WEBVTT - Dangerous Time For U.S. As Trump Guts Defense: Admiral Stavridis

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day,

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Well, there's been a lot

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of movement and the senior leadership of the U. S military. Yesterday,

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Defense Secretary Esper was terminated by President Trump, and today

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>political reporting that the Pentagon's acting policy chief resigned today

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>after falling out of favor with the White House. What

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>does its mean for our leadership of our military. There's

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no one better to have this discussion with than

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>retired Navy Admiral James Tarvitis, former military commander of NATO

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and a Bloomberg opinion columnists Adam Well, thanks so much

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Let's start right there. Lots of turnover,

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>starting at the top with our Secretary Defense. What is

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>your take? There's no reason to do this kind of

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>decapitation of the Department of Defense while we're in an

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>inherently unsettled period of a transition. And let me tell

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you three things that really worried me. One is that

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Defense is very tactically involved. He or

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>she is someone who makes the crucial individual decisions about

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>what unit is going to deploy to Afghanistan, and we've

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>got troops in combat all over the world. Number Two,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at the operational level, kind of the theater level, he

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>or she is a person who makes decisions about should

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the carrier battlegroup go to the Arabian gulfer to the

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>South China Sea. And number three, strategically, the job of

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Defense is to work with our allies

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to guard the nuclear code. So what's happened is we've

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>fired the current Secretary of Defense, who by the way,

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is the fourth one in four years, and they brought

0:01:56.280 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in a retired Army colonel. He's not qualified for the

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>job remotely, and his name is Chris Miller, and he's

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have to try and learn the job and

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>presumably do the job for the next seventy one days.

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It's dangerous. Yes, this particular person who resigned wrote a

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>letter of resignation saying, now, as ever, our long term

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>success depends on adhering to the US Constitution, all public

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>servants swear to support and defend political reporting that Anderson

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>had clashed with White House personnel and that there is

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>expected to be several departures in the wake of Esper's firing.

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how how got it out could the Pentagon

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be by the time we know, you know exactly when

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>President Biden is going to take office, If indeed it

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is a President Biden, I think we're going to see

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>this kind of bleeding of talent across the entire administration.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people have been hanging on waiting for

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the election. I think the majority of these folks would

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>be will link to stay and have a reasonable sensible transition.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I've been personally involved in a

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>number of these transitions at very high levels in the Pentagon. Normally, um,

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>despite the rank or of an election, the two sides

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>get together because everyone knows, especially in the Pentagon, it's

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about our national security. It's bigger than Republicans and Democrats.

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>The way that doesn't seem to be how this is

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>trending at the moment, and it is very concerning, Admiral,

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you still have a plenty of contacts with

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the in the Pentagon. What is the thought coming out

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Pentagon of what perhaps they perceive President Trump's

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>strategy or endgame here? Does he have one? Um, I

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can use the word Trump and strategy

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in the same sentence, and he would probably be proud

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. He's a transactional player. He's someone who is

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>famously instinctive, operates from his gut, and at the moment,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>his gut is upset because he lost the allife. Let's

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>be frank about what's happened here. Um, I'll give you

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the good news if I can, Paul and Bonnie. It's

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that the uniformed military will uniformly, uh park this off

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to the side. They look at this as the civilian

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>leadership is in turmoil. But I assure you, people like

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>General Mark Millie, the Chairman, and the Joint Chiefs, all

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of the chiefs of Defense, and all the way down

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to the most junior sailors and airmen and greens and

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>soldiers board deployed, they just parked this off to the side.

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>They keep their eye on the mission in front of us.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>They'll keep us safe. But boy, we do them a disservice,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and we dishonor their volunteer spirit and their sense of

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>mission when we let things just dissolved like this, it's

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad day for our national defense. Yeah. Morell

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be buoyed by this. Political is

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>reporting that this potentially paves the way for Anthony Tata

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to take over the policy shop, so that the policy

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the Pentagon. Let's say, do you know this man?

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>I do. He's a retired one star general. He had

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a respectable career in yarmed forces. Um. He is someone

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>who has been a Trump loyalist throughout the campaign of

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and has been a Fox News commentator. He's extremely conservative. Um.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>The administration has been trying to get him confirmed, but

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that's been very difficult because of the whole series of

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>inflammatory statements he has made over the years. Um. He

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is not the kind of balanced, uh, centrist that is

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>necessary in a job like that, especially during a transition period.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So unfortunately, I think this is not going to be

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a healthful choice. He's a partisan. We don't need partisanship

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Admiral, from your experience, what do you believe

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>our adversaries, whether it be Russia, China, Iran, North Korea.

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>What is their view of what's happening right now? What

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>strictly within the Pentagon. Yeah, I'll give you two words.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>High fives, UM in Moscow, Uh, Beijing, shun Yang, Kran, Caracas, Havana.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>This is exactly what our opponents hoped for. Is this

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of turbulence. They feel as though we're taking our

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>eye off the ball. It opens the door for all

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of mischievous behavior by Iran and the Arabian Gulf

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>or Kim jong Na and this would be an ideal

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>time for him to launch another long range intercontinental ballistic

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>missile UM. Overall, this is greeted very positively and frankly.

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Election interference both in and is real, UM, But it

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>was less about doing anything for Donald Trump. It was

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>all about creating vision in our society. So let us hope,

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and I know this sounds like an extremely negative interview

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and it is, but let us hope that UM, as

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we get through this transition, that the two sides can

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>come together and work through this because these are these

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>are big issues and it is a dangerous moment for

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>America in the world. But our adversaries know that too, Right, Admiral.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they know that President Trump is potentially on

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the way out of this point, and so if there

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>were to be an attack launched, it might be a

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>very dangerous time for them to do that because there

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>might be you know, an an unequal retaliation. Um, You've

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>got it right that this kind of uh, destabilizing moment

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>can cut both ways. It makes the calculus harder for

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>our opponents. But what I would argue, Vanni is the

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>dangerous not so much of a massive strategic level attack.

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's that in this period when for apps, opponents would

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>feel as though our military are intelligence services were distracted

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and somewhat decapitated. And by the way, we are to

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>recognize their rumors that the CIA direct when the FBI

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>director maybe fired, we are to recognize that, um, there

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is room for quiet, deleterious behavior. That's what concerns me. Admiral.

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. It's always illuminating to speak with you. Admiral

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>James Stefrida's US Navy admiral former military commander of NATO.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Oral arguments going on right now at the Supreme Court Court,

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>shaped by President Trump, of course, hearing a challenge to

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the Affordable Care Act and in the last few minutes

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we're here in Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice spread

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Common are both saying they're inclined to leave the rest

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the law intact even if Republic and Challenger is

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>succeeded in validating the so called individual mandate. Let's bring

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg legal analyst and host of Bloomberg Law, June Grasso. June,

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I know been keeping an eye on what's going on

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>right now at the Supreme Courtinate. Where are we beyond

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>what I've just outlined. Well, the argument started with a

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.599
<v Speaker 1>standing question, and this is a legal question as to

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the states that are challenging this and

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the plaintiffs challenging this have what's called a stake in

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the outcome, were they injured? And a lot of the

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>justices were questioning whether the states here really had standing

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to even bring this lawsuit. So that was the first barrier,

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. There was very little talk about the

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>merits of it, because a lot of the justices wanted

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to jump from that right to whether it was severable.

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And as you said, two of the justices, the Chief

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Justice and Justice Kavanaugh, came out really strongly saying that

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in their opinion this was a severable thing. So that

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that means that if they can take away that one

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>part of the law, they could leave the rest of

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the law standing and that would give them that would

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>give him five votes for severability. So June, I think

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the summary here is are they going to throughout the

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>entire Obamacare or just certain aspects of it? If you

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>can summarize that for us, I'd be helpful, alright, So

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that's sever ability. The question is whether so they're challenging

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this one part of the law. They're saying because Congress

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>zeroed out the tax penalty and left the mandate in

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>with no practical consequences, then they have to strike down

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole law. That's that's the opinion of the Trump

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>administration and the Republican States here. The comeback to that is, no,

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to set sever out the whole law.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to throw out the whole law. You

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>could just take out that one provision of the law

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and leave the law standing. And you know, the Court

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in its precedence has done this several times. And you heard, uh,

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Chief Justice John Roberts really going at one of the

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Texas Listitor General who is up, still up now, I think,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Texas Lisitor General and he basically said to him,

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I took some notes. One second. Let me just get

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>he said the mandate was critical. Now everything is I'm

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>are He said, well, it's hard for me to argue

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>that Congress intended the law to fall and didn't even

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>try to repeal the Act. Why wouldn't Congress have repealed

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the Act? So that's the whole thing. If they wanted

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the law to fall, why wouldn't they just have taken

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the Act away? Which they didn't. They just took away

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the individual mandate. Yeah, I mean, Kabo, there was conflicting,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, messages even from the White House right about

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing existing conditions and then taking away the individual Monday,

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and there was so many different messages. But that's the

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>point here, right, if you take away the mandate, if

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you excise the mandate and the words of Brett Kavanaugh,

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>then the whole law is in trouble anyway, because it

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of depends on everybody paying into it. Right. No, Actually,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean they didn't really go into it that way.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>What they look at is right now they're saying, look,

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the individual mandate doesn't matter. Because the laws working without it,

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>people are buying insurance. As v really Donald Varili, who

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was a former Solicitor general, as he argued, he said

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know the mandate it worked without it was

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>a carat and a stick thing initially for Congress to say,

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay this text to get this and

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to get this law rolling. But now they

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>found out that they don't need the stick because it's

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>working without it. So what they're saying is you don't

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>need this mandate to let the law work. And what

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Justice Kavanan Roberts are saying, yes, we can excise out this,

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we can take that little part out of the law

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and the law still stands. And you know, uh, Justice

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>Brier really came on strong with the Texas Solicitor General

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and he put all these examples forwards. Supposed, you know,

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>in the in the during the war, Congress said by

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>bonds in law, suppose Congress has planned a tree in

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>law or clean up the yar in law in law,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but there's no penalty for doing any of that. Well,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a you're gonna say that all of those laws are

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>unconstitutional because there's no penalty attached. And a lot of

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the justices came out with that also, the Chief Justice

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Kavanaugh said, suppose you

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>had your required to have uh American flag flying, but

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no penalty if you don't. Does that mean that,

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have to take down the entire law.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think that most of the Justices are heading

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>toward the idea that even if there is standing, which

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a question of whether or not they're standing, that

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>still they wouldn't throw the entire law out June. Give

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of timing here. This is arguably one

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the more important cases in front of the Supreme Court.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>When should we expect the ruling, Well, I would say

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>around June. You'd expect a ruling in normal times, unless

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the Justices decide for some reason to speed this up.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't really see any need to

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>speed this up at this point. This case has been

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>challenged so many times. This is the third time that

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it came up to the Supreme Court, So I don't

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's any harm in holding off on the opinion

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in this case. Maybe they prefer to hold off on it, actually,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so um, I think we'll see it in June. All

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the big decisions come down at the end of the term.

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>If the term last, when it usually does, we'll see

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>these big decisions in June. It will be fascinating because

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is a court that is more shaped

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>by President Trump, and he has boasted of getting rid

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>of the individual mandate. But you do wonder if there

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>won't be slippage at some point down the line, that

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>if there isn't a penalty, then those who can't afford

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>really to to keep up there there there, there, their

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>insurance premiums and so on, if they won't sort of

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>end up out of the system, and if that won't

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>push it up for everybody else. Anyway, We'll have to

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>see how it goes. But oral arguments are always fascinating

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>at the Supreme Court, and June Grosso always has a

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>great handle on what's going on. She will be back,

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, hosting Bloomberg Law, so do tune in for

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that for more of a summary of what happened. It's

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>an eighty minute argument, by the way, so you know

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's quick. And we also know that oral arguments of

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the Screme Court tend not to have a huge amount

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of impact over the actual decision at least that's been

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>what's been the case in the past, but always interesting

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen to again. June Grosso, Bloomberg, Lean Land Unless

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and host of Bloomberg Law. All right, let's got straight

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to dr Amish Adulteria of Johns Hopkins University. A fantastic

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation always with the doctor Adulgia. Let's begin with the

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Eli Lily antibody drug dr Adlgia. After yesterday's five FISER announcement,

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>what do we make of the ramp up of positive announcements.

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is all a testament to the fact

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that when we actually start to try and invest in

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>technological solutions to this infectious disease problems, they will bear fruit.

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is a lesson for other infectious

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>disease threats, and then we will get through this COVID

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen pandemic. It's going to still take some time with

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the fiser, with the even with the fiser and used

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>with the literally drugs to get through this winter, which

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be rough in the northern hemisphere. And uh,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but but there is sort of a light at the

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>end of the tunnel coming and we are getting getting

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to a point where we have much many more tools

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to fight this virus than we did in the beginning.

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Dr do give us you talk about this and then

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>President like Biden called it a you know, a long

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>dark winter coming up, and we're seeing the numbers just

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of go through the roof set new records. Unfortunately, um,

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, just from the New York perspective last March

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in April, it seemed to take you know, a month

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>or so to start to really bend that curve. Do

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you think there's a simple similar scenario here or is

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>something different about this second slash third wave. I think

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there's something different about this third surge because there's a

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of transmission that's going on with people's small gatherings.

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think this definitely has a lot to do

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with pandemic fatigue, which wasn't there during the first surge

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>because there that was people were scared it was a

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>new virus. The second thurde was really bars and restaurants

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and and and that type of activity, which this one,

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this third surge, is a little bit different epidemiologically, so

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be much harder to control. So I don't

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>know that we'll bend the curve of curve in all

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of these places around the country that are that are

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing surges. It's just it's very difficult now to get

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>people to to comply that haven't complied. So I really

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>fear for the worst in some places where their hospitals

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>are already under stressed. You know, the President elect, Joe Biden,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to do something, but he's limited in what

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>he can actually do. Can he have an impact? I mean,

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he obviously can't do anything at a federal level. I

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>do think he can have an impact just by bringing

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the moral authority of the of the presidency, which he's

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>going to assume in in a several weeks, as well

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as the team that he's assembled, which can constitute some

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of the best minds in the field that can start

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to issue guidance, can start to speak to the American

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>public and maybe with that kind of clear messaging, with

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a single voice, without any of the mixed messaging and

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the evasions and the misinformation, you may see Americans actually

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>start to accept this information and be able to modify

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>their activities in a way that decreases the spread of

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the virus. And it's also important for him to articulate

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>how he turns his plan into actionable items that state

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and local health depart rents at hospitals are going to use,

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>so people know what what to expect and know what's

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>coming in January. So dr we had that good news

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.239
<v Speaker 1>from Fiser yesterday about their vaccine. Of course, there are

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>other groups out there Moderna as well. How do you

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think this is gonna all play out as we get

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>into maybe the mid part of the year. Are there

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a number of vaccine choices for consumers? Will

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>doctors prescribe different vaccines for different people? How do you

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>think that will play out? Ideally? I hope that's the case,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that we have so many vaccines that we have a

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>choice and and and what might happen is that you

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>have more than one vaccine get emergency use approval, and

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you're pulling all those resources together to vaccinate the country,

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and you just have to keep track of who gets

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what vaccine, which can be logistically challenging. But I think

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we would be happy to be in a position where

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to have that as our problem. The other

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>thing is is that some of these vaccines may do

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>better in different subgroups, so we may have targeted vaccines

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>for different groups, just like we do for influence to

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>where we give certain types of flu vaccines to the

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>elderly population and other types to other populations. So that

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>would be something I would expect to see. So it's

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>important that we continue the research and development and the

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>clinical trials on all of the other candidates, because I

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think this is going to be a one vaccine solution.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We're likely going to have many different vaccines, and the

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>vaccine we get in a couple of years for coronavirus

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe something completely different than what we're seeing now in

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the clinical trials. If you don't mind talk to us

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Europe right now, because we're seeing

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>France coming very very close to i CU capacity. That

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is the whole entirety of France, it's already above capacity.

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>We all have a major problem as well. In Denmark

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>with Mink explained this to us. For those who haven't

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>been following this story, well, you have to remember that

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>many of these European countries, what they relied on was

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>an economic shutdown, a lockdown type of approach without actually

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>investing in the public health infrastructure needed to think about

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to deal with the cases that would

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>inevitably occur once you started to get people socially interacting.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that there is this kind of magical thinking

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that this virus can just go away with with having

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>people social distance for a period of time, and that's

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not the case. The virus has established itself in the

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>human population and has a wide spectrumribilenus of many mile

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>cases that never get big diagnosed. So when you when

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you lift the shutdown, when you lift a lockdown, if

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the ability to test, trace and isolate,

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>if you have an expanded hospital capacity, you're going to

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>go right back to where you were. We're nowhere near

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>her immunity for this. And it's if this is a

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>lesson that if you don't invest in the public health infrastructure,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you will continue to make the same mistake over and

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>over again and not have any kind of sustainable approach

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to controlling this virus. Doctor, you're part of one of

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the biggest and most well respected medical facilities in the world.

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Give us a sense of how the rank and file

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>people that doctors, the nurses, the orderlies. What's the morale

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of those people right now as they face what again

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>might be a very long winter. Well, it varies, and

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think think that talking to my colleagues all

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>around the country, that this is something that everybody is

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>dreading because we know inevitably that the cases are going

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to increase. We're already seeing it happened in many parts

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of the country that that hospitals now have more COVID

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>patients than they ever had before outside of the New

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>York area, and we're we're worried about it because now

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of complacency in the public and people

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the community don't seem to care what's happening in

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>their own hospital. So I do think that that is

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>demoralizing to realize that people, uh, they may clap for us,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and they may call us heroes, but if they're not

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>actually taking the actions that are not going to put

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>us in harm's way, that are not going to put

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>our hospitals into crisis so other medical care can't be rendered.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it really is all empty applause. Yeah, I mean,

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's a desperate situation. And also in

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>places like nursing homes where you know, the staffing levels

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have gone down after all of these people worked so

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>hard to shepherd their patients through this or to you know,

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to Worrett, many patients died and then you know, because

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>these nursing homes couldn't take in new patients, they didn't

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>have money, and staff were let go. It really is

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's almost nothing good about this. No, there

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't and it's interesting. Dr amish Adology, thank you so

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We appreciate it as always. Dr Amisdaloger,

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Senior scholar and Infectious disease physician for the Dons Hopkins

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public Health,

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and of course, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School Public Health

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder Bloomberg LP and

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Philanthropies and this radio station. So, Vonnie, some some

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>tough tough months coming up for this pandemic here. Uh,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that's tempered somewhat by the advances that our scientists and

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 1>medical research folks are making in terms of therapeutics, UH

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and vaccine, a steepening in the yield curve, A little

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of optimism out there in the marketplace. Let's get

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>some more color on that. We do that whenever we

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>talk interest rates yield curves with Ira Jersey, chief US

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>interest rate Strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence. Ira, thanks for joining us.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the treasury market trading over the last several days

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even you know more than that. What's that

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>telling you? Yeah, so there's obviously the vaccine news from

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>yesterday was it was pretty optimistic. We're bouncing right off

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a pretty important technical level right now in tenure yields

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>at around uh zero point nine six, So you know,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about basis points because yields are so low,

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>but but that's a pretty important level because that's where

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we got to back in June, and if we break

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>above that, then then we could see a pretty significant move,

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe well above one percent for the first time since March. So, um, yeah,

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the I think as we see light

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the tunnel, you'll see more of

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this bear steepening you mentioned where the market sells off

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and longer term interest rates tend to go up a

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit more than, or potentially a lot more than

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>shorter term interest rates, so that it's not not surprising

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're seeing this on kind of a more risk

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on tone that you've had the last couple of days.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>At what point, IRA, does it become less about a

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>better economy and more about inflation. Yeah, I don't think

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it does. So, you know, we've seen a pretty significant

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>rebound in inflation expectations from the lows U in the

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>second quarter of this year, so back to basically the

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>reins that we were in for most of twenty nineteen.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So um, So I don't see inflation expectations going up

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>a whole heck of a lot more inflation itself. The

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>reason being that even though we might rebound, um, you know,

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty sharply in terms of growth, what really drives inflation

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>in the U S And this is I think very

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>underappreciated and misunderstood. It's really wages. So you need significant

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>wage gains, and particularly wage gains by lower income sectors

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>in order to get a sustainable uptick in inflation. Because

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>most of what US consumers buy is actually services, and

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>those services all most of the prices of those services

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is our wages. So you really need unemployment to be

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>backed down toward you know, five percent four percent probably

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to get the lower income spectrum hired again.

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and also jobs being created and new business

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is being created to drive that inflation and inflation expectations higher.

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So so I don't think that that's going to happen,

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>which which is very important actually, Vonni, because the last

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>thing I would mention on this score is that means

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that if we do continue to get higher interest rates,

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really going to be tips, uh, tips

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that really do poorly in this such situation. And not

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because inflation is not going up, because inflation is going up,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 1>but it's because with yields moving higher, uh, really yields

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>move much higher. So so tips actually can have a

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>negative return even if inflation is you know, one and

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a half to two percent. Tell us what happened, if anything? Really,

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>How did the treasury market react to the election news

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>from last week? Yeah, it was volatile, Um, it didn't

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>really move significantly out of the ranges that they were

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in until until yesterday when you got the news about

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.239
<v Speaker 1>about Fiser. You know, the market was was hadn't been

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>anticipating I think a blue wave, and that blue wave

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>would have probably meant that we'd have a very large

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus, a lot more bonds outstanding. So the curve

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like like you had mentioned before, Paul, the curved bear

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>steepened and anticipation of that as it looked like we

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>were not going to get the blue wave and we'd

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>have a split government. Um that that were unwound a

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And but again well within the ranges that

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been in the last three or four months. So, UM,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>you know. So I think at this point, and one

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I've been looking at is how

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>much new supply are we likely to get? What is

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the next size of a fiscal stimulus? Because I think

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>we will get a fiscal stimulus, But how and the

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>way is that? Um is that I think that that

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>now uh a President Biden, assuming that um, you know,

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>he he is the ultimately the winner. UM, I think

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that that he will compromise with some of the moderates

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the UH in the Senate on the Republican side,

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and you will get a reasonably big fiscal stimulus one

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half to two trillion dollars. Our baseline is

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>around two trillion, and that will still need to be

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>funded at least a little bit through through treasury issuance. IRA.

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>What will be the difference if it's one trillion verses

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>say just one point two trillion or one point five trillion. Yeah,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so so that there so one trillion. It's it's interesting,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 1>So one trillion dollars when it comes to the treasury

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>market means that they don't have to issue any new

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>bonds because the Treasury Department right now has over a

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars sitting in cash with the Federal Reserve, so

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they can just use that money in order to fund

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a small fiscal stimulus. A larger fiscal stimulus over one

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half trillion, and they'll have to continue to

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>issue uh issue a lot of net uh net treasury

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>bonds over the next twelve months in order to fund

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>anything larger than about one and a half trillion UM

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus. You know, it's interesting. We're going to get something.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Is you were just mentioning your baseline is two billions,

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we get nothing? And if that were to occur, what

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think the treasury market would do? Yeah? So,

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think if we don't get any fiscal stimulus,

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we are priced in for some kind of

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus, and if not, I think we do probably rally.

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So you wind up seeing ten uere yields back in

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the old range call at six eight basis points. Um,

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, so kind of pretty boring. Very briefly, the

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>FED made a comment yesterday which was interesting because it

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>was right after the election. Tell us how much the

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>FED is weighing in on on this economy right now? Yeah. So,

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>well that that was on fiscal on financial stability. So

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>they do a quarterly financial stability report, and um, you know,

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in that they basically said that the virus really mattered,

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and um, the you know, I think that that they're

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>worried about whether or not markets are functioning. And markets

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>are functioning, so I think the FED can probably step

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>away from that a little bit. All right, Ira Jersey

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>always with the latest. Thank you so much. Our Jersey

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is chief US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence on

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the on Market and the universe of fixton come out there.

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg radio