WEBVTT - How Tech Has Made Government Obsolete | Martin Gurri

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>How technology makes the current form of government obsolete. Now,

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I just finished reading an amazing book called The Revolt

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:10.159
<v Speaker 1>of the Public, which goes back through history, which you

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>know I love, talking about how technology changes the way

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we communicate and act, and it goes to explain how

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>all the problems, well many of the problems that we

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>see today, specifically the problems with the loss of trust

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of institutions and the way that this top down control works,

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course the way that the economic model is

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>mimicking the complex system of information. I sat down with

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the author of the book for an awesome conversation. Martin

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Gurry joins me, and we are going to discuss the

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>book itself, what were the fourth and fifth wave of communication,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>How the parabolic increase and the rise of information is

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>making the current forms of government obsolete. We go through

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>recent history to look at revolutions that happened from twenty

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven forward, Occupy Wall Street, and so much more to

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>break this down so you can understand exactly what's going on.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>It'll give you a framework to figure out where we're

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>going and how you should be managing your life. And

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this is something that you should know specifically with the

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>restrict Act that's going into place right now, is ramping

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>up this war, this battle because government is not compatible

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with what's going on anyway. It was an awesome conversation

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>with Martin Gurry, with the author of this book. We

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>do spend a little bit of time kind of setting

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>up the book before we really dive into the revolutions.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So check out the time stamps down below if you

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>want to jump ahead, but I'd encourage you to listen

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to the whole thing with that. Let's jump right in,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, Martin, thanks so much for joining me today.

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to dig in and talk to you about

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>your book and learn so much. So thanks for joining me.

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>My pleasure. Mark.

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, I just read this book here, The Revolt

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Public, and you know I love books like this.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>It was a big, thick book. I had a lot

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of good information, a lot of stuff that I have

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>been seeing, a lot of stuff I have been saying.

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But man, you really dug in deep to it. I guess,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe just give us the quick thesis of the book

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>before we start digging into what it's about. From your words,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess yeah.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the origin of the book goes way back

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 2>when I was still in CIA, I was an analyst

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>of global media, and I and a number of people

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>with me noticed this just radical transformation of the information sphere.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Once that digital tsunami of information hit and we noticed

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 2>further were behind that, there was this political turbulence. Now

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 2>it seems very naive now, but we thought, we asked ourselves,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>what's the connection. Right, we have the Internet, which is

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 2>kind of like this fun communications thing, and you have

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 2>politics over here. Right. And now, of course we know

0:02:52.800 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the mutual influence is powerful, determinative, but at the time

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>none of us do that. So after I left government,

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I dedicated myself to research of that, and it became

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 2>clear to me that essentially the profound transformation in the

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>structure of information was changing completely the institutional environment in

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 2>which we had evolved from the twentieth century underward, institutions

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 2>that were all shaped by the twentieth century ideal of

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>top down. I talked, you listen, there's no talking back

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>from the public, and that a lot of the categories

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.839
<v Speaker 2>in politics, such as liberal and conservative and the right

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 2>and left, which go back one hundred and fifty to

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>two hundred years, really had lost a lot of meaning

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>and what I saw was that there was an eruption

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>leaping into the center stage as a political actor of

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the network public, people who had suddenly gained voice because

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>of their ability to link up to the digital platforms,

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>and that almost every political conflict in the world today,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 2>some exceptions in some countries, almost everyone really maps down

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 2>to the network public against the elites who run those

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 2>institutions that were shaped in the twentieth century, who initially

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 2>had no understanding what was happening. After certain events like

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Trump and Brexit, understood what was happening, but did not

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 2>like it and wanted it to stop happening. So almost

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 2>every conflict you have, and every eruption of change and

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>around the world, around the world, can be mapped to

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 2>this profound, profound through tectonic collision between the public and

0:04:59.320 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the elites.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess since the beginning of time, that's how it's been,

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the public verse, since the beginning of time, that's what

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been, right, the public versus the elites.

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 2>And how not at all, not at all, I think.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I think in the olden days, the public just kind

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 2>of knuckled its forehead and said yes, sir.

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But it was still the elites trying to figure out

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>how they could control the masses. Uh, there's a there's

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a part in the Bible in Exodus where Pharaoh looks

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>out over all the Israelites in Egypt and said, they

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>outnumber us. What will we do? And they said, here's

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>what we'll do. Let's work them so hard that they'll

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>never have a chance to uprise again. So, I mean

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>that was written thousands of thousands of years ago, so

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe always been a way that they try to

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of somehow manage the people.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Only insert the qualification that you can be an elite

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>in an institution that has legitimacy, and whether that you

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>should have it or not are that's a separate conversation.

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>But you have legitimacy, meaning you have authority, meaning that

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you what to do and you will

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>probably do it without me having to point a gunna,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>do you right? For example? And there are elites who

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>need to point a gunna or you're not going to

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 2>do it. And we're slowly coming to the point where

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>if the elites don't have a whole lot of compulsion,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 2>nobody's going to listen to them. Yeah, you can see

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 2>that you saw it with COVID for example.

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's definitely a topic we're going to dive into.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, you made that point very clear in

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>your book, kind of breaking down the trust in these institutions.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to that. But looking back

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>throughout history, we see that it's always some piece of

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>technological innovation that seems to kind of change the way

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that we communicate and organize. A point that I had

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot a lot about and you talked about

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 1>as well, was about five hundred years ago we had

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the Protestant Reformation that really seemed to have been driven

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>by a catalyst about seventy years previous, which was the

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>printing press, and sort of this dissemination of information that

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>then led to this I think you would call it

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>like this democratic access to information that changed so sort

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of like that times like a thousand or times a million.

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't even know. I actually think the printing

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 2>press was probably the most disruptive innovation in terms of

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>information change. I mean, it's still early days with the internet, right,

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 2>so we may get there and surpass that one, but no, no,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I think I think and it's instructive to go back

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>to that time because you know it. The results were brutal.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>The results, the consequences, the immediate consequences of the printing

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 2>press were brutal. If you went to the Thirty Years War,

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>which was kind of an offshoot of their Reformation, in which,

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:54.119
<v Speaker 2>for example, if you know, if you went to church

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>and the church next door had three different words than

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>what your hymnal did or creed had, you now had

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>those words in your book. You knew them there they were,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 2>they had So the other guy who didn't have those

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>words or who had different words, they had to die.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>The Thirty Years War was the bloodiest war in the

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>history of Europe. And if you had gone there and

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 2>asked those people what do you think of the printing press,

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>that would have said it's the most horrible invention ever,

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 2>take it back, destroy it. Well, today we know it

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 2>was probably the most liberating, not only because of the Reformation,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 2>but because of the scientific revolution. You could not have

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>had that with manuscripts. And then the French and American

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>revolutions that brought democracy to the world. Yeah.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And if we frame that up in context of

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of what the book is and how we want

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to kind of move forward, it was basically the state,

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the church and state. At the time, we're basically controlling

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the information, telling the people what the Bible said, but

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>they had no access to it. But once it was democratized,

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>once the people were able to get it and read

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it for themselves, they said, wait a minute, you've been

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>lying to us whole time. And now even though the

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Church labeled them heretics and heresy and killed them, if

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>they spoke out about it, it didn't matter. I mean,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>would that be a right way to frame true?

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the parallel is good in many different ways, right.

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean number one, yes, the church and you know,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>you get inquisitions, right, and I mean we are not

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>at the thirty years War level. We're not killing each other.

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 2>But there are the minor, not not real inquisitions. But

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>but I mean, you're not gonna get burned at the stake,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 2>but you might lose your job, you might get you know,

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 2>all the platformed called out by digital mobs. You your

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>reputation could be tord to shreds overnight by saying the

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 2>wrong words, right, So that's one thing. The other one

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 2>is that once you start that process though, of well,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I am breaking off from the Church and the next

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 2>thing that happens is some group inside you. Your group says, well,

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm breaking off from you, and another group says I'm

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 2>breaking up from that, and you get this kind of

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 2>process of specialization where at the end you arrive at

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 2>almost a chaos and you have to work out at

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>what point do you put a boundary around that and

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>try to make that thing work? Right. The Reformation basically

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>exhausted itself in the Thirty Years War and essentially resulted

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 2>in our system of nation states, the nation states in

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>both order that religious groups that sort of deserred the

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 2>way in my opinion.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you go back before that, it was the

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>religious groups that recreated the social order. Right, So we

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of had this decentralized kind of world, and the

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>churches kind of came into power by bringing order, right.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>They brought order through chivalry and acts of kindness, and

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>then they also rebuilt public infrastructure, which then kind of

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>created that centralization. Then the printing press tore that apart,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the nation and states kind of brought it

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>back together.

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, and there were different you know that the

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>nation state at a certain point, particularly when it got

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 2>to the industrial state and the industrial democratic states like

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the United States, say in the nineteenth century, then you

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>had to you have to somehow provide for the fact

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that you know, just printing books or having access to

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>a printing press, which only a few people could have,

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 2>was not really enough. So then mass media came into

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 2>being as a way of bringing, you know, bringing into

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the fold the tens of millions of citizens who had

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>essentially entered history. They had become educated, they had become

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 2>relatively affluent, they understood the world, but it had no

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 2>access to the current information. And so you had the

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 2>mass media movement that you know, I'm old enough, that

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>was the world I was born into.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the mass media where you had had a few

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>new sources to choose from it. We'll get to that now.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You talked about in the book. A couple of things

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>that you talked about the book was one was sort

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 1>of like this fourth wave and then fifth wave of information.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I do want to go back to just kind of

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing that you said, just kind of for everybody,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of reiterate this since I've read the book. You

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about in the book, and you have a chart

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate this, and maybe this was the catalyst for

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>you writing the book. That you said in two thousand

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and one, all of a sudden you realize that more

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>information was created in two thousand and one than all

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of humanity before, and then double that amount happened in

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two. And when you realize that, you

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>realize that everything was going to be different. So that's

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the key piece, and I think it's super powerful. Actually

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>just tweeted that out earlier today as I was preparing

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>for this. That's a massive movement, and I could only

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine it must be going parabolic for me, especially now.

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Exactly that's exactly right. And you have to add to

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 2>that that are institutions, and by that I mean not

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 2>just government, but political part but corporations, the media, the academia,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 2>all these essentially nine twentieth century institutions were developed with

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 2>a small trickle of information in mind, most of which

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>they control, and that the gigantic doubling upon doubling up

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 2>on doubling of information has just battered them away. The

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 2>institutions are in a state of absolute prostration because they

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 2>weren't set up for this. They were not set up

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 2>for the world that we live in today. They are

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>like the dinosaurs. So the media are coming down. They're

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>just maladapted. They were big in the twentieth century, they

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 2>are looking at going extinct in the twenty first. Wow.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So what was the fourth wave and then what's the

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>fifth wave?

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Right? Let me go quickly through them all so that

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing makes sense. The first wave first was

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>the invention of writing, which required sort of like a

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 2>priestly or each wave of information, each structure of information

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 2>accommodates or delivers a certain political and social system. So

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>you have the the invention of writing. You need a

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>mandarin or a priestly cast like in Egypt to do

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>this very elaborate system of writing with thousands of symbols.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 2>The alphabet is the second wave. You could not have

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 2>had the classic republics of say Rome and Athens without

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 2>an alphabet. The third one we just spoke about is

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the printing press. The most is eruptive ball in my opinion.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>The fourth was mass media. I also mentioned that. And

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>then the fifth is where we are today. You're right

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and one. Two thousand and one doubled

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>all previous information in history. Two thousand and two doubled

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and one, And I'm not sure that it's

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent doubling, but it has continued. Parabolic is

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 2>a good word.

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and yeah, so when you look at it

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>from that zoomed out frame, and then you realize that

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>technology changed the way that we communicate, which then change

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the way that we organize, and so then the state

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>also changes how it organizes and manages us. And so

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the points that you made in the book

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>was that really through the Industrial Age, it kind of

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>brought us from the farms into the cities and the factories,

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we started having this kind of mass movement

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of really Henry Ford kind of created this assembly line

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was a way to control the masses and

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of equalize the masses. And then you talked about

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>how then we needed sort of like a governance system

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and an information system on top of that to kind

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of manage that was that, right? Can you explain that?

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's pretty close. I mean, you're talking about the

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Industrial Age. Industrial age was the profit of the Industrial

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Age was this guy who's sort of been forgotten but

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>was very important as important still Ferrick Taylor, who believed

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>that he did all kinds of time and motion studies

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>and essentially treated workers like like pieces of equipment right

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 2>for for the sake of efficiency. So everything was delivered

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 2>by the brilliant engineer at the top gave all the

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 2>instructions where all the tools are going to be. The

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>workers had no say in anything. They just they just

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 2>basically moved. There could have been robots. That is the

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 2>model for the industrial age.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>The mass movements, particularly the totalitarian mass movements like like Marxism, Leninism,

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>like Nazism, like fascism, resembled that model very much. They

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>had the brilliant fewer at the top or or you know,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the polic bureau, and basically they decided everything all the

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>way down to as Gorbashoff used to say, women's women's stocking.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 2>How many women's stocking is you're going to manufacture in

0:16:58.480 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>a year?

0:16:59.000 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Uh? And that system can only function and democracy wasn't

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 2>quite that that brutal, but it was a version of that. Okay,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 2>there were two three four TV channels, there were two

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.959
<v Speaker 2>three four carmakers. You had very limited choices. You were

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>a mass consumer, and industry found it very comfortable to

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 2>say this mass product is exactly what you want. Right.

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>What the digital age has done just sweep all of

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that away and lay bare the fact that, no, it

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 2>turns out we're very divided. We want all kinds of things, right,

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>we want all kinds of things. The mass consumer of information.

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, I was born into that. It was

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>like looking into this gigantic mirror and we were all there.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 2>We were all the same picture, the public in the

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 2>digital age. It's just if that mirror has fallen and

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 2>shattered and we all live on different pieces. So it's

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 2>a very divided, very fragmented, very conflicted world.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I wonder for me growing up in

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the eighties and the nineties, the same way, we all

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>listened to the same songs, we all watched the same movies.

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, bands got really big and they could fill

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>out a stadium, And now today there's you know, a

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>million bands and they're just streaming on some station. Right.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's I mean, I guess it's just

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>natural progression. I don't know if it's a chicken or

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the egg. I think you kind of made the point

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of the book that, like, our choices were limited, so

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.719
<v Speaker 1>our tastes were limited. But as we've been given more

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>choices now, our tastes have grown. I guess that's just

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a natural evolution.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I actually think, I actually think we have now rediscovered

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:48.719
<v Speaker 2>our actual tastes. In other words, it was never the

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 2>case that we wanted three kinds of car. It was

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>never the case that we wanted three TV channels. That's

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 2>just what there was. And since we had no voice,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 2>the public had no voice, we just took it. I mean,

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 2>their alternative was you walked if you didn't like any

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 2>of them, or you turned off the TV if you

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 2>didn't like any show. Right, So it was all or nothing,

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 2>and most people just went along with it. But I

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>don't think it was any any moment where any anybody,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>any large number of people within the mass audience actually

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 2>believe that being part of a mass audience was what

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 2>they were meant to be.

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, you talked about I think you called it

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>rather Gate. Explain Rathergate for us.

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's see if I remember that one that was

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 2>essentially a report during the trying to remember what year

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 2>it was. It was two thousand elections, was it? When

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 2>essentially it was very critical of George W. Bush for

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 2>basically using his privilege to avoid going to just go

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>to the National Guard, leaving the guard early and all

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>kinds of what might be construed as abuse of power.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 2>And this is a TV broadcast of which Dan Rather,

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 2>who was the heir to Walter Cronkid, who was like

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the great figure of authority in the news world.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a that's a key piece. I mean,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>he was seen as this trusted authority, right totally.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Dan Rather stood behind this report saying all these things

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 2>about George W. Bush. And what happened was the bloggers

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 2>got a hold of that report and within literally hours,

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>somebody had put it online and showed that it was

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>in Times New Roman Fund. And this was supposed to

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 2>have happened way back in you know, I think in

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 2>the Vietnam War, and there was no New Times New

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Roman Fund in the Vietnam era. This is a digital fund,

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 2>all right. So it showed that this supposedly type written

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>document i'd actually been printed off a computer. The whole

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 2>thing was a hoax, all right. And then Rather sort

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 2>of lost his job over that one. Yeah, yeah, And

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 2>the credibility, of course of the anchorman never regained what

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 2>it was doing. What the krunkitees day.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing how fast that happens today, you know, I'm

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter way too much these days, and I'll see

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>someone post something that seems real, authentic, believable, and then

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll just read through the comments and just so quickly

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>people will just start to disprove it or argue it

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And it's amazing how fast that crowdsourced information

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can change. But so you can see it's very hard

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for an institution to put that trying to be a

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>trusted institution put that out there and being constantly fact

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>checked by the crowd in real time.

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, part part of the problem, I think is the mode.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 2>The rhetorical style of the twentieth century institution, authoritative institution

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 2>was we are run by experts, which is whatever field

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>you have, right, we know. So the problem with the

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>digital world is now we know that we don't know, okay,

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and these institutions are still telling us you know that.

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I sort of call it the Anthony Fauci syndrome. Right,

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is really what science tells you, But wait,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 2>two weeks ago, you told us the exact opposite. So

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 2>people get very confused, and trust in that rhetorical style

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 2>has evaporated. It's zero, right, and the elites that run

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 2>the institutions have not learned and do not want to

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 2>learn to speak in a more conditional way that have

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>not learned to say we think this is the way

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 2>things are, correct us if we're wrong, right, which is

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the way most of us speak, But that would that

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 2>goes against the green of that style of vehetoric.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing is that with access to that information,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, a doctor would used to have to

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>go through all this medical school to learn this stuff,

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and none of us had any access to that information,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>so then we would just have to trust that they

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>had read it. But today I could spend an hour

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or two online and probably learn more about a specific

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>something very specific related to my health than my average

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>practitioner would probably know. I might know more about it

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>than he will. And we haven't had that before.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, at least you think you know more.

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that that's necessarily the case. I'm saying.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, in some topics, like an average practitioner like

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>they didn't they haven't studied everything, right, And so you know,

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, if I have something concerning my own health,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I could spend a couple hours and probably learn more

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>about something very specific than that average practitioner might know,

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for example.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Essentially your doctor is going to encounter a much more educated,

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 2>much more opinionated, and much more prepared you. Right, So

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>whereas before we were just like as with television, as

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>with the cars, we were the passive recipients of information.

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm your doctor, I'm telling you to do this. Now

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 2>people say, well, wait a minute, I just read that.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 2>And this, by the way, cuts all across society, all

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>across society. Precedent, for example, used to have as what

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 2>used to call it his news paper was the CIA

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Daily Brief, Right, And CIA came and had we have

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 2>all these secrets, and we're going to tell you, mister president,

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 2>what's going on. We're going to tell you the future.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Because part of CI's thing is that if it tries

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 2>to foretell events. And it came the moment when the

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>President started saying, but wait, I just read something here,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and I just read something there, and you could just

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>see the authority of the CIA leaking out, leaking out

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to where it probably is very low. Right now, precedents

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>can go online just if you and me and they

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 2>they can question what their geopolitical doctors in CIA tell them.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 2>And CIA has never learned to deal with this.

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Hm. That's a great point, you know it It reminds me,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically what we have as an economic situation

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>really or it's an information problem. And you kind of

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>referenced the centralization of some with these previous you know,

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:07.719
<v Speaker 1>whether that be the Russian, the Russian or the or

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what happened in Hitler's Germany or you know what Mao's

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>greatly before he tried to do. And really the overall

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>problem with central planning is that they don't. Gorbachev doesn't

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>have enough information to figure out how many girls pantehos

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>need to be made. They don't have enough information. The

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>free market has the information. They don't have the information,

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and so that's why central planning of an economy can

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>never work. And sort of what you're I guess now,

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to think about as the CIA is a

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>central planner of information for the president or the night

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the news is the central planner of information for us.

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 2>But they can't. They can't.

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't have enough data, enough information to control that

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for the public, of what the public wants and needs

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at any given time.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 2>They are very different modes of conveying information, and I

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 2>think as much as anything. I think there's there's a

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 2>definitely structural problem here, and the structural problem is the

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 2>one that has to be tackled. But there's also a

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 2>rhetorical or a style model. I mean, who do you

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>get your information from?

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 2>That you trust? Right, It's usually some person and you

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and you trust that person because of personal characteristics. What's

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>happened with the internet is in my youth. Uh, that

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 2>was not the way it happened. It happened from authority.

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I am the institution, you know, And so there was

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 2>it was depersonalized, and it became you know, newspapers spoke

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 2>with a completely impersonal voice. Presidents stood behind great big

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>podiums and you know, basically looked down and and and

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 2>gave us truth. The professors did the same. The Internet

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 2>has re personalized information. So in other words, yeah, I

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 2>think there's still people out there who provide information and

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 2>are very good at it. And you can be somebody

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 2>like Barry Wise or or Matt Taibe on Substack for example,

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and the personality of the human doing writing just shines

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 2>through and you go, this is the person I can trust,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, So I in part the difficulty is that

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the people in authority don't want to do that, I

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 2>think in part because they have no personalities. These are

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 2>people who are exceedingly they're just climbers. They're just institutional climbers.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 2>And if they were to let their instant their personalities

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to shine, we would they would have nobody listened to them.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's uh, Matt Tybee, you know, or Barry

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>White you're talking about. It's almost like a meritocracy right

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to the people who are better writers and who do

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>more research and who present more of truth and facts

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>get risen up, and the people who are trying to

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>hide behind some bacade of fake authority, they quickly get

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>found out in discredit. It's sort of almost like the

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>industrial Revolution. So, as you were saying, like, the one

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>way I've looked at it is we had this assembly line,

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>right and as you said earlier, like they kind of

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>put everybody down into like a number and they can

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of control everybody. And if we were on the

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>assembly line, you know, I put my part on you

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>put your part on it, and you may be way

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>smarter than me, but we basically do the same work.

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's obviously economic reasons and geopolitical reasons

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>why the US middle class has been haulowed out. But

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a big piece of it is that we went from

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the mass you know, mass assembly lines into the information age,

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and in the information age, if you're smarter than me,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>you really start to rise up faster, and now I

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>start falling behind. And so kind of back to this meritocracy.

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The Matt Taibe's they can rise up, while the Dan

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>rathers they just start falling behind. Like CNN, they can't

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>just live on those laurels of being trusted anymore.

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hesitate there. We call it buddy smarter or

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 2>less smart, and that being a reason for success. I

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>think what Taibi does and what Barry Wise does and

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>several others that I follow, is they put their product

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 2>out there on substack. Right. That is a very talk

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>about in the marketplace. That is there is no advertising

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 2>right so that you can't be kept afloat. There's no subsidy.

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>The government doesn't give you money, foundations don't give you money.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 2>You're out there by yourself, and then you either have

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 2>readers or you don't. Now substack it was a relatively

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 2>small number of readers fifteen twenty thousands by Internet standards

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 2>is nothing. It's going to make you a wealthy man.

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 2>So you are now being given by your readers the

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>freedom to be an independent writer. So if you don't,

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 2>if you don't attract that, then then basically you may

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 2>be smart, but you lost the race.

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and what we have now going on, I don't

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>want to go dive down those rabbit hoax. I want

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to jump into revolutions and the follow USSR and stuff

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. But just real quickly, we're at a point

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>now with technology and where we're at at the friends

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>right now of really going to a model with substack

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>type models of what we call value for value. So

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if I as a subscriber like Mytt Taibi, I can

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pay him directly. He doesn't need sponsors because the sponsors

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>can still co opt them and they could still kind

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of force his direction. But now we the people can

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>pay directly to the creator and get that value for value,

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>which is then really starting to drive that even faster.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump into. So you spent a lot

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of the book talking about these revolutions that happened mostly

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>around twenty eleven and kind of kind of around the

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Arab spring I think Era and you drew a lot

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of connections that happened, you know, Tunisia and Egypt and Syria,

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and you drew a lot of connections there, mainly about

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>how really one person with an Internet connection and a

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook group or something like that could really start to

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>mobilize the masses and kind of get this uprising. I

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>want to dig into some of the relationships between those

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and then some things that I thought about as I

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>was listening to that. But before, do you kind of

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>spend some time trying to separate the distinctions between what

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you call the public and the people and the masses?

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, right? So the public guy that I didn't come

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 2>up with my definition for the public, I borrowed Walter Lippmann's.

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Lipmann is one of the great political writers of the

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century, and he basically he was he thought that

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the public ought to have, should be synonymous as a citizen,

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and should have a tremendous engagement in democracy and so

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 2>forth in our government. And he was very disappointed in

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 2>all his researches and the fact that no, the public

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>just seemed to be the people who are pursuing a

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 2>specific affair, I think is what he called it. Uh

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>And use their you know, their their voice, their voice

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 2>under influence to support on that side of that affair,

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 2>of their side of their affair. So you know, if

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 2>you are an anti Hosni Mubarak person, young person in

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Egypt in the year twenty eleven, your affair is to

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 2>get rid of Obarak, right, And so the people in

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Tyree were square. That we saw with all that drama

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 2>were the public in Egypt that had gathered there because

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 2>they had all met each other online. And there were

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 2>several groups that did that. I highlighted one in my

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 2>book that continued. That continued not just twenty eleven, it

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 2>was pretty much through twenty nineteen, twenty nineteen. In fact,

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 2>it was probably the most turbulent year for those who

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 2>of There were like at least twenty five major street

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 2>revolts in twenty nineteen. It all kind of came to

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 2>a screeching halt in twenty twenty. Mysterious.

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, magically there was. There was ten countries with over

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>one million people each in protesting previous to the twenty

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty silence.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And I mean the interesting thing about it,

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you've got to touched on economics. This included rich countries.

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 2>They included poor countries, you know, very rich countries, very

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 2>poor countries. They included very healthy democracies and pretty terrible dictatorships.

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 2>So the revolt of the public it doesn't seem to

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 2>be completely or even maybe primarily about economics or about democracy.

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 2>There seems to be something else that people are after.

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And what is that.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a good question. If you had if you

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>had the answer to that, you know, you could probably

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 2>make a lot of money.

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I have the answer. Okay, maybe I can

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>make Maybe I can make a lot of money with it. Well,

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think. I think Ultimately, people want to

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to pursue their own life, right, pursue their

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>own life. And the problem is that my definition of

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>utopia isn't the same as your definition of utopia, and

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so I need to be free to pursue my direction,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>my life, my version of utopia, and you should be

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>free to pursue yours as well. The problem is when

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we have these authoritarian figures who want to In the

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>United States, three hundred and thirty million people have to

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>live under one single regime and let's just way too

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>many people. We can't live under that regime, and so

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you hinted in your book about you know,

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>smaller regions.

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, yeah. I think the tendency of the twentieth century,

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 2>which is still the tendency of our institutions because they

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 2>live mentally in the twentieth century, is to centralize and

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 2>standardize everything. Right, as you say, I think we have

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>reached the point in that experiment where we can say

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 2>it's failed. We can't do that, not at this level.

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Not yeah, right, if you're even Switzerland, I me, Switzerland's

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 2>like ten million, twelve billion people, and they live on

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 2>their valleys. They don't live in Switzerland's is the federal

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 2>government of Switzerland, My goodness, it has almost no power.

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 2>So yes, the US is on a different scale, but

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 2>most any scale quickly registers up to the point where

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 2>you cannot centralize it to that degree.

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I have another theory too. I'm going to come back

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to that though, because I want to go back to

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>these revolutions. So you kind of talked about these different

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>revolutions that happen around twenty eleven, and to your point, yes,

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they're continuing, et cetera. And you talked about I want

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to kind of go back to that though. The public

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is all the people, but they identify with different causes

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that don't always interrelate. So I care about what's going

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on with surfer with surfing and motorcycle riding and health food,

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but not always at the same time. And other people

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that are interested in health food don't necessarily care about

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the motorcycle right in the surfey right, So we're we

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.919
<v Speaker 1>all have these different interests that don't necessarily overlap. That's

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the public or that the people.

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 2>There is the people, it doesn't exist, Okay.

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's just the public, and then what's the masses?

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>The public are the people are part of the masses.

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 1>That then the public.

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 2>The public is not the people, although every protest you

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 2>will ever see it claims to represent the people, but

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 2>the people the people essentially is a category of political

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 2>philosophy that there's no such thing as the people. The

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 2>masses was just a twentieth century sociological term. It was useful,

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 2>then it's not so useful anymore. It doesn't really get

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 2>to use.

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So maybe the masses and the people are kind of

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the same.

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>It's just just.

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>A group of people that don't really identify themselves, whereas

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the public are a group from within the public or

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the are people over the masses that step up to

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>identify themselves with a movement.

0:36:55.840 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 2>The public is born from friction. Okay, if if the

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 2>elites are legitimate and the public is content, and the

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 2>people within who are not elites, non elites, are content,

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 2>there will be no public. At some point, something done

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 2>by the elites or some circumstance of life rubbs enough

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 2>people the wrong way that they break off from the

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 2>elites and say, I don't like the way things are headed.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 2>And that's how the public is born. In the old days,

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 2>they would have had, you know, radical parties that are

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 2>organize them or whatever. Today they go online and they

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 2>organize that way.

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So we have these revolutions that were happening, and not

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just over in the Middle East. Obviously we most of

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it in the Middle East that you talked about, but

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>then you even talked about Occupy Wall Street happened in

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States and it wasn't near as big of

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>a movement. But one thing that you had drawn some

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>ties between these groups was that they weren't like a

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>poor class. They were typically kind of more of a

0:37:56.040 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>middle class, educated class of people that that that seemed

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to kind of how how how they were You also

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of drew some conclusions that maybe they weren't organized

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>or agitated or placed there by the left. You talked

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>about the left versus the right, and you said that

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe the left wasn't the ones that had put them

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>up to they seem to have kind of moved more

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>organically something like that.

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Is that right? Yeah, I mean the reaction of the

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 2>opposite side. But first of all, these groups are not

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 2>left or right. They have lefties flavor, and for example,

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the Indignalois and Spain were sort of like leftish and

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 2>when they finally after years organized a minor particle, but

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 2>then it was definitely a left party, and some like

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 2>for example the Yellow vest in France have kind of

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 2>like a rightish flavor. Okay, but the politicians from those

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 2>sides have tried tried to draw them in on their

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 2>side and they rejected them. They're really anti establishment, anti

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 2>status cool. They want a radical change. The problem is

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 2>they have no leaders, they have no organizational structures, they

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 2>have no programs, no idea. Yeah yeah, yeah, so they

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 2>are against but they are not necessarily they can't articulate

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 2>what they are for.

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>They'refore there. It's not what they're for, it's what they're against.

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>How would you define the left versus the right in

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that context.

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good question. I would just almost genealogically

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 2>right people who claim to be that and descend from

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 2>from left. For example, both the Indignado's and and the

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Occupiers had a very strong anarchistic element. Right, so the

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 2>anarchists are real good organizing these street protests and and

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 2>their system. See all these are our model after like

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 2>online discussion groups, and the anarchistic model of discussion fits

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 2>that very well, the model where everybody's allowed to talk

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.479
<v Speaker 2>and there's no votes, no decision making process or anything

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>like that. So that you know, basically those those movements

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 2>had a slightly leftish flavor because they were slightly leftish,

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, the genealogically leftish people in them. But the

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 2>vast you could put i mean, not Occupy Wall Street.

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 2>That was a slightly different group because they never generated

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 2>large numbers, but the indignology could put a million people

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 2>on the street. And there aren't that many anarchists in

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 2>all Spain, right, So and they got opinion polls showed large,

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>large majorities approving of them, even though they stood for

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 2>nothing everybody wanted against.

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Would you say that left tends to want to have

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>more government control and right wants to have less government control.

0:40:56.239 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's true here. I guess generically, I see

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 2>what is? What is? Uh? What's Emmanuel macronan France? For example?

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Emmanel Macron was sort of born in the Socialist Party,

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 2>but he was a he was with the Rothschild Bank. Okay,

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 2>that's not your idea of what a socialist should be doing.

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 2>And then he broke away from the social he created

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 2>his own party. What was that party? Was it left?

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Was it right? Well? He is turned out to be

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a very undemocratic president. He basically just ram this this

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 2>law without getting a vote of the National Assembly in France.

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 2>But is he right? Is he left? He definitely wants

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 2>more government power. I don't know. I do not know.

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the problem, you know. You know they say

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fascism is right and socialism is left, but to me,

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>they're both authoritarian governments. So uh, it's hard. It's hard

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to draw a line. I recently wrote a book, shameless plug.

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I wrote it last last August. Nowhere near like your book.

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's titled The Uncommunist manifesto.

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, I've heard of with it.

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So the uncommiss Manifesto, and in it I have

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a diagram. It's it's too small to show you, but

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I drew a diagram here in the book. And basically

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what this did, it's what we framed as the real spectrum.

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:27.399
<v Speaker 1>And over on the right hand side we show politics,

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and we have you know, communism being on the left

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and fascism being on the right, but all of it

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>is on the politics side. And then over here, all

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the way over here is where we have individualism. So

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>fascism is right, socialism is left, whatever right, they're both

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian governments trying to tell us what to do and

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>tell somebody paneo as we could have. I don't know

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>what the differences of the flavors are. But anyway, so

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>going back to this, so the one thing that I

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>was thinking is I was listening to frame up all

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of these is you had talked about how really this

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 1>top down central planning fell, It really collapsed with the

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>fall of the USSR. So you kind of made that case. Now,

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, in my book the COMMSS Manifesto, we talk

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 1>about how Marxism, communism really never kind of went away.

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>It's still kind of here, kind of almost went underground.

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And so what I was kind of hearing as you

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>were talking about all these different movements that were going on,

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>it was all very anti capitalist, very anti capitalist, and

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:32.760
<v Speaker 1>pro welfare. That's what it seemed to be what people

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>wanted the well okay, actually, so it seemed like the

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>main problem that they were all facing. And when I've

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 1>studied the study some of these, it seems like when

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>people can't eat, that's when they go revolt. And so

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they were all sparked by the rise of in christ

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>increase of living standards. That girl that you talked about,

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I forget where, you know, she blogged about she couldn't

0:43:56.320 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>afford her apartment anymore in Israel, right, real, she couldn't

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>afford apartment anymore. So really it was the rise of

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>prices you talked about all in Spain and Catalonia. What happened.

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.879
<v Speaker 1>It was the increase in living costs drove people past

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the point, past the brink, and then they seem to

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>demand the government fixed that, fixed that by taking away

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>capitalism which they think had caused that divide, and to

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>give more welfare to help bridge that gap. Do you

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's a fair assumption.

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I think in some cases, yeah, I think I think

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 2>that what the term was that that young woman whose

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 2>name escapes me right now used was Swinish capitalism, which,

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 2>of course, if you were in Israel, is rarely you know,

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 2>anything associated with pork isn't a good thing. So and

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the Wall Street occupiers, who are very anti capitalistic, I

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 2>think they're all anti system. They're all anti system.

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>But they they wanted more welfare.

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, you can't even say that because there was there

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 2>was no theay in terms of any programmatic demands. They

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 2>had their never programmatic demands. They want the government to

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 2>make life meaningful, they want the government to make it

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 2>life interesting. They all had certain, uh more or less

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 2>reasonable and reasonable economic demands, but they also had social demands.

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 2>We in the US go for racial demands and you know,

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>gender demands. So it is a sense in each one

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 2>of these groups that the world is out of order,

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's out of kilter, and and the people

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.879
<v Speaker 2>in charge, the elites, are responsible for that. And then

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 2>they turned to the same elites and you're right about

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 2>that and say fix it. They had just accused them

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 2>of destroying basically the meaning of life or whatever. And

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 2>they have turned to the same people who have done

0:45:56.960 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 2>that and they say, fix it.

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, but do you think the main catalyst

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>was that? Back to kind of what I said, this

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>cost of living, this quality of life was going down.

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So to the girl in Israel, right, she couldn't afford

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>her apartment anymore, They couldn't afford food.

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 2>She was. I don't agree with that all. I think

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 2>she came from a wealthy Ashiknaz family.

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>She had turned her back, but she had turned her back.

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 2>On that, right she No, no, she had not. Israeli

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 2>families are powerful. She was basically, I mean, everybody in

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>life sometimes has to, you know, adjust to economic realities.

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 2>She did not want to do that. She wanted the

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:37.799
<v Speaker 2>government to give her an apartment where she did not

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:42.800
<v Speaker 2>have to commute. And basically, this enormous protest, the largest

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 2>ever in the history of Israel till these recent ones

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 2>that we're having right now, arose from this one young

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 2>woman not being able to afford her apartment.

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So, but that's my point. She came from the cost

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of living or the quality life. She couldn't afford apartment.

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>She wanted the government to give her a better apartment, right.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 2>She wanted the govern to do something such that there

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:08.800
<v Speaker 2>would be you know, she could stay in a place

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 2>where where she was close to her work. Yeah, but

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean in the motivation varied. In Spain, of course,

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 2>there had been a tremendous decline in the standard of

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 2>living after two thousand and eight. But in the US,

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the occupiers were just anti.

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 1>It happened after the two thousand and eight great financial cracks.

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Well no, it was twenty eleven, so it was like

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 2>three years later, all right, So it was an that

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>would be.

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Called Arab spring was because massive inflation happened and they

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>couldn't afford bread anymore.

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's that they were way more affluent in

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Egypt than they had been ever in their history. So

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 2>that's not true either. And you know, a country like Chile,

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 2>which has probably the most drastic of the revolts, because

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 2>basically the street protesters ended up running the presidency and

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 2>writing the constitution. Chile was a massively prosperous, prosperous the

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 2>most prosperous, like in the American country, unbroken prosperity.

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, yeah, I'm just trying anyway, and so

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 1>then it seemed like, like I said, it seemed like

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they all were demanding the government give them this. So

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like, on one hand they wanted to dismantle the government,

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to your point, but on the other hand they wanted

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the government to fix it. And so it seemed like

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a socialist ties and so I was just

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 1>curious if that's it seems like a lot of Marxism

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to me, right. Karl Marx himself talked about how he

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>was so mad because he wanted to write philosophy, but

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the market didn't didn't value that, and he couldn't make

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 1>any money, so he wanted to take from the rich.

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So he could, you know, each according to his ability,

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>each court in their need, he could just write his

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>philosophy get paid. And so it seems a lot of

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 1>this kind of Marxist socialist kind of thinking that has

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>spurred a lot of this.

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Well he got angles to basically write his meal tickets.

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly exactly. So on one hand, it's like seemed

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like the USSR collapsed, But then maybe the idea is

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the ideologies of Marxism still kind of seemed to do

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that seemed to kind of still stoke that and ultimately

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>it seems like you know, I guess we could say categorically,

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:17.840
<v Speaker 1>when people aren't happy with their own lives, and typically

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>when people can't afford to live the quality of life

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they went and ultimately can't afford to feed their families,

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that's when they really get crazy. This kind of goes

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>back to this economic model. I'm curious. So you wrote

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot about, you know, what was going on in

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>those days, obviously in our phone or conversation right now. Now,

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you wrote the book in twenty sixteen, is that right?

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 2>The first edition was twenty fourteen. The second edition, which

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 2>has a pretty large update, was not like December of

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:52.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen.

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, because trust has seeming to be an eroding even faster,

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at a faster pace than we might have even imagined.

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm curious kind of what your take is.

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, shoot, just in the last two years you

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>already kind of mentioned the COVID complex and Fauci, what

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen happening with the Canadian truckers. You know all

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of this, and now today you know the DeVos group

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:23.240
<v Speaker 1>met in February. The number one topic of Davos is missing.

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>How do we handle misinformation and disinformation malinformation in the

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>United States, it's a threat to our democracy misinformation. But

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, we can't. Every day find out

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>more lies the government's telling to us, and so it's

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 1>like they are telling us they have to combat misinformation,

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 1>but every day we find out they're the purveyors of misinformation.

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious how this is sort of escalated in

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:48.359
<v Speaker 1>your thinking since you've updated the book.

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean that aspect doing to find really fascinating

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 2>because what I love is dealing with information and how

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 2>it intersects with politics and power. Right, So they're actually

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:07.280
<v Speaker 2>working on an article on that subject. Essentially, the elites

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:11.520
<v Speaker 2>want to return to a twentieth century, their reactionary twentieth

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 2>century was a really good time.

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>To be put the genie back in the bottle.

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you could be John F. Kennedy and you know,

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:22.399
<v Speaker 2>have all these run ins with women, and they protected you.

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 2>You were protected. Today of course everybody is out there.

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 2>You know, the emperor is naked, and then nobody likes that.

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 2>So so they have tried, in the most interesting way

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and not good, to control the source of all this,

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:44.879
<v Speaker 2>which is the digital domain, and really and truly over

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the last of since twenty sixteen, since since Trump got elected,

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:55.319
<v Speaker 2>there has been this coalescing of government agencies NGOs, you know,

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:59.879
<v Speaker 2>non governmental organizations, the media, the traditional media all kind

0:51:59.880 --> 0:52:04.600
<v Speaker 2>of huddled together, uh, to influence. And I think in

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the end, censor that's not a word I use lightly.

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I only use it in terms of when the government

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 2>is involved, right, Uh, censor social media from using uh,

0:52:16.360 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, basically broadcasting opinions that that they disapprove of.

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 2>And I mean that's happening right now. And of course,

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:27.120
<v Speaker 2>like the Twitter files, which you know was born when

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 2>uh Elon Musk bought Twitter and then turned uh basically

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:36.399
<v Speaker 2>a lot of internal documents to Matt Taibi, Michael Schellenberger,

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 2>and Barry Weiss, and they looked at what was going on,

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and they saw that the FBI was essentially the Biden

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 2>White House was telling Twitter, get that expel, that that

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 2>account expelled that American citizen from speaking on on Twitter,

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:53.760
<v Speaker 2>and Twitters saluted and said.

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, yeah, And it's happening more and more and more,

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and now they're uh, you know, they're trying, they're trying

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.320
<v Speaker 1>everything it can. You talked about this conundrum that I

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 1>thought was pretty interesting where you said, you know, governments

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>would like to restrict speech and communication, but the problem

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is will stifle growth. So they want to have the

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>communication and allow speech, but then they risk their power.

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now, if they stifle growth, they're going to risk

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>their power too. So it's like they're kind of caught

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in this conundrum where like, really there's no win there.

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if they stifle growth, they're going to get overthrown,

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't stifle growth, they're going to get overthrown.

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You had said early in the book that you I

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think you made the statement, correct me if I'm getting

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it wrong, but that the current form of government today

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:43.799
<v Speaker 1>isn't compatible with this kind of technology that we have.

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's not just technology, it's a structure of information. Right,

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 2>So are we are set up for a world with

0:53:56.640 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 2>very thin streams of information that feed into each institution

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 2>like the media for example, and and and it becomes

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a sert of as semi monopoly that then because there's

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:12.320
<v Speaker 2>so little this which is so scarce. When Walter Cronkite

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 2>did go on television and say that's the way it

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:20.359
<v Speaker 2>was for you know, whatever date, we had no way

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 2>of knowing anything. So if he gave us some information,

0:54:22.520 --> 0:54:26.720
<v Speaker 2>we were happy he had authority. Right today that that

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 2>that whole system has been has been battered down and essentially,

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I I mean, it's the battle has been joined. So

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't make predictions, but I find it hard to

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 2>believe that you can put the Internet genie back in

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the bottle. It's too big. The Internet is essentially for

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 2>any individual purpose, infinite right, and government is not very capable. So,

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even governments that specialized in repression aren't very

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 2>good at it. So our government, thank goodness, has not

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 2>specialized in that yet. Uh, it's terrible at it. So

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:15.839
<v Speaker 2>the idea that it can somehow deal with with the

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 2>information world from a twentieth century perspective, it cannot. So,

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are many ways in which we can change.

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 2>These government structures can change. And you know, I'll tell it.

0:55:27.600 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you one, I mean one. The trust in

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:35.880
<v Speaker 2>our government organizations is collapsed right now. A lot of

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 2>corporations the trust is collapsed. If you look at one

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 2>corporation in which it hasn't collapsed is Amazon. Amazon, for

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 2>all its you know, problems or questions, what you have

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 2>gets from customers a gigantic amount of trust. It makes sense.

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, who of us did not use Amazon during

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic? And what do you do when you do that?

0:55:56.719 --> 0:56:01.320
<v Speaker 2>You put your credit card online. That's not massive active trust.

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 2>And you expect something to show up on your doorstep

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:06.799
<v Speaker 2>a day later. That's another massive active trust, and you

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 2>expect the thing to be of high quality a third

0:56:09.440 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 2>massive active trust. Now Amazon is a gigantic bureaucracy, but

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 2>that's not what you experience. You experience quick service with

0:56:19.120 --> 0:56:25.320
<v Speaker 2>good products. The federal government is the most gigantic deliverer

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 2>of services probably in the world, but that's not what

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:33.920
<v Speaker 2>you experience. What you experience is bureaucracy, condescension, arrogance. You

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:36.920
<v Speaker 2>know this this form that form, Who are you come

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 2>back tomorrow? It's gonna take years. It's gonna take So

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 2>if you want to change the federal government in the

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 2>set services side, make it more like Amazon and a

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 2>lot less like the Great Pyramid of Giza.

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:57.840
<v Speaker 1>While I'm certainly in agreement, and I sometimes hang some

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of my guests, some of my solace in the shearing

0:57:00.880 --> 0:57:04.440
<v Speaker 1>competence of the government, to your point, they've look what happened.

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:07.080
<v Speaker 1>They tried to launch the Obamacare website, or they tried

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to overhaul the IRS website or whatever. But you know,

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the more control they lose, the more

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to try to squeeze. You know,

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're following along with the latest technology.

0:57:22.520 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big bitcoin advocate. And we have these decentralized

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 1>networks now that are outside of the hands of the government,

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and so, you know, not a brand new one, but

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:35.439
<v Speaker 1>like Napster I think you maybe reference in your book,

0:57:35.480 --> 0:57:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But then we had like BitTorrent, and we could download

0:57:38.440 --> 0:57:40.640
<v Speaker 1>music and movies on the web and there's just nothing

0:57:40.680 --> 0:57:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they can just do about it. And so we have

0:57:42.520 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 1>these decentralized networks.

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:57:43.760 --> 0:57:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we have Bitcoin and that's outside the hands of

0:57:46.520 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the government. They can't stop that. And now there's another one.

0:57:49.040 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It's called Noster and it's a decentralized communication platform where

0:57:53.960 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you can build decentralized Telegram or Twitter or YouTube clients

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on it. And this is just it's outside of their control.

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So in the past to your point where you know

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter file is exposed that they were telling Twitter what

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to do, these are now new networks that that can't

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they can't impose their will on I don't know if

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you've if you've seen the rise of that, or if

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you have any prediction of how that changes things.

0:58:16.480 --> 0:58:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I mean I won't make predictions because I don't.

0:58:20.080 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 2>But that's part of what I'm talking about. The the

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the digital realm is too big and too elusive. It

0:58:31.320 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 2>escapes like water. You can't grab it, you know. I

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:38.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether those those particular technologies and modes of

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:43.400
<v Speaker 2>communication will be the ones that permanently escape government control.

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:45.920
<v Speaker 2>They may just be at the moment in time, we

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 2>are at the very very early stages of this cosmic

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:53.520
<v Speaker 2>transformation from the industrial age to something that doesn't even

0:58:53.560 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 2>have a name yet, right, And these may just be

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 2>moments in that, or it may be that, yes, indeed,

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, crypto and bitcoin and so forth, uh turned

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 2>out to be a decisive change. I mean, if you have,

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 2>if you have a way of essentially printing currency that

0:59:12.680 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the government has no control over it, you have radically

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 2>changed the foundations of the nation state.

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, one thing I would say, and we don't need

0:59:19.960 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to spend a lot of time on this, but just

0:59:21.400 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 1>like to the point of your book, you talk about

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>how what we considered information pre Internet era was you know,

0:59:28.080 --> 0:59:31.400
<v Speaker 1>cronkite or rather either one you know, giving us the

0:59:31.440 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 1>nightly news and three newspapers that were written by the

0:59:34.120 --> 0:59:37.920
<v Speaker 1>same person. That was information, whereas today what we consider

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 1>information has completely changed. And so a kid you know

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in Asia posts a picture on the beach, and I

0:59:42.800 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have this information about the weather, the waves, all this information.

0:59:46.920 --> 0:59:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is a way that we can transfer value. What

0:59:50.360 --> 0:59:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we would consider money would be like our we store

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:56.320
<v Speaker 1>our value on that, we can communicate value. But I

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>think the definition of that has been expanded, and so

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that'd be interesting to watch. But what's interesting is so

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I recorded a video earlier today from my YouTube channel

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about this new bill that has been put forth.

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Bipartisan Democrats and Republicans are going for this, the Restrict Act.

1:00:17.960 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard about this Restrict Act? So basically it's

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>called the Restrict Act, and it's basically to make TikTok illegal.

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So they want to make TikTok illegal. But if you

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>dig into what the act is, just like all of these,

1:00:31.280 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, save the Puppy Act, it's not what they

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>appear on the outside. This is the this is the

1:00:37.760 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Patriot Act. Times a thousand times a million. And basically

1:00:42.400 --> 1:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll just read you a couple of things from this.

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Inside this Restrict Act, it allows the Director of National

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence and Secretary of Commerce, so two people we didn't

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>vote in the authority to universally designate new foreign adversaries

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>without notifying Congress, without a fifteen day window to notify

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the president, and it would require a joint resolution of

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Congress to overturn it.

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:07.920
<v Speaker 2>I have not heard.

1:01:08.000 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Now you might know from the Patriot Act that foreign

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>individuals can now also be US citizens that are deemed

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a national security threat. Once designated, the bill grant's authority

1:01:18.280 --> 1:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to enforce any action deemed necessary to mitigate the threat,

1:01:21.520 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>with no due process and few limits on punishment. The

1:01:26.080 --> 1:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Restrict Act will allow the government to access all of

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the data on your video devices if it has more

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>than one million people using it iPhones, ring cameras, etc.

1:01:38.560 --> 1:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So now they can access all of that information. What

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of punishments? A million dollar fine, twenty years in prison,

1:01:46.600 --> 1:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and the forfeiture of everything you own. You use a

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:53.479
<v Speaker 1>VPN to get around this boom, you go to jail,

1:01:53.600 --> 1:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, you lose everything. This act also grants unlimited

1:01:57.960 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>hiring position to to power to positions of enforcement, unlimited funds,

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and little to no review of immunity with no Foyer requests.

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Well that's why I like these conversations. You have taught

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 2>me something I had not heard of that.

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is bad. It is like really bad.

1:02:17.600 --> 1:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is if you can't beat them, might as

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>well just cut the internet lines like they tried in Egypt.

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's kind of what this is saying, because

1:02:25.280 --> 1:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they see these decentralized protocols that are

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>popping up and they know they can't control them. So

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>then we just have unlimited access to everything, and if

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we catch you even looking like you're going to use

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it with a VPN, we're going to put you in

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>prison for twenty years with no due process.

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I can't imagine that's going to pass.

1:02:44.240 --> 1:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It's got bipartisan support by big names including uh, I mean,

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll read you, I'll read you a couple here. It's

1:02:55.040 --> 1:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of firepower behind it. It's got Mark Warner, Democrat,

1:02:58.360 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Senator Warner. It's got a couple of big ones here,

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Baldwin Wisconsin, Joe Manchin, Democrat, West Virginia mansions on it.

1:03:09.720 --> 1:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Moran represented from Kansas, A couple other big ones here,

1:03:14.800 --> 1:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Kristin Gilbrand from New York, Mitt Romney, Republican from Utah.

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's got, it's got, It's got twenty or

1:03:22.080 --> 1:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so people on here, both sides of the aisle.

1:03:24.520 --> 1:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>This is this is the elites. Yeah, of course, I

1:03:26.840 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 2>mean this is the I mean every one of those names,

1:03:30.080 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I would say, you can you can reproduce their behavior

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:38.640
<v Speaker 2>almost endlessly as elites for sure. Yeah.

1:03:38.680 --> 1:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's, uh, it's back to that conundrum.

1:03:42.240 --> 1:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we don't allow this technology, we're going

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to put ourselves in the back into you know, we're

1:03:47.800 --> 1:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going to restrict our growth. If we do, we're going

1:03:49.880 --> 1:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to constantly be overthrown here. So yeah, it's a it's

1:03:53.920 --> 1:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a massive ratchet up in this uh, in

1:03:57.720 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this communication game, to say the least.

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll look it up.

1:04:01.640 --> 1:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, Well, you don't make predictions, and you've

1:04:06.600 --> 1:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>already said that. In the final part of your book,

1:04:09.640 --> 1:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you kind of give your thesis of where this where

1:04:12.800 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you think this kind of goes though, do you want

1:04:16.040 --> 1:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to summarize kind of where you think that goes or

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of how you summarize the thesis in the end.

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure what you mean by that.

1:04:23.760 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>What was it called the finale for skeptics and you

1:04:28.360 --> 1:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>had a.

1:04:29.320 --> 1:04:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well basically what I say is, actually that was

1:04:32.560 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 2>my sort of like, you know, if you do an experiment,

1:04:36.200 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 2>you need to have well X happens, then you know

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:42.280
<v Speaker 2>this it means this. But if why happens is.

1:04:42.640 --> 1:04:46.040
<v Speaker 3>The no hypothesis you called it, Yeah, no hypothesis, right,

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 3>and and you know I have to say, I, as

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>you put it, I think earlier the one thing I

1:04:52.680 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 3>got wrong was the speed at which this was coming

1:04:55.360 --> 1:04:56.000
<v Speaker 3>at us, right.

1:04:56.120 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I definitely didn't realize how fast it was moving. But

1:04:59.120 --> 1:05:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I think in terms of the substance of it, when

1:05:01.320 --> 1:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>you look at us, I said, if my hypothesis correct,

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>these are the things that need to be happening. If

1:05:06.240 --> 1:05:09.280
<v Speaker 2>not that this is the opposite. Here's a no Our

1:05:09.320 --> 1:05:12.920
<v Speaker 2>world today looks nothing like the no hypothesis. It looks

1:05:13.040 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>like they were bolts of the public in steroids. Got it,

1:05:15.800 --> 1:05:16.240
<v Speaker 2>got it?

1:05:17.160 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's it's certainly interesting. What a time to be alive?

1:05:19.840 --> 1:05:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:05:20.720 --> 1:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I often say that.

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 2>If you're if you're a geopolitical analyst. It is kind

1:05:24.240 --> 1:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>of fun, but I mean, what a mess. I also

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>fear feel kind of like doctor death because my book

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:33.280
<v Speaker 2>and my people wanted to talk to me wretch it up.

1:05:33.360 --> 1:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Every time something horrible happens somewhere, everybody feels like I

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>can explain it, and of course I mostly can't. But

1:05:41.400 --> 1:05:42.040
<v Speaker 2>happy to drive.

1:05:42.160 --> 1:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I definitely recommend getting the book. I enjoyed

1:05:45.200 --> 1:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>reading it. Have you read the book The Sovereign Individual?

1:05:49.760 --> 1:05:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, really good book.

1:05:52.080 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It's good, fits together, fits together well with this, you know,

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So recommend to anyone listening check out The Sovereign Individual

1:05:58.320 --> 1:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>check out this book if you want an idea. I

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>think I think it helps. It helps show what's going

1:06:05.160 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on in the world today. So it kind of brings

1:06:06.680 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>some clarity to what's going on, and it helps you

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>develop some frameworks to think about where we're going into

1:06:11.840 --> 1:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the future and how you can navigate that.

1:06:14.640 --> 1:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

1:06:15.120 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The problem I have with with this act, this act,

1:06:18.040 --> 1:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this restrict Act, is like, this is anybody in the world,

1:06:21.880 --> 1:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Like this is the long arm of the government, right,

1:06:24.080 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's against foreign individuals, which can also be you

1:06:26.680 --> 1:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>as citizens. But like you can't just move to another

1:06:29.760 --> 1:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>country and get away from this. So it's going to

1:06:34.200 --> 1:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>be interesting anyway. Man, it has been awesome reading the book,

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it's been awesome talking to you about it. Anything that

1:06:40.040 --> 1:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to point attention to that people should go

1:06:41.960 --> 1:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>check out?

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:48.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, like I said, the whole disinformation. You

1:06:48.560 --> 1:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>know what Michael Schldenberger calls it a information the censorship

1:06:55.200 --> 1:06:59.720
<v Speaker 2>industrial complex. He calls it censorship industrial complex, which is

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>really not industrial. Is bore like a protection racket. I

1:07:02.680 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 2>would say, I think anybody who who values freedom ought

1:07:09.320 --> 1:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>to be watching that. I mean, it really is. It happened.

1:07:11.800 --> 1:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>It happened without debate, It happened without laws being enacted.

1:07:17.040 --> 1:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>It happens without warrants. It happens without judges being involved.

1:07:20.600 --> 1:07:24.919
<v Speaker 2>It happened without formal investigations. Suddenly we have this apparatus

1:07:24.960 --> 1:07:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of control that the government has implemented, and I think

1:07:30.160 --> 1:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>we as citizens need to push back.

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>On that definitely. Well that we'll get and sign it off.

1:07:34.640 --> 1:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna link to everything down in the show notes

1:07:36.320 --> 1:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>down below, so you can check out the book, check

1:07:38.640 --> 1:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>out his blog, and with that will sign off. Thanks

1:07:40.400 --> 1:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so much, Martin. All Right, that's a wrap. Hopefully enjoyed

1:07:43.080 --> 1:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this conversation I had with Martin gurry It. It was

1:07:46.040 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a good conversation, it was an even better book. I

1:07:47.920 --> 1:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>highly advised checking it out. We'll put a link down

1:07:49.880 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to the description in the show notes below. As I said,

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>there's new technologies that are going to make this state

1:07:56.040 --> 1:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>incompetent at trying to enforce this Bitcoin, decentralized monetary net works,

1:08:00.480 --> 1:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>NOSTER decentralized information protocols. If you want to check it out,

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you should come check out the Bitcoin Conference in Miami

1:08:07.440 --> 1:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>coming up soon. I'll be a speaker there. I have

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a link for discount tickets if you'd want to come,

1:08:11.480 --> 1:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I can get you a discount on some tickets, and

1:08:13.360 --> 1:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>if you send me send me a message showing that

1:08:16.280 --> 1:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you bought it with my link. I'll put it down below.

1:08:18.280 --> 1:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to organize little meetup with some people. So

1:08:20.960 --> 1:08:22.439
<v Speaker 1>if you want to come check out the Big Coin Conference,

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>get at discount on tickets, there's a link in the description. Otherwise,

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>leave me a comment, let me know what you think

1:08:26.840 --> 1:08:29.599
<v Speaker 1>about this conversation. Let me know what you think about

1:08:29.640 --> 1:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>what the future of government looks like with this new

1:08:32.720 --> 1:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>technology that allows us to communicate without censorship. I'd love

1:08:36.400 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear what you think as always hit that like

1:08:38.240 --> 1:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>button if you like it, the dislike if you don't subscribe,

1:08:41.000 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're not already subscribed, And that's what I got

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to your success. I'm out.