WEBVTT - Not Happy.  Just Mad.  Debra J. Saunders talks to Armstrong & Getty.

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>When you're ready to ride Metro, we want you to

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>know we're ready for you. Here are just a few

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the people at Metro to tell you how we're

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>doing our part to keep riders safe. We're cleaning before

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you have found halfs out of suns of statist no mask,

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>no Metro need one. We have a few extras at Metro.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>We're doing our part to keep the DC area moving.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Find out more at Well not a dot com slash

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>doing our part. Michael Albanani man, what an interesting little

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>blip in US history? He was, Oh, yeah, you know what,

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to find somebody's probably doing it, somebody with

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a bigger staff and budget than us. Stormy Daniel's lawyer, Right,

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>can we come up with a montage of clips in

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.639
<v Speaker 1>which he is touted as a presidential candidate, a possible

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate? Sewan? See if you can find that, I'll

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bet somebody's already done it. You got GFP congressman quoting Hitler,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is mine comp to slam Trump's adversaries? That's that's just

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>never gonna work, dude. Mo Brooks of Alabama took to

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the House floor on Monday to portray President Trump's detractors

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>as Nazis. Hey, Moe Brooks les Hitler would be like,

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a fan of Hitlers. Hilarious. But then, of

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>course the Washington Post mentions that actually the quote he

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>used had to do with Jews, and how to even

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>use the quote means you like Hitler? Okay, all right,

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>which is why you don't play the Hitler card. He

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the idea of the big lie, a

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>lie so huge and audacious that it perversely it defies

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>disbelief because you think somebody making claim that bold, there's

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>got to be something to it, which is actually a

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>really interesting it's still propaganda. Doesn't make any difference if

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>mine comp has the best advice on how to handle

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the common cold cold from it, now, that's good advice

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>right there. Debra J. Saunders joins us debray is the

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>White House correspondent for the Las Vegas Review Journal, and

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>when we last met yesterday, we were discussing the state

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the American media, among other things. Hello, Debra, thanks

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for sparing us a few more minutes of your time,

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure. I'm standing outside and the White House North

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>lawn right now. Oh really, what's what's the what's the

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>general vibe around there today? I mean, is there a

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>big giant xhil or not there tech care? I mean

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>they're still tech. So Kelly and just came out and

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>what happens is every way to her and throws up

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>questions for her, and she was saying, oh, and there

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>are number of questions on healthcare. And she was like, oh,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>so now you guys want to talk about healthcare? Right

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>where were you before? And she's really just black And

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were asking her, of course about

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>uh some of the things that have been said by

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the administration, and she was she's kicked. So is they're not.

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not They're not relieved, they're mad. He's real functioning

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as the de facto press secretary at this point. Well,

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>uh no, but she is a good she is a

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>star again. I mean, it's an interesting thing for us

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>to have seen because, um, you know you, tomp has

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>not been really active on Twitter on this and instead

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>he's let people like Kelly and Conway and Sarah Sanders yesterday,

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>um and a lot of other people come out and

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>talk for him instead. I think I think we're seeing

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a change in the president. Interesting. I'm not relieved, they're mad.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting headline out of this whole thing. Yeah,

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>tell us about it. Well, I think, I mean, I'm

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>sure they're relieved that the fact that there was no

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>findance collision as well. But they're failing here is that

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they never should have had to spend the last uh

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty months, uh whatever anyway, that they shouldn't have had

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to spend two years dealing with this, and that they'll

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>calling was talking about how people were saying that this

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>was an illegitimate president, and she was talking about the

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>beginning of failing that people had when that dossier first

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>came out and all of the restless stories that we

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>saw on cable news about how this is really going

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to allow just something, and they're furious that their reputations

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>got dragged through the mud. I think the question most

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners have is Deborah Saunders stands on the

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>north lawn of the White House, is how does the

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>north lawn compared to the south lawn. I'm assuming the

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>south lawn is greener because it gets more sunshine and

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the south lawan I think also I'm looking at or

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that the security dogs pee. Now that's an

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's not nearly as it was well groomed. But

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of course the South Lan has to deal with Marine

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>one landings, so every every every corner has its challenges here, guys,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So onto the hot kind of tangential topic of the

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, which is the state of American journalism. And

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Taiebe in particular in Glenn Greenwald are just

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>howling mad about the idea of if it fits your

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>narrative or your biases, you will just gobble a whole whatever.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>In particular, the FBI and intelligence services tell you, and

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they think that is a shocking like an abandonment of

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>journalists the journalistic principles, especially because you know, intelligence services

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in the FBI sometimes and this may shock you spread misinformation. Well,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and as you know, I mean Glenn Greenwald is somebody

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>who's highly skeptical of federal investigators and officials. And he's

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>watching the press go so back and forth with this

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>where they can be really skeptical of the CIA when

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it came to w m D at least eventually light

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and then decided anything that the CIA tells, uh, Donald

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump's he has to listen to. And there's this real

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>back and forth that we've seen on so many other

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>issues as well. But the media, the fact that there

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>were people who were shocked that this was going to

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>be the outcome, I don't know, over the weekend just

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>amazes me because the signs were so clear that there

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was nothing to add. For instance, well, again, the way

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that we knew what was going on in the investigation is, uh,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Robert Mueller would indict people or he would get guilty pleased,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and they would lay out a case of what these

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>people had done wrong. There were tax chiefs, there were

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>bank chiefs, there were people who lied to investigators. But

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing in all of this that tied the

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>campaign to the camp campaign to the Russians. Nothing including

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>at least the indictments of all those Russian guys, the

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>rush that's right. That that that and then the letter,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>the bar letter. Um, I think that's where it was.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>There's there's no winning, coopera, there was no winning talking

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and nobody got used. So now we do know. I mean,

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>one thing that looked back for the president during all

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of this is we found out that there was a

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>meeting between Donald Trump Jr. And and and Jared Krishner

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and Paul Manafort with the Russian attorney Natalia vits on

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that Skaya and that was something where apparently they were

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>hoping they could get some dirt from about Hillary Clinton

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't happen. Would that have been collusion? I

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. The other thing it seems pretty clear

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is that Robert Mueller thought that he might be able

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to tie Roger Stone to Julian A. Sage. And by

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, I mean at this point in time, again,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>there was a time when media believed all sorts of

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>things that Wicky leaks contended. And now according to this

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>UH report with Muller, there's like no question Juliana Sang

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is related to Russia, and that's where a lot of

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this information came from. But there seems to be absolutely

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>no proof that Roger Stone talked to Juliana Sans. He

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>might have boasted about it, he might have coincted that

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he's had, but it just doesn't seem to have happened.

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>But back to your main point. Any anybody who was

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>astounded that there were no uh, you know, a collusion charges,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy charges really ought to check themselves because they were

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>running and kind of running away with their their own

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>desires that's fair, that's right. And John Brennan, the former

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>CIA director, just a couple of weeks ago, was on

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>television saying that he expected, uh, he expected the Molo

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.679
<v Speaker 1>report to come in sooner than it would He expected

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>indictments of the Jared Kushner and other members of the

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump family, and of course he was completely wrong. Now,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if he's still going to be on TV, stay saying

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, how credible is he? What when when somebody

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>lies to you like that, do you keep going back

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to them for information and then repeating it on television.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a question people have to deal with. I got

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a good example of that I'll bring up in a

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of minutes. But my final question for you would be,

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not into this whole making people apologize thing. I

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think Rachel Maddow needs to go on our show

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and apology. But do you think there's anybody in journalism

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>if you heard anything behind the scenes where anybody's thinking,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe I ought to rethink the way I

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>go about things. I mean, does anybody feel like they

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe did something wrong? How would you not? Well, you know,

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because with this gaggle with Kelly Anne. There

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>were certain people who are asking the same question, how

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know Trump called people a trade or uh treason

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is how who was he talking about? And there's they're

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not They're not saying, see, we really got this wrong.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>They're just not doing it. And I think I don't

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>think I need to name any names. We know who

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they are. We've seen this before, right, And Matt Tybe

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>actually makes that point. We really need to take a

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>look at how we do our jobs, but we won't.

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Debora J. Saunders does your job beautifully. White House, correspondent

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Las Vegas Review Journal. Debra, thank you very much.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Great to talk to you, my pleasure. Thank you all right,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. So when you're ready to ride Metro,

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we want you to know we're ready for you. Here

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>are just a few of the people at Metro had

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>said how we're doing our part to keep riders safe.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Were cleaning like never before, hospital a great queen. You'll

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>found handsund the towns of status all over the Metro,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>no mask, no Metro need once. We have a few

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>extras at Metro. We're doing our part to keep the

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>DC area moving. Find out more at will mata dot com.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Slash doing our part,