WEBVTT - 1141 | Burning Questions for Every AL Team + Francisco Lindor Trade Rumors?

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>The Times a league record.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Bring we will sue you to.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 3>The gunner. Welcome, hang out, Welcome to the Just Baseball Show.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 3>It is Friday, July seventeenth. That's arm Laden. I am

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Peter Rapple and today one burning question for every team

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>in the American League. This is part two after yesterday's

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 3>episode Part one, going through the entire National League. But

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna start with this recent trade deadline report from

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>the New York Mets. A rival executive said, the Mets

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 3>have informed everyone that they're basically open for business. And

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>we're going to end with a weekend preview. And it

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 3>is all brought to you by bet MGM and BETMGM

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 3>is officially live and Alberta, Canada. Or remember to use

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 3>code just Baseball when you make an account because if

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 3>your first pick loses, you'll get it all back in

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>bonus bets up to fifteen hundred bucks. And everyone who

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 3>has a bet mgm account can use this MLB no

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Sweat home Run token. You don't got to worry if

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>your bet didn't clear the fences. Just activate your token

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 3>today when you bet on any player to hit a

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>home run in any MLB game, and if that player

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 3>were to fail to go yard, you're going to get

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>your stake back in bonus bets. Remember to use code

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 3>just Baseball on bet MGM to unlock it all. Also,

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 3>if you're looking for a home run bat, I personally

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>like Cody Clements. Weirdly enough, my model makes him the

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 3>most likely guy to hit up home run today, And

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about it, like, what why is he

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 3>number one?

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Show?

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Hey O Tani is facing the Yankees, Like, there's plenty

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>of great bats out there. But then I look at

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Colin Ray with wind blowing out at Wrigley, and it's

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 3>blowing out to right center, exactly where he hits most

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>of his home runs. And Ray has allowed fourteen of

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 3>sixteen home runs against left handers. So I was like, oh,

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Cody Clement sneaky has sixteen home runs, So I get it.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 3>So that would be my pick. What's your pick real

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 3>quick for today? Yeah? Any any any feelings that you

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 3>got on a home run guy?

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, now I just want to take another left handed hitteror.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Playing at Wriggly there, I'll go Josh Bell, I'll stack him.

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I like it.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Twins Nation before we get into anything. Happy birthday brother,

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>turning twenty nine today, I put out a nice tweet.

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Five and a half years ago, we started just baseball

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 3>and now you're the best prospect writer out there, a

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 3>BBWAA member, and I hope to keep it going.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it, dude, It's been awesome.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy how much of a blur it has been

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 2>already five and a half years. But yeah, this is

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>the last year for me to be able to enter

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>free agency and get a long term deal, Like we

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 2>talked about it next next year. If I try to

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>answer free agency I'm not getting anything more than four years.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Still. One of my favorite bits from part of my

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>take is when pft is he was turning thirty and

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 3>he was like, I think it's officially time to give

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 3>up my dream on.

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Y being in the NBA.

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>The other like the age they were like, yeah, before that,

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 3>I still had a chance. So technically at twenty nine

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 3>a team could still give you a look, but you

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 3>got one more year of it. Yeah, this is it.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>This is it.

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to try to make the most out of

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>this last year, maybe get on the pep tide, see

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>what I can do well.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>The Mets have certainly not made the most out of

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>this season. We got a new recent report from Chelsea James,

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>who's an MLB insider for s n Y, and the

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 3>report reads a rival executive said the mets in informed

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 3>them that everyone but Juan Soto, Carson, Bengje aj Ewing,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Christian Scott, and Nolan McClain are available for a trade.

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 3>And my first thought immediately goes to Francisco Lindor. Are

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>you telling me there's a chance with Bobaschett. I'm still

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 3>thinking about when Paul Hembikitis aka Hembo came on the

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 3>show and floated Bashett returning to Toronto. I'm thinking about that.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Clay Holmes, I know he's currently on the IL, but

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>he should be back relatively soon. Is somebody gonna go

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 3>after him? But I wonder why they didn't include Lindore

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 3>on this list. Now I get it. In theory, he's

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>owed thirty two million dollars until he's thirty seven years old.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>He's currently thirty two years old. He's not off to

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 3>that grade of a start. However, this is Francisco Lindor

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about. I thought the point was marrying the

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>two door and Soto and creating a young core surrounding them.

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 3>But technically, and they've been fielding off as nothing is

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 3>said in stone yet, I still think it's unlikely that

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 3>he's traded. Yeah, the fact that he's not on this

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 3>report was the biggest thing that stuck out to me.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's one of those where it's not like, oh,

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess I for you know, forgot to mention him

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>like a you know, an omission there. There's a reason

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 2>why it was mentioned. I don't think he's gonna be

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.559
<v Speaker 2>traded either. I think between the money and the fact

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>that that's not gonna do it in a salary dump.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>So whoever it's gonna be acquiring him is gonna have

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 2>to still give up something.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna make it really difficult for that deal to happen.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think the.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Omission of Lindor in the names of players that are untouchable,

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 2>I think and large part is because they are definitely

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>I would be expecting them to be willing to listen

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>because you are one hundred percent not able to move

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 2>Soto in that contract. No one's gonna take that on,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>even though it's not necessarily a bad one. The Yankees tried,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe maybe they could try to make it curious.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you think nobody would take it on.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I think there's three teams that can one of them

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>he's on, and then I mean the Yankees couldn't go

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 2>that high and didn't want to match that structure, So

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 2>you could really say there's two teams.

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>The other would be the Dodgers, who didn't do it right.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 2>So like that's the crazy thing is like the Mets

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>outbid everybody for SODO services, So I just I don't

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>see that happening. And ultimately I think they keep these

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 2>two together. But I think when you have the history

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of you know, the butting heads that they kind of

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 2>have had a little bit from even though it's most

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.119
<v Speaker 2>of even behind closed doors, but seemingly it has become

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more public, the struggles of the team

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>are only gonna make that stuff worse. Like I could

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 2>see the Mets and concerns being like, hey, we should

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>probably maybe we want to shake this up. Also the

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 2>money that would clear up for the Mets to be

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>able to go do something else. But at the same time,

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>who are you gonna go sign a free agency this

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 2>year that's better than Francisco Indoor?

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Who are you gonna be able to add that's better.

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't see where that would be.

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Wes Lindor, with the injuries, is having the worst year

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 2>that he's had really of his career so far.

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's unexpected.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>That said, I think the larger part of this report, though, too,

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>is said like the Mets are one of the few

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 2>clear cut sellers, and I think the Mets will be

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the first teams to trade away from their

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>ball cup. Like, I think they're going to jump start

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>this deadline a little bit quicker than others.

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I think Devin Williams is certainly going to

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 3>be on the move. I think Luke Weaver might be

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the best reliever acquired at this deadline. Considering that the

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox per Fangrafts have an over forty percent chance

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of making the playoffs, increasingly unlikely that they would be

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 3>willing to part with the role as Chapman making. I

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 3>think Luke Weaver potentially. I mean, who knows what the

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Padres are going to do if they decide that Mason

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Miller is on the table. Throw out that statement about

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Luke Weaver being the top reliever available. But if Mason

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Miller is not available, I think Luke Weaver would be

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.119
<v Speaker 3>a welcomed edition to a lot of clubhouses. Another point

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 3>on Landor, John Hayman came out this morning and tweeted

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 3>out that the Yankees are not in the market to

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 3>add a shortstop because when considering teams who could potentially

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 3>take on the money that Lindor is owed. Again, there's

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>another shortlist, right You mentioned the Dodgers, who of course

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>have Mookie bets at shortstop. Could they move off them?

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 3>But do they want to truly add another huge contract

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 3>like that? Who knows, but technically they could bring them on.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 3>The Yankees are another team like that, and maybe the Phillies,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 3>but there's just no way the Mets are trading Lindor

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 3>to the Phillies when the Phillies have Francisco Lindoor. So

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I was surprised to see that the Yankees aren't even

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 3>in the market for a shortstop. I know Volpi is

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>not nearly as bad as Yankee fans are calling him,

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 3>but if he is on the other end of that trade,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand why the Yankees wouldn't at least think

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 3>about it bringing Lindoor onto this team. He would be

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>a perfect fit. Now I know he's not having that

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 3>greade of a season, but the defense is still above

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>average when you look at the difference between his walls

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 3>his ex world. But he has been one of the

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 3>more unlucky hitters in Major League Baseball. But I really

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 3>don't need an ex Wloba bloba equation to tell me

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>that I still believe in Francisco Or is bad at

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>thirty two years old. I'm just citing numbers that are

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 3>happening right now where even if you're the biggest Lindor hater,

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 3>you can't really deny what's in front of us.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Any of injuries to explain it too, like he's been

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>banged up all year.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 3>I think the Yankee should absolutely be exploring a Francisco

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Lindor deal. I tweeted last night there's no way the

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 3>Mets would trade Lindor to the Yankees, right.

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>And that's another one where it's like it's not inter division,

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>but like I think it would be a tough optic

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>cell as well to send him that way. It's about

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>if you whatever is left of this year, so I

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 2>guess it would be about five in a quarters years

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 2>left at about one hundred and one hundred and seventy

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>five million dollars hundred and seventy two million dollars.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be exact if you want to.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Just make it easy math like, for the next five

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 2>years after this season, it's five years of one hundred

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 2>and sixty million dollars roughly for Francisco Indoor Like, there's

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 2>teams that will take that on, I think, but you

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 2>just start to try to match it up and it

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 2>gets difficult. And also again the season that he's having

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 2>makes it tougher. But at the same time, it's not

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>like you're paying him through age forty one. It's it's

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>up to his age thirty seven season. And I think

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the tough cell will be When the Mets gave this

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>contract out, a big part of it was that you

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>were getting those prime years. You're getting age twenty eight,

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine to thirty thirty one. This is kind of

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 2>like the last she perceived prime year, and he's been

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 2>banged up physically. So most teams aren't jumping out of

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 2>their chairs to take on contracts where the best part

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of it is already behind them, right Like, the back

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 2>years of this deal are kind of accepted as the

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>price to pay for the prime years that you're that

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>you were paying for and what you were getting, So ultimately,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he goes anywhere. And ultimately, I think

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 2>like for the Mets to be competitive sooner rather than later,

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they've got to figure out a way to

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 2>make it happen with Lindor and Soto and the rest

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>of the guys that they have around them. Like if

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 2>you have your everyday shortstop figured out where he could

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>be still, I mean, when healthy, he's arguably one of

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the best in the game. And then you have Soto

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>as well, Like those are two huge building blocks. You've

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>got the young kids, You've got McClain in the rotation.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Christian Scott, who we just talked about yesterday made us

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 2>look great, proceeded to just shove on the only game

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>on TV last night, and he just continues to look

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 2>like he's settling in.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>They have the pieces.

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I think you trade and really reshuffle this team, But

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you need to trade. You know, one

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 2>of the best shortstops in Major League Baseball at an

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>all time low.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 3>So rank the likelihood of these three players getting traded

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Clay Holmes, Boba Schett and Francisco Lindor, and is it

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 3>in that exact order I just laid out.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I think it's in that order because John Hayman pointed

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>out something really important the other day, which is that

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Boba's Jets contract is almost fully paid out for this year,

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 2>so you get paid like a forty million dollars signing mode.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's do we not owe anything this year.

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, it's still a little bit of a poison pill

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 2>contract because if you acquire Baschett, remember it's it's player

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>options for next year in the year after that. So

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 2>if he stinks he's going to opt in for forty

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>plus million again, he's going to opt in for forty

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>plus million again. But now at least it makes it

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 2>semi possible that if you're acquiring Bashett, you're not taking

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>on fifteen million dollars for the rest of this season

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and then the forty.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So that is where it gets interesting.

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>And maybe because the Mets already paid it out, they say, hey,

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>if he opts in for next year, you know, we'll

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>put in a stipulation where we'll pay down ten of

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>it if you give us like some really good prospects,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 2>which we've seen the Mets do in the past. Right,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>they paid down that Verlander contract. To get better pieces back,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 2>they paid down a couple of deals, I think to

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>get better prospects back.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that would be the craziest thing in

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the world.

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 2>So I still think it's unlikely for Baschet, but the

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 2>fact that this year is already all paid out, so

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the team acquiring him it doesn't have to worry about it.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 2>And next year maybe the Mets get paid down a

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 2>little bit. I think there's a world where it's remotely

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 2>possible that Bishek could be moved. And then Clay Holmes,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 2>he's already throwing. I think they said he's inching back

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 2>towards a rehab assignment the second that he looks. I

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 2>don't even think he needs to be on the mountain

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in a regular season setting for a team to say, hey,

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>let's go get Klay Holmes. With the way he looked

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>this year, and with how many teams are gonna need pitching.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent, one more player that I want to

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 3>throw at you that I wasn't shocked was not on

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>this list of untouchable guys, but I was a little surprised.

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Francisco Alvarez, Yeah, Homers last night brought his ops up

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to seven seventy three. And this is on the heels

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 3>of a twenty twenty five campaign where he posted his

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 3>seven eighty six ops. And you can say, well, the

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 3>defense isn't great, and I would agree with you. But

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 3>at the same time, he is twenty four years old

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 3>and is flashed really solid tools behind the plate. Right,

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>He's flashed a good arm, he's flashed receiving skills. It's

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 3>just kind of gone up and down with him defensively.

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Now I really don't know what to call him as

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 3>a defender. At times I think he's really good. At

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 3>times I think he's really poor. But then I have

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 3>to remember in the back of my head, this guy's

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty four He's twenty four years old. Yeah, could he

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 3>get better? Absolutely? Could this be an eight hundred oh

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 3>ps bat behind the plate who's averaged defensively and sometimes

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>showing flashes of above average, even elite abilities to receive

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>the baseball?

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So a good amount of teams need catchers. Yeah,

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I think he could be a sneaky player that the

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Mets move at the deadline. Where we go when we

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 3>see the package in return and say, WHOA, that's a lot.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 3>But then we think to ourselves, Yeah, deservedly so.

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say they'd have to be absolutely wowed

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 2>on that one. And he's one where I'm like, I

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>wonder if they just forgot to mention him, because I

0:14:58.960 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>just I wouldn't.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to it didn't.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Understand why they don't. Real quick, here's why I don't

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 3>think they forgot him. Why they add Christian Scotty. And

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>I love Christian scott I'm not saying that they shouldn't have.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad that they did. I'm glad he's going to

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 3>be a part of the Mets feature for a long time.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 3>But they picked their players on they did like this

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 3>wasn't I don't really like if they said Nolan McClain,

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Juan Soto and Lindor and then benj and Ewing, I'd

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 3>be like, yeah, I don't think they did. They didn't

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>add specific players.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, And it might be just the injury history

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 2>and whatever where it's just like, hey, come overwhelm us.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we really don't want to move them.

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>But like, gum, knock our socks off, and that I

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 2>guess I can understand because I think the thumb injuries

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 2>have affected Alvarez is receiving because we've seen him, as

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, receiveing an elite clip. But yeah, I think

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that's one where you'd have to just get absolutely overwhelmed

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>with an offer. But I think the Mets are to

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 2>be really savvy and just try to I mean, whatever

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 2>flyer prospect you're gonna get for Viento, it's like everything,

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>cash in every little piece that you can and see

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>where you go. But yeah, I'm excited to see us

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Sterns navigates this deadline.

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Pry Polanco is another one, but I know he's kind

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>of injured, but.

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just walking about. I mean, the Viano's is hurt too, exactly.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting they have a ton of guys that could

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 3>potentially be on the move. I think the Mets might

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 3>be the number one team to watch this deadline. But

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>now it's time for one burning question for every team

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 3>in the American League. Just want a special shout out

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>to our YouTube live comment section. The best way to

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 3>support the show is to make sure that you smash

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 3>the like button and subscribe button. And for all those

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 3>listening here on audio, best way to support the show

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 3>is by leaving a five star review. All right, We're

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna start in the American League West, so we're gonna

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 3>work wet west to east, just like we did yesterday.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 3>The American League West, of course, features the Texas Rangers,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the Seattle Mariners, the Houston Astros, the Sacramento A's, and

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 3>the La Angels. So we're going to start at the

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 3>top of the division. And my burning question is about

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 3>the division for the Texas Rangers. Can they win the division?

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's a question that to me is

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 3>the most burning in my eyes because I guess I

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 3>could ask, well, will Corey Seger come back and perform?

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Of course, he's injured, and at the end of the day,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I just I don't know. I don't know what he

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 3>gives the Texas Rangers this season, so I'm kind of

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 3>just assuming he's going to be back in September. He

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 3>might give a little bit of a jolt. But can

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 3>they maintain this lead for the foreseeable future? Because like

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 3>I said at the very beginning, when I gave out

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Rangers plus two fifty five, I said, ninety percent of

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 3>the public is on this Mariner's team. Cal Rawley's got

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 3>a five eighty two ops like the Mariners have problems.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 3>This is not a perfect team. The Astros are a

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 3>few games below five hundred are not perfect, But to me,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 3>they look like the best team in the division. And

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 3>then I go to Fangraphs and I look at some projections.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 3>The bat X, which is my favorite projection system on Fangraphs,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 3>has the Rangers at fifty seven percent chance to win

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the division atc Another one of my favorite Fangraphs projections

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 3>has the Rangers not quite at fifty seven, but above

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 3>the Mariners. So some of the best Fangrafts projection systems

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 3>are starting to put the Rangers truly in front of

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>the Mariners. And for any of my betters out there

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 3>who missed the plus two to fifty five price based

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 3>on those there is a lot of value currently on

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 3>BETMGM at plus one seventy five for the Rangers. So

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 3>the books haven't quite adjusted yet because they have to

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 3>balance all of the money that they have gotten for

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 3>people betting on the Seattle Mariners to win the division.

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 3>I know, I just gave the betting version, but the

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 3>baseball version is this Whyatt Langford is back, Ezekiel Durant

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 3>has stepped up, Brandon Nemo has been a great edition.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 3>They have six bats in their current lineup with a

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 3>WRC plus above one hundred in their current rotation. You

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 3>still got to Gram, You still got to Eovaldi. You

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 3>have Gore, who hasn't taken the next step like I thought,

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 3>but is still a fine number three, and Kumar rock

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Her flashes great thist at times, and Cal Quantrill's the

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 3>greatest pitcher alive. Plus they're also our closer Jake Latz,

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 3>and then they have that slew of guys who not

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 3>sexy names, but they do a job. My burning question

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 3>to you are can the Rangers win the division?

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh uh?

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 2>My burning question is in regards to what can help

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 2>them win the division, which is what version.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Of mackenzie going to the Rangers get good?

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 3>One?

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 2>This is where I'm at, Like, I think the offense

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned it's getting better, it's healthy. The other direction

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 2>I was going to go is like can White Langford

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 2>stay healthy? But like I do we talk about that

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 2>so often? Yeah, Gore is I think, because he's been

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 2>on the mound, is the most like pivotal with aspects here.

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>It's like, if Langford's healthy, he's gonna perform, He's gonna

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 2>be good. He's gonna be a huge cool guy for

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 2>this line up. But I look at this rotation, de

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Gram great, You'valdy really settling in and looking good.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>But you mentioned like some of.

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 2>The other pieces, and you know, I think they're they're

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.199
<v Speaker 2>they've been really solid, solidly reliable.

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 2>I think regular season arms, especially like what they've been

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 2>able to get out of cal Quantrill actually has been

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 2>quite incredible. And I think, yeah, Kumar, like with with

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>the slider and the way that he's been able to

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 2>ride that pitch to to enough success this year is great,

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 2>but like he's limited.

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I think cal Quantrill's limited.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Jack Rider's hurt right now, and when he comes back,

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll see, but you know that there's just been challenges

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>for him to just.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Stack successful starts.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Gore is the guy to be your clear cut three here,

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 2>Like he's the guy and he has a four to

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>six three eel right. And here's the fascinating part for

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 2>me is in his career, his story, Gore has been

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 2>terrible in the second half terrible, and this year he's

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>been like the surface level era looks worse than I

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 2>think the underlying is. And I think he's been better

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 2>than the numbers suggest, which I just wonder like, does

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>he then turn that into better run prevention numbers on

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the surface, or do we see him give way a

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit in the second half and those numbers become

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 2>even rougher. I don't know, but I do know if

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>this Rangers team is going to reach their potential, like,

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna need a quality start out of Mackenzie Gore

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot more frequently than they're getting it right now.

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 2>And then the other one is obviously Corey Seeger and

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about that like ad nauseum with this team

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 2>right Like, this team I think really will only go

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>as far offensively as is Seeger can take them. But

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the best way to hedge that is keep throwing the

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 2>crap out of the baseball and Mackenzie Gore raises the

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>ceiling of this rotation significantly.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 3>I also think that the Rangers are going to be

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 3>sneaky buyers, just like they always are. Yeah, And I

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 3>think when we put out trade deadline predictions or anybody

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 3>does not just we, I think a lot of people

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 3>just inherently forget about the Rangers. I'm not sure why

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 3>they're just not floated like for example, you're hearing more

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>about Seattle buying than you are the Rangers, and the

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 3>Rangers were the team to make the shocking move for

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 3>McKenzie gore. Right, They've made a lot of moves where

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh, where did the Rangers come from? It's like,

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 3>have you been watching the Rangers. Chris Young has been

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 3>one of the most aggressive gms in baseball. They they

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 3>are absolutely a team who is going to be one

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 3>of the most aggressive buyers at this deadline, I believe so.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 3>So you combine that with their current team and Seeger

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>coming back eventually and hoping that McKenzie gore has a

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:53.719
<v Speaker 3>bounce back second half, it's hard not to understand why

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 3>a projection system like the bad X or ATC or

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 3>my own personal model would didn't make the Rangers the

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 3>current favorites to win the American League West. So again

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 3>i'll throw it back to you. I know we've talked

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 3>about it, but it has been like a month since

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 3>we made it a prediction, and last month, I think

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 3>when we talked about it, you said, I'm still going

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 3>with the Mariners, but I don't feel good about it.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Are you still at that point or are you starting

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 3>to migrate over to my Rangers.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Gosh, these teams, these both these teams, dude.

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Dude, what are you talking about? Rangers are two games

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 3>over five hundred. That's amazing.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>These teams, dude, It's just unbelievable.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I get.

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 2>Any time you start to think one is going to

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 2>separate themselves from the other, they just crater again. I

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>would say, right now, though, I feel better about the

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Rangers situation with Langford back and the Segar wrinkle is

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be important, But like, I have more confidence

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I think in Cory Seger, who's had a rough year

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>even when he's been on the field coming back and hitting.

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Then I think I do cal Rowley figuring it out

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>at this point. So from that lens, and then you

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 2>can mention like the Mariner's pitching, but those guys have

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>been throwing the ball all year, like it's still been

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 2>a battle of all battles. It's just it's hard for

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>me and then and Julio the concussion stuff. I feel

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>like more and more players hitting at baseball so freaking

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>hard now that if you have a concussion, you have

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>like if your reaction time or just your your vision

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 2>is compromised by like three percent your toast like it.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like all these guys are having such residual effects.

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 2>I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not going to be

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>expecting Julio to just come back and swing it right away.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be a little bit of a

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>process there.

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 2>So I lean Rangers right now, but like I'm gonna

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 2>flip flop on this probably every single week because these

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>two teams are just there is frustrating as to come.

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to spend too much more time on

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the Rangers. I want to go over to the Mariners.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's very important to note before we

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 3>move on that I don't think that the Rangers offense

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>is predicated on Corey Seeger's success, because we already talked

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 3>about Langford and his eight ninet ops. But he's got

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 3>another twenty eight year old teammate with an eight nineteen

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>ops and his name is Josh Young, who has put

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 3>together a fantastic year, rocking a two point seven four.

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Jock Peterson, remember last year when he was the worst

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 3>header alive. He ain't anymore. He's been twenty two percent

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 3>above league average. He's been a staple in this lineup.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Brandon Imo has been great, Jake Berger is even three

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 3>percent above average, and Ezekiel Duran was a two and

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 3>a half win player in the first half with a

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 3>one to twelve WRC plus. Right those are their six

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 3>right now that have a WRC plus above one hundred.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Then you add Corey Seeger to that lineup, of course

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 3>it'll help. But I think that this team can weather

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the storm offensively until he comes back and ended up

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 3>winning this division. So that's my take.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the division, I think so. I think if

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>they're going to do anything in the playoffs, say they

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>need they need an anchor in there, they need, they

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 2>need a little bit more going. I just it's it's

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 2>a slightly above average offense and the pitching staff that's average,

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 2>slightly above and that's slightly above average team.

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 3>You really love a lot of the teams of the

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 3>American League now better usters than the Ragers. I'll up

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 3>say this. I'm sitting out of fourteen to one ticket

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 3>for them to within the Petite too.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's not bad.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to the Mariners. Uh, arm, my guess

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 3>is you have the same one. Is this a lost

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 3>season for cal Ralely because there's a couple there's a

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 3>couple other you know, burning questions that I have for

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 3>some players where I'm thinking, do we see a second

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 3>half search? ARM. I don't think we see a second

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 3>half search from cal Rawley. He's hitting a BUCKS sixty nine.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 3>He's got a five eighty one OPS to give him

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:42.719
<v Speaker 3>a sixty seven OPS plus. I mean, this has just

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 3>been a full blown disaster at the plate. His quality

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 3>of contact has dropped off the face of the planet.

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Thirty two percent hard hit rate this year, Arm. He

0:26:55.560 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>was at forty nine percent last year. Strikeout rates jump

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 3>to eight percent. He's chasing, he's whiffing. The baseball savant

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 3>looks ugly. He's not framing well. He's got one of

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 3>the slowest pop times in baseball. He's got nine home runs.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 3>And this comes to us from inside edge. Cal Rawly

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 3>has chased thirty seven percent of pitches out of the

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 3>zone on the first pitch of at bats this season.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 3>That is the highest Immediate League Baseball among hitters with

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 3>at least one hundred and forty one total plate appearances.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I can't think of a drop off like this homers.

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 2>To I just think he I think he's hurt. I

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 2>know that he was hurt. It's I think it's still

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 2>affecting him. I really do. There's no other explanation. Everybody

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about, like you knew he wasn't gonna match

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 2>last year, it was probably unlikely, but that stat too,

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 2>where he's chasing on the first.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Pitch more than anybody, or as much as anybody.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 2>It feels like to me, he looks like a guy

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>who just feels like he's slow, Like he's slower this year,

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 2>and he's cheating, and he's like, I'm not getting the

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 2>barrel out as quickly as I normally do. I got

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I gotta decide a little bit earlier. I got to

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 2>get it out there. I gotta get it out there.

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 2>And it's leading to bad decisions because you're seeing the

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 2>quality of contact effect affected.

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think with.

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 2>That oblique and trying to play through it a little

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 2>bit and come back quick from it and all those different things,

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's it's affecting him.

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I really do.

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>There's just no way you drop off like this after

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 2>what we saw from him last year, and even if

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 2>the whift jumped and the chase jumped, the QOC should

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>be there right, and it's not so I think it's

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>injury related. The one hope you have here is that

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 2>just the further removed he gets from that, maybe the

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 2>All Star break helps a little bit too. He's able

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to just kind of get back to himself physically and

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 2>start to trust himself again, because the swing decisions, to me,

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 2>imply a guy that just doesn't feel like he's moving

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 2>as quickly and getting the barrel out as quickly as

0:28:58.280 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 2>he normally does.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's now compounding the issue.

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent. And I also think that that point

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 3>that you made about cal Rawly potentially being injured and

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>not wanting to come out of the game is an

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>important one because when you hear Lyle and TJ are

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 3>friends at the Marine Layer Pod talk about cal Rawly,

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and you know, they talk about his leadership qualities and

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 3>how he's always there every day in the locker room.

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 3>And this guy, even when he's hurt, he does not

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 3>want to take off days ever, Like even if he's

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 3>banged up, he's like, I'm catching behind the plate. He

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 3>caught one hundred and twenty games last year he bag.

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I think he played literally every game outside of what

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 3>one or two. I think he played one hundred and

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 3>fifty nine games last year and one hundred and twenty

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 3>of those were behind the dish, and then again this year.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I know he's been banged up with injuries, but he

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 3>still played fifty of his sixty six games behind the plate.

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 3>This guy wants to catch every day. He knows how

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>important it is to the Mariners arms. And I think

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 3>that if he took lie detector test and told you

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 3>that he was healthy, I think he would fail. And

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a big reason why he's having a

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 3>season like this, which is a complete falloff. Yeah, I agree,

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 3>So I guess maybe it was a bad burning question

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 3>just I feel like, but it sold portion for the Mariners.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 2>He's everything, especially with Julio too. I mean, like Julio's

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 2>heard as well. It's just can your MVP runner up

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.719
<v Speaker 2>that would have won MVPs in most other seasons play

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 2>like a player that's not a detriment to the team

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 2>like that. To go from MVP to detriment is one

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest Like, there's nothing a GM can do

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 2>to account for that.

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, let's go over the Houston Astros and mine's going

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 3>to be quick. So I'll just go first. Can youord

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 3>On Alvarez win the triple crown? The first since Miguel

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Cabrera Since twenty twelve, he's hitting three eighteen. He's four

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 3>points off the batting average leader boards, behind Yanni Dias

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 3>of the Ampa Bay Rays. He's got thirty one homers,

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 3>which leads the American League, and he's got seventy RBIs,

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 3>which leads the American League. I don't know if he's

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 3>going to do it. If there was a hitter to

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 3>do it in Major League Baseball, his name would be

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Judge, but he's injured. It could be Shoheo Tawny,

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 3>or it could be Jordon Aparez, right, and he's got

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 3>a real shot at doing so. Right, if he doesn't

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 3>do it this year, at twenty nine years old, in

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 3>this week of an American League, with Aaron Judge injured,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 3>we might not see a triple crown for a very

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 3>long time. So this is the opportunity I want to

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 3>see if Jordon does it.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 2>And he's I mean the exact archetype of hitter to

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 2>be able to do it with just the bats ball

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>and power that he has, and would be really fun

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 2>thing to watch. And also, I mean, if he's doing that,

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the Astros are probably continuing to be in the hunt.

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the fun part with him.

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>He's one of the best two strike hitters we've seen

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 2>in this year. I mean, this is stupid, stupid stuff.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 2>This year in two hundred and eight played appearances with two strikes,

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 2>sitting two eighty five with a eight ninety four ops

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 2>fourteen homers, it's a two forty nine ops plus. It's

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty percent better than league average with

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>two strikes. That's just outrageous, absolutely outrageous.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we'll really ever see somebody.

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Peyton put that up there. And Peyton, I don't know

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 3>if he's ever gotten a stat wrong. I don't believe that.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 3>But forty nine ops plus with two strikes, it's like

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 3>it's one of those numbers that does I it's so

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 3>crazy that I can't believe it's true.

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 2>You like, literally, with two strikes, he's still way better

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 2>than the average hitter in an count. He's better than

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of hitters in advantage counts with two twos.

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 3>He almost want to get him to two strikes.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.719
<v Speaker 2>It's great, well, you know, otherwise he's got in one

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 2>thousand and fifty nine ops.

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:49.719
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 2>He's still he's still worse than he normally, is it?

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 2>It's special stuff. My big question with them is what

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>is this pitching staff? Because it's not necessarily terrible like

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was a couple months ago.

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 2>It may by production standards be terrible the rest of

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the way, but I can look at this pitching staff

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 2>now and say I could see some things going right here.

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Brown just needs to starter, like entire pitching staff.

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Ohtarters, Like what is this rotation? Because Hunter Brown is

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be fine.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 2>He's made seven starts this year, He's coming back from

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 2>a long layoff arm injury wise, I think he's gonna

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 2>be and still even with himself not looking great, like

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 2>he's still got a three five seventy R, like he's

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 2>found a way to prevent runs. Christian Aavier just came

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>back off the aisle from TJ and just trying to

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 2>find the zone. But like he's Christian Xavier. So if

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>he sucks the rest of the way, I get it.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>But if Christian Avier snaps in and he looks like

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 2>a number four starter, even wouldn't be surprised.

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Peter Abbert's been right all year.

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 2>That guy, I trust him now, is just a solid

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 2>inning zeting type of guy. Arraghetty has been at points

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 2>really solid, at points really frustrating. If he's somewhere in

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the middle there again take it and then that too,

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 2>you Ami has either been completely unusable or dominant. And

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 2>that's another big one where it's just like, what do

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 2>you get could he get anything.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Usable from him? That helps?

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 2>I just think we're not running out like and then

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Mike Burrows is doing with a little bit of injury.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he comes back and throws a little bit better.

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna get Kaiwait Tang back. He can eat some innings.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like with this rotation, it's not one

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 2>of those where you just look at and say, oh, well,

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 2>none of these guys have any shot to be decent.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 2>Like you look now and you say, well, when Araghetti's hot,

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 2>he looks good. We've seen Javier be good when am

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I is remotely throwing that wrong.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>With slider for a strike. He's been good.

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 2>When Hunter Brown has been healthy, he's been one of

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the best pitchers of Major League Baseball. So if a

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 2>couple of things go right with this really wide, high

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 2>variance group. With the way the Astros have been trending,

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>with the return of Josh Hater and the bullpen, and

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 2>the bullpen overall is just great.

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Like, I just need these guys to be five and

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>dive and I think they can survive.

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 2>That's where I'm fascinated, because I think this team's gonna

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 2>weirdly still just hit en off, especially with jord On.

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't really know what to make of it.

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 2>But with this rotation, if they're able to just be

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>half decent, I think the Astros can you find themselves

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs.

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 3>The Astro's rotation is emblematic of the entire American League.

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 3>And here's what I mean by that. They are wildly inconsistent.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 3>They give you performances where you think, to yourself, are

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 3>you a big league arm But you're still holding out

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 3>hope because there's some big names, right Like you said

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.439
<v Speaker 3>it yourself. A tatsu Imai. We've seen what he looks

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 3>like when he's dominant. We've seen another hitter, vladimirg Row,

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Junior Gunner Henderson. Look no, we know what they look

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 3>like when they're dominant. But they have been wildly inconsistent right,

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 3>and the same can be said about Spencer Arraghetty, the

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 3>same can be said about Christian Javier Right. Continue to

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 3>go down the list. It's guys with talent that just

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 3>haven't been able to put it together this season, And

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 3>with the Nashros team in the American League where it

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 3>is still wide open, it's not a bad rotation to

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 3>have when you're currently in a hole and you need

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 3>some upside and the Ashro's rotation can deliver it. My

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 3>thinking is it's not going to be enough to dig

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 3>them out of said hole, because I'm sure they'll all

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 3>have their points where they show that dominant talent that

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 3>they have, but they will, unfortunately also have outings where

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 3>the Ashros offense cannot overcome the seven runs after four

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:47.280
<v Speaker 3>innings that all five of them including Brown currently.

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Can do so.

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 3>But if we're just talking about plain upside, I don't

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 3>want back of that rotation. I just still think the

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Ashros are going to be on the outside looking in

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:03.479
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the playoffs, even if they buy.

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I do think that there is just too much inconsistency

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 3>in this rotation.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, one other fun variable is Ronel Blanco on his

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 2>way back too, and like, go hit her. I mean, dude,

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Ronel Blanco would be one of the most welcome stabilizers

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>for this team, I think, which is crazy to say,

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 2>but like he's only thrown two hundred and seventy four

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 2>innings at the big league level, but to a three

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 2>four five R and like, that's a guy though that Like,

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's that much variance with I know,

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 2>you do the no hitter Blake, He's gonna go out

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 2>there and give you a chance. I think he's gonna

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>be kind of Peter Lambert coated, and like, I think

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the Astros would kill for another one of those, so

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 2>that that helps a lot too. I just think those

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 2>aspects of the rotation are fascinating to me. And I

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 2>think we was Nesky could potentially come back at some

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 2>point this year, and then whatever they get from Burrows,

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 2>who was phenomenal in the second half last year too

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and just has been hurt and frustrating this year. So

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>so much variance in this rotation that I just want

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>to see what it looks like.

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 3>It is certainly going to be fun to watch that,

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 3>there is no doubt about it. Let's go over to

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 3>the a's and I've gone first the first three times,

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 3>so you get a run of going first a's.

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 2>What you got with the a's is just can Lawrence

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Butler find it? You know, I think this is the

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:17.919
<v Speaker 2>season's kind of over for them, right.

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you have.

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Most of the guys that are banged up are probably

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 2>not going to come back, and if they do, like

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, there's not gonna be that much time

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 2>for you to gauge too much, you know about what

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 2>it's going to look like. Like Denzel Clark, if he comes

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 2>back and struggles, it's kind of a last year for him. Unfortunately,

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.439
<v Speaker 2>this year Kurtz is Nick Kurtz, and once he's back,

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, it is what it is.

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Rookers out for season.

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence Butler, you paid Lawrence Butler has shown us stretches

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 2>where he has been fantastic and and this year he's

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 2>been one of the worst players in Major League Baseball.

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 2>They've had to throw him out there in center field

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 2>because of the injury to Clark and some other guys,

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 2>So that you know, that's definitely torpedo the the f

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 2>wur a little bit. But at the same time, I mean,

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a five ninety one, Oh asked from a guy

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:01.800
<v Speaker 2>that has all the talent in the world.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they extended him for a reason.

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty four, it was a one thirty WRC

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 2>plus and even like last year where there was some

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 2>ebbs and flows, he hit twenty one homers, stole twenty

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 2>two bags, and yeah, finished slightly below average by WRC plus.

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 2>But I still think you looked at Larrence Butler and said,

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 2>age twenty four season like this is this is a

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty good player, and this guy that can continue to develop.

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 2>So for his age twenty five season, just turned twenty

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 2>six a week ago to be hitting the wall that

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 2>he has, Like, you go in the next year now,

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 2>and you just don't really know what you have.

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>If Lawrence Butler doesn't get better. If Lawrence Butler.

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Improves and you know, finishes the year on a higher note,

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 2>you go in the next season and say, all right,

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 2>well that's our corner outfielder, and you know everything's gonna

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 2>be all right, and you know, we'll assume he's going

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to continue to build on on the second half that

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 2>he had. But I think that's the big question and

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 2>a couple of just interesting Lawrence Butler stats, he's slugging

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 2>one seventy six with the pitcher behind in the count.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 2>So when Lawrence Butler is ahead and counts, he's slugging

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 2>one seventy six. That's the lowest among MLB players with

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 2>at least one hundred and forty one plate appearances. So

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 2>he's not even leveraging his advantage counts. He's slugging seventy

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 2>seven on high ninety five plus mile prior pitches. So

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you got the scouting report on him, just elevated fastball

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and he's toast.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the second lowest in Major League Baseball.

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 2>So he's not leveraging his advantage counts because Pittrick knowes, oh,

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm behind, I'll just throw an elevated heater and good

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 2>luck Lawrence. So's it's a timing thing, it's a mechanic thing.

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>He's going to need to figure it out, and hopefully

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 2>he does in the second half because that makes it

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 2>a lot easier for the Athletics to go into next

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 2>year and know what they have.

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:42.840
<v Speaker 3>The only point that I wanted to add, well, just

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 3>a few small ones. You mentioned tank to f war

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 3>among players with at least two hundred and fifty plate

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:54.760
<v Speaker 3>appearances this season, he's second to last, behind Salvador Prez

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 3>and just in front of Mark Fiento. So truly, he

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 3>has been one of the least valuable players in Major

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:05.280
<v Speaker 3>League Baseball. And you said that last year in totality,

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 3>the year wasn't that bad, and I agree with you.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Like a ninety six WRC plus, like an ops in

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 3>the seven ten, seven to twenty range, with a two

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 3>win season, it's not bad. It's not great, it's like fine, right,

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 3>But it's not a season that you're just giving up

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 3>on a guy, of course not. But the thing is

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 3>in the second half of last year, and I don't

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 3>know this off the top of my head, but I

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 3>remember watching him get beat a lot. Like I'm curious

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 3>if the high fastball thing became more prevalent in the

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 3>second half of twenty twenty five, where he posted a

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 3>seventy WRC plus. Yeah, and then this year it's a

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 3>very similar WRC plus and he's getting fed these high heaters.

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 3>This might just be an area of the zone where

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 3>he is simply overmatched. Could he come back next year

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and fix the problem maybe theoretically hopefully, But at the

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 3>same time, I'm sure, he noticed this was an issue

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 3>in the second half, and he should have fixed this

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 3>going into this year, and it's been the same or

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 3>arguably worse. That's what makes me nervous for Lawrence Butler

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 3>long term, which is why my one burning question was truly,

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 3>is he a part of the core? Is this just

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.240
<v Speaker 3>a sunk cost? Like is he worth it to trot

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 3>out there every single day moving forward? Because this has

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 3>been abysmal and he has a clear hole and it's

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 3>not just this season, it's carried over from last season

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 3>where he was also one of the worst hitters in baseball.

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's where like maybe it wasn't pressing

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.879
<v Speaker 2>enough for him to fully make feel like he needed

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to make a major overhaul change at the end of

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 2>last year. I think this offseason, you know this is

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 2>it's quite pressing, and if it doesn't get any better

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the year too, like I think clearly

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 2>there's there's some need there and then you're gonna go

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 2>in the next year with probably a shorterlyation if he

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 2>continues to have the same issues for an athletics team

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna want to be competitive and was hoping to

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 2>even be competitive this year, I think he'd start to

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 2>see the rapt start to dwindle a little bit.

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's end one burning question in the Ale West with

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 3>the La Angels, and with the Angels again pretty much

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 3>a lost season at this point. Uh, they brought in

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 3>a new GM, John mose Lac. I'm very excited to

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 3>see what he does during the trade deadline because I

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 3>know with Perry Manassian, the report was out that the

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Angels don't want to trade from any of their three

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 3>studs at the top of the rotation, whether that be

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 3>Walbert Orina, whether that be Jose Soriano, whether that be

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Re det Mers. So that's just one burning question again.

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 3>But my big one is it's more of a fascination.

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious what does Grace and Rodriguez look like for

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the end of the season, because Grace Rodriguez so far

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:58.280
<v Speaker 3>this season hasn't come back fully healthy, hasn't looked like himself.

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 3>He's pitching to an array above seven. They traded Taylor

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Ward it was only one year, so you kind of

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 3>understand what the Orioles thought about him where they just

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't think he was gonna stay healthy. And when he

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:14.399
<v Speaker 3>is staying healthy, it's not gonna be anything worth much, right,

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 3>But the Angels took an opportunity and so far the

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Orioles have been quote unquote proven right. But the thing is,

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 3>you still have years of control for Grayson for him

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 3>to turn it around. So my one burning question simply

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:30.399
<v Speaker 3>would be does that turnaround happen in the second half,

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 3>because I would love to see it because I'm rooting

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 3>for the guy. Like when he's on, he's he could

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.240
<v Speaker 3>be dominant. I mean, he could be a frontline starter.

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 3>We just haven't seen it in a while. But I'm curious.

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Crazier things have happened than Grayson Rodriguez turning it around

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the second half.

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think it's huge for them.

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you imagine going into next year, forget like

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 2>not pitching prospect in baseball, Grayson. If Grayson Rodriguez looks

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>like a guy that can throw to a high threes

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 2>below fours, and you saw that guy to your four

0:44:58.080 --> 0:44:59.399
<v Speaker 2>spot for your rotation.

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Next year, that's exciting.

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 2>You got Soriano to debt Mercy Urania to just a

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.280
<v Speaker 2>respectable four, and then you just figure out the five

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 2>and maybe you just go sign a back end guy.

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Kikuchi's healthy and you know you can go with him.

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:19.240
<v Speaker 2>That's where I think it's really interesting. So I'm fascinated

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 2>by that side of thing. And that's a fun part

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 2>about this rotation is like Kakuchi has been hurt pretty

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 2>much the whole year. He's just starting to work his

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 2>way back. You could start to talk yourself into this

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:31.359
<v Speaker 2>rotation a little bit. I mean, Kikuchi the previous two

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 2>seasons was a four era in one hundred and seventy

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 2>five innings with with pretty good strikeout to walk numbers.

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Like if that's your four and then Grayson's your five,

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you're in a pretty good spot. So I think that's

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 2>a huge area. And for me it's you know, what

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 2>is what is a selling angels? And I know even

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 2>if they're not selling those guys, they're gonna sell some

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 2>pieces presumably.

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>What does that look like with John mose Lock now?

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think perrym andasi AND's hands were

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:00.839
<v Speaker 2>tied to a degree, and maybe mose will be tied

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 2>by what is one of the more you know, I

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 2>would say overbearing and just just misguided owners and in

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 2>sports and.

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Them that's the nicest way you could describe him, correct.

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 2>And I think I'm just curious, like if Artie says,

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 2>all right, well a new guy here, like, let's this

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 2>guy's very experience, let me see what he can do,

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and like just even for some of the relief pieces,

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 2>like what kind of prospects do you bring in? What

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>does it look like? I'm just interested to see Mosaylock

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 2>operate a little bit.

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go over to the American League Central

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.319
<v Speaker 3>of a podcast Pee, let's hear from our friends at

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Hampton Farms Peanuts one burning question for every team in

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the American League. We move to the American League Central,

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 3>which features the White Sox, the Guardians, the Twins, the Tigers,

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:55.319
<v Speaker 3>and the Royals will start up top even though both

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 3>teams are tied. I think technically the White Sox have

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the better winning percentage, so we'll go that. And actually

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I've been going first a lot. You go first arm

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 3>White Sox burning question?

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Can Mari Kai? Can Morikami keep it up? Is my

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 2>question because this this team's identity this year in particular,

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 2>is that they're gonna need to bang, like if they're

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 2>gonna make the playoffs, they're gonna win the division, if

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:22.799
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna make any noise and have a strong finish.

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna need to bang with the best of them

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 2>like they've done for a lot of this year. And

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of reason to believe Miguel

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Vargus is going to continue to be Miguel Vargus. Costa

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Montgomery's now showed us for a pretty large sample that

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be a power with guy.

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But the power is gonna prevail.

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 2>And then Tristan Peters and you know, some of these

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 2>complimentary pieces have been great. Of course, Sam Antonaci is

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a one thirty w RC plus I don't know,

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:47.399
<v Speaker 2>but he's gonna be above average big league bat like that.

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Was the whole story with him. It's just how high

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the floor is.

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 2>But for this team to make the noise that they're

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna make, like they're not gonna aggressively buy, I just

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's that's realistic here. So the odds of

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 2>them getting a rotation piece that's going to change things

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 2>or is relatively slim. I think their staff you just

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of see if they hold serve and and the relievers.

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Continue to do what they're doing.

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 2>I think they got a bang and Murakami before he

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>was hurt, was giving them some of the best power

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 2>production in the league. It's a nine to eleven ops,

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a thirty four percent strikeout rate.

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 1>It's contact rates.

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 2>That are right kind of below what typically is needed

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 2>to have a consistently good season.

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:32.839
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like, if you're at a there's not a

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of hitters that have had a sub sixty percent contact, right,

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Mourakami's at fifty nine point five and have been productive

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 2>for the entirety of a season.

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard to do that.

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 2>So that's where I look off the injury, just into

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a second half where the scouting reports are a little

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 2>bit more detailed, the games become a little bit more important,

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 2>things are a little bit tighter. Can Morikami continue to

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 2>produce with a fifty nine and a half percent contact

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 2>or can he improve that contact.

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Right one hundred percent? My one burning question for them

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:07.919
<v Speaker 3>is more about the deadline. I'm curious what they're going

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 3>to do. This came from Ken Rosenthal this morning on

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Foul Territory. The White Sox are willing to be relatively

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 3>aggressive and I quote on players with control of the deadline,

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 3>but are not inclined to overpay for rentals, which actually

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 3>I think is the exact direction that they want to go, right,

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 3>You're not trying to send over big time prospects in

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 3>order to get rentals that are not going to be

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 3>a part of your future. So who are these pictures

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:38.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm assuming that they want to bring in with control

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 3>And how far are they willing to go with their prospects,

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 3>because if they know they're getting a picture, what let's say,

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 3>with two and a half years of control with it,

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 3>which is certainly now in this new White Sox contention window,

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 3>are they willing to give up a Caleb Bonnemer who

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 3>currently doesn't really have a spot, Considering Miguel Vargas was

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 3>an All Star and has truly been one of the

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 3>best hitters in baseball this year at third base, it's

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 3>just twenty six years old, and they have Colson Montgomery

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 3>at shortstop twenty four years old, could be the first

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 3>lefty to hit forty home runs by shortstop, a left

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 3>tended hitting shortstop. Ever, and you can't really move Vargas

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 3>over to first base because again, like you said, you

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 3>have Murakami at first. So could Caleb Bonnerber be available?

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Considering they also just drafted rock Chlowski, like, could they

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 3>dangle him in a big time pitcher with control, which

0:50:29.040 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 3>could end up being the move of the deadline. So

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm really intrigued with what the White Socks are gonna do.

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think they hold sir, but yeah, if

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 2>you get the opportunity to get a controllable arm and

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 2>it helps you now, but most importantly in the next

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 2>two years, who knows, who knows what they could ultimately do,

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 2>but I think it'll be kind of a fascinating deadline regardless.

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:53.360
<v Speaker 2>For like, I think the White Sox and the Marlins

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 2>are in very similar situations where they're gonna if they're

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:00.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna buy, they're gonna be creative, and I'm curious to

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 2>see how they do that.

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, let's go over to the Cleveland Guardians again. You

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 3>go first, what's your burning question?

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just the most obvious one for me, it's just

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 2>what version of Jose Ramirez do they get upon return?

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, he comes back from that broken handmate, he

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:17.280
<v Speaker 2>wasn't having a very good year before that, and talking

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 2>to some of just my friends and pro ball that

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 2>have broken their handmate, Not everybody has to go this way,

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 2>but some kind of felt it coming for a while,

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 2>like you kind of knew that it was going to go,

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 2>and then it went some It just goes, but you

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of feel it wearing and getting sore, and then.

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It finally goes.

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And so I wonder if that was the case with

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Jay ram because a lot of the batted ball specs

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 2>like he was still really solid overall, right, like he's

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 2>not whipping, he's not chasing, he's still hitting the ball

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 2>hard enough.

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't his typical production, right.

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:51.399
<v Speaker 2>It was a one to ten WRC plus the first

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 2>seventy two games ten homers. At reminder, he hit thirty

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:56.800
<v Speaker 2>nine homers in twenty twenty four and he hit thirty

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 2>homers in twenty twenty five. He was on pace for

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, twenty change this year, striking out a couple

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:05.399
<v Speaker 2>percentage points more.

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>It's split in hairs.

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:10.879
<v Speaker 2>But coming back from the himmate as a switch hitter,

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 2>just how does it affect him is the biggest question

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 2>for me, because if they have twenty twenty five Jose Ramirez,

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I really think this team is a problem.

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I've made my pitch on them that I think this

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 2>is one of the better Guardians teams we've seen, you know,

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 2>in the last half decade, and I think he makes

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>a big difference, obviously being the guy that sets the

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 2>tone for them, but he's had to set the tone

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 2>for this team with much less around him.

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So if they have a good Jay ram look out.

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 3>So my burning question actually relates to that, and the

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:44.240
<v Speaker 3>burning question is who is going to supply the power

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 3>in the second half. This Guardian's team ranks twenty ninth

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 3>in home runs and the leader in the clubouts of

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 3>home runs is on Hell Martinez with eleven. On Hell

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Martinez hasn't played a full season. Chase the latter is

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:03.240
<v Speaker 3>tied with with him at eleven, but again hasn't played

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:06.279
<v Speaker 3>the full season either, right, and also has gone through

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 3>some pits and valleys and hills. I don't even remember

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 3>what I'm saying, but you know what I mean. Like,

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.439
<v Speaker 3>it's been an up and down season for Chase the lotter.

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 3>So I think to myself, Jose Ramirez is recovering from

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 3>a handmaid injury. What's the most common side effect of

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 3>handmaid injuries? Zap's your power a little bit. I still

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 3>believe that Jose Ramirez in terms of his bat to

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 3>ball abilities. Is still gonna end up putting up a

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 3>good season. It's just those thirty nine home runs are

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 3>not going to be there. So I look around the

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 3>diamond and I say, well, Kyle Manzardo, he should be

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:47.479
<v Speaker 3>hitting more home runs, but he ain't. Chase the latter

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:50.240
<v Speaker 3>should be hitting more home runs, but he ain't. Brian

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Rochio has been a really solid hitter this year, but

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 3>you're not banking on him for power, right. Josh Naylor

0:53:55.640 --> 0:54:00.080
<v Speaker 3>has been gone. Stephen Kwan is providing nothing offensively. I

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 3>expect him to be better, but it's certainly not going

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 3>to be because he's putting balls.

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:05.919
<v Speaker 1>In seats, that's for sure.

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:08.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think, well, are the Guardians going to be

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 3>aggressive at the deadline to go get a power bat?

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. I just don't think it's in

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 3>their DNA. Someone is going to have to step up

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 3>in this lineup. Maybe it's Bizana, but it's not like

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 3>his balltleball metrics look that good either. For the Guardians too,

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I think reach the peak that you're talking about, they

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:28.840
<v Speaker 3>got to hit with some juice. Yeah, And I just

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:33.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know who's going to provide the juice. If Jose Ramirez,

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:37.439
<v Speaker 3>his power is zapped from the handmate bone. And even

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 3>if he is supplying the power, they still need more

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:42.120
<v Speaker 3>than just him hitting homers.

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Manzardo's got to do it too, man, I mean, Manzarto's

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 2>got to be better than he's been. And I know

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 2>this isn't homers, but if you're not gonna hit homers

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:52.280
<v Speaker 2>like Stephen Kwan's gotta be one of the better bats

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 2>to ball guys and hitting for average so that you

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 2>can manufacturer runs that way, right, So I agree, I mean,

0:54:59.000 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 2>naturally you're gonna get the power back with Martinez hopefully

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:03.360
<v Speaker 2>coming back.

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Is he done?

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 2>He's not done for the other they ten ai oled him,

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 2>so hopefully he'll be back at some point.

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's gonna be interesting to see.

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Like this team has the pieces I think to make

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 2>it happen, but yeah, they're gonna need a good Jay Rim.

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna need a couple of guys to pick it up.

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:18.840
<v Speaker 2>How Wise, I think the water is starting to after

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 2>the rougher stretch. And yeah, I mean just simply, especially

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs, gonna need to slug better than this.

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Have to.

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to the Minnesota Twins, who're slugging a ton.

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 3>But my biggest question for the Minnesota Twins is can

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:37.279
<v Speaker 3>this bullpen step up in any meaningful way? Because the

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota Twins brank ninth and ops this season. Ladies and gentlemen,

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:47.800
<v Speaker 3>damn right, my Minnesota Twins top ten offense. They're starting

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:51.759
<v Speaker 3>rotation thirteenth of the Alright, you got Joe Ryan, you

0:55:51.800 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 3>got Taj Bradley taking the next step. Zebbie Matthews has

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 3>even looked okay, Bailey ober is back. It's a decent rotation.

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 3>But the bullpen twenty ninth in el. I mean, they're

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 3>sitting in National's territory where even if they have a lead,

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 3>good luck, they could blow it at any given time.

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Gomez has stepped in and done an okay job

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:16.440
<v Speaker 3>as the closer. But I don't trust anybody in their bullpen.

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 3>But they still have some names that you kind of remember,

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 3>right like Taylor Rodgers. Yeah, there's some names there can

0:56:24.960 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 3>and they've tried, like they jumped started the market a

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:29.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit to go get like Tommy Nance, and I

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 3>think that's a fine, fine addition there.

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Like they even try to get creative and like purchase

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:37.239
<v Speaker 2>wusak go from from the from the Tigers, who was

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:38.880
<v Speaker 2>just like throwing starting to throw the ball well on

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:40.839
<v Speaker 2>trip away, like they're trying.

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 3>To step up because the Twins are sitting at five hundred,

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and sitting at five hundred in the American

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 3>League is basically ten games above five hundred. So I'm

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 3>not like if they don't sell, if they win a

0:56:54.600 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 3>couple of games here and all of a sudden they're

0:56:56.640 --> 0:56:59.279
<v Speaker 3>two games back of the division, why would they sell?

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 2>No, And it's just trending more and more towards them

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 2>not And I think that Tommy Nant's move, even though

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not anything crazy, I think implies that they're trying

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:10.399
<v Speaker 2>to bolster a little bit here and for the next

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:13.319
<v Speaker 2>two weeks especially to then see, you know what they're

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:16.439
<v Speaker 2>gonna do. My question is a short term, long term

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 2>thing here. But I think also what help them this

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 2>year is is it finally Walker Jenkins time? Yep, Jenkins

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 2>was hurt, came back, he's been producing again. Saw him

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:26.080
<v Speaker 2>at the Futures game. My gosh, that guy looks like

0:57:26.120 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 2>he's thirty five years old. By the way, and I

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:29.040
<v Speaker 2>don't even mean that in a negative way. He just

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:31.920
<v Speaker 2>he looks way, way, way ahead of his years. But

0:57:31.960 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 2>I also look at this team that I know Byron

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Buckston's on the shelf right now. But when he comes back,

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:39.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe you saw at Keishaw to a corner. You figure

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:41.840
<v Speaker 2>it out. But I also think he could also start

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to play in the infield again, and you.

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Figure some things out.

0:57:46.040 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Regardless, You've got Alan Roaden, who I still think can

0:57:49.040 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 2>be an okay player, but you got Allen Roaden playing

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 2>corner outfield right now. Walker Jenkins is one of the

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:56.440
<v Speaker 2>best prospects in Major League Baseball. Not only does he

0:57:56.480 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 2>give you a blend of hit and power that has

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:02.320
<v Speaker 2>really developed, he gives you a good approach. He can

0:58:02.320 --> 0:58:04.640
<v Speaker 2>play all three outfield spots, so that's able to give

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 2>bucks In some days off in center. And he's just

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:11.120
<v Speaker 2>a very well rounded complete player. The only drawback of

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Walker Jenkins now that he has added the raw power,

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 2>has been injuries. So there's nothing you can really do

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:19.000
<v Speaker 2>about that other than get him up to the big

0:58:19.080 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 2>leagues and have him working with a big league training

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 2>staff and have him surrounded by big leaguers and big

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:26.640
<v Speaker 2>league resources. And I'll get this team if you want

0:58:26.680 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 2>an addition from within.

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Walker Jenkins is a guy that can make a huge

0:58:30.480 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 1>difference for you. Love it.

0:58:32.080 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to the Detroit Tigers, and I think

0:58:35.880 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 3>this is a good opportunity to talk about the latest

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:44.520
<v Speaker 3>headline from Ken Rosenthal where he said the Tigers are

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 3>unlikely to trade Derek Scooble at this point. Yeah, it

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 3>was also reported by Bob Nightingale that Schooble badly wants

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 3>to stay in Detroit. And I want to quote Ken

0:58:55.560 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Rosenthal directly because really what he said is there's a

0:59:00.880 --> 0:59:03.960
<v Speaker 3>far less chance of Schooble getting traded than there was

0:59:04.040 --> 0:59:06.960
<v Speaker 3>on June first, And I think that was his main

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:09.439
<v Speaker 3>point that over this last month and a half, where

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 3>the Tigers have arguably been the best team in the

0:59:12.200 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 3>American League. Right, we're not saying much, but they've been

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:18.720
<v Speaker 3>well above average in terms of their record, and they've

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:22.560
<v Speaker 3>clawed back into this race and you're still looking at

0:59:22.600 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 3>a Tigers team that can compete. It's still a good lineup,

0:59:26.480 --> 0:59:29.640
<v Speaker 3>it's a fine bullpen, and he got scooball and from

0:59:29.680 --> 0:59:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Berre at the top, with Troy Melton really taking a

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 3>step forward, with Casey Miz putting together an excellent season.

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I know he's been injured on and off, but when

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 3>he's been on the mound, he's been awesome. And even

0:59:41.240 --> 0:59:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Kaida Montero is filled in as an excellent number five starter.

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this Tiger's team. I'm I could hear anything

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 3>if you told me that the Tigers will claw back

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:53.120
<v Speaker 3>and they could win the freaking Pennant. I'm not really

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna give you much pushback. Nobody in the al I like,

0:59:56.360 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 3>really yeah, So again, it's so wide open. I totally

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:06.479
<v Speaker 3>understand why the Tigers wouldn't trade Trek Scoobel. However, it's

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:11.920
<v Speaker 3>extremely risky, yeah, because you could get back the biggest

1:00:11.960 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 3>package for a rental. Ever, in a market where they're

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 3>not there's not a lot of sellers. We saw what

1:00:19.560 --> 1:00:23.280
<v Speaker 3>happened with the Angels and Otani and look at where

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 3>they are now. It's happened to other teams in the

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:30.040
<v Speaker 3>past two so the Tigers are making a big risk. However,

1:00:30.920 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>in this current context, I understand why they're making said risk.

1:00:36.400 --> 1:00:38.960
<v Speaker 3>So again, my one and burning question is what did

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the Tigers do with the deadline? Smiley, I think this

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:44.560
<v Speaker 3>is a great opportunity to talk about that schoobl report,

1:00:44.720 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 3>and I'll throw it over to you, what do you

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:47.040
<v Speaker 3>think they should do?

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the more we we just kind of sit

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and look at the entire situation. They got a lot

1:00:53.120 --> 1:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>of additions coming from within too, Like Labor Torres was

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>playing really well before he got hurt and strained his

1:00:58.280 --> 1:01:00.520
<v Speaker 2>oblique and I think he's already working his way back

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:03.439
<v Speaker 2>on a rehab assignment. So you add him back, that's

1:01:03.440 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be a much needed right handed bat added

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to the fold there to help this offense. You then

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>look at the pitching side of things. You're gonna get

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Jackson Joe back at some point this You're how they

1:01:13.920 --> 1:01:15.560
<v Speaker 2>decided to use him and everything. I'm not sure, but

1:01:15.600 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>he's thrown rehab outings. You could use him in a

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>relief role. Again, it's not something he's unfamiliar with with

1:01:20.200 --> 1:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>this bullpen. That could probably use that down the stretch,

1:01:23.280 --> 1:01:25.400
<v Speaker 2>just having him in the fold. And then of course,

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:27.960
<v Speaker 2>like when you look at the combination of mis when

1:01:27.960 --> 1:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>he's been healthy, Melton returning and being great fromber and

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>then headlined by scoobl that rotation's money. Your five is flarity,

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:38.320
<v Speaker 2>which at that point to get through the regular season,

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>You're fine, He's just not gonna go to many important

1:01:40.200 --> 1:01:41.040
<v Speaker 2>postseason innings.

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't looking at any names. These are just off

1:01:43.520 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the top of my head. Totally forgot about Flarity. I said, well,

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I think is better, but I did forget about it.

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, and they've got Kyder in this like long man role.

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>He's throwing more innings than Flarherty. If Flerity sucks, put.

1:01:55.120 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyder in the fives. But I think Kyder's better in

1:01:57.080 --> 1:01:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that role.

1:01:57.480 --> 1:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

1:01:57.760 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what they do, which they've got options,

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>so all of a sudden you've got this depth pitching wise,

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Kiter is like you're a long man. They just need

1:02:08.440 --> 1:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>some some leverage relief arms. But the fact that they're

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:13.400
<v Speaker 2>getting some offensive reinforcements too is what's interesting to me.

1:02:13.520 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Is like they really need exactly a glabor torus, and

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>they're getting labor torres back, so that I don't think

1:02:19.240 --> 1:02:19.959
<v Speaker 2>they do much.

1:02:20.000 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they hold.

1:02:21.240 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Serve and you'll see the classic like trade a couple

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 2>crappy prospects for a couple of crappy relievers and say

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>we bought, Like.

1:02:27.560 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what Harris will do.

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>But I don't blame him for doing that, because this

1:02:34.200 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>team is good enough if everything's going right to make

1:02:37.840 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>some noise in a crappy American league, do.

1:02:40.040 --> 1:02:41.880
<v Speaker 3>You think it's in their best interest long term not

1:02:42.000 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 3>to trade school and go for it.

1:02:44.200 --> 1:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I think.

1:02:45.360 --> 1:02:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I think at this point, if the team continues to

1:02:49.120 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>show signs of life, yeah, because I think the one

1:02:51.800 --> 1:02:53.720
<v Speaker 2>thing that may limit that the Schoople return is how

1:02:53.760 --> 1:02:55.920
<v Speaker 2>expensive he's gonna be. Yes, he could be one of

1:02:55.920 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the most valuable rentals out He's also one of the

1:02:57.360 --> 1:03:01.479
<v Speaker 2>most expensive rentals ever after you know, winning that arbitration case.

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 2>So it shortens the list of teams willing to trade

1:03:04.080 --> 1:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>for him and also probably hampers the return some unless

1:03:07.680 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the Tigers wanted to eat money the other way. So

1:03:09.760 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>then it's like if you're trading your ace and eating

1:03:12.280 --> 1:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>money when you're two games out of the wild Card, like, ah,

1:03:15.720 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 2>it's just that's a tough that's a tough one to

1:03:17.680 --> 1:03:18.080
<v Speaker 2>sell here.

1:03:18.120 --> 1:03:20.080
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing though, about the money, And I

1:03:20.080 --> 1:03:23.600
<v Speaker 3>think this is important because he's the biggest rental potentially

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>of all time, maybe outside of CC going to Milwaukee

1:03:26.960 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>or something like that or SODO. The amount of tickets

1:03:32.160 --> 1:03:35.080
<v Speaker 3>that these teams are going to sell and they're increased

1:03:35.160 --> 1:03:38.040
<v Speaker 3>chances of not only making the playoffs, but doing well

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs. I think they're gonna make their money

1:03:40.280 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 3>back from this because again, like let's say, can you

1:03:44.600 --> 1:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>imagine Wrigley if they got Trek Scooble. Can you imagine

1:03:47.760 --> 1:03:49.880
<v Speaker 3>a couple of other teams if they got Trek Scooble,

1:03:50.000 --> 1:03:51.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe outside of the Dodgers, because.

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But they're gonna be like sold out anyway, So what's.

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:56.040
<v Speaker 3>The difference potentially, But I think there would be a

1:03:56.040 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 3>certain there'd be a different energy if yeah.

1:03:58.960 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't hurt, doesn't hurt. I just think a lot

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 2>of teams are are kind of like up against it.

1:04:04.160 --> 1:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>To take on ten million dollars for a couple of

1:04:08.040 --> 1:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>months is tough, especially if they're working with the CBT

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:14.040
<v Speaker 2>and whatever else it might be. So I just know

1:04:14.080 --> 1:04:16.360
<v Speaker 2>in general, like for teams, it's gonna limit it some.

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:19.840
<v Speaker 2>But I agree with you, like he is a guy

1:04:19.880 --> 1:04:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna change it a little bit to where yeah,

1:04:23.280 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>like let's if we have a mid market team, did it?

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I think they'd have a few more butts and seats.

1:04:28.800 --> 1:04:30.360
<v Speaker 3>For Tampa Bay Rays, did it.

1:04:30.720 --> 1:04:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there's gonna be a few more butts

1:04:32.520 --> 1:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>in seats for terrass Google starts.

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:36.880
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm saying. Like it, this could be a

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>particular option where yes, it's expensive on the surface, but

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:42.880
<v Speaker 3>it pays back. That's all I wanted to bring up.

1:04:43.560 --> 1:04:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to the Kansas City Royals. Tough one,

1:04:46.920 --> 1:04:49.040
<v Speaker 3>tough one to have one burning question. It's been a

1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:54.320
<v Speaker 3>tough year, injuries to the rotation, injuries to MIKEL Garcia,

1:04:54.520 --> 1:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Vinnie Pascantino is not stepped up. Salvily is the least

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 3>valuable player, every day player major League Baseball. The bullpen

1:05:02.480 --> 1:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>has done basically nothing. They said at thirty eight and

1:05:05.440 --> 1:05:09.000
<v Speaker 3>fifty nine, they're tied with the Angels, ten games out

1:05:09.040 --> 1:05:14.400
<v Speaker 3>of a wild card seasons basically over. So I guess

1:05:14.400 --> 1:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>my one burning question is I think we're still trying

1:05:17.440 --> 1:05:21.440
<v Speaker 3>to find the robin to Bobby Woo Junior's batman in

1:05:21.480 --> 1:05:24.360
<v Speaker 3>this lineup, and we thought it was Michael Garcia. But

1:05:24.800 --> 1:05:28.880
<v Speaker 3>a below average season plus an injury, the door is open.

1:05:29.880 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 3>So my burning question is, can Jack Caglione be the

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:36.560
<v Speaker 3>batman or excuse me, be the robin to Bobby vi

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Junior's batman for the rest of the season. So you

1:05:39.080 --> 1:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>have Bobby with Junior extended for a very long time,

1:05:42.440 --> 1:05:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and then you have Jack hagleon at twenty three years old,

1:05:44.840 --> 1:05:46.760
<v Speaker 3>and you go into next year thinking, all right, if

1:05:46.880 --> 1:05:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Garcia can bounce back, if Vinnie can bounce back, which

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think is a sentence we can really say anymore.

1:05:53.480 --> 1:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how much longer do we have to see

1:05:55.120 --> 1:05:58.680
<v Speaker 3>a one eight WRC plus bat at first base with

1:05:58.760 --> 1:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>no defense and then this or it's way worse than that. Yeah,

1:06:01.800 --> 1:06:04.439
<v Speaker 3>So I don't I think that sentence should be thrown

1:06:04.440 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>in the garbage.

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's just kind of he is what he is.

1:06:06.600 --> 1:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>He's going to be twenty nine. At what point do

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:12.320
<v Speaker 3>we know what a guy is? I think we do

1:06:12.400 --> 1:06:14.680
<v Speaker 3>at this point. So who's going to be the batman?

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 3>And I'm hoping it could be Cacs? Right, you can

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:19.360
<v Speaker 3>look at again. He's another guy who, based on the

1:06:19.400 --> 1:06:21.919
<v Speaker 3>quality of contact metrics, has been a bit unlucky this year.

1:06:22.240 --> 1:06:24.720
<v Speaker 3>And he's just a really exciting player and he looks

1:06:24.800 --> 1:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>the part. I mean, he looks like a Greek god

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 3>out there playing baseball, and he's super fun to watch.

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:32.040
<v Speaker 3>And at least he's someone who will put butts in

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:35.360
<v Speaker 3>seats and hopefully provide some protection for Bobby Wood Junior,

1:06:35.440 --> 1:06:37.520
<v Speaker 3>not only for the rest of the season, but for

1:06:37.560 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>the long term.

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's pretty much what I had too, but

1:06:40.920 --> 1:06:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I expanded it a little bit more, which was just like,

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>can the young bats take their leap or make their leap?

1:06:46.480 --> 1:06:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Like that's I include Carter Jensen in that good Carter Jensen.

1:06:52.080 --> 1:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>You know how much I've loved him as a prospect.

1:06:54.280 --> 1:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And there's a guy that I thought, you know, could

1:06:56.520 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 2>make a run at Rookie of the year and.

1:06:58.400 --> 1:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Had a really slow start to the year. But I

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think since they've let.

1:07:01.800 --> 1:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Him start to catch again and got Salvey out of

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:07.920
<v Speaker 2>that role and let Jensen start doing what he's been

1:07:08.000 --> 1:07:10.720
<v Speaker 2>used to doing, he's been a lot better and we've

1:07:10.720 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>seen him really pick up and I know he's kind

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:15.640
<v Speaker 2>of limped into the All Star break, but overall it's

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>just been better overall. So I think this is a

1:07:19.000 --> 1:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>guy too, between him and Kagleion, like can both of

1:07:22.200 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>these guys take that step forward in the second half

1:07:24.280 --> 1:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>and you just bolstered this offense to where you go

1:07:27.160 --> 1:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>into next season and say, okay, last year for Mikelica

1:07:29.360 --> 1:07:33.160
<v Speaker 2>because it was just injuries, but now you have four

1:07:33.280 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>really solid big league bats that you feel great about

1:07:35.880 --> 1:07:39.120
<v Speaker 2>going into twenty twenty seven, and then you build around that.

1:07:39.480 --> 1:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>And if any Pascentino is then your your fifth bat

1:07:42.520 --> 1:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>at a slightly above average one and a half win player,

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>then that's fine. If he's your second best bat, that's

1:07:47.040 --> 1:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>a problem. So that's where it's where my mind goes.

1:07:50.120 --> 1:07:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And then of course what returns they can get for

1:07:52.280 --> 1:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Lugo and Waka and that side of things.

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>And podcast piece said he had a good nugget for

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Jack kaglion And this comes to us from inside edge.

1:08:03.200 --> 1:08:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Jack HAGLIONI is slugging eight twenty one in non two

1:08:07.720 --> 1:08:11.680
<v Speaker 3>strike counts this season. That is the sixth best in

1:08:11.760 --> 1:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Major League Baseball. But with two strikes, he's slugging one seventeen.

1:08:17.280 --> 1:08:21.120
<v Speaker 3>That is the lowest in the American League. Reading those

1:08:21.160 --> 1:08:23.639
<v Speaker 3>two numbers, arm, what does that tell you about CAGs?

1:08:24.479 --> 1:08:27.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he just destroys velocity. He's really good when

1:08:27.520 --> 1:08:30.479
<v Speaker 2>he's you know, in his like attack mode. But I

1:08:30.520 --> 1:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>think there's still this balance of trying to limit the

1:08:33.120 --> 1:08:37.679
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts being a better two strike hitter per se, where

1:08:37.800 --> 1:08:40.639
<v Speaker 2>CAGs is compromising. What his biggest strength is, and that's

1:08:40.680 --> 1:08:43.439
<v Speaker 2>something that it's tough because everyone tells you to strike

1:08:43.479 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>out too much, blah blah blah blah. You want to

1:08:44.920 --> 1:08:47.800
<v Speaker 2>cut down on that, but you can get a lot

1:08:47.800 --> 1:08:49.960
<v Speaker 2>of pitches to drive sometimes with two strikes, and if

1:08:49.960 --> 1:08:52.719
<v Speaker 2>you're focused on not striking out, you're missing opportunities to slug.

1:08:53.000 --> 1:08:55.479
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's always a difficult balance with young

1:08:55.479 --> 1:08:57.479
<v Speaker 2>power hitters trying to get their feet, you know, under

1:08:57.560 --> 1:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>them in the big leagues.

1:08:58.800 --> 1:09:01.200
<v Speaker 3>No doubt we're going to move over to the American

1:09:01.280 --> 1:09:04.760
<v Speaker 3>League East next But real quick, let's hear from our

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:06.640
<v Speaker 3>friends at Hampton Farms Peanuts.

1:09:07.280 --> 1:09:10.160
<v Speaker 2>The best power hitters in the game pride themselves on

1:09:10.240 --> 1:09:13.600
<v Speaker 2>swinging hard and maximizing exsit velocity, and they can't do

1:09:13.720 --> 1:09:17.599
<v Speaker 2>that without muscle. Hampton Farms in shell peanuts are a

1:09:17.640 --> 1:09:21.120
<v Speaker 2>great source of protein, with seven grams in every serving,

1:09:21.360 --> 1:09:24.200
<v Speaker 2>America's number one brand of in shell peanuts gives you

1:09:24.240 --> 1:09:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the fuel and strength you need to attack your day

1:09:27.479 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>like the pros. Hampton Farms Peanuts fun to crack, better

1:09:31.160 --> 1:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>to eat. Find a bag in your produce atyle or

1:09:33.800 --> 1:09:37.879
<v Speaker 2>take twenty five percent off online at Hamptonfarms dot com

1:09:37.920 --> 1:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>with code just baseball. That's one word, just baseball for

1:09:42.120 --> 1:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percent off, one.

1:09:43.920 --> 1:09:46.519
<v Speaker 3>Burning question for every team in the American League. We

1:09:46.600 --> 1:09:49.400
<v Speaker 3>move to the American League East, which features the Rays,

1:09:49.439 --> 1:09:52.519
<v Speaker 3>the Yankees, the Red Sox, the Orioles, and the Blue Jays.

1:09:52.560 --> 1:09:55.320
<v Speaker 3>We'll start up top with the Tampa Bay Rays. And

1:09:55.360 --> 1:09:57.439
<v Speaker 3>I know we've talked about a lot of deadline stuff

1:09:57.520 --> 1:09:59.679
<v Speaker 3>on this episode. Are on with a lot of these teams,

1:09:59.720 --> 1:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>because especially in the AL, it's so wide open that

1:10:03.560 --> 1:10:05.360
<v Speaker 3>you could be a buyer one week and you could

1:10:05.360 --> 1:10:09.080
<v Speaker 3>be a seller the next. The Rays are solidified buyers

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:12.640
<v Speaker 3>at this point, and my burning question is are they

1:10:12.680 --> 1:10:15.160
<v Speaker 3>going to make the biggest splash of any team at

1:10:15.160 --> 1:10:18.559
<v Speaker 3>this deadline. They're a fascinating team. First of all, they're

1:10:18.600 --> 1:10:21.479
<v Speaker 3>three games up over the Yankees in this division and

1:10:21.560 --> 1:10:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Judge is not coming back anytime soon, so I

1:10:24.680 --> 1:10:26.360
<v Speaker 3>don't think that the Yankees are going to be able

1:10:26.400 --> 1:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>to close the gap. But I think the Rays are

1:10:28.880 --> 1:10:32.680
<v Speaker 3>also thinking about you know, not the Rays, their new

1:10:32.720 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>ownership group that would like to spend some money and

1:10:37.200 --> 1:10:41.040
<v Speaker 3>is willing to make some flashy moves. I think they're

1:10:41.080 --> 1:10:43.519
<v Speaker 3>thinking this is a good opportunity to do so right

1:10:43.600 --> 1:10:46.439
<v Speaker 3>before you know, we could potentially be locked out. So

1:10:47.080 --> 1:10:50.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the Rays as potentially the biggest buyer

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:54.639
<v Speaker 3>at the deadline of any team in Major League Baseball.

1:10:54.920 --> 1:10:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I cannot wait to see what they do.

1:10:57.479 --> 1:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm so excited because we've heard so much about it,

1:11:00.360 --> 1:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>like Leander will will swing for the fences when the

1:11:02.600 --> 1:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>right opportunity presents itself, and like having that maybe push

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of the back from a new ownership group will only

1:11:09.960 --> 1:11:12.200
<v Speaker 2>help that. And then having a ridiculously good farm system,

1:11:12.479 --> 1:11:16.559
<v Speaker 2>having a very good team that still has clear areas

1:11:16.560 --> 1:11:19.360
<v Speaker 2>of need, and having the American League be as bad

1:11:19.400 --> 1:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>as it's ever been. I think is the perfect storm

1:11:22.520 --> 1:11:24.479
<v Speaker 2>for this to be that time to just go for it.

1:11:24.720 --> 1:11:27.639
<v Speaker 2>And also, you look at free agency and how weak

1:11:27.680 --> 1:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>it is, so if it's a player with you know,

1:11:29.080 --> 1:11:30.840
<v Speaker 2>another year of control, I think the race could look

1:11:30.840 --> 1:11:32.320
<v Speaker 2>at it that way too and say like, this is

1:11:32.760 --> 1:11:35.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, an opportunity to make our quote unquote free

1:11:35.640 --> 1:11:38.919
<v Speaker 2>agent addition as well, and who knows they could surprise

1:11:39.040 --> 1:11:41.519
<v Speaker 2>us with that kind of That's one where it would

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>be funny, Like we talked about Francisco Lindoor, like what

1:11:44.240 --> 1:11:46.280
<v Speaker 2>if what if the Rays said, hey, we'll take that on,

1:11:46.920 --> 1:11:48.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, And I don't think they would do that,

1:11:48.960 --> 1:11:51.040
<v Speaker 2>but I just think that that is a fun wrinkle

1:11:51.080 --> 1:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>of like all of a sudden deals that we never

1:11:53.760 --> 1:11:55.640
<v Speaker 2>really mocked to the Rays maybe because they're willing to

1:11:55.640 --> 1:11:57.679
<v Speaker 2>take on some money, knowing the free agent classes ahead,

1:11:57.680 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and with the ownership group that they have, with the

1:11:59.320 --> 1:12:01.519
<v Speaker 2>trays that they can make, maybe changes things a little

1:12:01.560 --> 1:12:05.240
<v Speaker 2>bit so that I had the same question like is

1:12:05.280 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 2>this the perfect storm for Neander to swing for the fences?

1:12:08.640 --> 1:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think it is so with him looking at

1:12:11.800 --> 1:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it this way.

1:12:12.520 --> 1:12:16.200
<v Speaker 2>You have Junior Kamenaro having, you know, just this unbelievable season,

1:12:16.360 --> 1:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and you have a three headed monster at the top

1:12:18.280 --> 1:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>that is just so much fun and so special. But

1:12:21.880 --> 1:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>you need to link them as lineup a little bit, uh, And.

1:12:24.840 --> 1:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of ways to be able

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that.

1:12:27.000 --> 1:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean, and you'd always upgrade the rotation, but

1:12:29.960 --> 1:12:31.759
<v Speaker 2>I think they they're gonna find ways to just always

1:12:31.760 --> 1:12:33.200
<v Speaker 2>get outs on the mound and they've been doing that

1:12:33.240 --> 1:12:35.040
<v Speaker 2>all year and you have a healthy use win klanahand

1:12:35.080 --> 1:12:37.200
<v Speaker 2>and so many good things going. I just want to

1:12:37.200 --> 1:12:39.679
<v Speaker 2>see a big splash And I think everything is lining

1:12:39.800 --> 1:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>up for the race to do it.

1:12:41.240 --> 1:12:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, at first I thought, you know, and this was

1:12:45.040 --> 1:12:46.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of a while ago now and now I definitely

1:12:46.880 --> 1:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's gonna happen. But the idea to float

1:12:50.080 --> 1:12:52.960
<v Speaker 3>into my brain that Jordan Alvarez could be a Tampa

1:12:52.960 --> 1:12:55.519
<v Speaker 3>Bay Ray, Now, of course I don't think that's gonna happen.

1:12:55.520 --> 1:12:57.639
<v Speaker 3>The Astros are gonna be buyers, not sellers. That's how

1:12:57.640 --> 1:13:00.479
<v Speaker 3>fluid the American League is right now, how can switch

1:13:00.520 --> 1:13:03.000
<v Speaker 3>on a dime. But I do think that if there

1:13:03.080 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 3>is a team, like you said, to make the big splash,

1:13:06.720 --> 1:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>it's the Tampa Bay Rays. Anything else on the Rays

1:13:08.920 --> 1:13:10.360
<v Speaker 3>before we move on, I feel like it's.

1:13:10.200 --> 1:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that was my pitch a month ago, and

1:13:13.320 --> 1:13:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I was hoping that, uh yeah, that it could come

1:13:16.320 --> 1:13:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to fruition. But I think the Astros play and just

1:13:20.560 --> 1:13:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the way things have shaken out, and the Astros being

1:13:23.000 --> 1:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>vehemently against trading yourd on, I don't think that that

1:13:26.160 --> 1:13:28.120
<v Speaker 2>pipe dream will ever happen for me now.

1:13:28.200 --> 1:13:31.000
<v Speaker 3>And stay tuned here on the Just Baseball Show because

1:13:32.160 --> 1:13:34.759
<v Speaker 3>as we lead up to the deadline, we will certainly

1:13:34.800 --> 1:13:38.040
<v Speaker 3>be making predictions for these teams. But this isn't really

1:13:38.120 --> 1:13:41.280
<v Speaker 3>a predictions episode. And again, if you are enjoying this

1:13:41.360 --> 1:13:43.680
<v Speaker 3>episode of the Just Baseball Show, the best way to

1:13:43.680 --> 1:13:48.400
<v Speaker 3>support liking and subscribing on YouTube and rating five stars

1:13:48.400 --> 1:13:51.840
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcasts. Let's move over to the

1:13:51.880 --> 1:13:56.360
<v Speaker 3>New York Yankees, and I'm curious your one burning question

1:13:56.479 --> 1:13:57.200
<v Speaker 3>for the Yankees.

1:13:57.960 --> 1:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but the Yankees' is just what version of Gary

1:14:00.160 --> 1:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Cold do we get?

1:14:01.120 --> 1:14:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Because I think they're gonna address the offense and some

1:14:04.240 --> 1:14:05.280
<v Speaker 2>guys are gonna pick it up.

1:14:05.280 --> 1:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And I could point out a few different guys.

1:14:07.720 --> 1:14:10.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think for this Yankees team, A big reason

1:14:10.200 --> 1:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>why I was such a believer early in the year,

1:14:12.320 --> 1:14:14.719
<v Speaker 2>going into the year, at a lot of different points

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:16.519
<v Speaker 2>in the first half was that I was like, this

1:14:16.640 --> 1:14:18.920
<v Speaker 2>rotation can go toe to toe with anybody. You've got

1:14:18.920 --> 1:14:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Cam Schlitzler, it looks like the cy Young favorite, and

1:14:22.760 --> 1:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>you've got, you know, solid complimentary pieces. But Max Freed

1:14:27.280 --> 1:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>has been hurt, Carlos Rodin has been hurt, and I

1:14:31.280 --> 1:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>think you need a clear cut number two. And I

1:14:33.080 --> 1:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>think it'll be Freed when he comes back, But even then,

1:14:35.600 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 2>like who's your queer cut three? And Cole has been there,

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:42.439
<v Speaker 2>done that if he's pitching like we've seen him capable

1:14:42.439 --> 1:14:43.280
<v Speaker 2>of pitching in the past.

1:14:43.640 --> 1:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>This even if this team isn't hitting.

1:14:46.240 --> 1:14:49.840
<v Speaker 2>If you go Schlitzler to freed to, Cole can win

1:14:49.880 --> 1:14:53.280
<v Speaker 2>any damn series with They'll have to address the bullpen

1:14:53.320 --> 1:14:54.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit too. But then some of the other

1:14:54.960 --> 1:14:57.400
<v Speaker 2>rotation pieces you can use in different roles and like

1:14:57.520 --> 1:15:00.400
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna be in the driver's seat. But if it's

1:15:00.680 --> 1:15:02.639
<v Speaker 2>this kind of subdued Cole, who I know is still

1:15:02.640 --> 1:15:04.960
<v Speaker 2>pitching back from TJ, so it's going to take some time.

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:08.160
<v Speaker 2>He's fine, But that's not a guy where I'm like, oh,

1:15:08.280 --> 1:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, advantage Yankees in this one. So do you

1:15:11.280 --> 1:15:13.000
<v Speaker 2>have the coal that you've had in the past that

1:15:13.080 --> 1:15:14.320
<v Speaker 2>helps kind of carry you to make some of the

1:15:14.360 --> 1:15:15.760
<v Speaker 2>playoff runs that you've been able to make.

1:15:17.520 --> 1:15:23.519
<v Speaker 3>So my burning question is kind of along those lines,

1:15:24.240 --> 1:15:30.879
<v Speaker 3>and how will Aaron Judge's absence affect the Yankees' trade headline?

1:15:31.800 --> 1:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Because without Aaron Judge, the Yankees have gone eighteen and

1:15:36.479 --> 1:15:39.559
<v Speaker 3>nineteen and they're averaging about four point one runs per game.

1:15:40.520 --> 1:15:42.920
<v Speaker 3>With Aaron Judge in the lineup, the Yankees are thirty

1:15:42.920 --> 1:15:46.599
<v Speaker 3>five and twenty three averaging five point two runs per game.

1:15:47.960 --> 1:15:50.679
<v Speaker 3>The Yankees with him without Aaron Judge are two completely

1:15:50.720 --> 1:15:54.640
<v Speaker 3>different teams. And we still don't have a timetable of

1:15:54.680 --> 1:15:58.080
<v Speaker 3>when Aaron Judge is going to return. It certainly won't

1:15:58.120 --> 1:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>be by the deadline. So I can understand Brian Cashman

1:16:03.479 --> 1:16:07.200
<v Speaker 3>and the Yankees' front office looking at this current Yankees

1:16:07.240 --> 1:16:11.000
<v Speaker 3>team and thinking, Okay, if we don't get Judged back

1:16:11.040 --> 1:16:16.519
<v Speaker 3>by September, and there aren't a lot of sellers and

1:16:16.560 --> 1:16:18.479
<v Speaker 3>the pieces that we need to bring in are going

1:16:18.479 --> 1:16:22.719
<v Speaker 3>to be expensive because of supply and demand. If there's

1:16:22.720 --> 1:16:24.439
<v Speaker 3>not that much supply, there's going to be a lot

1:16:24.439 --> 1:16:30.040
<v Speaker 3>more demand. Is this really the trade deadline where we

1:16:30.080 --> 1:16:33.000
<v Speaker 3>address all of these needs? Because in your statement, arm

1:16:33.200 --> 1:16:36.160
<v Speaker 3>you were talking about addressing the offense, potential need to

1:16:36.200 --> 1:16:38.960
<v Speaker 3>address the starting rotation, and a potential need to address

1:16:38.960 --> 1:16:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the bullpen. I agree with all of those things. Are

1:16:41.920 --> 1:16:46.040
<v Speaker 3>you going to send prospects for rentals, send guys for

1:16:46.120 --> 1:16:49.040
<v Speaker 3>years of control when you have all these different problems

1:16:49.040 --> 1:16:50.800
<v Speaker 3>and you're unsure if Judge is going to come back.

1:16:51.000 --> 1:16:53.360
<v Speaker 3>It is also no guarantee that Max Freed comes back.

1:16:53.360 --> 1:16:55.599
<v Speaker 3>And looks like the Max freight of aolt. There is

1:16:55.640 --> 1:16:57.840
<v Speaker 3>no guarantee that Garrett Cole gets better as the season

1:16:57.840 --> 1:17:02.439
<v Speaker 3>goes along, because when podcast flashed his savant profile, one

1:17:02.439 --> 1:17:04.640
<v Speaker 3>thing that you notice with your eyes, and it is

1:17:04.680 --> 1:17:07.920
<v Speaker 3>reflected in the numbers, is that third percentile and wiff

1:17:07.960 --> 1:17:11.519
<v Speaker 3>rate Army's not getting swings and misses. This stuff is

1:17:11.520 --> 1:17:14.479
<v Speaker 3>not nearly as crisp as it once was with Garrett Cole,

1:17:14.600 --> 1:17:17.679
<v Speaker 3>and it makes sense he's aging. Unfortunately, he hasn't looked

1:17:17.720 --> 1:17:20.120
<v Speaker 3>like Zack Wheeler. He has looked like an older pitcher

1:17:20.160 --> 1:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>coming back from a big time injury, which is understandable.

1:17:23.800 --> 1:17:25.559
<v Speaker 3>But I thought he could potentially be in the Wheeler

1:17:25.560 --> 1:17:29.360
<v Speaker 3>bucket where almost nothing matters. He's Zack Wheeler, He's Garrett Cole.

1:17:29.880 --> 1:17:32.920
<v Speaker 3>It matters. And you look at this rotation and say,

1:17:33.000 --> 1:17:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Cam Schlitzler is the man. Is he going to maintain

1:17:37.040 --> 1:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>a two o five RA? Probably not right. It's gonna

1:17:40.240 --> 1:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>go up a little bit, I'm not. I know there

1:17:41.840 --> 1:17:45.439
<v Speaker 3>was a lot of quotes lately about regression and that

1:17:45.439 --> 1:17:47.640
<v Speaker 3>he's watching a Red Sox podcast. Whatever. I don't care

1:17:47.680 --> 1:17:49.880
<v Speaker 3>about that. But does he probably finish with a two

1:17:49.960 --> 1:17:53.200
<v Speaker 3>six RA, which is still an unbelievable season. Yes, could

1:17:53.200 --> 1:17:55.720
<v Speaker 3>he still win the cy on Yes? Does he pitch

1:17:55.800 --> 1:17:59.559
<v Speaker 3>to a two oh five? Probably not so? And then

1:17:59.560 --> 1:18:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the bullpen? You like Bennar in the closer role. I

1:18:03.240 --> 1:18:06.000
<v Speaker 3>love Brent Headrick. He's committed, just been awesome for the

1:18:06.040 --> 1:18:09.599
<v Speaker 3>Yankees this season. It's not a lot of other names

1:18:09.600 --> 1:18:14.240
<v Speaker 3>that you're in love with, especially Camillavall. So I could

1:18:14.320 --> 1:18:17.960
<v Speaker 3>understand cash Man looking at this team and saying, if

1:18:18.080 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Judge isn't coming back anytime soon, sorry, we're standing Pat.

1:18:23.600 --> 1:18:25.360
<v Speaker 3>We don't think it's worth it to go full board

1:18:25.360 --> 1:18:28.000
<v Speaker 3>with this team. And to be honest with you, I

1:18:28.040 --> 1:18:28.919
<v Speaker 3>agree with him.

1:18:29.240 --> 1:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:32.320
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the biggest burning question is just when

1:18:32.320 --> 1:18:34.280
<v Speaker 2>do you get your Aaron Judge back in? What version

1:18:34.320 --> 1:18:37.120
<v Speaker 2>of him do you get because yeah, he takes his

1:18:37.160 --> 1:18:38.320
<v Speaker 2>team as far as it's gonna go.

1:18:39.600 --> 1:18:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's the he's the bright light. Yeah that they follow, right,

1:18:44.320 --> 1:18:48.200
<v Speaker 3>He's the star in the night. So without him, would

1:18:48.280 --> 1:18:50.960
<v Speaker 3>you add to this team? Like my burning question, would

1:18:51.000 --> 1:18:54.000
<v Speaker 3>you add to this current Yankees team with Bellinger? I

1:18:54.000 --> 1:18:56.240
<v Speaker 3>know he just won All Star Game MVP, congrats to him,

1:18:56.240 --> 1:18:58.639
<v Speaker 3>but he has fallen off cliff since Judge left. Ben

1:18:58.720 --> 1:19:03.679
<v Speaker 3>Rice is still doing his thing. Jazz has not done

1:19:03.800 --> 1:19:07.600
<v Speaker 3>much of anything this season. Austin Wells has been a

1:19:07.600 --> 1:19:08.400
<v Speaker 3>complete disaster.

1:19:08.960 --> 1:19:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think you're always going to have

1:19:10.960 --> 1:19:13.200
<v Speaker 2>to that a little bit and give it the old

1:19:13.240 --> 1:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>college try, especially if you're eight or so games over

1:19:17.280 --> 1:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and in the wild card. But you know,

1:19:19.960 --> 1:19:22.120
<v Speaker 2>if Judge is ruled out for season, I think it's

1:19:22.120 --> 1:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>going to look a lot different and we're just kind

1:19:24.280 --> 1:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>of on wait and see what that.

1:19:26.120 --> 1:19:28.519
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to the Boston Red Sox. What's your

1:19:28.520 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 3>burning question for Boston.

1:19:30.560 --> 1:19:33.080
<v Speaker 2>The Red Sox, it's I don't think it's a matter

1:19:33.080 --> 1:19:34.120
<v Speaker 2>of buying and selling anymore.

1:19:34.280 --> 1:19:35.559
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think they're going to sell.

1:19:35.640 --> 1:19:39.759
<v Speaker 2>So can they get Roman Anthony back and inform this season?

1:19:39.960 --> 1:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, they shipped him out of Boston.

1:19:41.760 --> 1:19:45.360
<v Speaker 2>He's in Fort Myers rehab and now I still don't

1:19:45.400 --> 1:19:49.800
<v Speaker 2>really understand what is going on, and you know why

1:19:49.520 --> 1:19:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the hand issue has been such a weirdly communicated thing

1:19:54.160 --> 1:19:58.400
<v Speaker 2>and why it's held him out so long, But just

1:19:58.479 --> 1:20:01.120
<v Speaker 2>continuing to try to figure that out and get him back,

1:20:01.160 --> 1:20:03.439
<v Speaker 2>and I just think this is the guy that is

1:20:03.479 --> 1:20:05.679
<v Speaker 2>a game changer for them with how bad Jaron Duran

1:20:05.760 --> 1:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>has been this year with the way that they are

1:20:08.360 --> 1:20:12.360
<v Speaker 2>throwing the baseball. Like Roman Anthony, it's not just the

1:20:12.400 --> 1:20:14.720
<v Speaker 2>fact that if he comes back and he's just above

1:20:14.760 --> 1:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>average bat or slightly above average, bet that'd be a

1:20:16.840 --> 1:20:17.679
<v Speaker 2>huge addition for them.

1:20:17.880 --> 1:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>He also has the ability to be an all Star

1:20:20.120 --> 1:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>caliber bat. We've seen it.

1:20:21.560 --> 1:20:24.519
<v Speaker 2>So for me, it's just if you get Roman Anthony

1:20:24.600 --> 1:20:27.479
<v Speaker 2>back and he's even just a one to fifteen WRC plus,

1:20:27.479 --> 1:20:29.880
<v Speaker 2>my gosh, that's huge compared to you know, what you're

1:20:29.920 --> 1:20:32.080
<v Speaker 2>getting from Jaron Durant has been one of the worst

1:20:32.120 --> 1:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>hitters in Major League Baseball and some of the other

1:20:34.320 --> 1:20:36.720
<v Speaker 2>guys that are getting a lot of run. But on

1:20:36.760 --> 1:20:39.120
<v Speaker 2>top of that, you add in such a high ceiling

1:20:39.160 --> 1:20:42.400
<v Speaker 2>player to the fold here, and that really could jump

1:20:42.479 --> 1:20:43.639
<v Speaker 2>start and jolt this offense.

1:20:44.040 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 3>It's funny, we're very aligned on this one. But I

1:20:46.400 --> 1:20:49.519
<v Speaker 3>also added Garrett Crochet, and yeahause Gret Crochet is at

1:20:49.600 --> 1:20:52.080
<v Speaker 3>least due to be back. And my one burning question

1:20:52.280 --> 1:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>was can this Red Tux team make the playoffs without

1:20:55.000 --> 1:20:58.599
<v Speaker 3>a Roman Anthony or without a Garrett Crochet, And they're

1:20:58.640 --> 1:21:04.040
<v Speaker 3>certainly tracking towards that right now. But yeah, you basically

1:21:04.040 --> 1:21:07.400
<v Speaker 3>added all the context about Roman and with Crochet, it's

1:21:07.479 --> 1:21:10.240
<v Speaker 3>just about rehabbing back, you know, from I think it's

1:21:10.280 --> 1:21:13.920
<v Speaker 3>that shoulder that he's currently dealing with. Yeah, not taken

1:21:13.960 --> 1:21:15.040
<v Speaker 3>if you could fact check.

1:21:15.160 --> 1:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>That for me.

1:21:19.320 --> 1:21:22.439
<v Speaker 3>They have an offense where Durbin has turned it on

1:21:23.680 --> 1:21:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and Duran hasn't. But you're getting contributions from guys where

1:21:29.000 --> 1:21:31.599
<v Speaker 3>you think yourself, all right, they're hitting enough. But what's

1:21:31.680 --> 1:21:34.400
<v Speaker 3>been the biggest thing about this Red Sox team is

1:21:34.439 --> 1:21:37.760
<v Speaker 3>their rotation. You know, you got your three really talented

1:21:37.800 --> 1:21:41.960
<v Speaker 3>young lefties and Bennett and Tolly and Early, and you

1:21:42.000 --> 1:21:44.519
<v Speaker 3>have Ranger Swars having a great season and Sonny Gray

1:21:44.600 --> 1:21:47.200
<v Speaker 3>having a great season. Like we talk about the Tigers

1:21:47.320 --> 1:21:50.960
<v Speaker 3>rotation and how like Dak could propel them, the Red

1:21:50.960 --> 1:21:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Sox rotation is just as good. And imagine adding a

1:21:53.960 --> 1:21:59.080
<v Speaker 3>healthy Crochet to that. But my prediction is Crochet doesn't

1:21:59.080 --> 1:22:02.200
<v Speaker 3>really give them much this here. So can they weather

1:22:02.280 --> 1:22:05.519
<v Speaker 3>the storm? I'm starting to lean they can.

1:22:06.040 --> 1:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean they have been.

1:22:07.760 --> 1:22:10.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean because without Crochet, pitching has been the strength

1:22:10.479 --> 1:22:12.839
<v Speaker 2>that's got them back into it. They just brought Patrick

1:22:12.880 --> 1:22:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Sandoval back and off of injury, he just gave him

1:22:16.160 --> 1:22:18.360
<v Speaker 2>really good four and a thirds innings the other day.

1:22:18.200 --> 1:22:22.599
<v Speaker 2>They have been throwing this guy in Wardo Rivera out there.

1:22:22.920 --> 1:22:26.320
<v Speaker 2>He's been nasty as well, like they've If it's a

1:22:26.400 --> 1:22:29.800
<v Speaker 2>left handed pitcher, Brezlo is going to bring him in

1:22:29.880 --> 1:22:31.559
<v Speaker 2>and he's going to maximize and that's one thing you

1:22:31.560 --> 1:22:33.439
<v Speaker 2>cannot take away from that guy. And so they could

1:22:33.479 --> 1:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>start to funnel some of those guys into the bullpen

1:22:35.360 --> 1:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>as well. They could put Patrick Sandival for more offensive

1:22:38.960 --> 1:22:41.519
<v Speaker 2>help in a more rare big leaguer for big leaguer deal.

1:22:41.600 --> 1:22:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Like they're the Red Sox are in a really unique

1:22:44.160 --> 1:22:46.479
<v Speaker 2>place here all of a sudden, and with the depth

1:22:46.520 --> 1:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that they have, and that's why I'm like, you're the

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:50.639
<v Speaker 2>one thing they won't be able to do is acquire

1:22:51.080 --> 1:22:54.639
<v Speaker 2>a bat of Roman Anthony's caliber, and the only way

1:22:54.640 --> 1:22:56.639
<v Speaker 2>to be able to do that is to get him

1:22:56.680 --> 1:22:58.920
<v Speaker 2>healthy and get him back in the lineup.

1:22:59.040 --> 1:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that's the thing that can really push

1:23:01.400 --> 1:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>them over the top.

1:23:02.720 --> 1:23:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to the Baltimore Orioles and my big

1:23:07.080 --> 1:23:09.559
<v Speaker 3>question mark for them is do we see a second

1:23:09.640 --> 1:23:12.680
<v Speaker 3>half surge from Gunner Henderson? Yep, right, I think he

1:23:12.880 --> 1:23:17.000
<v Speaker 3>is the spoon that stirs the drink Gunner. So far

1:23:17.080 --> 1:23:21.120
<v Speaker 3>this season, he's hitting two twenty four, which is just shocking,

1:23:22.040 --> 1:23:27.040
<v Speaker 3>six ninety seven ops. Ninety five ops plus he's been

1:23:27.040 --> 1:23:31.720
<v Speaker 3>worth one point nine f war this season. Now, the

1:23:32.240 --> 1:23:36.400
<v Speaker 3>reason it's a question and not a statement is arm

1:23:36.439 --> 1:23:38.960
<v Speaker 3>there's not a lot in the data to tell me

1:23:39.080 --> 1:23:41.160
<v Speaker 3>that he's going to have a second half surge other

1:23:41.240 --> 1:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>than the trust that you have in a Gunner Henderson.

1:23:44.800 --> 1:23:47.160
<v Speaker 3>But this is in twenty twenty four Gunner Henderson, who

1:23:47.160 --> 1:23:50.360
<v Speaker 3>put up an eight ninety three ops. Twenty twenty five

1:23:50.400 --> 1:23:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Gunner Henderson was a seven eighty seven guy. Like, is

1:23:54.160 --> 1:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>that what we should expect moving forward? Do we see

1:23:57.080 --> 1:23:59.599
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four Gunner? Do we see more of the

1:23:59.640 --> 1:24:02.599
<v Speaker 3>same where he gets worse? I mean that's in within

1:24:02.640 --> 1:24:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the range of possibilities, because if he gets worse, I

1:24:06.360 --> 1:24:10.200
<v Speaker 3>mean Orioles, forget about it, right, forget about October. But

1:24:10.280 --> 1:24:12.920
<v Speaker 3>if he looks like twenty twenty four Gunner, you could

1:24:13.000 --> 1:24:15.719
<v Speaker 3>talk me into the Orioles in October. If he's twenty

1:24:15.720 --> 1:24:18.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty five Gunner, I'm like, they're going to be on

1:24:18.080 --> 1:24:21.840
<v Speaker 3>the precipice. So I really do think that he is

1:24:22.000 --> 1:24:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the driving force, whether or not the Orioles are going

1:24:24.960 --> 1:24:25.960
<v Speaker 3>to be a playoff team.

1:24:26.160 --> 1:24:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, And just in general, it's just like how

1:24:29.000 --> 1:24:30.960
<v Speaker 2>this day you feel about this team next year too?

1:24:31.120 --> 1:24:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Is your presumed budding superstar shortstop? It really was a

1:24:36.760 --> 1:24:41.719
<v Speaker 2>superstar shortstop able to look like a superstar forget superstar,

1:24:41.800 --> 1:24:46.639
<v Speaker 2>all star, above average, regular, any of those. Right now

1:24:46.880 --> 1:24:48.960
<v Speaker 2>he's none of those. So that was mine as well.

1:24:49.040 --> 1:24:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I just can the real Gunner Henderson please stand up?

1:24:52.920 --> 1:24:57.519
<v Speaker 2>Was my question, because I just don't really know what

1:24:58.360 --> 1:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>version of him this is right now. It's been frustrating

1:25:02.840 --> 1:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>to watch because of how talented he is, how funny

1:25:05.040 --> 1:25:07.040
<v Speaker 2>is to watch when he's going right, it just has

1:25:07.160 --> 1:25:09.040
<v Speaker 2>not been right for him all year.

1:25:09.080 --> 1:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The approach has just been an issue. It just seems

1:25:12.240 --> 1:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>like he's in his.

1:25:12.680 --> 1:25:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Head a little bit, and you know, I think for

1:25:15.200 --> 1:25:17.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of different Oiols hitters that seems to be

1:25:17.080 --> 1:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the case. So I definitely, I definitely think it changes

1:25:20.320 --> 1:25:22.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot even beyond this year, just going in the

1:25:22.439 --> 1:25:25.320
<v Speaker 2>next year, if Gunnar Henderson can spread through the finish line.

1:25:25.520 --> 1:25:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Because this Orioles rotation is really rounding in form and

1:25:29.000 --> 1:25:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I feel like they just need a couple of offensive

1:25:31.040 --> 1:25:34.200
<v Speaker 3>pieces to really lift off here. I mean, Kyle Bradish

1:25:34.200 --> 1:25:36.880
<v Speaker 3>has looked better and better. Shane Boss is giving you

1:25:37.400 --> 1:25:39.679
<v Speaker 3>a ton of innings at least at the very least,

1:25:39.720 --> 1:25:41.200
<v Speaker 3>and he's pitched to a four to one nine era.

1:25:41.320 --> 1:25:43.840
<v Speaker 3>He's been totally fine this year. Brandon Young has been

1:25:43.880 --> 1:25:46.439
<v Speaker 3>an excellent story. Dean Kramer returned from injury and I

1:25:46.439 --> 1:25:49.439
<v Speaker 3>still think he's a pretty talented arm. And Trevor Rodgers

1:25:49.520 --> 1:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>over the last month and change has looked a lot

1:25:52.320 --> 1:25:54.880
<v Speaker 3>like the Trevor Rodgers that we saw last year. So

1:25:54.920 --> 1:25:57.960
<v Speaker 3>they have this formation of a rotation. I still think

1:25:58.000 --> 1:26:00.439
<v Speaker 3>their bullpen nes work, but they still have a couple

1:26:00.439 --> 1:26:03.880
<v Speaker 3>of arms that you like. Pete Alonzo has ended up

1:26:03.880 --> 1:26:07.040
<v Speaker 3>having a really solid season. Adley's had a good season.

1:26:07.120 --> 1:26:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Ward's been twenty percent abovely gathered. Samuel Bissio has

1:26:10.479 --> 1:26:13.360
<v Speaker 3>been a good bat. You're seeing Jackson Holiday kind of

1:26:13.439 --> 1:26:18.240
<v Speaker 3>round into form, but that finishing blow to get the knockout,

1:26:18.320 --> 1:26:21.400
<v Speaker 3>to get the Orioles to October, it's gotta be on Gunner.

1:26:21.680 --> 1:26:24.599
<v Speaker 3>That's why he's just by far the biggest burning question

1:26:24.640 --> 1:26:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I have for the Orioles. And we'll end it with

1:26:27.880 --> 1:26:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the Blue Jays. You go first, what's your one burning

1:26:30.880 --> 1:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>question for them?

1:26:32.479 --> 1:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Can the real vlad Guerrero Junior please stand up? Like

1:26:35.240 --> 1:26:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I had to bring her to it as well, There's

1:26:37.479 --> 1:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>just no other way to go from what we have

1:26:40.720 --> 1:26:43.080
<v Speaker 2>seen from him at his best versus what we've seen

1:26:43.080 --> 1:26:46.719
<v Speaker 2>from him at his worst, and this has been kind

1:26:46.720 --> 1:26:49.120
<v Speaker 2>of close to, if not his worst.

1:26:49.200 --> 1:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, So that's just the story here.

1:26:52.120 --> 1:26:53.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're talking about a guy that in his

1:26:53.560 --> 1:26:56.599
<v Speaker 2>career has been thirty five percent better than league average,

1:26:56.600 --> 1:26:58.639
<v Speaker 2>and this year has been one percent below league average

1:26:58.640 --> 1:26:59.120
<v Speaker 2>for a team.

1:26:59.000 --> 1:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>That sorely needs.

1:26:59.840 --> 1:27:01.919
<v Speaker 2>Right, he's been one of the guys that's been available

1:27:02.000 --> 1:27:03.880
<v Speaker 2>and healthy for a team that has been extremely banged up.

1:27:03.880 --> 1:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>You know how you weather the storm when your team's

1:27:05.320 --> 1:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>hurt all the time by your superstars, Raking, So I

1:27:09.720 --> 1:27:13.439
<v Speaker 2>think this is a spot where just you need Vladgroo

1:27:13.600 --> 1:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Junior to pick it up again. This is another one

1:27:15.240 --> 1:27:16.680
<v Speaker 2>where he can maybe help you get back into the

1:27:16.720 --> 1:27:19.320
<v Speaker 2>hunt here. But also just going into next season, man,

1:27:19.439 --> 1:27:22.040
<v Speaker 2>just knowing that you can count on Vladdie to be

1:27:22.120 --> 1:27:23.559
<v Speaker 2>the superstar that you paid him to be.

1:27:24.000 --> 1:27:26.320
<v Speaker 3>No doubt about it. And this comes to us from

1:27:26.320 --> 1:27:29.040
<v Speaker 3>inside edge. Vladimir grow Junior is a ground ball rate

1:27:29.080 --> 1:27:31.639
<v Speaker 3>of fifty five percent on first pitch of at bats

1:27:31.640 --> 1:27:34.280
<v Speaker 3>this season. It's the fourth highest in the American League,

1:27:34.320 --> 1:27:36.519
<v Speaker 3>and he's averaging just three point five to six pitches

1:27:36.560 --> 1:27:40.200
<v Speaker 3>per play appearance this season, ninth lowest in Major League Baseball.

1:27:40.920 --> 1:27:45.679
<v Speaker 3>That is a very damning stat knowing that a lot

1:27:45.720 --> 1:27:48.840
<v Speaker 3>of Laddie's at bats this year, he's not making the

1:27:48.880 --> 1:27:52.880
<v Speaker 3>pitcher work. He's being way too aggressive, and when he's

1:27:52.920 --> 1:27:56.040
<v Speaker 3>making contact, fifty five percent of it is on the

1:27:56.080 --> 1:27:58.720
<v Speaker 3>ground when it comes to that first pitch. And I

1:27:58.720 --> 1:28:00.920
<v Speaker 3>feel like that's emblematic of just what I've been seeing

1:28:00.920 --> 1:28:03.799
<v Speaker 3>with my own eyes. I'm watching Vladdie swing at pitches

1:28:03.920 --> 1:28:08.599
<v Speaker 3>arm that are just downright stupid. Like I wish there

1:28:08.680 --> 1:28:11.400
<v Speaker 3>was chase rate and there was s chase rate where

1:28:11.400 --> 1:28:15.480
<v Speaker 3>it's stupid chases where it's a two to oh count

1:28:15.760 --> 1:28:18.240
<v Speaker 3>and he's swinging at a slider that was never a strike.

1:28:18.840 --> 1:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah what?

1:28:20.640 --> 1:28:23.599
<v Speaker 3>Or it's a two to one count and you've got

1:28:23.600 --> 1:28:27.920
<v Speaker 3>a two seamer barreling in on him and he's inside

1:28:27.960 --> 1:28:32.160
<v Speaker 3>outing a ground ball to shortstop. Why pitches that were

1:28:32.200 --> 1:28:34.160
<v Speaker 3>never strikes?

1:28:34.320 --> 1:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Stupid chase rate.

1:28:35.960 --> 1:28:37.559
<v Speaker 3>Bladdy leads in Major League Baseball.

1:28:37.600 --> 1:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I swear, yeah, it is.

1:28:40.000 --> 1:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of swing decision models that I know

1:28:42.479 --> 1:28:46.040
<v Speaker 2>teams probably used that he would be, you know, probably

1:28:46.080 --> 1:28:48.160
<v Speaker 2>in that in that realm there, and it's just like

1:28:48.200 --> 1:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you're a power hitter that and a star hitter that. Look,

1:28:51.840 --> 1:28:53.640
<v Speaker 2>every edge that you give the other side they're going

1:28:53.720 --> 1:28:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to try to exploit. And he's hard to get out.

1:28:57.280 --> 1:28:59.200
<v Speaker 2>And in the respect that like he doesn't strike out,

1:28:59.200 --> 1:29:01.439
<v Speaker 2>he hits the ball hard. The area where he makes

1:29:01.479 --> 1:29:03.400
<v Speaker 2>it easier to get to get him out is that

1:29:03.439 --> 1:29:05.479
<v Speaker 2>he gets himself out when you can kind of get

1:29:05.520 --> 1:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>him to chase and I would say squander the advantage

1:29:09.520 --> 1:29:13.000
<v Speaker 2>counts and maybe even get himself out early. There's not

1:29:13.040 --> 1:29:15.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of reasons sometimes to come into him here

1:29:15.800 --> 1:29:18.160
<v Speaker 2>when you know that he's going to maybe expand even

1:29:18.160 --> 1:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>when he shouldn't be.

1:29:19.880 --> 1:29:22.400
<v Speaker 3>And I think another important note on Vladdie is that

1:29:22.479 --> 1:29:24.479
<v Speaker 3>you see a hard hit rate in the sixty seven

1:29:24.600 --> 1:29:28.639
<v Speaker 3>percent of forty four point three percent, but a lot

1:29:28.680 --> 1:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>of his hard contact is on the ground. When he's

1:29:30.680 --> 1:29:32.320
<v Speaker 3>been putting the ball in the air, that hard hit

1:29:32.400 --> 1:29:34.679
<v Speaker 3>rate is a lot lower. So you could say, well,

1:29:34.680 --> 1:29:36.960
<v Speaker 3>he's still hitting the ball hard like, yeah, but it's

1:29:37.000 --> 1:29:39.080
<v Speaker 3>mostly on the ground. And again when he puts the

1:29:39.120 --> 1:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>ball in the air, it's floating. That's why Vladimir Grove

1:29:42.479 --> 1:29:46.599
<v Speaker 3>Junior has six home runs in three hundred and thirty

1:29:46.720 --> 1:29:49.719
<v Speaker 3>six abs this year. He's got to turn it around,

1:29:49.760 --> 1:29:52.519
<v Speaker 3>and Springer has to turn it around too. A big

1:29:52.560 --> 1:29:54.799
<v Speaker 3>reason why the Blue Jays took the Dodgers to seven

1:29:55.400 --> 1:29:57.360
<v Speaker 3>was like a lot of big swings from George Springer

1:29:57.479 --> 1:29:59.160
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that he was a top five hitter

1:29:59.240 --> 1:30:02.160
<v Speaker 3>in all of base ball last year by WRC plus. Yep,

1:30:02.400 --> 1:30:06.519
<v Speaker 3>he's seen a seventy point drop off in WRC plus yep.

1:30:07.840 --> 1:30:10.599
<v Speaker 3>Can he be better than a ninety? Yeah, he's coming

1:30:10.720 --> 1:30:11.880
<v Speaker 3>in there. We need it.

1:30:12.479 --> 1:30:14.400
<v Speaker 2>We were the better right handed hitters in the game

1:30:14.479 --> 1:30:17.960
<v Speaker 2>last year. Like, that's just they need that from him too,

1:30:18.080 --> 1:30:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and they need their Without their stars performing the way

1:30:20.720 --> 1:30:22.679
<v Speaker 2>they could they should be. On top of the fact

1:30:22.680 --> 1:30:24.960
<v Speaker 2>that you have all the injuries, it's it's it's gonna

1:30:24.960 --> 1:30:25.679
<v Speaker 2>be really hard.

1:30:25.520 --> 1:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>To hang around.

1:30:26.680 --> 1:30:29.200
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna take one last break before we get to

1:30:29.240 --> 1:30:32.639
<v Speaker 3>our weekend preview where we're previewing the best games from

1:30:32.680 --> 1:30:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the weekend Slate podcast. P Would you mind giving us

1:30:35.680 --> 1:30:46.920
<v Speaker 3>a whoahhh weekend preview going through the best games on Friday,

1:30:47.320 --> 1:30:50.519
<v Speaker 3>Saturday and Sunday. And it is brought to you by

1:30:50.680 --> 1:30:55.120
<v Speaker 3>the Picket Sports app. Folks, I don't need an ad

1:30:55.200 --> 1:30:58.679
<v Speaker 3>read you know why. I use the app every single

1:30:58.760 --> 1:31:01.240
<v Speaker 3>day For all of my better out there. It is

1:31:01.360 --> 1:31:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the best way to track your picks. I know Arum

1:31:05.200 --> 1:31:07.519
<v Speaker 3>downloaded it or he had it for a long time

1:31:07.520 --> 1:31:09.559
<v Speaker 3>but wasn't really using it. And then when we were

1:31:09.560 --> 1:31:11.519
<v Speaker 3>at the All Star Game, he sinked one of the

1:31:11.560 --> 1:31:13.879
<v Speaker 3>sports books and he immediately goes, oh, this is probably

1:31:13.920 --> 1:31:17.720
<v Speaker 3>really good for betters. Right, yes, because not only does

1:31:17.760 --> 1:31:20.559
<v Speaker 3>it track your total units, it tells you which areas

1:31:20.560 --> 1:31:23.200
<v Speaker 3>you're good at, which areas you're bad at, so you

1:31:23.240 --> 1:31:26.719
<v Speaker 3>can become a better sports better or you better at totals,

1:31:27.160 --> 1:31:29.799
<v Speaker 3>Are you better at money lines? Are you better at props?

1:31:29.840 --> 1:31:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Are you better at parlays? They will tell you what

1:31:32.520 --> 1:31:35.599
<v Speaker 3>sport your best at. But on top of it, Picket

1:31:35.680 --> 1:31:39.080
<v Speaker 3>also takes away all those odd screens. Right for all

1:31:39.120 --> 1:31:42.160
<v Speaker 3>my gamblers out there, they know how much money these

1:31:42.200 --> 1:31:44.599
<v Speaker 3>odd screens are so they can find the best line.

1:31:44.800 --> 1:31:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Because every cent matters when you're making a pick. Picket

1:31:48.160 --> 1:31:51.559
<v Speaker 3>does that immediately. In apps, you can save all of it.

1:31:51.560 --> 1:31:53.920
<v Speaker 3>It is a free app, and when you download the

1:31:53.920 --> 1:31:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Picket Sports Book and or the Picket Sports app, excuse me,

1:31:57.920 --> 1:32:01.599
<v Speaker 3>and sync your sports book, whether that be bet, MGM

1:32:01.760 --> 1:32:05.799
<v Speaker 3>or others, you will get three to one hundred dollars.

1:32:05.880 --> 1:32:08.960
<v Speaker 3>It's a almost a roulette wheel in a way where

1:32:09.000 --> 1:32:10.680
<v Speaker 3>you might get three, you might get eight, you might

1:32:10.680 --> 1:32:13.280
<v Speaker 3>get ninety, you might get one hundred, you might get seventeen.

1:32:13.600 --> 1:32:17.559
<v Speaker 3>It's a random number generator. So use code just baseball

1:32:17.560 --> 1:32:20.479
<v Speaker 3>when you sink your sports book, be a better gambler

1:32:20.960 --> 1:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and make some money while doing it. Let's start Friday's

1:32:25.200 --> 1:32:28.960
<v Speaker 3>games arm and again we're using these Picket screenshots, and

1:32:29.000 --> 1:32:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I think arguably the best game on the slate Dodgers

1:32:32.360 --> 1:32:37.240
<v Speaker 3>versus Yankees Roki Sasaki taking on Garrett Cole, and as

1:32:37.280 --> 1:32:41.200
<v Speaker 3>you can see looking at the market, it's basically an

1:32:41.360 --> 1:32:49.560
<v Speaker 3>even pick them. Why Cole Roki Sasaki has been wildly consistent.

1:32:50.439 --> 1:32:53.680
<v Speaker 3>That's why it's close to a pick them. But even

1:32:53.720 --> 1:32:55.800
<v Speaker 3>though I'm a Yankee fan, it's hard not to lean

1:32:55.840 --> 1:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>towards the Dodgers at this price. I know Roki hasn't

1:32:58.280 --> 1:33:01.040
<v Speaker 3>been great but neither is Garrett Cole. But maybe you

1:33:01.160 --> 1:33:03.400
<v Speaker 3>see like Garrett Cole's best start of the year, like

1:33:03.479 --> 1:33:06.360
<v Speaker 3>getting up at Yankee Stadium against the Dodgers on a

1:33:06.400 --> 1:33:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Friday night. Yeah, I could see it right, And the

1:33:09.400 --> 1:33:12.519
<v Speaker 3>Yankees offense doesn't scare me. I know, Dodgers Yankees. My

1:33:12.600 --> 1:33:14.519
<v Speaker 3>favorite bet in this game would actually be the under,

1:33:15.000 --> 1:33:16.840
<v Speaker 3>like under nine. I don't think there's gonna be that

1:33:16.920 --> 1:33:17.479
<v Speaker 3>many runs.

1:33:17.840 --> 1:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's fair enough.

1:33:19.400 --> 1:33:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I think I just think Sasaki it's it's just been

1:33:22.320 --> 1:33:26.240
<v Speaker 2>tough lately and you have a three game losing streak

1:33:26.240 --> 1:33:28.840
<v Speaker 2>getting for the Dodgers going into the break. Not too

1:33:28.880 --> 1:33:31.240
<v Speaker 2>worried about it, but I didn't think Cole gets up

1:33:31.240 --> 1:33:33.599
<v Speaker 2>for this one. I do think Sasaki is gonna struggle

1:33:33.640 --> 1:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. I think this is the one game

1:33:35.400 --> 1:33:36.719
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees get out of the series.

1:33:37.120 --> 1:33:39.479
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's go over to the next game on Friday.

1:33:40.760 --> 1:33:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Great pitchers matchup. I think you got the Pirates taking

1:33:44.200 --> 1:33:48.440
<v Speaker 3>on the Guardians. Jared Jones for the Pirates, Gavin Williams

1:33:48.800 --> 1:33:50.960
<v Speaker 3>for the Guardians. And I don't know if you guys

1:33:50.960 --> 1:33:54.000
<v Speaker 3>saw I put out a pick today. I took the

1:33:54.160 --> 1:33:58.960
<v Speaker 3>under seven and a half Jared Jones lately has looked diabolical.

1:33:59.320 --> 1:34:02.919
<v Speaker 3>Over his last ten innings, he's given up two hits, arm,

1:34:02.920 --> 1:34:05.240
<v Speaker 3>two hits, one or run with the strikeout to walk

1:34:05.320 --> 1:34:08.360
<v Speaker 3>ratio of fourteen to two. I think we're getting Jared

1:34:08.479 --> 1:34:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Jones ninety nine at the top and when he's that,

1:34:11.560 --> 1:34:13.680
<v Speaker 3>and he could spend that slider at ninety ninety one

1:34:13.760 --> 1:34:16.000
<v Speaker 3>miles an hour. Like you said earlier when we were

1:34:16.000 --> 1:34:20.160
<v Speaker 3>talking about the Pirates on the National League Burning Questions episode,

1:34:20.280 --> 1:34:21.960
<v Speaker 3>he could be a top thirty pitcher in the sport.

1:34:22.160 --> 1:34:24.479
<v Speaker 3>And he's going up against the Guardians offense that ranks

1:34:24.479 --> 1:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty first in WRC plus, Like they don't scare me.

1:34:26.920 --> 1:34:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Gavin Williams on the other side, six point fifty four

1:34:29.880 --> 1:34:33.840
<v Speaker 3>ops at home, opposing hitters are hitting, he keeps the

1:34:33.840 --> 1:34:36.439
<v Speaker 3>ball on the ground. Pirates have the fifth highest ground

1:34:36.439 --> 1:34:40.360
<v Speaker 3>ball rate against righty's. Gavi Williams does suffer a little

1:34:40.360 --> 1:34:43.720
<v Speaker 3>bit with hard contact allowed Pirates ring twenty third and

1:34:43.800 --> 1:34:46.080
<v Speaker 3>hard hit rate against righties on the road. I think

1:34:46.120 --> 1:34:48.040
<v Speaker 3>he's set up for a good outing. I think the

1:34:48.040 --> 1:34:50.920
<v Speaker 3>bullpens are both rested. I think this ends three to two,

1:34:51.760 --> 1:34:53.559
<v Speaker 3>and I think the Pirates actually pull it out. I

1:34:53.560 --> 1:34:55.960
<v Speaker 3>think we're going to see a really good Jared Jones outing.

1:34:56.240 --> 1:34:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I think this is an awesome pitcher stool, a couple

1:34:58.160 --> 1:35:01.840
<v Speaker 2>hard throwers, good heaters. I'm excited for this one. This

1:35:01.920 --> 1:35:03.519
<v Speaker 2>is probably one of my favorite of the weekend.

1:35:03.880 --> 1:35:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I agree. My only worry is do they play this

1:35:06.439 --> 1:35:09.560
<v Speaker 3>game with the wildfires coming in from Canada. I'm in

1:35:09.640 --> 1:35:12.519
<v Speaker 3>Chicago right now. The air quality is horrible. Really, I

1:35:12.560 --> 1:35:15.599
<v Speaker 3>know in this area air quality is going to be affected,

1:35:15.640 --> 1:35:17.360
<v Speaker 3>so I hope it doesn't affect this game. But that

1:35:17.400 --> 1:35:20.240
<v Speaker 3>would be the only reason to not watch this game

1:35:20.360 --> 1:35:22.759
<v Speaker 3>is if it doesn't happen because of the air quality.

1:35:23.040 --> 1:35:25.439
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's move over to the next game. You

1:35:25.479 --> 1:35:32.120
<v Speaker 3>got your Marlins taking on the Brewers, and it's Sandy versus.

1:35:32.640 --> 1:35:34.879
<v Speaker 3>I forgot to write this one down. I know Sandy

1:35:35.000 --> 1:35:37.960
<v Speaker 3>is on the mound and on the Brewer side it

1:35:38.000 --> 1:35:40.320
<v Speaker 3>is Logan Henderson. No wonder I brought it up because

1:35:40.360 --> 1:35:42.719
<v Speaker 3>I think Logan Henderson right now, with Kala Harrison injured,

1:35:43.040 --> 1:35:45.559
<v Speaker 3>is the second best starter that the Brewers have, especially

1:35:45.600 --> 1:35:48.240
<v Speaker 3>again with Brandon Woodruff injured. And as you could see,

1:35:48.240 --> 1:35:50.840
<v Speaker 3>the Brewers are decent favorites, which is a little bit

1:35:50.880 --> 1:35:54.599
<v Speaker 3>crazy to me considering how well that the Marlins have played.

1:35:54.600 --> 1:35:56.080
<v Speaker 3>But another reason I wanted to bring.

1:35:55.880 --> 1:35:56.599
<v Speaker 1>It up is.

1:35:59.320 --> 1:36:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you like the Marlins at that price or do

1:36:01.720 --> 1:36:04.760
<v Speaker 3>you see them going into Milwaukee off the break and

1:36:04.840 --> 1:36:06.320
<v Speaker 3>this hot streak won't last.

1:36:07.640 --> 1:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:36:08.840 --> 1:36:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've seen anytime Logan Henderson tows the rubber,

1:36:12.920 --> 1:36:14.160
<v Speaker 2>you got a really good chance.

1:36:14.720 --> 1:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. I love this. I love this

1:36:17.680 --> 1:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Brewers team.

1:36:18.360 --> 1:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a spot for them to just

1:36:21.680 --> 1:36:23.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of jump out of the break here Ridy and

1:36:23.760 --> 1:36:26.840
<v Speaker 2>then two lefties in the series, I think, I don't know.

1:36:26.880 --> 1:36:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Henderson has been so good it's it's hard to argue

1:36:29.080 --> 1:36:31.160
<v Speaker 2>against him. And I think I think he's gonna present

1:36:31.200 --> 1:36:34.280
<v Speaker 2>some some some tough aps for the Marlins here it's

1:36:34.320 --> 1:36:35.080
<v Speaker 2>in Milwaukee.

1:36:35.200 --> 1:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a reason why they're the heavy favorite.

1:36:37.360 --> 1:36:39.439
<v Speaker 3>Me too, I'm gonna go with the Brewers as well.

1:36:39.560 --> 1:36:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to Saturday's game, and the first game

1:36:43.840 --> 1:36:47.559
<v Speaker 3>that I want to talk about is the Giants taking

1:36:47.600 --> 1:36:52.000
<v Speaker 3>on the Mariners. Logan Webb against Brian wu And these

1:36:52.000 --> 1:36:56.320
<v Speaker 3>screenshots are from our friends at Baltpark pal excellent model

1:36:57.280 --> 1:37:01.360
<v Speaker 3>that predicts basically the outcomes using you know, whether you know,

1:37:01.400 --> 1:37:03.920
<v Speaker 3>they're really really good with the weather, and they have

1:37:04.160 --> 1:37:08.400
<v Speaker 3>this as a very even pick them Logan Web against

1:37:08.439 --> 1:37:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Brian Wu fifty to fifty exactly on both sides. I'm

1:37:14.200 --> 1:37:16.599
<v Speaker 3>curious to see when the lines come out, but as

1:37:16.640 --> 1:37:21.519
<v Speaker 3>of now, Arm we're flipping a coin. I tend to

1:37:21.640 --> 1:37:24.320
<v Speaker 3>lean on Wo at home because on the road, Brian

1:37:24.320 --> 1:37:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Wu has just been abysmal this season, but still a

1:37:26.720 --> 1:37:29.479
<v Speaker 3>team mobile, He's been awesome. I love Logan Web, but

1:37:30.000 --> 1:37:32.479
<v Speaker 3>I tend to lean towards the Mariners in that game.

1:37:32.520 --> 1:37:34.080
<v Speaker 3>But my guess is the Mariners are going to be

1:37:34.120 --> 1:37:35.560
<v Speaker 3>minus one thirty and the Giants are going to be

1:37:35.560 --> 1:37:37.599
<v Speaker 3>plus one ten, and Ballpark Palle is going to tell

1:37:37.600 --> 1:37:38.960
<v Speaker 3>you there's value on the Giants.

1:37:39.360 --> 1:37:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:37:39.640 --> 1:37:41.479
<v Speaker 2>I like the Giants just because of the way that

1:37:41.520 --> 1:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Logan Web has just continued to pitch this year over all.

1:37:45.360 --> 1:37:47.320
<v Speaker 2>But and I just think he's the kind of guy

1:37:47.360 --> 1:37:49.479
<v Speaker 2>that with the way that the Mariners have swung it,

1:37:49.560 --> 1:37:51.559
<v Speaker 2>you just kind of blank and you're in the sixth

1:37:51.560 --> 1:37:54.760
<v Speaker 2>inning and you haven't scored yet. Wu's just not been

1:37:54.960 --> 1:37:56.600
<v Speaker 2>as sharp of Wit. I know that it was a

1:37:56.640 --> 1:38:01.520
<v Speaker 2>limp into the break for Web but it was at Colorado,

1:38:01.640 --> 1:38:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and then still went seven innings against Toronto, though he

1:38:04.280 --> 1:38:07.439
<v Speaker 2>did give up the five earn. I think bounce back

1:38:07.479 --> 1:38:10.559
<v Speaker 2>start for wablow scoring and a late run decides it.

1:38:10.600 --> 1:38:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know which way though, but I think it's

1:38:12.080 --> 1:38:14.720
<v Speaker 2>gonna be low scoring. Both offenses are kind of frustrating.

1:38:15.200 --> 1:38:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Love it. Next came up White Sox against the Blue

1:38:18.280 --> 1:38:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Jays and two pitchers. I have no idea what to

1:38:20.800 --> 1:38:22.720
<v Speaker 3>expect from in the second half, which is why I

1:38:22.720 --> 1:38:25.160
<v Speaker 3>wanted to bring up this game. You got Davis Martin

1:38:25.240 --> 1:38:27.599
<v Speaker 3>going for the White Sox and you got Shane Bieber

1:38:28.040 --> 1:38:32.559
<v Speaker 3>going for the Toronto Blue Jays, and this one, like

1:38:32.640 --> 1:38:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Davis Martin put together a really solid first half but

1:38:36.479 --> 1:38:40.280
<v Speaker 3>started to kind of falter towards the end there. And Bieber,

1:38:40.880 --> 1:38:42.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we were talking about him when we were

1:38:42.760 --> 1:38:45.920
<v Speaker 3>all in the same Airbnb in Philly, and I just said,

1:38:45.920 --> 1:38:48.320
<v Speaker 3>to have people been noticing how bad he's been. I mean,

1:38:48.320 --> 1:38:50.639
<v Speaker 3>this has been He's been one of the worst pitchers

1:38:50.680 --> 1:38:52.920
<v Speaker 3>in baseball period. He's rocking an ERA at seven, but

1:38:53.000 --> 1:38:56.439
<v Speaker 3>it's still Shane Bieber, so I still want to believe

1:38:56.479 --> 1:38:58.920
<v Speaker 3>that he's going to have better days ahead. I just

1:38:58.960 --> 1:39:01.000
<v Speaker 3>don't know where to go with this one. Yeah, and

1:39:01.200 --> 1:39:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Ballpark pal is even kind of close. Minus one nineteen

1:39:03.960 --> 1:39:06.400
<v Speaker 3>for the J's plus one nineteen for the White Sox.

1:39:07.680 --> 1:39:10.439
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe making Bieber the favorite, but if you

1:39:10.479 --> 1:39:13.080
<v Speaker 3>believe on a bounce back from him, and Martin continues

1:39:13.120 --> 1:39:15.040
<v Speaker 3>to falter, I get it. I have no idea what to.

1:39:15.000 --> 1:39:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Do with this one. Yeah, I don't know either.

1:39:18.920 --> 1:39:20.880
<v Speaker 2>It seems like a tough matchup for Bieber, who's been

1:39:20.880 --> 1:39:22.840
<v Speaker 2>giving up a lot of hard contact to go against

1:39:22.880 --> 1:39:25.320
<v Speaker 2>a team that makes a lot of hard contact.

1:39:25.439 --> 1:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think the White Sox swing it.

1:39:28.600 --> 1:39:34.479
<v Speaker 3>Next one up, Twins taking on the Twins are taken

1:39:34.520 --> 1:39:37.400
<v Speaker 3>on the Cubs in Wrigley, and it's Taj Bradley taking

1:39:37.479 --> 1:39:40.680
<v Speaker 3>on Matthew Boyd. And I found this interesting that they

1:39:40.720 --> 1:39:43.759
<v Speaker 3>make the Twins the favorite, and I think they should

1:39:43.800 --> 1:39:46.160
<v Speaker 3>be the favorite. Matthew Boyd has not had that great

1:39:46.200 --> 1:39:50.559
<v Speaker 3>of a season, and TOAs Bradley has really beenastic. Not

1:39:50.760 --> 1:39:52.960
<v Speaker 3>fantastic is a little bit too much. That's the four

1:39:53.040 --> 1:39:55.439
<v Speaker 3>point three percenter in me coming out on him. TOAs

1:39:55.520 --> 1:39:59.439
<v Speaker 3>Bradley has been very solid, and again the Twins can

1:39:59.479 --> 1:40:01.719
<v Speaker 3>swing it but I love that Ballpark Pal is bringing

1:40:01.720 --> 1:40:05.040
<v Speaker 3>this up. Wrigley Field plus eighteen percent in terms of

1:40:05.120 --> 1:40:08.240
<v Speaker 3>run environment. It is expected that the wind is going

1:40:08.280 --> 1:40:11.080
<v Speaker 3>to be blowing out all weekend, so I can't wait

1:40:11.120 --> 1:40:13.759
<v Speaker 3>to watch this series. I'm gonna go with the Twins

1:40:13.840 --> 1:40:16.120
<v Speaker 3>and our friends at Ballpark Pal. I think they win

1:40:16.160 --> 1:40:16.479
<v Speaker 3>this one.

1:40:17.600 --> 1:40:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, I think we get a decent one from Boyd. Okay,

1:40:22.880 --> 1:40:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go with the Cubs. I think someone needs

1:40:24.920 --> 1:40:27.360
<v Speaker 2>to step up wind blowing out. I also like that

1:40:27.400 --> 1:40:30.280
<v Speaker 2>for the Cubs offense too. I think Boyd battles.

1:40:31.400 --> 1:40:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing with the Minnesota Twins. I want to

1:40:33.760 --> 1:40:37.080
<v Speaker 3>put up, pull up exactly what their numbers are against

1:40:37.280 --> 1:40:40.320
<v Speaker 3>left handed pitching, because I know they're really strong.

1:40:40.640 --> 1:40:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Nur WRC well on the season.

1:40:44.000 --> 1:40:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh it must have been lately what I was looking at,

1:40:48.360 --> 1:40:50.479
<v Speaker 3>So maybe they are a little bit weaker against lefties.

1:40:50.479 --> 1:40:52.639
<v Speaker 3>I swore maybe earlier on in the season. But whatever,

1:40:52.880 --> 1:40:55.519
<v Speaker 3>it could be actually a good maybe. Then you do

1:40:55.600 --> 1:40:58.360
<v Speaker 3>go with the Cubs, let's go to but I'm still

1:40:58.360 --> 1:41:02.040
<v Speaker 3>going with the Twins. Let's go to Sunday game. Excellent

1:41:02.080 --> 1:41:05.439
<v Speaker 3>pitching matchup in Boston on Sunday, during the day, you

1:41:05.560 --> 1:41:09.599
<v Speaker 3>got Shane McClanahan taking on Sunny Gray, and McClanahan has

1:41:09.640 --> 1:41:13.000
<v Speaker 3>looked great. But ballpark pal is pretty bullish on the

1:41:13.000 --> 1:41:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox arm giving them basically sixty percent chance of

1:41:17.840 --> 1:41:20.360
<v Speaker 3>winning this game. I'm sure they're going to be short

1:41:20.400 --> 1:41:23.240
<v Speaker 3>favorites and likely the value side according to ballpark Pal.

1:41:23.360 --> 1:41:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you agree with them? You think the Red Sox

1:41:25.080 --> 1:41:27.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of take care of business because as we're recording

1:41:27.360 --> 1:41:29.840
<v Speaker 3>right now, the Red Sox are beating the crap out

1:41:29.880 --> 1:41:31.880
<v Speaker 3>of the Rays. It is eight to zero in the

1:41:31.920 --> 1:41:34.320
<v Speaker 3>bottom of the sixth inning. Could this be a series

1:41:34.320 --> 1:41:36.920
<v Speaker 3>where the Red Sox kind of take control here? Obviously

1:41:36.920 --> 1:41:40.320
<v Speaker 3>not the division lead, but really make a statement like

1:41:40.520 --> 1:41:42.559
<v Speaker 3>we're going to battle and we can be a playoff team.

1:41:42.880 --> 1:41:44.559
<v Speaker 1>And Gray's been awesome and it's a one.

1:41:44.720 --> 1:41:46.599
<v Speaker 2>They have a one to eleven WRC, plus the Red

1:41:46.600 --> 1:41:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Sox against left handed pitching, so it's a pretty good

1:41:49.200 --> 1:41:52.320
<v Speaker 2>matchup for him. I kind of get why the Red Sox,

1:41:52.439 --> 1:41:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the hottest team in baseball right now, would be the

1:41:54.000 --> 1:41:54.840
<v Speaker 2>favorite in that one.

1:41:55.120 --> 1:41:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, so we're both going with the Red Sox there.

1:41:57.439 --> 1:42:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to an excellent pitching matchup in Houston

1:42:01.479 --> 1:42:06.280
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday, Kyle Bradish taken on Hunter Brown, the Orioles

1:42:06.640 --> 1:42:09.320
<v Speaker 3>take on the Astros, and Ballpark Powell makes the Orioles

1:42:09.479 --> 1:42:13.519
<v Speaker 3>ever so slight favorites at minus one oh three. I

1:42:13.600 --> 1:42:15.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of agree with them. I'm gonna go with the

1:42:15.400 --> 1:42:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Orioles in this one. Bradish has looked awesome. Brown has

1:42:18.280 --> 1:42:20.400
<v Speaker 3>looked good, but not quite as good as Bradish has.

1:42:20.960 --> 1:42:23.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think the Astros are vulnerable here. I'm gonna

1:42:23.280 --> 1:42:25.320
<v Speaker 3>fade their ace and take the Orioles ace and go

1:42:25.360 --> 1:42:26.679
<v Speaker 3>with the Baltimore Oriols.

1:42:27.560 --> 1:42:28.559
<v Speaker 1>This is a tough one.

1:42:29.400 --> 1:42:31.360
<v Speaker 2>I really want to see Brown kind of have that

1:42:31.439 --> 1:42:33.960
<v Speaker 2>like statement on backstart, and I feel like we're still

1:42:34.040 --> 1:42:37.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of waiting on that one. This wouldn't be a

1:42:37.080 --> 1:42:40.360
<v Speaker 2>bad time for it to happen. But five walks last time,

1:42:40.840 --> 1:42:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Bradish has look sharper.

1:42:41.960 --> 1:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I'll go OHS.

1:42:43.920 --> 1:42:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Game of the Weekend Dodgers Yankees Sunday Night Baseball, Yoshinobu

1:42:48.080 --> 1:42:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Yamamoto against Cam Schlittler. About as good as it gets.

1:42:52.520 --> 1:42:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Ballpark Powell makes the Dodgers slight favorites at minus one sixteen,

1:42:56.320 --> 1:42:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and it's hard to disagree really with that. I know

1:42:58.760 --> 1:43:01.479
<v Speaker 3>Cam Schlitzler is awesome. The Dodgers lineup is way better

1:43:01.520 --> 1:43:05.320
<v Speaker 3>than the Yankees is, especially right now without Aaron Judge.

1:43:05.760 --> 1:43:07.719
<v Speaker 3>I think Cam Shuler has put up a better season

1:43:07.760 --> 1:43:10.559
<v Speaker 3>than Yamamoto. I think if you were to just grade

1:43:10.600 --> 1:43:13.560
<v Speaker 3>them out on an equal playing field facing equal offenses,

1:43:13.600 --> 1:43:16.240
<v Speaker 3>you would give Cam Schlitzler a slight edge, especially at home.

1:43:16.760 --> 1:43:21.120
<v Speaker 3>But with the Dodgers, they're better bullpen, they're better offense. Again,

1:43:21.160 --> 1:43:22.840
<v Speaker 3>I think the Dodgers kind of take care of business

1:43:22.840 --> 1:43:23.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Yankees this weekend.

1:43:24.080 --> 1:43:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately. Yeah, I tend to agree.

1:43:27.720 --> 1:43:29.360
<v Speaker 2>It's when I said, I think the Yankees get the

1:43:29.360 --> 1:43:31.479
<v Speaker 2>first one and then the Dodgers take the next two.

1:43:31.560 --> 1:43:35.639
<v Speaker 2>I do think Schlitler rises to this one and absolutely shoves.

1:43:35.680 --> 1:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Yankees bullpen gives it up.

1:43:37.600 --> 1:43:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think it's going to be Cam Schlitzler

1:43:39.840 --> 1:43:41.280
<v Speaker 3>as the reason they lose that game.

1:43:41.479 --> 1:43:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think bullpen gives it up.

1:43:42.960 --> 1:43:45.519
<v Speaker 2>But we get a really fun pitcher's tool through the

1:43:45.520 --> 1:43:48.880
<v Speaker 2>first six or maybe seven innings between two of the

1:43:48.880 --> 1:43:49.519
<v Speaker 2>best in the game.

1:43:50.080 --> 1:43:54.559
<v Speaker 3>An our forty five just baseball show. Hopefully everybody enjoyed it.

1:43:54.560 --> 1:43:57.240
<v Speaker 3>The best way to support this YouTube live stream is

1:43:57.280 --> 1:43:59.160
<v Speaker 3>make sure to smash the like button and subscribe button.

1:43:59.200 --> 1:44:01.960
<v Speaker 3>And for all those listening on audio, leaving a five

1:44:02.040 --> 1:44:05.080
<v Speaker 3>star review would be very very appreciated. As we send

1:44:05.120 --> 1:44:07.719
<v Speaker 3>you off into the weekend, we did a weekend preview.

1:44:07.880 --> 1:44:10.000
<v Speaker 3>We went over the Schooble trade report as well as

1:44:10.000 --> 1:44:13.479
<v Speaker 3>one burning question for every American league team and the

1:44:13.560 --> 1:44:16.960
<v Speaker 3>recent trade deadline report the New York Mets. An absolutely

1:44:17.000 --> 1:44:20.160
<v Speaker 3>loaded show, we'd really appreciate your support, and if you

1:44:20.160 --> 1:44:22.360
<v Speaker 3>want to dive into even more baseball stuff with us

1:44:22.439 --> 1:44:24.879
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend and leading up to the deadline and beyond,

1:44:25.439 --> 1:44:27.280
<v Speaker 3>join the best baseball group chat in the world. You

1:44:27.280 --> 1:44:30.320
<v Speaker 3>can find the link to our discord in the episode description.

1:44:30.520 --> 1:44:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Or get yourself some just Baseball merch. I'm rocking the hat,

1:44:33.240 --> 1:44:36.920
<v Speaker 3>arms rocking the long sleeve tea. Make sure to go

1:44:36.960 --> 1:44:38.800
<v Speaker 3>get yours again. You can find the link in the

1:44:38.800 --> 1:44:42.400
<v Speaker 3>episode description. Special shout out to Podcast P for brilliant producing.

1:44:42.439 --> 1:44:46.519
<v Speaker 3>Once again for arm Laighton, I'm Peter Apple. Hopefully everybody

1:44:46.520 --> 1:44:49.840
<v Speaker 3>has a great weekend. Last special shout out Happy birthday brother.

1:44:50.280 --> 1:44:53.080
<v Speaker 3>We will see you on Sunday night for the weekend

1:44:53.640 --> 1:44:56.200
<v Speaker 3>round up and until then, with that thank you.

1:45:01.560 --> 1:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>A fact