WEBVTT - Little Boxes All The Same

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Vonnie Quinn this week. It's

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>terrible to move ahead with something that looks like a

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>partisan prosecution, but it's also terrible to let a president

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>get away with crimes. Jonathan Bernstein on the progress of

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the House January six Committee, and later a look at

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>China's economic woes with Julie Ren and Tim Coulban. First,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>people might be coming back to big cities post pandemic.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>One thing that never went away though, and is in

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>fact proliferating even more post pandemic big box apartment buildings.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Justin Fox about housing renting and all

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the problems associated with So justin mortgage rates finally topped

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>six percent, So I imagine there's going to be a

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>lot more renters out there. Is that a question of

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand as to how prices go. I mean,

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly we've been switching to more people renting versus owning

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>over the past ten or fifteen years, and I think

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, yeah, if somebody who was looking to buy

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a house with a mortgage is suddenly going to be

0:00:59.920 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a much different situations, so they'll probably be more demand

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to rent both houses and apartments. The thing is in

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>New York City and I imagine other large cities, pandemic

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>rents meant that it was possible for artists and people

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>who didn't make a whole lot of money to move

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>into the city. Are they all now being pushed out

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the city, the ones that had the courage to move. Yeah.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know that there were all that many

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>people who did that or thought that the lower rents

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>would stick forever, but definitely rents went up in all

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of these suburban areas and in cities like Boise, and

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>those have settled down some, but cities where they fell

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot, especially in New York, they've come careening back up.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>We're hearing stories about the median price increasing third base

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>effects involved. These are obviously above pre pandemic rerants, but

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a different city as well. Yeah, I mean there's

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of demand to rent apartments. I guess there

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>were some people who thought, in the depths of the

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>pandemic in two thousand twenty that no one would ever

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>want to live in a city again, But that's not

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happened. Which brings me to one of your recent

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>columns about Big Boxy apart buildings, which really I guess

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>went out of style during the pandemic because you were

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>beating in everybody else's air. There was a lot of

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>people walking in out of the buildings and so on.

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know, I don't think they ever

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>went out of style, but definitely you would have thought

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they would have. Given all the rhetoric against cities and

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>apartment buildings and all, and you know, for a couple

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of months there as someone who lives in an apartment building,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know it would have been nice not to

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have to share the air with everyone else. Well, you

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>looked into the data, and apparently they're actually getting more

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and more plentiful. In fact, yeah, there's this great annual

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>data release from the Census Bureau that is sort of

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>my favorite data release, and I've seen it be the

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>only person favorite data release who who looks out for it,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's all these great things like how many fireplaces

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>there are in new houses and how many bedrooms and bathrooms.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the things they keep track of is just

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>housing units completed by the size of the building in

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 1>multifamily apartment buildings. And something kind of remarkable happened last

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>year that more apartments were built in Buildings of fifty

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>units are more than ever before in US history. Two

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>D are we talking about across the United States? Across

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the US where mostly the South is overall where most

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>construction is happening. So just about half we're in the South,

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and then a lot in the West and less in

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the Midwest and a bunch of the Northeast. What's the

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>impetus for these big buildings. Part of it is that

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>there's been an increase in demand for apartments, partly because

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>of this slight switch away from ownership since the financial

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>crisis that will now get sort of renewed boost with

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>high mortgage rates. Also, it's that in big metropolitan areas

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>there's limited space on which to build. It's often close

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to commercial districts because you're less likely to have NIMBI

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>homeowners saying don't build an apartment building there. And increasingly

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the development of apartment buildings is sort of driven by

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>these big institutional actors, and you know, for them, it's

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>not worth it to build a couple of duplexes. They

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to build big projects. So what you get is these

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>larger buildings. And I mean another aspect is this change

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in building codes and adaptation by builders to it has

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>resulted in this specific kind of building, mostly called the

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>five over one, which is five usually five stories of

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>wood framed building over the bottom floor of concrete, and

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it can be sometimes it's six over two. Their variants.

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They're not allowed in New York City, but in other

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>cities and suburbs all across the country. That's the form

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that most of these buildings are taking. Knew, that's what

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they were called five over one or six over two.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I presume that I prefer to call them stump ees,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>but that hasn't really fought on. Rents for these buildings

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>are not exactly cheap, and when we're talking about media

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and rents plus for many of these buildings, they're considered

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>almost luxury buildings. They're often marketed as luxury buildings. I

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>mean mostly that just means stainless steel appliances. They're not

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like they're not that luxurious. It's just that's how

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you market these things. Very often they're at higher rents

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>than some surrounding buildings. But I think over all the evidences,

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you build more stuff like this, and it it puts

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>some downward pressure on prices. Now, how do the pandemic

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>affect builders that we're building these apartments, because I guess

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>building was one of the things that didn't really shut down.

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It kept going out. Yeah, I mean it's shut down

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of months in some places, and in

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>some places it didn't at all. I mean, one thing

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about this is it takes a while to get a

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>large apartment building built. So all these buildings that were

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>being completed in two thousand twenty one, I think the

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>majority of them were actually they got the permits and

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it was in the works before the pandemic, and there

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>actually was a dip in permits for the first six

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>months or so of the pandemic, but then since late

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>permits of skyrocket, and it looks like if you go

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>by the it takes like nineteen months or so to

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>get one of these buildings built. They're going to set

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>another record in two thousand twenty three, and there are

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>people to live in all of these I guess. So,

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean part of it is, you know that with

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the lead time, they may be opening all these new

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>buildings into a weak market if there's a recession, but

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe not. I mean, it does seem like for the

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>most part, they're able to fill them all up. You

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>have a great chart here housing apartments issued for Austin

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>round Rock in more than twenty five and a half thousand.

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But I guess we are seeing a lot of companies

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>build new headquarters in other cities. I mean, Austin's booming,

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Nashville's booming, Salt Lake cities booming. What's just interesting is

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that traditionally these booming cities, and this is still true

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of like Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, the vast majority of that

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>new housing is single family. But increasingly what's happening in

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>even inland metro areas is what's happened a while on

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the coast, is that almost all the constructions that's happening

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>as apartment buildings because there's either just too much opposition

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>or these places just can't sprawl any farther out. Justin Fox.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>The House January six committee is several public hearings into

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>its investigation of the attack on the capitol. Seventeen months ago,

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with Jonathan Bernstein about what we've discovered so far.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>We just literally heard that we might actually be getting

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>more hearings than we originally thought because there are new

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pieces of evidence available to the committee. What's the outlook, Jonathan,

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens after recess? Well, apparently after recess they're going

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to have at least two more, but they may schedule

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>more after that. And you know, I hate to do

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and I told you so, but I've been screaming for

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>months that one of the reasons to get to the

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>hearings is because hearings themselves may produce additional evidence. And

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>apparently that's what happened. We spoke about that on this program.

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>At this point, they're really starting to hit a hard

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>deadline because they have to write the report, which is

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhat important, but all they have is the end of

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this Congress to do it, and we're going into election season.

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>As we get closer to the mid terms, it becomes

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>increasingly difficult for them to put these hearings on without

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>acting as if they are electioneering. And part of the

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>importance of this is to try to appeal to people

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>who will be turned off by electioneering. So there is

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>some suggestion out there, Jonathan, that if there were to

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>be delaying tactics we might reach into the next Congress

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that would be a different speaker that might change things.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean is that a possibility. Well, if we assume

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans will take over the majority in the next Congress,

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>which certainly seems very likely, it's impossible to imagine basically

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a Republican majority Congress continuing anything of this stuff. So realistically,

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they've got till the end of the year, and I

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's unlikely that they'll come back in September and

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do further public hearings. So really they just have the

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>end of July until the August recess unless there's something

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so spectacular that they feel they have to do it.

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They do have the option of coming back in a

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>lame duck session after the election, but again, they have

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to write a report. So I think that they're really

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in a time crunch and the impetus will be to

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>get this done. Well, we have had four public hearings,

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>will have x amount more. We have heard from people

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that were completely anonymous before the hearings. Has the committee

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>done a good job so far? I think given the

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>parameters they set for themselves of having a small number

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of fearing starting this late, I think that they've done

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>an excellent job. A couple of things, in particular, the

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>restraint the members have shown you know, they're having just

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the chair and Representative Chaney the vice chair speak in

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>each hearing, but outside of that, just one member is

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>designated to interview entire panels, and in fact, around the

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday edition, we had you know, Adam Shift interviewing both panels.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Every other member sits there like a stone, doesn't say anything.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>That's a really hard thing to get members of Congress

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to agree to do on something which is a major

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>publicity opportunity. The other thing they've done extremely well is

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>using video, using physical evidence, tweets and documents and all that,

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and coordinating that with questioning in a way that makes

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the presentations very compelling television. What were the most salient

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>facts uncovered? You know, I think that while there have

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>been some specific facts that have been uncovered, for example,

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they really emphasized the extent to which people told Donald

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump that he lost the election. So there's been some

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>progress on digging out specifics, but I think what's most

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>important is the overview and telling things, some of which

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we learned as early as before January six, you know,

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>his call pressuring Georgia officials and other state legislative officials,

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>but putting it all in one piece explaining how all

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the different pieces of what Trump and his allies

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>were doing added up to an attempt to, put it bluntly,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>overthrow the government, which doesn't mean that it's actually going

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to impact anything in the future when it comes to

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the former president running again or even having an impact

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>on the primary so far as certainly doesn't seem like

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>there's been any negative influence on the primaries, you know.

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Trump has not had a particularly good primary

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>season during these midterm primary but I wouldn't credit the

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>January six investigation particularly. I think it is possible that

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the events of January six in the first place may

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have turned some people off from Trump. But I think

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>that what the hearings can do in terms of the

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>audiences that they have some Republicans who may have been

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>willing to go along with Trump but weren't real comfortable

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>with that may be affected. That won't necessarily affect primary

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>elections this year, but long term that may have some

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>consequences for his influence within the party. Um. I think

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>also to the extent that it changes press coverage going forward.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>The one attentive group is the media itself and people

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>in the media who think of themselves as neutral, pounding

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it into them that being neutral about these things includes

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>accepting the truth of what Trump actually tried to do. Well.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is, we still don't have firm evidence

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>tying Trump exactly to violence or groups that were violenced

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that day. Do the details really matter? We still don't

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>have firm evidence tying Trump to violence or groups that

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>were violenced that day. Do the details really matter? They

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>may matter for prosecution and what exactly he can be

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>prosecuted for. One of the audiences here is the Justice Department.

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And the thing about violence is it's complicated. Right by

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the time that we get to January six, it's clear

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that the way Trump talks about things has consequences in

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of violence and threats of violence. And I think

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear that Trump knew or should have known

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>by this point that his words and the words of

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>his allies had these consequences. Now, for legal purposes, that

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>may not be good enough, but there is something different

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>between that and if there may have been more direct

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>contact between Trump and some of these organized groups. We know,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that Trump said to one of the organized

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>groups in the national debate, you can't get a more

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>public thing than a presidential debate that they should stand by,

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you has to condemn them, so you know,

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you can draw lines here, but how deeply the lines

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>should be shaded. We still don't know if there's more

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to come well, and Bennie Thompson has said that there

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is footage from a documentary and Alex Holder who had

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>access to the Trump family before and after January six,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know what's going to come out of that.

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>What would the Justice Department need more of in order

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute Donald Trump? Well, two things. One is do

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they feel like there's public pressure to move ahead on

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this without seeming partisan? And again I think that the

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General is very hesitant to move forward with anything

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they could look like a partisan prosecution of a former

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>president and current presidential candidate, and rightly so, he should

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be very hesitant. It's an impossible conundrum for the Justice

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Department because it's terrible to move ahead with something that

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like a partisan prosecution, but it's also terrible to

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>let the president get away with crimes. Um. That's yeah.

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the legal side of things, which is how

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>open and shut a case do they have on some

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of these charges, and there's discussion within sort of Upella law,

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and bloggers and and columnists about what matters in

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of Trump's state of mind for some of these

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>charges and what exactly is needed to make good these persecutions,

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>because option one of convicting him, an option two of

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not charging him or bad but options three of bringing

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>him to trial and having him declared not guilty, that's worse.

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Bernstein. They're turning east now and specifically to China,

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>where President she Jin things this week criticized the impact

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of sanctions for causing global economic pain. Also this week,

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>President she warned of hunger and he ordered more pro

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>growth policies to boost China's COVID mattered economy SHOOTI ran

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>joins Now for some perspective on the Chinese consumer SHOOTI

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>President she sounds concerned about his people. How badly is

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese consumer suffering right now? I mean, if you

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>just look at the use unemployment rate at the Periodic

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Sentiment survey, it's done though it's on record. Use

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>unemployment has already had eighteen percent. Yes, it's going to

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>kick higher because college graduates are going to graduate in

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the month. Also, Yes, so we're going to see basically

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>one thing, four or five young people aged between sixteen

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and twenty four unemployed. How do you think that happened, Julie.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>We know that inflation hasn't been a problem, but how

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>is unemployment such a problem in China? Well, a lot

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of it was the big tech at the real estate

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>developer crackdown. I mean, the tech sector employed a lot

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of people, especially young people, right So that's a big chunk.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And also because of the COVID lockdowns, I mean, the

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies also hired a lot of gig economy workers,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>food delivery workers, drivers, And these people don't have any

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>jobs right now. Do they have social security benefits or

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>any kind of income coming in? So very little to

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be honest, And that's something very interesting about China. Even

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>though it claims to be a communist country, there is

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>very little social security net. And the president, Shimking is

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely not into this notion called the welfare state. He

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>basically hears this ideology called production first and then living next.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So what China has done is that they are giving

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>subsidies to factories and say, oh, you know, like if

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you just keep those workers, we're going to give you

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>some tax rebates, and they're not very many, to be honest.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's no talk of stimulus check, and there's very

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>little unemployment check, to be honest. I think in twenty

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty about sixty million people lost their jobs, only two

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>million managed to claim unemployment. Wow, that is a serious,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>serious black mark on the Chinese economy. Now, President season thing,

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>he has an ego, he wants to hold himself upright

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world. How does he allow this unemployment rate

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to be the case? If it's for use, what

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is it overall? Well, we all urban unemployment is a

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit shy of seventh perment. A lot of it

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is because if you're like forty fifty year old, chances

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are your work force their own enterprises and they don't

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>lay off workers, right, So a lot of the tension

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is into generational young people are struggling, whereas you're forty

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty year old that you're doing a little bit better,

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but still you will have children for young right, So

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>use unemployment is the biggest problem right now. Presidency has

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>been talking about going easier on the tax sector and

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>also fintech reforms and reforms in other areas, and that

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy is almost ready to incorporate those reforms and

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>allow these companies operate again. Would that be a bright

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>sign for employment. Yes, that would be that's the early

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>stage of perhaps unemployment recovery. We don't have the complete statistics,

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but just according to surveys, the tutoring sector it used

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to hire about seventeen percent of fresh college graduates and

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that actor was completely wiped out because of the tax crackeder. Right,

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>so the government is trying, but it's not going to

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>be like what it used to be. No. You point

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>out that a record ten point eight million college graduates

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>will be fresh out this summer and there are no

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>jobs for them right now. I mean that will lead

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to social unrest if it continues. Correct. I think that

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the government is truly very worried. The thing is the

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>way China sees unemployment. For micro workers, they always feel like, okay,

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you can always go back to your country side, then

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>go far. They would never be worried about micro workers unemployment.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>They feel like, you know, the land is their employment ultimately.

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But for young fresh college graduate it's a problem because

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they're quite educated and they're frustrated, and we have seen

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the Middle East and other parts of

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the world. China is very worried right now. And China

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>has a great reputation in the tech sector in semi

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>conductors in all sorts of areas, and you would have

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>imagined that China would be able to put them to work.

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about what you call gold, silver, and copper babies.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So Chinese schools can be very harsh. I mean I

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>went through the Chinese from the earlier the Rancors by

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>our great and then divide into gold, silver and copper.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>So the gold babies they are the ones who can

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>go to Chincha and Baking University and they're the next

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>generation engineers that can design China's world class chips or

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>e D autopaths. And then the copper babies they tend

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to be micro workers children, so they will do more

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>gig economy work and perhaps lower manufacturing construction work. The

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>big chunk basically we're talking about two thirds now because

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>China's middle class is getting bigger. Are they so called

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>sumer babies? They're okay, students, not stella. But now most

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of those super babies they are getting college education as well.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>China's college attendance rate is close to sixty in the US.

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It's only and these tuber babies, yeah, they don't want

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to go working factories anymore their parents did. And then

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they are not good enough to design the next generation

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the chips, so China didn't know what to do with them.

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And the all these super babies, they want to go

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>work for their own enterprises or work for the government,

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but the government is purring back its own employment as well.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>The government knows it's so easy uploaded to bloaded. Everyone's

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>just sitting around doing nothing. Way, and then the sewer babies.

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>They used to go to the tech sector a lot,

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and now the tech sector is not hiring because of

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the crecktown. These are the big problem. Julie ran there

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>By the way you do get in touch, comments and

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>opinions always welcome. I'm at Vonney Quinn on Twitter or

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>email v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. China's COVID zero

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>approach has been controversial. Communist Party slogans of oak maximum

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>results achieved with minimum cost, but some of that cost

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is in the form of economic growth. Economists and a

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Survey forecast GDP will expand at a four and

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a half percent rate this year, a full percentage point

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>below the official target. There's a wide range of forecasts,

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>though Bank America says in the worst case scenario, were

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there to be, for example, citywide lockdowns beyond Beijing, growth

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>would weaken to two and a half percent. I chatted

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>with Tim Colpen, who lives in Taipeidi on to weigh

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the pluses and minuses. So, Tim, the Chinese government has

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>come under a lot of fire for its COVID zero policy,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and clearly there's a lot of suffering in China because

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of it. At the same time, as far as we know,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>there are far fewer deaths than there have been around

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. How do we measure how good or bad

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the policy is? You know what one of the toughest

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>things for any national leader, whether it's in in China

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or the US, or in Australia, in England or Taiwan,

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is that nobody's really appreciated for the efforts they've done.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And you also, now in kind of mid two, you

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have to look at COVID very differently to early We

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have amcron which spreads a lot more quickly, and there's

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>debated about whether it's less or more severe, but certainly

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>medical practitioners know how to handle it better, and we've

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>got vaccinations, which makes the impact of it much more mild.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think the struggle for China is they're still

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the early mindset, but we're in a mid healthcare situation,

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and they believe in COVID zero, whereas other places have

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>lightened up. In a fact of just across the waters

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.239
<v Speaker 1>in Taiwan, where I'm based, Taiwan is basically given up

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on COVID zero. They're not too worried about it, whereas

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>they stuck to COVID zero until earlier this year, and

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>healthcare authorities in Taiwan basically felt, well, you know, we're

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly vacts, more than vacts, and quite a little high

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>booster rate, and so we're willing to ease up and

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>accept the trade off of more freedom to move around

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, while still keeping masking policies. For example,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in Taiwan. China is not willing to do that, and

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the decision they've made, and it's impacted the way

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese people view the government. Well, that's just the thing.

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Will it backfire on season ping? It does seem that

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>people have got a little more vocal than you might

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have expected Chinese people to get. And yeah, yeah, I

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>think there's a misunderstanding that, you know, Chinese people are

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all very compliant and do whatever the government tells them.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really not the case. You know, in private

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>discussions and even on social media, people have very strong

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>opinions about the government, but they're also very aware of

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of how far they can push it, and they're

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>aware of the consequences if if they see something that's

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>too outlandish, and unfortunately for for Chinese people, those goalposts

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>do move quite a lot. But there is a big

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>difference to the way people felt about the government's handling

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of Uhan two years ago, when Uhan was locked down

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in in January, and we saw what happened there, and

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>at that time the government even denied that there was

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a problem, and we had the doctor who died, who

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>was martyr unfortunately to the cause, who raised the alarm

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>bells and was even criticized by the government for doing so.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>That is a very different thing to today. Recently in Shanghai,

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this lockdown happen. We've seen a large kind

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of groundswell of backlash, and I think the difference is

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>people believe that the lockdown is not necessary, that COVID

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>zero is not necessary today, whereas they kind of accepted

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that it might have been necessary in all two years ago.

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>And so what is happening now in China is more

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and more Chinese people are thinking that this was not

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily good decision making by the Communist Party in Shanghai,

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and they feel that maybe there's poor judgment by the

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>central leadership this time, whereas last time they didn't like it,

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but they kind of understood why it was needed. And

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the real difference. Well, some of the final judgment

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>will depend on the growth figure is a far cry

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>from the five point five percent that the Chinese government

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>had set out as its school. Is that effectively the

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world's recession. Yeah, but you know it's

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not a small economy, right, It's the world second

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>largest economy. And so at some point China and the

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>world has to accept that it's not emerging market economy

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>but developed market economy, and you have to really re

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>orient the way you think of the country. But at

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, we love GDP, we large unemployment, inflation,

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they're the kind of the big three statistics that we

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>look at, but not all GDP growth is created equal, right,

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So what the Chinese government has to think about is

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>is this going to the right people? And to the

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government's credit, they have this new concept of common prosperity.

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>We haven't heard about it as recently in the last

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>few months, it was a big talking point in one

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But the idea is that all of this growth of

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>China's experienced and all this wealth that's been created in

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>China hasn't been distributed fairly across society, from city to

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>city as well as within the various echelons of society.

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>So if the Chinese government is willing to accept a

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>slower growth rate but it's better distributed, costs are still

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>kept under control, and people still feel they've got a

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>roof over their head, they've got food on their table,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>they've got stability, then it won't be a problem. However,

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>if that slower growth rate and there is inflation that

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>goes with it, or other issues such as unemployment or

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>housing collapse, things like that, then definitely people are going

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more and more annoyed. And you can't eat statistics,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>As says my colleagues, Shuly wrote recently, and that's something

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that I think she jimping will need to remember, and

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we know that as far back as six months ago.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>She's only found out about it recently. She's something was

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>warning about the dangers of mass joerlessness. We didn't know

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that at the time, but it was clearly high up

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>on his priority list that that should not happen. Yes, exactly,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, we've seen an incredible about face in

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the last six months when they started to realize I

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>guess that, you know, a slowdown was a very real possibility.

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>In remembering we've got, you know, Russia's invasion of Ukraine,

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>which is is definitely a headwind. We've got a rising

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and all the other things that are happening

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and those will either indirectly or directly

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>impact the Chinese economy. And unemployment is definitely something that's

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>no government wants to see, but certainly in China, if

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got more and more people out of work, they're

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be happy. So we're seeing these efforts

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>by the government to reduce the economy, and one of

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>those is to implore companies not to know layoff workers

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to to keep unemployment under control because that definitely has

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>an impact on first order and second order effects on

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy. But then there's the danger of the Japan model,

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>where you have people employee just for employment's sake, and

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>that's not good long term for an economy either. That

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is you know what you're right, There is definitely concern

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that there could be kind of a lost decade like

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Japan has faced, and that's something the government needs to

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>focus on. Is surely aware of. We've gone through this

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>incredible cycle of innovation in China over the last ten

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty years and they want more of that innovation now.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>The last ten or fifteen years of that has been

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>very much the internet economy, Ali Barber ten cent by

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Do is not where it used to be, but JD

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, Matwin, all these companies that are coming forward.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>The platform economy is really what it's called. Has brought

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of innovation employers, a lot of people not

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just as coders and programmers, but it's allowed people to

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be you know, delivery drivers and all sorts of other things.

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>People can be merchants from their own home selling stuff online,

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and so that's been a very very innovative part of

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy. It's been very important to the Chinese growth

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade. But China decided they want to

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>crack down on that. They didn't want these platforms to

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have as much power, and they started cracking down and

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>limiting the way these companies could use their power, their data,

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.479
<v Speaker 1>their user base kind of further themselves. So I think

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the real challenge there is for China to balance these

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>issues of allowing these companies to still grow and innovate,

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but also kind of holding them back, reining them in

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so they don't have too much power. And by raining

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>them in too much, they could really risk the possibility

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that economic growth will suffer as a result. And these

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are the companies that are hiring and hiring well paid workers,

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and we do seem to be seeing a small burbon

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about face. So the clampdown is just easing, very very slightly.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I do want to ask you though, about the supply

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>chain issue, because more and more countries are deciding that

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they need supply chains domestically, they need to not depend

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>on China solely for their own materials. You're right, You're right,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a big issue, and you don't have to be

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in anti China cam to realize it's not smart to

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have all of your product coming from one place, right,

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's semiconductors which is mostly based in Taiwan the

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>high end level, or electronics manufacturing which is mostly in China,

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>especially southern China, but also around the Shanghai area, and

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so many other things. You know, textiles are concentrated in

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>some parts of the world. All sorts of things are

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>concentrated in China. And I think because of the Cold War,

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the tech Cold War, or the neo Cold War, which

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of came to the fore under President Trump, but

0:29:55.240 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we're already brewing. People have realized that, wow, we depend

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>on China for a lot of our stuff. And then

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>with COVID and the lockdowns and the problems of getting

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, workers into factories, and now the bigger problem

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is not so much factories, but the logistics trucks being

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>able to go from city to city ports, being able

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to load and unload their cargo. We now realize what

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we really are stuck with China, and governments and corporations

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>are wisely waking up to that idea and realizing that

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe we need to onshore again of course that then

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>allows those who have a nationalistic meant to say, hey,

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to have it made in made in America,

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or made in England, made in Europe, made in Japan,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>made in Australia, as if somehow that is a solution

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to the problem. So we'll probably see a whiplash where

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it will go too far and we'll have probably overexpansion

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and over investment in production capacity in say the US

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>or in Europe, and then maybe, you know, fifteen years

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>after that it might balance again. But certainly were in

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this reshoring or on shoring phase and it's definitely got

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of political backing behind Tim Culpan there. We're

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>now choosing to end all conversations not with you, though

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.239
<v Speaker 1>as always we love to hear from you. I'm at

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Bonny Quinn on Twitter or send your assaults to ve

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. We're produced by Eric mollow

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Till next time on Bloomberg Opinion.