WEBVTT - Bill Barr Schools The Deep State

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Attorney General bar stares

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>down the Lib media and explains the facts of life

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the Muller Report and the deep

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>state coup against President Trump. Also, the Trump administration is

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>saying there should be some tariffs coming against Mexico unless

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Mexico plays ball on immigration with us. And finally, the

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>creator of Chernobyl takes the wrong view of his own creation.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into that more coming up on the buck

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show where the

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>mission or mission is to decode what really matters with

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again,

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>The buck Sexton Show begins analyst, Remember then he's a

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>great guy. Now. I think Bob said that he was

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to engage in the analysis. He was he

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was not going to make a determination one way or

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the other. We analyzed the law and the facts, and

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a group of us spent a lot of time doing

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that and determined that both as a matter of law,

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>many of the instances were not amount to instruction as

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a matter of law. As a matter of law, in others,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>we didn't agree with the legal analysis. A lot of

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the legal analysis and the report. He did not reflect

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the views of the department. It was the views of

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a particular lawyer or lawyers, and so we applied what

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we thought was the right law. Welcome to the buck

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show journey, General Barr throwing down with the Libs,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>with Muller, the partisan hack, and all the rest of them. Oh,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that's right. It was so obvious as there was obstruction

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that they can't even decide which count of obstruction was

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the most obvious. It was so clear that Trump broke

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the law in the cover up of an investigation that

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>he'd not that he did not cover up and at

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>any point could have ended and did not. But it's

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so obvious that Mueller wouldn't even say that it happened.

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a bizarre world we are living in now,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>my friends, where Libs completely conjure some alternate reality where

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>up is down and down is up, where no collusion,

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>no obstruction is well, no obstruction is really there was

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely obstruction, but they just wouldn't say there's obstruction because

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't prosecute if there had been obstruction, And the

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor wouldn't say there was obstruction because he couldn't prosecute it. Well,

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but he could have said there was obstruction, So that's

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>not true. So that doesn't hold up. And why did

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Mueller hold this press conference? It's almost like he's let's

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>look at this. The report was released, people were going

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to read through it. They let that breathe, They let

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that breathe in the news cycle for a couple of weeks.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It's all I was talking about the all Report. Let's

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>just wargain this out from for a moment. If you

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>were Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, really Pelosi because this

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is more of a house side issue, but the Senator

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is involved in some way as well. It's the Democratic Party.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>If you were the DNC and you were trying to

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>work with Muller to kick off an impeachment proceeding after

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the report has been released, what better thing could you

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have than Mueller having a press conference where he is

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>essentially imploring Congress to take this up as an impeachment matter.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Could you have coordinated this anymore effectively? Could you have

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>come up with a better plan? I think the answers no.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So are we really to believe that it is then

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence that that's not what was driving Muller here.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>That just kind of happened. Why did he think he

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>had to hold that press conference in the first place.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>We didn't misunderstand anything. He didn't tell us anything new.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He just wanted to, you know, make sure that he

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>gave one last little parting shot at the president before

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he did his mic drop. I'm out of the DOJ

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not answering any more questions. This was this

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was lighting a match, putting it up to the you know,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the window drapes right as you walk out and say, well,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do anything. I just you know, if the

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>house burns down, it's not my fault. This is what

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>he did. So it's so clear. But people know that.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>They can't they can't allow that to to settle as

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the narrative because what it tells us is what we've

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>we should know, we should have known all along, and

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>now we know beyond a reason with doubt. Muller's an

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump hack. He's a partisan just like Comy. Remember

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>they used to tell us that Coomy was above reproach,

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that Komy was the last honest man in DC, that

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Komy was to be absolutely usted when he exonerated Hillary

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>or not exonerated, but bailed out Hillary Clinton on the

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>email thing. Oh he's been FBI director, and he's been this,

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and that he's so great. Now we know Comy is

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a self loving, self involved hack, a sanctimonious, super tall

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>twerp whose only real loyalty is to himself, his ego,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and his perception of his role in this praetorian guard

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Fbido j Deep State that he was the ringleader of.

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, that's all he really cared about. But

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they used to tell us to remember that Comy had

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>no politics, and same thing with Mueller. Muller and Comi

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are cut from the same cloth. These might will be

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the same guy. They are part of this cast that

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>thinks they're above elected officials. They're the ones that keep

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the country going. They're the ones that hold up this republic.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that are providing the framework that all

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us live in a very grandiose sense

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of their their own roles and importance in American society.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But remember, how people feel about themselves determines what they

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>think about everything else around them. Bar knows he's not

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick a big public fight, but he knows.

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 1>What Muller did was meant to be a last attempt

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>at ambushing the president and handing off impeachment to the Congress,

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>which is not his job. That was never his job.

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>This was not supposed to be oppo research for Democrat

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>impeachment purposes, but that's what it very quickly turned into.

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you also have what really went on here and

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>when is this going to get aired out? When can

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>we approach this part of this critical part of the story.

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no way that they opened an investigation on Papadopolis

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>based on the meetings in July of twenty six There's

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>no way. How did a human asset get near him

0:06:58.839 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the first place? How did he come up on

0:06:59.960 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the radar? The first Russia interference in the election, you know,

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>warning flags need in the intel community went up apparently

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in April of twenty sixteen. So you're telling me it's

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>July when Papa dapplos. That's one that no way, no

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>way they're hiding stuff from us. Bar knows it, and

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he's going to find out what it is by thirteen.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>What have you seen? What evidence? What makes you think

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to take a look at this. So, like

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>many other people who are familiar with intelligence activities. I

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of questions about what was going on.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I assumed i'd get answers when I went in, and

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I have not gotten answers that are no all satisfactory,

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and and in fact that probably more questions, and that

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the facts that I've learned don't hang together

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with the official explanations of what happened. What do you

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>mean by that? That's that's all I really will say.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Things are just not jiving. Things are not jiving. You

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>know what the Attorney General is saying, they're lying. He

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to use that word little inflammatory. For right now,

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the official narrative of Russia collusion, peddled by the Deep State, FBI,

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:14.559
<v Speaker 1>DJ under the Obama administration is a lie. Barr knows

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a lie. He's going to expose it as a lie,

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and the wrath of liberals across the country is going

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to come upon his head. But you know what the

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>good news is, he's prepared for it. Folks. This guy's

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a bulldog. He's a fighter. I like him. I got

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>more on this in a moment. Well, in a way,

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I did expect it, because, yeah, because I realized we

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>live in a crazy hyperpartisan period of time, and I

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>knew that it would only be a matter of time

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>if I was behaving responsibly and calling him as I

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>say him, that I'd be attacked because nowadays people don't

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>care about the merits or the substance. And that's one

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that I ultimately was persuaded that maybe

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I should take it on, because I think at my

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>stage on life, it really doesn't make any difference in

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>your career. At the end of my career, I've you know,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's a reputation that you've worked your whole life on. Though. Yeah,

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but everyone dies and I'm not, you know, I don't

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>believe in the Homeric idea that you know, immortality comes by,

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, having old sung about show over the centuries.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>You know. I gotta say I love this guy, Attorney

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>General Barr. He's a boss. This guy's the real deal.

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>This guy's a patriot. He's a brilliant legal mind, and

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he really cares about doing what's right. And that's one

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons I get so annoyed, so aggravated with

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the attacks on his character. But it's it's reassuring because

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just they're not they're not attacks that are made

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in good faith at all. They're just character assassination efforts

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for political reasons. He's done nothing wrong. He's done nothing

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>except be ethical, be transparent, be fair minded. And I'm

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>just happy to hear his attitude is like or die, son,

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, let's do this. I see what's going on.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna intimidate me. They're not gonna push me around.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I'm at the end of my life. This

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>thing about how everyone dies, that's what you you know

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>these days. This is really the attitude you have to

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>have if you're going to be fighting for conservative values

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and ideals, you gotta just say, you know, win or lose,

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this is what I gotta do. That's how I feel

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>increasingly in the media. It's one of the reasons why

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaving the hill. Win or lose, I gotta throw down.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got to fight for what I believe in and

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>do what I think is right and say what I

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>think needs to be said, and come what may, and

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>then there's gonna be some rocky, rocky stuff ahead for me.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>I know that there already has been rocky stuff for

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>people ain't me, you know, try to come after me

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and everything. But this is why it's a fight. This

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is why we are ideological warriors. And Bill Barr isn't

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>even really an ideological warrior. He's somebody who is fighting

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for what is just. He's fighting for the rule of law,

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>He's fighting for the truth. And they hate him for it.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>They absolutely hate him for it. They would so much

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>rather have someone who is malleable, someone who can be

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>who can be persuaded that you know, the Democrats will

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>be their friend if only they turn on their former allies.

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Democrats will cajole, will will pressure, induce, solicit,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They'll just whatever they have to do to get someone

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>to abandon who they are as part of the Democrats

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>lost for control and power, and Bar is a threat

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to all of that. But you see here, he is

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the perfect man at this time for this job. He

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>has the intellect for it and as importantly, he has

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the temperament for it. I mean, I can't imagine being

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>this guy and seeing all these you know, I was

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on TV last night and Box and Shannon Bream Show,

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know's some guy who's a former Obama DJ,

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's just the stuff he's saying. It's just it

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was just laughable that they've been so fair to Trump,

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that they've been too fair to Trump. It's too fair

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>to Trump. They had put him through a two years

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>special counsel investigation based on a lie. Too fair to him.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>They're throwing people in prison. They said, thirty guys with

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>m fours to go pull Roger Stone out of his

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>bed because he, like you know, lied about nothing. And

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they're they're too fair to the Trump people, the Democrats

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that broke the same laws, people like Tony Podesta and

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>others about failure to registers and agent they don't get

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor too fair. I mean, how do these people look

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>at themselves and not laugh? But Barr doesn't get to

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>say what I say. He has to maintain a certain dispassionate,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>reason based method of talking about out and talking to

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>these talking about these issues and talking to these people.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure he just wants to be like, you know,

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a lot smarter than you, right, and you know

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're kind of a moron and you're a Trump's

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>deranged and everything that you're saying here, Pelosi or Shift

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>or Nadler is the rantings of a lunatic. You know that, right.

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's kind of what I wish he could say.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And I know that he thinks that deep down, But

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>many they are going after him with everything they have.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>After Trump, he is the I would argue to that

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>after Trump, Barr has become in a very short period

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of time, the most hated figure by the left in

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>American politics. And it's we can judge him by his enemies.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>This guy is doing heroic work. He is standing up

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to the mob and he's not yelling, he's not making

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a scene of it. He's just like, bring it. I'm

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Barr. Brig it. That's all he's saying. He's just saying,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is this is it. I know what's

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>going on here. I know the games that were played.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>He can't prove it all yet, but he sees this.

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>He sees what happened. You know, when he when he

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>puts out quotes like where he's talking about the Pratorian,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the Praetorian Guard media, I'm sorry, Praetorian guard deep state

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that thinks that it's above the laws that rattles the left,

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that concerns them, because that's the truth. If it were

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>if it were ridiculous, they wouldn't care. But he knows

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that there was this cast, this this self appointed elite

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>under the Obama administration in the federal government that that

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>thought that Trump was a clear and present danger to

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And so they abuse their power and

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in some cases did break the law in order to

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>try to take him down. That's it, and Bar's going

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to get to the bottom of this, but you know,

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the attacks on his reputation. Thankfully, he's like a guy

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>who it's like the end of a Shakespearean play and

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna just set some things right before he sails

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>off into the sunset, so to speak. He's like, look,

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna sit back on this one. I mean,

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm I think he's done such a good job. And

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I also, I really appreciate how he refuses to back

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>down on this whole spying thing, because he knows they

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>really if he caves on that, they think they'll get

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>him to cave on everything else. They attack his reputation,

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>they get him a change words. He knows you cannot

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>give an inch to these crazy libs. You cannot back

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>down at all. You can't say, oh, well, let's take

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a moderate position, because they're not looking for moderate they're

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just looking to win. You're just you're just giving them

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>more territory to work with. That's all you're doing, is

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>what he said in this interview on CBS about the

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>word spying Play twelve. You've testified that you believe spine occurred, Yes,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>into the Trump campaign. Yes, you've gotten some criticism for

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>using that word. Yeah. I mean, I guess it's become

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a dirty word somehow. It hasn't never been for me.

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's nothing wrong with spying. The question is

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>always whether it's authorized by law. Some former intelligence chiefs

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that the president has made that word somewhat pejorative, that

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they're spine, and it's as a witch hunt, is as

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a hoax, and so you're used to that word. Makes

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it seem that you're being a loyalist. You know. It's

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the craziness of the modern day that if

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a president uses a word, then all of a sudden

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it becomes off bounds. It's a perfectly good English word.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll continue to use it. He's the man, he really is.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a spying the spying. The fact that Trump says

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>spying doesn't mean that. That's not a word I can

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>use anymore. Okay, this is He's not he will not

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>play their games. So many Republicans take that kind of

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>romneyesque view of like, let's just be really polite to them,

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's just give them their way a little bit, give them,

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>give them their way on this, give them their way

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>on that, and maybe we can all be friends. Nope,

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to be our friends. They want to

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>crush us. They want to destroy us, just like they

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>tried to crush Trump with this deep state coup and

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>bars like, I'm sorry, we're not letting this go. We're

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not letting this slide. You can throw all the stuff

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you wanted me. Bar's gonna keep on coming. They can't.

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>They can't beat Bar, just like they couldn't beat Trump.

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>And there that's what they're getting worried about it. Man,

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>This Inspector General report, when it comes out, it is

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be sweet Coomy McCay. These people are gonna

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>get They're gonna get their come up. And it's maybe

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>not legally, but in terms of public repudiation. Hoof. I'm hoping.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Also you see some senior Obama appointee DJ folks Sally Yates.

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Sally Yates involved in all this. There's there's some really

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.479
<v Speaker 1>bad folks that when it comes to light what they

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>did to try to take Trump down, it'll be jaw dropping.

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking to them for months, asking them for

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>months to step up and take on a greater role

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and a greater responsibility. Of the number Wednesday alone, we

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>had over a thousand people move as one, one large group.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the largest group we've encountered come through the Mexican

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>country up to our border and try to cross all

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>at one time a thousand people. The fact that they

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't break that up, they didn't try to return those

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>individuals back to their home country is what we're asking

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>them to do. They have the capability, it's within their

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>law to do that. Their immigration laws allow for this,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and we want to see that happen. They should be

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to help us fix this problem that they can

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>so easily do. Is it easy for them to fix it?

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Will they fix it? These are the questions we turn

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to now and in the aftermath of the announcement from

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the administration that President Trump plans to put these tariffs

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on Mexican goods starting at five percent in June, and

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>then it goes up to ten. Then I think fifteen

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five. It's going to these escalating tariffs until

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Mexico is more helpful in dealing with the immigration crisis

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that we currently have at the border. Let me just say,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and I believe early in the week I told you this,

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 1>we're going to come back to immigration. I mean, this

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is not an issue that's going away. This is not

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>an issue that and it's because it hasn't gotten better,

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't improved. In fact, it's exactly where it was

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but a few months ago when I first started telling

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you there's a massive scam going on. You've got thousands

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and thousands, hundreds of thousands of people who are coming

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>into the country who should not be allowed into the country,

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>who are abusing our laws, who are abusing the goodwill

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and good nature of the American people. And this is

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>finally now an issue of some national attention. But the

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>problem has not been solved. We have not fixed this yet.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>This has not been addressed effectively by the administration. I'm

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>not just blaming Trump. Judges have gotten in the way.

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Congress have no interest in fixing it. There's

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pushback against every effort that he has,

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's bad faith pushback too. You have

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>judges on the federal Court who are effectively a part

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>of the hashtag resistance, and there you use their power

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>with these universal injunctions to stop the President from being

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>able to do really anything at the border. So that's

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a major issue that the Department of Justice, I know,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is thinking about trying to address more directly and hoping

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>to be able to turn around. But now Trump is

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>going with not quite the the ultimate sanction that he

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>had discussed of shutting down the border, but across the

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>board tariffs on goods coming in from Mexico, and like

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Mexico is our largest trading partner. President Trump, though, defended

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this move, tweeting out earlier today that Mexico has taken

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the United States for decades because of the

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats or immigration laws are bad. Mexico makes a fortune

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>from the US and has for decades. They can easily

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>fix this problem. Time for them to do, finally what

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>must be done. This comes at a time when there's

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the US Mexico Canada trade agreement that still needs to

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>be finalized and that has been very important for the administration.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So this throws that into some degree of doubt, although

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Trump would say that there's no doubt. It'll

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>all be fine. But this is now a five percent

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>tariff on three hundred and sixty billion dollars in goods

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that are imported from Mexico. That's going to take effects

0:21:53.920 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>starting June tenth. And you know, this is a trade

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 1>deal that we're going to have to get done. This

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is a trade deal that or rather the US Mexico

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Canada trade deal is. But also what do we do

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>if we get to the point that these tariffs go

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>higher and higher? The you know, the Mexican government, I'd

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>have to look at what the what their laws are specifically,

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>but I do know, for example, that Mexico, it is

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>not illegal to be in Mexico and to try to

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>cross into America. That's our problem. There is no Mexican

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>law that I was told this by Border patrol. There's

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>no Mexican law that says leaving from Mexico to go

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to america's legal. Leaving from America to go into Mexico.

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>They'll defend their border, but they're not really helping us

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>defend ours and as a function of law, I don't

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>know where that really leaves them. If they take in

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>these Central American migrants, thousands and thousands of Central American migrants,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of what happens then? Are they supposed does the Mexican

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>government now have to deal with these migrants? Isn't it

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so interesting that that the Democrats will tell us that

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>all of these illegal immigrants coming in from Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala,

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to be a huge economic advantage

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to do all these jobs that we

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>won't do, and they're so hard working. The Mexicans don't

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to see it that way. The Mexicans aren't like, oh, no, no,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you don't take our Central American migrants, sir. We're keeping

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>them here where they can bolster our economy. No, it's

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>only in this country that the Democrats are telling us

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. In an even more sophisticated and information

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>based economy, we're led to believe that non English speaking migrants,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>who in most cases will have less than a high

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>school level education and perhaps in many cases almost no

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>formal education, they're going to be a great economic benefit

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to us. This is what Democrats say. What do we

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>make of the fact that Mexico is not thrilled to

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>be the new place that people fleeing Central America are

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be set up? And that's assuming Mexico goes

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>along with this. I don't know if they will. They

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have their own domestic political considerations, you have to remember that.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>But for us right now, you know, I think the

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>bigger concern is the possibility of some economic fallout from this,

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Peter King, for economic fallout for us going an election year. Look,

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump is playing high stakes poker. Let's be honest about this.

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's what Peter King says about the play ten. If

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the President's going to do it, I think it has

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to really be thought out and to see what all

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the collateral damage is going to be, you know, the

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequences because obviously have more of an impact on

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Mexico than on us, but many American businesses and that

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>means many American workers could be affected by this. So again,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the president, I believe, has the power to do this,

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>He has the right to do it, and it may

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be the appropriate thing to do, right and hope as

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they do it, they really watch the consequences, you know,

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>very close. You got to watch the consequences for American

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>workers and consumers. It's gonna hit the auto industry in

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 1>this in this country pretty hard if if this actually

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>gets implemented and then once those escalations kick in, there's

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of American auto makers that some of the

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff is some of the plants are in Mexico or

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>even just some of the parts are assembled in Mexico

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they're brought to the US and finished here.

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is a bigger This is a

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger deal and would be I think have more impact

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>than even the China tariffs that we've seen so far.

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>China gets people on edge because there's this possibility of

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the of a much broader escalation, but it started pretty small,

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty targeted. This is Trump is threatening and across the

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>board tariff on all goods. This isn't just steal or

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just soybeans. Is everything and the only way.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And you've heard me say it. I'm gonna keep saying

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it because I'm very confident in the truth of this statement.

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>If the economy is when people go into cast their

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>votes in twenty twenty, if the economy is more or

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>less what it is right now under this president. Trump

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>wins if we head into a major recession, whether it's

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>cyclical or not, whether there's one event that kicks it

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>off or not, it does not matter. If we head

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>into a major recession, Trump stands a very good chance

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of losing because he doesn't have to lose that many

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>votes to lose to a Democrat, and it doesn't really

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>matter who the Democrat is. And class warfare and socialism

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and the state stepping in to save you, that's all

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>more popular. That's more likely to get traction, not in

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>good times, but in bad times when people are scared.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>It's when you've already seen your house value plummet, you've

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>lost your job, and you know you've lost thirty percent

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of your four oh one k or something like that.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>That's when someone like Elizabeth Warren showing up and saying

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>free school, free childcare, free healthcare for you. You go,

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe maybe I gotta listen to the free

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>lady who's a fake Cherokee. You know, maybe maybe that's

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the way to go. This is my fear is that

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump is trying to follow through on these very important

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>promises from his presidency. He's he's trying to do what

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>he can to actually deliver on these promises. But the

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>timing of this may mean that there's there's some unintended consequences,

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and if there are unintended consequences that have a real

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>effect on the election, we got we got a problem, folks,

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we got a problem. Trump's not gonna be able to

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>get a deal deal with China before reelection. I'm very

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>confident in that as well. And he really needs to

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have a US Mexico Canada trade deal in place before

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>his election because he's the dealmaker. He's the guy that's

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>always been saying I know how to get this done.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I know how to get the deals done. I'm not

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>saying he's wrong, and I'm not saying that this won't work.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm merely pointing out that this is a this is

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a role of the dice big time, and the way

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that this could you know, the way this could go,

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it could be rough for the economy. So we will

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 1>have to We'll have to see. I'll be right back, team,

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>stay with me. Trural issues, intellectual property rights, forced technology transfers,

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially the respect for private property that at this point

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>China has not reflected in their practices, and we need

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to see reforms in that regard. Will we see reforms?

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>We've been asking China to reform for a long time.

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's a concern that I have is I reflect more

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on my time in China. There has long been this

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>paradigm of America running on four year people would say

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>even shorter or two year or one year election cycles,

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and that our politics is inherently very short, verst short

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking and tactical versus strategic in its approach. Whereas the Chinese,

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>because you have this central committee that's authoritarian, that is

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>not elected, that does not go anywhere, or can take

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a much longer view that they can position themselves. And

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the argument from most China experts that I

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>know is and they have positioned themselves with a longer

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>horizon for their plans, their projects, their activities, whether it's

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>economic competitiveness, military growth, and and capability, that they're not

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what will this look like in two years

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>or four years, They're thinking where we be in twenty years,

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>where we be in you know, fifty years. That's a

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>disadvantage that we have at a strategic level. There's a

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of advantages that we have because of our society

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>versus theirs. We have much more localized improvisation and individual initiative,

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we have much better business environment, much

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>better a rule of law. You know, they're less corruption.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so we do have a lot of advantage

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese. I'm not just sitting here trying to say, oh, well,

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>because if you go too far in this direction, you

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>start to think, well, why don't we do what people

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like Tom Friedman we're saying ten years ago. You know,

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe China has a better model than us. In many ways,

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they do not have a better model than us. They

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>might be better at creating rapid economic growth coming from

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a place of poverty. But you know, we've we've had

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a much more you know, a rise that has been

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in our own way. Every bit is as incredible and meteoric.

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>We just haven't done as rapidly, and haven't done it

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>by completely oppressing our own people and starving them and

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>killing millions of them. And we haven't had quite the

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>same costs in place either for our economic rise of

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese have had. But when when Mike Pants is

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about how we want to see reforms we want

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to see change. This is where you see some of

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the shortcomings of our approach to these other countries and

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the tools that we use to try to get compliance,

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>things like sanctions, right, that's usually that's the more serious stuff.

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But even tariffs, you know, a tariff is not that

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>far off from a sanction. I mean, sanctions have more

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>bite and can be more punitive in nature. But you know,

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a tariff isn't necessarily we're angry at you for this thing,

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's we're going to take some stuff from you

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>because we think we need to, and we're hoping that

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>China backs away from this, backs away from the different behaviors,

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the theft of intellectual property, the you know, as I

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>told you, walking around and seeing all the incredibly incredibly

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>accurate looking fake fake Louis Baton bags, fake Rolex is fake,

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I learned. So I learned more about about fancy watches

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>from being in China that I have from any else

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>because there were there were stories you'd walk past and

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they had just right there for you Panorize and Paddock,

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Philippe and Rolex, and these are the most expensive, some

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of the most expensive watch brands in the world. Certainly

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the most celebrated watch brands in the world. And they're

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>all fakes though, but you can kind of look at

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>them and hold them and I don't know how much

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is this one? How much is this one? They don't

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>care that there's been billions of dollars of marketing and

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>research and effort. I mean it goes into all these products.

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.719
<v Speaker 1>They're just like, well, we're gonna we're gonna copy them

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and sell them to people and give those companies nothing. Obviously,

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a very unsavory trade practice because then they could

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>also flood the market with them, and that's what they've

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>been doing. But we think that they'll change because of

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>pain that's inflicted on them. What the reason I was

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the authoritarian nature of the Chinese state is

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.959
<v Speaker 1>when you don't have to worry about elections, how much

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>do you really care If you have a monopoly on

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>force and you sit atop a mountain of force as

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Central Committee and in an enormous police state,

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know you're pretty good at waiting out a republic

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like ours that's going to have a change in leadership,

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if not every four years, at least every eight years.

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And that waiting game gives them a major advantage in

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>any negotiation. This is one of the reasons why I

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's no chance we're going to get a deal

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>before the election, because why would the Chinese do that.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>They can wait this out. We're going to slow down

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>their economy a bit. Okay, fine, they'll say, we'll slot

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on the economy, but we'll make up for it when

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the next American comes along. Who's they're hoping it's a democrat,

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, and goes back to the old way where

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese just get to cheat to get ahead, and

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what they've been doing. They've been cheating. So the

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to withstand public pressure when you don't have any

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>accountability to that public, no real accountability short of revolution,

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>short of an armed insurrection, that's a difficult thing to overcome.

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I think the problem in our trade

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>dispute with China. You know, we don't have an answer

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to this, We don't have a well what do we

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>do about that? And in that sense, it mirrors some

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of the the sanction policies. You know, we sanctioned Iran,

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>we sanctioned North Korea, we have sanctions against these, sanctions

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>against Russia, doesn't change anything. We're really we're really not

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>changing behavior. We're certainly not changing regimes with sanctions. So

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>are we really able to change central economic policies of

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Central Committee with tariffs? Um, I don't know.

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm I'm in waiting cmode here with Trump.

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm open to letting him have the leeway to see

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>all this through. But I'm going to judge this by

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the results. I'm gonna judge China and the trade war.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>There was a one way trade war until Trump came along,

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna judge that by the results. I'm also

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>going to judge this possible imposition of tariffs on Mexico

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>by do they finally comply? Do we see a complete

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>plummeting of the illegal crossings at the border. Let's see,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>let's see what the Trumpster can pull off. I mean,

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm hopeful, but I'm not just gonna trust. I'm

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna verify on this. We have to be ready. It is.

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a very our founders. I always like to say this,

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>our founders in the darkest days of the revolution, they

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 1>said the times have found us. Well, I think right

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>now the times have found us. We have a defiance

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:30.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution of the United So and so when

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we go down this path, we have to be ready

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and it has to be clear to the American people,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and we have to hope that it will be clear

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Republicans in this United States. She's talking about impeachment. Folks.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Remember but a few weeks ago, the conventional wisdom coming

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the swamp and the mainstream media was, oh, no, Nancy,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Nancy's too savvy for impeachment. They know that that's not

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>going Oh no, no, no. That was all That was

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>all staging. That was preparing the battlefield to the Libs

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>advantage by making it seem like this is not the

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>plan all along. It's very important the perception here really matters,

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.439
<v Speaker 1>because if the plan all along has been impeachment, one

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that affects the foundational rationale behind the whole Mueller probe.

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And as Annie McCarthy or Buddy was on yesterday, has

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>written Natural View today, this was always an impeachment probe.

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>This was never really a criminal investigation of Trump. As

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>soon as it was clear to Muller that there was

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>no collusion with Russia, so from then on it was

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 1>just how do we get them on impeachment? How do

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we set up impeachment? But for Democrats it looks more measured,

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it looks more authentic and reasonable for them to come

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to the decision of impeachment because of the quote facts

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they discover then to make it obvious that this was

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just going to be impeachment along, because that's pure politics.

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It in that way somewhat similar to why why is

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>it that CNN clings to the fiction that it's a

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>neutral news gathering organization, that it does not have a

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>political agenda or bias. I mean, it's it's a laughably

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>flimsy perception of itself that it has. But why does

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>CNN have that perception? Why does it keep fighting to

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>at least make some people believe that? And that's the

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the outward messaging, no matter how much people realize

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's crap. Why Because their left wing propaganda is more

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>effective if it is coming from a place that is

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at least ostensibly neutral, because then it's just the facts.

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like the apples versus bananas. They're they're they're just

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>saying apples or bananas. They're not giving you, you know,

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not giving you a a rotten tomato and telling

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you that it's a it's a an apple, which is

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what they do all the time. They're not, you know,

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>falsifying things. Are not promoting either fake news or an

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>agenda through a narrative that is partisan and is trying

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to pursue a certain end, not spread certain knowledge. It

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>adds to the efficacy, it adds to the mission, the

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness of their mission. A lot of think tanks, by

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the way, claim to be nonpartisan research foundations. Meanwhile, anyone

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>who is familiar with their work and look at it

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and say that's a Lib think tank full of Libs

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>pushing Lib policies. But they'll say, oh, no, no, we're

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a nonpartisan research foundation. Sure, you are right. That's the Democrats,

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in the same way, are trying to trying to hold

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>themselves up as we aren't partisans who have been planning

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this and scheming this all along. We're just defending the constitution.

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>We're just trying to uphold the best traditions of America

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with you know whatever. I think this is Nancy Pelosi

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about it, for heaving's sake, and she's on the

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel Show, by the way, of course speaking to

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel about this, Who's don't know him, and he

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely doesn't know me. And he's the kind of person

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 1>who I'm sure would be like, look, who knows who

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>he is? You know he's he has their education of

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>being a really mean guy, which I think is interesting

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 1>for a comedian you know who else though, And this

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I know from people who worked for him, So this

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is not the Jimmy Kimmel thing, is a little more

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hearsay that he's mean, like just a nasty person. You know,

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he was really nasty? Was David Letterman? Not a nice

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>guy well known by his staff, not a nice guy.

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't think a funny guy either. I think

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.439
<v Speaker 1>he's somebody who just got really lucky right place, right time.

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.280
<v Speaker 1>At least Jay Leno was kind of funny sometimes. Letterman

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I never and I was a New Yorker. I never

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>liked Letterman, and a lot of people work for him

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't like him. I can tell you that not quite

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>as reviled as Keith Alberman, whose staff was pretty much

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>an open revolt about how he was. The irony of

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Keith Alburman was that he had a show where he

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>did the worst person in the world, and he was,

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in fact the worst person in the world. That's the

0:39:55.719 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>irony of Keith Olberman. But Kimball's talking to Pelosi here

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and she's saying that impeachment, you know, the American people

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be ready. She said, we have a defiance

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>of the constitution. What's the you know, she says that,

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's very much a pelosiism because it's it's

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a grandiose sounding term. She's trying to, you know, rally

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 1>left wing imbeciles to her side. What is a defiance

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of the constitution? What's the defiance of the constitution she's

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about? You know, this is just like undermining our institutions,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>protecting our democracy. These are are phrases that that that

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>bring with them all this this sense of importance, you know,

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the gravity of the moment encapsulated in words. Okay, but

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>what does it really mean? You know, this protecting our institutions?

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>How do all of our institutions deserve reprotected or do

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>some of them need to be pretty much raised to

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the ground and started anew Should the FBI just be

0:40:57.440 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 1>celebrated for being awesome and perfect, or should we look

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>at what really happen there with regard to spying on

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a presidential campaign and Russia collusion and all the rest

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think these are fair questions to ask. Meanwhile,

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel, to give you a sense of where the

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Live mindset is on all this. Right, So, Pelosi's

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>engaged in a perpetuating a fraud in front of the

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>American people. The fraud is that they have not been

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to and planning on an impeachment for seeding all along.

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course they have. That's obvious. That's what's going on.

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>They're going to impeach, all right, you're hearing it from me.

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You've been hearing it from me. They're going to impeach

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the president. They will not be able to back down

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:43.879
<v Speaker 1>from this and not look weak to their base. They

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>figure that this will, at if nothing else, tie Trump

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>down in counter narrative efforts instead of going around saying, hey,

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>look at how Austin the economy is. Look At how

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>much better the country's working now than it was working

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 1>literally in terms of jobs than it was when Obama

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>was in charge. No, no, he's gonna have to spend

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>all this time. No, I didn't obstruct that's a lie.

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a lie. So they just bury him in this slime.

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>They know they'll be able to do that with the

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 1>impeachment proceeding. But Pelosi is still sticking to the script here.

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>If we haven't made the decision yet, you know, we're

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>just waiting to see, just waiting to see what we

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:21.959
<v Speaker 1>come up with when we've reviewed all the facts, because

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we're so objective in all this. And it's about the Constitution.

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not about the Constitution. It's about Libs want to

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be back in power and get even with Trump. There

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people that put their hopes and

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>dreams that attach themselves to politicians the way that other

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>people attach themselves to sports teams or celebrities. You know,

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they think that that person or that team is a

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>reflection of who they are and look at in certain ways.

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:47.399
<v Speaker 1>It's not. You know, people who love their sports team,

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine and good, but some people take it

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>too far. You know, some people keep referring to the

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>teams as we long after the game is over, and

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't wipe the paint off their faces, and they

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>go to work for a couple days wearing the jersey.

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like calm down, but you're not actually on the rangers.

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you need to need to chill. But politicians

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and for liberals, I mean I've seen people recently. I

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>saw someone right that, you know, liberalism is a form

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of identity politics for college educated white people now in

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this country, that you really want to be liberal just

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>because of what it says about you, not because of

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>what your beliefs are. And that's a major part of

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>liberal liberal branding. And Nancy Pelosi is playing into that here.

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi knows that you know you you. She just

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>has to convince the Libs that the good people want

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to punish Trump and then everything else will start to fall,

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and then everything else falls into place. It doesn't need

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to worry about the details. You don't have to worry

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about the details. Just just push this narrative more. But Kimmel,

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 1>who's one of these nasty libs, rich libs on on

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast, here's what he has to say to

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, And let your play seven. You know, we don't.

0:43:56.440 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had a chance to see the Muller report.

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't seem like it seems like when your subpoenas somebody

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, and they for some reason, it used to

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>be it seemed like you've got subpoena by Congress, you

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>had to go in and speak. Now it's like, I

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I'm gonna do that. If I do,

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I have some different terms that. Can't you put those

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>people in jail? Can't you put those people in jail?

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a comedian everybody on a major national TV platform.

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Can you put those people in jail? Don't forget as

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we get closer to the real height of this election battle,

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>don't forget the lessons of Kavanaugh. Don't forget that the

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>true believer lives don't think it's enough to have power.

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.359
<v Speaker 1>They don't think it's enough to get their way. They

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:49.240
<v Speaker 1>want to get their way, and they want to inflict

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>punishment and misery and degradation on their ideological opponents because

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the only way they can believe what they believe is

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>by insisting on the not just wrongness but evil of

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Otherwise they would have to grapple with facts,

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>they'd have to grapple with differing notions of the common

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>good and what policies work and don't work. No, No,

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 1>so much easier to We're the nice people. We're the

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>good people. We care about the poor, we care about minorities.

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Those mean conservatives are evil, they're white nationalists. They're all right,

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>they support Trump. They're all of these things. And if

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they have to go to prison and have their lives

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>ruined and have you know, their families pulled apart, and

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we have to win, then so be it.

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>That's their attitude. It's a very common attitude on the left.

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 1>They view all of this as zero sum. They're going

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>scorched earth. They have no interest whatsoever in meeting us halfway.

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to happen. In fact, they complain to

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>people like the Speaker of the House, why can't you

0:45:54.320 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>lock up those who don't do what the congressional majority says, Well,

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>there are some very good reasons, they're very good answer

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to that, But Nancy Plosi didn't give them, of course,

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because she's a panderer, just like Elizabeth Warred, who will

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about later on. Stay with me. Some of you

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>may be aware of or gun laws in the United

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>States don't make much sense. Anybody can buy any weapon

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 1>at any time, you know, without much if any regulations

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>make a buyer or the Internet vager buyer machine guns.

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:40.879
<v Speaker 1>That was a former president Obama. I think we can

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just refer to as Obama. I'm not a believer, as

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I'm never gonna change my mind on

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 1>this one unless somebody makes a really compelling case. I'm

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not a believer in anyone maintaining a government title when

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they no longer have that title. I don't like calling

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>former Speakers of the House mister speaker. I don't like

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>calling former ambassador's ambassador or you know. My only exception

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is people in the Middley and that's just because I

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>think the military should get a special, special deference. But

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that's it. The former president of United States here is

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking in front of a foreign audience. He's in Brazil,

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and everything that he said there is a lie. It's

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not that it's up for debate or discussion or

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, okay, the one part about much

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>if any regulation, you could argue that that's an opinion, right,

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>although that's a it's a stupid it's a stupid opinion.

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But he's allowed to have stupid opinions. I think Obama

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>had many stupid opinions. But the things there are there

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:38.959
<v Speaker 1>are objective things that he said, anybody can buy any

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>weapon any time. That's a lie. Anybody cannot buy any weapon.

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you are a prohibited possessor for a whole

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 1>host of reasons. If you're convicted felon, if you have

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 1>been convicted of a crime of domestic abuse, if you

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>are an abuser or addict of illegal drugs, not a

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>those none of those categories you're allowed to legally own

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 1>any firearm of any kind. So it's not true that

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:08.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody can buy any weapon anytime. That's that's that's a lie.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Start with that, that's a lie, and any weapon. He

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>also says, really, how many of you who listen to

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this show who owned a Noba fires How many of

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you think you could just walk in and buy an

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 1>M sixty fully automatic, belt fed M sixty. Now, I

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>know there are a few of you who are like

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I can buck, I have the federal license, I know,

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>but not you. I mean, the rest of the ninety

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the people listening to the show cannot

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 1>buy an M sixty legally, would not be able to

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 1>do it. There's a whole bunch And if you live

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 1>in a blue state, you probably or depends on the

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Blue State. But I mean, if you live in Connecticut,

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>for example, you would not be able to buy a

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>standard a standard cult made a R fifteen, couldn't buy it.

0:48:56.200 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd have to. I don't know what how

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the band is there. I know the ban in New

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:02.839
<v Speaker 1>York is you couldn't buy a standard air fafine. You'd

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:05.879
<v Speaker 1>have to buy some kind of modified AR that has

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a different stock and a different magazine and no four grip,

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's all these essentially cosmetic restricts. So but the

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 1>point here is it's a lie. What Obama saying is

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a lie. They can buy it over the internet. That's

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 1>also not true. They can he explicitly said they can

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>buy machine guns. That's not true. So well, let's let's

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>unpack that for a moment. What are we what are

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we to make of that? Why why would the former

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>president United States go before a foreign audience and tell

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>them things about America that are not true and and

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:50.280
<v Speaker 1>then do it in a way that you know, what's

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of this? Why would he do this? Why

0:49:56.440 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>take down America as the former president of the United

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>States to a foreign audience. He was speaking at the

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>VTEX Digital Innovention Digital Innovation Convention in Sal Paulo. He

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>also said the most difficult day during his two term

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:17.879
<v Speaker 1>presidency was the Sandy Hook shooting. So look, it's it's

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:22.320
<v Speaker 1>also I think noteworthy that Obama is saying this in Brazil,

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>which has very restrictive gun laws. You know, you are,

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:29.720
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard to get a gun in Brazil legally,

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and Brazil has among the highest firearms homicide rates in

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, and it is about per capita I think

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:42.120
<v Speaker 1>five or six times five or six x r O.

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So he's speaking in a country that has strict gun laws,

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.320
<v Speaker 1>where they suffer from a true plague of gun violence

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>every day, and he's doing it to get cheap applause.

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Because I've always felt this way about Obama. He is

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he is fueled by cheap applause. Now, a lot of

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>politicians aren't. Don't get me wrong. I'm not. I'm not.

0:51:00.760 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that this is a unique to Obama,

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 1>but not a guy that had a lot of new ideas,

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:13.359
<v Speaker 1>really was dogmatically liberal, you know, did not break from

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the liberal consensus on anything that I can remember, and

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>knew exactly what to say to different audiences to get

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>them to go liberal audiences to get them go along

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with it. But this is also just a general liberal trait.

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>They like to go on TV, they like to go

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:33.879
<v Speaker 1>on foreign soil. This is like my I know, I'm

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 1>still fixated on c AN International, but I'd like to

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>go in front of foreign audiences in trash America as

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 1>though they think that there's some benefit to be derived

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 1>from that. You know, they feel like they elevate themselves

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 1>personally by taking shots at their own country. I can't

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:53.480
<v Speaker 1>understand that. Let's just say it, Okay, Brazil has a

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 1>heck of a lot more to learn from Us than

0:51:57.239 --> 0:52:02.919
<v Speaker 1>we have to learn from Brazil, and even close. So

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I just wish the Libs would would stop doing this.

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:09.239
<v Speaker 1>It's very common they like to go over you know,

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, actors or musicians or you know,

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 1>just sort of famous self righteous libs, Democrat politicians. They're overseas,

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's always a pretty really there's always this possibility

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even probability that when America comes up and say,

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, you know, America's an embarrassment, they'll make fun

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of all the you know, the right wing crazies and

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>everything in this country and all we do is eat

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 1>cheeseburgers and drive around in big SUVs that guzzle too

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>much gas and climate change and all this. You know,

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we're one American family here. When when you go outside

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the family, everyone knows this. There's what you can say

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>inside the family, and then what you say outside the family,

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you talk to somebody outside about what's going on the family.

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Everything's great, everyone's awesome. You don't air the family dirty

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 1>laundry in funt of outsiders. And this is what democrats do.

0:52:56.800 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>They get on foreign soil, and in this case, a

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>former president, the most recent president before Trump, they get

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:03.760
<v Speaker 1>them foreign soil, and it just takes some cheap shots

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:06.840
<v Speaker 1>at their own country. And it's just it's just smarmie

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 1>and low and and uh, I don't I don't think

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's okay. Russia, Russia, Latimer Putin, Russia of Russia, Russia,

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Russia hates Russia, Russia, Russia, Putin Russia's Russia, Russia, Russia, Russian, Russian, Russian, Russian, Russia, Russia,

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Moscow Moscow, Russia, Russian Pro Russian, Russian, Russia, Russian, russ US.

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 1>We just gave you, We just gave you a review

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of Rachel Maddow's show the highest rated show at MSNBC.

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Some it's the highest rated show across all the LIB networks.

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:39.320
<v Speaker 1>We gave you a review of Rachel maddow Show for

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>about the last two years. Russia, Rusia, Russia, Moscow, Trump Tower,

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump Tower, Moscow, Russia, Mana Fort Moscow, Russia, collusion, collusion, collusion,

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:50.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, election interference. Blah blah. That's it, that's all.

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>If you know that, you know what she's been doing

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for two years on the air, and turns out that Russia, Russia.

0:53:57.440 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 1>What when it comes to Trump, Russia did what exactly

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:04.359
<v Speaker 1>with the Trump campaign? Oh, that's right, nothing, nothing. Well,

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it turns out there's a little bit of unease among

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>some of the libs right now because they know that

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 1>their brand has taken a hit. They're aware of the

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:24.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that the public, at least the public that has

0:54:24.400 --> 0:54:26.800
<v Speaker 1>two brain cells to rub together that watches these shows,

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>which is not that many of them, recognizes that they've

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>been led astray, that this was overhyped. Now not many

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of them, by the way, most of them still are.

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Trump and Trump and Russia, Trump and Russia.

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:43.840
<v Speaker 1>They've been brainwashed. The Trump and Russia. They work together.

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, they can't help. It's more, you know, not

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:50.879
<v Speaker 1>my president. It just gets them so excited to this

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 1>prospect that Hillary didn't really lose it. It's such a

0:54:55.040 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>seductive they can't escape. It's such a seductive narrative, so

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 1>much easier to look at that. But some of the

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 1>newspapers are walking are back in a way, at least

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 1>from their quote news reporters, which we'd all know. They've

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all got an agenda too, but they do more of

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the facts than the strictly opinion and propagandizing networks out there.

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a story on Vanity Fair today, inconsistent, incoherent,

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and poorly conceived. The New York Times clamps down on

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:35.279
<v Speaker 1>reporters going on MSNBC. Is this a liberal media war?

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 1>This is very interesting. Apparently the Times just yanked quote

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:42.879
<v Speaker 1>one of its journalists from Rachel mattau amid concerns about

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:47.360
<v Speaker 1>cable news bias. Deem Backey or is it back it?

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you say it. Backe thinks it's

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a real issue. That's the guy who runs New York Times,

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but didn't MSNBC. How build the Times is business and

0:55:56.920 --> 0:56:01.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't they in the same Trump era vote? Oh wow,

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you mean the New York Times is trying to walk

0:56:03.320 --> 0:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>away a little bit from the the nonsense propaganda of

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Maddow Show and it comes to Russia collusion. You

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>mean you mean to tell me that there is now

0:56:16.160 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 1>some recognition among these various libs that they should not

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:23.359
<v Speaker 1>have gotten way, way, way ahead of the facts. If

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>they're now going to present themselves as objective, objective news reporters. Nope,

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not objective, not objective. In fact the opposite. They are

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:38.320
<v Speaker 1>highly highly partisan. But they need to try to protect

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that brand somehow. So there are there are reporters from

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:44.200
<v Speaker 1>New York Times. They're being told they cannot go on

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The Madou Show, which is if you're a liberal, the

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:51.640
<v Speaker 1>single Oh it's not just Madou Show. Don Lemon too,

0:56:51.680 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 1>who I believe Trump calls the dumbest man on television

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.960
<v Speaker 1>or the dumbest news host on television, which is a

0:56:57.040 --> 0:57:01.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty that's a pretty strong case. You know, the New

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:04.479
<v Speaker 1>York Times contributors aren't allowed to go on Don Lemon

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Show anymore. Opinion columnists can, but not the news reporters

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:12.279
<v Speaker 1>because because of the perception of bias So for those

0:57:12.320 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 1>who have been saying, ah, along, oh, you know this

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the it's just the facts that seeing everything. No, no,

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there's some recognition coming up now of they've gone they've

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just gone too far. Trump has broken them and they

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>really have lost their minds. And in the era of Trump,

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it has become too obvious that there's an agenda at work.

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:34.360
<v Speaker 1>It's become too obvious that these lib networks have taken

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it upon themselves to be the hashtag resistance and to

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>protect the perception of their news gathering organizations as neutral

0:57:42.840 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or nonpartisan. The Times and others are pulling their people

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>off air. Sure enough, Hollywood disappoints again. I had told

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you all about Chernobyl and how it's a very well

0:57:55.720 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>done show. It will haunt you. It's difficult to watch

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in parts, especially because you can't comfort yourself by telling yourself, Ah,

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this is fictional or this isn't really what happened. It

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is what happened. And you know, Chernobyl, it doesn't really

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:16.440
<v Speaker 1>spare you from some of the very painful and gory

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 1>moments of that nuclear meltdown. And it's just a way

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of seeing what a sclerotic, ossified Soviet bureaucracy is really

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 1>like and how the state, the big es state, if

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:35.880
<v Speaker 1>left to its own devices, doesn't really care about the

0:58:35.880 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 1>suffering of its people, doesn't really want to be held accountable,

0:58:39.560 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and is willing to use brute force to make sure

0:58:44.840 --> 0:58:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that suffering that is occurring is not known to the

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the people. So there's some very important lessons

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>from it. But they were not content, Hollywood and the libs,

0:58:56.360 --> 0:58:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and they were not content to just allow it to

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be a very good show. Um, they went that well,

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:05.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the creators of it decided to get into

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a wow. HBO's Chernoble's already the highest rated show of

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 1>all time on IMDb. According to producer Mike Here, I

0:59:13.120 --> 0:59:14.680
<v Speaker 1>told you, it's a very good show. It's just very

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:17.800
<v Speaker 1>well done. Um. The guy who plays the kind of

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>leads scientist is is really exceptional. I don't know, I've

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 1>never I don't I've seen him in other stuff, I think,

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 1>but I can't remember what. But he does a really

0:59:26.280 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 1>good job. But Stephen King, the guy who writes about

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the you know, always really he's he's one of the

0:59:32.400 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>most famous fiction writers of all time. I think you're

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at least one of the most famous of my lifetime

0:59:37.960 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King who wrote it? And pet Cemetery and all

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:43.440
<v Speaker 1>these different books that you know, producer Mike what what

0:59:43.560 --> 0:59:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is the most famous is there? Like? What's the are

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you Stephen King person? Here and there? Like? I do

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I like some of this stuff. I don't haven't read

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 1>any of his books, but um, I watched his movies.

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not really my genre, but I do enjoy some

0:59:55.400 --> 0:59:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of them. I mean, what's the what's the most famous

0:59:59.200 --> 1:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King book of all? Is it? Pet Cemetery? Is that?

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Or that's the one I would identify with. That's the

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>one that this and I think just did a remake

1:00:06.840 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of that. Um, but I remember he got on my

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>radar with pet Cemetery and then there's it right with

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the Clowns. Anyway, I never I've never read a Stephen

1:00:15.120 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>King book, actually, and if he's not one of those,

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've read a lot of Tom Clancy and

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Michael Crichton. I've never read any Stephen King.

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, he went and he's a super lib no surprise.

1:00:24.480 --> 1:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>He weighed in on Twitter with the following, It's impossible

1:00:27.800 --> 1:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch HBO's Chernobyl without thinking of Donald Trump like

1:00:32.760 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>those in charge of the doomed Russian reactor. He's a

1:00:35.560 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>man of mediocre intelligence in charge of great power, economic

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and global that he does not understand. Now, I mean,

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I have problems with us on many levels. First off,

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to tie the Chernobyl Reactor meltdown of nineteen eighty six

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump is a stretch in every way. It's just,

1:00:58.480 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is like saying that anything bad that

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>happens is essentially Trump like, because Trump is so bad

1:01:04.640 --> 1:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can compare it, that you can compare him

1:01:06.840 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to any bad thing. I mean, there's really no similarity here.

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>If you say that he's a man of mediocre intelligence

1:01:12.680 --> 1:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in charge of great power that he does not understand.

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>How did Donald Trump beat the most completely in the tank,

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>media and political machine imaginable with the Hillary twenty sixteen campaign.

1:01:31.320 --> 1:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>The guy is I'm not saying that he's a great intellect.

1:01:35.960 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that he could sit down and write

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you an incredible essay on you know, the origins of

1:01:41.480 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Burkey and conservative thought or something. He is a political genius.

1:01:46.720 --> 1:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a political genius. To do what he did required

1:01:49.600 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a level of genius. And this is why I almost say, Look,

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>he's a president, I'm not. He understands things in the

1:01:53.760 --> 1:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>way that I don't. Am I more well read than

1:01:56.600 --> 1:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump? Yes? Is that bragging? No? Because I don't

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's that hard to be. Does he have tremendous

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>skills that far exceed my own in different areas, and

1:02:04.240 --> 1:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that I'm nearly in awe of his, like his ability

1:02:07.560 --> 1:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>to sell, his ability to endure, his ability to have

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>animal political instincts that are just correct when everyone else

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>thinks they're wrong. Those are like, those are almost like

1:02:19.000 --> 1:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>special powers that he has. And I'm not saying that,

1:02:22.360 --> 1:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's as a as a person, he's some

1:02:24.600 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a superhero. I just mean he has he

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>has gifts. He has some gifts. But to suggest that

1:02:29.240 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he's this this bumbling full they said this about George

1:02:31.640 --> 1:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Bush too, you know. And they tell us that Obama

1:02:34.520 --> 1:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was a genius. Though Obama's not a genius. Obama's very

1:02:36.600 --> 1:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>mediocre political skills, yes, great thinker, Absolutely not Obama's. Obama's

1:02:44.400 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>entire worldview ideology, the way he'd react to things on

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the fly was just wrote pure left wing liberalism that

1:02:54.400 --> 1:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you'd get from any college professor at any third tier

1:02:57.560 --> 1:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>school anywhere in the country. That was Obamas. But it

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was in this persona of the you know, the the

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>whole Obama of life and the you know, all that stuff, right,

1:03:09.360 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that so that was anyway. I know, I'm

1:03:12.000 --> 1:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>getting a little bit deeper into the weeds on this

1:03:13.920 --> 1:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>than I'm meant to, but I just think that that's nonsense,

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that Stephen King will say that. Well, what's even more

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>annoying to me, though, is that Then Craig Mazin responded

1:03:25.000 --> 1:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to this tweet, and he is the creator of Chernobyl,

1:03:31.480 --> 1:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe, and he wrote, first this is to Stephen King,

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm so pleased you're watching. And second, I'm so pleased

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you're smartly watching. Not that there was ever a doubt, so,

1:03:42.880 --> 1:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, not quite piling on as hard as he could,

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but definitely suggesting that this comparison of Trump to the

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Chernobyl meltdown and the Soviet bureaucracy around it is apt.

1:03:57.720 --> 1:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is this is just so inverted thing.

1:04:02.200 --> 1:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>This is so it's such an inverted reality. I mean,

1:04:05.080 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump is an Even if someone hates Donald Trump, Trump

1:04:08.760 --> 1:04:12.479
<v Speaker 1>is a hyper capitalist. Trump is a may the best

1:04:12.520 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>man win you know win whenever you can, like, that's Trump.

1:04:17.320 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump is not. Nobody actually gets to win. Everyone pretends

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to share all the stuff, share the wealth, no one

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>makes any decisions. I mean, he's the opposite of a

1:04:27.040 --> 1:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Soviet bureaucracy. He's the opposite of a slothful government functionary.

1:04:34.600 --> 1:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know why there's a sensitivity here is that

1:04:36.480 --> 1:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party is the party of the slothful government functionary.

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic Party is the American political ideology that is

1:04:45.520 --> 1:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>most associated with a crushing, massive federal bureaucracy. It's not conservatives.

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not the ones that are saying, let's get rid

1:04:54.040 --> 1:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of whole departments, let's cut the budget for this stuff,

1:04:56.400 --> 1:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>let's have less regulation. Let's so, I mean to make

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this comparison, but this is the same people that you

1:05:02.160 --> 1:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>know that Trump is hitler. They used to say Bush

1:05:04.440 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is hitler. Anyone they don't like is hitler. Anyone in

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>power that doesn't agree with the various tenets of contemporary

1:05:12.080 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>liberalism can be disregarded as as a not just a

1:05:16.160 --> 1:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>dumb person, but a bad person. You know what it

1:05:20.080 --> 1:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is is liberalism is just intellectually flaccid. It just it lacks,

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it lacks a structure that is tangible and real. It's

1:05:30.760 --> 1:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just it's emotion wrapped in emotion, covered in self righteousness

1:05:36.480 --> 1:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and virtue signaling. What does the contemporary liberally even stand for?

1:05:42.800 --> 1:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Bigger government destroying the you know, kicking at the load

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>bearing walls of Western civilization? I mean, what do what

1:05:49.880 --> 1:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do liberals even really you know, giving giving some people

1:05:52.680 --> 1:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what they want and telling other people that even if

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it harms them or it takes from them, well because

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of an interpretation of history or because of an interpretation

1:06:02.280 --> 1:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of contemporary oppression, It's fine. I just I just think,

1:06:08.840 --> 1:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think liberalism is really a kind of massie.

1:06:11.240 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's turned in the era of Trump, it has turned

1:06:12.880 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>into a mass psychosis. And this comparison of Trump to

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet bureaucracy and the era of Chernobyl is just nuts.

1:06:22.000 --> 1:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's such a I was glad to see

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>my friend Dan Bongino weigh in on this one on

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter too. You know, Dan, and I'll tell you this,

1:06:29.400 --> 1:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't often I don't talk that much about other

1:06:31.440 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>people in the business. You know, Dan has had a

1:06:34.840 --> 1:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>He's always been a very talented guy, but the last

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>two years he's really done. And you know, he's just

1:06:39.960 --> 1:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>he's just built a real empire for himself. And I

1:06:44.360 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>will tell you he is one of the nicest guys

1:06:46.960 --> 1:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in this business. He's always given me helpful advice, he's

1:06:50.520 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>always been a friend, He's always been a really, really

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>good dude. Um. So I'm really happy to see Dan

1:06:56.480 --> 1:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>do so well. Also happy to see him smack smacksim

1:06:59.360 --> 1:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>lives around. He wrote the following why do Hollywood elite

1:07:02.640 --> 1:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is continue to publicly humiliate themselves on Twitter? Chernobyl was

1:07:06.200 --> 1:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a failure of socialism where the government controls the means

1:07:08.800 --> 1:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of production, the exact opposite of the Trump deregulation and

1:07:12.120 --> 1:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>tax cut agenda. Yeah, it's just another another very well

1:07:15.440 --> 1:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>put way of saying what I'm telling you, which is

1:07:19.040 --> 1:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that this is they take they make something artistic that

1:07:22.760 --> 1:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>has a worthwhile message, and the Libs will rewrite history

1:07:28.080 --> 1:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and create some obtuse, elogical takeaway because they can't help themselves.

1:07:35.480 --> 1:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Because what is close, what is closer to the Soviet

1:07:40.000 --> 1:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy that defies truth, that does not care about the

1:07:44.400 --> 1:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>real life consequences of policies, that believes that the revolution

1:07:48.560 --> 1:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and the cause as defined by a governing elite is

1:07:52.360 --> 1:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>more important and more powerful and more worthy than anything,

1:07:55.960 --> 1:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>including preventing the murder of perhaps millions or death, I

1:08:00.440 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>should say, of millions of people in the Soviet What

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is closer to that mentality? The individual rights, constitutional, limited government, freedom,

1:08:11.880 --> 1:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>liberty group, which would be conservatives, or the we get

1:08:15.400 --> 1:08:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what you can put on social media,

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:20.519
<v Speaker 1>what you can drive, what power you can use, what

1:08:20.680 --> 1:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you can say, how much of your own stuff you

1:08:22.960 --> 1:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can keep? Crossss and will use the deep state to

1:08:26.840 --> 1:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>ruin you. Democrat Party. I mean, who's closer to this.

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they are Soviets, but who's closer to

1:08:33.400 --> 1:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union? The American Left for the American right,

1:08:36.640 --> 1:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no question it's the American left. That's one of

1:08:39.840 --> 1:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I still really reject or resent this

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>usage of red as the color for the Republican Party

1:08:49.000 --> 1:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and blue for the Democrats. That's that's that's not an accident, folks,

1:08:52.040 --> 1:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's no good reason for that. The Democrats should

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be the reds, we should be the blues. It seems

1:08:57.920 --> 1:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>like a minor thing, but it's really not. Whether they've

1:09:00.600 --> 1:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>appropriated the term liberal, they've taken from us, the word

1:09:05.439 --> 1:09:09.479
<v Speaker 1>most associated with what is central to our belief system,

1:09:09.520 --> 1:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>which is liberty, individual liberty, and the human dignity and

1:09:13.360 --> 1:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>freedom that comes with it. They've taken that word and

1:09:17.200 --> 1:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>made it their word, and they're they're the antithesis of

1:09:19.760 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>liberalis And that's why I'll call them libs now. But

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I used to refuse to call them liberals, and then

1:09:24.240 --> 1:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>finally I said, all right, I guess I can't. I

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>can't fight City Hall on this one. You know, they've

1:09:29.040 --> 1:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>moved away from progressives because that's just that's just not

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:36.639
<v Speaker 1>hip anymore. I just like leftists. My college thesis, that's

1:09:36.640 --> 1:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>our referred to them. I'll keep referring in that way leftists.

1:09:39.520 --> 1:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, leftists, even when they make good movies, they

1:09:41.920 --> 1:09:44.799
<v Speaker 1>take the wrong message from it. Chernoble's a great show,

1:09:45.080 --> 1:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>but the creator of it and Stephen King and other

1:09:47.640 --> 1:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>libs take the exact wrong message away from it, which

1:09:52.840 --> 1:09:54.479
<v Speaker 1>is that all this is like Trump. No, it's not

1:09:54.479 --> 1:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like Trump at all. It's actually the opposite of Trump.

1:09:56.360 --> 1:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like you, guys, it's like the Democrat. Not you

1:09:58.280 --> 1:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>listening to this, but the Democrats. That's what the Soviet

1:10:02.720 --> 1:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy should remind everybody of And that's why there's the

1:10:05.280 --> 1:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>sensitivity in this effort to say, oh, it's it's like Trump.

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think so, clowns. I don't think so.

1:10:13.200 --> 1:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll bring it back. We can cancel student loan debt

1:10:17.479 --> 1:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for about nine of the people who have it. And finally, oh,

1:10:28.240 --> 1:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but we can do so much more two cents. We

1:10:32.920 --> 1:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>cannot only do that. We can also provide universal tuition

1:10:37.600 --> 1:10:41.519
<v Speaker 1>free technical school, two year college, and four year college

1:10:41.520 --> 1:10:48.479
<v Speaker 1>for every one of our kids. To what we can do,

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>universal childcare for every baby age zero to five, universal

1:10:56.760 --> 1:11:00.519
<v Speaker 1>pre K for every three year old and four year

1:11:00.520 --> 1:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>old in this country, and raise the wages of every

1:11:04.439 --> 1:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>childcare worker and preschool cenator. We're just gonna give a

1:11:11.720 --> 1:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of free stuff to different people by texting the

1:11:16.520 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>rich people, oh man, Elizabeth Warren, she makes Hilary seem appealing.

1:11:23.360 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>That was on the view. By the way, Joy bears, Yes,

1:11:25.400 --> 1:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I love all the free stuff, except I don't work

1:11:27.960 --> 1:11:30.519
<v Speaker 1>for free. I work for millions. But I care so

1:11:30.600 --> 1:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>much about poor people because I'm Joy beiha, I don't think.

1:11:35.080 --> 1:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that she cares about poor people at all.

1:11:36.880 --> 1:11:39.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it's all front. I think that these multi

1:11:39.600 --> 1:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>millionaire libs that go on TV their favorite thing to

1:11:42.120 --> 1:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>pretend they're number one thing to pretend they really really

1:11:44.920 --> 1:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>care a lot about talking about the white libs on

1:11:47.960 --> 1:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>TV is fighting against racism. That's because it requires nothing

1:11:52.240 --> 1:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>from them. I'm not you know, I'm joy Behad, I'm

1:11:54.920 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>not racist, and I hate racist Donald Trump because he's

1:11:58.160 --> 1:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>such a racist. And then there are other favorite things

1:12:01.320 --> 1:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to pretend they care so much about poor people. They

1:12:03.439 --> 1:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything for poor people. They don't have any

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily any even personal connection to the poor. They make

1:12:09.840 --> 1:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>no sacrifices in their own life, but they want us

1:12:11.960 --> 1:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all to know that they really care about poor, poor people.

1:12:16.400 --> 1:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But back to Elizabeth Warren talking about giving all this

1:12:19.600 --> 1:12:21.639
<v Speaker 1>free stuff. Notice how that crowd of the View, which

1:12:22.080 --> 1:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder where the mean IQ is lower the IQ

1:12:27.040 --> 1:12:29.519
<v Speaker 1>of the average audience member on the View or the

1:12:29.560 --> 1:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill Maher show, Both of them just liberal seals clapping

1:12:34.439 --> 1:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>like they're trained. You know, they're gonna get a fish

1:12:36.400 --> 1:12:39.479
<v Speaker 1>every time they clap like seals. That's true of both

1:12:39.479 --> 1:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of those audiences. I've actually been in the Bill Maher

1:12:41.960 --> 1:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>audience once because my friend see cupp was was on

1:12:44.400 --> 1:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the show and she brought me along as a guest.

1:12:47.640 --> 1:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That audience is the dumbest audience of anything I've ever

1:12:50.479 --> 1:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>just the things that they clap out. I'm like, are

1:12:51.920 --> 1:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys all morons? Well the answers yes, but poke well,

1:12:57.880 --> 1:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren, that was actually a freudience. Elizabeth Warren knows

1:13:03.240 --> 1:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that promising all this free stuff is going to get

1:13:05.280 --> 1:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this audience very very fired up and on her side,

1:13:08.400 --> 1:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and she's she's desperately trying to move away from her

1:13:11.680 --> 1:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>identity politics fraud right that she's a Cherokee from Oklahoma,

1:13:16.720 --> 1:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to how she's the idea's candidate. But really all she's

1:13:19.439 --> 1:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>doing is taking Bernie Sanders ideas and being a woman

1:13:23.400 --> 1:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>as she says them, and that's it. I mean, that's

1:13:25.000 --> 1:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the difference, and being younger than Bernie, which is not hard.

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's all that she brings to the table. At

1:13:31.680 --> 1:13:35.519
<v Speaker 1>this point, she went on this show The Breakfast Club,

1:13:35.640 --> 1:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>which I've seen clips up a few times before. I'm

1:13:37.960 --> 1:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not really familiar with the people on the show, and

1:13:40.880 --> 1:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I know it's I believe too. Of the host of

1:13:43.640 --> 1:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>African American, I think one is Latino. I don't and

1:13:46.000 --> 1:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who all the hosts are, but she

1:13:49.720 --> 1:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was on that show and it was very interesting. This

1:13:53.200 --> 1:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>this guy named Charlemagne the God. He was speaking Elizabeth Warren.

1:14:00.040 --> 1:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And I note that these politicians, especially some of the

1:14:03.600 --> 1:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ones who are very used to being treated a certain

1:14:05.920 --> 1:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>way by the mainstream media and everything else. These politicians, um,

1:14:12.439 --> 1:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't do very well with a kind of unscripted

1:14:15.120 --> 1:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>off the cuff podcast radio show kind of format. Um,

1:14:19.439 --> 1:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, with without there, without George Stephanopolas holding their hands.

1:14:23.479 --> 1:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>As a Democrat, they can get thrown off their game

1:14:26.880 --> 1:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Here's Charlamayne the God talking to Elizabeth

1:14:30.000 --> 1:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Warren and I'm gonna I'm gonna play a good chunk

1:14:32.720 --> 1:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of this clip because I want you to hear this.

1:14:34.120 --> 1:14:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he he calls her out. I give him credit.

1:14:37.560 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm m I believe the guys at Democrat. He's a leftist.

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:41.759
<v Speaker 1>He's I'm sure gonna vote for, you know, a Democrat

1:14:41.800 --> 1:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty. But at least he's doing a real interview.

1:14:44.439 --> 1:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Play clip play clip too hoo. How long did you

1:14:48.200 --> 1:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>hold on it? There was some report that said you

1:14:49.800 --> 1:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>are Native American on your Texas ball license and then

1:14:51.960 --> 1:14:53.719
<v Speaker 1>she said, you are a Native American on some documents

1:14:53.720 --> 1:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>when you were a professor at Harvard, Like, why'd you

1:14:56.040 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>do that? So it's what I believe, you know, that's

1:15:00.160 --> 1:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it's what I learned from my family.

1:15:02.360 --> 1:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>When did you find out? When did you find out

1:15:03.840 --> 1:15:08.679
<v Speaker 1>you weren't? Well, you know, it's I'm not a person

1:15:08.720 --> 1:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of color. I'm not a citizen of a tribe, and

1:15:12.720 --> 1:15:17.639
<v Speaker 1>tribal citizenship is an important distinction and not something I am.

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So were there any benefits of that? No, Boston Globe

1:15:23.240 --> 1:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>did a full investigation. It never affected nothing about my

1:15:26.920 --> 1:15:30.439
<v Speaker 1>family ever affected any job I ever got. Um didn't

1:15:30.479 --> 1:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>get a discount of college. Now he's kind of like

1:15:32.080 --> 1:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the original Rachel Doza, a little bit che do white

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>woman pretending to be black. Now this is what I

1:15:38.439 --> 1:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>learned from my family. Yeah, yeah, Wow, you're like the

1:15:44.800 --> 1:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>original Rachel Dola's all. He remember Rachel dolas All. She

1:15:48.320 --> 1:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was a white woman living her life as a black

1:15:51.160 --> 1:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>woman despite the fact that she was not black. And

1:15:55.000 --> 1:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe was a some senior member of the NAAC

1:16:00.320 --> 1:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>chapter in the Pacific Northwest. I think was Seattle or

1:16:04.280 --> 1:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Portland or somewhere like that. I forget where exactly, but she, yeah,

1:16:08.840 --> 1:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>she was a white woman living her life as a

1:16:10.640 --> 1:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>black woman and had adopted this persona that she was

1:16:13.840 --> 1:16:18.639
<v Speaker 1>a black woman and worked for the NAACP. If memory serves,

1:16:19.560 --> 1:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and here is Charlomagne and the god, who is a

1:16:22.800 --> 1:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>black person is asking Elizabeth Warre and like, how do

1:16:25.160 --> 1:16:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you how do you go through your adult life? You're

1:16:27.800 --> 1:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a teacher, You're a professor at Harvard, at University of Pennsylvania,

1:16:31.320 --> 1:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>these Ivy League schools, and you just assumed that even

1:16:34.960 --> 1:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>though you're the whitest white woman that anyone's ever seen,

1:16:37.200 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 1>that you're actually a Cherokee. You know. I spoke to

1:16:40.479 --> 1:16:42.639
<v Speaker 1>someone who studied with her, and this is a private person,

1:16:42.720 --> 1:16:44.559
<v Speaker 1>so I've got to protect the source. But I spoke

1:16:44.600 --> 1:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to somebody who took classes with her at Harvard Law School,

1:16:47.800 --> 1:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and he said that she would refer to herself as

1:16:49.360 --> 1:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a as a Cherokee from Oklahoma on a She was

1:16:53.600 --> 1:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the chapter president of the end UP. Sorry Elizabeth, not

1:16:56.720 --> 1:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>on this Warman. Rachel dolisol Pruscer Mike tells me was

1:16:58.880 --> 1:17:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the chapter president of the end of ACP in Spokane, Washington, YEP.

1:17:05.120 --> 1:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>The Chapter President of the end of ALACP. So wow,

1:17:11.680 --> 1:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that back to Elizabeth Warren. This guy that I know

1:17:13.439 --> 1:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>who studied with her at Harvard Law School, was a

1:17:16.680 --> 1:17:18.479
<v Speaker 1>student of hers when she was a professor there, said

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that she would refer to herself regularly. It was just

1:17:20.240 --> 1:17:23.559
<v Speaker 1>known that she was Elizabeth Warren Cherokee. That was that

1:17:23.640 --> 1:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>was her identity there. And this pretense now they're like, oh,

1:17:26.960 --> 1:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't do anything or whatever it's on and

1:17:29.120 --> 1:17:33.519
<v Speaker 1>I think Charlemagne the God looks at her and it's like, really,

1:17:33.720 --> 1:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like you never really thought this one through. It wasn't

1:17:36.960 --> 1:17:39.559
<v Speaker 1>like a minor thing. I mean, she really was representing herself.

1:17:39.560 --> 1:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>She wrote in Pow Wow Chow. She wrote in Pow

1:17:45.120 --> 1:17:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Wow Chow, where she plagiarized the recipe Elizabeth Warren Cherokee.

1:17:50.240 --> 1:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So she this was really a part of you know,

1:17:53.080 --> 1:17:55.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't write on things like Buck Sexton, you know,

1:17:55.760 --> 1:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Anglo Irish white guy. You know, I don't write that

1:17:58.880 --> 1:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on things. But this was really a part of her

1:18:01.120 --> 1:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>conception of herself and how she does things and who

1:18:03.840 --> 1:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>she was. And Charlotte Maagne's like this kind of weird, right,

1:18:07.880 --> 1:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you you were living this fraud, whether it

1:18:11.160 --> 1:18:15.479
<v Speaker 1>directly professionally benefited you or not, there's something definitely off

1:18:15.520 --> 1:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>about it. And then he asked her about something else,

1:18:18.680 --> 1:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't even know this part of her, so look,

1:18:21.080 --> 1:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I tipped my hat to the breakfast club. They got

1:18:23.680 --> 1:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a real interview out of Elizabeth Warren, and there was

1:18:27.479 --> 1:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pandering by the way that went on too.

1:18:29.320 --> 1:18:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at different points the interview, she started talking about,

1:18:31.960 --> 1:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the things that she wants to do

1:18:33.320 --> 1:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for the black community, and you know how she's in

1:18:35.360 --> 1:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>favor of reparations and all this stuff. I was just

1:18:37.320 --> 1:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the pull at Hillary Clinton be like, oh,

1:18:39.439 --> 1:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and I have hot sauce in my handbag all the time,

1:18:41.479 --> 1:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and I love hip hop music, and

1:18:43.560 --> 1:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just just being the most like lame old white lib

1:18:49.200 --> 1:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>boomer trying to pander imaginable, right. I mean, that's that's

1:18:52.760 --> 1:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>what Hillary used to do, and it's obviously what Warren's doing.

1:18:55.960 --> 1:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But mister the God that's his name, I don't know

1:19:00.880 --> 1:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>what his real name is, asked her about something else

1:19:03.360 --> 1:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't even know, which is that she used

1:19:05.000 --> 1:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a registered Republican. Play Cliff three, the only

1:19:08.000 --> 1:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>folks who were willing to stand and fight were folks

1:19:11.120 --> 1:19:15.519
<v Speaker 1>like Paul Wellstone and Ted Kennedy. And that's when republican

1:19:15.800 --> 1:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>is that why, like sometimes you do it your family,

1:19:17.920 --> 1:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I say, oh, really we weren't active,

1:19:21.560 --> 1:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't even know. Okay, I don't. I don't

1:19:24.280 --> 1:19:26.120
<v Speaker 1>even know how that. A lot of confusion back in

1:19:26.160 --> 1:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dame is one you thought you was Native American,

1:19:27.880 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you thought she was Republican. When you get on, when

1:19:30.080 --> 1:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you get on the right track, you got to a

1:19:31.320 --> 1:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>fucking road at some point. Yeah, you know, A bit

1:19:34.040 --> 1:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>part of it was when I got into the fights

1:19:38.080 --> 1:19:42.360
<v Speaker 1>over You've got to make the law reflect their values.

1:19:42.400 --> 1:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got to have a law that that doesn't just

1:19:47.120 --> 1:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>work for those at the top, but the works for

1:19:49.080 --> 1:19:56.519
<v Speaker 1>everyone else. Good for him, mister the gods saying yeah,

1:19:56.560 --> 1:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's some stuff in your background for miss

1:19:59.120 --> 1:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>progressive of fighter for social justice. And really all social

1:20:03.120 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>justice is, and this is borrowing a bit from Thomas Soul,

1:20:09.080 --> 1:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>social justice is just the institutionalization of the politics of

1:20:14.600 --> 1:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>envy and of class warfare and identity politics. That's what

1:20:19.040 --> 1:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>social justice is. A catch all term for changing things,

1:20:24.080 --> 1:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>changing things around so that some people are going to

1:20:29.160 --> 1:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>benefit at the expense of other people based on gender,

1:20:32.360 --> 1:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>racial categorization, etc. That's all it is, or class category,

1:20:38.080 --> 1:20:40.759
<v Speaker 1>And they'll say that it's justice. They'll say that that's

1:20:40.800 --> 1:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>what's fair. Is somebody the government taking from some people

1:20:45.920 --> 1:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to give to others, whether it's money, whether it's a benefit,

1:20:48.200 --> 1:20:53.479
<v Speaker 1>whether it's access, and it's a redistributive process. And there's

1:20:53.479 --> 1:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>always an arbitrariness to it. It's not it's not based

1:20:55.720 --> 1:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the market, it's not based on contracts, on free association,

1:20:58.640 --> 1:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>individual rights. It's what does the power, what do the

1:21:01.840 --> 1:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>powers that be think should happen here? And that is

1:21:04.320 --> 1:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens. And that's that is a very short, but

1:21:07.920 --> 1:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think decent working definition of social justice. Elizabeth Warren

1:21:11.240 --> 1:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is miss social justice. And you know, she might have

1:21:15.040 --> 1:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>been formidable if she had run in twenty sixteen, if

1:21:17.960 --> 1:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>she had run instead of Bernie, maybe it wouldn't have

1:21:21.160 --> 1:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>gone Hillary's way, although I still think the DNC was

1:21:23.880 --> 1:21:25.559
<v Speaker 1>probably so far in the tank for Hillary that it

1:21:25.600 --> 1:21:29.559
<v Speaker 1>would not have mattered. But she was confused about being

1:21:29.560 --> 1:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a Native American. She says, confused. I mean, I just

1:21:32.280 --> 1:21:34.719
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that it was like family lord

1:21:34.800 --> 1:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that she capitalized on. You know, she she took that

1:21:37.200 --> 1:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>little story that people you know, there's all kinds of stories.

1:21:39.960 --> 1:21:42.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, my background, I'm related to this like famous

1:21:42.560 --> 1:21:44.479
<v Speaker 1>founding father and that you know, I don't say it.

1:21:44.520 --> 1:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, is it true? Who knows? Who cares?

1:21:46.840 --> 1:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>She took this? Yeah, that's right. Bucks related to one

1:21:51.160 --> 1:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>of the not the most famous founders, really the forgotten founder,

1:21:54.680 --> 1:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>but apparently I'm related to him. But she took this

1:21:57.920 --> 1:22:02.519
<v Speaker 1>and realized that there's a a benefit and then she

1:22:02.600 --> 1:22:05.519
<v Speaker 1>got that benefit. And now she's telling us she didn't

1:22:05.520 --> 1:22:07.559
<v Speaker 1>get it. And Charlemagne is that God is like, so

1:22:07.760 --> 1:22:10.479
<v Speaker 1>you were confused about being a Republican and confused about

1:22:10.479 --> 1:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>being a Cherokee. What else are you confused about? Did

1:22:12.760 --> 1:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you happen to see the video this Buck? Oh yeah,

1:22:15.720 --> 1:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. It's the look on his face. It is priceless.

1:22:18.400 --> 1:22:20.559
<v Speaker 1>It's so awkward. He's like they're so close and he's

1:22:20.560 --> 1:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at her like really she was. It was priceless.

1:22:25.360 --> 1:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing. All right, we had a quick break team.

1:22:27.160 --> 1:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. What is this? I see all

1:22:29.160 --> 1:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, AOC and Ted Cruise are talking about

1:22:34.920 --> 1:22:39.559
<v Speaker 1>agreeing on a lifetime band for for members of Congress

1:22:39.600 --> 1:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>from for lobby from lobbying. I don't like this. It's

1:22:43.880 --> 1:22:45.519
<v Speaker 1>not that I don't like them agreeing. If there's something

1:22:45.520 --> 1:22:48.519
<v Speaker 1>they should agree on, I'm okay with that, but I

1:22:48.560 --> 1:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't think this is the right idea. I disagree

1:22:50.360 --> 1:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with Ted on this one. Okazio Cortez AOC, tweeted out today,

1:22:53.920 --> 1:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're a member of Congress and you leave, you

1:22:56.160 --> 1:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be allowed to turn right around and leverage your

1:22:58.320 --> 1:23:01.719
<v Speaker 1>service for a lobbyist chest. I don't think it should

1:23:01.720 --> 1:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be legal at all to become a corporate lobbyist if

1:23:04.200 --> 1:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you served in Congress. At minimum, there should be a

1:23:07.080 --> 1:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>long wait period. That was AOC. Ted Cruz responded to

1:23:11.960 --> 1:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>our on Twitter. Here's something I don't say often on

1:23:14.520 --> 1:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this point. I agree with AOC. Indeed, I have long

1:23:18.040 --> 1:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>called for a lifetime ban on former members of Congress

1:23:21.200 --> 1:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>becoming lobbyist. The swamp would hate it, but perhaps there's

1:23:24.680 --> 1:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a chance for some bipartisan cooperation. You know, there's a

1:23:31.320 --> 1:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you know there's a problem here, and that is that

1:23:32.880 --> 1:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the First Amendment is still a thing, even if some

1:23:36.680 --> 1:23:39.519
<v Speaker 1>people don't like it. Even if there are some people

1:23:39.560 --> 1:23:42.599
<v Speaker 1>who have an issue with the way that it works,

1:23:43.439 --> 1:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and you should be able to, you know, go and

1:23:48.760 --> 1:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>share your thoughts with your representatives, and even if you're

1:23:51.080 --> 1:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>getting paid for it, if you're lobbyist, you know this

1:23:52.960 --> 1:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the way it is, folks. I know

1:23:54.960 --> 1:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>right now you have I think a one year ban

1:23:57.000 --> 1:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on lobbying if you're a member of the House, and

1:23:59.280 --> 1:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a two year ban and if you remember the Senate,

1:24:01.880 --> 1:24:04.559
<v Speaker 1>but I mean a lifetime man that that to me

1:24:05.360 --> 1:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>just seems like a It just seems like an unconstitutional restriction.

1:24:08.479 --> 1:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you try to get redressive grievances from your

1:24:12.479 --> 1:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>government or try to push policies that you like as

1:24:15.080 --> 1:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a private citizen as a lobbyist, or not remember

1:24:17.000 --> 1:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the government anymore. So, I don't know. I don't see

1:24:20.280 --> 1:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>this the way Ted Cruz and AOC do. And I

1:24:23.320 --> 1:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>think that if you really believe that the swamp will

1:24:26.160 --> 1:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>be drained, because you're gonna make it harder for people

1:24:30.400 --> 1:24:32.519
<v Speaker 1>who formerly remembers Congress to be a lobbyists, I think

1:24:32.560 --> 1:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you're underestimating how deep and wide, and you know, intractably

1:24:39.560 --> 1:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>grotesque the swamp really is. I don't know if that's

1:24:41.760 --> 1:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a phrase, but I just made it up. But then

1:24:44.720 --> 1:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>there's something else about AOC or something AOC like that

1:24:47.760 --> 1:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>got my attention to. There's there's apparently this mini AOC

1:24:52.000 --> 1:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Ava Martinez of Lake Forest, Colorado. Have you guys heard this?

1:24:55.160 --> 1:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It's Fridays. I feel like you have a little fun

1:24:56.840 --> 1:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>with it. This is a young girl who does this

1:25:02.040 --> 1:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>AOC impersonation, and it's really pretty. It's really pretty fun.

1:25:08.200 --> 1:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really pretty funny. She does, she doesn't. She's an

1:25:10.960 --> 1:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>eight year old and she I think she gets these

1:25:15.400 --> 1:25:17.559
<v Speaker 1>issues about as well as AOC does. Play clip one

1:25:17.920 --> 1:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like Hello America and see here again, but this time

1:25:21.400 --> 1:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>from Washington, DC, which is named after our country's first president,

1:25:26.680 --> 1:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>George Washington DC. Did you know that? Like, I want

1:25:32.160 --> 1:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about my plan to single handedly save

1:25:34.840 --> 1:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the planet. I call it the Green New Deal. I

1:25:38.320 --> 1:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>picked green because I'm still learning my colors. I came

1:25:42.080 --> 1:25:44.759
<v Speaker 1>up with my plan after we were watching like the

1:25:44.800 --> 1:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>most important documentary on climate change. It's called I say

1:25:50.320 --> 1:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>two the melt Down. That's not me saying it, that's science,

1:25:56.680 --> 1:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Like Green New Deal, cause like ninety three trillion dollars,

1:26:02.439 --> 1:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>do you know how much that is me neither, because

1:26:06.320 --> 1:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it's totally worth it. If c Loski rising, we don't

1:26:10.280 --> 1:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to drive to Hawaii anymore. And I just

1:26:13.360 --> 1:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>got this electric car. It's eco friendly. Everyone has to

1:26:17.560 --> 1:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>drive one. I give my idea. I feel like I

1:26:22.320 --> 1:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like, you know, it's pretty much in line with

1:26:25.400 --> 1:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>AOC's thinking on everything. It's it's parody. Oh hopefully they're

1:26:29.920 --> 1:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>not going to try to get Facebook to take down

1:26:31.640 --> 1:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this young girl's videos. Oh man, it's pretty it's pretty entertaining,

1:26:36.840 --> 1:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. I see having an eight year old that

1:26:39.439 --> 1:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is doing comedy is one thing. No one's actually suggesting

1:26:43.000 --> 1:26:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that young Ava Martinez should march into Congress and make

1:26:47.400 --> 1:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>demands about commentating. That's what the libs do. But having

1:26:50.080 --> 1:26:51.519
<v Speaker 1>an eight year old be kind of funny in this way.

1:26:51.560 --> 1:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's it's a music. It's entertaining. That

1:26:54.439 --> 1:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that much is for sure. But yeah, Ted Cruz and

1:26:56.720 --> 1:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>AOC agreeing on this lobbyist band thing. I don't know.

1:26:59.600 --> 1:27:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I feel ted. I feel like Ted wanted some attention,

1:27:02.000 --> 1:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is one way to get it. Here,

1:27:03.360 --> 1:27:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I am talking about him. I haven't seen I haven't

1:27:05.680 --> 1:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>seen Ted. And while I'll tell you. I've interviewed him

1:27:07.360 --> 1:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>numerous times. I've met him numerous times. He always pretends

1:27:09.720 --> 1:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to not know who I am. I'll just be honest

1:27:12.400 --> 1:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>with you. Always pretends to not know who I am.

1:27:14.720 --> 1:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Like Ted, you know I interview I interviewed him for

1:27:17.439 --> 1:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the first time for an hour on the phone, say

1:27:20.520 --> 1:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>seven years ago maybe, and we've had several sit downs

1:27:24.920 --> 1:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>one on one since then, and Ted's always just like, good,

1:27:27.640 --> 1:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>good to meet you back. I'm like, yes, Senator Cruz,

1:27:30.680 --> 1:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>good to meet you for the eighth time. I'm glad.

1:27:34.680 --> 1:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that many do I look like

1:27:37.040 --> 1:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the guy from Parks and Wreck that much that you

1:27:38.840 --> 1:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>can't keep us, keep us separate in your head. Man.

1:27:42.360 --> 1:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>People Also, you say young James Spader, they look like

1:27:44.479 --> 1:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a young James Spader back then. I don't know if

1:27:46.240 --> 1:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that's I think I'll take that over Ben Wyatt from

1:27:49.200 --> 1:27:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Parks and rec but it is. It is what it is.

1:27:52.760 --> 1:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Trying to think of a new show that I'm gonna

1:27:54.439 --> 1:27:56.519
<v Speaker 1>watch this weekend too, I'll take some res on that

1:27:56.600 --> 1:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>from all of you before we get going into a

1:27:58.920 --> 1:28:00.519
<v Speaker 1>roll call here in a a few minutes. What is the

1:28:00.560 --> 1:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>new show on Netflix that I should try out and

1:28:03.120 --> 1:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>then I'll give you my impromptu review here on the

1:28:06.800 --> 1:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>show Game of Thrones, they just tried to land that

1:28:09.880 --> 1:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>plane before it came apart. I mean it was and

1:28:11.840 --> 1:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it was close. Man, they almost crashed. They almost crashed

1:28:14.080 --> 1:28:16.559
<v Speaker 1>that thing. I need a new show. I don't have

1:28:16.600 --> 1:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>any people. Should I watch the Americans? Should I launch

1:28:19.280 --> 1:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>into it and really do it? Is it worth really

1:28:22.080 --> 1:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>spending the time at this point, I'm sure some of

1:28:24.960 --> 1:28:27.479
<v Speaker 1>you will say, yes, that's top of my list right now.

1:28:27.479 --> 1:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But let me know. Roll calls up next, Rock and roll.

1:28:30.280 --> 1:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Fellow patriots, we made ours go up to eleven. It's

1:28:53.960 --> 1:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>time for roll call. Indeed, Friday roll called double the role,

1:29:00.120 --> 1:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>call double the fun. Remember that double double. You're a freshman?

1:29:05.200 --> 1:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, single gum double Freshmen's your laugh? Man? I

1:29:09.439 --> 1:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>watched so many commercials growing up. It's the TV industry

1:29:13.280 --> 1:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>really did brainwash us all in different ways. You start

1:29:17.040 --> 1:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to become more acclimated to it as you get older,

1:29:20.160 --> 1:29:22.719
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you recognize more as you get older.

1:29:23.800 --> 1:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. If you want to

1:29:26.280 --> 1:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>be a part of this, that is the way to

1:29:28.080 --> 1:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. Love to hear from you, appreciate your thoughts,

1:29:31.800 --> 1:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>all of that good stuff, all of those good things

1:29:35.000 --> 1:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>coming via the Facebook. As as I mentioned to you,

1:29:38.479 --> 1:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>next week is my last week at Hill TV, which

1:29:42.960 --> 1:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>means that the door will be open for more freedom

1:29:47.360 --> 1:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Hunt projects and less showing up paying the bills projects

1:29:52.560 --> 1:29:57.879
<v Speaker 1>at you know, the Hill. So here we go. Glenn.

1:29:58.600 --> 1:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>First up, if parenthood does other procedures besides abortion, then

1:30:04.240 --> 1:30:08.519
<v Speaker 1>why would the one in Missouri have to close? Well,

1:30:08.560 --> 1:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know planned parenthood. Glen always talks about the other procedures,

1:30:13.880 --> 1:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but they won't they won't continue to do those procedures

1:30:17.320 --> 1:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in the absence of abortion. I mean, they insist on

1:30:20.640 --> 1:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on bundling it all together and that way they can

1:30:23.800 --> 1:30:27.559
<v Speaker 1>refer to an abortion procedure as healthcare, when as we know,

1:30:27.760 --> 1:30:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a very euphemistic way of looking at an abortion

1:30:34.880 --> 1:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's putting it mildly looking at abortion procedure. Michael rites,

1:30:39.240 --> 1:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey Buck, can you please post more videos of your

1:30:41.360 --> 1:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>TV appearances onto YouTube? Thanks? Buddy Shields High Well, Michael,

1:30:46.400 --> 1:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I am happy to and I try to whenever.

1:30:51.040 --> 1:30:53.639
<v Speaker 1>It's really just I have to bother producer Mike sometimes

1:30:53.680 --> 1:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>after hours to get him to pull it because they

1:30:57.120 --> 1:30:59.519
<v Speaker 1>don't always post them on Foxnews dot Com, so we

1:30:59.560 --> 1:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have to find way to get it separately. But yeah,

1:31:01.800 --> 1:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>last night it was a little debate on Shannon Breem

1:31:04.800 --> 1:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Show though Ed Henry was hosting. I like Ed. I

1:31:07.320 --> 1:31:09.519
<v Speaker 1>think Ed always does, as he's a good he's a

1:31:09.520 --> 1:31:13.479
<v Speaker 1>good TV TV host in general. But he let us

1:31:13.479 --> 1:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he let us get after it a little bit. You know,

1:31:15.160 --> 1:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he let the exchange get pretty feisty, and it should

1:31:18.960 --> 1:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>because I mean I think that this guy, I forget

1:31:21.240 --> 1:31:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it was he was some former some former deputy assistant

1:31:25.760 --> 1:31:28.519
<v Speaker 1>attorney general or something under Obama. He's some Democrat lawyer.

1:31:29.040 --> 1:31:32.559
<v Speaker 1>And his position get ready for this, was that Muller

1:31:32.720 --> 1:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was quote too fair. That's what he said, too fair

1:31:36.800 --> 1:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to Trump in this whole process, which you know, if

1:31:39.680 --> 1:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be just absolutely delusional, then I do

1:31:43.320 --> 1:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>think that a bit of derision is is called for.

1:31:47.520 --> 1:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I was professional, of course, but I mean this guy,

1:31:49.840 --> 1:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this guy was just was just nuts. I mean he

1:31:51.720 --> 1:31:54.599
<v Speaker 1>also said that he might try to make some point

1:31:54.640 --> 1:31:57.439
<v Speaker 1>about how they don't prove that that the decision about

1:31:57.840 --> 1:32:00.719
<v Speaker 1>not exonerating is made every day, it's just made public.

1:32:00.760 --> 1:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Said no, that's that's an obtuse way of looking at this,

1:32:04.360 --> 1:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they either bring charges or they don't. They don't say, well,

1:32:07.040 --> 1:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we could have brought charges, but we didn't bring charges,

1:32:09.479 --> 1:32:11.799
<v Speaker 1>which is what Mueller did. That is not what happens

1:32:11.840 --> 1:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in legal cases. That is not what happens in our

1:32:14.280 --> 1:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>legal system. And that is what Mueller came up with here,

1:32:17.560 --> 1:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because as we've been discussing, this was just all all along,

1:32:21.320 --> 1:32:24.599
<v Speaker 1>this was about impeachment. That's what this was. That's what

1:32:24.680 --> 1:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was going on. Kristen, right, I know you support Snippy,

1:32:30.400 --> 1:32:34.439
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like it's kind of hard to navigate. Well, Kristen,

1:32:34.479 --> 1:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll go back and check out snippy dot com, make

1:32:36.280 --> 1:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sure that they've got all the updates they need, and

1:32:39.200 --> 1:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I will see what you're what you're telling me here.

1:32:41.680 --> 1:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll get a sense as to how we we always

1:32:43.840 --> 1:32:45.639
<v Speaker 1>want to update the products and do the best we can.

1:32:46.520 --> 1:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Sandra writes. Have been listening since Real News with Amy Holmes,

1:32:51.479 --> 1:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>since your recent iHeart Sight New Look. I'm not able

1:32:53.840 --> 1:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to listen via iHeart just get a spinning icon that

1:32:56.680 --> 1:32:58.559
<v Speaker 1>never turns into the arrow, so I have to listen

1:32:58.640 --> 1:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>via iTunes on my phone. Well, Sanda, first of all,

1:33:01.040 --> 1:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for continuing to listen. I'm sorry

1:33:03.960 --> 1:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're putting some obstacles in your way. That is

1:33:06.960 --> 1:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly not our intention, and you know we're trying to

1:33:09.640 --> 1:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>always update our technology and do everything we can to

1:33:12.240 --> 1:33:16.599
<v Speaker 1>make it a seamless and easy experience for you to listen.

1:33:17.240 --> 1:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So please stay with us on this and we'll try

1:33:20.120 --> 1:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to get it fixed on Bucksexton dot com so you'll

1:33:22.439 --> 1:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to listen there. John Shields high fan since

1:33:27.400 --> 1:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the Real News day as well. I love I love

1:33:29.200 --> 1:33:31.519
<v Speaker 1>you folks who have been with me now for I

1:33:31.600 --> 1:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>started Real News in twenty twelve, I think, so we're

1:33:35.400 --> 1:33:40.679
<v Speaker 1>going on now seven years. You've been spending time listening

1:33:40.760 --> 1:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, consuming the content I put out there. It

1:33:44.400 --> 1:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>really it does mean a lot, and I think you

1:33:46.400 --> 1:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>all who listened to the show know that I really

1:33:48.320 --> 1:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>honestly appreciate it. It's entirely possible, John, right to the

1:33:52.280 --> 1:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>left believes they can use impeachment as a political tool

1:33:55.560 --> 1:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to keep Trump from winning in twenty twenty. Think of

1:33:58.400 --> 1:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the campaign ads President Trump peached by the Senate, then

1:34:01.320 --> 1:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they can say how can you vote for a man

1:34:02.880 --> 1:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>who was impeached again? If they believe it will help them,

1:34:06.040 --> 1:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they will use it. Honestly, what else do

1:34:09.160 --> 1:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they have? Commie bear lives? Yeah, John, I think this

1:34:13.200 --> 1:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is what you're describing is the calculation that the Democrats

1:34:16.800 --> 1:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are making, which is that there will be enough of

1:34:21.000 --> 1:34:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a boost for them and it's worthwhile enough for them

1:34:24.920 --> 1:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to trash Trump through the impeachment process that it does

1:34:27.880 --> 1:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>not matter that there will also be an attendant backlash

1:34:31.600 --> 1:34:35.439
<v Speaker 1>and mobilization of the pro Trump base. You know, remember

1:34:35.439 --> 1:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>they're they're fighting over We're fighting over a few million

1:34:40.040 --> 1:34:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and really more likely a few hundred thousand votes when

1:34:44.040 --> 1:34:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it all comes down to it in twenty twenty, and

1:34:48.320 --> 1:34:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that will be the difference. And the mobilization and turn

1:34:51.280 --> 1:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the base obviously plays a part in this too.

1:34:53.240 --> 1:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But and if you're looking at the undecided and places

1:34:56.160 --> 1:35:00.040
<v Speaker 1>like Ohio and Florida, what do the Democrats think be

1:35:00.040 --> 1:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>able to run against an impeach president will mean for them?

1:35:03.040 --> 1:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And if they come away from it thinking well, this

1:35:05.040 --> 1:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>will be major benefit, they'll do it. And I think

1:35:08.920 --> 1:35:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they will do it. I think we are. I think

1:35:11.280 --> 1:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we are heading to impeachment. I really do. I believe

1:35:13.320 --> 1:35:17.519
<v Speaker 1>that that is going to happen. Brandy and Rights Hey

1:35:17.520 --> 1:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Buck Podcast listener, I understand that podcasts have the platforms

1:35:22.080 --> 1:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have the right to place their ads in the show.

1:35:24.400 --> 1:35:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the producers that load your show can work the

1:35:26.520 --> 1:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>platforms as to the time placement of their ads. There

1:35:30.720 --> 1:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>are breaks that could be utilized so we're not interrupted

1:35:32.800 --> 1:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of important parts of the show. You know, Brandon,

1:35:35.800 --> 1:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to a lot of people have been

1:35:38.400 --> 1:35:41.559
<v Speaker 1>writing it about this, and I'm just gonna have to

1:35:41.600 --> 1:35:43.439
<v Speaker 1>dive into this and figure out how to make this

1:35:43.600 --> 1:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the podcast experience a more seamless one. It is going

1:35:46.960 --> 1:35:49.479
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Trust me, this is a priority. We have

1:35:49.560 --> 1:35:51.479
<v Speaker 1>so many of you who are listening to this show

1:35:51.479 --> 1:35:56.559
<v Speaker 1>now via podcast. It's really in terms of size, it's

1:35:56.720 --> 1:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to get close to rivaling the overall radio show.

1:36:00.000 --> 1:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna do more and more here to make

1:36:03.760 --> 1:36:06.679
<v Speaker 1>sure that We're gonna have to have ads in the podcast,

1:36:06.760 --> 1:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously because got to keep the lights on in the

1:36:08.360 --> 1:36:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Freedom Hunt, but we will make it so that it's

1:36:11.560 --> 1:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>not as as jarring and experience. Kathy Rides, please bring

1:36:15.960 --> 1:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>back commy bear action movie quote is fine for those

1:36:19.439 --> 1:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that enjoy it, but I honestly believe that most of

1:36:21.200 --> 1:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>us would enjoy Commy Bear even more, also hoping you'll

1:36:24.000 --> 1:36:26.639
<v Speaker 1>have more time for History Deep Dives. Thanks kath From Kathy.

1:36:27.000 --> 1:36:29.519
<v Speaker 1>All right, Kathy the History Deep Dives. That's that will.

1:36:29.880 --> 1:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I know I've said it before, but I was just

1:36:31.960 --> 1:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this past year my schedule didn't allow for it. I

1:36:34.080 --> 1:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the time to do the research and the

1:36:36.280 --> 1:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>reading and everything, and Commy beart. I'm happy to bring

1:36:39.120 --> 1:36:41.559
<v Speaker 1>it back. It's just to get in the mindset of

1:36:41.640 --> 1:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>creating a character like that for a show like this.

1:36:44.040 --> 1:36:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Unless people really really love it, it's just a lot

1:36:46.479 --> 1:36:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of It takes a lot of time and thought to

1:36:49.760 --> 1:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>make it work. Well. Even a minute or two of

1:36:52.960 --> 1:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Commy Bear takes more time than a standard, you know,

1:36:56.920 --> 1:36:59.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minute long radio monologue to open the show in

1:36:59.360 --> 1:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of the Prepper ration, just because writing and the

1:37:02.280 --> 1:37:08.519
<v Speaker 1>writing and the voice of a throwback Soviet teddy bear

1:37:08.640 --> 1:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that drinks vodka but also likes American pop culture and

1:37:12.160 --> 1:37:15.559
<v Speaker 1>carries a Kalashnikoff is not an easy thing to do.

1:37:15.640 --> 1:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'm so glad, Kathie you like him, and I do.

1:37:18.960 --> 1:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get back to some of the

1:37:20.439 --> 1:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>team buck roots here, and that means Kamy Bear and

1:37:23.160 --> 1:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the history stuff. And I you your thoughts

1:37:26.000 --> 1:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>are very much appreciated on this Josh right. I'm excited

1:37:30.720 --> 1:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to see you leave Rising and focus more on buck

1:37:32.760 --> 1:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>centered projects. I listened to you via podcast while at

1:37:36.120 --> 1:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>work daily. It's my favorite part of my work day.

1:37:38.479 --> 1:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I hope when you say you're going digital you mean

1:37:40.200 --> 1:37:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Daily WY or Blaze TV, whatever it is. Your show

1:37:42.400 --> 1:37:44.320
<v Speaker 1>is the best take on the news each day. So

1:37:44.400 --> 1:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>keep it up and shields high. Josh, thanks so much.

1:37:47.160 --> 1:37:51.240
<v Speaker 1>That's really encouraging. And yes, there's going to be here.

1:37:51.280 --> 1:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you guys a little more of a preview.

1:37:52.800 --> 1:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm leaving the Hill next week, and I thank

1:37:54.760 --> 1:37:58.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody at the Hill for their for their time and

1:37:59.760 --> 1:38:03.360
<v Speaker 1>being colleagues of mind and all their hard work. But

1:38:03.400 --> 1:38:05.439
<v Speaker 1>we are. What we're going to end up doing is

1:38:06.160 --> 1:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we are going to start streaming this radio show. I

1:38:09.040 --> 1:38:11.479
<v Speaker 1>can't give you more details than that, but the radio

1:38:11.520 --> 1:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>show is going to be video streamed. We're going to

1:38:14.400 --> 1:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>have a seamless viewing experience. We're also going to probably

1:38:19.720 --> 1:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>create some either for the show or in addition to

1:38:22.920 --> 1:38:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the show, a kind of long, long format sty'll sit

1:38:26.360 --> 1:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>down interview that I'll do with people and we'll be

1:38:30.200 --> 1:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>able to video that. So there's we are. We are

1:38:33.400 --> 1:38:35.800
<v Speaker 1>launching deep into the digital era, but of course going

1:38:35.840 --> 1:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to continue with the radio show and provide great content

1:38:40.240 --> 1:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>as it is right now for all of our affiliates

1:38:42.560 --> 1:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>across the country. But we're just expanding. We're expanding on

1:38:44.920 --> 1:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the show, giving more options, more ways to watch and listen.

1:38:48.680 --> 1:38:56.639
<v Speaker 1>So that is definitely happening. Tommy. Right, um, try Relief Factor.

1:38:56.840 --> 1:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I've had a torn a rotator cuff than years of Versailles.

1:39:00.000 --> 1:39:03.479
<v Speaker 1>It's in the shoulder and surrounding tendons. First week of

1:39:03.520 --> 1:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Relief Factor, the pain is gone. My neck moves and

1:39:06.280 --> 1:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>pops like it should. Trust me. I'm a fat guy.

1:39:09.240 --> 1:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Relief Factor for the ankle and Cafe Sevilla Sevilla when

1:39:13.240 --> 1:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you go to San Diego next time. Well, thank you, Tommy,

1:39:16.080 --> 1:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad Relief Factor work for you. We should

1:39:17.840 --> 1:39:19.639
<v Speaker 1>get them as a sponsor on the show. That would

1:39:19.640 --> 1:39:22.519
<v Speaker 1>be great working on it. So there we have it.

1:39:25.000 --> 1:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Andre's rights, Hi and sorry, I've been busy. Only now

1:39:29.320 --> 1:39:32.799
<v Speaker 1>heard you're disconnecting from Rising. That's great. You've an amazing

1:39:32.840 --> 1:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>mind that I never liked that you were part of rising.

1:39:34.840 --> 1:39:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't allow to allow you to demonstrate your

1:39:37.400 --> 1:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>passion respectfully, lawyer listener of Unfiltered Buck andres Well andres

1:39:41.960 --> 1:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>That's really what that was what caused this conscious uncoupling.

1:39:45.560 --> 1:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>If you will, I'm I've just I need to do

1:39:48.920 --> 1:39:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what I do and be me and say what I

1:39:50.360 --> 1:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>need to say and not have to worry about the

1:39:53.200 --> 1:39:57.240
<v Speaker 1>decorum of the room and deal with the libs who

1:39:57.320 --> 1:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>surround me at any given time. You're going into an

1:40:00.840 --> 1:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>era of for those of you who like this show

1:40:03.400 --> 1:40:08.599
<v Speaker 1>of additional platforms and totally unfiltered Buck, We're going truly

1:40:08.640 --> 1:40:11.240
<v Speaker 1>buck wild. That's what's going to happen. That's why I'm

1:40:11.280 --> 1:40:14.439
<v Speaker 1>making the decision I'm making. I'm going to go all

1:40:14.520 --> 1:40:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in in time for the reelection of Donald Trump, in

1:40:18.800 --> 1:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>time for this bruising political cycle. I am not going

1:40:23.240 --> 1:40:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to have any Oh but can you be I'm not

1:40:25.640 --> 1:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to CNN, never going back there, uh, you know,

1:40:28.880 --> 1:40:30.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to it, And I'm not going to be

1:40:30.280 --> 1:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>working at the Hill anymore. It's just going to be

1:40:31.960 --> 1:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Buck Radio, writing Fox additional projects. That's where we're heading.

1:40:36.760 --> 1:40:38.679
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be no more, no more of this

1:40:39.960 --> 1:40:43.720
<v Speaker 1>forced politeness when it comes to my content. That never

1:40:43.760 --> 1:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>happens on radio, obviously, but it was the case. It was.

1:40:46.560 --> 1:40:48.479
<v Speaker 1>That was the deal. I mean, that was the agreement

1:40:48.520 --> 1:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>going into the hill, was that we were going to

1:40:50.280 --> 1:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>be cordial to the other side. And I did it

1:40:53.120 --> 1:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for a year. I think I did it very well

1:40:55.040 --> 1:40:59.519
<v Speaker 1>under the circumstances. Buck's not being polite anymore. It's time

1:40:59.560 --> 1:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to stop stop being polite and start being real. Remember

1:41:02.400 --> 1:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that the real news. That's basically what I'm gonna be doing.

1:41:05.160 --> 1:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, we got some more roll call in a

1:41:06.920 --> 1:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>sex there right there. All right, we got our double

1:41:09.200 --> 1:41:11.800
<v Speaker 1>roll call because it's Friday. Man, it's beautiful here in DC.

1:41:11.960 --> 1:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited to my little bro Keats. He is.

1:41:15.800 --> 1:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>It's cool name right named for the the romance poet,

1:41:23.120 --> 1:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>mister Keats. But he's here hanging out. So I've got

1:41:27.960 --> 1:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>my little bro in town. We're gonna be rocking out

1:41:30.000 --> 1:41:32.519
<v Speaker 1>doing bro things, and I'm excited about that. We got

1:41:32.520 --> 1:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>beautiful weather. I hope you have lovely weather wherever you are,

1:41:35.680 --> 1:41:39.599
<v Speaker 1>and you're listening to this podcast, you're making good choices

1:41:39.640 --> 1:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in life in general. Zach writes, My diet an exercise

1:41:44.520 --> 1:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>regime includes no snacking after dinner and fifteen to twenty

1:41:48.240 --> 1:41:50.439
<v Speaker 1>minutes of yoga three times a week on thirty seven.

1:41:50.520 --> 1:41:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I also don't want to get hurt. Of course, I

1:41:52.800 --> 1:41:54.760
<v Speaker 1>think I did pull something when I first started yoga.

1:41:54.840 --> 1:41:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Shields high. Well, Zach, thank you for sharing. Appreciate it, buddy.

1:41:58.520 --> 1:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not somebody who has ever been able to take

1:42:00.920 --> 1:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to yoga. I just I don't. I don't enjoy it.

1:42:04.080 --> 1:42:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it. It's not it's just not for me.

1:42:06.920 --> 1:42:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I've tried. I've tried, but it's not for me. Chad writes, Buck,

1:42:11.520 --> 1:42:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a joy watching you destroy and embarrass Harry

1:42:13.840 --> 1:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Littman on Fox. He is delusional. Well, Chad, I appreciate

1:42:17.840 --> 1:42:21.519
<v Speaker 1>your support, and I would just say that, yeah, Harry,

1:42:22.000 --> 1:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you wanted to disagree, if he wants

1:42:23.960 --> 1:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to disagree with me on a here, that's fine. But

1:42:25.400 --> 1:42:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to say things like I don't think Buck read it,

1:42:27.520 --> 1:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or it's like, dude, you're just now you're just clowning yourself,

1:42:30.600 --> 1:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and and that's such a that's that's such a a

1:42:34.360 --> 1:42:37.240
<v Speaker 1>non argument thing to say, that's such a non debate.

1:42:37.280 --> 1:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh you know, well, I don't even think you've I

1:42:38.600 --> 1:42:40.639
<v Speaker 1>don't even think you've read the resolution. It's like, shut up, dude,

1:42:40.640 --> 1:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you're getting your butt kicked, you know, just just get

1:42:42.400 --> 1:42:44.559
<v Speaker 1>your butt kicked. But do it with dignity, you know,

1:42:44.600 --> 1:42:47.439
<v Speaker 1>don't don't start trying to throw some low blows or something.

1:42:47.560 --> 1:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just embarrassing himself. It's embarrassing himself. And

1:42:50.760 --> 1:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>then to say that that Muller is being too kind

1:42:54.400 --> 1:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to Trump, this is These are like the rantings of

1:42:56.400 --> 1:42:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a crazy person, and it's shocking. This guy was employed

1:42:59.120 --> 1:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>by the DJ. It's point. But as I've said to

1:43:01.000 --> 1:43:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you many times, the government is full of not even mediocrity,

1:43:04.920 --> 1:43:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it's really full of subpar, subpar workers and minds. Now,

1:43:08.479 --> 1:43:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying full as in everyone. I'm just saying

1:43:10.640 --> 1:43:15.599
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty. There's no shortage of dumb asses that work

1:43:15.640 --> 1:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for the government. I'll just say it. It's true. Eric, right,

1:43:21.200 --> 1:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>mister buck, glad you're back from China. Say it in

1:43:25.400 --> 1:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump's style, safe and sound. I live in Georgia, not

1:43:28.360 --> 1:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that it matters, but listening to Disney say what they've

1:43:30.160 --> 1:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>said makes my head hurt. Wouldn't supporting abortion be killing

1:43:33.160 --> 1:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>your customers? It's Disney kids are supposed to be their

1:43:36.320 --> 1:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>prime marketing target. Am I wrong? Here? Shields way high sir, Now, Eric,

1:43:40.920 --> 1:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you would think that a great American brand like Disney

1:43:43.200 --> 1:43:45.720
<v Speaker 1>would know enough to stay out of this kind of

1:43:45.720 --> 1:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>a political scrum. But no, they're they're taking the corporate

1:43:49.800 --> 1:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>America is because they know that you get punished if

1:43:54.040 --> 1:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you aren't on the left. They just they accept that reality.

1:43:58.640 --> 1:44:00.040
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of leftists that run the

1:44:00.160 --> 1:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>big corporations, and we we have this double standard. Leftists

1:44:03.960 --> 1:44:06.720
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of noise, they boycott, and they get

1:44:06.800 --> 1:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>their way in corporate America, and conservatives we just take it.

1:44:10.280 --> 1:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>We just take it on the chin all the time.

1:44:13.160 --> 1:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's what's going on. It's annoying. Here we go

1:44:18.240 --> 1:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Roderid's buck. If you have Enemy of Choice t shirts made,

1:44:20.960 --> 1:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I would like one as well. Please well, Roger Um,

1:44:24.680 --> 1:44:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, if we could make like a cool

1:44:27.280 --> 1:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>logo for it so people know what we're talking about

1:44:29.160 --> 1:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>with enemy of Choice, because just saying enemy of choice

1:44:31.200 --> 1:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>might be a little too vague. But I hear you minute.

1:44:33.200 --> 1:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Kayla writes, great show, and I'm

1:44:37.120 --> 1:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>glad you're done with the Hill. I usually agree with you.

1:44:39.040 --> 1:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But oh my god, I've been listening to you long

1:44:41.280 --> 1:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>enough to get your whole get off my lawn opinions.

1:44:43.200 --> 1:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>But I have to disagree with your comments about the

1:44:44.840 --> 1:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>uber rider feedback. The uber thing is fine, but you're

1:44:47.360 --> 1:44:53.360
<v Speaker 1>excitement of the application sounds like China's Good Citizen ratings. No, no, Kayla,

1:44:53.400 --> 1:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I disagree. It's this is this is the free market working,

1:44:57.160 --> 1:45:00.599
<v Speaker 1>this is the this is yelp for for both sides

1:45:00.640 --> 1:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of the equation. I don't see why that's a problem

1:45:03.439 --> 1:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>because I because you know, it just makes it just

1:45:06.000 --> 1:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>incentivizes people to be better in their business dealings, you

1:45:10.840 --> 1:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Look, I mean social media Facebook.

1:45:13.240 --> 1:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>People can trash you on Facebook too, right, So but

1:45:16.080 --> 1:45:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you look a lot of people that have written and

1:45:18.000 --> 1:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. So maybe I'm missing something here. We'll

1:45:20.960 --> 1:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>see about that. But Kayla, thanks so much for writing in,

1:45:24.760 --> 1:45:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and I have to say that the show is now

1:45:27.760 --> 1:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>coming to a close. Have a great weekend, everybody. I

1:45:30.080 --> 1:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you Monday. She'll tie