Speaker 1: Welcome to his verdict to a Senator Ted Cruz Ben
Speaker 1: Ferguson with your Senator the headline that basically no one's
Speaker 1: seen because the media has a runaway from it. Is
Speaker 1: an ex Obama staffer as stenographer, has blown the whistle
Speaker 1: on Hunter Biden, Joe Biden and a kickback scheme. His
Speaker 1: words after Hunter joined Barisma, he said this was quote
Speaker 1: malfeasance in office, and I'm going to play for everyone
Speaker 1: what he said. But he says he has reached out
Speaker 1: to the FBI and he has heard nothing for them
Speaker 1: from them as a whistleblower. Urinitial reaction, well, I think
Speaker 1: it's a very concerning allegation. It is an allegation with
Speaker 1: significant indicia of credibility. This individual worked in the White
Speaker 1: House for fifteen years. He was a stenographer, He was
Speaker 1: on Air Force two then Vice President Joe Biden, and
Speaker 1: he has filed a formal complaint, a whistleblower complaint with
Speaker 1: the FBI. The FBI has ignored him. Here's what this individual,
Speaker 1: the Obama White House official Mike McCormick said, quote in February,
Speaker 1: I went to the FBI and filed one of their
Speaker 1: tips on their website If you do that and you're
Speaker 1: lying to them, you go to jail. I'm not lying,
Speaker 1: I'm telling the truth, and I'm not going to jail.
Speaker 1: And he continued saying, quote, Joe Biden is a criminal.
Speaker 1: He was conducting malfeasance in office to enrich his family.
Speaker 1: Jake Sullivan, who's the current National Security Advisor, is a
Speaker 1: conspirator in that. And there's more Obama officials involved in it.
Speaker 1: I believe. Here. Listen to what he said describing his
Speaker 1: whistleblower complaint that the entire corporate media is ignoring. Mean time,
Speaker 1: a former Obama White House official says he wants to
Speaker 1: testify to a federal real grand jury because he says
Speaker 1: he has information about then Vice President Joe Biden's role
Speaker 1: in his son Hunter's business, but he says the FBI
Speaker 1: has been ignoring him. Former Obama stenographer Mike mcconnick joins us. Now, Mike,
Speaker 1: thanks for being here. You say you are a witness
Speaker 1: to a crime. Walk us through why you say that. Yes, Hi,
Speaker 1: Ashley Hi Todd, thanks for having me. Sure so. In
Speaker 1: April twenty fourteen, I was an Air Force too with
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and Jake Sullivan at the time, no one
Speaker 1: knew that Hunter Biden was already on the board of
Speaker 1: Barissma Holdings, the natural gas conglomerate from Ukraine. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is directing Jake Sullivan in the front of the plane
Speaker 1: what to say to the press. My job as a
Speaker 1: stenographer on the plane is to record what the Vice
Speaker 1: President or a senior administration official says to the press.
Speaker 1: So I'm sitting back there with a tape recorder. Jake
Speaker 1: Sullivan comes back and somebody asked them about fracking. His
Speaker 1: answer is, well, we're bringing a lot of American assistance
Speaker 1: over for fracking. Barismo was the direct beneficiary of that fracking.
Speaker 1: And that's what I recorded, and that's in a White
Speaker 1: House transcript. In the transcript, you don't know who Jake
Speaker 1: Sullivan is. It's a senior reginistration official. I'm the witness
Speaker 1: that says Jake Sullivan is the guy who said it,
Speaker 1: and he should be investigated because at the time, Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden was on the board of Barissma and Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is bringing American taxpayer money to enrich that company and
Speaker 1: hisself and his family. Senator, you hear this. He says,
Speaker 1: it's in a transcript. He's a stenographer that did the transcript.
Speaker 1: People don't realize the senior level, you know, White House
Speaker 1: staffer is Jake Sullivan. How damning is this evidence and
Speaker 1: testimony in essence with the blow from a man that
Speaker 1: clearly had been there in the room and had been
Speaker 1: doing this for more than a decade. Well, it's extremely
Speaker 1: concerning on multiple levels. On one level, this is a
Speaker 1: White House official who is sitting on Air Force too
Speaker 1: with the Vice President and with the individual Jake Sullivan,
Speaker 1: who is right now the National Security advisor to Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: the President. He is alleging criminal conduct by both of them.
Speaker 1: On the face of it, that's got that, that's got
Speaker 1: real force. But you then go to the next step,
Speaker 1: which is that he raised this to the FBI months ago,
Speaker 1: and he says the FBI hasn't talked to him, hasn't
Speaker 1: interviewed him, hasn't put him before a grand jury, has
Speaker 1: had zero interest in what he has to say. Now
Speaker 1: pause and reflect. The last podcast you and I did,
Speaker 1: we talked about how the FBI is placing undercover agents
Speaker 1: inside of Catholic churches to spy on Catholics who are
Speaker 1: people of faith and are religious. They've got the time
Speaker 1: and resources, apparently to try to infiltrate the Catholic Church
Speaker 1: and try to flip clergy to spy on their parishioners
Speaker 1: for them. But the Biden Department of Justice apparently has
Speaker 1: zero time to even talk to a fifteen year White
Speaker 1: House veteran alleging criminal conduct. That is truly stunning. It
Speaker 1: is dismaying, And I got to say, look, this reminds
Speaker 1: me of a lot of the topics we cover on Verdict,
Speaker 1: because in anysane world, this would be on the six
Speaker 1: o'clock news. In any sane world, you wouldn't be hearing
Speaker 1: about this for the first time right now on this podcast. Now,
Speaker 1: maybe you watched Fox and Friends this week and so
Speaker 1: you saw the interview. That's about the only other place
Speaker 1: you'd hear this because if you watch CNN, this whistleblower
Speaker 1: doesn't exist. If you watch MSNBC, nothing to see here, ABC, NBCCBS,
Speaker 1: they do not cover news this also. Look, we've talked
Speaker 1: at length about the Biden Department of Justice under Merrick Garland,
Speaker 1: and they have leaked that they're investigating Hunter Biden. The
Speaker 1: relevant question has always been, is that investigation to hold
Speaker 1: Hunter out as a scapegoat and make it about his
Speaker 1: personal substance abuse issues, or are they willing to examine
Speaker 1: the corruption that implicates his father. The fact that they
Speaker 1: won't even talk to this witness, it tells you something
Speaker 1: really powerful that this is sadly an incredibly political department
Speaker 1: of Justice that has no interest in even beginning to
Speaker 1: examine the growing pile of evidence of corruption by the
Speaker 1: current president of the United States. This reminds me center
Speaker 1: and I want to play this real quick. It reminds
Speaker 1: me of Tony Bobolynski when he came out as a
Speaker 1: whistleblower right before the election, and then finally because he
Speaker 1: came out as a whistable or the FBI said all right,
Speaker 1: come on in, we want to talk to you, and
Speaker 1: they did nothing with what he told them after the fact.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna play and just remind people of what Tony
Speaker 1: Bobolynski had and could verify from Hunter Biden's laptop. Before
Speaker 1: we do that, let me tell you though about our
Speaker 1: good friends over to gusts of precious medals. Buying gold
Speaker 1: right now and silver for a lot of people is
Speaker 1: very appealing because of the ups and downs and the
Speaker 1: insanity in the economy. You know what's happening with interest rates,
Speaker 1: you've seen what's happening with inflation that, and you've seen
Speaker 1: what's been happening even with banks recently. If you have
Speaker 1: saved a hundred thousand dollars or more in your retirement,
Speaker 1: a Gust of Precious Metals wants to sit down with
Speaker 1: you and they want to talk to you about if
Speaker 1: gold and silver can help protect your hard earned dollars.
Speaker 1: Whether you're close to retirement or in retirement, you know
Speaker 1: one thing is true, you don't have time to make
Speaker 1: up losses, and that's where gold and silver come in. Now.
Speaker 1: They also are going to pay you in pure gold
Speaker 1: just to learn about their gold iras and how they
Speaker 1: can protect you. That's a big deal. A pure gold
Speaker 1: coin for free. Reach out to a Gust of Precious
Speaker 1: Meals a day and get started with gold. Don't let
Speaker 1: the bank failures get you down. Get this free gold
Speaker 1: and get some peace of mind at the same time.
Speaker 1: Eight seven seven four Gold Ira eight seven seven the
Speaker 1: number four gold Ira to learn how to protect your
Speaker 1: retirement and get your free gold coin. That's a Gust
Speaker 1: of Precious Medals dot Com eight seven seven, the number
Speaker 1: four gold Ira Center, Tony bob Olenski when he sat
Speaker 1: down and did one of his first big interviews. It
Speaker 1: wasn't that he was just confirming everything that Hunter Biden did.
Speaker 1: He was confirming who the big guy was. He was
Speaker 1: confirming these business deals of CFE and he did these
Speaker 1: inner views because the FBI wasn't doing their job. I
Speaker 1: didn't generate that email. James Gilliard generated that email, and
Speaker 1: in that email, James Gillier goes through intimate detail of
Speaker 1: what each individual's requests were from a compensation perspective, and
Speaker 1: how the equity in the enterprise would be divvied up.
Speaker 1: Very important May thirteenth. That email is generated by somebody else.
Speaker 1: To me. In that email, there's a statement where they
Speaker 1: go through the equity. Jim Biden's referenced as ten percent.
Speaker 1: Doesn't say Biden, it's as Jim, and then it has
Speaker 1: ten percent for the big guy held by h a
Speaker 1: thousand percent. Sit here and know that the big guy
Speaker 1: is referencing Joe Biden. That's that's crystal clear to me
Speaker 1: because I lived it. I met with a former vice
Speaker 1: president in person multiple times, and I had been meeting
Speaker 1: and talking with Hunter Biden and Jim Biden and Rob
Speaker 1: Walker and James Gillier. Where the media has tried to
Speaker 1: hide and I personally feel it's disgusting, is between that
Speaker 1: May thirteenth email and the final document that was executed
Speaker 1: called Onneido Holdings LLC. In Oeido Holdings LLC, that equity
Speaker 1: is broken up twenty percent Hunter Biden, twenty percent Jim Biden, Well,
Speaker 1: there are LLC's that represented them, right, twenty percent, James
Speaker 1: Gillier twenty percent Rob Walker, and twenty percent me and
Speaker 1: my investment entity. What I'd ask the American people to
Speaker 1: read and look at is how from May thirteenth to
Speaker 1: the final NIED document that got executed, did Jim Biden
Speaker 1: go from a ten percent owner to a twenty percent owner?
Speaker 1: I mean center, These are two people with very clear specifics.
Speaker 1: Torny Bobolynski whistle Bload. He meets with the FBI. The
Speaker 1: FBI agent he was supposed to be his quote point
Speaker 1: of contact, we now know as a disgraced FBI agent
Speaker 1: who did nothing but actually try to say that this
Speaker 1: was a smear campaign against the Biden's and to shut
Speaker 1: it down as disinformation. What Tony Bobo Lensky said, now
Speaker 1: you've got a sonographer saying I witnessed a crime, and
Speaker 1: I can tell you there's other officials there that witnessed it. Two,
Speaker 1: I'm the one that did the notes, and the FBI
Speaker 1: doesn't even talk to him. Well, and it's worth underscoring
Speaker 1: that both of these witnesses are serious, credible whistleblowers. Bobolynsky
Speaker 1: was business partners with Hunter Biden, with with Joe Biden's brothers.
Speaker 1: He was actively involved in these business organizations and he's
Speaker 1: testifying about the crime he witnessed firsthand. This stenographer spent
Speaker 1: fifteen years in the White House. He wasn't out on
Speaker 1: the piphery. He was sitting on Air Force two with
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, with Jake Sullivan. And the fact that under
Speaker 1: Merrick Garland, the Department of Justice has zero interest in
Speaker 1: hearing this, that they're like the three monkeys here no evil,
Speaker 1: see no evil. They do say evil, but they don't
Speaker 1: want to hear or see it. And I got to
Speaker 1: say it reminds me also of earlier allegations. These are
Speaker 1: not new allegations of corruption and conflict of interest. Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden and Joe Biden had been facing these allegations for
Speaker 1: a decade. And I want to want to remind you
Speaker 1: back of questioning that I questioned George Kent. Now, who
Speaker 1: is George Kent. George Kent is currently the Biden Ambassador
Speaker 1: to Estonia, and George Kent has been a career foreign
Speaker 1: service officer, and he was the US Deputy Chief of
Speaker 1: Mission in Ukraine from twenty fifteen to twenty eighteen. Now,
Speaker 1: George Kent had a moment of fame because he was
Speaker 1: a witness in Trump's impeachment and he sat there with
Speaker 1: his bow tie expressing great dislike for Donald Trump. And
Speaker 1: so the left got all excited about George Kent. But
Speaker 1: before he became a star witness in Trump's impeachment, George
Speaker 1: Kent had one brief moment of courage and clarity where
Speaker 1: he raised directly to the Obama White House his concerns
Speaker 1: about Hunter Biden's conflict of interest concerning Barisma, the exact
Speaker 1: same topic, by the way, this new whistleblower is talking about.
Speaker 1: And I got to tell you the reaction. That committee
Speaker 1: was chaired by Jane Sheheen, the Detocrat for New Hampshire.
Speaker 1: It was a subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
Speaker 1: and she did not want him to answer these questions.
Speaker 1: We had some real fireworks, and so Ben, I think
Speaker 1: we're gonna play play the entire questioning. It's extended, but
Speaker 1: I think it is it is worth revisiting because, like
Speaker 1: this whistleblower this week, the corrupt corporate media completely ignored
Speaker 1: it because if it doesn't fit their political narrative, does
Speaker 1: not exist, and they refuse to report on it. Take
Speaker 1: a listen to this, and this was back November twenty ninth,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. Here it is thank you, Madam Chair,
Speaker 1: and welcome to each of the witnesses. Mister Kent, you
Speaker 1: have been outspoken throughout your career speaking against corruption, and
Speaker 1: I want to talk about corruption. I want to talk
Speaker 1: in particular about corruption in the current administration. And I
Speaker 1: have serious concerns about corruption of President Joe Biden that
Speaker 1: extends for considerable time, both his time as president and
Speaker 1: his time as vice president. To take one obvious and
Speaker 1: troubling example, accounts linked to the Biden families personal finances
Speaker 1: received millions of dollars through ties to ce EFC China Energy.
Speaker 1: This is where we get the infamous quote about ten
Speaker 1: percent to the big guy from the Chinese Communists. But
Speaker 1: you've also been involved very directly with Ukraine and corruption
Speaker 1: in Ukraine, and I will say you showed real courage
Speaker 1: speaking out against what I think was the very obvious
Speaker 1: concerns of corruption of Joe Biden and his son Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden in Ukraine. In particular, on November thirteenth, twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: you testified to Congress that you had become concerned with
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's status as a board member of the Ukrainian
Speaker 1: natural gas company Barisma. You said you would raise those
Speaker 1: concerns to the White House in February twenty fifteen, and
Speaker 1: in particular what you said is I became aware that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was on the board of Barisma soon after that,
Speaker 1: and a briefing call with a National security staff at
Speaker 1: the Office of the Vice President in February of twenty fifteen,
Speaker 1: I raised my concern that Hunter Biden's status as a
Speaker 1: board member could create a perception of a conflict of interest.
Speaker 1: Tell me why did you have this concern about, as
Speaker 1: you described, a perception of a conflict of interest. Well, centered,
Speaker 1: I can give you, and I remember this committee my
Speaker 1: commitment that I will always raise concerns to members of
Speaker 1: any administration and to Congress when I have concerns, and
Speaker 1: so I was made aware of information, and I passed
Speaker 1: that along to the staff of the Office of the
Speaker 1: Vice President. And so why were you concerned? Why were
Speaker 1: you concerned about Hunter Biden being on the board of Barisma.
Speaker 1: The issue at hand was the owner of the company's Latchevski,
Speaker 1: had awarded himself gas contracts, and as I testified both
Speaker 1: in the impeachment hearings and in the Johnson Grassley hearings
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty, our concern was about the corrupt acts
Speaker 1: of Zlatchevski. The ex minister and the FBI had been
Speaker 1: pursuing freezing his assets, and it was in the interests
Speaker 1: of the United States to remain at the gold standard
Speaker 1: of our own actions. So the Ukrainian oligarch who owned Barisma,
Speaker 1: there was very substantial evidence of corruption on his part,
Speaker 1: and Tea named Hunter Biden to his board of directors.
Speaker 1: To your knowledge, does Hunter Biden speak Ukrainian? I've never
Speaker 1: talked to Hunter Biden. No, to your knowledge, did he
Speaker 1: have any knowledge before serving on that board about anything
Speaker 1: concerning oil or natural gas? I'm not aware of his eving.
Speaker 1: To your knowledge, did Hunter Biden have any qualification whatsoever
Speaker 1: for that board job other than the fact that his
Speaker 1: daddy was the sitting vice president at the time, Senator, I,
Speaker 1: no one consulted me about who was on the board
Speaker 1: of Barisma. There was another American Koepher Black, who was
Speaker 1: a former I asked a question, to your knowledge, did
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden have any qualification to be on that board
Speaker 1: other than the job his daddy had at the moment?
Speaker 1: I am not familiar with his resume, sir. Okay, he
Speaker 1: was paid eighty three thousand dollars a month by this
Speaker 1: Ukrainian oligarch. You're an expert in Ukraine. Have you ever
Speaker 1: been paid eighty three thousand dollars a month? I'm a
Speaker 1: public servant, Sir. I've never served on a corporate bord.
Speaker 1: So does that mean no, you haven't been paid eighty
Speaker 1: three thousand dollars an I have not been paid eighty
Speaker 1: three thousand dollars a month, no, sir. So look, the
Speaker 1: concern here is not Hunter Biden's own problems, but rather
Speaker 1: it is official corruption from the then Vice President of
Speaker 1: the United States Joe Biden and now the President of
Speaker 1: the United States, Joe Biden. Let me ask you, while
Speaker 1: his son was on the board of Barissma making a
Speaker 1: million dollars a year, did Joe Biden do anything that
Speaker 1: benefited the corrupt oligarch who was paying his son? Vice
Speaker 1: President Biden led our efforts to fight corruption in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you the question again. Did Vice President
Speaker 1: Joe Biden do anything that benefited the corrupt oligarch who
Speaker 1: was paying his son a million dollars a year? He
Speaker 1: did not. He did not. Well, it's interesting. Someone who
Speaker 1: disagrees with you, mister Kent, is Joe Biden. And I
Speaker 1: want to read from what he said on January twenty,
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen at the Council of Foreign Relations. Quote. This
Speaker 1: is Joe Biden speaking. And I went over, I guess
Speaker 1: the twelve thirteenth time to Kiev, and I was supposed
Speaker 1: to announce that there was another billion dollars loan guarantee,
Speaker 1: and I'd gotten a commitment from Porschenko and yet Yatsenyuk
Speaker 1: that they would take action against the state prosecutor, the
Speaker 1: prosecutor that was investigating Barisma, and they didn't. So Biden continues,
Speaker 1: I said, no, I'm not going to we're not going
Speaker 1: to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have
Speaker 1: no authority, you're not the president. The president said, I said,
Speaker 1: call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting
Speaker 1: the billion dollars. I said, you're not getting the billion dollars.
Speaker 1: I'm going to be leaving here. And I think it
Speaker 1: was about six hours. I looked at them and said,
Speaker 1: I'm leaving here in six hours. If the prosecutor is
Speaker 1: not fired, you're not getting the money. Well, son of
Speaker 1: a bitch, he got fired. Let me ask you something.
Speaker 1: Do you think Joe Biden holding a billion dollars hostage
Speaker 1: to force the Ukrainian government to fire the prosecutor? It
Speaker 1: is investigating the corrupt oligarch who's paying his son a
Speaker 1: million dollars a year. Did getting that prosecutor fired benefit
Speaker 1: that oligarc? Thank you, Senator Cruz. Senator Van are you
Speaker 1: going to allow him answer the question? Madam Chairman, I
Speaker 1: am not going to allow him to answer the question.
Speaker 1: And why are you covering for the vice president? Do
Speaker 1: you not want to answer that question? He said that
Speaker 1: the vice president I think to benefit. I think it's
Speaker 1: unfortunate for you, Senator Cruz, to put in position that
Speaker 1: are uncomfortable the nominees to be our ambassador. This is
Speaker 1: because testimony, this smorn testimony. I understand that the president
Speaker 1: that he is going to raise those concerns anytime. Was
Speaker 1: his testimony crewe or false? Biden did nothing to benefit
Speaker 1: the oligarc want to answer the question why are you
Speaker 1: afraid of him? Answering the question, I'm not. I just
Speaker 1: want to move on. But you won't let him answer.
Speaker 1: I asked a yes no question. Will you allow him
Speaker 1: to answer the yes no question? Yes, you can answer
Speaker 1: yes or no. Thank you. The prosecutor who was fired
Speaker 1: by the Ukrainian Parliament did not thing to investigate Slatchevski
Speaker 1: and everything the Vice President Biden, the State Department, and
Speaker 1: the US Embassy did acted in good faith to reduce
Speaker 1: corruption and healthy craning. Firing him did not benefit the O.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Senator Cruz, I mean Senator that is welcome
Speaker 1: to the Congress. Right. This is this is how much
Speaker 1: the Democrats will will jump in to take fire on
Speaker 1: basic guests no questions about the Biden corruption because they
Speaker 1: know how bad it is. But first, Senator, before I
Speaker 1: get you to answer that, I gotta tell everybody about
Speaker 1: our friends at Chalk. If you are a guy and
Speaker 1: you're getting older and you feel like you're losing strength
Speaker 1: and vitality, you feel like you're getting a little bit
Speaker 1: weaker and complacent. You just don't have the energy that
Speaker 1: you had before. It is time for you to take
Speaker 1: the Chalk Mail Vitality Stack wine because it can help
Speaker 1: you boost your testosterone up to twenty percent over ninety days. Now.
Speaker 1: I've been taking Chalk now for about ninet days. I
Speaker 1: can tell you it works. It helps you maximize your
Speaker 1: masculinity by boosting your testosterom webls. We've seen in studies
Speaker 1: that testosterom wevels for men are gone off a cliff historically.
Speaker 1: So if you feel like you've lost some of that edge,
Speaker 1: check out chalk Choq dot com cchoq dot com use
Speaker 1: my code Ben, and you'll get thirty five percent off
Speaker 1: any Chuck subscription for life. Plus you can cancel it anytime.
Speaker 1: So go to chalkhoq dot com, use a promo code Ben,
Speaker 1: grab the Mail Vitality Stack thirty five percent off, boost
Speaker 1: your testsastrum up to twenty percent over ninety days. Sender
Speaker 1: your reaction as I said it again and a moment ago.
Speaker 1: I'll say it again, Democrats will do anything to make
Speaker 1: sure the bidens are protected from answering questions. Well, that's
Speaker 1: exactly right. You could see Jean Shaheen desperately jump in
Speaker 1: there and not want him to answer the question. By
Speaker 1: the way, the question is obvious. Did firing the prosecutor
Speaker 1: who was investing eating the corrupt oligarch who was paying
Speaker 1: hundred biden a million dollars a year, did that benefit
Speaker 1: the corrupt oligarch? No kidding, duh. And I gotta say, look,
Speaker 1: Kent is perfectly happy to be a Democrat partisan. So
Speaker 1: even though he raised it at the time, that little
Speaker 1: brief moment of courage went away, and so he just
Speaker 1: tried to say no, it was perfectly fine. We saw
Speaker 1: nothing wrong with it now, but it says it speaks
Speaker 1: volumes how desperate Sheheen was to get in and say no, no, no,
Speaker 1: don't answer, don't answer, don't answer, don't answer with no
Speaker 1: substantive response. By the way, isn't that hearing No Democrat
Speaker 1: senator jumped in and said, oh, the facts are different.
Speaker 1: Here's why that's wrong. By the way, in that hearing,
Speaker 1: her comment was I think it's wrong for you to
Speaker 1: make a nominee feel uncomfortable. I'm sorry. I thought the
Speaker 1: Constitution provided that the Senate has advice and consent. And
Speaker 1: it becomes very clear she views her job as as
Speaker 1: protecting the Biden White House from political problems. Because if
Speaker 1: she didn't view it that way, any fair minded senator
Speaker 1: would want the answer to that question. When you've got
Speaker 1: a whistleblower who's raised serious concerns about corruption, the Senate
Speaker 1: ought to be concerned about them. But today's Democrat senators,
Speaker 1: there's not a one of them who's concerned about them,
Speaker 1: because their view is partisanship trumps everything else. And I
Speaker 1: got to say, part of the reason they can have
Speaker 1: that attitude is the rabid partisanship of the media. Listen,
Speaker 1: if you're a Democrat senator and you hear this, this
Speaker 1: Q and A. In a normal world where you have
Speaker 1: a media reporting on what happens, you'd be a little
Speaker 1: reluctant to jump in and seem like you're eager to
Speaker 1: cover up the wrongdoing. That That is not a good look,
Speaker 1: to put it mildly, But why is it the Democrats
Speaker 1: are not worried about this? Well, it's very simple because
Speaker 1: they know, they know to a metaphysical certainty that CNN
Speaker 1: will never cover it, that MSNBC will never cover it,
Speaker 1: that The New York Times, the Washington Post, that the
Speaker 1: entire corrupt corporate media won't cover it because if it
Speaker 1: doesn't fit their political agenda, from their view, it doesn't exist. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that goes back to Tony bobble Lensk. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: a guy that's an actually a human being that did
Speaker 1: business with Hunter Biden, had multiple meetings with the Vice President,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, had meetings with James Biden. He was involved
Speaker 1: in the Biden crime family. And once he was involved,
Speaker 1: he got to see how it worked. He knew a
Speaker 1: big guy was And what did the FBI do They
Speaker 1: after they met with him, they tried to shut it
Speaker 1: down where everything that Tony Bobo Lensky gave them could
Speaker 1: not be seen by anyone by saying by labeling it
Speaker 1: as disinformation. It's not just they sat down with them.
Speaker 1: They then tried to cover up what he gave them. Well,
Speaker 1: and in contrast this to the behavior of the FBI,
Speaker 1: the behavior of the Department of Justice, and the behavior
Speaker 1: of the entire corrupt corporate media. When it came to
Speaker 1: allegations against Donald Trump, when it came to the Steel dossier,
Speaker 1: something that was fantastical on its face, something that we
Speaker 1: now know was paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign
Speaker 1: in the DNC, something that, on the face of it,
Speaker 1: it was essentially rumors at a bar, some drunk guy going, well,
Speaker 1: you know, I think Trump is doing this, And every
Speaker 1: scurreless allegation, no matter how flimsy, no matter how not
Speaker 1: backed up by the facts, would be echoed on the
Speaker 1: front pages of the New York Times breathlessly. And in contrast, look,
Speaker 1: these are witnesses, babble. Lensky was a business partner, was
Speaker 1: an active participant in what he is testifying is a
Speaker 1: criminal essentially a criminal bribery scheme. The stenographer was a
Speaker 1: White House employee for fifteen years, was physically in the
Speaker 1: room with the Vice president and today's national security advisors.
Speaker 1: And yet this is not news they're willing to cover.
Speaker 1: And contrast the two, and let's be clear, the New
Speaker 1: York Times and the Washington Post both won Pulitzer Prizes
Speaker 1: for their false reporting on the Trump Russia collusion that
Speaker 1: turned out not to be Russia collusion, but that that
Speaker 1: titillated the fantasies and made the hearts go pitter pat
Speaker 1: of leftists. And I gotta say that it's gotten particularly funny.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you've seen that Saturday Night Live,
Speaker 1: which which sadly is not funny very often anymore. But
Speaker 1: SNL has done a mocking ad for what they call
Speaker 1: CNN Zen, which is for leftists who hate Trump, that
Speaker 1: this plays soothing words from left wing corrupt media commentators
Speaker 1: because they're so nervous they need to be soothed. And
Speaker 1: and I gotta say, for our listeners, this is a
Speaker 1: good way. We're gonna play you that SDL ad. But
Speaker 1: first before we play that for you, I want to
Speaker 1: tell you about a friends ever Patriot Mobile. If you're
Speaker 1: sick and tired of companies that are fighting against what
Speaker 1: you believe in and giving them your money, and you
Speaker 1: are ready to stand with companies and stand with your values,
Speaker 1: one bill you can change right now is your cell
Speaker 1: phone bill. You can change the Patriot Mobile, the only
Speaker 1: conservative cell phone company in the US. They actually take
Speaker 1: a portion of your bill every month when you pay it,
Speaker 1: and no extra costs you, and they give back to
Speaker 1: conservative causes that stand up for our First and our
Speaker 1: Second Amendment rights, that stand up for the life of
Speaker 1: unborn children, that even help with adoptions. That is exactly
Speaker 1: why I switch to Patriot Mobile. That you get the
Speaker 1: same exact coverage, by the way, that you're used to,
Speaker 1: the same coverage that you've got right now. You can
Speaker 1: keep your same cell phone number, but you know with
Speaker 1: every text and with every phone call that you're standing
Speaker 1: up for your values with a company that's willing to
Speaker 1: fight with you. Check out Patriot Mobile. Go online to
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile dot com, slash verdict that's Patriot Mobile dot com,
Speaker 1: slash verdict, or call them use the promo code Verdict.
Speaker 1: You'll get the best deals of the day eight seven
Speaker 1: eight Patriot. That's eight seven eight Patriot eight seven eight
Speaker 1: Patriot or online at Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict. Take
Speaker 1: a listen. This is the Saturday Night Live clip that's hilarious.
Speaker 1: Here it is these days, it's hard not to feel
Speaker 1: stressed out and overwhelmed. Sure, Trump got indicted, but now
Speaker 1: everyone says the case against him is weak and that
Speaker 1: he'll never serve any jail time. As someone whose entire
Speaker 1: personality is hating Donald Trump, you need more You need
Speaker 1: to feel calm and reassured. You need the newest meditation
Speaker 1: app Cnzen that suits even the most militant liberals, with
Speaker 1: sensual details from Trump's arrest featuring your favorite CNN anchors
Speaker 1: and correspondence. He see first American president to ever be indicted.
Speaker 1: This is truly a historic and humiliating moment. Trump is
Speaker 1: a sad, defeated man. They made him come from Florida,
Speaker 1: whereas eighty degrees to New York where it's only sixty degrees.
Speaker 1: How depressing for him. And his motorcade wasn't even that big.
Speaker 1: I thought it would be bigger, but it was so small.
Speaker 1: Donald was all old, no family or friends to support him.
Speaker 1: I shouldn't say this as a journalist book what olds
Speaker 1: or how New York Times reporter Maggie Habram and soothe
Speaker 1: you to sleep. This is his worst nightmare, and he's
Speaker 1: really freaking out because now he knows there are consequences, consequences.
Speaker 1: You can also listen to clips of Trump and his
Speaker 1: allies desperately spirally. Please Donald J. Trump is an innocent
Speaker 1: man and he needs your help. Send him all your
Speaker 1: money today at Donald J. Trump, Are you slash fundraising
Speaker 1: scam dot guilty from his next court appearance won't be
Speaker 1: till at least December. That's why CNZN has a whole
Speaker 1: section of Trump indictment SMR. Can you hear him getting
Speaker 1: fingerprints and a da opening his big leather briefcase and
Speaker 1: a little cable from a judge. I wonder if you
Speaker 1: live in here handcuffs with additional in app purchases like
Speaker 1: audio erotica of District Attorney Alvin Bragg reading all thirty
Speaker 1: four felony counts. Count one falsifying business records in the
Speaker 1: first degree, Count two falsified business records in the first degree,
Speaker 1: countree falsifieds. Help is conciousness, flemsis the Das case, CNZN,
Speaker 1: because you waited seven years for this indictment and you
Speaker 1: want every delicious detail and what ethnicity is Trump's judge? Again?
Speaker 1: It's back the nz in your night. He's already in jail. Mean,
Speaker 1: that may be one of my favorite skits from S
Speaker 1: ANDL Center ever, and I can't actually believe they did
Speaker 1: this basically mocking the case and also the psychos or
Speaker 1: sensor Donald Trump being indicted, when even SNL is making
Speaker 1: fun of CNN and the corporate media for being utterly
Speaker 1: corrupt and in bed with Trump. You know, it is
Speaker 1: obvious and undeniable. Yeah, it's it's, it's it's truly amazing.
Speaker 1: I think it's a great point to leave on. Don't forget.
Speaker 1: We do this show three days a week, Monday, Wednesdays
Speaker 1: and Fridays. Make sure you hit that subscriber auto download button.
Speaker 1: More importantly, help us reach new listeners by sharing this
Speaker 1: podcast on all your social media platforms. Tell your family,
Speaker 1: tell your friends. Right, it's a five star review, and
Speaker 1: we will see you back here in a couple of days.