WEBVTT - EM Investors Are Very Worried About China: Van Eck’s Fine

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. We're

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>very lucky right now to be joined by Eric Fine,

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager and Emerging markets fixed income at Strategy at

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>van Eck Global. He just returned from I MF meetings

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in Bali. He got back Sunday night. He's been going

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to these meetings for twenty years. This one, this one

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was different for you. How so um this Well, first,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what's different is they're crowded, um, and there are a

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people and it speaks to the amount of

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>investment that's going into the e M and e M

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>bonds and and that's a good thing. Um. But uh,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest thing is, uh, this is one

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the most if not the most you know, uh

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>worried meetings in the sense of, you know, I go

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to the meetings and then I spend time with the

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>old timers afterwards and see you know you are you

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>leaving here as more of a seller or more of

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a buyer because you have to have a bottom line

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>on everything obviously, and uh um and and and and

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a seller, but uh much more concerned about China. That's

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>really the thing China set up is. Though you could

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have said a lot of the things that are being

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>said now a year ago, two years ago, five years ago,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>um um and uh and I think that's fair. The

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>issue is when is it relevant? Wise it matter? And

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why I care. Is it now for reasons I

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>can get into. But now it's elevated as a concern. Well,

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that's where I wanted to go. Is this matter of

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>China's economy accelerating it slowdown? Or does this have to

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>do with trade tensions with the US? Um? I think

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you can't disentangle the issues, um um, even

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>though uh you know it's trade is a big jobs

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>generator in uh in China and the current account uh

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>surplus is declining and uh that's a that's an important

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>uh as I said, poor generator jobs, which it's important

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>generative confidence. Why do I say that the set up

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>for China, I don't. I think China is a country

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that has for twenty years been disciplined by equity investors.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>What do equity investors want? Growth growth, growth, growth, growth growth.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Bond investors are very different. They're happy with recessions, they

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 1>welcome recessions. They worry about over leverage. Right, so they've

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>gotten the growth. But with the growth, they've gotten the growth.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>With with with the growth came immense leverage. So the set up,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the initial conditions are bad. They're not bad in the

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional sense of oh my gosh, they owe a lot

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>of dollars and they don't have them. It's a very

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>different setup, and that's why people have been calm, and

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that's also essentially why I think the market has been

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>right to sort of say, you know, it's not really

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a problem, but not really a problem for today

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and not something here. The issue there is domestic claims.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>The most acute phase of EM crisis, in my experience,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is when locals lose confidence and all the money M zero,

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the money in your pocket, M want a short term

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>claim like a demand deposit or M two, something like

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>include savings accounts UM. When that when people start closing

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that and saying I want the dollars. I want the reserves.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And that ratio in China is basically the worst in

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. Um, the amount of domestic claims on dollars

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know what you're getting for a tenure bond

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in China and the local currency three and a half

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>percent in a tenure Do I need to say anything else? Right?

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the issue. And oh if the argumacy, Oh they

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>can hike interest rates, high interest rates, what is that

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do to growth? Right? And and if the

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>growth gets hit, this is an economy that depends on

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>significant investment, almost half of GDPs and investment. So those,

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I think are the issues that are coming to the fore.

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But they're coming. The trigger is, as you're suggesting, is trade. Um.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But this broadening of this tense of the relationship with China,

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>or the tense points on to beyond trade, I think

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is is settling it in people's minds. And there and

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's a new big risk. When you talk

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>about a new big risk. There is a headline in

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the South China Morning Post several weeks ago six trillion

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar debt bubble which Chinese local authorities have built up.

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, you know everything unwind that without a lot

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of pain. Yeah. Look, I I and and today's announcement

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is more sort of new products, right, more and more

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and more leverage. And I was struck by how more

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>leverage and stimulation is seems to be. My sense is

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's viewed as a legitimate policy option. More stimulation,

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>stimulating and then having your currency weakend is not stimulating, right,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's spinning your wheels, right, and trying to

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>get out of something. Um. Every time we've looked at

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese financial system um um. And when we seem

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that we feel like we get a handle on it, um,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>some new balance sheet with leverage comes up, and so

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a real problem. The one thing that we've consistently said, though,

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and that is probably still the case, is the Chinese

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>authorities are extremely impressive when you bring up these problems.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>If you brought up that problem, they are not denying it.

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the other thing that characterizes free crisis. They know

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>these they have tools to do. They come up with

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>tools to deal with it. Um. It's just that what

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>they need to do might be bigger than what they've fought.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you've got to give them the benefit

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of the doubt. But these issues are are are come

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>up and they're real, and so far the government's had

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the credibility to say, look, don't worry about it, We're

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>doing something. So I want to go back to those

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I m F meetings that you had with the old

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>time ers, as you said, how much are they considering

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that a possible disruption in China? How much of an

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>impact would that have on the rest of the emerging

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>markets complex in which countries would get hit the hardest?

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And are they staying away from as a result of

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this uncertainty. Short answer, profound impact and all right, um now, yeah,

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but but I don't think that means run for the hills, right,

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Argentina has already been through a lot. Right, you can

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>find short dated bonds with high yields where right or

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>wrong in the world. If they mature and they pay

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>their care, you're going to be fine. So kudos to you,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>because when you came in here you basically called the

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the Argentinian bonds sell offs to carry on.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks thanks, notice So, but there are there are a

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of countries that are being stressed out by tougher

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions and the trade trade conflict UM and UH UM.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>And so one one straightforward answer is there's you know,

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>there's there's some cheap things to do in UH in

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in emerging markets, UM and and and those are those

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. But China has been opening for forty years. UM.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>For the last forty maybe the thirty plus years, you've

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>had declining inflation and inflation expectations and rising trade. UM,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they've been related, right. I mean, it's, you know, the

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the economic logic of globalization, optimizing global outcomes and reducing

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation and is correct. UM doesn't mean it's right, but

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's certainly correct UM and UM. I think that's

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>at risk this thirty year trend. Thanks very much for

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>being with us, and we look forward to having you

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Eric Fine lots to talk about portfolio

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>manager emerging markets fixed income strategy for van eck Loobal.

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>For much of this week, the news in Washington, d

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>C was dominated by Saudi Arabia and US relations and

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>what would happen now that there was a disappearance that

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>resulted in the most likely death of a journalist who

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>worked for the Washington Post. But is that the big

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.559
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from this week? Marty Schanker joins US now chief

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>content officer for Bloomberg News. Definitely, Uh, the news out

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of Washington, d C. Is moving so quickly that you

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>blink you miss it. How much lasting power will the

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia US story have going forward or will people

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>just sort of forget about this doesn't have legs. It

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely does have legs, and uh, you know, it continues

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>even today. There's somewhat of a lull. It's a it's

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the Sabbath in the region, in the Mid East, so

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a lot of news. But in the the

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>issue as it relates to Donald Trump's response is still

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>very top of mind. Um in the politics of Washington.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not at actually resonates into the mid term

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>elections is another question. Why because I think that mid

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>term Why Why is it resonating so strongly politically? Because

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it in some ways, and I think the news channels

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>reflect this. It speaks to Donald Trump's unconventional way of

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>conducting foreign policy and the transactional nature of his presidency.

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, immediately people have gone to the whole issue

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of what kind of business relationship does Donald Trump have?

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't there a sense of complete outrage. Why aren't

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we taking very concrete steps to sever our close relationship

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>with Saudi Arabia? And in Donald Trump's defense, it is

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a much It is a very complicated issue. And many

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>people have commented on the fact that, uh, because o

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Ji's death, will try magic hundreds of thousands of people

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>being killed in Yemen, and no one says a word

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. Indeed, And just to kind of add a

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit more to the story, there was a report

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo initially did hear the

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>audio that the Turkish government claims they have, when in fact,

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>a State Department spokeswoman came out yesterday and said noe

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>had neither heard the audio nor the transcript. So my

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>question then is what do you think Secretary of State

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pompeo was doing in Saudi Arabia and is there

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a potential for conversations about succession planning in Saudi Arabia. Well,

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't speculate about what mom Mike Pompeo was thinking,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but clearly all the participants in this controversy are trying

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to figure a way out um that includes Donald Trump,

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that includes this the Saudi government UM in a way

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that provides some accountability for what happened in the in

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi embassy and Anchora, while still having repercussions. And

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump did hint at that that there would be

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>severe consequences if it was determined that there was a

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>murder uh in some way connected to the Saudi government.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But it is true that the Saudi the Saudis are

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>critically important to the strategic interests of the United States,

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and you have to balance that against you know, this

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously outrageous action, UM, and they're all trying to figure

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a way out. So let's talk about the political fallout.

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>There definitely has been vocal criticism from fellow Republicans in

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and elsewhere. There are reports that Nicki Haley

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>may have resigned from the u N Post as a

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>result of this. Is there any truth to that? Well,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, that is the big question. No one,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, have definitively said why

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Nikki Halley decided to resign and why she decided to

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>resign now, UM. None other than Steve Bannon, who's not

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>should not be underestimated in terms political acumen, said that

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>this was a horrible thing to do, terrible timing, you know,

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like less than a month before mid terms. She was

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>at the Al Smith dinner last night and actually joked

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about it. Um, but it could have

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>been a factor. But then there are you know, multiple

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>things that could also. There was also a report that

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it was Kavanaugh, which she denied. Anyway, she has her

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons and maybe ultimately we'll find them out. So let's

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>shift gears a little bit because we are heading into

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the midterm elections and I'm just wondering how important it

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is to sort of watch what comes out of President

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Twitter feed to figure out his agenda over the

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>next couple of months or next couple of weeks ahead

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of the midterm elections. Right, and we've already got a

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of discussion about UH, immigration and the and the margin.

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>What should we pay attention to him? Well, I think

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>if you looked at his uh, if you listen to

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>his rally speech last night, he sort of outlined what

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>his strategy is for the mid terms, it's you know

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that the economy is great, We're going for safe boarders.

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he used the slogan that the Democrats are

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>mobs and the Republicans are about jobs, and that's pretty

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>effective argument whether it and there are there is polling

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>that shows that, you know, there is a narrowing of

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>this race, that the blue tide is actually could be

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>questioned um, and that the poll numbers are moving in

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the GOP's direction. So that kind of messaging may quite

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 1>maybe quite effective. As we run down to the final

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>days of the Smith term campaign, just a little bit

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>more on Saudi Arabia, Marty is it uh? Is it

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a situation where business interests are colliding with strategic interests? Actually,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 1>I would say that they're similar their blind uh and

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we and others have written stories while the headline people

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like Jamie Diamond about out of the investor conference next week,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the underlings are going to be in

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the region and attending that conference because there are such

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>financial there is such financial importance to the Saudi Arabia

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>UM wealth that no one can afford to kind of ostracized.

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So there are deep historical financial connections that will underpin

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that relationship, just as there are deep political uh strategic

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>relationships on the government side that will continue that relationship.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for being with us, Always a pleasure

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Marty Schenker. He is our chief content officer here at

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg News. Much appreciated talking about Saudi Arabia and

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>US relations in light of the disappearance and alleged murder

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Jamal Kashogi, a contributing journalist to The Washington Post.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>It's time to talk about Brazil and Brazil's largest airline group.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Well in English, it's called Goal Intelligent Airlines. It carries

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>more than thirty three million passengers each year on more

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>than seven daily flights more than sixty destinations. The chief

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>financial officer is Richard Larkin. He joins us here in

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studios. Richard Lark, thank you very

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Thank you a good morning. Start

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>by just describing for people that may not be familiar

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with your airline how it came to be and how

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it has come to really be the premier airline in Brazil. Yeah,

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we started in two thousand one, which is about one

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>year after we had uh deregulation in Brazil UH. And

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we started with a traditional low cost carrier based on

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a single fleet type, which for US was the Boing

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>seven thirty seven high operating efficiency, high utilization, and we

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>started with four aircraft in two thousand one, and a

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>combination of the cost advantage of the company plus the

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>fair dynamic allowed us to over a ten year period,

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>UH become the largest airline in Brazil. That was also

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>helped by two acquisitions that we did. And over the

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years we've we've been investing heavily in

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>our product, UH technology and the onboard customer experience, which

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>has allowed us today to become the number one business

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>airline in Brazil. All right, so let's fast forward to now.

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We have a situation where the Brazilian economy has been

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>mired in a deep recession, the worse in its history. UH.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Things are starting to look up a little bit, at

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>least when you look at bond and stock markets, possibly

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>because of the candidate Bosonaro that looks like the front

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>runner who has a much more conservative view towards cutting

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the deficit and rearranging some of the pension the pensions.

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, from your perspective, how much will this

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>give a boost to your company should this go through

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and there is some measure of reform that gets enacted

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on the governmental level. Yeah, Obviously we can't predict the

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>outcome of the elections, but assuming UH we see that, UH,

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we see well adjust to the outcome. UH,

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we see UM. A lot of components in

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>bolson Oars platform are very clear in terms of the

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>impact that they're going to have on our sectors, such as,

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the reforms you mentioned, you know, pension

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>tax reform, we're also UH in his platform seeing some

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>things will be positive for the airline sectors, such as

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>increasing airport privalizations. We have a dire need for improvement

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and infrastructure and airports and airspace in Brazil, and a

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>general liberalization of a lot of the other regulations that

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>affect our sectors, such as bilateral agreements UH on international

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>travel for on capital rules UM and UH. We also

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>think that UM the policies are gonna have a positive

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>impact on demand, particularly in the corporate space and within

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 1>that particularly the agro UH, the agro sector in Brazil,

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a big portion of our air travel base. Also,

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>just to get specific on goal for a moment, ratings upgrade,

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to your credit tender offers, redemptions, improved

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>cash liquidity. This is all giving you greater financial flexibility,

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>any idea what you're gonna do with the money. Well,

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, we're continuing deleveraging over the next

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>two years. UH. We expected delever by another two billion eyes,

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>which is uh, you know, call it five six million dollars. UH,

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and that that's the main focus of this this additional

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>cash flower generating. In the short term is continued deleveraging. UH.

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>We were upgraded back to a single B, but our

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>our target is to get back to double B minus

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>entity within the next two years. I'm curious about the

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>mix of your travelers. How much is domestic versus international

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and how has that shifted. Yeah, today we're about eighty

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>five percent domestic international. We have been globalizing our business

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>constantly over the over the years, pretty much since our founding.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Today we have over ninety code shares and interlines. You know,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we sell tickets in over a hundred forty countries around

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the world. And in fact, one of the reasons that

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we're up in New York today is we're UH talking

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about our our direct service that we're adding to Miami

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and Orlando. In two weeks we launch uh service, and

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna allow us to expand our non Brazilian o

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in these non Brazilian revenues from the current fifteen to

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>around over the next three or five years. So how

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>does the backdrop of increased trade tensions and tariffs, etcetera

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>affect your business if at all, especially as you try

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to globalize. Well, we we have a platform that has

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>been developed over a period of time based on a

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of global partnerships. Uh. You know, Uh, we have

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a very strong relationship with Delta Airlines, with Air France KLM,

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and UH what really drives these flows is the demand. Uh.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>On the Brazilian side of the equation. For example, we

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>take our what we're adding service to to South Florida.

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is leisure, but there's a very large

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>uh small business uh component in South Florida. A lot

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of Brazilians have small businesses there, and we don't see

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that very much affected by anything on the trade side. Obviously,

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it is affected by on the currency side, which affects

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>purchasing power, which affects our business. Uh, but we're expecting

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>improvements on that. Well, that's where I was gonna go.

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Was the idea that if you have a devaluing currency,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that makes it just that much more challenging to buy

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the twenty Boeing seven three seven Max aircraft. Tell us

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about why you decided on the seven three seven Max

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and how that's going to change the operating efficiency of

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the company. Yeah, the main reason is the fuel economy.

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>The seven thirty seven Max eight, which is the model

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>war operating we are have already have three operating in

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the fleet. UH is already achieving for us a fifteen

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>percent fuel economy and about a third of our costs

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>are our jet fuel. That hasn't a significant impact on

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>our margins. So that's been the main driver UH to

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>have that absolute cost reduction. Secondarily, you know, Brazil is

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a very dynamic competitive market and our competitors are also

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>investing in in proved aircraft on the airbow side of

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the equation. We're the only Boeing operator in Brazil. But

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the second reason is the larger, slightly larger configuration of

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the Max. UH will be configured with a hundred and

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>eighties six seats as opposed to our current hundred seventy seven.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>That gives us a greater revenue productivity. But the final reason,

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>which is important, which is facilitating these flights that were

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>launching in two weeks to mamor Orlando. Is the additional

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>range of about uh kilometers on the max that allows

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>us to do direct flights to Miami Orlando. Richard Lark,

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Thank you,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Richard Larcas, chief financial officer of Goal Airlines based in

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>South Howlo, Brazil, but joining us here in our eleven

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>three oh studios. Among all stocks, Procter and Gamble really

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>stands out posting a game today that is the biggest

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>since October two thousand and eight, more than eight percent climb. Well,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they beat earnings, they posted great expectations. Joining us now

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this, Sarah how Zach Bloomberg Opinion, consumer calumnists, Sarah,

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>come on in here. Is this just that we like

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>to buy really expensive creams and we just keep on

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>buying them and Procter and Gamble cashed in on that.

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>So that's certainly a part of it. Beauty was a

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly strong division with seven percent organic sales growth in

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the quarter, and they definitely have been having success with

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>their premium lines within Beauty, so s K two, which

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>has very high price tags, has been leading the growth

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in that division for some time now. But that said,

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>that's not the whole picture. They really had strength in

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>their uh they grew sales and their grooming division, their

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 1>healthcare division, their fabric divisions. So um a broad based

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>series of categories fueling this gain this quarter. Sara, this

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>has to do also with organic sales growth, correct, it does.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So organic sales growth, what they mean with that number

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is sort of excluding M and A activity and currency fluctuations,

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and so that's a closely watched metric for the particular

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>company given its global reach. But if you're talking about organics, UM,

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that is definitely an area that they're focused on in

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>naturals um, understanding that the consumer is kind of moving

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>in this direction and considering that more of a priority. So,

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, in the diaper's division, they now have this

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Pampers natural lines that's supposed to be made in a

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>more sustainable way, and that helps drive growth in the quarter.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I love this sort of organic growth versus organics. And

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>then I have to wonder, what is organic face cream?

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how is that organic? I don't I just

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>boggles of mind. I do want to ask you, though, Sarah.

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>They also said that they were gaining market share at

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a number of different divisions. Who's the loser here? Who

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are they grabbing market share from? Yeah, it's it's not.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it varies widely across the globe. So for example,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think one interesting place to look is in their

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>loves diaper division. That's a place where they had been

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>getting smacked by the private label diapers makers because they

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>had so underpriced. So you can assume that's from the

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>likes of Walmart, from Target, from Amazon who have strong

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>private label offerings. There. They slash prices in the Love's

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>division this quarter to try to get some of that

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>market share back, and so presumably that's sort of where

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that push and pole is taking place. Have they been

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>able to raise prices or is that still a challenge.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good question. So they have announced they're

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be raising prices on some key brands like Bounty, Sharman,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and Pops because of commodity costs, right, pulp costs, paper

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>costs are increasing, and so they're going to be taking

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>those price increases starting October thirties one. We don't know

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>yet how consumers are going to respond to that, and

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really important thing when you look

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>at how sustainable as this growth that they deliver this quarter. Uh,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a real X factor. Executives were cautioning on the

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>conference call today that trying to take these price increases

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>could result in some volatility because they don't know how

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>much Kimberly Clark or Colgate pal Mama is going to

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>move in the same direction, and they could end up

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>losing shoppers when they take that that action. I am

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the strange person that actually pays attention to the price

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of my toilet paper or my paper towels. Do you

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>phim No to you, Sarah, I I pay attention to that.

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean the differential can be dollars, like entire dollars

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in one package. I don't. I'm definitely a person who's

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>just on autopilot. You know, I'm revealing too much about myself.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your sense on how much Procter

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and Gamble is just doing things right itself, and how

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>much it's indicative of the strong consumer the people have

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>really been rejecting so far this year. I mean, Procter

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Gamble shares are still down nearly two percent year to date,

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>so you know, is the consumer a lot stronger than

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>people think, and does this give wind to other consumer

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>product companies. I do think this is an indicator of

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the consumer environment is strong, and we

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>see this in so many different ways. We've got this

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in strong quarters from major retailers into two and I

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think this is an additional reflection of that. That said,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the consumer has been strong for

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.479
<v Speaker 1>a while now, right, so the fact that PNG is

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing this inflection point speak to some of the things

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>they're doing right. I think, particularly in the grooming category,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that is a business where they were just assaulted by

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>these newcomers like Dollar Shave Club and Harry's UM. They

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>were offering these sort of disruptive subscription models and they

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>finally returned to growth there this quarter, and so that

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>suggests that, you know, they on the one hand, did

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>some smart things in terms of adjusting their price structure

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to be more competitive with those guys UM, and also

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just got their mix of products in the right places

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in front of the right shoppers. I got to imagine though,

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that whatever happens in China is also important to Proctor

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>and Gamble. They cited double digit growth in some of

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>their skin care lines in China, yes, and and China

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't very so China is very important to their future.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now, it's actually only nine percent of their total

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>annual sales, but certainly that that will change over time

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>as the middle class grows there. But China is definitely

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:54.959
<v Speaker 1>a real success story for PNG. It was only two

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago that they were posting declining sales in that

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>market overall, and they've just been doing a lot of

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer product one oh one type work there. I think

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the l A brand is a great example of that.

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So in China, they really wanted to make that brand stronger,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>so they change the packaging of their ol A face product. Um.

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a place where in the Chinese market you might

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have an actual like over the counter service with a

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>customer representative there. So they sort of change the training

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and the approach to that kind of service. It's really worked,

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not as pim. She doesn't say change the cream, it's

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>changed the packaging. Change the way people talk about where

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>most of the marketing, it really is the one that

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>grabs most of the money. We're so gullible. It's true

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>when something is more expensive and packaged in a prettier

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>package can be as gross margins they could be over.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Sarah hall Zack, an expert in all

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>things retail our Bloomberg Opinion consumer columnist, telling us about

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Procter and Gamble. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that app, podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast,

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio