WEBVTT - Meta Platforms Banned & Serena Williams' Venture Fund

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where Innovation, money and power COLLI

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Chack in San Francisco, and this

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. Facebook

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram officially banned in Russia. A Russian prosecutor calling

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the meta platforms extremist organizations. The war on disinformation about

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a war plus discontent at Disney a planned walk out

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday over what some call Florida's Don't Say Gay Bill

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is causing some to question the future of Disney CEO

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Bob J. Peck and what Serena Williams takes from the

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>court to investing the Tennis Are joins us to talk

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>about her first venture fund and talks about everything from

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady to her own thoughts about retirement and what

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the Serena Slam of business might be. Russia is ramping

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>up its ban on information of court, banning both Facebook

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram. The metal platforms now officially blocked across the country.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the first time Russia's sweeping extremism law has

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>been used against a foreign tech company, joining me now

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>bluem Works. Kurt Wagner, as well as David Kirkpatrick, founder

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and editor in chief of Teconomy. Kurt, I want to

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>start with you here, Facebook and Instagram, we're already banned

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in Russia. How is this different? Yeah, as you pointed out,

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 1>they were blocked, Um, I believe Instagram was just last

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>week and Facebook has been a couple of weeks now.

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And and what this does, is my understanding, is that

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>makes it actually um an issue. It's a crime if

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you are working for one of these companies, If you

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>were supporting one of these companies, you'd be considered supporting,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, extremist behavior or an extremist corporation. And so

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's clear if you're an employee that would

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be a problem. Facebook says that they don't have employees

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in Russia right now. UM. But I think that raises

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>some questions around what happens if you're an advertiser on

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>one of these platforms, what happens if you're a an

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>investor who owned stock in one of these platforms? Is

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that considered a financial support of of a meta um

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in this case? And I think that's somewhat confusing still,

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately, you know, it just makes these um the

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>band much more official than just a simple block. A

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting questions there, David, curious for your take

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on this. It seems to be a rather rare example

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook coming off looking like a good guy. It's true. Uh,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the first time I've been on

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>your show in a long time where fundamentally I have

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to say Facebook is the good guy. Facebook was providing

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>genuine information in Russia. Yes it was banned, but this

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>new legal ruling is turning the screws even tighter. Although

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to be aware, in Russia there really is

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>no legal systems of the type that we know. The

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>courts are simply a rubber stamp for whatever the government decides.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So yes, it's true that advertisers or even users or

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Facebook could be in jeopardy, but given the nature of

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the way Russia works, if the country, if the government

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to come down on those people, it could do

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so for whatever reason it chose. But Facebook, look, the

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>best thing that could happen to them right now would

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be another AIRBS ring, which would basically show the world

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that they actually can be used for good things. Because

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they're in the doghouse for all kinds of reasons. Otherwise, Karl,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>what are the chances this could lead to criminal charges

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>against Facebook and Instagram employees? I think that's the idea.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe that if you are, you know, an employees

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>working at the company, um, you could then be accused of,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, aiding this extremist considered extremist activity right um.

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Now again, I talked to someone on Facebook earlier this morning.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I was told that they don't have employees in the

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>country right now. But it does raise some questions around

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Russian nationals who work for Meta or Facebook um

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in other countries right if they're seen to be working

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>for Meta, maybe they don't live in Russian now, can they?

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Can they return to Russia at some point? Maybe they

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have family there? What happens there? So it's definitely a

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>complicated issue, um that is creating, you know, some questions

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>at Meta today. So far, what's up met which is

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>another meta platform, doesn't appear to be blocked, and it

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't appear that that Twitter and YouTube have fallen under

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this this law either. David, what do you make of that? Well,

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I would probably say it's just a matter of time

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>probably in all three cases. Uh, certainly What'sapp has virtue

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of being invisible to the authorities because it's entirely encrypted,

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>so they can't really see what's happening inside it. Um

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But I wouldn't be at all surprised if it were

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>later decided that What'sapp constituted a threat. All they have

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to do was see evidence that it's causing problems for them.

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I said before, the government of Russia can act

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>by FIAT on anything they want any time. And in

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of YouTube in particular, there's been a lot of

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>speculation today that YouTube might be very shortly to experience

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>something very similar to what Facebook and Instagram I've seen Twitter.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously Twitter would be a very logical candidate

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>for shutdown as well. Karl, what do you make of

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Russia hasn't appeared to take official action

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on these other platforms yet. I would agree with David.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is just probably a matter of time.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.239
<v Speaker 1>But I think the fact that Meta has been so

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of aggressive in policing and cutting off state backed

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>media from Russia. You remember, Emily last week they had

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>this kind of change in policy where if you're in

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine you can actually post things kind of wishing violence

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>upon invading Russia forces. I think that alone, that policy,

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of loophole where they said, hey, normally this

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>would be against the rules, but if you're in Ukraine

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you can do this. Um. I think that really angered uh,

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, authorities in Russia, and they pointed to that

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as being a real issue that they seem to be

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>taking a firmer stance on Meta than they are in

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>these other companies. David. Obviously, the bigger question here is

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what does Russia's Internet start to look like over the

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>long term? Does is this the beginning of a digital

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>iron curtain that will remain down for years? Will there

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 1>be a totally separate Russian Internet as we have seen

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in China. Well, actually the answer to that is unequivocally yes. Um,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there is a digital iron curtain that has been slowly dropping. Anyway,

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think what could result would be even worse than

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the kind of system that the China has, because at

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>least China is a digitally savvy country at the national level. UM.

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia actually had been re searching in recent years the

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>possibility of changing the way that you are l's actually

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>work so that you wouldn't necessarily be able to type

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in the same thing. You could type in here and

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have it go to the same place. That would really

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.119
<v Speaker 1>be the ultimate example of a different sort of Internet,

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>because even in China, the U r L is all

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>work the same way. But that is where Russia is headed.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't completely shut down information and still have an

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Internet as we know, and they are shutting down all

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>information flow to their people. Kurent What are the business

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>implications of this? Obviously, China is such a massive market.

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Russia is a much smaller market, but certainly still an

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>important one. Yeah, I believe the CFO of Meta, Dave Wayner,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>said last week at a conference that the total business

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in Russia between you know, advertisers in the country but

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>then also advertising out of the country trying to reach

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people within Russia was something about one point five percent

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook's total advertising revenue. Now, that's a lot of money,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a massive amount of money. And I

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>wrote in our newsletter last week that I don't know

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>if Meta has the financial incentives to try and you know,

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>bend over backwards to get back into Russia, right whereas uh,

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they might be willing to make concessions in

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world. I just don't think they're business.

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Their business is big enough there for them to sacrifice

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stuff that they've been willing to

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>do up till now, and so that's one of the

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>reasons I again agree with David. I'm not sure if

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>if this might be the beginning of a totally different

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>version of the Internet for Russian citizens moving forward. Certainly

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating and evolving situation. Kurt Wagner for Bloomberg to

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Economies David Kirkpatrick, thank you both. Tuesday, Disney employees planned

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to put their discontent on full display, planning to walk

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>out in protest of Florida's Don't Say Gay Bill, or

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>so It's called, which Governor Ron De Santis hasn't signed

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>yet but is expected to. This bill essentially bands schools

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>from discussing gender issues with children. Disney CEO Bob Kapec

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>initially refused to release an official statement on the bill

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>until last week. Many cast members have been doing mini

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>walkouts every day during their breaks. This will be a

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>much bigger walk out Tuesday, however. Disney hosting a town

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>hall today to try to quell some of this anger internally.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>For more on what it all means for the future

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of Disney CEO Bob Kapeck. I'm joined by Lightsheed Partners,

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Rich Greenfield Rich. Disney is now holding this meeting today

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to try to cut some of the tension here. What

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the fact that Disney employees have

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>been so vocal about their their unhappiness with how Disney

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO Bob Kapec has handled this. Look, We've seen a

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of voicing of feelings among employees of over the

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>course of the last couple of years. I mean, if

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about sort of the furloughing of employees and

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of the layoffs that occurred around the pandemic, I mean,

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this has been a very difficult couple of year period

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>um for all consumers, are all employees around the world,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but certainly for Disney employees, this has been especially challenging. Look,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the reality is executives and management teams are

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>going to make mistakes. I think the real um hallmark

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of long term success is whether they recognize those mistakes

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and pivot quickly. And I think that's what you're seeing

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>here by Disney is pretty rapid change. You know, this

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is not letting this drag on and sort of addressing

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the issue very quickly. I can't speak to why the

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>original decision was made and what the logic was, but

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it is comforting that the speed of changing

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>their minds what was swift, because I think that's what

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>really matters. And again, Disney is at this really critical

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>crossroads as Tiger has left at the end of last

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>year and now shape because in full control. I think

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we're all waiting to see who is Bob Chapick? What

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is his long term Disney plan? And I guess to

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>your question, Emily, will we get to see it because

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he's got a year left on his contract, will we

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>get to see Schapick really put in in motion his

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>long term plan? Well? And I guess what I wonder

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>what your answer to that question is, Are these staffers

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>upset enough that this should should should should should give

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Bob Speck some serious concerns about his job. Look, I

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>think the he must have heard loud and clear how

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>broad based the fear was or concern was around this

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>issue for them to reverse course so publicly, so quickly.

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Um not to mention the internal meetings and everything that

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you've seen, but look, Bob Schapick's long term future is

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be most likely judged on the big strategic

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>decisions he makes. What is their plan for Disney Plus?

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it being merged with Hulu? Are they creating one

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>service and really going after or Netflix and trying to

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>become a massive streaming company. Are they really going to

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on just Disney content? Might they sell ESPN and ABC?

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Like why are they in the sports business? You know,

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>sports is not a business that you can scale. You

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>can't own the content. You know, the NFL owns the NFL,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>not Disney. Uh. You know, if you think about the UFC,

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>which has been the biggest piece of of ESPN Plus

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>that's owned by Endeavor E d Er public company. So

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you sort of get back to, like, why is Disney

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in some of these businesses and what is this long

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>term strategy? There is no doubt Bob Iger set in

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>motion and tremendous you know, ramp in Disney Plus subscribers.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But as you look at where we are now and

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>look out over the course of the next five to

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>ten years, the question is is what does Disney want

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to be when it grows up in streaming? Does it

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be something for everyone? Like Netflix, or does

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it really want to stick to its core franchises and verticals,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>which is probably a smaller but also very successful and

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>very profitable busines. This if you scaled that, what do

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you make of the Eiger side of this story? You know,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Iger doesn't disagree with doesn't agree with this,

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this position, that SHAPEC initially took that thing, reportedly no

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>longer talk Oiger and Spec. I mean, the speculation going

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>so far. You know, some I'm saying I could replace

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Bob Speck, which I believe Bob Iger has has said

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's ridiculous. Um, But you know, we're in a rapidly

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>evolving situation here. Look, this has been a relatively challenging,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, couple of years, I think for any executive

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>going through the pandemic, a lot of layoffs, a lot

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of change, closing down operations. I mean, look even I

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>think Shanghai Disney World just closed down again just today.

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe, so this is sort of a never ending

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>saga that impacts employees and creates a lot of emotion.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We're obviously living in a social media world where people

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can express their views about how they feel very visibly.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Look in terms of Iger verse a pick. You know,

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what to say other than you know,

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Bob Iger's gone, Shaping is now in charge, and the

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>question is going to be I don't think what Bob

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Iger feels or doesn't feel anymore matters. I think what

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>really matters is what does the board think and what

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>does shareholders think? You know, at the end of the day,

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the stock obviously is down a lot. Investors are concerned

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that they don't really understand what the strategy is. You know,

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>are they going after Netflix or is this more of

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a Disney focus service. I mean, we've been Disney has

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>effectively been dragging its feet on Hulu. Comcast owns a

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>third of it. What is the Hulu plan? Is it

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>all about being rolled in and creating one mega service

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>or are they going to continue to run three streaming service?

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Remember there's Disney plus, there's Hulu, and there's the ESPN plus.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems from a consumer standpoint, having multiple log ins,

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple different interfaces seems suboptimal. Obviously part of that is

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Comcast fault and sort of battling over price. But if

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you think about what I did when he came in,

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he made a very important strategic decision that shaped the

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>entire future of his run as CEO. He bought Pixar,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and that was a tremendous acquisition that completely changed how

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>investors thought about the Walt Disney Company and the content

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and the I P and the rest is obviously history.

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>The question for Shapeck is, you know, do you KEEPSPN?

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you keep ABC? Do you want to be in

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the general entertainment business? Do you emerge huluin with Disney plus?

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>The KEEPESPN plus? Like, all of these are these big

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>strategic decisions. I think we're gonna get a lot of

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>answers about all of this over the course of the

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>next nine months. But I think the stock is somewhat struggling,

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're struggling with the stock not knowing

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly what Shape's gonna do. So we'll be seeing just

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>how big this walk out from employees is Tuesday. But

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think this blowback could spread to consumers? Obviously

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there's been some discontent with the Genie reservation system, the

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>sky high pricing um, the star Wood Star Wars hotel.

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Could assumers revolt? Look, you know, my partner Brandon Ross

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>at Lightshed covers the live entertainment in business, you know,

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like you think I think you had. Michael Roupino's been

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>talking pretty openly Live Nation about just the incredible demand

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for concert tickets even with rising you know, gas prices.

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've just seen incredible demand for experiences. Disney

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>World is literally packed to the gills. Margins are moving

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to levels we haven't seen in years, if ever eventually,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and so like, look, there's always risk. I think if

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Disney probably hadn't reverse course and sort of addressed the

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>concerns of employees very quickly, sure, I think anything was possible.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the real issue is going to be right now,

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're raising pricing and taking advantage of this environment. I mean,

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation is obviously rising, and I think they're literally looking

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at demand. They can't keep the parks, they can't handle

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the demand, and I think that's partly why they're taking

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>advantage and raising price. But investors, they're not worried emily

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>about the parks. Investors have one concern. They're only worried

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>about Disney Plus and what is the streaming long term strategy.

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're gonna be hoping to hear from

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Shape when he holds an analyst meeting later this month, right,

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course we'll see how long of a chance

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets to prove himself rich. Greenfield of Light Shed Partners,

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you as always for Wayne. And now to a

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>MC flipping the script, the entertainment Giant announcing it's buying

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>of a golden silver mining company, an unorthodox move for

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the world's largest movie theater chain and a past darling

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of meme stock investors, bloomber Quick takes aux Web explains

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>why is Cinema Chain investing in gold During the AMC

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a big meme stock last year. The market

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>capitalization jumped from a four billion dollars to more than

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars in the space of just a few weeks. Well,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the CEO Adam Artan has just announced plans to invest

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about thirty million dollars in a gold mine, and it

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>says something quite interesting about how he perceives his own

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>company's prospects. You see, the role of CEO is often

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to do with capital allocation. In other words, how you

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>spend your investors money in a way that will generate

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the best possible returns for men. And usually you can

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>do one of three things. You can either invest in

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the existing business by opening new locations, investing in innovations,

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>adding new headcount. You can think about acquiring a company

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that will then play well with your existing companies and

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the two firms work better together than they would on

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>their own. Thirdly, you can just return that money to investors.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Now he's not opting to do any of those things.

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Returning money to investors would be a strange choice because

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he only raised from them last year. And besides, a

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>MC trades at a considerable premium to its competitors, so

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily buying shares at a sable christ when

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to investing adjacent dials or the existing business.

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>He's sort of telling investors that I can't find a

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>way of generating as good a return as I could

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>by investing in this gold mine. In other words, the

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>implicit suggestion is cinema business is not very good and

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you should put your money elsewhere. He's just cutting out

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the middleman and doing it himself. Are Alex Web.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>They're coming up from the tennis court to VC. We're

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear from Serena Williams about how she plans to

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>find the next generation of startup Champ, Welcome back to

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomore Technology and Emily Changes in San Francisco. Let's get

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>back to the markets enter at Ludlow's taking a look

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>at Chinese tech companies, which have had another rough day

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in US trading. I take it away, Yeah, I think

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>if there was a pocket of pain on Monday, it

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>was in the US listed shares of Chinese technology companies,

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>in other words, a d R S. And for everything

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>going on in the world right the outlook for the

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve and rates, what's happening in Ukraine and the

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>conflict with Russia, and global commodity prices, you have to

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>remember you have a bit of sympathy for those investors

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>out there that like Chinese tech companies because they've also

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>got a track what's going on with policymakers in China.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>These stocks have been fluctuating all over the place. Another

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>down day Monday, down four percent, really underperforming broader indices

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, broadered moves in technology. So

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>where we've been left, Mrs Director, to bring up the

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>next table, please, is a situation where Wall Street and

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Cellside analysts aren't getting it right on their forecast for

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the price of these US listed Chinese companies. We're talking

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about big names here, right, Ali Barbera, j D dot Com,

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Billy Billy, ten Cent Music. And what this board shows

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>is the percentage difference from the current price where the

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>share prices are actually right now, versus the highest price

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>target and the lowest price target on the street. So

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>let's just take Ali Barbara as one example, versus the

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>price of where we are on our on Monday. The

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>highest street target is a hundred and sixty three above

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>where those shares closed, the lowest below where we are now.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And it was all about a change of tone from policymakers.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And you and I have been talking for a year

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>about Chinese regulators clamping down on technology and internet companies

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.239
<v Speaker 1>in that country. What happened last Wenday Wednesday? Bring up

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the next board that the Golden Dragon Index, that kind

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>of basket of U S s is Chinese stocks massively

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>underperforming and then wash thirty gain in a single day.

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Why because policymakers came out and said that they were

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be more supportive these companies and make a

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>real downward push in the stock market. So I have

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit of sympathy and have some sympathy for these

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street names that are really struggling to get it right.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to muster something sympathy and thank you, Tennis

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>legend that Serena Williams has raised a hundred eleven million

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars in her inaugural venture capital fund, the goal to

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>find the next generation of champions from underrepresented backgrounds. Williams

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>has been investing in earliest start up for nine years,

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but this is the first time she has raised outside capital.

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I caught up with Williams and her partner Alice and

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Rappaport Stillman to talk about where they think a new

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>class of startup stars can be found. Take a listen,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't check just one box. We really are looking

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>forward to well well health and wellness, film tech as

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>well as fintech. Obviously we're the crypto space and the

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Web three space and n f t s are something

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that is on everyone's mind. And um, I don't think

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you can really have a VC firm and not have

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>some really big part of that into into big car

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>your fum into that part of the Web three space.

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So um, we're kind of like looking in those particular areas.

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Now you've been the greatest of all time in tennis

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for so long, but in venture capital, you've kind of

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>been in stealth mode or under the radar, and a

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of celebrities and athletes don't necessarily

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>get taken seriously here unless they're investing directly in the craft.

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there something motivating or energizing about trying to prove

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>yourself at something new. Yes, And honestly, that's one of

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the reasons I have been investing so long, and I

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have been in stealth mode for so long, because I

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like, you know, whether it's an entertainer or it's

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>an athlete, when we try to do something different, it's

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>seen as more of an opportunity as instead of a passion.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>This is actually a passion of mine. I wake up

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>every morning thinking, oh my gosh, I cannot wait to

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>open my computer and look at decks or just talk

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to the company, or just see how what we're gonna

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>do today. Um. And it's something that is I'm super

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>passionate about and I just genuinely have so much fun

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>with it. Um. But yeah, that's also another reason why

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I was operating in stealth. I really wanted to build

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>my portfolio. I wanted to build my track record, So

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>when people have questions, I would say, you know, we

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can just go to our track record, to go to

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>our data room and kind of see what we've done

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and it gives you a glimpse of

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>when we do have bigger fund and being able to

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>write those big checks, what will actually you do in

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the future. Now, Alison, there's a lot of money flowing

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>into the venture capital ecosystem, a lot of competitors out there,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and vcs often claim they have a unique network. Your

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>network with Serena's would seem to be unparalleled. How does

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that come to life on behalf of your startups? Are

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>there any examples you can share? Yeah, one of the

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>great things we're able to do is leverage the network

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that Serena's built for the twenty plus years in her career.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>UM for behind the scenes connections obviously has lots of

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>followers and being on Instagram or something like that is great.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But when we can connect someone to the head of

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the head of E. S. G At Nike,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or we can kind of connect someone to someone at

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Amazon or Procter and Gamble, those are people that she's

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in partnered with for a really long time, but are

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>either business development opportunities, potential acquirers, or long of them

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>are investing themselves in startups in the space. So we've

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>been doing a lot of work with that. You said yourself, Serena,

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't like to lose. What do you take from

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the court to investing, So that's a good question. You know,

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really about having a winning attitude and really just

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>about um understanding that you have to put a lot

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of time into this, you know, and you have to

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of effort into learning. And for me,

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm the kind of person that I like to really

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>do my homework and really do my due diligence and

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>really just kind of figure out exactly so I can

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>be the best at it because you know, I know

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>what that takes. I know what it takes to be

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the best at something in the world. So I'm bringing

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that to the table and not many people have that.

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time I understand that the hard

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>work and the dedication and then also that champions mentality

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of like, I like winning, So if you do, what

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>does it take to win? And it's really just figuring

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that out and applying it into this This part of

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>our of my life Allison, speaking of the track record,

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Serena Ventures has backed thirteen unicorns six exits to date.

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>What is the advice you're giving the founders right now

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>about the macro economic environment given what we're seeing with

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation and interest rates and GIA political uncertainty. Yeah, there's

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously a lot of risk right now in the world.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>We think about what that means, but we've also seen

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in times of kind of great economic distress some of

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the best companies coming out of that. People are looking

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>at new opportunities, whether they wanted to or not. Also,

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>with interest rates going up, we have you know, debt's

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>going to start getting more expensive, so there's more opportunity

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for different forms of financing. And when we're doing at

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the early stage, it's still the same course. It's make

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sure you have enough capital to get you to your

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>next stage. How can we help you, What are the

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>things that you need to build to get to that

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>next level, and what are the tools that you need.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>So for us, it's it's it's kind of business as

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>usual because there's a lot of opportunity happening right now,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great companies that we are seeing and funding,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>but also thinking about kind of making sure you have

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit saved away for a rainy day, because

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>no one knows what's around the corner, Serena. The New

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>York Times ran a story about your fund and mistakenly

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>printed a photo of your sister instead of you. You

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about this saying, no matter how far we come,

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we get reminded that it's not enough. How did you

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>process that mistake? Um, Honestly, I've been through a lot

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in my career and in my life, and I don't

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>let one thing tick me off too much. For me,

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I process process it as an opportunity to use it

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to let other people know that you're not the only

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>one being overlooked, and let people know. This is why

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm raising Serena Adventures. You know, this is why I

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>want to make an impact because we can. We need

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>people like me and people like Alison and like our

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>team at Serena Adventures to be writing the big checks

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to change that narrative so we don't have to be

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>overlooked and just just thought on and just you know,

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just say okay, let me just write right, let me

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>just post this as fast as I can. I'm not

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>even going to think about it because it doesn't really

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>matter to me, and so it's really about changing that narrative.

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's UM, I think that's so important because if

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a platform to talk about and to discuss it,

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>then it needs to be discussed. And UM, yeah, I

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's important for other women and other people of

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>color to see that you're not the only one struggling.

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've been number one for I don't know

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>EON's and m one more I can even find. And um,

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that that can still happen, it's just and

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and and the truth that this is why we have

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Serena ventures. Serena speaking of other great athletes. Tom Brady

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>on retiring, what's your take on that? Um, I think

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone is happy about it, or most people were. I

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>know I was, so it was definitely mixed feelings about

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>him retiring, and then kind of felt pretty good about

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the unretirement. I was like, oh, that's exciting. So well,

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>like Tod Brady, you've accomplished seemingly everything possible on the court,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and you've now started this second career and investing and

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got other business trist how much longer are we

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>going to see you playing tennis, and are you thinking

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>about the R word more often? I mean, I think

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>every tennis player thinks about the R word as soon

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>as they hit five years because sinness is so intense.

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It's literally eleven months out of the year. Um. But

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I you know, I don't know. I'm

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>not I'm living for the day. I always tell people

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not planning for tomorrow. Only in business, and when

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to tennis, I'm planning to spread it, all right,

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So what's the Serena Slam for business? What does that

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>look like? Um? I have never been asked that question,

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've never thought about it. And I think that

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is such a good idea, Like what a good way?

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Because I have I have a Serena Slam in tennis,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So what a good idea. I absolutely love that. I'm

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>going to think of something and come back to you

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on that. I love that. And you just challenged me.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I love being challenge. We're going to your trouble. I

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>got work to do today. You just gave you. Um.

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You have on that note, you have broken so many barriers.

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You have proved so many people wrong who didn't believe

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in you or support you. So I have to ask

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you about what what happened to Naomi Osaka at Indian Wells.

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>What's your reaction to this, especially given your own experience. Um, yeah,

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought that, you know, I thought that everyone is different.

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I always say this, I always say everyone is different. Um,

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's sport. I know a lot of people in sport,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's football. I know in basketball, I mean, shooting

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a free throw with all the noise and all the

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>angry words and the fans. It's it's interesting, you know.

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's a part of sport, unfortunately, and you have

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to be able to, you know, keep going in those

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>times because it's like it's not going. Unfortunately, people can

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be really mean and that's terrible. And I've been around

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>when people have been really mean and you just kind

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of have to understand that that's their opinion and just there.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a free world and they're able to have that opinion.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think that, you know, from my opinion

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is like, okay, I'm not gonna have that meanness when

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like okay, how do I do I

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>do that? And so unfortunately I hate that. It's a

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>part of sport, but it's part of sport and it

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>will probably always be a part of sport and so um,

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but everyone's different. Serena Williams and Alison Rappaport still been

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there from Serena Ventures. You can watch the full interview.

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>We had a lot more fun at Bloomberg dot com.

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, crypto and national security. We're going to speak

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>with the co founder of chain Analysis, also the chief

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>security officer, Jonathan Levin. Out there new tool to monitor

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>russ and sanctions and how they picture the role of

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>crypto in national security going forward. That's next. This is

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Time now for our crypto report. This now week

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>four of the war on Ukraine and it's been a

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>wild ride both for financial markets and cryptocurrency. I want

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring in our next guest to talk about uh

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>this and more. Ch Analysis co founder and chief security officer,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Levine. Jonathan cha Analysis is actually releasing a new

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>tool that would help users identify whether as I understand

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that the people they're interacting with our sanctioned entities. Can

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you explain a little bit how this works? Yeah, for sure,

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for having me. So Essentially, what we've

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>seen in sanctions in the US come out you know,

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>recently and over the past few years. Is it as

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes back to cryptocurrencies, is that o FAK, the

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>regulator that oversees all of sanctions, actually lists addresses from

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency blockchains like listed on the screen. Uh, and that

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>actually helps people understand whether they're interacting with people that

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>are sanctioned individuals that they're prohibited from interacting with. And

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, what we have released out there is

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>an ability for anyone in the world, free of charge,

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to actually screen transactions that they're processing against that API

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>or against our smart contract oracle to see whether they

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>are hitting up against one of those listed addresses by OPAK. Now,

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what you think, Jonathan, of the role of

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>intermediaries here, exchanges and the necessity to work with lawmakers

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and regulators. Do you think that there's more of a

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>role that they need to play in order to make

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>sure that the rules are being followed. Yeah, I think that. Well,

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the industry has been preparing for this moment a really

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>long time, and you've had exchanges and financial institutions really

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, as they step into the space and mature,

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>all of their risk and compliance programs really go into

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>business as usual. They know what the scenarios are, they

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>know what they needed to do, and they've been sort

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of adapting to all of the latest actions bio fak

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and and regulators around the world that have taken steps

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to broadened sanctions. So yeah, I think from that standpoint,

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the sort of business as usual or be a

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit busier than usual in a lot of the

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>sanctions teams in those financial institutions. Right, So, Jonathan, how

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>much evidence are you seeing of Russians potentially using cryptocurrency

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>to circumvent these rules? So currently we are tracking very

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>closely the macro environment, right, We're looking at all of

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the entry points and exit points from the Russian economy

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:01.760
<v Speaker 1>into cryptocurrencies and tracking sort of changes in liquidity, changes

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in volumes, different patterns of transactions to really understand has

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there been a systemic change in the way in which

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>people are using cryptocurrency in Russia and potentially abating sanctions

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, so far we're not seeing sort

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of the systemic level of crypticocurrency being used to evade

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>sanctions that people were worried about sort of at the

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this. How do you think about the role

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of cyber attacks in this war more largely, is there

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>evidence that this can become a bigger issue here and

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the role here of folks in the crypto community

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>who are also thinking about this at scale. Yeah, I

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great question because really what we've seen

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in this war in general is that you know, cyber

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 1>is a domain as part of this warfare. Um you're

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing sort of increased cyber attacks on Ukrainian internet infrastructure,

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen sort of activity to do with CONTI

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>ransomware really increase. As you know, there have been some

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>leaks and and some re establishment of Quanti as sort

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of the dominant ransomware family out there. And so really

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's incumbent on everyone in the industry to work really

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>closely with government and you know, share information about the

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>attacks that are happening so that there can be sort

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of indicators and shared intelligence across geographies and across business. UM.

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there's a lot more partnership to

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be done, and you're seeing a lot of the development

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of these task forces and a reprioritization of that in

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the US. You believe the war in Ukraine is a

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>key inflection point for the crypto industry. How do you

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>see this playing out? I think that one thing it's

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>done is it's really surfaced that cryptocurrency can be used

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for humanitarian purposes, you know, with a distinct example here

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of the speed by which money was able to go

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>from donors in all these different countries around the world

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>into the hands of the Ukrainian government and then for

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>them to purchase military equipment and emergency food supplies to

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to actually finance some of the defense of

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>their country. So that is a really sort of tangible

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>example that you know, is now in the minds of

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people around the world. You know. The

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>other thing here is that it is actually possible to

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have you know, sanctions compliance for cryptocurrency businesses around the world.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, I think the combination of you know,

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the legitimacy and the utility of cryptocurrency coming like to

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the forefront, as well as this increased focus and scrutiny

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on the regulatory piece, you know, is going to breed

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of an inflection point in how regulated cryptocurrency businesses

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>able to function in in Western economies. Alright. Chinalysis co

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>found er chief security officer Jonathan Levine along with our

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Shinali Bossic. Thank you. We don't think of it as

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a race at Blue Origin. Um. We are in this

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.479
<v Speaker 1>for the long term. And by long term, I don't

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 1>mean five years, I don't mean ten years. The vision

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of Blue Origin is generation spanning. I will not see

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it happen in my lifetime, maybe not even in my choice.

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>It's lifetime. That is how long the horizon of the

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Origins vision is. And I'm very excited to be part

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of these this early step, but it will keep on going.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Chief architect of Blue Origin suborbital rocket there Gary lie

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>back in July when Jeff Bezos made history on the

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>company's first manned rocket to space. Now Live will follow

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in bezos is Its steps and join Blue Origins flight

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on March twenty nine. He'll be taking the place of

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Night Live star Pete Davidson, who dropped out of

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the flight when the company announced the dates had been changed.

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>No additional reason given, and that does it for this

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology. Join us tomorrow. We'll be joined

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.240
<v Speaker 1>by Bradley Tusk of Tusk Ventures. He'll talk about crypto

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>investing and who will run the metaverse. That's tomorrow on

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. I'm Emily Chang. This is Bloomberg