WEBVTT - Is an Equipment Rollback on the Horizon?

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball.

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 2>In a bright egg Frida egg, the dreaded Frida egg,

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Frida egg, Frida egg, egg, Frida egg, bride egg Lie,

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm about ready to run off of the hump.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg Podcast.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Today's episode is with Jeff Shackelford. He is the owner

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>of Jeff Shackleford dot Com also runs the uh A

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>substack newsletter called The Quadrilateral. Jeff and I talk about

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 3>the latest on the Distance Insights Report. Obviously that's a

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>hot topic in golf uh and Jeff is very well

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>versed in distance and the issue, having you know, basically

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 3>written about it for the last twenty years. So we

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 3>talk about the the latest updated interests of that, as

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>well as a little bit on the Saudis and Augusta National.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 3>So this will be a episode that kind of covers

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things that's going on in regular golf

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 3>as well as pro golf. So, without further ado, here

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 3>is Jeff Shackelford. All right, we're we're back our Distance

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 3>correspondent our external distance correspondent, Senor Jeff Shackleford from Jeff

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Shackleford dot com, also the author of the Quadrilateral, a

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>substack newsletter that everybody should subscribe to.

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>It is a what is it, fifty bucks a year?

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Fifty four?

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I RaSE it.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't anticipate raising inflation for a while. Inflation and yeah,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>just inflation. That's all or six bucks a month.

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>The keys are getting more. They they're charging you more

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 3>every time you hit the key.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>The bandwidth.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we're back. We got another update on the

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>distance report. It seems like years ago when I was

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>in Los Angeles when this first came about and you

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>came over with the two fully printed out insights report.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>This was pre COVID. It was right before COVID. I

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it was.

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.839
<v Speaker 3>February of twenty nineteen, twenty twenty, and now we're here

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>another update added areas of interest another six weight is

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 3>six month kind of feedback loop. Jeff, what did you

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 3>think of the latest updates?

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was really good. I mean, obviously the

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>bad news is it's feeling like we're we're not going

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 2>to really address this for a while. When all is

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>said and done. So that's a bad news. I think

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>the good news, though, is that it's a little more

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>aggressive than expected, and obviously we don't have all the

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>details of what they truly have in mind. You know,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 2>it's the same kind of thing as the last one.

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>They're throwing out the areas of interest and and teasing

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>some of them. Others are more explicit, and so I

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>think that's fascinating how it'll play out. But if it

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 2>is what it reads like, it's it's it's it's the

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 2>R word. It's a there's a rollback for for the

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>top guys, and that's that's a big deal. And it's

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of shocking. I mean, I realize we have a

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 2>lot going on and we can discuss why this is,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>but there's been nothing from players, and I you know,

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I have a few theories, but that's kind of shocking.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought we'd get one sort of whiny meltdown from

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>a manufacturer bending somebody's ear, and there's been nothing. So

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's key because this thing could get derailed quickly.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 3>It's, you know, just like reading the tea leaves and

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the way it feels, it seems like the manufacturers are

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 3>somewhat on board.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's right. You know, David Dusk had

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a good piece in Golf Week a few weeks before

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 2>this came out where he had anonymous submissions to questions

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>from manufacturers, and the tone in that was a really

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>good sign. You saw for the first time a realization

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>or it just wasn't that knee jerk reaction, and they

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 2>may have had a good sense of what was coming.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is the thing I think was most impressive

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>in the in the rollout. And we've been you know,

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>wanting this for however long, but they're trying to throw

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 2>them some bones to actually help the recreational golfer because

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>all the data. They won't come out and say it,

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 2>but the data shows the average person has not gotten

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the benefits from from the equipment. The people who are

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>paying for the equipment haven't gotten the benefits that the

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 2>people who are not paying for the equipment who just

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>show it off are getting. It's it's not even close.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>And so they finally are saying, hey, look, we're going

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to give you some things that you've wanted or that

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>we think will help you innovate for the average person

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>who's actually paying, and we're going to though, you know,

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 2>throttle these guys back, and there might be some ways

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>they've done it where you know this addiction the companies

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>have to marketing off of the pros. They can keep

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 2>doing that. You know, they're just in love with that

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>idea and maybe there's just no other way to sell equipment.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but I don't think. I don't think

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 2>that's true, and so I like that they try to

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>give them some things and give them that opening to

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to come back with with stuff, because it makes it

0:05:55.560 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 2>very hard for them to whine about these chain when

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you've given them some room to innovate.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 3>So just to you know, give a quick overview the air.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Updated areas of interest are ball testing, so you know,

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 3>one of the things they haven't been doing is testing

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 3>golf balls at high swing speeds on tour. They've been

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 3>testing them at below the highest swing speeds on tour,

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>which will be an update. They still aren't going all

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the way up, which is kind of a head scratching

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>move in my opinions. It's just going to go faster

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 3>and faster in the next couple of years, and then

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 3>obviously a potential for a ball that's faster for slower

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 3>swing speeds, yeah, if I read it correctly, and slower

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 3>for high swing speeds, which I think is kind of

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 3>that's what you're talking about, blending the two really helping

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the average player out and you know, not helping I

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 3>think the ball has been the opposite.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The ball and the equipment's been the opposite.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 3>The higher you swing, the higher speed you swing it,

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 3>the more benefits you get from the average player.

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>That's been kind of the thing.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>So this is kind of flipping it on its head,

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 3>which is, in my opinion, probably the way it shouldn't

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 3>have been for a long time. And then you know,

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the big one is different driver faces for professional golfers potentially,

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 3>where we might see a less forgiving driver face where

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the moi, you know, where off center hits aren't as

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>rewarded as they have been. You'd see more of a

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:38.119
<v Speaker 3>distant drain if you miss the center of the club face,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>which I mean I can't I can't see how any

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 3>golf fan in the right mind wouldn't want to see that.

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>One want to know who's actually hitting the center of

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the club face coming down the stretch at a major championship.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, Now how that's done is beyond me. I

0:07:54.800 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 2>saw one report imply that would that would mean shrinking head.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that was the impression I got.

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:04.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not what I got either.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, and that's where I was saying, they can

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 2>still market the club whatever it is, the Rogue carbon

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Wood four, and and but there would be a marking

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 2>on it that would make clear that this this, this

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>one is for the elite player or the the serious golfer,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 2>whatever that is. And it's on the conforming list. And

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>then there's the one that's sold to the to the

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>recreational player. And so that to me is really fascinating.

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think we don't know but the combination of

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 2>all these things and then what that does to change

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the player's attack of the ball, that's the part. We

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know how much that might reduce distance. So I

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know what the final number is, but it seems

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 2>like it's a solid ten percent right now that it

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 2>would take off those elite guys. I would push back slightly.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that I feel like the clubhead speed bump.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're talking about going to a number that

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 2>is the average of the top ten drivers on the tours.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 2>So and they're also it's also more flexible. It's it's

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's optimum launch conditions. It's not a set number,

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's really important. I mean, I wrote

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the Future at Golf. I wrote about the need for

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>that a long time ago, and now that was before

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 2>you had guys walking out on the range with their

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>track man, and so it seems like a logical step

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>when you know that the players have this ability to

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 2>be fine tuning and honing their launch conditions daily with

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 2>adjustments to the equipment and some of its adjustable and

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>all that. So I think that that's a natural progression

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>of the testing, but it's also gonna Yeah, that was

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a pretty stagger statement that John Spitzer made to Mike's

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the Tour and golfed.

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 3>I just.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Probably pretty much every ball on the tour right now,

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>other than a guy playing a pro v from three

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>years ago because he likes the way it feels, might

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>be non conforming. That's kind of that. I mean, that

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>was that was shocking, and there's just been no I've

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>seen very little reaction. I've been watching a lot of

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the NCAA tournaments, so I can't say that I've been

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>mining on the internet for reactions, but I haven't seen much.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 3>It's been uh, you know, we talk about the balls,

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>they would be illegal under these new testing guidelines. But

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 3>in a way it seems like, you know, the Taylor

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Baide was puffing their chest out about the stealth. The

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>equipment companies, you've set parameters, they're always going to innovate

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 3>against them. I think that's if you go back to

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the history of the golf ball with when John Lowe

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 3>and got his regulations he was excited about way back

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 3>when you know, the next day the golf ball manufacturers

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 3>came out with something that was longer and faster than

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 3>the golf ball he fought so hard to regulate against.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 3>So you know, this is what engineers do. You give

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 3>them parameters, they are going to innovate against it. And

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 3>it seems like recent the recent innovations have been kind

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 3>of finding loopholes that make illegal equipment. For like you know,

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 3>with the stealth, they're talking about how this actually you know,

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>it goes beyond the CT because of carbon right where

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 3>it actually is faster than they'll allowed, but they found

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 3>a loophole to get to that, and it I think

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 3>the resetting is going to be great. I The one

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 3>thing I'll say is that we're going to reset and

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>we're probably going to get you know, they talk a

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 3>lot about like allowing for innovation. We're probably going to

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 3>get back here in another fifty years. Is the reality right?

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe? Maybe? I mean right now, I feel like it's

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 2>so aggressive, and it may be aggressive to with the

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 2>idea that they'll end up having to negotiate a spot

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 2>in the middle, But I feel like it's going to

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 2>make a significant dent. And then but I think the

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 2>bigger question is does it put an end to to

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 2>your question about fifty years? Does it does it slow

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>down or and the potential pursuit of speed the Bryson

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>esque type or I don't want to say, but I

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 2>watched a young golfer. I saw a clip on Twitter

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 2>just from a tournament over the week or last week.

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't believe how hard the player swung. And does

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>that do these changes permanently put an end to to

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of that long drive contest type swinging out of

0:12:55.559 --> 0:13:00.599
<v Speaker 2>your shoes and return a little bit more of a

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>premium on a variety of things and skills. Uh So

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 2>that's I. Yeah, I just feel like the injury thing

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 2>and the possibility that the driver phase changes could could

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 2>really stop players from trying to swing that way. I

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 2>mean maybe I'm maybe I'm that's a wishful thinking, I

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I but we'll take We'll take anything.

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Right now, years ago I did this.

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I did a podcast with a guy who did a

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 3>study on tennis, and this is what happened when the

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 3>oversized racket came about. And if you look at the

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 3>world's top ten ranked golfers now, it's the youngest they've

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 3>ever been. And this is this parallels tennis. Tennis had

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 3>a period where youth dominated and it was the youngest.

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 3>They had the youngest major championship winner at every venue

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 3>in the same year. And this is what prompted the

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 3>guy to look into it. And I think we're at

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 3>that same impass here right now, where we have, you know,

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the youngest top ten in the world we've ever seen,

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's by it's shattering. I mean, Sam Burns just

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 3>got into the top ten. Another twenty five year old

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 3>bumped out DJ. So we're at this impass. What's interesting

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>to me, I think about the whole situation is if

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 3>this gets say, this gets implemented in a couple of years,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's a less forgiving face that that in a

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>ball that spins more.

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Could we see.

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 3>A a window for the guys like Adam Scott and

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Sergio and these older players that actually have experience hitting

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the center of the face, because I remember when I

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 3>was in high school and I sound like an old

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 3>man saying this now, but I used to stand on

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 3>the first t terrified of hitting like a low quacker

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 3>off the top.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, that was the worst. Yeah.

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 3>And you see now with drivers that you want to

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 3>hit the driver, you you, that's like the best club

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>you can hit when you're nervous, because it's impossible to

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>really miss it. You know, if you hit one off

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the bear, off the hazzle, it's going to go fifteen

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 3>yards shorter and in the same you know, frame of

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>space if you nut one, you know, And I think

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be the interesting thing is that if

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 3>you do this, there is going to change the trajectory

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 3>of golf and which golfers are the best golfers.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 2>See. I still feel, and maybe it's wishful thinking, I

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>still feel like if you look at that top ten

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 2>right now, not not to focus too much on them.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 3>But.

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Colin Markyle will be given time to adjust to that

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 2>driver face and he won't have any trouble. Will Zalaturus

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>won't have it, and he's on the top ten, but

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 2>he's a great ball striker and he'll adjust. I do

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 2>feel like it will put a little bit more premium

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 2>on certain skills or other skills, and that's a positive.

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, maybe that that keeps some older players around.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>But my sense is that part of the reason we're

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>part of it is just a generational thing. At the moment,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>we've had some older players who lasted a long time

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>are kind of retiring or going away. But I'm having

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 2>a hard time with the money involves and the way

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the game's played. I just feel like there's going to

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 2>be a lot of turnover no matter what. So I

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know, and that has very little to do with

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 2>the equipment in some ways, unless you get into the

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>injury speed stuff, then that does have a direct tie

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>to how the equipment is what the equipment allows the

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>player to do. So I think it's a positive when

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the game has a lot of different ways to play,

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 2>it has a lot of different age groups. I think

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 2>it's the thing that makes our sport special and my

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 2>sense is that those those truly special players will continue

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>to be. In fact, I feel strongly, with no evidence whatsoever,

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>that those extra they're all great out there, but the

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 2>ones that are extra special, I think they may stand

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out more if this happens. You know, that would be

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the case i'd make to somebody like Rory McElroy, who's

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of I mean I briefly mentioned it at Riviera.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 2>He's kind of all over the map on it and

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>he rolls his eyes at people like us on this stuff.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 2>But I think you could make a case that he,

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, players like him, would stand out just a

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, or that player like Tiger Woods or

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Phil Mickelson actually would have won even a little bit

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 2>more if the equipment hadn't changed so much and then

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 2>gone the way it did in the last ten to

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 2>twelve years.

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, co Crack better get his Saudi check asap.

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 2>I think he's getting it soon. He'll be probably in London.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Picked it up the first of eight Biggies.

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 3>It's I think the one thing I forgot to mention

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 3>was the key thesis of that of that podcast was

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 3>when technological change is introduced, new skills are rewarded and this,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 3>this rollback at the professional level would be an introduction

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 3>of technological change, and I think what the overall point

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 3>would be is that it would be more the skills

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 3>would be more similar to skills of past, which is

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 3>where you know, these where older players hanging on might have,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, a significant advantage because they don't have to

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 3>relearn these skills or relearn new skills. And that I

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 3>think that's where these young players are at such an advantage,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 3>is that they never learned the skills of hitting a

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 3>small head and a spinny ball.

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>They don't even know what that was like.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 3>And whenever you have to relearn skills or learn new

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 3>skills at an older age, you're at a huge disadvantage.

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's no question I but I just feel like

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the timingness will be, this will be easy, will ease

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 2>into this, and there will be and and I'm you know,

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 2>with launch monitors now and fitting and how good people

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>are at doing that, I just feel that there's nothing

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 2>that they're talking about that's so extreme that that's the

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 2>equivalent of going from a big headed driver to persimmon

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 2>or something. It's just nothing that's that great of a leap.

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>And so the combination of what they have in terms

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>of availability, in testing, free, free equipment, the timing. You know,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at this happening over a couple of years,

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 2>three years, probably four years. I think they'll be able

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 2>to adapt. And those players you're talking about, some of

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 2>those guys, will you know four years from now, Sergio

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Lee Westwood, you know, well they yeah, yeah, I don't

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>want to say, but the chances of them still being

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>U relevant or not great.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 3>You look at Ricky Fowler and he's kind of I think,

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 3>like I who knows, like everybody loves it, but I

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 3>think he's one of the guys that you could look

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 3>at and concretely, you know, hypothesized that distance really cost

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 3>a very very He's had a very good career, but

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 3>a longer great career because when he came on tour,

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 3>as you know, he was the young guy. He was

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 3>like a top twenty five driving distance guy, and you

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:38.479
<v Speaker 3>can see like he just got completely outpaced with with

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 3>that new wave of golfers where he became average and

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 3>length and all of a sudden that has you know,

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 3>disastrous effects down down the rest of your game and

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 3>through the bag. And I think, you know, puts more

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 3>pressure on putting.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't put it.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 3>As well, he hasn't hit the ball as well as

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 3>he's tried to stay relevant in the distance race.

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 2>You could throw in a there's a Looke Donald before him.

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's quite quite a few cases. And yeah,

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>there's no question that watching what guys were doing, he

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 2>felt the pressure to adjust. It's very hard to hold

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 2>your ground. And again you could make the case there

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 2>are a couple of people who have sort of just decided

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 2>they play it a certain way and they'll play well

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 2>certain courses and they're happy to make a living doing that.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>But he had aspirations to do something a little bit

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 2>more profound in his career. But then you also can't

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 2>really gauge what kind of money he has made and

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 2>what that does to your drive. I mean, he has

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 2>done he and I mentioned this before on other shows.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, Forbes never puts him in that top one

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred list of athlete athlete income and it's just laughable.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's he's doing as well as anybody in

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 2>golf or has been in the last few years, so

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to so I just think those career windows

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>are going to shorten a little bit and that's what's

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 2>fascinating about not really necessarily positive about them, the Saudi

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>situation and all the money that's going into these towards

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 2>the players. Look, I mean it's it's there, they have,

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:21.959
<v Speaker 2>they can give it to them, but it's you do

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 2>wonder what kind of effect it's going to have on

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>longevity in a sport where we need. We We like

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 2>getting to know players, we like watching their career arc.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things that makes up for the

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 2>fact that the sport's kind of boring to watch. We

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 2>get invested in them and it's really fun when they

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 2>still do something later in their career after we saw

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 2>them emerge, And yeah, I just love that about the

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 2>sport and I feel like we're losing that.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you don't have to look at any further.

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 3>And this is if we could just you know, forget

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 3>the last six months of his life. But look at

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Phil Micholson with the PGA. You know, that's the perfect

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 3>example of a career arc. And you know, you know

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Watson at at uh at the Open years ago, it's

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 3>you get this, you you hold on because the sport

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 3>allows for players to age so gracefully in comparison to

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 3>a sport like football or basketball, where one day they're

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 3>relevant and the next day they're washed, and it's so

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 3>visually apparent that they're washed. But this sport allows for

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>some grace and some some aging and and you know,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 3>moments of of where they shine and they they still

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 3>have it. And and that was Phil at the PGA.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 3>And you know, that's the thing that you when you

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 3>introduce more and more money the drive. I think the

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>one thing I would push back on is like the

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 3>really special players will will stay special. Like Tom Brady

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 3>is a perfect example of of that, and like where

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, great, great players will defy this thing because

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 3>that what drives them is not the money. But for

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 3>a lot of players, and maybe that's the case, is

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 3>like a lot of players that were never that great,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the money will will make them, you know, kind of

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>fade out a little bit faster.

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's I think something we take for granted

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 2>with Tiger and Phil, how much they just kept coming

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>at you even when they had seemingly plenty of money.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 2>And I think Jordan Speed's one of those players who

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>will be that way. Most of the events considered the

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>greatest in the history of the game were the ones

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 2>where there was a convergence of generations and and the

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>new guy was coming and the old guy was hanging on,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and the and the and the elite player of the

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 2>day was involved. And I think that's a really a

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 2>good reminder, like sixty at Cherry Hills and the eighty

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 2>six Masters.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Pebble Pebble with Watson and Jack.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely yeah. So there, and you can go way back

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 2>even into the you know, pre pre war years, and

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 2>same kind of thing happened. And that's it's just one

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 2>of those things in our sport that we really really

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 2>love that they and we're very lucky a lot of

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 2>them like to travel. They like the life, and they

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 2>don't really know any other way, so they play a

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 2>lot and it's one of those intangibles for golf. So

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 2>and that's what. But one other thing on this, you know,

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 2>on the distance thing, I think that's really interesting. I've

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 2>been kind of mulling. I'll probably write something to the

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 2>newsletter about it. But part of the reason I have

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 2>a theory that we haven't gotten the reaction from players

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 2>is that the manufacturer's money just doesn't matter as much

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to most of the players like it used to again,

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, a new player coming out on the tour. Yes,

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm well aware that that whatever that one hundred and

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand dollars advance at the start of the year

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>to where ball, hat and glove is huge, And I

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>understand that five million a year for somebody is not

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 2>laughed at. But I think when you look at the

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 2>money that's coming to them from the tour or the

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 2>options they could have somewhere else, that manufacturer bending their

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 2>ear about Hey, you got to tell everybody this is

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 2>terrible for the game, and it's mean and it's cruel,

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and it's going to take the average person back thirty

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 2>yards and all that nonsense that you might get. I

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 2>just don't think they have that ability to sway the

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>players and have them do their bidding like that. And

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe they're not even pushing them.

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 3>That way anymore.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they really realize with the pandemic that the game.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 2>They will sell equipment if the game is healthy and

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>being played, and what the pros do has not very

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>little to do with their bottom line. Ultimately, if they're

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 2>moving equipment, it's because people are playing golf.

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Now for a quick word from our sponsor, Elijah Craig.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Discover the Greatness within Elijah Craig small Batch Bourbon. Elijah

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Craig Bourbon never settles for less than best. Every bottle

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 3>of their award winning small batch carries a signature warm

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 3>spice and subtle smoke flavor. It's exceptionally smooth and well balanced.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 3>I like to drink it on the rocks. I also

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 3>like old fashioned I am. I'm a connoisseur of brown juice.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I love bourbon in general, and Elijah Craig is great.

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I get complex aromas of vanilla bean, sweet fruit, and

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 3>fresh mint. The palate is pleasantly woody, with accents of spice,

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 3>smoke and nutmeg.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are all delicious things.

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 3>Elijah Craig won double Gold at the San Francisco World

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Spirits Competition last year and the Tried and True Award

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>from the Ultimate Spirits Challenge in twenty twenty. Pick up

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 3>a bottle or order today for home delivery. Discover the

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 3>greatness within Elijah Craig at Elijah Craig dot com slash

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Frida Egg. That's Isijah Craig dot com slash Frida Egg.

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 3>The Frida Egg is brought to you by Elijah Craig,

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Kentucky Straight bourbon whiskey, Bardstown, Kentucky, forty seven percent alcohol

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 3>by volume. Elijah Craig reminds you to think wisely and

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 3>drink wisely. Now back to Jeff Shackelford, so on a

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 3>different topics. Obviously, I think overall everybody's happy about this.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 3>This is a good positive development for the game of golf.

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 3>What's your what's your read on the Saudi situation? Obviously,

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 3>they last week they announced their their host sites, which

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 3>was quite underwhelming. Greg Norman has gone on a media

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 3>tour and from what I've seen, with the exception of

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:48.959
<v Speaker 3>Gary Williams, was met with with softball questions, what what

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>do you expect now that the schedule set? Do you

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 3>do you expect to see some players defecting in the

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 3>near future and challenging the PGA tours attempt to ban

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 3>players who go play.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just don't know the rules well enough to

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 2>understand because the way the dates are set up, it

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>looks to me like you could play I believe three

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 2>is the number that they can get a release on.

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>You can play three before the FedEx, and then the

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 2>three when the schedule flips to the New twenty two

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty three year. So I don't know is anybody can

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 2>unless they try to play four or is anybody gonna

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 2>really initiate a battle with the tour? And then so

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>that's number one and then number two. It just seems

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 2>like that he's rolled out a schedule. There's no requirement

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to play. So the thing that that the model they

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>stole from the Premier Golf League group required you to

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>be involved in all the events. The whole thing only

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 2>works if you're you're really all in on every half one.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly that you know, whether Lewis Hamilton wants to

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 3>or he's a dude. He's at Saudi Arabia, And you know,

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the thing that what made that speech

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 3>that he made a few few months ago so endearing,

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 3>was like I have to be here. I'm not happy

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 3>about it, right, but you know this is the you know,

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 3>the the requirement was a big appeal to the model

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 3>is that the top players are going to be playing

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 3>every time we tee it up.

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, So what's the point of this if it's they

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 2>can just dip in and dip out. And I think

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 2>a few guys will and can you blame him. I mean,

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 2>could you blame Richard Bland for playing that event in

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 2>London at this point in his career and probably not

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 2>that field that much better than the ones he's placed

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 2>played against in Europe and he can make a check

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that is phenomenal. I wouldn't blame him, and he doesn't

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 2>have to make any commitment. Although Greg mentioned I noted

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 2>this on my blog today. He mentioned in the Gary

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Williams interviews contracts. So I don't understand again this independent

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 2>contractor thing, and then you're signing signing contracts, you know,

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 2>like what's in that? They're they're kind of all over

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the map, and I get it. They're trying to pivot

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 2>here in a reaction to the tour, and they dump

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the Asian Tour event in London like a hot potato

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 2>and turn that into one of their events, just to

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 2>what six weeks after announcing it as a centerpiece of

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the Asian Tour. So they're moving all over the place

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and the courses are totally uninspired. And we know more

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 2>and more that I mean, we were goofy. We look

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 2>at a venue and that's what gets excited about a tournament.

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think more and more people are appreciative of

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the role the venue plays and the romance and the

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 2>history or the character of the design, whether it or

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 2>even you know, the players championship and the finishing holes.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 2>People just are more drawn to certain places and they

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 2>don't have the most inspired group of venues, is probably

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 2>the best way to put it. So it just seems

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 2>to me like, yeah, they'll get some players, but I

0:31:55.920 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>don't ultimately, I'm not seeing the long term wisdom of

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 2>wanting to join it. I'm not getting the long term

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 2>vision that can that a player can can trust signing

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 2>on for and that that's uh, that's a problem because

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and the Saudis could pull the plug at any minute.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 2>They could, they could lose interest in no time, and

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 2>they're not trustworthy that way. I don't think this. You know,

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Norman talks about going back, you know, back to twenty nineteen.

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 2>They've been involved in the game. Oh wow, it's like

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 2>they were, you know, practically at leaf Links at the

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 2>founding of the sport. I mean, give me a break.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 3>That's like one of my pet peeves is when when

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>somebody has in their logo, like you know, whether it's

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 3>like a coffee shop established twenty twenty, Yeah, like, what

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 3>what does that mean?

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, big deal, unless it's ironic, unless they're just trying

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 2>to be funny. But yeah, so that part of his

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>case is just really strange to me. And then yeah,

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that he hasn't I mean, tell you what you need

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to know about the saudis that he can't say. Look,

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 2>there's no question that they they they there's some things

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 2>in the past they would like us to forget. They

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 2>want to forget, they want.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>To move forward in the near pass.

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 2>A couple last weekend. But he can't even bring himself

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>to do that because it's not what they want to hear.

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 2>And so when you put that together with everything, it's

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>it's a it's a high risk thing for a player

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 2>to leap. On the other hand, you know, I don't

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>know how many people truly understand what who they are

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and what you're getting into.

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that that I think that's the thing.

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that the general public understands. I happened

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 3>to run into somebody on a golf course who you know,

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, I listened to golf dot com subpar

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 3>podcast about Greg Norman and he which you know they

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Colton Drew did an interview. They they didn't really ask

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 3>many tough questions. I don't think they identify themselves as journalists,

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 3>so you know, whatever that may be. But they didn't

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 3>ask any questions. But the guy was like, it's pretty interesting,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 3>there are some interesting ideas. And I think that's the

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 3>issue with you know, the general public just I don't

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 3>think it necessarily understands the the you know, impetus and

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 3>why they're doing this. And like you said, they could

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 3>get bored and pull the plug.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>There.

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 3>They're kind of they're kind of deploying what what Uber deployed.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're going to kill the taxi industry, which is,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, by offering an attempt to offer a better

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 3>product that pays pays more or in Uber's case, is

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 3>way cheaper for the consumer and more convenient.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>And then once we.

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Have killed off all the competition, we can do whatever

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 3>we want with it. And that's the thing I think

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 3>it's scary is that it could start as something and

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 3>if they effectively kill the PGA tour then it could

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 3>evolve into something that's even worse, you know than the

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 3>PGA tourist product.

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Ever was right right, and then one player one day

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 2>could say Holy cow, I just read a book about

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 2>this whole kushogi thing. This is terrible. And they could

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 2>they could, I mean the whole thing. You just don't

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>know what could set them off. And that's uh, you know,

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 2>that's something where the the agents and people involved have

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 2>to to do the homework for the players and explain

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>that to them. Because I had a conversation with a

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 2>player at Revier this year and it was an amazing

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 2>description of what this was and you know, I had

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 2>no concept of it was just to this player, it

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 2>was just a it's a rich guy who really wants

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>to get into golf. Well, it's a little more complicated

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 2>than that. And then the fund and and and then

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>it's obviously complicated because the public investment fund is involved

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of well Uber you just mentioned.

0:35:58.960 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well that's the.

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Hard thing is I mean, you you live your daily

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 3>life and you're probably contributing some money to to this,

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, regime, and you know that is something that's

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 3>important to point out, is that they are involved in

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 3>our lives every day almost you know, as is.

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so that's one of those things where it's

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 2>a it's hard for a lot of people to call

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 2>out this group and the way they're behaving. And but

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 2>again I just I just go back to, you know,

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 2>at least you know, the premier goth Leete concept. Uh,

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 2>there was with with you know, the franchise concept that

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 2>they are building a lot of their dream or idea around.

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Obviously is a money play. It creates value and their

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 2>tax implications and great things, but it also is a

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 2>statement about creating something for the long term. And so

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 2>now that the Saudis have dropped the that element of

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 2>the or concept and it's a startup. It's a beta.

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, billions of dollars and no product billions. Yeah, it's

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 3>a pre they got a pre money valuation. They you know,

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 3>they got a huge pre money valuation.

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 3>The thing is Greg's the founder of this startup that

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 3>has zero equity, you know, zero control. Is it's just

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 3>like a pre money valuation startup.

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is. And and what's the long term vision?

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Now when you strip away the one thing that would

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 2>be the incentive for players and for investors, uh, to

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 2>to build and to build into something bigger and bigger

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 2>and bigger and create that value of the franchise. And

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 2>so that's the brilliance and also where you get the

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 2>comfort level with what the PGL concept does and now

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 2>whether that has any gain, any traction with people. You know,

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I still have my doubts about the team element working

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:09.919
<v Speaker 2>if there's only really one team event at the end

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 2>and they're small teams. Yeah. Anyway, those are all details,

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 2>and you can look at team Tennis and say, well,

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 2>that didn't work, and that could be the same thing

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 2>in golf. I don't know.

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I think. And from all this, the PGL

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 3>has come out way ahead in terms of their image. Unfortunately,

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Saudi's kind of hijack their idea and

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and you know, just in terms of you know, their

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 3>intentions and what they're looking for onto positive things.

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>We're right around the corner from Augusta. Yeah, but what's one.

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 3>Storyline you're particularly keen heading into the Masters this year?

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, as somebody who loves golf architecture, naturally, I'm totally

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 2>fascinated by the changes at the eleventh hole and how

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 2>that's going to play. You know, we've gotten a teaser

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 2>which we don't normally get thanks to Eureka Earth, so

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 2>we get to see what's going on, and it's intriguing,

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 2>the fifteenth a little bit longer. There's some there's been

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 2>talk of some greens being redone. You've written a piece

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 2>about some some widening. The last aeriels did look it

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 2>did look a little wider, but the rough also looked

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 2>pretty pretty healthy. Who knows, it may have just rained

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 2>for a few days and then cut it. Excuse me,

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 2>the second cut. I got to start getting into my

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 2>into my master speak mode, and so I'm always interested

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 2>to see what they've done with the golf course, how

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 2>it plays, how the players react. You know, it's it's

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 2>another fascinating thing I've been. I've been, you know, at Riviera.

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I talked to players about something I was working on

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 2>for the old course, and you know, we haven't really

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 2>had many reports the players going there and playing. You know,

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 2>that used to be such a thing and now it's

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 2>more of rest and get there. Caddy figures out the lines,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 2>we discuss it the tea, we crunch the numbers, and

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.919
<v Speaker 2>we go play. So we really haven't gotten I mean,

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.959
<v Speaker 2>by now we should have gotten some players speaking about

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 2>what they've seen, and there just hasn't been much, or

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 2>if they've been, they just haven't been asked and all that.

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 3>So I'm I think there's the there's so much other

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 3>stuff going on.

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's part of it too.

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember a Masters where it's been.

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, the conversation's been so quiet about it coming

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 3>up because of everything that's going on in the sport.

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, usually like each week is kind of this

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Master's build, and it seems like each week now is

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the latest in this soap opera we've been watching with

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the Saudi's.

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, and also it's just the time we're in where

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 2>we have some parody Tiger and Phil. Well, Tiger's not

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 2>playing who knows what Phil. Hopefully Phil plays, if he's

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 2>gonna play, Hopefully he plays at the Valeros. So it's

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 2>not a full spectacle when he arrives at Augusta. Rory's

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Grand Slam West has been done now for several years,

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 2>so that's yeah, that's lost a little of its luster.

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 2>And the way he's putting you don't really feel like

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 2>right now his game is shaping up for Augusta. But

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 2>who knows, he could anything could happen, but it doesn't

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look great. So yeah, there's not any great storyline

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 2>with players coming in. Somebody's not on a streak, and

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the Major's Brooks is cooled.

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Off speed spend kind of quiet too, very.

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Quiet, and he's that the swing looks strange. And by

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 2>the way, speaking of duck hooks, he had a few

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 2>riv I saw, so it still can be done with

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 2>modern equipment. But yeah, he cooled.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Off Smith on sim Smith.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, that was a quacker. That was an

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 2>old school which made his T shot on eighteen so

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 2>incredible because again, like you said earlier, once you hit

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 2>one of those, uh, and again there's a whole bunch

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of players who just don't know what that feels like.

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 2>And once you hit one, it's the same as a shank.

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:04.399
<v Speaker 2>It's the same same kind of thing.

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It gets you here. Next one's going way right no

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>matter what.

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he hit that beautiful T shirt on a teen,

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Like my gout, he kept it on the planet. I would.

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 2>I was impressed.

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I think the thing with the snaphook that is like

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 3>so many times you hit it so flush and it's

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 3>just so far it doesn't feel that as bad as

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 3>like you know, when you block one, right, but that

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 3>snap hook can can sometimes feel pretty good.

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:35.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'll believe me. Uh, I'm from the era when

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 2>when we transitioned and shafts were not like they were,

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and there were certain shafts you you you'd like if

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you look up, you felt great and impacting. Where why

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 2>what happened? How did that happen?

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:49.439
<v Speaker 1>That was a good swing, that felt good?

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think that's the thing about the hook

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:56.879
<v Speaker 4>is where it can feel really good and then then

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 4>to the next one there's no way that's you know

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 4>that that one is going right no matter what.

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I don't miss that part of the game,

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think we want to bring it back,

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think these rule changes are intending to

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 2>do that, and they it's very hard to with again

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 2>with the quality of the equipment, But I do think

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 2>we'd love to see that that just slight throttling back

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 2>out of fear of missing the sweet spot would be

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 2>I think it would do a lot of good and

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 2>it would also help. Yeah, that's the thing we've got

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 2>to you know. The Green Reading Books, I think is

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a great example of where the players actually took the initiative,

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 2>either because they saw how stupid it looked, you know,

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 2>guys standing there watching another player plot and looking over

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 2>to the crowd and seeing people laughing at a guy

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 2>with the book up to his face. So they watched

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 2>it at home and it and somehow maybe the PGA

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 2>to a rule staff did it. They got it to

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 2>their ego and said, look, you know you guys, you

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.720
<v Speaker 2>all time, you really good players, you Brooks's and your rories.

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 2>You're this is stupid. You look stupid. You're gonna you're

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 2>not gonna appreciate this. Your generation is gonna look dumb.

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 2>And those guys took the initiative to kind of get

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a skill of green reading back, whether it was for

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 2>optics or whatever it was. And I think on the

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 2>distancing that's the job of Jason Gore and the various

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 2>player representatives. The PGA Tour role staff is like this,

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 2>this is not to humiliate you. We're not trying to

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 2>embarrass you. We want you, We want that that really

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 2>great player to just be separated a little bit more, uh,

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.399
<v Speaker 2>with these these changes, and if they can buy get

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 2>that buy in and not feel like they're gonna be

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to make them snaphook it and look bad.

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll it'll sail through.

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I think this is one other aspect we talk about

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 3>the Masters and having a little bit less pop. One

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 3>other aspect of a really, really, really young tour is

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 3>that we don't have these built up storylines for for

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 3>a decade, we don't have I mean, Sam Burns is

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 3>in the top ten in the world, has won three times,

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:07.720
<v Speaker 3>and he hasn't played in the Masters.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I'm really starting to get concerned about that in

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 2>terms of getting to know players, and I feel like

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 2>this and television still really matters. So I have PJ

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Tour live on a lot and every once in a

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 2>while for a bathroom break for the announcers, they'll go

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to a pre canned feature on a player and they're short,

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 2>you know whatever, they are a minute or something. But

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, that's great, Wait, that was good. We need

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 2>to do more of that. And the network model now

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 2>is so shot driven, and I think this is going

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to be looked back on as a disaster. You know. Again,

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 2>golf is not thrilling, and you need reasons for people

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to watch. And it used to be a sport that

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:05.879
<v Speaker 2>that that old old ladies. I knew. I knew a few,

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 2>you know. A friend of my mom's mom love golf,

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 2>never play in their life and they're there. I think

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 2>we're losing touch with with a broader audience by just

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:21.359
<v Speaker 2>showing shot after shot after shot and not you know,

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 2>going into the let's let's do thirty seconds where the

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 2>catty just shows us what the player has in his

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 2>bag and it shows a little personality or whatever it

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 2>is we're missing out. Of course, we're getting no sound

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 2>from the course, which every other sport is bringing you

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 2>sound so you get to to hear these people. The

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 2>players don't want to be heard whatever. I just feel

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 2>like we're moving in a very dangerous direction along with

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 2>what's going on with the parody where uh it's it's

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be hard for a casual fan to uh to

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 2>really kind of get invested. Plus, you know, let's face it,

0:46:57.560 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 2>the old broadcast used to be a little bit of

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 2>a yeah it's beauty, and we got that. CBS especially,

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 2>it's just killing it with the visuals and the drone

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and the blamp and camera angles and improved, but uh,

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, the travelogue element to a broadcast, the length

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 2>of the broadcast, you know, I just I'm kind of

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:22.240
<v Speaker 2>weird in that I almost think like the network shows

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 2>should be a little tighter and a little bit more

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 2>produced and less about shots. So I and I don't

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 2>know how you measure how that has an impact, but

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it does.

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 3>It's also on the TV network that has doesn't do

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 3>any features anymore.

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 2>No, No, that's what I mean.

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, are they beyond it's beyond just the broadcast.

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 3>But I think you know, you look at print journalism

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 3>when Brenda and I on the Shotgun start to those spotlights.

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, you go back and you read these these

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 3>feature pieces from sports illustrated from from you know, the

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 3>nineties and the eighties and seventies, and you just think

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 3>to yourself, God, this whole era of golf is devoid

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 3>of that. You know, the idea of sending a journalist

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 3>to right Sevy or to uh Jose Maria ol Thabo's

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 3>town too, you know, in Inhi May, I believe it

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 3>was him, didn't even have an interview set, and he

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 3>was there for a week and he just talked to

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the people that knew Jose Maria and and and you know,

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 3>and you're just missing the storytelling and in the uniqueness

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 3>and and everything now is run through a filter through

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 3>the agent. So I think that's an important thing to

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 3>point out is when you see these appearances on podcasts,

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:39.319
<v Speaker 3>These are set up through the agent. Then they've got

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 3>really strict talking points and different things with with some

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 3>of them. You know, some are better, some agents are

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 3>better than others. But you know, this is everything's kind

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 3>of of uh doled out on a kind of fed

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 3>out in a in a manner as opposed to the

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:02.239
<v Speaker 3>authenticity of the player profiles and different things is so

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 3>much less now.

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think Golf.

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 3>The telecast is an interesting subject because I think this

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 3>is a knee jerk of swings, like they can swing

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 3>in different directions and maybe it was too produced and

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 3>now they're pushing for more shots. Obviously there's all these

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.839
<v Speaker 3>features and sponsor features that need to be put in there,

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:28.879
<v Speaker 3>and and that you know, maybe that's the next thing

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 3>that's pushed against, is that, you know, really, what is

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:33.919
<v Speaker 3>the FedEx Cup updates doing?

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 1>What are they doing?

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the FedEx Cup file? Yeah, he likes to go fishing. Yeah.

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Great.

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Although I think they've trimmed some promos this year, which

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:45.399
<v Speaker 2>is kind of the other interesting thing. We're getting more

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 2>shots in part because they've they have trimmed a few things.

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Instruction is another thing I mean, I don't I don't

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 2>need a golf lesson. But guess what, most of the

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 2>people watching the broadcast would love more instructions Johnny Miller.

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 2>You realize Johnny was so masterful one because he called

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 2>it like he saw it. He knew how to create drama,

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:09.320
<v Speaker 2>and then he also knew how to educate you a

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit about the game and say, hey, now look here.

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, and some people didn't like his swing analysis

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:16.919
<v Speaker 2>and thought he was dead wrong and whatever, but that's

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:21.399
<v Speaker 2>some that's controversial. Those little things that are are being

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:25.239
<v Speaker 2>chipped away at I think are really problematic. And then

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to your point, yeah about I mean, look at the reaction.

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh Dan Rappaport's piece on Morgan Hoffman got and that

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 2>was kind of that used to be done as a lot, Yeah,

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and now it's not done and they spent the money

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 2>he went, He traveled a long way and it must

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 2>have been, you know, in the works for a while

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 2>and is and it wasn't a great and a fascinating read.

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 2>And there are more stories like that, but yeah, those

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 2>are all gone. And uh yeah, the Masters build up

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 2>used to be. I used to I couldn't wait to

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 2>get the golf World Preview issue, the SI Golf Plus issue,

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the Golf Digest, Golf magazine did great blowout stuff, and

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 2>they'd usually be pretty original, and that stuff now is

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 2>just kind of I mean, I did a piece of

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:14.759
<v Speaker 2>my newsletter just kind of revisiting one I wrote in

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten for Golf World about the links between Saint

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Andrews and Augusta National. And it's amazing how many people

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 2>when I did the piece or they still stumble on it,

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:28.240
<v Speaker 2>like I had no idea and I saw the headline

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and that sounds stupid. And then you you know, you

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:35.360
<v Speaker 2>explained all the backstory of Bobby Jones and and like

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 2>those kinds, and so it was fun for me to

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 2>revisit it and not hate what I wrote and then

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:42.480
<v Speaker 2>add a few things that have been we've learned since.

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, there's no place doing that now, and I

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:52.399
<v Speaker 2>think all that adds up to being not great for

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 2>the sport. That said, but at the same time, those

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:01.399
<v Speaker 2>podcasts you're talking about, they're still great that they're they're

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 2>doing those even if they are you know, their guidelines.

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 2>And then social media is a tool that I you know,

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 2>would love to see that the TV networks just don't

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 2>use very well to to do a little feature and

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 2>if the worst case scenario is they put it on

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:20.839
<v Speaker 2>the social feed, that's it. But then if they get

0:52:20.840 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 2>a rain delay or something, they can put it on

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 2>the broadcast. They just go right to the tape of

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the replay of the rain or the tournament before, the

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 2>year before. And they're also doing, by the way, very little.

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:34.759
<v Speaker 2>I haven't looked, but I haven't seen anything lately of

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 2>old Masters. CBS had built that they were going to

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:42.240
<v Speaker 2>do a lot of old retro broadcasts of tour events

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 2>this year, so little stuff. All those little things kind

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 2>of add up, and I don't I think they're kind

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 2>of being reflected in the ratings too.

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:51.239
<v Speaker 3>The players has done a wonderful job, and it's like

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 3>adding time you an old Players is on, there's buzz

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:55.399
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 3>It's like people are like enjoy going back and watching

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 3>nine nine players and in different things. But so we're gonna,

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna wrap up here, We're gonna see you in

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:10.920
<v Speaker 3>uh in Augusta and uh you're gonna you're you're ramping up.

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 3>This is quadrilateral season. This is what people should be

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:17.399
<v Speaker 3>signing up for. So you'll be on site, and uh,

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 3>how do people go about signing up?

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Ah, well, they can just go to my my main

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 2>website just spelled g Off Jeff g E O F

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 2>F and golf on Google and Jeff Shackle for dot

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 2>com comes up the sign ups there it's free and uh,

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:38.359
<v Speaker 2>or you can try and spell quadrilateral. It's not that hard,

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 2>but but it'll it'll turn up somehow, and or go

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:44.839
<v Speaker 2>to substack they have a ranking. And so yeah, it's

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 2>going really well. And I'll be doing daily reports. I

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:50.359
<v Speaker 2>don't know, you know the majors where I stayed home

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 2>during the pandemic. Uh, it was more of news and

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 2>notes every day. I hope to be a little bit more,

0:53:57.719 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 2>try to bring something a little more from on site.

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see. I'm a one man fan.

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So well, Jeff, we'll talk to you soon.

0:54:04.360 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 3>And and thanks for coming on.

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, my pleasure.

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for listening to another episode of the Friday Podcast.

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:26.439
<v Speaker 3>Today's episode was edited by meg Atkins. Thank you, mech

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 3>And just a reminder, we have another show, the Shotgun Start,

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 3>if you're ever looking for more podcasts.

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The Shotgun Start is a three day.

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Week Monday Wednesday Friday podcast that delves into the world

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 3>of professional golf mostly so if you want more takes

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 3>on pro golf, this is a great spot to go.

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 3>So it is on wherever you get your your podcasts.

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I host it with Brendan Porath. It is a it's

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 3>a wonderful listen. It's it's something that you can get

0:54:56.560 --> 0:55:00.040
<v Speaker 3>habitually into a little bit different speed than the f

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:03.640
<v Speaker 3>So thanks for listening. We will be back on Friday

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:21.400
<v Speaker 3>with another new episode.