WEBVTT - Seth Godin on living in Amazon's world

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Business journalism proves the old adage that truth is stranger

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>than fiction. You literally cannot make these stories up. The

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Unrun story was a complete game changer in my career

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>because n Run became this cultural moment in American history.

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>This major American company, with these executives who were supposed

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the smartest guys in the room, could collapse

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>into bankruptcy in the space of about six months. But

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who become investigative journalists set out

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to be that they want to go shed light on

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>wrongdoing in corporate America. I didn't necessarily set out to

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do that, and I still don't. I'm primarily driven by curiosity.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to explain things. I'm Bethany McClain. This is

0:00:50.120 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>making a killing. If you type relentless dot com into

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>your browser, you'll be redirected to Amazon dot com. Relentless

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was the original name that Jeff Bezos wanted for Amazon,

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and now more than ever, we can understand why the

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>company that started out selling books is in so many

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>ways today the Everything store. In nineteen ninety six, Amazon

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred and fifty one employees and five point

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>one million dollars in revenue. Last year, Amazon had six

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty seven thousand, five hundred employees and total

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>revenue across all its business segments, which obviously includes a

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>lot more than books these days, of two hundred and

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty two point eight nine billion. Its net income, though,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was only ten billion dollars. Amazon has long been criticized

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>for its risky strategy of inefficiency, burning capital without delivering

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>consistent profits, but this strategy helped it dominate several key

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>markets online retail, ebooks, audio books, cloud computing, to name

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just a very few, and it keeps on coming. There's

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon grocery, Amazon restaurants, Amazon healthcare. There's so much to

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>understand about Amazon, and given its rate of growth and

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>change lately, it can feel a little dizzying. But my

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>main interest is not in whatever the latest daily headlines

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.839
<v Speaker 1>are about the company. I'm interested in what all those

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>headlines add up to, taken as a whole, what Amazon

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>has become, what industries it has disrupted and forever changed,

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately what that means for all of us because okay,

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not quite all of us, but most of us are

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's customers. I'll confess to getting boxes on a frighteningly

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>regular basis. That means, in a sense, where Amazon's enablers

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as it decimate its other businesses, from our neighborhood bookstores

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>to now our grocery stores to maybe our pharmacies. If

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it's Amazon's world and we just live in it,

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is that a good thing? Can Amazon be trusted to

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>wield its ever growing power benevolently or are we all

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>going to come to regret the monster we've created? Is

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon a modern day Frankenstein? My guest now is Seth Godin,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>who hardly needs an introduction. Seth and I share a

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.519
<v Speaker 1>publishing on the Mater portfolio, the business imprint of Penguin

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Random House, and one of my memories from long ago

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>as of my publisher handing me sus remarkable book, Purple Cow.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's hard to believe this is the first time

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we're actually meeting live. He's exactly who I wanted to

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to in order to dive into questions of Amazon

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and publishing, but also retail in marketing and trust Sas

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>latest book, This Is Marketing, is a New York Times bestseller.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I know it's supposedly terrible podcasting to talk about something

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>only we can see, so let me just what we're

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at. There are these two pictures of Jeff Bezos

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>side by side. On the left is this nineteen ninety

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>eight Jeff looking very gentle and sweet and a frumpy

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>brown sweater like a New York City book editor. This

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Jeff's caption is I sell books. Over on the right

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is Jeff from twenty seventeen with a shaved head, aviator, glasses,

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>black vest, muscles, bulging, very badass, looking like he should

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>be the lead in the next Fast and Furious movie.

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>This Jeff's caption is I saw whatever the fuck I want.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I love this because it's just the perfect metaphor for

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's evolution, the change from selling books to selling everything

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>but more as this attitude of relentlessness is relentless. The

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>right word seth well. Relentless was Jeff's word. The original

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>name for Amazon was relentless dot com. I think it's

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>important to differentiate between the media's perception of Amazon as

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the work of someone who has a plan about what

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to sell on how he's going to sell it.

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It's more are about the system and if we can

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>understand the systems analysis of what is it like to

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>work there what is it like to sell there, what

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is it like to be an investor? Each of the

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>elements of the system add up into the Amazon as

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we experience it. I don't think Jeff could change the

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>system by himself, even if he wanted to. He's responsible

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for the system. We are all impacted by the system.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But what we're going to need to understand is systems

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that end up changing our culture at some level are

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on us because we are the culture, and we as

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a people have the privilege and the possibility of changing

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>systems if it's important enough to us. We just can't

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>wait till it's too late, because if we do, then

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.799
<v Speaker 1>we don't get to change the system. It's interesting because

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this analogy of Amazon as being like Frankenstein,

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's an interesting comparison because when you talk about

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>even Jeff bez As being unable to control the monster

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he's created, right, it's taken on a life of its own.

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>What are the key ingredients in that system that make

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it so powerful or make it so disruptive. Well, so

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the Amazon we see, not Amazon Web

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>services or the other things that contribute most of their profit. Yeah,

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but the Amazon that we see is a company that

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sells everything. They don't sell anything, and that's a really

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>big distinction. Most of the retail that we've ever seen

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>in our whole lives is run by merchants, and merchants

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>are driven by the idea that they have a limited

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of shelf space. So there's a skill and a

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>talent and a gift involved in being a good merchant.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Selectivity and curation, and not just curation, but owning the

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>outcome of what you just did. So when Nieman Marcus

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>pushes a certain kind of look, or when an item

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is sold in a chain of car stores and a

0:06:55.400 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>different item isn't these have impacts on us. Amazon began

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>with the insight that there's infinite shelf space, and therefore

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the entire organization is built around we sell everything, and

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>no one here has the power to sell a thing.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So the entire system is run by an algorithm, and

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm says this click, this moment, this bit on

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the screen, what's its maximum value today? And the problem

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>with day trading today is you don't know where that

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>cycle keeps pushing you. There's no long arc. There's just

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the oh if I use this word instead of that word,

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>today's sales go up. And the problem with that is

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it usually leads to a race to the bottom, a

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>race to the bottom in what respect in terms of

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the cheapest merchandise wins rather than the quality merchandise. So

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. So race to the bottom could

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>be make it cheaper so you can sell it cheaper.

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Race to the bottom could be make it more urgent,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>or pander to the people that you're trying to sell

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to make it more vivid. It said that if you

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ab test a website enough, sooner or later it will

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>become a porn site because it's really depressing. It is depressing,

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but sooner or later, this picture will get more clicks

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>than that picture this claim will get. So if you

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the horrible news and the buzzfeedification of the web,

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it didn't happen because Walter Conkite's airs wanted it to happen.

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>It happened because the algorithm said, make the headline one

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that people click on. And the same thing's true with

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>solar lanterns, and the same things true with paper clips.

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Expand that solar lantern piece of it. You and I

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>had discussed that, but expand, expand tell us what happened

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with solar lanterns in the old days. If someone came

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>up with an idea for a solar lantern, there wouldn't

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be very many factories that could make one. You would

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>take a risk, craft it, bring it to the merchant

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at Walmarter Kmarter Target and say here, I made this.

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>The merchant would have to allocate you scarce shelf space.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to stand behind it. There might be one

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>or two to choose from, and if it was good,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you would change the culture because you could get a

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>piece of the market. In the modern age of infinite

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>shelf space with dozens or maybe fifty companies, many of

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>them in China, but around the world. Using cheap labor

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and cheap systems, anyone can commission a solar lantern. You

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have to have a known brand name. You'll still

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>get shelf space. You need reviews, you can buy reviews.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You can buy reviews for a nickel, And so all

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the consumer who types in solar lantern

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>because the search box wins every time you type it in,

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's convenient solar lantern, and you end up at

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's right. But then Amazon search box shows you fifty

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>solar lanterns, twenty solar lanterns. Anyone can sell a solar lantern.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They're sorted by review, but the reviews are fake. And

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>which one are you going to buy? They're all the same,

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Buy the cheap one, the algorithm keeps saying, by the

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>cheap one. Okay. There's nothing that sounds appealing about this.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there a good side to it? Is there any

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>benefit apart from cheaper merchandise. It's all going to work

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>itself out in the following way. More access, more choice

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>will enable more consumers to make better decisions, and that

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>over time, the fake reviews will work themselves out. That

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon will always give you a refund if you say

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>my solar lantern is lousy. Amazon's brand is the most

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>respected brand in America. You're not going to switch. You

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of choices. This is hypercapitalism. It's

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>infinite choice, with nobody being the nanny state, nobody saying

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm the merchant, I'm in charge. Instead pick So let's

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>go back to this, to the retail part of Amazon,

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this obvious retail part, because I want to push a

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit on what the cost of this has been

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>and there's this common perception right that it's Amazon that's

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>putting retailers out of business Jim Boree Toys r US.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>But this has been happening for a long time. We

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>had superstars years ago putting the little guy out of business.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember watching the nineteen ninety eight Tom Hanks make

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Ryan movie You've Got Mail, or the Big Fox Box

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Barnes and Noble look alike as putting cute little shop

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>around the corner out of business. Now the bad guy

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is Amazon. So has anything really changed or is this

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>just evolution. Well, there's a very long history of retailers

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>going out of business, and if Amazon wasn't putting them

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 1>out of business, somebody else would retailers go out of

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>business because landlords never go out of business. The question

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for me is what will we do to our culture

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>when there is no main Street. I'm not saying that

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>our culture can't survive without main Street. I'm saying that

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a significant cost to that dislocation.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Because what main Street does for us, in addition to

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>giving us a convenient place to pick up a kind bar,

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is oh there's a bathroom, Oh there's lights, Oh there's

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>another human being. Maybe I could have a conversation without

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>human being exactly. If you watch enough Old Star Trek,

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>you'll come to see there are no stores. No one

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>goes shopping in science fiction. You know, I had never

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>noticed that, but you're absolutely right. The real question is

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this improvement that's going on making things cheaper. Improvement in quotes, right,

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>This improvement in quotes, this change things are cheaper. I

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>shop at Amazon all the time because it's more convenient,

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>more reliable, cheaper. I like that brand as something that

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>makes it easier for me to do my life. Most

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of the cash benefit accrues to the middleman in this

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>case Amazon, but it is all being sucked out of somewhere.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And the question is when that somewhere is gone, what

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>will we replace it with? And will we be able

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to fashion another culture, a better culture, one that we're

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>proud of when we take away the thing that has

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>fueled it. And So, when I think about the book

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>industry and the people that I cherish that I've worked

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>with for all those years, there isn't going to be

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a New York City book industry in twenty years. It's

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>impossible to imagine that it will exist because they don't

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have any friction. If there is no friction, where are

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they going to generate the heat they need to pay

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the bills? They won't be able to. So what will

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>those people do? How will we create cycles a forward

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>motion that enable people who create, or merchants or people

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>who sell, or people who own a factory to thrive

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in a world where there is no friction. It's a

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>great irony, isn't it that it is all of us

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's customers who are enabling something that in the end

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>may be very antithetical to our interests. It may not

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>be what we want. Is there something or welly in

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>about the Amazon that it's going to become? Well? So,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then the question is, once you build the systems and

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm, and you are doing it to please the

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>public markets, where do we see that the public markets

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>have ever been right in their long term perspective about

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what it is to please them? Because the companies that

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>we are the most proud of, the ones that we

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>point to, aren't the ones that Wall Street is happy

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>within the long run. That what it means to be

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to make Wall Street happy in the long run is

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that you are predictably and reliably beating estimates on your

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterly earnings per share, yep, not that you're leaving behind

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>something better than you found it. So let's pause on

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that point. Because Amazons somehow manage to play the game differently,

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>at least for a number of years, in the sense

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon didn't produce consistent profits, and yet the company

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>has had unlimited access to capital raising and a soaring

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>stock price. Why were the rules different from Amazon? Why

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was Jeff bez Us able to play by a different

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>set of rules, at least in the short term. Well,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring in a overused phrase, Jeff is almost always

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the smartest guy in the room and real, for real,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>no sarcasm in that right. And he understood that something

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>was shifting in the stock market because something was shifting

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in the way the Internet worked, and that there are

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>stocks that are traded because their numbers make sense, and

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>there are stocks that are traded because their story makes sense.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you can have the best story stock and

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a limited supply of it, people who want the

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>best story stock will buy it. So Jeff said, here's

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>what I want you to measure me on, and he

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>has regularly exceeded the thing he said to be measured

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on Other companies say you want to be measure us

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on profit, go ahead, measure us on profit. So Jeff's

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>consistency in that approach was key. He's vulnerable now for

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the following reason. Lots and lots of the key people

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>who he works with need the stock price to keep

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>going up. When it was just him, it was okay

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>if the story hit a speedboat. But when it's lots

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of people who are all have their hands on the algorithm.

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>The challenge you have, and I live through this when

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a Well was my biggest customer, and I live through

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this when I worked at Yahoo, is that these people

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>have their hands on the dials and there are decisions

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that they will make based on what Wall Street is

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>telling them, because at some point Wall Street always says,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we heard the story, now we want to go back

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to the thing we like to measure. Jeff business has

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>also been able to do something else that I think

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting, which is that he's created sort of

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this with Amazon Web Services, the cloud computing business. It

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially gives him leverage in the retail business that other

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>retailers don't have because he's got this money making appendage

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuck on this mammoth retail business. And so

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the AWS accounts for what like one hundred

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and fifty percent of Amazon's operating business, And so how

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>does that give Amazon advantages that other retailers don't have? Okay,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit of background here. Twenty five years ago,

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the typical newspaper made one hundred and ten percent of

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>its profit from classified ads. But people didn't think of

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the newspaper as the classifies with some bonuses. Right well,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>AWS is the invisible cloud in the sky that runs many,

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>many websites. And the brilliance that Jeff brought to the

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.959
<v Speaker 1>table was this. He said, I'm going to need something

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>like this. If I'm going to need something like this,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I bet my competitors are going to need something like this.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm willing to lose money building it to scale,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I can erect a moat, so my competitors will need

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to use mine because it's so much cheaper. I want

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to jump in and blow your mind. We all think

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of Amazon as the boxes that show up at our doorstops,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's just the Amazon. We can see the Amazon

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that sells more batteries than drursa more diapers than Pampers.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>CNN famously said Amazon is building an army of brands,

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and their private label sales reach seven point billion last year.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>There are more than one hundred million Americans paying more

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>than one hundred dollars a year for the service of

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime, and Amazon commands half of the US e

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>commerce market. But the rest of it, the Amazon you

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>don't see, is even more staggering. There's Amazon Web Services

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>or AWS, which accounted for fifty percent of the company's

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>operating and come last year. There's Amazon Video, Amazon Studios,

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Go, Amazon Fresh, Amazon restaurants, They own whole Foods,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>They acquired an online pharmacy. They are leaders in AI

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and deep learning. Their revenue across all business segments total

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and thirty two point eight nine billion, that's

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>billion with a B last year, up thirty one percent

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>from the year before, and there are no signs of

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown in twenty nineteen. I understand the concept of

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Amazon selling everything and and not selling anything in particular,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but the question for me is when can they changed

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that dial. And if you look a little bit closer

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>into the publishing world, right, Amazon just originally sold books,

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't sell a particular book. They sold books

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and everybody loved it. But now Amazon is also the publisher,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the creator, publishing its own books within its own system.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I was struck by this Wall Street Journal

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>story that begins with its great anecdote about a guy

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>named Mark Sullivan in his book Beneath a Scarlet Sky.

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon published it and effectively used Amazon's tools to make

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it into a best seller. And so what happens if

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon starts working that dial? Okay, so I can talk

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>about the book thing from personal experience, because it was

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 1>my idea. I met with Jeff in nineteen ninety five

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and I said, you're already doing the hard part. You

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>should do the part about publishing. And he laughed and said,

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not too soon. Five years later I went back. Five

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>years later, I went back and about I don't know,

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>eight years ago, they called me up and they said, okay,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>we're ready. Now it's time. Now it's time. Now what

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>do I mean by the hard part? The hard part

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is they know who the readers are, and they know

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>what the readers want. No one in New York has

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ever done that. Random House doesn't know who the readers are.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Penguin doesn't know what the readers want. There's this disconnect, right.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's created a knowledge in exactly. So they ought to

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to go to the author and say, based

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on what we know, we can find books for our

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>readers instead of you trying to find readers for the books.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a game changer. That's magnificent. They can upend the

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>entire system exactly. And this is where that everything and

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>anything thing kicks in because guess what Amazon has done.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Many many books like Sullivan's book, But they're pointing to

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the Sullivan book because it turns out they didn't pick

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>his book to be a bestseller. They're playing a portfolio theory.

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Lots of books went through the system and Amazon has

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>failed to act as a merchant and say we pick

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this book that in fact, it's a super level playing field.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't promote their books that much more than other

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>people's the way a real merchant would do it. They

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>don't make other people's books harder to find, the way

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a real merchant would. It's still back to this idea

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of everything. So the egalitarian and me says terrific. Now

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to look or sound like an author

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to get new York to pick you. You can go

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>straight to the Kindle and get twenty of your friends

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to buy your book, and a twenty of your friends

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 1>buy your book on the Kindle and it's amazing, and

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>now four million of your friends have bought the book

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're a best selling author. But what happens if

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon becomes not just the everything store but the only store?

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Then can't they start to work that lever? Why wouldn't

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they work those levers eventually? Well, everything in their algorithm,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in their DNA, in their setup is don't work that lever.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That the entire mindset is the system will figure out

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be sold. They don't think like direct

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>marketers or as marketers. They think like algorithm marketers. Put

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it in tag it properly, see what happens because it

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't cost them anything. Because they know something's going to work,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter to them which one works. That's brand new thinking.

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I am not anti Amazon. I am anti letting an

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>algorithm run wild forever. At some point I want human

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>beings to stand up and say, we understand the algorithm.

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>We're proud of the algorithm. We change the algorithm, and

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the problem. We have with Facebook and Google,

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd vote for man not machine. Google famously says it's

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>not up to us. The algorithm decided to put this

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>as the first match. This is nonsense. There are more

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>than three thousand people at Google who do nothing but

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>tweak the algorithm, but they don't want to accept responsibility

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for the fact that they do that. There are thousands

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of people at Amazon who are working on their search algorithm.

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>There are thousands of people Amazon who are figuring out

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what clues and signals you can put next to something

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to move it up or move it down. There are

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>lots of things that are built by hand that become

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the rules in the algorithm that shift how entire industries operate.

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Because the algorithm is in just a bunch of code,

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a series of principles. Well, then, let me push

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>back on your point that there's something non merchant like

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon, because aren't all those people in effect being

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>merchants in that sense that they are influencing the decisions

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to make about how we pick things and

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>how we make our selection. Aren't they embedding a humanity

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>or a friction into the system, perhaps in a slightly

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>different way than a traditional retailer would have. Let me

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>try to differentiate what I mean by merchant. In the

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>traditional model, a merchant owns twenty square feet of the

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>shelf and has a name. The challenge I have here

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are that people who are better at coding than being

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in a community are anonymously making decisions that have ramifications

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>far outside their twenty square feet right, and when we

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>see the bad outcomes of that, we don't even know

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>who to ask. Not only that, but we can't determine

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an innocent side effect or the point you

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>seem perhaps a little more optimistic than I would expect

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>you to be, or a little more optimistic than I

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>might be given that pressure from Wall Street that at

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>some point Wall Street is going to say, turn up

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the dial, do this, make the extra twelve cents on this,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>use your power to make a best seller, to pick

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a book that's going to be a best seller, use

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>your power to pick one product over the other, and,

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, make the person making the product pay

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for that in some way. I mean, it's not benign

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the way you're describing it, but doesn't have the potential

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to become something very not benign. So when I think

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>about monopolies that have failed us and what has happened

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>when they have tried to extract more money. We see

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to the first example of Standard oil.

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Standard Oil basically acted like gangsters and eliminated their competition.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>If we think about the company everyone hates the most,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>their cable company, they have done things like limit choice

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and given us a horrible customer service, lied to us,

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and tricked us because we don't have any choices. When

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think about how Amazon will make more money, those

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't the side effects that I see. I think they

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>will make more money by incrementally increasing the cost of

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>using AWS, which will be paid for by all of us,

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but not very much. And then I think they will

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>make more money by pushing the retail division to actually

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>make a profit, which means that each of us will

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>pay an extra five twenty dollars a month, and we'll

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>pay it because by that point we won't have any choice, right,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>We can't go back to the store down the street

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy our book or our toilet paper or our

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever instead, because that start down the street won't exist anymore.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>This is true, but it's still going to be cheaper

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>than the stores solder to us, we still come out

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>ahead on the money side. On the money side, cheaper

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting word because it depends on what costs

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to measure exact for your point. So my

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>whole articulation here is not about the fact that Amazon

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a net drag on the gross

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>national product of the United States or our efficiency to

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>acquire stuff. It's impossible for me to imagine that that

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>will occur. What I believe is a change is being

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>made to our culture, starting with some of the things

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we care the most about, books and television, and we're

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>not prepared to talk about it, and we're not aware

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>of how the change is happening, and that if the

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>change becomes algorithmic, I worry about that because as bad

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>as the people in Hollywood have behaved over the years,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we knew who the people in Hollywood were, and the

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>people in Hollywood were in our communion accountability versus anonymity.

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's a way to sum it up. I think

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Going back to the publishing example, It's

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>not so much that somebody at Amazon is saying, let's

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>make this book a best seller. It's more that an

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>algorithm is making the book a best seller, and nobody's

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>controlling it, but something is controlling it, and so the

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>choices where we get are going to be dictated by

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>something we can't see, and we'll be buying a book

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't hand selected for us by a someone who

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>loves books, but rather as the result of an algorithm.

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So here's the JK. Rowling story. When I was a

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>book packager, I did one hundred and twenty books in

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>ten years. I did almanacs, I did how two books,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and I also did young adult fiction. And I did

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a series for Scholastic based on Nintendo games because boys

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>weren't reading enough books. So I got the rights to

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo games and turn them into novels. And Scholastic made

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>me take out all vampires, all casual death because they said,

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we're not no casual death none. That's what Nintendo games

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>are filled with, right right, we are not ready to

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have nine and ten year old boys read this. Two

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>years later, after the series it sold pretty well, they

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>came out with this book that no one had ever

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>heard of, called Harry Potter. And I don't need to

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you there's a lot of casual death in Harry Potter,

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and then bookstores took this book and hand sold it,

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a longstanding, treasured tradition in book publishing, which

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is the actual owner, the actual clerk saw the nerdy

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>ten year old walk in and handed the book to

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the kid and said, you need to read this. And

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Harry Potter went on to make JK. Rerewlling the most

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>successful author in history, first billionaire as an author. It

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is inconceivable that if Amazon had existed, then that Harry

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Potter would have worked. That's an incredibly frightening thought. Change

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that comes down from tastemakers is different from change that

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>comes up from the grass. And I think we need both.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We've always had both, But the algorithm takes one of

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>those away. Yeah, it's not even change coming from tastemakers,

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's changed coming from an algorithm. Right, And how does

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that play out? We're talking about books which are of

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>critical interest to you and to me and to all

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of us who care about the culture. But what about

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes the same sort of power being applied

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to other aspects of our life, from what food we

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>eat to what medicines we have available. As Amazon becomes

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Restaurants and Amazon Healthcare, so The healthcare thing is

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting because Walmart is quietly planning on healthcare being the

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>next pillar that they're going to embrace. If we can

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to apply the efficiency of the algorithm

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to the price of an antibiotic, if we can figure

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out how to use rules based thinking to make sure

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>people don't waste their lives and their money on placebos

0:29:55.800 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>when they're not effective, you know, then we're going to

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>come out ahead. But again, what's a challenge here is

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that the science of direct marketing is different than the

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>magic of a human who sees us, who understands us,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>who speaks to us a certain way. And what we

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>know about medicine is that a third of the time

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we get better because we believe we're going to get better,

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>not because we took the right pill on the right day.

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I worry about the lack of choice. That what all

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the people who are trying to play this game are

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is lock people in, because in an

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>open system with unlimited choice and efficiency, nobody makes any money.

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So the race is always to create some version of monopoly,

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>because monopoly creates the ultimate form of scarcity, so that

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you can get your money back and That's why people

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>are arguing that a nonprofit in the center of the

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>system that is truly motivated to keep turning the algorithm

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>toward efficient is a worthwhile thing to have. And if

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you're a capitalist, I think it's important to acknowledge that

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>monopoly is almost the opposite of capitalism. It is not

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a useful product of capitalism. So when I look at healthcare,

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the book industry is tinker toys compared to the complexity

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of healthcare. Who's paying, who's the customer, what do they want?

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>What if you get it wrong? Right? My mom used

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to run the bookstore that she founded in Buffalo where

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it was in the all By Knox Art Museum, So

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>she had certain art books that no one else had.

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And I still remember the day Charlie, before she died,

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>she got a call from Amazon and they said, do

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you have this book? A human called her and she

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>said yes. They say, we'll pay full price and we'll

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>pay you to have you fedexit to our customer because

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they were willing to lose money to be able to

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>keep the promise. We have every book, and they found

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a copy of the book for well, if someone needs

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>chemo medicine, it's different than if they need a book

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>about Magreet and you're going to have to figure out

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>where in the supply chain you live, what are the shortcuts?

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>What are the shortcuts you can't take? Will you let

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone play? When Orn Hatch says, I want you to

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to sell bees wax vitamins and call them

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a drug, these are all very different decisions, then please

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>carry my kindle book called The Martian. In some ways, though,

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess the silver lining to that analysis is that

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this isn't going to be easy for Amazon. In other words,

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we're on a path at being Amazon's world and we're

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just going to live in it, but we're not getting

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get there quite as quickly if they're not

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to take over our healthcare business

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. There's stuff we need and there's stuff we want,

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And the thing about stuff you want is that once

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you have it, you want something else. So last year

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we spent as much on self storage as we spend

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on going to the movies. That we have more stuff

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>than we have room for. That's really depressing. True. So this,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>once you've created the actual everything store and everyone is

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a click away from everything, that's not enough. Now I

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>want to buy something from Shopify that nobody else has now,

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to buy an experience that no one else

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:23.479
<v Speaker 1>has experienced. We're watching already a whole generation now that

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>would rather have a smartphone than a car. Why is

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that right? Because the potemic value of a car has

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>gone down, whereas the value of being connected has gone up.

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So the culture and the economy are going to keep shifting.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's not clear that it's Amazon's world when it

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to this thing that they do the same way.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not UPS's world, even though they deliver everything. UPS

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is sort of invisible. And has UPS's ubiquity changed our culture?

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course it has, but I don't want to call

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it UPS world, even though UPS comes to my house

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>every day. So is there any chance that consumers start

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, no, no, no, this actually isn't what we want,

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>or that businesses that are being decimated, are producers are

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that are having their margins shrunk by Amazon start to

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on the system. Is there a way to

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>stop the algorithm in process? I think there is zero

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>chance that individual consumers and individual providers will have any

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>impact whatsoever on the algorithm. Zero zero. That's pretty strong

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like saying I'm tired of the telephone. I'm not

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have telephone calls anymore. I'm going to walk

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to people's houses and talk to them face to face.

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>At and T did not worry about that problem in

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty not going to be a problem. The problem

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for monopolists is when the culture says to the government,

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we care very much about antitrust and it comes in waves.

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>There was no antitrust thinking before standard oil, and then

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a ton of anti trust thinking and Teddy

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Roosevelt was it the heart of it, and then it

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>faded over time. So it comes and it goes, and

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been gone a long time. But I think when

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we saw when we see the high jinks at the

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>FCC and everything else, it's due to come back. And

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 1>when it comes back, and it's already come back in Europe,

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that is something that these giant algorithmic companies have to

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to deal with because they can't make

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it go away. Do you think that's on Bezos's radar screen? Oh,

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that they spend a lot of time thinking

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>about that. I mean from all the way from the

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>early days of sales tax, they could have fought the

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>sales tax being harder. Instead, one day they took a

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 1>deep breath and they said, fine, we're going to collect

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>sales tax. Is there any chance, if Amazon is around

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred years that we have both this or

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon like thing is around in a hundred years,

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that we can also still have independent stores on Main Street?

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Or does one automatically at some point come at the

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>expense of the other. So what we know is that

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a really big desire. We don't know if it's

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>primordial or recent for human beings to go to a

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.720
<v Speaker 1>store on Main Street that I was in a fancy

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>mall last week, the busiest business by far with Starbucks,

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because everyone was window shopping at everything else and drinking

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that they could afford in the store

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in the mall. Right, So merchants and retailers are clever.

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>They like being merchants and retailers. They will show up

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>with new things to do in those spaces that human

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>beings will pay a little to engage with. I think

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the big shift is going to be landlords have to

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.439
<v Speaker 1>understand that the thing that they were charging a huge

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>tax on has gone away, and you can't charge the

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>pottery barn tax anymore. You can't charge the proud attacks anymore.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to see landlords to take a big hit.

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Or what we're seeing in New York is dozens and

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>dozens and dozens of empty storefronts. And one of the

0:36:57.840 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>things I proposed on my blog, which was really interesting

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>feedback I got, was I think a vacancy tax is

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a great idea. I think if your store is vacant

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for more than three months, you should have to pay

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a tax on it, because it should pay for the

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>cops and the lights and everything else we have to

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>do to make up for the fact that you're not

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>doing it. I think that's a fantastic idea. It makes

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense. And I got four angry notes, all four

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>from landlords, so that's not surprising, all right. If you

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>could change one thing about the business world, or if

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you could have maybe a bit stick with Amazon, if

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>you could have Amazon do one thing differently, what would

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it be. I think we need to do two things

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to be our best selves as humans in a commercial economy,

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and they are to solve interesting problems and to lead.

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And what it means to lead is to see other people,

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to truly see them, to figure out where you can

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:49.959
<v Speaker 1>help them, where you can take them, and what you'll

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>take responsibility for. That is an interesting problem. There are

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>lots of interesting problems when I think about the least

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>thing a human can do in the commercial world is

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, will this be on the test? What does

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>my boss want me to do? And worst of all,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm just doing my job. And so I guess what

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I would hope for in a relentless company that's driven

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 1>by a series of algorithms is how many people they

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>are are charged with never saying I'm just doing my

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>job and instead are saying, here, I made this, and

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm proud of it. You want the algorithm to have accountability.

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I do, indeed. So I loved my conversation with Seth

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>in large part because what comes out of his mouth

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>is not what you think is going to come out

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of his mouth, and those are always the best conversations.

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm both more optimistic and more pessimistic after my conversation.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm disheartened because I really do see the dangers of

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm. As Seth calls it. We want accountability, we

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>want humanity, we want that great independent bookstore on the

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 1>corner of our main street, or at least we're going

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to want them when they disappear. But I'm less concerned

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon taking over the world than I was. Healthcare

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>is going to be interesting, even for Jeff Bezos. We

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>also spent a lot of time talking about not just

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon you can see as a consumer, but the

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Amazon you can't see, the algorithm, and I think I'm

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit reassured on that front. While the Frankenstein

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Bezos has built may not be controllable if Seth is right,

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>it's also not going to be able to act with

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>outright malice. Does that pass for optimism? Making a Killing

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is a co production of Pushkin Industries and Chalk and Blade.

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's produced by Ruth Barnes. My executive producers are Alison

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>McClean no relation and Megan Casey. The executive producer at

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin is Nea Loebell. Engineering by Jason Gambrel. Our music

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is by Jed Flood. Special thanks to Jacob Weisberg at

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin and everyone on the show. I'm Bethany mcclein, Thanks

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening. Find me on Twitter at Bethany

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>mac twelve