WEBVTT - The Extra Point: Play Isaac Guerendo Over Your Usual Starters? | Week 12 Fantasy Football Trade Advice and Start/Sit Decisions (Ep. 1478)

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in friends too. Fantasy Pros, the Fantasy Football podcast.

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the extra point right here on the Fantasy

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Pros Discord. We are live with a studio audience with

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the Discord audience that's gonna be raising their hands. We're

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be bringing them up. And it's a podcast

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of the people. That's it, because literally the people are

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>going to dictate the content. Who are we. I'm Chris Welch.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>That is Andrew Rickson here every single week for you

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and live on the Discord two pm Eastern every single Thursday,

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot Com slash chat. If you want to check

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>out all the other awesome stuff we've got out of Bounds,

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, is now on the video side.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Incredible edits we have, but you can come and join

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that two pm Eastern on Mondays. We've got a couple

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>other great offerings as well. We actually just had one this.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>We have these like bi weekly ones that pop up

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Werman Fits five pm Eastern on the first Tuesday of

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>each month, and then you end up getting fits and

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Bogs five pm Eastern on the third Tuesday of each month.

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Andrew Rickson not letting you talk

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>what's up, buddy?

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 2>What's up? Man? Feeling good? Week fourteen?

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 3>That's where he is, right We fourteen, Yeah, so the

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>precursor to the fantasy football playoffs. So hopefully if you're

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 3>tuning in, you're either just interesting you like hearing us

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>talk about football and fantasy and things that aren't real.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 3>But if you are tuning in because you want the analysis,

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the groundbreak, we'll also offered that too, because we have

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people, hopefully that are going to be

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 3>competing for championships. I know that I'm in the possible

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 3>of a couple of playoff berths, So I think all

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>you gotta do is say, hey, if you get in,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 3>anything can happen. And I want to stress one thing Welsh.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Don't reinvent the wheel here, right, don't get cute over,

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>don't get cute, and don't do things that you haven't

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 3>been doing all season long. Don't immediately become a kicker

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 3>connoisseur now that you're in the playoffs if you haven't

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>cared about your kicker, or don't start now because you're

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna overthink and you're gonna lead. It's gonna lead you

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 3>on a path you never want to go.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Down.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 3>So if you've been like I'm very particular about the

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 3>kicker I play, then up. You got here for a reason.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 3>But don't change your process now because these stakes have

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>gotten higher.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me pivot it. Because let me pivot this,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>then I don't. I don't think the kickers Like, I

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>know what you're saying, and I completely agree with it.

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, my process is give me a high

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>scoring team that's playing indoors and I'll take a kicker

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>even if they're not projected high. Blah blah blah. I

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>think this speaks more to a bigger issue, and that's

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the like, should I start Jameis Winston over Patrick Mahomes

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because he does this? Or let me throw a bigger one.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is the one that's in people's faces.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I imagine maybe we'll have a question or two on

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this show. One hundred good jullion percent. We're gonna have

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it this Sunday on the live stream. Is Isaac Grindo

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>getting too cute when it comes to real big decisions? Obviously,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>if you picked him up and you got the waiver,

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I had all the fab across the board, Dude, I

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get him anywhere. I could couldn't get him anywhere.

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I had all the fab in the world. It was nuts.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>So if you.

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Picked him up and you're throwing him in flex over,

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever, Like I mean, I'm gonna look at

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a player's and if you're throwing him in at flex

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>over Gus Edwards, no brainer. But if you're looking at

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Grinda and you're a little bit worried about Brice Hall,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is starting a guy like Grinda who's never started in

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this forty nine years offense because he was the number

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>one waiver claim over a guy like Brece Hall getting

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>too cute?

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that what you have to ask yourselves, I know,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 3>like the common mantras like start your studs, et cetera.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 3>But then the follow up question that is, well, is

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Briece Hall stud And the answer to that is now right, Mike,

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 3>that's so, Yes, the name brands have carried over and

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>carried weight throughout the year. But then you have to

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 3>be real with yourself and be well, has Briese Hal

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>been and studs?

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 3>No, Like, what's the worst going to happen if you

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>bet to Breese Hall? I mean, how is he going

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to hurt you.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Like, well, I mean the worst that could happen is

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>he could have six receptions three touchdowns, Like, I know what,

0:03:58.960 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 3>What you're getting at do something that he has never

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>done all season. Like, don't like project this to be

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the week for him to do something he hasn't done

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 3>all If they haven't done it up to this point,

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>it's probably not gonna happen. So like that's what you

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>need to just Again, it's the same thing with like

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Tyreek hill White. There's a reason why he's not in

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the top five an ECR anymore because he just hasn't

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 3>been that guy this year. Like yeah, I'm well, I'm

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 3>just saying so that's kind of how I look at

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 3>these things. And you have to also with Grenda, like yeah,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 3>there's always a risk, you know. Could this be a

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 3>situation where I think it was a couple of years

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 3>back where I think.

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 2>It was Mike Boone right for the minutes.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't even know what team he was on, but

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>he like looked like he's gonna be the starter and

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 3>people boother found the Broncos.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know what team he was on.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>My point, it might have been it might have been

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings. It would have been I think I might

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>have been.

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Dalvin Cook was out, Madison was also and Mike Boone

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 3>was next up, and people were playing him in the

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Championships just projecting his workload, and he of course

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 3>busted and then it was actually the next week that

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 3>he had a really good game. So at least this

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 3>week is Week fourteen, so than the playoffs yet, So

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's nice at least you can get a

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 3>kind of like test drive the GIRNDO. But I me know,

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 3>we've seen him play this year. He's looked really good.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a good matchup, and he's a fort Niners running

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>back and traditionally, like this is a guy that a

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>spot that Kyle Shanahan has leaned on, these speed size freaks.

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I feel pretty confident about Girndo. So yeah,

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to know what's funny is, to be honest

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>with you, I don't. I don't want to keep belaboring

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this as people just eyes will roll back into their

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>head and never come back. Is like Deebo Samuel might

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>be getting too cute, Like I'm seeing some of the ranks,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>early ranks on him, like I do believe he's gonna

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be more involved in the rushing game, but him being

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>ranked over Juwan Jennings and maybe Debo over Grinda would

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>be getting too cute. But you know, I digress into

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the entire conversation. Maybe you guys will have some of that.

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So again, this show is not just us blab boy.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is us blabbering on, but you guys

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to dictate the blabbering in the discord. We've

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>got the audience. They're raising their hands. That is how

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we are answering questions. Mister Andrew Rickson, you ready to

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>red this bad boy up? That's rock is Revick Cornwallace

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>first up on the extra point this week? What you

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>got cornwallis what's up?

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 5>Guys?

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 6>So basically, in a winning I'm in, it's effectively a

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 6>coin flip fifty to fifty tight match. So like the O,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 6>the rest are super favored. And uh, you know, you

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 6>guys are talking about getting too cute, and That's what

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm worried about. So like I was looking at like

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 6>tight end specifically, and like, is like Noah Gray or

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 6>Juwan Johnson getting too cute over some of the back

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 6>end tightened ones who may or may not be playing tonight.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say, like which ones you got it?

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You mean, like the ones that may have just played okay, correct?

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 6>And then also like playing BTJ over DK Metcalf who

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 6>seems to be losing more and more work to JSN

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 6>who's looked really good.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, those are two really good questions. Cornwallace actually specifically

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>love the tight End One told Ericson before we started.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I was like, hey, before you run off and escape

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>me when the show's done, I need to steal you, because,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as Erickson was kind of alluding to, we're invested this

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>year because we got some teams and I am in

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the championship. Well, I'm sorry. I'm in the finals of

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>one of my FFPC matchups, which you know, as you know,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of money on the line, and I

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have Noah Gray as someone I kind of I don't

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>want to get cute, but I picked him up because

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's also a tight End premium, and I have a

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of the decisions to make. I'm big on Juwan Johnson,

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so he's trying to poke the bear a little bit

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>with you and I Ericson about Juwan Johnson. So obviously

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>he's alluding to Laporta and Tucker Kraft, who just played

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and did whatever they did. Let's alterate a tiny bit

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and be like, is putting in a guy like Noah Gray,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, since he's been the alteration to Travis Kelsey?

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Would that be too cute? Over Let's say Kate Auten,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, who had a little bit of an ant

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>or Evan Ingram going up against Tennessee. Do you think

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Juwan Johnson is being a little too cute?

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's like no agree even being as well being

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>just too cute in that respect, even though maybe you

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are trying to play high upside and go for this

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>huge ceiling. If he's projected to be behind.

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think it is.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you got you know, Okray has to catch

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>two touchdowns, right, which he likes to do.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>He's done it twice already.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>But is that more descriptive or predictive of what he's

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>gonna I mean again, like it's like a Nick Westbropokine thing,

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 3>like is he gonna just score touchdowns every single week?

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Like? Maybe?

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 3>But what is what does conventional wisdom suggest? It's probably

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 3>not gonna last, like, right, So the same thing with

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>catching two touch and you're like, you gotta go back

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>to the basics, right, targets, who's getting targets, who's playing

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 3>the field, who's seeing a lot of snaps, who's playing

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>high scoring environments. That's a huge thing that comes to

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>tight ends. How do you find yourself scoring touchdowns? You're

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 3>playing games that are higher scoring. So if you don't

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 3>think that this game is going to be a shootout,

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 3>then why are you trying to trip over yourself to

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 3>play a tight end in that game?

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Right when?

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of what you need half the time, because

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 3>almost at least a lot of Titans tend to be

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 3>just bad anyway, and all you need is if they

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 3>score a touchdown, you feel like you win, right, Like

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm success, Like that's all you need. So that's kind

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of how I'm looking at it. So I don't think

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 3>that the streamer, I mean, the streamers are streamers for

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 3>a reason this week. I think they're really there. If

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>you've been playing Hunter Henry or Dallas Goddard, then you're

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 3>going to those streamers. But if you have already guys

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 3>that have been playing for you, Kate Aden still has

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>a good matchup this week. I know his targets have

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 3>been down since mc evans has been back, but he

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 3>still gets tarted a lot by Baker Rayfield and it's

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 3>a good matchup for him. So yeah, I also to

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 3>get a tight end too.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Last thing I'm going to add to the tight end thing,

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the Juwan Johnson stuff is more theory. Noah Gray does

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>have application. He has four straight games of four catches.

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>He has I'm sorry, three straight games of four catches.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got three straight games of four more targets, and

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>he had six targets in his last one, and then

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously has the four touchdowns, which kind of like, you know,

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>make the value go crazy. There's a little bit more

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>application and really tough matchup against the Chargers where I

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's doable, but it's tough over those other guys

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>because you are making a calculator risk, even though I

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>do think there's a little bit more of a floor

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>with Gray now that I say it, than this hypothetical

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>with Juwan Johnson. So the answer to come around as

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>being like, I'm probably not getting too cute either, because

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>guess what those guys that you talk about with that

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>massive talent. They're also scoring options, not just the craft

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on the porter who already played, but even like Aughton,

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you know he's going to get targeted in the red

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>zone some the other one. It's funny. I don't think

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Brian Thomas is being cute next to DK Metcalf. They're

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>ranked close to each other. I've got them relatively close,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so I don't really think that's being cute. I worry

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>about mac Jones in general, but he did technically get

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Thomas more involved. But I don't know. I don't like,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are you doing that over DK? I do have DK

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple spots higher than Brian Thomas. I just don't

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's getting cute. But DK is just like he's

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the dude, he's the floor.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think both guys have similar floor ceiling profiles.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 3>But again, I'm gonna have Metcalf, Frank Tire I would

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 3>probably start Metcalf. But Brian Thomas is really good and

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 3>he's shown that even with Mac Jones, he can deliver

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 3>big splash plays. He's facing a really good Titans run defense.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna see volume, and if he gets volume, he

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 3>should be good. Like think with Metcalf and more concerned

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 3>about it's like, is Metcalf like healthy, Like the dude

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 3>has really been He's been banged up all year. I

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 3>think that he's not playing at one hundred percent, So

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 3>that's my other concern. He's already on the He's on

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 3>the injury report again this week with a shoulder injury.

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>But he's also a beast, right he has Gino Smith

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 3>as his quarterback, so I don't think either guy is

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 3>in like the most ideal situation. The Cardinals defense has

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 3>really played well over the last couple of weeks. I

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 3>think the Seattle and Arizona is kind of a pretty

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of slug fest game, even though it's being played

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 3>in the Dome. And then you have the Tennessee Titans

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 3>that are hosting the Jaguars, like in an offense that

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 3>has seemingly no direction to go but down. But Brian

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Thomas has looked good, So yeah, I mean, I think

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>that both guys are wide receiver twos with upside, and

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 3>you know wide receiver is scoring tends to be pretty volatile.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 3>But just based on the body of work that we

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 3>know about Metcalf, he has a connection with Geno. We've

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 3>seen a very small sample size of Brian Thomas with

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'd also like i'd also always throw out,

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>like you know where we're here to give you guys suggestions.

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Go with your gut, you know, because don't blindly just

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>take us and then the scream and blame it. If

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you got to feel and you're like, hey, I'm really

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>leaning Brian Thomas, I'm going to tell you it's not

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy if you do it. I think it's in line.

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>We're both going to suggest DK metcalf over, but you're

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in the same general line. We know what Brian Thomas

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>can do. It's just can mac Jones unfurl that?

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 3>And we don't mean he's he's more like again, if

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 3>it's anything, it's more about like what's the floor?

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, the floor is much better with DK than

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Brian Thomas.

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because mac Jones, I mean he can just crater

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 3>like like the job Wrars could score zero points and

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 3>no one would be surprised.

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I have had him on my team all year. Actually,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this this team that's in the championship, I

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>have Brian Thomas. I've experienced those craters. It's not great,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not not so good. It's not so good as I'll

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you before with the Fantasy Pros discords, credible community,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>all these people in here, you know, we get these

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>great guys and gals in here. We've got rooms across

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>the board that you can go and talk in different

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football aspects. We've got games. This show absolutely free

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:20.719
<v Speaker 1>when you come in. We also have amas that you

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>can unlock, so we have a premium feature. You don't

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have to, but you can join up for free or

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get premium like Land, the man that's that entire thing

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I led to just say. Land shows that he's a

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>premium member, so he's got everything. Land, What's up?

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 7>How are we doing?

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Fellows?

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 7>Appreciate you taking my question. Similarly, the last guy panic

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 7>mode and need a win. I have a lineup question

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 7>wide receiver wise. I got T Higgins, Tyreek Helan, and

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 7>Pittman Junior. Currently starting deeling in my flex and wondering

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 7>if I should pick up MVS over THELAN for healing

0:13:58.600 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 7>poor matchup for the week.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question, Uh No, I would not, feeling

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in my mind THELAN is the target monster. They're going

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to be playing from behind. He's gonna get volume, He's

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>really good in just like short separation, which I think

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 1>makes him great. MVS is too volatile. It's two or

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>three catches. It does have big touchdown play. I personally

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>am going with Adam Thielen in that one. What's say

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you Rickson?

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I prefer Adam feel and I think

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 3>that you know MVS is probably gonna do his same

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 3>old song and d answer. He'll catch one pass for deep, deep,

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 3>deep yardage, maybe scores touchdown.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we bet his longest reception every single week?

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's facing the Giants this week, and the

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Giants are horrible against the deep ball, so.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna see if it's even upright now.

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't disagree with you, and I would say I

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>don't want to drop Feeling because he has more matchups

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 3>after the Eagles. He gets Dallas, Arizona and Tampa Bay

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 3>in week seventeen, Like you might be playing field in

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:02.479
<v Speaker 3>your Fantas Football Championships against Tampa Bay. So keep him.

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowards won't release it, by the way, they got some

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>other ones. I won't really release the MVS tape. Please,

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we want the longest reception that I'm looking for. Baby. Oh,

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>here's a little tease. I have a longest reception prop

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for the prop show. I'm betting pros with you and

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I and Piez of p. I haven't put a longest

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>reception prop one time the entire year. I was a

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>part of our card. It's part of my card this week,

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>or the longest reception that I love. So there's a

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>little teaser betting pros the best props for the week,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Eric's and myself and Joe Pizza Pa, stay in your lane?

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>What's up? What's up? What's up?

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 8>Well?

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I have two things.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 4>One of them is a funny fab story from one

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 4>of my leagues. This guy spent ninety two dollars out

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 4>of his hundred dollars budget on the Eagles defense this week.

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I thought you would find that humorous.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>No, what was the I mean.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 4>No, either no one else did on the Eagles defense

0:15:58.400 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 4>and he got clowned.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, wait, so I'm I'm with wanting to get it.

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Had he not spent a dollar all season? And he

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>just like it was all.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 4>Of the remaining budget. He spent eight dollars and then

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 4>in week fourteen he said, I need ninety two dollars

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 4>on Eagles detense.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 8>To be sued.

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm all about that defense this week, but

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that's like a it's like a ten dollars, all right,

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I like that is he still getting clowned to this

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like minute?

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I mean someone also put twenty dollars on McPherson,

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 4>and I made sure to call that out since McPherson's

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 4>now out for like four weeks.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just got we got put on the ir well,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, make sure to hit him back up when

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers score twenty four or something like that, and

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll remind him, a right, what's the what else you got?

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 4>So I've got Rico, Dowdell, Tuba Hubbard, and Bresee Hall

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 4>heading into the playoffs, as well as Brian Robinson. I'm

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 4>not worried about about Robinson. But those three running backs

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 4>in Daldell, Hubbard, and Hall, where would you rank them?

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, looking at that playoff schedule and you know,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 4>just kind of a one two three if you don't mind.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So, Dowdell, Hubbard and I also thought I took

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>myself off the stage here. I thought we were gonna

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm pulling up the rest of season schedule, strength of schedule.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Thought we were going to talk about this week, because

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, actually, like Cuba the least

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of all of those running backs this week. So we

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have Hall, Dowdell, and Cuba. The ranks say Hall has

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the fourth or the rest of season schedule. Hall has

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the fourth best strength of schedule, Dowdell is the tenth best,

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and I already for in Cuba is down at the

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom ten a two star rating. So that's how the

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule says it. Mister Andrew Rickson, what say

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of ericson strength of schedule?

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 9>Say?

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my rankings have Hall one and then Hubbard and Dowdell.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 2>It's it's it's pretty close.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's more of a kind of like

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 3>a COINI it depends on what we see from like

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Brooks, right, because like Dowdell is the bell cow

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 3>for the Dallas Cowboys rest of the season.

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Like, I think that's pretty clear.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Hubbard maybe not so much because now we're seeing

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Brooks get a little bit more involved. I think that

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Hubbard and Dowdell have similar schedule and you look at

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 3>just who they have to play, so I mean they're

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 3>playing each other again. We talked about this on one

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>of the trade shows. I think in week fifteen it's

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys Panthers, right, they're playing each other, and I remember

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 3>be like, all right, Welsh, who do you want?

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you want?

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it was Chuba Hubard and Ricot Dade's like, which,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 3>which which side do you want?

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Of this? Of this coin here?

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 3>We'll have to go back and listen to that episode

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to see, uh, which which player we each?

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it was Dowdell and somebody else, But

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a great matchup for both of them.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so those are good matchups for those players. Arizona

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 3>and Tampa Bay round up for Cuba. And then with Rico,

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 3>I believe he has the I mean he has Tampa

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Bay and Philadelphia, so I mean pretty good schedules most

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 3>of the part. There's a couple of tough matchups in there,

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 3>like Week seventeen Agains the Eagles, like you're not gonna

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 3>want to play Ricau Dadell. I think that they're both

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of like nah, like back end RB two's restless season.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Breestell is healthy, like he has the best

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 3>schedule and he's the best running back, but I don't

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 3>really know how healthy he is at this point. He

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 3>had another DNP here on Thursday, so we don't know

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 3>if he's going to play.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>That's the big thing. My playbook is not just a

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>tool for draft season or early season. It's a tool

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for all seasons, my friend. Manage your fantasy football lineups

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and dominate your leagues with my playbook from Fantasy Pros

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Championship. Yes, you can use my playbook suite

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>of powerful tools to help you make better decisions, manage

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>your lineups, and win your leagues. Even if we are

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>not here talking to you face to face, or you

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>miss a podcast or whatever it is, my playbook you're

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to miss. My playbook has got you covered

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>because all you gotta do is sink your league for

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>free to get customized fantasy football news, rankings, and analysis.

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So go and sink it today. You can even upgrade

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the full unlock Fantasypros dot com, slash my playbook,

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>or download my Playbook app in your app store. My

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Vans Van's fifty four. Next up on

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the extra point?

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 2>What's it?

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Vans, come on down, you're the next contestant on all

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>right here, we got go to the front. Yeah, we

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>got you. Hello, Hey guys, are we're good?

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Man?

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Not too much?

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 10>Not too much? Getting close to that nitty gritty playoff,

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 10>So I thought I'd ask you a few questions.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>If that's cool, let's do it.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 10>Okay. So I started out I'm in first place PS,

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 10>but I got lucky with a couple of wide receivers

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 10>at the start, and then I was planning on trading

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 10>a few AKAA Garrett and DeVante Adams. However, my Godwin

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 10>got hurt so I lost him. So I'm riding those

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 10>two boys for the rest of the season. I also

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 10>have Brian Thomas in the bench area there. Did I

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 10>just stick with the Jets or what do you? What

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 10>do you think there?

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Man? Those two ers? Where are you at with that?

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Because like, I'm just a pro Garrett Wilson guy every

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>single week, and I just feel like, I mean, obviously

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Rogers likes Davante, but it sometimes just amounts to Man,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel like the upside play is Garrett

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and Brian Thomas over Adams. I think that's how

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I have it in ranks. Ericson what say you.

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 3>For this week? Yeah, I think that's probably the move.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 3>I thought he was talking more like rest of the season.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 2>He's did you mean the playoff? Yeah, I mean I.

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't like having two Jets players because like one of

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 3>them is going to eat and the other ones not.

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Jets have a good schedule.

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 3>They play the rate they play the Jaguars in the

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>rams like and you think that okay, Like Rogers, like

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the season's over, but like he probably doesn't want to

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 3>go out like this, like he wants like maybe he

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 3>puts up number I don't know, but like the I mean,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.239
<v Speaker 3>the Jaguars are like historically bad on defense. Like if

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Rogers is ever gonna throw for three hundred yards, it

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 3>would be against the Jacksonville Jaguars, if he even cares.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 2>But again, I'll.

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Strength the schedule, by the way, real quick. Brian Thomas

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Jags are the third worst strength of schedule

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>for wide receivers fourteen through seventeen. The Jets wide receivers

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Wilson DeVante the third best among wide receivers weeks

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth through seventeen, So Jets wide receivers might be the

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>play Vans. Did you have a did you have another question?

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 10>Thanks for that, And I got the old Kyle Pitts

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 10>syndrome going on here as well. I was lucky to

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 10>pick up Tucker Kraft. Should I just ride Craft as well?

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Or what?

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 11>Yeah?

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, Kraft played and he did pretty good. Here's what

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I can say. It was better than Kyle Pitts. But

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem. Ericson and I are on opposite planets

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>on Kyle Pits and Kyle Pits production this week. So

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm a negative Nancy on Kyle Pitts. Hypothetically, Ericson, even

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>though he already played, would you have played Kyle Pitts

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>over Tucker Craft.

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 3>No, I had Tucker Craft going in a league. Somebody

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 3>dropped Kyle Pits in that same league, and as as

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:04.239
<v Speaker 3>much I wanted to just stick them into, but I

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I still like I want Craft. So even though I

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>like Kyle Pits a lot, this.

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Week, what was your what's your rank on Pits twelve?

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you have Pits or Disley? Oh Pit?

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have him at twelve, I was

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, oh, Pits or Noah Gray is a fun one,

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>but I bet you.

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.719
<v Speaker 3>Have I have Disleey Ahead, I have Dizsney hide and

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I have Pits.

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it Pits twelve, Disley's ahead of him.

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>What about Noah Gray? I have Pits, I have no

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a Gray one spot ahead of Pits right now? Yeah,

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I want no Agree to be better, and

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I want to keep moving him up.

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>But I need to be realistic with myself. But four

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks four recepts or three straight weeks or four

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>receptions not bad? How many Kyle Pits have last three weeks?

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 2>He has one catch the last two games?

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Why why he is so athletically talented? Why can he?

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Is he?

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>What is his separation score? Is it just the worst?

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 3>I don't dude, I'm just waiting. Dude, He's gonna be

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 3>so good in twenty twenty nine on the Commanders.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Just I mean, as soon as he Dreddas has a

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>good point. We never did put a bet on our

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pits versus Juwan Johnson for this week. I already

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>have a bet going with piece of Pia from the

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>out of Bound show The Nails Painted Caleb Williams bet.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 1>What could we bet? Dreddi's is shaved ahead, but we

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>can't lose more hair here at Fantasy pros We've only

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>got so much hair to go around. Is there anything

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>else you can think of?

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean I'm trying to think what would be fitting

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 3>for another Kyle pits, just like killing your fantasy team type.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Of So here's an interesting one. Dreddis is saying, no

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>face Erickson has a mustache? Do you You don't? Yeah,

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you have kind of like the mustache thing going right.

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's this hair that sometimes grows out of

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 3>my face. I'm not really sure why you want to

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 3>call it, but it's there sometimes.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I could have a mustache for a show and

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>then and then you could shave the mustache for a show.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 2>We should we shave our armpits because.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Gross, what are we gonna show it on?

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't know. I'm trying to think

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 3>of ideas. I mean, his name is Kyle Pitts.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>We could put we could put the letter of the

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>guy in the side of our hair. No, how about this,

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys listening put some comments? Yeah, I know you

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>guys can do that, Like if you're listening on Spotify

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, feel free or tweet at us

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>if you've got some ideas. We probably need it by

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>like Saturday, no later. But I don't think the armpit

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>one is super great. Just going to throw that out there.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>But maybe there's a mustache type of bet. We'll figure

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it out if you If you anything else comes up

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in the chat people are listening, feel free to throw

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>out ideas for what our bet can be. But listen,

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I gotta be careful here. If I lose

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>all my bets, I could have like a you know,

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Bert Reynolds mustache and painted fingernails. Like, I gotta be

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>careful what's going on. I do have to be on

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>video all week, so but we'll hear what you guys

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>have to say. All right, let's get back to it.

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to Nick. Nick up and now Nick's always here.

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 2>What's up?

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 12>Nick?

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 11>I have a questions for you regarding some flex situations

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 11>and grease hall situations. So in one of my leagues,

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 11>I got Grendo with only thirty five dollars fab somehow,

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 11>but that is my remaining of it. They're down to zero.

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 11>But I'm wondering between him and Tyrone Tracy. I'm assuming

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 11>Chuba is a bench this week anyway, But if it

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 11>would be Grendo or Tracy in the flex spot there.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 11>That's the first question.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's actually a little bit. It's not quite what

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I was like. I like started the show with of

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>saying it's it's cute or that might be a decision.

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit easier. I have Grendo higher,

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but I also really like Tracy this week and that

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>matchup against New Orleans. I'm not sure it's really being

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>cute or anything like that, but I got Grindo. Do

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you also, Erickson?

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 2>So why do you have Grendo? Explain that to me?

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Why do I have Grendo over Tracy?

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because you say like Tracy?

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, you know, I do like Trey. I like Tracy

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown, but I also like Grendo for it.

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that it's the run game against

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bears is an absolutely obtainable thing. I think he's

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna get eighteen plus carries. I think he's gonna be

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>involved in the pass game. I think the Niners are

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>going to run away with this game. Honestly, even though

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I laid down the spread a little bit, and I

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to lay on a decent amount of Grindo.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the only thing I'm worried about. They get

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>into the five and Grindo gets out and it becomes

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Debo running it in, and that takes away some of

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that upside. But I think from a volume standpoint, Grindo

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is a top twelve back. I'm a I'm a tiny

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bit worried about where some of that volume has gone

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>with Devin singletaryes, Tracy's got nine carries in two straight games.

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>He's a little bit more involved in the passing game,

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think Singletary took away a red zone option.

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I'm hedging a little bit where I'm like,

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Tracy, but his volume has gone down and

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Grindo should be a minimum fifteen carried. Guy, are you

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on the opposite end?

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 3>I thought that I might be, because you know we're

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>doing all this, like all this is Grenda is projecting, right, Yeah,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 3>we have no idea what his role is gonna be,

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 3>like no clue. Whereas Tyring again, like these are both

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 3>rookie running backs, right, Tyron Tracy has earned the job

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 3>as the starting running back on the Giants like he

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 3>earned his way again. An injury helped so I guess

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 3>for me, it's just like, are we hoping that Grendo

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>like has the tyrone Tracy roll right that Tracy has

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 3>already shown to have. Now that being said, I kind

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 3>of I don't want to say I disagree with the

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 3>touch projection for Girndo, but I I almost don't really

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 3>care because he's a running back that has shown I

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 3>only need ten carries and I can get it done

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 3>like he's explosive. So I feel like we might have

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 3>more outs with Grendo, even if we look up and

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh man, like Deebo got more carries than

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 3>we thought they used Patrick Taylor and it's like weird

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 3>receipt role or whatever, And then you gotta feel bad.

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 3>You look at the final touches, you're like, oh man,

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't that great. But Rondo's good. He fits the

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 3>scheme so in a kind of like a Bucky Irving fashion,

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 3>he gets it done even though his role maybe wasn't

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 3>as glamorous as we thought it would be. And then,

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 3>as I like to do with some of these tougher questions,

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 3>you zoom out, do you want to start the Giants

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 3>running back or the forty nine.

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Ers running Yeah. No, that's a really good state way

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to put it.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 3>And when you simplify it that way, like they just

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 3>give me the forty nine ers running back, like yeah,

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 3>So I have him ranked close together, So I think

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 3>that it is tight, but I think yeah, kind of

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 3>just working through and thinking more about it, I think

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Rendo is probably safer. I think both guys have similar

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 3>ceiling plays because remember, I Tracey doesn't score a touchdown

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 3>last week against Dallas, like he would have been a

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 3>bust and that was against Dallas.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll also throw a couple little things out there. Bears

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are on average giving up one hundred and sixteen yards

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>per game rushing to running backs. Six straight weeks, a

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>running back has had at least sixty yard or more

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>rushing and that running back has had sixteen or more carries,

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Bears have given up thirty or more carries

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in three of the last five games against So I

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>like Grindo's chances, but there is again this is coming

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>back to like there's a little bit of theory, like

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we've known what we've gotten Tracy. I just don't like

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the touches going down. So sorry, that was a lot. Nick,

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You've just been hanging around, didn't do you have a

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>DoD you have another one?

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 11>I do, and I totally agree with you guys. That's

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 11>sort of what I've been racking my brain between. So

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 11>in my other league, I'm trying to figure out if

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 11>Breese Hall is healthy, which I know is a big

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 11>question mark at this point, whether I should go with

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 11>like Brian Thomas Junior or Breese or if Bree's out,

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 11>if Brayln or Brian Thomas Junior would be a better

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 11>flex it's half PPR league. Then the other nuanced question

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 11>to this one, Kim Kaid is probably going to be back.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 11>I would start him at my tight end spot. But

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 11>on the wire there also guys like Will Disley, Ferguson

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 11>if he's back, Juwan Johnson, Uh, curious what you guys

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 11>think about both that flex situation and tight end situation.

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll come to the tight end in a second. If

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Erickson follow me here, because I think you're gonna agree

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Brace Hall over Brian Thomas easy, and if Bree is out,

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Braylan Allen over Brian Thomas. Easy.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The only way I would consider Brian Thomas is now,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you probably wouldn't consider him really yeah.

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Like if they were like Bree is super hurt and

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have a limited workload and then both of

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>them are eating into each other like maybe Yeah.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 3>And I was gonna say, like maybe if I'm like

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 3>a massive underdog, just because I think that the Jets

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 3>just they have a cap ceiling in general, but Brian

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Thomas can make plays on his own. So if I'm

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 3>like a massive underdog, maybe I chase the ceiling with

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Brian Thomas as being like this absurdly talented rookie that

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 3>can rip off one hundred receiving yards without mac Jones

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 3>essentially doesn't even better. But yeah, I would probably just

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>take the touch with Raymon. Allen went overthink it as

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 3>for the tight end, I mean, why do you want

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 3>to start doing kink Aid? Like what is what has

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 3>he done at any point this year where we think, oh,

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 3>he's a leak title that we can start every week?

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>So so would you you would dump him for Disley?

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I mean he's a land mine, isn't he.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I'm not like making a case for him.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I think I think I'd rather face kank Aid, Like

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 3>if my opponent picks up Kate plays him against me.

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 3>It's like similar to if your opponent picks picks up

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Pits and plays him against you, like I know

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 3>you're feeling great well if you're facing fits in your

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 3>line up this week.

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.239
<v Speaker 3>It's a sneaky play this week, Coyle pits just when

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 3>you just when you think it's safe to bench him

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 3>and cut him from your lineup.

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 2>This is when he strikes all.

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Right back in one oh oh yeah, so we did

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the tight end. I want to go back to one

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>thing real quick. On the Garrinda stuff. He's the topic

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of du jour and if you don't have him, you're

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>probably like a little bit disinterested. But I don't know

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>if you've looked. I have two different sites here, give

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>me what you think and unless you've looked, and you're

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>going to ruin this his projection. I have Fantasy Pros

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>projections and I also have PFF projections. PFF sometimes can

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>be like a little bit up. I like to use

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>them a lot. But what do you think Grinda's projections are?

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Obviously knowing he doesn't have a backdrop or anything like that,

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and what the number is, and then I'll and maybe

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>even where he ranks among running backs, like in projected

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards.

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 3>So you don't want like a fantasy points projection, you

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>just want like his like stat line.

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with yards for a second.

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I would say like.

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Sixty five all purpose yards all purpose okay, like right

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 3>rushing and receiving yards.

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Fantasy pros our projections have all purpose yards eighty

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:57.959
<v Speaker 1>one sixty nine on the ground, twelve receiving. That is

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the eighth most rushing yards pff I, I give out their eggs. Well,

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of kind of They're fine, go sub to them.

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They're great. Fourth most rushing yards among all running backs,

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred all purpose yards between rushing and receiving.

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>A pretty wild receiving number as well. It's actually almost

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like they just put Christian McCaffrey in there the

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy pros Fantasy points though for Grinda. So here's where

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>things get tricky in half PPR, He's I mean, I

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>can't even know, I don't you can know everybody in

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the number. It's about eighteen, somewhere between eighteen and twenty.

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, Tyrone Tracy projects higher in Fantasy points

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.720
<v Speaker 1>even though Grindo is the eighth highest projected rushing yards.

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think the big thing between the sites is

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a projected receiving yard number that PFF is putting on there.

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>But PFF's got one hundred total all purpose yards, Grindo's

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>eight on Fantasy pros projections, but they don't have the

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.879
<v Speaker 1>receiving side and his it's eleven point seven points. That's

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>under Dubtle, that's under Tracy, that's under Swift. I mean,

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I fully agree with some of this,

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but it is just not as high as the rushing

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>yard total. So I just want to throw that out.

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts on that.

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's again, it's a projection, right, if they

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 3>don't use any of these other running backs, then this

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 3>is all correct. But what like sometimes they just do,

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 3>like there are guys that like get random carries that

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 3>we didn't even know we're on the team, and like

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 3>what what I guaranteed none of these projections are even

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 3>in the same ballpark when it comes to Debos rushing.

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 2>What's his what are his rushing projections?

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, they're all I'm sure they're all over the

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 3>place because it's like, well, what's his role going to be?

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Like this is again I think Arendo like for most

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 3>intensive purposes, you're going to start him like you picked

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 3>him up. You're probably going to start them their six

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 3>teams on by like if you have the luxury of

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 3>not having to play him, like I guess like patch

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 3>yourself on the back. But I think he's gonna be

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 3>a good start. I think that he's going to get

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 3>at least sixty rushing yards. I think he's probably gonna score.

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you're gonna look up be like, oh

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 3>my god, I'm an idiot. I started Grendo like, maybe

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 3>he do start him over someone that gets more points,

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think that his output is going to

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 3>be like I'm massively disappointed.

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Tracy's close to one where you might be like like

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if you sat him for Tracy and whatever. By the way,

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>last thing, and then let's get back to some questions

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>from the audience. What do you think the project I

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>have both the projector from PFF and Fantasy pros the

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards for debo. What do you think it looks like?

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 12>Man?

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Because I feel like it could be as like high

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 3>as like thirty five. But then I would say, probably

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.959
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be a little bit more like less

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 3>aggressive because we haven't seen in a while. So I'll

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.479
<v Speaker 3>say like twenty twenty rushing yards twenty two and a half,

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty one and a half.

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy pros is eight, and the PFF is ten. Oh well, yeah,

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, I totally agree with you. I think I

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>think he can have more rushing yards than receiving yards

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this week. To be honest with you, like, it's just

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting element that the rushing yard projection is

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>not projecting Debo. But I had some people like just

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>losing their mud dog talking to do Bo. He doesn't

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>do anything, and it's like, well, no, like this is

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>where he might because McCaffrey is out, Mason is out,

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this is where the niners and now they might not

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>do it, but this is in theory where they would

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>do that. That's why there's just some weird It's good

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>to be asking these questions and we can work through

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it live, but at the end of the day, it's

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be hard for really anybody to come off of

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>being like, don't start Grenda unless it maybe is a

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>gunst like a brief hall. But I think that's the tyrone.

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Tracy one is like it's a perfect line. It's a

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>perfect line of looking at this player and being like, oh,

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 1>do you do it over Tracy.

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 3>If anything, we would just love to get some Kyle

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Shanahan coach speak where he comes out and says, Yep,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna I'm gonna use a running back by committee.

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's gonna get equal touches because I mean I'm actually

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 3>all right, no for twenty.

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Five yep, rely know, grenda fire him up? Baby?

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Does anyone? What is his coach speaking? You know, there's

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>like that Twitter account do we know?

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I mean, I don't need in the index

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 3>to say that he's you know, full of uh exploit

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 3>is right? Like the dude just oh yeah, mcaffy's fine,

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and then he doesn't play like the entire season, and

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 3>then he comes back and then oh yeah, we're not sure,

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 3>we'll like ease him in. And Christ McCaffrey is like

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:10.919
<v Speaker 3>a drug to Kyle Shannon and any guy can't stop

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 3>using him even though this is a fragile asset, and

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 3>he just doesn't.

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>So I created a new Broadway play on out of

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Bounds You go again? Yeah, yeah, exactly, Drey to just

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>put in there. It's called Lies the musical. Go and

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>check it out. It's on Out of Bounds on the

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. You can watch it. It's great and it's

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 1>my new musical and it's all about Kyle Shanahan. It's

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just called Lies Lies. Alan, it's up, Allen. We're getting

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>back to you guys. Hopefully it's not a great week.

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no way there can be any more grendo questions.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>We should have answered them all.

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.479
<v Speaker 2>We're trying to. Yeah, try to hit it on all.

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>It's an important thing, exactly, all right, Alan Read you

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to come up, Just come on back, sir Buckets.

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh hello, what's up those? What's going on?

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Man?

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:54.919
<v Speaker 4>Hey?

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 13>I got a dynasty question and that's cool with you all.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, throw it at us.

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 13>So I'm looking to acquire Cuba Hubbard for the playoffs

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 13>and I'm considering giving up two seconds and a fourth.

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>How big of a League.

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Ten team?

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you get what does your current running back

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>situation look like? Because I like, Tuba is not necessarily

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite for the rest of this season, solid dynasty

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>with a contract extension, but also really, I mean, Jonathan

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Brooks looks good. What does your running back situation look

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like is it abysmal?

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 13>It's actually not bad.

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:34.439
<v Speaker 2>My wide receivers aren't great.

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 13>I haven't been able to find anyone they trade for

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 13>four wide receivers. So but for running backs, I have

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 13>Henry Jacobs, James Cook, and Montgomery. I just picked up Corando,

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 13>so I actually do have a good amount.

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're not trading him for the playoffs?

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Really?

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean I I don't I hate this trade?

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh do you hate it? You hate giving up? See,

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I I are willy nilly give up picks? Like I

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hear two seconds and a fourth, I'm like, I don't know, man,

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Like there's impact in those later rounds. But then I

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>hear a ten team and I'm like, oh that's a

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:06.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. But you hate this bad boy?

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to trade for tube Hover right now.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean what if he goes out in bombs another week?

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:13.879
<v Speaker 3>Then where's his value at? Like, like you can look

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 3>up one week after this and immediately regretless trade.

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But like, if you're making this trade though, you're you're

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of giving yourself a little bit of support for

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:23.919
<v Speaker 1>as a backup because you're not playing him, except maybe

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that like Dallas game, you're giving your support, but then

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you're playing him into future years and covering from Derrick Henry.

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>So like, is it really that like if you look

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>at it from the grand scheme and not just like

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of weeks. Do you buy it

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more? A couple of seconds for Cuba Hubbard?

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Does that too much?

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 2>I think it is.

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I get that they signed the contract, but

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 3>they also drafted trumping Brooks in the second round. No,

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and it took what one game for us to look, wow,

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 3>jnth Brooks looks.

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Really he does look really good. That's right.

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 2>He played like one. He finally got a touch. We're like,

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 2>oh man, oh, this is the guy that we were

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 2>all obsessed.

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>And it's like the thing I don't love is if

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>they became like Rashad White Bucky and Jonathan Brooks took

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bucky thing. The Panther's offense is just not like

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the box and it says like, I don't know how

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna work in that. But I don't know. I

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 1>don't hate it like you do. It's not a first

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>round pick.

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 12>I don't know.

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you don't need to give up two seconds and

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>push you have a ton of depth. I don't know

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>when you would ever start Cuba, But I don't know.

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not against it. I'm trying to think, like,

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what the hell does that second round pick really look

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>like next year? Unfortunately as a ten team, And if

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>it wraps around and you win, that could be like

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.359
<v Speaker 1>a thirteen or fourteenth rookie pick. If you don't and

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you just swing the first round over each time, that's

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like a twenties.

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate it as much, all right, kind of

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>rapid fire a little bit. Oh, I forgot to get

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Allen in here. Egg boy, egg boy? What's up? Hello?

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 14>You can hear me?

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, you've got a great mic man. Yeah, what's up dude?

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 14>Two quarterbacks is Gino and Winston?

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 2>I picked up?

0:41:54.440 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 14>Because so I have Gibbs, I have Williams, I have

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 14>Kamara as my running backs. I got Grinda. So the

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 14>real question is do I play Gorendo Whil's up injured?

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 14>Do I play either of them over Gino?

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Or Okay? So that still broke up a whole bunch,

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But the question sounds like it was, do you play

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Grendo over either one of those picked up quarterbacks? In

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 1>super flex Gino and Winston ericson.

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 12>No.

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I just you just have such a high floor with quarterbacks,

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 3>like they don't even have to play good and they

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 3>can still get like sixteen fantasy points like they get

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 3>sixty eight. Wasn't a bad game, Like the floors is

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 3>way too high. And I know that sometimes it doesn't

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 3>always work out where you have a skill player that

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 3>outscores a quarterback. But I mean, nine times out of ten,

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the quarterbacks usually outscore the skill players. I just I

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 3>don't think you need to overthink it.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So I just play the two kbs.

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Which one would you do? By the way, if it

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was because I don't think he meant he was starting

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>both of them. If you had to start just Gino

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>or Winston, would you go, yeah, A volume.

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 2>He's not.

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 3>He's I mean, he's basically like matchup proof because he

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 3>like creates his own I mean, he creates his own

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 3>fantasy value.

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 2>With the way he pla.

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Like he gives like more opportunities because he's like, oh,

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.919
<v Speaker 3>we need more targets, pick six coming your way.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It's true, dude, I used to like It's good. I

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>don't do as much anymore like my my in this

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 1>League Show. I'm doing it for ten years. In the

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>first couple of years, just because I have a like

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 1>radio and audio background, I would just like sit there

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and re listen to the whole show and edit clips

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>in I would you like parody songs? I do just

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, and it would it consumes me and

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it would take like five hours and it was totally

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not worth it. But to me, I'm like, okay, great.

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>When I hear Jameis Winston speak, I want a super cut.

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I want one of those like you know they somebody

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>takes a meme, you know, like the hoktoor and they

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>turn into a song. Or I need a super cut

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>of Jameis Winston and his his stuff where he's just

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.879
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the snow or God Deliver Me from

0:43:55.920 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Pick six is just he's just a He's an electric factory.

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I just need a super cut of all the amazing

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>things he said. Someone, Please don't make me do it.

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the time and if I start, I

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>will get consumed. Please somebody else do it for me.

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>God I love him. Alan, we will try you again,

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>say we can get you out. What's up allan?

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 15>Okay, So I guess I'm kind of piling on the

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 15>Isaac Garendo talk. I have bris Hall obviously his status

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 15>is looking kind of doubtful for this week. Believe it

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 15>or not, both Isaa Guendo and Brailan Allen are both

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 15>available on waivers. Who would you like this week to

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 15>have a higher website game assuming Brisal is word out?

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think we can assume bres Hall is out.

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking up Grendo and I'm going with it. It's

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a good question. I thought this was going to

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>be Breuce Hall or Garendo Erickson first answer that, Brishall

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>or Grendo, And then would you rather if Haul is out,

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Grindo or Alan.

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Because they'll probably play bres if he's healthy. But again

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I mean, he did in DNP Thursday

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 3>and Wednesday last week and he played, but this week

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 3>he has done that, so I don't like his chances

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of playing. And I think that if you're gonna just

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 3>pick up one of those guys anyway, you just try

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 3>to pick up Grendo. Yeah, so you know, because he

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 3>not only has again like Braylen, Allen might be one

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 3>week of value. There's no other running back left for

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 3>the fy nin Ers. I mean, they brought in some guys,

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 3>but he has more value not just this week potentially,

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 3>but the rest of it. So that's something you have

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 3>to keep in mind with you're making these waiver wire

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 3>decisions like and even like start sit decisions like if

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 3>you cut a guy to add this other guy because

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 3>that you like him more this week, that's fine, but

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 3>then what happens next week?

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And as long as there is a next week though, yes,

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's all you know what I mean?

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, so obviously you need to cater to if

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I have to win this week, then you can't really

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 3>think about what's going on next week. You have to

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 3>do all everything in your power to win this one game.

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 3>But if you all start considering like the playoff run,

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 3>like yeah, you want Grendo because he has less competition

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 3>and Braylan Allen is depended on well Hall missus this

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 3>week or what he plays next week, then you can't

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 3>play Allen. And then you're also rostering two spots kind

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:08.720
<v Speaker 3>of for like one player between Hall and Allen, whereas Grenda.

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Now you have a Jets running back and a four

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 3>nine is running back. She could play them both technically

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 3>if they're both healthy.

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Dude, So I I just this surge just came through

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>me of just Corinda fails. We're talking so much about Grinda.

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried this is going to be a moment in time.

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>There's no reason behind it. By the way, everything we've

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about, like it's a good matchup, you can run

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Bears, it is Grinda. There's just something sick

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in my brain that like you're bringing up Mike Boone

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just having this flash of like, my god,

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we are talking so much about Grinda. If he fails, well,

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 3>God, I mean but that's again like you have to

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.760
<v Speaker 3>weigh like the risk reward. Yeah, yeah, he's all projectioned,

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 3>like he's projection, like you don't know what his role

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:58.240
<v Speaker 3>is going to be, Like we're all.

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 1>On everybody is on board, but it's as we don't

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>really know.

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and sometimes very long.

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.399
<v Speaker 3>But again going back to the outs conversation, right, why

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I feel confident about Grendo because what are we concerned about,

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 3>like the workload. If the workload's not there, well, what

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 3>does that leave you? Oh, it leaves you with a

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 3>running back on the fort and I ers offense that's

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 3>usually pretty good in a good overall matchup against a

0:47:22.160 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 3>pretty bad Bears run defense with a guy that has

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 3>gotten it done when he's gotten at least ten carries,

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 3>like he's gonna get ten carries, right, Like, I don't

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 3>think that's over projecting him in any way, shape or one.

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:33.959
<v Speaker 2>I think that's pretty safe.

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>He's projected run sixteen seventeen across both the sides, by

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the way.

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 3>But what I'm saying is I don't think he even

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 3>needs to get there to like be fine in fantasy,

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:44.919
<v Speaker 3>because he's an explosive running back, because it's a good matchup. Again,

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 3>like we've seen, number two running backs can produce against

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 3>bad run defenses We've seen all year against the Carolina Panthers.

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 3>And again I don't say the Bears are in that

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:56.799
<v Speaker 3>range of bad run defenses, but they're not that far off.

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>The only problem is the number two running back might

0:47:58.640 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be Debo in this one.

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:01.720
<v Speaker 2>That is also true.

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 3>So again I think that for the most part, the

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 3>process is pretty strong behind Corendo. And even if he

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 3>doesn't get the insane amount of volume like I would

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 3>probably you know, I'm the undertaker. I would probably go

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 3>under on whatever his rushing attempts prop is, what.

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it'll open up? It hasn't opened up there,

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>or at least like where I play. I haven't seen

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the number.

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I would probably say it's probably gonna be more around

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 3>like maybe like sixteen and a half. I think that's

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 3>probably like.

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Sixty wit, what did you say, sixty.

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Sixteen and a half? Like rushing attempts.

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, attempts? Oh were you were saying attempts over yards?

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Again, Like that's what I would bet against is his

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 3>total carries, not his yardage, because okay, again, like he

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 3>can rip off an eighty yard touchdown on one play

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 3>because he's good and he's fast. So again, I think

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 3>we could look up and say, wow, we were so

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:53.760
<v Speaker 3>wrong about the Garnda role, but it didn't matter because

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 3>he was really efficient and it was it was a

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 3>good matchup and he ended up scoring it, like because

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 3>he again last week he scored right like nobody played

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:03.959
<v Speaker 3>them last week and he's still score right. So yeah,

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that we shouldn't overthink it too much. And

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 3>I think that he's a good play and I don't

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 3>think you're going to be like, oh god, maybe he's

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 3>not the best play this week. Maybe he's not top

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 3>ten running back, but I think that'll be to.

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, listen, I'm like, I'm just a sickle My brain

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:18.879
<v Speaker 1>is a sicko person, Like I don't want him to fail.

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do it, but it's just like,

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you know how you do the thing. Erickson did this

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to me a couple of weeks ago, where he was like,

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I had it was my dumb, idiot, stupid

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>ladder bed on debo. He was like, how did you

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>do in the early games? And I'm like, I killed it?

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And he's like all right, And then I what I

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 1>knew was he wasn't going to play the Deebo one

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:38.440
<v Speaker 1>because just how the universe works, if I suck in

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:40.800
<v Speaker 1>all the early ones, probably going to hit some later ones.

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:43.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the same thing where I'm like, listen, Grenda's the play.

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 1>It's the smart play, But my sicko brain is like,

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>he will go down in infamy if he ends up

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>having like a seven and Audrey Audric estimate like a

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago where it's like thirteen yards on

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ten carries or something like that. Also, I want to

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:01.880
<v Speaker 1>throw out to you guys, Betting Pros. Make sure you

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>check them out. There is no current line. I was

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>looking to see if any books have a line. There isn't.

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>If you want to see who has the first line,

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're on Betting Pros. Download the Betting Pros

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>app and if you use promo code FP free, you

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>can get a free month of premium access where you

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>can go in. You can check out I'm looking at

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it right now, cover, probability, expected value, the better rating.

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are premium features that you can see when you

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>check out. Using the prop bet analyzer, you can check

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>out where he is across the books. You can see

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.760
<v Speaker 1>where every single place has, the rushing yards, the attempts,

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you can check all the different lines, and you can

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 1>do analysis with premium. You don't have to do premium,

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you can just download Betting Pros, follow

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Ericson and I but if you do, you can have

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>access for a month FP free, go and do all

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of that. So sorry, I did an ad right after

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that Ericson, But like I said, I'm just kind of

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:50.479
<v Speaker 1>a sick o brain and I don't want us to fail.

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll have a couple more minutes, so let's

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit of lightning round with some of

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.800
<v Speaker 1>our our peeps here. Bh, per Low, Hey, are you

0:50:58.800 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 1>guys doing We're doing good?

0:50:59.880 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 9>Ude?

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 10>Cool?

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, big fan, first time on the show.

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 9>I'm thanks, happy to be here.

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 16>Yeah.

0:51:04.560 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 9>I just had two quick questions. One of them was Dynasty,

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 9>if that's cool with you guys. Yeah, So, I'm not

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:13.319
<v Speaker 9>sure if it's the right show of doing it on,

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 9>but I was wondering if I could just send a

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 9>picture of my lineup in here and see if it

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 9>is a rebuild or not.

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 6>Sure.

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just throw the ask your other question while you're

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>doing that and then yeah, yeah, okay. The other one

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>was quick.

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:32.279
<v Speaker 9>I've got Stafford Russell Wilson and Jordan Love. Jordan Love

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 9>kind of just been on the down with interceptions. I

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 9>was seeing if you guys had one to start. I

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 9>know Stafford's been doing pretty well, but again it's Stafford,

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 9>russ and Love.

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I would have I started Love. Since this air started, Love.

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:49.320
<v Speaker 3>We Love looked pretty. I mean he threw four touchdowns.

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:52.919
<v Speaker 3>I get Christian Watson touchdown, Yeah, sick, those were great.

0:51:53.080 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 3>You mean the Jaden Reid touchdown that I really really need.

0:51:55.480 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Well know, I'm talking about the second Christian Watson. Oh okay, yeah,

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 2>after the first and retouched.

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That was the two that I really needed really bad

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for the FFPC. And just a basic look. As far

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>as the lineup, when I see Lad McConkey and Nico

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Collins and Chase Brown, I feel like that's not a rebuild.

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna throw that. I'm not gonna list off

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:17.280
<v Speaker 1>your entire team here. I can't even see the big

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:19.800
<v Speaker 1>giant one by the way. It's like some big long picture,

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but I see three guys that are like big key, Like,

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:25.760
<v Speaker 1>could you trade the Tony Pollard's in the can Allens

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Yeah, But I don't think that's like

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a rebuild. I don't know if you have any other

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 1>quick thought, Erickson, No.

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean this seems like a team that can definitely

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 3>like contend. I mean it sucks that it seems like

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:37.279
<v Speaker 3>you have a couple of pieces of that are just

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of trending in the wrong. Like Lamb obviously like

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 3>not as good because he doesn't have his quarter of

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 3>this year, so like he's not at the peak powers.

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 3>But you have like some decent quarterbacks. Jonathan Taylor got

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 3>another player that I mean, I think that there's some

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:53.879
<v Speaker 3>pieces that you could potentially get off of, Like you said,

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 3>Tony Pollard, maybe Jonathan Taylor is.

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:58.400
<v Speaker 2>A piece that you.

0:52:57.680 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Know, I mean, he's not super simple and in the

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 3>fact that we saw so many of these running backs

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 3>re emerge just by being quote unquote older this past year,

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe he's the guy who want to hold on to.

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that this this roster has a lot of

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 3>good pieces that it can definitely be contender, just like

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:14.399
<v Speaker 3>I think this year, just the the the cards haven't

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 3>stacked in your favor. I would say, like, you know,

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Lamb is again your top two guys are Lamb and

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Taylor.

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And Nico, and Nico was out for time.

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, So no, I think that.

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, again, if those guys stay healthy, their quarterbacks

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 3>stay healthy, then I think that you're looking at your

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:29.919
<v Speaker 3>team very differently. Also, you have a yuke on injury.

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean like, yeah, you have a lot of pieces,

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:33.879
<v Speaker 3>just like your key guys going into the year didn't

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 3>stay healthy. So of course that's going to result in

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:39.759
<v Speaker 3>unless wins. So no, I don't think. I don't think

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 3>that you're in.

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's a good way for Dynasty to show

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like when you if you got these good builds, just

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>because you had it down year doesn't mean it's a rebuild.

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just you can move some pieces. Also throughout, I

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 1>think Bogwin was telling me FITZI, but Chase Brown is

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:53.759
<v Speaker 1>like RB five in Dynasty or something like something huge. So, uh,

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Chase Brown's a good one. All right, We're going to

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>hit these last three here, Jay Bauer, Jay Bauer finishing

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 1>up here with the last ones. What you got, dude?

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:03.399
<v Speaker 15>Tell me how you doing?

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>We're doing good, dude? What's what's going down?

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll keep it.

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Quick for you. Watching my two star receivers, Uh just

0:54:11.880 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 5>evaporate and Milik neighbors and Garrett Wilson. As a desperation move,

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 5>because this is a to our die weekend for me,

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 5>I picked up myers Ja Kobe. I don't know if

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 5>I have the stones to play him. If I do,

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:26.240
<v Speaker 5>who do I play him over? And if I happen

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 5>to win this week, you know, Lord Willie, do I

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:31.160
<v Speaker 5>continue to play him over? The person you tell me

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 5>to play them over?

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Who was it?

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:32.320
<v Speaker 12>It was?

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Milik? And what was the other one? Garrett Wilson and

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Man?

0:54:37.160 --> 0:54:38.439
<v Speaker 2>I am I will.

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I have Myers ranked once about behind Garrett Wilson,

0:54:41.960 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 3>and I haven't ranked ahead of Melak Neighbors, so I would, honestly,

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:47.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't. You can play Myers over both of them

0:54:47.200 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 3>if you really want to.

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:48.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that that's that crazy. I would definitely

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 3>play more over Neighbors. I've seen enough of this Giants thing.

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I'm done.

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Lest at least I've seen enough of Garrett Wilson where

0:54:57.680 --> 0:54:58.760
<v Speaker 3>he's had these good.

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Games with Aaron Rodgers, like this season.

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Like it's in the range again. The Dolphins have one

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 3>good cornerback and his name is Jayleen Ramsey. All the

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 3>other cornerbacks are hurt so and he can't cover both

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Garrett Wilson and DeVante Is at the same time.

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's just like Drew Locke is starting again.

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to get fifteen targets with Drew Locke.

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:20.879
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have big separators. They don't. I mean, it's

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>just I want to go Malik here, but I can't.

0:55:24.600 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you can this week, go Jacoby long term,

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, come back for next week, Like could

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you start Myers over neighbors next week. Sure, I don't

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 1>even know if the line the matchup is right.

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I don't think you need to be

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:37.839
<v Speaker 3>like so defiant against your guy again. This is your team, right,

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 3>like you don't want any of these guys to do

0:55:39.760 --> 0:55:41.439
<v Speaker 3>bad like like like don't like again.

0:55:41.480 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 2>This is why the whole.

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Like dynamic of start sits becomes so it's almost kind

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 3>of like toxic, where like you hate the players on

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 3>your bed totally and like you want them to fail

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:51.720
<v Speaker 3>at all.

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I want my players to fall. I lot last week, dude,

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I looked again. I know I'd say it a lot,

0:55:59.000 --> 0:56:01.399
<v Speaker 1>but like my big I mean, FFPC is a lot.

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>These are high stakes, lee high whatever air quotes. But

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like I lost by four points in one of them.

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 1>The other one championship lost by four points. I looked

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:13.479
<v Speaker 1>at my bench and I was ready to start making

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>voodoo dolls and putting pens in them. Both I had

0:56:16.719 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 1>two other defenses. They both scored higher than mine. I

0:56:19.200 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think I had the quarterback I had scored higher. All

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of those would have been a defining factor and would

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have had me whin. I wanted them all to fail.

0:56:27.280 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So yes, to your point, I am I am what

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. I am toxic. I'm looking at all

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 1>my players and I'm like fail, stop it.

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:37.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's It's why best ball is a great thing

0:56:37.400 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 3>because you can choose that's a good point all your

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 3>team all the time because you just and you win

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:43.640
<v Speaker 3>when your guys as a has a good game. So

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 3>that's always something to balance things out and think about

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 3>joining best ball leagues during the offseason. Yeah, but I mean, yeah, Meyers,

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 3>this week he has the best matchup out of all

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:53.760
<v Speaker 3>He's facing the Buccaneers.

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 2>You think it's the Falcons.

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, look, I I didn't mean to come

0:56:57.520 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 3>off as saying no, like, don't just start Myers because

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:01.959
<v Speaker 3>he'd beat He was better than those guys this one week.

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 3>But when I look at the rest of the schedule

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:05.919
<v Speaker 3>for Myers, I don't see a spot where I want

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:09.319
<v Speaker 3>to bench him. He's got Bucks, Falcons, Jags, Saints. So

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:13.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, after look at the schedule, like, yeah, Meyers,

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 3>rest of the way, I.

0:57:13.920 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Will say though, like I will reiterate, also do what

0:57:18.360 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, like we will give you our advice, but

0:57:20.200 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of the day, make you're

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 1>making your final decision. Like if you're not comfortable with something,

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>then make the move. You gotta be able to sleep

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>at night. I have that sometimes, so I'm like, oh,

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't I couldn't fathom if this guy beat me.

0:57:31.560 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the last two. Did we have s Fan?

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have s Fan on. Let's we're not lightning around.

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 1>We're not doing very good at Lightning Round, but that's okay.

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 2>We if you're new to the show, we suck at Lightning.

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Round, yeah we do. We're not very good at it,

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but we like to talk. We like to do all this.

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So s Fan, unmute your mic and what do you got?

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:52.200
<v Speaker 12>So I didn't get hit too hard by by mcgeddon,

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:55.680
<v Speaker 12>but I did have Hunter Henry, So I'm gonna have

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:58.920
<v Speaker 12>to start Kincaid this week. Would you rather go to

0:57:58.960 --> 0:58:01.320
<v Speaker 12>Waivers and pick up a g I like Jake Ferguson

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 12>or Tucker Craft, Juan Johnson's there, or just stick with Kinkaid.

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I would rather all of them, But yeah, craft Craft

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>because he did really well in that game. He won

0:58:10.120 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 1>all the five touchdowns. I love three.

0:58:12.040 --> 0:58:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean Jordan love Man, just what an absolute

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe the Packers, man, how do they come

0:58:18.640 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 3>away with that big.

0:58:20.800 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Did they win? Well, I don't.

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember that covered. I never covered the total.

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I know the totals got smashed.

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I know the overhead the over smashed. That's the only

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one that I care about.

0:58:31.040 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Her.

0:58:31.240 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>No, So that's exactly right.

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Sure, what uh?

0:58:35.040 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh man? It's so weird.

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 8>Brost all the times first time and called up here

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 8>and talked to you.

0:58:41.240 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm good, glad you did what you got.

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Hey.

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:48.080
<v Speaker 8>So I'm still I'm like, I'm still in the standard league.

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 8>I know, I know, but Doc Commissioner, he didn't want

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 8>to change. So and it's a good league. We do

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 8>a lot of a lot of rousing on one another.

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:57.880
<v Speaker 8>So and it's it's very active for this week. I'm

0:58:57.920 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 8>trying to find out what's up with I have Jared

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 8>Golf and Will Levis and I'm I'm really going through

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:08.919
<v Speaker 8>it whether I want to try and let Jared Goff

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 8>go tonight or just go ahead and let Will Lewis

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:13.480
<v Speaker 8>go with Jacksonville.

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, Jared Goff also went off on that uh that

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:19.560
<v Speaker 1>total from yesterday because it went way over, so we

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>had to go Golf right Erickson.

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that's correct.

0:59:23.120 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We had to do it. He had to do it.

0:59:24.760 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So it was it was a really good decision that

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we said, all right, Dredas tried to leave. Dredas came

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 1>out the last second and then tried to leave, and

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Dredas, come back, what's up.

0:59:32.680 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 16>I didn't realize the time. I'm sorry, it's okay, it's

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 16>okay to real quick quick Grindo or Pollard.

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Correct Grinda for me?

0:59:41.560 --> 0:59:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Eric, Yeah, sorry, I'm starting, Paul. He's playing the jacks.

0:59:45.120 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 2>They suck. I had like one carry. He's like, they

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 2>don't use him. I'm using. I know you hate Tony

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Pollard Walsh, but I.

0:59:55.800 --> 0:59:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Do hate Tony. But let me look at my rank before.

0:59:58.400 --> 1:00:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Taking I'm not taking the projection and over the guy

1:00:01.040 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 3>that he's locked in low too three down work but

1:00:02.960 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 3>also has a great matchup like I'm.

1:00:04.480 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Not Yeah, I have Pollard two spots under grind I mean,

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to ericson there, he's smarter than me. Anyways, it

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was the other question, Oh.

1:00:13.160 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 16>My god, I totally liked never mind. Oh are yeah

1:00:16.440 --> 1:00:18.640
<v Speaker 16>John new Smith or najok you you.

1:00:18.640 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Answered ericson the other smart guy? Aileen? Aileen John who

1:00:22.680 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but in joke had like seventy four targets last week seventeen.

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>That is a good saying. I think more targets this

1:00:31.360 --> 1:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>week than I think Pitts had all season catches.

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Dude, you might be yeah, it's tough.

1:00:39.440 --> 1:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't ranked back to back. Oh yeah, let me

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>see where I have it ranked a lean John who,

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>but I haven't. I have John o'higher. I have John

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>WoT four, so John.

1:00:50.000 --> 1:00:52.320
<v Speaker 3>John, I have John five. I think the sample size

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>with John who has been longer. And again, is it

1:00:57.760 --> 1:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Yo going to catch two touchdowns again?

1:00:59.320 --> 1:00:59.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean no, great.

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I know, like has set the like that's the new trends,

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>like catch two touchdowns every single week after like this

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>lashing tight end.

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>But Joko didn't do.

1:01:07.120 --> 1:01:08.840
<v Speaker 3>A lot against the Steelers the first time they played,

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Like the weather play a role. But I don't love

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 3>him as he did also drop a touchdown, so he

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 3>would he should obviously have three. I mean John New's

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:18.480
<v Speaker 3>roles has been so good, like he's been the number

1:01:18.480 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 3>one receiver for the Dolphins and they're playing the Jets,

1:01:20.600 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 3>so he's not going to get any of the top

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>tier coverage. I think it's a good problem to have,

1:01:25.680 --> 1:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>but it doesn't really full. It was again, I feel

1:01:29.240 --> 1:01:30.840
<v Speaker 3>much better too if it's full PPR.

1:01:30.520 --> 1:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>For j Yeah, that's that's what Dreda said, it's full people.

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So yeah, John, and I think I'd get the

1:01:34.440 --> 1:01:37.400
<v Speaker 3>especially with because Djoku I think probably has maybe better

1:01:37.440 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 3>touchdown odds. But John, who has just been so locked

1:01:40.240 --> 1:01:43.200
<v Speaker 3>up massive value, and I think and if Tilman and

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 3>I know Tilman, I think had a DNP So I

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 3>don't even know if he's going to come back, but

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>if he comes back that that doesn't matter a little

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 3>bit for the total targets. So he'll only see ten

1:01:50.320 --> 1:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>instead of seventeen.

1:01:51.200 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>O keah.

1:01:51.520 --> 1:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>We always gotch it. We were going to end it.

1:01:53.080 --> 1:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>We bring on people because we love our community. And

1:01:55.120 --> 1:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that is it for this show. Thank you guys so

1:01:57.600 --> 1:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>much for hanging out. If you guys are listening on

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you could come and hang out with us.

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>All you gotta do is go to Discord Fantasypros dot

1:02:03.960 --> 1:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>com slash Discord. You can join up for free, download

1:02:06.640 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the Discord app. You can take it on your phone,

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you can do it on your computer desktop,

1:02:10.880 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you can come in and you can listen

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern every Thursday. We are here. I told

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you about the other offerings. You can come and ask

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:19.439
<v Speaker 1>your question. You guys get to dictate the show, which

1:02:19.480 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is the great part. Plus we got an awesome community

1:02:21.360 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>where you guys are getting interact with them. If you're

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a Premium member, you can have access to the AMAS.

1:02:26.080 --> 1:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You can jump into my AMA, which is nice and clean.

1:02:28.480 --> 1:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Right now, though, I have to answer a few question.

1:02:30.360 --> 1:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's see ericson look. We got to pick on fits.

1:02:32.800 --> 1:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Fits got to answer some questions here. Look at that thing.

1:02:36.920 --> 1:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>You gives me anxiety.

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>That que is like you ever see those videos where

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they're like I just saw them. They were doing it

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with like a baseball and a football team. They're like,

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>how many unread text do you have? I'm a firm,

1:02:50.160 --> 1:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>clear my text, clear my emails. If I look down

1:02:54.280 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>these people that are like, oh look, dude, my wife

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand unread emails or something like that, I'm like,

1:03:02.320 --> 1:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about. I can't do that. It

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>all has to be clear. So I'm with you. I

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>get anxious when I see a queue of questions. We

1:03:13.240 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>need fits to fix that.

1:03:15.360 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, and I know, I know he gets

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to all of them eventually.

1:03:17.920 --> 1:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>He does no fits is the best of everybody, but

1:03:19.720 --> 1:03:21.439
<v Speaker 1>it's give me anxiety. But I guess what people want

1:03:21.440 --> 1:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk to FITZI, So you guys can do it

1:03:23.360 --> 1:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with a premium membership on the Discord Fantasypros dot Com

1:03:27.040 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>slash chat friends.

1:03:29.400 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 2>That is it.

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Good luck. It's a crazy week that's going down here,

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Week fourteen. I know it's a do or die. We

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>got the live stream on Sunday morning to answer your question.

1:03:37.720 --> 1:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>We got a bunch of more shows that are going

1:03:39.160 --> 1:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to be dropping on the podcast and the YouTube, and

1:03:41.120 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you can also come and hang out with us on

1:03:42.520 --> 1:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros where we have got bets for the week.

1:03:45.120 --> 1:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>If you want to do it FP free for premium

1:03:47.120 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>access on the Betting Pros app and Ericson and I

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>with Piece of Pa on Friday for your prop bets

1:03:52.280 --> 1:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for the week. For Andrew Ericson, I am Chris Wells.

1:03:54.360 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You guys have a fantastic week and we'll talk to

1:03:56.840 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you next time right here on Fantasy Pros.

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:02.520
<v Speaker 12>Thanks for listen getting to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Football podcast.

1:04:02.680 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 12>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

1:04:05.280 --> 1:04:08.280
<v Speaker 12>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple podcasts

1:04:08.440 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 12>at fantasypros dot com, Slash Review or on Spotify. Follow

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 12>us on x, Instagram and TikTok at fantasy Pros, and

1:04:15.920 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 12>subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash

1:04:18.680 --> 1:04:19.400
<v Speaker 12>Fantasy Pros