WEBVTT -  SpaceX IPO Draws More Than $70B in Retail Orders

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and Vla Low in San Francisco.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX gears up to finalize its IPO pricing today. This

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 3>is it offers attracts more than seventy billion dollars in

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>orders from retail investors alone.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Plus Oracle is under pressure after the company reported higher

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 4>quarterly capex than expected, raising concerns about the returns on.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 3>AI and seven seven six founder Reddit co founder Alexis

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 3>o'hanian joins us live from super Return in Berlin later

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 3>this hour first ed with.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Us both here in New York.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 4>We check in on these markets that we see the

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 4>bounce back continue to an extent now as that one

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 4>hundred and three ten percent, we're coming down from earlier highs,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 4>but still there seems to be a lot of muscle

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 4>memory back in the memory perspective. We've got semi conductors

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 4>up two point four percent if you're looking at that

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Sock's index. We are buying back into the hardware. But

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 4>it's not all pretty out there. If you're looking at

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 4>certain names amid the geopolitical.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 5>Acts as well.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so the big earning story is Oracle, right, It's

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 3>down twelve percent, basically falls the most in six months,

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>and everyone is still worried about how much it costs

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>to get data centers built. And it's so funny because

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>like out there in the market, in the AI trade,

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the same anxiety exists on the other side of the table,

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 3>like you can't get it built fast enough, you know,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 3>give us the compute. We're so compute constrained. But we're

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 3>going to dig into that a lot more later in

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the hour. There's still only one story in town.

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 5>That is, and it's why you're in town.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>It's why we all.

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Gather together in town, because we've got the big story

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>of the day, of the week of months.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Spacexits IPO is upon us almost.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 4>It feels like we've been building to this crescendo moment

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 4>for a very long time. Bilumo's IPO reporter Bailey Lipschutz

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 4>joins us around the desks space which is in town.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Lauren Grush and look, we've been along this ride with

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 4>us for many a month, Lauren, what does this mean

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 4>when we're just galvanizing the amount of demand when we're

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 4>starting to see that retail investments are so extreme.

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 5>And order books are filling up. But this is a

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 5>space story. What does it mean for your industry?

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, it has become something more than a space story.

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 6>I had my bets on how SpaceX would IPO. I

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 6>do not think I would have had it IPO in

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 6>this kind of current form.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 6>We were told they would never IPO until they had

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 6>achieved the Elon's dream of going to Mars. Now it's

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 6>this hybrid rocket telecom AI company. But I just think

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 6>it speaks to the value that SpaceX has provided up

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 6>until now as a launch provider, as this telecom satellite operator.

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's hard to really.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 6>Understate the value that this company has brought to our

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 6>space program and now also to you know, the telecom

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 6>business as well. So it's hard to quantify, but I

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 6>think you're seeing it with these you know, astronomical numbers.

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 6>If you are sorry, I'm you.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Know all you know, this is out of this world, right.

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>This is also unusual, Like Bailey, you and I have

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 3>been sort of banging our heads on our desks because

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 3>there's a process to it. It's an atypical process that's

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>playing out. But catch the audience up on the mechanics.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess what happens likely aftermarket closed today, what happens tomorrow,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 3>and where we think the numbers stand, and then we

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 3>can get to the kind of more intergalactic theme that

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>we want to.

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 7>We just got to look back a week ago. They

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 7>came out with a fixed price. Abnormal thing here in

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 7>the U. It doesn't normally happen. No normally come out

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 7>with a range. You want to walk Wall Street up

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 7>to it. You want to start low, then come upsize,

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 7>raise the number of shares, raise the.

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Price, baking a big pop.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 7>Elon and Company over at SpaceX said, we're going to

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 7>treat this like a private equ private deal. This is

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 7>the price, this is the size. Are you in or

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 7>are you out? So that's been playing out for the

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 7>last week. The bankers closed the formal order books yesterday

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 7>at around four o'clock.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>They're all meeting today deciding who's going to get what.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 7>They're eventually going to take that to Brett Johnson and

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk and say this is what we're thinking. Allocations

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 7>are expected to go out this evening early tomorrow morning.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 7>People are going to find out either they got zero

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 7>or maybe they got billions of dollars worth of shares,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 7>and then tomorrow the fun will start to take place

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 7>when we start seeing where shares are indicated, probably in

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 7>the ten o'clock hour. Expectations are we'll get first trades

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 7>sometime later in the afternoon, and we'll see if the

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 7>plumbing holds up, because we again have never seen a

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 7>deal of this size. We've never seen a deal of

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 7>this size with retail being what it is, with Robinhood.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 4>And others and Betty, you've been front and center along

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 4>with ed breaking like the detail on how much demand

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 4>there is and what allocations thus far we're anticipating.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 5>So it's going to be slightly less to an international.

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Perspective, Japan still getting a couple of billion or more.

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 4>But talk to us about how much retail demand there is,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 4>how much they might be allocated, how much demand there

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 4>is coming from the Middle East and from US investors.

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 7>So we've put out, just starting with retail, we put

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 7>out and broke this morning more than seventy billion dollars

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 7>in demand, probably well more than seventy billion dollars in demand.

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 7>So you think about that, you're talking at least three

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 7>times over subscribe from retail, which means they have that

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 7>cash in the banking or.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>You could have done this IFEO just on retail, which

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 2>is crazy.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 7>If you told people a year ago that SpaceX was

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 7>going to Lauren Police disagree with me.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 6>Laura's research less than a year, less than a year

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 6>that this all kind of came.

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Together come together quickly.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 7>We've seen in Bloomberg Is reported about the demand from

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 7>the Middle East. We've seen and reported on potential anchor demand,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 7>and when you kind of stitch all that together, the

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 7>four times over subscribe number kind of seems like a

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 7>no brainer, especially because people on the buy side inflate

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 7>their numbers because maybe you put in for half a

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars, but you really want to get ten million.

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 7>At least you're getting shares. But it's something that we

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 7>haven't seen before.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get to this in a moment with

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 3>our guests, but you and are also reported with the

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 3>team that pre float. They also got basically investment grade

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 3>ratings for the credit agencies, which I think is a

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 3>big indication that this company will raise money post thing.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 3>I want to go to Lauren because can we just

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 3>remember there is a story here that's not about money.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 3>It's about a launch system in spacecraft called Starship and

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>data centers in space. Would you kindly, Laurene, just summarize

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 3>the plan here for SpaceX.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 6>Right, it's it's almost it almost represents an entirely new

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 6>direction for the company, This idea that they're going to

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 6>put up to one million data center satellites into space

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 6>to do complex computing for AI. I mean, as we mentioned,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 6>this wasn't even on our radar in terms of what

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX is going to be doing, you know, more than

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 6>a year ago, and now it seems to be the

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 6>new direction the future of the company. And yes, all

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 6>of this relies on Starship. Starship is that organtuan rocket

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 6>that they're building in South Texas. It was meant to

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 6>or it is meant to fulfill Elon Musk's AI or

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 6>a Mars dream, but now it's also critical for the

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 6>AI dream too, because it's going to be needed to

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 6>launch these AI data center satellites at scale.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>And you know, as.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 6>We've noted, the development road has been attacked rocky for Starship.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm not saying they can't get there, but it's still

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 6>unclear when they will unlock for reusability.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Blue Mike's Baley lip Schultz and Lauren Grash. Just incredible

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 3>reporting to date and obviously the next twenty four hours

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 3>are going to be a lot, Thank you very much. Indeed,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 3>just SpaceX's growth forecast actually hinges on ideas that seems

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>straight out of science fiction, but backers of Elon Musk

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 3>says he's pulled off the unbelievable before. Brett Winton is

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the chief futurist at ARC invest probably one of the

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 3>most prominent institutional supporters of must firm. Brett's great to

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 3>have you back on the show, and like, actually is

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 3>a place to start. I wanted you just to kindly

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 3>remind us of how ARC invested in SpaceX, the sort

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>of venture mechanism that you have, and then we'll go

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 3>into the thesis.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so SpaceX space XAI is the largest position in

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 8>our venture fund, which is an interval fund that you know, anybody,

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 8>not just the rich, can invest in. And we did

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 8>that because, as you can see from the retail demand

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 8>for the IPO, people understand kind of like the potential

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 8>power of these innovation focused companies and we think that

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, everyday people should be able to get access

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 8>to these AI exposures, including open Aianthropics SpaceX, which are

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 8>the top positions in the fun And so we've invested

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 8>in SpaceX, you know, as long as the vehicle has

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 8>been available, and you know, from the inception of ARC

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 8>we had reusable rockets as a break through disruptive technology.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 8>And so I've done work all along the way demonstrating

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 8>how being able to reduce cost of launch from ten

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 8>thousand dollars to one thousand dollars to we think much

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 8>less than one hundred dollars with Starship actually unlocks huge

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 8>market potential, certainly on the starlink side and kind of

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 8>as a second stage on the AI side.

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and for AI one needs data centers. We need

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 4>therefore maybe data centers in space. This is the entire

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 4>pitch that we now go through rule workings. You're numbers

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 4>your thesis on orbital data centers breadth.

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, what's interesting about this based XIPO is you actually

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 8>don't need the AI business to really work that well

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 8>in order to actually get a great return on kind

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.239
<v Speaker 8>of just the starlink business.

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 9>So you know, the Elon and Co.

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 8>They are saying they're going to be able to launch

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 8>tens of gigawaps per year by the late twenty twenties.

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 8>So an easy way to think of a gigawat, you

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 8>can rent it out at the current market rate over

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 8>the long term, it's something like fifteen billion dollars per gigwat.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 8>So imagine launching tens of gigawaps times fifteen billion dollars,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 8>so three hundred billion in incremental revenue in any individual

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 8>year that you're doing that. The reality of their AI

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 8>business today is on a blnded average basis. They have

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 8>just rented capacity to Google and Anthropic for just a

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 8>little under forty billion dollars per gigawatt. So actually serving

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 8>it as as an infrastructure as a service provider could

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 8>be a wildly lucrative business for them because they can

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 8>they can build assets on the ground so efficiently, and

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 8>once they launch into space they can build it efficiently.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 3>You know, Brett, like you are as a firm regarded

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 3>as some of the most bullish on Elon Musk like

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the individual and the plan that they outlined in the prospectus.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 3>But there of course are risks, right you know, must

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 3>post it an X last night, This idea that one

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 3>million tons to orbit will be possible in roughly five years.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Starship on paper can do one hundred and fifty metric

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 3>tons on paper. Right, do the math. That's one three

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty three launches a year every year for

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 3>five years to do that. You know you would concede, right,

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 3>that this a long shot.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, he always lays out super ambitious targets for its

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 8>companies because that's the way he's found to make his

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 8>workforce most effective it acts delivering world changing technologies.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 9>Think about it this way. Just look at the.

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 8>Starlink business and imagine instead of look at SpaceX, Imagine,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 8>instead of launching Falcon nine rockets, I'm launching Starship rockets

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 8>at the same cadence filled with Starlink satellites. That alone

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 8>would get me in two years of launching to roughly

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 8>a little under two hundred billion dollars in revenue. So

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 8>we don't have you don't have to make an assumption

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 8>that the company is going to be launching, you know,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 8>at even one thousand launches a year in order to

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 8>get into the kind of mostly on Starlink three hundred

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 8>to four hundred billion dollars in revenue by twenty thirty.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 8>So there's there's this discourse out there that, hey, you know,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 8>this company on a price to sales basis on the

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 8>immediate term looks very expensive, and poor retail is investing

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 8>in this thing because they don't understand the whole point

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 8>of capital markets is you raise capital and then you

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 8>deploy it in high return on invested capital businesses. And

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 8>Starlink alone is it's you know, a six month cash

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 8>on cash return for five year link satellites. They're going

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 8>to spend a half billion dollars building or launching a

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 8>rocket filled with satellites and acquiring the customers, and it

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 8>should generate them a billion dollars plus per year over

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.119
<v Speaker 8>the five year life.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 9>Of the satellite. So that's a great, great business.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean unarguable if you think about how much you've

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 4>turned twenty five thousand percent it's been returned since Tesla

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 4>went public. But what is also unarguable is as it stands,

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX net loss four point two eight billion dollars on

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 4>revenue of four point six nine billion dollars in the

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 4>first quarter, when.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 5>Does it become positive? Does it need to become positive?

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 5>You happy at being loss making.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 4>For the foreseeable because the revenues are just going to

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 4>go so astronomically high.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 8>No, no, I think that profitability at least as we

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 8>have a model, it happens very quickly. As they launched

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 8>the Starlink satellites. It really depends upon how much capital

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 8>they are throwing at terrestrial data centers to try to

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 8>catch up with the frontier labs.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 9>In terms of GRUX capability.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 8>You can build an amazing business just basically renting compute

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 8>to others and running Starlink, but there's clearly both an

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 8>ambition and then a higher margin in actually kind of

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 8>like competing within thropic and open. AI didn't argue that

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 8>probably doesn't happen until SpaceX's is launching, so you know,

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 8>multiple gigawatts into orbit.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry to interrupt you.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 3>There is a disconnect and that many people share this thesis.

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Right what the TAM number in the prospectus twenty six

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 3>point five trillion was for enterprise AI and I appreciate

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 3>this sub buckets in the here and now they've basically

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 3>played a blinder with a ready to go neocloud business,

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 3>and lots of people keep telling me like, in the end,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't matter if rock works or is competitive against

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic and open AI, just rent out the capacity and

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>that will fund the you know, the out of this

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 3>world ambition.

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>What would you respond to that.

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 8>I think that's possible, as in the way in which

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 8>we model.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 9>The business, that is the more likely outcome.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 8>It's I think to compete to get to the frontier

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 8>by twenty thirty, you'll need between thirty and fifty gigawat.

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 9>Years of compute in training.

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 8>It's and there because say I started later and they're

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 8>trying to build their own infrastructure, it's very difficult for

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 8>them to catch up on that amount of kind of

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 8>R and D compute thrown at their model. With the

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 8>caveat that if assuming that they merge with Tesla over

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 8>the next couple of years, cash flow from Tesla could

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 8>actually fund.

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 5>Catch up for you have seen that.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 8>I think it's a reasonable assumption or more likely than not.

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 8>After the company li and it shares, we're all floating

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 8>that there is a merger between the entities.

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 9>It makes us a ton of strategic sense.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 8>And as we model Tesla like the cash flow flowing

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 8>off Robotaxi, they can't effectively deploy it, so you know,

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going to want a special dividend out to

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 8>shareholders for Tesla. I want them to continue to reinvest

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 8>in growth after miss the robot business, you know, requires

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 8>it's not capital constrained, it's really like capability constrained. And

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 8>so whereas SpaceX actually can use additional capital to continue

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 8>to accelerate growth.

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Bret Winton, we could talk for hours, chief futurist at

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 4>our covestor. We are very thankful for the time that

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 4>you've given us. Now coming up, Oracle makes a costly

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 4>bet on AI and then massive spending plans are grabbing

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 4>wall streets attention.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't look pretty. This is rubg Tech.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Oracle shares having their worstday in six months. That's sixty

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 4>one billion dollars wiped out in market cap after they

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 4>reported quarterly capital expenditure which is above what the market thought,

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 4>raising investing concerns about the profitability of AI infrastructure buildouts.

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Pimbugs Brodie Ford breaks it down. Look, they sort of

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 4>try to tell us that they weren't going to raise

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 4>more debt equity this fiscal year, but we're looking now

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 4>at next year and there is going to be a

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 4>lot more raising needed to do.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 11>The whole question for Oracle is how quickly can you

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 11>convert this massive AI demand into actual revenue and what

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 11>are the capital requirements associated? And so last night when

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 11>a lot of different spending metrics came up a little high,

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 11>whether it was capex in the corridor or debt plans

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 11>for the next year, all of these things came together

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 11>to make investors a little bit indigested.

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 3>In the top line, right, like, yes, okay, they're going

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 3>to go to equity and debt markets again. They've told

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 3>us that, But are they growing, Like are they able

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.119
<v Speaker 3>to actually operate this business effectively?

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 11>They're growing massively. The question is whether it's empty calories.

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 11>It's all about that margin question, Becau. As we see

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 11>as the AI business ramps up, the gross margins come down,

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 11>and they fired thousands of people this quarter to try

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 11>to control those costs. But it's still crunching them right.

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 11>It's still a question around what is the margin of

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 11>offering AI infrastructure.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>And is this a good business to be in?

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 11>Generally, Oracle has gone up quite a bit in their

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 11>share price and investors are hopeful, but it's all about

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 11>how quickly they can deliver on the big promises.

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Brady Ford, thank you very much. The world's largest

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 3>private equity firms and deal makers are gathering in Berlin

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 3>for the annual Super Return Conference, Navigating a tough fundraising environment,

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 3>where AI is reshaping, where capital is flowing. Blue Box

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Danny Berger joins us live from the ground for an

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 3>exclusive interview with Reddit co founder and seven seven six

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 3>founder Alexis a Amian.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 12>Danny and thank you so much. That's right, I am

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 12>here alongside Alexis Lexis. Thank you so much for joining.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 5>Wonderful to see you, Hey, thanks for having Danny. So.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 12>Look, the big news that we it's inexcapable, is a

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 12>SpaceX IPO listing tomorrow. You're obviously very intimately familiar with it,

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 12>having owned xai got sold to SpaceX. Well, what does

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 12>it just mean to have this behemoth coming to market tomorrow?

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 13>Look, we are all excited, you know. I think right

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 13>now most of us in venture and in tech have

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 13>been waiting for some watershed moment IPO to hopefully get

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 13>the markets back open.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 9>Looks like that is upon us.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 13>And just generally speaking, I've been so excited about space

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 13>tech for about five six, seven years now, and that

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 13>to me is I think this feels like a milestone moment.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 13>This was an investment thesis that was unthinkable a decade

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 13>ago for most investors, and I think now people are

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 13>coming to grips with the fact that space technology is

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 13>really here. What would have been science fiction US maybe

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 13>ten years ago is now science fact. And I think

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 13>we're only going to see an acceleration of that.

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 5>Okay, what is it all a fact?

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 12>When we start talking about like a twenty nine trillion

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 12>dollar tam and ten million people on Mars. I mean,

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 12>you own space companies yourself is just like this the

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 12>way you need to think or is a little bit

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 12>of a fantasy.

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 13>I it's so these numbers are big, the projections, the

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 13>ambitions are big. I do think though, when we think

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 13>about what we are capable of as a species, space

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 13>has been something that has mystified us, excited us for

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 13>a very long time, especially in modern history and modern technology.

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 13>This was a frontier we really believed for a long time,

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 13>and I did growing up. It was only a place

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 13>for governments to build and innovate. NASA putting a man

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 13>on the moon, all that stuff was never something the

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 13>private sector could do. But what we're seeing now here

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 13>is undeniable. The private sector's being able to accomplish a lot,

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 13>and I think it's only going to accelerate. And I

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 13>do think the overall market is potentially that big. I

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 13>think when we're talking about human ambition, there is no

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 13>limit to that, when we talk about the opportunities in space.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 9>As Low Earth orbit.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 13>Alone just becomes more accessible, we're unlocking pharmaceuticals, We're unlocking

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 13>biotech that's going to help us here back at home.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 13>And that's the stuff that gets me fired up as

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 13>an investor. That's what gets me fired up as an American.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 13>I want to see that innovation come and help us

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 13>live better lives here on planet Earth.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 12>So as having SpaceX as a public company, is that

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 12>a good thing for your space investments because it shows

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 12>there's a pathway for public markets Or is it a

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 12>bad thing because so much money is going to get

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 12>funneled into this IPO that maybe leaves less room for

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 12>some of the other space companies.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 13>Well, the goodness is where I like to invest is

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 13>still so early. Very few of these companies, you know,

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 13>companies like Stoke or Astro Forger are thinking about going

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 13>public quite yet. They're still thinking about building and shipping

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 13>and launching. I do think you're going to have undeniably

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 13>a whole fleet of newly minted millionaires multimillionaires as well

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 13>as investors, So not just the early employees, but also

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 13>the investors who believe in space tech, who are now

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 13>going to have capital to put into the sort of

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 13>next wave. And I think we've seen that play out

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 13>in tech before and this will be no exception. And

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 13>I do think that all continues to accelerate all of

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 13>us in building the space economy.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 2>That we're open for building.

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 12>A space economy, though it is something that certainly takes time,

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 12>and I just wonder if there is room for disappointment.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 12>I mean, I don't mean to harp on sort of

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 12>the crazy numbers of it all, but is there a

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 12>fear that it gets too overhyped. A SpaceX IPO is

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 12>just too large, and there's some disappointment and it sets

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 12>the project back to humanity what you're talking about, It

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 12>sets it back in some time.

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 13>I do think it is it is important to have

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 13>this tempered expectation. I think, on the one hand, folks

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 13>have to balance one what I think is a very

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 13>important almost unbridled ambition for human progress, which is I

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 13>think a very important and noble and great quest and

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 13>at the same time the realistic, you know, expectations. You know,

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 13>everyone should obviously do their diligence, do their own underwriting,

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 13>all that important stuff before making any kind of stock decision.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for the legal leaders compliance.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 9>Is happy with me.

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 13>But at the end of the day, I do think

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 13>what we're talking about here is creating very real value.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 13>I know, even you think about anecdotally the difference of

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 13>person has once they've taken a United flight with Starlink,

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 13>Like there's a very very different feeling about how you

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 13>interact with technology when you've experienced just a little fraction

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 13>of what the space economy can do.

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 9>And I do think as we.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 13>Start to unlock pharmaceuticals and biotech that could really only

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 13>be done in zero G, we're talking about again saving lives,

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 13>improving quality of life, things that I know provide a

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 13>real economic value, but at the same time help us

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 13>live that Star Trek future. I think a lot of

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 13>us grew up wanting, so I think, be exuberant, be excited,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 13>but at the same time, obviously, you know, be thoughtful

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 13>and how you're.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 9>Interacting this stuff.

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 12>I mean it's not just obviously spacexsipon. We also have

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.239
<v Speaker 12>open AI filing. Anthropic does as well. And these are

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 12>companies that have had a lot of VC backing. In fact,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 12>so much so we were talking about this on stage.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 12>Sixty five percent of VC money has gone to just

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 12>zero point zero five percent of companies. Is something broken

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 12>that Those are the statistics we're faced with right now.

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 9>It is a unique time.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 13>I think clearly as an early stage investor, you know,

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 13>I am insulated from this a bit because where the ones,

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 13>these multi stages are often marking up my early investments,

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 13>and so you know, it's I think where you start

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 13>to see the challenge is a lot of these companies

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 13>in a previous decade would have already been public, and

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 13>because companies held off going public longer, the private markets

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 13>became a place that was effectively dealing like a public marketplace.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 13>So you're seeing these valuations, you're seeing this increase. I

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 13>think it is a positive for America and for the

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 13>world that you know, retail, that that regular folks get

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 13>access to these opportunities. I frankly wish it would happen

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 13>sooner because I think Historically, you know, people draw up,

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 13>you know, the market cap of Amazon or revenues of

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.959
<v Speaker 13>Amazon or Google when they went public. And you know,

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 13>we're in a different world now where privately held companies

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 13>are able to generate tremendous revenues and market caps before

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 13>going public. But I do think I think this has

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 13>been a long time coming, and I do think generally

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 13>venture should be a place to be contring and right

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 13>it should be a non consensus asset, especially on the

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 13>growth side. It's looking more and more consensus. So, look,

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 13>those companies are about to turn public. We'll see what

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 13>the next wave of private looks like. I'm certainly trying

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 13>to do my pest to be on the non consensus

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 13>and right side early. And I do think venture is

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 13>healthier as an ecosystem when it's not looking like a

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 13>couple of very very concentrated bets.

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 12>Well, usually what you say when there's a consensus is

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 12>that that's a dangerous thing, and it means that there

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 12>can be a correction. Do you think that that's possible

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 12>for this industry if everyone is crowding around similar bets.

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 13>Look, your instincts are right, and I know you always

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 13>get in trouble saying why something is different this time. Yeah,

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 13>And with that caveat, I still think something is different

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 13>this time. And I know, look, I live through the

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 13>social media wave. I naively thought the social media revolution

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 13>that we were building with Reddit was like the revolution

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 13>it was not. I naively thought mobile was a revolution.

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 2>It was not.

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 13>I mean it was, but in a much smaller way

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 13>compared to what this is. We have seen in just

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 13>a few years technology go from an interesting novelty that

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 13>could help you write like a press relief, to technology

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 13>that could literally write code as well as or better

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 13>than even some of the most senior experience developers. And

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 13>it really augments the output of folks. So there's a

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 13>real technology here. It's a real shift, and I don't

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 13>think it goes away. And I also think it has,

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 13>as I set on stage, a national security importance because

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 13>so much of our lives are digital being able. You

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 13>saw us with the way Anthropic thoughtfully rolled out mythos,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 13>like you know, we used it first and foremost to

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 13>shore up vulnerabilities that we had in our businesses here

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 13>in America. And so even if it never got even

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 13>if AI never got any better than where it is today.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 13>You know that is already incredibly valuable, and there's so

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 13>much wood to chop as we look across so many

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 13>businesses that right now don't have any software in them.

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 13>This hotel, I am sure.

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 5>Don't tell me this hotel.

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 12>Is going to be an aips AS, but I am

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 12>sure that whatever systems they're using right now are.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 13>Very bad and software as a layer of user experience,

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 13>these root should be able to level that up in

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 13>a meaningful way.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 12>And by the way, I do want to just ask

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 12>quickly because we have forty five seconds left. There is

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 12>this idea that the thing that survives in AI is

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 12>just like live entertainment, and you have a lot of

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 12>bets around women's sports very much. Has this whole revolution

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 12>this thing we're experiencing just Mede, you double down on that.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean look, I was a rare voice five

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 13>six years ago saying this was in a soutional great

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 13>asset not just sports, but also specifically women's sports. I

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 13>love seeing this. I am certain five ten years from

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 13>now we will still watch no matter how good the

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 13>AI generated highlights get. You know, watching the AI version

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 13>of that Knicks final last night would do nothing for

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 13>the human soul yep, because it requires even though even

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 13>if it was pixel perfect, if it didn't actually happen,

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 13>it is irrelevant and worthless. So live sports has to

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 13>be fundamentally human. No one is going to line up

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 13>to see a bunch of robots, you know, play eighteen

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 13>holes of golf against each other where everyone hits a

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 13>hole in one.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 13>The end state of this technology is some version of

0:26:58.400 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 13>this perfection that no one's.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 9>Going to want to watch. Sport has to be human.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 13>So I've been saying this for five six years now

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 13>and I'm only more confident about it. And I think

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 13>what this technology does is it makes these assets more valuable.

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 13>It makes them more engaging for fans. It improves training,

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 13>it improves so many elements, but it does not replace minding.

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 5>Is a out of time. But should we just end

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 5>with nix and five?

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Nix and five, I think that's fun.

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 9>That's a look into the camera and Nixon thie perfect

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 9>place to end it.

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 12>Alection, thank you so much for joining me, Ed Caroline

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 12>Alexis o'hanne and the founder of seven seven six and

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 12>read it.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, Danny Berger. I really want to

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 3>check back in in markets and I don't mean like

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in the here and now, we're like up

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 3>eight ten percent on that's that one hundred.

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I call it like a modest rebound.

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Oracle is down on track for his worst day in

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 3>six months because it warned investors is going to have

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 3>to tap equity and debt markets. It needs that capital

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 3>carro like it's like can't build compute fast enough. But

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting, like if you just take a sec calm

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 3>it down most of the names and then that's like one.

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Hundred a higher. It's the hyperscalers that are lower.

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 3>The software names are a little bit lower, and there

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 3>must be an element of like treading water to SpaceX's

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 3>debut tomorrow.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Definitely, maybe people still rearranging as to how much allocation

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 4>they can have, how much money they've committed. But also, look,

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 4>there's still hardware on the higher side and particular in

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 4>the chip side of the equation. And let's just talk

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 4>a little bit about that, because questions are clearly around

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 4>the cost of the AI boom for Oracle there, but

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 4>also costs for you and me for the American people

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 4>in freation is spiking with tech chants scrambling to build

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 4>out data centers. Memory chip prices have skyrocketed, driving a

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 4>record spike in tech, hardware and electricity costs. This is

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 4>exactly the story that Bloomberg's end a Current is helping

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 4>tell today. You tell it through an individual who's helping

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 4>small medium sized enterprises gain access to upgrading memory.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 5>And I mean he's just thinking this is out of

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 5>this world.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, indeed, I mean this is the word AI boom

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 14>is spilling over into real living costs. So you mentioned,

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 14>for example, I spoke to a couple of companies, one

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 14>of them in bolted More. He deals with small businesses.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 14>He does for it services. So they come in the

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 14>door looking for memory storage upgrade or maybe even new computer,

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 14>and he's saying to them, look, because of the AI

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 14>boom demand for chips, that's driving up the cost for

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 14>the components he needs, like RAM storage ssd' sa' driving

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 14>it up significantly, and as a result, obviously that means

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 14>their upgrade job will be much more expensive, to the

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.719
<v Speaker 14>point where he says, it's telling some customers looking motophill

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 14>gone by a new computer or new laptop, and the

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 14>cost of the new computer new laptop is also going

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 14>up as a result. So this these chips go into

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 14>everything that we use in every walk of life and

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 14>flowing through now to the inflation data.

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to just read this and because I couldn't

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 3>believe it, it's the AI summary of your story. But

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 3>the memory squeeze will add zero point four percentage points

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 3>to headline inflation before it eases. According to Blue Megeconomics,

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 3>it is shocking to me that there is a single

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 3>basis point. We're talking about a category of specific hard

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 3>round chips impacting inflation at a the substantive level. Like

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I've spoken to you for years, you've been all around

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the world looking at different economies, different supply chains.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that shocking to you?

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 3>What have you learned in the real world economy about

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 3>that data point.

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 14>It's certainly an impact. I mean, the official data that

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 14>we had yesterday to your point, showed that the technology

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 14>and computer components part of the inflation indicators was actually

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 14>up by just about fifteen percent from a year ago.

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 14>That's a record increase. So it is having the impact now.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 14>To be clear, obviously it's not the only issue driving

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 14>inflation right now. They ran more of course because of

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 14>the impact and energy is the bigger driver, but it

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 14>is filtering, is filtering through in a meaningful way, and

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 14>economs are saying it's going to be enough to keep

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 14>inflation simmering at a point where it wouldn't otherwise be

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 14>and that's a critical thing, and of course that's a

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 14>real worry for policy makers. So the AI inflation story

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 14>may not be the only factor of what's keeping in

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 14>terms of what's keeping US inflation elevated, but it is

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 14>certainly one of the factors. In a direct consequence of

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 14>this AI boomlet rolls.

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 3>In and when we were discussing markets a moment ago,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 3>I should also se like, of course the warring around

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East is like a driver a catalyst. And

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in equities at least today Bloomberg's end of

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 3>current in DC awesome, Really appreciate it. Thank you, So

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>stock stage, let's say a cautious rebound with tech stocks

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 3>somewhat leading the way, like as we were talking about,

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>there's a little bit of bifurcation in the bucket of

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 3>then as like one hundred, but concerns about the potential

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 3>escalation escalation right of the conflict in the Middle East

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 3>are keeping investors a little bit on edge. Oil prices

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 3>are still a factor. Again, I still think SpaceX has

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 3>quite a lot to do with this. Let's bring in

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Christina Hooper for her read chief market strategist in the

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Man Group two undred and twenty eight point seven billion

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 3>dollars in assets under management. You know, I say this

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 3>quite often, particularly for the tech sector, Like one session

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the market does not make But what is the story

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 3>you see in the numbers on the screen in front

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 3>of you right now?

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think there is a lot of excitement around SpaceX.

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 15>This is a I think creating a very significant level

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 15>of positive sentiments, so much so that markets can really

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 15>look through all the geopolitical risk and say, hey, this

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 15>is something exciting. This is something that has incredibly long

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 15>term potential. Long term it is you know, it is

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 15>to me a story about markets that want to focus

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 15>on the positive and this is giving them a reason

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 15>to be positive.

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 4>As a market strategist, Christina, when you're getting bombarded with cools,

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 4>should I buy in space X? Should I be looking

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 4>at open AI and and throw picking all the IPOs

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 4>and might becoming what is your answer?

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 15>My answer is, I think we need to think of

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 15>it in terms of the context of a diversified portfolio,

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 15>there is certainly potential there. As I talked about, there's

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 15>growth opportunities. We also have to recognize that valuations are high,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 15>and when valuations are high, stocks are vulnerable to a rerating,

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 15>especially in an environment in which you have an enormous

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 15>amount of geopolitical risk.

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 5>Now that may.

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 15>Impact some stocks more than others, but typically when you

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 15>have rates going up, that exerts downward pressure on equities,

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 15>particularly long duration equities like tech names. So if you're

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 15>looking out far longer term for your earnings, for your payoffs,

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 15>so to speak, then you could very well see some

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 15>kind of a rerating because.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 3>In a part of the space x IPO equation is

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 3>slightly mechanical, so some of the index fast track inclusion

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 3>right and in very simple terms, the passive funds will

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>have to buy their own by laws rebalance. Could you

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 3>explain that a little bit a the basics of it.

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 3>But when you're a strategist looking across assets, what you

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 3>think will happen as a result of.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 15>That, Well, essentially you have a built in demand that

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 15>is vast because if you think about all the different

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 15>owners of index like.

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Fund products.

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 15>You have this captive audience that will be owning it

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 15>as part of that, and so that certainly changes the dynamics.

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 15>That's very different than the other IPOs we've seen, and

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 15>again it's part of why there's so much excitement and

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 15>there's a view that this stock price could go up

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 15>quite significantly from here.

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Isn't an irony that Elo Musk has always pushed and

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 4>railed against past. Yeah, but passive is going to be

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 4>such a driver of demand more broadly for the IPO,

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 4>But so too is the commitment to the retail investor.

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Have you done much strategic thought around the impact of

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 4>retail investor right now on broader markets because they're a

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 4>loyal bunch quite often, but they can also wide in

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 4>on mean themes and cause more volatility.

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 15>I think that's why there are so many firms that

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 15>essentially monitor read it and other sites. I think that

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 15>was learned from game stuff that retail investors are quite

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 15>powerful now. I think think what we're seeing now is

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 15>that retail investors are seeing opportunities in technology, particularly AI

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 15>related names, and they have put their full force behind it.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 15>That's not to say we haven't seen institutional investors as well,

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 15>and so that has created quite a dynamic, and that

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 15>is really, I think largely behind the kind of incredible

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 15>recovery we've seen over the last couple of months. I mean,

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 15>the returns are really quite astounding.

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I would love to dwell on this, if that's okay, Christina.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 3>So Bloomberg reported that there was seventy billion dollars of

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 3>retail demand for the SpaceX IPO, though we don't actually

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 3>know the allocation yet, so it's oversubscribed. But one of

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the thesis, that thesis that you know, the existing investor

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 3>base of SpaceX tell me over and over again, retail

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 3>understands the story better, They're more likely to hold onto

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 3>the shares for longer, and that will support evaluation over

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 3>a longer time period.

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 2>You model for that, Do you share that belief?

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 5>So I think it can be a double edged sword.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 15>Yes, retail does under stand the story. That's part of

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 15>why there's so much excitement around it and there's so

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 15>much retail demand for the IPO. But by the same token,

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 15>because retail understands the story, if we see cracks form

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 15>in critical businesses.

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 5>Then you could see retail react to that.

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 15>Again, we have that sort of built in demand because

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 15>of the placement in the index. But having said that,

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:24.919
<v Speaker 15>you could still see a lot of volatility. You could

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 15>see some kind of rerating in this environment if you

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 15>see yields continue to go up, and if you see

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 15>retail investors just become risk averse in general, which could

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 15>easily happen.

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Christina Hoover, always so measured, always so thoughtful, Thank you

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 4>for coming on. MAD Group Chief market strategists there. Coming

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 4>up from Zatxa Software, go Poff partners with Spacexai a

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 4>new shopping experience.

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 5>We speak with the gop co CEO.

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 4>And why Spacexai, why they're offering why grow business, greenvectech.

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 3>As SpaceX heads towards its IPO tomorrow, investors are betting

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 3>on more than rockets and chatbots and satellites. The company

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 3>says enterprise AI represents a twenty six point five trillion

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 3>dollar opportunity, but can grop actually when corporate customers. One

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 3>of the few companies putting it to work is gopuff,

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 3>which built its new AI shopping assistant on XAIS models.

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now is Gopuff CEO Raphael Ilishaiev. It's a

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 3>great case study, right I think a lot of people

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 3>read the prospectus and we're like, Okay, the future of

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 3>SPACEXAI is enterprise AI, but they have struggled a little

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 3>to get people to use the models in a meaningful way.

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 3>You are just explain the basics of the relationship and

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 3>what you've actually done with the technology.

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Ed, Caroline, thank you so much for having me

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 10>so Over the last thirteen years, gobov has built infrastructure

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 10>to be the fastest and most affordable player in delivery,

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 10>and our partnership with SpaceX and the product that we

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 10>co developed called Go solves the final friction point that

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 10>we really had, which is the consumer shopping experience.

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>So we thought about this differently.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 10>Than I think a lot of other folks. And it's

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 10>not just an LM wrapper that's built within our app,

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 10>but in fact there's a co developed experience where it's

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 10>a whole new consumer on new consumer product where you

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 10>could shop via voice, you could talk to it, have

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 10>total total conversation like you would have with your best friend.

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 10>Go will build your cart, so if it knows enough

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 10>about you, it'll actually develop and build a whole cart,

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 10>and it has this TikTok style scrolling experience where you

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 10>can scroll and discover new products that are hyper personalized

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 10>and cared for you. So this is a whole new

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 10>experience that we co developed together with SpaceX over the

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 10>last year and fad.

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is when you're using data from X, You'll

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 4>know that I'm all in on the next in five

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 4>game on Saturday, and suddenly I'm being offered chicken wings

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:04.320
<v Speaker 4>or I'm being offered chips or whatever it might be

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 4>because I'm able to and gopof on that moment on

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 4>the Saturday. But from actually embedding within X and within groc,

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 4>did you push away other relationships? Did you decide no,

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 4>thanks open Ai, no thanks anthropic?

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 5>Did you look at doing it with competitors?

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 10>You know, this kind of relationship that we had and

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 10>the kind of product that we wanted to build, this

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 10>wasn't just a plug and play that we could have

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 10>done with anyone. So we looked for folks that had

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 10>the right technology, and SpaceX has amongst the best technology

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 10>both for voice and imagine and a partner that was

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 10>willing to co develop this whole new consumer shopping experience

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 10>for us. So you know, this was a long, you know,

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 10>ten eleven month process that we co developed together with

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 10>a partner that was willing to work with us, you know,

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:54.760
<v Speaker 10>even as early as this morning, talking with our engineers

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 10>and co developing this thing together to make it even better.

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 10>So we were looking for a partner that had the

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 10>right technology, which SpaceX is you know, in cutting edge

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 10>and the best boat in voice and in image generation,

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 10>and a partner that was willing to co develop this

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 10>new product together.

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Could you talk a little bit about how the economics

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 3>of it work, like how does XAI price things with you?

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 3>It sounds also a bit like you get good access

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to the forward deployed engineers, like daily access. All of

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 3>that is a big facts right now because everyone is

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 3>counting the cost of tokens.

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So it's a strategic relationship that we build together

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 10>with SPACEXI from day one. And the way that we

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 10>thought about the scaling is we wanted a provider that

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 10>can provide you know, a super high quality product bought

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 10>across voice and image and is arguably the lowest cost provider.

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 10>So we built a relationship that scales are.

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 3>The lowest provider you benchmarked against open ai and Anthropic

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 3>on the cost as well.

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we looked at we looked at a lot of

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 10>players when we did, and costs was one of the

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 10>factors here. But the quality of the product and the

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.919
<v Speaker 10>willingness to co develop this together, all of that kind

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 10>of gave us a lot of confidence to work together

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 10>with SpaceX, And I think the product kind of speaks

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 10>for itself if you play with it. I think it's

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 10>second to none from a consumer AI experience.

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Raphael is interesting reporting out over all Wall

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Street Journal, for example, there's a thought that open Ai

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 4>might be doing some drastic price cuts in particular basically

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 4>the cost of its product.

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 5>People are who been wonderfully token.

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Maxing is suddenly realizing how expensive that is and they

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 4>want to do that, perhaps ahead of competitors like Anthropic.

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 4>Are you seeing return on such AI investment? Is it

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 4>really driving growth for the business?

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 10>You know, we're a week in to Go launching, and

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 10>I'll tell you a lot of the consumer metrics really

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 10>early on are great. You know, basket sizes up and frequency.

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 9>Within the first week is up.

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 10>But what's even more special is the kind of conversations

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 10>that are consumers are having with Go. You know, we

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 10>saw a conversation earlier today with the mom saying Hey,

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 10>my kid is sick, can you help me? Or a

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 10>conversation a few days ago with someone asking, Hey, I'm

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 10>hosting a barbecue for six people, go can you help me?

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 10>And that kind of relationship that we're building with the

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 10>customer is kind of very special and I think those

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 10>kind of relationships are the ones that are going to

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 10>win and lead to ultimately better KPIs across the board.

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 4>That's great speaking with you, Afair alias Cherv he's the

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 4>co founder and co CEO of Gopuff. Appreciate the take

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 4>on groc and AI and SpaceX Ai. But there's a

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 4>lot to talk from governments around the world at the

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 4>moment about adopting AI. Many countries still having delivered on

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 4>that adoption. That's according to open AI's head of Countries

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 4>and the former UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, George O's one.

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 4>He sat down with bloombg Tech Europe's Tom McKenzie form

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 4>the Founders Forum in the UK.

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 16>I think you are saying what is true is that

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 16>many governments having yet really good delivered on the adoption.

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 16>They've they've talked about it, they've got ambitions around it,

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 16>but they're still in the process of delivering.

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 16>I know I've been in government. Things take a while.

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 16>But the governments, I think the do adopt more quickly

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 16>will be the big winners. They'll be the winners in

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 16>their national economy, winners in the quality of their public services,

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 16>and winners in potentially in like where their country is

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 16>going to be over the.

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Next centric coming up.

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Many things about the SpaceX IPO have been unusual. We're

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 3>going to talk through the mechanisms of this public market

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 3>launch next ready for lift off, et cetera, et cetera.

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech breaking news crossing the terminals. SpaceX

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:51.240
<v Speaker 3>preparing to sell seventy five billion dollars worth of shares,

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 3>at least a five billion dollar dollar order coming from Blackrock.

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 3>That's according to the Wall Street Journals siding sources. Bloomberg

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 3>had reported right that there were several institutions that had

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 3>placed orders for ten billion dollars worth of shares. The

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 3>allocation will get worked out in the next twenty.

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Four hours through to tomorrow morning.

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Pre trade for black Rock, according to the journal, at

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:15.800
<v Speaker 3>least five billion.

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it goes up. We'll see.

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 4>There are some big orders coming from institutional but also

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:24.959
<v Speaker 4>from retail ed and that is today's big number, more.

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Than seventy billion dollars.

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Retail orders for SpaceX's IPO have actually topped seventy billion,

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:31.800
<v Speaker 4>according to sources.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 5>And while individual investors are expected.

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 4>To be allocated well at least twenty percent of the

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 4>available shares at a seventy five billion dollar IPO size,

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 4>many are going to be left unfilled.

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 5>That's just one of the rather unusual.

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 4>Things about this listing, joining us to discuss the IPO mechanics, the.

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Market impact, the thesis.

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 4>Brian White and In, director and co head of Tech

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Investment Banking ever at PYPERSANDLA. You're not one of the

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 4>banks working on the listening, which frees us up to

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 4>discuss things at length with you. Brian, and I'm so

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 4>fascinated by some of the technicalities because you've put in

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 4>in your notes.

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 5>Look, this is a very small float.

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Seventy five billion dollars is enormous and record ibo but

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 4>compared to the valuation of the company, very limited amount

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 4>of how many stock we get access to Is that

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 4>an issue?

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, it is.

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:17.280
<v Speaker 17>It's about four percent of the float, and there's overriding demand.

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 17>You're seeing demand from retail and institutional as evidenced by

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 17>the black Rock order right there. But over time, hopefully

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:26.839
<v Speaker 17>they will continue to sell more and more. But right

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 17>now it looks like the demand is quite high and

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.839
<v Speaker 17>they could probably actually increase the amount that they want

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 17>to raise, and I'm sure that that's something that the

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:35.919
<v Speaker 17>underwriters are thinking about as we speak.

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 3>Ryan, they did the unusual thing and set out a

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 3>price pre road show one thirty five. How do you

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 3>think the bankers, the potential investors and everyone else responded

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:47.760
<v Speaker 3>to that behind the scenes.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:50.879
<v Speaker 17>Well, first, what they wanted to do is to back

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 17>into what they believe is an appropriate valuation, and that's

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 17>evaluation based on all the facets of the SpaceX business.

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Number two.

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 17>SpaceX is unique and led by probably one of the

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 17>best entrepreneurs of all time in Elon Musk, and there

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 17>is tremendous demand for it. And instead of the normal

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 17>mechanism where you're trying to determine how to price based

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 17>on where you think demand is and what the market

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 17>value is at, they've determined the price from the outset.

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.839
<v Speaker 17>What that's doing is putting an artificial floor on where

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 17>it's going to be. But what it also may allow

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:24.760
<v Speaker 17>for is a very very large pop for retail investors tomorrow,

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 17>and I think that that's going to be what we

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 17>want to watch, just how much it pops at the

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 17>open and where it sustains itself, because much of retail

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 17>may see such a large pop that what they decide

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 17>to do is to sell down throughout the day tomorrow.

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 4>But run aren't the limitations as to how much retail

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 4>is allowed to sell out or at least some of

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 4>the brokers that they buy through will punish them if

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:46.359
<v Speaker 4>they sell on the first day.

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 17>Well, we've never seen a IPO with this much retail allocation,

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 17>and so twenty percent at least is going to retail,

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 17>and the retail is going to be able to have

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 17>access to sell. Now what you may be referring too,

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 17>some of them may have some issues with future IPOs,

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 17>but most of the retail that's in this IPO is

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:09.240
<v Speaker 17>probably not necessarily planning for much more IPO investments.

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 4>You really think they're not going to be in an

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 4>anthropic or open AI if they want to buy into Xai, Well.

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 17>They would like to be, but it's unclear if open

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 17>AI and Anthropic will actually follow a similar mechanism. My

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.479
<v Speaker 17>instinct is they may not, but we shall see, because

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 17>this is setting a new precedent tomorrow.

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Brian, we reported yesterday that pre float SpaceX has IG

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 3>rating from the three main agencies. To you, how much

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 3>of a signal of that is that they will very

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 3>quickly go back to the markets and raise more money

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 3>through any mechanism available.

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 17>I mean, I think it's a tremendous signal. I think

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 17>that they are going look at the burn that they

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 17>disclosed in the prospectus, look at the ambitions that they have,

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 17>particularly with the XAI part of the business, and with

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 17>their vision about where they want to see their AI

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 17>business and their space business over time. This is a

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 17>business that will continue to consume massive amounts of capital,

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 17>will continue to need to access the public markets to

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 17>raise that capital.

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 3>You didn't get a brief on this. We're being transparent

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 3>about that. But is there a way that Pipe of

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:09.839
<v Speaker 3>Sandler can play this IPO event.

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 17>Well, what we're trying to do is just continue to

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 17>advise our clients about where defense technology is heading. You know,

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 17>the exciting things that is happening in space, the future

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 17>of you know, defense, Those are the areas that we're

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 17>spending a lot of our time in terms of the

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 17>future opportunities around SpaceX. It's something that you know, our

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 17>team is very fixated on, but we're not participating in

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:34.240
<v Speaker 17>this IPO tomorrow.

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Brian White, co head of Technology Investment Banking Pipe cent

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 3>to thank you very much, really appreciate it. Okay, you know,

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 3>this is it the final sprint and this is it

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:45.399
<v Speaker 3>for this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Are you ready?

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm feeling ready.

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, are you ready?

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Because you've got a long day ahead of you, Ed Ludlow,

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 4>there's potentially coverage of these things priced there's coverage throughout

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 4>the trading day here on Bloomberg after the trading day.

0:48:58.200 --> 0:48:59.839
<v Speaker 3>And of course we'll think me to take away from

0:48:59.840 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the game. It's all premeditated. You kind of know what's

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. Still lots to review on the pod.

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 4>There is Get That podcast you can find on the

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 4>terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart.

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:10.879
<v Speaker 5>I have ed here for another day. In New York City,

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 5>there's a bluembog Tech