WEBVTT - How Does the Butterfly Effect Work?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of iHeart Radio, Hey

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff laurenvog Obam here. The butterfly effect isn't just

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a movie from two thousand four. It's the idea that small,

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>seemingly trivial events may ultimately result in something with much

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>larger consequences. In other words, that small things have non

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>linear impacts on very complex systems. For instance, when a

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>butterfly flaps its wings in New York, that tiny change

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in air pressure could eventually cause a cyclone in Beijing.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>In the aforementioned film, Ashton Kusher's character finds a way

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to travel back in time to his childhood. Every time

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>he makes the journey, though, he does small things differently,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and those tiny changes wind up having major and horrifying

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>effects on his adult life. The term butterfly effect was

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>coined the nineteen sixties by Edward Lawrenz, a meteorology professor

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was studying weather

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>path turns. He devised a model demonstrating that if you

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>compare two starting points indicating current weather that are near

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>each other, they'll soon drift apart, and later one area

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>could wind up with severe storms while the other is

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>calm at the time, Whether satisticians thought you should be

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>able to predict future weather based on looking at historical

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>records to see what had happened when conditions were the

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>same as they are now, Lorenz was skeptical. He was

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>running a computer program to test various weather simulations, and

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he discovered that rounding off one variable from zero point

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>five zero six one to seven to zero point five

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>zero six dramatically changed the two months of weather predictions

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>in his simulation. His point was that long range weather

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>forecasting was virtually impossible, in large part because humans don't

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to measure nature's incredible complexity. There are

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>simply too many minute variables that can act as pivot points,

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 1>cascading into much bigger consequences. As The Boston Globe wrote,

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the innumerable interconnections of nature, Lorenz noted, mean a butterfly's

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>flap could cause a tornado, or, for all we know,

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>could prevent one. Similarly, should we make even a tiny

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>alteration to nature quote, we shall never know what would

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>have happened if we had not disturbed it, since subsequent

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>changes are too complex and entangled to restore a previous state.

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So while people often think the butterfly effect means that

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>tiny changes can have big consequences, and that we can

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>track this progression to see what change caused. What Lorenz

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>was trying to say that we can't track those changes,

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really know exactly what would cause a

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>weather pattern to go one way or another. Lorenz called

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this sensitive dependence on initial conditions when he introduced his

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>work to the public in a nineteen sixty three paper

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>titled Deterministic non periodic Flow. The term butterfly effect he

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>coined later in speeches about the topic. The paper was

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>rarely cited by other researchers, at least at first. Later on,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>other scientists realized the importance of Lorenz's discovery. His insights

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>laid the foundation for a branch of mathematics known as

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>chaos theory, the idea of trying to predict the behavior

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of systems that are inherently unpredictable. You can see instances

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of the butterfly effect every day. The weather is just

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>one example. Climate change relatedly is another. For example, as

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, warming climates are impacting appropriately enough species

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of alpine butterflies in North America. We spoke by email

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>with Alessandro Philozola, a community ecologist and data scientist and

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>postdoctorate fellow at the University of Alberta. He said climate

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>change is expected to have some large impacts, such as

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>too hot for some species or too dry for others,

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>but there are nearly infinite amount of smaller indirect effects

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that will also occur. In our research, we looked at

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those indirect effects and saw how future climate

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>will slowly cause mismatch in spatial location of a butterfly

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and its host plant. As a caterpillar, this butterfly only

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>feeds on this type of plant species, so any mismatching

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>range will cause a decline in the butterfly. He adds

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that if we were to pause for a moment and

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>think of all of the other species in a food web,

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>suddenly there's the potential of many species being affected, not

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just one butterfly, but everything that eats it or that

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>relies on the decay of its body for nutrients, and

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>everything that eats those animals and fungi and plants and

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>everything that's in competition with it for resources. That's the

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>butterfly effect in action on a large scale. When we

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>start to consider how one small change can quickly result

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of unintended consequence. There's naturally cause for concern.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>For example, limiting the construction of hydroelectric dams might reduce

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>certain types of environmental damage, but in eliminating this potential

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>source of clean energy, we tend to fall back on

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels that accelerate global warming, and biofuel subsidies meant

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels have increased rainforest

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>destruction and freshwater waste, and have lead to increases in

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>food prices that have affected the poorest segments of the

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>human population. How can we possibly do much of anything

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.559
<v Speaker 1>in our lives then, without fear of causing harm? Philo

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Zola returns to the butterflies as an example. He said,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>better understanding of indirect effects is probably one of the

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>most important steps in trying to mitigate those effects. More simply, though,

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just keeping nature as close to its original state is

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>really the most important thing. Ecosystems are vastly complex, and

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the loss of a single species might not have a

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>perceived effect, but it could have cascading effects on the

0:05:54.520 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>entire system. For another example, reintroducing wolves to yellow Stone

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>park where they had previously been hunted out of their

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>historical range, has wound up increasing beaver populations and increasing

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the number of willow and aspen plants, and provided food

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for birds, coyotes, and bears, among other benefits. Then we

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>have to consider how the butterfly effect can play into

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>our individual lives. With nearly eight billion humans on the planet,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>can just one person make changes that echo around the earth?

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Phila Zola says that he does wonder about the indirect

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>effects of his personal actions. He said, the items I buy,

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the people I interact with, the things I say I

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>believe each can have their cascading effects that rippled through society.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's important to try and be a good

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>person to create a positive influence. One thing I also

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think about is how these indirect effects are often not

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>as small and removed as I believe many would think.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode was written by an Than Chandler and produced

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>by Tyler Clang. For more on this and lots of

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>other small topics with big impacts, visit how stuff works

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Brain Stuff is production of I Heart Radio.

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Or more podcasts of my heart Radio, visit the I

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.