WEBVTT - Cleaning Up: Big Second Half Rankings Movers (Ep. 1073)

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>What's up, friends, and welcome in too, Fantasy Pros MLB.

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>This is cleaning Up. I am Chris Welsh, joined by

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rico, where we are live on our Fantasy Pros discord,

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>talking with the amazing people and talking with you on

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Love to have you guys here. Thank you

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>guys for joining us. As we it's kind of an

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>open forum show. As we get some of these people

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in dropping questions, we will be either bringing them on

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>or going through We've got some topics that we can

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hit as well, my friends. So mister Joe Rico, thank

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you so much for filling in for me. You had

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>a couple had a couple of days on the on

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the Big show. You're up in the majors there, mister

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rico, up on leading off.

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I've been shuffled back and forth from TRIPAA to the

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 3>Majors and back a couple of times this year.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 2>But it's good, you know. It gives me a little

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>bit of practice for.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 3>Later in the year when Joey p and later on

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>you will go to football and get the audience familiarized

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>with me. I did a lot of stuff in the

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>off season, but for just leading off listeners to try

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 3>and reintroduce myself.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>So it does work out. But good to have you back, man.

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, like the Edward oliveris, but

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>you know your production is much better than that Edward

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>oliveris just from the do you remember that year where

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>he had it felt like four good jillion just send

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>ups and downs all season long. But your production is

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.199
<v Speaker 1>quite above the oli Varius level.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>My friend, Well, thank you. I appreciate that. I very

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 2>much appreciate that.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You are very very very welcome. But glad to have

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>people in here, Glad to have people hanging with us,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and always funny in this as well, because people are

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>remembering baseball show. I think we had some football people

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that jumped in here as football season is closely coming in.

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>As you said, we've got, you know, piece of Pia

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be making that move over. I'll

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>be making a version of that but a little bit later.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But all your offerings here, but we do not leave

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you without some baseball before we get to it, getting

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>some of our our boys and girls in here, dropping

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>some questions, filling that up ranks. We are a day

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>away from the first of the next month, July, halfway

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>point of the season, all Star games coming around. We

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>all kind of do ranks a little bit differently. Some

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>people might go in like monthly pushes. I over on

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, me Mike Mayer think Kelly Kirby does it,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're kind of the big core. We

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>will continuously do pretty much weekly rest of season ranks

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>where you're trying to find this dance between the guy's

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>current value obviously where they're at, you know, for the season,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but balancing in like injuries. That's always a really tough one,

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, and like a guy like Catcher is a

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>perfect market for it, where you know you're looking at

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>values and you're going, okay, right now, duh. You know,

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Drake Baldwin is producing and Ivan Herrera is not. But

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>finding the rank with a guy like Ivan Herrera who's

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on the IL versus what the rest of season production

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is versus guys that are producing, now, that's the dance

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that ends up happening with ranks. So I've got my

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of season ranks and you might do yours, just

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a little bit different. But what I'm

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>curious about here, to start at the show off, Joe,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is do you have a guy or too that jumps

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>out that from the last time you had touched your

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>ranks to today or yesterday whenever you just finished them,

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that made big, massive, significant jumps for you. For whatever reason,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>it is sometimes I just kind of like, especially doing

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of season, you just don't put a hyper focus

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>on somebody. I've got a guy or too, but who's

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a player too that really got like a big boost

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your rank update.

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 3>So there are a couple that jump out, particularly in

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>third base. There was a lot of movement because third

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>base has been a bit of a dumpster fire, but

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>we have had some decent performances come out of the

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 3>woodwork as well. So there's a couple of guys. I'm

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 3>going to be called a homer and that's okay. But

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 3>I've moved Addison Barger up to a top ten third

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 3>base spot. He's at number ten, and I've also moved

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 3>up Ernie Clement V who is at number fifteen for

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>me right now. They have been so good for the

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 3>last month plus Ernie Clement really for a couple months now,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 3>and the Blue Jays offense as a whole just finished

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 3>off the month of June where they were one of

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the better teams in baseball, specifically on the offensive.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 2>Side, starting with Barger.

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 3>When I look at what he's done, you know, especially

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the improvements from last year to this season. The strikeout

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 3>rate being at twenty four percent is really solid. He

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>gets on base at a three to twenty clip, which

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 3>isn't crazy, but the power nine home runs in fifty

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 3>nine games, and.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:32.679
<v Speaker 2>It's backed up by the data.

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Thirteen and a half percent barrel, fifty three percent hard hit.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>The max ev at one sixteen is nice. The launch

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 3>angle is really good, and the play discipline metrics are

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 3>all really strong with him as well. He's cut down

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>in his chase rate. The end zone contact at eighty

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 3>seven percent is really good. Swinging strike rate, he's made

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 3>improvements there as well. He's only at eleven percent. I

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.559
<v Speaker 3>think across the board, Adison Barger has arrived, especially being

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>somebody who is consistently in the top three or four

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 3>of that Blue Jays lineup. There's a lot accounting stats

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 3>that are going to come from him, and I think

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the power is really legit. So I put him at ten.

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I didn't get any question.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Let's stop there.

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's stop there for one second, because what I

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>want to do, I'm looking at Fantasy Pro's ranks, and

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll take Vlad off of it because Lad technically qualifies

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there based on like the most open world of position eligibility.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>If I take Vlad off and I'm trying to see

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>who someone else could I take it, I don't think

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I could take anybody else off weird position wise, I

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>would have Barger at let's say best fourteen, because I

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>think I got him at fifteen or no, I'm sorry fifteen.

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Who is right below Barger for you that you pushed

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>him above rest of season?

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Have him above Jordan Westberg. I have him above Alec

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Bohm and Mark Fientos. Those are the guys who are

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 3>directly below him. Also Nolan ernadoum.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay, then okay, So here are guys that I have

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>above Jaziramirez Manny Machado, Jazz Devers, Cam and Arrow, Riley

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Bregman Chapman. Those are not a question right.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>So I didn't have Bregman in because I didn't rank

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>injured players. I should have probably specified that I don't

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 3>have guys who are if there's somebody who is coming

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>back this week, then I put them in, but guys

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 3>who we don't have a clear timeline on. I don't

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 3>have Bregman there, but if Bregman was healthy, absolutely, like

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 3>do you have chat I just don't know. Uh no, again,

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 3>because it's the injured thing. I didn't I didn't have

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Chapman on there. Chapman would be Chapman and Barger is

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of interesting. I think they'd be pretty close. I

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I wouldn't feel strongly going one or the

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>other there. I think it's probably Barger, but I think

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.559
<v Speaker 3>it's I think it's a reasonable conversation to have between

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 3>those two.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so here are then these players are not injured.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Johanniel Suarez, Preetis, MIKEL. Garcia, Cam Smith, Brendan Donovan. Qualifies

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Barger over every single one of them for.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>You, So I wouldn't have him over a Uhannio Suarez,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>can you say those again one more time?

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Suarez, Paradis, MIKEL Garcia, Cam Smith, Brendan Donovan.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 3>I have Parades at seven, MIKEL Garcia at eight, cam

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Smith is at fifteen, but I could probably put cam

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Smith up a couple more spots.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I just want to do the math to

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out, like I think it's a general vicinity, like

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I do rank Bregman and Chapman. I've got Paradis, I

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>got Garcia above, I got cam Smith above. I think

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's close. I think he's in that range. We're not

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>too far off. I want to throw this about Ernie Clement.

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Bogman and I were doing this really interesting thing joking

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>about how he's like a poor man's Luisa Rise. Did

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you know Ernie Clement has the same amount of runs

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>as Luisa Rise, the same amount of homers, the same

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of stolen bases, but he has a better batting

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>average and a better obp Ernie Clement versus Luisa Rise.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>He is cvs Luisa Rise. Right now, Louise Rice does

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>have more RBIs, but he also has more bats. So

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting take, just to kind of go with you

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on Ernie Clement. Any other guys you

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>want to throw out that got some rank jumps. I've

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>got some as well. I just want to give you

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the floor if you do.

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Ernie is just I'm not going to go on about him,

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 3>but he's been unbelievable this year. If you're just looking

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 3>at war, he is more winsbubperplacement than Matt Olson, Pete Alonzo,

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Manny Machado like that, both sides of the ball.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>He's been just so good.

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to a couple of guys who have kind

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>of fallen down the rankings, and it's mostly on the

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 3>pitching side, Bailey ober Zach Gallen, Sandy al Contra. I

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 3>have Gallen and ober right at the bottom here. I

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 3>did a top seventy five update and Gallon at seventy

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Ober at seventy five. They're both they're both coming out.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 3>I can't do it anymore. And also I have Dustin

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 3>May at the end here as well, at number seventy two.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 3>He has been just awful this year. So those guys

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>like I have them at the back end here. I'm

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna still, you know, move around a couple of guys

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 3>over the next couple of days here, and especially heading

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 3>into the All Star break. I'll continue to tinker, but

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I have lost essentially all faith with Gallin, El Contra,

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 3>May and over. It's it's ugly, man.

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, some I moved Carroll down. Nothing crazy. I'm a worry.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kind of worried in general about this injury,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the risk fracture that it's going to that more power.

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I just had him really high. I made sure, like

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>James Wood deservedly is higher, you know, can be higher

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>than rest of season. I'm going to bank on it.

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>He took a little bit of a dip from me.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Andy Pajus has taken a huge rise over my last

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>couple updates Byron Buxton as well. I mean rest of season.

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather have Byron Buckston or Michael Harris?

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh it's Byron Buxton without questions, Yeah, yeah, I have.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Michael Harris is at fifty seven in my outfield rankings,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 3>which maybe is too low, but is it I don't know.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've got him in the forties right now, so

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I moved him down. It's interesting you mentioned like third

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>base positionally. Another guy that I took a big boost

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for is brooks Lee. Brooks Lee has taken a big

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>jump up in my ranks to seventy seven eight homers,

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a stolen base. You know, he's missed some time. He

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>seems to be really kind of locking in another Minnesota

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Twins and Saddana Rafaela is the other one that was

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the one that I was really thinking about that I

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I had just had I didn't realize I had so low,

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's just sneaking up on it. A double digit

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>homer stolen base first half, two fifty three, nine homers,

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>eleven stolen bases so far this year. As of recent

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>he's got three homers since June twentieth, which is pretty

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>nice little stolen base in there. He's got hits in

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>five of his last seven games, Like he's just kind

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of locked in, and even though he's been more of

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a defensive guy, he just deserved a little bit more respect.

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>I just had him super low, but in the same

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>vein of like if you're going to bank on the

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>McClain's or whatever, like I boosted him up. And one

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>other is Brandon Lao is having an absolutely ridiculous season,

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>qualifying it first and second. But you know, Brandon Lao

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I had in the teams, but I moved him up

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even know if it's justifiably high enough yet,

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>but I've got him right near the top five of

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>second basement rest of season. Obviously, what he's done think

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo's player Raider has him is like the number one

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>second basement, but he is a legit shot to finish

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as the like I would say top, I mean easily

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the top three is within reach for him to

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>finish this season. So I'm a big believer. I don't

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>know any thoughts on any of those guys that I've

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>made some big rank jumps on.

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 3>So I'll start with Brandon Lao. I have him at eight.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 3>I moved him up as well. The only thing that

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 3>keeps me from moving him up even a couple spots

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 3>higher is just his history of not being able to

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 3>stay on the field and just to worry that eventually

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 3>that's going to come back to bite us.

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, his at bats are close to like what he

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>did last year. You're like, oh god, in the next

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety at bats, this is where he gets hurt.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I did a trade short couple weeks ago now, and

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 3>just going over his career, he played one hundred and

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>forty nine games in twenty twenty one, and every other

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>season that's been forty three, eighty two, fifty six, sixty five,

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>one oh nine, one oh seven. So I just don't

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 3>have a ton of confidence that he's gonna be able

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>to stay on the field, just based on this track record.

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 3>If we were just removing injuries and turned off the

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 3>injury sliders, then he is, you know, top five pretty easily.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I just kind of bake in some of the injury

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 3>risk into those rankings and that's why he's a little

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 3>bit lower. But it's unimpeachable production. So far this season,

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 3>he's on pace to go thirty five, one hundred and

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>one hundred with a good batting average with Brandon Law,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 3>and that's something that's not really been that consistent over

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>the years. The batting average is kind of bounced around

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of years two forty, two, thirty two,

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, but he's back up at two seventy five

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 3>and the Babbit is at three fifteen, So it's not

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 3>like it's a huge babboit running the show. He's just

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 3>been fantastic Sadain in Raphaela as well. Like I don't

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't really know what to make of him in

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 3>the long run, necessarily because some of the offensive metrics

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 3>are still not great. Like even with his production this year,

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 3>he's in ninety five WRC plus the swinging strike rate

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 3>is still sixteen percent. He chases every thing, he'll swing

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 3>at literally anything, So there are still some concerns. But

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 3>if you're just looking at the fantasy production, he's pacing

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 3>out to do a little bit better than what he

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 3>did last year. He had fifteen and nineteen last year.

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 3>He's probably gonna end up with, you know, maybe seventeen

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 3>homers and maybe twenty steel something like that. But where

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 3>he has made massive gains is in the hard hit data. Really,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 3>the barrel rate's gone from seven percent to twelve, hard

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 3>hit from forty six, or from thirty six to forty six,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the max ev one oh eight to one twelve, and

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 3>on average the average eggit velocity I think is more

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 3>important than the max. He's gone from eighty six to ninety.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 3>So there is a lot to really like here. And

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 3>he's also underperforming his expected batting average, he's expected slugging

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 3>in his expected wOBA A lineup. Sucks, but he's gonna play.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 3>He's definitely gonna play. And I think that he is

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>somebody that probably should be a little bit higher in

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 3>my own rankings. I'm just looking where I put him,

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 3>and I had him as my number fifty two outfielder.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Just looking at that, it might be I might be

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 3>selling him short a little bit.

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And he'll also qualify at second in some spots,

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you know something, the position eligibility kind of

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>opens it all up. And when you pair it against

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>injuries and stuff like that, Like you know, Anthony Santander

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is like an impossible one. You know, he's just been

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 1>out forever. We don't know what's going on. He was bad,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know what the power is. But it's like

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he just can't bake on Joe Adele. I think Joe Adell,

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like in the profile of what he's done this month,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it is staring us right in the face. But it's

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>like how much longer? It's an interesting game to play.

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You guys want to check out the ranks, you can

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>do it over at fantasypros dot com. You can go there.

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>You can check out all of the rest of season ranks.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It also powers some of the tools into my playbooks,

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So go and check that out. We update those again

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>me and mayor update it like definitely every week. I'm

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent on Kelly's but I'm finishing that

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>up today. If you guys want to check out what

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those rest to season look like and some

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of those player valuations and trades. Of course, it'll trade analysis.

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>If you guys want to be a part of the show.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot Com slash Discord. Get that bam takes you

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>over to Discord. You can sign up for free join

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Pros Discord with tons and tons of rooms football,

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>there's baseball. You guys obviously care about the baseball. We

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>got the cleaning up room, which you can do for

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely free. We've got I see a Leading Off mail bag.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got our MLB General Channel, and then you can

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>even upgrade it where you can get there's an MLB

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Trade Advice waiver wire. Those are on the premium side.

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Do that today Fantasypros dot Com slash chat and join

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>us every Monday at five pm Eastern where we are

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>here in the football season, we do them as well.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Just a really cool community. I see some of the

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>awesome people, and I see Van Rod who's in the

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>community as well in Leading Off. And we got our

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>boy mctunda, who's got the hand raise. So let's bring

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>on mctonda's becoming a regular on here. Let's bring up mctunda.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 3>What's up, dude, Hey, how's it going?

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Guys?

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Doing good? Man?

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Hold on man, I got a couple questions there for you.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 4>First, one rest of the season. Do you like Kyle

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Teel or Sean Murphy.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, so I like the production of Kyle Teal right now.

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But there's a couple of caveats to this. The Braves

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>look like they're trying to move Sean Murphy. They want

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to get out from under him. He hasn't been great,

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>He's only hitting like two twenty, but he's got a

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of home run power. I just wonder if he

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>goes to his because Drake Baldwin's knocking on the door,

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if Sean Murphy leaves and he goes

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to a spot where maybe he gets more playing time

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a team that needs a catcher, and that benefits him,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that benefits Drake Baldwin. Where Kyle Teal. My only problem

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with him is they've also got like Edgar Carrow there,

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so they've got two catchers and you're not seeing Teal

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>play in the outfield. So all of that said, I

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>think I'm gonna side on potentially Sean Murphy because I

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>think he's just gonna get that continued, continued play time.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think Teal is right there. And the winner

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of all of it, by the way, is as Sean

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Murphy goes, it's all about Drake Baldwin. What do you think, Rico, Yeah.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I'm not a big Sean Murphy guy.

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I have to heel ranked higher. I understand the appeal,

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Like the power is still good when he's able to

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 3>make contact, but he's also a thirty percent strikeout rate

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>guy to twenty six batting average. He was at one

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 3>ninety three last year. I just see Teal. It feels

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>weird to say the White Sox asset feels safer, but

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 3>he just does feel a lot safer considering how often

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 3>he gets on base. He hasn't hit a home run yet,

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 3>but he's barreling the ball up twelve percent of the

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 3>time with a forty four percent hard hit expected patting

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 3>averages too eighty six, expected slugging is five eleven. Like

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 3>the better days are ahead for him in terms of

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the actual production. He's hitting three nineteen, but you know

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>we're only looking at six runs and four rippies. There

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 3>are better days ahead, especially in OBP. I would take Teal,

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 3>But even if we're just talking standard five by five,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I would still go with Teal here.

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think Teal is actually more thing about

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the better answer, because like, if you want it now,

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you want Teal. Both of these guys are inversions of platoons,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but Teal is the one that's producing. And if Murphy

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stuff I laid out was like

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>speculative stuff with Sean Murphy. So yeah, I think Till

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is the answer. What else? What else did you have? Mctanda?

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 4>The other question I had for if you had a

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 4>dream scenario like one player going to a contender or

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 4>somebody being sold to the right team for the right

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 4>scenario for fantasy.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Who would it be, Like do you mean that in

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a person that is viably to be traded or like

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>any in the world viably?

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, definitely viably, because I mean we would all would

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 4>let you know.

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, we're like, oh yeah, we just start

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>dreaming about random players. Okay, So here you're you got

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to think of the like logical candidates. I think Jared

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Durand belongs in this conversation. Rico al contra Mitch Keller

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to think of other guys that are in trade rumors.

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Chris Sale has been photoed, but the Braves

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>are winning again, So I'm just throwing out a couple,

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you take it wherever you want. Dream scenario of guy

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that logically, most likely logically could be traded goes to where.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, well, this is kind of I don't know

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 3>how realistic this is. It's probably not terribly realistic, but

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 3>if we're talking about dream scenarios, I'm kind of still

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 3>hoping that Mike Trout gets traded at some point, and

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 3>just looking at the Phillies outfield, the fact that he

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 3>is from there, that's one that I would love to

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 3>see happen, especially considering what we've gotten out of Max

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Kapler this year. I think he could pretty easily take

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>over that role. I don't think it's terribly likely, just

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 3>because of the contract, But if we're talking about like

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 3>a dream destination, Yeah.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>But but the dream was also like someone that maybe

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is being talked about being traded. I think you're still

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as okay that. I don't think we've had any other

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>new firm, Like there's zero chrance Mike Trout gets traded.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't mean like, you know, let's put show

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Altani in Colorado like that type of ooh yeah, someone

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that could viably, But I think you're still kind of

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>will count we'll count it.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 3>As a as a blue Jay fan. One thing that

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I can say is kind of interesting. I don't know

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 3>if this specific connection has been made, but the Pirates

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 3>have a few players that they're probably gonna be selling

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 3>if they're you know, if they're gonna be running properly.

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 3>But that's a whole other conversation. But I just think

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Brian Reynolds, David Bednar, Mitch Keller, some combination of two

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 3>of those guys head into Toronto would be something I

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 3>would absolutely love to see as a.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jay fan.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Preferably if we're getting like Reynolds and Bednar shore up

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 3>the pen, get another solid outfielder. I know Reynolds hasn't

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 3>had a great season, but we're currently throwing Jonathan Classe

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 3>out there a couple times a week. David Schneider started

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 3>yesterday and left field, So that's something I would absolutely

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>love to see as a blue Jay fan.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think, like I wanted to say that

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Jared Durand to the Padres thing, but it's not a

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>great hitting environment for him to be in, so I

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think that is like that's a huge benefit. One

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that flashed to me was like Jared Durand to the

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Braves would be awesome if they really consider you know,

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>they already talked about these trades and if maybe that

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>had come up, like Jared Duran being in Atlanta because

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Profar can't be there for the playoffs, they

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just decide to make this like big move, and maybe

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Ozuna goes as well. Like that would be a destination

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>where I'm like, damn, that really really fits and he's

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of I don't know if that that conversation has

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>ever been had, but like that one jumps out to me. Mitch,

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller going to the Cubs. It's not like a

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>dream scenario, but it's just like, get him on a

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 1>winning team, you know, Mitch Keller maybe going to like

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Padres or the you know, like a

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>really pitching friendly environment with great offense would be really great.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But like I think the Cubs, I think they kind

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of qualify that. I'd love to see Mitch Keller and

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like san Dio Contra trated to drive Line, you know

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, like somebody fixed him, Like whatever the

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>hell's going on with That's what I want. But maybe

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Sandy go into you know, like the like the Mets.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, like the Mets have done a really good job. Yeah,

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Like the Mets have done a great job in their

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>player development pitching wise, that I feel like maybe they

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>could and they Lance Prazosi did that study where it

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know, they minor league major league have

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like the highest average fastball, Like, maybe they could fix

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>some stuff. So do you do you like that Sandy

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>one to the Mets.

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that something has to change. This is untenable at

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>this point. Like, I know, some of the expected numbers

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 3>are a bit better, but he has a seven ERA

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 3>at the halfway point of the season. This is not working.

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I don't think that it would just

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>be an immediate fix going anywhere, because I think that

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>it's something about just coming off of the surgery and

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 3>his command is still not there. The strikeouts rates are down.

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 3>But going to a team like the Mets, who have

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 3>turned around so many careers over the past couple of seasons.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 3>Tyler McGill, people were kind of writing him off. David Peterson,

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 3>no one was really sure what he was going to be.

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Griffin Canning turned in a really good season. He's done now,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 3>but they have some real success stories Clay Holmes. There's

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 3>a lot of good success stories out of the Mets

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 3>organization over the last couple of years, and Sandy could

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 3>be a prime candidate. I just wonder what the trade

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 3>would look like, because I don't know how much value

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 3>Sandy has at this point given what he's done. But

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 3>he has a pretty team friendly contract for the next

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 3>couple of years.

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So hes like I wonder if the ptrational years or something.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Like that he's got.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 3>He's signed through twenty six with a club option for

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven at eleven million, so that's like super team

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 3>friendly if they can, if they can fix him, what

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 3>it would it cost the Mets one of their top

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 3>pitching prospects, You.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Think, uh no, I don't. I think that's the problem

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is you're not getting a top now. See the Mets

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>will have quite a few guys, but you're not gonna

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>get Tong, You're not gonna get Spraught. Maybe you could

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>get Tidwell, but I think you're looking at a trade

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's probably closer to like two mid tierish prospects. You know,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a Tidwell and then maybe it's I don't know,

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know, maybe you can pull off Ronnie Mauricio, like,

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>where the hell are they ever going to play him?

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one hundred percent sure what it looks like.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I'm not is because I don't, like

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you said, I don't understand Sandy's value right now, controllable,

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>but he stinks and then he was amazing and then

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>fell apart again. Like I he threw everything in the

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>zone in that diamondback start. It's crazy slider you want

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to throw sliders also not in the zone. By the way,

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>everything was in the zone. Every slider was in the zone.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, every sinker was high up in the zone.

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's like in the low just look for us,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, look for offspeed low, look for anything fast high.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Even if you don't understand the break and stuff like that.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>If you don't throw, if you throw everything in zone

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and then your your fastballs are all up and your

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>breaking stuff is all low, kind of an easier thing

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for hitters to adjust to, even if like they're you know,

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>do you have a great this and that. It's just like, okay,

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>we know what the top and the low of the

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>zone looks like, and you go from there. So that's

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>why I'm saying like, I don't understand. I don't understand Sandy.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what his trade value looks like in fantasy.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you can even trust him anymore.

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what team would trade for him, and

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it costs. In the Marlins, they

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>may end up just going, you know what, but screw this.

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You know he's so bad right now, we still have

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>years of control. We're much better doing this in the

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>off season if he can write some stuff the rest

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of the way, and that's where we might be heading

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>unless the team is aggressive. So I don't know, dude,

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I do not know.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's look at some questions. Some of the people

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in the chat dropped us some questions. The Big Dance said,

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw Jikib Mizerowski on the trade video. Is Valdez

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>a fair trade target or do I need to aim lower?

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Schwellenbach. This is a keeper least by the way,

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not lower. By the way, Schwellenbach is not looking lower,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but this is a ten team roto keeper that changes

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the value of Misowski. Do you think Valdez. I know

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you're not the biggest keeper guy, but do you think

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Valdez or Schwellenbach too hire too low for a guy

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like Miz.

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you can get either one, I would

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 3>absolutely do it. And this is why I put him

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 3>in the trade video that I did, is because people

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 3>are already talking about him as a top fifth or

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 3>top twenty starting pitcher. So if somebody is willing to

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 3>give you Schwellenbach or Framber, you should absolutely do that.

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I prefer no human being is giving you Schwellenbach. That is,

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>if you can get Schwellenbach, you do it. No one's

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Valdez is a little bit different, maybe with age,

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I think you yeah, I don't know. That's a tough one,

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Like it might have to be like you get Miserowski

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>in a pick and you trade Valdez and maybe like

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, another win now piece. Like to me, that's

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a matchup of like a not winning this year team

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is trading for Miz and a pick and they're trading

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>away Valdez. Like I see that, Schwellenbach is arguably still

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a top like two or I'm sorry, top like six

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to ten starter in keeper leagues, somewhere in that range.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And the Big Dance says he offered mis and Peralta

0:26:55.520 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for Schwellenbach, Freddy Peralta and Miserowski for Schwellenbach. You might

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>actually like you might want to get something back on

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that now too.

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a lot.

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean, my selling of Miserowski is more redraft based.

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 3>If we're talking dynasty carlt is really really solid too.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 3>I think I think I agree with well, so you

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 3>could probably get a second piece back there if it's

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 3>just one for one, though, would you trade Miserowski for

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Framber if that was the only deal? Would you do

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 3>it one for one.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>If I'm like a losing team. I don't know if

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I do. I know that sounds crazy. It's just like

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Miserrowski is one of those guys that it was like

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>he has the potential to be number one overall pitching prospect.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Then he walked everybody in the world. And he's so

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>much younger, you know. I mean, I think he's got

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>he's in he what twenty two to twenty three, He's

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.479
<v Speaker 1>got seven or eight years on Valdez. But Framber's having

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>an insane season two two seven to two era. He's

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>already up over one hundred innings, He's got nine wins,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on the year. Like you, I like to work in

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>three year windows, so you probably have three incredible years

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>in front of him. It's just Miss has got you know,

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the best years are still in front and his stuff

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks so frickin' unhittable. His juice is so high.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that does make sense. But I think if you're

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>trading away Mis for Peralta or I'm sorry, Miz for Valdez,

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>where you have to do is you've got to find

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a way that you're getting another future asset and if

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to get so that's the way. That's the

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>dance where I don't like it straight up, but it

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>makes lots of sense. Now, if I'm trading miss and

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting Valdez, let me get a pickback, and then

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe I got to give you, you know, some other

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>workable piece that helps you, like a closer that I

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>don't care about, you know right now, where you know

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>rold As Chapman gives you saves. It's that type of dynasty.

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Is such a weird dance you have to do with

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>trades in a vacuum. Yeah, maybe Mis for Valdez kind

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of makes sense for the winning team versus the rebuilding team.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>But Misowski has the potential to be like Valdez's value

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>next season and then do it for ten more years.

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the problem trading him.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Like where does Mesrowski slot into your Dynasty rankings? Is

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 3>he a top fifty in top twenty, top thirty, Like

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 3>how high are you on him?

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So I don't I don't positionally break down. I have

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it in the rank, but I don't like I don't

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have like the Dynasty pictures and I don't like physically

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>look at them. What I can tell you, let me

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>look at Miss and that may be something I need

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to add to that. It's just a formatting sheet thing.

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I have Miss inside my top eighty overall players, So

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know pictures, I mean, I can do like a

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>rough look here, like I want two, three, four, five, six.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just doing this real quick, seven eight nine. I

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have ten pictures inside my top fifty. So that and

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just doing a little glancy glance probably roughly makes

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>him SP eight twenty to eighteen. Let's call it just

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>just I'm roughly just throwing out numbers in there, and

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I have it. I just did a new update on

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>my patroon, by the way, and in this thing dot com.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But there are some questions in there as well, like

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I really still love McClanahan, but if he if he

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like reinjures himself, he would come off that list. So

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>he's somewhere in that general range of twenty to fifteen.

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think sp dynasty already, but Framber because I value

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in three year windows. He's near there, but I have

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>him below Miz in my dynasty ranks. So like that's

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>where I'm giving you this weird advice where I'm like,

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I would you know, I kind of would want more,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like if you're winning now, I have Mis

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>hiring dynasty, but his value for a win now is

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>more important. So it's I'd go on and on about

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the quirks of dynasty and stuff like that. But you know,

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he's almost thirty two years old. You know, I've got

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Mis higher than Peralta, I've got miss higher than Valdez,

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but I have Schwellenbach over Miserowski in my dynasty. Yeah

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, Okay, a good dynasty. It's fun talking dynasty.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Da da da dinner says, hey, boys, are we dropping

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Westburg at all? I have him in like three points

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>leagues and his injuries have been brutal. Would you drop

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for someone like Otto, Lopez, Stott or McKinstry. What do

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you think?

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't really have a huge problem with it. I

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 3>think like, based on my rankings, I probably wouldn't do it.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 3>But I just have a hard time thinking we're gonna

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 3>get a ton out of Westburg, kind out of the

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Orioles really in general, just based on what we've seen

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 3>this year. They've been a little bit better as of late.

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 3>But he's he's such a wild card, Like he's out

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 3>again today, he's not on the lineup.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a finger.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's going to be a situation that

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 3>keeps him out a long time necessarily, But when he's

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 3>been out there this year, he's been eying nothing exceptional.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't mind streaming in that spot. Otto Lopez just

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 3>had an incredible week and Zach McKinstry has been low

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 3>key kind of great for a while, So I really

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 3>don't mind using as a streaming spot. There's a chance

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 3>that could come back to bite you in the end, though, Yeah,

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>In smaller leagues you can just not worry about it

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and do it leagues. He didn't say he didn't say

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what type of format. It's a little bit more of

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a question. But then throwing points and it's like, now

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>he's leaving a little bit less valuable. His strikeouts are

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>up this year, his walks are okay, it's a little

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>bit up year over year. The injuries are a really

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>big problem. He's just he's just weird right now. Like

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's underperforming to a level that you know

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be better. But his XBA has dropped

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.719
<v Speaker 1>down to two fifty the mounting injuries. He's whiffing a

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>lot this year. The k percentage is bad. Like, based

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on those guys, I'm gonna guess this is at least

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a twelve team league. Otto Lopez is really hot right now, Stott.

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you could kind of like run in and out.

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you could stream if those are the guys

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. I don't think it's the worst

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>thing in the world. Everything being fair, I want Westburg

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of season over all those guys. But if there's

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a constant churning, like I don't think anyone's going to

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>jump to pick up Westburg right now, So why don't

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you pick up Otto Lopez for the next week? See

0:32:58.120 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>if he gets, you know, get some of that run

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that he he just had. Unfortunate, he's not going to

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>get the Diamondbacks every day, and then see if you

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>can pick Westburg back up if he shows he's healthy

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and he starts hitting a tiny bit. If not, Stock

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>might be a decent replacement. So the Big Dance just

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>lost Jeremy Pania and I'm afraid he's going to be

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>out for the season. With the way the Astros handle

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>injuries lately, I'm actually pretty optimistic. They said it's a

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>small fracture, and with the All Star break coming up,

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to give him. They didn't say

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the timeline because they're super mysterious and don't say anything.

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Assuming this isn't the same fracture that Corbyn Carroll had.

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>If it's a small fracture, maybe it's two weeks. He

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:35.479
<v Speaker 1>gets a little time to heal. I think he's back

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>by August first. I feel very confident saying he's backed

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>by August first. What do you think?

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel any confidence saying anything about this.

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Situations or the injury because.

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Of the Astros, because three days ago they said Jeremy

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Panney is sore according to Joe a spot of the manager,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 3>but he does not have any fractures. This is what

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 3>they said three days ago. He does not have any fractures,

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 3>and today he has a fracture in his ribs. So there,

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 3>They've become a complete clown show in terms of injuries.

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Last year with Tucker, this year with Jordan Alvarez, Like

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 3>remember a month ago and they said he's now day

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 3>to day.

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, they just they are a mess.

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 3>So I have Jeremy Paany on a few teams I

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 3>have been my home league, which sucks because that team

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 3>is taking hits left, right and center. Carol Bregman, like

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 3>everybody's going down on that team. I hope he's back soon,

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 3>but with the Astros, Honest to god, if he missed

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the season, I wouldn't be sitting here

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 3>in September shocked by it.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of this to me is like

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take the risk, and if I could

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>go acquire him, I think I would. I know it's

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>super sketchy and scary and they could be lying and

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Alvarez has missed like everything. I kind of think that's

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 1>also why they had to make this public statement because

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of criticism, and I actually did this whole thing on

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>ITL just about like, I just think baseball needs to

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out a lot of sports. Do they need to

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 1>figure out about how to kill the the ambiguousness of

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>injuries and stop these teams from being able to to

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>lie and hold all this stuff back. And maybe they

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>need to put like, you know, league personnel in with

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>these doctors and MRIs and stuff. But whatever, that's another thing.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this might be kind of the result of

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>some of their caginess. And I think it's a small fracture.

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I think you can get back in a month. You're

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>taking on risk if you own him. I'm holding. I

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>think you're holding and you're bracing. I'm I'm a little

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>bit more optimistic than Arico is, but I guess I

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>get it. Brick says, think I'm dropping, Think I'm dropping

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Christian Walker to activate shape Bengaliers. I'm fine with that.

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 3>The other catch is but Walker's been brutal. I don't

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:39.959
<v Speaker 3>have any problem with it either.

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just I'll just in a vacuum seit. I

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>just I'm fine. I'm fine with doing that unless you

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>had some super garbage player on the other bench that

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you're deciding not to. But like Christian Walker stinks, it's

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a big l He just stinks.

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Hugel for me this year.

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Just dude, you and me, You and me both, Jay Salty,

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Happy Monday, Joan Welsh. I mean it's team had to

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>head categories. League had Henderson and Seger, but just sent

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Seager for Will Smith. What are your thoughts, he said,

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.479
<v Speaker 1>is my only catcher was Goodman and he's been dealing

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with a hammy, so that secures that position and still

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>can use a Goodman in the outfield or when Smith

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is sitting. So what do you think about trading Seeger

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>for Will Smith based on his catching position, because in

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a quick vacuum, I don't like it. I like buying

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in on Seeger for the rest of the season. But

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>there definitely seemed to be a positional need and he

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>had nobody. It looks like when Goodman was missing time.

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think?

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I ideally I would have wanted to get a

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 3>little bit more, especially considering the week that Seger just had.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 3>But Will Smith has been great this year too. He's

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in an amazing lineup. Corey Seeger is in a terrible

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 3>lineup and considering the positional needs, I don't think it's bad.

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 3>I think he probably could have done a little bit better.

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not sitting here saying it's terrible or anything.

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Agreed.

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fine. You got a chalk catcher who's

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>going to secure the position. And I also think he

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>could have got a little bit more for Seeger, and

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Segar is going to kind of lock in,

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he's got a lot of injury problems

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. I think it's okay, and I think that

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is it. We had our other one and then oh,

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Jay Brick was also saying he has Wilson contrarist who

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>can put it first, So when he drops Christian Walker,

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he can put Contraras at first, and then Langoliers can

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be his catcher.

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, chill some of the value with Wilson putting him

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 3>at first, But it works.

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It's fine, it's fine. I mean the question becomes Christian

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Walker or Langoliers rest of season.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, then it's Langler's Yeah.

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's fine. Big dance. Last one. Would you trade

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Schwarber for kateel Marte?

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I would, Yeah, Yeah, I think it's a good even trade.

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not even needing a lot of context here, Like

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, totally good, and you get that second base

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>locked up. I'm down with it. Also, friends, if you

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>guys have more questions, well guess what. Joe Rico and

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I are back on Wednesday. No piece of PA will

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>not be there. It'll be me and Joe Rico on

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>YouTube YouTube dot com Slash Fantasy Pros m LB. We

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>will be live for an hour at four pm Eastern,

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>busting through all of your questions. So get there. Make

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>sure you're subscribed on the YouTube, put notifications on. We'll

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>be there for an hour. Super chats front of the

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>line if you want to make sure, because we do

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of questions in there, we don't get

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to every single thing. Or you can just be in there, hangout,

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.399
<v Speaker 1>risk it, talk with people. There's a community in there,

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>but be there with us Wednesdays, four pm Eastern on

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube YouTube dot com Slash Fantasy Pros MLB. Joe Rico,

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>my buddy, I'm going to see you in a couple

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>days and you're gonna be on leading off with me

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday. You've got a lot of leading off.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Lately, Yes, sir, I am looking forward to it. I

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 3>love leading off. I'm rather biased in that sense, but

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I was a peanut and cracker jack once upon a

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 3>time man, so coming onto the show to host it

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 3>is always still a thrill to me, even after more

0:38:58.600 --> 0:38:59.320
<v Speaker 3>than a year of doing it.

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, that's right, body, Anything else in the works, article wise, videos,

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>anything on the planet for you.

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 3>You guys won't see my trade short this week because

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 3>it's the fourth of July, and even though I'm Canadian,

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 3>I'll be getting the fourth off and not tomorrow for

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Canada Day, So nothing for me on Friday. We're taking

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 3>that day off. But yeah, just be on the lookout

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 3>for the pods coming later this week and the live streams.

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 3>And we sure have subscribed to the podcast feeds because

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, the YouTube channel gets the majority of the love,

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 3>but the podcast feed, man, it's it's my baby.

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 2>It's become one of my babies.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 3>So go ahead and subscribe, whether it's a baseball, football

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 3>betting and show some support over there as well.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>We kill it on YouTube, but we thrive on in

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the podcast world still, So thanks to everybody that does that.

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for your support. Thank you to the people

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>that we're hanging out with. Us in here and that

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is it Joe Rico ninety nine on Twitter, you can

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>follow me at is it. The Welsh friends, have a

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>fantastic day and we will talk to you next time

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 1>right here on Fantasy Pros MLB.

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Peace.

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy PROSCE Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 3>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 3>us is by leaving

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>A positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, Follow us

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on x, Instagram and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and subscribe

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Fantasy

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Pros MLB