WEBVTT - Where Have All the Companies Gone?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>John Man. We've been talking a lot over the last

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of years about the changing geopolitical situation. We've been

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about how the whole world and the financial world

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in particular, is at an inflection point and everything's going

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to change. And when we've been talking about it, one

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I'm afraid was not on our

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>list was a new Israel Hama's conflict. But this does

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have massive impacts on the area that we talk about

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>on economics and on finance, and in particular possibly on

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the way that inflation will move over the next couple

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of years.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, I mean it's all just more evidence of

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 2>deteriory and overall kind of like geopolitical kind of sphere

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>and more disruption to what the world that we kind

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>of grew up and if you looked like, and what

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 2>it no longer looks like, and what everyone's something to

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>get used to it being. You invite them in, you know,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>a team, make it. You know, got a very long story.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 2>Short is just that you know it's going to be

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>more inflationary and more volatile and more disrupted and more

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of nasty surprises, which is not very cheerful, but

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 2>that is the way it is.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things that I've been thinking about,

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think about this a lot is ESG

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 3>investing and the way that environmental, social, and government factors

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 3>taken into account when you invest.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 4>And we talked after the war and the Ukraine began.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 4>We talked about had defense, which had long been considered

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 4>something that you absolutely could not invest in because it

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 4>was obviously bad, because owning shares in a company that

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 4>creates things that kill people is clearly horrible.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And then after that war started, everyone started to look

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>at it again and say, well, actually, you know, defense

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is really a social good. Having an adequate, adequate defense

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in place for your population is surely a very definition

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of a social good, assuming you believe in democracy, freedom, etc.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, which clearly not everybody does. And so we

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>got to the point where we're like, well, in wartime,

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe defense is about as ESG as you can get.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And now everything is shifting as well in terms of

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>energy and fuels, et cetera. And I got a note

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the other day from a fund manager explaining how investing

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in mining is now a good thing. And for years,

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, you and I have been told that you

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>can't touch a mine with a barge pole because it's

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>really dirty. And all the diesel big machines and the

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem destruction that's basically built in to mining, and of

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>course the use of water. All these things make a

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>mining non ESG. And now of course there's energy security

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>flies to the top of everyone's to do list. Mining

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is very EESG. What can be more of social good

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>than mining for the messols that allow the energy transition

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen to the extent that it can happen. So

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>ESG is kind of it's disappearing. It's disappearing into reality.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, events have kind of overtaking it. It's I mean,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 2>the frustrating thing is this has been blindingly obvious from

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the start, you know, when all of these idiots were

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>talking about stranded assets and all that sort of stuff.

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 2>When you were like, well, okay, maybe they'll be stranded

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>one day, But first of all, when you get to

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>the point where we don't need this stuff anymore, you know,

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's somewhat frustrating that we can end up being

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>at the point where it's only once you know, like

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>push comes to shove, the kind of logic starts to

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 2>kick in again. You know, we wasted an awful lot

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>of time and an awful lot of paperwork because ESG

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>was a useful way basically for you know, one group

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of people who virtue sign going for another another kind

0:03:59.960 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>of like group of people in the financial industry, you

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>find the sales pitch for John.

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's been the most exciting, if you're a marketing man

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in fund management, most exciting marketing campaign since the beginning

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of fund management. You know, the amount of money that

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is poured into this nonsense because a lot of it

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is nonsense. Let's be clear at this point, a lot

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of it's completely nonsense that it's poured into this nonsense

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>since what twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen when it kicked off.

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>This has been a marketing man's dreams, but it's also

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>been deeply misguided.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like a huge piste of time and I'm

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>investment capital in the water cases. So it's it's good

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 2>that we're coming out of this, but it's uh, you know,

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>it all kind of pop up in other ways, you know,

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, so it's rebranded so that it's no,

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 2>it's ESG. It's okay, it's good. It's good to Maine.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>As long as you're main in for lithium, you know

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that is that is you know, it's kind of you know,

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>nobody's it's going to see in the Oh, yeah, it's

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 2>good to mean for pool.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, I think when we're very nearly there,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>because let's not forget that you need coal to make steel,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and you need steel to put up a wind turbine.

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Not all coalers, not all steelers is from coal. But

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you need coal to make the majority of steel around

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the world. So I don't think it's very long before

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I get a note from a fun manager saying mining

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.559
<v Speaker 1>coal for good, feel good with coal.

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, you can't be too cynical a bit there.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>Stuff that absolutely right, you can't be too cynical. And

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I was talking to someone about it the

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>other day and I was thinking, once, once you take

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this pragmatic approach to es gee, there's no limit, no

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>limit of where it can end. You know. Take tobacco

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>companies right, amazingly well run, survived, longer, chucked out more

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.679
<v Speaker 1>cash than anyone could could possibly have begun to imagine

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>when when the consequences of smoking became clear. So there's

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of punches that's done really well out of that?

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that a social good? And we were told weren't

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we buy by Paul John the other day that the

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>cash that they pour into our treasuries far was the

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>medical cost of dealing with smokers and finances so many

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>other things that the state do. Wow, what a social

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>good you see? Once you get going, Once you get going,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's no end. It all means nothing.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean you're basically saying the bicigarettes to save our NHS.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, that is what I said.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 2>But tobacco companies stop, just.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Stop, just stop right, Okay, Moving on personal finance tip

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of the week, give me one John.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>O Well inter streets, interest streets Allo. The long term

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 2>out look for infleetion is obviously volataile earned up and down.

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>At the moment, it looks as if the Bank of

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 2>England is probably I think that the Bank England's done

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>at five and a quarter percent. Obviously it may go

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 2>up a little bit further. But looking at the least

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>we data and obviously we're we're recording this early, so

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>we haven't had the inflation data for September yet, but

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 2>chances are that it's going to that you can see

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>that the bank is itching.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>They kind of like.

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Call an end to rate hikes now. And so we've

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 2>seen NS and I the government bond kind of like

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>retail facing bit remove its six point two percent interest straight.

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Not get round to it. I did not get round

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to that.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't. And this is what I'm thinking today is

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>when we should be telling people, Look, okay, so maybe

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>if you've not been getting around this stuff, you should

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>start looking for your your one year fixed straight accounts. Now,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 2>if you've got a bit of cash, then you know

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 2>it's probably time you have a look because you can

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>still get if it's for a that for a tax

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 2>paying account, you can still get one year at six

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 2>point one percent, which is half decent. I think that's

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.679
<v Speaker 2>going through raising, you know, they kind of that's the

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 2>the place that does the it. It puts your money

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 2>into the best savings account that you can find, or

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you can go for a fixed cash Isa Paragan does

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>one for five point five five percent. I'm just looking

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>at money facts five point five percent with all the

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>more Mansfield Building Society five point four we leeds in Yorkshire,

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>so there's still you know, you can get a half

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>decent rate and giving the inflation is probably gonna come

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>down to blow five percent in the final quarter of

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 2>this year, it's at least going to be getting a

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of real return.

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's looking it's amazing Tasday's John that the best

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we think we can help for is to get a

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>rid of interest. It is only slightly below the right

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of inflation.

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Although this is slightly higher.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 5>It will be.

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>It will it will be, it will be. So there's

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this John predicting inflation for you as well.

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Dangerous come December.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, now, listen, I do want to make clear

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>before we before we go on to our interview today,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that we did record this interview a little while ago,

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so it was recorded before the Israel Helmuth conflict began.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And that is why it doesn't mention it. Not because

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>not because we didn't mention it. It just hadn't begun by dance.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It was recorded a little early. And this conversation that

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>John and I are having it's also been recorded a

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>few days before the podcast comes out, so obviously things

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of us moving and may have changed by the time

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it does come out. Welcome to Maren Talk to Money,

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast in which people who know the markets, Explain

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I'm Maren Zumsetweb. This week we bring you

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with Douglas abbotead of UK Welfish Rooders and

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Duncan Lamont, Global head of Pensions and Investments, also at Schroders. Duncan, Doug,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. We really

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Great to be here.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 6>Thank you for having me.

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thanks very much.

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We've been waiting, Duncan to have you on for ages.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>John and I mentioned you all the time like it's

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a mini data celebrity, and we talk about you off

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was when will we get them to come on? When

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>will we come on? And finally you're here. So I

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>hope you're really really good, because you're really disappointing. If

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not, I will do my best.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 6>There's a lot to live up to there, I know, right.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>What I want to want to start by talking about,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Duncan is you've done quite a lot of work into

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the shrinking pool of equities in the UK where we

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>are gradually de equitizing in the extent to which that matters.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if we can start by talking about

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening. Where is the UK a qreed market going.

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I think that there is an increased awareness

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 6>about this, but I don't think people have quite got

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 6>their head around the scale of what has been happening,

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 6>both in the UK but also internationally. And maybe you

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 6>can come on to the international element too. Just to

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 6>give you some numbers, back in nineteen ninety six there

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.599
<v Speaker 6>was twenty seven hundred companies on the main market of

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 6>the London Stock Exchange. Now there is one thousand and

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 6>seventy seven, a sixty percent reduction if you look even

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 6>low longer time horizon. So since the nineteen sixties there's

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 6>actually been a seventy five percent reduction in the number

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 6>of UK companies. Add an Aim Hey for Aim for

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 6>a few years actually was attracting loads of companies and

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 6>actually that kind of makes it look a bit better.

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 6>But the number of AIM companies has also follow by

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 6>half now, so there really is a situation where companies

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 6>have been rejecting a UK stock market listing both from

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 6>the and there's two sides here. One is less appetite

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 6>for an IPO, but the other side is also a

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 6>kind of sustained drip drip drip of de listings which

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 6>is mainly from mergers and acquisitions.

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we've seen quite a lot of that this

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>year already, haven't We seen quite a lot of transactions

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>that have taken companies off the market, and pretty much

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in no IPOs but one one ips. Yeah, they give you.

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 6>The de listing situation is interesting because it's been happening

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 6>everywhere around the world. So I did some work looking

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 6>at the number of companies that were listed on the

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 6>UK stop market in twenty eleven and then what had

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 6>happened over the following decade, like how many were still listed,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 6>what happened, what direction had gone in, And about a

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 6>third of them had delisted over that period, and the

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 6>overwhelming majority, almost all of them, it was because they'd

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 6>been bought. Not many companies just decide, hey, I've had enough,

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm throw in the towel in and leave the stock market.

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 6>Most of it's because they're being bought. And this kind

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 6>is so far so global. It's the same in the US,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 6>it's the same in Europe. Lots of delistings, lots of

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 6>m and A. But the big difference in the UK

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 6>actually is that who have been the buyers of those companies.

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 6>In the US, the biggest buyers of US public companies

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 6>in the delisting trend have been other US public companies,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 6>So if you keep investing in the US stock market,

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 6>you still kind of have exposure to those businesses that

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 6>have gone just not on a standalone business. They're kind

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 6>of subsumed in another company. In the UK, the majority

0:12:57.880 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 6>of the people down the buyn have been overseas buyers,

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 6>mainly US and Canadian ones. So what we have had

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 6>is the UKPLC has been kind of seeping overseas into

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 6>largely American and buyers and private equity buyers. So UK

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 6>investors no longer have the same access to those companies

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 6>if they're investing in the UK stock market, and that

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 6>is quite a different compared to what we see in

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 6>other markets.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And can do you have a sense of why that

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is and why are our companies going abroad? Is it

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>because that's so cheap? Because the UK market has been

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>cheap for quite a long time, and so it's an

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>easy thing to do to create growth of foreign companies

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>just to snap up the cheap UK company and subsume

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>intoin deal business.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Very much. Yeah, we've spoken about this. I know you've

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 6>spoken about this on many occasions that UK companies are

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 6>trading at evaluation discount to those around the world. If

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 6>you look at kind of forward price earnings multiples, the

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 6>UK stock market is trading at about almost a fifty

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 6>percent discount to the US, twenty percent discount to Europe.

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 6>It's not just about sectors. It's not just because we

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 6>don't have the tech companies the US has. Every single

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 6>pretty much every single sector of the UK stock market

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 6>trades at a pretty chunky discount to the US. Energy

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 6>sector forty percent discount, Pharma biotech sector twenty nine a

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 6>M is about a forty percent discount as well. Across

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 6>all of the sectors it's about thirty percent discounts. So

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 6>wherever you are looking, we have very kind of obviously

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 6>very successful, world leading businesses that are very performing, very

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 6>well operationally, but are not necessarily being valued to the

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 6>in the same way they would be if they were

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 6>listed in other country.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>And what do you put that down to, Well, I mean,

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I know what most people say that, oh, the UKs

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is a wreck. You know, we don't grow horrible inflation,

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we destroyed ourselves with Brexit, et cetera. But looking at

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers coming through more recently, none of that is

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>really really true. Our GDP our growth is no different

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to most other European countries, are inflation levels are converging

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>with other European countries. There's really nothing worse going on

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in the UK than anywhere else that you can really

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>put your finger on, Nothing you can back up with data.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So what is the problem here?

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 6>So the valuation discount we've always it did start emerging

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 6>kind of post twenty sixteen, so there has been I

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 6>think there has been an element of international investors in

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 6>particular being less keen on the UK, and I kind

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 6>of feel like there's maybe a bit of a situation

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 6>that we've had with value investing in the same way

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 6>that people have been saying it's cheap for a while,

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 6>and then there were perhaps some investors who backed that

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 6>view for a while. But the longer that valuation discount persists,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 6>the people's patience runs out. So I think there's a

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 6>bit of that been going on. But to give a

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 6>little bit more of a positive side, So the M

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 6>and A side means that other buyers, both private equity

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 6>and over these companies are saying these companies are worth

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 6>more than they are. The other people who recently have

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 6>actually started getting very interested in buying UK shares is

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 6>companies themselves. So share buybacks in the UK about forty

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 6>five percent of companies listed on the UK market last

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 6>year bought back more than one percent of their shares

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 6>in the previous year. In earlier years that figure was

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 6>something like I'm just looking at a chart right now,

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 6>we might be talking about twenty percent. So it's absolutely rocketed.

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 6>So Directors of UKPLC has said, we think our shares

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 6>are undervalued and we're going to start buying them back.

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's not just the investment trust sector. Just we

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>came because there's a lot of buybacks in the investment

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>trust sector which could be skewing the numbers.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 6>No, that's not just the investment trust sector at all.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing there's been very large increases in buybacks across

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 6>the UK corporate sector in general. So, and this is

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 6>in previous years it was mainly the US where lots

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 6>of the buybacks have but what we've seen more recently

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 6>is that it's been picking up in a lot of

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 6>non US markets, Japan as well as a market where

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 6>we're seen buybacks. But I think there is an element

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 6>here of directors saying well, actually we think our shares

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 6>are not necessarily fully valued. And people criticized buybacks for

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 6>the timing of them sometimes, but hey, if your shares

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 6>are undervalued, then that's actually the ideal time to be

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 6>doing some buybacks. That can be quite a value generator

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 6>in time.

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. One of the long term criticisms of buybacks is

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>that you quite often see them at levels that are

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely not cheap, and there's a relationship between top management

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>long term bonuses and the buyback. So that's been a

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>long term criticism. But you couldn't say that that was

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the case in the UK given the valuations.

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 6>But actually to put a bit of an international perspective

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 6>on this as well, so some of this has been

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 6>maybe a bit downbeat on the UK and saying and

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 6>I think we self flagellation. I do feel like as

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 6>a British pastime, like war is us Look how awful

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 6>we are compared with every in the world stage. And

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 6>actually this trend of de equitization, of companies not wanting

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 6>to join the stock market, of companies leaving the stock market,

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 6>it's global. There's nothing, there's nothing that's making us special.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 6>And saying that we're having an awful situation and everybody

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 6>else's is perfectly happy. The number of German companies is

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 6>down forty percent since two thousand and seven. Like everyone said,

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 6>puts the US on a pedestal and says how great

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 6>it is, and it is having an increased share of

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 6>kind of IPOs and of companies wanting to list there.

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 6>But the number of US companies is down forty percent

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 6>since the mid nineties. This isn't just a UK feature.

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 6>This is something that's happening globally, I think. And when

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 6>we come onto this, a big part of this is

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 6>the growth of the private equity industry.

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, before we come on to that, I want to

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>ask you possibly the most important question, which is this,

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>why does it matter? Right? I mean, these are huge numbers.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously a big shift, but people will be saying

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the companies continue to exist just in different ownly, ship abroad,

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>at homes, it merged into other companies whatever. Why does

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it matter if there are a few elisted companies fall in.

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 6>If you are a company, it is very easy for

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 6>you to raise capital wherever you want in the world. Now,

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 6>like we've seen obviously lots of UK companies raising money

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 6>in the US. But if the UK stock market ceased

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 6>to exist, it wouldn't necessarily stop some of these large

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 6>companies from being able to raise capital. If you're an investor,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 6>you can allocate money to funds, to ats, to individual

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 6>companies anywhere in the world for relatively low cost these days.

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 6>That wasn't the case in the past. So actually, I

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 6>don't think that it matters that much for individuals. I

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 6>don't think it matters that much to companies. Where it

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 6>matters much more is probably actually for the UK economy,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 6>the amount of conservices the industries that actually the financial

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 6>services sector supports here. If we were to lose were

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 6>standing on the world stage as a stock market, that's

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 6>what would lose. And probably, actually I've been a bit

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 6>simplifying as saying it doesn't matter to companies. It doesn't matter.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 6>If you are a big international company with the household brand,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 6>you can raise money anywhere. It matters a hell of

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 6>a lot more for your small and medcap companies. You're

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 6>going less than America. They've never heard of you. That's

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 6>going to be a much harder situation. So I think

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 6>it matters for the ecosystem of small and mid sized

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 6>companies that we want to grow in the UK. I

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 6>think it matters to the economy. I actually think it

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 6>probably doesn't matter as much to investors as perhaps we

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 6>sometimes claim it does.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 5>Possibly, even though we work together, it might disagree on

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 5>one aspect. I think the decline of the listed market

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 5>probably is a problem for the average punter who has

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 5>their savings over time and focused on the listed markets

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 5>or public securities. So if companies are coming to the

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 5>market much later in their development, and I guess that

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of hyper gross stage that you see in companies

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 5>just making funded by private capital, that means that kind

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 5>of the bulk of the population you have are relying

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 5>on the public markets to kind of help them generate

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 5>a pot in retirement or generate you know, turn their

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 5>savings into returns. Isn't getting access to that growth opportunity?

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 5>And I think we always look at the history of

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 5>the equity market and returns from equities and so on

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 5>as a as a factor as to why you should

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 5>invest them in the long run. But if the equity

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 5>market looks quite different, either there's less interesting companies in it,

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 5>or the companies that are on the market are later

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 5>stage and where they are in their cycle. That could

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 5>be a problem for people in the long run as

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 5>they're sort of trying to beat inflation or save in

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 5>the long run. So I think there's there's something about that.

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 5>And actually, while I've been quietly listening in the background,

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 5>I think one bit we've missed on UK so far

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 5>in this discussion is actually that structurally we're seeing less

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 5>domestic investment in the UK equity market from either retirement scheme,

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 5>so we've had dB switching to more fixed income allications.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 5>We see we're seeing a shift from dB to d

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 5>C schememes. In terms of people who get advice, we're

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 5>seeing a shift towards passive and global, and those two

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 5>things are related, right, So those solutions that people are

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 5>being put into don't include asset classes like private equity,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 5>infrastructure and real estate en mass, I think wealth managers

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 5>probably are offering solutions that do that because of the

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 5>investment the listed investment trust market and the strength of

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 5>that over the last ten years in the UK. But

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 5>then also people are going more global and that's affecting

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 5>the UK equity market, which kind of comes back to

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Duncan's point about having a throating economy. So I think

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 5>there's quite a lot going on here, but the decline

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 5>of the equity market, I think is it does have

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 5>an impact if you think about where are people's long

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 5>term savings being invested in. Have they got exposure to

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 5>the exciting, innovative growthy asset.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it also seems important to me on a social level.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, quoted companies, we can watch them there. I

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>have a certain level of crutiny both there from individuals

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and from the state financially operationally, and we can see

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. It's much more transparent than companies that

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>are private, and we lose that as companies leave the

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>equity equity market, we lose that sense that we can

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>effectively see the UK economy via listed companies. That matters too.

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, hundred percent agree with that transparency to double edsord

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 6>companies might not like it, but it's a great way

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 6>to be able to hold management practices to account. It's

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 6>harder when that's in the private markets. Albeit, then I

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 6>suppose you can argue that the choice of who you

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 6>invest with if you want to allocate to private markets,

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 6>and then the types of investor they are and whether

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 6>they care about particular things that align with your own beliefs.

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 6>That starts to matter more, but you don't have the

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 6>same look through to the companies at an investor. The

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 6>flip side probably is private equity investors get much much

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 6>more information than in public market investors. They can get

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 6>access to regular cash flow projections, lots and lots of

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 6>really in depth data that can help with their decision making,

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 6>but it is more closely held between say the company

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 6>the private equity invest It's not as visible and transparent

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 6>for the kind of broader social goods that you were

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 6>talking about.

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it means that for the individual investor a

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>middle man is required, and one of the things that

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we really like to get rid of in the men

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>or middle men, or certainly the necessity for middle men.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>But if you're going to invest in unlisted companies as

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>an individual investor, you really have no choice but to

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>do it via a professional and that makes it different too.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Actually I completely agree with what Doug was saying. Actually,

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 6>my points around it not mattering as much to investors

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 6>were much more about the say the demise of the

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 6>UK stock market relative to the global market still existing.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 6>I completely agree on the risks that might come from

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 6>the public market being less relevant. If you take it

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 6>to the extreme, it potentially feels inequality because those who

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 6>have assets can access all of these exciting, sexy companies.

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 6>Your ordinary retail investors basically cut out of that. They're

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 6>too small, they f either are too high, they can't

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 6>They basically don't get a seat at that table. So

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 6>all the kind of have which is everybody with tons

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 6>of assets, and here I actually include FIGN benefit pension funds,

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 6>they get to access all the great areas you have

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 6>not and in that and I'm going to include the

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 6>fine contribution investors on the whole, not all of them,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 6>but it's a lot harder for them historically to have

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 6>been able to access some of these private assets.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so the growth, the growth goes, whether money or

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>already is Okay. Well, there's not much we can do,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the three of us on this podcast in thirty minutes

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>about the decline of the number of listed companies globally.

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>We have to take what we have for now. So

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about how the private markets

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>work and how investors can or should be accessing the

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>non listed markets. Doug, is that really all area?

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean I think it's it's interesting and it's difficult, right,

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 5>So I think there's a lot of interesting companies and

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of interesting assets you can get access

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 5>to you but you know, the private markets are I

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 5>think that I think Duncan you might have some stats

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 5>on this, but there's something like seventy five percent of

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 5>economic activities sits in the private markets world. But getting

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 5>access to that is very difficult because they are assets

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.719
<v Speaker 5>which are complicated, their assets which are privately held, their

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 5>assets that don't trade regularly, and the liquidity angle is

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 5>the piece which a lot of people focus on, but actually,

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 5>in many ways, the liquidity of these asset classes, because

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 5>they have to trade between kind of willing bars and

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 5>willing sellers and it's quite complicated, is where you often

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 5>get the premium in the long term thinking that supports

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 5>kind of these assets. So it's difficult. In the UK,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 5>we have this remarkable market that has been booming until

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 5>sort of about eighteen months to two years ago, which

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 5>is the listed investment trust market that actually tackles that

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 5>issue really well. You know, there you have listed companies

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 5>where you have a selection of you know, good, average

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 5>and bad managers who are doing different things around asset managers.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 5>There's been some incredible success stories in that area and

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 5>a huge amount of growth in terms of raising money

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 5>and getting it into markets where anyone can buy a

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 5>share and they can sell a share that gives them

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 5>access to private assets on a daily basis. Of course,

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 5>the difficulty of investment trust is when there's lots of demand,

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 5>they trade really well, and when there isn't as much

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 5>demand or things change, the share price can controp quite

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 5>dramatically versus the price of the asset that you might

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 5>have exposure to you. So we've seen a big decline

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 5>in discounts in that particular area of the investment trust market. See,

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 5>there is a really good vehicle there, but there's a

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 5>whole bunch of new structures they're emerging, and there's a

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 5>lot of support from the Treasury to try and give

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 5>different types of access to private assets.

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's just stick with the investment trust for a minute.

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>There are an awful lot of private equity investment trusts

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, most of which are now trading at

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sub science of discounts to the stated NV. But the

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is because no one's convinced that the

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>stated NEV is the correct sorry, anyv being net asset value.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>No one's convinced that the net asset value is correct

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>given the sharp price and interest rates, suggesting that a

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of these private assets should be revalued down. SI.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually that's what's going on.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 5>Here, right, Yeah, that's definitely a feature, man. There's also

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 5>a you know, there's an element of how do you

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 5>work that out? What does the share price accurately reflect

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 5>what the NAV is? And that is quite difficult. You know,

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 5>that requires research, that requires understanding what's going on. You

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 5>know that that is not straightforward.

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>But it also involves private really managers confronting the reality

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of the new macroeconomic situation, which they'd be slow to do.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 6>That's right.

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 5>And when you have a complete change in the regime

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 5>around inflation and interest rates, that kind of completely changes

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 5>the cost of capital on which you price everything, and

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 5>that needs to filter through the system. And I think

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, one of the aspects of private assets versus

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 5>public equities is that you know that takes time. That

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 5>lag factor of where the pricing was and where it

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 5>should be does take a bit of time in that. Yeah,

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 5>And the question is how far have discounts actually reflected

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 5>where the pricing should be, how far are they actually

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 5>too far?

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And so on?

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 5>And I guess that's the difficulty for the private investor

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 5>is that discount versus nab piece is quite difficult to

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 5>navigate unless you kind of do your research and you're

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 5>an expert.

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But what's the answer. What's the answer, you're the expert.

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the.

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Reality is is that there is no straightforward answer. I

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 5>think what you have to recognize is that if you

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 5>want exposure to liquid assets, it isn't as simple as

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 5>owning a listed public company or a fund that trades

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 5>daily and so on. This is a fact of life

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 5>within the area. There's always going to be risks and

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 5>so on. But what is interesting is I think an

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 5>awful lot of people own property in the UK. Obviously

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 5>a large non people want to own more property, sit

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 5>of the young people. But I think actually, if you

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 5>think about private assets in the way that we think

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 5>about real estate, most of us own a house. Most

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 5>of us know that mortgage rates have gone up quite

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 5>a bit. Most of us understand that probably things are

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 5>coming off the boiler bit in terms of where real

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 5>estate is, and that there's a dynamic there around what

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 5>you think the house might be worth and what you

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 5>might be bid for in terms of having an offer

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 5>on a house, and that's how private assets work. And actually,

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 5>if we think of it in that way and realize

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 5>when you're going into an asset class, when you're buying

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 5>sharing one of these companies, that there may be a

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 5>risk that things are overvalued and things might come down,

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 5>or that if you're buying a share and the naves,

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 5>that the naves are where they are and there's a

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 5>big discount and the nabs may come down a bit.

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 5>If you think about it in that way, you know,

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 5>you can get your head around it, but you do

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.239
<v Speaker 5>need to kind of people do need to recognize that,

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, this is an area where it's not straightforward

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 5>and you need to think about more things that are

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 5>going on, and also recognize that not everyone's purpose in

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 5>this area, right. Some people are good, some people are averaged,

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 5>some people are not so good in terms of what

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 5>they're managing. And there isn't a capsule for private assets.

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, when we think about the equity market, we

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 5>talk about sectors, we talk about themes, we talk about

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 5>mids caps, we talk about small caps, we talk about

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 5>emerging developed and so on, Well, that's exactly the same

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 5>in private markets. You can't sort of tar let's call

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 5>private equity. You can't say that is all kind of uniform.

0:30:57.920 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 5>You really have to do your homework in terms of

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 5>what you're trying to get access to. Essentially, So I

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 5>don't think there is a perfect answer, Marion, but I

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 5>don't think that means we should write these things off

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 5>in the same way. There's lots of different ways of

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 5>getting exposure to interesting investments in public markets.

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 6>It's the same with private So can I just offer

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 6>a slight defense of some of the way that the

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 6>private asset valuations work. So one of the criticisms is

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 6>that the valuations are not updated often only enough because

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 6>of various raidings, you don't really know the true market value.

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 6>And people would then say the volatility is dampened because

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 6>of that.

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That is absolutely true.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 6>The volatility is effectively smooth because there's lags and the

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 6>way these are updated. However, if you look at public markets,

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 6>public market prices swing around all over the place based

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 6>on factors which are nothing to do with fundamentals. As

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 6>human beings, we are all prone to fear and greed,

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 6>and when there is panic in market and prices will

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 6>fall sharply, and that doesn't necessarily mean the fundamentals of

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 6>the business have changed. And often these things have a

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 6>habit of swinging back the other way once people decide

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 6>that the world was not going to end. So whilst

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 6>I think it is fair to say that private asset

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 6>valuations are smooth and maybe under shoot the true volatility,

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 6>I think you can also make an argument that public

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 6>equity volatility is almost over egged by the behavioral biases

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 6>that we exhibit. So I think that both are probably wrong.

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 6>One is probably too low and one is probably too high.

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 6>But I think that it's the inability to sell private

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 6>assets easily during kind of stressy markets stops us all

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 6>from doing the stupid things we might otherwise be tempting

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 6>to do. So actually that illiquidity almost insulates us from

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 6>some of our own behavioral biases. So I think that's

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:55.479
<v Speaker 6>kind of often a bit glossed over when people are

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 6>thinking about about volatility when it comes to private asset.

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a great way to protect ourselves from ourselves.

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 6>It's like a bet of friction is a good thing

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 6>in that sense. Actually, a betfrection that stops just prevent

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 6>you from the viney jerky reaction.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, and Doug, there's something else you want to talk about.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's a new structure for private assets that

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>our listeners may find interesting. Yeah.

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 5>So there's there's a new structure that's emerging in the

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 5>UK which is called the long term Asset fund. Now,

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 5>the idea here is that to create a structure which

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 5>allows people some access to liquidity, so monthly or quarterly

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 5>liquidity i e. You can get your money in or

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 5>out fairly regularly, but not daily, and in return for that,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 5>you'll get access to a pool of private assets which

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 5>will be a combination of things that are invested for

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 5>the long term, the medium term or the short term

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 5>to kind of help with that liquidity. And the idea

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 5>there is that you get much more exposure to a

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 5>pure nav rather than having to worry about, you know,

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 5>the discount premium problem we discussed before investment trusts. Now

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 5>that's an emerging structure and the FCA have allowed that

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 5>for DC schemes because they're trying to encourage DC schemes

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 5>to give people more exposure to this asset class. And

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 5>they've also recently allowed people who are advised by a

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 5>wealth manager or advisor to get access to this structure,

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 5>and there's a few that are starting to emerge. It

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 5>isn't established yet, but it's something that's coming. I guess

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 5>the key point here is that you know, you need

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 5>to choose the horse for the course. If you are

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 5>somebody who requires daily liquidity, the investment trust market does

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 5>a very good job, but you need to do your

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 5>research and be aware that you can have discounts and premiums,

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 5>and equally, if you're best worried about liquidity and you've

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 5>got a long term time frame, then the new structure

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 5>might be something that works really well for you. But

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 5>the idea here is to try and give people exposure

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 5>importantly to some of these companies, sectors, innovators that sit

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 5>in the private world in order to enable them to

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 5>kind of meet their financial objective. But I think that's

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 5>the thing sometimes we forget, is we focus on liquidity

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 5>and we focus on access and kind of the things

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 5>that might go. But the reality is what we're trying

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 5>to do is say, there's an awful lot of interesting

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 5>investments and innovation that sits in the private world, and

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 5>we're kind of trying to make sure that we can

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 5>bring people access to that in their portfolios. And so

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 5>that's what these structures are all about.

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Although it's like concern among the holders of pensions in

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the UK is that structure may be used to force

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>them into investing in the private sector in the UK

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>when they wouldn't necessarily have liked to. There's a type

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of financial repression built into that structure.

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that's how you use the structure, right,

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 5>and that's kind of pension times to have a fiduciary

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 5>GT and I think overall the government's trying to encourage

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 5>and kind of and give new structures. I think obviously

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 5>they have a Every pension fund trustee has a duty

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 5>to their underlying members and so it needs to be

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 5>up to them how they think about this area. But

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 5>I think our point of view would be let's make

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 5>some structures available and then decide if you want to

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 5>get access to private assets and use them, rather than

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 5>you have to be forced into something like this.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>A couple more questions for both of you. The first is,

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>I know I said earlier that we couldn't fix the

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>public markets in this podcast, but if there was one

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>thing that either of you could do that might make

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>public markets begin to be more attractive again. What would

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it be? Is there allegative change, is shift and regulation?

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>What could there be that might bring people back to

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the listed market? I mean our own view, by the way,

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>John and I have been talking about this, and we

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have a slight sense that the shift in the interest

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>rate environment might bring people back automatically.

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 6>The thing that I think we would need I would

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 6>really love to see in this country, and I'm not

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 6>sure how we engineer it, is that we have a

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 6>culture I think where our attitude to risk is that

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 6>should be minimized. So a lot of the way that

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 6>people think about investing is trying to think about ways

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 6>to remove all of the risks, which whereas actually I

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 6>feel if we can have a culture which is much

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 6>more were embracing, and I think with that it probably

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 6>comes with a better understanding from an earlier age. So

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 6>somebody mystifying investing from people and they're still at schooliage

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 6>rather than weaken until they're in their for seasons, they

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 6>decay to talk to a financial advisor.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And the only thing I would say about that is

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're very young, right, so you know they do

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're you know, we're an aging society, and the

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>older people get, the more frightened they are of risk

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>perfectly reasonably. You know, if you're in your fifties or sixties,

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>what do you want? You want a risk of capital. Also,

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you want a six percent dividend yield. I know what

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to want in my sixties, and it's certainly

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to be embracing risk in small, growing, unlisted companies.

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to want my dividend yield and I'm going

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to want to protect my capital as best as possible.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So in an aging society, there's always a bias against risk,

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and there is no getting away from that.

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, they're interesting, there maybe none for another podcast. We

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.399
<v Speaker 5>know that people when they're at are consistently underestimate how

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 5>long the honey their income for and probably don't take

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 5>enough risk to keep their capital pool strong. But that's

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 5>that's probably one for another day.

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>It is one for another day. They also don't take enough

0:37:58.360 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>out of their part they you know, they don't have

0:37:59.920 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to stand the importance of dying broke. Everyone should die broken,

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, you wouldn't have to worry about inheritance. To

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>excite that that list before we finish up you too, Duncan.

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that you do at short is

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that I absolutely love is that valuation table you provide

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for us every every month. And when we look at

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that again, of course the UK is consistently looking cheap, cheap, cheap,

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But what are the markets look cheap on your valuation

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>metrics at the moment? Fan emerging markets as well.

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 6>Emerging markets have paddy particularly bad period for quite an

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 6>extending period now compared to developed markets, and valuations are

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 6>quite a feeling there. I think Japan is a really

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 6>interesting one though, and you know you've spoken about this

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 6>before the fact that a large proportion of Japanese companies

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 6>are valued at less than the book value with the

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 6>accounting the value of their businesses and the regulator that

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 6>you had said something Americans, it's explain your anstitution tails

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 6>for what you're going to do about it. And that's

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 6>where were we didn't see more changes in share buyback,

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 6>other worship held for friendly activities. So I think that

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 6>Japan is people again been saying sheep for a while,

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 6>but it don't feel like this year is actually having

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 6>a bit of a resurgence.

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Excellent, and the final question this is for both of you. Doug,

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you ready, okay, okay, I'm going to lock you in

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a run for ten years, well not really metaphorically. And

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>before you go, you can only invest in one thing

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>gold Bitcoin. Not strictly an investment, but you know what

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean. Gold Bitcoin. You can stick your money in

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a UK deposited account. What's it going to be? Gold?

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Good answer. We've had a couple of bitcoins recently. We're

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>getting very confused.

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 6>Duncan yeah, go too.

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Gold is kind of one of you would be bitcoin,

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but both Gold is absolutely fine with us. We've been

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been related by the bitcoin as recently. It's made

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>John and I have to think about how we can

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>tell people to invest in bitcoin, which is which is

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>aw OWI thank you both so much for joining us.

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>That was absolutely fascinating. And listeners, there you go. Japan

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is cheap, the UK is cheap, and you know gold.

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Maren Talks Money catch

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>idea brief on this week's conversation on the Merrin Talks

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Money after show under our normal feed. Now that is

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>only accessible to Apple new subscribers, but if you're a

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg subscriber lookally after show online in the meantime. If

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you like a show, rate review and subscribe wherever you

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 1>listen to your podcast. This episode was hosted by me

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Maren Sunset where but it was produced by Some Society.

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Additional editing by Blake matlespcial thanks to Duncan Lamont, Doug

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Abbott and of course, as ever to John Steppek. Be

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sure to sign up to John's daily newsletter, Money Distilled,

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>where you can hear something from him every day and

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>it's always good. Link in the show notes