

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 12>having me as part of this. I think it makes

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 12>total sense as the market. You know, we're coming hot

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 12>off the heels of a couple of major you know,

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.479
<v Speaker 12>automotive launches with Volvo now getting the product into production,

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 12>to the technology for these light our systems you know,

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 12>and AI related systems going into the market, and we

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 12>can leverage that towards these industrial automation markets, you know.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 12>I mean it's what on the order of industrial automation

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 12>on the ear of a two hundred billion dollar a

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 12>year industry today and this is a big foray into

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 12>it for us, you know. So being able to have

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 12>Caterpillar as the leading provider of and manufacturer of industrial equipment.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 12>More broadly, selecting Luminar to partner with to make this

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 12>happen as part of their next generation platform is something

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 12>that just makes total sense as we expand beyond the

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 12>auto market. But again leveraging those same capabilities, technology and

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 12>products as what we've been making for the automotive market,

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 12>and you know, there's a huge amount of value to.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Be created now they're going to the cap off highway

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 3>trucks for exils. But this doesn't anyways speak to a

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 3>lack of commitment in the av space. You still push

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 3>you ahead as hard as ever there.

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 8>Oh absolutely.

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 12>I mean just this year alone, we're going to be

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 12>seeing what two hundred and three hundred percent you know,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 12>growth in the automotive space for what it relates to

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 12>our light, our production and shipments you know, globally to

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 12>these different automakers. So that's something that we're really excited

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 12>about and pushing full speed ahead on to get those

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 12>economies of scale and get that ramped up. But in parallel,

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 12>it makes total sense of to be able to capitalize

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 12>on markets like this as auto continues to be able

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 12>to ramp up in order to be able to I

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 12>would say, have that same mission around safety and autonomy

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 12>in a very high value add way. And of course

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 12>the ASPS and sales price that we're able to get

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 12>in the industrial markets is actually a multiple for the

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 12>same products in capabilities is what it is in the

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 12>auto market.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 3>So it just makes and is that the average selling

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 3>price is that because of a lack of competition. We

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 3>just think at the moment, the anxiety around your company,

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 3>your stock has been Chinese competition in particular, and when

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 3>it comes to, for example, reporting the Mercedes is going

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 3>with a Chinese competitor, are those the narrative is true?

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 12>Well, first of all, I think taking a step back

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 12>a little bit, you can give China certainly a credit

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 12>for a lot of early adoption when it comes to

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 12>you know, the Chinese market and light our market where

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 12>you now have you know what on the order of

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 12>a million vehicles being shipped, you know, with light Ar

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 12>and local providers. When it comes to a global standard

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 12>and the capabilities and technology, Luminar is really second to none.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 12>And I think you pointed out maybe there was some

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 12>confusion or misreporting earlier on some speculation when it comes

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 12>to you know, Chinese for some of the rest of

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 12>the world, Luminar's partnerships with the global automakers is not

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 12>only strong, but we're in the leading position when it

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 12>comes to global automakers more broadly, and I think that's

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 12>something that we're going to continue to capitalize on for

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 12>the broader Western world, which represents about ninety percent of

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 12>the volume and maybe even more of the value of

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 12>the global automotive market. And I think even with for example,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 12>in Mercedes in particular, I mean, things have been continuing

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 12>to move full speed ahead, you know, since the original

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 12>partnership that we've had with them, and actually even just

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 12>signed up officially to be able to use Halo as

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 12>kind of that next generation product that we kind of

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 12>alluded to at at earnings. So this is something that

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 12>we're in full speed ahead on. And by the way,

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 12>the Halo is the next generation technology beyond what we're

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 12>doing today, and that further allows us to standardize the

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 12>product across these markets and industries.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 3>So you have the Mercedes Benz business. When reporting was

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 3>that Hesai had it. I'm interested that tariffs. You talked

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 3>about production. How you're going to be scaling more than

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 3>two hundred percent in terms of the amount of light

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh you're going to be producing, but you produce over

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 3>in Mexico as well.

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 2>How is the current administration going to be affecting that?

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So, so I mean there's a lot of different

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 12>kinds of tariff considerations more broadly, and I would say

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 12>in terms of all the different dynamics going on, Yeah,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 12>Mexico is certainly one of those that's obviously a hot

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 12>button topic. We have a portion of our content value

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 12>that that comes from from Mexico currently that ships into

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 12>the US for the production you know, in particular of

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 12>the Bulbo vehicles that are being produced in South Carolina.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 12>So what we're we're working through as part of our

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 12>global supply chain, which Luminar is uniquely set up between Mexico, Thailand,

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 12>you know, and also with a Taiwanese company t PK.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 12>We we actually have the ability to be able to

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 12>shift around between our different partners at a global scale

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 12>that whichever way the trade winds blow, we're able to

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 12>have a truly global presence there. So so that's something

0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 12>that's that's going to be as part of a evolving

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 12>you know, production plan over the coming call it next

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 12>few weeks to make sure that's such in place. The

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 12>only other thing I'll say is that when it comes

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 12>to the terriffs for the vehicles themselves, we know there's

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 12>obviously new tariffs that are introduced today, but when it

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 12>comes down to it, you know, the vast majority of

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 12>all the production that we have going the US vehicles now,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 12>so that's not really affected by this.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Austin Russell of lumin oar CEO.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 10>Great to have your time with. Thank you.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Blue Meg Technology. Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hide in New York. A quick check on

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>these pretty volatile markets today. We've whipped between losses then gains.

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 3>We remain up about a tenth percent on the NASAQ

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 3>one hundred. So try to digest what the latest tariff

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 3>news coming from the White House really means the auto sector,

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 3>but how it spills into other sectors as well. As

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 3>we of course anticipate the beginning of April and more

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 3>of those retaliatory tariffs to come on board, we move

0:22:58.640 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>on and have a little look at what's happening on

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 3>the individual names, because from a points perspective, apple to

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the higher side. On the downside is a lot of

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 3>the chip names. You're seeing Broadcom on the downside, Video

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 3>off by a quarter of a percent, AMD off by

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 3>three point four percent. Come we're really seeing some anxiety

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 3>built in about what the auto sector means for the

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 3>semiconductor sector and what sort of tariffs we can see there,

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 3>but also AMD getting a note out from Jeffreys saying

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 3>once again it is not managing to compete against Nvidia,

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 3>or off by three percent, gainstop off by fourteen percent,

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 3>having its worst date since September of last year. This

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 3>is an announced it's going to be selling convertible notes do

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 3>by bitcoin. Yesterday, that news that they're looking to put

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 3>it on their balance sheet was a higher side push,

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 3>but today it's a drag as we see the likes

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 3>of web Bush saying this is going to fall flat

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 3>as an offering and even though potentially you can't always

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 3>bet against the retail investor, but let's just get more

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 3>broader perspective on these markets. How on Earth you trade them,

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 3>let alone invest for the long term. We're joined by

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Mike Reynolds, is the vice president of investment strategy over

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 3>at glen Mead, and boy, you have to be able

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.360
<v Speaker 3>to take a long term percent effective right now? Are

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you seeing investors willing to get into this market when

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 3>there's such noise coming from the administration.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 13>There's just been considerable uncertainty around trade policy, not just

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 13>the actual details of the policy itself, but just the

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 13>fact that it could go in any direction at any

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 13>point in time. So in a market like this, we're

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 13>watching sentiment indicators really closely to get a sign of

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 13>whether we've seen true capitulation moments where we see indiscriminate selling,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 13>which we have found are often really great opportunities to

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 13>step in on a contrarian basis, and we've seen a

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 13>little bit of this, just not in a grand scale.

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 13>Some of the investor surveys are telling you that investors

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 13>are getting really bearish.

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 6>Which is a good contraying indicator.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 13>You almost want to get bullish when everyone else is bearish.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 13>But other than that, we're not really seeing that wash

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 13>out moment that really makes a lot of sense to

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 13>materially leg into this market.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 6>But we are recommending.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 13>To our investors that they actively rebalance an environment like this,

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 13>especially if you came to the year with a relatively

0:24:58.240 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 13>balanced portfolio.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 6>Just look out of whack a little bit.

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 13>So it's good opportunity to get back to your policy weights.

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Why do those rebalancing flows direct you people likely to

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 3>go back more.

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Into tech or actually cut off more.

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, and it's really been tech that's born the brunt

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 13>of this down draft. So if you had a diversified

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 13>portfolio with tech in your portfolio.

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 6>That's probably some of the things that are down the most.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 13>Overall, we were looking at valuations on the growth side,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 13>which is very tech heavy, was at the ninety fourth

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 13>percentile to start the year, now at this seventy fifth percentile,

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 13>which is a huge differential, and we only aren't seeing

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 13>much of the market beyond the growth side correcting as

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 13>much as that. So certainly, you know, I think investors

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 13>are taking another look at the tech side, where things

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 13>perhaps were looking again very expensive not too long ago,

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 13>but perhaps there's opportunities now amid this downdraft.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:56.959
<v Speaker 3>Are they going to enter in slowly and resolutely, or

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 3>is there another catalyst from a fundamental basis for US

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 3>and Company that will suddenly make you willing to make

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 3>the trade, or is there a certain catalyst or number

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 3>that you're looking from an economic perspective that will get

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 3>people back in. It was weird Monday just went so

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 3>to the higher side, and many trying to wonder why

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that happened.

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, investors have to be careful to catch a falling

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 13>knife here.

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, if you look back in.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 13>The tech bubble, if you got too excited about tech stocks.

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 13>At a fifteen percent draw down, you really would have

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 13>gotten your face ripped off, as further declines would have

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 13>really been painful. We think it's really important to again

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 13>monitor the sentiment side, but also we think actually trade

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 13>uncertainty does sort of indirectly have an impact for tech.

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 13>You know, in particular, a lot of our tariffs have

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 13>focused on the cash cow of companies abroad or excuse me,

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 13>countries abroad like auto so far, and if they retaliate,

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 13>maybe they go after our.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 6>Cash cow, which is the tech side.

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 13>So until we get a little bit more clarity on tariffs,

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 13>it's hard to get really excited about legging into tech

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 13>to a material degree. But everyone's penciling in April second

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 13>in as sort of tea day or tariff day as

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 13>a time where we make it a little bit more

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 13>clarity on where things go.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Mike, we get fundamental clarity from companies in the next

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 3>set of earning season, and I'm hearing from many a

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 3>cell side note coming out at the moment that as

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 3>you're going to see CEOs lean into that anxiety, they're

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 3>just going to downgrade all our expectations. Really try and

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 3>make sure that people have recalibrated where company growth is

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 3>going to go, just so they can lock in some

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 3>of this anxiety is that are we going to have

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 3>a horrible set of earnings coming.

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 13>We're not expecting to see a material effect just yet

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 13>from tariffs or this uncertainty when it comes to earnings,

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 13>but you could see a lot of guidance around that.

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 13>Particularly uncertainty in and of itself can be an economic headwind.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 13>If CEOs are perhaps just going to pull back on

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 13>capex or hiring plans because they just don't know the

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 13>rules of the game, that's certainly a headwind. And you

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 13>may start to see CEOs talk through that a little

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 13>bit on their earnings calls and how they're seeing that

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 13>play out.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 6>But it's probably a little too early to see sort

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 6>of direct.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 13>Impacts on earnings themselves in Q two or Q one

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 13>earnings in particular, that we'll get over the next call

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 13>it a month or so, but watching those transfits really

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 13>closely for how they're guiding the rest of the year,

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 13>which could be really illuminating.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Mike, I was just bringing up GameStop when it came

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 3>to convertible notes, but it takes me to basically the

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 3>waterfall effect of assets that you can own. Around this,

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 3>we obviously lean into equities. Is there a quicker tell

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 3>often on a company, But when you're managing forty seven

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars, I'm sure you're completely cross asset. How many

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 3>are you looking to say, get into the corporate debt

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 3>side of these tech companies rather than say just the

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 3>equity side.

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we take a diverse about approach when it comes

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 13>to bonds, and we try to avoid some of the

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 13>sort of financial engineering stuff that happens on the bleeding

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 13>edge of financial markets, and some of this stuff out

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 13>of Game Stop kind of feels like that. But when

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 13>you're building a ballast in your portfolio, you typically want

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 13>a good healthy size of measuries in that portfolio. But

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 13>you can get to that incremental return by getting corporate

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 13>credit and being smart about it, not overextending too much

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 13>on your risk within your bond portfolio. But sometimes, you know,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 13>plain vanilla ends up being sort of the best thing

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 13>to get that good diversification in your portfolio and take

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 13>most of your risk on the equity side.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Mike Reynold's it's great to catch up with you.

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:21.479
<v Speaker 10>Thank you.

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Len me and vice president of Investment strategy.

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 2>We wish you well.

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, turning to a breakthrough in quantum computing in a

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 3>world first, JP Morgan said it it's generated truly random

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 3>numbers using the technology so called.

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Random number generators.

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Is could have applications for trading, for security for cryptocurrency.

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 14>Now.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan, which has been making a push into the

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 3>field for the last six years, used a quantum computer

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 3>built by Honeywell's Continuum, according to the paper published in

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 3>the journal Nature. Coming up more on crypto, the markets

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>there are set to gain regulatory clarity under the new

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration. We speak with August CEO Ayakontorovich.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 2>That's next.

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 4>This is Blue Meg Technology.

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 3>President Trump's sec pick Paul Atkins, you can see him

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 3>him now, says he hopes to create a rational crypto regulation.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 3>He's actually undergoing his nomination hearing as we speak, and

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 3>you can go to Life go if you want to

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 3>see all of this. But Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Massachusetts or she warns that his past actions could be

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 3>an indicator of a looser regulatory environment. She sat down

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 3>on blooms David Goro to take a listen.

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 15>I think this is entirely in keeping with what Donald

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 15>Trump and Elon Musk want to see us do, and

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 15>that is loosen regulations. Loosen regulations, loosen regulations. That is

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 15>what Paul Adkins did. He also said repeatedly that no

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 15>regulations just get in the way. Everybody needs to do

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 15>whatever they want. Those big Wall Street giants. We saw

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 15>the crash in two thousand and eight, and here's what

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 15>happens next. After the crash, he has the chance to

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 15>have a little twenty twenty hindsight. He has twenty zero hindsight.

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 15>He looks back and says, no problem with having let

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 15>those giant Wall Street banks run wild, and the fact

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 15>that the American taxpayer had to bail them out not

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 15>a problem. That's my concern. If someone has demonstrated such

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 15>poor judgment, you've got to be really worried about putting

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 15>them in a job where the failure to have good

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 15>judgment could be like it was back then. Remember, ten

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 15>million families lost their homes, millions more people lost their jobs.

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 15>We watched Wall Street do a real tank then. And

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 15>here's the thing about Paul Atkins. We have both his

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 15>demonstrated experience, but also look at his experience overall. So

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 15>his time in government is a real problem. But now

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 15>he's someone who has built a very lucrative business with

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 15>Potomac Partners. He charges evidently upwards of twelve hundred dollars

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 15>an hour to give advice, and he says, well, I'm

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 15>going to divest this interest, but he doesn't want to

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 15>tell us who he's divesting to, who's buying, and for

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 15>what purposes? And what are the long term plans. Because

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 15>here's the deal. SEC chairmanship doesn't last forever, right, two years,

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 15>four years, maybe longer? My concern is, And so what

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 15>happens on the other end, does he just come right

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.479
<v Speaker 15>back out and instead of charging twelve hundred dollars an hour,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 15>it's now twenty four hundred dollars an hour.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's who do you work for?

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 15>And why that matters is it has an effect on

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 15>the time you sit as chairman of the SEC.

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Senator Elizabeth Warren speaking with our own David Gura there like,

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 3>let's just get more contact to the cryptoregulatory environment what

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 3>it looks like under the new Trump administration. I'm joined

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 3>now by August co CEO and co founder Ayakontarovich. August

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 3>provides a platform to manage and trade digital assets securely

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 3>and the looser perspective too loose or actually, are you

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 3>thinking we will get a balance here that helps serve

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 3>your growth but also serve security and the protection of consumers.

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I think you know, very commonly people misunderstand where

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 16>Paul Akins is coming from, assuming that you know, we're

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 16>going to go from the Gary Gensler regulation by enforcement

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 16>to all of a sudden, no regulation at all. And

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 16>Paul Atkins is very very strict about no market manipulation

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 16>and no frauds. So we're going to see KYC, KYB,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 16>We're going to see AML requirements, and that's going to

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 16>be broadly across the crypto industry.

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 10>And then also clear regulation.

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 16>And I think if you look at you know what

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 16>Senator Warren saying, before, we saw all of the American

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 16>companies get pushed offshore, whereas now we're seeing an opportunity

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 16>to onshore these companies, make them, you know, founded in

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 16>the United States, and that's a really big shift and

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 16>a big difference.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 10>And you can do that somewhere in the middle.

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 3>So when she was trying to speak twice pose also

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the way in which he's managed to make it clear

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 3>that he has no skin in the game.

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 2>He has no exposure. He's selling off his assets.

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Are those in a position of power over in the

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 3>administration and in the various agencies doing enough of that,

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 3>signaling enough of that that there's transparency when it comes

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to crypto holdings and that not sort of managing to

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 3>benefit themselves.

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 16>I mean, you know, the same question was asked about

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 16>David Sachs as well when he divested I think it

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 16>was roughly two hundred million dollars worth, and he did

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 16>so at a loss. And you know, I think it's

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 16>really important to your point. One, he you know, disclosed

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 16>exactly what the positions are. So Atkins has two equity

0:34:56.840 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 16>positions and securitize and anchorage. She has one position, a

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 16>hedge fund called off Chain Capital, and he said he'd

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 16>divested those. So, you know, if he gets approved on

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 16>Thursday this week, and so I think we are getting

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 16>the transparency we need. But the bigger question here is

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 16>do we want you know, professional regulators who haven't been

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 16>in this space, haven't had that dialogue running the regulation

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 16>for us, or do we want people who have actually

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 16>been in the trenches who have had those conversations and

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 16>dealt with those problems directly to be running and making

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 16>those decisions on our behalf.

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Therefore, what you want is someone in the job

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 3>who understands the asset costs and then makes appropriately regulatory

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 3>changes appropriate all you getting the transparency you need there

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 3>as well. We're already seeing focus on well stable coins

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 3>it feels like, and unwinding some of the latest things

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 3>done by the Biden administration.

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 16>Absolutely so to your point, you know, the IRS Broker

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 16>Dealer Rule was just you know, voted by the Senate

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 16>that passed, and so it's going to President Trump that's

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 16>going to unwind. As you mentioned, the need for decentralized

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 16>exchanges to file you know, a ten ninety nine for

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 16>every user on the platform. It was very much you know,

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 16>not applicable to the way permissionless platforms exist today.

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 10>So it's great to see that happening.

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 16>And from what we've heard with colleagues who are in

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 16>DC every single day is that every day action is

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 16>being happened around you know, we have FIT twenty one,

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 16>which is currently going through Congress, that has a stable

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 16>coin regulatory oversight and guidelines. We have Wyoming that just

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 16>announced this week that they're going to launch a stable

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 16>coins and bank and Wyoming one hundred percent. So we're

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.360
<v Speaker 16>seeing a lot more progress in the last you know,

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 16>call four months than we've seen in the last four

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 16>years combined, and so it's very exciting for any American

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 16>company or anyone who's sitting in America building their company

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 16>as well.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Today, we've actually just got some more steer coming from

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 3>Paul Atkins as he undergoes his oversight over at the Senate.

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Let's just take a listen into what he's just been.

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 17>Saying unclear, overly politicized, complicated and burdensome regulations or stifling

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 17>capital formation. While American investors are flooded with disclosures that

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 17>do the opposite of helping them understand the true risks

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 17>of an investment. It is time to reset priorities and

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 17>return common sense the sec return.

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>To common sense.

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 3>At the Senate nomination hearing, coming from Paul Atkins, what

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 3>next for the common sense you've already said, what's already

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 3>underway when it comes to stable quains. What are you

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 3>lacking in your part of the business to get more

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 3>institution investors.

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Active in the crypto space.

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, So if you think about it, there are a

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 16>couple buckets. The first is the United States, without a doubt,

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 16>has been losing in the geographic regulatory space. So we

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 16>have in Europe, Mica, we have in Singapore, mass and

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 16>in the US we don't have anything. And so you know,

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 16>it's not just about onshoring American companies that went offshore,

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 16>but it's also how do we compete so that we

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 16>can actually get companies from Europe who are under the

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 16>micro registration to come to the United States as well

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 16>and build here in the United States. The other thing

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 16>too is, you know, how do we treat clients, how

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 16>do we structure our ENTI A large part that hasn't

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 16>been discussed for token companies specifically is all token foundations

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 16>are typically under BBIS or the kmans, and a big

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 16>discussion is how do we bring that to the US.

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 16>How do we create launch foundations token foundations in the

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 16>United States with clear guidelines.

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 3>And why would we want token foundations launching in the

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 3>United States? Just reitroit the positive nature of this for

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 3>investors and entrepreneurs.

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 16>Who are watching this, We're looking for transparency. We want

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 16>to see exactly how these companies operate. We want to

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 16>be able to go through, you know, tax filings if

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 16>we need to, and audit them as well, so you know,

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 16>it gives you the transparency everyone's asking for. But to

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 16>do that you have to onshore the company first, and

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 16>in order to do that, you need the clear regulation.

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 16>So I think we're definitely seeing path forward with Atkins.

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 10>It's going to be really exciting.

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 16>To make you know, New York, the United States the

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 16>crypto capital. We are for finance, it should be for

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 16>crypto and it's one step in that direction.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 2>I kind of rich.

0:38:58.080 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I said, great to have you on the show. Thank you,

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 3>August co CEO. There Jiang Yi Ming, the founder of

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 3>TikTok's owner Byte Dance. He's become the China's wealthiest person

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 3>for the first time. He topped the list on Wednesday,

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 3>surpassing ten Cents co founder among others, with a fifty

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 3>seven and a half billion dollar fortune. Jang's wealth jumped

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 3>by more than ten billion dollars after Bloomberg analyzed the

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 3>valuations of investors like Blackrock, fidelityt Rope price and the

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 3>company's plans to buy back employee stock, and evaluation of

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and twelve billion dollars. Now all of this comes,

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 3>of course, as the fate of TikTok in the United

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 3>States remains still very unclear, but President Trump said he

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 3>would consider lowering tariff rates in post on China to

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 3>secure Beijing support for the sale of TikTok's US operations

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 3>to an American company. Bloomberg's Stephanie Hi joins us some

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 3>more so, he's actually using TikTok in the broader tip

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 3>for tat debate.

0:39:58.120 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 10>When it comes to.

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 14>Trade, it is certainly an interesting time. You know, we're

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 14>looking at next week being a very big week for

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 14>tariffs and TikTok. April second is the day in which

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 14>Donald Trump has said that he's going to place most

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 14>of his reciprocal tariffs, and of course, the deadline to

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 14>find a deal to sell TikTok is on April fifth,

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 14>before it faces a shutdown. And so one of the

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 14>things that Trump has floated, as you noted, is a

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 14>potential reprieve for China if they are to agree to

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 14>a deal. And some of the complications behind this include

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 14>the fact that the Chinese government and byte Dance are

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 14>pushing to keep the algorithm within Chinese hands. But that

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 14>is something that many lawmakers are saying would not comply

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 14>with the US law. And so it seems like there's

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 14>sort of at an impasse in what Trump had floated

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 14>just yesterday seems to be one of the ways in

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 14>which he's trying to work around that.

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 3>And yet the algorithm in Chinese hands does seem to

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 3>be one of the potential deals being debated by the

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 3>White House. It looks as though there's this ongoing narrative

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 3>that Oracle founder Larry Ellison maybe he could be persuaded

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 3>to take a little piece of TikTok the US entity

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 3>and remain a security guard on it ultimately, but also

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 3>allow the algorithm to stay in.

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 14>China, certainly, and that is one of the deals that

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 14>has been floated. We've been told that from sources familiar

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 14>that there is a deal that has been proposed that

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 14>would allow Oracles to have a minority stake and to

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 14>continue storing the US data as it already has. And

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 14>also the other aspect of that deal is to allow

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 14>China to keep the algorithm.

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 10>And now this is.

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 14>Something that has caused some pushback among Republican lawmakers who

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 14>say that that doesn't comply with the law, and so

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:39.399
<v Speaker 14>it's not actually clear where this deal lands and whether

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 14>or not the administration would be okay taking this deal

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 14>at its face or going to China and asking to

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 14>negotiate with what we've been currently shown.

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 3>As we know, there other public bid is out there.

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 3>One of them is Fragment Court Junior and Alexis Ohanian,

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and we know that their bid doesn't involve the algorithm,

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 3>and they want to have a whole new focus on

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 3>social media who are in the United States. But the

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 3>value in many ways is in the algorithm, but also

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 3>the value is to be determined in some ways by

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 3>byte dance itself. But also the Chinese government. Have we

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 3>got any indication of whether they're willing to go through

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 3>with some sort of deal.

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 14>What sources have told us so far is that you know,

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 14>they want that China wants to keep the algorithm and

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 14>stop essentially that it would be a non starter to

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 14>facilitate a deal that does not include the algorithm if

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 14>remaining in their hands. Now, that seems to be a

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 14>problem given the letter of the law, and so Trump's

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 14>proposal to lessen the tariffs on China seems to be

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 14>one of the ways in which he's trying to get

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 14>everyone to the table and say, hey, you know we

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.399
<v Speaker 14>have to make a deal, and you know we need

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 14>to work past the sticking point in the negotiation.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 3>A story that's going to continue to evolve over the

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 3>next week. Bloomberg, Stephanie Lie, thanks so much breaking it

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 3>down for us.

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 3>You do not want to forget about our podcast, provided

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 3>on the Terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 3>and iHeart Supreme back Technology