WEBVTT - Iran Conflict Sell-Off Rattles Tech Stocks

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and v Low in Sent Francesco.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech Technology stocks full, bonds full, and

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>oil surges. As the war in Iran shows no signs

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>of the escalation, investor concerns rise as the possibility of

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 2>disruption to energy markets, supply chains, and a jump in

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>inflation loom large.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Correct, Let's take a look at those markets energy in particular,

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean extraordinary moves that we're seeing in oil.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Oil is currently having the.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Biggest move since twenty twenty two.

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 4>At one point since twenty twenty it's the highest is

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four.

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 3>That has implications for the Nasdaq down almost two percent

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 3>and the S and P five hundred down almost two percent.

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Why because the Federal Reserve cannot cut.

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Into this inflationary environment. Is the way that the market

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 4>is anticipating. Bitcoin is off by some one point.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Seven percent, then as that one hundred is off session loads.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 2>But that is what we're looking at right There is

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>targeted drone and missile activity as a threat to energy

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure in the Middle East. New York Crew WTI up

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>eight percent seventy seven dollars a barrel, but also brent

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the global benchmark, surging to eighty five dollars first time

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in a long time. US tenure yield had been above

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 2>four point one percent and on track for its biggest

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>two day advance since April of last year.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 5>We've come off that little bit.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>We are very focused on what is happening in the

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Strait of Horn moves right. There are boats that are

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.919
<v Speaker 2>stuck and cannot carry oil. As a result, the producers

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 2>like Iraq have stopped producing. By the way, America relies

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot on Iraqi oil in terms of the refiners.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to look at that. There is specific

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 2>tech action. So let's get to that action when Bloomberg

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>equalties reporter Ryan.

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 5>For the SELECA.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot to unpick here right at one point,

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and as that one hundred was on track for its

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>biggest drops since October, certainly since November when we got

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 2>that strong jobs print. There is inflation concern, but broadly,

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>where is the risk of sort of mentality and sentiment

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing, Ryan.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 5>Good morning, Thanks for having me.

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 6>So one thing I would just notice that all of

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 6>this recent news, all this rise in political uncertainty, comes

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 6>at a time when investors were already showing signs of

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 6>being cautious about tech. We have seen concerns about how

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 6>much money is being spent on AI. We have seen

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 6>concerns about AI related disruptions. So if you add a

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 6>new wrinkle on top of that, I think you already

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 6>had investors predisposed to sell and sell pretty broadly.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Ryan more broadly, dwell a little bit more on what's

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 3>happening in terms of the software perspective, and what's happening

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 3>in certain names Mongo dB, and I hate to bring

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 3>it back to what the market was treading water on

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 3>or trying to digest before this geopolitical upheaval, but we

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 3>have to go back to what's happened in terms of

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 3>Mongo DB's extraordinary sell off, despite the numbers not being

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>quite as ugly as many would have anticipated.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 6>Right, So this occurs against the backdrop of people being

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 6>very cautious that AI services are going to diminish the

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 6>growth prospects for legacy software companies offer some kind of replacement,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 6>diminish their pricing power, their margins. Marco DB's results kind

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 6>of fit into that narrative where they weren't necessarily bad,

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 6>but the upside was a little bit smaller than people

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 6>had expected it or relative to past quarters, the outlook

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 6>was not dramatically higher. All these sort of concerns is

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.839
<v Speaker 6>feed into this broader environment right now where people are

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 6>very concerned about AI. When you have results like this,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 6>it just sort of add to the concern by not

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 6>really diminishing them. You know, like I said, people were

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 6>already predisposed to sell, and you're really seeing that in

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 6>a stock like Mango right now.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Right also massive underperformance in chip stocks, which we're going

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to explain a little bit later on in the show Bloomers.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Ryan for Selca, thank you very much.

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a bit more broadly about what's happening in markets,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Brian White, it's pi Ersanla, cohead of Technology Investment Banking.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have a different conversation probably to the

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 2>one that we thought we might be having. Caroline made

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 2>a really interesting observation at desk this morning. You look

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 2>at a name like Palenteer for example, still down significantly.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>There was a big run up yesterday, cyber stocks under pressure.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>How those are areas that you might think in this scenario,

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>if this environment a war in Iran might go to

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the upside, it's an area that you look at software

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>go from there.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 7>Please, Yeah, I mean I think that it's still going

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 7>to be the bride spart in this market. I think

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 7>the challenge that we have right now is that this

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 7>increasingly looks like a prolonged conflict, and so investors are

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 7>selling off right now. They're panicking in regards to what

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 7>continues to go on. This doesn't appear to be kind

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 7>of the limited engagements that we've seen traditionally, and so

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 7>thus when you're looking, you know broadly and you step back.

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 7>I still think if you want to be in cyber

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 7>or you want to be in defense, those are going

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 7>to be bride sparks. But right now everything's risk off.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Co Head of Tech IV five percent of I've read

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 2>your CV. If you don't mind, and you know you

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 2>know the apparatus of government, well, yes, how important is

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that that that kicks in in a market environment like this.

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 2>You understand the understandable, you know what a policy maker

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 2>may or not do in a war environment.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 7>I think it's helpful because you can put things in context.

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean Fundamentally, what we look to do is advise

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 7>clients on how to navigate this termoril. And having the

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 7>experience to see how government thinks through these issues, particularly

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 7>during conflict like this, is critical because we're not just

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 7>dealing with the AI disruption, We're dealing with geopolitical disruption,

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 7>and clients are wondering, how do I raise capital in

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 7>this environment? Should I think about M and A on

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 7>the buy side or the south side. This is where

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 7>people are going to be thinking about what moves should

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 7>I make to take advantage of the uncertainty in this environment, because,

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 7>as we know, people that are able to do smart

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 7>moves right now often of the long term winners because

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 7>they don't sit back risk off, and that experience is

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 7>helpful when I'm advising clients.

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>How much is that experience applicable to the current administration though.

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.239
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it's traditionally the levers of government remain

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 7>pretty stable. There is obviously some political influence that goes

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 7>on over the years. You know, one thing that we

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 7>should all take a great regard in is just the

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 7>experience of the military that is there, the decision apparatus

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 7>and what has been in place to make these informed decisions.

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 7>I think as we're increasingly seeing this is going to

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 7>be a prolonged conflict, it is going to require a

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 7>lot of you know, deft policy making, particularly as we

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 7>engage with the Middle East that is in a bit

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 7>of turmoil. I don't think when we woke up on

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 7>Saturday morning, people nearly suspected how wide this would appear

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.119
<v Speaker 7>to be. And so people are going to be looking

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 7>for some off ramps soon and the market impact of

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 7>that is unknown, and that is what people are reacting

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 7>to right now.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 3>So without wanting to be just knee jerk and thinking

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>through if this could be a longer term conflict, if

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>there's inflationary pressure there, what does it mean in terms

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 3>of the influence that AI has been having on the

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>market thus far.

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Do you just stay in the winners that have been working.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>And yes, maybe overallocate a little bit more, even to

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 3>defense TEP.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 7>I think defense will be a bright spot. And then

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 7>even before ARA, defense looked like an area where there

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 7>was going to be tremendous innovation. I mean, what we're

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 7>continuing to see is that people are looking for new technology,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 7>new approaches. We have a increased geopolitical conflict in this world,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 7>So being in defense is a good place to be,

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 7>and that was pre Iran, and as it relates to AI,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 7>I think there will remain some bright sparts, particularly in infrastructure,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 7>particularly in cyber. Those are going to be good places

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 7>to be, and over time, I think people will gain

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 7>more confidence as we see earnings come out. I mean,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 7>don't forget we've still got a couple more weeks of

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 7>earnings to go. This week, we're going to have news

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 7>out of a couple of the technology conferences, and hopefully

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 7>that will start to calm this market down a little

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 7>bit more and people will realize that this is a

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 7>bit of a selloff that is not applicable to all.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Just really quick and trying to keep this on the news.

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>DHS is warning right, which seems inevitable about the threat

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to citizens in this country and response cyber. Just give

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>me more on cyber and why it's not getting more

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>traction in this environment.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I would say two things first and foremost, we've

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 7>always known that Iran via it's proxies like hesbalah Is

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 7>may have the capacity to do something in the American homeland.

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 7>So I think that's partially what we're hearing from the administration.

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 7>I think more saliently though, is that people need to

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 7>invest in cyber right now. The attack surface for both

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 7>the private sector as well as the public surf sector

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 7>could not be any higher in terms of their threat environment.

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 7>So everybody should be paying more attention to what they

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 7>need to do because where the Iranian cyber capability is

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 7>quite strong.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Ry Pipersander, great to have you here on Bloomberg Tech.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I want to get to what happened in Career overnight

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>shares of Samsung and sk Heinex both falling by around

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent. There was a holiday in the Korean markets

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 2>on Monday, so this was the first session since the

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>war in Iran and the events of the weekend. But

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 2>remember that the costs fee, the main index in Career,

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.359
<v Speaker 2>has been a massive outperformer year to date, led by Samsung.

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 5>And sk Heinex.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>It's just a market reaction as sentiment reaction, particularly with

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 2>the energy infrastructure concern in those two names. But was

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 2>a big move, and maybe that's transferred character chip names

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in the US in this session.

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Suddenly extraordinary sell off over there. Meanwhile, coming up, well,

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 3>look at some extraordinary moves from Sam Altman calling open

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 3>a eyes Pentagon deal roll out sloppy.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 4>That's next, there's a bluebir tech.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Open Ai is facing backlash over its new Pentagon deal,

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 2>and CEO Sam Altman is admitting the rollout was mishandled.

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>In a post, Altman said the company shouldn't have rushed

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the announcement, saying it looked quite opportunistic and sloppy. Here

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 2>of the latest is Bloomberg's AI reporter Rachel Metz. It's

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 2>one where you probably need to explain to us what

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the deal is and how it came about. But a

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 2>very public statement by open ai CEO about how it

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 2>was done.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean this was all part of this really

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 8>rush situation that happened over several days. We had Anthropic

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 8>scoring off against the Pentagon, the Pentagon saying we're not

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 8>going to be using Anthropics AI models anymore and making

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 8>some even further declarations than that about how companies perhaps

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 8>could even use Anthropics models if they work with the government,

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 8>and then open Ai very quickly swooped in and said

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 8>we have a deal with the government. So I think

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 8>that caught a lot of people, maybe not so much

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 8>off guard, but it certainly left a lot of people upset,

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 8>including some people at open Ai who were posting about

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 8>it publicly on social media.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people were painting the streets outside open

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Ai and well fears and concerns, Rachel. This has prompted

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 3>a backlash that is actually impacting downloads of chat GPT

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 3>and certainly has been pushing those to be getting into

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Anthropics offering Claude instead. It would feel like the numbers

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 3>stack out in that way, Rachel. But talk us through

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>ultimately what has been changed in terms of their agreement

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 3>with the Pentagon, if anything.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it sounds like open Ai has basically done

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 8>a little bit more back up and forth with the

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 8>Pentagon to make sure that the redlines that Opening Eyes

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 8>says are in place regarding their software not being used

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 8>for surveillance will be kept in place.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Rachel, Sorry, do we have any understanding of how big

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 2>a piece of open aised business this is?

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Is this something like severely critical to them or is

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 2>it still the case that you know, CHATGBT subscriber as

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 2>an enterprise is really what they're most concerned about.

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, at this point, I don't think that this

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 8>is like an overarching piece of their business. I thinkause

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 8>is a smaller piece, but as we've seen with the

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 8>disagreement between Anthropic and the Pentagon, just having this kind

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 8>of connection can really telegraph a lot about your business

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 8>and it could lead to other things, other ripple effects

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 8>and other kinds of business, either happening or not happening

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 8>now or in the future.

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Rachel Mattz, thank you so much.

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>An ongoing narrative that involves geopolitics the same times as

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 3>generator of AI. Let's take a look at those tech

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 3>markets in the eye of a geopolitical storm that is

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Middle Eastern conflict. We're currently seeing one point seven percent

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 3>lower on the Nasdaq one hundred. We had fallen more

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 3>than two percent. In fact, only thirteen names are on

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 3>the green on the Nasdaq one hundred as we speak.

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 3>New York Crude is where the action lies.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 4>We're up more than eight percent ed.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing this inflationary tension mean that people think the

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve cannot cut into the situation.

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Therefore that has a.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Long term impact on the value of stocks.

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Right now well way off session lows, but at one

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:30.719
<v Speaker 2>point we're on track for the biggest drop on the

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 2>NASZAG one hundred since October when the President was really

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 2>escalating the tariff tension with China. That's how markets are

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>weighing in here. We're also tracking shares of Nvidia, one

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 2>of the top stories on the Bloomberg terminal and on

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 2>dot com, down one point six percent. The US is

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>weighing new limits on Nvidia's AI chip sales to China,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 2>including a potential cap of seventy five thousand of its

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>h two hundred accelerators to any one, single Chinese company.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 2>That's according to sources. Bloomberg's Ian King is here to

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>explain it. When that regulatory filing hit at earnings, they

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>were pretty clear that they have no idea whether China

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>would even let the chips in. But what we're reporting

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>is on the US side putting a cap on the export,

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the cap level and the strategy behind it.

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 5>What do we know?

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, the understanding had been that the US

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 9>side was more amenable to this happening, right, and that

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 9>China was kind of the roadblock. But now what we're

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 9>reporting is that there are more restrictions, more kind of

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 9>fine print details being piled upon it, and that obviously

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 9>makes situation more difficult than the likelihood of major shipments

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 9>and major business less likely.

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 3>And that's why many ways in video and Jensen didn't

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>include any China business and therefoward looking guidance.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 4>So do we just take it from here that China

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:44.599
<v Speaker 4>doesn't want.

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Even h two hundreds and where we are in terms

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 3>of a potentially crafted blackwell offering.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 9>I mean the way that in Videa's leadership are phrases

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 9>is like, look, you'll know the Chinese have given us

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 9>permission when you see the Chinese companies make orders. We

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 9>haven't seen them make the big orders yet. That doesn't

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 9>look positive. It doesn't look hopeful for the way things

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 9>are progressing.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Going back to the basics of what Caroline just said

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 2>that the forecast for sales is seventy eight billion dollars

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>plus or minus two percent in the quarter, does not

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 2>include any China. But when you did your earnings piece

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the next day, a lot of the analysts were like, well,

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 2>China is then therefore potential upside in the event they

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>are allowed to do it.

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Jensen's modeling for that or not, it.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 9>Doesn't appear to be. I mean they're being prudent right now.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the potential upside came from the detail that

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 9>we got during earnings, which is, hey, we got a

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 9>few licenses, so Wall Street was like, oh, great crack

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 9>of light, here we go. And then now we get

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 9>this and obviously we still haven't seen any movement from

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 9>the China side either.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, China used to be a significant era of revenue.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 4>What was it almost twenty percent one point.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 3>For a video numbers or thereabouts.

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Where's the Middle East at.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Can I just ask something to throw a curve ball

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 3>into the mix of the current Gyo political situation?

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, that's a very good question. Obviously, in video cares

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 9>very much about what's called sovereign AI, which is, you know,

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 9>come trees, attempts to try and build their own infrastructure.

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 9>We've seen that in Saudi Arabia, we've seen that in

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 9>the UAE, and these are areas where there's a lot

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 9>of cash and there's a lot of investment in this

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 9>future economy being made. So any threat to that would

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 9>obviously be a threat to this whole system.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, certainly in video is one of the key legs

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 3>to the downside in a points perspective. Today, in King

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 3>we're always so thrilled to have his expertise.

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 4>And it's nice to be sat next to him as well.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 3>I Meanwhile, let's take a quick look on what's happening

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 3>with Apple, because if you didn't realize amid the torrent

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 3>of news that you're trying to digestiday, the company is

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 3>actually introducing refreshed MacBook pros and airs with an M

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 3>five chip. The company also raising the prices of those

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 3>products amid an industry wide memory crunch. Other products announced

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>include two new external monitors.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 4>As you see shows down nine.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Tex percent, so actually better performing than the rest of

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the market ed.

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. We're in the Middle East.

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 3>We take a look at what's happening in the markets

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 3>amid a US is really focus on Iran. We've got

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 3>the Nastaq one hundred off by one point six percent,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Micron leading you on the points perspective to the downside,

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 3>so two it is in video, we're seeing the S

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred off by one and a half percent.

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Bitcoin is acting like a risk asset today.

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 3>We're back lower, but it's still elevated versus where it

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 3>was on the weekend.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Sixty eight eight hundred is where we trade.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Move on to individual names because it is important.

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 4>To see where the impact.

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Of tension and ongoing war in the Middle East, where

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 3>it has and what it does to assets owned by Amazon.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 3>For example, AWS warning of prolonged disruptions to its services

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 3>after drone strikes damage three of its data centers in

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East. They say the companies said drones had

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 3>directly struck two facilities in the UAE in damaged infrastructure

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 3>near other facilities in Bahrain Palanteer.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 4>The sentiment shift today.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Is so negative that even companies that are meant to

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 3>benefit from the focus on defense and defense tech are

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 3>on the lower side. We're off by one point four

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 3>percent after a rally yesterday. More analysts are going positive

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 3>on Palenteer, of course, software that's used by the government

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 3>very much in the defense perspective, and we're seeing twenty

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 3>out of thirty one analysts now saying by.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 4>The stockhead we're great.

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Shares of defense firms have joined the market sell off,

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 2>even as the conflict in Iran rearforce is their critical role,

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the critical role of the US primes. Let's bring a

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence senior analysts Wayne Sanders for more. You've been

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 2>keeping the react and the research up to date over

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 2>the last two or three days. You have this scenario

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 2>where if this conflict losts weeks or more, you look

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 2>at the air strike capabilities the United States has and

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>who might benefit. We showed some of those names on

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the screen just there. But give us your latest research please.

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, thank you so much for having me on.

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 10>When you think about this conflicts so far, a lot

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 10>of the munitions experts right you're looking at RTX, you're

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 10>looking at Lockheed in Northrope, are really the ones that

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 10>are set really to benefit off off of part of

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 10>this because they're going to have to replenish what they've got.

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 10>The problem is that as we continue to expand a

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 10>lot of the munitions right now, especially if if you're

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 10>looking at your AIM nine x's and your am rams,

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 10>which your aircraft missile shots, as well as your Tomahawks

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 10>that are coming from your naval vessels, which comes from

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 10>our TX, these are the ones right now that are

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 10>going to be critical also in further contingencies that we

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 10>would look down the road twenty twenty seven and beyond.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 10>So we want to make sure that there's a balance

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 10>between both that we are using them effectively now and

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 10>having the ability to replenish in the future when.

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 3>We turn to you, because not only are we lucky

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 3>enough to have you as a senior defense research analysts

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 3>here with us of BlueBag Intelligence, but your past experience

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 3>with the officer of the under Sectary of Defense up

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 3>until twenty twenty four, the fact that you were so

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 3>ingrained with the Department of the Army as well.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 4>Therefore, are we well placed when you're looking out to

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty.

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 3>Seven and the likes and then here and now, are

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 3>we using the right strategic assets?

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 10>No, great question. And so the bottom line I try

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 10>to tell a lot of people is the US military

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 10>does a very good job of making sure that they

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 10>have contingency plans in place. They wargain these all the

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 10>time to say, Okay, these types of conflict scenario that

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 10>we would be looking at would require this amount of munitions,

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 10>it would require these amount of aircraft, it would require

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 10>these amount of targets that we would want to be

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 10>able to hit. When you put all those into place,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 10>I guarantee you that there is not a way where

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 10>the President of the United States got a briefing from

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 10>the Pentagon that says, hey, we're going to run out

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 10>of missiles in a specific period of time if we

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 10>were to go into Iran, So they have those contingencies

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 10>in place, they know what they're doing from that. Given

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 10>the fact that we have air superiority as well, means

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 10>that we have plenty of resupply capability in the area

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 10>as well.

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 2>So I want to talk about what's happening on the ground.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Our colleagues of Bloomberg News and Bloomberg Economics have basically

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 2>done the missile math for the United States. This has

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>been focused on the Patriot missile system right four million

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 2>dollar missiles, whereas Iran has deployed lower cost twenty thousand

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 2>dollar drones. There is evidence that the US is also

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 2>looking at drone strategy. What are you seeing in the

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 2>data that's being published.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we're doing a lot right now. The US is

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 10>doing a lot, especially on counter drone technology as part

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.239
<v Speaker 10>of the Pentagon's Replicator two point zero initiative. There are

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 10>a lot of companies out there right now BA working

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 10>on apkws as well.

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 5>That's been something that's been used.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 10>In Ukraine as well from a counter drone capability. And

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 10>then you're also you start looking at things like directed energy,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 10>high powered microwaves and high energy lasers. Those are further

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 10>further out right. They are not right now at the

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 10>point of full rate production scalability. But it starts to

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.719
<v Speaker 10>ask the question, like you guys are talking about, is

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 10>you have to be able to look at the magazine

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 10>depth how much it costs for us to be able

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 10>to shoot those things down? And they've got to be

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 10>alternate technologies that are out there that can help us

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 10>be able to do that a lot cheaper.

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 5>You look at it.

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 10>On munition side of the house, we reverse engineered, the

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 10>United States reverse engineered a Shahi drone specifically to create

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 10>the Lucas drone. So from a strike perspective, you're now

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 10>looking at instead of a one and a half million

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 10>dollars Tomahawk missile, you could actually use a thirty five

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 10>thousand dollars unmanned one way attack drone. Which this is

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 10>the first operational employment that has been out there is

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 10>during this time, and I.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Ran Ryan Sander's a Blue May intelligence analyst as well

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 3>as retard Colonel.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 4>We so appreciate your time today.

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Look, demand for defense tech may be set to rise,

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 3>but the spike in oil, the gas prices, the closure

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 3>of key shipping routes. Well, they're raising concerns about how

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 3>those products reach markets. Tara Murphytosi is here with our

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Gavini. Look, it's a software provider for defense

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.719
<v Speaker 3>tech supply chains. You have the inside track on resilience

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>right now. You sit there in Washington, Tara, and I

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 3>asked you put out a note really thinking about an

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 3>availability crisis that we currently have. Spell out that reality

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 3>that we have in acquisition right now.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 11>The reality is that I think you can see from

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 11>the weekend, the demand for American military power is continuing

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 11>to increase, and so much of the conversation, including what

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 11>we just heard from Wayne's great summary, is focused on

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 11>production of new systems.

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 4>That's incredibly important.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 11>But when you also look at what the United States

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 11>is bringing to bear in the Middle East right now

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 11>F fifteen's, F twenty two's, some of these systems are

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 11>sustainment challenges as well, and so there's a production need

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 11>in the United States. There's also an availability of parts

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 11>and legacy systems that is equally important.

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 3>We're not in any sort of real immediate crisis, though,

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to this Iranian focus and battle that currently.

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 4>Rages, We're not.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 11>I would say that the United States today is capable,

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 11>including not just from a military capability perspective, but a

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 11>capacity perspective, of executing any military operation that it deems appropriate.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 11>We are not in immediate danger of running out of

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 11>stock of munitions. We are when you look at longer

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 11>term trends in a situation where if we are firing

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 11>one year's worth of missile production in one week time,

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 11>then things start to really become questionable in terms of

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 11>overall sustainability.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 5>Tara.

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 2>One of the most read stories on the Bloomberg is

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 2>about Russia seeing the war in Iran is putting pressure

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 2>on its own air defense systems in the context of Ukraine.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 5>Very interesting.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Earlier in programming we spoke CFSFCFO about how Ukraine fits

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 2>into the Iran dynamic.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 5>Just listen to this.

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 12>Some of the experience from Ukraine is developed quite quickly

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 12>into the use. Some of this will take time and

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 12>the experience is still coming. So I'm expecting now the

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 12>focus in AI particularly is so massive, as well as

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 12>all the other technologies like for example, three D printing

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 12>of the missile et cetera. What we can use within

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 12>the US and European.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Startups exactly the same topics you've been discussing, right, the

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>lessons that should have been learned from Ukraine in predictive

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 2>preparedness versus like in the US military apparatus at least

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 2>this cultural just in time.

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 5>System.

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Essentially, how do you see that learning from Ukraine and

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 2>what we're seeing in Iran?

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 4>I think you put it perfectly ed.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 11>I don't think the learning has been absorbed enough. And

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 11>we know that AI the era is upon us, and

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 11>what we need to do as a US military, as

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 11>a US national security apparatus is better harness it for

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 11>US national security aims and overall American interests. Your point

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 11>about being able to look ahead here is such a

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 11>good example of where AI can be powerful. You know,

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 11>we were just talking about the impact of this war

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 11>with Iran or this great military crisis with Iran and

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 11>on the primes, and yet one great example of how

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 11>Gavini uses AI in this context is to demonstrate that

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 11>when you look past the primes, the sub tier suppliers

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 11>of critical parts for those munitions are shared, and so

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 11>you end up with these bottlenecks and choke points in

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 11>the supply chains for military systems that used to be

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 11>completely invisible to decision makers. That's not true today with

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 11>what you can do with AI and data, and so

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 11>the next step is we understand those dynamics.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 4>What are we doing about it.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 11>From a prepositioning and stockpile management perspective.

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Tara Murphy, do TCO of Gueni, thank you very much.

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 2>So coming up in the program, Coherent CEO Dumandison joins

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 2>us to talk about his company's new strategic partnership with

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia that includes a two billion dollar investment.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 5>That's next. This is Spoonmberg Tech.

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Vidia has agreed to invest four billion dollars in the

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 2>photonics firms Coherent Momentum. The two equally sized bets by

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the AI leader should ensure demand for advanced optical components

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 2>used in data centers. Let's discuss the Coherent CEO J Anderson.

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 2>I think a reasonable place to start is to understand

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 2>the role that a laser has in the server design

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>and in the data center.

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 5>More Broady House servers talked to.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>One another because the market reaction is quite clear to

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>how investors feel about this, But where does the technology

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 2>fit in?

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a good question.

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 13>First of all, thank you for having me and I

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 13>appreciate it. Yeah, the way you can think about it

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 13>is a laser is really ultimately it's photonics. It's really

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 13>about light, and it's about using light to transmit data

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 13>in the data center. And there's a good portion of

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 13>the data center already today where all of the communication.

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 5>Of the data is happening with light.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 13>And the reason that light gets used rather than, for instance,

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 13>an electrical signal is light is the absolute fastest, most

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 13>power efficient way to transmit data. And so good portion

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 13>of the data center already runs one hundred percent on

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 13>photonics optical connections. But as we move forward building new

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 13>data centers, as we see a massive ramp in the

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 13>amount of data flowing through these data centers, more and

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 13>more of the data center connections will be based on

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 13>light on optical forts.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.479
<v Speaker 2>So in this arrangement you'll take the funds for R

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 2>and D purposes, But inside of it there is a

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 2>purchase opportunity for Nvidia if it has done a lot

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 2>on silicon photonics. They've told me about it quite a while.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Now what's new in it for them? You know, what

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 2>is it that they're able to now do that they

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 2>couldn't do?

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 13>Themselves, Well, they're relying on us to bring the photonics

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 13>expertise right. So in Vidia for US has been a

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 13>long term partner actually over twenty years as a customer

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 13>and a partner through their Melanax acquisition, So we've had

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 13>long history with Nvidian and really what we're doing is

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 13>working together to use photonics to advance the architecture of

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 13>data centers, to find new innovation within data centers. And

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 13>the key thing that photonics or optic springs is incredibly

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 13>power efficient data transmission because again there's no more.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 5>Place transferring virra election exactly.

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 13>So as you increase the data rates, as you increase

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 13>the amount of data that's being transmitted, you have to

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 13>if you're using electrical today, eventually you'll hit a physics

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 13>limit and you'll be kind of forced to.

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Switch to optical.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 13>And so we'll see more and more of the connections

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 13>within the data center moved to optical. And that's really

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 13>where we come in. We're a global expert in photonics

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 13>in optical communication.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 4>And the market is forward looking.

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 3>They understood the copper to optical vibe for a few months,

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 3>if not years, and your shares have shown that. But

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 3>what's interesting is Momentum CEO was speaking at an event

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 3>yesterday Michael, and he was talking about even with scaling

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>of their supply, they're still way back, they're falling further

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 3>behind where demand is. Is that something similar for you

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 3>as one?

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.479
<v Speaker 13>Well, demand There's no doubt demand is incredibly strong and

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 13>that is both in the near term and in the

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 13>long term. And the forecasts that we're seeing from our customers,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 13>not just in Nvidia but large hyperscalers, cloud service providers

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 13>are just exceptionally strong. And so what we are doing

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.479
<v Speaker 13>about that is we are rapidly expanding our capacity. I mean,

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 13>we are building capacity as fast as we can. Yeah,

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 13>I was going to say, just as one example, ed

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 13>you asked about the lasers.

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Let's take the lasers we want to.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 13>So if you look at the lasers, we're doubling our

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 13>capacity this year, right, So we're coming out with twice

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 13>as much indium phosphide that's the key material underneath the lasers,

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 13>but twice as much indian phosphide production. So we are

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 13>ramping our capacity as fast as possible. But back to

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 13>as we see more and more of the data center

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 13>converge from electrical to optical. You've got kind of two

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 13>big secular growth trends underneath us, and number one the

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 13>data center growth, but number two this conversion of electrical

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 13>toptical and so that just generates an incredible amount of demand.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 13>So we're trying to stay ahead of that. We're ramping capacity.

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 13>This in Vidia partnership is part of that. That investment

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 13>that they made into Coherent is will help us ramp

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 13>capacity faster and make sure that we've got the right capacity.

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 5>In paste where right.

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 2>We had the co founder's mesh on the show recently

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX alum who did lasers at SpaceX, and they came

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 2>to market with a very simple argument. Output of these

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>systems at scale was done in China. There isn't a

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 2>facility in the United States. There isn't the capacity here.

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that part of your game plan or you dispute.

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 13>That laser Absolutely, lasers. Some of the key technology that

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 13>we're developing and ramping is here in the US.

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 13>So we have a long history of US manufacturing. We

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 13>were founded as a US manufacturing company. We've got over

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 13>twenty manufacturing sites across thirteen different states. But one of

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 13>the key technologies that we're ramping on behalf of Nvidia

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 13>and other customers. Is that laser technology that's happening in Sherman, Texas, right,

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 13>And that's a great facility we've had. We've supported customers

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 13>out of that facility for years. But that's where we're

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 13>going to be part of where we're going to be

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 13>doubling capacity.

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 3>What you need from like a raw material perspective, what

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 3>is it that makes us manufacturing ever more capable.

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you're discussing this from government all the time.

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 13>Yeah. So one of the key inputs is it's the

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 13>Indian phosphide substrates themselves, and so we have a very

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 13>diversified supply chain. We've just like in videas securing you know,

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 13>capacity rights to our capacity. We're doing the same thing

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 13>with our suppliers. So we're making sure that we've got

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 13>all the key input capacity or input supply secured. But look,

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 13>it's we believe that these key optical technologies like lasers,

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 13>we absolutely want to see that manufactured in the US. Now,

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 13>we have other sites as well. We're a global company

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 13>and so we are ramping at multiple sites. But that's

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 13>one of our key facilities is Sherman Texas.

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Jim, it's great having you on.

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Is a rather busy week.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 3>John Anderson, Coherent CEO, always talk, he lass