WEBVTT - US-Iran Interim Deal and Fed Chair Warsh

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Rebecca Patterson right now to be kind senior fellow with

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 2>the Council on Foreign Relations. Her work at Bridgwater bessemer

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 2>at JP Morgan over the years, thrilled she could join.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess I gotta do the FED meeting. To me,

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>it could be dramatic. If he's going to change things.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't want to dawdle around, does he mean?

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I think Priority one, two and three this week is

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>reinforce the Fed's credibility. You don't want any questions about

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 3>any political bias. So that's goal number one for Kevin

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 3>Warsh this week, I think, which he should be able

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 3>to execute beautifully. I think beyond that, if he does

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>a press conference, I expect he will, but it's not

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 3>a given. If he does a press conference, then that'll

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>be his opportunity to lay out the priorities. What is

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 3>he going to focus on?

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 4>First?

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine he wants to review all the economic models,

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 3>the processes. He's going to review communication. He's already been

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 3>very vocal about having less communication, think more less.

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 2>It has been for years.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 5>Yes, a new thing, the balance sheet will wait.

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so, Rebecca. Obviously he's got some level of pressure

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 6>from the President from the White House to lower rates.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 6>But wait, the data is not there. He's got a

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 6>committee he has to deal with.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 6>Wait, I would think the messaging this week is as

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 6>much for the rest of US i e.

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 7>The market, maybe even more so for the President. Yeah.

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's got a difficult needle to thread here, right,

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>keep the President on his side ideally, but build credibility

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 3>trust with his colleagues at the FOMC, I mean, And

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>to your point on the data, I mean, right now,

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>core PCE for May is tracking at around three point

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>three percent year on year. If that's the number that

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 3>comes in or something like that, there's no way they

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 3>can cut rates anytime soon. And even if the straight

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>of the hormones straight of hormones does open soon, which

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 3>we all hope it does, and oil prices retreat further,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>you still have a strong economy, now probably stronger. You

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 3>have inflation coming through the AI channel as well as

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 3>other channels, and so it seems like the market pricing

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 3>and the possibility of a hike makes a lot more sense.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 3>So that is going to be a challenge for Chairman

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Warsh for sure.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 7>I met u s dollar here. We kind of came

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 7>into the year.

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 6>I guess the consensus on the street was for a

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 6>week or a dollar, and then the war with Iran

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 6>starts and we had that flight to quality like we

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 6>typically see.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Now what well, the dollar until the news over the

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 3>weekend was down or sorry, was down again only two

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>major currencies, the Norwegian crown and the Australian dollar, both

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 3>big commodity exporters. It was stronger against everything else, primarily

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>on rate expectations, higher interest rates following higher energy prices

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 3>and broader inflation pressures. Now that that is off the table,

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 3>you have seen yields, as you guys just mentioned, down

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. You are seeing the dollar down a

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 3>little bit today. And the question again it goes back

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>to the Fed, do we have a hawkish bias in

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the press conference this week or not. I think the

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 3>rate expectations will continue to be pretty important for the

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 3>dollar going ahead. And again it's not just the US, right,

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>two sides to every currency trade. We expect a Bank

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 3>of Japan hike this week. The ECB, the European Central Bank,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>just raised rate. So it's not clear how much stronger

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the dollar gets.

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Out of Florida. And Johns Hopkins, I mean, there was

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>this idea that if you end a war, even as

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Caplin says, a middle war, the idea is you get

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>a disinflationary tendency competison now at CFR. But if you're

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>on Wall Street right now, and what's clearly a boom

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>investment banking environment, do you just assume disinflation?

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't assume anything right now. Look, we have we

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 3>have some tweets and some headlines suggesting that we have

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 3>a step forward towards peace, but the deal isn't supposed

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 3>to be signed till Friday, and even then it's not

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 3>clear yet if it sticks, it's not clear what the

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 3>terms are going to be. I mean, Iran wants and

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 3>needs funding. I think they could still pressure to have

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 3>some sort of fee, service fee to go through the

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 3>straight not at all a service fee.

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>And Paul, this is really Rick Wilson just now on

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Twitter with just a scathing quick note like where are

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the details?

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, when do we get the details? I don't have an.

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 3>Answer, and we might not for sixty days. Right.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 2>The markets will flip right around if we do that.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, they do that, right, And that's the point. Oil

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 3>has come down, stocks are up. Does it last? Do

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>you want to chase it here? I mean, if we

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 3>have peace and it's certainly in both sides interest to

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 3>have peace. Iran desperately needs money. It needs to rebuild.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 5>The US does.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Not want oil at a four handle or thirty year

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>year olds at a five handle going into midterms.

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 7>Gold, well, it seems like just a cup of coffee goes.

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 6>Tom had said we were at five thousand dollars and

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 6>now so we've seen a pullback.

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 7>Here at forty three hundred.

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I mean you had a lot of speculative

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 3>money going to gold at the beginning of the year.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 3>We had a little bit of a parabolic move, so

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>that was part of it. But the other part of

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 3>it is we did have two big central banks, Russia

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 3>and Turkey selling Russia sold for four months in a row.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Turkey was the biggest seller of gold in March. But

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 3>those are the outliers. Central banks in general are continuing

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 3>to buy.

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg surveillance across the SNAE show Boy and for San Antonio,

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 2>Three Am and a diner and re Ordered tried to

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>get over the hangover. Joining us now with the Rebecca

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Patterson and studio is Anry Horder, who was, Yeah, doing

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a seminar in Houston.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 5>In Newston, can you get.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 2>Me tickets to San Antonio. I'll take it over. How

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 2>did you get from Houston to San Antonio?

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 7>Our friend drove me.

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Friend.

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So a friend saw that I was in Houston.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 8>Also saw I was at Game three with the presidents

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 8>and I'm going to game five.

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Why didn't you come?

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 8>And I made a game time game time decision Saturday

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 8>night and I was like, you know what, like, I'm

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 8>so cold?

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 7>Are you sitting with Prince Harry?

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 8>I was not sitting with Prince Harry.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, you texted me.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 7>I saw him.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 8>I saw Spike Lee. I was sitting more by Patrick Ewing,

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 8>which was pretty amazing.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Did he block your view?

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 5>He did not block my view?

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 7>He was actually behind me.

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 8>So I will say San Antonio was the sixth borough

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 8>on Saturday night. It was how to be fifty percent

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 8>maybe seventy five percent New York Knick fans and the

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 8>first order or two.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Obviously we were.

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 8>Behind, but we've been there before and it was a

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 8>little intense, and then Jalen Brunson does what he does.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 8>This team works together so well and they clinched it.

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 8>It was incredible.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 2>You have to call him my Jalen. Missus Keene is

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>calling my Jalen this week.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 8>My Jalen.

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I gotta ask what was in the arena the energy

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>that was not captured for America on TV.

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 8>I think what was not captured was the moment you

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:34.239
<v Speaker 8>realize they were about to become champions after fifty three years.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 8>There was literally tears from New Yorkers and their faces,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 8>grown men just absolutely crying. One guy next to me

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 8>was a New Yorker, stayed for the whole thing, moved

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 8>to San Antonio in nineteen ninety four, so he was

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 8>technically there supporting the Spurs, but even he was emotional

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 8>and he said, this is.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 7>Pretty bittersweet for me for our fans.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 6>On radio, I just have to highlight the outfits that

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 6>are in this studio here. Rebecca Patterson, New York can

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 6>Nick orange head to toe fantastic. Hamry Horner comes in

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 6>to the whole thing going and the Tom's got the blink.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean I didn't know Tom either.

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 5>You were a Celtics fan.

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, we're all Nick fans.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I said, he just writes to pay check exact.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 2>One more question for Rebecca Patterson. Here. The spirit of

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>this to me, the single miscall a New York city

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 2>in the gloom was a census of twenty twenty where everybody,

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>including the smart people, said, oh, we had six hundred

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 2>thousand in the MSA here. I mean, it's his bet

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 2>against New York that's always been there.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I think there is a human emotion

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>that you always want to go after whoever's on top.

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 3>And that could be a company, it could be a person,

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 3>it could be a city. So it's easy to go

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 3>after New York. But look, New York's back. People are

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 3>working five days a week in the office, real estate

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>prices are coming back.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 9>God.

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean last week, if you tried to get around

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the city in a cab or even on the subway,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 3>it was packed.

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Rebecca, thank you so much. Rebecca Patterson with us

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 2>writing for the Console on Foreign Relations, a terrific podcast,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>The Royal strategist for Robinhood joins us right now for

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>two shortest visits stuff guild with us as well. If

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I haven't ended his conflict. How does it change your

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>six months forward view, your journey thirty report.

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 10>I think it makes costs a little bit lower for everybody.

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 10>All those input costs that were elevated obviously start to

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 10>come down. I don't think it'll happen right away because

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 10>it takes a while to restart things. I saw something

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 10>this morning where quit will take the longest because they're

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 10>the most impacted. But it I mean, obviously the market

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 10>is for discounting, so the market will care about it

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 10>now and today, and you're seeing it in energy prices

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 10>and energy stocks.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 6>So let's say we do get some type of resolution

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 6>here with around a little bit more certainty in that

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 6>part of the world that brings the AI story right

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 6>back to the you know, the front burner here. How

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 6>do you guys think about AI at Robinhood, because that's

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 6>a story that's kind of morphed over the last several

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 6>years since we've all become involved with AI. How do

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 6>you guys position it these days?

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean at the company, we use it a lot,

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 10>but when it comes to you know, I've subscribed to

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 10>Jensen Huong's five layer cake approach, and it starts everything

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 10>from like the materials and the energy inputs down to

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 10>the application layer. And I think, you know, at times

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 10>you're going to have some things that go back and forth,

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 10>like some fits and starts, because the physical world can't

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 10>just doesn't move as fast as the agentic world. And

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 10>so I think that's where you know, obviously the conflict

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 10>in the Middle East impacted that, but I do think

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 10>we're moving a little closer to the application layer, which

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 10>is like that that top end of the layer, which

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.239
<v Speaker 10>is if you look at a company like Eli Lilly,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 10>they have lily Pod where they take all of the

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 10>data they've ever garnered and have, you know, can work

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 10>with it in AI. I think that's the most powerful

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 10>aspect of working with AI is when I take all

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 10>this data and I put it into something that I

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 10>can talk to. Talking to your data, I think is

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 10>extremely powerful.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 6>How do you guys think about just I mean, what's

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 6>your approach here as we go into the second half

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 6>of twenty twenty six, here, stocks, bonds, alternatives on your platform?

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 7>What are your clients doing these days?

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the stock market's been really good, so there's

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 10>been a lot of buying of stocks. Whenever there's the pullback,

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 10>we see them use ETFs to kind of, you know,

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 10>add a little bit more exposure, but the buying has never.

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 5>Really slowed down.

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 10>I'd say prediction markets is are something that's rising, and

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 10>I see a rising and ability to people to put

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 10>their own views into it beyond the sports area that

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 10>I focus beyond the sports area. So for example, the

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 10>New York City, I'm sorry, the La Mayor Race was

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 10>one of the top things in the last week or so.

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 10>And also the price of bitcoin, the price of oil,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 10>like that's kind of where they were playing. And we

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 10>also have robin Hood Ventures, which is our foray into

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 10>It's a close and fun and it's our foray into

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 10>actually private investments.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Steph Coil, thanks so much with Robinhood driving all of

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>their strategy this morning. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Surveillance coming up after this.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live weekday

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on Applecarplay

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or watch

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>us live on.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 5>YouTube through Queen Victoria Street in London.

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Julian Lee joins oil strategist doesn't describe as expertise and

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 2>a global sense of flows of hydrocarbon. Julian, I'm looking

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>at a chart of Brent crude. The obvious question is

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 2>do we get back to seventy dollars from the present

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 2>eighty two? But what I see is a convexity. There's

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 2>a real acceleration to a lower price. Is it the

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 2>market getting out front of oil or is a market

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 2>chasing where oil is going to be?

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, at the moment, it's perhaps the

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 4>market getting a little ahead of oil. There is a

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 4>growing expectation that this MoU will get signed on Friday,

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 4>and that will result in an opening of the strait

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 4>of hormos. It's not going to be, you know, back

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 4>to normal immediately. But there is a timescale to get

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 4>flows back to normal through Hormus within thirty days. That

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 4>may be optimistic. So I think the market is starting

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 4>to price that in. There's still a lot of hesitancy

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 4>among ship owners. They really want to see a bit

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 4>more than just talk about this. I think they may

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 4>start to change their position come Friday if this deal

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 4>is signed. And at the moment, you know, we've seen

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 4>in the newsroom, we've seen three different versions of what's

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 4>in this deal. All of them have come from the

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Iranian side. They're all slightly different. We've had nothing official

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 4>out of Washington yet, so you know, there's still plenty

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 4>of room there, I think for wrinkles to appear before Friday.

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's what shippers are slightly nervous about.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 4>The market I think at the moment is it's much

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 4>more optimistic about a deal being done than they have

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 4>been for the past month or so.

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 6>Julian, I'm looking at just an image on the screen

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 6>of all the dots representing ships that are in strated

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 6>permeus both sides, but quite frankly, and there's they're all

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 6>over the place. Isn't it that the insurance companies who

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 6>decide if this trade is open or not.

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's a mixture of the insurance companies, certainly,

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 4>the ship owners, and to some extent the ship's crews

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 4>as well. You know, it is an owner willing to

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 4>risk its its vessel and its crew by sending it

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 4>through a waterway that is still to some extent contested.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 4>They will want to see much more clarity and I

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 4>think some mechanism of protecting these ships, at least legally,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 4>if not physically, before they start to move.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 6>Do we yet have a good sense of the damage

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 6>that may have been done to the infrastructure in the

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 6>energy real complex there in that world, because I'm not

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 6>sure where oil goes even if the straight is open.

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's a very good question. I mean,

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 4>there has undoubtedly been damage to some key facilities, certainly

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 4>liquefied natural gas production in Katar, some gas and perhaps

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 4>oil production in the United Arab Emirates, possibly installations elsewhere

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 4>in the region. The other problem, I think is not

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 4>just physical damage, but it's the fact that being unable

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 4>to get their oil and their gas out of the Gulf,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 4>countries have had to scale back production. They've had to

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 4>shut wells in they've had to reduce the flow from fields.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Once everything opens up again, all of that has to

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 4>come back into operation. That will take time. We think

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 4>the shutdowns have been done in a fairly controlled manner,

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 4>so that shouldn't have damaged the infrastructure. But then it

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 4>has to be opened in a controlled manner as well

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 4>in order to avoid surges of pressure that can damage

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 4>well heads and pipelines and all that kind of stuff,

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 4>and that will necessarily slow the process of everything coming back.

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 2>What does it, excuse me, what does it mean for

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the Pacific rims Julian. Obviously the boat's going to come

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 2>out to Paul's great question. And infrastructure, I guess that's

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>distillates and refinery cutter in Awe. But how does Singapore

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>fields this morning? Or Japan?

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you know. I think Asia in particular

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 4>has been hit hard by the closure of Horn Moves.

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Most of the oil out of the Persian Gulf, whether

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 4>it's from the Arab side or the Iranian side, most

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 4>of that goes to Asia, and so it is them

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 4>is refiners in that part of the world who've been

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 4>scrabbling around for barrels from elsewhere. I think if the

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 4>strait does open fully, and if we start to see

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 4>oil and gas flowing again, I think refiners in Asia

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 4>will breathe a huge sigh of relief. The people who

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 4>perhaps won't will be those in the Kremlin who have

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 4>enjoyed the surgeon prices that this war has brought, and

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 4>have enjoyed some relaxation on sanctions on their oil that

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 4>has allowed Indian refiners back into to the market, and

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 4>perhaps even some of the you know, the US oil

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 4>companies who have have had a real boost from the

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 4>higher prices and the demand for US.

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Crewed Julian, thank you so much. Really appreciate the breathe

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a small folks. This is the way we start really interesting.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 5>We stay with us.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch US Live

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>watch US Live on YouTube.

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 2>This is an important conversation Jim rowins with us with Deloitte,

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 2>and this is on the fundamental issue of revenue for

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 2>all this AI stuff. Off the twenty billion dollar n

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia bond deal today, Jim, on these tokens, to me,

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 2>there will be price discrimination, There'll be all sorts of

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 2>levels of usage. When do we start seeing a much

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 2>more sophisticated pricing of how we use AI? Yeah?

0:19:58.880 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Thanks s having me on, guys.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think one of the key things that

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing right now in the market is that people

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 9>are moving from basic AI use cases, you know, chat

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 9>simple agentic workflows, to thinking about how they apply AI

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 9>agents across their business functions, and that's seeing a real

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 9>explosion in the usage of tokens. But it's also going

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 9>to see the explosion of value creation because we're now

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 9>talking about real work getting done by agents in the

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 9>enterprise and really adding efficiency to what we're seeing.

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 5>But do you model price down?

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 9>You know, we're going to expect to see that the

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 9>cost per token go down over a period of time,

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 9>but the number of tokens people need continue to increase up.

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 9>And given the constraints that we see in the data

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 9>center space, there's going to be a competition there for

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 9>those tokens for you enterprice to get access to them

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 9>and use them effectively in their enterprise.

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 6>Jim, I'm going to speak for about ninety nine percent

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 6>of our viewing and listening audience.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 7>Can you explain, I don't know what a token is neither.

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, what's the token? Right? What is a token of?

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 7>Why does it matter? Yeah?

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 5>Think about it.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 9>So, if you're in front of one of your AI

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 9>tools and you're putting some input, that's an input token.

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 9>So you're asking a question, you're asking it to do something,

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 9>provide some feedback. You've sent it a picture and you

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 9>want some help with something. That's an input token, and

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 9>then the response back from the large language model is

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 9>the output token. So organizations price it on both the

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 9>input and the output. So if you think about a

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 9>closed source model, they're charging you for the input that

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 9>you're putting in the output that you're taking out. If

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 9>you think about an open source model, that's where some

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 9>organizations are finding success putting models inside their enterprise and

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 9>running their own kind of AI factories where they're running

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 9>essentially these tokens without having to go outside the enterprise

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:38.479
<v Speaker 9>to pay those fees.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 5>So is this our.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 6>Token costs now a line item on my P and

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 6>L that I have to mention for sure?

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Like when I talk to a lot of CIOs

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 9>and enterprises that I'm working with. They're looking at their

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 9>overall token budget, much like they were looking at their

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 9>cloud budget that they were dealing with over the past

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 9>couple of years, and so they're saying, you know, how

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 9>much money do I need to set up side for

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 9>the tokens for my employees? But also it's not just

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 9>the amount of tokens that you're using, it's am I

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 9>getting the value for the token that I'm putting in?

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 5>Like? What's the actual output that I'm getting that helps

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 5>my enterprise?

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 7>Jim Rowan.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 2>This weekend, Sir Lewis Hamilton did awfully well at Barcelona

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 2>for Ferrari and at the top of his helmet is

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>his personal endorsement from Perplexity. So I guess they're behind now.

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 2>They're not like Apple, but they're behind. Where are we

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 2>going to be in front? What does Deloyd say in

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 2>five years about where the Perplexities and all the meta

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and all the other non players.

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 5>Where are they going to be?

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean you have to break down the market into

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.239
<v Speaker 9>a couple different sets of companies, right, so you have

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 9>your frontier model organizations that are advancing the capabilities of

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 9>these labs, you have the hyper scalers that are out there,

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 9>you have open source providers as well, and so we

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 9>think there's going to be continued advancement on the model frontier.

0:22:58.359 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 5>When you continue to get better.

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 9>You see the release after release with the new capabilities

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 9>that are out there. At the same point in time,

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 9>organizations and other capabilities like other software companies are adding

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 9>a layer above the model, sort of what we call

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 9>an agentic harness, a wrapper around the model that allows

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 9>you to tool calling, maintain memory, really complex technology related things.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 9>And those are the areas where they're trying to differentiate

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 9>to say that beyond the model, these are the things

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 9>I have to offer you.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 5>They can create value for you.

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 6>So tokens allow me to measure the cost of my

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 6>AI usage. Are companies is it possible to measure the value?

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 6>I mean, is that what they're trying to do?

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean it's a complex equation.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 9>Right, you put your tokens in, you're not going to

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 9>get an immediate ROI back out in a calculator. What

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 9>you need to figure out is what are the workflows,

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 9>like where am I applying this technology today and how

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 9>is the work getting done? Differently in a more efficient

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 9>and effective way, or am I opening up new areas

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 9>of revenue growth through the usage of those token And

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 9>so that's where the application of both where am I spending?

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 9>But then what's the business value creation side becomes a

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 9>big question for clients.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>You people did a great essay. I loved what Deloitte

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 2>did on this. Are we to compete away the profits

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 2>of AI? Just compete them away to a perfectly competitive analog.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 5>I don't think you compete them away.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean in our token economics paper that we had

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.959
<v Speaker 9>back in January, we did an infrastructure survey back in

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 9>March too. We're seeing a large number of the token

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.239
<v Speaker 9>volume increase. But it's really what the enterprises add their

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 9>IP to this conversation that really differentiates what they're trying

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 9>to do. And so the model is going to be

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 9>the model, but what do you wrap around it? Where's

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 9>your internal intelligence that you're adding to the model to

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 9>differentiate your services? And that's the key piece. I think

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 9>I'm going to put this paper out folks January of

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 9>this year from Deloyte. I'm sure they'll do an update

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 9>at some point. Jim Rowan, thank you, Gold Principal US

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 9>head of Ai at Deloyde. This paper was absolutely fabulous

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 9>on tokens.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal