WEBVTT - P&L: How Blockchain Will Affect Market Structures

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. I want

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.319
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Christian Catalini. He is a professor at

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the m I T. Sloan School of Management, coming to

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>us from Boston. Christian, you recently wrote a paper UH

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with Joshua and Gance of the University of Toronto arguing

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that cryptocurrencies will affect key costs in the economy and

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>namely the cost of verifying transactions, the cost of running

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a network platform or a marketplace. I just want to

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>get your sense of where we are in the evolution

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>away from paper money and towards cryptocurrencies. So thank you

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>very much for having me here. UM. I think this

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting time, UM are around this space. We

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we we just came back from I think the most

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>ip phase around cryptocurrencies and blockchain and digital ledgers. UH

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen and fifteen have seen a lot of VC

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>investment and attention in this space, and I think as

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>people are starting to build solutions that actually deliver value

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>UH to to customers to different industry verticals, we're coming

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>closer to two applications. UH. Digital currency is clearly one.

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>A number of central banks are looking at this really

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>closely because it has implications for how we think about

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, taxation, UH, and a number of other dimensions.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, as many other systemic changes. UH. It's unlikely

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen overnight, and I think a lot of the

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>IPE has inserved well this UH this ecosystem because the

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>technology is complex and bringing it to market what will

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>take some time. Can you speak in detail about blockchain

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and its ability to create or to offer tamper proof

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>trans action records. I mean that's part of the promise, absolutely,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, so in our piece, what we're trying

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to focus on is really basic economic theory. So from

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>from an economics perspective, we verify attributes of transactions all

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the time. Anything you can think of in the economy

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a transaction, whether you're authenticate yourself, you buy

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>goods yourself goods, you're trading UM, and those attributes matter

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot because often, you know, as long as things

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>go well, we we don't worry and and the transaction

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>goes smoothly. But when there's an exception, we often need

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to go back and verify credentials of individuals involved, attributes

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>of the goods, think about the provenance, how they've been

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>manipulated across the supply chain, and that's usually very costly.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>We usually perform an audit when we need to verify attributes.

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Um I think the promise of blocation is really lowering

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the cost of that process, that process of verifying attributes

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to almost to zero, and that's quite fascinating, you know,

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to to markets. Well, Christian, I want to look at bitcoin,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>which is probably the most close watched virtual currency out there. Yesterday,

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a story in the Wall Street Journal that

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Circle Internet Financial, which is one of the most heavily

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>funded digital currency startups, will no longer offer customers the

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>ability to buy and sell bitcoins based on the setbacks

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that we have seen with bitcoin gaining cloud as a currency,

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the failure for block chain to really

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>take off at the big banks. What's your optimism that

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we will transfer the financial system towards something that is

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>more in line with a cryptocurrency model. Absolutely, so I

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>think those are all very valid points and and those

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>are kind of the main challenges of a technology that

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is evolving into compliance. Right. So Bitcoin was designed, let's

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>remember that to be totally decentralized, censorship proof and distribute it. Right.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So it was in in total antithesis to the regular

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>financial system. Uh, therefore it made some choices in terms of,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the privacy of the transactions, who can vet

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>transactions that were very deu syncratic to Bitcoin at the

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>same time, and we need to not forget that the

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>major breakthrough in cryptography behind blockchain is much more general

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, what you're seeing now is you know, banks,

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions, accounting firms rethinking this technology from the ground

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>up and repurposing it for different markets. In different settings.

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>You will need different types of cryptocurrencies with different properties,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with different you know, compliance levels. Bitcoin, I think it's

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>scaling quite successfully on a global scale, but not necessarily

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the way that it's the most compatible

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to current financial systems. Um the movie that you you

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned by Circle is one where the company is seeing

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>itself more and more as you know, a global payment

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>app where people can easily transfer money across the globe.

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really matter what cryptocurrency they use. It could

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>be bitcoin, it could be something else. Uh, the technology

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is still kind of working in the background, but the

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>consumer doesn't really need to see it. Is This competition

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>include companies such as Venmo and then maybe bringing our three,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>which is that consortium back by financial firms right JP,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Barclay's absolutely and in fact,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're seeing a lot of experimentations from startups

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that maybe want to tie themselves to to bitcoin or

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>etherium or other cryptocurrencies to consertions of banks. Are three

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>recently released Korda's fascinating to see how even within that consortium,

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>some players have decided to just tell people what courtA

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is briefly because that's an interesting collaboration result. Yea. So

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>essentially that's a number of banks that have decided to

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>design their own protocol to streamline transactions because I think

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge opportunity here in improving our settlement and

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>reconciliation of books. Happens on a global scale. Um, but

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>even within KORDA I think you're starting to see that,

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, Goldman, Sacks and others are deciding to

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>go alone because maybe they want a slightly different implementation

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the same technology. So real quick, what's the one

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that you're looking for, the one development that will

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>push the evolution of cryptocurrency into the mainstream and make

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it the base of the financial system. I think it

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.119
<v Speaker 1>will take time, but I think what we may see

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is maybe an economy, a government or um. You know,

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it could be even like a private player within an

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem with the supply chain doing a major adoption effort. Um.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that would take some time, but as you

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>as you know, like recent events like the India demonetization

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of the thousand and five hundred Europe's can provide the

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>fuel for for further adoption in this market. And I

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if, you know, given the current microeconomic turmoil,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe a central bank we considered this as an opportunity

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to reform taxes and how they do many of their

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>services to citizens. Christian Catalini, thank you very much, Professor

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>of Entrepreneurship at the m I. T. Sloan School of Management.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>If you want some immediate thoughts from our next guest,

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>John Stults was is Oppenheimer's chief investment strategist. He knows

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>everything about global markets. John, it's always a pleasure. Thanks

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>for being here with us. Let's start off with the

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Mario Draga European Central Bank, and then I want to

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts on emerging markets. But won't you start

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>there and tell us what that all means for investors. Well,

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been big fans of Mario dragging for a long

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>time with think his his process of doing whatever it

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>takes has has helped Europe. It's a very complex situation.

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But when you consider it that it's they're coming up

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on their second anniversary of KWI and already they're talking

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tapering much of that not officially talking, but I was

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>just auty. We learned today at sixty right, sixty billion,

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but for a longer period of time until December. It

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of Shakespeare Arose by any other name, you know,

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean, honestly, everyone today is debating the meaning

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of taper. Basically, they said that they're going to lower

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the pace of purchases next year of the longer term

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>bonds that they're buying, but they haven't discussed tapering. So

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>then you had all of these journalists asking Mario Traggy, wait,

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but how does that work? You're you're you're slowing the purchases.

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually looked up tapering in the dictionary this morning.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, that's the definition of it. That's the thing,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, The process is always one of a lot

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of dialogue, questions of semantics, always wide for interpretation, and

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that that probably offers the day to day drama for

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the markets, which I think we saw on the currency

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Europe first was stronger than it moved lower

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>uh ash as the announcement came out today. But I

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>think the good news is just the thought that they're

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking of going to that UH sixty UH number on

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a monthly basis versus eighties shows it yet very much

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>on parallel to Bernanky in in May of twenty uh

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>when when Bernanky intimated that the Fed was beginning to

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>think about the possibility of tapering, and uh when the

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>market took that the market actually had a tantrum. Then

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like we're getting that today, And I

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you about that. That to me is

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>meaningful that We're not seeing a tantment markets. Yes, you

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are seeing some price wings, but these are pretty minor

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>moves in the scheme of things. This is not another

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>taper tantrum all over again. Does this mean to you

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that central bankers have really lost their clout, that people

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are not looking to them as much anymore. I really

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that that's the the issue. I think

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's more that I think there's a recognition that the

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>central bankers have become remarkably experienced since two thousand and

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>eight dealing with a significant crisis situation, coming out of

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it and managing a recovery process, both sometimes on a

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>concerted effort and sometimes really on a parallel effort. It

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>just just depends what they appear to have learned from

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>one another. And of course the next chapter is as

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>government start fiscal spend. We think the infrastructure story here

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>from state side, which would have happened I there with

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton and now will happen probably a greater extent

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump, will spread around the world, and it's

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>something that's needed both by developed nations as well as

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>emerging nations. So and it will relieve, it will take

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the onus away from the central banks we think of

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>having to carry these economies, aren't we. You mentioned emerging nations.

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd like you to get a little specific and tell

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>us which ones do you think will benefit the most

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>from the fiscal stimulus that you're describing may appear in

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Well, I would have to think that

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on a regional basis, Uh, we would probably there's risks,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>of course, because of the president elect Candida with Mario.

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Mario said spec he said, quote political uncertainty

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is dominant, and he cited Brexit and the election of

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. Yeah, without a doubt that there are all

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>kinds of questions is to to what's going to come.

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that in terms of signals that are

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>coming out of fifty six Street and Fifth Avenue, we

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>would have to think that what we're looking at is uh,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly it's somewhat of a melioration from where the very

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>sharp rhetoric during the campaign being rounded out here. We'd

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have to think in terms of emerging markets, we think

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Asia looks like it's it's plenty happy about what's going on,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>compared to what many would have thought initially, Uh, not

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>necessarily on China, but on the region, so their trading

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>partners of what we do like about China. Of course,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>as we saw an uptick in imports and in exports, UH,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a good sign. And we can't help but think that, Yeah,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is a globalist, even though he is, he

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is looking to uh perhaps take back some of the

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>economic edge we gave away years ago in trade agreements.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Now on a world where the competitive landscape has been

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>vastly reduced or leveled by globalization as well as by technology,

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>where emerging markets are so which countries okay? In terms

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of countries, I'd have to think, Uh, Korea, Taiwan.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I would have to think, are you naming countries that

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>have turmoil related to the political issues or opportunities both well?

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say here opportunities from the extent that of

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>multinational uh trade positions that will likely not be as

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>affected as negatively as might be thought. And we'd have

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to think China will come will benefit from this as well.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>We we've just been usually we like to benefit from

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the region more than direct in China. What about back

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>here in the U s UM, I've heard some calls

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for decline and the SMP UH. Some people are saying

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe just a ten percent. What's your thought? What what

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, and we'd have to get

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a bolt from the blue to see

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a decline. Do you think that the

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.719
<v Speaker 1>SMP is going to keep going up? I think that

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>the S and P will likely level out. We're hoping

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>it will go through our twenty target, which we put

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in last December twenty two. We're about two and a

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>half percent away from that right now. But we've seen

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>real good performance, much better performance out of mids and smalls,

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and we were market capagnostic also, so we're optimistic. We

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think the the but the the level of and and

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>momentum that we're seeing now we think will carry through

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. But the first quarter may

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have a traditional New Year's revisiting and consideration, but we're

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>not looking for a significant drop. Just real quick, What

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about highyeld bonds related to high yield? You know, the

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>thing about high yield is if, if if anything, it

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>tends to be an area that we're sentiment swings very

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sharply either one side of the boat or the other.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the fact that you're dealing with a scenario

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>that appears to be a continuation of increasing growth. State

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>side moving forward should be good for high yield bonds,

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>which are proxies for the equity market within the bond

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>space forward. You sound pretty bullish. Yeah, I still am bullish,

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have been bullish actually since January of two

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine when we were looking forward. Fortunately we

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>were quoted by by a newspaper out in Des Moines

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>at that time, Otherwise we would have forgotten when we

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>turned bullish. John stultis Oppenheimer's chief investment strategist. Thank you

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>so much. I want to learn more about moonshot ideas,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to sort of out there crazy ideas that may one

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>day make another billion dollars with us, to tell us

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>all about those ambitions, ambitions and how they may be

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>getting ratcheted back at Google. Is Max Chafkin, Bloomberg tech

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>reporter who's here in Bloomberg eleven three Oh's studio. Max,

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you wrote this fascinating story about how Google makes so

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>much money. Me that never had to worry about financial

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>discipline until now set the scene for us. Right. So, uh,

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>basically you think of Google, and you think of um

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>search obviously, but you also think of a very successful

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>email program. Maybe YouTube, Um, maybe you start thinking about

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>these these further off ideas, the self driving car, they

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>make internet balloons. Uh, they have venture capital arms, they

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have all these different divisions trying to find a cure

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for death trying. Yeah, there's a company called Calico trying

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to find a cure for death, run by Art Levinson,

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>um and and and the weird kind of reality of

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this is that there's really only one piece of the

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>business that makes a lot of money, which is their

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>advertising part, primarily search ads, the little ads that show

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>up when you search and you know, and that and

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's created kind of like one of the weirdest companies

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I think in like the history of capitalism, where you

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>have this amazingly successful business and then all these other

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>businesses that are outside of that and um. For years, uh,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Larry Page ands are gay Brand basically allowed these other businesses,

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>which are kind of these little fife tums to just

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>do whatever they want. And now Google, which is now

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>called Alphabet, is trying to kind of rain that in

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but also ran it in a way that doesn't totally

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>squash innovation. You know. One of the illustrations for this

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>story is an energy generating kite, and I confessed that

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it immediately brought to mind images of Howard Hughes and

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the spruce goose, the mega plane that flew just once.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us about Astro Teller, the people that

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you met while you made this story come to life? Right? So,

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>so my co writer and I Mark Bergen went inside

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of X, which is used to be called Google X.

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It is the crazy research lab that's responsible for for

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Google's moonshots. They call themselves the Moonshot Factory. They all

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have these crazy titles. Astro I think is now called CEO,

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>but for a long time he was keptain of moonshots

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>um and and so you have and so anyway, it's

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's this crazy research lab they have. They have

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the driver car, they have the energy generating kites, they

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>have these Internet balloons, and they have drone delivery and

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of these things. You know, they could

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be huge businesses, but they're all still sort of a

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>ways off. I'd say the car, the driverless car, is

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's closest to becoming you know, a revenue

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>generating uh business. They're they're supposedly they're going to spin

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it off next year, although we don't know for sure.

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I love this quote from the Owner's manual for Google shareholders,

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>do not be surprised if we place smaller bets in

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>areas that seem very speculative or even strange. Uh. You know,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you were talking Max about how Google is unlike any

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>other company possibly in history, because they get most of

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>their revenue from one area and then invest in all

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>these other areas. One possible agent for change has been

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Ruth Poorat, who came to the company last year as

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>chief financial officer from Morgan Stanley. Uh. And she's developed

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of an unflattering reputation among these sort of Moonshot magicians. Correct. Right, Well,

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's probably important to point out that on Wall

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Street people love this. They love they They're very happy

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that Google is trying to be a little bit smarter

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about how it spends its money. However, in the Moonshot

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Factory and in some of these other divisions, uh, this

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is look really looked at as like bringing in this

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of New York Wall Street type to kind of,

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, make a bunch of decisions where you know

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, where where. From their perspective, she doesn't

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>know anything about Yeah, it's some one person called called

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>her referred to as a hatchet man. Um. Now, I

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think what Google would say, and what what what people

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>inside of these bets as they're called say, is that

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, from you know, constraints, you can still have innovation.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>That sometimes it's important actually to say like you can

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>only spend this much money, because that forces people to

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more creative. I actually think there's

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>something to that. And I think one of the things,

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>especially when you look at, say the driverless car, I

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's possible that the driverless car suffered a little

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.239
<v Speaker 1>bit from basically an almost unlimited budget. Um. You know,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Google is technologically ahead of just just about everybody else,

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but commercially they are actually kind of behind a bunch

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of companies there, behind Tesla, they're behind Uber and you

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>wonder if maybe if they had had placed some more

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 1>constraints on the business, they would have been forced to

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>take a product to market sooner. On the other hand,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>their safety reasons and and you know, it's a long game.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. How was the food. The food at

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Google and Alphabet is excellent, as you might imagine. Um,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And and one of the one of the most surreal experiences, Uh, Mark,

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>my co writer and I had during the during our

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>visit to X was you know, sitting there and there's

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this picnic area where people are picking at you know,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>seared tofu it's probably locally sourced or something. And you know,

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just a few feet away from this picnic area, there's

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a drone going up and down and up and down,

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's just you know, basically ignoring it, like you know,

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>like it's nothing, and you just realize, like, man, this

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is a this is an interesting place. Is a place

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that's that's doing things that nobody else is doing, and

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of doing it on a scale that nobody

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>else is doing it at while you're doing it on

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a great scale. By sharing this information in this story

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>with us Max Chafkin, also with Mark Bergen, co authors

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of this great story, you've got to read about Google

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>making so much money that it doesn't necessarily have to

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>worry about discipline. I want to take a look at bonds.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to look at particular European bonds which have

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>been out responding to today's ECB announcement that they will

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>slower the amount of bonds that they will purchase each

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 1>month starting in April next year. But they also had

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some other messages that might be a little bit more uh,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of dovish. Frankly, I want to bring in for

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>more insight, uh, Max seems abay, Euro Area economist for

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Uh, to give us a better sense of

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here. So Maxie, what's your big takeaway

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>from the CBS announcement today? Yes, Settle from London. Well,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the the announcement of d c B was quite a

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>surprise actually because right, yeah, because they went for for

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>actually it went for longer than what I expected, but

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at a bit at a smaller pace. So now they're

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy sixty billion months starting in April until December

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen. So that means they're going to go

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>for one more year of que market expectations, well for

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>something a bit a bit shorter at the same current

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty billion pace. So they're going smaller but for longer. Wait,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>hold on, I just I want to raise one important point.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.719
<v Speaker 1>They also lowered the yields, or they allowed the ECB

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to buy bonds with yields that are lower than the

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>deposit rate. In other words, Uh, this is saying, Okay,

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to go buy those two year German yields,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>German bonds that have yields that are too low under

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the current provisions, go ahead, We're going to allow that.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And what you're seeing is a steepening in the yield curve.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the German yield curve steepened to the widest

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year and uh and and the most in

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in many years. So I'm looking at this and wondering,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is this a similar move to the Bank of Japan.

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this basically the e c B saying we're gonna

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>peg short term rates and we're gonna allow longer term

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>rates to sort of creep upward. Well that's not what

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>they said explicitly, but maybe they're going to that. The

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>deposit rule well actually something they put in place from

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the start to avoid making losses on on these purchases.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.719
<v Speaker 1>And basically now they can buy anything below the deposit

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>which is set a minus your point four percent. And

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>also another cuy parameters that changed today is the fact

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that they can buy anything now until one year maturity.

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Before that it was from two years and thirty years,

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and now it's also one year to thirty years. So

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a double effect here, obviously weighing on the

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on the short end of the curveous, Can I just

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>ask you to comment on whether these projections into two

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen really make any sense? I mean, I know

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>they have to answer the question and they have to

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>check the box. But you know, even if we just

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>look back to two thousand fifteen, originally the European Central

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Bank estimated that they would have maybe a trillion euros

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on their balance sheet. Today they have more than two

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and a quarter trillion on target. This is a changing situation.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So why did these projections out to two thousand nineteen

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and and beyond, Why does that really matter? Well, Um,

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>as an economist, it's always difficult to to to talk

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>about projection in the next three years. Obviously, it's already

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do it for the next year, the next

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>two years, so three years obviously it's a bit stretched. Um.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The thing is they have to publish this because it's

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>also an eddication of how they assess um their own homework,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>how they are reaching the target. And this thing to

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to to be careful with these projection is that they

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>what they did today the announcement and all the decisions

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>are not penciled in these projections because they were made

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>before that. So it's important to keep that in mind. Um. Obviously, Drag,

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you acknowledge during the press conference, just it just explained,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and so what does that mean? What should we what

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>should we take away from that? Well, let's takeaway is

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that you acknowledge during the press conference that one point

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>seven percent in two thousand nineteen, which is the projection

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they have now for inflation, is you acknowledge it is

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>not close to the target to the mandate and that

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>means the it's a very dovish message actually that they

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>could actually go for even longer than the seven two

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>seventeen uh. And yeah, again that's the dovish message from

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>drug Is saying we're not done here. It could be

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>much longer than than what we have today. Maxim, what

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>insight did you glean on what the latest ECB announcements

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>mean for the peripheral nations, namely Italy which has struggled, uh,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>certainly after the no referendum vote, but also because of

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the banking system there. Well, we know that the career

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>program is helping the periphery more than the core. If

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>even if they buy more at the core then at

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the periphery because of the capital keys. But the message

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sent from the EC year is that we're gonna be

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>here for longer. Mario Dreggie said that. He said, there's

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>no tampering. We're gonna stay in the market. We're gonna

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>continue exert pressure on prices. It was very clear about this.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>The message is your boring costs are gonna say, uh,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for longer, I'm gonna stay very low, and that we're

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>here to help you, not just the periphery but the

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Eurozone as a whole. Speak if you can about the

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>implications for currencies, because the tenure US Treasury at right

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>now two point three nine percent, a sell off of

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>sixteen thirty seconds. The thirty year stands at three point

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>oh eight percent. It is off one and six thirty seconds.

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Implications for the euro and the dollar well, Obviously the

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>e c b S is probably expecting, it's probably hoping

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>for this to have an effects effect. Obviously with the

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>fom C next week, this would also be a factor. Uh,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not a policy target, as they say, but it's

0:25:55.119 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>surely something they're watching today. Thanks for listening to the

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg pien L Podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio