WEBVTT - An Underwhelming Robotaxi Rollout, X Strong-arms Advertisers

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you we have a new star.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 3>A star is born Elon On Mars Juthan Kennemy.

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 4>He is the Thomas Edison plus plus plus of our age.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 5>Probably his whole life is from a position of insecurity.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 5>I feel for the guy.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 3>I would say ninety eight percent really appreciate what he does.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 6>But those two percent.

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>That are nasty, they are our pit in four post.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 5>We were meant for great things in the United States

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 5>of America, and Elon reminds us of that.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm very disappointed in Elan.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 7>I've helped Elon a lot.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Welcome to Elan and Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 5>It's Tuesday, June twenty fourth. I'm your host, David Popadopoulos.

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.959
<v Speaker 5>So over the weekend, while the world was transfixed by

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 5>the war raging in the Middle East, US quietly rolled

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 5>out the Tesla robotaxi on the mean streets of Austin, Texas.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 5>It didn't stay quiet for long though. In fact, it

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 5>sounded a little like.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 3>This, This is a big day for Tesla robo taxi

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 3>experience is.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 5>About to be crazy.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 3>We are fastened, we have our location here estimated rival

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 3>start ride. Our ride is complete, but it looks like

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 3>the Robotaxi is waiting for its next call.

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg EV reporter Kara Carlson was there for it all,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 5>and she makes her elon Ink debut today to tell

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 5>us about it. Welcome to the show, Kara.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks for having me.

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Then later on, our man Kurt Wagner, just off the

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 5>plane from the French Riviera, will join us to break

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 5>down Ex's participation or perhaps absence, from the all important

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 5>Lions Advertising Festival. Of course, an episode of elon Ink

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 5>ain't an episode of elon Ink without the pre one,

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Max Chafkin.

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>I was wondering who if you were going to introduce

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 3>me or what here? I was very patiently.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 5>You were nervous, worried. All right, So Max will have

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 5>for you today, in no particular order, reports on enchiladas,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 5>exploding rockets in Musk's odd computer situation. But we do

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 5>indeed start in Austin with you, Kara. You were there

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 5>for the launch on Sunday. What did you see?

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I started off bright and early.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, six am is when they were potentially going

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to start launching, So I didn't see any four hours

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>they end up launching it about too. But I live

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 2>in one of the neighborhoods they're launching, so I actually

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 2>was seeing some of their vehicles just driving around, you know,

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 2>my neighborhood streets in the morning as we were waiting

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and watching streams. I ended up watching the first three

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 2>rides through the stream of some of these people with

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>early access before heading out, and there was only a

0:02:58.320 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 2>few cars out, so it was actually a bit of

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 2>a game to try to find any of them.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So in other words, like there was no starter gun,

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 5>there was no pomp and circumstance or a hype man,

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 5>there was no musk, there was nothing that said the

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 5>Robotaxi launch.

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 5>Suddenly they just started popping up here and there.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they've been in areas of south and southeast Austin

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>for a few months now. They're not labeled Robotaxi, the

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 2>ones they've been using for testing. They're just model wise

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 2>that they just recently refreshed. And I started noticing there's

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot with you know, manufacturer plates just kind of

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>popping up. Sometimes they had some roof racks with sensors

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 2>on them. They're just kind of driving around. I think,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, Elon Musk said, they're driving around in circles,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and that really is what some of these neighborhoods have

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 2>felt like we.

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Should probably just like lay out the basics of this launch.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Kara mentioned it very small number of cars. I think

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 3>we think, what like about ten, Tara, is that right.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 4>About ten to twenty? I would say from what I observed,

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>that feels like the right number. And that's what Tesla's

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 4>said before.

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 3>I feel like you maybe saw every single one of them.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Very small area, I mean, you know, it doesn't include

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 3>downtown Austin. And really importantly, there was a safety monitor

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 3>in the passenger seat, which so a guy sitting in

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the passenger seat, not behind the wheel, but somehow babysitting

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 3>in the car. In a lot of these videos, the

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>safety monitor has his finger on a button which I

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 3>think most people assume is an emergency brake. Yeah, it's

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 3>the it's the button that kills you if you tweet

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 3>something mean about the ROBOTAXI while you're in it.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 5>Uh wait, women, so literally the whole time he or

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 5>she has their finger like just hovering over the button.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, or or just kind of on it. It seems

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 3>like there may have been some other types of you know,

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 3>controls or ways to provide input in the vehicle. You

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>also have, at least according to statements that that Musk

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 3>and others have made you know, on the earnings call,

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 3>some tele operation as well, So they're probably in addition

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>to that safety monitor is a guy sitting at a

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 3>desk watching the ride who is also able to intervene

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 3>one way or another world. I don't think we know

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>exactly what that intervention could be. It could be anywhere

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 3>from sort of giving the ROBOTAXI some commands or suggestions

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 3>all the way to you know, maybe a steering wheel

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 3>or whatever where where that person could literally take you.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 3>But we don't know exactly what That tele operation.

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 5>A lot of supervision. Now, obviously the idea is at

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 5>some point, once this thing gets you know, a little

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 5>more experience out there, the training wheels come off and

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 5>it's out on its own in the wild. Now, Kara,

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 5>who got to take these initial rides? Was it just

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 5>picking up random strangers on the street.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 2>So Friday night, a bunch of Tesla influencers and retail investors,

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and these are accounts that you know, really are interacting

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>with Elon Musk get interacting with a lot of like

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Tesla News at all times. That's kind of whole brand.

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Got emails that said you have early access to the

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Robotaxi starting Sunday, and then you know, some other Tesla

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>fans ended up coming in and kind of going as

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>their plus ones.

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 4>They were allowed one guest per.

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Ride, but it was really just a handful of pretty

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>loyal influencers for the most part.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 3>These are not like automotive influencers like we've seen Elon

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Musk kind of include like these sort of YouTubers who

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 3>review cars and stuff in at you know, at at

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 3>at earnings calls and so on. This was like Elon

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 3>Musk influencers. These are people who are very, very very

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>enthusiastically on the Musk train, which Karen and I found

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 3>out when we tried to be asked them if they

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>would take us as their their plus one and were

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>at least in my chance in hell, yeah, repeatedly denied.

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 5>Right, Well, I can't blame them in your case now,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 5>I don't care. I'm just getting to know you. But

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 5>in Max's case, yeah no, I also wouldn't ride in

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 5>a vehicle with you, all right, So how in general

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 5>these vehicles perform and how are they continuing to perform.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 5>There has been there have been some videos that have

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 5>started to go a bit viral about some unconventional, shall

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 5>we say, driving techniques. But on the whole and these

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 5>things held up okay so far.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 4>They drive pretty much as any other car.

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>They you know, they were doing pretty predictable driving behavior

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>when we were following them around. But there have been

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a few videos that have shown some concerning behavior. There's

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 2>been some mild speeding, you know, a few miles over

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the limit, which people are you know, humans too too,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 2>but it is strange for a robotaxi to speed typically.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>There's been one instance that a lot of people have

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>poined us particularly concerning. So there's a vehicle that was

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 2>starting to turn left, peared to maybe decided it was

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>going to go straight instead, and the spearing wheel really

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>jerked around and it started to go straight instead, and

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it was going in the wrong direction, in the wrong

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>lane for a few seconds there and then.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Got well, wait, so it was going into potentially into

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 5>oncoming traffic, did go it did go in downcom then,

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 5>but then it got it right two hours later, figured

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 5>it out.

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>It got back into them.

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 5>Well that doesn't sound good.

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I almost feel like I don't need to

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 3>say this, but this is very much a demonstration, in

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 3>a very controlled demonstration, so we're evaluating it. So so

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 3>part of why Kara is bringing up these like what

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>they sound like very minor examples, and they are, except that, like,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 3>this is a situation where you're where there is a

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 3>ton of monitoring, where they're where the roots have been

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 3>traveled over many times, where it's like a very controlled

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 3>and we're even getting the information we're getting from these

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 3>rides is also very controlled because it's being filtered through

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 3>these fans. But the thing is, like what they've done

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 3>here really is a long way from what Elon Musk

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 3>has said they're going to do, and what he said

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 3>they're going to do, just to remind people, is to

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 3>be able to have any tesla anywhere driving around unsupervised.

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 3>None of that is true right now. There is a

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 3>very small geographic area, a very small fleet, and there

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>is a ton of supervision, and I think it would

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 3>have been it would have been surprising if something really

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 3>bad happened with these tests. Even these minor, you know,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 3>screw ups are a little bit surprising just because again,

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 3>this is not all that different from what we saw

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 3>in October, you know on the soundstage, right, it's just

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 3>like a charger version of that thing, and which, okay,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe that's some progress, but still.

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 5>Right, which gets me to the next point, Cara, which

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 5>is despite how sort of you know, just okay, this

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 5>whole launch seemed the stock really popped yesterday Tesla stock

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 5>did it? It rallied eight percent, which by Tesla standards

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 5>because it's a very volatile stock, it's not some enormous move,

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 5>and yet eight percent is eight percent. It's certainly did

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 5>not go down, So I guess the market market's first

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 5>take is like, wow, this is great, big hit.

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, this is an event that people have

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 2>been waiting years and years for. Elon Musk has really

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>bet the entire company on autonomy, on AI, on the

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>ability to launch a network like this, and investors are

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 2>just glad it's meeting that mark on.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 4>A lot of levels. They will be closely watching to

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 4>see if it actually can scale from here.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 2>Is something that even the most polish investers are really

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>keeping an eye on right now.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Though, Yeah, I mean, is is ten percent in a

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 3>day for Tesla a huge move. That's like it's like

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 3>a Wednesday or something.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's nothing. Esha Day Bloomberg Tesla reporter told

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 5>me she doesn't even get up for an eight percent move.

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 5>She's Tesla, right, you yeah, for most other stocks, but no,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 5>so yes, correct.

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Look, the other thing is for this stock, eight percent

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 3>is not a huge jump. This is a very volatile stock.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 3>But also like there were versions of this day that

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 3>could have been a lot worse. Right, One thing that

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>has surprised me, frankly, is how cautious Elon Musk is

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 3>being with this launch, like it in certain ways, like, yes,

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 3>he's putting these cars that in a lot of ways

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 3>don't seem to do the thing that he says they're

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 3>do on public roads. On the other hand, he's kept

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 3>this to be a very modest demo, I think, much

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>more modest than anybody believed or anybody would have thought.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Like he's he's talking about teleoperation, which is something that

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>it hadn't talked about before, or he had said if

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 3>if there was tele operation, that would be a bad sign.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 3>So in other words, like he's being safe at least

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 3>or maybe safer than he otherwise could have been or

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>some of his actions like we didn't see as you know,

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe concerning or whatever. As the incident we talked about

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 3>with the Tesla crossing over the double line is you know,

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 3>there wasn't anything worse. So maybe it's slightly beat expectations

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 3>that some people had.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 5>I do think apparently the bar was pretty damn.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm say a very low bar. But I'm they're

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 3>also maybe like the enthusiasm may fade because like the

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 3>novelty here of being able to drive like from one

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 3>end of part of Austin to the other, it's is

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna face.

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's like the boring company right where you can

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 5>go from what I want.

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 3>One end of the yea from the Las Vegas Convention

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Center to the resorts world.

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, Max, last week when you launched your acronym

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 5>a report.

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Talking about mammoot or Madra, there were multiple, right, there

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>were two, you had two. It was a two fer.

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 5>I must forgot about Madra no when you were Okay,

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 5>so when you were launching your acronyms, a bit of

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 5>a riff on Taco, Trump always chickens out. Hence uh

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 5>stock investors by stocks, we had asked our listeners our

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 5>legions of listeners to put forth any ideas they may

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 5>have for acronyms that could improve upon if such a

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 5>thing could be done that would improve upon mammoot. And

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 5>you know we got a brilliant idea.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we got some fun responses. My favorite and Grant,

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 3>who responded with a lot of good ideas, but also

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 3>complaining that we hadn't seen that he had his own acronym,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 3>which was enchilagaha.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Way, so he launched it. He alleges he launched it before.

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately, the time stamps uh confirm his his his launch

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 6>uh elon never completes his innovative level for autonomous driving

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 6>announcements enchilada.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 3>This guy obviously, you know, something of a bear. I

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 3>would I would guess. He also, in response to mamoot,

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 3>which he thought was, you know, insufficiently creative, uh, suggested

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a few others with the help I believe of chat Ept,

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 3>including and now these are replacements for mamoot, which was

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 3>musk always makes up with Trump. These include kso Coral

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>until eventually snuggling online salsa spats are loud. Still amigos

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 3>guawk grudges usually aren't consistent. Burrito billionaires ultimately reconcile, regardless

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 3>of Internet tempestuous outbursts. None of them are perfect. But Grant,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 3>thank you Grants for these ideas. They are all hilarious,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 3>and I regret missing Enchilada.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 5>Grant's given this a lot of thought.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 3>I know a lot to work with.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 5>I like just about all of them, Enchillada in particular

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 5>because there's a just a mouthful quile. It's very long,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 5>it's slightly incomprehensible. Elon never completes his innovative level four

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 5>autonomous driving announcements. That's all good, But Kara, now that

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 5>the robotaxi is is roaming the streets of Austin, is

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 5>that still true? Is en shallota truer? Was the acronym

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 5>launched only immediately to be vanquished, defeated and go away?

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it depends on kind of where we go

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 4>from here.

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, no, no, depends well.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Level of autonomy they're using.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 2>They haven't actually revealed a lot about what kind of

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the text stack behind this.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 5>Looks like level four autonomy is like a lot of

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 5>are you doing it.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Without any kind of supervision? I don't think this counts.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 3>He's good, Kara, You think there's even a question here.

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I think we need to wait and see what level

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of autonomy they claim it to be, and they will

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 2>have to self report in the very least suite to Texas.

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, wait a minute, but if there's a dude in

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 5>the vehicle with his finger always hovering over the emergency

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 5>eject button, I don't know. I mean that doesn't sound

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 5>I think Grant's good. I think is good now for now. Okay,

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 5>very good, Cara. We will talk again soon.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 2>So good.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 5>We are now joined by Bloomberg ex reporter Kurt Wagner. Kurt,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 5>welcome back to the show.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi David, thank you for having me, so.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 5>Listen, Kurt. Let me just get this out of the

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 5>way and get it off my chest. But fuck you, Kurt.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 7>Okay, Max and I been sweating it out on the

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 7>mean streets of Manhattan, earning an honest living, and you're

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 7>sipping Royal vespers and taking in the sea breeze at

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 7>La Belle Epoc.

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 5>What kind of gig is this that you have?

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this wasn't even the worst introduction you've

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>ever given me on this show, so I feel like,

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, by that standard, I'm actually moving up in

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. That's right, David. While you were sweating here

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in New York, I was sweating in the south of France.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's a hard life out there, you know, you

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>get up early at the meetings.

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, looking out at the French River.

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I expect you to understand. But yes, I was at

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Canlon's last week, the Wonderful Advertising Festival. For those who

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are unfamiliar, it's essentially everybody in the world who is

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>involved in the ad industry, from you know, the big

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>players like the Metas and Youtubes and Googles of the world,

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to these agencies to the creators who are now making

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a living on this. They all show up and and

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>spend a week together sort of cutting deals and boondoggling

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>and all that kind of stuff. So it was a

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>good time.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 5>Now, what was Ex's presence there, because I feel like

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 5>just last year its presence was kind of odd, unique,

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 5>and how did it play out this year?

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So last year was interesting because Elon showed up himself

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and I believe he did a keynote with WPP, one

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of the largest ad agencies in the world, I believe,

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the largest ad agency, and he kind of signaled, hey,

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this is important to me by physically showing up and

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>giving his time. In years past, X formerly known as Twitter,

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>had literally like a beachside setup, you know, they set

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>up there was a concerts that they had, they would

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>hold the all there. I was. That was back in

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the day. This was you know, pre COVID. When I

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was there this week, I did not see a single

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>X branded sign throughout the entire conference. Just to give

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you a sense, like TikTok took over an entire hotel,

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 1>essentially Meta takes over multiple floors of a hotel, has

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a giant beachside thing, you know, like everyone is throwing

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>their logo in your face. Essentially you can't walk down

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the street without seeing these things, just just like right

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in front of you. X was nowhere to be seen.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was very notable.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 5>So how do I interpret this, Kurt? Are they just

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 5>giving up? What does this mean?

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 3>So there's two ways.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a I'll give maybe the positive X

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>version and the more critical X version.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Positive is it's not very doge to go to can

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 1>right like it is not.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 5>For all the reasons I stated at the time.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Saysten, we're cutting We're cutting into it a

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Okay, fine, I'll admit it's not the most

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>doge thing to go to. Can It's it's definitely a show, right,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a bit of a circus. And so

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>if you are X and Elon is running your company,

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe the last thing you want to do is be

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>seen out here kind of frivolously spending money for a

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Diplo concert on the beach. I shouldn't say that Yahoo

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>hosted a Diplo concert. I did go and it was

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun, so, you know, sorry for sorry to use

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that as the example. Yah was a great time. But

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>my point is like, maybe Elon is not wanting to

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>be seen doing that kind of stuff right now. That's

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the positive like reason why X might not be visible.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>The more negative is that, quite frankly, they either don't

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>have the money to do those kinds of things or

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>they're no longer in that tier as an advertiser.

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 5>What do you mean they don't have the money there?

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 5>They're a unit of Xai. Xai has got money coming

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 5>out the ear.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 3>When I hear about Kurt talking about X's advertising business,

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 3>I have that feeling of when you hear about a

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 3>really old celebrity who you thought had already passed away

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 3>like years ago. Like it's like, oh yeah, X has

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 3>an advertising is I completely forgot because David, like you said,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 3>they are now part of Xai, and it really seems

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 3>like this whole part, you know, this whole soilent.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 5>They're simply soilent for the Xai robots.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Not necessarily the metaphor I would have used, but yes,

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>that's exactly what I mean.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the cynical way to look at it, right, is

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>that x is sort of now the you know, the

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.479
<v Speaker 1>any money they make is sort of bravy, and it's

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the back burner to this much more important thing, which

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is that they're using the data to power Xai and

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that's really all that matters. And so you know, if

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the way that that X is, it's certainly nowhere

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 1>near the kind of top of the conversation that it

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>was several years ago in the advertising industry. But maybe

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it has a different purpose now to your point.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 5>But now, Max, it just said a minute ago that

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 5>oh my god, right, X advertising, you know, it's just

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 5>a corpse, it's a cadaver. It's it's it's long since past.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 5>But I actually thought there was reporting, including perhaps from you,

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 5>that indicated there's been a bit of a of an

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 5>uptick in advertising revenue over there at X.

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we talked about this a few months ago and

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it came up again this week. So way back in February,

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I wrote this newsletter that essentially said, hey, we're seeing

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>it up to an advertising Elon Musk is out here

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>saying the quote unquote a boycott is essentially over or

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>soon to be over, like what gibs, right, And what

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I heard and what I put in this newsletter was

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially that everyone in the ad industry is terrified of

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>not advertising on X because at the time, the owner

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of the company was bff with the President of the

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>United States and they were suing people who didn't advertise there. Right,

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So there was this implicit sort of idea that hey,

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if we don't spend money on X, we are going

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to be sued, and it has been talked about for

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>several months. The couple days maybe a day before the

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>conference started last week, the Wall Street Journal had a

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>more detailed version of that story that said, the lawyers

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for X are literally calling some of these advertisers and

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>making this threat explicit, right, you advertise with us or

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we will sue you, and that.

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 5>The illegal argument is kurt. The legal argument is, uh,

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 5>what what's the legal argument?

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm not an anti trust lawyer. The claim is

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is anti competitive and that these brands are

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of colluding to damage X's business. Now, I have

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>never really heard of a boycott being considered anti competitive,

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>anti trust, right. I mean, think about how people vote

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>with their their wallets all day, every day, right, And

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there's never been any kind of sort of to my knowledge,

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like pushback on this from all illegality standpoint. When you

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>think about what Elon in particular and Linda really have

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>said about free speech, it's quite comical to think that,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, hey, spend money on our product or we

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>will sue you. Oh, by the way, we're free speech absolutists.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>To me, those things do not really go hand in hand.

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>But again, on the eve of this conference, essentially this

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>story comes out that paints X in quite a negative light. Again,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not totally new. We've been talking about this for months,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>but it did set a stage, i would say, for

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>discussions around next At the event, and a bunch of

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>people that I talked to last week pointed out like

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty shady stuff. If this is indeed what's

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>happening to people.

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, Max, I guess I don't understand if

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 5>they are doing this and they're allowed to do this,

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 5>I guess I just don't know where it ends like

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 5>to me. Then, I suppose the hot dog vendor at

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 5>the street is, you know, his sales pitches by this

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 5>hot dog or I'll punch you in the face. The

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 5>guy selling shovel says, by this shovel or I will

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 5>beat you with it. I mean, it's pretty darn odd like.

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 5>And I don't, well, I guess if it's working in

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 5>the short term, I suppose, God bless him. But man,

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Seem still is it working? I mean the data.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 5>Kurt said that he's got reporting that says revenue is

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 5>ticking back up.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just again, like you sort of would wonder

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 3>if we're seeing maybe token purchases, small purchases to deal

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>with the threat rather than well it.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 5>Just Kurt, that is the would token purchases of ads

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 5>be enough to drive that pick up and add revenue

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 5>that you talked about.

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, at scale, because remember the numbers are quite small. Right.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not like a one hundred billion

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>dollar annual revenue company where someone spending ten million bucks

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>gets totally lost in the sauce. It's like they're making

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, two zero point five billion dollars in annual revenue.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So if suddenly you have, you know, a dozen advertisers

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>that all could you know, spending ten million plus dollars

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is, that's going to actually be a notable,

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>noticeable jump in revenue. Small but noticeable. So I do

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>think the token thing is is sort of a real

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you are a giant advertiser, you have to

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>weigh like, is ten million dollars worth sort of the

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>public drama of being sued by X and going through

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a multi year lawsuit. And I think a lot of

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>brands would just say, you give money enough.

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 5>You just give them the money and run the ad.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But is this a sustainable thing? Right? Like to Max's point, like, Okay,

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's an uptick this year, but like, this is

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>not the sign of a healthy business when you have

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to force your clients to spend with you at risk

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of lawsuit.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Kurt so CEO Linda y Eckarino sat down with

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 5>an Axios reporter for a panel there at kind and

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 5>it got a little sporty tell us briefly about it.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, we talked about that story that came out, and

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so Linda was asked about this on stage. I believe

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's on Monday of can so, the very first day

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the conference, and essentially, instead of you know, either

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>acknowledging yes, we are doing this or even disputing it,

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the real feedback was like she trashed the Wall Street Journal.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, was like, and we.

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 5>Will still read that publication.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, and the whole notion. And you guys are familiar

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>with this because you cover Elon and have paid attention

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>to Elon for years, but like, this is a pretty

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>tried and true strategy from sort of el Dusk as well, right,

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>which is like someone writes something that he doesn't like

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>or in this case, she doesn't like, and the response is, well,

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to bash the journalism. I'm going to

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>bash that outlet and those reporters and sort of cast

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>doubt on the story that way. And so that's what

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw. But it was a kind of an awkward

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>way to start the week, right, everyone's there to potentially

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>do these deals and and.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps give x big checks for money for ads.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>But instead of starting that way, it really started with

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this sort of combative conversation with Linda, and and it

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>did come up several times throughout my discussions that week.

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Is just sort of like it wasn't really a great

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>look for her or X on the eve or the

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this important conference.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 5>A bit of a buzzkill.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I'm thinking about as Kurt is talking

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 3>about this, we talked last week about cash burn at XAI. Yes,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I think a billion dollars a month was the figure

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 3>that we had from our reporting. I mean, there's a

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of cash going out of this combined company, and

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 3>for x.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 5>It's mostly just going to be for the debt, right,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean they've sacked a huge chunk of their workforce

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 5>and right, I mean, yeah, you're right, they are believing.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying there's not that much revenue coming in

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 3>to this operation, either from the AI side or from

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 3>the advertising side.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I mean that fundraise apparently, which they are still

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 5>doing right now for XAI, of which x is now

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 5>a unit, apparently came a touch too late for the

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 5>big con party. They had that money come in. You

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 5>know they would you know, that's where Kurt would have

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 5>been hanging out on Thursday nights.

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 3>It would have been doing a double.

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 5>Okay, now, Kurt, don't hang up, don't leave us.

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 5>But I got a couple of quick things rapid fire

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 5>for Max and if you have some clever thought, some epiphany, sir,

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 5>great way in the shouted out Max, there was another

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 5>exploding rocket.

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, over the weekend, a starship rocket doing a static

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 3>fire test. That's a kind of test where they fire

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 3>the engine while it's it's on the ground. It exploded.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 3>I think in the statement SpaceX called it like a

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 3>significant anomaly or something like that.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 5>But yes, it was a bad They say the darnedest

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 5>things they do. You got to give them credit. They

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 5>have rocket engineers.

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Is funny, right. Anyway, this was bad. This was not

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 3>something they expect, especially, and.

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 5>It's bad because they just keep happening one after the

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 5>after another, like.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 3>The third fourth, Yeah, I think maybe the fourth trier

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 3>we've had it not go exactly right. If Lauren Grush,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, our colleague and Bloomberg Aerospace reporter, were here,

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 3>she just got Curt. She would say that like, look,

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 3>this is these are experimental crafts. Explosions are not totally

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 3>uncommon or or necessarily even unexpected.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, wasn't it and maybe you already said this, But

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 5>wasn't it simply refueling?

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 3>It was a fuel mishap. There was an explosion while

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 3>they were loading fuel in Uh. Yeah, definitely not supposed

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to happen, and they're investigating it. And I do think

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 3>while these are experimental craft each time something like this happens,

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 3>it pushes the timeline back a little bit. And this

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 3>is a company that is very much under the gun

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>if they want to meet Elon Musk's very very aggressive

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 3>timelines for sending these rockets, you know, towards Mars or

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.239
<v Speaker 3>even set putting them to tests that could lead them

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 3>to go to Mars. So definitely a setback. You know,

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>on top of the issues that we've talked about for

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 3>the last few weeks with Trump and the former NASA

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 3>point e.

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Now we also had a revelation of sort On Musk's

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 5>computer situation.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is where I want Kurt's input here, because

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people were surprised that in the legal

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 3>filings between open AI and Elon Musk in the dispute

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 3>between Sam Altman and Elon Musk open Ai and Elon Musk.

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Elon's team essentially said he does not have a computer

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 3>and that, like the open Ai, I had been expecting,

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, emails or documents from his computer. I guess

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>they got some from his phone, but his lawyer said,

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 3>no computer. And a lot of people are surprised by this.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 3>And my reaction, Kurt, was, is it really that surprising.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Elon's not the only CEO who goes

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 3>or claims to go without a computer. Yeah, I'm not.

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually wasn't surprised at that at all. For the

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>same reason Max. I remember in the book I wrote Battle.

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 3>For the Bird.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 5>By the way, by it read it?

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, by it read it?

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Please.

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorsey, the co founder and former CEO of Twitter,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>did his entire job from his smartphone. You know what

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean. He had an iPad that he used from

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>time to time. But really, I mean, like this is

0:30:59.040 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy running.

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 3>That's like very you know, elderly I don't know, or

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 3>child of him or something.

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I like, Yeah, but I mean like this guy wasn't

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>just running Twitter. He was running Square now Block at

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the same time. So a CEO of two publicly traded

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>tech companies who did his entire job from his phone, right,

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And so, I, I mean, it's hard for me to

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>imagine Elon's sitting down at his laptop and typing away.

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we know he did, because he's posted some

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>some screenshots of a laptop at one point that The

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>only reason I remember is they were like really smudgy

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and gross, and everyone was like, Oh, your screen looks

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>really looks really gross. You need to clean it. So

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I do remember some of that, But no, I'm not

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>surprised to hear he he works from a phone.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 3>I suspect that laptop is his gaming piece, like he

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 3>does play a lot of computer games. But yeah, like

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>these guys have assistance and stuff as well, Like what

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 3>what what would you need a computer for? If you're

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 5>You've got he's got what's what the hell is the

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 5>name of his robot. He's got optimists Optimist. Yeah, and

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 5>he's got like a he's got a hole flock of

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 5>Optimi around him that just at his beck a call.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I would be surprising if you saw Elon Lake typing

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 3>away at a laptop, I'd say, unless he was playing

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 3>a computer game. Or composing a meme.

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Kurt Wagner. Thanks as always, Max.

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, thank you, thank you, Thanks David.

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 5>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong and edited by Annamasirakas,

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Blake Maples handles engineering, and Dave Percell fact checks. Our

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 5>supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson. The elon Ink theme is

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 5>written and performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugierra. Brendan

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Francis Newnham is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman is

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 5>ahead of Bloomberg Podcasts. A big thanks as always to

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 5>our supporters Joel Weber and Brad Stone. I'm David Papadopoulos.

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 5>If you have a minute, rate and review our show,

0:32:53.760 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 5>it'll help other listeners find us. See you next week.