WEBVTT - Monday night recap, getting you ready for Championship week, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess Dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, m Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Don due do do do? Dude? Did it

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>do Yo? There's as love Fantasy best Friends Forever here

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Ringer Network alongside Frankie standfll I

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>am Greg's reggae. We're finally here, We're here, We're here.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Is that? This is everything on the line. Week sixteen,

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Football Championship. Week fifteen is in the books.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Slobber knocker last night, Greg, I hope you took the over.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Just kidding the Panther Saints game last night. Uh, that's

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the bet everyone loved, Greg, That's the bet everyone loved.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Twelve nine your final score. But at least we gotta

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>pick two out of the game. You don't see that.

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't see the pick too often. You don't see that.

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably the most fun part of that game last night,

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately for you, Greg, watching Cam Newton suck once again,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>watching Alvin Kamara do awesome once again, it was not

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>fun for you. No, sorry, Bud. Not a great night.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>You got the next time, Greg, get him next time, semifinals.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>He made it to the semifinals. Man. Not many people

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>can say that, especially on this network. Nothing the playoffs.

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>This yeah, not about the payoffs. It's whether you finish

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>or not. Brutal, man, brutal. I'm sorry, man, you know

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>what I really touchdown? I thought you had a good

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>shot to you know, for those wondering what's going on?

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>What you had a two point lead, right, two point lead,

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton versus Alvin Kamara in a standard league. Something

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>seriously seriously wrong with Cam Newton right now. I think

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>we realized that last night. Pretty cool tweet from Josh

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Norris about uh the NFL next sin stats. They have

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>charts now which show you how far down the field

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>each throw has gone for a quarterback. Cam Newton attempted

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>one throw that was longer than fifteen yards down the

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>field last night. And you know, we always noticed this

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>watching the way that Cam Newton throws a football, which

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.679
<v Speaker 1>leads to a lot of his inaccuracies. But this is

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>something that, like the Money Night broadcast was hammering into

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>your head all night long, was well, he uses his

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>whole entire upper body to throw the ball. It's really

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of an awkward throwing motion for Cam Newton, but

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it looked even more awkward last night. I wouldn't be

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 1>surprised if, you know, he sits out these last couple

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>of games, because what are they playing for at this point? Yeah,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they really have a like a shot

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs anymore, right, No they don't. They

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>asked Robert Rivera about that after the game last night.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna just shut Cam down given what given when

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>he looked like given clearly not healthy, and ultimately Rob riveriss, no,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we have no plans to do that now. Of course,

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>take twenty four hours, reevaluate where you're at. That obviously

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>could change, but it would surprise me. Cam Newton comes

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to mind. Aaron Rodgers comes to mind, also, as someone

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that could sit out here. This week, we saw the

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>line of the Jett game moved very very quickly that

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>they were the Jets. Yesterday the game opened up as

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Lane, three points on the road. It's down

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick him so and you wonder if they know

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>something before we do. And it seems like that's the

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>way that it's training right now. My j E. T

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>s problem is I don't really want them to win

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>any games right now. Surprisingly enough, we'll talk about that

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>game later on, but the Packers Jets, that's where you're

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna find a lot of your waiver wire gems this week. Greg, Yeah, absolutely,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and that that's really where what will start. And I

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's actually a really good spot to start because

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire jams. I want to stick with the quarterbacks here, Frank,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>because if I Rodgers doesn't play, Cam Newton doesn't play,

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're in the finals somehow, Cam Newton is your

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and maybe less less shockingly without Rodgers quarterback. If

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>these two guys are out and you have them where

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you need a streamer for whatever reason, something happened to

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback. You've been streaming guys. You want to make

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a change Sam Donald is somebody that you can actually

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>turn to, right. I mean, I don't know if we're

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if we're there yet, but yeah, I mean Cam Newton,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. You're gonna have to find some quarterbacks hopefully.

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>You know in your league, you'll notice ownership percentages are

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>all over the place at this point, because really there's

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>only two teams left playing, so you know, there's not

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people still making ad drops. So it

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>might look like those running rookie r backs are still available,

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>guys like Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, even Baker Mayfield. I

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>think we would all point you in the direction of

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>those guys first, but we've been talking about those guys

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for weeks, Greg, so there's chances are that those players

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>are not available anymore. So yeah, we are looking at,

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the next man up, so to speak,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in Sam Donald. And look, he played he played his

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>ass off last week, Greig against the Houston Texans, a

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 1>defense that you know, all right, the way to attack

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans is through to the secondary, but they

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have a phenomenal pass rush, and what Sam Donald was

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>able to do consistently throughout that game was evade the

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>pass rush, get outside the pocket. And you know, something

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I like to see from his development already is that

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he's keeping his eyes down the field, he's getting outside

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the pocket and making plays with his arm. So the

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Packers secondary is not one that scares me all that much.

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And just looking at what Sam Donald did last week,

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what through for two fifty yards through for two touchdowns,

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>added an additional thirty rushing yards on the ground, So

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this is like really like slim pickings this week. Again,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the other rookie quarterbacks we like more, not Josh Rosen,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, and Baker Mayfield. But if

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>those guys are taking you're playing a super flex league.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>You'll lost Aaron Rodgers or Cam Newton. Again, we're just speculating,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'd be surprised if those guys play. Sam Donald

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>looks like the next man up, greggy, Sam Donald us

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>look like the next guy off, And it's possible. Um,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he's the only one out there now. I was looking

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Josh Allen is actually still available in over

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty of CBS Sports dot com leagues. But do you

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>trust the ownership percentages? That's the thing, because there's only

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like two or four teams still making waiver pick and

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you you you're in thousand percent, right. But a lot

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the other quarterbacks that I looked at, Lamar Jackson, UM,

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott, some of the names that we've gone over

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>over the basketball of weeks. I mean, they're only five

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of leagues, right, so those guys are owned exactly.

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen was the one that people still have question marks.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And he only ran for like nineteen yards this week,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but one of those runs were for a touchdown. He

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>also through for a touchdown. So Josh Allen's gotta be

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that first choice. I think he's just played really really well.

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh faces New England this week. Um, but he's played

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>too well, and he's Chris Bencher said it, I'm benching

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton for Josh Allen this week. He was like,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.559
<v Speaker 1>you've been saying it for weeks. I'm bending Aaron Rodgers

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>for Josh Allen this week. And you've been right when

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he said for Tom Brady you weren't. But that's okay.

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But Josh Allen overall, he's the quarterback. He's the guy

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>if you need one this week. Sam Donald certainly could

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be the next man up and We're gonna talk about

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>this game a lot, and Frank put up a poll

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in regards to defenses this week. We'll get to that

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in just a few minutes. But Derek Card for Oakland.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>What could be the last game for the Raiders in

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.559
<v Speaker 1>Oakland on Monday Night. Imagine having your quarterback on Monday

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Night football with everything on the line, Frank, true story.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Oakland also played Monday Night last Fantasy Finals one year ago.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>This week, it was the Oakland Raiders and the Philadelphia

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Eagles on Monday Night. From the link, Michael Crabt, you

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>put up a zero in that game. Crossed a lot

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of people. Great. I had him in my lineup. I

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>had already clinched going into Monday Night, so I was

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>fine he put up a zero. Disaster disaster. Yeah, we

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>did get a response. You know, put up that Twitter

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>poll asking which defense you like most, because I think

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really close. Right, There's not really just one defense

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that stands out this week. Last week we were all

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>over the Falcons. We recommended the Bills and a Lions

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, Greggy, But just looking at the defense for

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>this week, it's you know, the Titans. Um, the Titans

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>are playing the Washington football team. The Cowboys are at

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>home against Tampa Bay. You got the Broncos in Oakland,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>so we'll talk about that game as well. But there

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting point about you know, we gotta response

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>saying this is the this could be or I think

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it will be the last game in Oakland. So the

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Raiders are gonna be fired up, there's no doubt about that.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>You know the crowd is gonna be crazy there. Uh

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>does that differ you from almost using the Broncos defense

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>because you have to assume that the Raiders are gonna

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>put up some points in the spot. Yeah know in

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that poll that you put without Frank, you gave me

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>enough alternatives, right. It wasn't like it's the Denver defense

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>or Boss that nobody else has good match. There's a

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of defenses that are going to be out there

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that aren't owned, that aren't stashed away, that I think

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you'll have the ability to pick up. And I think, really, everyone,

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>this is the one pole that you honestly put up

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>all season. I know it's like a ridiculous powl, just

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the defense and weeks sixteen, but I didn't know who

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to choose. I really had no idea who to choose

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in this one. So I think there's other options as

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of right now, say the Titans, So you know, fine,

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the public that people are voting here are they're a

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit more in on the Titans than than we are.

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But obviously the Dolphins at home playing against Jacksonville Cody

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Kessler that they're also in play of the Cowboys at home.

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>The hot Boys defense going up against Tampa Bay. You

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>know that Jamis Winston could be turnover prone at times. Um,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks offense did not do much against the Baltimore

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Ravens a week ago, and I think the Cowboys it's

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a nice little bounce back spot for the him at

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>home coming off a los for like I shut out

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>against the Indianapolis Colts. I'm sure they'll be up for

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the for that game, Greg and I need them to

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>be up for that game because I have the Bucks

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>season under six and a half. The Bucks are at

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>five wins right now, just lose one. How about them Cowboys?

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I need the Cowboys to win this game this week.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of people are in the same boat.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I also had the Dolphins under for the year. That

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>is out the window. Oh man, I don't really want

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to say the final one. I don't want to say alright, no,

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say it. I had the Jets over.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The Jets over six most you know they can get

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to at least six wins. But if you look back

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>at it, did get shot over. They didn't get into seven. No,

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>well at least six. I mean it's a push. Then

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>if you get to six to push, oh there's six,

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>not six and a half. So the shot they were

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of clothes, you still have a shot

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to push. It's not gonna happen. Actually, maybe playing week's seventeen.

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not Jets fan. I don't know. I don't think

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>you have to be Jets fans. Might betsins. Maybe maybe

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots bench all their guys right, Probably not, probably

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen. It might be the Packers though, which

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>would actually suck for draft pick wise. Do you have

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>any other quarterbacks before we move on the year, considering

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>picking up this week? If necessary? Again, super flex, just

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>throw his name out there. Josh Johnson two owned going

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>up against Tennessee. I know, you know we're talking about

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the Titans defense and how much we like them. It's

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just really because the Washington is a net on offense.

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they're putting up They're not putting up a

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of points with Josh Johnson, but when it comes

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to Johnson's and that at least forty five rushing yards

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and back to back games. Here, I'm looking at my

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>home league. It's a four point passing touchdown league. He's

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>given you at least fifteen Fantasy points in two games.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is just like a hail Mary, like super flex.

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>If Rogers or Cam Newton doesn't play, if Sam Donald,

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>then like every other quarterback is owned, I'll just throw

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Josh Shotnson's name out there. Josh actually came to my mind.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>One more quarterback, and I have on my list Morga's

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Mariota against in that same game. Actually, I know that

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 1>on problem with Mariota is the botto has been nothing

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>over the past two weeks. There, I say, I like

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Josh Shahnson more than macause what's working for the football?

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Turn and slam that rock into the stomach of Derrick

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Henry times a game. His snap percent is Derrick Henry

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>up to this past week. We've seen what he's done

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>over the past two weeks. Now this is two years

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>in a row, Greg, where towards the end of the season,

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry starts to take over. Now we're going to

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>fall for this again. All right, We're we're gonna carry

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this over to the next year, and we're gonna say

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the breakout season coming for Derrick Henry. Maybe

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>it's just if you look at the snap percentage in

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the way he was used, maybe they purposely did that

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.599
<v Speaker 1>where all right, well, we'll kind of save him for

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season where everyone else is kind

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of banged up football the game of Attrician where he's

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of just banging everybody around. You saw him that

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>long run against the jack Bards. No one wants to

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>tackle this guy. It seemed like no one wanted to

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>act last week against the Giants either. So maybe this

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is by design kind of save Derrick Henry and keep

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>him fresh for the end of the season. Two years

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in a row. I know the idea of that. I

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just can't buy it, because you need to win games.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>You need to win games early, need to win against late.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Why wasn't getting twenty plus carries? Are you single game

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this year? And why did it take it down? I

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.599
<v Speaker 1>don't know fourteen for Derrick Henry to get unleased, and

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I have the same questions for a guy like, you know,

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams with Los Angeles. Well, and that only happened

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>because Keenan Allen got hurt. Yeah, but like, why hadn't

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>he been on least he's clearly awesome. He's awesome. Yeah,

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know with guys like Derrick Henry. Next,

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, we are very recently bias.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>What have you done for me lately? We'll see what

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they did at the end of this season, and we'll

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>carry that over into next year. And I wouldn't be

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>surprised if Derrick Henry starts to climb up into the

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>fifth fourth round again next season. We said it on Friday,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>will say it again. With Tyro Williams being a free agent,

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams, that ADP is going to just skyrocket again

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and they could bring back Tyroll Williams. But to me,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you use what a top six seven overall pick on

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams, I think you kind of want him to

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>be the number two wide receiver in your offense. So

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to me, it seems like Tyrolle Williams is gonna end

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>up somewhere else a team that needs a burner, a

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>guy that could get on the defense. I'm not sure

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers really need to pay him when they have

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>guys like Mike Williams Hunter Henry. To bring up Hunter

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Henry as a possible ad because you know he's returning

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to practice. Stephen A. Smith. Have a little bit of

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a crystal ball here now as a possible adds. You're

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>turning to practice for the playoffs. This is why you're

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>turning into practice. He will not play in the regular season.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>There's no where, there's no reason too. How about this though,

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're playing in a dynasty or keeper league, it's

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of scoop him up right now if no one?

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean so, so, here's the thing, right you're acting.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a three week window when it comes to Hunter

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hen right where they have to activate him. That'll be

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a week, fifteen weeks, sixteen weeks, seventeen, there's twenty one

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>days right there. Boom, you activate him on the Tuesday. Uh,

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you active him on Tuesday going into the first round

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of the playoffs. If you're playing in there and you

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have Hunter Henry back for the playoff, that is what

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>he's back for makes sense? Yeah, And I look, I

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>really hope Philip Rivers comes back for at least one

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>more years. Kind of the time where you know, yesterday

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we speculated will Drew Brees be back next year? Philip Rivers? Yeah,

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just me. It's just me. But um yeah, Philip

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Rivers again, I mean, why wouldn't you just We're gonna

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>start talking a lot more about, you know, next year

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>as weeks go on, because you know, a lot of

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>people that are tuning in, Yes, they're still tuning in

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>for to find out about the playoffs, who they should add,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>who they should start, But a lot of people who

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>are still just sticking around, they want to know, like,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, what's gonna happen next year? The Chargers offense, Craig,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you wanted as much exposure to

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that offense as you could possibly get from Keenan Allen,

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams, Hunter, Henry Um, Melvin Gordon, Austin Ekeler, Philip Rivers,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>just lots of lots of fun pieces for fantasy heading

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>into next year. I don't know, really, just thinging off

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the top of my head. Is there a more complete

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>fantasy offense that you want a piece of heading into

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>next year. Because Hunter Henry, if he didn't get heard,

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna be a top five drafted tight end

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this year. So you're gonna have a top five tight end,

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a top let's say, top eight, top

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>ten wide receiver, you have another let's say, top twenty

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>four wide receiver drafted, and then another top five running back.

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Is there a more complete fantasy offense heading into next

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>season the side of the Chargers, Yeah, I'd say so,

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I will. I think he's in terms of like including

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the tight end. Well, and I realized that. Otherwise, you

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>go to the Rams because the Rans have three wide

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>receivers right the same amount of players. Um, you go

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to the child You go to the Chiefs, who have

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a tight end. They have they have a quarterback. Chiefs

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>they have whatever whoever is starting running back. I don't care. Um,

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't. They don't have that second one. They don't

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have that second wide receiver. Though I was an issue.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh comes to mind. They have a running back, a quarterback,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers, Jesse James kind of whatever. There the

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>top three most complete fantas offense without question, without question, um,

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>speaking of a complete fantasy offenses, we want to complete

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy offense for this weekend if you're in your

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>fantasy playoffs, still in the finals, because it is week

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>sixteen now, Frankie, what I wanted to get into here

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is the running backs, and I wanted to make sure

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that you were playing, you're recognizing which injured players are

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>well out, they are out for good. And that starts

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>where we started with the quarterbacks in that Green Bay,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>New York game, specifically with Aaron Jones, who it looks

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to miss the rest of the season,

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>which means it all comes full circle. You started the

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>year and Jamal Williams is the starting running back in

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Green Day. You end the fantasy football season with Jamal

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>will Is the starting running back in Green Day. Frankie,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work out well for me on any of

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>my teams, which is all of them where I drafted

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams and I went with him. Will it work

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>out in the fantasy finals? Do you trust Jamal Williams

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>in the finals? Trust is a strong word, especially this

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>time of year, but again due to the injuries and

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>under performance this time of year, look at what Jamal

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Williams just did in terms of snaps, what he played

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>eight seven percent of the snaps. He has legit workhorse.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think the fact that the Packers signed Capri

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Bibbs today off waivers tells you that Aaron Jones is

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be he I'm not gonna play in this game.

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It looks like he's gonna be out two years ago.

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Now that he's deal dealt with this m c L injury,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'll be right back in on Aaron Jones

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>again next year. But I think that this m c

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>L injury in his knee is actually starting to be

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>something consistent, which is a concern we'll talk to about.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to dr about that in the off season

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and find out where that will be heading into next year.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>But for this week, Greg, when we up against the

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Jetsmal Williams last week against the Bears twelve carries fifty

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>five yards, four point six yards could carry, had a

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown targeted five times. In the passing game, four receptions

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>for forty two yards. Obviously, if Deshaun Kaiser is the

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>quarterback into this team, the whole offense takes a hit.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But just based on the fact that he played that

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>many snaps and got that big workload. We'll be in

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on jamal Wi. We will be and I'll tell you

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:03.479
<v Speaker 1>where I am next. Daily rodo dot Com Learn from

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We never stop. Industry leading DPS tools and custom projections,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily rodo dot Com optimizer. In minutes,

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>build an optimized line up for cash games and tourneys.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Learn from the game's best DBS players. Join Daily rodo

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The following ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is advised. Is someone in your family playing a dangerous

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people die

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a year from drug overdose. A hundred and twenty people

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a day, five people every hour, one person every twelve minutes.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Thousand people die every year from alcohol abuse. Over two

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour, one

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>person every six minutes. Somebody you know maybe next learn

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>how to help someone you love get away from the drugs, alcohol,

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and bad influences. With the f m l A, people

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>can take a leave of absence from their job and

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>still keep it. Call now and learn how we can

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>help you. Eight six six four eight four nine six

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>two one eight six six four eight four nine six

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>two one. That's eight six six four eight four ninety six.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>This is just the fourth wood for Ben Roethlisberger that

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>gets the Patriots at fourteen tries. But now it knocks

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots out of that that first round vibe. We

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>might actually be talked to. You know them played like

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a wild card game, but they've never advanced to the

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl. Wild card. When they get a bye, they

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the super Bowl. When they don't, they don't.

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Greek Day seven am Eastern on F and T, s

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Y Radio and on your popular podcast for me, do

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I need to step? Come on? Come on like that

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>great no, Welcome back to the Fantasy best Friends Forever,

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>where we will sing two aparts in any other guilty

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>pleasure songs. Do you have request? If you want to

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>be the next fantasy legend, go to Daily rodor dot

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>com for free this holiday season. That's right, Free advice

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy pros, free NBA DFS projections, free optimized or access,

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>and free everything else you need to dominate Daily Fantasy

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>basketball this holiday season. Stop your stocking with the cold

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Heart cash and get free access at Daily Roder dot

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>com with the promo code d R Holidays to access

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>your free trial. That's Daily Roder dot com. The promo

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>code is d R Holidays. What's for you, Greg? The

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>mark of still being a child is singing two hearts

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>when you well, no, probably not, but um when you

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>said stuff your stockings, I chuckled, nothing, you got nothing.

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't even get it. Stuff forget it, creat it, Greg,

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it. Stuff your stockings? Nothing? Is that

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>like going into the new Year of the Bang? That's

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a great ad. So I was walking I went out

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for a few this morning. So I walked back into

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the studio and I there's a big billboard outside and

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I went that this is where I screwed up on

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the graphicspartment and send the picture to Martine who could

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>have showed it. Um, but there's a big billboard outside

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that says start your New Year's off of the Bang

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and then order new room service Hotels dot com. I

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, whoa that is It's pretty good. That's good.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good. That is suggestive. I like it. Sexcels

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Baby advertising. It has me talking about alive on the radio.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Probably Canna yelled at our YouTube chat right now for

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>not mentioning football whatever. Callen Belage, whoa sex? Look at

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the screen, Greggy, Oh yeah, yeah, that's Greggy there on

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the on the left and not um alright, it's back

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the right. Jamal Williams, I asked you if you trust him,

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he's in the circle of trust, and you said, I'll

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>trust him as a low end RB two, which at

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this point of the year it's it might be harder

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to find Aaron Jones because I trust the talent a

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>lot more. Regardless of matchup, he was a high end

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>RB two, he was a low n RB one. I

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>still had him high end RB two in last week's

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>matchup against the Bears. We all know how that ended.

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams stepped in and performed admirably. But I think

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>based on the way that he was used in that

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>game eighteen total touches, played seven percent of the snaps,

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.479
<v Speaker 1>he is going to be the workhorse on this offense.

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Could potentially be not a good offense with de Shaan Kaiser,

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>but that might even lean towards them. UM using Jamal

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Williams even more because Deshan kas is the quarterback. They're

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to let him drop back and throw the

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ball thirty times. So I think Jamal Williams is in

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a good spot in terms of workload usage. It's an

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>okay matchup against the Jets. I think he's a low

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>one RB two. This week was your number one wave

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>wire add So that was the question I had right like,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>who is who would you rather have this weekend? Jamal

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Williams or Kalin Ballage. Definitely Jamal Williams because with Kalen

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Ballage it's like, I don't trust Adam Gaze as far

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as I could throw them. Actually I might be able

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to throw Adam Gaze kind of far. I don't know

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>how big Easy looks. I don't know. It looks kind

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of like a scrawny dude. But um, speaking of Adam Gaze.

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Gregor, I mean, this is just you know,

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>all year long, this has kind of been my thing.

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like me versus Adam Gaze. Like I love Kenyan Drake,

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>he clearly doesn't. Chris Eventra loves Kenyan Drake. Adam Gaze

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly doesn't. Greg King of went to a rage cage

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. You know what a rage cages? Rage

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>cage no idea. So basically, they give you a bat,

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they give you crowbar, they give you a bunch of weapons,

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and you get to beat up a bunch of stuff

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like keyboards. Heard about TV you might have, Dude, I

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>want to go inside a rage cage where everything is

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Adam Gaze's face, and I want to do it while

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>wearing a Kenyan Drake jersey. Like that's really what I

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>want to do. I read some stuff about this that

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually what like Kenyan Drake and Adam Gaze, all right,

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what you read he basically feels that Kenyan Drake doesn't

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>know how to run his plays and whose job is

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to teach him. And he also feels like he's a

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>terrible pass blocker. That might be true, so he was

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a mon early downs anything else, That's what I read.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I also read something that says like he doesn't trust

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake to get positive yardage or something like apparently

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>when Kenyan Drake is on the field, they get negative

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>plays and that sets them up for like second and

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>long and third and long, so on and board. But

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the numbers, like Kenyan Drake has

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>been right there with Frank Gore in terms of like efficiency,

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy to say Frank or has actually weren't

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>officially this year, but they're both over four yards per carry.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake has scored pretty much all of the running

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>back touchdowns this year. Before last week, he was the

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>only running back on the roster with touchdowns. Calin Balloge

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>scored the seventy five yard touchdown. We all saw that

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were hoping it was Kenyan Drake, but it wasn't,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, because Adam Gates hates him. But with Frank

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Gore going down here, I understand why Calein Ballage is

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on the list because again Adam Gates hates and you Drake,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>which means that Blage is going to be in the

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>mix here. I think the primary guy. I don't think so.

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we could trust anyone. Still, like

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it's probably gonna be, you know, twelve touches Camelon Blage,

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, six to eight touches for Kenyan Drake for

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, and in Brandon Bolden will get like a

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>handful of touches in this game as well, which is

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as completely ridiculous. Calon Blage if its flash a little

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>bit on that one carry seventy five yards against the

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings. To your point, Greg Blage did touch the

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ball twelve times, carry the ball twelve times. Keny Drake

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to carged the ball once. He did have some work

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in the past game. Drake did re receptions. Um. I

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>just overall, I don't trust the matchup really, Like, I

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>know the Jaguars are not great and what Derrick Henry

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just did against him a couple of weeks ago, but

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still not great matchup. I don't want to trust

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins loss is probably in plays like a

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>flex running back. That's pretty much where Frank Gore has

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>been all season. So I think the logs kind of

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>like just slots in in that Frank Gore role in

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a mediocre matchup against the Jacksonville Jaguars. I

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>like Jamal Williams and even Elijah McGuire for the Jets

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than I do blogs. Let me give

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you a one more name that I like more than

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams, and that's Jeff Wilson Jr. Mat Breeda doesn't

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>play with his ankle injury. God with Jeff Wilson, Man.

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I know he had an altercation on Sunday. I know

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>his one plane did not go very well. But Matt

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fred is not active Wilson. You know all the touches

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we can he can handle. We saw what he could

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>do a couple of weeks back. He's the guy man.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I will agree with that, just based on workload, the

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>way that he was being used in a two games

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>without Matt Breda, he was at least twenty three touches

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and ye of those games at least ninety yards from scrimmage,

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and both of those games obviously the game that Matt

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Brida we all thought was gonna play and didn't. It

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>was like that first game where Jeff Wilson took over

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>monster get interception game actually set season highs in terms

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of targets and receptions for a forty Niners running back.

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you. If Matt Breeda can't go, I

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>mean there's something will pay attention to all week long,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>like we have all season long. Because Matt Breeda again

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>was kind of like limited last week, still ended up

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>playing that game and still had a lot of touches.

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Wilson actually fumbled in that game against Seahawks as well.

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll mention it's not a good matchup against the Bears.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams just performed well, but for the most part

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>all season long, the Bears have limited fantasy production to

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>running back, so fum just and the Bears are still

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>playing to try to get that by don't. They're definitely

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>still playing. And if I just had to rank them,

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be for me, Jamal Williams still number one,

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Elijah McGuire number two. If Matt Breed is out, Jeff

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Wilson be number three. That's really I'm just kind of

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>like pushing him down. I know the workload would be there.

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It's because of the matchup against the Bears. And then

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>number four b Klin Blash. Okay, other running backs before

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we move on to some wide receivers here this week,

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>make sure Todd Gurley is active, obviously, make sure he's

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not he's playing. People talk about John Kelly. Kelly was

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the next man up. He was finally. I know that

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we were speculating on Justin Davids. I think Justin David's

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like hurt necking, Yeah, it must have been. Yeah, it's

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>finally John Kelly's time. And he went from being the

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>cheap of staff to being tell gurliers back. So there

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you got right over my head, Greg, some kind of

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>political joke there had to be sure. John Kelly, though,

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a guy will just mention this. He was a guy

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>who like college analytics, um people who study you know,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>analytics for college for like pro football of focus and stuff.

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>John Kelly was the guy who like jumped off the

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>paper for them because in terms of like everything that

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he could do, like yards after contact and a bunch

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of like deeper analytics like that. John Kelly the guy.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Do we care who buffalo Is running back is this week?

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Did you see came last week? Greg? No, I know

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's against the Patriots, but I mean even shaw

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>McCoy hasn't been able to do anything. I know. Keith

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Ford is like a name. He was like the next

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>guy up after the next, the next guy up. So

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that was interesting. They were seemingly dunce like no running

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>backs last week. But Josh Allen is your running back? No,

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any interest in the Bills. All right,

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to wide receivers here this weekend, Frank,

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>who's your favorite wide receiver that people can plug into

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>their lineups right now to try to win a championship.

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think we just mentioned Mike Williams off the

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>top it has available. We don't know what's gonna happen

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with Keenan Allen. The injury doesn't seem severe, but if

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you and Allen weren't able to go, I know the

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup is against the Baltimore Ravens, but I'm sure Mike

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Williams will be force fed targets in that game, so

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll just throw his name out there. I know he's

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>already owned in a very high percentage of league, So

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams if gonna playing ten team leagues or whatever

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it might be, I'll throw his name out there. And

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.719
<v Speaker 1>then I think this is close, Greg. I think it's

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>very close between Robert Foster and Robbie Anderson. Robbie Anderson,

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I talked him up last week. Um, the Texans secondary

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>was one that you could take advantage of. I think

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they're in another similar spot this week against the Green

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers. Um, you know Robbie Anderson again, you know defenses,

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>know how to play Robbie, And if you watch the

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>games like they're playing off, they're giving him cushion and

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of like earlier on the season where he was

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>just kind of running past people and trying to, you know,

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>get that deep target, he's pretty much just stopping and

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and taking what defenses are giving to him. And you're

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing that kind of reflected in his reception total, in

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>his yardage total. It's not a lot of like alright, um,

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not he's averaging twenty yards per catch or whatever.

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Like he's being used as a PPR guy and he

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is the apple of Sam Donald's I right now as well.

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's very close between Uh. I think

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have Robby Anderson number one against against the

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Packers this week. But I do think Robert Foster is

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>close a guy that we've really kind of discounted the

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks. And I know, like his A

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>A dot is like twenty six average depth of target

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, Josh Allen either runs or he just bombs

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it down the field. And when he's bombing it down

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the field, those are going to Robert Foster. So when

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine against the Patriots, where I'm sure the Bills will

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>be playing from behind, or at least expected to be

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>playing from behind, Robert Foster over the past five weeks

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>has had at least ninety yards in four out of

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>five of those games. He scored two touchdowns during that stretch.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, realistically, Mike Williams is not available. Robby Anderson

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and Robert Foster the top two wide receivers to target

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Waivelard. Yeah, so I think Robby Adderson certainly

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly makes the cut. I have been nowhere on Robert Foster. Dude, Like,

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where this guy came from. People are

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>coming people were admittedly people were asking us about him

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>last week, and it was very dismissive. Shame. I don't

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>really want to trust a wide receiver who's only getting

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a few targets per game. It's really you're depending on

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy for a deep shot with Josh Allen. But

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what Josh Allen does well. It's either he runs

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it or he throws the deep shot. And he's taking

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at least a few of these deep shots per game

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>down the field to Robert Foster. And look, you can't

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>deny the production at this point. Whether he's just getting

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>three or four targets or you know, whatever it might be,

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>he is producing at least ninety four yards in four

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of his last five games. So you know, I will

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>dismiss Robert Foster no more. And I think it's a

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>solid matchup, good spot against New England Patriots. I don't

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>think you can dismiss him anymore. I think he's now

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>um going over a hundred yards and what three of

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>his last five games along those lines, so at least

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety four and four out of five. Okay, So it's

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been impressive since Josh Allen got back into the

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>saddle as starting quarterback. Same with Sam Donald and Robby Anderson.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think those are just two combinations that are simply

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>real and we have to buy into them right now.

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You need him as a flex play. You gotta do

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what you gotta do. You have some tough injuries and

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>now I guess the real question I have is like

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>these type of guys, you Robbie Anderson, your Robert Foster's,

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>do you use them over like the Calvin Ridley types?

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're in the finals with Calvin Ridley, you gotta right, yeah, definitely, yeah.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>What what have you done for me lately? Calvin Ridley?

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It has been very you know, if he doesn't score

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. He's very touch ondependent basically. That's where like

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the guy is not going out there and putting up

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>huge reception totals, target totals, um uh yard totals. Yeah,

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like every single week there and and

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan has always done this. There's like some Joe

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Schmo catching a touchdown for them justin hardy. Um. I

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I feel like Marvin Hall, I don't even

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>know if he's still with the team, but like randomly

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>scores a touchdown. Mohammed san Now is still kind of

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>using there. So yeah, I think that's a good one

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to throw out there. I haven't done running back wide

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver rankings yet, but I'm sure you know I'll have

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson and Robert Foster and that makes high end

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three where you know, I want to trust

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>these guys. I'll throw them to Patrick out there as well.

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Both Broncos wide receivers Tim Patrick and Dashawn Hamilton, who

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the targets have been there for. And Courtland Sutton. No,

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 1>don't do it anymore. I mean, if you made it

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.399
<v Speaker 1>this far with Courtland Sutton in week sixteen, I don't

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>want to have to trust him. I just don't think

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>that his play style goes well with what case Keenum does.

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because that's gonna be a really weird name

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going into next season, like what you do about Courtland Sutton,

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>because the hype was so high and he really really

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>flounder given the opportunity this last few games of the season.

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna really tough name undrafted. I think he's very

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jockson esque. It doesn't isn't that what it reminds

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you of, though. He's not like a big guy who

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 1>should be using the red zone and catch touchdowns. Maybe

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>not a ton of separation between him and the defense.

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, still kind of seems like he's not a

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>polished route runner either, kind of a guy that's just

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>supposed to go up and win the fifty ball. But

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>case Keenum isn't that guy. Even going back to last year,

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to target the slot a lot. And you know,

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I brought this up Dashawn Hamilton's back to back weeks

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>double digit targets. He is, Uh, it's very Bruce Ellington

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>asked what he's doing right now where he's getting a

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of receptions, not getting a lot of yards. But

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I think for PPR, I think he's in play as

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver three, especially against the Oakland Raiders. Just

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wide receiver to Tyler boyd Um. They've

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>struggled against slot receivers. So I do think I do

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>like I like Dashawn Hamilton's the most of the group.

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Markets are there, the receptions are there, the yard is

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>not very high, catching a lot of passes close to

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage. But if I had to rank

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos wide receivers, it would be Hamilton's. Tim Patrick.

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he has to be at this point. He

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>has to be. He's just done the least and like

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you say, what have you done for me lately? Nothing

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is the answer. Nothing thing. At least you know DaShan

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's going to be targeted seven Tariot's back to back games,

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>like you know that's going to be there. So to me,

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it's Scott to be Hamilton's, then Patrick, then Sutton with

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the Denver guys, but we you know, we don't really

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>want any But I don't want to mess this Denver

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Oakland game one day night. That's terrible. It's not the

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>worst matchup though, right, No, it's the Oakland Raiders. I

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>don't I just know how to mess with us. And

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what on the other side of the football,

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the Outland Raiders. Jordy Nelson, Gregg, I'll just throw his

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>name out there. You talk about coming full circle, greg

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>On right now is Jordy Nelson. But you look at

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks, at least seven targets in each game,

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>at least six receptions in each game. He's been eighty

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>eight yards forty eight yards against Pittsburgh a little bit

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of a tougher matchup than ninety seven yards against Casey,

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So at least eighty eight receiving yards in two of

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>his last three games. The receptions have been there for

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson. Dare I say I'll throw his name out

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>there as a wide receiver three as well this week?

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>It all comes down to this and what you mentioned, Greg,

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with guys like Alvin Ridley take the name off the

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>back of the jersey. Has you've been doing that the

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks? Do you want to trust one

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of these guys or do you want to trust one

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of these waiver wire wide receivers who have actually been

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>producing the past couple of weeks forty Nelson, Robbie Anderson,

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Tim Tim Patrick, Robert Foster. I'm going with those guys.

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Take it a break. We take your calls when we

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>try to eight four or four eight four or three

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>six eight seven nine. If not, we'll answer your YouTube

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>check questions. We have a big debate. Have stick around

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>back after this. If you're someone that needs fantasy sports

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>advice every day, the Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered.

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>When you download the n T S Y Sports Radio

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Network GAP, you get the top fantasy advice every single day,

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>right through the weekend. Be sure to listen to our

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>weekend warriors like College Football Today. Welcome to College Football

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Today Weekend Fantasy Update. They called me the fantasy Jesus

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>in this league is never short of exciting at I

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>T L and it's so much more. Download the Fantasy

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes and Google Play

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Store now and keep the best fantasy experts right in

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>your pocket all day long and all week long. Indeed

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>knows finding the right higher takes time away from your business.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Hiring a qualified data engineer felt like a second job.

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Seekers use indeed than any other site, so there's no

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>better place to find someone with the skills you're looking for.

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I needed someone with a masters in computer science and

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>database experience. Plus Indeed screener questions help you find your

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 1>shortlist fast. Now I'm back to having just one job.

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>See why more than three million companies worldwide use indeed

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>too higher post your job and indeed dot Com slash higher.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Indeed the world's number one job site source com score

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>total visits. Lumber Liquidators is celebrating the opening of our

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>four hundredth store, so we're putting over four hundred floors

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on sale. That means huge savings for you. Get pre

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>finished hardwood and bamboo up to thirty six percent off,

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>including news styles like Mediterranean maple and best sellers like

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>silver Stone Bamboo. Take twenty five percent off all dream

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 1>home laminate and ten to fifteen percent off our best

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>waterproof floors. More from just forty nine cents, plus special

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>financing and professional installation. Hurry get to your local lumber

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>liquid Dators today. Aime time decisions. It's actually talking to

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the soccer guy too. I'm trying to plan a trip.

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do a road trip game at Utica. I

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's three but three hours away from Manhattan, take

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a train and I think that's uh in the New Year,

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>and the guy wants me to do a couple of

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>game road trip with him. Go, I can't really go

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>away for like a week. You're gonna get a free

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>ride to Utica and then take a train on your own? Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll he'll, He'll get me to Utica. I

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 1>about my own after that nice guy. That week days,

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>four pm Eastern one pm Pacific only on the Fantasy

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network. Back with you, Fantasy best Friends Driver

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Have you like to ways you're

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on sports or never have? I want to try handing

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>over to bet d s I have wagering options for

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>almost any sport you can think of, including sides to

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Ito was a player props where you can utilize your

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>daily fantasy skills without salary captain strains you can never

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You can even wage your on e sports, politics, and

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>reality TV. Get an edge with live betting at bet

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>d s I, where you can wage your virtually any

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>time during a contest, capitalizing on in game action. There

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>are so many ways that you can make money. Handing

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>over to bet d s I and Edge of the

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>promo code fn T s y E teen when you

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 1>sign up and you get a hundred percent bonus deposit match.

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>That's promo code f n T s y E teen

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 1>where players get paid eight four four eight four three

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>six eight seven nine. Let's start it off with Bobby.

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Yesterday? Was playing the um thing they have

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on face draft teams that you know this um and

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that'll down captain playing the show down. Yeah, I went

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to blocks. Wow. Yeah, it's not big, but I wanted something.

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Finally got nice little toasted bagel with butter right there, Bobby,

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I took marking room right, and I took the Panther.

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I had him as my um. Oh, it's called as

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>my should captain. I mean I should have kept Mars

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>my camp and then Panthers Saints is my flex and

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Drew Weez as my He did do good at door,

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>so he sucked. He sucked. Do good when they go

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.320
<v Speaker 1>out trying cold weather, Bob, what happened to the Giants

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>this week? Oh my god, don't at least at least

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the Giants with us and the Calgols us too, so

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're happy about. Yeah, the calgarys got to shut

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>out too, and then Camara as a flex and so

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised I even went two bucks. Yeah, you

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 1>did not deserve it, but congrats on your You didn't

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 1>deserve it. You didn't deserve it. Well, I try to

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>try that. I tried to. And that's you know, the

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>NFL dot com one. You have to pick the perfect challenge.

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>You weren't even close. No, no, not that. No. I

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>try every week. I don't get anything on that that

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. You know that game when we're gonna we're

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna help some other people. Now, um, well, we appreciate

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>your call. We always do. We'll talk to you next time. Thanks,

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Bobby four A four three, six, seven nine. Let me

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 1>move on to Tyler in Nova Scotia. Let's up, Tyler? Tyler?

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:45.240
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Man? Um? I just had a quick receiver

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>question and a tight end question the receivers like I

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>got Holiday Allen Robinson and Dave Shawn Hamilton's. I was

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>wondering if I should plug in either Robbie Anderson or

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy from the Bills and Spad So Golliday Golliday

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson. So Golliday is going up against the Vikings

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>this week. Not the best matchup, but we just kind

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of saw Holliday's matchup proof Man again and then Allen

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Robinson the Bears going up against San Francisco another pretty

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>good matchup. But I was, you know, I was a

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit let down by Allen Robinson last week. I

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>thought he would have a better game. Who was who

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>was the last name you mentioned? Robert Foster and Robby Anderson,

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Allison Hamilton. Basically, the question is do you start Robbie Anderson?

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you start Robert Foster over either Allen Robinson or

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Dashawan Hallilson. Yeah, so I would definitely use Robbie Anderson

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and Greg Please call me out if I if I'm

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>off base here because you know the Jet fan j

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>E t s Jets, Stets Jets. But I'm gonna take

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Robby Anderson over Dashawn Hamilton's for sure. I know I

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned I like Hamilton's in PPPR, but I think there's

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more upside the way that Robby Anderson

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is being used right now. Touchdowns and backs back weeks.

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>The target to have been there, the receptions have been there,

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the yards have been there. He seems to be thriving

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with Sam Donald, he is the go to receiver, So

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson definitely over DaShan And then it comes down

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to do you go as far as to use a

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>guy like Robert Foster over Allen Robinson, the Bears going

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton over Allen Robinson, then Ashan Hamilton's over Allen Robinson. Yeah,

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done the wide receiver ranks again as of

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, I would have I would have Kenny Golladay

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>number one. I think I would have Robbie Anderson on

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>number two on this list, ahead of Allen Robinson and

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone else. And then it really comes down to all

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>those other players. I'm really gonna have to dive in

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Um. I think I like Robert Foster

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>more than DaShan Hamilton's though, So then it really comes

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:42.240
<v Speaker 1>down to Foster versus so I Foster against the Patriots

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in New England, Allen Robinson against the forty Niners in

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. To me, I'm sorry, Robbie Anderson, I agree, Frank,

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you have it one to Galla Day than

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson for that third spot? Though? I don't even

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>think I'm considering Allen Robinson, Like, what do you what

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>do you expecting from him? What do you want. He

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do anything. He doesn't do anything, so strip the

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>name off the back of it. So what are we

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>starting Alan Robinson for? What are you hoping for? He

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>hasn't scored a touchdown in over a month since week ten. Yeah,

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so he doesn't do anything. The targets have still been there,

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at least seven targets in three games straight, at least

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>targets in you know, five of his last he's had

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty receiving twice all year. All right, No, I mean

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you're talking into it Robert Foster over Allen Robinson. I

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's the way to go. So I agree with

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Robert Foster Alan Robinson, but I think they're also gonna

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>be a consideration for um. So Alan Robinson's last for

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you on this, He's last, He's he's behind Dash. I

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 1>think you can make a consideration for Dashawan Hamilton as well.

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>With Foster. I don't know how which way I would

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have it yet. I think it's one of those two guys.

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I realized what Foster has done. This is classic safety.

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Yes it is in Hamid For Robert Foster. This comes

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>down to what kind of player are you? I think

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Robert Robby Anderson has been safe and has had a

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of upside the past couple of weeks. Again,

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he's second on this list. DaShan Hamilton's the targets have

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>been their receptions have been there for PPR, so it

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>gives you the safe floor, but the yardage hasn't necessarily

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>been there. He scored a touchdown two weeks ago, didn't

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>score a touchdown this week. But Robert Foster more so.

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the targets aren't there, but he's getting targeted

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>down the field and he's picking up big chunks of yardage.

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 1>So to me, I'll play the upside man. I'm going

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for the championship. I'll play Robert Foster over Nashan Hamilton.

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you're the guy who wants the floor, it

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>comes down to what kind of player you are. You

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 1>want to play it safe, DaShan Hamilton's your guy. I

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately agree with that. Four eight, four, three six sevens.

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Continue on the phones, Frank Um, Let's go to Albert

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in Long Beach. What's up, Albert? How about them Chargers?

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 1>About the Chargers? My West Coast team. I gotta get

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a charges Jersey, Greg. I don't know who to get yet.

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll get Mike get a Mike win. No, no,

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting Mike Williams. Now we're past that. What's going

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>on in cool Man? I have a I have a

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>that question. I only made it to the championship. I'm

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>very thrilled on that regret. So I have either Goff,

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I have either go or I have catam Newton.

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't start Cam Newton. The thing is, it's kind

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of hearts trust either guy right now. But we spoke

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>about at the top of the show. We don't even

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>know if Cam Newton's gonna play. We don't know what

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the motive is for the Carolina Panthers right now as

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they fall to six and eight, seemingly pushing them out

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the playoff picture in the NFC. I don't really

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 1>know what Cany Newton is going to be playing for here.

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:33.839
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers pretty good matchup at home against Atlanta, which

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>all right on paper, everything like you should expect points here,

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if Cam Newton's going to play.

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you, Greg, I'll use Jared Golf. Going

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to Arizona looks like it's it's to get right spot.

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>We could see a lot of Todd Gurley in this game.

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:49.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, I might look as far as to say

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I might want to stream a quarterback really though he

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't done anything the pass. A couple of weeks, I

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>under talking about Allen Robins matchups to get right match

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>up man, I had no problem with n I requested, uh.

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I requested Baker Mayfield on the waiver while I was

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>just in case. So Greg, Cincinnati is playing against the Bengals.

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Goddamn headphones aren't working either the Bengals. And the last

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 1>time Baker face the Bengals, he threw for Oh, we

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:22.279
<v Speaker 1>got Greggy thinking a little bit. You know, Baker, you

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:25.439
<v Speaker 1>know Baker is my guy. Here's your guy. Last time

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Baker faced the Bengals. To put it in perspective, Greggy

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>two fifty eight and four touchdowns. Gark Goff has done nothing, Baker, Man,

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>give me Baker in the championship. I look, it's bold.

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you think it's the get right spot for

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. I think it could be the get right

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>spot for Todd Gurley, assuming he's healthy. I mean they

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>might not even need him for that matchup. Again, like

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 1>if John Kelly is available, I would go out and

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>just add him like speculatively, but it's to get right

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>spot for the Rams. Overall, I think their defense can

0:48:57.320 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of plays in this game. I don't

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>know that they're gonna have to depend on Jared Goff

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>all that much in this matchup. Greg, get it, I

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>get it. I think they need but they also think

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 1>they need to get Jared Goff right, so I think

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they will. I was thinking with Jared Goov. I love

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. I do um. Yeah, ask another phone call here?

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Have allowed the most fantasy points to quarnerbacks this here, Greg,

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>alright eight four four eight four three six seven nine

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>actually voting before you get to the calls. Four. I'm

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not taking a call. I don't worry about it. It's

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>all right for you. I can't hear anything, all right.

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So before we get to the calls, you brought up

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 1>an interesting tweet that Barfield tweeted that yesterday. So why

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>don't you go ahead and print that out there to

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 1>our listeners. Yeah, I want people to follow up here,

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's via call, comment in the chat. Let us

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:46.359
<v Speaker 1>know what you're thinking as well, because I do think

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. Nice little debate topic here from grhand Barfield

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Make sure you're following a lot of great stats,

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great information for fantasy football. If the

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks have proven anything, it's that straight up

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>head to head formats and fantasy footb need to go

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>play all total points best ball, et cetera. Is the

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>future reward the best teams for the full season, not

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the luckiest for a week. Now, Greg, what this says

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to me is that we should start pushing fantasy football

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 1>more towards fantasy baseball, because this has been the purest

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball argument for years. Play Road hisstory. It's the

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>mark of the best team in fantasy baseball. You know,

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it encompasses all the categories. And it's not just well,

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 1>if you play head to head, your team could get

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 1>hot at the right time. You could win a match

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>up here, you win a match up there, you get

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>hot in the fantasy playoffs, and it turns out that

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the best team in the fantasy playoffs doesn't always win.

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>In fantasy baseball heads ahead and in fantasy football heads ahead,

0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But in fantasy football, Greg, this has just been such

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a mainstay in the industry, in the game for so long.

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that we can't venture outside of that,

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's you know, I like best ball formats, and

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, in a lot of high stakes

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>league in the NFFC, you know, once you make it

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>to the playoffs, it is just playoff. It's all right.

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take your average points score from throughout the

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>seed and your weekly points. You'll start with that. Then

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 1>whenever you accrue in weeks fourteen, fifteen, and sixteen, that's

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>your total points. And whoever has the most points from

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that platform at plus what you did in the regular

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:22.520
<v Speaker 1>season wins wins it all. So I see the arguments

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for both sides, and I would say that the better

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>team would win if we do play it out that way.

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But there's a trash talking element, more so in fantasy

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>football than fantasy baseball head to head, where it's just

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been that way for so long. Are we really

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>going to get to that point now where we're really

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about best ball? And just like the most points

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>scored throughout the season starts to take over as the default.

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>One might say for fantasy football, I don't know what

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you think about it. I have what I think, you know.

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I I like the way that we play fantasy football

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I'm not denying that it is a

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 1>better measurement for the best overall team to go that

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>route is to just go buy points points scored. But

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:06.800
<v Speaker 1>if this takes away like the trash talk, you know,

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we get people calling in about you know, I'm facing

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:11.880
<v Speaker 1>my wife. We've had a lot of calls about that

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>recently as well. Uh, it's just more fun to me

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the trash talk element head to head. How do you

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>feel about it, Greggy? Before I give you my thoughts,

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to say goodbye to our YouTube audience if

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a feeling on this, tweeted us at Road

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to underscore, Frank At, Greg Sausmon're gonnapen up the show

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow talking about this exact topics. We want to get

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts calling tomorrow, let us know where you are

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on this debate. You'll get my thoughts in just a moment.

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.760
<v Speaker 1>The frenzies up next Corey Parson, Jim Day, and Chris Ventra.

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening live in the podcast, thanks for taking

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 1>with us. Obviously subscribe like rate us five stars in

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the comment. If you're live on the radio, we also

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:46.439
<v Speaker 1>very much appreciate it. We go another four minutes. Where

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>am I on this? I hate being the guy I'm

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not calling you out for, but like I hate being

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the guy that says, we've always done this way, but

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:55.759
<v Speaker 1>we have to do it. I don't like that, and

0:52:56.480 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I say that often as well, and it's not right.

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 1>And we shouldn't not change just because we've always done

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it this way, because changes sometimes for the better. One percent.

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>We all like super flex more now that was not

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the standard ten years ago. Absolutely, I don't know if

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I like super flex, but yes, but yes, exactly, super

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>flexily really good response Like PPR is another thing that

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>is is the norm now that wasn't ten years ago.

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So another thing that in my leagues that what we

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>do is is your continuous waivers, whereas every day the

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:28.879
<v Speaker 1>waiver pile, the waiver comes goes through rather than any

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>first come, first served. Again, that wasn't the standard. Now.

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Some sort of waivers m whether it's every day or

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.280
<v Speaker 1>twice a week or whatever, is the standard in the industry.

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I personally, when it comes to this is recognized almost

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:45.240
<v Speaker 1>like an auction. That it's more fair is when thousand

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>percent more fair, I leave every draft should be an

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>auction because football, baseball, basketball, whatever you do, it should

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.400
<v Speaker 1>be an auction because you deserve and you have, You

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:55.879
<v Speaker 1>should have the right at any player you want. It's

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the fair. If someone has the first overall pick and

0:53:57.719 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they get Todd Gurley and I had no shot at him,

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that's kulous for no reason. It's like I had the

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>worst record last year. It's all random draft order. You

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>played the Royal Rumble on a video game. That besides it. Right,

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not fair, it's it's look And ultimately, do you

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:11.839
<v Speaker 1>still want to do Auxtion after the terrible Auxtion team

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you had this year? It was the worst team in history.

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm the only person in this country, in this world

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that finished last place with Pat Mahomes and my quarterback

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 1>for one dollar, right, Like, it's ridiculous, but it's fair.

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I picked my stupid, effing crafty team using the

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but like I budgeted wrong. I had Odell and Antonio

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Patrick Mahomes and my running backs wound up

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>being mark Ingram, Jordan Howard and Jamal Williams. Like that sucked,

0:54:35.280 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's all my fault. I had an opportunity to

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>draft anybody, anybody, Right, that's always my auction argument. Now

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this when it comes to the scoring, I get it.

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense. It's the most fair. It's what we

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:49.440
<v Speaker 1>do in the G S T League. There's a point total,

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:51.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a winner for if you if we win the league.

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's another substantial prize, even more substantial prize for

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this exact thing, average your points. We went through thirteen

0:54:58.480 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and in fourtune, fifteen and sixteen, wherever I the most

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:04.759
<v Speaker 1>points is your winner. We do that? Is that most fun?

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:09.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the question. Is that more fun? And my answer,

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:13.880
<v Speaker 1>quite honestly, is not. I've been ROTI history leagues. I've

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 1>been in weekly leagues in baseball and basketball, and Frank

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and everybody watching and listening to knows, I hate it.

0:55:19.320 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It's boring. If I'm playing against myself, which is essentially

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:28.720
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing in a rot Hisstory Baseball league, rot Hisstory,

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Basketball leave. We're not playing anybody. You're playing against yourself.

0:55:32.600 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>And that to me is the least fun part about

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the game. Trying to maneuver and I'm I'm not saying

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't take more skill, and it does. It takes

0:55:39.239 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a look out of it. And I know in this

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 1>game we try to take the look out of it.

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand it, but I believe by taking the look

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>out of it, you're taking the fun out of it.

0:55:49.480 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So for me, whether it's baseball or basketball or football

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or any fantasy sport I play, I love going head

0:55:57.600 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to head, even in a DFS like the contest that

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I choose, I'm going head to head again a hundred

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:05.760
<v Speaker 1>different people, and I may have chosen the wrong contest

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:09.040
<v Speaker 1>where my cut line is much higher than your cut line,

0:56:09.320 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was just bad luck. I had the opportunity

0:56:12.040 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to choose whoever I wanted, of course, but it was

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>bad luck. But I'm going against other people. I don't

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>want to play in a league where i'm literally just

0:56:20.640 --> 0:56:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the same thing as it's the DFS,

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:25.399
<v Speaker 1>where just the scores that matter. That's boring. I can't

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>trash talk like you said, I can't analyze the matchup.

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:30.879
<v Speaker 1>There's no matchup. I'm just hoping your guys don't do well.

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It sucks, it's boring all that having fun, Frankie. Head

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to head is how you have fun, and I think

0:56:37.520 --> 0:56:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the GSC does a good job of kind of incorporating both, right,

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe that's kind of the move right. In the

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:47.399
<v Speaker 1>D S T. We have a playoff where whoever wins

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that is obviously the league champion and wins the substantial

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of money. But we also have an overall prize

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:56.240
<v Speaker 1>which goes for the highest point score for the season.

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So again, as I mentioned, to take your point scored

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 1>from the regular season, you divide that by however many

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks you played, most leagues, whatever, thirteen weeks. You take

0:57:05.040 --> 0:57:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that point total, and then you add the playoffs, so

0:57:07.840 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. Overall, there you frenzies up next.

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll see tomorrow, we hope.