WEBVTT - Delusional ETF Trading with Sarah Newton

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trilliance. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric belchionis Eric.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>We have a guest here, Sarah Newton. Who is she?

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Newton is somebody I met digitally. She has a

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>handle on Twitter at Phila Trades, and you know, I

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>live in Philly, and she started posting stuff on E

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>T F S and uh, you know, kind of interacting

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>with me, and I got to know her digitally, and

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>then I started seeing around the circuit and she's I

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>found out her story, which I thought was very interesting.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one of the things we vowed to

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>do this year was to talk to actual and do

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>it yourself investors of ETFs and skip the middleman, the

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>asset managers and advisors, which are good to talk to,

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes it's good, like with my two dads, to

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to someone who's out there doing it on their own.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And unlike my two dads, which are doing a little

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>more retirement and estake type work, Sarah is really more

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of a trader. I mean, she is doing it herself.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>She's almost reminds me of like the nine, The's version

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the day Trader of stocks. She's kind of doing

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it with E t F s and so she can

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>share some of those insights I thought, and she has

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>an incredible story which we're gonna hear all about this

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>time on Trillions Delusional E t F Trading with Sara Hi. Sarah,

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>welcome you, Trillions. Hi do So, how did you get

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>into E t F trading? UM? Actually, UH, to be honest,

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I first got into e t F s thanks to

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>something called finn twit. I was mainly into stocks before that.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I would just trade common stocks and you started to

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>hear more about E t F s UM, so I

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of heard of them, didn't really think of it

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>as a trading vehicle. I started using finn twit, which

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is uh a subsect of Twitter, and I started following

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people like Eric Dave Nadie would post um Christian Fromhertz,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>who is actually a trader much like myself, And a

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>great thing to follow with the t F S is

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the flow it. It helps you UM visualize the sector rotation,

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a big, big part of UM swing trading.

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's how I initially got my INN and then

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it kind of segued into something more risky like UM options.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But you weren't a trader to start with right, you

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>were just doing this on the side, right, Okay, So

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's let's start with my back story. I

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>started investing, I guess, I can't say trading. Started investing

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth grade. Fifth grade. It's a crazy story.

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>A father of one of the kids in my class

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>got extremely wealthy during this time period donated twenty dollars

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.399
<v Speaker 1>to us to trade, So he was actually making placing

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>trades based on what we're picking. I know, I know, insane, insane.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>At the end, it didn't matter what we made, what

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we lost, he was going to keep it. It was

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>his money. So he was your broker, and you were

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>just calling him up and like telling him what to do.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how our trades are submitted, to

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>be honest, but um, we picked I think as a

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>class we picked uh ten and um. When I was

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth grade, it was the dot com bubble. Actually,

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when I started the fifth grade, we didn't know it

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was a bubble quite yet. So what we would do

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>is pets dot com, I'm all in. We would use

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was the Wall Street Journal, and we

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>would literally paper trade. And this is not the paper

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>trading that people know of today. This is use the

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>newspaper to trade. We would write down our stock selection.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>We would track the stocks every week, and at the

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>end we started with at the end we we ended

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the fifties. Um, so this guy made money

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>off a bunch of fifth graders. So, as you can imagine,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it was an experience of a lifetime. It's stuck with

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>me and my My mother always stocked picked a cash account.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>My dad actually left his job for a little bit

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to try his hand at day trading. So I wasn't

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a stranger to this field. So being that age, seeing

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>these astronomical returns, I was like, I'm gonna get rich

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>one day. This is one I'm gonna do. So fast

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>forward to you're out of college, out of you go

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>into investing or well listen, hold on before we get there,

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll just go really quickly. And I always stock picked.

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I stock picked my mom's cash account when I was

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>in high school. You know, us traders out there, we like,

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we like to lay our claim to fame. So I

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>just gotta put this out here right now. I wrote

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>my mom a note to get into Google. I said,

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Google's pong tomorrow. I need you to buy me a

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>few shares. Um. Those few shares fast forward after college

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>helped me fund honestly where I am today. So I

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was one of Google's first investors. Those hold on all

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>those c NBC articles that you see about. I was

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>going to say that was me because I hate those

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they inspire lottery picking and like. But you're

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those people. I'm going to soften my stance

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a little because it worked for you. But they'll they'll say, oh,

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>if you were only invested in Google, you know, twenty

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago, here's how much that that money would be worth.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>But there were a lot of other companies that written

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>by Sarah Newton. Okay, so you had some seed money

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>from hitting the jackpot. Yes, I did. But okay, fast

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>forward to college. I went to college during the Great Recession.

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>It was a horrible whole world time, especially since I,

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was pretty familiar with stocks, had money

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in stocks, and had access to my mom's for one K.

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So I watched that thing get cut in half. It

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>was devastating, and I thought to myself, I don't want

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with this. So I left the world

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of investing. Um. Actually, now that i'm thinking of it,

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that I own some fracking stock still

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to this day, because they were big at that time,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and I still have not looked at that account since

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand. Anyways, al right, not to get too off track,

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I left, and you know, it was really hard to

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>hard time to get a job, and I took the

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>first job I could get, and that was in consulting.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I went into consulting after graduation, which is

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in like two thousand, two eleven, and I was making

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a career as a consultant when my mother, UM, my

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>mother got sick. UM I had to leave consulting to

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be her primary caregiver. Um. She had breast cancer, which

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, at first, doesn't it doesn't sound like that

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal. People actually go through chemo and work. Unfortunately,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>my mother was already sick with kidney disease, so she

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was on chemo and dialysis at the same time, and

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it really required full time caretaking. So I left consulting

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and I went to care for her. And you know,

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at this period of time, I was like the rest

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>of my friends, you know, had been in the workforce

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>two to three years. They started getting promotions, their lives

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>started taking off. I mean, it really hurt. It was

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to watch. I had always been like a great

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>student in college. I was successful in my career, and

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it was it was hard to take a back seat

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to that. And um, at this point in time, you know,

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the market had started to rebound, things were looking better.

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think, honestly, when I try and think back

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>of like what was like the light switch a moment,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>I think my mom might have accidentally because she was

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>not a frequent watcher of CNBC. I think either she

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>had it on or I honestly might have been in

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a doctor's appointment and it was on in the waiting room.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember exactly how it happened, but like the

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>light switch went off, and I was like, I should

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>get back into this. Why did they did you when you?

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought to fifth grade and how much money I made,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, oh, clearly, I can you know,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>make a living easily doing this and were in a

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>place where you were like it was hard and you

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>guys needed the money. Oh no, No. I was more

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>at the standpoint that you know, when you're life like,

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>finance is compounding. When you're not doing anything, you're losing everything.

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And I was losing my career and I needed to

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>figure something out for myself. Um, I think that is

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a very um common treat intrinsic two females. A lot

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of times we're put in these hard situations. You know,

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>many of us become caretakers at all different points of

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>time in life. Like hopefully, hopefully a lot of us

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have to do it as young as I had

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Um, I know there are probably a

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people actually my age that coming up soon

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to do it. Um, my parents

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>were boomers. I'm pretty sure your parents are boomers. Um,

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just something. It's something that's coming. There's not enough

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>workers in the field to care for all these people.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>There's not enough finances to pay for it, and people

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to bite the bullet and you

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>know do caretaking on the side and investing or not.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can trade, but investing is definitely helps fill fill

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the void of that income and that lack of exposure

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to the workforce. We basically looked at your life that

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>you needed to be making some money, that you were

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the game, but you could get back in

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the game because you knew some basics exactly, and what

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>was your next move? Um? My next move was to

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>return to the account that I abandoned and not looked

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>at since. And was that your fracking account account? That

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was my account that had actually the fracking stocks, It

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>had the Google in it, and I think it had

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>some Apple shares, and it was a fifty It was.

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>It was a really pleasant surprise. It was not anywhere.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It was five times I left it at ten. I

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 1>returned and it was five times the size that I

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>had left it. It was I had no idea that there.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I know. Okay, so all these crazy articles you hear about,

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them happened to me. Don't don't take

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this all with a grain of salt. It's not common. Um.

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So I returned and I had this nice little nest egg.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>And if you look back to that period and time,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>arguably from you two, you know, pretty recently, was like

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a really great time to be in the market. There

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>were some extreme draw downs that were really hard when

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you're staring at screens all day every day, but other

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.599
<v Speaker 1>than that, it was a good time to be I

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>like to call it what I did in the beginning

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>active investing, because it wasn't it wasn't trading. I wasn't

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>staring at the screen all day every day because you know,

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I was a caretaker. Um, that took up most of

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>my time. So more like active investing, like something in

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>between long term investing in swing trading. That's what I

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>was doing during that period of time. When you started

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>doing this sort of trading for yourself. Can you remember

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the first E t F trade you did or what

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>started off the E t F portion of your account? Oh,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm positive the first E t F trade I did

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a spy without a doubt. I'm pretty sure that's everybody's

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>set of training wheels exactly. Um. You know, I really

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think at first when I got into E t fs

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>pre fin twit, I really just thought they covered the indexes.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think my knowledge, my knowledge pre Twitter

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>was minimal, but almost in a in a good way,

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not minimal, simplistic, I'll say simplistic. And I think that

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was a double edged sword. Um. I think in some

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ways it saved me a lot of pain. But you know,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of more innovative opportunities that I

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about because of it, and E t S

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>would be one of them. So I did. I definitely

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>did have money in spy. Um, nothing fancy, nothing options,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just sitting in spy prior to Twitter. But post Twitter

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is when I started to get into you know, the

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>more exotic e T F. So, so you put would

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you do with that fifty? Did you go all in

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>on spy? Oh no, no, definitely not. Um I The

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>way that I used to stock pick was not technical,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>not fundamental. It was I would pick stocks that I

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>felt like I used the company's a decent amount, and

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that morphed. I started reading different investing books like Jim

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Kramer's books. Um I started searching. Oh my gosh, I

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>remember the first thing I searched online was was I

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.719
<v Speaker 1>just typed in stock charts And of course the first

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that comes up is stock charts dot com, which

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>is actually a really great resource. And I picked up

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the basics that I know about technical

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>analysis from there. So you spy and then you know,

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you've given me here a list of E T s used.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>This is like, you know, level four hundred here, so

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you you definitely went from one oh one to four

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred at some point. How did the training wheels come

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah into it? So again and I like double edged Sword,

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but so Finn twit came into my life. And what

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this is is this it's a subsect of Twitter, and

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it has all of the best of the best, also

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with the worst of the worst. Um there's people like

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Eric on there. There are hedge hedge fund managers you

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>see in the movies on there. Um there's anonymous accounts

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that are you know, backstage geniuses. Um that you know

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>go on there and share their wisdom. And this is

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>how I learned most of what I know today. And

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing I would recommend for anybody listening who doesn't

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>use Twitter, but if you don't have to tweet, but

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing I do sometimes if I'm preparing for a

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>quick TV hit or something, or I just want to

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>see what the latest people are saying about an et F,

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>just put cash tag in the e t F in

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the search and you can see all the latest people

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. I did this for h y G

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>recently and there was some interesting charts and things put

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>out that really helped deepen what I was looking at.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's free, I mean, it was an amazing quick resource.

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like Google on steroids and and very specific. If

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I put H y g Intwo Google, I wouldn't have

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>gotten that specificity at that speed. UM, so it can

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>really help. And you just put the dollar sign in

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the ticker and you can find everything that people are

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>saying about that e t F before you potentially buy it. Yes,

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so if you're new, if you're new to the Twitter

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>sphere and you're hearing this podcast for the first time,

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>UM finance, Twitter does not work with hashtags. They work

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with what's referred to as a cash tag, and that

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>is the dollar symbol. So if there is an e

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>t F you're looking to find more research about, like MJ,

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you put in the cash tag or the dollar symbol

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>mg A and you can you can filter it by top,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you can filter it by latest um and you can

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>see all different opinions. Fast forward to today, right, you're

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you have your account, right, so e t f s

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>are a tool in your account that you use and

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are you riffing off of like economic data or interest

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>rates to move money within e t f s? Like

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>do you use say like H Y G or t

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>L T like do you know what I mean? Like

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people might use those to play rates. Okay,

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>so I use e t f s in way more

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>ways than I used to use E T s now.

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I use them in about ten different ways, one of

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>them being what you're talking about, UM speaking to economic data. UM.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Do I trade them all? No? Do I watch them? Yes,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole different story. H y g j N

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>k U U p UM UP is the dollar junk

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>bonds high yield And if I'm to trade anything, it's

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be t l T and that's bonds UM.

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I just I think anybody out there who who watches

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>bonds has seen the trade that there just was recently

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with the experience volatility. If I'm gonna trade anything, it's

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be t LT. The liquidity in it UM

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>makes up for the non existent liquidity in the actual

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>bond market because as you know, you know, bonds sell

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>at different times UM and t l T is the

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus your treasury, so it definitely is sensitive to

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>rates and also sometimes used as a as a crisis hedge,

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>like if you think things are getting really bad, t

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>LT could be a flight to quality as well. Yeah,

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and I hate to hedge. You know. If if I

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have to hedge, uh, I probably shouldn't be in the

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>trade in the first place. I don't use t LT

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to hedge. I do use the volatility instruments to hedge.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Um there's v x x B, which is is the

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>new v x X. But hold, let's there's this thought

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>fear for a minute now. The volatility instruments are power tools,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>right right. They hold Vick's futures and so they have

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to roll them, and so the roll, the cost of

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>rolling could be like years. So they're they're widely known

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>not to hold long term. So you're you're you're kind

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of going in and out of them. But when the

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>market has a bad day, nothing goes up like a

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>vix et f. It it's up like three or four

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>times what a negative three times smp E t F

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>would be up like it's the ultimate jack pot if

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you're right. If you're wrong, though, they it's like it

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>corrodes on you. So do you do you like kind

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of come in and out of it. I've never held

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a volatility product for longer than two days. I never would.

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>There's you can't there's no there's no real chart patterns

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to it. People will try and play technical analysis on it.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it works that way. Um, there's some

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>people that do. Most people don't. But yeah, after after

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Dad's podcast, UM, I do. I do

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>fear there's a lot more people out there like them

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>who misunderstand these instruments and are and are being encouraged by.

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>So let's just step back for a second. What what

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think your strategy is right now? Right now? Okay,

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so the commodity play. Um, I think this year, uh,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a significant move in gold, and

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing that out via g LD. Wow, she seems

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>really confident about that. Listen, I think gold is uh

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>why do you think gold is going to move? Because

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>gold has zero correlation, right, so it doesn't necessarily move

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>opposite stocks. I mean, I won't bore you guys with

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>all of my technical analysis jargon, but technically it has

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the potential to break the downtrend line from two thousand eleven,

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which which would be you know, a very large move. Also,

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm also playing this off of the chance that you know,

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we might be entering our recessionary period in the next

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>two years. Like I'm not saying that definitely this year,

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>but most definitely in the next two years. Um, this

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>can be played out for easily. I I'm playing it

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>out through actual shares of the e t F. I

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>know other people who are playing it out through leaps,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>which are options that go out into UM, so you've

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>got time on that. So they're not as volatile. They

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of they don't really move much at all. But honestly,

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>if there is a big move to the upside, you

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>know they're gonna they're gonna read for the reward. I

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>see one on here that I want to really unpack

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Um. You like em. There's two reasons

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I find find that interesting. A. You know, merging market

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>has been beat up for a long time, so why

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>do you like it? And be you know, amongst the

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>CTF analysts, e M is a tough pill to swallow

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's so expensive, So we are so inclined to say,

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 1>you know what, use I MG or v W Oh

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>they're way cheaper um. But traders do like e M.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you kind of break down why you like that?

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I like em because of the way it looks technically. Again,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>like most people who are traders trade on a technical basis,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>So from looking at e M, it's been in a

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>consistent down trend um. And the reason why I'm watching

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it right now is because uh, and I shouldn't even

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>say watching, because I have been playing it. But I've

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>gotten burned several times so far. So Um in October

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I was in it, thought it was going to break

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to the upside. It kind of did a fake breakout

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>failed again. Um. But E E M is you know,

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost like volatility, like the volatility products, in

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the sense that it's got a wild ride. You can't

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>get in it and expect it not to move a lot.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think the reason why traders like it is

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>because the upside potential if it works is big. Um,

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the payoff is big. And you know, since we don't

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be in these products for long, the cost,

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the cost of things like management fees is not really

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>important to us. How long are you typically in a

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>position something in my active account, I would never be

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>in for more than three weeks. That would be and

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be long, like a long term swing trade.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>We did a study. There's a thing you can calculate

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the break even holding point on where the bidass spread

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>versus the cost like and I think, E M. This

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is like five years ago. I did this. If you're

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to go be in within three weeks. It's actually cheaper

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to use em because the expense ratio is pro raded

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>over a year, so the bitest spread and the liquidity

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is such that it's cheaper. That's really all I'm ever

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>looking at. I I honestly, I know from following so

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>many et F guys, what you know the BIPs are?

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Do I really care? Now? I'm focused on the bidass spread.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the end all be all for me. When you

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>put on here, which again I find interesting, it's the

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>best performing e t F this year's MJ. We've covered

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>cannabis a couple of times on this podcast, Like we

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.959
<v Speaker 1>had Barry red Holts on even though he believes that

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>pot is going to be a big deal, he just

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>won't touch it. You have it on here. Um, what

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is your take on the cannabis industry as a trader

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and m J? Alright, so I have two viewpoints on this.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>One is from my my trading lenses, which is technically

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and technically right now, m J is back above its

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>two day moving average, where it's arguably been hovering for

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a while. Now. Um, it's got impressed of relative strength

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>comparatively to the market, which means that you know, in

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this in this increased volatility we've been having, you'll see

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some weak stocks and then you'll see stocks with momentum,

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and those are the ones that you want to be in.

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>So MJ. MJ is showing that it's it's got strength

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>comparatively to the market, and technically it's it's currently bullishly flagging,

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>which means that it's got a lot of potential to

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>break to the upside. And then again, like part of

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I like to be exposed to E

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>t F and let me just like switch my goggles here.

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>This is more from like an active investor, long term

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>investors standpoint, and like picking themes and picking trends. Marijuana arguably,

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it, it's and it's the ball is

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep rolling. Things are just going to

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>keep advancing. You're just bullish because Jeff Sessions is no

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>longer Attorney General. I also want to that you're totally delusional, yes,

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>which you know talk about explaining all of the content

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of this problem. I love your blog with the Delusional Trader,

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>which is the name of your website right where you blog. Correct,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I do blog that is actually not the focus of it.

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Um and what it is is it's curated content. UM.

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've I've brought up Twitter past and um

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>essentially when I was first exposed to Twitter, you just

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you're inundated with information. And this this speaks more to

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>than to just Twitter. This is to CNBC, this is

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Wall Street Journal, this is to what we're

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>doing right now. There is just so much information out there,

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you'd be remiss not not to take

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it in. It's extremely helpful, but then you're also bogged

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>down and drowning when you try to consume it all.

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And a big issue is that most of it's biased.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Most of it is is just content that's being put

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>out for free by different services just trying to you know, um,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>create more information about either they're they're audict, whether their advisors,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>whether they're like, whether they're selling actual et F s,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>whether they're just passive or whether they're active in they're

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to you know, rep their brand. Um. So

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you've started to curate it a little bit more, filter

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of the most biased stuff. It goes

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>take away the noise. And essentially what I did was

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I was doing this for myself and then I was figuring, well,

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>if I'm just doing it for myself, why don't I

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just put it on the web so then other people

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can enjoy it too. And it's interesting. Um, I like

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>uh self deprecating titles of anything. I was attracted to

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>it when I when you're um, Sarah came to our

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>et F event and it's a delusional trader on her badge,

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and I was just like, oh my gosh, that's the

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>greatest thing. Yeah. So um, But I do like the

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>self deprecating nature. I think a lot of people are

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>bombarded with sites and books that are sort of how

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to make money in you know, in the stock market. Uh,

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of these very confident type ways that

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>things are being presented to you, which I always wonder,

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>why would you write a book if you figured out

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the secret to making money the stock market. That's in

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a whole different question. But to come out and call

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>yourself delusional, I think is attractive. Um. In this day

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and age, I think people are trust will trust that

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a little more than that sort of typical um sort

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of the titles of things. That's just my view on that.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But as part of this, if you're delusional, I also

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>want to know, like, how delusional are you? Like? What's

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>your performance been? Like? Okay, so my performance, although I

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>will not share numbers with you, has been good enough

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep me doing this full time now for six years.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So Europe, I am up. Another thing it's interesting about

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you is finn Twit. As you said, it's very male dominated.

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a lot of gen extras with young

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>children who just use it as a vice, like the

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>bar down the street. But it also very good. You

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>learn a lot. But there aren't that many females in

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the sort of finn Twit underworld. You're one of them.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a little bit about that and being

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a day trader in that sort of more male dominant

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>dominated world. Right, So I feel like that this is

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a question that comes up a lot um.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Why why are there not more women in finance? Why

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>aren't there more women in trading? And honestly, I'm kind

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of surprised there aren't more women in trading um because

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it kind of speaks to my story in the beginning.

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of times, as women we get

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>we get placed in these situations where we kind of

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>have to make things work. You know, some people open

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>cupcake shops. Other people decide to go on the internet

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and try to make money fast. I don't know. I'm

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the latter apparently, But you know, I think one of

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the characteristics that has helped me most, and I think

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>helps you know a lot of the female fund managers

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>out there is that, you know, we take risks, but

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we take well defined risks risks and I think, um,

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>there's something to be said about the male ego, and

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that that can get in the way when

0:25:55.560 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes to trading. I think my my sensitivity to

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>risk is what has kept me in the game this long. Um. Also,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>something else that I'd like to touch too, that you know,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I get in arguments quite frequently with the quants about

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>is the emotions. You know, quants like to believe that

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you should check your emotions at the door, but I

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that. I think you need to acknowledge that

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we're human and we have emotions. But that being said,

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, identify what they are so that way you

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>can take a step back and kind of make more

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>objective decisions. But you know, we're human, we have emotions.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you take a loss, you're gonna you're

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna feel that when you're winning, you're going to feel that.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Um but you know, when you're winning, don't don't put

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on more size because you're winning. You know, when you're losing,

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>don't put on more size because you need to make

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>it back. You know, I'm just I am, and women

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>are and I'm sure there are men that are too,

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>just in touch internally with what's going on and where

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>their head is at. I mean arguably the market. You know,

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it is just an exchange of emotions going on. When

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you think back to that moment that you had spy

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and then you took the training wheels off, what do

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you wish you would have known then? I wish I

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would have known that all of the information out there

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>is not it's not true. Don't don't take everything for

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>face value. Do your research. So the way that you

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>can apply this to E t F S is so

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and E t F might say that it's tracking something

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>new and innovative, like she like, oh, we're tracking female

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>board member companies with female board members. It's kind of

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>just tracking the SMP. Honestly, UM, so kind of know

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're what you're getting into? Is this like is

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this actually a special E T f is it actually

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>going to create alpha for me? Or is it really

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>just a beta tracker? Sera. Thanks for joining us with

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening to Trillions until next time. You can

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and wherever else you'd like to listen. We'd love to

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Weber Show,

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Fall Tuns and you can find Sarah

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Newton at FILI Trade. Trillions is produced by Magnus Hendrickson.

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Francesa Levie is the head of Bloomberg podcast by