1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:04,480
Speaker 1: Front page headline, Ron de Santis is the future of

2
00:00:04,559 --> 00:00:08,280
Speaker 1: the Republican Party, as Jonah Goldberg set up on CNN,

3
00:00:08,360 --> 00:00:11,240
Speaker 1: representing the Republican side of things, he is the head

4
00:00:11,240 --> 00:00:13,760
Speaker 1: of the Republican Party now, Ron de Santis, I think

5
00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:16,439
Speaker 1: that might be a little premature. There's a there's a

6
00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:18,960
Speaker 1: there's an orange man from New York who has actually

7
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:22,120
Speaker 1: from Florida who has a say in that. Also, if

8
00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:24,400
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go with the more negative spin though, I

9
00:00:24,440 --> 00:00:27,480
Speaker 1: was just watching a little Fox News coverage in the

10
00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:30,760
Speaker 1: lunch room and their hosts saying, We've got the worst

11
00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:34,120
Speaker 1: inflation in forty years, We've got the worst crime in

12
00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:37,960
Speaker 1: forty years, we have the worst border ever, and the

13
00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:42,280
Speaker 1: Republicans couldn't get over this is this is a referendum

14
00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:45,959
Speaker 1: on the Republican Party. The Fox host said, Let's chat

15
00:00:46,040 --> 00:00:48,880
Speaker 1: about this and more with Sarah Westwood, an investigative reporter

16
00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:54,000
Speaker 1: for the Washington Examiner previously the White House reporter for CNN. Sarah, welcome,

17
00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:57,400
Speaker 1: how are you. I'm great, Thanks for having me. We

18
00:00:57,480 --> 00:01:01,000
Speaker 1: will give you free reign over our radio show. What

19
00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:04,240
Speaker 1: are your takeaways? What are your impressions from last night?

20
00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:08,040
Speaker 1: But to a lot of pressure, but thank you. You know,

21
00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:14,000
Speaker 1: I think Republicans had raised expectations to an unrealistic level

22
00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:16,800
Speaker 1: before the election, and I think some of the choices

23
00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:20,280
Speaker 1: that the Republican campaign are made in the run up

24
00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:22,560
Speaker 1: to the election are going to be second guests. I mean,

25
00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:26,160
Speaker 1: if you look at, for example, the Superpack connected to

26
00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:30,840
Speaker 1: House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, that group Congressional Leadership Fund

27
00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:35,160
Speaker 1: was spending millions of dollars in districts that ultimately didn't

28
00:01:35,160 --> 00:01:39,600
Speaker 1: even come close. In districts in Oregon, in Washington State,

29
00:01:39,720 --> 00:01:43,479
Speaker 1: you know, big reaches for Republicans and not shoring up

30
00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:46,160
Speaker 1: the winnable districts that ended up being very close, but

31
00:01:46,240 --> 00:01:49,280
Speaker 1: many of them broke for Democrats. So I think there

32
00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:55,160
Speaker 1: was sort of an irrational optimism among Republicans because the

33
00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:58,360
Speaker 1: landscapes looked so bad for Democrats. But in the end,

34
00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:04,120
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was not the polarizing figure that Donald Trump was,

35
00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:08,480
Speaker 1: and so even dissatisfied voters went into the poll box

36
00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:11,480
Speaker 1: and at the ballot box and didn't necessarily cast a

37
00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:15,720
Speaker 1: vote purely against Joe Biden. So his unpopularity wasn't the

38
00:02:15,760 --> 00:02:18,560
Speaker 1: type of drag that I think a lot of analysts expected,

39
00:02:18,639 --> 00:02:20,959
Speaker 1: and of course we we answered the question of can

40
00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:24,280
Speaker 1: you be a doctor who sells fake dial the diet pills,

41
00:02:24,440 --> 00:02:26,000
Speaker 1: moved to a different state and try to become a

42
00:02:26,040 --> 00:02:28,919
Speaker 1: U S Senator? So that question has finally been answered. Uh,

43
00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:32,160
Speaker 1: the age old question can you be a quack doctor

44
00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:34,840
Speaker 1: from a different state and become a senator? He lost

45
00:02:34,880 --> 00:02:37,640
Speaker 1: to a stroke victim, good Laurel and a guy who's

46
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:40,799
Speaker 1: never held a real job. If you wanted to look

47
00:02:40,840 --> 00:02:43,520
Speaker 1: at the Federmentaz race, Sarah or a number of different

48
00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:47,640
Speaker 1: races around the country, what about the Republican senatorial candidates.

49
00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:51,560
Speaker 1: So there's you know, got a lot of talk about

50
00:02:51,639 --> 00:02:55,679
Speaker 1: candidate quality, and I think that the Pennsylvania race is

51
00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:58,360
Speaker 1: a perfect example. Dr Oz didn't have a lot of

52
00:02:58,360 --> 00:03:01,320
Speaker 1: credibility on the issues that pattered the most to voters

53
00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:04,760
Speaker 1: this cycle. Right, they cared about inflation, they cared about crime,

54
00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,320
Speaker 1: and Dr Oz was television doctor, so he wasn't able

55
00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:12,560
Speaker 1: to speak to the issues most important to voters. And

56
00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:14,720
Speaker 1: that's sort of the same problem that you know, herschel

57
00:03:14,760 --> 00:03:18,639
Speaker 1: Walker and Georgia had. Sure, he had celebrity, he had charisma,

58
00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:21,720
Speaker 1: but what credibility did he really have to be talking

59
00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:26,760
Speaker 1: about keeping the street safe and keeping inflation down. Democrats

60
00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:29,480
Speaker 1: have a lot of message discipline in both of those races,

61
00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:32,799
Speaker 1: even though John Cutterman was an exceptionally weak candidate and

62
00:03:33,120 --> 00:03:36,120
Speaker 1: he was beatable, and and so was Rafael Warnock in Georgia,

63
00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:38,440
Speaker 1: and you know, you can go down the line down

64
00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:41,320
Speaker 1: through house races. There were a number of other UH

65
00:03:41,480 --> 00:03:44,360
Speaker 1: races that were winnable for Republicans, like in Virginia, the

66
00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,240
Speaker 1: race in Northern Virginia Gainst Abigail span Burger and Yes

67
00:03:47,320 --> 00:03:51,200
Speaker 1: Lea Vega, Yes Lea Vega had a big controversy saying

68
00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:53,520
Speaker 1: something kind of like if you remember taught aken then

69
00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:56,440
Speaker 1: the Missouri Center race said about women's bodies can't get

70
00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:59,880
Speaker 1: pregnant if they're raped. You know, candidates that weren't vetted,

71
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:02,040
Speaker 1: it weren't ready for prime time. We're put up in

72
00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:04,760
Speaker 1: these key races, and Republicans sort of thought that that

73
00:04:04,800 --> 00:04:07,640
Speaker 1: would be overlooked because of concerns about the economy, and

74
00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:11,200
Speaker 1: it wasn't. Okay, I have another essay type question for you,

75
00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:13,800
Speaker 1: but before we get there, let's let's not leap past

76
00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:17,599
Speaker 1: the headlines. It looks correct me if I'm wrong, Like,

77
00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:20,680
Speaker 1: the Republicans will take the House of Representatives. How likely

78
00:04:20,800 --> 00:04:23,080
Speaker 1: is that that? And by how many seats do you think?

79
00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,360
Speaker 1: Right now? It does look that way, but it just

80
00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:31,560
Speaker 1: looks to be like a handful at this point, and

81
00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:35,520
Speaker 1: the races outstanding are really really close, So that doesn't

82
00:04:35,560 --> 00:04:40,440
Speaker 1: exactly give Republicans a big mandate, And you know, it

83
00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:42,800
Speaker 1: makes it so that any vacancies that occur in the

84
00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:45,440
Speaker 1: House are going to be big marquee events over the

85
00:04:45,480 --> 00:04:49,040
Speaker 1: next two years, right, So that's going to be instructful

86
00:04:49,400 --> 00:04:52,200
Speaker 1: for Washington. In the Senate, you know, there's still an

87
00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:56,680
Speaker 1: outside chance that Republicans can take the Senate. The Republicans

88
00:04:56,680 --> 00:04:59,440
Speaker 1: are looking really good in Nevada with Adam lack Salt

89
00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:02,320
Speaker 1: running a out of Catherine Cortez Bass, so that will

90
00:05:02,360 --> 00:05:05,320
Speaker 1: be a pick up opportunity that would essentially cancel out

91
00:05:05,760 --> 00:05:08,840
Speaker 1: the Settlement win and control of the Senate could come

92
00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:12,520
Speaker 1: down once again to Georgia runoff, which I believe would

93
00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:15,480
Speaker 1: be December six, So just a few more weeks until

94
00:05:15,480 --> 00:05:19,360
Speaker 1: we've learned the outcome. So all is not lost for Republicans,

95
00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:23,400
Speaker 1: but you know, conceptually, politically, it was a bad night

96
00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:26,720
Speaker 1: and even if they pull out very narrow majorities, this

97
00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,400
Speaker 1: won't be considered a good mid term. History won't remember

98
00:05:31,560 --> 00:05:33,560
Speaker 1: definitely was not a good mid term for the Republicans.

99
00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:35,440
Speaker 1: But if you're going to pick out, the best thing,

100
00:05:35,440 --> 00:05:38,520
Speaker 1: which I already mentioned earlier, is the Republicans have a

101
00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:40,000
Speaker 1: new rock star. I mean, he was a rock star

102
00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:42,520
Speaker 1: before last night, but now he's an ultra super rock

103
00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:45,120
Speaker 1: star in Ron Santas. And let me let me throw

104
00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:48,359
Speaker 1: this in as well, Sarah, the email to the Armstrong

105
00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:53,479
Speaker 1: and Getty show has been running astonishingly toward Trump has

106
00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:59,159
Speaker 1: to go practically universally, which was as surprising to me

107
00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,039
Speaker 1: and Jack as any buddy. Um, you feel free to,

108
00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:03,880
Speaker 1: you know, throw that into your answer. What about the

109
00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:07,279
Speaker 1: santiss rise, Yeah, I mean I think that's the other

110
00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:11,960
Speaker 1: huge element of this, of what these results tell us

111
00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:17,120
Speaker 1: is that Donald Trump, I think was a drag on

112
00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:21,719
Speaker 1: a number of candidates who didn't have brands independent of him, right,

113
00:06:22,279 --> 00:06:26,279
Speaker 1: and or candidates who were associated very very closely with him.

114
00:06:26,880 --> 00:06:30,080
Speaker 1: For Republican candidates who were not, who were seen as

115
00:06:30,680 --> 00:06:33,960
Speaker 1: independent of him, they did very well. Rondo Santis is

116
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:36,000
Speaker 1: a great example of that. I mean, he ran up

117
00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:40,520
Speaker 1: historic margins in his state sort of solidified his position

118
00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:43,880
Speaker 1: as the hat of the party. I think that Trump's

119
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:46,680
Speaker 1: negative of facts on the party's prospects has been something

120
00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:49,440
Speaker 1: that's sort of been whispered about with more frequency and

121
00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:53,200
Speaker 1: Republican circles, and I wonder if this result will let

122
00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:56,520
Speaker 1: people start saying it out loud, because at this point,

123
00:06:56,560 --> 00:07:01,040
Speaker 1: what cost will Republicans have for kiding that Trump stepped

124
00:07:01,040 --> 00:07:02,880
Speaker 1: off the stage? I mean, before there was a fear

125
00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:06,520
Speaker 1: that voters would punish any Republican who said that out loud.

126
00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:09,840
Speaker 1: This election is clear evidence, but that's not the case.

127
00:07:09,880 --> 00:07:12,240
Speaker 1: I don't think that Republicans will be punished if they

128
00:07:12,280 --> 00:07:15,600
Speaker 1: start to say it's time for a new leader to emerge.

129
00:07:15,800 --> 00:07:18,200
Speaker 1: So maybe some of that fear of speaking out against

130
00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:21,679
Speaker 1: Trump will be removed from electric Republicans and they can start,

131
00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:24,480
Speaker 1: you know, moving the party in a direction away from him.

132
00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:26,760
Speaker 1: I mean keep in mind that, you know, the Christmas,

133
00:07:26,760 --> 00:07:29,160
Speaker 1: after the midterm elections, once we get through the holidays,

134
00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:33,400
Speaker 1: basically the presidential race will start, and so it's time

135
00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:36,000
Speaker 1: to start having the conversations now well, right, and including

136
00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:38,440
Speaker 1: on the other side, where a lot of the belief

137
00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:41,560
Speaker 1: was if the Republicans have a giant knight. That gives

138
00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:44,080
Speaker 1: a lot of Democrats the power to say, look, Joe Biden,

139
00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:46,360
Speaker 1: you gotta go. You're a drag on the party. But

140
00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:49,640
Speaker 1: you can't make that argument now, So where's that leave us?

141
00:07:50,720 --> 00:07:52,880
Speaker 1: That could ultimately end up if there's if there's a

142
00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:59,040
Speaker 1: very outside overlying for Republicans, this gives Joe Biden the

143
00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:02,840
Speaker 1: justification to stay a top his ticket. He can argue

144
00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:07,760
Speaker 1: that he saved his party from a historic beating in

145
00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:11,440
Speaker 1: the mid terms when the history suggested he would his

146
00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:15,800
Speaker 1: party would endure, and with his brilliant shuffling leadership across

147
00:08:15,840 --> 00:08:21,440
Speaker 1: the country exactly something he can claim. And then Republicans, conversely,

148
00:08:21,480 --> 00:08:23,680
Speaker 1: can look at these results and and take away from

149
00:08:23,720 --> 00:08:26,680
Speaker 1: it that it's time to push Trump off the off

150
00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:30,640
Speaker 1: the stage and usher a new leadership. And if race

151
00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:33,880
Speaker 1: could boil down to someone like Rhnda Santis running against

152
00:08:33,960 --> 00:08:36,880
Speaker 1: someone like Joe Biden, that could put Republicans in a

153
00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:39,240
Speaker 1: position to take a historic amount the palette. I think

154
00:08:39,280 --> 00:08:42,520
Speaker 1: you've nailed it. The headline flip was yesterday it was

155
00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:45,720
Speaker 1: looking like Trump's gonna announce He's gonna be tough to beat,

156
00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:48,280
Speaker 1: and the Republican and the Democrats are gonna push out Biden.

157
00:08:48,360 --> 00:08:51,400
Speaker 1: It might have flipped overnight. Biden is going to be

158
00:08:51,440 --> 00:08:55,040
Speaker 1: the nominee. Trump's gonna get pushed out alright, two points

159
00:08:55,120 --> 00:08:58,000
Speaker 1: number one. God gets a vote on whether Joe Biden

160
00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:00,200
Speaker 1: is going to run again, as does his brain. There's

161
00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:03,040
Speaker 1: no freaking way it happens. I'll bet you my house, Sarah.

162
00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:06,040
Speaker 1: I tell you what you put, what, what do you

163
00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:08,760
Speaker 1: have of value? Anything you get a nice ballpoint pen,

164
00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:11,840
Speaker 1: you bet that pen against my house. I'll take that action.

165
00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:18,199
Speaker 1: Joe Biden does not run again. Uh. Secondly, it's if

166
00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:21,280
Speaker 1: you will accept that premise. It is wide open on

167
00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:23,960
Speaker 1: the Democratic side because Kamala Harris doesn't have a snowball's

168
00:09:24,040 --> 00:09:29,080
Speaker 1: chance in hell. So that's gonna be a knife fight. Well,

169
00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:32,520
Speaker 1: I I think that's definitely right. Um, it's hard to

170
00:09:32,559 --> 00:09:35,360
Speaker 1: see though, who the natural successor is. I mean, the

171
00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:38,080
Speaker 1: thing that benefits Republicans is that they have a clear

172
00:09:38,559 --> 00:09:41,720
Speaker 1: natural successor to Trump, and that's round the santis and

173
00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:45,240
Speaker 1: there's near unanimity about that in the Republican Party. I

174
00:09:45,280 --> 00:09:47,560
Speaker 1: don't think if Trump doesn't run that that will be

175
00:09:47,559 --> 00:09:52,120
Speaker 1: a particularly close Republican primary. Because he's so popular. Meanwhile,

176
00:09:52,160 --> 00:09:54,920
Speaker 1: the Democrats would have a blood baths on their hands

177
00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:57,559
Speaker 1: if Joe Biden decides not to run because there are

178
00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:01,800
Speaker 1: so many candidates U weaker candidates in a more wide

179
00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:05,360
Speaker 1: open field. So I think in either scenario, if Joe

180
00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:08,560
Speaker 1: Biden runs again, obviously Rhonda Santas that would be a

181
00:10:08,600 --> 00:10:11,240
Speaker 1: favorite given the dynamics in the country right now, if

182
00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:16,839
Speaker 1: the economy doesn't improve dramatically. Um. But if Joe Biden

183
00:10:16,840 --> 00:10:19,400
Speaker 1: did not run, I think Rhonda santa is having all

184
00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:21,640
Speaker 1: that time as the heir to the throne of the

185
00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:25,080
Speaker 1: Republican nomination while Democrats kill each other to see who

186
00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:29,000
Speaker 1: emerges successful, and a Democratic primary always involves tacking to

187
00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:31,280
Speaker 1: the left. Um, he would have an advantage in that

188
00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:34,560
Speaker 1: scenario as well. Boy, that excites me, and my new

189
00:10:34,600 --> 00:10:37,240
Speaker 1: pan excites me. I'm gonna write polies with that pen.

190
00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:40,960
Speaker 1: I'm going to sign checks right, personal letters. I can't wait.

191
00:10:41,080 --> 00:10:45,360
Speaker 1: I think people too casually use the term blood path.

192
00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:50,800
Speaker 1: I mean, that's a horrific notion. She means it metaphorically,

193
00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:55,000
Speaker 1: and it made me excited. Sarah Westwood, investigative reporter of

194
00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:58,280
Speaker 1: The Washington Examiner. Sarah, you are absolutely terrific. It's great

195
00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:00,920
Speaker 1: to talk. Thanks don't thank for having me