WEBVTT - An Athleisure Brand That's Defying the Odds

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>clus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Just about one year ago,

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the Southern California inspired active where brand Vori got a

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>four hundred million dollar investment from soft Bank, giving the

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>company at that time a four billion dollar valuation. That

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>brand founded in by Joe Couldla. We got Joe Kudla

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>joining us now, founder and CEO of Vori joining us

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New York City, trading one coast

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>for the other coast. Joe, good to have you this

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with us this afternoon. How are you. I'm doing great,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Great to be here in New York. Hey, Well,

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us on this UM. So

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the company, but before we

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>get to the company, I want to talk a little

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>bit about the macroeconomic environment and get an understanding from

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you about how the consumer is faring around the world

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, because you guys are an expansion mode, which

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is definitely not the same thing as other companies that

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are out there right now that are pulling back a

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Absolutely, UM. You know, it's an interesting time.

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>There is, without question we are you're we're dealing with

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>complicated macro economic issues on a global scale, UM. But

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we do feel there's a bifurcation between you know, best

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>in class brands that are leaders in their categories, that

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are innovating UM, and folks that are maybe called the

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pack, more legacy mass market brands UM,

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that are seeing you know, growth really slow as a

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>result of this inflationary environment that we're in. You know,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we feel very fortunate to be UM, you know, experiencing

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>dynamic growth this year. I feel our our customer, are

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>relationship with our customer has never been stronger. We're excited

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>about Q four and holiday. When we look towards we

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are being optimistic but cautiously optimistic. We are planning for

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>another year of dynamic growth. We are going to continue

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>to expend our fleet of retail stores, but we're not

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to swing for the fences. We want to lock

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in a number that we're that we're really content with,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.559
<v Speaker 1>not overinvest in the business, UM, and be be responsible

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>with our growth because there are some macro factors that

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.959
<v Speaker 1>we're watching very closely, and UM, we just don't know

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>how things will go. No, And you know it's interesting too.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think at the time about a year ago of

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that soft bank investment, which was just about a year ago, UM,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it was reported that you plan to open more than

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred stores in the US over five years. So

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>as you look at those macro concerned, has that number

0:02:55.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>been reduced or that plan that forecast been changed? You

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>know it hasn't. Actually, you know, the performance of our

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>stores today and has never been stronger. UM. We're still

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>very bullish on our vertical retail expansion. UM. You know,

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>four wall contribution payback still best in class, and you know,

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we're in the unique position because you know, relative to

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the size of the market, theory is still very much

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>early stage. You know, we're in our seventh year of

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>selling in market UM, and there's a lot of opportunity

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to gain market share UM as we grow into the

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>years to come. So while we might be in a

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>more challenged macro environment, I think that will be counterpunts

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>by the growth and taking market share from some of

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the other more established players. So talk to us about

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>growth metrics where Bloomberg we're nerdy, We leve all these numbers,

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so talked about top and bottom line growth. Give us

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>an idea same store sales growth. What have you guys

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>been seeing? Yeah, I mean this year where we're seeing,

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the business is going to grow north of

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>between seventy and upline UM at at a pretty sizeable scale.

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a number that we're very proud of. UM. You know,

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>our same store sales are still comping very strong over

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>prior years, demonstrating you know that you know, it's still

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>very much early in our awareness curve. People are experiencing

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the brand, we're converting them into loyalists, they're shopping with

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>us for years to come while acquiring more new customers.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>So we see really great year over year growth in

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>our existing fleet UM. And then you know, as we

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>expand the network across the country. You know, we're leveraging

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>e commerce data so we can be really intelligent about

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>where we go. UM and we tend to open strong.

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that trend is really accelerating as

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the brand builds more and more awareness. Joe, how are

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you doing with inventory right now? We saw inventory challenges

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>of course from Nike just in the last couple of weeks,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>not to mention, you know, companies that we can't necessarily

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>compare you to, like Target for examp ample, How are

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>you managing inventory? Yeah, it's a great question. You know,

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we have definitely seen impacts from this complicated supply chain environment. UM,

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>although we are seeing it begin to normalize, especially on

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the logistics side of the supply chain, you know, getting

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>your product in containers, getting it on boats and delivering

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>on time. That has become much more normalized. The cost

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of a container, you know, from Asia to the West

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>coast of the United States. You know, pre pandemic was

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, called three thousand dollars. It went up as

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>high as eighteen thousand dollars. Now back to pre pandemic

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>levels or materially close to pre pandemic level. So the

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>logistics aspects of supply chain have normalized, where we're still

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of challenges in the ability to source

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>raw materials um and get them delivered to your factory

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>partners on time. So what happened to the larger marketplaces?

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, your spring deliveries delivered late. That created promotion

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>as we transition and from spring and summer into fall,

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you saw the same thing happen, you know,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was a double whammy with the

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>deliveries of fall being material delayed for a lot of

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>our peers, and that's putting a lot of pressure on

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>inventory levels. That's why a lot of folks anticipate highly

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>promotional holiday coming up. Viewer. While we're not immune to

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>these challenges, we've stayed very close to our supply chain.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>We've dealt with delays, but nothing that's been catastrophic, and

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been able to maintain our full price business, which

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>has been a goal of ours since we launched in

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the spring of two thousand and fifteen. And we don't

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>anticipate in overly promotional holiday. So you probably you probably

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>know better than anybody else the competition that's out there,

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, those giant brands, including Nike, You've

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>got Lulu Lemon, You've got under Armour. I mean, it's

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a super competitive market that could be on track for

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>some slowing growth because you know, what we're seeing is

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>people are going back to the office. I've stopped wearing

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>my yoga pants during work. You know, I'm back wearing

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know what I would call grown up clothes um

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in a big way. So tell us, you know how,

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the competitive advantage that gives you the optimism that

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you can continue on your growth trajectory. Yeah, I think

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>those Yeah, it's a great point, you know. And it's

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. When we launched the brand, we were facing

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this competition and we saw nothing but open space. And

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's due to our product positioning, our brand positioning,

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the ethos of the brand, which is built to move

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in style for life. And it all comes down to

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>building product that will support you in a workout, but

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it will transition and work across multiple aspects of your life.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And so we prioritize fabrications that are have performance at

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>their core, but they're incredibly soft. We design all of

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>our products with a more modern athletics fit that works

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>across multiple aspects of your life, and we design our

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>product with an aesthetic, color story um that is sophisticated,

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't identify you as somebody going to the gym,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to compete in a sport, but it just

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>again works across multiple aspects of your life. That was

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>always the premise of the brand, and we applied it

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost to activewear product that you would move

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and sweat in. But the brand has really evolved and

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>when you look at our assortment and where we're growing,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's evolved from core fitness into outdoor, which is rooted

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in outerwear, and the fastest growing segment of our brand

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>is travel commute, which is taking the lessons those technical

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>fabrications and constructions that we applied to activewear and applying

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it to everyday sports where and that's one of the

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>fastest growing segments of our collection. And those are the

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>products that you're wearing to the office, you're wearing to travel,

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you're wearing on the golf course. And so I think

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>our vision to build a more well rounded collection that

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>speaks to multiple aspects of your life is really benefiting us.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>As you see the preferences of the consumer change. So

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of different directions that it seems

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>like the company could go at this point in terms

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of trajectory. One of them is the Lulu Lemon route

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>where you go public. Another one and forgive me, but

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this has happened before. I think of a company like

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Outdoor Voices, which you know, five years ago was the

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>talk of the town of the town and has gone

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>through several CEO transitions and a New York Times profile

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>that essentially said that it imploded after raising about fifty

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in funding. How do you avoid the fate

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of a company like Outdoor Voices. It all comes down

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to your people, incredible leadership, alignment of your people, but

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>higher talent to people that are much better than yourself.

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>That's been our ethos from day one is building an incredible,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>incredible team that can see around those corners, you know,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and prioritizing making incredible products. You know, we are maniacal

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about our products, our level of service. You know, the

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the NPS scores in our stores are off the charts,

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the most important thing. You know,

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard comparison. You look at a brand like Outdoor

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Voice is in theory. You know, I wasn't great at

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>raising capital in the early days. Admittedly um I didn't

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have a background building an apparel business, and so the

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>little capital that I did get, I had to make

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it stretch a long way. And so we prioritized, you know,

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the basics of business, the fundamentals of you know, acquiring

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>customers profitably from day one, and we built a business

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that was profitable from early stage and we never had

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to sacrifice that profitability for growth over the years. And

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why theory received. You know, one of

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the highest private market apparel valuations ever is because we've

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>been able to demonstrate a commitment to growth, doing it

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>profitably and also responsibly with our commitment to E s

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>G and making decisions that prioritize the planet UM as

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we're as we're building, which is an important part. Increasingly

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for consumers, we know that they look at what a

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>company stands for their impact on the environment. Hey, Joe,

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just before we wrap up, So what's the endgame here?

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it ultimately to go public at some point? I

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>think that could be a viable outcome. Right now, we're

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>very heads down building the business. We're having a lot

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of fun. I'm a young man. I've got a lot

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of energy for the business. We've got big plans for

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>growth both here in the in the US as well

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>as abroad, and so today that's what we're focused on.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we want to optimize the business and

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>provide the best return for our shareholders. A public offering

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>could be a viable option down the road. All right,

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>We're going to leave it on that note. Great stuff, Joe,

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and stay in touch so that we can, uh, you know,

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>here more as you guys continue to grow the business

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>here in the US and certainly outside. They're based in Encinitas, California,

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>which is like the best place in the world. Okay,

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody from southern California like Encinitas is great. I know

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of talking your book there, Tim Stinovic. All right,

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 1>Joe could thank you so much. Founder and c F

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Vori joining us on the phone in New York City.

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, we mentioned

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier you know what's past is prologue, which gets us

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to a story in the upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a new double issue out later this week.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a story about Paul Woker's inflation fight and how

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it hints at what lies ahead for the current Fed

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>chief J. Powell. Yeah, the Fed had to inflict a

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of pain in the eighties to convince markets. It

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was serious. We've got just a fantastic guest with us

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon. Christine Harper is Executive editor of Finance and

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Investing at Bloomberg Editorial. She joins us live in the

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. She's also, along with Paul Woker,

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the co author of Keeping at It, The Quest for

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Sound Money and Good Government. It's paul workers memoir. So, Christine,

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you spent a lot of time, um with the late

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>former Chairman of the Federal Reserve. I just want to

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>start with with that as some context here, give us

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>an idea of you know how he would in your interpretation, Um,

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the inflation fight that's J Powell is doing today. Well,

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you when he was writing his memoir

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>back in eighteen No, but he was playing attention to inflation.

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if they were at all, it was in

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>an effort to get more inflation right, So he was

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>quite concerned that people were underestimating the risks, and so

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>part of the mission of the book was to remind

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>people of how important the central bank's role is in

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in in keeping inflation down and maintaining that credibility that

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he fought so hard to maintain. I mean, he had

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>been involved in getting the dollar off the gold standard,

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and after that the dollar was not it was not

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>connected to any actual value, and so when inflation took root,

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>he had to drive interest rates up to unprecedented levels,

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>caused all kinds of pain for people, for financial institutions

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and and um. The result was there was more credibility

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>in the dollar. It some people talked about it when

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Vulcar standard from the gold standard, but you know,

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that's something you can't squander because he fought so hard.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like having gone to war to

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>fight a fight, you know, to win a battle, and

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>then discover that your future, you know, commanders are allowing

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you to give up the territory again. So he he

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>would have been very upset that inflation was allowed to

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>get to where it was. We're talking like Christine Harper

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and as we mentioned this is in the upcoming new

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>double issue of Bloomberg Business Week out later this week.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Also with us is the editor of Bloomberg Business Week,

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber. Christine, thank you for this remarks. Uh also

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to ask, you know, and you might have

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to extrapolate here a little bit, but I mean you

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you got to know Mr Vocal very well. I'm curious

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what you think, if anything, Powell might have learned from

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>from him, and if not him directly, then the book.

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, well, I mean, you know, as you and

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I have discussed. I mean, one of the things that's

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is how often FED Chairman Powell invokes not

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>only you know, Volker himself, who he says he's a

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>great admirer of, but but the book. I mean, he

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>talks about everybody should read it. And he he has

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>used this phrase keep at it, which people see as

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>an echo of the title keeping at it um let

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>one more time keeping at it um And you know, uh,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing that I think Powell sees, and I mean

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing that Vulgar made clear was when I was

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking to him, was how how much he's he supported

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Powell as FED chairman because he liked the fact that

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Powell had this similar to Vulcar had this experience of

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>having worked in the finance in a private financial institution.

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>In Vulcar's case it was Chase, in Powell's case it's

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle and other places, and also working at the Treasury Department.

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So understanding markets, understanding the government is really important to

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>being practical in the job, and not just being an

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>academic theorist. So I think um Powell shares that sort

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of recognition that you have to win credibility from the markets,

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>from the government, all these sides, and be practical in

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>your approach and not just you know, not just trust

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>all the economists around Christie. How tough was it for

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Vulcar two hike rates? Like what were some of the

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>conversations that you all had about that, which was going

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>against what everybody wanted, But it was necessary in order

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to write the situation well to that point. I mean,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>he he said that when he came into the role,

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it was clear. I mean the reason he he was

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>brought in really was to do something about inflation that

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>his predecessors hadn't really succeeded in bringing down. Even so

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>at that point the economist had to FED were forecasting recession,

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>so he had to sort of ignore that and just

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>say we're gonna raise rates. There was a split on

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the on the Federal Reserve Board on the second time

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they voted, and so the markets didn't believe there would

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be any stronger action. They thought the FED was going

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to lose their spine, and so he turned to this

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>monitorist approach of just targeting the money supply, and that

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially told people, we're tying our hands and we're gonna

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>let interest rates go where they have to go. And

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>they went up to like, what do you present? You know,

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a name in here that I did not expect

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to see that I wanted to ask about Larry Cutlow.

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>He was quoted by the Associated Press at the time,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>um and he was at bear Sterns. Then what what

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>did Mr Kudlow have to say? Well, I mean, it

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>was funny looking back at the clips because when Paul

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Vulker was telling me about this fourth ree vote and

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>nobody believed it, and he didn't see under understand really

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>why nobody believed it, because he knew that people were

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>supporting him would keep supporting him, but the markets didn't so,

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I did some research and found these

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>comments that were made in the press at the time,

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>including from then FED bear Sterns economist Larry Cudlow, saying

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that essentially the fact that the vote had split on

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the f O m C showed that there would be

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>very timid approach going forward. The markets just didn't see

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED being able to stick to their guns. Okay,

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta ask a question because this this book

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>almost had a different title. Oh yes, and we got

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that, because it's just this little easter egg.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk to us about the sharett Sure, of course.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Um So. As I mentioned earlier, when we started working

0:17:57.960 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>on the book, you know, nobody was really paying a

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>time into some of the central parts of Paul Walker's legacy,

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>including inflation, and so he was feeling a little I

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think overlooked. And uh so he opened the book with

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>this very funny joke about a parrot, a wise parrot

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>who's known as the Chairman. And I encouraged people to

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the book because it's a very funny little story.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>But um but he went so far as saying he

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to title the book The Wise Old Parrot speaks Now.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>The marketing Department and I all agree that was not

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>a great title for this book. So we spent weeks

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to offer him other ideas, all of which he rejected.

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>He hated all the pompous, kind of you know, pretentious

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>titles that a lot of other economists and people use

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>on their their books. So we were really going back

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and forth. It was very It was one of the

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>most difficult things of working with him because he was

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 1>so stubborn on this. And so finally one day I

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>was going through this long list of titles i'd come

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>up with, you know, I found a phrase from the

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Fed Minutes at that time, sustained commitment. And he looked

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and he stopped and he said, keeping at it. And

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it was great because that really was him, you know,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>he believed in speaking plainly, and you know, so he

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>took the kind of jargoning, jargony phrase and translated it. Um.

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>But I do think it would be funny if Powell

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>was having to deal with the wise old parrot. Everyone

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just goes to show everyone needs a really good editor.

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what it comes down exactly. Hey, Christine, I just

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>want to talk a little bit, a little bit about

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>his legacy from a market's perspective and from an investing

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>perspective as well. Given what we know about the nineteen

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>eighties and what markets did and what inflation did after

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>he raised rates so significantly, what's in store this time around? Well,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think everybody is seeing that interest rates

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to go up. UM. The you know, policymakers

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are making it very clear they're not going to back

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>down on this UM if they show any signs of,

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, weakness. I think people understand what will happen

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what happened to Paul Wolker's predecessor. So

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that is an example of where Powell sees

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>he has to be steadfast. But Um, as you would

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>see reading the book, UM, the chapters that follow the

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation fight are a series of financial crises that UM

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Wolkers Fed had to deal with in the wake

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the interest rate increases. And so you know, when

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you hear these experts come on Bloomberg radio and television

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about something might break, I think, you know, what

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw back in the eighties was a lot of

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>things broke, a lot of things weren't. We're sort of

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of risks were built up, everything from the

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Hunt Brothers speculation on silver to Continental Illinois Savings and loans,

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>all these different banks that when when belly up and

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so the ultimate one was the Latin American debt crisis,

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh that was so bad that in a D two,

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that was really what caused Volker to say, Okay,

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>we've got it, back off and and and stop the

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>inflation fights. So ultimately it is often let something breaks

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's a financial crisis. I think it's interesting on

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>a day when the I m F has revised its

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>estimates and the concern is about global central banks not

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>doing enough, it fits right in to your story and

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly um your book. Christine. Thank you so much, Christine Harper.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Check out our story in the new issue of Bloomberg

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, and of course our thanks to Joel Weber,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the editor of the magazine. Christine is editor of Bloomberg

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Markets Magazine. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio, Uber

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and Lift Tumbling. Today, after the Biden administration issue that

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>proposal for a federal rule that would change the way

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it to approaches workers employment standards. It's a move that

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>could up end the right hailing companies business models, since,

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>as you know, they rely on millions of gig workers.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's pretty incredible to see the way that

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>these shares the companies are moving. Were worth repeating these numbers.

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Uber down more than we got left down more than

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent, Door dashes down as well. Lift is my decliner,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what I chose. But door dash and and Uber

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>are down just the same. Um. Jackie Davalos this technology

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News. She joins us on the phone

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>from Washington, d C. Jackie, why did this news catch

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>investors so off guard? You know, I think that it

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>was a long time coming. Even companies themselves said they

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>were expecting this proposal to come out from the administration's

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>first day in power. And so I think investors are

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>really starting to grapple with what a gig worker friendly

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>administration will really mean in practice, and this proposal is

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of the first start of that. Even though it

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>was on companies, radars, labor activists radars um, it doesn't

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>substantially change the way companies operate in the immediate term.

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But just the risk that it poses for for their

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>business models is still very much lingering, which is why

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing shares fall so much today. You know, it's

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>so funny. I keep going back to this comment that

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>David Einhorn of green Light said that, you know, we

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>really don't know what anything is worth, and he was

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>really putting that against you know, investments, against kind of

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the big macro stories that are out there. But you

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>take it something like lift in uber or anybody else's

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>part of this gig economy. What does a gig right?

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You take a gig and you do other things. That's

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>what it's all about. But you do have to think

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that if these workers are classified as regular workers with

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>all the benefits that come along with it, that's increased

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>costs for the company, and it's going to change how

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they are valued. It will have to. It has to.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the argument that UM companies and labor

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>activists have actually made is that, you know, the way

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we classify employees are it is rooted in a law

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that just doesn't account for the rise of digital work.

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>These laws were made, uh, you know, in a post

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>World War two era, not when you know you're ordering

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>food and hailing a ride just from your phone, and

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so the landscape has totally changed. Or absolutely right, Caroline,

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that everyone in some capacity has a connection to gig work,

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>whether or you're the one ordering or you're the one,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>um actually delivering something to someone's doore steps. So UM,

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>this rule I think is the first step in which

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the administration is really looking to broaden that definition. UM.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>There's not a whole ton of guidance that we have

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>on you know, will companies eventually have to fully reclassify um,

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>but you know Uber has a little bit of experience

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, they had to do something similar

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in London a Supreme Court ruling basically said that their

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>drivers were full time employees and and had to be

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>given certain benefits and way to protections. The company didn't tumble.

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's still it's still alive. And so what

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of um uh legal experts are saying now

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, this is really gonna be hashed

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>out more so in the courts where this rule is

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>now going to be the interpretation, uh, in the basis

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>which you know that labor law is then applied. What

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I find so incredible about that Uber and Lift story

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>is they entered these markets as disruptors and in many places,

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>including New York City, just decimated the incumbents the taxi industry.

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Now we're at a place and I think anyone who's

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to take an uber or lift from the airport

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>recognizes this. Where you're getting into one of these cars

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to get back from the airport. It's costing so much

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>more than it ended up costing a yellow cab if

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you were to take a yellow cab. But you can't

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>get a yellow cab these days because you know, those

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>drivers aren't necessarily around. Yeah, Jack, you talk a little

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>bit about the way the landscape has changed and what

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>ends up happening here, because it does seem like at

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, the way the companies are

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>able to pay for this is through higher fares. Absolutely,

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly what um. You know, the industry groups

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>who don't want to change, well, we'll tell you that,

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we should keep things the way they are

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>because then it means that consumers will will bear the cost.

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, while that might be kind of

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the extreme version, it's certainly going to be you know,

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the reality. Um, when you think about uh,

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the protections that in the benefits that any

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>employee has, whether it's you know, a sick day or

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>workers compensation. A lot of these drivers have to put themselves,

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>um sometimes in harm's way without you know, knowing that

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're signing up for. And and that's kind

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of this um this debate. Now it's not going to

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be one or the other. It's going to be some

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of hybrid, and investors are kind of pricing that

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in companies as well. I think Uber has kind of

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>come out at the forefront of this now that they've

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>had to contend with us in Europe that you know,

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they're open to what they call an independent contractor plus model.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So we may not you know, have you be uh

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>full time employees, but hey we'll throw some benefits your way. Yeah.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>This is like innovation disruption, pupping up against kind of

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the established models. We'll see how it plays out. Jackie

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Devolos Technology, Ploomberg News, the Journal. Now that you let

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>me drive, Oh no, no, no no, no, please, I'll do.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's a good question. D This

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>is the drive to the Clobe. Don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody just about under ten minutes left in

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>today's trading session and another volatile day bouncing around. We're

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>certainly off our highs and loads of the session. Those

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England Governor comments Mr Bailey, that certainly has

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>put some pressure on the trade today and we saw

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>market reaction. We've got a great guest actually in studio.

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>It has been a long time since we've had him

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in studio. I can't believe this is the first time

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten to meet him in person, and two years

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>doing this. Doug Ramsey is chief investment officer at the

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Louthold Group. He joins us right now in the Bloomberg

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker studios. Doug, good to have you with us.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Is this your first time back to the city. It

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is the pandemics here end of February, just as things

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>were starting to erupt. Welcome back, it's going to have

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to be back in the city. Great vibe here in

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the blue Berg building as well, not a grade vibe

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in the markets. No, no, Well, spend on your perspective.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean opportunities are being creative for created here for

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>flexible managers. Well what does that mean? So I agree?

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Right like when everybody's running for the exits. That's when

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you find opportunities much smarter investors than we have said that,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know you're saying it too. So are you

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that we're nearer bottom when it comes to the

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>equity dropout or No? But even the selling so far

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>provides some great opportunities. No, I think there's a ways

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to go. But I mean the valuations are far better

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>than they were coming into this year. That's especially true

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for for mid and small company stocks. Um. You know,

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we tracked evaluations across the landscape and globally, but mid

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>caps and small caps are now uh somewhat below their

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>long term valuation averages and we haven't been able to

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>say that for quite a while, so that that's encouraging.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a buying opportunity that is developing.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not yet there. I mean, if we are going

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to get one invaluation terms on large caps, we've still

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>got some distance to go. And that's normally the way

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>things unfold in a bear market is large caps have

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>better liquidity, they tend to be more defensive in nature.

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>They are really the last to fall in a cyclical

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bear market. And I still think we have that that

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>phase ahead of us. But I am encouraged by some

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of the valuations I see in pockets of the market

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for a later buying opportunity. What about when it comes

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to the large caps, When do you think we'll get

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to a buying opportunity for those? Uh? I don't like

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to get too focused in and really either on time

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>horizon or price levels. I mean, I do think what's

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna evolve over the next several months is we'll have

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the best buying opportunity we've had in the stock market

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>for over a decade. I mean, not back to two

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine levels, but I think it will be a

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>very good buying opportunity. But just in terms of numbers,

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And again I mean it's well known that valuations are

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not a timing tool, but just for some perspective, Um,

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>if we were to put in a bear market low

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that matched the valuations we saw in March of which

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>was by far the most expensive bear market low in

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of valuations, uh, we'd still have to sink the spire.

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And again I don't want to get two locked into

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>price levels here because the sps about seventeen or about

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>seventeen point five, so still high. Well, we look at

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we certainly look at at four p s,

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but the number was really referring to like the average

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of multiple different valuation statistics. And we do something akin

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to what Robert Schuller does with the ten year pe.

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>We've been doing it for decades using five year normalized earnings.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just adjusting for the fact that earnings dramatically can

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>overshoot as they did in one and then they get

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>crushed during recessions. Let's just try to see through that

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>by smoothing out earnings for the cylicality of that earnings

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>can have. So on that basis, yeah, we'd have to

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>drop our multiple on the basis of normalized earnings is

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>still around twenty three. That's a pretty big drop from here. Yeah,

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>well you'd have to go from twenty three to eighteen

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to match again what will be the highest valuation we've

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>ever seen, and then we supplement that with work on

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the price to sales ratio, price to cash flow. Um,

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is there anything different about this market environment other than

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we're coming out of a pandemic that none of us

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have lived through before, Like, is there something you know

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the old adage, you know, it's different this time around,

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not different this time around. Is there something different

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>about this market environment? Though? Well, I mean the abrupt

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>change and not just monetary policy, but also in fiscal

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean just the delta versus a year ago. I mean,

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we blew out the the trailing twelve month federal deficit

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to as high as eighteen of GDP. Now it's about four.

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we all talk about q T and

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the rate hikes, but the degree of swing and fiscal

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>stimulus has been every bit as great, So Doug in

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of the way we're thinking about this moving forward

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>into the federal reserves role here, Um, how are you

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at the terminal rate? How are you thinking about

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed is doing when it comes to tightening

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the investment decisions that you're making.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't necessarily have a forecast I guess for where

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that funds rate might peak. I mean we are assuming

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they've already overdone it. And it's the emphasis. They are

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>data dependent. The question is are they the right data points?

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are coincident to lagging data points. I

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>mean our work would say that inflation has probably peaked

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>out the leading inflation indicators is why you say Powell

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to be vulcar Uh. There are a number

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of reasons well along those lines, and this is maybe

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to take some good notes here. This is some

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>good stuff, Carrol. That's what they say in the biz.

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>This is some good stuff. You know. Even though we're

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>cautious on the stock market in the economy, we do

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>think that inflation is peaked and it's going to come

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>down significantly. One reason is the stock market itself. It's

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the negative wealth effect, and Bill Dudley in the spring

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>came very close to like mentioning that term exactly. It's

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you know, we've had a stock market decline.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The issue is, don't think about it just in terms

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the percentage decline in the index. Think about how

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>large the stock market was in relation to GDP at

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>its peak coming into this year. It was more than GDP.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So this relatively moderate decline is a big deal in

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of the wealth destructure. We never have enough time

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with you, and I hope you got your notes there,

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Tom twenty second, So what do you will say we're

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>near bottom? I know you don't really to serve a number,

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but what kind of field we have? You have to

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>be quick, uh lower evaluations, a big relative crack in

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the blue chips where small caps and mid caps they

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>probably still go to new lows, but maybe show some

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>relative strength, so giving and maybe a give up. And

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it in the utilities. But when you start

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.959
<v Speaker 1>to see the defensive crack, that's a sign that people

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are selling what they can and we may be near

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>um a complete capitulation, which I think is still ahead.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Get your notes, you'll you'll hear in a couple of

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>minutes what I have to say. We love talking with you,

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>so come back anytime on phone in persons even better,

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but m safe trips back. Doug Ramsey, chief investment Officer

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>at the Luthholl Group. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud or Bloomberg dot com,

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you to search Bloomberg Global News m R m HM