WEBVTT - Ranking NFL backfields

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Do you Around the NFL podcast has told you everything

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>they know. Welcome back to another edition of the Around

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.079
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Podcast. My name is Dan Jansas, and I

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>am joined by a room filled with heroes. Mark Sessler,

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris Westling, and Greg Rose the ball. What is up? Boys?

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey dude, what's happening? What is up? First Monday podcast

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in uh sometime, And it's good. It's good to be here.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I like Monday podcast. You know, he's get right into

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the week, getting get in touch with the people. Mark

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>actually changed my day off to be here for this today.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>That's how important there is to me. Yeah, nice humble brag. Well,

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they might not be the whole reason, but I don't

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>even think it was there either. I don't know it was.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It had some impact, wasn't the really good to have

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you here though? Either way? Yeah, it's great to have

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the four because it's after this week we're gonna start.

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be some vacations and we'll be we'll be

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>running three across. Maybe we'll have some guests in here

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>um to sit in. I know there was some buzz.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I continue to see buzz on Twitter like people love

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Colleen Wolf will try to get Colleen and here at

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>some point, you know, we'll see what we can do.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But for this week we've got three shows. Uh and um,

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, by the way, don't forget Thursday when West's

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Toaster is back, by far the worst drop that we've

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ever had. This technically a disaster. We gotta mate, we'll

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>make a new one. But I love the charm. Listen

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to it again, the charm of it. It's like a

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>toast when West's toes. When West's toes, that would be

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a weird game. Um, so we'll do that on Thursday.

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Sally has done a great job behind the

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>scenes looking for people all tds, where's he? He's like

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like the King of France's wedding. Now is any mark?

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know who knows where TD is it is.

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a string of many weddings and like multiple

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>full nations, and I think you're right, it's it's France

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>based at this point in his royalty involved And Wes,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you did some digging on Twitter that perhaps people have

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>been illicitly feeding t D some of these secret code

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>words for the podcast, and t D might not be listening.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have to do much digging because people tweeted

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>us and told us they captured screen grabs of our

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>friend Isaiah and a couple of other people just absolutely

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>feeding t D all this stuff to say, So, who

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>knows if tds even listening to the podcast. Actually your

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>gut feeling, Greg, Yeah, they probably gave him the information,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>although in this case, at least he's taking that and

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>using it smartly. I give our listeners some credit for

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>passing on. Well. The time stamp proves that he responded

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to the information our way immediately, so it did not

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>come organically from listening to the show. And by the way,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Sully's hoping t D stays in for every wedding in Europe.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>He's loving it. Behind the glass, you can tell the

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>confidence is flowing out of it. I'm just excited to

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>see King of Frances. It's been a while. That's why.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a special wedding. So yeah. So TV

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>will be back maybe a little later in the week,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>four of us for three shows this week, So that's exciting.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 1>And we got a nice show today and I sincerely

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that, a very nice show today. We're going to

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>uh uh as we do, We're gonna do a little

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>news what's happened since the last time we spoke with you,

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>which was a few days ago now, So we'll catch

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>up on what's going on in the NFL, and then

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>big day for a guy. You know, he moved the

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>schedule around. We didn't find this out until he told us.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark said he moved some pieces around, some chess pieces

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of his week. He's here and there's a reason why

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because this the whole theme of this podcast is Cessler.

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark Anthony Cesler related the running back rankings. He ranks

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFL backfields from one to thirty two. It's a

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>new post up on nfl dot com slash around the

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Around the NFL. So make sure he checked that out.

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I read it, really liked it, and we're gonna go

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>through his thirty two to one countdown Big Cessla Show

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>One takeaway. Middle name not Anthony, I thought I thought

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it was you were named after the Latino crooner Edward,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>which is my dad's name. Yeah, be insulting to my

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>dad that he'd think I'm potentially spreading that information that

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm changing my middle name. Have I met ed Cessler?

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 1>Your daddy? My dad had the same name. I like that.

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so that I don't think his connection

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why you guys get along so well. So yeah,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that's it, Cessler a big show. We're gonna go through

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>his countdown. Um. Like I said, though, before we do

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:43.679
<v Speaker 1>any of that, we check behind the glass with Sally

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, Sally, can we please if you would do

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>some news. We start in Dallas where the Dallas Cowboys.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you know, this Des Bryant deal has not

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>been one that that has gotten done. We thought it

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>would be got got done last summer. It never happened. Uh.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And now that the Dallas Cowboys receiver has told NFL

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>media columnist Michael Silver that he might miss regular season

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>action because of this contract dispute. Uh, Dez is under

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the franchise tag right now, but he's not happy about it.

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>He said to Silver about the idea of a holdout

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that could extend into the season. This is not a rumor,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's legit. Start with you, Greg, this uh on the

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>surface in early June. This broke on Friday. You know,

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>just an obvious contract ploy to get the job done.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there any way we actually see this happen where

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Des doesn't play a game. I believe that Dez Bryant

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>believes it's possible, if that makes any sense. But do

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I really think there's any legitimate chance that Dez Bryant

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>passes up nearly a million dollars per game for playing?

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>No way, He's made eleven point eight million dollars in

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>his entire five year career. The franchise tag pays him

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this year twelve only eight million dollars. There's no way

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>he's going to pass up these big pay days. But

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the only leverage he has. It's this week.

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>If if you want to threaten, I'm saying I will

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sit out games. Not I might sit outs, you know.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But he probably does believe it because it's an emotional

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>contract issue on in June. He probably believes it, but

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't believe him. We're downstairs watching one

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Cowboys Super Bowls from ages ago. In the

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>last Cowboys player I commembered to do this where it

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>actually happened, was Emmitt Smith held out for the first

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>two games of the year, if I remember, and came

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>back and toward the league part. And Dez is that

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>type of player, and he is that important to the Cowboys,

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and if he did actually fall through it. Yeah that

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess that would give him leverage, But still I

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is you know, I feel like

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they did a bad job here. I feel like they

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>should have taken care of him already. I guess you

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder if they're still not sold on whether

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy they want to invest in big

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>time money with in future. That's the only reason to me.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's some salary cap issues obviously, but

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this deal should have been done to me, and you're

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you're playing with fire in my opinion, on multiple levels,

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't really feel sorry for a guy who's going

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to make right and where it's all splitting hairs. I

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think your point is well taken, Dan. Maybe they're trying

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to structure it in a way that they're not guaranteeing

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so much upfront that it's a little more year a

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>year than some of the big contracts. But I don't

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>fault the Cowboys here without really knowing the information. For

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>all we know, Dez Bryant is asking for more money

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>than Calvin Johnson's ever made by far. That would not

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>surprise me at all that he's looking to be by far,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the number one wide receiver in terms of his contract

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and when that happens, these things just take a while

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of have to wait each other out

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>for the contract numbers to go down a little. But

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>something is going on behind the scenes that we will

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>find out about later on, because it wasn't at the

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>last owners meeting, but the one before where Jason Garrett

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was saying, absolutely no question, Dez is a priority for us,

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna make this happen. I mean a full

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>year plus has passed at this point. He's he's been

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite players for a few years. Now.

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Where do you guys put him? Who's better than him?

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>At the widers? Is Julio Jones better? Is A J

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Green better? Is Calvin Johnson better? I mean Odell Beckham?

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>These are some guys I guess you could put ahead

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of him, but I would I you can make the

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>argument that he's the best wide receiver. What he is

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for Dallas, He's right up there. I mean, if you

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>want to talk pure wide receiver, I mean, Julio Jones

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is just as important to the Falcons potentially. But you

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>take Dez Bryant off of the Cowboys and they are

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in big trouble. With what they have on offense. He's

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>been the best red zone receiver in the NFL for

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>three years in a row. Now I don't Calvin Johnson.

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets to benefit of the doubt because

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been the best receiver for a while. O'Dell Beckham

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can be better, but Dez Bryant's right there. Like you said,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>with Julio Jones and Calvin Johnson, Antonio Brown right there

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>at the time. A J. Green I would put in

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that mix too. You know, you see with Dez Bryant

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a few more mental errors where he's not lined up

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in the right place, and you a little bit of

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that more than you do with Julio Jones or Calvin Johnson,

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for instance. But I think he makes up for in

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of his just his aggression and how hard he

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>plays in the red zone. He's gonna get the contract

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with all these contents. This one feels a little different

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that there's some it's it's a complicated one to get done,

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna get the money. Moving on, the Carolina Panthers,

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, made Cam Newton one of the highest paid

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks in the league recently. Now they take care of

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>business with linebacker Thomas Davis, who signed a two year

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>extension where he'll collect eighteen million over the next three

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>years when you factor in the previous deal. This according

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to rap sheet uh Davis is thirty two but still

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>playing at a high level for three linebacker, and of

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>course Mark came back from three a c L surgery,

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>so you know this is a contract well earned. Well

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we if we say that the Cowboys or other teams

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't handled certain things, well, I mean, I think the

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Panthers showed incredible patients with Thomas Davis dating back a

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>long time, and they obviously is high class guy. That

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>means lots of the organization off the field too, but

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he's incredibly valuable on it. But some teams would have

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>jumped ship a long time ago on players with so

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>many reasons to have to keep waiting for his production.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think this is a classy move by

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. And I'll finish because his career there. What

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a year for him. He wins NFL's Man of the Year,

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>got the key to the city of Charlotte, and now

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>now it gets to the city actually do for you.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's strictly ceremonial. I think it opens any

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I used to shop I was as a kid. I

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>thought it literally lets you get into any place in

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the world, which was the best idea ever for like

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>an honor. No, that is what it is. Like. If

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Davis wants to go grab a frozen yogurt, he

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>can just go to any of the Charlotte one in

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the morning, like the donut store. He's a big used

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>book fan. Uh, just in general city, go over to

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the using those stores in the morning. Just take whatever

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of quitting TDS MVP of the Pod. When I

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>was like in eighth grade, Uh, the guy at the

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>local gym handed us the keys to the gym so

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we could practice basket basketball, like on weekends or after hours.

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was much more important than you can

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>come to my gym anytime. You won't change in the

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>locker room. You can actually go in after hours and

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>play basketball. That is pretty honest. Did anything negative come

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>about from it? No? We were good kids when you

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>boys come to my gym. Do you think you'll ever

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>get the key in Cincinnati? No? No, West, was there

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>anything sinis there better? Am I any too much into it? No?

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>There was nothing. We we we were good kids. Then.

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was not a very special episode of

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>different strokes. It was a more it was a more

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>innocent time. It was the early seventies. America is at

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the top of the charts. Sister Golden Air moving on

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons. Uh. Two mainstays of their offensive line

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>in recent years. Uh uh both in the news today.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam Baker, their left tackle, who has missed most of

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the last two years with knee issues, was released. Um,

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Baker's out of a job, so he's on the street now.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>He was potentially gonna compete for the left guard position,

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>which opened up when the Falcons released Justin Blaylock in February.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And Blaylock, according to rap Sheet, is planning to retire now,

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so Baker uh is on the is a free agent,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Justin Blaylock calling it quits and Blaylock Uh is only

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one. Baker's thirty. But I thought the Blaylock thing

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. Mark, you love your boy Kyle Shanahan. Uh

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>he Uh. He is a capable guard, obviously, but he

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>was pushed aside because Shanahan didn't seem as a fitness

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>offense and I guess after looking around, he decided to

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hang it up at thirty one years old. Well, I

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>mean the one. Atlanta's line has been a mess for

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a while, and now they're going through something of a

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>scheme change too, so I that'll be interesting to see

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>how that that works this year. I think these the

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>retirement and and releasing Sam Baker highlights at the Falcons

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>who's been worse than them at drafting and developing offensive

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>lineman Over the past five years, They've spent five picks

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in the first four rounds on offensive lineman, and none

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of them has emerged as a above average start. There's

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>still hope for Jake Matthews, but guys like uh Cons

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Peter Kan's the center. They drafted the second round, Lamar

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Holmes at right tackle. He had an okay career. But

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember when Sam Baker got taken. It was in

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the early twenties of the first round. People were really

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>surprised about that pick. They drafted him with Matt Ryan,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and I was even more surprised that they doubled down

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and gave him a big contract two years ago. So

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I always talk about self scouting. They did. They really

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>tried to believe in that Baker pick, even though it

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>never really panned out, and then when they gave him

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the big money again, it double backfired on him and

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>he's just been hurt. I'm not sure what the numbers

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>are right now, but it's a sizeable cap hit they

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>take by getting rid of Baker or uh so, yeah,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Greg is absolutely right. Reminds me of my boy Mr

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>T Mike Tannebaum, what he did with Mark Sanchez once

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>U by the time, Oh, I thought you were gonna

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>say it reminds you of your boy boy. David Baker

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>massive uh NFL personality, a massive man. Hall of fame.

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>The head of the Hall of Fame is Sam Baker's

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>father also used to run. He was the commissioner of

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the UFL. I believe Bears, this is why I see

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you on those top ten lists on the network all

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. You're just the fountain of information. He bears

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a physical resemblance to a late career Babe Ruth. He

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely does. And you always seem with the Super Bowl,

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you see him in the lobby and everyone's coming up

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and talking to him. It's like, for your who is

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy? I thought, And finally we know he is

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the father that was the former Falcons. I think the

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>only reason I know is because you were emailing or

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>texting me from one of the like, who is this

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>guy I see everywhere? This huge guy, and we kind

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of we figured it was like, he looks like it

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>could be the brother of Andre the Giant. I was

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna say NFL player as well. Telling telling me a

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>guy that you look like Babe Ruth in the dusk

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of his life is one of the big putdowns you

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>could throw at somebody. A very nice guy by all accounts,

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that true? Yes, you could just see what people

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>are lining up plugged in on this guy. I don't

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything about him. I've never been to

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>runs the Pro Football of Fame. Alright, alright, I'm sorry,

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>all right. West said he's never going to the Hall

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of Fame if you like gets in. So you know

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the football like NFL, all those players, Yeah, they're they're

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in Canton getting inshrined every time. Beckham's Mark's going back

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. Really breaking news. Wow breaking Mark's on top

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. You got your running back, you got your

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>running back rankings, big show you came in today, showed

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>your commitment to the boss. Going back to Canton. What heut?

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>What could happen next? What's next? Playing plane crash on

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the way to Ohio And I'm just saying it's what

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>could happen next? You're a better week, you were Thomas Davis. Well,

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Davis won't need no one in that family need

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to have a job again for the next two years.

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So probably Thomas Davis. Thomas Davis play Mark's dentist Bill,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>like Thomas Davis is having a better week. Yes, he

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is all right. Moving on another retirement. Jason Campbell, who

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is one of West's favorites at quarterback, known for his

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>worm burners, as West calls them, uh, the King of

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the checkdown. Jason Campbell has decided he's planning to retire

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>after ten seasons. He uh. A source close to Campbell

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>told rap Sheet that the decision is not final, but

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>with training camps on the horizon, Uh, he's he's oh,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess he's he's down to retire if

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>nobody calls his number. That's what it seemed like to me.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But Campbell played ten years of former first round pick

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>by the Redskins, of course, went to Oakland, had a

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>cup of coffee with Mark and Cleveland, and then last

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>year was Andy Dalton's uh backup in Cincinnati, so it

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>might be it for Jason Campbell West you'll never see

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>him again. At one point, I believe he had seven

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinators in the first seven years of his career, UM,

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>so he never really had a fair shake. But he's

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>also another reminder that just because a first round quarterback

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>shows a little bit of promise in the second half

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of his rookie season, that doesn't mean he's going to

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to develop into a stud. You see this all

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. He had me pretty excited about him at

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>one point in his career. It's really even into his

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>third season. I'm looking at his stats now. He led

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the league if this is you know, a stat in

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the fewest interceptions per throw thirteen touchdowns, six interceptions through

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for thirty yards. The team was eight and a. At

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that point, you thought Jason Campbell was TWI years all

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the time. At the very least, he's going to be

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>a starter in the NFL For ten years. He was

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a promising guy and then I don't know what really

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>did him wrong injuries. This was never really accurate and

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a great touch on his pass. In two

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve, I remember this. They the Bears signed him

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to I think a three and a half million dollar contract,

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a one year deal, which was like the most money

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of any backup quarterback, and they thought that they had

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy they could trust in case Cutler got hurt.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think Cutler got hurt, and I remember Campbell

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>played the game played the Niners on Monday night and

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>he got absolutely waxed. There was a Texans game too,

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe, yeah, and one of the worst games I've

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>ever seen west it made him crazy. Was the game

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he played for the Browns where he through. I was

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>convinced he had retired already at that point. But the

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>year before he signed that contract, I drove up to

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Oakland on the fly to watch Cleveland play Hugh Jackson's Raiders,

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and that was the game early in the year where

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>he got hurt. Campbell got hurt. He looked outstanding in

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the early part of that year, and that game especially,

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>they ran over Cleveland and they looked dangerous. And that

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was what got Carson Palmer into Oakland because he was

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>gone for the year. That helped him get that contract

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Bears. Had he not gotten hurt there, I

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>think we would have thought of him differently after that season.

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>They had a gun at the playoffs and don't forget

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>about uh he yeah, he was seven and five. And

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't his injury lead to the panic trade by the

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Raiders to get Carson Ponds Good. We were reminded once again,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>while it's not a good idea to allow coaches to

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>make trades because they don't think of the future. They

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.959
<v Speaker 1>only think, I gotta save my job right now. Well,

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise that Hugh Jackson, who you know, absolutely

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>got fleeced by the Bengals, got a job with the

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Bengals soon after. I think it's safe to say, what

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are you sting? I think I just did. I think

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to say that Jason Campbell is the most

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>successful Raiders starting quarterback since Rich Gannon. And it's not

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>even close. Eleven wins and seven losses. There's no one

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>else that possibly been four games over five as a

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Raiders quarterback Andrew Walter stop. All right, So good luck

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to you, Jason Cambell lest someone calls him and then

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably see him in August, but we'll see what happens,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>all right. Finally, I just want to touch on this

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark you wrote about it on uh Saturday. I believe

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the Colts. Uh remember at the Combine. At the Combine,

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I noticed the same thing. There were banners hanging at

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Oil Stadium. Uh. It was like, you know, saying

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that they when they won their divisions, they got a

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>banner when they went to the a f C title

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>game and the early aughts, they you know, it would

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sayd a f C finalists, but they just hung another

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>banner for two thousand fourteen a f C finalists. And

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, this caught the eye of social media

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and it took off. Basically, I'm saying I got I

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>got screwed out of the you know, glory on this

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>for noticing at first. Glory accompanies this very little, but

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the point being that these banners are hanging. It went

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>nuts and caught fire in the blogs, and the Colts

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>stood by their decision to hang these silly participation trophies.

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Did you write about it back then? I tweeted about it,

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>which is I thought was enough. I didn't want it

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to, you know, get anybody upset.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you had a larger following, it probably

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>could have gotten some wheels on that for you, NFL

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>writer Blackway, he did it anyways. Cult CEO O ce

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>O Pete Ward Uh says that this acision to hang

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the banner boils down to one factor pride. What stupid,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what he said. Oh I love this Postmark drops

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a hammer on Patriots fans at the end. Oh, let's

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>read it. We'll read it ready, Uh do not need

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to read it line for line. Much of the finger

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>pointing has come from New England, where Patriots fans, no

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>strangers to blissful seasons, can't fathom why the Colts would

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>magnify a run that ended with hoisting the Lombardi without

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.959
<v Speaker 1>hoisting without hoisting the Lombardi. What a great point. And

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>then bang a post of the Patriots banner with the

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and oh regular season record two thousand seven? Is

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that still up? That's permanent thing? Yeah? And next, and

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that's agree to all these Patriots fans that were and listen,

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you're celebrating the game where you got jobbed to seven.

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But suspect, but the Patriots went and somewhat did the

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>same thing. They kind of did. This is your pr

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>machine trying to get people that sex no banners bad finalist.

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the word finalist, because no one's ever

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>called anyone a finalist. You're you're the runner up, or

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you're the loser of that game. I don't even let's

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>you've appeared in the game, and not only did you

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>appear in the game, you embarrassed yourself, you got bombed

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the building. It's not something that you want

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>to necessarily even remember. They're they're too successful franchise over

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years. Like this is going the way

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Adam Corolla. Everybody gets a trophy for participating

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>speed Ah, that's what's happening, all right, So maybe we'll

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>put up some banners around. You know, Mark hasn't been

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>able to win that m v P award, but we

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>could put up by his desk, you know, Mark Sessler,

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>m v P Award finalist, right, or like you've at

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>least been a finalist for the podcast or like eight

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>rank Story of the Day two thousand forty two thousand

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>fourteen Stitcher nomination for Best Sports Pod. And we can

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>get that, you know, din we lose one reason something

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah, put it on the cover. Take off

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the Best of iTunes two thousand and six or whatever.

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>It's maybe it's time for that contend to while we're

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>on the topic. Alright, So Mark, you wrote the piece

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>ranking NFL backfields from number one to number thirty two,

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh, why don't we build up? You know, first

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of all, everyone should read it. I read it cover

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to cover. I'm not convinced to that. I don't know.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I read it though, and you know it was comprehensive

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark talk. Not only it wasn't just when Mark sat

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>down and and and his mother's basement and blogged it out.

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Mark made some phone calls. They actually listened in on

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>one inadvertently when he was talking to the Vikings running

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>backs coach and speaking in a broadcasting voice on the phone. Uh,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I had go ahead. Yeah, anyway, So what I'm I'm

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to give a compliment, pay a compliment. Mark really

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>dug in to figure this list out. So why don't

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we count down from the back end. It'll be a

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>little fun. Uh yeah, you know, throw it, throw a

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>little curveball right off the bat, and uh, I'll give

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you thirty two through five? Why not? And uh, we're

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>through twenty six Because Mark broke into tears the Buccaneers. Wow,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin has fallen quite a long way from when

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he was thought of as one of the best young

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>backs in the league. H Thirty one the Titans, uh

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with Bishop Sanky leading the way, thirty Raiders twenty nine,

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots, which is interesting, jag Jaguars with t J. Yelden,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals at seven, and the Cowboys, who of course

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>led the NFL and rushing last year, got rid of

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>de Marco Murray and now have Darren McFadden and Joseph

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Randall leading away. They come into twenty six. So that's

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the bottom tier of Mark's list. Thoughts, West, you've got

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>his going. I went back and watched Charles Sims and

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin because I've done posts on both of those

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>guys recently. Dirk Cutter, Buccaneers offensive coordinator, basically saved Doug

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Martin's roster spot, saying that he went back and watched

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>film and Doug Martin looked like a lot better than

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>he expected. And book there are in the last three

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>games he clears ninety yards, and two of them one

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he has a sixty three yard line through a gaping

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>chasm in the middle the field, and another one is

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>mistackling on a forty five yard run. I know we

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>don't like to do this, but if you take away

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>those two runs, he ever's two point eight yards per

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>carry over those three games. It's not like he was

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>sustaining an offense or moving chains. He just didn't look

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>that good to me, and Charles Sims looked like a

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>slow C. J. Spiller with no power. So I have

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>no problem ranking them as the worst running back crew

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Maybe he looked at Doug Martin's rookie

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>tape seriously. Maybe he just thought this guy was this

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>dynamic in the NFL. At one point, I can save him,

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but I have no problems putting them thirty second. I

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>do argue a little bit with the Cowboys. To me,

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>they're in contention for that worst spot. I would probably

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>have them right there at thirty two one, where I

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>like Joseph Randall, I have been, you know, vocal about that.

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>But if that's your best option, in my mind, by far,

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty bad part of me. Was the cow

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have you have to factor in, like what

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>were the results gonna be. They've got arguably the best

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>line in the in all of football running are you

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>judge in the running backs or the line? Well, I

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>mean with in this case, I look at Dallas and

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that Darren McFadden situation like some do.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a loud mouth and Joseph Randall, who

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is good, I think, but the guy cannot stop talking,

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and then the rest of the roster, I just I

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>don't look comparing them to the teams above them. It's

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Dallas let the offensive player of the year walk out

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the door, and they didn't exactly replace him the way

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that teams like the Eagles and the Saints went out

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in restocked. You uh, not buying in on Latavius Murray

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>having a breakout season as a Raiders coach recently said

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he could be in for a huge year. I found

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that interesting. Uh. And also at the Patriots, you have

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>yours on the in the piece you list all the

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>guys in the backfield where they have one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight,

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So they're they're really kind of the thrown the sink,

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>catching sink and doing that whole thing and hoping one

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of these guys steps up. Um, maybe it'll be Jonas Gray,

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but uh, hopefully he got I mean if blood's a

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>nice change of pace. Guy Jonas Gray showed something like

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>there's something here potentially with the Patriots can move the

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>well one thing with them because I on paper they

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>probably belonged down here in terms of the names, but

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they're they're such a good team in terms of coaching.

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>No namers up that really, honestly, someone's gonna blow up

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for a two hundred yard game at some pits. Someone

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.479
<v Speaker 1>you suggesting the piece could be Lindsay lowin. I mean

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>they could pull anyone off the straight to do that.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But I talked to someone actress, she's getting bigger. She

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>could get two yard game out of Lindsay low And

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>if need that happened, feels real for week eight, talked

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>to one coach who doing the roster well and he

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, they are to thirty squad because they don't

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>have a standout right Well, it was someone that didn't

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>want to name give the name. Position going, I I

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>think they totally belonged this load. They would be in

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>contention for the worst backfield I think in the entire league,

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>right with the Cowboy if you put T. J. Yellin,

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Not that I've seen T. G. Yell than yet but

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>just eat a good second round pick if he turns out,

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>or Lettavius Murray or even Bishop Sankey and your boy

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>David Cobb. Daniel Deremia said, watch out for David Cobb

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>as a potential rookie that you can. If you put

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>those guys on the Patriots, I think they'd be in bed.

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, my boy. Bernard Pierce is the fifth

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>guy in this list of the jack that's terrible Patriots backfield,

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Um White is going to be there passing down back

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point, who knows? I mean Bolden Blount, that

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>guy could not have looked more underwhelming and preseasonly. Agree.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And for those of you scoring at home. The Chris

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Westling word of the day is chasm, which is a

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>deep fissure in the earth, rock or another surface. I

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 1>think that's pretty much I mean common. It's not like

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a word that nobody uses. I'm saying I said it

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>was the word of the day. It doesn't say whether

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it should have been used or or anything else. To use.

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>My last translator, he just called you a dumbask well.

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that a word that people Chasm is

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty widely. I mean, it's only five letters, it's pretty

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>widely something. You're literally the first person I've ever heard

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>say the word that's not that's it, And it does

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>not reflect anyway on my intelligence that no one's ever

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>said that word before. Just you know, maybe I'm not

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>around high fluting people like you guys. It's out there,

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it's in the elect whatever. It's over. I've I've had

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I've canceled West's word of the Day because of an angry,

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary response. Moving on number twenty five to twenty one,

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons at the law, the Lions at twenty four,

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns at twenty three, the New York Giants two,

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Miami Dolphins at one. Uh Mark Lamar Miller

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was pretty I think total yards last year, but you're

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not in necessarily on them having a huge ceiling now

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I moved them up and down. It's also with the

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of offense they run some of these I'm gonna

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be dead wrong on in Miami's one of the ones

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of suspect. But part of it is

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to rank rookies very and they have

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a rookie j Gies. How you say his name like

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that's he basically can't count on a fifth round pick

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to make that big of an impact even though everyone

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>likes him. Well, that's talking to Daniel Jeremiah. He talked

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>him up and felt like he could be the steel

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the draft in terms of where he was picked because

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:17.959
<v Speaker 1>they were worried about his injuries and stuff. So if

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>he and Millard together and he and he performs that

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be much better than twenty one. But part

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of it is then you start to say, who do

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you move these guys above? And that's where I got

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>into trouble. I look, I like the teams above them

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>better than Miami right now. Well, to me, this exercise

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is not the most productive backfield because then of course

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys and the Patriots are gonna be way high.

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You're just looking at pure talent. And to me, the

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins out of this group, if I had to just

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>choose the group of players, might be last. Well, the

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Falcons too, I mean, I think the Giants it's not dynamic.

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But Rashad Jennings, Andre Williams, Jane Green, you got a

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit of everything. I think that's a dark you're

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>cooking with gas there. The Browns, I like, I'm buying

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>some of this Duke Johnson hype. That was interesting you

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Thomas in the third round of the tray, Yeah, that

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was that was suspect. You had a coach, a brown

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>source rather tell you that the running back room could

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>be up into the top one of the ten best

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>groups in league. And they talked up Duke Johnson a

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and I mean he said basically he would

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>be shocked the source was a male, it was not

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a female. He would be shocked if they weren't top

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>five in the NFL and rushing attempts and that seems

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>obvious with what they have through the air, but they

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>have three different types of running back, so possible top

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.479
<v Speaker 1>ten seemed a little rich your sources. Did you have

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>any female sources? No, they were comprehensively male. Well, there's

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>no there's there's not a lot of team personnel or

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>coach coaches that are female. That's accurate. The one guy

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in this tear that I'm most intrigued by is a

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>mirror yea Lions rookie who a lot of people I

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>first think he can be a star mhm and j

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>one of them. Yeah, he went off on him, and

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in a great spot because joyke Bell

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>went from essentially a journeyman or a guy who had

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a great story that he even made the NFL to

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a guy fantasy leaguers, for whatever reason, are just in

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>love with all this is gonna be the guy. He

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that physically talented. He was a try hard guy,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's coming off serious surgeries. Yeah, they don't think

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he'll So there's no If I'm betting on a running back,

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely Abdullah and that joy Bell is never the

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:37.719
<v Speaker 1>guy you draft in the first three rounds. You can

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>pick up guys like him off the waiver And there's

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>already some bad buzz around him about whether they're running

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>back coaches were that he's whether he'll be in shape

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>when he finally gets a training camp. He's coming off

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>surgeries to his knee and achilles. Uh. The Falcons, by

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, I wrote a post on Sunday, they haven't

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>had a running back average four point oh yards per

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Carrie since two thousand eleven. So I mean that is like, uh,

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least the primary back offensive line. Remember

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the playoff games where they couldn't get fourth and short. Ever,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that offensive line is come out to

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Freeman didn't do much last year. Tevin Culman will see

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens. I do though, with with Shanahan there, it

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>might take more than one season to turn the line around.

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Plus but they he's always had productive running backs. I

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>think they'll be productive. I don't think that's necessarily that talented.

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm shocked. I'm shocked by that. That's that. That's why

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>someone's gotta give ja Quiz Rogers a chance. I know

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he does have a job now, but I always thought

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he was a little better than people thought. He's part

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. Well, you just said the line was

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>so bad that no one could run. But Stephen Jackson's

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>putting up a higher average than Quiz. Name me. Here's

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a win wests Toaster, the Atlanta Falcons running back in

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years or six years that led the

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>league in yards per carry. There's a couple actually, now

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that I think of it the time, Michael Turner, Jarius Norwood,

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>remember old Jarius? How many care that? Just that just

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>brought this part of chasm you've created for the show?

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg Moving on number twenty, the New York Jets number nineteen,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the Rams number eighteen, The Panthers remember seventeen forty Niners

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>number sixteen. The ravens uh Forts seemed high to me. Mark,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the Reggie Bush hype train rolled into

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Sessler corner. I think it's much more about Hide. I

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>think that Hide with gore out the door, and he's

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be given a big chance to do his thing.

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And I went back and watched him, and you know,

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>he'd He didn't have not all of his games were

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>shining last season, but he had some moments that made

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>me think that they could use him quite a bit.

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.479
<v Speaker 1>And I Reggie Bush is not the reason I would

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>put them up at seventeen. But he's not a bad ascid.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>He had a couple of games last year when he

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>was healthy were I thought he looked good. That's a

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>solid group. If Kendall Hunter gives him anything to that's

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>a good number three. Bush is a good number two.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>If he's really the number two, we'll see about Hide.

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I I like that you you know, weren't too biased.

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>You have the Jets. I would Motley Crew ahead of

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>your Browns. That poop that Jets poop poop latter, I'd

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have down in the next year under under a few

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>teams well, as Mark remarks that they ranked third in

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>rushing last year. They got rid of Chris Johnson wisely

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>bringing Ridley. If Ridley comes back and he's healthy and

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 1>he's the Ridley that he was before the knee injury,

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good back film the micrad I think

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Aubrey, they're all ifs in this backfield. I don't know.

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Ivrey for two years now has been a guy

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that ever had carries in the season. He fumbles a

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lot and he gets injured a lot. Well part of

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it you got to get the jets up high just

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to get Dan on board and putting him a number twenty.

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a good place too. Well, it's all I think

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they should be hiring in fairness to pay. He is

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not an IF. He is one of the most steady

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>law pals in the league. He's not very exciting, but

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you're going to give him like a

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>new contract every five years for the next forty years.

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They love him so much. I hate to be you know,

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>naturally we're picking this apart, but you did a great

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>job with the list. One team that really intrigues me

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that I probably put a little higher just on potential,

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and I know you didn't want to overrate the rookies

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Girly and Tray Macee. Yeah. If I'm just ranking watchable

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>backfield or the backfields I want to watch this year

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that that is in the top five for me. I

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>love Trey Mason and Todd Gurley. I'm just intrigued to

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>see what he's all about. I think it was. I

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>really tried to not overdo it with any rookie and

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not healthy yet. But that said, they could be

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ten spots higher by the time this season ends. What

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>did your male sources say about Panthers running back Cameron

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 1>artist Pain. I didn't get a lot of feel I

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>found out that if your name is not Adam Schefter,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that when you email thirty two NFL teams, they aren't

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>breaking down the doors to talk to someone they've never

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>heard of. You got some good you got some good stuff, Yeah,

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I was. I didn't hear anything about Cameron artists Pain kid. Yeah. Actually,

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what DJ I believe I remember on move

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>This either him or Bucky liked Cameron artists Pain for

0:36:56.360 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>what cap did? I feel like the answers ranking you

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.760
<v Speaker 1>would have had them higher, but Jonathan Stewart's injury history

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was a factor. If he if he plays all sixteen games,

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and you factor into some degree what Cam Newton does

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on the ground that cost it didn't hurt them, It's

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>not gonna it's it's to me, really, the issue was

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that Stewart. I feel like I've written seven thousand posts

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>on NFL dot com about foot and lower leggage issues.

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>When he was healthy last season, he was a fireball.

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>He was great. But can He's missed twenty games in

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>three years. Ravens is the one that sticks out to me.

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I if I was a GM, I'm not excited about

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for set Talia Faro Alan, I think they could be

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>productive again. But I love I love him as a player.

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you're just talking from scratch, is he a

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>better than average NFL starting running back? Just scheme independent?

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>You know they before last year, not before last I mean,

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he was a guy who's a good guy to have,

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you go after him. Talia Faro, Fitzgerald Toussant

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>makes your little list here of running backs. I don't

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>even know if it's Gerald. I couldn't spell half of

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>those great name. Fitz Gerald's not very literary next tier

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>number fifteen, the Washington Redskins fourteen, the Bears, that Bears,

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>number thirteen, the Denver Broncos, uh twelve, the Chargers and

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven the Cults. The cults. Now we're starting to get

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to the groups. Let's getting juicy. Look at Mark. When

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Mark puts the team whoever he puts out eleven, they

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>should see that as a shot, because Mark said they're

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>not top ten material. To me, the inconvenient truth, I

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's a back full backfield full question marks

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>um Frank Gore, I don't think, at his age is

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the best backs in the league anymore. This

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>tier especially, I struggled because it was I've heard from

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>from Chicago that we're not excited about the Bears being there.

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 1>And part of me is this, like with Forte, it's

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>not a shot on Matt Forte. Part of it is depth,

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and I look at the rest of that group. Carrie

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>was very unimpressive last season. I thought Langford's from what

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I've read, I haven't watched a lot of tape of

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the guy, but he's just a he's a jag. And

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.839
<v Speaker 1>so you got Jakey's Roger, So what happens if Forte

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.399
<v Speaker 1>can't go wire to wire. I mean they they've used

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 1>him so much. If he plays the whole way, fine,

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>they were twenty seven and rushing last season with him

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>going the full way. Those are all excellent points. You're

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>right that they've struggled running. Forte is a backfield though

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>unto himself. Yeah he is. I mean again, and he's

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a He caught out a hundred passes. He broke the

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL records. So it's not a shot at Forte. But

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>there's no way I was. I didn't see them as

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>top ten. A lot of people going to disagree. Also,

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>uh went to to Lane University. You guys heard about that?

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Who went there? Great guy? Redskins. Redskins gonna be good.

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>People are talking about Matt Jones and so that's a

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>nice one to combination Alfred Morris. I would have them

0:39:58.120 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a little higher. I have a question about that when

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you say that Alfred Morris is a strong fit for

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Bill Callahan's manpower scheme. Is that something um that one

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of your sources said or no, Uh, that was done

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>through some research, and but what I also found was

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're not married to just using that blocking scheme

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to also continue with the zone, and

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:20.879
<v Speaker 1>I do think he was good in zone too. He's

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>one cut runner, that's yeah. That's why I questioned it,

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>because he was drafted for the zone and that's all

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>he's ever played in. I know he's a power back,

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't always mean you do well in a

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 1>power scheme. Mark Well, that's fair. I love Callahan and

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and I like hearing that they're not gonna just go

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>down one road with that. So he's also I think

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not the only guy. I do think that it

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds like uh Jones is gonna definitely threaten for some plane.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Charges did a good job the Melvin Gordon move because

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it solidifies it makes it look a lot better because

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>it went from a bunch of like guys you you're

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>not sure about too. Now it's a nice backfield. You

0:40:56.040 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>got Gordon, Brandon, Oliver, Danny Woodhead, Damn McDonald. Is there.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There's some guys that can run the football there. Maybe

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll do a better job with it this year. I

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>really like Oliver and they absolutely needed to fill the

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Matthews void, and you know, Gordon. We don't know, but

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the early reports are very good on him and Woodheads

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a mismatch in the passing game place, all right? Moved

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>into the top ten. This is Harold ground. There's a

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>chasm between eleven and ten. Here we go the Texans

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>number ten, the Packers number nine, the Chiefs eight, the

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Bills seven, and number six. Another shot missing the top

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>five the Bungles. Why do you got to pick on

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. Yeah, they should have been in the top

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>five here. I don't know. I couldn't. I couldn't get

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>him in there, but I thought they and I and

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Wesley was a big influence on me moving them up

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to six from where I Hadn't you read West's love

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 1>letter to Jeremy Hill last week? Well did you read

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>marks piece because he calls West's piece brilliant? Well it was.

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a good read. But I know what Jero.

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is Bernard Matt, you know, matched with Hill.

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that they can do a lot and they

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to run the ball, probably even more than

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they did last year. And I'm I'm just joking around here.

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually I think I would have him even a

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher, not much, I mean top five. You

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have Hill, which, as West mentioned, in his Chasm piece

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that this guy is ready to break out. Nobody was

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>better than the second half in terms of yards per

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 1>carrying it. I think yards overall, right, And then Bernard

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 1>is maybe the best receiver there is out there. And

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and to that point, by the way, West, when you read,

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>when you read that piece that you wrote, the brilliant

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>piece again, it starts to feel like you might be

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>coming back. He's coming back to coming around again. Paid

0:42:55.719 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are we where are we right now? With Where are

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 1>we right now? Well? I think because West just for

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Anny new listeners, just to set it up. West left

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the team. He was so disgusted in the nineties. He

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>no longer follows the bangals. But it seems like, as

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Carly Simon once said, you might be coming around again. Well, look,

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 1>this is like an ex wife, and it's been twenty

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 1>years almost. It's not a good idea to hop back

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in bed with your ex wife. But you know, feelings

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you had buried in our in our latent. Sometimes research

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>don't if you allow them to resurface. And I think

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the Ohio River offense piece allowed me to get back

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in touch with some feelings I still had about their

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties teams in nineteen se How about the the

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>idea that the Bengals when you quit them, it was,

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a partner that let herself go a little bit.

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Now she's looking tight and looking really good and all

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden like, whoa, that's the woman I fell

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in love with. I think that's that's that's valid. So

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you're what you're saying, you could wake up, you know,

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>after a long night out hazy kind of come into

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and metaphorically, Andy Dalton's right in bed next or at

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>least one text away, one late text and Andy Dalton

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>has a bit of a two bagger something. Wow. Some

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the great dramas end with that couple that's been

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>apart for so long. Kids are all upset, Well, my

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>dad get back together at the end. I think this

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>works on. I mean in my life, I've seen girlfriends

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>who have really made themselves more attractive and the feelings happen.

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Bengals, Yeah, you're right. I mean, Jeremy Hill,

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a fun guy to rud On, Geo, Bernard A. J. Green,

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones, he loved her for a reason. You know,

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 1>those those feelings can resurface. I'm not saying they're there,

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's more about the seventies and eighties Bengals. You

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>almost wish they kept Carson Palmer. No, no, that's not

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>sweetening the deal. I yeah, I have a theory that

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton's the only thing now standing in the way

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if they ever were to swap him out and get

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>something somebody exciting coming around. I know that, by the way,

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>there's only great teams ahead of these teams on the rankings.

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 1>But but Jamal Charles just continues to be the most

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>overlooked guy and if one of the best players in

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFL the last five years, and he's got a

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>great backup in Nile Davis and Old Cessler just dropping him.

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he's very consistent. Fourteen hundred total yards last year.

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he had thirteen touchdowns in fourteen games or

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and fifteen games. Something got he wasn't as good

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>he I think at two thousand total years, he'd be

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>higher on on a ranking of running backs. But Nil Davis,

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I just the rest of the list and

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the way they use well. I just like the rest

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the list, and it's part of it is you

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>know you're gonna swing and missing some of these. Jamal

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Charles five point five yards per carrying his career, Jim

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Brown five point two j Jamal Charles one of those

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>sneaky guys. If he had a good run here the

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way, He's someone that will get some

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>conversation Hall of Fame that no one would think of

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Jamal what seems to be hanging in the air here.

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark is like, this was a missed opportunity to give

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Charles a respect he deserves. I do respect him,

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, I'm not a barbecue person, and

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing because I'm not gonna be going

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to Kansas City anytime soon. Based on the feedback I've

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:13.839
<v Speaker 1>gotten where I placed him, So I like that you

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>have the Bengals over the Bills. This was something that

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've gotten some feedback on this. On Twitter.

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I asked Evan Silva Rhoda World last week, would you

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>rather have Lashawn McCoy right now or Jeremy Hill for

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the same salary, And a lot of people responded to

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that and said, why would anyone take Lashawn McCoy. You know,

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he's only two years removed from leading the NFL and rushing.

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think Jeremy Hill is a better runner than McCoy,

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think McCoy wasn't quite last year what we're

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>used to him being bold. I agree, I like I

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>like Bengals, that high bills, Fred Jackson. I mean, I'd

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.959
<v Speaker 1>love me some Fred Jackson. But one of these years

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's got to end. Yeah. Part of with the Bengals

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:54.359
<v Speaker 1>is Hugh Jackson. Yeah. And I'll say number number ten

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the the Texans Aaron Foster. You know again, he didn't

0:46:57.840 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>play the whole season last year. That's gonna be a

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>bad quarter back group. There's gonna be that box is

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna be stacked. I think against it. That's gonna be tough.

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:06.359
<v Speaker 1>And if he goes down. Are you getting excited about

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Offord Blue? Yeah? I mean how excited are you gonna

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 1>get about that? I don't know. So I would think

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe they would have been out of the top ten,

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>but so far, I love your list. Also, well, not

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone does. Everyone I talked to you thinks they should

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be top five, whether they're Tampa Bay or Tennessee or well,

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I just you know the fans. Oh, you don't like

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the feedback you're getting? Care less breaking out that black

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know they have to come nice pool on the

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Carly Simon drop. He wasn't quite the fixing. In the seventh,

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard that song popular song that well, it

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>was like a mid eighties hit. My my mother is

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>a huge Carly Simon fan and I grew up with

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that her greatest hit CD on loop, so I know

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 1>every single notable Simon is the Nora from movie that.

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't that song like the theme song of that

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>movie with Jack Nicholson And uh, oh as good as

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it gets something heat, body heat, the body heat is

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not yet. Uh. No cool car person ever has started

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with the phrase what was that Nora fron that it

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 1>was called heartburn? I think it was because it came

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>out and uh, Carly Simon's coming around again came out. Ye,

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that was the movie Jack Nicholson, Nail the stupid for

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of that song Director's cut, Working Girl

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and that and that concludes pop culture memories from Chris Wesley.

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the top five here we go. This is

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 1>where Mark makes his money, his incredible salary, starting with

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>number five, the Pittsburgh Steelers Number five, with of course

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the dynamic Leby on bell D'Angelo Williams behind him Andrey

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Archer in the mix. Number four Nolan Saints with Mark Ingram, C. J. Spiller,

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Robinson the number three the Minnesota Vikings with Adrian Peterson,

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Jerick McKinnon, Matt right. Let me, let me just say

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>something about the the Vikes. Peterson's back and we you know,

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and you just West you brought it up, so it's

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a good way to get into it. Evan Silva, who's

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy that we respect over at Rodal World, knows

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>his stuff. However, you know, everyone seems to think that

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Leshawn McCoy is in declined because he wasn't as good

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>last year. He dropped the yard to carry uh in

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>his average, but ap dropped the yard and a half

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. He's four years older, he has h

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 1>But I just don't understand why everyone thinks McCoy is

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>going downhill when yes he is, but he's also I

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 1>don't ever compared Leshawn McCoy to him. I think they're

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 1>held to different standards. I'm just saying Peterson when you

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>get down to and he's thirty, he's been out of

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>football for a year since. It's also a freak. The

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>last yes, the last year he did play, he was

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a significantly lesser version than the guy that went nuts

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve. So to assume that he's still

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that guy, I am I don't know, assume it despite

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.479
<v Speaker 1>your protest protestations. I don't think he was significantly worse

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:07.359
<v Speaker 1>last time around. Either the factors around him were worse

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and he was a little worse. But I think he

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 1>he was still the best running back in the end.

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's not coming off an injury. He's coming

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 1>off not being around, but he's kept in shape. Everyone

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that's been around him said he looks like the same guy.

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So part of me is like, I'll be I'm fine

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 1>being late on the Adrian Peterson trained on on announcing

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:28.359
<v Speaker 1>his decline until it happens, because he is seems hell

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:31.240
<v Speaker 1>bent unproving everyone well. I think he's the best player.

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>He's arguably the best player in the NFL over the

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:36.960
<v Speaker 1>last ten years in terms of being at just the

0:50:36.960 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 1>best that his position. Since I've been working just covering football.

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 1>He's right there with the guys that you think have

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:45.879
<v Speaker 1>a chance in twenty years that we'll be talking about

0:50:45.920 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>as one of you know, when they make those lists

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the top ten players everywhere, like he might be on

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it if he has a good art. Perhaps point is,

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you just feel like he can do anything. And I'm

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily doubting Peterson. I'm more saying that I feel

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:58.239
<v Speaker 1>like people have been a little quick to jump to

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>saying that Lashawn McCoy is decline that's fair, and I

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>was Peterson's own dropping stats. But I yeah, I think

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>he proved that. Peterson when he went nuts in two

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve, proved a lot of people wrong. Um, and

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised if he's great again, But I

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:14.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't have a problem with putting them third.

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>You've got Derrick McKennon behind him, You've got two good backfields.

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 1>We won't spoil him coming up. I was really surprised,

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and I know I could have voiced my opinion to

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you earlier. You gave me the option over the weekend,

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 1>but I just thought this should be Mark's list. You

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need my input. The Saints number four, uh just

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:36.840
<v Speaker 1>uh talk about that. Well, this is this reminds me

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:39.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit with some of the other teams where

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's if Ingram stays healthy all season and he plays

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the way he did last year, and you pair him

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with what Sean Payton is going to do with c J. Spiller,

0:51:48.200 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 1>with what he's proven he can do with c J.

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Spiller type guys. But Spiller is better than all those guys.

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I think if he's if he also stays healthy, this

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 1>is a dynamic backfield and I I can't wait to

0:51:59.280 --> 0:52:02.239
<v Speaker 1>see what New Orleans, Uh, their whole scheme is gonna change.

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 1>We talked about that. I think they should be in

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the conversation for number one back I thought having them

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>number four was really bold. That's what boom bust. That's

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>why I didn't honestly want to give you what I thought,

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.360
<v Speaker 1>because then I would have just watered it down and say, well,

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that seems bold. It's good to be It's

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:19.280
<v Speaker 1>good to be bold. You believe in the Saints backfield.

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Believing in the Saints that that has never gone wrong

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:27.319
<v Speaker 1>for you or West Spillers never. Spiller has the guy

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>calling place for him, and Scheming, who was the perfect

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 1>compliment for his his skill set and also the perfect

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>like guy compliment in their tandem, mark Ingram and c J.

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Spiller are two different styles of backs, and they work

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>really well together. I think they decide. How many other

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:47.600
<v Speaker 1>backfields here have a former making a leap candidate as

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the number three back Kyrie Robinson, who I really like.

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a little of it's a little of bold. But

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I got another one coming up that we haven't talked

0:52:56.719 --> 0:53:00.959
<v Speaker 1>about yet. Uh any other thoughts on the five through three?

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I was, yeah, I mean that's just all Levian Bill.

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>That's how high you regard that is. And I and

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I like levy On better, better than Jamal Charles or

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Lashawn McCoy or Jeremy Hill. I have no problem with

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's one guy that like. When I went back to

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:20.359
<v Speaker 1>watch collection of his of his games, I don't even

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 1>think last season quite caught me how specially is. And

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 1>when I talked to his former coach as well, he

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 1>just said, this guy will be that player that we're

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:31.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about for another ten years. So I buy into

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>him big time. And I think what he did last

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>season was outstanding and they'll only get better. Actually, we

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:39.720
<v Speaker 1>should give you some credit here. Talking of Vikings running

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 1>back to coach Kirby Wilson, broke a little news in

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of Wilson backing off Peterson in terms of his workload.

0:53:46.400 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Name checked Mark Sessler on NFL Total Access for this.

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:53.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the rhythm of the well. And if I

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 1>had cable television, I would have seen that trepid Reporter

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>three is your week your secret. It's obviously going to

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>be countered with a destructive, terrible week next week. It's

0:54:06.680 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>got a balance. We have the m v P award

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 1>up here for the podcast, but there is another type

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of MVP award at the company. How mad would you

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 1>guys be if Cessler got his second one, I'd be

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>out of here. I would lose. I would West would

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:21.959
<v Speaker 1>handle it fine. I would lose Dan as a friend.

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:27.319
<v Speaker 1>They have an MVP award. Mark's already won it once.

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that any of us are getting He's

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>got a coin. I would have to give it to

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Dan immediately just to save you. But I'm friends with

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>his whole family. What win with his toaster? You can

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just make up rolls and passing map. Oh yeah, hey,

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 1>here's the toaster. West, you want it? But wait, your

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>last thing was a lot but ducking and we wouldn't

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have to do it that way. Oh I like that drama.

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:55.280
<v Speaker 1>One day disturbing Don King will get them together number

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>two on this list. The twelves aren't gonna be happy

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:03.359
<v Speaker 1>because they thought had this locked up. The Seattle Seahawks

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:09.319
<v Speaker 1>always the brides maide number two, just like the bridesmaid

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona at the Super Bowl when they blew it

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't give it to Marshawn Lynch. And yet

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Mark says they're not number one. Their number two on

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this list nothing to be ashamed of. Robert Turbin also

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on that team, former making the leap candidate Christine Michael

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 1>still not over that name Rod Smith, who was a

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:30.840
<v Speaker 1>great wide receiver for the Broncos before Y two. K

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a nice little group. If the

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks don't trust Kristin Michael enough to put him on

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the field, why should you trust him enough to rank

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 1>them number one on your list. Part of it is, well, listen,

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they are Marshawn Lynch is unstoppable. But Michael I went

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 1>and wrote a gigantic piece on him last summer and

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he did me wrong. So I'm not gonna believe a

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:51.799
<v Speaker 1>word of it until I see it. You're right, What

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if the Seahawks taking a page out of the Colts

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:59.799
<v Speaker 1>book puts up uh finalist Mark Sessler is running Backgrankings

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this year. They it's been a long time since Seattle's

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>had anything nice said about them, so they're gonna need

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to go down that road. I could see Richard Sherman

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>going after you about this. That ever you know, got

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on his radar. Seems like the twelve Sherman the Twelves

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:20.160
<v Speaker 1>will hand take this one in stride and they, by

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, they should be happy. There's a much stronger

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>case for moving them down below the Vikings, who have

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson on the list. I think the Steelers. If

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you just want to make a case for Levy on Bell, yeah,

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I means Marton Lynch is a brilliant running back, but

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 1>also spent like twelve percent of last season on an

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:40.480
<v Speaker 1>exercise bike for some reason. You got it. Also of

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the season never ready for the beginning. Who knows what's

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:47.239
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. I did factor in Russell Wilson too.

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, only fifteen running backs had more yards than him.

0:56:50.840 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 1>He's part of that doesn't count. I didn't know that counted.

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>To redo the entire lest I started thirty two factoring

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks here we go, all right, and now number one backfield.

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't figured it out, I'm sorry, you're stupid.

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:14.480
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles with DeMarco Murray, Ryan Matthews, Darren Sprawls, Jim Barner,

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Tucker Man Award. How about that. Congratulations to the Eagles, Mark,

0:57:21.400 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Why are they the number one backfield in all of

0:57:24.200 --> 0:57:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League? Well, it starts with Matthew Tucker. No,

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I just I look at number one, Chip Kelly. Everyone

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:36.520
<v Speaker 1>was ridiculing Chip Kelly when the whole free agency thing happened.

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Gore walked out of the building. Chip Kelly's losing it.

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 1>He's probably be back at Oregon two years from now.

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But instead you wind up with the best running back

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:48.200
<v Speaker 1>from last season in the Offensive Player of the Year,

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan Matthews, who is easily the best number two

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>back of anyone on this list. And we'll see a

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 1>ton of work I think this season. And then you

0:57:57.120 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 1>got Darren Sprawls, which is sort of like the best

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 1>number back on this Yeah. I don't know. This wasn't

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 1>really that hard for me. Uh, it's a great back field.

0:58:06.360 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Is there a little concern in terms of like it's

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a chemistry experiment to like, how do you

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>use these guys? How do you put them together? Do

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you you know, give Ryan Matthews a quarter? Like how

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 1>does this? How is this gonna work? You know? It

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is interesting is when I talked to Daniel Jeremiah, one

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>thing he said that why this would work for Philly

0:58:23.360 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 1>versus another team is that they're high. Their offense is

0:58:25.840 --> 0:58:28.959
<v Speaker 1>so fast paced. That isn't just Ryan Matthews coming out

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for the occasional carry. It's you could do a full

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:34.800
<v Speaker 1>series with Ryan Matthews and a full series with Murray

0:58:34.840 --> 0:58:37.680
<v Speaker 1>which running backs. If they're not gonna be willing to

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 1>team that way, that could become a problem. But it's

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not just Ryan Matthews getting the occasional attempt. It's gonna

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 1>get let them get in the flow. That makes a

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:48.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense because you know when they're playing hurry up,

0:58:48.760 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>when they're at their best, they're not making substitutions. I

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:54.760
<v Speaker 1>do wonder if Matthews can be a quality guy on

0:58:55.000 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 1>passing downs that necessarily hasn't been his strength throughout his career.

0:59:00.440 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>But that makes a lot of sense. And and this

0:59:02.120 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is a team that has more plays and runs to

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>play with are they going to well, if he's he's

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 1>if he's on the hole for the whole series, he's

0:59:10.880 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 1>on the field for passing down is what I'm thinking.

0:59:13.280 --> 0:59:15.320
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna run the ball a lot. Yes, they are.

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Everyone said that about Chip Kelly when he came to

0:59:17.760 --> 0:59:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. He's not really all about the past, and

0:59:20.080 --> 0:59:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he's he's showing it. And I think if you're worried

0:59:22.320 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about their chemistry, I thought Ryan Matthews had some good

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Speaker 1>comments last week and he was talking up to Marcomergy saying,

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 1>guy led the league in rushing. He deserves those hill

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of the coopters. He deserves the praise the helicopters for

0:59:33.560 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, swirling overhead when he was you know, when

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles were recruiting him and he came in to sign,

0:59:38.160 --> 0:59:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and Matthews said, he deserves all that. You know, we

0:59:40.800 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 1>all buy into this system and and we'll be fine together.

0:59:44.360 --> 0:59:46.840
<v Speaker 1>All right. That's it. That is Mark's top thirty two

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:51.000
<v Speaker 1>backfields in order. Congratulations Eagles. You don't have any Super Bowls,

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but you got this. Congratulations to Mark, what a performance,

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 1>great work, what was fun to do. Thank you for

0:59:58.560 --> 1:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>chatting about it. Right, that's it. Before before we get

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out of here. Uh. If you are an l A

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>listener and you're looking for something to do on Tuesday night,

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>please check out the premiere of a movie. It's called

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Flock of Dudes. It's playing at the l A Film

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Fest right now. Directed by a good friend of the

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>show and a long long time friend of mine, Bob Castrone.

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh tickets dot l A Filmfest dot com and search

1:00:20.840 --> 1:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Flock of Dudes. That's the world premiere of the movie.

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very funny, great comedy. Mark You and I checked

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>out one of the screenings earlier this year, didn't we

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It was great? I mean I it was. I didn't

1:00:31.000 --> 1:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>know what would happen or what will happen with it.

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I think big things. But it's the kind of thing

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that has kind of a it's people were gonna be

1:00:36.600 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>watching it like a cult type of comedy for a

1:00:38.640 --> 1:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>long time. It's well acted. Jason zelmald Or other friend

1:00:41.360 --> 1:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the listener of the show was a writer. There is

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a character loosely based on Dan Hansis is that right?

1:00:47.200 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>A little bit? I was involved with this project way

1:00:49.080 --> 1:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>back when a little bit, so I do have a

1:00:51.280 --> 1:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>connection to it as well. But please go see the movie,

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Your Lovely Wife, Emily, my lovely sweet wife, was the

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>casting director. So yes, it is a bit of a

1:01:02.840 --> 1:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>passion project for my circle of friends. So check it out.

1:01:05.720 --> 1:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Tickets dot l a film Fest dot com, search flock

1:01:08.280 --> 1:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>up dudes. Tuesday, ten pm. Right, that's it. Dan Hans

1:01:11.960 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is signing off for the great I mean Studley Mark Sessler.

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>They call him quiet Storm and Big Delivery. Didn't leave

1:01:18.520 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of meat on that bone today with that article.

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Joseph Randall's words, not such a quiet storm

1:01:25.640 --> 1:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>today's show. And of course the Mailman, the Boss. More

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>great work by Sully behind the Glass, and of course

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the Irishman Random Against. Thank you for listening to Wednesday