WEBVTT - Anthropic Disables AI Access for Foreign Nationals

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up the biggest AI export

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>restriction yet and Tropic disables access to its most advanced

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>models for all foreign nationals. The US concern jail breaks

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>in the code in video, is seeking to raise at

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 2>least twenty billion dollars from its first corporate bond sales

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>since twenty twenty one. We'll have the details. And SpaceX

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>shares throttle up on day to trading, adding to a

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>blockbuster public market's debut on Friday. And this is what

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>markets look like. Hello, Welcome to Bloomberg Tech Monday, June fifteenth.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>There is a big focus on what is happening between

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the US and Iran Later in the show. We'll get

0:00:59.960 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to that. But SpaceX in its second day of trading

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>up eight percent and it's putting a big spotlight on

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>the AI trade, on AI infrastructure. Then aw's that one

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred's off session highs, but we're again close to records,

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and the narrative is that there is feel good in

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 2>this equity market. Let's get to our top story. A

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.919
<v Speaker 2>major escalation in Washington's approach to AI. The US government

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>has ordered Anthropic to block foreign access to its most

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 2>advanced models after officials flagged security vulnerabilities and it's new

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 2>to released Fable five system and Mephos five to two.

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Talks r underway between Anthropic and the Trump administration joining

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>us now our AI editor Bloomberg, Seth Figman and in

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 2>DC Bloomberg's Mike Shepard and Shepp I want to start

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>with you. This came from the Commerce Department. Explain the

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 2>export restriction and what the government asked of Anthropic.

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, this all dropped right as everyone was still so

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 3>focused on the SpaceX ip IPO. Five twenty one pm

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 3>on a Friday, a letter a directive to Anthropic saying, look,

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 3>we are concerned about foreign nationals having access to two

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 3>of your most advanced models, essentially the key products that

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the company would want to pitch as it's heading into

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 3>this nearly trillion dollar IPO. And this really marked a

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>huge shot across the bow once again for this AI

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 3>developer from the Trump administration, and in essence it forced

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 3>the company's hand and Thropic had to deny access worldwide

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 3>to these two products Fable five and Mythos five in

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 3>response to the government's move. Now, this in a way

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 3>It really marked not only an unprecedented step for any administration,

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 3>it really marked a break from what the Trump administration

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>had laid out just a little more than a week

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 3>ago with that order, that executive order, the President Donald

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump sign that was aimed at cybersecurity and AI and

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 3>that it included language that said this does not should

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>not be interpreted as establishing a licensing regime. Yet an effect,

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 3>what we are seeing is that the government is blocking

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 3>the release of these models over the kinds of safety concerns,

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 3>in essence, the vetting that the government had wanted to

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 3>see done on a voluntary basis, and yet it is

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 3>setting its foot down now over security concerns and essentially

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.399
<v Speaker 3>holding off the release of these two products.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Seth this was an action directed at the use of

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the models Fable five me PUS five by foreign nationals,

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>but Anthropic made the decision to close off access to everyone.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 2>What was the explanation that the AI Lab gave.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, they're saying access to foreign nationals not just

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 4>in other countries, but those residing in the United States.

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 4>And it seems that Acanthropic made the decision that this

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>was unworkable to allow this model to remain on the

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 4>market for those restrictions. So they've pulled up while they

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 4>continue to talk with the government. Now there's a certain

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 4>irony here. You know, two days before this move, Anthropics

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 4>and Dario Medea had come out and said, you know,

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 4>he thinks the government should have the ability to ban

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>models that pose certain risks. Two days later, the government

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>took a step has effectively caused a model or two

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>models to be pulled from the market. But in this case,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, Anthropic is saying it's essentially misguided and the

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 4>risks outlined may not be as severe as the government's right.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I think they are seth and Frobic saying there's a

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 2>misunderstanding here. The issue that the government laid out is

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>something called a jail break in the code. It has

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to do with guardrails that are placed on the models themselves.

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Could you explain to the Bloomberg Tech audience what the

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>jail break concern?

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Is important to note that at this point we have

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 4>not seen the research that Anthropic and former White House

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 4>or David Stacks have alluded to that implies that there

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 4>is some kind of jail break former ability. What we

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 4>understand is that it seems to be pretty narrow in nature.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 4>It may actually be something that enables cyber defenders to

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 4>use the technology to spot and protect against flaws. But

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 4>what Anthropic is saying is, if not some universal jail break,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 4>some wider flaw that could be breached in a potentially

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 4>damaging way. And it seems to believe that the government

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 4>is either overstaving or misunderstanding the nature of the risk.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Here, Mike, real quick, what's happened behind the scenes.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, that is what we are trying to find out next,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 3>of course, and we want to first know what remedial

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 3>steps the company could take at the government's behest, what

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 3>those might look like, how long that might take, and

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>whether the company really would follow suit. We don't know

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 3>how long this will unfold or if there will even

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 3>be a legal challenge, And also we have to look

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 3>at the politics of this abroad. The President just arrived

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>in Geneva for the summit in Evion with other G

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>seven leaders. AI is on the agenda, and now it

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 3>will be a more urgent issue, especially as we see

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>economies including the European Union, examining the question of tech

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>sovereignty and the concern that they have about perhaps over

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 3>reliance in US technology that may be at risk of

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 3>being taken away from them at a moment's notice.

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloombergs Seth Figmann and Bloombergs Mike Shepard in DC, thank

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 2>you very much. The industry weighs in for more in

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the impact across the AI ecosystem. We're joined by Joel Pinot,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 2>chief AO officer at Cohre, a frontier AI firm focused

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 2>on LMS and AI applications for business customers, and shep

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 2>just set it out pretty clearly. At issue here is

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 2>whether or not the government should be able to say

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>you can or you cannot use a particular piece of

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 2>technology because of the concern that was outlined. What is

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Coher's position.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 5>On that, indeed, And you know co Here's a company

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 5>that's fully focused on developing models and a gentic platform

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 5>for enterprises and government, and so we've been talking to

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 5>that segment of the market for a number of years now.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 2>What we've been.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 5>Hearing is that customers want the ability to really control

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 5>their tech stack. They want to make sure that the

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 5>technology runs in a predictable way, that it's stable, that

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 5>it has high guarantees in terms of confidentiality and security,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 5>so there's a number of companies and governments already who

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 5>are opting for on premise installation where they can control

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 5>the model and they can control all of the software stack.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Clearly know all the news from the last few days

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 5>is a huge wake up call for others across the industry.

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 5>The fact that models which a few days before were

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 5>presented as some of the most capable in industry suddenly are

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 5>no longer accessible means that there can be a lot

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 5>of volatility in terms of access to the technology, and

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 5>that's got to be a big concern for companies.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Joelle, This news hit five twenty one pm Eastern Time Friday,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 2>So I appreciate it's been just a couple of days

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend, but has Cohed had any inbound right

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>If there are entities that can't get access to meet

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 2>those in fable five, maybe they use you.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 5>I would say, like huge number of inbounds. It's coming

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:47.119
<v Speaker 5>from business customers who are looking to diversify the set

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 5>of technology that they can rely on, both for the

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 5>core models and we do build our own models and

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 5>for the orchestration and governance platform. A large number of

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 5>inbounds from governments around the world especially outside of US

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 5>and China. Governments are concerned about their own ability to

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 5>access the technology, but also the economic trajectory of companies

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 5>and citizens within their frontiers. And then of course a

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 5>lot of inbound interest from investors who are wondering what

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 5>does that mean. We know there's of course the big

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 5>IPOs coming, a lot of volatility from that point of view,

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of people who are just trying to

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 5>understand the situation and see what have the news changed

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 5>in terms of what should be their investment strategy.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I had asked Seth to explain the concept of a

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 2>jail break in the code, right, that is the reported

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 2>issue that the US government had with me FOS in

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Fab five. Explain technically how that works and how you'd

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 2>approach I guess explaining it if it was you that

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 2>was dealing with the Commerce Department on a restriction like this.

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And so the concept of a jail break can

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 5>be used pretty loosely, but quite specifically. There's a sense

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 5>in which a particular system has some guardrails around the

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 5>intended use of that system, and a jail break happens

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 5>when someone manages to infiltrate the system in ways that

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 5>weren't intended. So in this specific case, we can imagine,

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, from Meethos to Fable, anthropic hasts put in

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 5>some guardrails that circumvent that prevent the ability for the

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 5>model to be used to create cybersecurity attacks. So we

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 5>can presume that the specific jail break that was identified

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 5>is the ability to go around these defenses and in

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 5>fact make the model produce outputs that would that would

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 5>leverage some of the cybersecurity capabilities of the model.

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Something the Center of Anthropics response is that many of

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>their own staff wouldn't be able to access this technology

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>based on the restriction, right because many of their staff

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 2>are foreign nationals. It also highlights a world dependent right

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 2>now on US technology. You're a Canadian company, I get that,

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 2>But what's your thinking on that issue, the concentration of

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>leadership in the field of small group of US companies.

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you dispute.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 5>That, No, I don't fully dispute in the sense that,

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 5>like where we sit today, there's literally, you know, four

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 5>countries in the world that have the ability to train

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 5>Foundation model US China, France, Canada. Right now, even in

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 5>those companies in the US, there's a large number of

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 5>foreign nationals. The you know, inbound talent into the US

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 5>has been formidable force for the progress of this technology.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 5>So this is going to be a big challenge. And

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 5>the other thing that's worth mentioning is, in many ways,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the developments in AI of the last

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 5>few years, you know, are at this level of ideas

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 5>and concepts. Sure we have the models, but really the

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 5>recipe for training these models sits in the head of

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 5>a relatively small number of people. But there's, you know,

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 5>a large enough amount of circulation between the various companies

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 5>that we can assume that the capabilities to do that exist,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 5>not just at asan tropic.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 2>Joelle Pinot of Cohre, thank you very much for your time.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>What is our top story today? Now coming up, in

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Vidia heads back to the bomb market after a five

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 2>year absence. Why is the AI giant looking to raise

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars while it's sitting on a mountain of cash.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what the stock picture looks like. Be right back.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Blimberg Tech. Today's big number twenty billion dollars.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 2>In Vidia is looking to raise at least that in

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 2>its first bond sales since twenty twenty one. According to

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>sources seven trenches maturities from two to thirty years. The

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, including refinancing

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>existing debt as in Vidia joins other AI leaders like

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Amazon and Alphabet in raising large amounts of capital to

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 2>fund AI related infrastructure. But why does a company so

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 2>flush with cash need to borrow more? Bloomberg Intelligence reckons

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 2>that it's to focus on funding partners, b I Senior

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Credit and List. Robert Schiffman joins us, Now, when you

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 2>publish the react, that's the bit that jumps out of

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>me off the page, right, Why would they do that? Well,

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 2>they have a track record of investing in the kinds

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>of startups that rely on their technology. Extrapolate on that thesis.

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, listen, you can never be too rich. It's

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 6>a good problem to have. Quite frankly, in Video does

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 6>have a cash problem. They have too much of it.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 6>So people are scratching their heads this morning thinking why

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 6>are they raising more? Listen, you take money down when

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 6>it's available. There is so much money chasing after this

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 6>AI build out. They're going to put in the highest

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 6>quality names that they can, and I think in Video

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 6>is just taking opportunity here to basically borrow at effectively

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 6>a zero rate, at least from a whack perspective, to

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 6>give them more financial flexibility. I think they're likely to

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 6>pour money, probably back into street strategic partners like open Ai,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 6>like Anthropic, and who knows, maybe a SpaceX, which is

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 6>likely to do their own bond deal might come to

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 6>in Vidia for some financing down the line as well.

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 2>There's like the smart cost of capital angle to this.

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 2>The shareholder return story has changed recently with Nvidia. You know,

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a student of your work, right, It's not that

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>unusual for companies flush or cash to just say, like, okay,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>this is an interesting thing for the finance or with

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 2>the treasury team to do. Explain the kind of nitty

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 2>gritty of that.

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, listen, you know, the weighted average cost of capital

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 6>is what they're looking at. The weighted average cost of

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 6>debt when you have a five trillion dollar equity market

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 6>cap is basically zero. So you could take money, borrow

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 6>it from from bondholders, and use it for equity or

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 6>equity style investments at a little or no cost. I

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 6>think you're going to see more of this. You sell

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 6>a lot of this from Apple over the years.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 2>We're not used to.

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 6>It now though, because most of these other companies have

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 6>now turned free cashual negative and they need it for

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 6>funding for their AI investments. That's not what Nvidia needs.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 6>And Video is probably going to generate a couple hundred

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars of free cashrow over the next year, so

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 6>they're swimming in the money. But again, when people are

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 6>willing to give it away for next to nothing, you're

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 6>going to take it and you're going to give yourself

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 6>that financial flexibility.

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Robert Schiffman, who leads our credit research of Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. Let's turn to SpaceX, who shares

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>our extending gains for their second day of trading following

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the company's blockbuster public market's debut Friday. The trading offers

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 2>this other glimpse into investors demand for what was one

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>of the world's most private companies. And then they did

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the biggest IPO in history. There are some mechanics to

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in the market next joining us as Stephanie Aliaga,

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan Asset Management, Global market strategist. You know, the

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>big anxiety in the days leading up to the IPO

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 2>was this great rebalancing of the passive funds. Because nasdak

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Russell Indicas fast tracks SpaceX's inclusion, it's day two. Shares

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 2>are still higher. But how much does the market need

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 2>time to digest before it has to undertake that rebalancing.

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 7>It's a great question, and that's exactly the point. You know,

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 7>this issue of all of this issue and sitting the

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 7>market doesn't happen all at once. You know, relative to

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 7>the size of how much supply of SpaceX there will

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 7>be in the market right now, we're just looking at

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 7>a small fraction of it. Right four and a half

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 7>percent was that first day's volume, and that's going.

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 2>To ramp up over time.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 7>We think that six month mark is really going to

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 7>be the point where you might see more volatility just

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 7>to give in a greater supply in the markets, and

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 7>then that increasing over time gradually over the over the

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 7>course of the year, particularly given the S and P

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 7>taking a more temperate pace there, but given that longer

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 7>term horizon, I mean, that's key here. You know, this

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 7>is a market where we are looking at a large

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 7>bump in terms of IPO issuance this year. This year

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 7>projected around two hundred and sixty billion dollars, but for

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 7>a market the size of sixty five trillion dollars that

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 7>is less than one percent of the overall market cap

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 7>of the market, a market that is also fifty five

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 7>percent greater than it was in twenty twenty one. So

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 7>we think so long as the market continues to trunk

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 7>along here with robust fundamentals, we just had a really

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 7>solid earning season. This AI capex boom continues to funnel

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 7>earnings growth and revenue growth across the market, and households

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 7>remain in pretty strong buyers retail activity is strong. We

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 7>think that this is a market that can digest this

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 7>increase in issuance and its issuance that we have really

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 7>been strapped for for a number of years.

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to something we show them the

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>screen a minute ago, and it's basically more of an

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 2>fyi that in the end, they sold more than the

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and fifty five point six million shares and

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 2>raised more than seventy five billion dollars. Right, this is

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 2>basically an instant exercising of the green shoe, eighty three

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 2>point three million shares raising proceeds of eighty five point

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 2>seven billion. This has been a story that started to

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>about a race to IPO, SpaceX and now likely anthropic

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 2>and open AI, and it quickly changed to a story

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 2>about race to capital. Alphabet came in massive equity offering

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>in Nvidia, tapping the corporate bond market. Do you see

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 2>a race to capital?

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 7>I think the economics around the AI boom continue to mount. Now,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 7>obviously these companies are all in different pieces of this

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 7>value chain in are raising capital variety of different reasons,

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 7>but it is something that investors are going to have

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 7>to get used to. I think, you know, we as

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 7>great as the balance sheets of some of these companies are.

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 7>This AI wave is just getting to be that much

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 7>more expensive, and all of the revenues around AI will

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 7>eventually come, but this is going to be a multi

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 7>year phenomenon, and right now we are ramping up to

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 7>spend significantly more around AI infrastructure and all of these

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 7>different pieces of the value chain. I think that points

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 7>to the need for selectivity. Not all that glitters is gold.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 7>These companies do vary in their financials. We think at large,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 7>the fundamentals of this market and of the companies you know,

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 7>spending the most and raising issuance in various markets is

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 7>still robust, but you want to make sure in your

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 7>portfolios that you have some proper diversification, just given that

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, the leverage and the economics around this AI

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 7>wave are definitely beginning to diverge.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie, we've just got thirty seconds. But how closely are

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 2>you tracking private markets because there are competing stories right

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 2>There is also the staying private for longer because you

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 2>can like, how much do you track that?

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, we think that that theme is still very

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 7>much alive and well, I mean, you are going to

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 7>get likely some big, high profile AI names, but the

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 7>IPO markets are still going to be very selective. And

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 7>a lot of the companies building in this AI race,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 7>whether it is robotics or even semis, but also particularly

0:18:55.880 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 7>the application layer and building AI for healthcare, AI for logistics,

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 7>all of those companies are in private markets right now.

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 7>And of course not all that glitters is gold. I mean,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 7>market returns there can be quite volatile too, But when

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 7>these companies eventually reach public markets, a lot of that

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 7>growth has already happened, and that is a reason for

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 7>investors to make sure they're looking beyond just public markets

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 7>and their portfolios.

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie eliagro JP Organizet Management. Thank you very much. A

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 2>quick update on the Anthropic story. A US official has

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 2>just confirmed that unpropping executives will be meeting at the

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Commerce Department today. Will follow the story as it develops

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 2>and bring you the latest. Now coming up, Fox has

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>agreed to buy device and streaming company Roku in a

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 2>deal that would create a new TV juggernaut. We've got

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>those details. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech. Fox has agreed

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 2>by Roku in a deal that values the streamer at

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty two billion dollars including debt. The tie up will

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 2>create the third largest player in the US television market

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>by viewership. Bloomberg Deals. Michelle Davis joins us with the deats.

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Interesting one. I've got a Roku TV somewhere in my house.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 2>What's this about. What's the strategic play from Fox? Yeah,

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 2>this is a.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 8>Really interesting deal because Roku is seen as kind of

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 8>the last big aggregator out there that everyone was wondering

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 8>when it would get taken over. The founder for years

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 8>has controlled the company and there's always a question as

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 8>to does it make more sense to aggregate content and

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 8>be the platform on top of which you know, content streams,

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 8>or does it make sense to be a really big

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 8>streamer that generates most of its revenue that way? And

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 8>by buying Roku, Fox is basically saying we want to

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 8>make sure we are that neutral third party platform. Roku

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 8>makes most of its money on advertising, which is an

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 8>area that Fox had kind of fallen behind its competitors

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 8>on in this you know, new streaming central environment, and

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 8>so that's a lot of what the value is going

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 8>to be coming from here for them twenty.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 2>First century folks down significantly take me into the terms

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>like where we're at in the process.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 8>So the deal, it's a cash and stock deal that

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 8>the shares are down on the news of course, because

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, investors don't always love to see a stock deal.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 8>At this point, the deal values rocud about twenty two

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars enterprise value, so that's including debt. Of course,

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 8>if Fox shares continue to decline up until the deal closes,

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.479
<v Speaker 8>that will mean that some of the overall value for

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 8>the deal will be a little bit lower than twenty

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 8>two billion dollars. But this really caps off a multi

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 8>month process where Roku had been exploring strategic alternatives. The founder,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 8>Anthony Wood as if we were just talking about had

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 8>been thinking about, you know, what's next, succession planning and

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 8>Roku and Fox actually have a long history. Fox had

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 8>invested in Roku years ago before the IPO. They sold

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 8>out of their stake at the time that they bought

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 8>to be but by buying Roku, they're kind of the

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 8>two companies are coming back together. The founder will have

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 8>a role on the board of the combined company.

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 2>In books, Michelle Davis, thank you very much. In other

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 2>m and A and US sales Force has agreed to

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 2>by aifirm, Finn for three point six billion dollars. Finn's

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 2>customer service tools will complement Salesforce's agentic capabilities. According to

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the company, AI is a key part of the software

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 2>maker's growth strategy as it works to boost investor confidence.

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Salesforce shares upper percentage point right. M and A has

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 2>been at the heart of the Salesforce story for a

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 2>little while. Now we'll keep tracking it. Coming up. City's

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 2>head of pan Asia Internet Research, Alisha Yapp, joined us

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 2>to break down where China's tech market stands in a

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 2>big global race. It is halftime. People will be right back.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. This

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 2>is what the technology sector looks like. There is a

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>big focus on the outcome of what's happening between the

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 2>United States in Iran and some sort of deal. We'll

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 2>get at the details on that in just a moment.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX is trading for just the second day as a

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 2>public company, up eight percent, one hundred and seventy three

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>dollars fifty five cents a share and rising. We'll keep

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 2>tracking that story. There's a lot of factors going into

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the biggest IPO in history. Let's get out to Geneva.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Global leaders are arriving in France for the G seven summit,

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and this time the usual geoplogical guest list has tech additions.

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 2>The chief executives of major AI companies Open Ai Andthropic

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Google are all slated to attend the gathering commes just

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 2>days after an unprecedented White House order forced Anthropic to

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 2>block foreign access to its most advanced AI platforms. But

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>first on the agenda the US and Iran. The two

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>countries reached an interim deal to reopen the Strait of

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Hormuz bliomers. Tyler Kendall joins US Now live from Geneva Tyler.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 9>Hey, and well, at this point, we're waiting for some

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 9>firmer details from either side about what is in this

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 9>potential memorandum of understanding that we did here from the

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 9>Vice President Jadie Vanced earlier today, who said that they

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 9>are going to try to get that text out before

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 9>this potential signing ceremony happening here in Switzerland on Friday.

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 9>So far, we know that the main pillars of the

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 9>deal are what we've been tracking for weeks, which of

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 9>course includes reopening the strait of her moves. But there

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 9>is still some big questions here about how Iran feels

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 9>its role is going to be connected to this going forward,

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 9>after Iranian state media earlier today seem to indicate that

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 9>Iran wants to continue to impose fees and have some

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 9>sort of grip over the street even after a deal

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 9>is signed. We also have questions about what economic relief

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 9>will look like and ultimately what sort of curves Iran

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 9>will agree to in this deal. Though it is our

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 9>understanding that this is going to be a phased agreement

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 9>where those negotiations come later, and while the conflict in

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 9>Iran is dominating the conversation already here at the G seven.

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 9>As you mentioned, President Trump has some really important meetings

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 9>scheduled for later in the week on Wednesday, where we

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 9>will see this base to based meeting with G seven

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 9>leaders and these big tech CEOs, and that meeting is

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 9>going to be just as much about the potential opportunities

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 9>around AI as well as those potential risks because ed

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 9>Bloomberg News has now confirmed that senior staffers for Anthropic

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 9>are meeting in Washington today with members of the Commerce

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 9>Department after this unprecedented move by the administration to threaten

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 9>that export band.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Grin Books, Tyler Kendall, n Geneva, thank you very much.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 2>There's also a massive ways of news across China's tech

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>landscape today. Social media powerhouse Jaohongshu is reportedly gearing up

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 2>for a blockbuster Hong Kong Ipo this month, while shares

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>of AI model maker GPU's skyrocketed following a major price

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 2>target hike from JP Morgan. But despite all this heavy

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 2>corporate activity, City Group warns that global investors are still

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>treating China tech as quote a source of funds, with

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street dumping local stocks to fund the global AI

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 2>hardware tradeing US now as Alicia, Yeah, head of Pan

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Asia Internet Research at City Group, And let's start with

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>that thesis. I find it so interesting. There's a big

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 2>distinction between newsflow and activity China's tech sector and deployment

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 2>of capital or finding capital to deploy elsewhere. Explain what

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 2>you're arguing.

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So, I think the reason why we mentioned it

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 10>is because I think the investor interests, especially for those

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 10>you know from the US and Europe so outside of Asia,

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 10>and even for those that we speak to in Asia

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 10>they're based in Asia. The there's so, I mean, people

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 10>have interests, but then somehow we know that they've been

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 10>underway uh China Internet specifically or even too many that

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 10>you know investors that share with us, they're actually uh

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 10>using you know, internet as a source of fun obviously

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 10>to to find the hardware trade in Korea, in Taiwan

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 10>and Japan, partly because I despite Internet, for example, Ali

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 10>Baba by doing their heart full stack of ai uh.

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 10>But then because of their core business are not really

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 10>doing as well are you know, they've been you know,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 10>investing aggressively on food delivery for example, they've been dragging

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 10>the profit. So a lot of investors give us uh,

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, the feedback is that why should I border

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 10>so much of that while I have to deal with

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 10>the core business is not a pure play and I

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 10>mus as well just play directly into some of the

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 10>hardware ings. So that's why this has been you know, happening.

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 10>And we've seen the last few weeks, I mean sorry,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 10>the last few months. You know, China internet sector has

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 10>not been performing despite the valuation is actually getting quite attractive.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 2>Right, Alicia. The story of the first half of this

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 2>year was Chinese internet giants and frontier labs moving very

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 2>quickly to try to close the gap with American technology companies.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Does your research show that that gap is closing, Yes.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 10>I think indeed, especially for example, take you know Ali

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 10>Baba Kuan model, you know since three point five and

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 10>then three point six, three point seven. Now we're actually

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 10>seeing there's a huge step up in terms of the

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 10>model intelligence. And then same thing for you know the

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 10>independent lab for example Minimax they recover and also I

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 10>think ten Cent the latest model are and three that

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 10>they released at the end of April. This are also

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 10>increasingly closing the gap with the frontier model.

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>The story and the data that we track in the

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 2>US is capital expenditures on the hyperscale side, and then

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>how real is the agentic AI deployment on the enterprise side.

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Take that story to China, how is that playing out

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 2>in that market?

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 10>So I think from the Kapex point of view, and

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 10>think many of us aware that I think China side

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 10>is not spending as you know, as high as what

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 10>the US hyperskill is indicating. Partly, I think there's a

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 10>lot of cost components. It's cheaper right in China. Partly

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 10>I think there's also some of the assisting capacities that's

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 10>already built up the last few years is actually able

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 10>to support that. And then in terms of the agendic

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 10>right the future agenda workflow, we think that you know,

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, Ali Baba's trying in terms of the coin

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 10>versus the assisting you know application for e somebod the

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 10>Talbo or the AMAP. But then I think over time,

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 10>we do hope that Tencent at the end of the

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.959
<v Speaker 10>day could actally come up with their AI agents insidech

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 10>Ad which they are obviously testing on it, and then

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 10>with the next versions of the model if it's intelligent enough,

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 10>because I think they're going to train a lot of

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 10>their proprietary data into the next versions of the model

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 10>and then hopefully that could actually you know, ensure the

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 10>AI agents also working within the Vita ecosystem.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Another big story overnight from China was a group based

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 2>planning to overhaul the Alipaid super app, but to bring

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 2>in an agentic AI user face you brilliantly set out

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of what's happened one aged twenty twenty six, what

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 2>does city think happens in China's tech sector in the

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 2>second half of this year.

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 10>So we hope that for example, you know, company like

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 10>ten Cent or even you know and to someone sense

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 10>some of this super app that if they're actually able

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 10>to bring up the agendic workflow working within the super app,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 10>which allow a lot of the enterprise that have mini

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 10>programs for example, they're able to use agent within that ecosystem,

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 10>then most of these enterprises would be able to stay

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 10>within that ego system in a way. Then hopefully you know,

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 10>things could take off, especially for the super app environment,

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 10>that they can become the AI power ecosystem that we

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 10>are looking for, and hopefully that could help to re

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 10>rate you know, the leaders like Tencent or Ali Baba.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 10>Then in that sense to help the entire sector to

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 10>get the fund flow rotation back. Yeah.

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Alicia Yapp, head of pan Asia Internet research at City Group,

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 2>big focus on China tech right now, appreciated. Thank you.

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, should we be sticking data centers in

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Earth orbit or should they be under the ocean. We're

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 2>going to speak with Mike Schrope for a founding partner

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 2>of gigasale caps. He might recognize the name former meta cto.

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 2>He has a thesis. This is what the Nazak one

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred looks like. We're back nearer toward session highs and

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>again of almost three percent, a lot of momentum. The

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 2>index is near record high. Is a big part of

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 2>it is kind of feel good from the SpaceX ipo Friday,

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 2>but also of course what was outlined by Tyler from

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Geneva about a US Iran deal. This is blimberg tech

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 2>check back in on SpaceX shares hire second day of

0:31:55.840 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 2>trading after a blockbuster public debut Friday. That performs help

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>booth confidence in a broader AI rally and it marks

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the start of a shift from two decades of shares

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 2>disappearing from public markets to this new era of stock

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 2>abundance as the likes of Open Ai and Anthropic also

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 2>prepare for IPOs and other companies sell new shares. Bloombos Common,

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Rhinokey has been all over it, and we expect in

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the next days, weeks, and months a bit of volatility

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>should we start, would like to hear and now I

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 2>hope you had some of a weekend to digest what

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 2>happened Friday. But right now that the net takeaway is

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 2>what cormen about this IPO.

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 11>The net takeaway is very positive. We see shares up

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 11>a second day here. It was up about eight percent

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 11>the last time I looked at my terminal, extending gains

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 11>from Friday's first day of trading. And this gives the

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 11>company a valuation of about two point two trillion dollars.

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 11>So it's already launched itself into one of the top companies,

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 11>the one of the biggest companies in the stock market.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>So the takeaway was really positive.

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 11>You know, investors into the IPOH there was solid trading,

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 11>nothing went horribly wrong, and that's kind of given investors

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 11>the ability, one just to be very enthusiastic about the

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 11>AI trade. That's supported by what happened over the weekend

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 11>a potential piece deal with Iran, and investors can hopefully

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 11>start to shift their focus towards a FED meeting on Wednesday.

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Com and you and the team are out with the

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 2>big take. And basically there's going to be a lot

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 2>of new equity that hits the market and it's going

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to change the story of like the last two decades.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Explain that to us, give us the key numbers that

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 2>we need to know.

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so this is a really huge deal. Basically, over

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 11>the last few decades, there's been you know, twelve trillion

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 11>shrink you know, equity taken out of the markets as

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 11>company buy backstock, which is a key way that they

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.479
<v Speaker 11>once spend you know money down on their balance sheet

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 11>and you know, return value to shareholders. It's been a

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 11>major support of the stock market and especially these big companies.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 11>So what's happening now. I mean, we see IPOs like

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 11>SpaceX's record IPO on Friday, as well as equity issuances

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 11>from companies like Alphabet, Meta and Oracle bringing equity back

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 11>into the market, so growing the total number of shares

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 11>that are available in a way that actually it can

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 11>be diluted for stockholders. So one point five trillion dollars

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 11>in shares coming back into the markets this year. That's

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 11>according to a JP Morgan analysis. And really what the

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 11>signal is these companies are saying, one, we can go

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 11>to the equity markets. There's investor, you know, desire demand

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 11>for our shares, and it's a good way to raise

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 11>money to spend on what we need to do to

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 11>build out more capacity, more data centers, to use AI

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 11>in a way that will hopefully be a creative to

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 11>earnings going forward.

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 2>The most common rhinicky thank you very much so. One

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 2>way that Moss games to drive revenues and profit is

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 2>to build out of all bit data centers, a complicated

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and expensive ambition that our next guest says may only

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 2>be achievable by SpaceX. Instead, others should turn to submarine

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 2>data centers to save on things like energy costs. Microver

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Hoped add tens of millions of square feet of cloud

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>computing capacity. As the former CTO at Meta, He's now

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the founding partner of Gigascale Capital, a venture firm making

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 2>some early stage bets on those companies that are more

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 2>focused on climate impact. But you put yourself in one

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 2>bucket or another. I guess orbital data center or data

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 2>centers where the ocean is the playground. Present your thesis

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 2>to me.

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 12>Well, I don't think it's an either or. I think

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 12>it's a little bit of all of the above. For space,

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 12>it's very hard and expensive to get there, and I

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 12>think nobody but SpaceX can do it with their vertical

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:49.439
<v Speaker 12>integration and launch costs at wholesale. Otherwise, economics are just tough.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 12>You know, I can put a ton of mass in

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 12>the ocean one hundred times cheaper than I can put

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 12>it in orbit. So I think you've got a lot

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 12>of room to go in terms of using huge energy resources.

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 12>We've got ten terot lots of power in the Southern

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 12>Ocean that's completely untapped, unused. We've also got you know,

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 12>I built a lot on land, tens of millions of

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 12>square feet. I don't think we're anywhere close to done

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 12>using solar resources on land. Between solar and batteries, I

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 12>could put together a new power plant in twelve to

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 12>twenty four months, you know, in a pace that's faster

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 12>than gas or launching into orbit. So I think there's

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 12>a lot of different ways to do this. I think

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.399
<v Speaker 12>SpaceX is going to do space based data centers. I'm

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 12>bullish on on land solar plus batteries plus next generation

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 12>and in the ocean with companies like Panhalasa.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I think we therefore need to kind of understand the

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 2>lasting and ripple effects of SpaceX's IPO, right, which is,

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, the prospectus could not be more clear. Here

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 2>is the plan orbital data center. But when you're in

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 2>private markets putting bets on earlier stages, you know, if

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 2>someone comes to you with a deck and it says,

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I too have a plan for orbital data center, do

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 2>you bother? So you just say, well, SpaceX has got

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>that covered. There isn't a need to fund this concept,

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 2>this idea, this plan elsewhere.

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 12>I mean, I'm in the business of looking at everything,

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 12>so I'll always take a meeting to understand, to see

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 12>if I've missed something, and I'll update my priors if

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 12>I see new information. Every time I've looked at the math,

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 12>the economics on space based data.

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Centers, it's doable.

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 12>It just like it's extraordinarily expensive because you have to

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 12>pay for launch, you have to pay for radiation hardening,

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 12>you have to pay for radiators large enough to get

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 12>rid of the heat, because these servers produce a lot

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 12>of heat, and once you add up all those costs,

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 12>I just don't see how it's cost competitive with current

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 12>on land or current ocean. You'd have to assume a

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 12>dramatic increase in the price of building stuff on land

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 12>before you want to go into space. Again, unless you're

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 12>SpaceX and you get all of those things that wholesale costs,

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 12>in which case your costs are very different. So I'm

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 12>not wholly no, but I'm skeptical when people pitch me

0:37:59.160 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 12>on these ideas.

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 2>Mike, if we measure the economics of and we're just

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 2>showing what SpaceX presented the other night, the design the

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 2>economics of the space based data center is a dollar

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 2>per token basis, how does submarine data center compare on paper?

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 12>Well, again, I think you have to look at all

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 12>the assumptions into that, and you know, when I've done

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 12>the modeling in math, if you just sort of do

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 12>some basics on this, it is against about one hundred

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 12>times cheaper currently to put a ton of mass in

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 12>the ocean than it is to put that same ton

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 12>of mass in space. So I think you have a

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 12>huge cost advantage when you look at the ocean, you

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 12>have almost unlimited free cooling in cold seawater. You know,

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 12>in space you can radiate heat, but that requires building

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 12>radiators or rating into a vacuum.

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 2>It's expensive.

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 12>So again, I don't see how the math closes for

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 12>anyone who's but SpaceX, who again has everything at wholesale costs,

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 12>already launching large volumes of starling satellites. So I think

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 12>it's a great business for them. I'm just like not

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 12>clear on how anyone else can compete on costs.

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 2>So our starting assumption is right. Now the world is

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 2>compute constrained, right. You weren't Meta for a long time.

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Meta is going to be one of the big capital

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 2>expenditure deployers. Do you see Meta being open to a

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 2>world of submarine data center as a solution or looking

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 2>at orbital data center as an alternative.

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 12>I think all of these providers, you know, will look

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 12>at these technologies when you show tokens being generated.

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, once I'm out a terminal, I.

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 12>Can say, here's a chat experience with a live webcam

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 12>of a little booie bobbing in this southern notion, or

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 12>you know, a feed from the live satellite and saying

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 12>this is where the tokens are getting generated.

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I think everyone's going to perk up and add more attention.

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 12>Until then we're talking about theory because no one's still

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:53.479
<v Speaker 12>either of these things.

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 2>But I think that you know, at the end of the.

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 12>Day, people want reliability, they want availability, and they want

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 12>okens now. So if you can provide people compute now,

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 12>then they're open to it.

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And reminders of the audience that SpaceX said the earliest

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 2>deployment of orbital data center is twenty twenty eight. Mike Trope,

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 2>founding partner at Gigascale Capital, thank you so much and

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 2>as allys continue to be on SpaceX, we bring you

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 2>some of the biggest investors in the company. Tomorrow, Sequoia

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Capital partner Sean maguire joins us a conversation you don't

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 2>want to miss now coming up, we're going to discuss

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 2>the newest update on the long awaited AI capabilities of

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 2>Apple's Siri paron. This is Bloomberg Tech. Apple's Serie AI

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 2>is catching up to its chatbot competitors, pulling the tech

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 2>company out of an AI slub two years after making

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 2>promises of AI functions. Series newest features center around it's

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 2>so called personal context and on screen awareness technology. Bloombers

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Mark German got the access and joins us. Now this

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 2>is so interesting. So you've had time to to use

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Apple's Serie AI in a way that you can explain

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 2>where we're at with it in power on Over the weekend,

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 2>you detailed the most important parts. What what's it been like?

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Seri AI, Apple's revamped Siri. You want to call

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:17.919
<v Speaker 13>it Serie two point zero, you can do that. Here's

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 13>what I'll say. It fulfills the promise of Siri that

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 13>the company made fifteen years ago when it debuted the

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 13>first version as part of the iPhone for us in

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 13>two thy and eleven.

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 2>It's terrific.

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 13>It's on par probably with recent versions of Chat GPT, Google,

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 13>Gemini and Claude. It's not perfect. There's a lot it

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 13>can't do. You can't do in depth research like you

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 13>can do on chat GPT. You're not going to get

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 13>major PDF summaries of very long documents. You're not going

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 13>to get tax preparation, you're not going to get Excel

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 13>and powerpoints slide decreation. But for ninety five percent of

0:41:56.120 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 13>people they use chat GPT in Gemini for web AI, search,

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 13>for historical information, for asking questions about anything. It could

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 13>do all of that, plus actually do the things that

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 13>Seria has been supposed to do, like correctly player music

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 13>or correctly navigate your places.

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 2>This is a big win for Apple, just as people

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 2>use chat GBT for the most part. Right now, the

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>title of the Power on Apple's new series is just

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 2>good enough to ease AI crisis if I put the

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 2>emphasis in the right place quick.

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 14>It is just good enough because it's not exactly as

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 14>good as the competition, but for ninety five percent of people,

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 14>and to meet the needs of the majority of the

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 14>Apple userbase two billion plus strong, it does that.

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Mark Gunman a Power on every Sunday. You've got

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 2>to read it and then Mark will be on the

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 2>show give us the details that we need. Thank you

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 2>very much. A quick check on shares of SpaceX, so

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 2>the gains in the second day of trading now up

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to ten percent, giving SpaceX as it stands a market

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 2>cap of around two zero point three to two trillion

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars just day two as a public company trading in

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the public markets. But we talked throughout the hour about

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the lasting effect this will have in not just the

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 2>next few weeks, for the next few months and years.

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 2>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Those

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 2>conversations really worth recapping. There's a lot happening in capital markets,

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 2>across public equity, across debt, and it's the biggest technology

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 2>companies in the world that are dominating that news flow

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 2>and that market move. Check out the podcast. You know

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 2>where to find it on all the Bloomberg platforms, as

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 2>well as on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart. From San Francisco,

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Day one, This is Bloomberg Tech