WEBVTT - Liberals Still Obsessed with Rush & Path to 9/11

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>This next story. I'm sure you've seen this, heard about it.

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a kind of thing infuriates me. And I

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>have to tell you when I watched the Path to

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven. By the way, we're going back to audio

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>soundbites three and uh and four next ed I just

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>when I saw all of the hesitation and all the

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>rules and all the regulations that prevented us from taking

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:29.159
<v Speaker 1>out Bin Laden or other terrorists, my blood boiled. And

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>now there's their stories in the New York Post today

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Taliban and there's a picture of it. Taliban terror leaders

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who had gathered for a funeral, and we're secretly being

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>watched by an eye in the sky. American drone dodged

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>assassination because US rules of engagement bar attacks in cemeteries.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>According to a shocking report, US intelligence officers in Afghanistan

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 1>are still fuming about the recent lost opportunity for an

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>easy kill of Taliban han shows packed in tight formation

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for the burial. NBC News had the pictures. It looks

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>like there might be a hundred ninety of them there.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>The unmanned drone circling undetected high overhead, fed a continuous

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>satellite feed of the target to officers in the ground.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 1>We were so excited they came rushing in with the picture,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>one U S Army officer told NBC. But that excitement

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>quickly got to turn to gut wrenching frustration because the

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>rules of engagement on the ground in Afghanistan blocked the

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>US from mounting a missile or bomb strike in a cemetery.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>According to the report, Pentagon officials declined comment. Referred to

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>New York Post to Central Command officers in Afghanistan, who

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't respond to request for comment or explanation by by

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>press time. Now, the Taliban bombs other Muslim funerals. The

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Taliban hides behind women and children, as does al Qaeda

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and all of these other terrorists. This is a new

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of war, and we're gonna have to rethink these rules.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I know why we do it, folks, I know why

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we do what we do it to, uh maintain the

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>United States dignity and and and so forth. I understand

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that blowing up cemeteries and this sort of thing. But man,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>when these people are we just we spell out hiding

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>places for him, uh in the in the process. Let

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>me go back. There's a couple more soundbites here on

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the Path to nine eleven UM, we have an unreal

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>analysis here from a professor at the University of Pennsylvania

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>his name is Michael Dellicapini, and being interviewed by PBS

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Course Moment Jeffrey Brown, who says, there have been reports

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in recent days about ties between the filmmakers the past

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 1>to nine eleven and conservative causes our organizations. I wan quickly,

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's not quite clear what that means exactly, or

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>what those ties would mean. But because it's been so

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>much disgusting, what ways would that matter to you? Perhaps?

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>In what ways wouldn't it matter to you? I think

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it matters a lot. And the ties are both with

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the direct and with the screenwriter, and they have to

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>do with involvements with organizations that have as part of

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>their mission bringing more conservative views into mainstream media. What

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the audience needs to know and what needs to be

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>upfront with people as they view it, if they're going

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to watch it critically and understand what's being said to them,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is that that's the case. I would put on the

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>network a very strong obligation to let its audience know

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that they are getting a film that comes from a

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>point of view, even if there is an effort to

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>make that point of view more subtle. Stop stop that,

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Mr Mr Deli Carpini, Would you also agree that we

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>need such disclaimers in front of practically ninety percent of

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the movies that come out of Hollywood, from the big

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>screen and for television. What is this to say that

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>there is an agenda behind movies? Is new and only

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>conservatives are doing it and the public needs to be

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>warned about this. And by the way, what is so

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>threatening and what is so dangerous about conservatives in Hollywood

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>attempting to produce and write and distribute product. Well, I'll

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you what's so threatening about it, folks, The same

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>way this program threatens them. They used to have a

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>monopoly and they're worried, sick they're going to lose it.

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>This movie, The Path to nine eleven, was an earth

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>chattering But what is no crime in being sorry this

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>there is? Conservatism is criminal. They're attempting to criminalize conservative ideology.

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Here's the rest of the bite. We got one more

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>from this guy, just as we would expect a news

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>show to tell us where their information is coming from.

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there a bias? Is this an opinion hold? Hold

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>hold it. When do we get that? When do we

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>ever get a new show telling us of their bias

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and where a certain story came from? What is this

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>guy is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania. Here's

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the rest active presentation of things. And then the next

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>bite is this, uh, actually different, different, It's not the

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>same guy that that again was a University of Pennsylvania

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>professor Michael Dela Carpini. On MSNBC yesterday, the anchor Babe

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Melissa ray Burger talking to Democrats strategiist Flavia Colgan. Maybe

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Flavia. I don't know, I've never heard it pronounced,

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>ray Burger says, after you saw the Path to nine level,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>are you upset ABC didn't pull it all together or

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>did the edited version make a difference? Oh, absolutely not one.

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it undercuts the credibility of a film when

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you have it being released to Rush Limball beforehand, forty

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>million dollars funding it. We don't know where it's coming from.

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Sandy Burger and Clinton were well um within their rights

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>certainly to appeal to Tom Kine the forty million dollars

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know where it came from. How about ABC.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an ABC movie. Flavia Flavia Touchstone put it out.

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I do who have the DVDs? It's imitates him so much.

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>They can't they can't get over this. They're beside themselves

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that I got the DVDs. But I

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the first Flavia Flavia. How many times have I

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>got to say this? This movie was screening the National

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Press Club and half the audience was Democrats, including Richard

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ben ven East and some people from the nine eleven Commission.

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I was not first on the list. I had nothing

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with writing this thing. I didn't even talk

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to Cyrus nor Rasta in the process. All I knew

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>was some years ago he was working on it. But frankly,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>when he told me about it, it went in one

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>ear and out the other, because I figured this thing.

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't have a prayer, but go for it, Cyrus. I

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>didn't even get all the details. I had no clue

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>what this thing was gonna be before I. They think

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I wrote it. They think they told I guided Cyrus

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>and what Cyrus and his people. This is an ABC project, folks,

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>This is an ABC project. And I'll bet you before

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all this hubbub came up. This thing was so good.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I will bet you ABC I thought it was one

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest things they'd ever produced internally, this University

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania professor. For just a second, Michael Delhi Carpini

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>PBS News or with Jim Alara being asked about the

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>movie Path to nine eleven and uh, I'm not gonna

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>listen the whole thing stand by ed for when I

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you to kill it. I think it matters a lot.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And the ties are both with the director and with

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the screenwriter, and they have to do with involvements with

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>organizations that have, as part of their mission bringing more

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>conservative views into mainstream media. What the audience needs to

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>know and what needs to be upfront with people as

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they view it. If they're going to watch it critically

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and understand what's being said to them, is that that's

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the case. I would put on the network a very

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>strong obligation to let its audience know that they are

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>getting a film that comes from a point of view.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Stop the alright, are Mr Della Carpini. Let's say I

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>were to take your suggestion to something useful and valuable.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I would then say this to PBS and the News

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>are with Jim Larra, and next time you have University

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania professor Michael Della carpinion, Inform your viewers he

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>has a point of view. Inform your viewers where he

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>comes from. Inform your viewers whether he's a liberal criticizing

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>what he thinks, he is a conspiratorial conservative movie. I mean,

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander.

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>If conservatives in Holly would have to identify their work,

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we're conservatives, and this has a conservative slant that I

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think every liberal ought to be forced to do the

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>same thing. People, you know that all these professors and

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>all these elite is the smartest people in the world

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>cut above, and they're not. They're so easily refutable that

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's refutable for those of you in real inda

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's hardly worth the time. I want to go

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>back and correct something folks. I said a moment ago

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that these libs think that I co wrote the Path

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to nine eleven because I'm a friend of the writer

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Cyrus No Resta, and they think and they aren't there

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to say that the released the Limball first Limball,

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and trying to imply Limball was in on it. Here's

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line. They know I had nothing to do

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with this. They know full well I had nothing to

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>do with any aspect of this movie. This is just

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the way they do things, typical smear tactics. I'm bad, Cyrus,

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>No rest is bad. That equals the movie is bad.

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>They do it to people. They do it to people

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>like me and Cheney and Bush and Rovan Rumsfeld. They

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>do it to companies ex On, Walmart, Halliburton. They do

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it to objects, guns, cigarettes, and cvs, SUVs. All they

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>do is smear things and smear people. They produce nothing.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Liberals produce nothing, They accomplish nothing, They're responsible for nothing.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So they seek and destroy because that's the only way

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>they can deal with their opponents is to discredit them.