WEBVTT - JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon Talks Bond Market, Inflation 

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're wasting no time.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's get straight to our exclusive conversation with Jamie Diamond

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Shaman and CEO of JP Mantt and Chase Jimmy cand

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Have you with us, and thanks for having us here.

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Happy to be here.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 3>The bond market is front and center. We're seeing yields

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 3>at the highest levels in decades. Yet we see the

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 3>stock market keeps rallying in factice again in the money today.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Should we be notice or not?

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's always reasonable in the investment world

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to be nervous a little bit because you've mentioned the opening.

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of geopolitical risk. You have a bunch

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of wars going on, which I hope are properly resolved.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>You have bond rags going up. Inflation is a little

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>bit higher than people thought. So yeah, but I'm not surprised.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think when people say you should be surprised bond

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>raigs can go up, the notion that somehow people said

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll never go up is the wrong notion. And so

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>companies like us prepare for higher rates, lower rates, and

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, figure those things can happen. So the thing is.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>There at the highest level in decades. I mean that

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>is where the surprise could be.

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I think they could be much higher they are today.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, And you know you say decades, but we've

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>had like one of the greatest bullmark other than brief COVID.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, since the Great Financial Crisis, we've had a

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>huge bull market, huge uh lower rates for the most

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>part for a long period of time. But the world changes,

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like we may have gone from a savings

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>glut to a to not enough savings, you know, and

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know the AI investments you come about in America

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>loan four and fifty billion last year, seven and fifty

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this year, a trillion next year. Global deficits that are

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>all time highs and they are huge. So the government's

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>including ours, has to borrow huge sums of money more

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>next year than this year. So you know, people who

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>owned bonds, they tend to look at these things and

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>both inflation and you know, demands for capital can push

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>up rates.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 3>The thing is, it's not just an inflation story right now,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>it's also I guess credibility story, right I mean, we

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 3>we have off an environment where everybody's trying to pay

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>debt and governments around the world have so much debt

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 3>at a higher level.

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, at some point it's going to hit.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is going to head. Like the US government

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>debt is thirty trillion. The average rate is three and

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a half percent, you know, so even today they can't

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>possibly refinite it, finance it at lower than that rate.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>They have another two trillion dollars to do this year.

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, But the thing is, we don't know when

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't know when the world gets too scared about that,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>when inflation makes it, where people don't want own long

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>term duration securities, and where it's just a demand for capital.

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>There have been examples in history where there's so much

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>demand for capital rates are going up. But it's very

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>good reason people are making productive investments in the world.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Government spending is often not that government spending is much

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>more consumptual later, which doesn't help future productivity. So all

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that spending too drives corepate profits, so people should be

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that surprised that core profits are doing quite well too,

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>which helps obviously the stock market.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 3>The question, I guess, if I could get you to

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 3>live in the crystal ball right at what yield would

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 3>that be spillover to the economy, to policy, to markets.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I'm very questions about crystal balls, because I

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone has a crystal ball. We look at

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>all potential possible outcomes, and you'd be surprised from recessions

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>with inflation, from recession with no inflation, from your home

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>price is down forty percent, of stock right down forty percent.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a wide range of outcome. I think when people

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>think this is our forecast, that that's what's going to happen,

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an intellectual error. I think you should

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>be much more thinking about range of outcomes, possibilities, probabilities,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and for us, we want to handle all of them

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>so we can serve our clients. So I'm not that

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>worried about, you know, our profits going down in the

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>stock going That doesn't worry me at all. I want

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to serve our clients and do a good job. And

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I do worry about the geopolitics for the future of mankind.

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a far more important issue in my mind. But

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just looking forward, I think it's a pretty my own

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>view and it's just different than other people. Is that

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>race can easily go up more and credits, breads can

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>go up more.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I know everything's going to be okay even with the

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>rates going on.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>No, at one point you can have a lot of

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>people who have to refight higher rates. So there's this

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>general assumption that, oh, I can refi all this debt

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at roughly the similar rate. Well, if credit breads go up, people,

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>companies and governments will have to pay more, and so

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that can put stress in the system and easily could

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>cause a recession type of thing. Again, I'm not terrified

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>at recession other than you know, hurst people will get

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>laid off. But I think as a scenario that's a

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>very possible scenario.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 3>There are risks people have cult time on the credit market.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 3>If heels continue to rise, there'll be a lot more

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 3>pressure on the credit market. How might that play out.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Oh, a lot of companies are levers. There's you know,

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>there's five six trillion dollars of levers loans out there.

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna have a hard time refine at those rates.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>The equity values will be considerably less. Some will be

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>prepared for it, some hedge for it. A lot of

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>people didn't hedge for it, so which means that people

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think about But that means to take an interest

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>rate risk, you know, and that they should be very

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>cost to take interest rate risk. And so as you said,

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>this could put pressure on the system high yield.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 3>That's been so much demand for it, never mind that

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 3>inflation is sticky.

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 2>Is this worrying or not?

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, you mentioned at the top there's a little bit

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of exuberance in the marketplace. Personally, I'm not a buyer

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of credit spreads. I am not that instruy what other

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>people do. I would not buy credit spreads at these levels,

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know other people have other views. But a

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of people out there, remember they have passive, passive

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>funds buy it. You know, people have to meet indexes.

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of reasons people have to buy, and they're

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>just trying to create a little bit of outfit for

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>themselves as opposed to would you go absolutely long credit

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>spreads or not? So I would have a luxury saying

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to enough. Of course, we're in the business,

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so we continue to make loans that I think may

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be more stressed than people think. But that's part of

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a long term strategy. That's not because I like it

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>at this price.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>But the thing is so much demand. What's behind that demand?

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 3>Is it that complacency?

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I suppose yes, But demand changes. You know, people forget sentiment.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>If you look at you know what happened before the

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>crash of seventy three, the crash of eighty two, or

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the bond market in ninety four, the crash of two

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand or eight. That was all true. And then things change,

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and even the things change about when people talk about liquidity, Well,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens when things get tough is sentiment changes and

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>people want more cash. And you know, so the liquidity

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>requirements change, money supply changes, central banks change, banks pull

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>back and that all can you know, pull liquidity of

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the market precise the wrong time and when people need

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>cash they sell risky assets. So you might predict that

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>all we have no but I wouldn't be surprised if

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that happens.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not just about markets, it's about AI. It's about tech.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, jefpy Morgan has come up to

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 3>say it is actually a tech company that just happens

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 3>to be a bank. You have a huge tech budget.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 3>I think nine billion dollars three billion for twenty million,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>and then I think three billion for cybersecurity. Talk to

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 3>us about how you're mobilizing the capital a party.

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>So we don't actually deploy capital by saying we'll put

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>capital there. We and everywhere we do in every business

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>we grow in China like here, if you look at

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>just China, we've gone from banking ten companies to banking

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's two or three hundred. We've gone from

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>banking thirty multinationals coming here to banking six hundred multinationals

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>coming here. And as we serve them, it deploys capital.

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So the deployment of capital, deployment loans are an outcome

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of building the business. That's true for every country. It's

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>true we open branches in the United States, it starts

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to demand capital as people will give us deposits, we

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>start to make loans. So we are pretty Comforanty. We

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>get deploy capital intelligently serving clients. We don't deploy capital

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like an investor saying, oh, this is the best place

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to put it. It's kind of an outcome of how

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we kind of grow with the business.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And always us ay I though, I mean how are invested?

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely AI, if you would any business meaning we have

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and we've been doing it for thirteen years, and every

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>business meaning you have, we talk about how you can

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>use technology do better job for your clients. What are

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the projects you have? So we're using AI for risk fraud, marketing, design,

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>document management, who you should call in the morning, salesforce

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>type things, branch location, hedging, and it's a tip of

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the iceberg. You know, it's moving very very quick coding,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it's moving very quickly. So we want to just stay

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>up there and use AI to serve our clients. And

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do that. How can I do a

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>better job for our clients using a technologic called AI,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just like we did it with a technology called digital,

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a technology called cloud, and way back at technology called mainframe.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Like it's no different. We got to do a better

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>job for a client because that's how we compete.

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>So how will Jimmy Malgan look like in three to

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 3>five years and on the back of developments in AI?

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>How will what?

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>How will Jimmymugan look like? I mean, how will are

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 2>your business?

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope with thriving? But what's not going to change?

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>People would have to hold money, movement and invest money,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>raise money. I think how it happens? Will I change?

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, we use blockshain. There may be more blockshain

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>being used to do that. There may be more people

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in AI jobs and less people in certain jobs, you know,

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>so it'll all morph. But that's our job to serve

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the client. And of course, you know, I always point

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>out that we in the old days, we had you know,

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the big banks were big competitors and the investment banks

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and that was global, different banks in every country. Now

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's fintech in every country, and they're good. You know,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these people in Revolute Stripe and Citadel,

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they're quite good. So we have to compete with all

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of that competition will be technology and AI.

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So we are investing that money to be competitive to

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>do a better job for our clients. And if we're

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>not fast and nimble, we'll lose.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 2>And you're false and nimble, right.

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we're faster and nimbal Sometimes I feel like we're

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're a dinosaur and elephant riding a bronco.

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>It is about menpower.

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 3>In the end, we've had the license power menpa, women power.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:45.359
<v Speaker 2>It's about the workforce.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>We had from Sena Chanta shedding about eight thousand jobs

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>of a spread of three years. We also had metas

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 3>saying it's shutting the same number of people. I mean,

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>how are you looking at manpower, women power? How are

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 3>you looking at the workforce on the back of you know,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 3>advance is being made an effort.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The most important thing is we do a good job

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for our clients and use AI. Will it change the

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>structured jobs? Yes?

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Will?

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been very few announcements are AI related.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of coming to too much bureaucracy,

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>and they may use AI to cover up the fact

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>that they should never hire those in the first place.

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But AI is going to change jobs, I don't know.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll overdo some of our jobs down the road.

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you'll be all different types of jobs,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have to deploy it at a level like

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll be hiring more AI people and probably

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>less bankers in certain categories, and it'll make them more productive.

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So when you get up in the morning and you

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>want to interview someone, it'll lay out what I've said

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in fourteen different places. They'll give you questions. Your job

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>will be the same, you'll just be much smarter how

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you execute that job. So, but we will retrain and

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>redeploy people. You know, we have ten percent attriction a year,

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>which means our headcamp's going down twenty five thirty thousand

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a year, and we are We're gonna be prepared to say, Okay,

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we love these people, they're great, We're gonna take care

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of them. We're going to give them reskilling, new skills,

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>better jobs, move them somewhere else, maybe early retirement, and

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>then I think society maybe need to do a little

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>bit of that, get prepared. In my view, that's got

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to take place locally. So some jobs are across a nation,

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>like AI and cyber and maintaining certain types of equipment

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and cars. Other jobs are very specialized. You know, this

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is a mining town, and that's a car manufacturing town,

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's a chemical town. And so the local schools

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's I mean high schools, community colleges, and colleges

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>should work with the local businesses say I'm going to

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>give these kids certificates in the twelve weeks or one

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>year of training they need to have that job. There

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be eight million trade jobs which pay

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand dollars a year available in the United

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>States in the next five years. So we're not helpless.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>We just have to get prepared, kind of have a plan.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>The plan is if it happens too quick, it may not,

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but I might view whatever you think there might be

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a risk, prepare for and if it doesn't happen, so

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>be it used to. Most of the stuff you did

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in preparation you should have done anyway.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I just want to be clear.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 3>So yours is basically about natural attrition. You're not looking

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to n downsides because of the efficiencies of an E

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>that's going to happen.

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It will cause that, but you know that's that happens,

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's been having my whole life. I mean, if

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at all our jobs, they've always been changing

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>how you do jobs. But we will do it to

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>do a better job for clients. And yes, it will

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>do some jobs. We know that. I can't tell you

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>specifically what because you know it's kind of at the

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>early stages. It is every app every process, every job

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>will be affected, some will be more productive, some will

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>be not enough jobs and then will help our people

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>have a good career.

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Jimmie, there's been a lot of backlash on social from

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 3>what stunshot CEO The Winters said. He talked about how

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 3>you know AI will wipe out the lower value human capital.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of people took issue with how clinical

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 3>and how cold and how perhaps insensitive that was.

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Can you weigh on that?

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Builds a friend of mine, and all of

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>us say something incorrectly, He's already come back into you know,

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>taking that back. It was an artful way to say something.

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But I also think it'll be old jobs. I don't

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>think it would be higher level, lower level. I think

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it'll be more than you think. But it will also

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>create some jobs, so you know, in some ways of

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>you if you know, back office jobs disappear, we need

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>more front office jobs to cover more clients. So so look,

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>you get a lot of noise from this ice O,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the backlash and data centers and AI. I do think

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's incumbent about us society to think through if it

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>happens too fast, what do we do about it. You

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to stop at all, you know, and you

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>can talk all you want, do the work, get prepared,

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>take care of your people, take care of society, and

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll be okay.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 3>We hear that you'll be speaking to New York mayor,

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Ma'm donnie along with David Solomon of course we know

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 3>he wants to increase taxes for the wealthy in the city.

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>What's the message you're sending him. What will be your

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 3>conversation with you?

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>No, I did be with him, and I told him,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know exactly all of the great things that Jap

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Morgan does, the employees, the taxes, the philanthropy, the biggest

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 1>in New York, the biggest fofordable lender, how we take

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>care of our people, how they all get medical or

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage of twenty five, just so he understand, and

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of what we do in New York

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>is exported around the world, so it's a huge export

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for the United States, a competitive avantage for the city,

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>any competitive avantage for the United States of America. And

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>there were good citizens and we always have been known.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And we talked about affordable housing and childcare, which are

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>his two things. Well, of course, you know, anyone I

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>know thinks we should do more affordable housing. But I

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>told him it's a smart policy that gets that. You

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>can say it all you want, but if you watch governments,

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they do some things that have the absolute opposite effect

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>what they say. And I can go through exacts. The

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>same for childcare it's got to be then right, it's

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>got to be effectively, it's got to be place based,

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's got to work, it's got to be thoughtful and

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Every city. But he had read my

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>chairman's letter and we went through that every city. He

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>has to compete, and they have to compete at every

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>level arts, science schools. That is what it is. I'm

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not inventing that he can be an id logue. He

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>has to compete too, And we'll see will he learn

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's got to make the city a place where

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>people want to grow and build and live and have

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>families and work. And he's got to compete with Shanghai

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and Hong Kong and Singapore and Nashville. And people vote

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>with their feet. So it isn't this morality thing that

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>people talk about. It's like, are you building a great

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>city of lower crime and stuff like that. Howls. I

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>want to point it out that I did mention to

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>him because it's important to me that I am against

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>racism of all types, including anti Muslim racism, anti Jewish racism,

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>which I considered anti semitism, anti Jewish, and I think

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Israel has a right to have a state. So I

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's a little confusion between anti Semitism. So you

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>may not like what a country's doing. I don't like

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what i Ran is doing. It doesn't make me anti Muslim,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and so I think we have to be a little

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>careful of this. But why, I want to be absolutely clear.

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And he acknowledged it, and he said, I think he

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of agrees.

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to go back to the Texas that she

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 3>wants to impose. At what point do you think those

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 3>taxes will make New York less competitive? At what point

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 3>do you think you know there'll be an erosion of

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 3>talent within the city.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's already doing that, you know. And my

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>letter I pointed out that these are just numbers. JP

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Morgan when I got there, had thirty five thousand employees

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in New York City and now it's twenty six thousand.

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>We had twelve thousand in Texas and now it's thirty

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>three thousand. That is because of individual taxes, corporate taxes,

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>state taxes, but also the schools in Dallas. They've become

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>very good. The life in Dallas. You know, the Dallas

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>mayor calls up all the time saying what can I

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>do to help you out. I have land over here,

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I have you know, And that is pro business and

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>pro people love living there. And that's what New York City.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>New York's a wonderful place too. But that is a

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>result when I grew up in New York City. And

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this is an amazing number. In the seventies they had

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty of the fortune, five hundred were

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in New York City in those ten years. Are about

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>those ten years, sixty left or failed or immerged out,

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly because of things like taxes and crime and stuff

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>like that. And those are big names like ge Ibm,

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>American Airlines, you know, and and is that what you want?

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>You know? And that's what it sees people even want.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>They think that somehow being anti business is going to

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>help the city. It's not. So we all want to

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>pay fair taxes. Not that's not the point. But at

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>one point people vote with their feet. And there are

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of studies that have shown that all these

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>people moved out, and they they're obviously the tax obviously

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>in New York booming, so you're not gonna see it

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>this year's taxes, but a lot of people are paying

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>billions dollar taxes left. Why do you want that? How

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>does that help the lower paid person in New York?

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Just one final question before we let you go.

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I also want to hear these people talk. But they

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>say fair taxes, fair share, what do they mean? Like,

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the fact that, you know, if up

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to me, I saw Jeff Bezos, who I love, schmash buckling,

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, fight, I don't think the lower people make

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it under certain amount have been a tax at all,

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would agree with that. But when they

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>say fair share, what do they mean? I mean they

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>should give a number and say that's a fair share.

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 3>So what do you make of the beef he has

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 3>mcdoney has with Ken Griffin. I mean, there's been a

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of pushback as well.

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>From my view is I need to speak to him

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>about that. I think he realized he made a mistake

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in naming Ken, vilifying a name and a person, and

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know Villa and even Villa, you know, my grand

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.239
<v Speaker 1>perhaps with all Greek immigrants. Okay, you know, I've been

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>working my ass off now for a long time. I

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>think vilifying people, simplifying arguments, you know, even if you

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's politically is a bad idea. And I think

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>he probably realizes that was a bit. It's probably why

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>he's seeing a bunch of us now. And I'd like

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to maybe have a better relays with the business community.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But we'll all be doing to the same thing. What

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>does he do. I don't care what he says. What

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>does he do? I will judge that and so well

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>what actually happens, because you can have you can talk

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>about morality and ideology all you want, but if things

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>don't get better, you didn't do a good job. And

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>my view, and I'm talking about him now, I have

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>seen mayors who make statements and they make it worse

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and worse and worse, you know, and they don't know

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they can't get in the details of why why is

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the foible housing not there anymore? Why does not work?

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I you know, hopefully he'll learn. I want

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>him to do a good job. I'm not against him.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 3>So, Jamie, I've been REMISSI not to ask you about China.

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 3>We are in China, after all, we saw that. I

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.239
<v Speaker 3>guess one chemistry between the two leaders, just you being

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 3>as role Donerald Trump, does that change your perspective on China?

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 3>And perhaps you know the appetite for investments here.

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Not really. Look, I think I look, we have China

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>and America have real differences, and I think these wars

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>also highlight that, you know, America, we want Ukraine to

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>end up as a free and democratic date. You know,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I don't know about the war, but

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see i Ran end up without nuclear

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>weapons and no one controlling the straits of her moves.

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And so object to the notion that somehow Iran was

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in the threat. They've been killing and murdering people for

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>forty seven years. That's not a threat, okay. And a

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of Americans, a lot of Muslims, a lot of Jews,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other people. They've been having proxy wars,

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, for forty I don't know why you allow

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>these proxy war thing. So that makes it more complicated.

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>But put Taiwan aside, America and China a lot in common, okay.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>We want to help our people. You know, you've this

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>country's grown dramatically. I think that's a wonderful thing. We

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of common interests and anti terrorism, anti

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>nuclear proliferation, proper the proper control of some of these

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>ai thinks that can damnage society. So they should engage

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>all the time at every level. You know, work out

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the trade differences. There were gonna be some real differences

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in that, and then you know, have a good proper relationship.

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good for both pay I think it's

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>good for the world. You know, the world has got

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to deal with these two huge, powerful countries and we

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>should help each other. And they help the world and

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so well. So I like the fact that they did,

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like PLoud, they're doing it.

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 2>What's the biggest rust for the Chinese economy right now?

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You think the Chinese economy. You know, they've been very

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>smart imagine their economy for years. But I would say

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>too much reliance on exports. They know that that's been

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>their plans. That's that irritates a lot of the countries

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>around the world. I think that there are neighbors around

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the site China see are getting quite upset with about

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>their behaving the South China see, not because of anything

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that America does and trade. We should work out trade

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in a way that doesn't damage the global economy. So

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>but I look, they've been quite and also some of

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the cap allocation in real estate and some of the

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>local stuff. But my experience with the Chinese that they

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of know these issues and they kind of go

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about attacking them strategically correctly over time.

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>But is there a sense that China has become somewhat

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 3>of a safe haven given you know, all the chaos

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 3>elsewhere in the world.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's yes, but it's somewhat artificial. I mean,

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>America is still a safe have. I mean just we

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>just surprised people, you know that recently. But we're still

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the safest countries in the world, the

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>best investment destination in the world, the most secure rule

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of law. When you give you a dollar, you can

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>do whatever you want with it. But China has become

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>a large, important country and I applaud that. I'm not

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>against that, and they, of course think that they're more

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>they're more consistent with other countries that've been true a

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit recently. That's not forever, that's recently.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 2>But is that changing the perception of investors though? I mean,

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 2>are they looking to China.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>As a little bit But if I was an investor,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I'd always be looking at place like China, you know,

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have you know, when you look at China, when any

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>investor comes here, you just have to be impressed with

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>their cars and their batteries and their solar and their

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 1>machine tools and their capability. So of course that's how

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>investors are seeking out opportunities around the world. There'll be

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>plenty of opportunities here.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.959
<v Speaker 3>I've been messaged and I was still to wrap it up.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 3>Jamie all is at Playure like if you're joining us

0:22:56.200 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 3>on jamis Folks Shaman and CEO of JP Mogan Chase