WEBVTT - Bitcoin's Big Surge, Tech Takes on Geopolitics

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbonn.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up, Bitcoin blast past one

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 4>hundred thousand dollars. We dig into the positive sentiment, including

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 4>the sec share announcement.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Plus it's TikTok for TikTok as.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 4>A social media joant anxiously awaits the legal decision on

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 4>its upcoming US ban and geopolitical risks across Europe and

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 4>Asia are bound, but US stock stay near records. Can

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 4>tech keep American exceptionalism alive? But first, let's checking on

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 4>these markets, because that exceptionalism just takes a turn to

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 4>the downside, off by two ten percent on the Nasdaq

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 4>one hundred. But look, we are so close to the

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 4>record highs that we saw across benchmarks yesterday. We have

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 4>some nervousness ahead of the non farm pay rolls tomorrow

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 4>as job as claims come in today, and we still

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 4>look at what's happening geopolitically speaking, Chips to the downside,

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Tesla to the upside as it gets basically a bit

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 4>more optimism coming from Bank of America as they go

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 4>to visit that gigafactory, move in on some of the

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 4>other asset classes of choice. Here on the Tech show,

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin one hundred thousand, we're currently one hundred and one thousand.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 4>We went past one hundred and three thousand earlier, up

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 4>three point six percent. Why a whole fledge of positive sentiment.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it's a little bit to do with FED chair

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 4>J Powell yesterday a deal book saying it's akin to gold.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 4>We've also got putin saying that he wouldn't be in

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 4>any way restraining crypto. But then you have the all

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 4>important Paul Atkins announcement announcement. Let's go to that with

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:51.559
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Mike Shephard now because we do have someone from

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration future administration SEC chair pick Paul Atkins,

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>and just give us his background.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Why is he seen as crypto friends.

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, he has emerged after years of being a well

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>known regulator here in Washington. He previously served on the

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>SEC as a commissioner during the George W. Bush era,

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so he has the street cred as a regulator. But

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>more recently he has emerged as an advocate for digital

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>currency and fintech, and so naturally investors around the world

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>were so encouraged to see Donald Trump select him as

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the incoming SEC chair. During the presidential campaign, Trump really

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>advocated for changes in US policy toward digital currency. He

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>wants to make the US a crypto hub, and one

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of the keys to that is making changes at the SEC,

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>which under President Joe Biden, has cracked down on this

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>market after seeing some excesses we saw during twenty twenty

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>two with fraudulent behavior that the current agency chair, Gary Gensler,

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>singled out. But Trump has called for a change, and

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the crypto industry investors who supported his candidacy also wanted

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to see a change of the agency, hence their encouragement.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 4>Now and as you say, someone who has not only

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.399
<v Speaker 4>served on the SEC before as a commissioner, but someone

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 4>who then gone on to advise fintech, in particular crypto companies.

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 4>But just tell us a little bit more other than crypto.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 4>How else is he going to be facing the financial markets?

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm glad you brought that up, Caroline, because he

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is far from a one trick pony. As I said,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he is a seasoned regulator, one of the analysts that

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>our colleagues spoke to yesterday after he was named, referred

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to him as the godfather of conservative capital markets ideology,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and that is a big statement. But he will be

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>coming in there with an agenda to make broader changes

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>at the agency which oversees how markets report to investors

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and how companies report to investors in markets, and we

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>will be looking possibly for changes and disclosure rules and

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>also easing up perhaps of some the heavier fines that

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the SEC and POST under Gary Gensler. That

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is something that Atkins has singled out in the past,

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and we can look to him to try to target

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that again in the future.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Mike Shephard, with all the context, we thank you for

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 4>more on the border implications for the crypto market. Katherine

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Dowling's with us bitwise asset Management, General Counselor and chief

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 4>compliance officer. And Catherine, I mean, just first and foremost

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 4>more than one hundred thousand dollars for people who've been

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 4>in crypto for a long time, that must feel extremely vindicating.

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 5>It does, and thanks so much for having me this morning.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 6>It was fun to watch it go over six digits

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 6>last evening and to see it continue to hold.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Today when you think of the fund side on one,

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 4>but also then the realities of what perhaps pull Atkins

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 4>could mean. Dig in a little bit to the SEC announcement,

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 4>what you made of it?

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Absolutely.

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 6>First off, leading up to this announcement, really all the

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 6>names that were floated were positive.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 5>So we had that.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 6>We knew it was going to be better, So there

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 6>was really no wrong answer. But in this choice, it's

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 6>a great choice. Quite simply, you have somebody who can

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 6>hit the ground running. He has been a commissioner before.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 6>He knows how the commission works. And one really important

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 6>factor that we're hearing about Paul Atkins is he gets

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 6>along with people. You can't underestimate how important that is.

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 6>He needs to be able to work with the industry,

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 6>he needs to be able to work with lawmakers.

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 5>I've been at those.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 6>Hearings in Congress where it was antagonistic. Questions weren't being answered,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 6>eyes were being rolled, and this was the environment in

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 6>which Crypto was trying to achieve regulatory clarity and it

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 6>just wasn't going to happen with that back and forth

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 6>and the tension that was created in the Gensler era.

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 6>So we are very much looking forward to a person

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 6>who can come in, hit the ground running, work with

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 6>the other commissioners, and hopefully also have a dialogue with

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 6>the CFTC and with lawmakers so in the new Congress

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 6>we can get some clarity, we can get some forward

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 6>motion stable coin bill market structure. So, quite simply, this

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 6>is an excellent choice and he's another great ad to

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 6>the you can't fault regardless of your politics, you can't

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 6>fault the economic team that is being put together by

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 6>the transition team here.

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 4>Catherine, I want to just speak to the cynics out there.

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 4>People are now out oh great, crypto's got a pro

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 4>crypto sec chair, or all hell's going to break loose.

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 4>We're going to see yet more fraudulent behavior that they

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 4>believe goes on in space. I want to ask you

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 4>because specifically, yes, you're in the ecosystem, but you're someone

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 4>who comes from a federal prosecutor background. You're someone who's

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.799
<v Speaker 4>worked for US Attorney General offices in California.

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 3>So speak to that concern.

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Here that we're suddenly going to see rip roaring in

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 4>crypto with no holds barred.

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Great, Absolutely, you're going to have that approach.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 6>You're going to have the folks who are going to say, oh, great,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be no regulation. But if you actually

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 6>look the folks in the industry, we aren't asking for

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 6>no regulation. We're asking for clarity for regulation. We're not

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 6>just enforcement actions. And I know we've heard that quite

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 6>a bit. What does that really mean? If you break

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 6>it down, the enforcement actions are expensive, they're limited to

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.119
<v Speaker 6>the case and point. You don't get a broader rule

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 6>that will help businesses who either haven't engaged with the

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 6>industry or trying to engage.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 5>In the correct way.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 6>So having been at the attorney's office before and having

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 6>worked very closely with the SEC the light doesn't flip overnight.

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 6>It's not suddenly that all the cases or are going

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 6>to disappear.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 5>Into the ether.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 6>It's just that you're going to have a better dialogue,

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 6>you're going to get collaboration, and you're going to have

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 6>a more positive approach.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 5>To how we get there. It's not we're not getting

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 5>rid of everything. We're just going to.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 6>Get there in a more collaborative fashion, and that's what

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 6>you need.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is we are seeing actually some of the

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 4>crypto related companies just turning to the downside. A little

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 4>bit a lot of run up into that announcements, so

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 4>perhaps a bit of profit taking going on, Catherine, But

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 4>spell out exactly what some of the you talk about,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 4>certain laws and regulations that need to be put in place.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 4>We hear about stable coins being tackled first and foremost.

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Is that the number one line on the agenda.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>From the SEC.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Where do you think the first rules are going to come?

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 6>I think stable coin legislation coming from Congress will probably

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 6>be the first one out, just because it's a smaller,

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 6>niche er piece and there's been bipartisan support, So I

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 6>think that's going to be the first, the first mover.

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 6>The market structure legislation are referred to will take a

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 6>little longer.

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 5>But it's a more of a dialogue has to happen.

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 6>That's the definition, that's who is going to be the

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 6>regulator depending on where these assets sit from a definitional

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 6>standpoint along the spectrum. So that'll take a little longer,

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 6>but we'll have some more forward motion on both of

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 6>those fronts.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Is there any risk here could we see pill Atkins

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 4>not take the role, not be acknowledged for the role.

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, there's always risk, but as I said, you know,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 6>we're hopeful that that goes smoothly. I see no obstacles

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 6>out there that should block it. However, as I mentioned earlier,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 6>there are a list of other folks, all of whom

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 6>would be great choices. I'm really liking the Pollakin's choice,

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 6>given his involvement with the industry, his understanding, and quite

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 6>frankly before, his demeanor and ability to collaborate and work

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 6>with others, which is quite simply important in having a

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 6>negotiated position with regard to some of this regulatory action.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Catherine Dowling, great to have you join Bidwise Asset Management.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate it.

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 4>Elsewhere on Capitol Hill, Elon Musk is, in fact there

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 4>today stoken congressional enthusiasm. He hopes for his pretty ambitious

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 4>effort to sash at least two.

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Trillion dollars in the federal budget.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 4>Now, Mosk and his partner in the initiative, former Republican

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.239
<v Speaker 4>presidential candidate Vivit Gramswami, plan to meet with groups of lawmakers,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 4>followed by a session that all Republican House members have

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 4>been invited to. Coming up, we'll discuss the impact the

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 4>French government TERMOL on the country's businesses. And startup sector

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 4>that's next. This is the Bloomberg technology. I think we're

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 4>just going to hear from the National Rally leader Marine

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 4>la Penn now, who is speaking with Bloomberg earlier today.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Just take a listen because you need to l DI

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Missions Library.

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>What I said was that the president's resignation is a

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>personal decision for him and can only take place in

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 2>my view, when a political crisis happens or an institutional

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 2>crisis can no longer have any other solution than the

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 2>resignation of the President of the Republic. What I do wish,

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, because for sure there will be

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>new legislative elections in the next few months, is that

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>we work on a voting system by then that enables

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 2>us to have a real majority, whatever that majority may be.

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 2>But the country needs a majority. It can't live for

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>months and years with three blocks, which in reality can't

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 2>implement a policy.

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 4>That was Marine Lapin of the National Rally commenting on Macron.

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 4>President Macron's position, after, of course, he has been dismissing

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 4>growing calls for his own resignations from politicians across the

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 4>political spectrum, Macron came out saying he will serve out

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 4>his second term in full. He's set to talk further

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 4>at eight pm Local time, that's two pm here in

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 4>New York. But let's just discuss the impact of all

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 4>this political drama on French businesses, on tech companies Bloomberg's benwell,

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 4>butflo does.

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 3>That for us? And how a sentiment at the moment.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Is there a moment of crisis among executive boards?

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I mean it's a moment of uncertainty and as

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 7>we know, business leaders don't like uncertainty then like to

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 7>be able to focust their.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Budget for next year, etc.

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 7>Actually, that uncertainty started this summer in June when Macron

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 7>called the unexpected app election, So that's that's ongoing. Basically, Barnier,

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 7>the Prime Minister, was preparing a budget for next year

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 7>that was actually going to slash some helps for innovative

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 7>startups on R and D, etc. So now there is

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 7>a certainty of it's going to happen, we have there

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 7>is a few weeks left for Macon first to pick

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 7>a new prime minister and then to vote if possible,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 7>the budget. So yeah, like startup leaders and companies in

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 7>general waiting to see what's going to be in that budget.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Or if we are going to continue with this year's budget,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 7>which could be reconducted through next year through special law Benoir.

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 4>It's notable that leaders like Eric Schmidt, course former Google

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 4>CEO and now focused on geopolitics as in particular, has

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 4>come on this show and said France is the standout

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 4>in Europe in terms of getting things done, having a

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 4>really healthy ecosystem where companies like Mistral for ai can thrive.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 3>Has that been something being questioned late.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 7>It's not been questioned, but you're right, Like Macrome started

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 7>about seven years ago when it was first elected, a

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 7>sort of push for what he called startup Nation. He

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 7>helped companies to hire foreign scientists, for foreign companies to

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 7>come to France to start their business. He's been doing

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 7>some helps to get visas for foreign tech workers, for example.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 7>And then the push in AI led by open Ai

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 7>led to new French startups trying to rival with open

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 7>Ai like Mistroll. As you said, Macron is also going

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 7>to be organizing a World summit in February or an AI.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 7>There certainly is this push that companies hope can continue,

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 7>and obviously the political situation is not the best. Just

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 7>to ensure that this momentum, which is quite fragile, can

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 7>keep going.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Benwa, It's great to have you. Bernan Bardelo on the

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 4>impact in France at the moment. Sticking with international politics,

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 4>South Korea's main opposition later says it may be difficult

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 4>to get enough support from the ruling party to impeach

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 4>President yunsuk yuil this week after his declaration of martial law,

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 4>but he remains committed to removing the president.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Democratic Party leader.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Lee Jim young sat down for an interview with Bloomberg

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 4>earlier today.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Here's what he had to say. Chung Chung kungu chor Kumnia.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 8>Ultimately, politics is done by the people, and even if

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 8>the result of the vote may go against the world

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 8>the people in the current situation, the vote result may

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 8>change next time if individual members of the parliament are

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 8>pressured heavily by public opinion. That's what I think important.

0:14:55.960 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 4>For companies such as Samsung, Skhiinex. Of course tech more broadly,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 4>let's discuss the impact of all this geopolitical uncertainty on

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 4>tech markets.

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 3>More broadly.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 4>J Jacobs us head of Thematic Active, BTF and black Rock,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 4>and thus far J hasn't had much impact that US

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 4>stocks have continued to show their exceptionalism. We've had record

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 4>high's yesterday amid global turmoil.

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of that?

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, actually, the tech sector in the United States is

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 9>one of the most geopolitically exposed sectors out there. About

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 9>sixty percent of the revenue of tech comes from overseas.

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 9>So one of the ways that we've been looking about

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 9>geopolitical fragmentation is can you really tilt your exposures within

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 9>the tech sector to companies that buy in the United States,

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 9>build in the US, cell in the United States really

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 9>to try to isolate some of that geopolitical risk. I

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 9>think it's very present in the tech sector in particular.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Where would that end.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Up leading you which companies I mean, first and foremost,

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 4>you might think, well, those that have been benefiting from

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 4>the Chipsact, who've been building here in the United States,

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 4>but then inter hasn't exactly been having the best of

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 4>times of it.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's coming from a range of companies, just kind

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 9>of across different industries within technology. I mean, I think

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 9>if we look at artificial intelligence, we see that a

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 9>lot of leadership is with US based companies. For example,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 9>you could look specifically at data centers and power companies

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 9>as being really important parts of the AI ecosystem but

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 9>are very localized to the United States. You're getting some

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 9>of that isolation from geopolitics. We even brought out an

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 9>entire fund based off of this strategy, I Etc. Which

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 9>is really looking at the tech sector but tilting towards

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 9>those US kind of very domestic focused companies to isolate

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 9>geopolitical risk.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 4>The infrastructure build out is one that many have turned

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 4>to other than just thinking okay, in Vidia chips and shovels.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 4>We then think about the next layer down, the energy,

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 4>the companies, But how many people are asking you, well,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 4>what about application layers?

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 3>What about the next frontier of AI?

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 9>That's really where a lot of the conversations are going.

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 9>I think if we look at the last two years,

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 9>it's been a huge focus on the Magnificent seven, and

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 9>it's been a really concentrated rally within artificial intelligence. We

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 9>think as we enter the third year of what we're

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 9>really calling the build phase of artificial intelligence, this is

0:16:58.080 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 9>when the markets are going to recognize that this is

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 9>something much bigger that's going to impact a wider range

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 9>of technology stocks. A wider range of semiconductor stocks, the

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 9>power stocks. It could even impact cybersecurity stocks as data

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 9>gets more valuable and needs to be protected. And you

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 9>can even look at adjacent industries in financial services and

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 9>healthcare where AI can really create more productivity and efficiency.

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 9>So I think we're going to see a transition in

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty five to really a broadening of that artificial

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 9>intelligence story.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 4>How much of the story is starting to pick up

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 4>back in crypto for you as.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, Jay, Well, it's significant. You know, of course bitcoin

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 9>passing one hundred thousand is a significant milestone, but really

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 9>you have to take a step back and look at

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 9>the broader picture of why is this happening. You know,

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 9>I think there's certainly some anticipation of more friendly regulatory tellens,

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 9>but also in your previous segment, you're just highlighting some

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 9>of the geopolitical risk around the world in Europe and Asia,

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 9>and in a lot of ways, professional managers which are

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 9>really just starting to access digital assets for the first

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 9>time with our launch of ibit our Bitcoin etp are

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 9>thinking about it as a hedge in their portfolio. Behaves

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 9>very differently from stocks and bonds, and if you see

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 9>more geopolitical risk Bitcoin could really benefit.

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting about your role is not only thinking about

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 4>strategy or leadership clients, but you're also thinking about the

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 4>international ATF offering as well. And I'm just interested about

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 4>whether anyone is betting on outside of the US.

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 9>They are, but in more targeted ways where we've seen

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 9>some really significant flows in the past year. Specifically looking

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 9>at India is really a play on changing supply chains,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 9>particularly if you look at a lot of the reshoring

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 9>that's happening in the United States. There's been an effort

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 9>to build more here domestically, but also to diversify supply

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 9>chains geographically, and India has been a major beneficiary. Just

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 9>like we have a Chips Act in the United States,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 9>they've been focused on building out more chip capacity as

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 9>well as well as building out more tech manufacturing. So

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 9>India has been a big beneficiary Mexico as well as

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 9>you look at nearshoring and the interplay of growing trade

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 9>relations between the US and Mexico.

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Fascinating. J Jacobs, thanks so much for that. US Head

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 4>of Thematic and Active ETF over a black Rock AMD

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 4>CEO Lisa Sue spent the better part of her ten

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 4>year career engineering, one of the biggest turnarounds in Silicon

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Valley history. Now just preparing for a battle against Nvidia,

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Emily Chang sat down in the CEO at MD's headquarters

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 4>in Austin, Texas to discuss the bets she's.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Making to compete.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 4>A long view on the global chip supply chain and

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 4>even her distant family link within video CEO just one

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 4>take a listen.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 10>In Vidia is seen as the dominant force in AI

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 10>right now, and AMD is widely considered the next best option.

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 10>Is that good enough for you?

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 5>Do you like being seen as the underdog?

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't call it a like or dislike.

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 11>What I would say is, you know, AMD has had

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 11>a history of doing amazing things, and from that standpoint,

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 11>we've always been in this place where we haven't necessarily

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 11>had same amount of people that you know, other larger

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 11>companies have, but we've certainly punched well above our weight

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 11>in terms of technology capability, in terms of impact on

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 11>the industry.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 12>This is the most complex highest performance computer.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 13>People are kind of obsessed with the fact that you

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 13>and Jensen are distant cousins.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 10>I know that you are competitors, but do you ever treat.

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 11>Notes well, first of all, Jensen is brilliant, so I

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 11>fully admire him for that. We were really distant, so

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 11>we didn't grow up together.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 11>We actually met at an industry event, so it wasn't

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 11>until we were well into our careers.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 10>So no family dinners.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 5>Just to put the rumor to rest.

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 11>No family dinners. And it's an interesting coincidence.

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 10>So many of your customers are building their own chips

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 10>hyperscalers like Apple and Meta and Google and Microsoft and Amazon.

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 14>Is that a threat?

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 11>This is a huge market, Emily, There's like more than

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 11>enough chips for everybody to build. And the beauty of

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 11>this is once recognized trips are so important. Yes, so

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 11>it's natural that they're going to have their own capability.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 10>Has the shakeup of a very established industry. Surprised even you.

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 5>It has a little bit, I have.

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 4>To say, Mdco lis to c there alongside Blue Megsmily Chang.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 4>Check out the full episode of The Circuit tonight on

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 4>bloom Meg TV ten pm Eastern or stream on Bloomberg

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 4>Originals a pm Eastern.

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Now it's time for talking tech.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 4>First up, all chips TSMC is in talks of the

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia to produce Blackwell AI chips at TSMC's new plant

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 4>in Arizona. It'scording to Reuter's now TSMC is said to

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 4>be making preparations to start production early next year. Plus,

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 4>Apple's major manufacturing partner, fox Conn, reported a second consecutive

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 4>month of just single digit sales growth, raising concerns that

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 4>demand for AI infrastructure won't be able to offset weak

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 4>iPhone sales. Apples historically accounted abound of fifty percent of

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 4>hon Hui's overall sales, and the EU's new competition chief

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 4>says a potential split of Google's businesses is still under consideration.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Joyce of Ribeira, who started.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Her five year term this week, said she aims to

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 4>build on the legacy of her predecessor, mar Great Vestia.

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 4>New Yorker. Quick check on these markets because while we're

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 4>teetering around record highs, the NASAC is only off by

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 4>eleven points, and a's that one hundred that is the

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 4>big benchmark for big tech.

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 3>We are being put to the upside.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 4>By the likes of Tesla, for example, chip stocks. On

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 4>the downside, though we're looking at bitcoin is the real

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 4>punchmark that we're all looking at.

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 3>In the moment. It's now got an ecosystem worth.

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 4>Two trillion dollars, I mean actually smaller than some of

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 4>the biggest tech companies, but still we have run up

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 4>past one hundred thousand dollars, up another three and a

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 4>half percent today. Move on and have a look at

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 4>some of the individual movers within that Nasdaq one hundred

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 4>and some of the benchmarks. Now the biggest points dragged

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 4>to the downsize as Synopsis Integral to chip designed chip

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing basically to testing your designs and numbers came in

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 4>a little bit weak. We have seen dragged down for

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 4>the Electronic Design Automation Software Company today, first called a

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 4>forecasts weekend, then expected Intel off by three point four percent.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 4>Maybe some of that moon music around chips pulling it lower.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 4>There has been some interesting news in terms of its

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 4>board trying to shore it up, and the Microchip CEO

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 4>comes on. So does a former ASML chief executive too,

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 4>so two key experienced operators coming onto the Intel board

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 4>as they seek a new CEO.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Micro strategy actually just turning.

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 4>To the downside of by one point seven percent, having

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 4>been rising earlier. But we are going to dig deep

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.959
<v Speaker 4>on all things micro Strategy after what has been a

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 4>phenomenal run up in the stock. Why because it's basically

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 4>a bitcoin proxy. We can talk about that. We've both

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 4>us and Chen and Jen. I mean, MicroStrategy has been

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 4>beloved of the retail community, but actually some institutional players

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 4>have been getting in on Michael Saylor's bitcoin base.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 15>So I just published our story today about how micro

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 15>strategy has become the hottest trip right now with war Street.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 15>If you look hash file, managers stare buy in the

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 15>convertible bonds. That the other instrument because micro Strategy has

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 15>this plan about keep raising capitol right to fund is

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 15>bitcoined buying, and so they have already raised six billion

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 15>convertible bonds and for hatch funds, this is a perfect

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 15>instrument for them to play in market neutral arbitcharge bat

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 15>and this is a complex bet, but the essential part

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 15>of it is to bet on the volatility. So they're

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 15>writing on the volatility of the underlying of micro strategy.

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>As we see today, there's.

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 15>A big jump right like at the open MicroStrategy was

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 15>up like almost nine percent when bitcoin hits new record.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 15>So MicroStrategy move on that lots of price points, and

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 15>they just make the convertible arbitcharge trade much more appealing

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 15>to this headphone group.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 4>We were talking about how the retail frenzy has been

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 4>there and actually a lot of people playing leverage bets

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 4>on MicroStrategy getting into two x three x the ETF exposure.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 4>She grew quite a difficulty from a liquidity perspective in

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 4>the market.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Is there any talk about what.

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it this volatility or playing this volatility when you're

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 4>looking at institutional and retail.

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 15>Sure, yeah, I would say micro strategy is just no

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 15>short of volatility, right because it's a bitcoin proxy, so

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 15>you know the volatility rise on the bitcoin pricing, but

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 15>also the premium it's bitcoin holding because it's now training

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 15>on two hundred percent wars and it's the it's like

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 15>the value of bitcoin it holds, and you know those

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 15>things could also move around. And then you have the

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 15>retail that's buying the ETF leveraging ETF two times right

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 15>along two times shots. That's that, and then the institution

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 15>and I think in a way that the company, even

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 15>it's alf told that it's more volatizing any sm P

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 15>five hundred stock. So that's where you know the money

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 15>flow coming from, and people are just riding on the

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 15>volatility and a retail frenzy.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 4>According to Breenberg, fourteen percent about standing shares are currently shorted.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 4>But thus why that has been a painful trade. Thank

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 4>you so much, All things MicroStrategy. With the Jinschen, they're

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 4>another story. We're tracking Chinese hackers compromised eight American telecom

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>companies as part of a wide ranging espionage effort to

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 4>gather intelligence on prominent US citizens. That's according to Biden

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 4>administration officials. Here for the details, Bloomberg's Kelsey Griffiths and

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of absolutely shocking, lady that eight have been compromised

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 4>and we can't seem to get them out.

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 16>That's exactly right, Caroline. What we do know, and the

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 16>details are pretty scarce on the ground right now, is

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 16>that multiple US telecoms have been breached in this seemingly

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 16>very wide and broad campaign to burrow into our telecommunication

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 16>networks and glean really important and valuable details about public

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 16>officials and about life.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 3>In the US.

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 4>We also know there's worries about both incoming president and

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 4>vice president in terms of being compromised on their communications.

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Just talk to us about what the CEOs have been saying.

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 4>We understand that Ateen TCEO has been speaking with other

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 4>law makers who has.

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Come out and sort of talked about this publicly.

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 16>Though that's right, there haven't been a lot of companies

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 16>that have so far come out publicly and talked about this.

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 16>T Mobile last week became the first carrier to publicly

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 16>share details about what they had seen on their networks

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 16>and sort of some of the markers of that threat,

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 16>and they spoke with me about that exclusively. They also

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 16>put out a blog post last week that details some

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 16>of those threats. So I think that you know, what

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 16>we're seeing as a really sophisticated attempt and T Mobile

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 16>caught it early, but some of the other carriers, it seems,

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 16>weren't so lucky.

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Kelsey fascinating reporting and I think Senator Marco Rubio, who's eventually,

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 4>of course meant to be sexual mistate talking about how

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 4>this is a as it gets Kelsey Griffiths on all

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 4>things hacking coming up, does.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 3>The unicorn status need to be reevaluated?

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 4>And we're discussing that with Rebecca Line of co founder

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 4>and general partners of Canvas Ventures.

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 3>That's next This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 4>In the last year, more than fourteen hundred startups were

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 4>valued at more than one billion dollars, but actually only

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 4>fifteen percent claim profitability. That's how our next guess is

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 4>measuring well the fact that these numbers don't seem to

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 4>be a measure of real success anymore, unicon status, how

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 4>do we reevaluated? And one of the new markers for

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 4>that success, Rebecca Linn' pleas to say, co founder and

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 4>general partner of Canvas Ventures, we steal all your great statistics, Rebecca,

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 4>but their statistics are shocking, and I'm interested as to

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 4>what you think the new benchmark is and how many

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 4>of those fourteen hundred actually still vindicate a one billion

0:28:58.600 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 4>dollar valuation.

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 14>Yeah. I think the number I've heard is it would

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 14>take about twenty years for all of those unicorns to

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 14>actually make it to the public market, and only fifteen

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 14>percent are profitable. And on top of that, a lot

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 14>of them have been around, you know, for over twelve years,

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 14>so just way too long to really hit their stride

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 14>and hit profitability. I think with Jeni now, a lot

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 14>of the metrics we'd seen in the past aren't really

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 14>the metrics, you know, we're looking forward in the future

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 14>for success, you know, Unicorn status. I think people have

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 14>said that we need a new beast. I think that's

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 14>absolutely true, and they're you know, getting to that billion

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 14>dollar valuation is not realy not meaningful anymore. And then

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 14>on top of that, what we're seeing with GENAAI is

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 14>an incredible opportunity to generate revenue quickly. We're seeing this

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 14>in the statistics about how quickly companies can get to

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 14>a million dollars of revenue. It used to take companies

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 14>quite a lot longer. Right now with Jeni, the median

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 14>is like a less in months, right and we actually

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 14>saw a company the other day that got to a

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 14>million dollars of ARR in two weeks.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 3>But it's insoluable, Like is that something it's not? None, No,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so.

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 14>I think what's happened. I don't think it's sustainable. And

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 14>so what we really are looking for are companies that

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 14>have sort of a unique insight and very deep industry

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 14>knowledge in the area that they're going into. We think

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 14>that's more important than it ever was before. And I

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 14>think this, you know, ar the ar ramp we're seeing

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.479
<v Speaker 14>which so many vcs cold were hanging their hats on

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 14>for so long. Is really ephemeral. And so you know

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 14>what's happening is, you know, these big enterprise companies and

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 14>consumers too are signing up and they're paying money to really,

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 14>you know, really pilot you know the technology. And at

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 14>the same time we're seeing massive you know enterprise companies

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 14>like Salesforce, you know, highre fourteen hundred new salespeople to

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 14>capture that opportunity.

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>How many SOI agents Rebecca on not know Salesforce?

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 4>How many Asian AI companies are you being hit within

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 4>the moment?

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 14>Oh my gosh, dozens a day, dozens a day. And

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 14>I think those are features. Those are features of you know,

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 14>large enterprise companies in the future.

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 4>The feature is, so what is the reality? What companies

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 4>do you want to see being built? What problems are

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 4>you wanting to see being sold? That is unique right now?

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 14>I love that question, Thank you. Yeah, it's so exciting

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 14>right now to be an venture. There are so many

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 14>thesis out there that we have wanted to invest in

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 14>for a very long time, and there are companies that

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 14>tried to do it, but the technology just wasn't there yet.

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 14>I mean a prime example you know was of a

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 14>company that was impacted by Jenai was case Texts. Case

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 14>text was doing really well, they had ten thousand customers,

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 14>but they couldn't fulfill the last part of their promise,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 14>which was really to truly stand in the shoes of

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 14>a legal counsel. And when Jenai came along, they could

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 14>do that and that was a huge unlock and why

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 14>they were purchased very quickly by Thompson Reuters. Another one

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 14>that we've wanted to see for a very long time

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 14>is voice and I think that is the most exciting

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 14>thing about Jenai right now. And so when we were

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 14>in doc Simity for many years, I just thought, you know,

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 14>we should be taking the entire patient call volume, both

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 14>inbound and outbound, off the shoulders of the physician's office.

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 14>That should just happen. And the tech just wasn't there yet.

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 14>You know, we've been looking for this tech ever since,

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 14>you know, we led Siri many moons ago, right and

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 14>with Jennai, it suddenly is there. So we invested in

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 14>and a company pretty recently called Parakeet, with a founder

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 14>with super deep technical knowledge on the medical space, and

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 14>they're doing just that. They're taking the call volume the

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 14>inbound and outbound call volume off the shoulders of a

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 14>doctor's practice, and that to me is really really exciting.

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 4>We listen to you because of the amount of times

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 4>you're on to my dismissed the amount of times are

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 4>called one of the top of vcs, but also because

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 4>of the exits that you have seen a new call

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 4>out case text versus M and A. We're also seen

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 4>as you just mentioned, well Numena for example, which which

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 4>actually managed to do the public kind of route. How

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 4>are you anticipating some of your portfolio going public come

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 4>tent in twenty five.

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean I think there the window is starting

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 14>to open. There are so many companies that are that

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 14>are ready. I think the market's ready. I think with

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 14>the new administration, people are ready for the unlock. And

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 14>I do think I we'll see the public markets start

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 14>to open up. Maybe I'm too optimistic, I don't know,

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 14>but I do think that that's a very viable option

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 14>for people going forward. The other thing is I think

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 14>M and A. I mean, I actually prefer M and

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 14>A every single time because it's a much it's just

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 14>a much you know, more linear exit for founders often

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 14>and so I think founders should always keep both options

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 14>in mind. My most successful companies have had it very

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 14>exciting IPO path, but have also dual tracked with an

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 14>M and A path at the same time.

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 4>Rebecca Lynn, we thank you for pushing head to next

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 4>c co founder, general partner of Canvas Ventures.

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 3>We hope to see you in that new year.

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, let's talk about a company that's part of one

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 4>of the most valuable startups out there, Bike Dances.

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 3>TikTok.

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.280
<v Speaker 4>It's tripled its US shopping sales to over one hundred

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 4>million dollars. The social media platform says it's app drew

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 4>in one hundred and sixty five percent annual increase in

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 4>shoppers for the two days between Black Friday and Cyber Monday.

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 4>This comes as the app faces, of course, potential shutdown

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.919
<v Speaker 4>in January, as regulators fear its parent company, Bike Dance,

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 4>poses a national security threat. Let's dig into that TikTok

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 4>on TikTok and Dexandra Levigne is with us.

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 3>It could come tomorrow.

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we've been here all week thinking that we'll

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 4>get a ruling on whether or not the case can continue.

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 3>That US would ban TikTok come January nineteen.

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it is finally here. We are expecting a decision

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 13>probably out of Washington tomorrow morning. And it's a really

0:34:58.719 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 13>consequential moment.

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 3>It feels like it's been.

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 13>A very long time, but this is actually a hugely

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 13>consequential moment, probably the biggest deal for TikTok since Biden

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 13>actually signed the divestor band law back in April.

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 3>And part of the.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 13>Reason this is such a huge deal is because if

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 13>this comes to pass, this will be the first time

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 13>that a foreign owned social media app has ever been

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 13>banned in this country. And so and by the way,

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 13>it's not just a social media app. It is a

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 13>social media app used by half of the American population.

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 13>And there are more people on TikTok in America than

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 13>voted in our last selection.

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 4>The future administration. The head of it is on TikTok.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Many of us are on TikTok.

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 4>And I feel like the anxiety around whether it is

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 4>going to be banned has just dampened away as time's

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 4>gone on. But I mean, are we feeling that the

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 4>US Court is going to let this continue or could

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 4>they take it off the table?

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 13>You know, no one knows for certain. I think reading

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 13>the tea leaves. It seems likely that the court is

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 13>going to uphold this law that would potentially see TikTok

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 13>shut down next month. But that doesn't mean that that's

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 13>sort of the end of the line for TikTok. I

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 13>think that it's probably not going to disappear off of

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 13>our phones in January. In all likelihood, if TikTok loses tomorrow,

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 13>they are probably going to somehow appeal the decision, either

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.399
<v Speaker 13>asking the DC Circuit to take it up and hear

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 13>it again, or potentially taking it to the Supreme Court.

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 4>How has TikTok been just countering this little being behind

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 4>the scenes, because we haven't heard much publicly.

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think a huge, a huge piece of this

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.280
<v Speaker 13>is actually American investors, and it's also a hugely overlooked piece.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 13>I think that you know, American investors have so much

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 13>money tied up with ByteDance, which is TikTok's par and company.

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 13>They have collectively billions, and so it's not just a

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 13>decision tomorrow that will affect millions of people. It's also

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 13>a decision that will affect billions of dollars. And I

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 13>think one really big question I've had about What's been

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 13>going on behind the scenes is how will Trump's tie

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 13>to some of these investors. We know that there's at

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 13>least one big Republican mega donor, Jeffyass who Trump is

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 13>you know, has a good relationship with big question is

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 13>how are these American investors behind the scene is potentially

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 13>going to affect the outcome for the app's future here.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Soakoya, General Atlantic, Susquehanna International, you name a lot of them.

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 4>In a great piece today, Go and check out the

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Tech Daily with Alexandra Lumine and stay tuned for that decision.

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Open AI it's partnering with Defense Tech Company andrel on

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 4>anti drone Systems. Infari has inside track and this is

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 4>more of a push was seeing from open Ai to

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 4>be something that serves US defense, the government particularly.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 12>So the company has said that they want to prioritize

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 12>supporting the US government and its democratic allies in adopting AI,

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 12>and a big part of that is increasing their defense partnerships.

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 12>So they have also done a partnership with the US

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 12>Air Force Research Lab, They are working with Los Alamos,

0:37:56.360 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 12>and they've hired a former top Pentagon official to head

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 12>up their policy in that area, and also added the

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 12>former head of the NSA to their board recently, so

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 12>we're seeing a lot of movement in that direction.

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 4>How do employees feel about it, because it can sometimes

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 4>do controversial this kind of work.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, absolutely, you know, historically in the past, for example,

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 12>in twenty eighteen, when Google was starting to partner with

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 12>the Pentagon in what was called Project Maven, it was

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 12>hugely controversial. Employees protested the partnership ended up not working

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 12>out at that time. However, now we're seeing I would say,

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 12>less resistance from employees generally. Of course that could change,

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 12>but so far we haven't seen much pushback.

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 3>And it's not just open Ai opening eyes.

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 12>Competitor Anthropic recently did a big partnership with Palanteer and Amazon,

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 12>and Meta has also been doing some work in this area.

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 12>So I think this is a trend we're continuing to.

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 4>Secrow and very briefly, Like Sam Altman was at the

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Deal Book event yesterday talking about his optimism that you know,

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Musk is in agoby to vindictive when close to Donald Trump.

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that this could be in any way

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 4>an issue.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's really too soon to say.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 12>What is going to happen in terms of AI policy

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 12>and exactly how or if Elon will be involved. We know,

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 12>of course he's leading dog, but so far there's still

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 12>a lot that's being decided about who and how AI.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Policy is going to shake out. So I would say

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 3>it's too soon to say, sharenk if I brilliant to

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:28.359
<v Speaker 3>have you, thank you.

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, President link Trump, as we're just talking about, has

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 4>now nominated fintech billionaire and SpaceX astronaut Joed Eisigman to lead.

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 3>NASA for more but most Lauren Grush joins us.

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:42.479
<v Speaker 4>And look, he has been busy going up and doing

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 4>space walks with SpaceX and now he's going to be

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 4>leaving his CEO role.

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 17>Yes, absolutely.

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 18>I mean, if there's one thing that most people can

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 18>say about Jared is he's very passionate about space. He

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 18>really kind of bursts onto the scene in twenty twenty

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 18>one when he announced that he had booked the first

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 18>all civilian astronaut crew trip to space on SpaceX, and

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 18>ever since then he's only become more of more of.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 17>A central figure at SpaceX.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 18>So it's certainly a very interesting pick, and I think

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:17.720
<v Speaker 18>it's going to open up a lot of questions about,

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 18>you know, his relationship with SpaceX. I mean, you have

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 18>to understand NASA. NASA and SpaceX are very big partners,

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.879
<v Speaker 18>and SpaceX is maybe the biggest contractor that NASA has

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 18>right now. So it's definitely a very unique pick for

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 18>the agency that I don't think we've seen really before.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we're pricing Bill Nelson.

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 4>How are there ways in which they have protections in

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 4>place to not have these blurred lines as to someone

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 4>who ultimately doesn't work for SpaceX but has plowed an

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 4>awful lot of his personal fortune into riots using SpaceX.

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 3>And I'm sure has a personal relationship across the board.

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 18>Absolutely, I do believe there are some areas where he

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 18>might have to reaccuse himself. For instance, he has an

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 18>investment in SpaceX where he holds shares, It's possible he

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 18>might have to divest those If there are major decisions

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.399
<v Speaker 18>that are being made about future contracting, you know, it's

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 18>possible he might have to recuse himself from making those decisions.

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 17>A lot of the times NASA administrators don't get into

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 17>those nitty gritty details. But again it's it's a lot

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 17>of open questions.

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 18>I think a lot of people will be asking because

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 18>anytime NASA makes a decision on a major NASA contract,

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 18>you know, those can get quite contentious.

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 17>We saw that when they put out bids for their

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 17>human landing system.

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 18>SpaceX won that, but Blue Origin ended up suing NASA

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 18>and the federal government over that decision.

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 17>So those things, those decisions can get quite contentious.

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 18>And I think his selection will only add fuel to

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 18>those fires.

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 4>And there's pictures of Jaredisman doing that spacewalk quite a

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 4>few months ago. Interesting that stallin Coles is a customer,

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 4>all shift, full payments, so plenty of inte linking going on.

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 4>We thank you bringing us the latest Bloomberg's Law and

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 4>grush on the latest from Trump administration picks. That does

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 4>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You don't want

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:11.240
<v Speaker 4>to forget to check out the podcast.

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 3>You'll find it.

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 4>On the terminal as well as on Apple, on Spotify,

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 4>and on iHeart. From New York with stocks near record highs,

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 4>this is a Bloomberg Technology