WEBVTT - A U.S. Space Force, Why the Weather's Getting Stuck, and Maple Syrup Medicine

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to hous To Works Now. I'm your host, Lauren Vogelbaum,

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a researcher and writer. Here at hous To Works. Every week,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm bringing you three stories from our team about the

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>weird and wondrous advances we've seen in science, technology, and culture.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>This week, new research demonstrates how climate change may specifically

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>affect weather in different areas in the near future. And unrelated,

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is it time for the United States military to have

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a dedicated space force? But first? Senior writer Jonathan Strickland

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>explores the increasingly impressive makeup of maple syrup. A compound

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in the stuff could help humans treat a range of diseases,

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>from cancer to antibiotic resistant superbugs. Maple syrup is more

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>than just a tasty breakfast condiment. A couple of years ago,

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>researchers discovered than extract in processed maple syrup has anti

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>inflammatory qualities, meaning it could reduce pain and swelling in

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>certain injuries. They named the extract Quebec call after Quebec,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the region in Canada that leads the way in maple

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 1>syrup production. They also discovered that this extract didn't appear

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to be present in maple sap itself. It was only

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>when they processed the sap into syrup that they could

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>find quebec call. And that's not all. In two thousand fifteen,

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>researchers in Japan published a paper explaining how a phenolic

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>extract of maple syrup can inhibit cancer cell growth and division.

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>A phenomic compound is a crystalline substance, typically one with

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>aromatic properties. The researchers wanted to be sure it wasn't

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>just the high sugar content interfering with cancer cell division.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>They discovered that the phenomic extract interfered with a kat

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>signaling pathways, which play a part in cellular growth and division.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But wait, there's more. Recently, scientists from McGill University presented

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>their sweet findings to the American Chemical Society. They discovered

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that a phenomic extract from maple syrup has another medically

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>useful function. It boosts the effectiveness of antibiotics. We use

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>antibiotics to fight off bacterial infections, but there's a risk

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>populations of bacteria can over time develop a resistance to antibiotics,

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>giving rise to superbugs. Mixing this maple syrup extract with

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a dose of antibiotics reduces the amount of medicine needed

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to kill a bacterial infection in fruit flies. In fact,

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the team found that with the extract they could reduce

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the amount of antibiotics by as much as ninety percent

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and still get the effect of a full dose. It

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>turns out the compound affects the permeability of the bacterial

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>cell walls, making it easier for antibiotics to pass through

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and do their thing. And honestly, it's pretty hard to

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>blame the bacteria. Maple syrup is delicious. They're currently testing

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the extract in mice and it could take years of

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>research and testing before the extract could be made available

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for the average human. But nonetheless, than next time you

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>have band gigs, waffles, French toast, take a moment to

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>thank the maple syrup. It's not just tasty, it's a

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>potential life sape. Next up, I've got a story for

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you from our freelance writer Jesselyn Shields about the global

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>state of the climate. One of the major influences on

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the billions of factors that go into weather is jet streams,

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>high fast air currents that meander through Earth's atmosphere. They've

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>always been fairly predictable, but they're changing, and sussing out

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the effects of those changes could help minimize disasters worldwide.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Our collective grasp on the extreme weather consequences of climate

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>change isn't great. Sure, our weather is changing, but if

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you ask a random person on the street what that's

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>going to look like in their community in ten years

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or fifty, most of us probably couldn't even hazard a guess.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Climate scientists, due to the nature of their work, no

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>more than the rest of us, but even they don't

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>always agree about the ways in which climate change will

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>affect weather in specific races. In a controversial study published

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Geophysical Research, Letters challenged previously accepted ideas

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>about the mechanisms through which climate change will affect our weather.

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Those accepted ideas including that warmer temperatures will result in

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>more heat waves, that hotter summers will bring worse droughts,

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and that the warmer atmosphere will hold more water, resulting

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in heavier precipitation and flooding. All of this might still

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be true, but the studies suggested that something else might

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>be happening as well, That the relatively predictable flow of

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Earth's weather is changing. Due to alterations in the behavior

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the jet stream, especially in the middle latitudes, weather

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>patterns are getting stuck in places for longer periods, thus

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>intensifying on the ground effects, resulting in severe droughts, flooding,

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and intense heat waves. This concept has been controversial. The

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>leading edge of research always has its supporters and detractors,

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>but a study published in the March issue of Nature

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Scientific Reports reinforces it. The da is that climate change

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is altering the world's weather, making wind conveyor belts in

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a way that favors extreme and long lasting weather anomalies. Okay, so,

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>jet streams are high atmospheric air currents that move from

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>west to east, driven by Earth's rotation. They also make

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>our weather happen. Although the winds of a jet stream

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>flow in a single direction, the difference in temperature between

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the poles and the equator pulls those winds into meandering

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>north south wave patterns. But if temperatures at the polls

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>change more rapidly than those at the equator, those dual

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>constraints on the jet streams become imbalanced. Michael Mann is

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the lead author of the new study and a professor

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of atmospheric science at Penn State, he told us via

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>email quote, just like a coaxial cable acts as a

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>wave guide to deliver electromagnetic waves to our televisions with

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>minimal energy loss, the atmosphere tends to confine waves in

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the jet stream in a way that allows them to

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>always travel with minimal energy loss. When the temperature difference

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>between the all in the equator is large, the flow

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of the jet stream becomes stronger and the waves shorter.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>When the poles warm up at a faster rate than

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the equatorial regions do, like what's happening right now, it's

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>most efficient for the atmospheric waves to stretch out and

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for the flow to thus become weaker, that is, slower.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Man said. These very large north south meanders are associated

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>with both extreme weather and weather getting stuck in place,

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>leading to persistent regional droughts, flooding, heat waves, et cetera.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>We show that climate change is making a temperature pattern

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that supports those conditions more common, and you don't have

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>to look far to find evidence of extreme weather hammering

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>particular spots on the globe. Recently, in an intense low

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure system in Pakistan delivered unprecedented monsoon reigns resulting in flooding,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>killing some two thousand people and destroying the homes, crops,

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and livelihoods of eighteen million. More. There's also the two

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand three European heat wave, which is estimated to have

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>caused thirty five thousand deaths, the Russian heat wave and wildfires,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the eleven heat wave and drought in Oklahoma and Texas,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and the California wildfires, to name just a few. But

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>now that we're hopefully getting a better handle on how

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change might affect our lives here on the ground,

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Man and his co authors are looking at how this

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>information can help us in the future. He leaves us

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>with this, We hope this paper can inform the larger

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>discourse over the very real risks that climate change poses

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to us. Secondly, there might also be the opportunity to

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>use the information to try to predict when extreme weather

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>events are most likely to occur. We hope so too. Finally,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this week, our very own producer, Dylan Fagan and our

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>freelancer Patrick Jake Haiger delve into a debate that's less

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like science fiction than it sounds. Some experts are saying

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's high time for the U. S. Department of

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Defense to develop a militarized branch in space. It's easy

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to think that the United States Air Force operates in

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the skies and NASA deals with space. Because of this,

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it may come as a surprise to learn that the

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Air Force has been launching the X thirty seven B,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a mysterious and robotic miniature version of the Space Shuttle

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Space for years. On orbit, the X thirty

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>seven B spends hundreds of days at a time performing

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>classified experiments. According to the magazine The National Interest, that

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>research includes developing a new type of high efficiency propulsion

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>system that could allow spacecraft to say an orbit longer

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and to maneuver in between orbits with agility. In the

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>event of a future war in orbital space, US controlled

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>drones similar to the X thirty seven B might rapidly

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>replace military satellites attacked by an enemy, or presumably to

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>counterattack the enemy's satellites. If that sounds like a scenario

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>out of a Tom Clancy novel, guess again. We're talking

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>about reality here, as the United States is preparing for

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the future of combat. In a January speech, General John Heighten,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>leader of the U. S. Strategic Command warned that Russia

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>possesses anti satellite weapons and that China has been hard

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>at work on developing them as well. He said, in

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the not too distant future, they will be able to

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>use that capability to threaten every spacecraft we have in space.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>We have to prevent that, and the best way to

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>prevent war is to be prepared for war. For decades,

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>U S military efforts in space have been run by

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Air Forces Space Command, which heightened headed from twenty

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to twenty sixteen, but some think the job of

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>protecting U. S interests in orbital space is so important

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.599
<v Speaker 1>that a special, separate branch of the military ought to

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be created to do it. In a recent essay, M. V.

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Coyote Smith, a retired Air Force colonel who is now

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a professor of Strategic Space studies at the Pentagons Air University,

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>argues for the creation of a U. S Space Corps,

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>especially when considering the needs of potential future space war.

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>The former space weapons officer argues that operating an orbit

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>requires a different mindset from the rest of what the

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Air Force does, and that space activities will never receive

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the funding or resources they need if they remain a

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>part of another service, a separate space where, he writes,

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but have the freedom to develop the best thinking on

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>space operations. Smith believes it would also be better equipped

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to provide advice to the President and combat commanders, and

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to make an independent case to Congress for funding. Smith

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't respond to request for comment, but he's not the

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>first to argue that a special space service is needed.

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>A few examples back in former U S Senator Bob Smith,

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a Republican from New Hampshire, advocated for a separate space Corps,

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and an Air War College paper published in two thousand

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>draws a parallel between the current need for space corps

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to the post World War One efforts of General William

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Billy Mitchell to get Congress to fund strategic air power development.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>A two thousand six article in The Space Review also

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>advocates for an independent space force, saying the officers whose

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>formative experiences came from flying planes in Earth's atmosphere cannot

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>be expected to instinctively understand the nature of space warfare.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Another argument for having a separate space Corps is that

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the Air Force already is trying to do too many things.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>From operating satellites to wage electronic warfare, and then it

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>gives short thrift to anything that doesn't involve flying airplanes.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Joan Johnson Freeze, a national security affairs professor at the U. S.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Naval War College who focuses on space security issues, said

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>this the Air Force went from being an air force

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to an air in space force, to an aerospace force

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to an airspace and cyber force, with jet jockeys still

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>getting the lion's share of top air Force positions. General

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Heighten has gone a long way, but he's still not

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Air Force Chief of Staff. Until there is a separate

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Space force, air force culture won't change, and fire pilots

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>will still rule. The current Space Commands budget, of roughly

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollars in annual funding, is a small slice

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Pentagon's overall five eighty billion dollar budget. The

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of a US Space Corps conjures up a mental

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>image of astronauts strapped into space fighters armed with laser beams,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>But as Smith's notes in his essay, the current Space

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Command is different from the rest of the Air Force

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>because flying is in its mission. It's earthbound personnel law

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>uch and supervise satellites even so he writes its units

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are organized in the squadrons, units and wings that even

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>borrow patches and logos from famous aviation units. He thinks

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that conveys the wrong message that the Air Force and

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>his words, does not value space space power or its

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>space professionals. In Smith's vision, the Space Corps would not

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>only support terrestrial military efforts, but in some situations would

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>take the lead and the event of attack against US satellites.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>For example, the Space Court commander might direct other services

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to attack targets on Earth in order to thwart the

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>space attackers. He also sees acting as sort of an

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>orbital police force, which would protect commercial US space industry

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and ensure that, as he says, all awful and non

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>hostile actors enjoy the full benefits of space faring, regardless

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of national origin. He would be up to Congress to

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>create a separate military arm and it's unclear how much

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>support the concept would have, but President Trump is pushing

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for a big boost in defense spending, including spending more

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to develop both defensive and offensive space weapons, so creation

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of an orbital force conceivably could become part of the debate.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>That's our show for this week. Thank you so much

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in. Further thanks to our audio producers Dylan

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Fagin and Noel Brown, and our editorial Liaison's Christopher Hasiotis

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and Alison Loudermilk. Subscribed to now Now for more of

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the latest science news and send us links to anything

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to hear his cover. Plus, do you think

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>military should develop space presences? Let us know You can

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>send us an email. Now podcast at has stuff works

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course, for lots more stories like these,

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>head on over to our home planet now dot ho

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com.