WEBVTT - U.S. Is Losing the Battery Race

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanabek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world's of business and finance,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. So a bunch of virus headlines.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>California lifting its regional stay at home orders. We talked

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about New York City postponing vaccations at large sites they

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough doses. Maderna beginning human studies of a

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>booster shop for its vaccine to help protect against a

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>more transmissible South Africa virus variant. There's a lot of

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>things going on, and we also have a ranking on

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg about kind of whose or where are the

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>best places to basically ride out the pandemic. Can I

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>just tell you hint hint, us isn't near the top.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say the same thing um at some

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>familiar names at the top. If you've been following the

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>pandemic for the past ten months, ten months, right, unbelievable meantime,

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>US infectious to seize Chief Dr Anthony Fauci. You just

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>heard a little bit of him. He says he's worried

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>about a push to delay administering the second dose of

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen. He talked at a Virtual World Economic Form panel.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 1>It was moderated by Bloomberg's editor chief John mccothwaite. Here's

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that. You don't get full efficacy

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>until you get that second dose, and if you allow

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>some optimal efficacy, you can actually immunologically select more for

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>mutations when you do that. So that's the reason why

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, it may not be the case, but it

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>gets risky, and that's the reason why we prefer to

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>keep it on the time that the clinical trials said, right,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the protocol calls for two shots in terms of maximum efficacy.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>That's of course, Dr Anthony Faucci. Let's get to our

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>own Bloomberg News Health Science and Medical Technology reporter Michelle Cortez.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>She is with Tim and me on the phone in Minneapolis. Michelle.

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you here. Uh. Dr Anthony Faucci talking

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about two shots, I do wonder the more that you read,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the more you research, you know, is it better for

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>us to get a vaccine out to more people at

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this point considering the slow rollout, or is it, like

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Dr Fauci says, we got to just make sure we

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of max out the efficacy of these vaccines and

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>do two shots. It really does matter what the goal

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is for the vaccination effort. If you're really trying to

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>protect the people who are the most at risk of

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>dying from the virus or those who are most likely

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>to contracted, like those who are caring for people with coronavirus,

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>then you really need to give those doses because that's

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>where the evidence is, that's what we know works, and

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>if you start going away from what we know work,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>you run the risk of it not working. And so

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>having vaccinating half the people is something that doesn't work

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>get you in a worse position then actually just buckling

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>down and giving the full vaccination to that smaller number

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of people. Of course, if you're just trying to get

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to hurt immunity. If you're just trying to get to

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're just trying to get to some measure of

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>protection for the greatest number of people, then you might

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>want to gamble. So it really is how much of

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a gambler are you? Michelle Carol, That's such a good

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>question earlier that we don't know the answer to, which

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is where is this bottleneck when it comes to where

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines are? Is it manufacturing? Is a distribution? Because

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>here in New York City, the city is postponing vaccinations,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>as Carol mentioned, at large sites because of a doze shortage.

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Where are they? I think at this point what we're

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing is just dislocation as a general rule. If we

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>did have massive stockpiles of the actual vaccine itself, I

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>think that we would be able to start seeing these

0:03:56.000 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>facilities in sports stadiums and amphitheaters and can you city centers, schools,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>post office those sorts of things. We would be able

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to ramp that up. But it's really hard when all

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the pieces are moving at the same time. You know,

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>if you can get all the people, if you can

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>get the location and the vaccinators and the vaccinators and

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>everything to a spot but you don't have the vaccine itself,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>then that's not going to do you very good. When

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you do have the vaccine, but you have fluctuating numbers,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you set up for that. So it's all

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of the moving parts that are moving at the same

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>time that is causing the problems. And we're seeing different points,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>different issues everywhere. So if it was all just a

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>matter of we don't have enough vaccine, then we would

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>know just what we have to fix, what we have

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to address to fix the problem. Does that mean that

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there are potentially enough vaccines out there, but there may

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>be sitting somewhere at the wrong place and not where

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they're really needed. I'm just trying to understand, right. I

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>think that there are certain cases where you can look.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>For example, we understand, you know, in Florida, for example,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>they've only given out about half of the vaccine that

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they have. Now, that's not because they are just you know,

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>sitting in in a warehouse and it's in some freezer

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhere they don't need it. It's because it's just in

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the process of going from one place to another place,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't know exactly how much they're going to get.

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the uncertainty of the process. So every place

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at, and not every state, but every hospital,

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>every county, there's probably differences in every particular area. And

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of course the challenge with this vaccine itself, the fact

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that you have to take it out of the freezer

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>thought we constituted and get ready to administer it, and

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>then you have to give it all at once, makes

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>it so that people are trying to be very careful

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>with what they're giving, what they're pulling out of the freezer.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's if you have a little bit in different places.

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Everywhere that you look, there isn't one consistent answer to

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that question. Well, I mean I wish there were, right.

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>If there were, maybe it would be in a better spot. Um, Michelle,

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of vaccine news this morning, though,

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering about this news that Moderna is planning to

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>do studies of a booster tell protect against a more

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>transmissible virus variant, this one coming from South Africa. When

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you saw that news, what was your reaction? Well, that

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was actually really interesting stuff. There's good news and bad

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>news in this particular set of information that's coming up

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>from Maderna. The problematic piece was the fact that the

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>vaccine itself generates a less robust response then against the

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>new variant then against the old variant. So if you're

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>getting madernat vaccine, you want to make sure that whatever

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>virus actually you come into contact with, you're going to

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>be better if you have the original, the wild type virus.

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That being said, the the vaccine actually is still very potent,

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in fact, generates a stronger immune response than even the

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>natural infection. Michelle, I want to get your thoughts on

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>that headline that that Charlie just read. Governor Cuomo says

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>New York is ready to ease rules after holiday spike ends.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, um, whenever I see I'm just

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna put it out. The headline came across and I

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>was like, Carol, did you see this, because it feels like,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we are starting to do better, we

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to do something, uh that could potentially

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>make us do worst. Same thought about California, Tim, You're

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, and to point out to California as well,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they're still in the middle of a pretty bad outbreak

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. So it's getting better, but it's getting

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>better from a really terrible position. It does make you

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>wonder how we're going to handle this outbreak. We've seen

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it over and over again. It's this roller coaster, right,

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the cases go up, people get worried, they start staying

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in the numbers come down, so they ease back up

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and then and then it just happens all over again.

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So it is this tension between being able to get

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>out there, having the social stimulations, seeing people in person,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>getting our economies back going again, versus keeping the virus

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>under control. Like send this wing that's been happening, and

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I just can't imagine it's going to end, probably not

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>for another year or longer. Well, it just makes me think.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I was telling Carol about this. Over the weekend. The

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>New York Times had this interactive chart that they published

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that that showed, based on speaking to experts, if restrictions

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>are lifted in February, twenty nine million additional total infections

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>could happen, versus if current restrictions remain in place until

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>late July, we could actually see us in the pandemic sooner.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's like it's surprising to me, I know, there

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is this tension between making sure that we are doing

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>what we can do to keep the economy going. But

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, if the virus is not under control,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy is not going to get going, right. If

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the virus is still hanging over people, then they're going

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to be reluctant to to do certain things. And I

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>believe that you'll see that even in certain areas where

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>things like gyms and hairdressers, those sort of movie theaters

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are open. If you go there, often you're the only

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>person in the entire movie theater because people are still worried. So, yeah,

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>hopefully it won't be a complete, you know, flooding back

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the the economic engine powering everything, empowering

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that virus level right back up to previous heights. MICHELLEO,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>do you have some hope faith in that because we

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at least have a vaccine, that that is going to

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>be that is a game changer. We've said that a

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>million times. But even as economies or markets or cities

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or states begin to open up, that because we are

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at the same time giving out the vaccine, it's not

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>a case that we slipped back to where we were

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lass summer less spring, like we won't go back there

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is that kind of the game changer here, even though

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we've got to still be careful. But that's kind of

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>something that provides a little bit of a safety net

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>here for us. I think the safety net is going

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to be on the severe disease piece of it. And

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we have really worked very hard in the US to

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccinate all of our seniors who are in nursing homes.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And I would say that's one area that it has

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>gone really well when you look at what Walgreens and

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>CBS have done, not necessarily if you look at how

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they've actually tracked all the numbers and and how they've

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, specifically given it to exactly the right people.

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>But if you just look at the numbers of people

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that they have gotten to, most nursing homes have had

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>folks come in from CBS and Walgreens. Most nursing home

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>patients are getting these vaccines, many of them have gotten

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>two of them. That's a reduction and serious disease. And

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>that's the people who are going to die. So I

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>would say we might see cases still high, but we're

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to see the deaths at the rates that we've

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>been seeing. That's significant. I like this, Yeah, this is good.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm trying to understand like a right kind

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of just at least some progress moving forward. Michelle, Thank

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Michelle Corte, Senior Health Science and Medical

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Technology reporter at Bloomberg News, on the phone from Minneapolis.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Well, the annual

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the year I had issia of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It is on newsstands, now online and on the Bloomberg

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and in it a deep dive into batteries from Asian

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers in the global race, to batteries hidden in around

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>New York City and the startups that are kind of

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>blazing a new way forward. There's so many different angles.

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We want to cover some of them. Bloomberg News editor

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Demitri Cassoneds is with us on the phone in New

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>York City, along with Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel Weber

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>on the access line in Brooklyn. Batteries. Joel, you guys

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>really kind of got into it. Yeah. I even did

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a cover line there's a great future and batteries. Think

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>about it, which if you're if you remember the graduate

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>U graduated but with plastic and now it's batteries but demitra.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is this the year of the battery? Well, you know,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the batteries are in everything, right, ideal a lot with

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>electric automobiles and vehicles, but batteries power everything. And so

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing massive factories coming online around the world. The

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Asian companies have really dominated this in recent years, and

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they're making a very big play this year with battery

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>factories that are going to open in Europe and even

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in the US. And finally, others are kind of opening

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>their eyes to this out of necessity in many other reasons,

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and so we're starting to see more of a real

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>heated competition that's going to emerge among European battery producers,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Asian battery producers, and um, we think American battery producers

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>as well. Well. That's interesting because the US is definitely

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not in the lead, and the you know, the Asian

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>companies are the ones that we're kind of we think

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of first and foremost, like C A. T. L UM

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're eyeing Europe over US for expansion. What's that about. Well,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you see what's happening right with Volkswagen and

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>all the European automakers who are coming out with new

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>models of electric vehicles, and in check sales figures for

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>autos in Europe last year, we're definitely down, but in

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the e V sector they were up quite a bit,

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's only a trend line that's going to keep

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>going up, up, up, So that's a primary factor motivating it.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You'll see partnerships that are struck between the carmakers and

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the battery makers. Um. Uh it's c A t L

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, LG is another one. LG is also

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>one of our companies on the sixty Companies to Watch list, uh,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Korean companies that are big in the game kind of

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>sonic as well. UM. And so what you're seeing is

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that the automakers are going to start thinking about whether

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this is an area that they should be getting into,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>as Tesla does in terms of really developing things themselves.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they partner certainly with companies, but there's so

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>much opportunity because of where we're seeing electric vehicles going

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and also massive battery storage systems right to deal with UM,

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>greater security in terms of grids and power lines. That's

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>where we're seeing a lot of here in the United States,

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>batteries systems are really going to be the key to

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>help US deal with very weak and compromise grid systems

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>across the country. Okay, so let's talk more about America,

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>because distant third place in the in the global race

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>goes to the US, but there is a chance that

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, America could catch up. What does that have

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to look like? Well, you know, I think that we

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just haven't thought about it as much, and because again

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we weren't really thinking about these as a way to

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>both powered grid systems. But also if we're talking about

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>e VS, the US market is really very far behind

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in this right. I mean, we're maybe two percent of

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>auto sales in the US are electric vehicles, So batteries

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have not been front and center part of what we're doing.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>But we have the resources, we have the technology. You know,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we have areas that are rich in lithium deposits, so

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we have the ability to develop a really strong industry

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in this and there have been a lot of reports

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last six to eight months that have indicated

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're competitiveness sake, this is going to be an

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>area that the US is going to have to develop,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>not just jobs wise and economy wise, but again keeping

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the battery production close to where you're doing the other

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>things that are going to need the batteries because all

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the trade issues and everything else are complicating to some

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>degree the ability to effectively like source your batteries from

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies and countries that we're having a lot

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of trade issues with. For example, listen, I'm into local

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>lettuce and I'm into local batteries. I'm just gonna put

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it out there. Um so, right right, So Dmitri talked

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to us. One of the stories I thought was really

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting was about all the batteries that are hidden across

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>New York City. What's that about? So that's very much

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about um, you know, weak sort of grid and um

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a need to bolster what we have in the way

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of power supply, and those are battery systems that are

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>going to becoming. What we show you online and in

0:15:55.680 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the magazine are photos of location that MG micro rig Networks,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the company that's behind us, have actually secured and paid for,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and between now and the end of the year, massive

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>battery systems will be installed in those locations. And what

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is identifying locations that are like abandoned lock

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>abandoned parking lots, rooftops that are massive enough, and in

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>areas where again where the greatest compromised because they're in

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>flood zones because they kept badly by storms. And so

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start to see and they're multi use

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of battery systems where you see a lot of

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>batteries on the top level of something powering you know,

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>our needs, and also like car chargers underneath, because we

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are expecting that more and more people are going to

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>start to buy electric vehicles and need locations to power

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>their cards exactly. One other interesting thing that is covered

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in this week's issue of Bloomberg Business Week when it

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to batteries is investors are seeing chip makers and

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>battery makers is safer than investments in companies like Tesla

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and Neo. UM. So they're still seeing chip makers and

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>battery makers specifically as a way to get exposure to

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles without the volatility of Tesla. Yeah, I mean,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think also without the volatility maybe of some of

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the companies where there have been valuations and a lot

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of activity um and and you know, there isn't something

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as let's say, really certain and stable that you're looking

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to invest in. I mean with batteries, there's an actual

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that's getting produced. Um. A lot of the ones

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>that they're investing in already have operations set up, factories,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>created materials that they've sourced, the natural materials that are

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>necessary and they're making the batteries. And again there is

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>such a demand because we're not talking just about cars.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>We think about the war world and what around you

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>was powered by a lithium ion battery, whether it's a phone,

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a computer, whether it's a lamp on your

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>death that are now increasingly a fan. I mean, you

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>know all the smart home stuff. I mean, there's a

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ton of stuff, and there's such a need and such

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a demand. Um. And I think that there's seeing what's

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>happening with these companies and saying this is definitely something

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>we want to invest in. So and you've gotta be

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>quick here, demtro Is there anybody anybody who can make

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>money on disassembling old batteries? Yet? That's a Kyle Stock

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>story that I thought was really interesting. Well, if you

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>believe the company that we one of the company's we

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>profile is Redwood Materials. Sounded by a former Tesla executive,

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>James strubble, and they would say, yeah, and we do

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that there is because we're not seeing just redwood

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in this. Several companies are actively developing the process for

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>recycling batteries because all these electric vehicles, within ten years,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>their batteries are going to be dead, so we gotta

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>do something with that. Yeah, this is going to be

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>important part of the equation otherwise we're no better off. Um.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff, guys, and it's such a must read all

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>these different angles. Demetro Cassini's editor Bloomberg News, Joe Weber,

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>editor Bloomberg Business Week. Go to the magazine check it out.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes. Tim's GENEVIEC on Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Business Week gets brought to you by SEI Crises bring

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>out the best in people, character, community, partnership together as one.

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Se I go to se i C dot com slash

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>i m s for more information. So Tim, no doubt

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. Former President Trump and current President Buying two

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>very different individuals. They're expected to lead pretty differently as well. However,

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to China, they might be a little

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>bit more similar when it comes to policy, so says

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Andy Brown Bloomberg New Economy, saying that Biden is Trump

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>two point oh when it comes to China. Andy joins

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>us now on the phone from New York City. He's

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>editorial director of Bloomberg New Economy. Um, So, Andy, why

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>do you say that that Biden is looking like Trump

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>two point oh when it comes at least relations to

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>relations with China. So, of course it's been clear for

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a long time that China is now a bipod is

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>an issue UM in the United States in Congress. But

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think what really dramatically brought this to my attention

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>was the way that on his way out the door,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pompeio, the now former Secretary of State, designated China

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a perpetrator of genocide a genocidal state, and

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the incoming Biden administration UM, including Tony Lincoln his replacement,

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>concurred with that assessment. This is pretty dramatic stuff, and

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>nobody quite knows what it means for the United States

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to formally designate China as a genocidal regime, what it

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>means to tie China with the same brush as for instance,

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul Potts Cambodia. But I'm sure that it has pretty

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>far reaching consequences. I think we can be very sure

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of that. Well, Andy, what does it tell us then,

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>potentially about how a Biden administration might approach its relationship

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to China more like what we saw with the Trump

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>administration versus different So the first thing that has to

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be said is it's going to be a differentiated approach

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that the Biden administration is committed to

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>working with allies. Not whether those allies are prepared to

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>go along with the United States um A US that

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they still and will not trust, don't trust and will

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>not trust perhaps for many years, is another question. But

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be a smarter approach um

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that includes friends and allies. But the substance um of

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the Trump pushback against China, I think substantially remains the

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>there is no going back to the former policy pursued

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>by what administration after another, that policy of engagement with China,

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>which failed to deliver on its promise, which was supposed

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a more open liberal economy um and A

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and a more democratic or representative political system. So what

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for for American business because what we've

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>seen in the last few years, more than just the

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>last few years, is the opportunity for American businesses, international

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>businesses to a certain extent, some more successful than others,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to actually operate and and grow in China. What does

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 1>this mean for businesses moving forward? Okay, first of all

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>has to be said that US businesses are not pulling

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>out of China at all in response to UH Trump's

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>hardline policies. Quite the opposite. Wool Street is piling in

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of money going into UH, into China, UH,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>into Wealth Management UH and other areas, tracing chasing trillion

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar opportunities. But I think what it's going to mean

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is there is a I mean, there is a lot

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of nervousness that I've I've been hearing myself from businesses

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>about what does it mean when the Biden administration takes

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>over a policy condemning China UH for genocide. Look, companies

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like Apple, like Amazon are already scrambling to comply with

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>sanctions regime against multiple Chinese entities and individuals linked to

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>repression in in xin Jong. They're now going to be

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>under added scrutiny. What about the Olympic Games. I mean,

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, can the Olympic Games put pull off? We've

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>heard we've heard already calls from human rights groups to

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>abandon those But more generally, I think there's going to

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>be an ethical issue here that businesses people are going

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to be greats groups are going to be questioning why

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>are we doing business with this country. So it's so,

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the one hand, you have the poll

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese market, it's the only major economy still growing.

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other hand, UM, you've got you know,

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the the the poll of of of all these groups

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>who are questioning the fundamentals of US business engagement with

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the People's Republic of China. And it was also interesting

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and important that you pointed out that the Biden team

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>UM invited Taiwan's to factor ambassador to attend the inauguration

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:10.959
<v Speaker 1>for the first time they had they actually gave an

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>official invitation. And I do wonder to like another sign

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of or signal that the US administration, the new administrations

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>may be sending to China. That's right on on Taiwan. UM.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course, this was a highly opportunistic and and and

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>as as as many of these decisions were by the

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>out by the out by by Mike Pompeo on the

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>way out rather self rather self serving. This one was

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly hamhanded. Nevertheless, Um, it is the case that the

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration formally invited to representative Taiwan to come to

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the inauguration. That is a big deal, and that of

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>course is the hot issue, the hot button issue for

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government. So you know, you're you're seeing we

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>saw this speech by by Shijimping just today where you

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>know he's not he's not indicating uh anything that looks like,

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, a softening or a sort of a warm

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>outreach to the Biden administration. They're going to be watching

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and and and and waiting and testing him. So Andy,

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>very briefly in just thirty seconds. Um, if we think

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>about the legacy of the Trump administration when it comes

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to international relations, is pushing China, pushing the conversation in China?

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that what is he is going to be remembered for.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>He changed the conversation on China. I think that is

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that is very clear. As they say there is no

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>going back to the former UH policy of engagement. Now,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what he will be remembered for, but

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he will also be remembered for not delivering um on

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>his on on on anything that looked like a coherent

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>UH strategy in pushing back. That's what the Biden administration

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>has to play for. All Right, We're gonna leave it

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>on that note. Hey, Andy, thank you so much, really

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Andy Brown, editorial director at Bomberg New Economy,

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New York City. Thanks for listening

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News