WEBVTT - Trump Headlines White House Correspondents' Dinner; Measles Cases Rise

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>This Weekend podcast with David Gura, Christina Raffini, and Elisa Matteo.

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us for today's selection of conversations from

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the show.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 3>You can listen to our favorite discussions right here on

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the podcast, but also make sure to join us live

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 3>every Saturday and Sunday morning, starting at seven am Eastern.

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 4>We're on Bloomberg Television, Radio and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 4>bringing you unique takes and in depth interviews on news, politics,

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 4>lifestyle and culture.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>President Trump returned to the White House Correspondence Centner. The

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>initial dinner, of course, ended abruptly after a gunman breach

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 2>security well.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 3>The President condemned political violence at the dinner last night,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 3>while at the same time attacking political opponents and the

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 3>press at large.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 5>But tonight we come back together to answer that Hanus

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 5>attack with unwavering resolve, and every one of us here

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 5>this evening to show that in America we.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 6>Do not yield to political violence.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 5>As I said three months ago, the show must go on.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 5>But this place is the really largest group of Trump

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 5>derangement syndrome people ever put together at one time, I

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 5>suspect this evening it's really all about the fake news media,

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 5>and you're handling of prizes and writing and producing and

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 5>performing made up stories like the Academy Awards, and this

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 5>is somewhat of a scoop my intention to run for

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 5>a fourth term as President of the United States. I

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 5>will be doing that. I will be having an official

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 5>In fact, I think I have yeah, I want three times.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 5>Now I'm going to do it again.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 7>Thank you, Joyce.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Now as Bloomberg White House correspondent Jeff Mason, he was

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 3>at last night's dinner. He was a president in the

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>past with White House Correspondent Association.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 6>Jeff, great to see you, and I.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Guess I should start just by asking you about the

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 3>feeling in the room. We were all there at the

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>first iteration of this. Dinner took place at the Washington Hilton,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 3>a giant ballroom. This was a much smaller affair, different affair.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 3>How much was the program last night duplicative of what

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to happen at that first dinner just a

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 3>couple of months ago.

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 8>I think it was pretty close. In fact, the fact

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 8>that of course the President spoke, the President Association spoke

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 8>the awards were given to members of the press, and

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 8>also student journalists were recognized for scholarships, and then there

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 8>was the mentalist at the end as well. It was

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 8>pretty much the program that was meant to have gone

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 8>on in April, just three months later, and with the

0:02:54.720 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 8>fact that that shooting stopped that dinner, that was over shadowing.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 8>I guess you could say this dinner again. But in general,

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 8>the program was the same, but the venue was smaller,

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 8>and that was very noticeable, certainly for someone who's attended

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 8>a bunch of dinners. The ballroom at the Hilton, of

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 8>course fits more than two thousand people. It's the biggest

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 8>ballroom in Washington. This one was instead of about twenty

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 8>six hundred people, there were fewer than seven hundred in

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 8>the room. That doesn't mean it's small, but it's just

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 8>a much much more I guess you could say intimate

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 8>size of a dinner. And then that changed the mood

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 8>in the room too. And we can talk a little

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 8>bit more about this, but when the President spoke, I

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 8>think that he also was speaking to what for him

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 8>was an unusual crowd in that most of the people

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 8>in that room were journalists like myself and it was

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 8>not a friendly crowd for what ended up being very

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 8>much like a rally speech.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>That's an interesting point, Jeff, because I mean, we said

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>it the first cinner, and it is a huge ball,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned, and it's a mixed crowd because the

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>journalist invites so many guests. You have entertainment people. You

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 2>often invite people who are familiar.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 9>Or close to the White House.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 2>This is a much smaller room, and I imagine, you know,

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 2>if he's used to speaking to a bigger crowd, it's

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>harder when the audience is right in front of you.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>And you can see some of those reactions. I mean,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 2>what were the reactions to jokes like I'm assuming it

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 2>was a joke, you know, running for a fourth term,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and some of the other remarks, And then there were

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>also you wrote a few awkward moments where awards were

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 2>presented to journalists for being hard on this White House.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>How did the President react to that?

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean to your first question. First, the reaction

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 8>were a lot of straight faces in the crowd, because

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 8>that's our job, you know. I mean, I certainly was

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 8>keeping a straight face, and I think so were most

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 8>of the reporters in the room who are committed to

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 8>neutrally covering this president and recognize that that joke, as

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 8>it were, of him running for what he called a

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 8>fourth term is a joke about the constitution, which of

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 8>course prohibits him from running for another term when he's

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 8>already served too, which he will have at the end

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 8>of his second term now. But he I mean, it's

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 8>also again a quote unquote joke that is rooted in

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 8>the fact that that's something that he was actively thinking

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 8>about at the beginning of his term and something that

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 8>he has openly mused about before. I think right now

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 8>it is a joke. I mean, he has stopped talking

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 8>about it regularly, particularly after a Speaker of the House,

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 8>Mike Johnson, basically told him this is unconstitutional, and he

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 8>seems to have accepted that, and so I think, you know,

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 8>I think he wanted. He likes to poke at the

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 8>press with stuff like that, and that was one of

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 8>the things that he did last night. Remind me of

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 8>your other question, Christina.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 2>That's all right, Jeff, we can move on. I know

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 2>you had like three hours of sleep, so we're very

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>grateful for your getting up a friend of the show,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Mason, we really appreciate you, David.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Just a generous I mean, there's been this over the

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 3>course of having this dinner, there's been a conversation about

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>should it be smaller, should it involve fewer celebrities, fewer

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>members of the administration. I'm curious, as you experienced the

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>dinner last night, did it give you a sense of

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe this is the way that it's headed in light

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 3>of the criticism most recently that it faced after that

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 3>first dinner. How is the conversation about the longevity of

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>this dinner changed, you know, in the context of the

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 3>one that we had last night.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 8>You know, I think I think the answer to that

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 8>is still TBD. The The incoming president of the Association,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 8>Jackie Heinrich, who works for Fox News, announced that the

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 8>dinner would be held again next year, back at the Hilton.

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 8>So that was certainly a foreshadowing by the Association that

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 8>they're not looking to keep the scale down version as

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 8>a model. But yes, you're you're not wrong to say

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 8>that this sparked a lot of conversations, certainly about security

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 8>at the Hilton and security for this event, but it

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 8>also sparked some conversation within the press court itself about

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 8>this dinner more broadly, and it's you know, there are

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 8>people who are who are are big fans of this

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 8>dinner in Washington, and there are people who aren't. And

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 8>I imagine those conversations will continue.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 6>Jeff Mason, come back here in a little bit. We'renna.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Let you take a nap over the course the next

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe forty minutes, bringing back, take a quick disco nap,

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Maason, our White House correspondent, joining us on the

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 3>heels the White House Correspondents Association dinner which took place

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 3>last night.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Jeff.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 8>All right.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Just hours ago, the UK Maritime Trade Operations Center warned

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>of an incident involving a tanker and military forces in

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 2>the Gulf of Oman and his warning vessels in the

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 2>area to remain diligent.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now is Boomberg Energy and Commodie supporter Stephen Sebpcimski,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 3>who joins us now from Singaport. Seem great to have

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 3>you with us, and I want to start just by

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 3>asking you how the contours of this war have changed

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>here in recent days that the Houthies, which were of

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 3>course lined aligned with the Iranians, getting into this conflict.

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Announcing this this blockade, and maybe I could ask you

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 3>first just what effect that's had so far on the

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 3>oil trade and sort of what traders, what investors are

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the consequences of that going forward.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think the market is still trying to

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 10>digest exactly what is happening or in the Red Sea

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 10>and at the Bab Almandeb Strait, which is where the

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 10>Hoo thieves are trying to tighten control. Now let's put

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 10>this into context, since the Straight of Horn moves close

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 10>effectively since the end of February, when the US and

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 10>Israel began strikes on Iran, Saudi Arabia was beginning to

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 10>ship more of its oil. Four million barrels per day

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 10>were loaded in the Red Sea through an east west pipeline.

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 10>Normally that oil be flowing through Hormves it was shot,

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 10>so they were using this workaround. The oil would then

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 10>go south, down through the Red Sea, through the Bab

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 10>Almandeb Straight and then out to customers in Asia. And

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 10>what's happened is with the Houthi rebels increasing attacks targeting

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 10>specifically Saudi ships, there was a fear that this key

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 10>workaround was now in danger and either would really real

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 10>lead to delays or even a reduction in loading from

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 10>from Saudi ports, because that would require them going through

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 10>the north, through the Suez Canal through and then around

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 10>the southern Cape of Africa to get the customers in Asia.

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 10>We did see a few ships you turn over the

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 10>last week away from the Babel Mandeb straight but in

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 10>the last twenty four hours we did see two China

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 10>linked super oil tankers though carrying Saudi crude did get through,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 10>So it's a mixed picture. There is some oil flowing through,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 10>but at the same time there are some ships turning around,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 10>and you saw oil prices. Brent was about one hundred

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 10>dollars a barrel when I was leaving the office Asia afternoon,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 10>but it closed the session US afternoon around ninety six

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 10>ninety seven dollars, which indicates a bit of a fall

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 10>after those red sea flows continued. But at the same time,

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 10>you have to remember this is Friday. You never know

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 10>what Trump's going to do. It was probably a lot

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 10>of people just wanting to enjoy the weekend as well

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 10>and not have to worry about having a long position

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 10>going in. But at the same time, the market, the

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 10>way they're looking at this, it is.

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 7>A risk, and this is the biggest escalation.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 10>Of the war in the region and attacks on infrastructure

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 10>risk to oil that we've seen since March and April.

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering, can you to find that risk a little

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 2>bit because I know, according to a report from CBS,

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 2>at least seven major pipeline projects are under construction trying

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 2>to find alternatives to the Strait. And I know the

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 2>main threat right now in the Red Sea is the

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 2>distribution point, but we've also got reports this morning the

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Houthis have claimed to destruct Saudi Arabia with missiles on

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Saturday morning. Is the concern mostly about that Red Sea

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 2>distribution point? Or is the concern also that an escalation

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 2>between Saudi's and the Houthis could start to impact Saudi

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 2>production as well.

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think that's a really good point, and

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 10>it's both and I go even a step further that

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 10>any sort of flare up between Saudi Arabia and the

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 10>Houthis and the Houthis attacking ships. Trump himself has said

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 10>that they will then if their ship's attacked by the Hohothies,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 10>they will then attack Iran, and he's threatened power plants

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 10>and bridges Iran in time said that if that happens,

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 10>they will attack energy infrastructural throat the region. The biggest

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 10>risk in this war since since hasn't necessarily been the

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 10>closure of these straits, these waterways. Sure they could be closed,

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 10>but with a good piece deal, they could open up

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 10>within weeks and trade could resume to normal in months.

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 10>The real fear has been if this escalates into a

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 10>wider conflict within the region, if energy infrastructure, pipelines, LICKFI,

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 10>natural gas plants, ships, if they're getting attacked, that's infrastructure

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 10>that can't easily come back online if there is a

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 10>piece deal. So the reason why oil was at one

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 10>hundred and twenty dollars in March wasn't so much because

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 10>of the hormones closure. It was because Iran kept attacking

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 10>infrastructure across the region. We haven't gotten to that worst

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 10>case scenario that we've seen three or four months back,

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 10>but if it does spiral into that sort of situation, yes,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 10>certainly that is something that the market is going to

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 10>be deeply worried about. And if Saudi Arabia create other

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 10>countries Qatar's LNG export plant, if all those facilities are

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 10>either damaged more or if they have to reduce production,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 10>then then certainly we'll see another leg up in rent

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 10>and WTI oil prices.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 3>Steve, when I said that was the Fonti Bureau a

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 3>few weeks ago, and we talked about the state of

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 3>inventories around the world, and countries have begun to kind

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 3>of refill those reserves that they had in the lulls

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>that we've seen.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 6>Sounds like they haven't.

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 3>Can you just get us up to speed sort of

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 3>on the status of reserves globally. I know there's been

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot of focus here in the US, where the

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.599
<v Speaker 3>strategic petroleum reserve is the lowest it's been in a

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>very long long time. How much effort has there been

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 3>around the world to kind of replenish those reserves that

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 3>have been deployed on an emergency basis since the start

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:31.479
<v Speaker 3>of this conflict.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think I think the better way to

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 10>look at it, perhaps is that a lot of customers

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 10>in Asia of Persian golf oil they're really looking at

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 10>they were looking at replacing their supply instead of replenishing.

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 10>So there hasn't been a really big effort to refill inventories.

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 10>As you said, the SPR in the United States lowest

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 10>level in decades, pushing as well.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 7>A key point it's getting low used to decrease.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 10>Chinese oil inventories are something that are opaque. You're not

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 10>exactly sure what's going on there, but there is an

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 10>expectation that China use quite a lot of their oil

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 10>inventories when when their imports dropped pretty significantly in April

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 10>May and then into June, so and then Japan as well.

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 10>All the other G seven nations had been using their

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 10>spr So you're in a situation where oil inventories are low.

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 10>But it's not just oils, also other fuels diesel, gasoline,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 10>jet fuel. The amount of supply globally is at an

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 10>uncomfortable level and that's why you're seeing those product prices

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 10>rise as well. And it's also not just oil products,

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 10>it's also natural gas. In Europe, natural gas inventories at

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 10>the lowest seasonal level in about five years. They're not

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 10>on pace to hit an eighty percent target refill by November,

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 10>which is what they want to be at when when

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 10>winter starts. Because in winter and Europe they use a

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 10>lot of natural gas for heating. So inventories are a problem.

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 10>And I think the issue is we pulled that lever

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 10>in March and April to help ease some of the

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 10>pain in the oil market, and because of this current

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 10>situation with depleted inventories, you can't really pull that lever

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 10>again if this horror moves, closure continues, and if the

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 10>bab al Mandeb straight as well is affected. So it

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 10>is a worrying part of the market.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Are you starting to see that stress a little bit

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 2>in the prices of oil? I mean, it seems to me,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 2>as we've been covering this conflict, there's been kind of

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 2>this indefatigable optimism, of somewhat frustrating optimism for those of

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>us who covered diplomacy that this is going to get resolved.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 2>But I'm wondering if that's because they did have those

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 2>strategic reserves as kind of a buffer, and ASO start

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>to deplete, do you think that optimism will start to

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 2>wane as well.

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 10>I think there are a few reasons why oil has

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 10>I mean, granted, we're at one hundred dollars print in

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 10>very just a few short weeks, so I would say

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 10>that we're at a pretty relatively high level. We're not

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 10>the highs of one hundred and twenty that we were before,

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 10>and we're certainly not near two hundred dollars, which is

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 10>what some analysts we're warning about. Part of that is

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 10>because of the workarounds, you know, the Saudi Arabia's Red

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 10>C the East West Pipeline. They had their ad knock

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 10>in the UE being able to do their uh their

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 10>shuttle service to get some oil out, which is to

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 10>a degree continuing perhaps although those ships are going dark

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 10>as well. Chinese demand has not really returned, and China

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 10>is one of the big factors that the biggest buyer

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 10>of oil globally. So as long as China, Chinese demand

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 10>doesn't come roaring back, that does add a lot of

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 10>length and and it does provide some ease to the market.

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 7>But I would say it is showing up in some prices.

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 10>I mean you look at the diesel run rate or

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 10>basically the the the profits that you can make from

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 10>refining crude into diesel, gasoline and other other products has jumped.

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 7>There is a need for for those fuels, and there

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 7>is a.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 10>Fear that those supplies are depleting natural gas supply is

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 10>natural gas in Europe. Those price this are a settled

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 10>basis at the highest level since twenty twenty three, LNG

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 10>prices in Asia at the highest level since March, and

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 10>almost the highest level since January twenty twenty three.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 7>So you are starting to see that some.

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 10>Of that pain maybe not showing up in crude itself,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 10>which is about twenty dollars off from the highs of March,

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 10>but you're seeing it in other products.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>See before we let you go, let me ask you

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 3>about another shooting war, the one taking place in Ukraine

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 3>and the effect that that's had on energy prices. We've

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 3>talked a lot about the crackspread in recent weeks on

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 3>the show, talked about refined products, and we've seen Ukraine

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 3>launching those attacks on energy facilities in Russia, and we've

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 3>seen Russia reply and kind targeting energy facilities in Ukraine.

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>What have been what's our sense of the broader implications

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 3>of that on the global energy market, the way that

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 3>that's escalated.

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that's again, that's one more lever that the

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 10>market was depending on that is now gone. So let's

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 10>look at it from a crude perspective. The Black Sea

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 10>is a key export area for Kazakhstan oil.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 7>It goes to the CPC.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 10>Through the CPC pipeline to a Russian port, and right

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 10>now Russia Moscow's basically said that it is unsafe for

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 10>them to be docking there. Ukraine has targeted in recent

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 10>weeks over ninety ships that are connected with Moscow. So

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 10>you're removing those Kazakhstan supplies, which I believe is about

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 10>one to one point five percent of global seaborne oil supplies.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 7>It's not nothing.

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 10>So again with Babelmandem straight with horror moves, that's one

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 10>one amount of oil that's that's reduced. Then you look

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 10>at the refining capacity in Russia which has been greatly

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 10>affected and disrupted by constant attacks by Iran on the refineries,

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 10>and Russia is a big, pretty big supplier and exporter

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 10>of that fuel and they've had to restrain and essentially

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 10>stop exports of diesel. Again, that tightens the global diesel market.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 10>So you're getting the crude hit from Kazakhstan and also

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 10>the diesel hit again, tightening things for consumers globally.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, Steve Sipchinski, thank you for breaking that all

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>down for us.

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us for more on Bloomberg this weekend.

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 6>Right after this, and.

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Alarming statistics from the CDC On Friday, the number of

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 2>measles cases this year in the United States hit two

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and eighteen. That's higher than all of last

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 2>year and is now the most infection since nineteen ninety one.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 6>For more, joining by doctor Amisiadlogy.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 3>He's an infectious disease expert and senior scholar at Johns

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Hopkins University Center for Health Security. Doctor Dalsh, great to

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 3>have you with us once again, and let me just

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 3>start by asking you about how we got to this place.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 3>And I guess a natural follow on to that is

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 3>what would the US need to do to kind of

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.479
<v Speaker 3>get beyond this or get back to the way things were?

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 6>How far is the cat out of the bag?

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 11>When you think about outbreak, sometimes it's hard to understand

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 11>how things got started. How you got to the status

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 11>quo with measles. It's really a no brainer. We got

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 11>there because vaccination rates fell below the herd immunity threshold.

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 11>And we're talking about what is the most contagious infectious

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 11>disease that we humans face, one that requires a high

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 11>level of immunity in the population, and one in which

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 11>it's circulating in many parts of the world. So all

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 11>it took was for us to lower our armor, to

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 11>lower our force field, and then measles came back. It

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 11>never went away. And the solution is equally simple. It's

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 11>just to get more vaccine into the arms of people

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 11>who are unvaccinated, and then this problem will disappear.

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 2>David and I have a selfish question when we were

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 2>putting this in the lineup yesterday. We've had mmrs as kids.

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Are we protected people who had the usual vaccine course

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 2>as children? Does that take you through adulthood or at

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>some point if you're in one of these places with

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 2>high infection rates, do you need some sort of booster.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 11>The vast, vast majority of people the standard two dose

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 11>childhood vaccination schedule will protect them for life. That doesn't

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 11>mean that the vaccine is a high undred percent, but

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 11>it's pushing above ninety five percent. So there's no generalized

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 11>recommendation for boosters that are needed for the population. It's

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 11>really about people who've had zero doses of measles. That's

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 11>what's driving this.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, your line of work, a lot of what

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 3>you deal with is kind of communication about the need

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 3>for vaccination going forward. And I'm curious at this moment

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 3>when it seems like there are government officials who are

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 3>not promoting them or not advocating for them. Maybe it's

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 3>incumbent more on public health practitioners like yourself to push

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 3>for that. What is the messaging campaign like? In other words,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 3>how do you assess the way in which public health

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 3>professionals are making the case for vaccines at a time

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 3>when they seem more necessary than ever.

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>And what kind of campaigns have been effective? Have you

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 2>seen any of that have worked?

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 11>So I think it depends upon why someone is not vaccinated.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 11>There may be people who haven't gotten around and getting

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 11>their children vaccinated. There may be people who have questions

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 11>about vaccines. So you kind of have to take a

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 11>different tach depending upon where someone is. And often it's

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 11>very different to do it kind of as a one

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 11>size fits all message on television by a talking head

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 11>versus a provider sitting in front of a patient or

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 11>a patient's family and asking what questions do you have

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 11>about measles? And I think that's the better way to

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 11>do it. We know that people will move towards vaccination

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 11>if they can get their answers, get answers to the

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 11>questions that they have in a non judgmental way. That's

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 11>a very different type of rhetoric when you're dealing with

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 11>the likes of RFK Junior, who is spreading disinformation, where

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 11>you just have to basically call him out for spreading lives.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 11>So it's very kind of nuanced and very personalized, and

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 11>that's what works. And we know that parents trust family doctors,

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 11>they trust their primary care providers. That's where that that's

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 11>where the actual movement occurs, not so much when someone's on,

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 11>you know, blasting from a megaphone about the vaccine.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I think we talked about this last time you were

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 2>on here, but it seems pretty much a FATA company.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Now that the US is going to lose its measles

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 2>elimination status, there was this hearing the US requested that

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>it be pushed back into the fall, so now that

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 2>decision won't come down fall. But at this point, can

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you see anyway that doesn't happen given the case rates

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 2>in the US.

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 11>No, I think that the United States has effectively lost

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 11>its elimination status, and even if by some technicality it

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 11>maintains its elimination status, the deeper question is does the

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 11>United States have resiliency against measles the answer is no,

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 11>irrespective of what the eliminations status decision is, and there

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 11>will be politics around the elimination decision. So I think

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 11>it's just for all intents and purposes, the US does

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 11>not have the ability to control measles any longer.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 3>On the issue of control, I'm curious how that details

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 3>with kind of economic considerations. So when you look at

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 3>where these outbreaks are, I saw there's one in Titon

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 3>County in Wyoming, for instance. When you start to see

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 3>an outbreak like this, so much work has to be

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 3>done to track down who's been exposed to it, get

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 3>the word out, obviously.

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 6>Mount vaccination campaign as well.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Could you talk a bit about the economic consequences of

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 3>having a resurgence in a disease like measles in the

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 3>way in which we're seeing here in the US.

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 11>So, anytime there's an infectious disease, it will lead to disruption.

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 11>People can't go about out their activities of daily life,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 11>which means if it's a child with measles, that child

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 11>can't go to school, that child's parents might have to

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 11>stay home, that child's parents might have to hire someone

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 11>to babysit, And then you have a health department that

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 11>then has to go and investigate who was the person

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 11>in touch with Do they need to contact people, do

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 11>they need to do any kind of countermeasures to stop

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 11>the measles from spreading in a given community. All of

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 11>that costs money, and it's money that doesn't need to

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 11>be spent because these measles cases are happening voluntarily by

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 11>people's choices. This is not some force of nature. This

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 11>is people's choice to not vaccinate their children. And then

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 11>it has economic consequences that don't need to be incurred.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 11>And I think that's another important point to make with

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 11>infectious diseases, is that they keep humans from flourishing because

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 11>they're stuck in bed sick and they're not out there producing,

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 11>they're out there innovating, And you're taking money that could

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 11>be used for some other other concern. Now it's being

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 11>put back to something. It's put into something that we

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 11>shouldn't have to be putting money into when we've had

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 11>a solution to this since the nineteen sixties.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 8>Back before we.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Let you go, we want to ask you about the

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 2>other thing a lot of Americans are worried about, and

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.479
<v Speaker 2>that's a cyclospora going around with this you know, possibly

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 2>that's tainted let us. It seems like did the administration,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 2>did the government react faster fast enough? And is this

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 2>a larger concern about food safety and oversight in the US?

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 11>So I do think it was more of a reactive

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 11>reaction from the government. I think state governments did very well,

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 11>namely Michigan, which got hit very, very hard. But you

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 11>have to remember that the CDC basically got decimated in

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 11>this administration in terms of cuts to its budget, Whole

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 11>divisions that were eliminated, including the division that would have

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 11>been responsible for cyclospora. So there's less people doing this.

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 11>So when you're thinking about a food born outbreak, it's

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 11>time and speed in the speed to under identify what

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 11>the vehicle is that's spreading something. If you've got less

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 11>people around to crunch the data, to do the interviews

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 11>with people who are who have our case patients, it's

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 11>going to take longer. The state departments have done well,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 11>but they are also underfunded, chronically underfunded, understaffed, So it

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 11>is something that decreases the overall resiliency to food born illness.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 11>Is when you don't have a robust system in place,

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 11>or when that system is being actively dismantled.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, Doctor Adalga from Johns Hopkins University Center for

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 2>Health Security, Thank you so much for joining us.

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 12>Stay with us for more on Bloomberg this weekend.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 6>Right after this.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Christopher Nolan's film treatment of the Odyssey has had an

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 3>epic debut.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 13>Feel free to proces Christine if you'd like to.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 3>It's on track to rake in nearly five million dollars

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 3>in its first two weekends in theaters.

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 2>The three hour long blockbuster is based on the twenty

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 2>seven year one hundred year old Greek poem that inspired

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Nolan's screenplay. Joining us now is Emily Wilson, professor of

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 2>classical Studies at the University of Pennsylvania and the first

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 2>woman to translate the Odyssey into English. Ellie Wilson, thank

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 2>you so much for being here. I have a very

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>strange anecdote to share with you, but it's relevant to

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 2>how big this has become. I was in Central Park

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 2>yesterday walking my dumb little dog, and I overheard two

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>like bros in their twenties explaining the plot of the

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Odyssey to each other. And I turned around and I said,

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, I have Emily Wilson.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 9>On our show. Tomorrow, and he went, what, no way,

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 9>I gotta wash it.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 2>She's the chick who did the new translation. So did

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 2>you ever think at any point when she's in this

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 2>career you would have Central Park tech pro name recognition?

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 13>Who could have on a random Friday?

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 8>So weird, it's so funny. I mean, I still wake

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 8>up and think this can't possibly be real.

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 14>It's wonderful, though, but I love that Homer is getting

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 14>all of this new free press thanks to Christopher Nolan,

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 14>who was an English major, not a classics major, but

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 14>he's really put his humanity's education to good use.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 3>You brought your brood to see this film, I gather.

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious what you thought of it and how you

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 3>is somebody who has been so deeply immersed in this work.

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Can you enjoy a film like this or are you

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 3>able to kind of enjoy it as a viewer, or

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 3>are you kind of constantly thinking about whether or not

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 3>it's sticking literally to the text.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 14>I had a lot of fun, as you said, Yes,

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 14>I took my three kids, my teenagers. One of thems

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 14>over twenty, but the others are teenagers.

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 8>They all had a good time.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 14>I thought it was a fun time.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 8>At the movies.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 14>You know, I think there were many ways in which

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 14>the book is better, But I would say that right,

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 14>this is a fun summer movie, and I think it's

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 14>very entertaining, and I'm actually really looking forward to many

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 14>years of discussing with my students. How does the book

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 14>relate to the film.

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 8>I think it's really going to.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 14>Enrich classroom discussions of the Odyssey all around the world.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's interesting because there are people who take

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 2>issue with the movie. There are people who take issue

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 2>with your translation. The book may be better, but it's

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 2>this big I mean, is it good that people, like

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 2>you said, are at all just showing interest in it?

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Does that do you think lead to more interest in

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the classics? And is controvers maybe a good thing to

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 2>get people reading these these texts.

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 14>I think it's wonderful that this engagement of whatever kind.

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 14>I mean, I think it is really clear that this

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 14>film is bringing both lots and lots of people back

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 14>to the physical movie theaters, which is I think also

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 14>a good thing. But it's also bringing people back to

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 14>reading big books. The sales of the Odyssey and library

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 14>checkouts of the Odyssey. My translation, but also other translations

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 14>are by some order of magnitude up this summer, which

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 14>I think it's wonderful, And it's just this new engagement

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 14>with people who didn't maybe didn't think ancient literature could

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 14>be for me realizing this is a really fun read

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 14>and really interesting in so many different ways.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Just to put another on it, sales are up one

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and twenty percent of hard books of the Odyssey. Crazy.

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, interesting remuneration I think come hand in hand, which

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>is good. Who's knocking on your door at Penn these days?

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>What does a classics major look like? What's his or

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 3>her background? Who's showing interest in majoring in the classics

0:28:59.520 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 3>these days?

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 14>You know, it's really very very diverse. I mean, kids

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 14>from all different backgrounds. I mean, I think back in

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 14>the day, there used to be an idea that if

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 14>you haven't gone to the kind of private school where

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 14>you do Latin, then there's no hope for you as

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 14>a classicist. And that's very much not true anymore. I mean,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 14>there's every possible background, every possible high school. Even if

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 14>you didn't go to a high school where you read

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 14>The Odyssey in ninth grade, even if there wasn't Latin

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 14>offered at your school. There's so many opportunities at the

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 14>college level to get into this. I mean, one common

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 14>thread that I see, especially in the big myth classes

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 14>that I teach, is very often it's kids who've read

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 14>the Percy Jackson books as very excited about following up

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 14>with what is different about the Percy Jackson universe verusus

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 14>the universe that we get in Homer, And we have

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 14>those discussions and it's fun.

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that diversity makes for a better, more

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 2>holistic study of the classics? I mean we were mentioned

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 2>you were the first woman to translate this text. Talk

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:01.959
<v Speaker 2>to us a little bit about what you think your

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>perspective brought to that text as you looked at the

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 2>language and search for nuance. And does you know do

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 2>people from different places, different backgrounds, different ethnicities bring that

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>to these translations as well.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 13>I think that can be the case.

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 14>Yes, I mean the first woman headline I slightly resist

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 14>the idea that women's work must always be defined by gender.

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 14>And of course for many other female homerests before me.

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 14>The Odessey and the Iliad have been translated into many

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 14>other languages by women before me. I don't think you

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 14>could pick out of a lineup which translations are by women.

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 14>I actually don't think that guest stands up to any

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 14>particular scrutiny. I mean I would say that, yes, of course,

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 14>all kinds of background questions can feed into any interpretshi

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 14>of activity, whether it's being a historian, being a journalist,

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 14>being a translator, being a literary critic. The things that

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 14>you both know as a scholar as a reader, and

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 14>also the things you know through bodied experience are going

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 14>to feed into your interpretative work in some way or other.

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 14>I mean, for me, my background in English poetics as

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 14>well as in Greek and Latin poetics, seems essential to

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 14>what I'm doing as a translator, and so far as

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 14>my primary intervention as I see it is to do

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 14>with using traditional metrical verse, in contrast to the vast

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 14>majority of modern translators who've used unmetrical free verse or

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 14>prose to translate homer And that has nothing to do

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 14>with gender.

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 8>It's about It's about poetics.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask a dumb question about the way you work?

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 3>So there's the Homeric question, of course, who wrote this?

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Did he write this? And the ilia etca, etc. You know,

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.959
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned these other translations, so there's Fagels and Fitzgerald

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and Mendelssohn for that matter. As you're writing this, as

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 3>you were doing your translation, how much of that was

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 3>it in dialogue with those translations that you'd read previously.

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 3>In other words, where're working principally from the text in

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 3>ancient Greek? Or are you drawing from at least inspiration

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 3>from those texts those translations as well.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 14>Primarily from the Greek. And I don't actually, in terms

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 14>of my practice, spend much time looking at other translations,

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 14>because most of the time, if I'm wrestling with a

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.719
<v Speaker 14>particular problem about this line is so beautiful in these

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 14>particular ways, how can I convey that using.

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 8>Completely different words?

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 14>It's not going to help me if I then look

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 14>and see, oh he did that. Now I can't use

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 14>that anymore because he's already stole that. So I actually

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 14>need to spend the time by myself wrestling with it.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 14>I'd read a lot of commentaries, I reread the dictionary

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 14>over and over to try and figure out how else

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 14>is this word used wherever else it's used in ancient Greek.

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 14>But it's not really about other looking at other translations. So,

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 14>of course, while I was starting this project, I was

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 14>meditating on my experiences, especially in the classroom, using many

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 14>different other translations, and thinking about what doesn't get across

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 14>when I use bagels or when I use Latimore. And

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 14>primarily I've thought about both meta and about the vividness, rapidity,

0:32:55.920 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 14>and the multi vocality of Homer, about how, in some

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 14>ways this is about how Homer can work for the

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 14>screen as well as for the stage and adaptation. The

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 14>Odyssey was composed before drama existed, but it has these

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 14>amazing speeches of characters who are so fully realized, and

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 14>we fully understand who Penelope is.

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 6>We're gonna have to leave it there.

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 9>Thank you so much.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I welcome you excellent version of the Odyssey. My other

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 2>favorite is, of course, wish Bone.

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 12>Stay with us for more on Bloomberg this weekend. Right

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 12>after this, you've.

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 13>Waited, as I have, for more than two hours for this,

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 13>It's time for the pointed news quiz.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.959
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you what David Gera and Lisa Matteo.

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 2>If you change the rules again to benefit David, I will.

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 9>Walk off this set.

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 13>I always defer to Lisa. That's why I do so

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 13>well at this game.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>A table.

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 8>What is happening.

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 7>Lisa.

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought we had a girl code and she shared

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that list.

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 13>My respect and comes down to that week after week.

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 9>Okay, don't discount it, David, to it. We are talking

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 9>about the pointed news everybody. This is the part everybody's

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 9>waiting for. Okay.

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 4>So for those of you at home, you're like, what

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 4>is this game? Okay, here's what happens. You can play

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 4>too on home at home if you want, might choose

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 4>the rules again, change the rules. There will be three categories, okay,

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 4>David Christina each have thirty chips in front of them.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 4>They will place their bets on each category depending on

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 4>how they feel. You know, maybe they feel more confident

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 4>about the first or maybe not so much the second.

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 9>We'll see.

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Are you ready for your three categories? Born before you

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 4>place your bets. Okay, here are your categories. First off

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 4>is birds, second is frequent flyers, and third is world records.

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 8>Did you read bad bords this week?

0:34:57.719 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 13>I've read no stories this week, which is part of

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 13>my strategy here.

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 9>So are you going thirty across.

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.240
<v Speaker 13>The board because birds could be frequent flyers?

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm also true, Lord help us From David Gara Puns today.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 9>Across the board as well. All right, they have placed

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 9>their vets. Let's go on to the first question.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Here we go, birds, Lisa, Chinese exports are surging for

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 4>what type of bird used in a popular dish? Now?

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 4>This is despite local demand kind of being soft. So

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Chinese exports surging for what kind of bird used in

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 4>a popular dish? What bird is used in a popular

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 4>dish from China?

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 9>Anytime? Now, David, he's writing people.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 4>He even drew a picture for those of you who

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 4>duck is courage.

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 9>More specifically peaking duck. But I'll give it to you. Okay,

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 9>there we go. I have I've tried it, and I'm

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 9>not a big fan. I don't know.

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 13>Crispy skin, Yeah, I don't know.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's hard to prepare. They have to do

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 2>it like really well it's well yeah, so why is this?

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Why are the exports up? Gets back focusing I'm focusing

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 2>on back.

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 6>Down to get us back.

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 13>Why are they soft soft in in in the country.

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 9>They just don't soft a man in the country. They

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 9>just don't not so much. I mean they have it

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 9>all the time.

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 4>What they're trying to explore it getting more popular, trying

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 4>to get more popular.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 9>Yes, Okay, there we go. We're moving on to frequent flying.

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Energy duns up there, thinking about that duck ducks to

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 3>frequent flyers.

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 4>What public figure has flown fifty seven thousand miles since

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 4>June in a Gulf Stream private jet enough to.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 9>Circle the equator twice? See, I know you know who

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 9>it is. But what is the name? What is this

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 9>person's name?

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 13>Okay, it's cryptic?

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 2>What now?

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 9>Now I'm confused? What public figure? What is his name?

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 4>He's flown fifty seven thousand miles since June since in

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 4>the Gulf Stream?

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 9>What's what it is?

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 14>I wonder?

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I wonder. David Garrett, A lot's been happening since.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 6>Mentioned on a certain sport. Maybe the attention to the

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 6>chat in weeks.

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 9>I don't know. Okay, okay, flipp it.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 6>What do you got Johnny Infantina, Hey Taylor?

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Then you said yes, yes, so the president of FIFA.

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 9>Yes he is the one.

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you have the expanded World Cup right, there's

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 4>now forty eighteen, So thanks, I get her chips.

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 9>Okay, but listen to his travel schedule, okay.

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 4>June twenty sixth he went from Miami to Dallas, Dallas

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 4>to Seattle, Seattle to Miami because he has to watch

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 4>all these games, most of them, so it's.

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 6>A doc plan. I should say he's paying for it.

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 7>No, no, no, yeah.

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 4>The estimated costs for jet fuel three hundred and fifty

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 4>thousand dollars.

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 9>That is a price quite the carbon footprints that as well.

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 9>Uh number three you ready, number three world record.

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Continue my suffering, Lisa.

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I did this story, so I want to make

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 4>sure you guys were listening when I did it. Runner

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Josh Kerr he broke the world record for fastest mile. Okay,

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 4>which Berkshire Hathway own brand designed his shoe?

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 13>Such a good question.

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 9>Sneaker brand, think about it. Sneaker brand running the world.

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 13>Here has always listened to Lisa Matteo, pay attention.

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 9>I can't remember we talked to him pulling.

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 13>Back the curtain.

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're always trying to get ready for the

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 3>next segment, listening to what the director has to say.

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 9>Always it's drugs, Christada.

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 12>Oh yes, he also was wearing a speed suit special suit.

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, special credible to save those thousand time.

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:49.959
<v Speaker 9>Every every second count.

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 2>No if like it's not swimming I don't know how

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 2>much the speed suit is going to be different.

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, three hours, forty two minutes and sixty six seconds,

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 4>that's exactly.

0:38:57.880 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we can speed up this.

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 9>All right, let's do it.

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Let's hit the bonus because Christina, you can win these

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 4>all of my when you get all the back.

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 9>Okay, bonus is New Jersey. Okay, that's the category.

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 4>James Patten was sentenced to twenty months twenty one months

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 4>in prison after he inflated sales from twenty thousand dollars

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 4>to one hundred million dollars for.

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 9>What type of New Jersey small business? Think about it?

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 9>New Jersey small business? What type of New Jersey small business?

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.240
<v Speaker 6>Interesting? All right, I really have no idea.

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 14>On this front.

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 9>Oh you don't know so fast?

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 13>Okay, I wrote lawn care trash collection.

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 9>It's Deli Deli. Remember the story?

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 7>Next?

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you see that condescending for a radio? Listen, there's

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a very contor.

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 8>The battery just received.

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Always listen to Lisa Matteo. You can test your knowledge

0:39:58.280 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 3>on all ten questions. You can take the point in

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 3>new quisite Bloomberg dot com slash pointed. You can find

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:03.959
<v Speaker 3>it on the Bloomberg Business App.

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us on today's Bloomberg This Weekend podcast.

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to tune in live for the show every

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Saturday and Sunday morning, starting at seven am Eastern.

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 3>We're on Bloomberg Television Radio and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 3>bringing you unique takes and in depth interviews on news, politics,

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 3>lifestyle and culture.