WEBVTT - President Trump Suggests Lawmakers Should Be Executed For “Seditious Behavior”

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, it is Friday, November twenty first, and we

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have several members of Congress who have had to have

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>their security stepped up. Even their families are being checked on,

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>all because of a threat that's come their way. The

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>threat came from President Trump, and with that, Welcome to

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this episode of Amy and TJ. Robes. I took some

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>liberties in the introduction before the most part. What I

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>said is exactly what people are saying has taking place.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>The President of the United States called for the death

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of certain members of Congress.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there's no other way to say it. He suggested

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>that certain members of Congress be tried and potentially executed.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.599
<v Speaker 2>Even there was a suggestion a retweeting of being hanged

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>for sedition because of a video that six lawmakers put

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>out on social media.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The President's also he didn't like to He didn't

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like so he reacts, which he often does. Want to

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>say here off the top, I don't want to wait

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>until we get to the bottom of this of this episode,

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but when you're talking about something in this series. This

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>went on for the most part of the day yesterday.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>There's back and forth in DC. The President's spokesperson did

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>come out later was asked directly, and she said no,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 1>that was the answer. She didn't go farther and explain

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>when she was asked, does the president want any members

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of Congress? Actually killed no, and then she went on

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to something else. So what's happened now is that he

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>amplified this thing with his messages. How many people are

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>going to pay attention? That wasn't a forceful response, it

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>was just no.

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>There was no explanation, there was no impact. She turned

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the tables, as she often does. We're talking about Carolyn Levitt,

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the White House Press secretary, back towards the media that

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 2>you weren't getting what actually the story is, and it's

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>about this video. It's not about what the president said.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 2>But what the president said was extraordinary and deeply concerning,

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and in this era of the President and Republicans saying

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>that words matter, that words incite violence, and they point

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 2>to Charlie Kirk's asassination as example or exhibit a, what

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 2>in the hell is the president doing?

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>So we'll tell you exactly what he said. We've said

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>this before. He was kind of on one last night,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>or at least when he was starting to put these together.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>If you ever go to his truth Social page. You

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>can tell kind of what was going on with him

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for the day. Some of them are just sometimes it's

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>so many in a row that it's hard to keep

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>up with, and it's hard to understand how he has

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this much time to post all of these things. But

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this was kind of a you tried to piece together,

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of an unhinged rapid fire messages that, frankly, some

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of them wrote, He's used to explaining a lot in

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>his messages. It seemed like some of these he was

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>just firing off right quick.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and we can start with some of what he

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 2>wrote on True Social. The president wrote, it's called seditious

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>behavior at the highest level.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 3>That was in all caps.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 2>Each one of these traders to our country should be

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>arrested and put on trial. Their words cannot be allowed

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 2>to stand. We won't have a country anymore. An example

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 2>must be set.

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Their words he's talking about there. Their words cannot be

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed to stand. He didn't like that these members of Congress,

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all Democrats. I think all of them had military backgrounds.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 3>They all had military service, but they came.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Out and put this video together, put out on social media,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>essentially bringing attention to something and also, I would say

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>urging members of the military and the intelligence community, you

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have the right, you do not have to follow unlawful orders.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the message they were getting out, and that's what

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>upset the president.

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Correct, And so the President went on to say this

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>is really bad and dangerous to our country. Their words again,

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 2>cannot be allowed to stand. Seditious behavior from traders three

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>exclamation points, lock them up, question mark, question mark, question

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 2>mark got me.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>He seemed like he was fishing for it, like, give

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>me your response, what do you think?

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Does anyone else agree that this should happen? And then

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>in a third post, this is among the scariest seditious

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:16.679
<v Speaker 2>behavior punishable by death, and he has death in all

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>caps with an exclamation point. And then he reposted some

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>posts that other truth social users were putting out there

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 2>after his initial string of posts, including one that said

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 2>hang them George Washington, would.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>We keep talking about temperature going up and down? I

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you defend I don't know how you

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>defend this and say it's not contributing to what is

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>an awful time of political discourse in this country that

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>has led to death, that has led to violence. He

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't just say investigate them. He could have said that

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we need to look into this language, or this is

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>flat out rove. This is terrifying because someone sees this

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>as marching orders. Someone sees this as well, he's given

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>me permission. Will someone also see this and go, well,

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>my guys in the White House I do this for him,

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>like he said, maybe he'll pardon me, Like what is

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the message here? Is clear? Like it's almost it feels

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>like marching orders. And look they came back and they said, no,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't actually want them, but man words, you cannot

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>take this back and these get amplified. Nobody's amplifying her answer, no,

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's all she said.

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 3>She said, so yes, she's just said Carolyn love it.

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>And I actually wanted to read what she went on

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>to say afterwards, because she did not bring the temperature

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 2>down period with her no. And then she went on

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to say, many in this room want to talk about

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the president's response, but not what brought the president to

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 2>responding in this way. You have sitting members of the

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 2>United States Congress who conspired together to orchestrate a bit

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 2>you a message to members of the United States military,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 2>to active duty service members, to members of national security apparatus,

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 2>encouraging them to defy the president's lawful orders. That is

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 2>not true. If you read the video, they specifically say

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>to defy illegal orders.

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's all they're talking about, obviously, clearly, plainly, it's

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they're talking about here. And it's difficult to

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>she justified him calling for the death possibly of members

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of Congress. It's justified because what you should be talking

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about is that video that caused him to react this way.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>If it's really difficult in you, look, we do not

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>do politics here. We do not go back and forth

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>with political with issues and take a stance. We don't

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. But at some point we all have to

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>look at the same thing and agree that the President

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>of the United States should not be calling for the

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>death of members of Congress. If you want to say, well,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't really mean it, you can if you want to, fine,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But you still cannot argue that this is not helpful

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and where.

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>We are and we are not ad living or inferring

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>from or assuming what he meant.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 3>By no, we are reading exactly what he said.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 2>And I do appreciate, Babe, that you pointed out this

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>is not about politics. This is not about Republicans and

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Democrats and where we stand politically. This is about what's

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>right and what's wrong, and how can anyone defend that language.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 3>And I will say this again.

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Having Carolyn Levitt put out in that press briefing room

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>misinformation that these lawmakers were calling for members of the

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>US military to defy the president's lawful orders is just

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a boldfaced lie.

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Their argument, I guess she would say, is that they

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>believe every order the president has given is lawful. I

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>think that is what they would say. Now, plenty of

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>judges at this point courts have said no, that is

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not lawful. Deployment of National Guard in this city on

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that street up. Yes, he's lost some of these, but

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in his mind it's lawful. I'm just saying in a

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>technical case, she's probably believed everywhere. Came out of her mouth.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I believe she believed what she was saying, she went

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 2>on to say. Levitt went on to say that the

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 2>video perhaps is punishable by law, so she agreed with

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 2>the President on that, and then she added, I'm not

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>a lawyer. I'll leave that to the Department of Justice

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and the Department of War to decide.

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm just discouraged. I'm really really well. Just the

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>temperature this is now.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this, go back to January sixth, even

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>right well, people were arguing, is was he inciting an

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>insurrection in that moment in that speech, And people will

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you yes, it sounds like he was giving marching

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>orders to go up there and fight like hell and

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>all these things. So how how can anyone here or

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>listen a follower, a fringe follower, someone who's not quite right?

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>This is my god. The president just said their words

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>can't be allowed to stand. He didn't just say trial,

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say investigation.

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Punishable by death. I just reposted someone suggesting that they

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>should be hanged. That is not That is not something

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to be taken lightly. It's not in ingest. It's not funny,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 2>it's not it's not cute, koy. This is serious. And

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>six democratic lawmakers again who have military service, who served

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>our country, are now fearing for their life and their

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 2>famili's safety.

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of times and you know what,

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>even the piggy thing, even when that happened, he called

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a reporter a piggy. It's whatever degree he has a

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>different standard that we hold him to. And we heard

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that even in one day, Yeah Trump and went about

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>our business. It's rare for him to shock the hell

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>out of you. This one's I'm this is this is

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>something else, just given the times we are, and good

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Lord Charlie Kirk, after we saw this man gunned down

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>over words, over politics, over somebody saying his words can't

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to stand. He can't continue to eat you

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>shut somebody up.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Teachers are fired, people are losing their jobs because they

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>suggested something or they made light of a death. And

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 2>yet the president says what he says, and Carolyn Levitt

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 2>tells us that we're focused on the wrong thing.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, aren't there people out there, including maybe many of

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>his supporters, who will see or who will take this

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and go yeah, I agree, who are following his direction

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and following his policies. They're following his mindset, They're following

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the way he sees things. I'm trying, I'm really really

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to be on that side, to look at it

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>from that angle and go, wow, these members of Congress

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>did something so egregious that they should be looked into

0:10:54.480 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>as treasonous as seditious. It does it right. I'm trying

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to see the other side and to where you would

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>use this type of language, to where you would make

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this type of suggestion over what they said. I just

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>can't get there.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I would like to read what they said because I

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 2>have it here. So, folks who are listening, if you

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 2>haven't watched the video, certainly you should. It's on Senator

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Alissa Slotkin's social media pages that the whole video is

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>up there, and certainly it's been running on all the

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 2>news shows today. But this is what the lawmaker said.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 2>We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 2>The administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>oath to protect and defend this constitution. Right now, the

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 2>threats to our constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>from right here at home. Our laws are clear. You

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders. No

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 2>one has to carry out orders that violate the law

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 2>of our constitution. Now, these lawmakers did not call for

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>any opposition to a specific policy or to a specific order,

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>but They're just saying, you actually have a duty as

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 2>a member of the US military to uphold the constitution

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>and to reject any illegal order.

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 3>They say they made this.

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Video because they've been hearing from rank and file members,

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 2>from their contacts that people are concerned about being forced

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>to do something that they believe is illegal.

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>They stated facts, and they stated law, and they stated

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>do they not as this is understood, all of us

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of knowledge of that tangentially or whatever

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that that exists, that you're not permitted and you're okay

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to refuse somebody just tells you, hey, go in there

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and attack that Walmart. For me, you're not going to

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>follow that order because it's illegal, right, It's very simple stuff.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>How does that rise to the level of you, all

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the traders who need to die?

0:12:58.840 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 3>You got me?

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying, I'm trying to find I'm always trying to

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>look at both sides and not just go after and criticize.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>But this is just dangerous stuff. How many of these

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>episodes have we done talking about violence, talking about Charlie Kirk,

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about everything that came after that rose. Oh we

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>could what the lawmakers were killed up in? Was it Michigan. Yes,

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>this year Pennsylvania governor house set on fire.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this is Nancy Pelosi's husband attacked. I mean, you

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 3>can keep going on and on.

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.479
<v Speaker 2>It's been happening in greater numbers over the years, and

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>this is the exact opposite of what we need in

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>this country of bringing.

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>The temperature down with folks. We don't just take our

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>word for it. We certainly got us thinking. A lot

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of people are talking about treason versus sedition, versus insurrection.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Those have been thrown around. We'll get some clarity on that.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>We do have the law here in front of us.

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Also some famous cases. Maybe you know about the cases

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of treason, but maybe not the ones having to do

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>with seditions. Stay with us here, we're right back, all right.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>We continue now on this episode of Amy and TJ

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>talking about sedition. The president's tweets in which he said

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that certain members of Congress who did something he didn't

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>like should possibly be charged with sedition, which is punishable

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>by death. One of my you know, one of my

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite favorite favorite movies, Michael Douglas, American President. You remember

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that movie. Yes, there's a great scene with a net

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Benning when he first meets her in the White House.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>She was showing off talking about him in some meeting.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>He sneaks in, They turn around, they see him there,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and he, with a great smile, says, let's take him

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>out back and shoot him. And he gets this laugh

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>out of it because it was just this cool moment

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and it scared everybody in the room. The President's here,

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about him, and and he made this joke.

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And I always love that scene in that line because

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it was delivered perfectly, and it gave you an idea

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of I guess the energy in the room and why

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>something like that sounds so ridiculous. That obviously is.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Jogi right coming from the President of the United States.

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Clearly he would never call for the death of someone.

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Take him out back and shoot is what he said

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in front of them. And here we are. That was funny,

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's so ridiculous that it you'd have to laugh.

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 2>You knew it was a joke. Yes, immediately today not

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We have to take everything he says. Seriously.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Wow, it's frightening. So we went and looked up what

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 2>sedition actually is, and so the US Code defines sedition

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 2>as this a crime involving two or more people in

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the United States for any of the following purposes. To

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 2>conspire to overthrow or destroy by force, the government of

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the United States, or to wage war against it, To

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>oppose by force the authority of the United States Government,

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>to prevent, hinder, or delay by force, the execution of

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>any law of the United States. Or to take, sees

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 2>or possessed by force any property of the United States.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the way it has to This involves conspiracy, right.

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 2>At least two people, two or more people in the

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 2>United States.

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is why it jumped out to me when

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about this early. I'm looking back at

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Carolyn Levitt's she used some language that seemed to try

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to set up there. It is you have sitting members

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of the United States Congress who conspired together to orchestrate

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>like it was specific language.

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 2>But this is the caveat here that really got me

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 2>to get a conviction for seditious conspiracy. The government has

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>to prove that the defendants conspired to use force. Simply

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>advocating for the use of force is not the same thing.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>By that definition. This is a non sense.

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a moot point, yes.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But has impact who knows what kind. Yes, they're not

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>going to trial, They're not going to get hauled into

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>court over this.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>No. Yes. And the interesting thing is, if you are

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 2>just a US citizen and you're convicted of sedition, you

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>can face up to twenty years in prison. But if

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 2>you are a member of the military, if you are

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a military or you can face the death penalty under

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 2>the Uniform Code of Military Justice. And these members of

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Congress were members of the military, So by that connection

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 2>you would say it's possible that they could get a

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 2>death sentence if they were to be convicted of sedition.

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>And we tried to find there are not a lot

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of cases historically having to do with sedition. We thought

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>that might be a bunch of famous cases. It's actually

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.239
<v Speaker 1>really not, not names you would know, but there was

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what was the best two years, I guess this was

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty high profile members of the Oath keeper Low. Yes.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, those who were charged January sixth, Yes, there

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>were some sedition charges in a few of those cases.

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 3>But this is really really rare.

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I went and looked the AP says that in the

0:17:53.800 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 2>history of the United States, only twelve people have been

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 2>convicted either through treeson or s edition, and we're talking

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Burr, we're talking Tokyo Rose, We're talking very different cases.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Completely, it was Benedict Arnold. We go back to that.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't. Actually we consider him a traitor, but he

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>was never formally.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>He's not on this list.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>The point is you have to go back a ways.

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>This isn't used a lot.

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Correct, and so this is just I mean, I would

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>say the only good thing that has come out of

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the story is that maybe we as Americans are learning

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 2>more about our laws more.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm serious.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I looked up and learned things I did not know

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 2>that I wouldn't have looked out or looked at either way.

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 3>And also looking at the Uniformed Code of Military.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Justice, which is basically what the military is allowed to

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 2>do when it comes to lawful orders. And I actually

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 2>looked at all of this too, and it was really interesting.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 2>So basically, any person subject to this chapter who willing

0:18:56.200 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 2>willfully disobeys a lawful command shall be punished, Okay, so

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 2>that could be punished by death. So if you disobey

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a lawful command, that could be punished by death, just

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>by the way, and.

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Then if the offense is committed.

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>You end up outside of a war time, you can

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 2>be court martialed and again serious significant punishments.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 3>But I thought this was interesting.

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 2>An order is considered lawful, and this is where I

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 2>think the question is between what the lawmakers are saying

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and what the president is saying. A military order is

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>of the United States, or lawful superior orders, or for

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 2>some other reason beyond the authority of the official issuing.

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So it is a little confusing.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, who gets to say whether or not this order

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is lawful or not? Especially a lot of this stuff

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is tied up in a court, correct, So is it

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>an illegal order to tell me to go patrol this

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>street because a judge just said this is an illegal deployment.

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 2>It is a gray area and very confusing, especially in

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 2>these times when President Trump is ordering, yes, members of

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the military to go in to cities and then you

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>have judges saying you're not allowed to go into said cities.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 2>So where whose orders are the lawful ones? It is confusing.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting conversation. It just doesn't need to be

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>fueled with all this horrific rhetoric.

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point, we could still be having the

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>same debate without this part being in it. But folk,

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>we just if you listen to us a little bit

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>at all and our pat you know, we always are

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>on trying to just bring the rhetoric down and words

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>matter and careful of what you say. So we encourage

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you all to being careful in what you're saying today

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and just remember always that words matter. And please be

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a part of bringing the temperature down in this country

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>if you can. If that's even with a conversation on

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the subway, at the grocery store, just please, we gotta

0:20:59.320 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be better.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Or around the Thanksgiving Thanksgiving dinner this coming week.

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot to talk about here. Thank you for listening, everybody.

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 3>We always appreciate you. I may be Robock alongside TJ. Holmes.

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 3>We will talk to you soon.