WEBVTT - SpaceX Exceeds Revenue Estimates in First Earnings Since IPO

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Weekdaily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>today's complex economy, plus global business finance and tech news

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast with

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 2>It shares a SpaceX kind of bouncing around, but muted

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 2>in the after hours, barely up by about half a

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 2>percent right now. The company out with its first report

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>as a publicly traded company. Revenue exceeded Wall Streets expectations,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>reported seven point eight billion dollars the company reporter and

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>operating loss though of one point twenty six billion dollars

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 2>from its AI business. That's better than the consensus expectation.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Shares a plunge since that IPO raising more than a

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars in market value from their peak. I think

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 2>we'll hear a lot more on the coll when it

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>starts a little later.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 3>One can certainly hope. All right, let's get to it

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>with our team. We've got a great team to kind

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 3>of go through the numbers and the results, and we're

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>going to continue to kind of track as we get

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 3>into the call. Man Deep Seeing is with us right

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 3>here in studio in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio is

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence, Global head of Technology Research. And out there

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 3>in our San Francisco news bureaus, of course, our own

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>ed Ludlow host, a Bloomberg Tech ed. Let me just

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 3>kick it off with you. What jumps out here? I

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 3>know you're also on the live blog, but you know,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 3>investors just kind of reading through right now. The stock

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>is down just about one percent here.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean overall revenue and sales came in above consensus.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 4>But you go into this saying this was the first

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 4>quarterly earnings for SpaceX since they became a public company,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 4>and it will be their first earning school and there

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 4>was a lot of acceptance that the consensus numbers out there.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 4>There was a bit of skepticism, right, they're a bit

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 4>squishy because we don't have a whole lot of contemporaneous data.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 4>But it's really interesting. You know that the status quo

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 4>is still that starlink is the is the driver on

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 4>the top line and also sort of the cash cow.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 4>But they really improve the economics of this business in

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 4>the quarter of Yes, it's a rocket company, but renting

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 4>compute capacity to other technology companies, you know that has

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 4>proved to be a strong business for them. There's a

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of discussion in that in what's a very limited

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:20.559
<v Speaker 4>earnings release.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 5>Many I've I want to bring you in here.

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 2>If you were to look at the three different segments

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>through reportable segments, ED mentioned the cash cow and in

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 2>terms of where the revenue is still coming from in

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 2>terms of growth, in your view, which segment is the

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>most important.

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they reported a backlog number of forty seven

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 6>point five billion.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.399
<v Speaker 7>That tells you most of the backlog.

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 6>Is likely coming from AI and what is not captured

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 6>in this print is the Entropic and Google deals.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Said, Okay, that's what I was going to ask you.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 2>When you say a backlog that means companies like Anthropic

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and Google coming to XAI part of space X and

0:02:59.080 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>renting compute.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 6>That's right, yes, and in fact we know some of

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 6>the deal terms. Entropic will be paying SpaceX about one

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 6>point two five billion dollars a month, so next quarter

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 6>when they report, there will be at least three point

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 6>seventy five billion dollars from Entropic and another probably two

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 6>billion plus from Google. When they report so six billion

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 6>bump just from these two deals.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 3>S x quarter, that sounds pretty impressive.

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 6>So that's why the backlog number is very important because

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 6>in that forty seven billion dollars is that Entropic deal

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 6>and the Google deal and there's one more company, I think, Reflection.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>And what can XAI offer these firms that Mandeep mentioned

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>that like a Google Cloud, a Microsoft Azure and AWS

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>or even a Neocloud can.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Offer space that they're not currently using.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 5>So it is it's a commodity little bit.

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>So like in Tennessee, Xai now space Xai set up

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 4>a number of data centers in very quick order, Colossus one,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 4>Colossus two, and Colossus three. And what was explained to

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 4>me in great detail by sources is that once they

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 4>had built all of them, they were like, okay, how

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 4>do we use this ourselves? And they realized that in

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Colossus one, which is a big tin Can data center,

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 4>they had multiple generations of Nvidia GPUs all mixed together.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Some were Hopper generation, some were black Wells, some were

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 4>even as old as the A one hundred generation, and

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 4>so they decided the best use of that capacity was

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 4>to rent it out with attractive economics for those renting

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 4>it at a premium. Many would say, I think, Mandy,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 4>it's been over that really well in the past, and

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 4>for them, like they run it really operationally efficiently, it

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 4>can be a high margin business. But it was all

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 4>born out of the fact that for their own models

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 4>and running them, not just training later generation models, they

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 4>couldn't work out how to use that capacity for themselves

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 4>to best effect.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the worries that we've had man deep

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>about this company and feeling like we didn't know some things.

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Should investors, I know, we never give investment advice, but

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>feel all right, we're getting more information about the business

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>that we can kind of figure out and cross with

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of where this company's going. The valuation. It means

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the valuation is still a little crazy, right.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 5>It is crazy.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 6>But what I think may work in their favor is

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 6>this is a company that will likely have accelerating top

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 6>line growth at least for the next three or four

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 6>quarters with margin improvement, and that is a type of

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 6>story that investors typically like, I mean, we just saw

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 6>what Palanteer did today, you know, with their quarter partly

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 6>because of that accelerating top line growth, and there is

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 6>no doubt in my mind, given that forty seven point

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 6>five billion dollar backlog number, SpaceX will have accelerating top

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 6>line growth at least for the next three quarters.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 2>We're speaking with Man deep saying our Bloomberg Intelligence global

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 2>head of Technology Research. Also with us Ed Ludlow out

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>there in San Francisco. He's the host of Bloomberg Tech.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I want to remind everybody if you have questions about

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX's earnings, the company's report, send us a question Bloomberg

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash ask Radio. That's Bloomberg dot com slash

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Ask Radio. It's only for Bloomberg dot com subscribers. You

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 2>can submit questions for us or for any of our

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>guests this afternoon.

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm just looking at you know, you pull

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>up SpaceX, do the ticker. Do you know CNBN SpaceX's

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 3>business growing across all three segments. SpaceX exceeds revenue estimates

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 3>in the first quarter, first earning since IPO. You know,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX's first earnings offer a chance to reverse the stocks

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 3>plunge that was earlier in the day. Top of mind

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 3>you and come on back in because I'm just thinking

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 3>how much of what we we didn't know? So this

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 3>is kind of our first real picture of a lot

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 3>of what the business is about. There are speculations, certainly

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>coming off the IPO, and there is numbers, and there

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 3>were estimates, but how much of this is like, oh, okay,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 3>so this is the business at least now?

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Yeah.

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 4>So what you can do is you can compare with

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 4>the backward looking data we have from the IPO perspectus,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 4>the S one and the amended versions of it, just

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 4>the two Aikey points, because I think it's really interesting

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 4>to get Mandiv's take on this is AI is probably

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 4>inflecting a little bit faster than the street expected. So

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 4>the AI revenues are two point five six billion dollars, right,

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 4>compare that to the first quarter, which is data we

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 4>got in the perspectives about eight hundred million, So it's

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 4>quite a jump sequentially quartered a quarter. And then on

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 4>an adjusted ebit DAR basis, which you know, let man

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>deep into this one because I know how the street

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 4>feels on adjusted ebit DAR, but AI adjusted ebit dar

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 4>did term positive AI specifically, and so like right now,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 4>with the knowledge that all of these other business lines

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 4>are futuristic orbital data center, the space economy, and enterprise AI.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 4>What they have I've done is move pretty quickly on

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 4>the arm structure business, and you know, Mandy's outlined the

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 4>deals that they did to get there.

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's just reset here a little bit, because we're

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>seeing shares of SpaceX down about six and a half

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>percent after the company reported results. Starlink growth continues to

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>be a revenue driver, shares are slumping those investors digest this, Mandy,

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>what's the sort of I don't know, from a guidance perspective,

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the expectations about what we'll hear on the call that's

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 2>different from what's in the press release. Again, first time

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 2>we've had a call for this company, so we can

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of only go with what Tesla has done in

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the past. But what do we expect in terms of guidance.

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean, when I look at this Starlink number, to me,

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 6>that's slightly misconsensus in terms of number of subscribers. And

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 6>given we talk about how that's the cash cow that's

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 6>funding you know, the other businesses, that is probably the

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 6>number one question that I feel they're going to get

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 6>on the earnings call, but along with that backlog, which

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 6>I think will help them in the quarters upcoming quarters.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 6>But clearly that Starlink business was slightly below consensus.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned that we have Bloomberg dot com slash Ask

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Radio as a way for our subscribers to get in

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 2>touch with us and ask questions not just to us,

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>but to Ed and Mandeep in all of our guests

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX's a question about SpaceX coming in right now, guys.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Sanjay out in Irvine, California writes that the fact that

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX's valuation is already high, does that make today's earnings

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>more or less in line with the high expectations. I

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>want to send that one over to Mandeep. First valuations question.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>We talked with Max Chafkin earlier about the so called

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Elon premium and the idea that Tesla is valued more

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 2>than any other carmaker despite the fact that, you know,

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in terms of revenue, it doesn't even crack.

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 5>The top ten.

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Valuation question about SpaceX, what do you make of it?

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean at one point five trillion, you know,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 6>for a company of SpaceX size, there is a lot

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 6>embedded in that number in terms of you know, growth,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 6>expectations and how investors see margins improving. So that's why,

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, even though I feel like they will do

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 6>very well over the next three quarters in terms of

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 6>top line driven by AI, but at this valuation, and

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, it hypeered at even a higher valuation. So

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 6>it's always hard to keep up with the expectations, and

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 6>unless you come out and show positive surprises the way

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 6>Nvidia has done that constant consistently, I think it will

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 6>be hard for SpaceX just to kind of keep this multiple.

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 6>So they really have to grow into that multiple, which

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 6>I think they should be able to given the backlog

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 6>number we are seeing. I mean, all the cloud companies

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 6>had backlogs of four hundred billion dollars plus you know

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 6>when they reported, and they had an excellent quarter, all

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 6>of them, you know, Google, Amma, On, and Microsoft. So

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 6>from that perspective, SpaceX reporting a forty seven point five

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.599
<v Speaker 6>billion dollar back long. If they keep growing that I

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 6>think will be positive for that SpaceX story.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 3>I also want to mention we're getting some additional headline

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX second quarter AI segment capex a fifteen point eighty

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>three billion versus an estimate on the street of thirteen

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 3>point zero nine billion. I know ed you were on

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 3>a live blog like looking for more insight when it

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 3>comes to Capex.

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 4>No, I think they have positioned this in the CFO

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 4>commentary about having a really strong liquidity position. Right, they

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 4>have the proceeds of the IPO and then they immediately

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 4>went to the corporate debt market and so they have

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 4>one hundred billion dollars to play with. But you again

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 4>can go back to the prospectus on how capital expenditures

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 4>were tracking in the first half of this year. The

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 4>consensus number, again there's a note of caution on all

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 4>the consensus numbers because this is their first ever quarterly

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 4>earnings as a public company. The expectation was they spend

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 4>about forty five forty six billion dollars this year. A

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of that's still to come right this, you know,

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 4>it's it's it's really key information because across those nascent

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 4>business lines starships as a launch system, orbital data center,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 4>and then the business of like actually selling AIS the

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 4>software at scale, it's still going to take a lot

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 4>of spending.

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>And is this is this report, are we getting the information?

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of an inside baseball question, but is the

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>information coming at a cadence that's on par with what

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>we get from Tesla.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 4>No, so this I find this really interesting. So, you know,

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Tesla presents a pretty detailed shareholder deck each quarter, and

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 4>it is multiple pages long. It has a lot of information,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 4>for example, the headwinds and tailwinds to the top and

0:12:55.440 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 4>bottom line, the macro impacts, they felt, any political impacts,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 4>their sort of forward looking strategy as it relates to

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 4>software in different markets, et cetera. This is a very

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 4>modest release where there's zero commentary from Elon mask who's

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 4>the CEO of SpaceX. There's zero commentary from Gwyn Shotwell,

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 4>who's the president in COO and de facto runs the company,

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 4>just the CFO commentary from Brett Johnson. And it's you know,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 4>it's very modest, so there's a lot still to learn.

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's not the same level of detail. There

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 4>are fair questions like will Elon Musk be on the

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 4>earnings call? You know, we just we have no definitive

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 4>answer in that one assumes, so what kind of role

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 4>did Gwyn Shotwell and Brett Johnson play on the earning

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 4>scoore are like, are they the stars of the show

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 4>or is it like Tesla, where Elon's still the star

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 4>of the show. We just don't know, and that's kind

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 4>of fun.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 3>So do we have an idea man deep of how

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>much cash they're burning through?

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they are investing fifteen billion plus in capex

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 6>every quarter and they're not generating any free cash flow

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 6>as of now. I mean, the startling business is the

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 6>only one that seems to be generating free cash flow

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 6>and that seems to have misconsensus. So from that perspective,

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they have this challenge in terms of meeting

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 6>expectations around free cash flow, unlike the hyperscalers that clearly

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 6>have strong balance sheets to invest in capex. So from

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 6>that perspective, I feel there is a ceiling to how

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 6>much higher they can go in terms of capex increases.

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 6>I do think they will raise the capex, but even

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 6>at sixty billion dollars rund rate, how high can they

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 6>go given they don't have the balance sheet and the

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 6>free cash flow that the other hyperscalers.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Have ed Come on in, you have a.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Question, Yeah, so I have a question with I rely

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 4>on Mandeep's expertise and he's modeling. So in the first

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 4>half of the year, SpaceX about three point five billion

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 4>dollars operating cash flow, but the capital expenditures for the

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 4>first half of the year were like twenty nine billion dollars.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 4>So you just do the operating cash flow minus the

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 4>capex and that gives you a sort of an approximation

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 4>on the negative free cash flow right overall? Am I

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 4>doing the math right on that?

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 5>That's right? Yeah?

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 4>So I see again, like this is me doing math

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 4>in my head and phone my high school teachers. It

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 4>weren't my strong point, but I see, let's say, let's

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 4>say twenty five billion dollars of negative free cash flow

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 4>and aggregate across those businesses in the first half.

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 6>Look, I think what you will see is the cloud

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 6>rental business is going to be a lot better margins.

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 6>So that's the part that you know when you do

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 6>the first half calculations and analyze it, you you're expecting,

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 6>maybe you know there will be negative fifty billion dollars

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 6>for the full year, But my guess is that cloud

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 6>rental business is going to be positive in terms of

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 6>the margin profile. Now, it's not going to be as

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 6>high as a hyperscalers. So Hyperscalers as we have seen

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 6>this quarter, they have mid thirty percent margins when it

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 6>comes to their cloud businesses. In the case of SpaceX,

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 6>even in a best case scenario, that AI segment would

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 6>have you know, low to mid teens margins, but at

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 6>least it's positive. So from that perspective, if you see

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 6>AI business at the end of the year around a

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 6>twenty five billion dollar run rate with low to mid

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 6>teens margins, then it will offset some of that negative

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty five billion dollar you know, burned that you've seen

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 6>for the first half. And that's where I think there's

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 6>a good story to tell in terms of margin improvement

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 6>driven by that cloud rental business.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 2>up after this.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>We were listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast.

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>during Listen on Apple Karplay and Android Otto with the

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Wayfair investors man are pushing this stock up a big

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 3>time today, shares surging thirty one percent as we speak

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 3>after the home furnishing retailer set sales at the US

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 3>grew at their fastest clip since twenty twenty one, held

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 3>by a growing number of brick and mortar stores, which

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 3>has been a new initiative for them over the last

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 3>few years and growing and also sales growing, helped out

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 3>by demand for some of its higher end brands.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the stock ops seventeen percent your day earlier today

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 2>as much as thirty two percent intra day highs the

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 2>most going back to April of twenty twenty some perspective,

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the stock is still down Carol sixty six percent from

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 2>that peak that was back in March of twenty twenty one,

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 2>but today soaring higher.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, big time. So we're delighted to have back with us.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Joining us once again, Kate Olliver. She's the chief financial

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 3>officer and chief administrative officer. We like to remind everybody

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 3>that Kate oversees finance, legal talent, real estate, corporate affairs

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 3>at Wayfairs. She has a full plate, so delighted once

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 3>again to find some time for us. She's in Boston

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 3>where the company's bossed. Kate, good to have you here.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Congratulations Killer quarter. Thank you talk to us about the momentum.

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, I think you just said it right.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 8>It's it's nice momentum. Over many quarters now, and so

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 8>I think what you're seeing is really the sort of

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 8>multitude of initiatives that we've laid out the consistency of

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 8>that playthrough and you know, building momentum there and that

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 8>reaction is a result of those factors. So you know

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 8>that US revenue growth of nearly nine percent, the highest

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 8>in the post COVID period, the flow through to really

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 8>solid contribution margin, high EBITDA margin, and then you know,

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 8>best free cash flow that we've had since Q two,

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty, and so all of the things that we

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 8>have been working on to drive and improve that customer

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 8>experience continue to come together help us gain share, and

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 8>we're flowing that through quite nicely.

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Who are the customers who are buying right now? Because

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>when you hear a superlative like you know, most since

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>post pandemic days, you think to yourself, Okay, well, well,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 2>who are the customers who have who have the money

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 2>right now to be buying this stuff.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 8>It's a great question. And we actually went on the call,

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 8>we went into a little bit of detail around Paragold,

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 8>which is our luxury brand. You know, it's of our

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 8>sort of family of brands that plays at the highest

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 8>end of the market. And we do see really nice

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 8>momentum there. We said that was growing north of thirty percent, right,

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 8>So you do see nice momentum in the higher end segment,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 8>the top part of that K shape you will in

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 8>the K shaped economy that said Paragold is only you know,

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 8>a little over four hundred million. So when you think

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 8>about the overall Wayfair business, the Wayfair dot com brand,

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 8>that mass market brand has to also be performing well

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 8>to get to that nine percent comp and so what

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 8>we're so seeing there is ongoing share gain and we

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 8>think that's from programs like our Wayfair rewards program, programs

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 8>like the stores you know which Carol, you had the

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 8>opportunity to see, programs like our Wayfair Verified. The combination

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 8>of those things is helping us, you know, both attract

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 8>and retain these customers and have them engage more and more.

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Tell us about the stores. My understanding is that more

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 3>than fifty percent of store customers are new. But tell

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 3>us about that's a big investment, Kate. We've talked about it.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I did go there. I was kind of blown away

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 3>by the size and the scope of it. You guys

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 3>continue to add stores, but tell us about you know,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 3>we kind of marveled over how everybody had pushed back

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 3>on brick and mortar for years and so interesting. You

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 3>know that your guy that you're finding success with it,

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 3>but tell us how this is really moving the needle

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 3>for you.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's a great it's a great call out. I

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 8>think we're seeing that folks really do desire that multi

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 8>channel experience. And you know, the stores are supported by

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 8>e comm and e comms supported by the stores. Now,

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 8>obviously it's very early days on the stores, so they're

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 8>a very small piece of this overall momentum. We've had

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 8>the Chicago store open now for a little over two years. Atlanta,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 8>where we were able to meet, has been open since

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 8>early spring, and then we opened Columbus about a month ago.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 8>We've also announced Denver opening later this year, and then

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 8>five more stores into twenty twenty seven. So the momentum,

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, to use the word of the day, is

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 8>building with these stores. But it is early days. But

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 8>what we're seeing is customers, you know, are new to defile,

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 8>so they are new customers coming to the store. It's

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 8>been a great acquisition channel. Customers are also getting exposed

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 8>to the breadth of what we offer, so engagement in

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 8>more sort of frequency categories decorative accent, seasonal decor. Being

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 8>able to touch and feel the product is a win

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 8>for them. And with that combination of the breadth of

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 8>selection that we offer online, that's very compelling.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Paragole at this higher end brand and it's

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 2>actually like it's it lives distinctly from Wayfair. I'm wondering

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 2>about the momentum that you're seeing there, but also the

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 2>momentum that you're seeing more broadly, and how you're confident

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 2>that it's sustainable.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's a great question. I think it goes back

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 8>to the fact that most of this momentum is coming

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 8>from self help measures, right, So these are our own

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 8>initiatives that are driven by it. We think the category

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 8>itself is, you know, overall roughly flatish, and you know

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 8>the category has been in a complicated place over the

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 8>last few years, so you know, flatish place is a

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 8>nice place to operate from. But the you know, close

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 8>to nine percent comp in the US that's driven by

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 8>US gaining share. And so what we can see is

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 8>the building blocks of these pieces getting into place, and

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 8>then we see how they compound on each other. So

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 8>the Wayfair Rewards program, for example, is supported by Wayfair Verified,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 8>which is also supported by improvements and changes to the

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 8>storefront experience. And then to your point around Paragold, it

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 8>does have absolutely its own, you know, separate go to

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 8>market facing site. It leverages the entire back end infrastructure,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 8>so the logistics infrastructure across you know, Wayfair, Inc. The

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 8>tech stack, the ad tech stack across Wayfair, Inc. How

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 8>the storefront evolves, and so we're able to build test

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 8>things on Wayfair and then push them out to you know,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 8>Paragold or the specialty retail brands. For example, Wayfair Rewards

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 8>started on Wayfair and that'll be launching at some point

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 8>over the next year in the Paragold system as well.

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 3>But you have to conceive, like you know, Kate, we

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 3>talked about this, you know, existing home sales still you know,

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>not on fire like the housing market. Yeah, if they

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 3>but to see these results amid that backdrop, if that stays,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 3>let's say, existing home sales is depressed for another twelve

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 3>to twenty four months. You guys have talked about kind

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>of growing. I think it was roughly twenty percent growth

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 3>through company specific initiatives. I think you said it earlier

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 3>this year, if we kind of still contain, you know,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 3>remain somewhat depressed, do you still feel like you can

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 3>achieve those goals or does it require a housing recovery

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 3>because it is pretty remarkable in this market to see

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 3>these results.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so I think you're referring to a new urgency

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 8>of our co founder shareholder letter earlier in the year,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 8>and they talked about these initiatives that could get us

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 8>back to that you know, double digit and then you know,

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.239
<v Speaker 8>from there to that twenty percent growth, and we do

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 8>have a high degree of conviction of that. You know,

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 8>we feel very good about these initiatives and the building

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 8>effects of these initiatives. You know, obviously again that close

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 8>to nine percent comp on the US this quarter, that

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 8>high single digits guide, So we're building there, but the

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 8>momentum is sustaining.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the way that you're doing this internally, in

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the way that you're gaining share from a market that

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 2>is relatively flat wayfair rewards. How does that play into

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 2>that and the metrics that you're seeing there. What changes

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 2>are you seeing when it comes to frequency, retention, customer

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 2>lifetime value payback relative to folks who are.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 8>Not members it's a great question. So what we, you know,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 8>wanted to try to do with Wayfair Rewards was exactly

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 8>to drive up that frequency. The average wayfare customer shops

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 8>you know, with us or buys with us just under

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 8>two times a year, whereas a Wayfair Rewards customer is

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, three times a year, right, So you're seeing

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 8>an incremental purchase from them, which at an AOV of

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 8>three hundred dollars is pretty meaningful. And so the Wayfair

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 8>Rewards program is really designed around frequency and ongoing engagement

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 8>for the consumer, and we are seeing that from those

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 8>rewards customers. We're also seeing them shop categories that are

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 8>not you know, we are very well known for furniture.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 8>The rewards customers, though, are shopping decorative accents, they're shopping

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 8>kitchen accessories. In some of these categories, they get preferential

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 8>pricing or they get early access to sales, and so

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 8>those things sort of reinforce the quality of the experience

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 8>for them in that rewards program. And then on the

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.719
<v Speaker 8>P and L, you know, we've talked a little bit

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 8>about how obviously rewards has an impact on gross margin

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 8>because of the cash back element of it, but it's

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 8>helpful on what we really look at, which is contribution

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 8>margin because the rewards program you know, costs less obviously

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 8>on an ongoing basis to get that incremental sale. So

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 8>a lower ad cost is a percent of net revenue,

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 8>meaning it would be a creative to the contribution margin

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 8>that we really look at and ultimately to ebitdem margin

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 8>ebit dead dollars.

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Kate, you know, one of the coolest thing is

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 3>you guys really are a technology backbone and you go

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>back to the origin of your company, which is really

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 3>interesting if you think about, you know, kind of what's

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 3>going on right now. You've partnered with different platforms, whether

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 3>it's open AI, perplexity when it comes to agentic commerce.

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 3>So what key performance metrics are you guys seeing when

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 3>it comes to AI driven shopping shopping specifically, is it

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 3>a meaningful contributor when it comes to traffic or to sales?

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Are you seeing that?

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's a great question. So we work across many

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 8>of the lms you mentioned a few. We also work

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 8>with Gemini. You know, we've said that we're an earlier

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 8>partner on Universal Commerce protocol through them. We do say

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 8>traffic today is is small from these sites, but it's

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 8>growing meaningfully, right, so it's small but rapid growth. We

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 8>think it's really important to be where our customer is at,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 8>and so if our customer desires to shop through these channels,

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 8>we want to show up well there, whether that's you know,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 8>through actual shopping like Universal Commerce protocol, or you know,

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 8>through ads like on open Ai, or if that's through

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 8>you know, better search performance and how you show up

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 8>in LLM based search. Right, So all of that, those

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 8>are all things that we look at and that we

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 8>work with a variety of these partners on. I think

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 8>this is the place where our scale benefits us. You know,

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 8>we have nearly twenty five years of history and data

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 8>here and we know both one how to work with

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 8>these partners. As you said, we're technology first, and two

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 8>we bring to it, you know, some important data in

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 8>terms of how we're able to show up there. And

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 8>I think that helps the customer ultimately, because if our

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 8>customer you know, wants to be using the platforms and

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:57.959
<v Speaker 8>shopping there, will be there. If she wants to come

0:27:57.960 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 8>to us through the app, we're there. If she wants

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 8>to you know, go into a store and shop with us,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 8>we're there as well.

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 3>We got to leave it there. Kate's so great to

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 3>get some time with you. As always always the stock

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 3>as we're mentioned, it's up thirty percent as we speak,

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 3>so investor is certainly liking what they heard.

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Kate.

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you, thank you, Thank you. Kate Oliver. She's

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 3>chief financial officerver at Wayfair. She's also chief administrative officer.

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Joining us from Boston.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five.

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>During this listen on Apple, Karplay and Android Otto with

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 3>So we're gonna talk a little bit about Copper because

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 3>we did see it. Doctor Copper advanced to the highest

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 3>and two months reaching fourteen thousand dollars a ton in London.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Traders monitoring ballooning volumes held in the United States ahead

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 3>of an expected decision on an import terror by President Trump.

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 3>So we are seeing it come into the US at

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a rate at least twelve years, the fastest rate in

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 3>at least twelve years, I should say, so some positioning

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 3>ahead of that, the US is proposing including an additional

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 3>fourteen types of derivative products on its section two thirty

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 3>two tariffs and steel, aluminum, copper. I kind of say,

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 3>coming into it and want to get to our guests,

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 3>it just feels like tariffs go out of the headlines

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 3>for a little bit and then all of a sudden,

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 3>something else happens, another possible action or an actual action.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if day affected your top or bottom line and

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 2>you've had to keep track.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 5>Of those things. Yeah, not easy, right, not easy.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 2>We've got Richard Burke, with a senior analyst of metals

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.239
<v Speaker 2>in mining with our Bloomberg Intelligence team. He joins us

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 2>here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio on the tariffs front,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>what is the administration now considering when it comes to steel, aluminum,

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and copper?

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 7>Okay, on steel, you know, tariffs are at fifty percent.

0:29:55.440 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 7>We've seen tariffs actually be put on a lot river

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 7>of products over the last year or so, a lot

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 7>more than initial that initially was set went up to

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 7>fifty percent. Our view is that the tyrescent steel will

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 7>stay at fifty percent just because you know, the sector

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 7>has seen kind of resurgence. You've seeing you know, new

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 7>core steel dynamics US steal through Nippon all reinvesting and

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 7>starting new capacity and new plants and things like that,

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 7>and that's what the government wants to see. On a

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 7>lunum they're fifty. The trouble is that the US is

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 7>short aluminum. Is a huge importer of aluminum, you know,

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 7>applying rational economic thinking, I would think that that would

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 7>drop down a little because you're hurting the US. The

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 7>US can't is short of aluminum and probably can't produce aluminum.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 7>Aluminum is often referred to liquor metal electricity, So the

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 7>fact that the US power cost is higher in the

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 7>rest of the world, you're probably not going to see

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 7>companies expand into the US. And plus now with the

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 7>data centers, they're competing against the data centers who seem

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 7>to have an unlimited budget to pay up for electricity, so.

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Asn't Historically a lot of the processing move to places

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 2>like with a lot cheaper power. Like I remember being

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 2>in Iceland like twenty years ago, and they were talking

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 2>about the metals processing they were doing because of the

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 2>cheap geo thermal that they had, which was essentially outsourcing

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the production of this because power was cheaper.

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, the interesting about Iceland is seventy five percent of

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 7>their power is by three aluminum smelters.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 7>And then the other twenty five percent the people in

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 7>the country, you know, their homes and things like that.

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it's just something really odd.

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 2>But but from an economics perspective, like that made sense

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 2>for so many years because you go where the power

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 2>was cheaper, because this is a very energy intensive thing

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>to do, right, Okay.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well so you know, I think it was last month, right,

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration and now let me just look here

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 3>and send a program to cut tariffs on imported aluminum

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 3>to about twenty five percent from fifty percent. Our companies

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 3>that build expand of refurbished illuminum plants in the US.

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your point is right. You can't just do

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 3>this stuff overnight. It's expensive, it's difficult, and there might

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 3>be some constraints about the cost of electricity here versus elsewhere.

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 3>So is the administration doing that? It's it's just not realistic.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, right, absolutely. You know you heard like for example,

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 7>Alka has a plant, the war plant that's only half running,

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 7>and they said in order to get up and run

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 7>up and running, it would take them two or three

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 7>years to get up and running and the tear you know,

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 7>who is what the terriff situation is going to be

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 7>in two or three years. And second of all, the

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 7>cost of the power is prohibitive or drive and they

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 7>haven't made In fact, you know they recently they're going

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 7>to acquire SOP thirty two is aluminum business and a

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 7>different country rather than take that money and invested in

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 7>the US. So it's you know, when you have like

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 7>the restart of three Mile Island Microsoft contract that had

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 7>to buy the power at one hundred dollars in Megaua,

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 7>the aluminum people, the looming companies need probably thirty five

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 7>dollars in Megawa to be competitive with the rest of

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 7>the world. So when you have a data center that's

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 7>willing to pay three times to going rate, you know,

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 7>it's kind of hard to restart aluminum in this country.

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 3>It's like terrifying, like the power grab, It's like so

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Hunger Games, the power version, like it really what what.

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 5>That means is we're going to keep importing this.

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 7>Right, we have to keep impooring.

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 5>And that's why it just does economically does not make sense, right, And.

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 7>That's our viewpoint. Is that we you know, when we

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 7>look across the tariffs of various metals and things like that,

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 7>where like I said, applying rational economic theory, you're like, okay,

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 7>this has to go back down versus other ones.

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 9>This is what Jodo has talked to us about with

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 9>rare earths, with the idea that the processing and extraction

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 9>of this has been a challenging business in many parts

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 9>of the world, including the United States, which is like, okay,

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 9>why a lot of this moved to.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 3>China for right, because we did do it and then

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 3>we gave it up hard to make it work. Exactly

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 3>what about with steel? What do we need to know here?

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 3>With steel?

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 7>Steel? I think we'll stay at fifty percent because the

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:40.959
<v Speaker 7>government stands the reaction they're seeing, you know, plants being

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 7>built and the US increased capacity. And basically if you

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 7>look at what we call parents supply shipments plus imports,

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 7>it's kind of stayed flat over the last two years.

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 7>And what's really happened is our shipments are domestic shipments

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 7>have just displaced imports. Now we still need a few

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 7>imports because there's certain steals that the US doesn't make

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 7>or they don't want to make, and you know, there's

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 7>not big enough quantities or things like that. But really,

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 7>what's you know, that's kind of going to what I

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 7>would call the administration's game plan is the US has

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 7>you know, displaced the imports and invested to do that?

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 3>Was that pre though the Trump administration sec well let's

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 3>start back in twenty eighteen was first one, so it

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 3>did start back there.

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 7>It kind of encouraged like new cores for example, new

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 7>cores you know, just finishing up like a six or

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 7>seven year capital spending program that they invested billions of

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 7>dollars at. Really in twenty eighteen, I think the tariffs

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 7>kind of gave them you know, made that decision easier

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 7>to try. The stomach and things like that.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.439
<v Speaker 3>So the mouth was there in order to do because

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 3>a business, especially certainly if you're publicly held or something,

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 3>but you're not going to do it unless you can

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 3>make money here right.

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 7>Right or it's viable well or the top you know,

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 7>the you know, I think the bigger uncertainty is the timing.

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 7>Will terrorist stick around things like that, and you know

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 7>they have they you know, they've kept the twenty five

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 7>percent Terrists that start back at two thousand eighteen you know,

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 7>increase them with fifty percent, and took certain countries that

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 7>previously were examp from tariffs and are example like Canada, Mexico.

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 2>So I guess the the question is are the terrorists

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 2>accomplishing with the Trump administration wants to accomplish?

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 7>I think and certain and definitely steal. I think that's

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 7>an instance, whereas other ones I'm not so sure it is.

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 2>So what what could the what could the administration do

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to further provide an incentive for this stuff to be

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>made in the US? I think aluminum notwithstanding, because it

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 2>sounds like that one just won't be able to be

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 2>done well.

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 7>I think what they're we're starting to see companies reshoring.

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 7>You know, you know, the was this whole big thought,

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Hey they're going to resure We hadn't really seen that.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 7>But I would say this last set of earnings calls

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 7>talking to steal companies and service centers and stuff like that,

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 7>they've kind of said that, hey, we're starting to see

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 7>manufacturing come back and and be located in the US. Now.

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 7>Part of the reason is tariffs. I also think another

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 7>part of the reason is just the pandemic with the

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 7>supply shape, supply chain shocks kind of said, Gee, companies

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 7>that are starting to wake up like, hey, maybe I

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 7>don't want to have my supply chains spread across the

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 7>whole world and I needed closer to me to keep

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 7>an eye on and things like that. So you know,

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 7>it's kind of I think there's all intertwined things that

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 7>are kind of starting. We're starting to see play out

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 7>a bit.

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 3>All right, we're gonna leave it there. It's interesting. Yeah,

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 3>the reality of what canon can't be done. Thank you

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 3>so much. I feel like it was a and we

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 3>need it to get on the space because there's just

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 3>things that kind of keep flying at us and just

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 3>understanding it. Rich Thank you so much.

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 7>Rich Berg.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 3>He is senior Analyst of Medals and Mining with our

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence team, joining us right here in studio.

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal