WEBVTT - Championship Nuggets, Dynasty Brewing? & This or That

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>The Apple Watch Series ten is here. It has the

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest display ever. It's also the thinnest Apple Watch ever,

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>making it even more comfortable on your wrist whether you're running, swimming,

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>or sleeping. And it's the fastest charging Apple Watch, getting

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>you eight hours of charge in just fifteen minutes. The

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch Series ten available for the first time in

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the glossy jet black aluminum compared to previous generations. iPhone

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Tennis are later required. Charge time and actual results will vary.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>by checking All State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 2>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.639
<v Speaker 2>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>You're in good hands with All States Savings. Very terms

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 2>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 3>Welcome. In episode one fifty nine, What's Right with Nick Wright?

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 3>We have a new NBA champion for the first time

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 3>in the history of their franchise. The Denver Nuggets are champions.

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Right as I say that, my monitor goes out. I

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 3>assume we're still on the air. You guys will tell me.

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 3>If not, maybe this is the basketball gods trying to

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 3>torture me. Also new to the show a new sponsor,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>our friends at Starbucks. Today's episode brought to you by Starbucks.

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Ready to drink coffee. Tune into moments that matter with

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the uplifting boots of Starbucks Mocha Frappuccino chilled coffee drink

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>available now online or wherever you buy your groceries. So

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 3>we have a ton to do today. As you may

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>or may not be able to say, hey, I can

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 3>see myself again. My daughter Diora, my co host for

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the last couple months, is not here today. She is

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 3>doing graduation rehearsal for her graduation from high school, which

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 3>is on Thursday. So it is just me. But you

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 3>know what, it's kind of perfect because we have a

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 3>lot to discuss from last night, from the Finals as

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 3>a whole, from my commentary on Niko lejokicch over the

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 3>last few years and where he and this Nuggets team

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 3>falls in NBA history, and of course, on the losing

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 3>side of the coin playoff, Jimmy and heat culture fell

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 3>just short. Once again. We will discuss all of that,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 3>But here's what missed the cup for today's show. DeAndre

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Jordan winning a ring before Chris Paul. You know, I

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>didn't even think about that, but that is true. Is

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 3>this the closest Russell Wilson gets to a title in Denver?

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine that is true. And Trey Young saying

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 3>he is next up? Well, I you know, maybe that's

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 3>a trade demand. If it's not a trade demand, it's

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>a laughably incorrect tweet. But let's get to the actual

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 3>game now. The producers wrote today's show out as if

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I were going to have a co host to poke

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 3>me and prod me and mock me, even though I

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know that I deserve much mocking. By the way,

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>congratulations to Daniel, producer, Daniel, his team won. More on

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>that in the moment. I'm begrudgingly happy for you, Daniel.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Well done. That is a nice sweatshirt. You guys want

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 3>a title, you know what? Good for you. Now let's

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 3>get to the show. So, as I mentioned, the Nuggets

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 3>are champs and this script says Jokich is undeniably the

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 3>best in the world. More on that in a moment.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Your Jokics take, My Jokic take is officially an l

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 3>They say, did you have the producer to raise all

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 3>your previous episodes. Yet here's the thing, guys, Niko Lejokic

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 3>right now this moment is, without a doubt, one of

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the twenty five greatest players ever. Yesterday he was not.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 3>That's simply how this stuff works. And we will discuss

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 3>what the top fifty would look like later in the show.

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>So in a weird way, because I am such a

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 3>nerd to NBA history, I like the fact I don't

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 3>like that I was wrong in picking Heat, but I

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 3>like the fact that Jokic has a ring and a

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 3>truly dominant start to finish, finish, playoff run because it

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 3>makes those two MVPs that he won makes sense in

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>a way that Steve Nashes never will, in a way

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>that Russell Westbrook's won. And I know some people still

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>defend that Ohie average a triple double. It didn't at

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 3>the time and it won't in history make sense. And

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 3>we got to a spot that I felt we don't

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 3>have to rehash it today that we were changing the

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 3>rules in a way that favored Nikola Jokic in a

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 3>way that I was uncomfortable with, but that knife cuts

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>in both. It is now incumbent upon us, most notably

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the most ardent or vocal critics or skeptics of Jokic,

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 3>to not then do the same thing to him, change

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 3>the rules in a way that go against him. He

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 3>gets the exact same treatment Yanis did. When Yannis was

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>a two time MVP with minimal deep playoff runs and

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 3>then broke through, he instantly became the not universally but

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 3>near universally accepted best player alive. And on top of that,

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 3>he instantly vaulted into the top twenty five all time.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 3>I had him in the top fifty of the last

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 3>fifty years. Now, Jo kicch is not the defender Yannis is,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and I don't have Yokich ahead of Yiannis on the

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 3>all time rankings, but he is now in that same neighborhood.

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 3>When your team goes sixteen and four in the postseason,

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>when you go eight to one in the conference finals

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and NBA Finals, and you do it by averaging a

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty thirteen to nine, he was eight total, no, ten

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 3>total assists, ten total away from averaging a triple double,

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>a thirty point triple double for the postseason, and you

0:07:55.800 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 3>do it on fifty five forty six split. It's you

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>get all the flowers. You have answered all the questions.

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not into step skipping, and I really wasn't into

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 3>giving a six seed an MVP, much less a second

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 3>straight MVP. But it all kind of evens out, I suppose,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 3>because while if my vote was the only vote that counted,

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Jokich would have one MVP right now. You can very

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 3>easily justify his first one to me far more than

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 3>his second one. And if he had only had one

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>and hadn't won last year or last year was his first,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>this year he would have won it, and he would

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 3>have two. So maybe in that way he has the

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 3>right number of MVP and now has had the right

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 3>amount of postseason success. There are no holes to poke,

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 3>And I understand that there is going to be a

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of smug media cohort that is going to today

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 3>if they have not already say yeah, some of us

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 3>didn't need to see him win a championship. Well some

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 3>of us did, and I don't think that is a

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 3>flawed way of looking at things. Playoff basketball is different

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 3>than regular season basketball. If it weren't, James Harden would

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 3>be one of the ten greatest players in the history

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>of the sport. And Harden, I think is a good

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>player to bring up because if you simply skipped the

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 3>steps with Harden and said, oh, you see what he

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 3>does in the regular season, you see him get to

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 3>a conference finals with an overmatch team. You see he

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 3>loses in the postseason. If we go years back, I'm

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 3>talking about those first few years in Houston, he loses

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 3>in the postseason to teams that are markedly better than him.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Why can't we call him the best player in the world.

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Why can't we call him one of the twenty greatest

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 3>players ever? The answer then would have been proven out correctly. Well,

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 3>because until you see a guy do it in the

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 3>playoffs on a not a two round run, but a

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 3>four round run, and you don't always have to win

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that fourth round. You don't always have to win the

0:10:54.120 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 3>finals to prove it to us. Durant didn't win his

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 3>first finals, but he proved it to us. Lebron didn't

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 3>win his first two finals, but Lebron had proven it

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 3>to us. Once you see it, you know, we've now

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 3>seen it undeniably with Jokic, and I feel like even

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 3>if the Heat had won this series now would he

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 3>be one of the twenty five greatest ever? No, but

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 3>he would have answered all the questions. His biggest liability

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>is his defense, and defensively, I thought he was pretty

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 3>damn good these last couple rounds. He did not wear down.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 3>He averaged forty minutes a game this postseason. He went

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 3>through Durant, He went through Durant and Booker, Lebron and

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 3>AD and then a Heat team that folks are now

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 3>going to try to once again confirm their preconceived notions

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 3>of disregarding the fact that this Heat team dispatched of

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Milwaukee in five and was up three to zero on Boston.

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 3>This is a great championship, Nikola Jokicz just won, and

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 3>I understand folks would be like, I'd be an eight seed,

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 3>a four seed to seventh seed, and an eight seed

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 3>that's bull. He beat Katie and Booker, Lebron and AD

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>and then the team that leads the NBA in playoff

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 3>victories over the last four years, a team that was

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>in the finals three years prior and in the Game

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 3>seven of the Conference finals. Last year, they beat worthy

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 3>opponents and they didn't just beat them, they dominated him.

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 3>The Nuggets, it's a weird spot because they didn't really

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 3>have all that many close games this postseason. In the

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 3>first round they won by twenty nine nine nine, lost

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 3>in overtime, closed them out by three. They beat the

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Suns by eighteen and ten, then lost two, then won

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>by sixteen and twenty five. The Laker games, all four

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 3>of them were That was their one series where they

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 3>were all close games, but they won them all. All

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>those games were in the balance at the end, and

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the Nuggets, most notably Jokic and Jamal Murray, made the

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 3>plays they had to make, and they beat Miami in

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 3>their four wins by nine, fifteen, thirteen, And then last

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>night was a hell of a game and it did

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>feel like Miami was gonna steal it at the end.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 3>They won last night by five, and it was actually

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 3>closer than that. This is a great championship. It's a

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 3>great championship. And this is where if I may be

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 3>self focused for a moment, folks ask me and have

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 3>asked me during this playoff run. Oh, Nick, it is

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 3>brutal for you see what people are saying about you

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter, the old clips that are going around. Does

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 3>it bother you? And it The only thing that bothers

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 3>me is if an old clip from eighteen months ago

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 3>is being positioned as if it was said eighteen days ago,

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 3>that I think is a little unfair, like the you

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 3>have clips of what I was saying about Jokic when

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>we were back doing this from my house and it's

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 3>being positioned like I was saying it during this playoff run.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a little fake Newsy. But other than that, none

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 3>of it bothers me. And it's because I know the

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 3>standard that I hold all great NBA or potentially great

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 3>NBA players too. And one of two things is going

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 3>to happen with the guys i'm skeptical of. Either I

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 3>am going to be proven right or they are going

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 3>to clear those hurdles, and I will, without any hesitation,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 3>give them all the credit that they have earned. I'm

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>just not into microwaving it. With the exception, of course,

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 3>of Luca. Dontitude is as you guys, my large adult

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Slovenian son. Sorry, blood's thicker than water. I'm gonna always

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 3>have a special place in my heart for him. Now.

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 3>The one thing I said more on in a moment

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 3>that we didn't get to yet was Jokich undeniably the

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 3>best player in the world. He gets to hold the

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 3>crown and the belt, he gets to fairly be called that.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 3>But much like and I disagreed with these people when

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Yannis won his title and I said he's clearly the

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 3>best player in the world, some people were like, yeah,

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 3>I I still think Durance better. If I were hooked

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 3>up to a polygraph and I were asked if I

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 3>had the number one pick of the draft, every player

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>is a free agent. Who am I taking me? Personally,

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably not. Probably I'm still taking Yanni's first. I

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 3>am jo Kich would be second. But that's just my

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>own personal It's close enough that I totally understand the

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 3>alternative argument. Totally understand it. And if people call them

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the best player in the world, as I think they will,

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 3>they have a lot of evidence on their side, a

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of evidence, and that's what they've earned. And it

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 3>is a great championship. Man. And well, we'll talk Jamal

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Murray when we get into the dynasty stuff. Some of

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the other questions on this the producer has written, where

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 3>is this rank in terms of all time championship runs?

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I I don't have that. I've never made that list

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 3>the like you know, there are some that certainly stick

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>out to me. Dirk's in twenty eleven, it's pretty damn great. Uh.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:26.959
<v Speaker 3>I think Lebron's in twenty twelve, the last two rounds

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 3>of it, beating the Big Three in Boston, then beating Katie,

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Russ and Harden's pretty great. I was just doing contemporary ones,

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the Warriors in eighteen beating the sixty five win Rockets

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 3>and then but the No in eighteen that cavsine was

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 3>terrible except for Lebron, So in contemporary NBA history it's

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty damn good man, and going through who they went through.

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 3>A sneaky good one is is and it looks better now,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe now than ever. A sneaky good one was the

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Lakers in the Bubble. Round one against Dame, Round two

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 3>against Russ and Harden, Round three against Joker and Murray,

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Round four against the Heat. That's like a sneaky, really

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 3>good one. But a lot of how we view how

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 3>heavy of a load Jokic carried in this is going

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to be how we end up viewing Jamal Murray and

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk about that when we get to the Dynasty stuff.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Now to the other side of it, the producers, right,

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 3>for all the talk about playoff Jimmy disappeared when the

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 3>heat needed him most. Was all the Jimmy bucket type unjustified.

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 3>That's the that's so dumb, Sorry producers, guys. Did Jimmy

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Butler have a disappointing finals? He did? To Jimmy Butler,

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 3>did this Jimmy Butler finals remind you of anyone's finals

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 3>an undeniably great player. And if you're like, yeah, Lebron

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 3>and eleven, no, no, no, no, no, that Lebron and eleven had

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 3>an objectively bad series, Jimmy, these finals averaged twenty two

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 3>five and six on forty one from the field thirty

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 3>seven from three. Twenty two five six, forty one thirty seven.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 3>In twenty sixteen, Stephen Curry in those finals averaged twenty

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 3>three five four on forty percent from the field forty

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 3>percent from three, so one more point, the same rebounds too,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 3>fewer assists, field goal percentage one point less, three point

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 3>percentage three points more. It was not a great finals.

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 3>It was not a disastrous debacle of a finals and

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 3>the idea that we are going to This is one

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of the things that I hate. I hated when it

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 3>happened to Lebron, I hate when it happened to I'll

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 3>pick out some of my favorite guys Mahomes in twenty twenty.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I hate when it happens really to anybody who gets

0:21:50.359 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 3>penalized or more criticized for coming up a little short

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 3>in the final round. Then someone gets criticized that was

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 3>beaten along the way to the final round. The people

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 3>today on the pre show call for First Things First,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 3>they were like, do is Jimmy still deserved to be

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 3>in Club Superstar? And I almost ended the zoom call,

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 3>like what are we talking about? So you're not kicking

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Jason Tatum out of Club Superstar who had his lunch

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 3>eaten by Jimmy in the previous round and that's why

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 3>he didn't get to play in the finals. But now

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna kill Jimmy because in the finals he wasn't great,

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 3>And don't get me wrong, he wasn't great. Now last

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 3>night he was really bad until the end when it

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 3>looked like he was going to have a vintage playoff

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy moment with the threes and the free throws and

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 3>getting them back, and then he had two really rough

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 3>plays down the stretch. But this is where I think

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 3>an interesting thing sports media does, and I gotta say

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I actually kind of agree with it, is we criticize

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 3>more harshly. Two guys can have the same level of

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 3>performance and receive very disparate amounts of criticism based on

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 3>how close that performance was to what we think their

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 3>peak performance is. Meaning a player with slightly less talent

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 3>or natural ability gets more of a pass than a

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 3>player with immense amounts of natural ability that can't seem

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 3>to rise in the biggest moments. And so there will

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>be guys like Tracy McGrady who probably get a little

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 3>unfairly maligned by history because those of us that watched

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 3>him new at his best he had an argument wasn't

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.959
<v Speaker 3>a strong argument, but an argument that he was the

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 3>best player in the entire sport. Conversely, a guy I'm

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to think of an example that's not Jimmy Butler,

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 3>but a guy whose overall talent level is not nearly

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>that player's level, who seems to consistently be getting the

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 3>most out of it. We have massive admiration for those guys.

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 3>And Bruce said this on TV yesterday and I'd never

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 3>heard it put like this, and I think he's right

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 3>that Jimmy's single best trait is his competitiveness. That that's

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 3>what he is top three in the world at just

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 3>raw competitiveness. And it did seem like he ran out

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of gas a bit. He didn't seem anywhere close to

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Joker when it came to best player on the court.

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 3>And honestly, that's probably okay. And this is where even

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 3>though I again I picked the heat, so I probably

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 3>should have seen this part coming, but this is where

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 3>it is worthwhile reminding people that if you don't have

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 3>one of the twenty five greatest players in the history

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 3>of the sport, or just let's just go the last

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 3>fifty years, if you don't have one of the twenty

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 3>best of the last fifty years, you're not winning a

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 3>title unless you were on the four Pistons. If we

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 3>can go from nineteen eighty to now, and it's like,

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>who did the champions have, well, the entirety of the eighties,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 3>the champions were Kareem slash Magic Bird, Moses slash Doctor Jay, Isaiah.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Those are all top twenty of the last fifty years,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 3>the nineties, Michael Jordan, Akeem Tim Duncan, check check check

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 3>the two thousands, Shack slash Kobe, the four Pistons, d

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Wade slash Shack. I'm not gonna do this in exact order,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 3>but you guys are gonna follow me, of course. Duncan

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of times, Dirk Novitzky, Kevin Garnett, who is

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 3>right there along with Paul Pierce and Ray Allen who

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 3>are not but Kevin Garnett, Lebron, James, Steph Curry, Duncan,

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Somemore or Duncan again. Kawhi Leonard would be the other. Yeah,

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 3>but he's not top twenty of the last fifty years.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 3>But he's a unique case because he was certainly trending

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 3>towards that and his body betrayed him. And Giannis and

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Lebron again, and Steph again, and Durant with Steph and

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 3>now Jokic, who's in there. Jimmy Butler's are not the

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 3>best player on Champions typically, and they should not be

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 3>crushed for that. It is a very unique thing that

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 3>in the NBA post the seventies, essentially since the NBA

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 3>ABA merger from nineteen eighty to now. The worst player

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 3>who was the best player on a champion it is

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And again this is not an insult, but it is

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Chauncey and then Kawhi and then KG and Dirk. Those

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 3>are the worst guys who were the best guys on

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 3>a champion. Think about that, honestly. And so I don't

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 3>think we should be in the business today of crushing

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Butler. I think that'd be ridiculous, all right. Next,

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Jamal Murray said that this title would be the first

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 3>of many. Are we witnessing the beginning of the next

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 3>NBA dynasty? And if not, who's standing in their way?

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>So I want to pump the brakes on dynasty talk

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 3>for now because there are a few things standing in

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 3>their way. But before I get to that, where I

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 3>do want to give the Nuggets credit and their front

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 3>office credit, is they made a let's try to get

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 3>a final piece of the puzzle trade in Michael I'm

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 3>sorry and Aaron Gordon, and they got it. He was

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>great for them. They made some very savvy pickups in

0:29:52.200 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 3>KCP and Bruce Brown, and they built a champion. There

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 3>are two things and they just made a trade recently,

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 3>understanding that due to the new CBA they're not going

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 3>to be able to be big free agent spenders. They

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 3>grabbed another first round pick because they want cost certainty,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 3>they want young, cheap players. That's very smart. There are

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 3>two things that would concern me if I were a

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Nuggets fan about could this be a dynasty? The first

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 3>one is obvious, what do you have in Michael Porter Junior?

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Because I know what you have in his contract? Well,

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 3>you have in his contract is four more years? Sorry,

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 3>let me take a sip of this delicious Starbucks new

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 3>sponsor of the show. What you have is another four years?

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 3>And how much is it? Another one hundred and fifty million? Right?

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>So four years one fifty left for Michael Porter Junie.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 3>That's a swallow, hardened hope situation. But the other question,

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 3>and the biggest question too, can this team be a dynasty?

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Is not about Nikola Jokic. It is about Jamal Murray.

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 3>How good is your second guy? Because if we are

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 3>being honest, Klay Thompson, as great as he was pre injuries,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 3>was not good enough to be the second best guy

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 3>on a dynasty. Was the second best guy own a champion,

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 3>and it looked like he could be the second best

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 3>guy on a dynasty, and you had Draymond Green there

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 3>and they needed to go get Kevin Durant. Now, is

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Jamal Murray good enough to be the second best guy

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 3>on a team that wins another title? I think on equivocally,

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Joe Dumars was there's a lot, you know, we can

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 3>find that a team didn't really have a second best

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>guy on the first team, on the second team at Clyde,

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 3>but a dynasty you need Jamal to take a significant leap.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 3>And everybody, we do this weird thing where certain guys

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 3>go from wildly underrated to a touch overrated without ever

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:59.479
<v Speaker 3>being properly rated. And I do fear that that is

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 3>about to happen with Jamal Murray, because folks are gonna

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 3>be throwing around the term superstar pretty liberally, and I

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 3>just I think we are a couple leaps away from

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 3>that for Jamal, unless you think this league's got twenty superstars.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 3>But unquestionably, I'm just looking at my club superstar right now.

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Guys who are currently better than Jamal. Yeah, I just

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 3>this is not in order, but it's just guys. Ad

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Jannis bron Dame Luca, Jimmy Tatum, Booker Durant, Steph Embiid Jokic,

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 3>assuming he gets back on the court. Jah I think

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Donovan's better than him. I think Sga is better than him.

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Dearon Fox, it's at least a discussion Anthony Edwards. Certainly

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 3>next year it's a discussion. I didn't mention Kawhi because

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 3>we don't know how much he's gonna play. So now

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 3>we're at seventeen eighteen guys. Jamal has turned himself into

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 3>a star and a fringe top twenty player. I think

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 3>he's a better player than Trey Young. I think he

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 3>is a better player than Karl Anthony Towns. I think

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 3>he's a better player at this point of his career

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 3>after all the injuries to than Paul George. Certainly better

0:34:52.880 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 3>than Bradley Beal. But if we're you're talking dynasty, he

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 3>needs to take one more leap. I'm not saying he can't,

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 3>but dynasty is a very And again I went over

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the the list of champions over the last forty years.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 3>If we do all the dynasties or semi dynasties in history,

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 3>you have Russell Celtics you had Bill Russell, one of

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the five greatest players of all time, along with you know,

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 3>a different collection of four or five other Hall of famers.

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 3>You had the Lakers in the eighties that had the

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 3>second and the fourth greatest players ever in Kareem and Magic,

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and even though Kareem near the end of that was

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 3>on the downslope. And then you also had another Hall

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 3>of Famer in James Worthy. Bird Celtics were not a dynasty.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 3>They won three total titles and never won back to back.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 3>Isaiah's Pistons were not a dynasty. Jordan's Bulls obviously were.

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 3>You have the third greatest player ever, plus another no

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 3>doubt Hall of famer could be the best player on

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 3>a really good team, as he proved not a champion,

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 3>but a really good team the very next year in

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 3>Scottie Pippen. And then for the last three championships you

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 3>added another no doubt Hall of famer and Dennis Robmin,

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 3>who for the first two of those three championship was

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 3>a great player and maybe the greatest coach ever. Shaq

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 3>and Kobe's dynasty. You had Shaq and Kobe. Duncan's a

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 3>weird one because it was it was a great run,

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 3>but not necessarily a specific dynasty. With the first championship

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 3>you had David Robinson that was still really good. Second

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 3>championship kind of Duncan on his own, and then the

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 3>next two you have Man who and Tony who are

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 3>great players. Is your second best guy not really good

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 3>enough to be the second best guy on most champions

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 3>but your third best guy way better than most other teams.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 3>Third best guy plus the coach. And then the last one.

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 3>Seven years after the fourth you add Kawhi Leonard to

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 3>that young Kawhi Leonard, but still Kawhi Leonard. The Heat

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't really have a dynasty. They went to four championship.

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 3>Do you have lebron and wait, and of course Chris

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Bosh is your third guy. Dynasty can't be throwing around

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 3>dynasty that easily, guys. So I'd pump the brakes on that,

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 3>but I would set if you set the over under

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 3>on Joker career titles at one and a half, at

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 3>this point, I would take the over. I think he

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 3>gets one more. The other thing that hurts him in

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that regard is the late blooming, which was similar to

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Yannis like not amazing players right when they came in

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the league. They had to grow. But that right there

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 3>is the most interesting and exciting to me NBA story

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 3>of the next half decade. Joker and Yannis, a fight

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 3>to be the apex predator of the league. Joker and Yannis.

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 3>They both have two MVPs, they both have one title,

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.959
<v Speaker 3>they both have one all time playoff run. They both

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 3>have one finals MVP. Jokers twenty eight, Yannis is twenty eight.

0:38:54.960 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Two twenty eight year olds in their prime. Go get it.

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 3>That should be the rivalry of the next half decade.

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 3>And then we see, you know, can Booker and Durant

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 3>put a run together over the next couple of years?

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Can Luca get the right people around him? Does lebron

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 3>an ad have one more run in them? That's out

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 3>west and out east? Will Embiede ever have a run

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 3>like this? So not looking like it. Can't close the

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 3>door on it, though Tatum and Brown did. They kind

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:43.359
<v Speaker 3>of reach their ceiling. So and then there is the

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 3>looming cloud of what will Victor Windbinyama actually be. So

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll fade the dynasty, but I'll buy another championship, all right,

0:39:56.120 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 3>last one before we take a break, Nick, you left, yo,

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 3>get you off your top fifty all time. That didn't

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 3>age well. Where does he rank now? All right? When

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I did the fifty best of the last fifty years,

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Joker had won one league MVP ever, Okay had one

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 3>playoff run to the conference finals. That was it. It

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 3>was totally legitimate at the time to not have him

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 3>in the top fifty. Now where would he slot in?

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 3>So let's look at my top twenty five? I mean,

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 3>so number twenty eight. I know I said twenty five,

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 3>number twenty eight to Centa, though Patrick Ewing Joker obviously

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 3>is ahead of him. I just want to check Jokers.

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 3>So Joker's got three first team All NBAS, two second

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 3>team All NBAS, obviously a two time MVP. I'm gonna

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 3>have to try to keep this in my head. He's

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 3>a two time MVP and how many I'm just trying

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 3>to look up the things that I wait a lot.

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 3>And he's got two other top five MVP finishes. He

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 3>has a fourth and twenty nineteen and obviously a second

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 3>this year. All right, So three first teams, two second teams,

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 3>two MVPs, a finals MVP, and two other MVP top fives. Okay,

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 3>so number twenty five in the last fifty years I

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 3>had Harden. He's obviously ahead of Harden. Number twenty four

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 3>I had stocked in Stockton, had's two first teams, six

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 3>second teams, zero top five MVP finishes, but his all

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 3>time counting stats are bananas. He's obviously had a Stockton.

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Number twenty three of the last fifty years I had

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 3>David Robinson. He has four first teams, two second teams,

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 3>one League MVP, two seconds and two thirds, and a

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Defensive Player of the Year. He obviously also has two titles,

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:21.879
<v Speaker 3>one of which he was really good on. I think

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 3>he's better than David Robinson. Number twenty two is Kevin Garnett.

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Four first teams, three second teams, one MVP, two seconds,

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 3>five top five finishes. I think he's better than Kevin Garnett.

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 3>Garnett we don't talk about it much, but Garnett had

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 3>some real playoff struggles, and it wasn't justin Minnesota. He

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 3>was not a guy you could give the ball to

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 3>and just you knew he was gonna come. Three great

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 3>defensive player all time defensive player Number twenty one's Chris Paul.

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:12.359
<v Speaker 3>He's now better than Chris Paul. It just is. That's

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 3>what a championship does for you. Number twenty was a projection.

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 3>If you remember I had Luca, you got to obviously

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 3>have him ahead of Luca. Number nineteen I had was

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 3>d w eight. I do not think he's better than

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 3>d Waight yet, So right now, he would be for

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 3>me the twentieth best of the last fifty years. And

0:43:48.239 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 3>how many guys in all of NBA history would that leave? Obviously, Will,

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Russell and West would be the three super old timers

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I'd have ahead of him. I'd have him ahead of

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 3>Oscar an Elgin and Mike and Impetitor. Just too hard.

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 3>It's just too hard. You got to give credit for

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 3>what they did, but come on. So that's where it

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 3>would be for me. He would be the twentieth best

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 3>of the last fifty years. The guys still to catch

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 3>would be d Wade, Berkley, Karl Malone, and Karl Malone's

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 3>a very unique one because his regular season resume is

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 3>that of a top four player of all time and

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 3>his postseason resume is not great. Two finals appearances. Is

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 3>the best player but didn't really come through huge. But

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 3>he also was a two time MVP, nine Top fives,

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 3>eleven time first team all NBA third most points of

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 3>all time. I have Dirk still out of him. Dirk,

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:16.720
<v Speaker 3>oddly is very underrated by some people. I don't quite

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 3>get it Isaiah Thomas, who is wildly underrated by people,

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:26.359
<v Speaker 3>but they're just wrong. I just won't even engage them

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 3>on it. And then Giannis, Durant, Moses, Doctor j Steph Shack,

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 3>dream Bird, and we're getting a really hollowed ground. So

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 3>my guess is Joker ends up somewhere in that top

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 3>five fifteen of the last fifty and with a chance

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 3>to crack the top twelve. The problem there is for

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 3>any of these guys is Durant is still playing. He

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 3>could climb, even though it's not likely. And Giannis is

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 3>still playing, and I think he will climb. It's gonna

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 3>be very interesting to see who climbs higher, Joker or Yannis.

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 3>But that's where we are, and that's what a championship

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 3>does for you. So here's what we're gonna do. We're

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 3>gonna take a very quick break, We're gonna come back.

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 3>We're going to do a lightening round B block, and

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 3>then I will try to spend some real time on

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 3>your guys questions before I go to TV Today. But

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 3>that was a forty minute, forty five minute opening segment

0:46:56.000 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 3>paying tribute because we now have It's always exciting when

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:06.479
<v Speaker 3>the All Time Greats Club. Oh you know what, let's

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 3>just stay here for a second. That's a fun exercise,

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 3>the All Time Greats Club, when guys got admitted. Maybe

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 3>I should do this on TV Today, Dusty, if you're

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 3>watching from the first thing's first studio, text the show,

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 3>but also like jot this down like all Time Greats

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 3>date of admittance. I that's not Dusty texting me. I

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:48.680
<v Speaker 3>wish it were, though hopefully he's watching. So Nikola Jokic

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 3>guy in the club in twenty twenty three. He is

0:47:56.000 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the latest guy in there, the most recent guy. I

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 3>should say. No one was admitted last year. Jannis got in.

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 3>In twenty twenty one, no one was admitted. Kawhi looked

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 3>like he was getting in, but no one got in

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 3>in twenty nineteen. In twenty seventeen, Kevin Durant got in.

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 3>In twenty fifteen, Steph Curry got in and twenty twelve,

0:48:49.840 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Lebron James got in. In twenty eleven, Dirk got in.

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 3>In two thousand and three, Duncan got in. In two

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 3>thousand and one, Shaq and Kobe both got in, and

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 3>that's it. Those are the only guys all time. Oh

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 3>you know what I in twenty eleven, their twenty twelve

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 3>pardon me, it was Lebron and d Wade who got in.

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:47.759
<v Speaker 3>D Wade already had a ring, but he wasn't to

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 3>that level yet. They both got in there, and that's it.

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, of the last twenty years, those are the

0:49:56.080 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 3>all time greats. And when they got in, Joker welcome

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 3>to the club man. Pretty special stuff and he's in there. Congrats,

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Congrats to everyone, even Daniel quick break right back. What's right?

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Hey there, Ryan Reynolds here, it's a new year, and

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:26.720
<v Speaker 4>you know what that means. No, not the diet resolutions,

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 4>a way for us all to try and do a

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 4>little bit better than we did last year. And my resolution,

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 4>unlike big wireless, is to not be a raging and

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 4>raise the price of wireless on you every chance I get.

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 4>Give it a try at midmobile dot com slash Switch.

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 5>Forty five dollars up front payment required equivalent to fifteen

0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 5>dollars per month new customers on first three month plan only.

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Taxes and fees extra speeds lower above forty gigabytes on

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 5>unlimited cementtmobile dot com for details.

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back in What's Right with Nick Right, and guys, listen.

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 3>My life moves fast between this show, the TV show

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 3>my daughter are getting ready to graduate high school. Sometimes

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I could just use a pick me up, and Starbucks

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Ready to Drink Coffee delivers an uplifting boost that helps

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 3>you tune into the moments that matter wherever you are.

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Bottled Frappuccino Chilled coffee drink is inspired by Starbucks cafe

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:21.360
<v Speaker 3>favorites and comes in four delicious flavors, Mocha, Vanilla, caramel,

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 3>which this one is, and regular coffee. I like to

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 3>start my day with coffee, especially when I'm recording a

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 3>new episode of What's Right. My go to is Starbucks

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Ready to Drink Coffee for that uplifting boost I need

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 3>to conquer the day. I love the range of Starbucks

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Ready to Drink coffee, whether I want to grab a

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 3>Starbucks Frappuccino chilled Coffee drink or a Nitro cold brew.

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:44.280
<v Speaker 3>So many good choices for whatever mood I'm in. Starbucks

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Coffee Ready for right now. Shop the full lineup online

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 3>or in store, wherever you buy your groceries. It is

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 3>really good, guys. It's very convenient. And for some reason,

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't spill this on myself as much as I

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 3>do go coffee cups that I've stained these. You know this.

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you guys have noticed, but I

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 3>only break out the full NBA sweatsuit outfit on special days.

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 3>And you know, we've crowned a new champion. We I

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:16.919
<v Speaker 3>just came up with the gimmick of you know, when

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 3>someone got into All Time the All Time Great Club,

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 3>and Joker's the newest guy in. It's like the Heisman House,

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 3>except there's not a car dealership sponsoring it all right.

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 3>By the way, speaking of sponsorships, I'm not gonna you know,

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 3>I didn't say on the air what type of car

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:37.319
<v Speaker 3>I was buying. I didn't end up buying it. I

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:40.359
<v Speaker 3>texted it privately to Matt. But what I will say

0:52:40.480 --> 0:52:44.359
<v Speaker 3>is to well, you know what I shouldn't name car.

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm I don't know what I should do. We should

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:50.879
<v Speaker 3>have a car dealership sponsor, Matt, you know the car

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 3>that I bought. See if that helps us get a

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 3>car dealership sponsor. Okay, before we get to your questions

0:52:57.600 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 3>rapid fire b block because I also have to do

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Colin Coward Show today, not not hosting, but go on

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 3>with him. Sakuon Barkley not happy with a franchise tag. Uh,

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 3>you even seemed to entertain the idea, at least temporarily,

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 3>of holding out for the season. It's not really holding out,

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 3>just refusing to sign the tag. Here's my advice for

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the Giants right now, he's tagged one year, just under

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 3>eleven million bucks. He doesn't want to play on that.

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 3>The Giants don't want to commit big money to a

0:53:28.280 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 3>running back. I get it. He has said he doesn't

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 3>need to reset the marketplace. What if you go to

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:37.919
<v Speaker 3>him with a contract offer of three years forty five

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 3>million dollars. I sat on TV yesterday twenty million guaranteed.

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's up that to twenty two and a half million.

0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Pardon me, twenty two and a half million guaranteed. So

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 3>you tell Saquon listen, here's the deal. You will be

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:55.399
<v Speaker 3>paid like a top three running back. We will more

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 3>than double the guaranteed money that you had on the

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:02.480
<v Speaker 3>franchise tag. It's fifteen million a year each to the

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 3>next three and if something terrible happens this year, you

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:09.719
<v Speaker 3>still get all of this year's money and half of

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:13.879
<v Speaker 3>next year's money. If you're awesome this year, then you're

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:16.239
<v Speaker 3>gonna get all of this year's money and all of

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 3>next year's money, and if you're awesome the next two years,

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:24.479
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna get the full forty five million. If you're

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the Giants in a Vacuum or on Madden. I understand

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:33.319
<v Speaker 3>why committing even that type of money to a running back,

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 3>especially you're a running back who's had some injury concerns,

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:40.320
<v Speaker 3>does not typically make sense. But this is where the

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 3>human being component has to matter. You are trying to

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:47.840
<v Speaker 3>build on the momentum of last season and build a

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 3>new culture in that organization. Saquan is the most popular

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:56.759
<v Speaker 3>and the most talented player in that locker room. It

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 3>has massive negative downstream effects if you alienate him. So,

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 3>just like guys end up having to take a haircut

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 3>because teams don't want to deal with them in the

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 3>locker room. Great guys and great leaders, you gotta pay

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:20.960
<v Speaker 3>a premium for Saquan. Is that that's what I would do? Uh?

0:55:21.440 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Time? For a game this or that Aaron Gordon was

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:27.760
<v Speaker 3>kicked in the groin, but got called for a shooting

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 3>fellow Jimmy Butler. The NBA is rigged or fair? All right?

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:34.359
<v Speaker 3>With the NBA is obviously not rigged. I don't know

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 3>what's fair or what's not. But here's what I do know.

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely thought that call was going to stand. I

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:51.759
<v Speaker 3>like Van Gundy and Jackson. I know Demons disagreed with

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 3>me on it, and we can show his tweet if

0:55:54.600 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 3>we want, uh. The Daniel tweeted Demonse waiting for Demonze

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 3>to tweet where he says the reps are making about themselves,

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:06.880
<v Speaker 3>and Demonte said that would be giving them the attention

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 3>they are seeking. I won't do it. Well done, Son.

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing Jimmy did not do on that play

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 3>a wild kicking motion. His leg did extend, but it

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 3>was at least semi reasonable, and Gordon ran through him.

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:33.799
<v Speaker 3>Now do I think that's a foul? No? Do I

0:56:33.920 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 3>think it is close enough to being a foul that

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:40.319
<v Speaker 3>once they call it a foul on the floor, they're

0:56:40.440 --> 0:56:45.280
<v Speaker 3>not going to overturn it exactly. So I wasn't shocked

0:56:45.280 --> 0:56:47.920
<v Speaker 3>by that. I also don't think it was a bad challenge.

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:49.760
<v Speaker 3>It was late enough in the game and a critical

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:53.360
<v Speaker 3>enough moment it's worth the risk. But I did not

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:57.279
<v Speaker 3>think it was a clear cut, obvious this is getting overturned.

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I just didn't Next the rumors are swirling that if

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Houston misses out on hard and they could be interested

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:05.880
<v Speaker 3>in Kyrie, this would be a bad idea or the

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:10.359
<v Speaker 3>worst idea. It makes no sense. Kyrie to Houston. I

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:13.200
<v Speaker 3>have talked about, and I think other people have as well,

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 3>that an interesting possible free agent destination for Chris Paul

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:22.240
<v Speaker 3>if he is released is san Antonio. Like, try to

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:28.760
<v Speaker 3>build a winning culture instantly for Wimbin Yama and get him,

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, a player who's gonna set him up and

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff. That's just like Kyrie to Houston, except

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the exact opposite. You have all these young, impressionable players.

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't if I were the Rockets. I honestly, I

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:47.280
<v Speaker 3>don't know if there's a player in the league that

0:57:47.320 --> 0:57:50.200
<v Speaker 3>I'd be less interested in than Kyrie. And they can't

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 3>win with or without him next year. Aaron Rodgers got

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:54.680
<v Speaker 3>the last six weeks and most fun he's had in

0:57:54.720 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 3>a while. He's been on good behavior for speciously long time.

0:57:58.040 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Rogers will get through the offseason without an incident or

0:58:00.560 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 3>with an incident. I think without an incident. Not only

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Rogers has a lot of major incidents. I just think

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 3>he's a pain in the ass, but I think you'll

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:11.520
<v Speaker 3>get through it without an incident. Novak Djokovic when I

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:13.880
<v Speaker 3>was twenty third Grand Slam with the friend Joping this weekend,

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 3>the best Serbian athlete right now is Djokovic or Joker.

0:58:20.360 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 3>The best right now is Jovich. The best of all

0:58:23.040 --> 0:58:26.280
<v Speaker 3>time is Djokovic, as he now is the most Grand

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:27.960
<v Speaker 3>slams ever, and some people would argue he is the

0:58:28.000 --> 0:58:31.720
<v Speaker 3>greatest tennis player of all time. I probably unfairly have

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 3>him as the third best. I know that's not fair.

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 3>I know I can't really fully justify it. I just

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:39.720
<v Speaker 3>like nadolmore and I still think Federer is the best

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I've ever seen. Uh. Also, I was on all cores

0:58:44.440 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 3>and I was very upset after his visit to Tennessee

0:58:47.000 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 3>when great DeAndre Hopkins is gonna be heading to the

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Patriots better fit Titans are Patriots neither, But if you

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:54.600
<v Speaker 3>got to pick one, go with the Titans. But the

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:58.720
<v Speaker 3>answer is neither. And lastly, I was Nick, you were

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 3>so close to winning the Belmont Stakes along with your

0:59:01.680 --> 0:59:05.040
<v Speaker 3>daughter Diana and her best friend Carras. Forte screwed me,

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 3>though I basically made a bet that I would have

0:59:10.040 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 3>won the Exacta, the Trifecta, and the Superfecta. All I needed.

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:25.600
<v Speaker 3>What I here was I will admit it was not

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 3>the soundest gambling strategy ever, but here's what I did.

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 3>There were nine horses in the race. There were three

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 3>fifteen to one or longer shots. I eliminated those three,

0:59:39.560 --> 0:59:45.920
<v Speaker 3>and then there was the favorite, Forte. I eliminated him too,

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:51.320
<v Speaker 3>And then I took horses two through six and put

0:59:51.360 --> 0:59:55.480
<v Speaker 3>them in everything and boxed them in everything. And so

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:59.200
<v Speaker 3>what I needed was none of the long shots nor

0:59:59.320 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Forte to finish in the top two, and I would

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 3>have won a little. If none of the long shots

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 3>nor Forte finished in the top three, I would have

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:11.960
<v Speaker 3>won a lot. If none of the long shots nor

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Forte finished in the top four, it would now be

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:18.200
<v Speaker 3>called the What's Right Stakes. I think I would have

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 3>owned the track, and it was all looking good until

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the stretch run when Forte came from fifth. Then he

1:00:28.120 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 3>got to fourth, and I'm like, okay. The Superfecta was

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>because my other horses were all there. My other horse

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>is finished first, third, fourth, fifth, sixth I think, or first, third,

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>fourth and fifth. But then Forte makes a really late

1:00:43.880 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 3>kick and I'm like, oh, the trifecta is dead, but

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna hit the exactes so I'm gonna be okay.

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 3>And then literally at the wire, Forte puts his damn

1:00:57.080 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 3>nose down and there is like all they put up

1:01:01.480 --> 1:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>on the screen is that Arcangelo won the race and

1:01:06.800 --> 1:01:12.520
<v Speaker 3>then they say photo for second third And it took

1:01:12.560 --> 1:01:14.960
<v Speaker 3>like five minutes and fourt a one and so I lost.

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>The shame of it is and this is a true story.

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:23.440
<v Speaker 3>This man who really looked like he knew something and

1:01:23.480 --> 1:01:27.240
<v Speaker 3>I should have just I'm so mad at myself. This

1:01:27.400 --> 1:01:31.840
<v Speaker 3>is such a terrible job by me. This man walks

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:33.680
<v Speaker 3>up to me and I'm with my daughter and her

1:01:33.720 --> 1:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>best friend, the nine year old and her best friend.

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Before the race, says, Hi, shakes my hand, old, I

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:45.960
<v Speaker 3>think he's Italian guy. He then comes back like twenty

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:48.920
<v Speaker 3>minutes later with two twenty dollars tickets in his hand

1:01:50.000 --> 1:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>and he said, like, pulls me in close. He's like,

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Archangelo's got this. I bought a ticket for your two daughters.

1:01:57.400 --> 1:02:01.760
<v Speaker 3>He thought they were both my daughter's fine. I'm like yeah,

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:06.880
<v Speaker 3>he's like yeah, he's seven to one. He's winning. And

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 3>somehow I didn't recognize that as the sign from the

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>gambling gods that it was that I should have just

1:02:13.360 --> 1:02:17.600
<v Speaker 3>put all my money on Arcangelo, who won the race easily.

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 3>And the only winners of that race were my two daughters,

1:02:22.440 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>or sorry, my daughter and our best friend, who both

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>had a twenty they're nine years old, had a twenty

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>dollars seven to one ticket. They got paid out. And

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:34.880
<v Speaker 3>so the questionnaire is teaching Diana about the wars. Is

1:02:34.880 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 3>a good idea or the best idea? It's the best idea.

1:02:37.080 --> 1:02:39.280
<v Speaker 3>They had a wonderful time. They can't wait to go back.

1:02:39.520 --> 1:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>We answer your questions next, What's Right?

1:02:49.720 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 6>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblist, who defined every expectation

1:02:55.960 --> 1:02:58.840
<v Speaker 6>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:02.480
<v Speaker 6>original movie from on MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

1:03:02.560 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 6>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:09.200
<v Speaker 6>thrilling wrestling matches Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

1:03:09.240 --> 1:03:12.760
<v Speaker 6>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:17.000
<v Speaker 6>Bobby Knavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

1:03:18.320 --> 1:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, welcome back in episode one fifty nine. What's right?

1:03:21.120 --> 1:03:23.919
<v Speaker 3>We think right? The Nuggets are champions. I answer your questions. Now,

1:03:24.240 --> 1:03:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Pat's nation Nick, Now that Nikola Jokicic has a title.

1:03:28.000 --> 1:03:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Outside of EMBIID, who do you think is the most

1:03:30.880 --> 1:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>pressure to win a ring? So if we're talking about

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 3>guys who have never won one, Embiid's obviously at the top,

1:03:40.120 --> 1:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Harden is still very high. There will unfairly but sneakily

1:03:46.040 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 3>be some added pressure on Luca. I wonder if if Jimmy,

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>you know what, none of those are the right answer.

1:03:54.680 --> 1:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>It's Tatum. He's been to a finals, he's been first

1:03:58.880 --> 1:04:01.720
<v Speaker 3>seam all NBA back to back years, been a top

1:04:01.760 --> 1:04:04.600
<v Speaker 3>five MVP guy. I think the ship has probably sailed

1:04:04.640 --> 1:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>on hard and outside of EMBIID, I think it's Tatum next.

1:04:07.880 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Mister Brownstone says Can Denver's offensive system point center supplant

1:04:13.280 --> 1:04:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the need for a second great player in your dynasty argument. No,

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:20.720
<v Speaker 3>not I don't believe so not to be a dynasty,

1:04:21.360 --> 1:04:24.560
<v Speaker 3>because the other thing is teams in the West in

1:04:24.640 --> 1:04:28.760
<v Speaker 3>particular are going to adjust, and they're going to adjust

1:04:28.840 --> 1:04:32.520
<v Speaker 3>by just while there's been an emphasis on wings and

1:04:32.600 --> 1:04:35.240
<v Speaker 3>three and d guys, there is now if you are

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 3>a Western Conference team trying to win a title, you

1:04:38.520 --> 1:04:42.360
<v Speaker 3>are going to spend a couple roster spots on seven

1:04:42.400 --> 1:04:48.280
<v Speaker 3>footers just to spend thousand minutes up. So no, I

1:04:48.360 --> 1:04:50.600
<v Speaker 3>still think to be a dynasty, I still think you

1:04:50.600 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>need the second start. Jake Fisher says, do you think

1:04:53.080 --> 1:04:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the successive Giannis and Jovis will cause other teams to

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:59.400
<v Speaker 3>be more patient with high upside young players? They should be. Now,

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:03.360
<v Speaker 3>those guys are special all timers, but yes, they should be.

1:05:04.480 --> 1:05:08.959
<v Speaker 3>Vkc Asks or vic cs. Was this Jimmy's best chance?

1:05:08.960 --> 1:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>What do you think pat Riley is cooking something up? Oddly?

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I think last year might have been his best chance.

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I think they could have beaten the Warriors, but they

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:21.480
<v Speaker 3>didn't get there. As far as pat Riley cooking something up,

1:05:21.480 --> 1:05:24.520
<v Speaker 3>He's always cooking something up. I do wonder if that's

1:05:24.520 --> 1:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>where Kyrie goes. I'm not saying that's where he goes,

1:05:28.720 --> 1:05:32.240
<v Speaker 3>but I wonder if that's on the board. Nathan Berger says,

1:05:32.320 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 3>thoughts on Christian Brown winning three high school state titles,

1:05:35.160 --> 1:05:38.000
<v Speaker 3>an NCAA title, and now the NBA Finals. I was

1:05:38.040 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 3>one of his high school teammates from Kansas. We'll shout

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:43.439
<v Speaker 3>out to you, Nathan Berger, who you also it would

1:05:43.440 --> 1:05:49.040
<v Speaker 3>appear are a state champion. I think it's great, and

1:05:49.080 --> 1:05:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I do think he's a winning player. He's obviously never

1:05:51.560 --> 1:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a great player, but he's a winning player

1:05:54.720 --> 1:05:58.040
<v Speaker 3>and a hard nosed, tough player. I like him. Alex

1:05:58.080 --> 1:06:02.440
<v Speaker 3>asked at graduation, will do yours? Principal caller Diora, what's right? No,

1:06:02.720 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 3>it would have made me prouder than you could imagine,

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:07.640
<v Speaker 3>but she opted against it. All right, fun show, I

1:06:07.640 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>gotta run, I gotta get to work. I'll see you,

1:06:09.560 --> 1:06:12.520
<v Speaker 3>by the way, No show Thursday. My daughter's graduating. I'll

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:14.000
<v Speaker 3>see you guys on Tuesday. What's right,