1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,640 Speaker 1: We're joined by Craig Singleton, Senior Fellow at the Foundation 2 00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:08,320 Speaker 1: for Defensive Democracies, to discuss China's foreign policy. And it's 3 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:11,240 Speaker 1: a great time to have this discussion, Craig, with the 4 00:00:11,240 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 1: Party Congress coming up, We've been musing on this program 5 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:19,279 Speaker 1: about a possible ideological shift coming from the Congress, uh 6 00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:22,440 Speaker 1: and it would be a tweak away from economic development 7 00:00:22,520 --> 00:00:25,640 Speaker 1: as the priority of the Party two, more of a 8 00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:30,040 Speaker 1: balance between development and security. So that has a lot 9 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:32,519 Speaker 1: of implications to it with how China sees itself on 10 00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:35,120 Speaker 1: the on the global stage. So I'd like to ask you, 11 00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:37,440 Speaker 1: if indeed that's the case, how do you expect the 12 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:41,879 Speaker 1: cooperation between China and Russia to be over this next period. No, 13 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:43,720 Speaker 1: thanks for having me. I mean, I know this may 14 00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:46,560 Speaker 1: sound like something of a head scratcher, but I really, 15 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:50,280 Speaker 1: despite all the media fanfare about the upcoming leadership gathering, 16 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: I don't think this Party Congress is all that remarkable. 17 00:00:54,080 --> 00:00:56,640 Speaker 1: I mean, we've known for months, some might say years, 18 00:00:56,640 --> 00:00:59,360 Speaker 1: that she would assume a third term. He has laid 19 00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:03,400 Speaker 1: out and excruciating detail already his division for a China 20 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:07,840 Speaker 1: centric global order, one that reflects Beijing's interests and values, 21 00:01:08,160 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 1: And so I do think this Congress actually does more 22 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:15,600 Speaker 1: represent a continuation, not a turning point in China's policy orientation. 23 00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:18,320 Speaker 1: What you see was she is, I think, I think 24 00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:21,360 Speaker 1: really what you get? Uh? You know. Nevertheless, even with 25 00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:25,120 Speaker 1: his position secure, um, there are no easy solutions to 26 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 1: either the war in Ukraine or china support for Russia, 27 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:31,800 Speaker 1: let alone any of the deep structural and balances that 28 00:01:31,920 --> 00:01:34,560 Speaker 1: played China and its economy. And so far, at least, 29 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:36,880 Speaker 1: you know, she has really failed to put forward a 30 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:40,319 Speaker 1: compelling suite of policies or even a compelling narrative to 31 00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:44,440 Speaker 1: address these complicated issues. I think as for Russia specifically, 32 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 1: I suspect sooner rather than later, she is going to 33 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,920 Speaker 1: be forced to maybe take some both depths to bolster 34 00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:53,840 Speaker 1: Putin's regime. How far she is really willing to go is? 35 00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:56,840 Speaker 1: I think frankly anyone's guess. Yeah. And that gets to 36 00:01:56,880 --> 00:01:59,160 Speaker 1: that point that I know you've sort of alluded to 37 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:01,640 Speaker 1: as well about why Beijing perhaps is refused to cross 38 00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:03,560 Speaker 1: the sanctions red line here when it comes to the 39 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:07,520 Speaker 1: war in Ukraine. So what happens if the war deteriorates? 40 00:02:07,560 --> 00:02:09,919 Speaker 1: What does that mean for the China US relationships China 41 00:02:09,960 --> 00:02:13,280 Speaker 1: Russia relationship absolutely. I mean, I think in the case 42 00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:16,560 Speaker 1: of the No Limits partnership, I suspect that we may 43 00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:19,760 Speaker 1: be thinking, perhaps incorrectly, of this partnership as a Western 44 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:23,120 Speaker 1: style alliance. You know, China is not familiar with that 45 00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 1: sort of alliance construct or the notion right that China 46 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:29,480 Speaker 1: would put another country's interests or needs above its own. 47 00:02:30,040 --> 00:02:32,000 Speaker 1: That's very foreign to Beijing, and so I think the 48 00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:34,919 Speaker 1: threat of U S sanctions against China at a time 49 00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 1: when China's economy is already really in a tail spin 50 00:02:37,919 --> 00:02:40,959 Speaker 1: that start is very acute, and leaders in Beijing understand 51 00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:44,000 Speaker 1: those risks, just as they did in the wrong context 52 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:46,880 Speaker 1: back when China dialed down its supports they were on 53 00:02:47,440 --> 00:02:50,280 Speaker 1: so as to avoid being sanctioned by the Trump administration. 54 00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:53,600 Speaker 1: I think, whether China likes it or not, there's every 55 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:58,160 Speaker 1: indication that China remains as reliant as ever on US 56 00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:01,400 Speaker 1: technology and capital to in its development. And so at 57 00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:03,960 Speaker 1: the end of the day, China could easily take steps 58 00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:08,080 Speaker 1: today to help Russia as it needs for additional wartime support, 59 00:03:08,120 --> 00:03:10,000 Speaker 1: but doing still would come at up pretty high cost, 60 00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:12,519 Speaker 1: and right now there's just no indication that Beijing is 61 00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:15,200 Speaker 1: willing to tie its own economic fate to that of Moscow. 62 00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:19,080 Speaker 1: As you noted in your Peace in Foreign Affairs, UM, 63 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:24,520 Speaker 1: the Shanghai Cooperation Organization can speak to about forty of 64 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:27,360 Speaker 1: the world's population. And if you think about it, it it 65 00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:30,360 Speaker 1: does fit with that narrative of of she looking more 66 00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:34,560 Speaker 1: at security because it gives China and Russia and countries 67 00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 1: like Iran, you know, a sort of a bolstered position 68 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:41,920 Speaker 1: to stand up to the West. And and so maybe 69 00:03:41,920 --> 00:03:45,040 Speaker 1: that is maybe that is the direction that they go. 70 00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:47,720 Speaker 1: And what do you think the consequences for the West 71 00:03:47,880 --> 00:03:51,400 Speaker 1: are if that grows? No, absolutely, I mean I think 72 00:03:51,840 --> 00:03:55,800 Speaker 1: when we talk about at least s CEO or perhaps 73 00:03:55,920 --> 00:04:00,880 Speaker 1: China and Russia's partnership, I often think while they are 74 00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:03,680 Speaker 1: brought together by a mutual loathing of the United States, 75 00:04:03,920 --> 00:04:06,560 Speaker 1: I'm not actually convinced that they have like a shared 76 00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 1: vision for the world. I think that Putin really relishes 77 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 1: this role as a spoiler. He wants to blow up 78 00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:15,920 Speaker 1: the US led order, She, by his own emission, talks 79 00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:18,680 Speaker 1: about co opting it. I think some of that divergence 80 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:21,720 Speaker 1: is actually what we're seeing now in Ukraine. UM and 81 00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:25,240 Speaker 1: what we would likely see as the growing power asymmetry 82 00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:29,560 Speaker 1: between Moscow and between Beijing sort of expands. I think 83 00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:34,880 Speaker 1: SEO is a manifestation and a representation more of She's 84 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:39,680 Speaker 1: vision for this alternate global architecture that reflects China's values 85 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:44,039 Speaker 1: in China's interests, and it is an attractive proposition. It's 86 00:04:44,120 --> 00:04:48,360 Speaker 1: non interference focused. Uh, everyone gets to show up. SEO 87 00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:51,480 Speaker 1: and other like entities aren't going to tell member states 88 00:04:51,560 --> 00:04:54,880 Speaker 1: or participants what to do. It's very different than what 89 00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:57,680 Speaker 1: we would probably associate with the U S led Order 90 00:04:57,760 --> 00:05:01,920 Speaker 1: or the United Nations or classic MO lateralism. And I 91 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:03,960 Speaker 1: think that that is still very appealing when you have 92 00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:08,240 Speaker 1: big countries, including India, the world's largest democracy, feeling as 93 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:11,720 Speaker 1: if the UN doesn't reflect its interests, doesn't representative of 94 00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:14,919 Speaker 1: its values and sort of peaks India for granted, I 95 00:05:14,920 --> 00:05:17,920 Speaker 1: mean it is quite compelling, and I think she will 96 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:21,920 Speaker 1: build out this water architecture both in the security space 97 00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:25,560 Speaker 1: but also in the water multi lateral space as as 98 00:05:25,640 --> 00:05:29,240 Speaker 1: he pursues this next to their term in our In 99 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:32,960 Speaker 1: our opinion piece by Mention pay Um, he writes that 100 00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 1: that leaders like Mao Zedong and Dung Shaoping and now 101 00:05:37,160 --> 00:05:41,400 Speaker 1: Shi Jinping often get in trouble later in their in 102 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:44,040 Speaker 1: their period, and he cites the example of Vadimar Putin's 103 00:05:44,040 --> 00:05:47,800 Speaker 1: invasion of Ukraine and mouse cultural revolution. Uh, do you 104 00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:51,360 Speaker 1: see any signs that she is moving towards excesses where 105 00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:55,800 Speaker 1: he gets, you know, sort of insecure and starts making 106 00:05:56,680 --> 00:06:00,160 Speaker 1: coming up with certain programs that just can't can't come 107 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:03,640 Speaker 1: to fruition. I think we've we've seen that already come 108 00:06:03,680 --> 00:06:08,600 Speaker 1: to fruition in his second term, where um, big bold 109 00:06:08,720 --> 00:06:13,000 Speaker 1: initiatives have boomerang back on China's economic growth in ways 110 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:18,400 Speaker 1: that most reform oriented or reform minded technocrats have been 111 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:21,920 Speaker 1: just shocked by. They assumed at some point even zero 112 00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:26,040 Speaker 1: COVID probably been the greatest recent manifestation of that desire 113 00:06:26,120 --> 00:06:30,600 Speaker 1: for control at the expensive growth. There's no indication that 114 00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:34,200 Speaker 1: zero COVID is going away anytime soon. China or actould 115 00:06:34,240 --> 00:06:37,599 Speaker 1: say she appears in this moment willing to absorb the costs, 116 00:06:37,720 --> 00:06:42,560 Speaker 1: and they are severe that come from zero COVID policy 117 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:46,359 Speaker 1: and other policies that we've sort of seen enacted. Uh, 118 00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:49,800 Speaker 1: mostly driven to ensure that the party state can drive 119 00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:54,200 Speaker 1: deeper into the lives of Chinese people, and deeper into um, 120 00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:58,720 Speaker 1: I would say China's economy in ways that we're already 121 00:06:58,800 --> 00:07:02,919 Speaker 1: seeing how devast aiding and how much they've undermined China's 122 00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:06,839 Speaker 1: growth prospects. It's global reputation. There's no reason to believe 123 00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:10,360 Speaker 1: that that's going to do anything but exacerbate as it 124 00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:13,440 Speaker 1: goes for China's she will double down. I suspect, Yeah, 125 00:07:13,520 --> 00:07:16,200 Speaker 1: all right, Craig, thanks very much. We really enjoy having 126 00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:17,920 Speaker 1: you on the program, or have enjoyed having you on 127 00:07:17,960 --> 00:07:20,239 Speaker 1: the program. Thanks very much for taking the time. Craig Singleton, 128 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:24,000 Speaker 1: their senior Fellow the Foundation for Defense of Democracies