WEBVTT - What Just Went Down

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot went down on Capitol Hill today, a lot

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of which you probably didn't hear about. But one man

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>was there to do the job of many. He refuted

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats arguments for upending our election system, he shot

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>down the Democrats arguments for taking all of our guns,

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and most impressively of all, he tweeted the whole time.

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael Knowles, this is verdict with Ted Cruz. Senator Cruz,

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear everything that happened today. It seemed

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>as if you were in multiple places at once, hearings

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>on guns, hearings on the Corrupt Politicians Act. And there

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>was a charge that while you were tweeting during all

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>of this, that it was just your staff sort of

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tweeting on your behalf while you were in the Senate.

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask, I know, you'll shoot straight here.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Were you the one tweeting? Oh yeah, that was me.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I was live tweeting. The look when you're in a

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>room with senator who are droning on and on and on,

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly when they're reading from like staff has written a

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of pages of like text for them to read.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit like the student and Charlie Brown

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to the teacher, and the teacher goes wa wah wah,

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>wah wah. And the truth of the matter is, like

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>most senators are on their phones and are scrolling through

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>email or text or this, being the social media world

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that it is, I was on Twitter, and then of

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>course some lefty publications saw me on Twitter on c

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>SPAN and so tweeted about me being on Twitter on

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>c SPAN, and so I promptly retweeted them and said, yep,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right, and they were sort of surprised, going,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>holy crap, is he retweeting us. It's like, yes, I am,

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And in fact that they made fun of

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>me because Amy Klobuchar was giving some long, long speech

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that I suppose somebody somewhere listened to, but but nobody

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in the room did, and they were shocked that I

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was on my phone for that, and I just said, well,

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>she's still reading her statement even after your tweet. Well,

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>you obviously wear many hats. You're a senator, you're a

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast host, you are often the booking producer on this show.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not at all surprised to hear that it

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>was actually you on Twitter. So you were covering it. Actually,

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're joking about the Twitter of it all,

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>but it is important that you were communicating this and

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>shedding light on what was going on. You were in

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple places. Yeah, look, and there's value to that. I was.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.399
<v Speaker 1>So the day started off, I went to a TV

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>studio and did did Fox News in the morning to

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about the markup that was coming on HR one

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or S one, which is the big election federal takeover

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of elections bill that is the top priority for Democrats.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And what we had today was what's called the markup.

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The markup is when you actually take the bill and

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you consider amendments to it, and the rules could comte

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate as the committee that has jurisdiction. I'm

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Rules Committee. Actually, interesting bit of trivia. I

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was put on the Rules Committee as a brand new

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>baby freshman, which is relatively unusual for newly elected senators

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>in my case nine years ago, to be put on it.

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.119
<v Speaker 1>And actually the reason Mitch McConnell asked me to serve

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on the committee is that the Rules Committee has jurisdiction

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>over campaign finance reform legislation. And he asked me at

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, he said, look, when the Democrats come with

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>some horrible campaign finance legislation, Ted, I'd like you to

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>lead the fight against this, and that's sort of like,

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, throw me in that briar patch. I am

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>eager to defend the first Amendment to stop the Democrats'

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>efforts to undermine democracy, and so I was happy to

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>do it then. And this is the most dramatic time.

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And so the markup started at ten am and it

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up about seven pm. So it went about nine

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>hours straight and during the course of it, we had, oh,

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know thirty or forty different amendments. I filed

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>forty six amendments, and so we brought up amendment after

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>amendment debating the bill. The bill is a really bad bill,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and I do hope and think that the markup today

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>highlighted just how extreme, just how partisan the bill is,

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Democrats ended up casting some really

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>bad votes today that underscores their top priority is staying

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>in power. What this bill is all about is keeping

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in power for the next hundred years, and they're

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>really trying to rig the game to do that. And

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important function of the markup today

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was to highlight how they're doing it. So you you

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned here the campaign finance angle. It actually sort of

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>surprised me because I had forgotten how broad this bill is.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>When I think of S one HR one, we're calling

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it the Corrupt Politicians Act. The In my mind, this

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was about changing the rules for congressional elections and federalizing

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>those those rules that would ordinarily be made by the states.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But then you're reminding me there's a campaign finance aspect

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to it. There. Could you just take us through a

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of specifically that portion, but but sort of

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>all the all the pieces of this legislation. Sure. So

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>this thing is nearly nine hundred pages long, and it

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is every bad idea every left wing advocacy group has

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>had over the last twenty years to try to change

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>elections to make sure that Democrats always win. So what

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>does the bill do? Well, let's start with what does

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it mean? HR one or S one. Nobody knows what

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that means. HR one means it is the very first

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>bill filed by Democratic leadership in the House. S one

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.679
<v Speaker 1>means it's the first bill filed by Democratic leader leadership

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. It means it's their number one priority. Yeah,

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and so just pause for a second and think about

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>what the Democrats are telling you. Their top priority isn't COVID,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>it's not back nations, it's not jobs, it's not reopening schools.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Their top priority is staying in power, and that trumps

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>everything else. Now, what does this bill do. Well, it

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>federalizes elections. It puts the federal government in charge of

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>elections across this country. One of the things it does is, look,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got fifty states. States generally administer of elections and

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they pass laws governing how elections are handled. This bill,

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>which many of us are calling, as you noted, the

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Corrupt Politicians Act, what it does is it essentially repeals

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>virtually every state voter integrity law. Now what does that mean. Here,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>here's some examples. Voter ID twenty nine states require some

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>form of identification to vote. You think about it, it's

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a common sense provision. Seventy five percent of Americans support

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>photoid for voting. By the way, that's true, sixty percent

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats support photo for voting. Seventy seven percent of

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Independence support photoid for voting. Sixty percent of African Americans

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>support photo ID for voting. What does the Corrupt Politicians

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Act do It repeals every one of those laws. It

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>makes it illegal for a state to require voter id Likewise,

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ballot harvesting, all right, what is ballot harvesting? It is

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a particularly corrupt practice where you send in a paid

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>political operative to collect the ballots of other peoples. Why

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is that corrupt? Well, because let's say you have an

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>operative from the DNC, the Democratic National Committee, who goes

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>into a nursing home where you have a bunch of

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are elderly, some of whom may not even

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be capable of making decisions. With ballot harvesting, these operatives

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>help them fill out their ballots, including people that may

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not be competent to make those decisions. And it invites

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>voter fraud because number one, they can prompt the people

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to vote the way the operative wants them to. Number Two,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if the operative sees how they vote, Let's suppose you

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>have a senior who stubbornly votes for Donald Trump instead

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of Joe Biden, the corrupt operative can take that ballot

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and throw it in the trash. It is dangerous when

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you have an employee of a political campaign handling the

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>ballots of other people. That's why thirty one states either

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>prohibit or restrict ballot harvesting. What does the Corrupt Politicians

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Act do? It repeals every one of those restrictions, and

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it mandates ballot harvesting. Likewise, this bill mandates universal mail

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in ballots, It mandates drop boxes everywhere, both of which

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are very susceptible to fraud. It also provides for welfare

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for politicians. Is this one of the more egregious elements

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of it? That it provides for a six to one

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>federal government match for money raised in increments under two

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. So if you raise two hundred dollars, the

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>federal government gives you twelve hundred dollars to match that.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That is a particularly idiotic proposal, as I observed at

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the hearing today. If you think of all of the

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>populations in need of welfare and need of subsidies, in

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>need of supports, politicians are really near the bottom of

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.599
<v Speaker 1>that list. Yeah. And I'll tell you, Michael, the provision

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that I think is most naked, that makes most obvious

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what the Democrats are doing is the Federal Election Commission.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>It was established after Watergates. So Watergate was a big scandal,

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance scandal. They created the Federal Elections Commission in

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies. It's a bipartisan commission. There are three

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Democratic commissioners, three Republican commissioners. The reason they did that

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is they wanted it to be for the FEC to act,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 1>it had to be bipartisan agreement. You had to get

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>at least four commissioners, meaning you had to get at

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>least one from the opposing party. What does the Corrupt

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Politicians Act do. It turns it into a partisan organization.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It leaves it with three Democratic commissioners and only two

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Republican commissioners, which means the FEC becomes essentially the attack

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>dog for Chuck Schumer. And it's designed. What the intention

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of this would be is to use it to target,

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to persecute, to investigate Republicans, and by the way, to

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>do it in all likelihood a month or two before

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the election, right when they're vulnerable, to have an October

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>surprise of guess what, every Republican in a close race,

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Schumer Federal Election Commission is going to announce

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>an investigation into some scandalous aspect of them. It's a

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>really bad idea, and that's what this bill does. So

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing because I've been reading the headlines on this bill,

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but when you see it all laid out all of

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>these things, it's it's such a major bill. And yet

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not all you were doing today. There was another

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>major issue. So while the Democrats are trying to ram

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>down which I think you put it very well, the

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>most radical legislation you've seen in your time, there perhaps

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.599
<v Speaker 1>perhaps rivaled only by the Equality Act or something like that.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And Michael, it's much more dangerous than the Equality Act

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's designed to rig the system. So two of

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the provisions that are most dangerous in the Corrupt Politicians Act.

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>So one is automatic voter registration. So any individual that

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 1>has any interaction with the government. So if you get

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a welfare check, get an unemployment check, if you get

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a driver's license, if you go to a state college

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 1>or university, you're automatically registered to vote. Now, that is

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>intended to and will, in fact, if it's enacted, register

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>millions of illegal aliens to vote, because there are anywhere

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>from eleven to twenty million illegal aliens in the country.

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>The estimates vary a large a significant percentage of that group.

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>We don't have an exact estimate, but it is in

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the millions by any way you assess it is interacting

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with the government. And all of these who are interacting

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with the government, this bill is designed to automatically register them.

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Not only that a number of states have very reasonable

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>provisions that provide that criminals can lose their right to vote.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>That if you commit a horrific crime, a number of

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>states have said you can forfeit your right to vote.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>What does the Corrupt Politicians Act do. It strikes down

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>every one of those laws. It says criminals the instant

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>they're released from jail can vote. And the reason for

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this is Democrats have decided, and I think quite reasonably,

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that having millions of illegal aliens vote, and thousands or

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands or millions of criminals and felons vote,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>that those individuals are likely to vote for Democrats and

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it will benefit Democrats. This is all about keeping Democrats

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in power. So during the course of the day, in

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the markup, as I said, I had forty six amendments.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I introduced an amendment to provide that before anyone is

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 1>automatically registered to vote, you have to verify citizenship, that

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not registering someone illegal. Of course, every Democrat voter

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>know that amendment was voted down. I introduced another amendment,

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>so a portion of this law grants amnesty, grants immunity

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to any illegal alien who's illegally registered to vote because

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of the automatic registration. Look at the bill anticipates millions

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of illegal aliens are registered to vote, and so it

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>grants amnesty. It says they're not liable. There's no criminal liability,

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>no civil liability. They're completely immune from any exposure for

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>being illegally registered to vote. I introduced it amendments to

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>just strip that. That is so radical, and I feel

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>people may not appreciate that. On the one hand, Democrats

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are saying this bill absolutely will not register illegal aliens

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to vote, and also when they are, they'll get amnesty

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>for it. That's in the same bill. It is the

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>same bill. The Democrats argued, no illegal aliens will be

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>registered to vote. I said, great, then you should vote

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for my amendments. If it's not registering anyone, then you

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>ought to welcome these amendments. They're like, no, no, no, no,

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>we can't have that. Have the amendments so I introduced

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a narrow amendment, just say, let's get rid of the amnesty.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>If nobody's registered illegally to vote, what's the value of

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>creating a special amnesty for people who are illegally registered

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to vote. Every Democrat voted no. They voted it down

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>on the criminals. All right, here's a very funny thing.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So I had a whole series of amendments allowing states

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to prevent criminals from voting. The first amendment that got

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>called up was from Senator Hyde Smith, and it was

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>an amendment focused on child molesters, and it said, people

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that commit crimes against children, states can prevent them from voting.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things I did going into this meeting,

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I sat down before the markup with Mitch McConnell. I said,

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>down with Roy Blonde, who's the ranking Republican on the committee,

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and we lay it out a strategy for fighting this.

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I drafted a whole bunch of amendments. And

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I did is gave a number

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of amendments to other Republican senators for them to drive forward.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So Cindy Hide Smith, Senator from Mississippi, introduced this amendment

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that said, if you've committed a crime against children, states

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>can prevent you from voting. Miraculously, Michael, this amendment passed,

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and Angus King, who is an independent from Maine, although

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he votes exactly like a Democrat, he voted yes. He said,

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a parent, and so if you commit a crime

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>against kids, states can say you can't vote. And I argued, forcefully, like,

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>why is it Democrats think our democracy would be better

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if child molesters were voting. When I think of what

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the country needs, the enlightened views of child molesters is

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not high on the list. So once Angus voted for that,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, well, you're not going to have a

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of other amendments onto other crimes. And I said, well, yeah,

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I do have a whole bunch of others, but I'll

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>just do one. So I pulled up mine, which was murderers.

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, okay, you've agreed child molesters. States can say

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they can't vote. How up murders people convicted of the

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>felony a murder. Angus King voted, noted that the Democrats

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>voted it down. So every Democrat of the committee voted

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that it should be illegal. For states to say murderers

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>can't vote. That that's how radical these guys are. Well,

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's not even to say, because people will you

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>confuse the federalism of it all. All you're suggesting here

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is that states should have the right to determine whether

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>or not murderers can vote. That even that was too

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>much for the Democrats. Yeah, to be clear, my amendments

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>were not requiring a standard, whether it is photoid for voting,

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it is barring criminals from voting. Under the Constitution,

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the principal responsibility for those decisions of the states. Now,

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I will say this in discussing it, there is an

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>argument that some on the writer making, which is that

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this whole bill is on constitution. I actually think that

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>argument is probably not right. That the way the Constitution

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is drafted, the states have significant responsibility for structuring elections,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but Congress also has the authority to promulgate standards, and

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's a concurrent jurisdiction. So I think it is.

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a valid argument to say Congress

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>can't legislate here. What I do think is a valid

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>argument is that Congress shouldn't be repealing the laws of

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine states when it comes to voter ID thirty

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one states when it comes to restricting ballot harvesting, that

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Congress should respect the state laws that in turn reflect

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the values of their citizens. This is an important point

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>because there are a lot of conservatives, I think, who

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>just want to say, oh, well, we don't need to

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>worry too much, because because the courts will strike it down,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and so you're making the point, actually that might not

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>be a bulletproof argument. But then there's also the practical

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>political reality here, which is that when we rely on

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the courts very often we're disappointed. So probably we're gonna

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>want to fight against this now. Well, and it's worse

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>than that. I don't think the courts will strike this down.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And here's why. If the Corrupt Politicians Act passes into law,

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it will be because the Democrats have ended the filibuster,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because they have rammed it through on fifty votes. It

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>will be because Joe Manchin and Christen Cinema gave in.

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>If that happens, the Democrats will also pack the US

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. They'll put four left wing justices on the court,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and a packed Supreme Court with four left wing justices

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>will uphold the Corrupt Politicians Act. So the current Supreme

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Court would certainly strike down significant elements of this bill,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but a packed Supreme Court with four new left wing

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>justices will rub or stamp this. And so the filibuster

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is the whole ball of wax in terms of stopping this.

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And this is really about, you know, Michael, if you

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>look at what the Democrats are trying to do, I'd

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>really break it into two baskets. What is bad policy?

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>They want to do things that are just bad policy.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Massively high taxes, massively high regulations, open borders, massive trillions

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in spending. All of that is bad, it's harmful. Yeah,

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>but all of that can be undone. If Republicans take

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>majorities again. We can cut taxes again, we can cut regulations,

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we can try to cut spending all the Historically that's

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>harder to do. But bad policy can be undone. There's

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a whole separate, separate category that the Democrats are trying

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to do that is rigging the game, that is changing

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the rules. And what falls into that HR one the

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Corrupt Politicians Act, making DC a state to get two

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>new Democratic senators and packing the US Supreme Court, and

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>those are designed to change the rule because I think

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Democrats believe if they enact those, they stay in power

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the next hundred years. That Republicans can't win if millions

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of illegal aliens and millions of criminals are voting. And

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>that's why they want to do it, particularly if you

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>have a partisan federal election commission that is a political

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>weapon going after Republicans at the behest of Chuck Schumer.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>They believe, I think quite reasonably, that that will ensure

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they win for a long time to come. That's why

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the whole edgelata. Senator, you've sufficiently depressed me

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about the corrupt politicians act. So now, because a wise

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>man once said that it is always darkest before it

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>goes totally pitch black, we have to address the other

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>topic that you were working on today, which is the

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>gun grab. Democrats are trying to pass big gun control.

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>You were there, you were in the room. What's it

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>look like and how do we stop it? Well, it's

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution Subcommittee, the Senate Judiciary Committee. I've been the

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>chairman of that committee for a number of years. I'm

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>now the ranking member because we're in the minority, so

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>center Richard Bloomenthal from Connecticut is now the chairman. He

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>had a hearing on so called ghost guns. I mean

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you said it's always darkest before it goes pitch black.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's fitting that pitch black is when the

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>ghosts come out. I showed up. Irritatingly enough, this hearing

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>was at the exact same time as the markup for

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Corrupt Politicians Act. So what I talked about on

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the hearing unquote ghost guns and what is a ghost gun?

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to be honest, who the hell has heard

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of a ghost gun? I mean, you want to talk

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about a made up phenomenon, and it's designed to be

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>really scary, like, oh, ghost guns? What? What? What the

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>heck are those? They're handmade guns. They're they're people, they're

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>hobbyists who make handmade guns. They make guns from kits.

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>They order different kits online and they assemble them. And

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the reason this is a made up problem is there

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is zero evidence, like, like nothing, nada, that handmade guns

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>are producing any violent crime at all. Like it It's

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a totally made up And so I kind of unloaded

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Democrats this morning, and I said, look, you've

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>got a hearing on a totally bogus threat, but it's

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>designed to be scary and frankly, they're taking advantage of

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>ignorant liberals who don't really know anything about guns and

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a ghost gun that they want to use a term

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that sounds really frightening. Yeah, but I said, what are

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you next going to hold a hearing on civil war

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>replica canons? I mean, they're not being used in crimes.

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>You want a hearing, You want a hearing on gun crime.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Gun crime is a serious problem. How about have a

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>hearing on Chicago and New York and Philadelphia and how

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>left wing gun control laws aren't working. That's actually a

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>real hearing. But they don't want to do that. And

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what I talked about also in my opening comments, I said, listen,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>why is it the Democrats are trying to do this?

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Because number one, their objective is not going after actual

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gun crime. It is stripping the Second Amendment rights from

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>law abiding citizens. That the people that build homemade guns

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>are collectors. Frankly, if you're a gang banger in Chicago,

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you're not making a homemade gun. You're buying an illegal

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>gun on the black market that you're murdering people with.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's where the guns come from. But here's

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>what this is all about. And it was interesting Bloomenthal

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at his opening statement, he said, look, these are untraceable,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and untraceable is meant to be scary. They want to

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>be able to trace every firearm in America because they

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>want a registry of every firearm in America. And I

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>put it out. I said, listen, Heidi and I own

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a number of firearms. There is no government list of

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the firearms we own. It's none of your damn business

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>what firearms we own. You want to find out what

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>firearms we own. Come into our house at night, you'll

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>find out what firearms we own. Look like it is.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And for the big government liberals, they want a registry.

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And the reason they want a registry is if you

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>look at countries throughout history that have confiscated firearms, it

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>always starts with a registry, a list of what guns

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 1>does Michael Knowles own, so that when they come knock

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on the door, they say, okay, mister Knowles, you've got

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a rifle, you've got a shotgun, and you've got a

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight revolver. Produced the guns now we're seizing them.

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I am fighting tooth and nail against a registry.

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>This whole ghost guns thing is a made up bass topic. Yeah,

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>because what they want is a registry of every gun

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to confiscate. Before we go. We're as

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>always pressed for time before we go, We've got to

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>touch on this Israel issue. We have to touch on

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>it because I don't understand anything about it, and I

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>think most people, frankly, are looking at this conflict, the

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Israel Palestine conflict. It seemed to have been fine. Everything

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be going pretty well for the past four years.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>You had lots of new peace treaties. We happened to

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be doing episodes. We were in DC during those peace treaties.

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You were there at the signing of them. And now

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>everything's gone to hell in a handbasket. What went wrong?

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Weakness causes violence and aggression. Terrorists like weakness. They're encouraged

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>by weakness. You know, I had dinner, I think week

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>before last, with David Friedman, who was the former US

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador to Israel under President Trump. David is a good friend.

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Four years of President Trump, you saw the Palestinian attacks

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Israelis on Americans dropped dramatically and it was

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>because I believe President Trump drew a line in the

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>SANUS as we stand with Israel. There was no ambiguity

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>about it. What did Joe Biden do when he came

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>in immediately put ambiguity about it. Immediately. One of the

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>things Biden started to doing is he sent over one

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars to the Palestinian Authority. Now, the Palestinian

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Authority is the quasi government of the Palestinians within Israel.

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It is in what's called a unity government with Hamas.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Hamas is a terrorist organization. It's explicitly a terrorist organization.

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Hamas and the Palestinian Authority they pay bounties to terrorists.

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a Palestinian terrorist and you strapped dynamite

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>on a vest and you walk into a mall and

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you detonate the dynamite and you murder women and children

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a moss and the Palestinian Authority will pay your family

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>a ongoing stipend for the rest of their lives. And

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a major budget item that they want to encourage.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's the government spending money to pay the families

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of terrorists as rewards for them murdering Israelis. And murdering Americans. Yeah,

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, Congress passed a law called

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the Taylor Forsac. Taylor Force was a Texan. He was

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>a veteran who was murdered by a Palestinian terrorist in Israel.

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And the Taylor Forsack says, US tax collet dollars will

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not go to any organization that rewards terrorists, that pays

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the families of terrorists as a reward for them committing

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>terror What did Joe Biden do in the first couple

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of months in office. Base basically ignored the Tailor Force

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Act and started paying hundreds of millions of dollars to

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the Palestinian authorities. So Joe Biden is sending your tax dollars,

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>my tax dollars to fund hamas in their payments to terrorists.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, the terrorists see that and say, Okay,

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this Biden administration is weak. They won't stand with Israel.

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's start firing rockets. And they're firing rockets. They're

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>firing hundreds of rockets at Jerusalem, at Tel Aviv, all

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>up and down Israel. And by the way, not only

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>is the Biden administration not doing anything meaningfully about it.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>But you've got democrats like Ilhan Omar and Rashid Tali.

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Omar accused Israel of carrying out acts of terrorism because

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>it's trying to defend itself against rocket attacks aimed at

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>civilians and it's trying to take out the terrorists. And listen,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted this week, why is a member of Congress

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>acting as the press secretary for Hamas? And this is

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>contrast at six months ago, we were seeing historic peace

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle East. Why because the President of the

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>United States and the US government was clear and unequivocal,

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We stand with Israel, and no one wanted to screw

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>with us. Now because Biden is not able to be

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>clear and unequivocal, suddenly they want to screw with Israel

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and they want to screw with us. And this is

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a manifestation of the failures of Biden's foreign policy.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It's night and day. I remember when John Kerry, but

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>before he was trapesing all over the world stopping the

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>sun monster. When John Kerry was the Secretary of State,

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>he said that it is not possible to solve the

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Israel Palestine conflict. It is not possible. Rather, to solve

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Eastern conflict more broadly, without first dealing with

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the Palestinian conflict. And the Trump administration comes in and says,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think that's true. I think we're

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going to just deal with all of these other Arab

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>states and we're gonna get peace deals with those separate states.

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And the Democrats said that was not possible. What happened

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for the last several years, we've seen lots and lots

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of peace. Three now that seems to be falling apart.

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you, Senator, a bit of a

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>depressing show on the voting rights, on the guns, on

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the international diplomacies. Is there any glimmer of hope here?

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the markup today on the Corrupt Politicians Act

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>was very beneficial in one since it showed just how

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>radical and extreme the Democrats were. I mean, when every

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrat on the committee voted to allow murderers to vote,

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty extreme vote. When every Democrat on the

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>committee voted to allow millions of illegal aliens to vote,

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's an extreme vote. When every Democrat voted to maintain

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the amnesty for millions of illegal aliens voting illegally, that's

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>an extreme vote. You know, there's another provision we talked about,

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the six to one match of federal funds, which is,

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, welfare for politicians. One of the things I

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>did at the markup today I went through what every

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrat on the committee had raised in Q one in

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter of this year, and I went through

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>how much they would get under the match, and some

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>would get a million. Angus King I think would get

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like seven hundred fifty dollars, he got virtually nothing. The

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrat who got the most was John assaf who was

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just elected out of Georgia, and he would get a

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 1>little over eleven million dollars in federal funds. I mean,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a bunch of money, eleven million dollars. So the

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>senator who would get the most on the committee was

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>yours truly. And last quarter in Q one of this year,

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I raised five point three million dollars five point three

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Ninety eight percent of that came from contributions

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>under one hundred dollars. I think the average contribution, if

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember Wright, it was either forty one or forty

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>seven dollars. I forget which one it was, but it

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was forty something five point three million dollars six to

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>one match. Now there's a cap. So what it would

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>have meant is I would have gotten twenty four million

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars from the federal government. And I asked the Democrats,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, why do my Democratic colleagues want to give

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>my campaign twenty four million dollars in federal funds? This

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is asinine. I don't want the funds. I'd like to

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>go raise the funds. By the way, if you're watching this,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>go to Ted Cruz dot org and make contribution. I

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome those funds, but I'm not interested in taking federal

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer money. And every Democrat voted to give my campaign

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four million dollars in federal funds. I mean it's

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>asinine because their priority is staying in power, and so

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they want billions of dollars of federal funds going to

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>their campaign. So as incumbents, they have massive amounts of

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>money and they can crush any challenger. And I gotta say,

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer began the hearing by the markup by giving

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this this sanctimonious speech, and it was a speech about

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Jim Crow. And I responded shortly thereafter, and I said, look,

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer rightly talked about Jim Crow. Jim Crow was shameful,

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it was racist, it was big. Jim Crow laws were

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>written by Democrats, they were implemented by Democrats, and the

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>purpose of Jim Crow laws was to keep Democrats in

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>power forever. Now I recognize today's Democrats and the corrupt media.

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Their narrative was, well, that was the Democrats of a

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>long time ago, but not today. I said, listen, this

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>bill today is Jim Crow two point zero. This is

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>designed for the same purpose, which is to prevent the

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>voters from throwing the bumbs out, to prevent the voters

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>from voting Democrats out when they embrace socialism, when they

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>embrace open borders, when they pack the Supreme Court, when

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they advocate abolishing the police. The Democrats want the voters

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not to have the power to vote them out. And

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>how do they do that. They do that by registering

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>millions of illel aliens, allowing criminals to vote, and making

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Election Commission a partisan weapon to target Republicans.

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>This is all about disenfranchising voters, just like Jim Crow.

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta admit to say Democrats didn't like that

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>would be something of an understatement, and I think there

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is value just shining the light and explaining what it

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is they're trying to do. I think that's true. And

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a guy who's going to turn down twenty

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>four million bucks probably doesn't care what the Democrats say

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>about him on the committee. Twenty four million bucks. You know.

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess there is the glimmern thing. I guess the

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>glimmer of hope is no matter. If they'd upped it

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five, I might have been up open to it,

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly. And I suppose there's got to be a

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>number somewhere. But if you think you're having a bad day,

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the politics all around the world, you

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>say everything's going to hell in a hand basket. At

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>least you didn't have to turn down twenty four million

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars today like Senator Cruz did. We have to leave

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it their senator. But we will be back soon. I'm

0:33:48.280 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Michael Knowles. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought to you

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack, a political action committee

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>country in twenty twenty two. Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>help the Republican Party across the nation.