1 00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:03,519 Speaker 1: When we initially released Ken Middleton's episode in March twenty 2 00:00:03,560 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: twenty two, we were hoping that Jackson County District Attorney 3 00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: Jean Peters Baker would be moved to action. But it 4 00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:13,040 Speaker 1: turns out it looks like Ken's son, Cliff Middleton, has 5 00:00:13,119 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 1: exposed another conflict of interest for the Jackson County Prosecutor's office, 6 00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:21,079 Speaker 1: and this one comes with a constitutional violation. When the 7 00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:24,239 Speaker 1: trial prosecutor struck a bond agreement with the court for 8 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:27,440 Speaker 1: mister Middleton, there was a stipulation that he would not 9 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:31,600 Speaker 1: have access to his assets. This was a clear violation 10 00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:35,239 Speaker 1: of his Sixth Amendment rights, as affirmed in twenty sixteen 11 00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:38,440 Speaker 1: by the Supreme Court, who decided in Louis versus United 12 00:00:38,479 --> 00:00:42,120 Speaker 1: States that the Sixth Amendment prohibits the pre trial restraint 13 00:00:42,159 --> 00:00:45,080 Speaker 1: of assets needed to retain a defendant's council of choice 14 00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:47,920 Speaker 1: when those assets have not been used in conjunction with 15 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:52,479 Speaker 1: criminal activity. Mister Middleton is hoping that the Court agrees 16 00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:55,480 Speaker 1: that the actions of the Jackson County Prosecutor's office to 17 00:00:55,560 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 1: do just that to mister Middleton pre trial represented a 18 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:02,200 Speaker 1: conflict of interest that will disqualify that office and result 19 00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:05,759 Speaker 1: in the appointment of a special prosecutor. A prosecutor who's 20 00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:09,200 Speaker 1: free of this conflict, among others, would be able to 21 00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:13,000 Speaker 1: apply the newly enacted SB fifty three in order to 22 00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 1: grant mister Middleton a new trial on his ineffective assistance 23 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:22,880 Speaker 1: of counsel, constitutional violations and actual innocence claims. Canon Kathy 24 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:25,560 Speaker 1: Middleton had properties in Blue Springs, Missouri, as well as 25 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:28,319 Speaker 1: Ken's family land back in Arkansas, where they hoped to 26 00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:31,960 Speaker 1: one day retire. On February twelfth, nineteen ninety, when he 27 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:33,840 Speaker 1: planned to clean a gun that he had brought back 28 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 1: from Arkansas, Ken felt Hill, laid the gun down and 29 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:40,399 Speaker 1: took a nap. Meanwhile, Kathy returned early from work to 30 00:01:40,440 --> 00:01:43,320 Speaker 1: confront Ken about news of a regretful affair that had 31 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:46,520 Speaker 1: ended three years earlier. After grabbing the gun from where 32 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 1: Ken had laid it down, Kathy made her way to 33 00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 1: the phone to call the alleged mistress. When tragedy struck. 34 00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:55,440 Speaker 1: It is believed that it destroyed. Kathy mishandled the weapon 35 00:01:55,440 --> 00:01:57,800 Speaker 1: in her left hand and shot herself in the head. 36 00:01:58,160 --> 00:02:01,080 Speaker 1: Ken immediately called nine to one one when first responders 37 00:02:01,120 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 1: found him without a drop of blood or gunshot residue 38 00:02:03,880 --> 00:02:07,520 Speaker 1: on him. A positive gunshot residue test of Kathy's left 39 00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:11,240 Speaker 1: hand would have conclusively ruled her death as a tragic accident. However, 40 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:14,440 Speaker 1: her left hand test results went missing and the crime 41 00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:17,480 Speaker 1: lab document was altered in what clearly appears to be 42 00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 1: evidence tampering, where a medical examiner and blood spatter expert 43 00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 1: willing to testify to an impossible scenario in which Ken 44 00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:27,280 Speaker 1: was magically able to shoot Kathy from less than a 45 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:31,080 Speaker 1: foot away while remaining free of blood and GSR. Ken 46 00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:34,400 Speaker 1: was sentenced to life plus two hundred years. Despite the 47 00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 1: mishandling of the crime scene, ballistics testing was still able 48 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:40,960 Speaker 1: to prove Ken's innocence. His conviction was overturned in two 49 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 1: thousand and four, but a jurisdictional technicality has held him 50 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:48,639 Speaker 1: in legal limbo ever since. Keneda's son, Cliff Middleton, join 51 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:51,560 Speaker 1: us to ask, how is it that, even though a 52 00:02:51,639 --> 00:02:56,440 Speaker 1: new statute remedies that technicality, the current prosecutor, Jean Peters Baker, 53 00:02:56,560 --> 00:03:13,080 Speaker 1: refuses to act. This is wrongful conviction. Welcome back to 54 00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:15,920 Speaker 1: Ronful Conviction. I'm your host, Jason Fom. You know each 55 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:18,639 Speaker 1: week I have a pretty good idea of how I'm 56 00:03:18,639 --> 00:03:20,799 Speaker 1: going to start the show. You know, usually there's one 57 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:24,680 Speaker 1: main focus, one main problem that we can talk about 58 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:28,800 Speaker 1: in any particular case. But this time, I don't even 59 00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:32,400 Speaker 1: know where to start. When our friend Larry Garrison, who's 60 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 1: actually known as the Newsbreaker, okay for his years of 61 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 1: investigative reporting and his work through Silver Creek Entertainment, when 62 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,960 Speaker 1: he first told me and us here at Ronful Conviction 63 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 1: about the case of Ken Middleton, he had lived up 64 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:48,320 Speaker 1: to his nickname once again, I mean the Newsbreaker. So 65 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 1: I'll start by saying that Ken Middleton has been in 66 00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 1: prison for over thirty years for being present during what 67 00:03:54,440 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: they may well have known all along was just a 68 00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 1: tragic accident. And there are so many problems in this 69 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:01,480 Speaker 1: case that we could literally pick on any one of 70 00:04:01,480 --> 00:04:03,840 Speaker 1: them and make an entire episode of the show just 71 00:04:03,920 --> 00:04:08,000 Speaker 1: about that. I'm talking about ineffective assistance of counsel, false 72 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 1: expert testimony, evidence tampering, incompetent investigator's official corruption, conflicts of interest, 73 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:18,880 Speaker 1: Ken refusing freedom through an Alfred plea right, something that 74 00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:21,680 Speaker 1: you never catch a guilty person doing, and that's something 75 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:25,960 Speaker 1: that happened seventeen years ago, almost eighteen now, plus there's 76 00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:29,520 Speaker 1: this insane jurisdictional technicality that has kept this innocent man 77 00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:32,160 Speaker 1: in prison long past the time that I believe everyone 78 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:35,240 Speaker 1: knows that he should have ever been in there. So 79 00:04:36,200 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 1: without further ado, at seventy seven years old, Ken is 80 00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:43,560 Speaker 1: calling in from inside the prison walls in Missouri. Ken, 81 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:47,240 Speaker 1: I'm so sorry you're here because of the reason why 82 00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:49,920 Speaker 1: you're here, but I'm very honored to have you on 83 00:04:49,960 --> 00:04:50,359 Speaker 1: the show. 84 00:04:50,640 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 2: Thank you appreciate it. 85 00:04:52,839 --> 00:04:58,280 Speaker 1: And with Ken is his son and probably most passionate advocate, 86 00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 1: Cliff Middleton. Thanks for joining us. 87 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:03,560 Speaker 3: Thank you so much for having me on. Jason, I 88 00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:04,920 Speaker 3: really really appreciate it. 89 00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:06,880 Speaker 1: And I know how hard this is going to be. 90 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:09,240 Speaker 1: I mean, like any other son, you love your dad 91 00:05:09,279 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 1: and you just want this thing to end. Okay, let's 92 00:05:12,800 --> 00:05:16,280 Speaker 1: go back in time and I'm gonna turn to you. Ken. 93 00:05:16,440 --> 00:05:20,480 Speaker 1: This is early nineteen ninety in Blue Springs, Missouri, and 94 00:05:20,720 --> 00:05:23,200 Speaker 1: you're there with your wife Kathy. So tell us what 95 00:05:23,240 --> 00:05:26,160 Speaker 1: was happening in your life? What were things like before 96 00:05:26,279 --> 00:05:27,080 Speaker 1: all this happened. 97 00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:30,560 Speaker 2: It was great. We had a great marriage for over 98 00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:34,520 Speaker 2: sixteen years, had a farm in Arkansas, two different farms. 99 00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:37,599 Speaker 2: I had three hundred and fifty two acres of the land. 100 00:05:37,760 --> 00:05:40,640 Speaker 2: I had drove a truck for over twenty years, and 101 00:05:40,839 --> 00:05:43,720 Speaker 2: I'd injured my back and I wasn't working right then, 102 00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:46,800 Speaker 2: so I was going to the farm and doing projects, 103 00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:50,000 Speaker 2: working on the house and watching nice of the cattle 104 00:05:50,040 --> 00:05:53,039 Speaker 2: and stuff like that. Kathy worked today at and T 105 00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:57,160 Speaker 2: for twenty eight years, and two years you'd have her 106 00:05:57,240 --> 00:06:00,160 Speaker 2: time in Horse you could retire regardless of age. And 107 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:03,360 Speaker 2: that's what was waiting on, and was moving back to 108 00:06:03,360 --> 00:06:04,400 Speaker 2: Tarkansas for good. 109 00:06:04,960 --> 00:06:08,640 Speaker 1: And let's get into how this came to pass. So 110 00:06:08,760 --> 00:06:11,480 Speaker 1: let's go back to February twelfth, nineteen ninety and just 111 00:06:11,640 --> 00:06:14,279 Speaker 1: to set the stage here, you had been at your 112 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 1: place in Arkansas and you brought a handgun that you 113 00:06:18,839 --> 00:06:22,120 Speaker 1: owned back to Missouri with you. But meanwhile you had 114 00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:25,560 Speaker 1: been feeling sick, but no one knew at the time, 115 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:28,480 Speaker 1: not you or anybody, that you were really seriously ill 116 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:30,400 Speaker 1: at this point, Is that right, right? 117 00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:34,120 Speaker 2: And I was sick for left Arkansas, and when I 118 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:38,080 Speaker 2: got back Sunday afternoon, I didn't sleep much all night. 119 00:06:38,440 --> 00:06:41,120 Speaker 2: So the next morning, Kathy had went to work at 120 00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:44,480 Speaker 2: at and T and I unloaded the rest of my 121 00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 2: truck and brought the gun in the house. It had 122 00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:51,479 Speaker 2: been in Arkansas since i'd went to Colorado Elcott in 123 00:06:51,480 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 2: the fall before, and there's a big snow and rain 124 00:06:54,720 --> 00:06:57,479 Speaker 2: and stuff in Colorado and it got wet. So I 125 00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 2: picked it up and brought it back to Missouri. I 126 00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:02,719 Speaker 2: was aiming to clean it. And when I got it 127 00:07:02,760 --> 00:07:05,000 Speaker 2: out of the truck, I went in the house and 128 00:07:05,120 --> 00:07:08,279 Speaker 2: sat down. I called Kathy at work, and she asked 129 00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:11,160 Speaker 2: me how I was feeling. I said about the same. 130 00:07:11,240 --> 00:07:14,400 Speaker 2: I wasn't feeling good, and I sat in a recliner 131 00:07:14,440 --> 00:07:16,920 Speaker 2: and I went to sleep. And I'd never cleaned the gun. 132 00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:21,400 Speaker 2: So the next thing I knew is she was already home, 133 00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:24,320 Speaker 2: and she'd picked up the gun out of the towel 134 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:26,600 Speaker 2: that I had had the gun laying on, and she 135 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:30,520 Speaker 2: was upset that somebody had told her that I was 136 00:07:30,560 --> 00:07:34,480 Speaker 2: having an affair with a woman, which was true, but 137 00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:37,880 Speaker 2: it had been over for three years, and she walked 138 00:07:37,880 --> 00:07:40,720 Speaker 2: over to the phone in the dining room to call 139 00:07:40,760 --> 00:07:44,240 Speaker 2: the woman. So I got up and was dizzy, and 140 00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:47,080 Speaker 2: next thing I know, the tragedy had happened. 141 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 1: And the tragedy that had happened is the matter of 142 00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:54,160 Speaker 1: this dispute between the Middletons and the State. Now, Ken 143 00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:56,840 Speaker 1: maintained his innocence in the matter, that this was a 144 00:07:56,880 --> 00:08:00,520 Speaker 1: tragic accident at which Kathy visibly upset about the news 145 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:02,840 Speaker 1: of this affair, and on her way to the phone 146 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 1: to confront your alleged mistress, Kathy was holding the gun 147 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:10,960 Speaker 1: in her left hand and accidentally shot herself on the 148 00:08:11,080 --> 00:08:14,600 Speaker 1: left side of her forehead, splattering blood all over the wall. 149 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 1: This version of events is supported by the ballistics and 150 00:08:18,840 --> 00:08:21,200 Speaker 1: all the other physical evidence. And then there's what the 151 00:08:21,240 --> 00:08:23,960 Speaker 1: state wants everyone to believe. Right, bear with me, because 152 00:08:24,000 --> 00:08:27,040 Speaker 1: this is nuts. That Ken had somehow held Kathy up 153 00:08:27,040 --> 00:08:30,520 Speaker 1: against the wall and shot her in the face, but 154 00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:36,120 Speaker 1: somehow miraculously was able to be completely clear of blood 155 00:08:36,160 --> 00:08:39,679 Speaker 1: spatter or gunshot residue, not a trace on him. And 156 00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:42,199 Speaker 1: we'll get into all of that a bit later. So 157 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:46,839 Speaker 1: back to this terrible tragedy. A gunshot rang out and 158 00:08:47,360 --> 00:08:49,880 Speaker 1: Kathy was on the floor in a pool of blood. 159 00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:52,040 Speaker 1: What a nightmare, Ken, What happened next? 160 00:08:52,679 --> 00:08:55,040 Speaker 2: I'd seen her on the floor and grabbed a gun 161 00:08:55,080 --> 00:08:57,839 Speaker 2: and put it on the table and call nine one 162 00:08:57,920 --> 00:09:01,760 Speaker 2: one immediately. I asked for the paramedics, and I'd called 163 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 2: him three times within a short period of time wanted 164 00:09:04,920 --> 00:09:07,600 Speaker 2: to know who the paramedics was. And the third time, 165 00:09:08,160 --> 00:09:12,679 Speaker 2: the operator told me to go outside, that the paramedics 166 00:09:12,720 --> 00:09:15,959 Speaker 2: were there. And I looked out, and I told her 167 00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:18,280 Speaker 2: that I'd looked out and there wasn't nobody out there, 168 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:21,080 Speaker 2: and she convinced me to go outside that they were there. 169 00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:24,120 Speaker 2: So I went out and the first thing I've seen 170 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:27,440 Speaker 2: was a copp hole behind the walls, screaming at me 171 00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:30,680 Speaker 2: to get my hands in the air and turn around 172 00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:34,040 Speaker 2: with my back to him at his gun pointed at me, 173 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:37,120 Speaker 2: and I'd done as he said, and he'd come up 174 00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:40,480 Speaker 2: behind me and search me. I wanted to know where 175 00:09:40,520 --> 00:09:44,360 Speaker 2: the paramedics were, and he ordered me back in the house, 176 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:47,480 Speaker 2: and we went back in the house and he went 177 00:09:47,480 --> 00:09:51,000 Speaker 2: in and checked on my wife, and I was just hysterical, 178 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:53,640 Speaker 2: and I guess I was down on my knees and 179 00:09:53,800 --> 00:09:56,880 Speaker 2: he jerked me up, and when he'd done that fast, 180 00:09:56,960 --> 00:10:00,640 Speaker 2: I become dizzy, real dizzy. Oh No, I was ain't 181 00:10:00,640 --> 00:10:03,920 Speaker 2: a blackout, So I said it was amb six and 182 00:10:03,960 --> 00:10:06,360 Speaker 2: I went down the hall to the bathroom and I 183 00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:09,079 Speaker 2: went in and spliced water on my face, and then 184 00:10:09,120 --> 00:10:11,600 Speaker 2: he took me outside and I had a real bad 185 00:10:11,679 --> 00:10:13,959 Speaker 2: hurting in my left arm and chased. 186 00:10:14,679 --> 00:10:18,280 Speaker 1: Now, when the paramedics arrived, they determined Ken, that you 187 00:10:18,320 --> 00:10:21,640 Speaker 1: had been hyperventilating, complaining of chess plains and blood pressure 188 00:10:21,679 --> 00:10:25,120 Speaker 1: was going crazy, and they convinced you to go to 189 00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:26,720 Speaker 1: the hospital for an examination. 190 00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:29,720 Speaker 2: They taught me to go into the hospital, and they 191 00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,480 Speaker 2: took me to three medical hospitals, and then on the 192 00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:35,280 Speaker 2: third one, I was forced in a mental hospital till 193 00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:35,960 Speaker 2: the next day. 194 00:10:36,440 --> 00:10:38,800 Speaker 1: They later tried to say that you had checked into 195 00:10:38,840 --> 00:10:41,280 Speaker 1: that mental hospital to try to get away with murder 196 00:10:41,320 --> 00:10:43,920 Speaker 1: claim by claiming insanity defense. But we're getting ahead of 197 00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:47,160 Speaker 1: ourselves here, and let's not leave out the fact that 198 00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:49,280 Speaker 1: your dad was in and out of consciousness on his 199 00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:51,839 Speaker 1: way to the hospital. And they took an EKG at 200 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:53,959 Speaker 1: the hospital and it showed that Ken, that you had 201 00:10:53,960 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 1: recently suffered from a heart attack. Now here's another thing 202 00:10:57,720 --> 00:11:03,640 Speaker 1: that I have trouble understanding processing. The officers didn't write 203 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:08,719 Speaker 1: their statements until days later, and they did it by memory, right, 204 00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:11,000 Speaker 1: And these statements that were taken from a hysterical man 205 00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:13,160 Speaker 1: who had to be rushed to the hospital talking about you, 206 00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:15,120 Speaker 1: of course, Ken, who was just trying to help figure 207 00:11:15,120 --> 00:11:18,840 Speaker 1: out what happened, so the officers didn't bother to write 208 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:19,440 Speaker 1: it down. 209 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:23,960 Speaker 3: There were a couple police reports that were handwritten out 210 00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:29,359 Speaker 3: that day, but the official reports that I have reviewed 211 00:11:29,960 --> 00:11:34,760 Speaker 3: were written on I believe it was February twenty first, 212 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:37,000 Speaker 3: and Kathy died on the twelve. 213 00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:41,720 Speaker 1: Now, in researching this case, I saw in the police 214 00:11:41,760 --> 00:11:44,800 Speaker 1: reports where they kept on documenting instances in which Ken 215 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:47,760 Speaker 1: allegedly had done something with his hands, like he mentioned 216 00:11:48,320 --> 00:11:51,600 Speaker 1: splashing water on its face, right. They wrote down another 217 00:11:51,640 --> 00:11:55,160 Speaker 1: instance where they said he wiped his hands on a door, 218 00:11:55,280 --> 00:11:59,400 Speaker 1: touched dirt in a potted plant, and the implication is 219 00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:04,239 Speaker 1: that Ken was trying to somehow wash away the gunshot residue. 220 00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 3: There's a picture the Independence News Examiner paper took of 221 00:12:08,920 --> 00:12:13,280 Speaker 3: my father out there on the front stoop, leaning over 222 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:19,640 Speaker 3: that powder plant, sobbing, and the two paramedics are consoling him. 223 00:12:20,040 --> 00:12:24,160 Speaker 3: It's very obvious that he was in a state of 224 00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:28,480 Speaker 3: shock in hysteria. First of all, you already claimed he 225 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:31,560 Speaker 3: was washing his hands when he splashed water on his face. 226 00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 3: It's crazy to think that somebody's trying to wash their 227 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:37,880 Speaker 3: hands in the dirt. Unless you've been involved in something 228 00:12:37,960 --> 00:12:40,840 Speaker 3: like this, how would you even know what a gunshot 229 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:45,480 Speaker 3: residue test is, especially in nineteen ninety Jayson, maybe today 230 00:12:45,559 --> 00:12:48,720 Speaker 3: with crime shows and things, but he didn't know what 231 00:12:48,800 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 3: they were testing him for. 232 00:12:50,920 --> 00:12:53,720 Speaker 2: They took my shirt, under shirt and clothes and shoes 233 00:12:53,760 --> 00:12:57,080 Speaker 2: and all, and they did this and then come back negative. 234 00:12:57,200 --> 00:13:00,240 Speaker 2: No blood or nothing on my lone sleeve shirt. And 235 00:13:00,280 --> 00:13:02,720 Speaker 2: that picture in the front high of a house when 236 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:05,520 Speaker 2: I was over the stuke shows the long sleeve shirt 237 00:13:05,640 --> 00:13:09,640 Speaker 2: down to my risk, there was no blood, no gunshots. 238 00:13:09,880 --> 00:13:12,760 Speaker 1: Right, and as the evidence clearly shows, she was shot 239 00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:15,800 Speaker 1: from very close range, less than a foot away, and 240 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:18,760 Speaker 1: there's no way you can do that without being covered 241 00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:23,199 Speaker 1: in blood and gunshot residue. But you weren't because you 242 00:13:23,240 --> 00:13:27,559 Speaker 1: didn't kill her. And Kathy's gunshot residue tests would likely 243 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:30,480 Speaker 1: have corroborated Ken's version of events and shown that this 244 00:13:30,640 --> 00:13:34,480 Speaker 1: was a tragic accident, not a homicide. Cliff, can you 245 00:13:34,559 --> 00:13:36,079 Speaker 1: explain what I mean by that. 246 00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:41,680 Speaker 3: They swabbed both of her hands, that they four gunshot residue, 247 00:13:42,160 --> 00:13:46,480 Speaker 3: and the prime document that they fill out shows that 248 00:13:46,920 --> 00:13:50,920 Speaker 3: they swabbed both hands, right and left hands, and it 249 00:13:50,960 --> 00:13:54,480 Speaker 3: shows they used two different kids to do that, one 250 00:13:54,520 --> 00:13:57,240 Speaker 3: for the right hand and one for the left hand. Well, 251 00:13:57,280 --> 00:14:01,360 Speaker 3: the next day when the corner did the autas, the 252 00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:04,880 Speaker 3: corner ruled it a homicide based on what the police 253 00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:11,000 Speaker 3: were telling him unless other information come forward to prove otherwise. 254 00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:17,200 Speaker 3: Now that gunshot residue was important information, and took them 255 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:22,120 Speaker 3: nine days to turn the gunshot residue samples into the 256 00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:25,960 Speaker 3: crime lab. And when they turned them into the crime lab, 257 00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:31,840 Speaker 3: the document was altered to show only one kit and 258 00:14:32,160 --> 00:14:35,360 Speaker 3: the left hand was wided out to show they only 259 00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:39,440 Speaker 3: tested the right hand when she was shot from eight 260 00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:42,160 Speaker 3: to twelve inches away on the left side of her head. 261 00:14:42,560 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 1: You really have to see this to believe it. And 262 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:47,520 Speaker 1: we're going to link pictures of this in our episode Child, 263 00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:51,560 Speaker 1: because I'm looking at it right now and I still 264 00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:56,280 Speaker 1: can't believe that I'm actually looking at what I'm looking at. Okay, So, 265 00:14:56,400 --> 00:14:59,960 Speaker 1: the test of Kathy's left hand, the one in which 266 00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:02,720 Speaker 1: she would have held the gun in order to shoot herself, 267 00:15:02,920 --> 00:15:08,360 Speaker 1: the test of that hand disappeared or it wasn't tested 268 00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:13,520 Speaker 1: on purpose. There's only two possibilities. The crime lab document 269 00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 1: that should have been for both of her hands was 270 00:15:17,120 --> 00:15:21,960 Speaker 1: altered with whiteout. Okay, remember white out, it's unreal. This 271 00:15:22,080 --> 00:15:25,320 Speaker 1: is like to show that only her right hand had 272 00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:28,800 Speaker 1: been tested. And this is reinforced when you compare it 273 00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:31,840 Speaker 1: with the GSR test document for Ken in the same 274 00:15:31,880 --> 00:15:36,120 Speaker 1: handwriting okay, get ready for this, it states quote number 275 00:15:36,200 --> 00:15:40,960 Speaker 1: of articles two GSR test kits for right and left hands. 276 00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:45,240 Speaker 1: End quote. But then on Kathy's GSR test document, in 277 00:15:45,320 --> 00:15:49,840 Speaker 1: the same exact handwriting, it says, quote number of articles 278 00:15:50,640 --> 00:15:54,640 Speaker 1: and whatever was there is white it out, right, just 279 00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:58,640 Speaker 1: white it out, and the number one is in its place. 280 00:15:59,040 --> 00:16:02,240 Speaker 1: And then it reads quote gunshot residue for right and 281 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:07,520 Speaker 1: quote followed by another gob of whiteout and the word hand. 282 00:16:07,720 --> 00:16:10,920 Speaker 1: So in all likelihood the white out is simply covering 283 00:16:10,960 --> 00:16:13,880 Speaker 1: the words and left, as it would have been in 284 00:16:13,960 --> 00:16:17,320 Speaker 1: a request for testing of both right and left hands, 285 00:16:17,920 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 1: where now only one test for her right hand exists 286 00:16:22,280 --> 00:16:26,600 Speaker 1: and the one that really matters the left hand is missing. 287 00:16:27,400 --> 00:16:30,520 Speaker 2: Later on, after us convicted years later, we took their 288 00:16:30,520 --> 00:16:34,920 Speaker 2: deposition and Jeff Rogers that wrote the report out he 289 00:16:35,080 --> 00:16:37,280 Speaker 2: swore that he didn't put the white out on that 290 00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:41,080 Speaker 2: because his on green paper, and he said that he 291 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:43,600 Speaker 2: wouldn't have whited it out. He'd just filled out a 292 00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:46,440 Speaker 2: new report and we got Dave Link, the one that 293 00:16:46,560 --> 00:16:49,800 Speaker 2: took it to the lab. Nine days later, he swore 294 00:16:49,880 --> 00:16:52,600 Speaker 2: up and down that he didn't do it. And he 295 00:16:52,800 --> 00:16:56,440 Speaker 2: was asked, did he always take both hands of a 296 00:16:56,480 --> 00:17:01,840 Speaker 2: close gunshot residue test? He said yeah, My attorney asking 297 00:17:01,920 --> 00:17:05,680 Speaker 2: years later in ninety seven, always, and he said absolutely. 298 00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:09,680 Speaker 1: They whited out the left hand, and they whited out 299 00:17:09,840 --> 00:17:13,560 Speaker 1: the number of articles. I mean, somebody literally just took 300 00:17:13,760 --> 00:17:14,400 Speaker 1: white out. 301 00:17:14,920 --> 00:17:17,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, the left hand. If it would have come back positive, 302 00:17:18,200 --> 00:17:22,959 Speaker 3: it would have been powerful evidence that she accidentally fired 303 00:17:22,960 --> 00:17:26,959 Speaker 3: the gun herself. Our attorney told us that if that 304 00:17:27,080 --> 00:17:30,040 Speaker 3: left hand come back positive, the coroner would have changed 305 00:17:30,040 --> 00:17:33,399 Speaker 3: his findings and they wouldn't have had a case against 306 00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:36,040 Speaker 3: my father. It all would have ended right there. 307 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:52,520 Speaker 1: This episode is underwritten by AIG, a leading global insurance company. 308 00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:56,320 Speaker 1: AIG is committed to corporate social responsibility and is making 309 00:17:56,359 --> 00:17:59,159 Speaker 1: a positive difference in the lives of its employees and 310 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:01,880 Speaker 1: in the communities where we work and live. In light 311 00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:04,719 Speaker 1: of the compelling need for pro bono legal assistance, and 312 00:18:04,760 --> 00:18:08,600 Speaker 1: in recognition of AIG's commitment to criminal and social justice reform. 313 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:12,840 Speaker 1: The AIG Pro Bono program provides free legal services and 314 00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:23,000 Speaker 1: other support to underrepresented communities and individuals. Now, this is 315 00:18:23,040 --> 00:18:26,320 Speaker 1: a small town police department. My understanding is there hadn't 316 00:18:26,320 --> 00:18:30,399 Speaker 1: been a homicide investigation in almost a decade. These people 317 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:33,840 Speaker 1: were not up to the task, and they started making 318 00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:36,160 Speaker 1: mistakes more or less as soon as they walked into 319 00:18:36,200 --> 00:18:36,639 Speaker 1: the house. 320 00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:39,520 Speaker 3: Yes, yes, And like so many other cases, I believe 321 00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:44,199 Speaker 3: the police immediately focused on my father and had tunnel 322 00:18:44,280 --> 00:18:49,400 Speaker 3: vision as they began to investigate this case. I'll start 323 00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:53,719 Speaker 3: with the fact that they took photos that day of 324 00:18:53,840 --> 00:18:59,600 Speaker 3: the alleged crime scene, and the photos allegedly did not 325 00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:06,280 Speaker 3: come out, And after Kathy's body was removed, they went 326 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:10,760 Speaker 3: back and restaged the crime scene and took new photos. 327 00:19:11,320 --> 00:19:14,080 Speaker 3: By the time they'd done this, my stepmother had already 328 00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:17,920 Speaker 3: been taken out of the house, and the fire department 329 00:19:17,960 --> 00:19:21,240 Speaker 3: had actually been called in to cut sheet rock out 330 00:19:21,240 --> 00:19:24,720 Speaker 3: of the wall with blood spatter and things, And so 331 00:19:24,880 --> 00:19:28,400 Speaker 3: the new pictures they took the sheet rock was already 332 00:19:28,440 --> 00:19:32,920 Speaker 3: cut out, and they had drawn a diagram of the 333 00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:37,879 Speaker 3: dining room where this happened, and the diagram didn't match 334 00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:41,840 Speaker 3: the pictures. They had moved the dining room table all 335 00:19:41,840 --> 00:19:45,120 Speaker 3: the way up against the wall to make it appear 336 00:19:45,200 --> 00:19:50,040 Speaker 3: that there was a bigger area there when she was shot. 337 00:19:49,640 --> 00:19:52,760 Speaker 1: Right to make room for this alleged struggle that never 338 00:19:52,840 --> 00:19:55,400 Speaker 1: even happened. When she went to use the phone. 339 00:19:55,680 --> 00:19:58,440 Speaker 3: In every picture they took of this small dining room, 340 00:19:58,760 --> 00:20:02,119 Speaker 3: they missed that phone Jason by a quarter of an inch. 341 00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:07,159 Speaker 3: Another mistake that was made that day at the crime scene. 342 00:20:07,160 --> 00:20:13,159 Speaker 3: According to the police reports, they unclothed my stepmother naked 343 00:20:13,640 --> 00:20:17,680 Speaker 3: right there on the dining room floor and folded her 344 00:20:17,720 --> 00:20:21,119 Speaker 3: clothes up and put them in bags and transported her 345 00:20:21,640 --> 00:20:26,240 Speaker 3: to the morgue naked for them to unclothe her and 346 00:20:26,440 --> 00:20:30,600 Speaker 3: alter any evidence that could have been gathered from that. Now, 347 00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:35,359 Speaker 3: that goes against every protocol of any police department anywhere. 348 00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 2: Best I remember, the medical examiner said she'd come in 349 00:20:39,080 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 2: fully clothing, So what they actually done was recloser the 350 00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:46,440 Speaker 2: poor the medical examiner examiner. 351 00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:50,920 Speaker 3: That's exactly right. What the medical examiner reported didn't match 352 00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:54,920 Speaker 3: the police reports. They unclothed her and at some point 353 00:20:55,240 --> 00:20:56,600 Speaker 3: reclothed her. 354 00:20:56,640 --> 00:21:00,520 Speaker 1: So they mishandled the scene, and the evidence altered or disappeared, 355 00:21:00,600 --> 00:21:03,520 Speaker 1: the key gunshot resident test of Kathy's left hand, And 356 00:21:03,560 --> 00:21:07,320 Speaker 1: then they arrested you, and eventually you got out on bond, 357 00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:09,320 Speaker 1: and even that was kind of odd. 358 00:21:09,600 --> 00:21:14,280 Speaker 2: Right, Prosecutor Peters agreed to ten thousand and he put 359 00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 2: a restriction on my bond that says not to dispose 360 00:21:19,160 --> 00:21:23,280 Speaker 2: of any martal or jointly held property without the permission 361 00:21:23,320 --> 00:21:26,199 Speaker 2: of the prosecute attorney in the probate court. 362 00:21:26,440 --> 00:21:29,199 Speaker 3: You got the State of Missouri coming after you with 363 00:21:29,400 --> 00:21:34,480 Speaker 3: unlimited resources, and your life and liberty is on the line. 364 00:21:34,640 --> 00:21:38,399 Speaker 3: My dad should have had access to every dime he 365 00:21:38,760 --> 00:21:40,399 Speaker 3: had to save his life. 366 00:21:40,640 --> 00:21:43,160 Speaker 1: Right, And this also gets us to a crazy part 367 00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:47,080 Speaker 1: of this whole story. So while you're facing Prosecutor Patrick 368 00:21:47,160 --> 00:21:50,359 Speaker 1: Peters in this criminal trial against you, there's also a 369 00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:54,680 Speaker 1: wrongful death civil suit filed against you by Kathy's sisters. 370 00:21:54,880 --> 00:22:02,359 Speaker 1: And get this, Prosecutor Peters's father is part of the 371 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:08,040 Speaker 1: law firm behind that civil suit, so stands to benefit 372 00:22:08,560 --> 00:22:11,439 Speaker 1: from the outcome. And of course you didn't even know 373 00:22:11,480 --> 00:22:12,200 Speaker 1: that at the time. 374 00:22:12,640 --> 00:22:15,159 Speaker 2: They had concealed it and they had said that he 375 00:22:15,600 --> 00:22:19,000 Speaker 2: convinced them and he would convict me, and the law 376 00:22:19,040 --> 00:22:21,080 Speaker 2: firm would help keep me in prison. 377 00:22:21,600 --> 00:22:25,240 Speaker 3: I'd like to point out that the Blue Springs Police 378 00:22:25,280 --> 00:22:30,000 Speaker 3: Department city attorney for Blue Springs was also in the 379 00:22:30,040 --> 00:22:33,880 Speaker 3: same law firm as the prosecutor's father, So you had 380 00:22:33,920 --> 00:22:37,840 Speaker 3: a triangle of a conflict of interest here that was 381 00:22:38,080 --> 00:22:39,560 Speaker 3: hidden from everyone. 382 00:22:39,920 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 1: Every time we do an episode, I always think I've 383 00:22:41,800 --> 00:22:43,760 Speaker 1: heard it all, I could say, even after doing two 384 00:22:43,840 --> 00:22:46,880 Speaker 1: hundred and fifty episodes of this show, I've never heard 385 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:51,879 Speaker 1: of that the prosecutor refers the family of the woman 386 00:22:51,920 --> 00:22:57,760 Speaker 1: who died to his own father's law firm. Now everybody's compromised, right, 387 00:22:57,920 --> 00:23:00,880 Speaker 1: because now there's a whole nother for them to want 388 00:23:00,920 --> 00:23:03,959 Speaker 1: to convict you of this crime so that everybody can 389 00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:04,600 Speaker 1: make money. 390 00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:08,480 Speaker 3: And they ultimately got a one point three five million 391 00:23:08,600 --> 00:23:12,080 Speaker 3: dollar default wrongful debt judgment against my father. 392 00:23:12,600 --> 00:23:16,919 Speaker 1: So now there's been this litany of errors, misconduct, malfeasans 393 00:23:17,840 --> 00:23:20,399 Speaker 1: straight up insanity. I'm going to call it what it is, 394 00:23:20,440 --> 00:23:24,080 Speaker 1: it's insanity. And now finally it's time for the trial. 395 00:23:24,920 --> 00:23:28,520 Speaker 1: It's February nineteen ninety one, a year after the incident. 396 00:23:28,880 --> 00:23:32,520 Speaker 3: Basically the cross of the state's case against my dad 397 00:23:32,760 --> 00:23:35,679 Speaker 3: was that he held her up against the wall and 398 00:23:35,840 --> 00:23:38,320 Speaker 3: shot her from a foot away from her face. 399 00:23:38,800 --> 00:23:42,560 Speaker 2: The prosecutor put on his so called experts saying that 400 00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:46,439 Speaker 2: she was two inches away from the wall, and that 401 00:23:46,520 --> 00:23:49,520 Speaker 2: I had my arm across her chest and held her 402 00:23:49,600 --> 00:23:52,760 Speaker 2: up against the wall and shot her and blood to experts. 403 00:23:52,800 --> 00:23:56,720 Speaker 2: Admitted that he had a week's training, and he's self taught. 404 00:23:56,880 --> 00:24:01,800 Speaker 3: He had taken a forty hour course on blood spatter evidence. 405 00:24:01,880 --> 00:24:04,600 Speaker 3: That's all the training that their expert had. 406 00:24:04,760 --> 00:24:08,040 Speaker 1: These quote unquote experts have a forty hour training course 407 00:24:08,160 --> 00:24:10,400 Speaker 1: that doesn't actually teach you anything except how to act 408 00:24:10,440 --> 00:24:12,800 Speaker 1: like you know what you're talking about in court pretty much, right. 409 00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:15,879 Speaker 2: But he didn't tell that there was no gun shot 410 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:19,280 Speaker 2: residue on my hands or long sleeve shirt, or blood 411 00:24:19,359 --> 00:24:21,639 Speaker 2: or nothing else on my long sleeve shirt. 412 00:24:21,960 --> 00:24:24,760 Speaker 3: And they said he put a bootprint on the wall, 413 00:24:25,200 --> 00:24:29,359 Speaker 3: which was false. It had been there weeks prior, and 414 00:24:29,440 --> 00:24:32,760 Speaker 3: in order for that bootprint to get there, his leg 415 00:24:32,800 --> 00:24:35,159 Speaker 3: would have had to have bent backwards at the knee 416 00:24:35,400 --> 00:24:39,200 Speaker 3: and hyper extended in order to put that bootprint there. 417 00:24:39,560 --> 00:24:42,560 Speaker 1: Right, you have this bootprint that was physically impossible to 418 00:24:42,640 --> 00:24:45,159 Speaker 1: have been made in this scenario. But you know what, 419 00:24:46,240 --> 00:24:50,040 Speaker 1: none of it freaking matters why it could have produced 420 00:24:50,280 --> 00:24:53,520 Speaker 1: any other made up nonsense to try to support their theory. 421 00:24:53,560 --> 00:24:58,000 Speaker 1: But without Ken being covered in blood and GSR, it's 422 00:24:58,119 --> 00:25:02,400 Speaker 1: all pure drivel. Blood in GSR has to be present 423 00:25:02,520 --> 00:25:06,720 Speaker 1: for us to even entertain these bullshit footprints. Not to 424 00:25:06,840 --> 00:25:11,320 Speaker 1: mention the analysis from Bob Tressel, the renowned forensic crime investigator, 425 00:25:11,320 --> 00:25:15,320 Speaker 1: that further clarifies just how bogus the state's theory was. 426 00:25:15,440 --> 00:25:17,480 Speaker 1: We'll get into all of that a bit later, but 427 00:25:17,680 --> 00:25:20,720 Speaker 1: unfortunately Ken didn't benefit from Bob Trestle's testimony or any 428 00:25:20,760 --> 00:25:24,320 Speaker 1: of this being pointed out at the original trial. Ken's attorney, 429 00:25:24,400 --> 00:25:29,320 Speaker 1: Bob Duncan couldn't be bothered to do an investigation, not 430 00:25:29,400 --> 00:25:32,960 Speaker 1: even a thorough examination of the gun. Cliff, what else 431 00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:34,000 Speaker 1: did the state present? 432 00:25:34,400 --> 00:25:38,480 Speaker 3: They also put on evidence that the gun would take 433 00:25:38,600 --> 00:25:41,479 Speaker 3: ten pounds of pressure I believe it was without the hammer, 434 00:25:41,520 --> 00:25:45,440 Speaker 3: pulled three and a half pounds with the hammer pooled. Well, 435 00:25:45,520 --> 00:25:48,159 Speaker 3: the gun needed to be examined in the exact state 436 00:25:48,560 --> 00:25:51,600 Speaker 3: it was found in, and it wasn't. They had dismantled 437 00:25:51,640 --> 00:25:54,679 Speaker 3: it and put it back together before testing it. So 438 00:25:54,760 --> 00:25:57,320 Speaker 3: if there was any problems with the gun. They fixed 439 00:25:57,359 --> 00:26:00,679 Speaker 3: it when they put it back together. Bob Duncan was 440 00:26:00,840 --> 00:26:03,920 Speaker 3: asleep at the wheel, if you will, and had none 441 00:26:03,960 --> 00:26:07,040 Speaker 3: of the physical evidence examined by an expert, and hadn't 442 00:26:07,080 --> 00:26:11,560 Speaker 3: interviewed any witnesses. He was totally unprepared for the case 443 00:26:11,600 --> 00:26:12,719 Speaker 3: to even go to trial. 444 00:26:12,920 --> 00:26:15,160 Speaker 1: Did I hear this correctly? That he didn't even make 445 00:26:15,200 --> 00:26:16,440 Speaker 1: an opening statement? 446 00:26:16,880 --> 00:26:18,919 Speaker 3: He reserved one, and he forgot to give it. 447 00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:21,920 Speaker 2: I couldn't get him to do nothing. They didn't see 448 00:26:21,960 --> 00:26:25,600 Speaker 2: nothing about the gun shot residue, not one word of 449 00:26:25,680 --> 00:26:28,360 Speaker 2: them with lighting that document out. They never seen it. 450 00:26:28,680 --> 00:26:31,840 Speaker 3: Without a proper defense, you're out there, mercy. 451 00:26:32,240 --> 00:26:36,080 Speaker 2: Years later, in ninety five and ninety six, he gave 452 00:26:36,160 --> 00:26:39,800 Speaker 2: me three affi davids of what he had failed to do. 453 00:26:40,359 --> 00:26:43,240 Speaker 2: This is my trial attorney, Robert Duncan. I did not 454 00:26:43,480 --> 00:26:46,840 Speaker 2: have any physical evidence in the case examined by a 455 00:26:46,880 --> 00:26:50,520 Speaker 2: forensic expert, other than speak to a gun expert about 456 00:26:50,560 --> 00:26:53,679 Speaker 2: the gun. But I did not have him examine the gun. 457 00:26:54,080 --> 00:26:58,280 Speaker 2: And then he gave another affidavit and he said, father, 458 00:26:58,560 --> 00:27:02,200 Speaker 2: I believe my ability to defend mister Middleton was impaired 459 00:27:02,520 --> 00:27:06,720 Speaker 2: because I wasn't given information of the connection between the 460 00:27:06,720 --> 00:27:11,639 Speaker 2: police department, the prosecutor, and the civil claims against mister 461 00:27:11,720 --> 00:27:17,239 Speaker 2: Middleton seeking a substantial monetary recovery. This information, if for 462 00:27:17,280 --> 00:27:21,440 Speaker 2: no other purpose, would have been admissible as impeachment evidence 463 00:27:21,800 --> 00:27:25,800 Speaker 2: showing the bias of the police and some of the witnesses. 464 00:27:26,080 --> 00:27:29,159 Speaker 1: So Kathy's sister, Mildred Anderson gave false testimony for the 465 00:27:29,200 --> 00:27:32,760 Speaker 1: prosecution to show motive that Ken had secret assets in 466 00:27:32,920 --> 00:27:35,239 Speaker 1: Arkansas that no one in the family was aware of. 467 00:27:35,440 --> 00:27:38,200 Speaker 1: And we know this is just another lie because Mildred 468 00:27:38,240 --> 00:27:40,720 Speaker 1: Anderson later said she admitted that she and the rest 469 00:27:40,760 --> 00:27:43,199 Speaker 1: of the family actually did know about all of the 470 00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:47,800 Speaker 1: assets before Kathy's death, which is a clear cut example of. 471 00:27:47,720 --> 00:27:51,119 Speaker 2: Perjury, which in Missouri in a murder case, that's a 472 00:27:51,200 --> 00:27:55,520 Speaker 2: class A felony. Intact, Peters colluded with her because Peter's 473 00:27:55,520 --> 00:27:59,760 Speaker 2: put it in the question would be simple for her, says, quote, 474 00:28:00,119 --> 00:28:03,040 Speaker 2: quite a bit of holdings down in arkansall that you 475 00:28:04,040 --> 00:28:09,800 Speaker 2: and your family, including your sister, were unaware of. She says, yes. 476 00:28:10,560 --> 00:28:14,560 Speaker 3: It should also be mentioned, Jason that after the sister 477 00:28:14,880 --> 00:28:20,320 Speaker 3: testified to that, the prosecutor instructed the police department to 478 00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:24,719 Speaker 3: release eighteen seven hundred dollars worth of jewelry that was 479 00:28:24,800 --> 00:28:28,439 Speaker 3: confiscated out of the house to the witness, So not 480 00:28:28,520 --> 00:28:32,360 Speaker 3: only was it perjury, she was rewarded with eighteen seven 481 00:28:32,440 --> 00:28:33,800 Speaker 3: hundred dollars worth of jewelry. 482 00:28:33,960 --> 00:28:37,800 Speaker 2: And then eight years later, on March at twenty fifth 483 00:28:37,800 --> 00:28:42,600 Speaker 2: to ninety nine, Mildred Anderson gave foreign testimony entered Arkansas 484 00:28:42,720 --> 00:28:46,440 Speaker 2: lawsuit against Kenneth Middleton which show she clearly perjured herself 485 00:28:46,480 --> 00:28:50,400 Speaker 2: in nineteen ninety one and her sister collaborated it. 486 00:28:50,960 --> 00:28:54,720 Speaker 1: Wow, okay, So I got to ask about what must 487 00:28:54,760 --> 00:28:57,920 Speaker 1: have been the worst day all of your life, which 488 00:28:57,920 --> 00:29:00,000 Speaker 1: of course is the day that the jury went out 489 00:29:00,160 --> 00:29:04,160 Speaker 1: for a freaking hour and came back in and sentenced 490 00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:08,000 Speaker 1: you to life without parole plus two hundred years. 491 00:29:08,480 --> 00:29:11,200 Speaker 2: Well, I don't know how to describe it, but I 492 00:29:11,280 --> 00:29:14,240 Speaker 2: was in shock and until this out and I never 493 00:29:14,280 --> 00:29:16,680 Speaker 2: spent a day in jail in my life, and take 494 00:29:16,760 --> 00:29:20,640 Speaker 2: you from being free in the country and working all 495 00:29:20,680 --> 00:29:24,720 Speaker 2: my life to tow you in a cage. It's unbelievable. 496 00:29:25,080 --> 00:29:25,920 Speaker 2: I can't explain. 497 00:29:26,640 --> 00:29:29,959 Speaker 3: Growing up as a kid, I would have never in 498 00:29:30,000 --> 00:29:32,840 Speaker 3: a million years dream that what happened to my dad 499 00:29:32,880 --> 00:29:35,880 Speaker 3: would have happened to him. He just was, you know, 500 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:41,640 Speaker 3: a great father's He's been more of a father to 501 00:29:41,760 --> 00:29:46,360 Speaker 3: me behind bars than most kids could ask for from 502 00:29:46,360 --> 00:29:51,160 Speaker 3: a father on the street. And it was devastating to 503 00:29:51,280 --> 00:29:52,680 Speaker 3: our whole family. 504 00:30:09,520 --> 00:30:11,440 Speaker 1: So now we move to the post conviction and there's 505 00:30:11,480 --> 00:30:14,760 Speaker 1: still more insanity to come. So it's nineteen ninety two 506 00:30:14,840 --> 00:30:17,480 Speaker 1: and your appellate attorney is a man named Gerald Handley, 507 00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:20,920 Speaker 1: who was recommended by Bob Duncan. Well, that's not a 508 00:30:20,960 --> 00:30:23,400 Speaker 1: good sign. And one of the first things we come 509 00:30:23,440 --> 00:30:26,720 Speaker 1: to is that what's called the twenty nine to fifteen appeal, Cliff, 510 00:30:26,760 --> 00:30:29,280 Speaker 1: can you explain that to us and get us started here? 511 00:30:29,760 --> 00:30:33,560 Speaker 3: After trial, the first appeal that you have in the 512 00:30:33,600 --> 00:30:36,240 Speaker 3: state of Missouri is your post conviction twenty nine to 513 00:30:36,320 --> 00:30:40,080 Speaker 3: fifteen twenty nine point fifteen is an appeal that's filed 514 00:30:40,120 --> 00:30:43,400 Speaker 3: back in front of the trial judge to evaluate your 515 00:30:43,440 --> 00:30:46,360 Speaker 3: trial to make sure that you had a fair trial. 516 00:30:46,760 --> 00:30:50,240 Speaker 3: That's where you bring your ineffective assistance of council issues 517 00:30:50,280 --> 00:30:53,800 Speaker 3: if you have any. So you have ninety days to 518 00:30:53,880 --> 00:30:56,520 Speaker 3: do that in Missouri or you don't get that hearing 519 00:30:56,640 --> 00:31:00,160 Speaker 3: on ineffective assistance a council, and that's right back in 520 00:31:00,200 --> 00:31:02,880 Speaker 3: front of the very trial judge that just set on 521 00:31:02,920 --> 00:31:06,200 Speaker 3: your trial and convicted you. So you got a high 522 00:31:06,280 --> 00:31:08,920 Speaker 3: burden to meet there, right, you got to prove that 523 00:31:08,960 --> 00:31:11,560 Speaker 3: you had an unfair trial and your attorney didn't do 524 00:31:11,640 --> 00:31:15,640 Speaker 3: his job. Our appella attorney at that time had a 525 00:31:15,800 --> 00:31:19,800 Speaker 3: ninety day window to file an amended petition for Dad 526 00:31:19,840 --> 00:31:23,400 Speaker 3: and get all of his issues in the appeal. He 527 00:31:23,440 --> 00:31:26,000 Speaker 3: never met with my dad, never went over any of 528 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:29,680 Speaker 3: the issues, which the law requires him to do. And 529 00:31:29,760 --> 00:31:32,560 Speaker 3: at the last minute, before the ninety days was up 530 00:31:32,600 --> 00:31:36,040 Speaker 3: and you could get no extensions, my dad gets a 531 00:31:36,640 --> 00:31:40,920 Speaker 3: letter from his attorney telling him to sign this affidavit 532 00:31:41,240 --> 00:31:44,120 Speaker 3: that all of his issues are in the amended petition, 533 00:31:44,560 --> 00:31:47,600 Speaker 3: even though my dad had never seen the petition. And 534 00:31:47,680 --> 00:31:50,680 Speaker 3: if you didn't sign that affidavit and have it with 535 00:31:50,800 --> 00:31:53,520 Speaker 3: your amended petition when you filed it, you were out. 536 00:31:53,720 --> 00:31:56,200 Speaker 3: You couldn't even get a twenty nine to fifteen hearing. 537 00:31:56,520 --> 00:31:59,400 Speaker 3: So my dad had to sign it and at least 538 00:31:59,520 --> 00:32:02,160 Speaker 3: hope that his attorney was gonna put all of his 539 00:32:02,240 --> 00:32:04,840 Speaker 3: issues in it. Well, we had to do a lot 540 00:32:04,840 --> 00:32:08,480 Speaker 3: of fanagulon to get that affidavit to him before Monday, 541 00:32:09,040 --> 00:32:11,760 Speaker 3: and when we got it to him on Monday, Gerald 542 00:32:11,840 --> 00:32:16,480 Speaker 3: Hanley filed a three page motion on my dad's life, 543 00:32:16,640 --> 00:32:21,560 Speaker 3: procedurally defaulting all of his issues on appeal. So because 544 00:32:21,640 --> 00:32:25,800 Speaker 3: that attorney procedurally defaulted all of his issues, the facts 545 00:32:25,840 --> 00:32:28,400 Speaker 3: and the merits of his case were never heard. 546 00:32:28,680 --> 00:32:31,760 Speaker 2: And when we went to the evidentiary hearing, I had 547 00:32:31,880 --> 00:32:35,000 Speaker 2: nine witnesses out in the hallway. When I got to 548 00:32:35,080 --> 00:32:39,640 Speaker 2: the courthouse, the witnesses that knew Pat Peters through trial 549 00:32:40,200 --> 00:32:43,840 Speaker 2: seen Pat Peters talking to the uniform guard, and the 550 00:32:43,880 --> 00:32:47,120 Speaker 2: guard took a post at the door and wouldn't let 551 00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:50,800 Speaker 2: none of my witnesses in the courtroom. I didn't know 552 00:32:50,880 --> 00:32:52,840 Speaker 2: what happened to him until I got back to the 553 00:32:52,920 --> 00:32:57,000 Speaker 2: jail and made some calls. Peters called Duncan to the stand, 554 00:32:57,640 --> 00:33:02,120 Speaker 2: and Duncan testified this base answered Peter's question, said, I 555 00:33:02,200 --> 00:33:04,760 Speaker 2: checked himself into the hospital. Well, I was shake him 556 00:33:04,760 --> 00:33:06,880 Speaker 2: the head. It was a lie because I was forced 557 00:33:06,880 --> 00:33:08,080 Speaker 2: in that mental hospital. 558 00:33:08,200 --> 00:33:10,640 Speaker 3: One of the records that Bob Duncan didn't get was 559 00:33:10,680 --> 00:33:14,520 Speaker 3: the medical records from the mental ward. The prosecution's theory 560 00:33:14,840 --> 00:33:18,560 Speaker 3: was that it was trial strategy for Duncan to not 561 00:33:18,800 --> 00:33:23,320 Speaker 3: get the medical records because the prosecution had a witness 562 00:33:23,360 --> 00:33:26,640 Speaker 3: that would have said Dad told him, if you want 563 00:33:26,640 --> 00:33:29,280 Speaker 3: to get away with murder, you check yourself into a 564 00:33:29,280 --> 00:33:32,680 Speaker 3: mental ward after you do it. So Judgement Sina agreed 565 00:33:32,720 --> 00:33:36,000 Speaker 3: and said, yeah, that's not in effective assistance and counsel 566 00:33:36,080 --> 00:33:40,240 Speaker 3: he didn't get them records because he voluntarily checked hisself 567 00:33:40,280 --> 00:33:43,720 Speaker 3: into a mental ward. Well that wasn't true, but Gerald 568 00:33:43,720 --> 00:33:48,280 Speaker 3: Hanley never got the records either, so the judge never knew. 569 00:33:48,080 --> 00:33:51,200 Speaker 1: This, and so the hearing ended and no witness is recalled, 570 00:33:51,280 --> 00:33:54,720 Speaker 1: no expert testimony was given, and no evidence was presented 571 00:33:54,800 --> 00:33:59,200 Speaker 1: to refute the state. Gerald Hanley ended up being, and 572 00:33:59,240 --> 00:34:01,520 Speaker 1: this is hard to believe, but he ended up being 573 00:34:01,640 --> 00:34:05,880 Speaker 1: just as disinterested as Bob Duncan was before and so predictably, 574 00:34:06,080 --> 00:34:11,320 Speaker 1: Judge Messina rejected your twenty nine to fifteen appeal. It's insane. 575 00:34:11,320 --> 00:34:13,239 Speaker 1: It's not because the appeal wasn't valid. It's because the 576 00:34:13,280 --> 00:34:16,040 Speaker 1: lawyers didn't do their freaking jobs. And according to the 577 00:34:16,120 --> 00:34:19,239 Speaker 1: law at that time, the trial court's jurisdiction over your 578 00:34:19,320 --> 00:34:23,760 Speaker 1: case ended, so Cliff, eventually you all get a new attorney. 579 00:34:23,880 --> 00:34:26,920 Speaker 1: Jonathan Lawrence, And there's a new law that gave you 580 00:34:27,000 --> 00:34:30,520 Speaker 1: and your dad some hope, or maybe false hopes, but 581 00:34:30,760 --> 00:34:34,839 Speaker 1: some positive things came about nonetheless, So can you tell 582 00:34:34,920 --> 00:34:35,799 Speaker 1: us what happened next? 583 00:34:35,960 --> 00:34:38,759 Speaker 3: In two thousand and one, a law come down that 584 00:34:38,960 --> 00:34:44,200 Speaker 3: give courts the opportunity to reevaluate cases. If you could 585 00:34:44,280 --> 00:34:48,839 Speaker 3: prove your twenty nine to fifteen attorney Gerald Hanley abandoned 586 00:34:48,880 --> 00:34:52,280 Speaker 3: you on your twenty nine to fifteen the trial courts 587 00:34:52,280 --> 00:34:55,279 Speaker 3: could look at your case again. So my dad had 588 00:34:55,320 --> 00:34:58,680 Speaker 3: done all this research on this and had done everything, 589 00:34:59,239 --> 00:35:04,080 Speaker 3: and we get to Jonathan Lawrence, and Jonathan Lawrence at 590 00:35:04,120 --> 00:35:06,080 Speaker 3: first didn't think we could do it, but once he 591 00:35:06,120 --> 00:35:08,520 Speaker 3: read the case law, he said, yeah, I believe we can. 592 00:35:08,960 --> 00:35:13,400 Speaker 3: So Jonathan Lawrence got involved and filed an eighty one 593 00:35:13,560 --> 00:35:18,399 Speaker 3: page motion and convinced Judge Messina, who denied us back 594 00:35:18,440 --> 00:35:22,480 Speaker 3: in ninety two, to reopened my father's case. And she 595 00:35:22,600 --> 00:35:27,040 Speaker 3: held a two day evidentiary hearing in two thousand and four. 596 00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:29,520 Speaker 1: And you finally have an attorney here who can do 597 00:35:29,719 --> 00:35:32,879 Speaker 1: justice in your father's case, who gathered and presented some 598 00:35:33,000 --> 00:35:37,480 Speaker 1: powerful expert testimony, including from investigator Chuck Gay who had 599 00:35:37,520 --> 00:35:40,600 Speaker 1: been at the courthouse for the nineteen ninety two hearing, 600 00:35:41,160 --> 00:35:45,000 Speaker 1: but had been prevented from entering the courtroom. Now he 601 00:35:45,120 --> 00:35:46,520 Speaker 1: finally had a chance to speak. 602 00:35:46,800 --> 00:35:49,759 Speaker 3: Chuck Gay was a twenty five year police officer in 603 00:35:49,800 --> 00:35:53,760 Speaker 3: Long Beach, California. He had actually talked to the FBI 604 00:35:53,920 --> 00:35:59,480 Speaker 3: in different courses on crime scene investigation, and he testified 605 00:35:59,520 --> 00:36:04,360 Speaker 3: to the crime scene photos not coming out. You can't 606 00:36:04,440 --> 00:36:10,080 Speaker 3: restage a crime scene. That's absurd, unclothing her at the scene, 607 00:36:10,239 --> 00:36:14,160 Speaker 3: all of these things. Crime scene preservation is what Chuck 608 00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:18,600 Speaker 3: Gay testified to and how improper it was. The gunshot 609 00:36:18,719 --> 00:36:21,920 Speaker 3: residue was a real big one with him. We found 610 00:36:21,960 --> 00:36:24,920 Speaker 3: out a little more about the green document. See, you 611 00:36:24,920 --> 00:36:28,000 Speaker 3: have to realize before trial, when they give us that 612 00:36:28,120 --> 00:36:31,640 Speaker 3: green document, it was just a copy, so it was 613 00:36:31,719 --> 00:36:35,480 Speaker 3: on white paper. We really didn't know what it said underneath. 614 00:36:36,080 --> 00:36:39,000 Speaker 3: But we knew something was wrong because the left hand 615 00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:43,680 Speaker 3: was missing. And when our investigator after the trial went 616 00:36:43,800 --> 00:36:48,000 Speaker 3: to go investigate that, the crime lab said, we didn't 617 00:36:48,040 --> 00:36:53,000 Speaker 3: do that. They said, these are our documents. We use greenout. 618 00:36:53,600 --> 00:36:56,160 Speaker 3: So they were pointing the finger at the police. They 619 00:36:56,239 --> 00:36:59,759 Speaker 3: knew that that wasn't right. There was no in this 620 00:37:00,120 --> 00:37:03,920 Speaker 3: Jules or anything that would indicate who did it or 621 00:37:04,440 --> 00:37:08,359 Speaker 3: why they did it. Myself and our attorney in twenty 622 00:37:08,600 --> 00:37:13,000 Speaker 3: sixteen went to the crime lab and got this document, 623 00:37:13,160 --> 00:37:15,239 Speaker 3: and him and I both held it up to the 624 00:37:15,360 --> 00:37:19,279 Speaker 3: light and you could see underneath the wide out on 625 00:37:19,360 --> 00:37:22,960 Speaker 3: a number of articles, and then underneath the other wide 626 00:37:22,960 --> 00:37:26,080 Speaker 3: out off to the side, you could see the word left. 627 00:37:26,800 --> 00:37:30,000 Speaker 3: And he give us an affidavit that that was the 628 00:37:30,040 --> 00:37:33,560 Speaker 3: worst alteration of official documents he had ever seen in 629 00:37:33,600 --> 00:37:36,200 Speaker 3: thirty two years I believe of practicing law. 630 00:37:36,480 --> 00:37:40,640 Speaker 1: And you also had testimony from a ballistics expert proving 631 00:37:41,360 --> 00:37:45,279 Speaker 1: that the scenario presented by the state was physically impossible. 632 00:37:45,760 --> 00:37:49,200 Speaker 1: And this guy was no slouch. He had overseen over 633 00:37:49,360 --> 00:37:53,760 Speaker 1: eight hundred investigations, and importantly he had been an expert 634 00:37:53,800 --> 00:37:57,279 Speaker 1: for both prosecution and defense. And of course, the guy 635 00:37:57,280 --> 00:37:59,000 Speaker 1: I'm referring to is Bob Tressel. 636 00:38:00,080 --> 00:38:05,000 Speaker 4: I'm Bob Tressel. I'm a forensic crime scene investigator. When 637 00:38:05,000 --> 00:38:07,800 Speaker 4: I first looked at the case, the bullet was found 638 00:38:07,800 --> 00:38:12,400 Speaker 4: across the room after it had struck the doorframe, ricocheted 639 00:38:12,440 --> 00:38:14,560 Speaker 4: up to the ceiling and overtoo, on the other side 640 00:38:14,600 --> 00:38:17,799 Speaker 4: of the dining room. So we began looking at the 641 00:38:17,840 --> 00:38:22,800 Speaker 4: angles that the bullet took in striking the doorframe exiting 642 00:38:22,840 --> 00:38:26,200 Speaker 4: the doorframe. Their lab came up with what we call 643 00:38:26,239 --> 00:38:28,640 Speaker 4: a muzzle to target, or the barrel of the whip 644 00:38:28,640 --> 00:38:31,840 Speaker 4: and having to be approximately eight inches from her face 645 00:38:31,920 --> 00:38:34,640 Speaker 4: where the bullet entered. So then we started looking at 646 00:38:34,680 --> 00:38:37,920 Speaker 4: the gun. The gun's a three fifty seven mangnum. You 647 00:38:37,960 --> 00:38:41,520 Speaker 4: get the length of the barrel, chamber and the grip area, 648 00:38:42,280 --> 00:38:45,719 Speaker 4: so although the barrel's eight inches from her face, the 649 00:38:45,800 --> 00:38:49,680 Speaker 4: gun is almost fourteen inches and total length away from 650 00:38:49,760 --> 00:38:54,240 Speaker 4: her face. And then we started looking at the wounds themselves. 651 00:38:54,520 --> 00:38:58,160 Speaker 4: Pretty well, a straight shot gunshot when with little deviation 652 00:38:58,640 --> 00:39:01,840 Speaker 4: on the upward or downward lane, and with a bullet 653 00:39:01,960 --> 00:39:05,319 Speaker 4: not deviating very much right or left, the shot had 654 00:39:05,400 --> 00:39:08,239 Speaker 4: come from directly in front of her the upper trajectory. 655 00:39:08,560 --> 00:39:11,080 Speaker 4: Because we know where it strikes on the wall and 656 00:39:11,120 --> 00:39:14,080 Speaker 4: then rick shaves off, we know it's going upward. So 657 00:39:14,120 --> 00:39:17,160 Speaker 4: she has to have her upper body bent over or 658 00:39:17,200 --> 00:39:20,000 Speaker 4: her head bent over towards the table in order to 659 00:39:20,080 --> 00:39:23,880 Speaker 4: receive that gunshot one, and there's only about two feet 660 00:39:23,920 --> 00:39:27,640 Speaker 4: distance between the table and the walls, and so you've 661 00:39:27,640 --> 00:39:30,799 Speaker 4: got to get two people almost directly in front of 662 00:39:30,840 --> 00:39:33,200 Speaker 4: each other. But the gun's got to be held way 663 00:39:33,239 --> 00:39:37,120 Speaker 4: down low, and in order to get the distances that 664 00:39:37,200 --> 00:39:39,920 Speaker 4: we saw, the gun has got to be almost on 665 00:39:40,040 --> 00:39:42,640 Speaker 4: top of the table. So where can the shooter be 666 00:39:42,719 --> 00:39:46,000 Speaker 4: at that point when we finally did all the calculations 667 00:39:46,120 --> 00:39:48,440 Speaker 4: in order for someone to be directly in front of her, 668 00:39:49,040 --> 00:39:51,640 Speaker 4: if a shooter was the one that fired this weapon, 669 00:39:51,800 --> 00:39:55,600 Speaker 4: he would have to be under the table. That makes 670 00:39:55,640 --> 00:40:01,240 Speaker 4: no sense whatsoever. There's no direct for rents evidence either 671 00:40:01,280 --> 00:40:05,839 Speaker 4: by blood tissue, gunshot residue, things that they make sure 672 00:40:05,880 --> 00:40:10,040 Speaker 4: that indicate that Middleton fired this gun killing his wife. 673 00:40:11,360 --> 00:40:14,359 Speaker 1: And so all of this powerful expert testimony has been heard, 674 00:40:14,400 --> 00:40:16,480 Speaker 1: and the top it all off, there was one more 675 00:40:16,560 --> 00:40:20,480 Speaker 1: witness that testified on your father's behalf, the former governor 676 00:40:20,600 --> 00:40:24,600 Speaker 1: of Missouri. Yes, you heard that correctly. The former governor 677 00:40:24,680 --> 00:40:29,440 Speaker 1: of Missouri, Joseph P. Teesdale, testified on ken'sby had and 678 00:40:29,480 --> 00:40:33,040 Speaker 1: he had extensive trial experience as an assistant US attorney, 679 00:40:33,520 --> 00:40:37,600 Speaker 1: prosecuting attorney, and as a trial lawyer. And he testified 680 00:40:37,640 --> 00:40:41,080 Speaker 1: to the quote suspect conduct of the prosecutors and the 681 00:40:41,200 --> 00:40:45,359 Speaker 1: quote ineffective performance of the Defense Council, and at the 682 00:40:45,480 --> 00:40:49,000 Speaker 1: end of the testimony, former Governor Teesdale was asked what 683 00:40:49,200 --> 00:40:51,600 Speaker 1: he would have done if this case had been presented 684 00:40:51,640 --> 00:40:55,280 Speaker 1: to him in his capacity as governor, and he replied 685 00:40:55,320 --> 00:40:58,520 Speaker 1: that this was the worst case of constitutional violations that 686 00:40:58,600 --> 00:41:02,080 Speaker 1: he had ever witnessed in forty one years of practicing law, 687 00:41:02,840 --> 00:41:06,279 Speaker 1: and that he, and this is a direct quote, would 688 00:41:06,440 --> 00:41:11,520 Speaker 1: clearly have pardoned mister Middleton of all wrongdoing end quote. 689 00:41:12,520 --> 00:41:14,320 Speaker 2: That's a strong statement. 690 00:41:15,239 --> 00:41:19,120 Speaker 3: He had gotten familiar with Dad's case a few years before, 691 00:41:19,960 --> 00:41:22,799 Speaker 3: and I reached out to him when we got this 692 00:41:22,880 --> 00:41:27,080 Speaker 3: evidenciary hearing and asked him what his costs would be 693 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:30,600 Speaker 3: for him to come testify, and he said, I don't 694 00:41:30,640 --> 00:41:33,400 Speaker 3: want any money. I want a steak dinner when your 695 00:41:33,480 --> 00:41:36,160 Speaker 3: dad gets out of there. And it meant a lot 696 00:41:36,239 --> 00:41:36,480 Speaker 3: to me. 697 00:41:37,360 --> 00:41:40,279 Speaker 1: So, finally, this information that you've been trying to get 698 00:41:40,320 --> 00:41:43,680 Speaker 1: heard for so many years, the ineffective counsel, the prosecutorial 699 00:41:43,680 --> 00:41:47,560 Speaker 1: misconduct and complex of interest of botched investigation and altered reports, 700 00:41:48,239 --> 00:41:51,000 Speaker 1: You're finally able to get that before the judge, and 701 00:41:51,200 --> 00:41:55,040 Speaker 1: even a more conservative judge, Judge Messina, could not deny 702 00:41:55,120 --> 00:41:56,680 Speaker 1: the merits of Kent's case. 703 00:41:57,080 --> 00:42:00,640 Speaker 3: So this was all powerful evidence that the journey ever heard. 704 00:42:01,080 --> 00:42:04,359 Speaker 3: After all this evidence was put forward, Judge Messina took 705 00:42:04,400 --> 00:42:07,880 Speaker 3: it under advisement and would not rule on the case 706 00:42:07,960 --> 00:42:12,600 Speaker 3: for eleven more months. Two weeks after the hearing was over, 707 00:42:13,040 --> 00:42:15,879 Speaker 3: the prosecutors come to my dad with an Alford plea. 708 00:42:16,320 --> 00:42:18,960 Speaker 3: If he would plead to an Alford plea and plead 709 00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:22,320 Speaker 3: guilty to second degree, he could walk out of prison 710 00:42:22,480 --> 00:42:26,640 Speaker 3: a free man. But even though all of his appeals 711 00:42:26,680 --> 00:42:30,040 Speaker 3: were exhausted and we were setting in front of very 712 00:42:30,120 --> 00:42:35,200 Speaker 3: conservative judge, my father refused the Offord plea. For him 713 00:42:35,239 --> 00:42:39,040 Speaker 3: to turn that down with all appeals exhausted, that speaks 714 00:42:39,320 --> 00:42:41,640 Speaker 3: volumes to his innocence. 715 00:42:41,320 --> 00:42:44,239 Speaker 1: And on May two thousand and five, Judge Massina came 716 00:42:44,280 --> 00:42:47,320 Speaker 1: back and vacated Ken's nineteen ninety one conviction and granted 717 00:42:47,360 --> 00:42:50,880 Speaker 1: him a new trial. So the same judge who denied 718 00:42:50,960 --> 00:42:53,800 Speaker 1: him in nineteen ninety two overturned his conviction. 719 00:42:54,160 --> 00:42:57,920 Speaker 3: Judge Messina found eight different points of ineffective assistance and 720 00:42:58,000 --> 00:43:02,239 Speaker 3: counsel on Bob Duncan. The man had three other capital 721 00:43:02,440 --> 00:43:06,280 Speaker 3: murder cases overturned at the same time he was handling 722 00:43:06,320 --> 00:43:07,160 Speaker 3: my dad's case. 723 00:43:07,400 --> 00:43:10,719 Speaker 1: But just six days after this incredible news, you get 724 00:43:10,719 --> 00:43:12,280 Speaker 1: a huge punch to the gun. 725 00:43:12,520 --> 00:43:16,840 Speaker 3: What does the Jackson County Prosecutor's office do. They appeal 726 00:43:16,960 --> 00:43:20,560 Speaker 3: the decision. So if he would plead guilty after that hearing, 727 00:43:20,600 --> 00:43:23,000 Speaker 3: they were willing to let him go. But when he 728 00:43:23,120 --> 00:43:26,440 Speaker 3: stood by his innocence and the trial judge agreed and 729 00:43:26,480 --> 00:43:30,240 Speaker 3: overturned his conviction, they appealed it. They ruled that Judge 730 00:43:30,280 --> 00:43:34,440 Speaker 3: Messina didn't have jurisdiction to issue that new trial. They 731 00:43:34,520 --> 00:43:36,920 Speaker 3: never got to the merits or the facts that she 732 00:43:37,239 --> 00:43:40,879 Speaker 3: ruled he was wrongfully convicted in violation of his sixth 733 00:43:40,960 --> 00:43:45,400 Speaker 3: Amendment right to constitutional effective representation. They never got to 734 00:43:45,480 --> 00:43:48,399 Speaker 3: any of that. They just said she didn't have jurisdiction. 735 00:43:48,800 --> 00:43:53,960 Speaker 1: And this is now seventeen long years ago. It's crazy. 736 00:43:54,360 --> 00:43:59,320 Speaker 1: I mean, the court heard the merits of his innocence, 737 00:44:00,239 --> 00:44:02,960 Speaker 1: he should get a new trial. But outside of the 738 00:44:02,960 --> 00:44:05,200 Speaker 1: twenty nine to fifteen of Pelle proceedings, it was ruled 739 00:44:05,200 --> 00:44:07,879 Speaker 1: that the trial court didn't have jurisdiction. So Ken has 740 00:44:08,080 --> 00:44:11,520 Speaker 1: just been sitting there since two thousand and four, awaiting 741 00:44:11,560 --> 00:44:13,640 Speaker 1: a miracle or a change in the law so that 742 00:44:13,760 --> 00:44:17,960 Speaker 1: his case could be heard again, and that finally happened. 743 00:44:18,000 --> 00:44:21,239 Speaker 1: In August of twenty twenty one, a new law was 744 00:44:21,360 --> 00:44:24,000 Speaker 1: passed in Missouri that allows a case to go before 745 00:44:24,040 --> 00:44:26,600 Speaker 1: the trial judge outside of a twenty nine to fifteen hearing. 746 00:44:27,400 --> 00:44:29,960 Speaker 1: So what that means is that if a prosecutor knows 747 00:44:30,000 --> 00:44:32,480 Speaker 1: that a man is innocent, as the current prosecutor has 748 00:44:32,480 --> 00:44:36,520 Speaker 1: implied in Ken's case, they're no longer jurisdictionally barred from 749 00:44:36,560 --> 00:44:40,040 Speaker 1: doing something about it. Judge Messin has already ruled on this, 750 00:44:40,239 --> 00:44:42,799 Speaker 1: and she's now an advisor to the current prosecutor, Jean 751 00:44:42,880 --> 00:44:45,960 Speaker 1: Peters Baker, and Baker already made use of this new 752 00:44:46,040 --> 00:44:48,080 Speaker 1: law in Kevin Strickland's case in the fall of twenty 753 00:44:48,080 --> 00:44:51,759 Speaker 1: twenty one, Yet strangely, she is yet to act in 754 00:44:51,880 --> 00:44:56,560 Speaker 1: Ken's case. It's mystifying and maddening at the same time. So, Cliff, 755 00:44:56,920 --> 00:44:58,720 Speaker 1: what's going on with all of this? Now? 756 00:44:59,480 --> 00:45:04,080 Speaker 3: This new Yes, it's about a prosecutor's right to file emotion, 757 00:45:04,560 --> 00:45:08,239 Speaker 3: but it's also about a court's right to have jurisdiction 758 00:45:08,440 --> 00:45:11,160 Speaker 3: to consider and hear the matter. Well, now they're given 759 00:45:11,200 --> 00:45:15,480 Speaker 3: the motion courts jurisdiction, but the prosecutor has to file it. 760 00:45:16,000 --> 00:45:20,000 Speaker 3: So in our case, we've already proved everything there is 761 00:45:20,080 --> 00:45:24,080 Speaker 3: with this statute. This statute lays out that upon the 762 00:45:24,120 --> 00:45:27,080 Speaker 3: filing of such a motion, the court shall have a 763 00:45:27,120 --> 00:45:31,239 Speaker 3: hearing and issue of findings in facts and conclusions of 764 00:45:31,360 --> 00:45:35,680 Speaker 3: law on all issues presented. That's exactly what Judge Messina did. 765 00:45:36,080 --> 00:45:40,800 Speaker 3: So we've already been successful at securing a new trial 766 00:45:40,880 --> 00:45:43,759 Speaker 3: from my father, but the only thing we didn't have 767 00:45:44,320 --> 00:45:47,719 Speaker 3: was jurisdiction. Well, now this new law gives the court's jurisdiction, 768 00:45:48,120 --> 00:45:51,279 Speaker 3: but the prosecutor has been reluctant to file it. So 769 00:45:51,440 --> 00:45:54,319 Speaker 3: now that this new law has passed, I believe the 770 00:45:54,360 --> 00:45:59,040 Speaker 3: next steps are for Jane to file emotion conceding jurisdiction. 771 00:45:59,239 --> 00:46:01,880 Speaker 3: That's it. We don't need anything else from her but 772 00:46:01,960 --> 00:46:07,080 Speaker 3: a one page motion conceding jurisdiction and allow a court 773 00:46:07,160 --> 00:46:10,840 Speaker 3: there in Jackson County to get to the merits of 774 00:46:10,960 --> 00:46:15,600 Speaker 3: the trial. Judge Edith Messina's order overturning my dad's conviction. 775 00:46:16,040 --> 00:46:19,359 Speaker 1: Cliff, we are audience out there listening. Now, is there 776 00:46:19,440 --> 00:46:21,440 Speaker 1: something you'd like them to do? What can they do 777 00:46:21,520 --> 00:46:24,440 Speaker 1: to help to write this horrible injustice? 778 00:46:24,719 --> 00:46:30,160 Speaker 3: Yes, you'd go to our website at free Hyphenkenmiddleton dot com. 779 00:46:30,600 --> 00:46:36,440 Speaker 3: There's a wealth of very compelling documents that support everything 780 00:46:36,520 --> 00:46:40,400 Speaker 3: we spoke about today. If we said it today, rest assured. 781 00:46:40,480 --> 00:46:44,000 Speaker 3: You can go to our website and find it. And 782 00:46:44,120 --> 00:46:47,760 Speaker 3: on the homepage right up front, there's a petition asking 783 00:46:47,840 --> 00:46:51,520 Speaker 3: Jean Peters Baker to abide by her oath and follow 784 00:46:51,600 --> 00:46:55,759 Speaker 3: the plain language of this new Missouri statute. It's as 785 00:46:55,760 --> 00:46:59,839 Speaker 3: simple as a one page motion conceding jurisdiction so that 786 00:47:00,080 --> 00:47:04,200 Speaker 3: my dad can once again prove his innocence and come 787 00:47:04,200 --> 00:47:06,399 Speaker 3: home to the family that waits him. 788 00:47:06,760 --> 00:47:08,839 Speaker 1: Right. We'll have that linked in the bio, as well 789 00:47:08,920 --> 00:47:12,719 Speaker 1: as a link to Silver Creek Entertainment. I believe there's 790 00:47:12,760 --> 00:47:15,880 Speaker 1: a film on the way about Ken's case, and it 791 00:47:15,920 --> 00:47:19,040 Speaker 1: can't come soon enough as far as I'm concerned. I'm 792 00:47:19,239 --> 00:47:21,680 Speaker 1: both dreading and really looking forward to watching it. So 793 00:47:22,040 --> 00:47:24,120 Speaker 1: check that out, click on the link in the bio. 794 00:47:24,760 --> 00:47:27,439 Speaker 1: And now, guys, we have a tradition here and it's 795 00:47:27,520 --> 00:47:30,000 Speaker 1: really my favorite part of the show. It's called closing arguments, 796 00:47:30,040 --> 00:47:32,920 Speaker 1: and closing arguments is very simple. It works like this. 797 00:47:33,040 --> 00:47:35,520 Speaker 1: I'm just going to turn my microphone off, kick back 798 00:47:35,560 --> 00:47:37,800 Speaker 1: in my chair, with my headphones on, you'll turn to 799 00:47:37,880 --> 00:47:40,640 Speaker 1: volume up a little bit and just listen to anything 800 00:47:40,680 --> 00:47:42,880 Speaker 1: else you'd like to say, anything at all you have 801 00:47:42,920 --> 00:47:45,279 Speaker 1: to say to our audience. So Cliff, why don't you 802 00:47:45,320 --> 00:47:48,399 Speaker 1: go first? And Ken, we'll let you close us out. 803 00:47:49,440 --> 00:47:52,719 Speaker 3: I'd like to thank you for using your celebrity to 804 00:47:52,800 --> 00:47:56,440 Speaker 3: bring awareness to wrong for convictions, given a voice to 805 00:47:56,480 --> 00:48:00,399 Speaker 3: the voiceless. It's an amazing thing what you're doing. It's 806 00:48:00,520 --> 00:48:04,799 Speaker 3: encouraged other celebrities like Kim Kardashian and John Grisham and 807 00:48:04,920 --> 00:48:08,319 Speaker 3: Johnny Depp and you know a lot of others to 808 00:48:08,440 --> 00:48:11,680 Speaker 3: take up the cause and stand up for justice. And 809 00:48:11,719 --> 00:48:14,239 Speaker 3: so i'd like to thank you again, Jason, and now 810 00:48:14,360 --> 00:48:15,520 Speaker 3: Ken over to you. 811 00:48:16,880 --> 00:48:19,400 Speaker 2: Well, what I'd like to say here that all the 812 00:48:19,440 --> 00:48:23,799 Speaker 2: people that's listening, I would appreciate it more than words 813 00:48:24,120 --> 00:48:29,640 Speaker 2: can explain. Anything they can do, sign petitions, sign letters 814 00:48:29,640 --> 00:48:33,120 Speaker 2: to Baker to get her to follow the statue, anything 815 00:48:33,200 --> 00:48:36,359 Speaker 2: anybody can do to help to clear and get the 816 00:48:36,400 --> 00:48:41,000 Speaker 2: same justice as Kevin Strickland got. I would appreciate it 817 00:48:41,080 --> 00:48:42,520 Speaker 2: more than words can say. 818 00:48:49,160 --> 00:48:52,120 Speaker 1: Thank you for listening to Rafel Conviction. I'd like to 819 00:48:52,160 --> 00:48:55,880 Speaker 1: thank our production team, Connor Hall, Justin Golden, Jeff Cliburn, 820 00:48:55,920 --> 00:48:59,359 Speaker 1: and Kevin Wardis, with research by Lyla Robinson. The music 821 00:48:59,400 --> 00:49:02,200 Speaker 1: in this production was supplied by three time OSCAR nominated 822 00:49:02,200 --> 00:49:05,920 Speaker 1: composer Jay Ralph. Be sure to follow us on Instagram 823 00:49:05,960 --> 00:49:10,239 Speaker 1: at Wrongful Conviction, on Facebook at Wrongful Conviction podcast, and 824 00:49:10,320 --> 00:49:13,440 Speaker 1: on Twitter at wrong Conviction, as well as at Lava 825 00:49:13,480 --> 00:49:16,680 Speaker 1: for Good. On all three platforms, you can also follow 826 00:49:16,719 --> 00:49:20,400 Speaker 1: me on both TikTok and Instagram at it's Jason Flam. 827 00:49:20,560 --> 00:49:23,400 Speaker 1: Wrongful Conviction is the production of Lava for Good Podcasts 828 00:49:23,440 --> 00:49:27,680 Speaker 1: and association with Signal Company Number one