WEBVTT - White House Lax Protocol Opens Window For More Security Breaches

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P and L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. How

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult is it to hack into the US election system? While,

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>according to one report, Florida's Department of State has criticized

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>an experiment to thwart hackers because an eleven year old

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>hacker needed only ten minutes to bust into a replica

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>site and make it look like the wrong candidate had

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>won a presidential election. Here to tell us more about

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the situation is Clint Watts. He is a senior fellow

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Far Policy Research Institute. He is also Senior

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Fellow at the Center for Cyber and Homeland Security at

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>George Washing at the George Washington University. He was previously

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>an infantry officer in the United States Army, executive officer

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Combating Terrorism Center at the US Military Academy

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at West Point, and a former FBI official. Clint watts.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Should we just go back to paper ballots? Yeah, I

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>would seem that way, doesn't it. I it's amazing that

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>our tech, you know, we should expect it to be

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>able to return a vote very quickly and to do

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that efficiently, but it is almost impossible to secure it

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>if it has any sort of connection to the web.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And at the same point, we're relying on just a

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>few programmers to try and prevent thousands or even you know,

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of potential hackers out there over time

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from breaking into systems. So we're in a tough spot.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think the important thing America is that we

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of audit trail and paper ballot backup

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>so that we can verify a vote, because we've seen

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this happen, particularly Ukraine for example, of Russia had hacked

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>into the system there and the Ukrainians caught it before

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>it went live. But we will always have this threaten

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as we have candidates that are as also

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>going that maybe we can't trust the vote, we're going

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to have these sorts of problems over the horizon. You know.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Pim raised a good point, which is there are these

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>tests and studies being done of just how compromise the U. S.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Electoral system really is right now, And I have to wonder,

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 1>especially as we head into the midterm elections, just how

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>far have hackers gotten, How how pervasive has some of

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the influence already been, And are you worried about the

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>integrity of these elections. I'm not so much worried about

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the integrity as much as the perception of the integrity.

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And by what I mean by that is it actually is,

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, fairly difficult to change the votes. We have

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people looking at it, but we still

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>have about five states. It sounds like that don't have

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a sufficient audit trail or a paper ballot backups that

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we can verify. What I'm more nervous about, though, is

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the perception or the casting of doubt about the integrity

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of elections. We saw this in twenty sixteen when we

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>were watching Russian influence. UH. When I was studying this,

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the second way was really about making people nervous that

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>democracy isn't true or that their votes didn't count. And

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that come up again in twenty eight team.

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>We're already worried about it now months in advance, but

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>looking forward we're hearing Canadas say that the vote is

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be rigged or the election is rigged against me.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>That sort of doubt is almost impossible. And even if

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you didn't change a vote, let's say you just took

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a proemptive hack, you just made it look like you

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>hit a voter database, or you change something and then

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>dumped it out online. That would create widespread doubt in

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the electoral system. That's an attack on democracy and it

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>really under undermines the trust and integrity in both are

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>elected officials in our institutions. Clint, what do you believe

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that any conversation or communication is secure, particularly if it

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>takes place in the White House. Yeah, it's it's fascinating.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have said yes up until now. I just

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>don't know. We've seen unprecedented things in the last two years. Uh.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>One example is the Russian Foreign Minister lab Ra going

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>into the Oval office without any US media there, but

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there was Russian media there. Uh. We've seen cases in

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Helsinki with the president is talking with Ladimir Puttin one

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on one and there's no witnesses and we don't know

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>what the electronic situation was there. And then this amrose

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to tape that that came out in the last week.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>These are all unprecedented things, and so I don't have

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>confidence right now in terms of communications, uh, the way

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I did pre two thousand sixteen. I just know working

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>in the government, you didn't take a cell phone in

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>anywhere or recording device in anywhere. So it's pretty startling

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to see these revelations come forward, if they're true. And

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, uh, Omar rosso Manigald Newman, she

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>was a former White House advisor who got fired uh

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>and is releasing tapes that she made of President Trump. Uh.

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>And she is saying that she has more that she

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>will release. President Trump has a couple of colorful tweets

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in response, for example, I'll read you the latest one. Well,

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not presidential to take on a low

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>life like Omar Rossa. And while I would rather not

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>be doing so, this is a modern day form of communication,

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and I know the fake news media will be working

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>overtime to make even wacky h Omar Rossa look legitimate

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Sorry, So what is the possible consequence other

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>than being this sort of soap opera that everybody is following.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>What is the potential security consequence of have somebody taping

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the current president in the White House and potential advisors.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>What is the security concern here? Yeah, Well, as we

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>talked out with the uh eleven year old that may

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be hacked into a simulated voting machine, we don't know

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>who's hacked into those devices. Uh, John Kelly, the Chief

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of Staff, there was another point just a few months

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ago where there was reporting that his personal phone had

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>been compromised at one point or hacked into. We know

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the President tweets a lot, and so he's carrying around

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a device as well, and so all of the security

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>protocols that they're not being followed through on provide an

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>open window, uh, you know, either in terms of access

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>via microphone, email, or even possibly video at some point

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>into our government. And this is just unprecedented. Usually, I know,

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>working at the FBI and even with the military, you

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>leave your phone in the car, you leave it at

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the door, checked into a box. And so this is

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the highest pinnacle of our government and we have people

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>carrying around devices, not only using them uh in places

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe they shouldn't be, but using them to record each other.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Just think the erosion of trust on that staff, right,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>now if you thought you were being recorded by your coworkers,

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>where you couldn't openly discuss policy or move forward. It

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>slows down the wheels of government at every single level.

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And it also probably makes long time civil servants in

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>our country very nervous to not be sure that they

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>can openly and discuss policy freely with leadership without maybe

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>being recorded by one of their colleagues or with somebody

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in the administration. It's a really dark time in terms

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of personal trust inside the White House. Clint Watts, do

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you believe that your communications are monitored or have been monitored,

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>either by US intelligence forces or by overseas intelligence agencies.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I assume so, you know, in a certain context. I

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>traveled overseas before. I know in in certain countries just

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their cyber capabilities, and in authoritarian regimes

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in particular, they tend to monitor very heavily. That's whether

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in Southeast Asia, China, you know, Europe, whatever it

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>might be. I always kind of operate under the assumption

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that when I'm particularly in a foreign country or accessing

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>through WiFi when I'm traveling, that I'm putting myself at risk,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>because that's it's just different. The standards of surveillance are

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>different in different countries. In terms of the United States,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't say that that's the case, but I've definitely

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>had hacking attempts against me and and institutions that I've

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>worked for. Clint Watts, thank you so much for being

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with us and for all your insights. Clint Watts is

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a former FBI Special Agent. He is currently Senior Fellow

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. He also is UH

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a Senior Fellow at the Center for Cyber and Homeland

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Security at the George Washington University. You know, Lisa, at

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year, one dollar would get you

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>three point seven for Turkish lira. How many you get today? Yes,

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>good question, six point nine one. That is a drop

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in value of more than eighty per cent. Dr Win

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Thin is the global head of Emerging Markets FX for

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Brown Brothers harrim and he joins us now. Dr Win Thin,

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>were you able to call this decline in the value

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Turkish lira? Well? Uh, first of all, thanks

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Um. Yes, I've been embarrassed on Turkish

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>lever for most of this year, but I think the

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>speed of this decline is is great than anyone imagined.

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Why Well, I think in general markets surprise that there's

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>been a putal lack of action by the policymakers. Um,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>if they'd come in and allow the center brank to

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>high grades. Uh, it takes some orthodox measures. We wouldn't

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>be in the situation who we are now, I think.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>But by waiting so long, the situation is really close

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to getting out of hand. Um. And you know at

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this point the sky's limit, all right, So when you

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>stay close to getting out of hand, what's the worst

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>case scenario and how much should investors in other parts

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>of the world care? Well? Luckily? Well, let nas the

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>second part first, that you know lucky. I have been

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>down playing the denotion of compasion. I mean, if you

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>look at em and we've been in a bear market

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for e M for for really much of this year,

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, I shy away from atasion. I

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think you know, we have rising US interest rates, we

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have rising global tensions, we have economic ris from China.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>There's all very negative em. So my what I've been

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.479
<v Speaker 1>telling clients is that well, within this bears e M backdrop,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got five currencies that are have idiosynocratic risks. That

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>are underperforming. That would be Turkish Layer, Argentine Pasto, Brazilian Real,

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Russian Rouble, South Africana Ran. So if you hold any

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>five of those currencies, and yes, that would be very concerned.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the bad news. The good news is if you

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>look at your wonderful w c RS page, you see

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>here to date we actually have the Colombian paste to

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the mixing pay up here to date Malaitian ring

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>get only down three proven sold down when so there's

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely divergences within e M and that to me sort

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of speaks less of the sort of contagion and more

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of divergences within a bear market. Do you believe

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that there are going to be any surprises from European

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>banks that hold large amounts of Turkish debt? Well, we

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>know already from ECB that there are several European banks

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that have exposed to Turkey. But uh, you know, if

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>we're talked about systemic risk, I don't think it's big enough,

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>big enough that big of a concern. Strongly they'll be

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>against either scar risks to certain corporates, certain banks, but

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a widespread systemic um sorry or two

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>seven eight type crisis. I really would downplay that. I

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're as leveraged as we were back in

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>those days. The fundamentals in many of these countries are better.

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, of course I always hesitate to say this

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>time is different, but uh, you know, I'm going to

0:11:58.000 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of go on a limb and and and say

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and downplay the systemic risk. Well, just to be Debbie Downer,

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what would you have to see in order to change

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>your view that perhaps this does have more potential for contagion. Uh, well,

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to see, uh, some greater knock

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on effects. I think the global growth and in that respect,

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Turkeys is no China. Uh, It's one of the larger

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>EM countries, but it's it's it's by no means a heavyweight. Uh.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>We have uh several other EM current countries that are

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>much more important to the sort of the global supply chain.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think the one sort of big unknown

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>as sal political risk. I mean, in that respect, Turkeys

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly punches above its weight. Um, but you know, again

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, I think the banking systems in the

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>developed world are much stronger now after crisis. Again, you know,

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we've been through a multi year period of de leveraging. Again,

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not to say they're not gonna be individual victims

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and individual casualties. But again I'm I'm at this point

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>downplaying the systemic risks, al right, down the risks. What

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>if there is some political repercussions in Turkey because of

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this in terms of its relations with the West, or

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>were relations internally with the government of of President Urdwan

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>because of increased inflation, or because of the inability of

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the country in order to import its necessary fuel obligations. Well,

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, Um, you know, in some ways

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>urd One is lucky this happen after selection, because obviously

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a terrible pain. I went back and

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>look back at the two major crisis Turkeys. Turkey that

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>suffered in recent years. We had a seventy percent evaluation

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that year. The economy contracted five back in two thousand one. Uh.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The litteral loss I think, uh seventy percent of its

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>value UH and the economic contract about six per So

0:13:57.840 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, I think that the risk of

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a hard land are there. The way things are going,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to the brink. We're gonna have hard landing. Whoever,

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>recession in Turkey, spiky inflation, corporate default um and probably

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>some banking failures. Yes, that's very bad for Urwan, but

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he's lucky. He just got releacted, so he's he's safe

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the next four or five years. So and one of

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the things, we get your crisis, you might as well

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>get it early in your term. Well, he certainly has

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a crisis on his hands, but he's got plenty of

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>play of runway to go there. Dr Winton, thank you

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. It's always a pleasure

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>having new Dr Winton is Global Head of Emerging Markets

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>f X for Brown Brothers Harriman in New York City.

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Another day, another announcement of new tariffs. It is hard

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to keep track of which country and which as a

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>class commodity is getting hit. Arlen Siderman is going to

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>help us understand where we need to be focused right

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>now when it comes to the commodity market. Arlan is

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Chief Commodities Economistic I N T l f C S Stone,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>or rather I N T l F C Stone, based

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City, Missouri. Thank you so much for being

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with us, so Arlena, and just we do hear about

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>President Trump? Doubling tariffs and Turkish steel and aluminum Russian sanctions. Obviously,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we have the escalating tariff off with China and European Union,

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>although that's cooled a little bit. Which set of tariffs

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>so far have had the greatest impact on commodity prices

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>from your view, Well, certainly the trade war with China

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>has had the biggest impact. China is the largest importer

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of commodities overall, and they tend to set the tone

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for the world, and to to lose that market is

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly has the biggest impact. Well, they might lose a

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>certain market, but what about the market for energy that's

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>made by the United States. Hasn't that changed things? Well,

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it certainly has, and we saw as Bloomberg reported on

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Friday that China lifting the tariff, the retaliatory tariff on

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>crude oil, I think really shows a significance that the

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>United States plays now in the global energy markets. And

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it also shows a crack in the armor

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>armor of China. Their economy cannot afford to see inflation

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>pressures right now. Even some of the social media within China,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>UH seeing some resistance starting to come up from the

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>general public. UH comments that the soybean cargo from the

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>United States that was holed up in their port for

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about five weeks trying to get unloaded. That all this

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to end up costing the consumers. So there

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>are some signs of the cracks in the armor there

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in China. I don't expect an end anytime soon. Um,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's still the big player. The big question, Arlen,

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is at what point will all of these tariffs significantly

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>slow global growth? And I'm particularly talking about the tip

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for Chad that we're seeing between the US and China.

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>What's the answer. Well, I think we're seeing it already

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in China and the US numbers are still strong. Uh.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>China United States are certainly big players in the world market. UH.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>China has an influence on Europe as well. And so

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think as we go forward and we look at

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, we probably start seeing some numbers. I

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>think we probably, in my opinion, we get a trade deal,

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>probably negotiated somewhere in the November December time period. By

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that time we'd probably be starting to see some effects

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on global economic growth. But if we get a deal

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in that time period, then I think some of the

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>other trading partners that we have spats, we start to

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>fall in place as well, and we start picking some

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>momentum backed up again in the first second quarter of

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>next year. Arlen, what can you tell us about the

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>soft commodity complex, specifically when it comes to soybeans and

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>wheat and corn and how their prices have just tumbled

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean soybeans nearly twent in just the last sixty days. Oh,

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a really amazing since we're setting record exports this summer,

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>for this time of year now, the fall is our

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>big exports season. Of course, China is a big part

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of that, but with China being the only customer really

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for Brazil, Brazil has a captive customer. Their prices are

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>running about above US prices, So the rest of the

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>world's coming to United States for soybeans and will likely

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to do that as supplies become tight in Brazil,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this falling right into probably late January February when they

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have new crop supplies available. Uh. Corn and wheat are

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>really little affected by this, so they're really caught up

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 1>in the current. And if you look at the numbers

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>from USDA on Friday, they were really pretty positive even

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>though it had a bigger corn crop than expected. We're

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>still seeing domestic stocks decline year on year and just

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in time supplies and global stocks are falling at a

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>fast space. When you look at the major exporters of

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>wheat in the world, supplies are near thirty year lows

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at around fourteen percent stocks to use the ratio, but

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>corn and wheat were pulled under by the tsunami of selling,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and soybeans did some chart damage. I think at some

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>point the trade starts to see the disparity between them

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and starts a trade appropriately. Marlyn, is there a commodity

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that you think has really big upside a really big

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 1>downside going forward? The people perhaps aren't pricing in I

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think a long term the big story is in corn,

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think corn and the energy has come out

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the winter. In any trade agreement we've got have with China,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>UH coming maybe at the end of the year or

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>early next year. Corn supplies globally are just in time

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>supply heavily dependent upon US production year in and year out,

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and and UH we're continually falling short. Production is falling

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>short of demand. Then if you throw China in there

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>with their move towards ethanol, blending mandate by they're rapidly

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>building ethanol production facilities there. They do not have enough

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>production to meet that demand. They'd like to clear up

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>their air ahead of hosting the next Olympics. And uh,

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>they've got some real shortages of corn. They're rapidly moving

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>through their reserve supplies and they need to get this

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>trade deal done before they need to start importing corn.

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think corn is probably the long term winner

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>once we get a trade deal with China. Thanks very

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Arlen Superman is the chief

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Commodities economist for International fc Stone talking about corn. The

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's public Investment Fund had approached to

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk going back almost two years about taking Tesla private.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>It's according to a blog post by Elon Musk, the

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>founder and the president and chief executive of Tesla, also

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>happens to own nearly of Tesla shares. Here to tell

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>us more about this potential investment is Matthew Martin, our

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Mid East finance reporter for Bloomberg. He's based in Dubai,

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>but he joins us from London today. Matthew, thank you

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us. What can you tell

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>us about the interest that the Saudi Arabian Investment Fund

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>has has made in Tesla? Well, thanks for having me. UM. Look,

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I think the Public Investment Fund really embarked on a

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>very strategic shift about two years ago. It used to

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be very domestically focused and investing within Saudi Arabia, and

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>then under the new rulers in Saudia, Saudi Arabia that

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the the onus came on the fund to start looking

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at investing outside um and in start trying to diversify

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the country away from the reliance on oil and obviously,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the biggest oil exporters in the world,

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>so they're looking at ways that they can diversify around that.

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, as we've seen from what

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has said, as long ago as two years ago,

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>they had identified Tesla as being part of that strategy.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think we've seen the Saudi Is now being

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>very interested in the electric vehicle space as as a

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 1>way of hedging against the country's obviously huge oil exposure.

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>UM So I think you know we're going to see

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the Saudis being very keen on seeing this transaction go

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>through UH and and and very keen on playing a

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>big role in Tesla's future. So, Matthew, you said it's

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi Arabia would be very keen on seeing this

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>transaction go through. Are you talking about Tesla going private?

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Is this transaction? And if so, why are Saudi Arabia

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>only committing to a five percent stake of Tesla when

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more up for graps. Well, so, yeah,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they what we've seen them do is they've

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>quietly built up this steak of five percent um just

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>or just under five percent to avoid having to disclose

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>what they've been doing, so that they've quietly built that

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>up in the market in the background while they've obviously

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>been having these conversations with Elon Musk. Um And now

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think now that the potential is there for a

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>deal to take Tesla um off the public markets. Um,

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the p i F is very keen to be part

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of that. And you know, I think that the question

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>now is going to be how significant um an amount,

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>how big a check can the p i F right

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>to support Elon Musk's plan of taking Tesla private? You know,

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly with the sort of patient sovereign capital that the

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>p I f has behind it the much that then

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be interested in the sort of short

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>term volatility that we've obviously seen in Tesla stock, and

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm making a much longer term bet on the future

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of electric vehicles, right. I guess that, Matthew. There has

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of skepticism about how serious Saudi Arabia's

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Sovereign Wealth Fund can be. If soft Bank, which is

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>partnering with for a lot of its assets to invest,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>has basically said they're not interested in Tesla, and when

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of mainstream, large producers of cars

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>getting into the electric car business, in other words, they're

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>big competitors for Tesla, and they actually have shown that

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they can produce the cars that they promised to make.

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a sense of sort of given the

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that soft Bank is not interested, how serious Saudi

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>arabia Sovereign Wealth Fund could really be. The impression that

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we've got speaking from sources close to the Saudi Fund

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is that they are very serious about this transaction. Um

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh and yeah, and they do see this as

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>part of building that strategic portfolio, hedging their oil exposure.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of the relation between what the

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Saudis do themselves through p IF and what they also

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 1>do through the very big exposure they have to the

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank Vision Fund UM. I mean, look, I think

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, clearly the two of them cooperate a lot

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in some ways UM, and I think this is one

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of those instances where their views are probably going to differ.

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think Soft Bank and the Vision Fund thinks

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that it has to some extent made its bets on

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>on electrification UM. But the p I f is UH

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.959
<v Speaker 1>is keen to go further on that and and do

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>some more. And you know, I think I've had this

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>discussions with other people as well about you know, obviously

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that there is a question of you know, why not

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>get exposure to another car manufacturer which is also UM.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Other car manufacturers obviously also exploring UM creating electric vehicles UM.

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And sure that opportunity is there. But I think if

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at the kind of the ambition of the

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom around the new Crown Prince Mohammad beIN Salman, the

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>way he talks about the sorts of investments they want

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to do, is they want to be you know, this

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>is a thirty two year old UM, a guy who's

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, ultimately directing the fund and its investments. Um,

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and he wants to he wants to take very big

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and aggressive and headline grabbing bets, and so you know,

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>putting a big steak into something like Tesla um fits

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>into that character profile, probably a lot more than than

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>putting some money into an established carmaker that also has

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a sideline in electric vehicles. Matthew, just quickly give you

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty seconds. Is there any evidence to support that previous

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>investments that are similar to this in nature by the

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Investment Fund have been successful? Very early to say the

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>strategy is um two years old. UM so um. You know,

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we've still got to wait a little while

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>before we see whether they can ride this out. But

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>clearly the appetite for risk is very very high if

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at also taking stakes in companies like Uber

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>um uh you know, and Tesla. You know, these a

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>companies which are not big revenue generators yet, but have

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that promised to be in the future. Right, Matthew Martin,

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Matthew Martin

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:14.959
<v Speaker 1>is mintist finance reporter for Bloomberg News. Thanks for listening

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abramowits one

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio