1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,360
Speaker 1: Would you sell a corporate sponsorship for some of the

2
00:00:02,360 --> 00:00:05,480
Speaker 1: most important moments in your Life's a double show, like

3
00:00:05,519 --> 00:00:08,360
Speaker 1: the birth of your first baby sponsored by Little Dickey's

4
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:12,000
Speaker 1: All you Can Eat pasta bar and casino, or your

5
00:00:12,039 --> 00:00:15,880
Speaker 1: master's degree sponsored by Billy's Fun Time Taco Cantina. Hey,

6
00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:17,840
Speaker 1: because even with a master's degree, it's hard to get

7
00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:19,800
Speaker 1: a job in this economy, and Billy's Fun Time Taco

8
00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:24,239
Speaker 1: Cantina is hiring and as low wages and even lower standards. Ah,

9
00:00:24,400 --> 00:00:27,240
Speaker 1: Or how about your wedding. One couple is making international

10
00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:30,280
Speaker 1: headlines for having their wedding sponsored to pay for it,

11
00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:32,680
Speaker 1: But of course it ended up a disaster and now

12
00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,760
Speaker 1: they're suing the company. We'll tell you what happened. Right

13
00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:38,680
Speaker 1: after this Seduble show, Would you let a company sponsor

14
00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:41,400
Speaker 1: your wedding to pay for it? Said Doble Show. And

15
00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:43,800
Speaker 1: there's a story making international headlines today about a couple

16
00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,519
Speaker 1: who did just that, and the details are insane, and

17
00:00:46,560 --> 00:00:48,239
Speaker 1: of course it ended up in a disaster, and now

18
00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:51,080
Speaker 1: they're suing the company that sponsored their wedding. We'll tell

19
00:00:51,080 --> 00:00:53,000
Speaker 1: you what happened. In the second but first, in a

20
00:00:53,040 --> 00:00:55,720
Speaker 1: new survey, over two thousand Americans, sixty one percent say

21
00:00:55,760 --> 00:00:58,680
Speaker 1: they'd happily consider allowing a brand to sponsor their big

22
00:00:58,760 --> 00:01:00,760
Speaker 1: day in exchange for paying for some of the wedding bills.

23
00:01:00,800 --> 00:01:02,680
Speaker 1: Wow wow what wait?

24
00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:05,759
Speaker 2: Really it makes perfect sense to me. It's so expensive.

25
00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:09,400
Speaker 2: I just wonder why they would want to, like a company,

26
00:01:09,480 --> 00:01:11,080
Speaker 2: sponsor a normal person's wedding.

27
00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:13,920
Speaker 1: I think it would depend on what brand you want

28
00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:17,240
Speaker 1: to sponsor. It you want like McDonald's, like sponsored by

29
00:01:17,360 --> 00:01:20,720
Speaker 1: McDonald's and like everything? Why not? Though, I mean I

30
00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:22,240
Speaker 1: don't know, Like my wedding is such a big day,

31
00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:24,160
Speaker 1: I don't it would be nice to have everything paid for.

32
00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:26,800
Speaker 1: But a couple from the UK, in a saga that

33
00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:29,360
Speaker 1: has taken the Internet by storm, a Bristol couple is

34
00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:33,040
Speaker 1: suing a little known frozen pizza brand, Doctor Pizza Lotties

35
00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:39,000
Speaker 1: after their ambitious attempt to have their wedding completely sponsored

36
00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:42,759
Speaker 1: turned into a pr disaster that has people all over

37
00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:45,160
Speaker 1: the world shaking their head in disbelief. Here's what happened.

38
00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:49,160
Speaker 1: The couple, Harriet and Daniel Fisher, made headlines last sprink

39
00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:51,160
Speaker 1: when they publicly announced that they were in search of

40
00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:54,120
Speaker 1: a sponsor for their wedding. But not just any sponsor.

41
00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:58,960
Speaker 1: They specifically wanted Doctor Pizza Lotties, a niche frozen pizza brand.

42
00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:01,600
Speaker 1: The Fisher couple said they had a clear vision. They

43
00:02:01,600 --> 00:02:03,960
Speaker 1: wanted the wedding that was not only cost effective, but

44
00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:08,720
Speaker 1: also a full blown marked spectacle inspired by influencer culture

45
00:02:08,760 --> 00:02:11,799
Speaker 1: and corporate sponsorships, and they believe that it could leverage

46
00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:14,960
Speaker 1: their love of pizza into a wedding funded by the brand.

47
00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,640
Speaker 1: And after months of negotiations, they actually secured a deal

48
00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:22,480
Speaker 1: for a sponsorship for their wedding worth forty pounds eighty

49
00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:23,720
Speaker 1: thousand dollars US.

50
00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:24,160
Speaker 2: WHOA.

51
00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:27,880
Speaker 1: But the problem was the pizza experience turned out to

52
00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:30,360
Speaker 1: be more of a logistical nightmare than they ever imagined

53
00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:34,000
Speaker 1: because the company that sponsored them, paying almost eighty thousand

54
00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:37,280
Speaker 1: dollars to sponsor their wedding, wanted them to do a lot.

55
00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:40,480
Speaker 1: The ceremony was held in a chapel and had to

56
00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:43,360
Speaker 1: begin with the couple's grand entrants and a pizza delivery truck,

57
00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:48,560
Speaker 1: which is kind of cool. I would like that. I

58
00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:51,440
Speaker 1: like Doctor Pizza Lotti and it said Pizza Lottes love

59
00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:54,560
Speaker 1: it first slice. On the side, Guests who had been

60
00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:58,119
Speaker 1: sent invitations shaped like pizza slices, whereas to collect stamps

61
00:02:58,120 --> 00:03:03,960
Speaker 1: on their branded pizza loyalty cards. Throughout the evening the ceremony,

62
00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:06,639
Speaker 1: everybody had to post on social media using the hashtag

63
00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:09,799
Speaker 1: zipped for love. So that would be annoying as a

64
00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:11,880
Speaker 1: guest to go to a wedding and have to use

65
00:03:12,440 --> 00:03:15,560
Speaker 1: corporate hashtag. We're talking about a couple who's making international

66
00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:18,840
Speaker 1: headlines because they had their wedding sponsored by a company.

67
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,720
Speaker 1: That's because apparently sixty one percent of people say they

68
00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:24,720
Speaker 1: would have a corporate sponsorship for their wedding to pay

69
00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:25,079
Speaker 1: for it.

70
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:27,280
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I'm definitely open to something like that.

71
00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:28,720
Speaker 2: I don't know why you wouldn't want to.

72
00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:32,680
Speaker 1: The bride or setting off white gown that had been

73
00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:36,160
Speaker 1: designed in collaboration with Doctor Pizza Lotties, the company that

74
00:03:36,240 --> 00:03:40,560
Speaker 1: was sponsoring the wedding, to resemble a giant pizza box. Yeah,

75
00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,400
Speaker 1: the dress was decorated with patches of red for sauce

76
00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:46,720
Speaker 1: and yellow for cheese. So an off white dress with

77
00:03:46,920 --> 00:03:51,000
Speaker 1: red and yellow dots on it basically, now, we might.

78
00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:53,160
Speaker 2: Be going a little too far because I don't know

79
00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:55,400
Speaker 2: how I feel about red and yellow dots on my dress.

80
00:03:55,480 --> 00:04:00,880
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, pizza inspired wedding dress a bizarre attempt to

81
00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:03,440
Speaker 1: look couture, but it looked more like a child's birthday

82
00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:06,040
Speaker 1: party costume. So that's all. Like, if it goes that

83
00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:08,640
Speaker 1: far with a wedding, would you still let them sponsor

84
00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:12,240
Speaker 1: you if you had to wear a pizza themed wedding dress?

85
00:04:12,760 --> 00:04:14,560
Speaker 2: Yeah, No, I would have to go with a different company,

86
00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:16,200
Speaker 2: like maybe like Dairy Queen, and then it could be

87
00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:18,480
Speaker 2: like an ice cream Sunday, you know, and that's still

88
00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:19,200
Speaker 2: a pretty dress.

89
00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:22,640
Speaker 1: It would still be white, yeah, you know, with random

90
00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:26,320
Speaker 1: stuff on it. Also, No, it's plain vanilla. But what

91
00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:28,679
Speaker 1: if every company made you do that? Like if McDonald

92
00:04:28,760 --> 00:04:31,599
Speaker 1: your dress had to look like a chicken nugget that's

93
00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:34,520
Speaker 1: cuter than red and yellow spot? Would you get the

94
00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:36,840
Speaker 1: Amazon logo in the back of your wedding dress? Yes?

95
00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:42,800
Speaker 1: On my butt? What No? And the group's tuxedo actually

96
00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:46,120
Speaker 1: had a QR code on his tie, linking to promotional

97
00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:47,480
Speaker 1: discounts on pizzas.

98
00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:51,960
Speaker 2: It's a little taggy, but they really are getting creative here,

99
00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:52,880
Speaker 2: It's true.

100
00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:54,680
Speaker 1: I guess the trouble really began when it came to

101
00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:57,680
Speaker 1: the vows talking about a couple who's making international headlines

102
00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:00,680
Speaker 1: because they had a pizza company sponsor their wedding to

103
00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:02,880
Speaker 1: pay for it. Would you sponsor your wedding to pay

104
00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:04,279
Speaker 1: for a text in four one to six to one,

105
00:05:04,440 --> 00:05:07,119
Speaker 1: the efficient who had been sent by doctor Pizza Lotti's Wow,

106
00:05:08,480 --> 00:05:12,400
Speaker 1: he was a marketing consultant with no actual marriage officiating experience,

107
00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:16,240
Speaker 1: interrupted the ceremony no fewer than three times, they say,

108
00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:19,440
Speaker 1: to ask the couple to repeat brand slogans for the cameras.

109
00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:21,680
Speaker 1: So you imagine that being up there to give your

110
00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:25,080
Speaker 1: vows and he's like, let's get that again, clean please. Yeah.

111
00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:25,400
Speaker 2: You know.

112
00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:29,680
Speaker 1: The guests were also told to stay on brand, and

113
00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:32,279
Speaker 1: they couldn't even say I do without first shouting Cheese's

114
00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:33,320
Speaker 1: love Jesus Life.

115
00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:39,640
Speaker 2: Ah, Wow, Jesus Love Jesus Life.

116
00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:44,280
Speaker 1: I do. And now they're suing the company as all

117
00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:46,960
Speaker 1: guests were encouraged to get up and dance with a

118
00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:50,360
Speaker 1: slice of pizza in their hands. Wow, and a coordinated

119
00:05:50,440 --> 00:05:54,359
Speaker 1: routine created by doctor Pizza Lotti's social media team. So

120
00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:55,920
Speaker 1: that would be annoying if you're out a wedding in

121
00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:58,240
Speaker 1: his corporate sponsor and you have to do all this stuff.

122
00:05:58,360 --> 00:06:00,880
Speaker 2: You also probably shouldn't be eating dancing at the same time,

123
00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:01,400
Speaker 2: you could choke.

124
00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:06,920
Speaker 1: Yeah, doing the choshaw slide while to the left three times.

125
00:06:07,120 --> 00:06:11,400
Speaker 1: Now choke. They're suing Doctor Pizza Lotti's for breach of

126
00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:15,640
Speaker 1: contract and emotional distress. The lawsuit claims the brand's forced

127
00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:22,039
Speaker 1: enthusiasm and impractical pizza centric requirements. Impractical pizza centric requirements

128
00:06:22,360 --> 00:06:25,279
Speaker 1: led to the couple enduring extreme embarrassment on their wedding day.

129
00:06:25,400 --> 00:06:27,880
Speaker 2: But they signed that contractor green to everything. That's their fault.

130
00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:32,320
Speaker 2: What's the emotional damages? Though they probably don't have any

131
00:06:32,320 --> 00:06:34,120
Speaker 2: friends left after they went to the wedding