WEBVTT - Nine Times - The game!


0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 1>here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. This is

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a special edition. We're unfurling a brand new game with

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Harrison. Two weeks in a row.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Y'all tuckered out? Oh man, it's it was a long drive,

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>long drive, yes, Matt Harrison with us. This game comes

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>back to one of our favorite eternal bits on this show.

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And do you have the button all set to go

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and and labeled, because here we go. You're all you're

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear that a lot. If you don't like that sound,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you probably want to just listen next week. Now. The

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>good news is it's not as long as some of

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>our drives. This one is thirty seconds of bad trombone. Okay,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we might play that one later, may come up later.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So this game is called nine times. Yeah, the premises

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's great, it's called and it's the way

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that this game works. Matt. If we magically played this

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>season nine times, how many times would something happen? And

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain to something in each of these cases. So

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a game in which there is no right

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or wrong. That's just all your opinion. I will ask

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the questions, you'll give the answers. Okay, all right, so

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about being wrong. We'll save

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that for the we'll save that for the regular season.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Tough questions. Once we get into three tough questions, you

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>can disagree with exactly. As a reminder, Guillotine leads dot

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>com open for business. We are forming leagues every day.

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>We have private leagues. We've got public leagues where you

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>can join contests when cash who you're doing it? Nine times?

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>We're doing nine times. That's right, nine times every single day. Uh.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>And our brand new zombie mode at Guillotine dot Com. Okay,

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>here we go. Question number one, if this season were played,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>how many times would Carolina running back Christian McCaffrey be

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the top scoring running back? Okay, well, he's played about

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>nine times in the last two years, actually played ten

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>total games, sorry, about nine, about nine about nine When

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 1>he was able to play, he was very good, but

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>he was not the dominant running back he was back

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in which was also run Rivera's last season in Carolina.

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.839
<v Speaker 1>If this season were played nine times, I think he'd

0:02:54.840 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>play all seventeen games only three times, and of those

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>three seasons, i'd give CMC the top spot in one

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of the three. If healthy, he's got that upside, but

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I worry that the mileage is catching up to him,

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and considering he just hasn't been healthy for two years,

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to think that he can get through a

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>full season unscathed. So final answer, one out of nine.

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I like your answer, and I think I'm fundamentally impored

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with that. I worry about soft tissue injuries a lot

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>more than like a broken leg. You know, I know

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're gonna come back from with the broken leg.

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You know it's gonna be fine. Players with a history

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of soft tissue injuries they tend to escalate and get

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>worse over time. I'm worried about that part. If this

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>season we're played, how many times would Rams wide receiver

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup repeat as the highest scoring wide receiver. Dude

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>had a hundred and ninety one targets last year. That

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was more than That's a lot twenty more than anyone else.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Cooper Cup had a number four overall

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>year in twenty nineteen with Jared Goff as this quarter ac.

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's injury to consider with god with a Cup,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>as he did miss half a year with injuries once

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in his five year career. There's also a couple of

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>other good candidates that could just pop up and and

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>get him. Jefferson, I have Davante Adams on the shortlist.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs I think has a chance to be a

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>guy who goes off with Josh Allen and Jamaar Chase.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody would be surprised if one of

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>those guys had a crazy good year. But still, the

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>connection with Stafford is so good. They have breakfast together.

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>The offense runs through Cooper Cup there in l A.

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna take out two of those nine seasons

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with weird injury stuff Stafford gets hurt hurt either one.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take two more with just outlandish play from

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>another wide receiver. I think he finishes as the top

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in five of those nine seasons. It doesn't

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>happen often, but it could happen here. There's not a

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>good reason for him not to repeat. And Antonio Brown

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>did exactly this for like four years in a row

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in in Pittsburgh. So I think that Cooper Cup has

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that ability can be done nine times. Question number three,

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if this season we're played, how many times would quarterback

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Tray Lance finishes a top ten quarterback? By the way, charge,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>how many times are we going to ask questions? Well?

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>How nine times? Okay, that's good because you have to right,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>gotta do nine questions? Yes, um. I highlighted this in

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>last week's podcast Time not a Tray Lance believer and

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I am, and you are and four of the least

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>optimist yeah, and four. The last five years San Francisco's

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>offense set a bottom half quarterback position in Fantasy points.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>But that's Jimmy Gray Lance. He just brings a whole

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>another factor. I mean, yeah, rushing. If he's actually good,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I just don't trust the situation at all. But if

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the and it's aligned, I must concede that Lance could

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>run his way to an absolutely huge season and pass

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>accurately enough that Deebo could take some five yard passes

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and take them to distance. I'll give him two out

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.559
<v Speaker 1>of nine times for Trey Lance yeah, I'm probably double

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the optimism. But you know it makes sense. You know,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>he's he's all upside and downside. We did our Make

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or Break podcast a couple of weeks ago, and you know,

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's Now we've talked about Tray Lance in

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>three straight weeks. But yeah, how many of these do

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you think in these nine seasons? Does Trey Lance start

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>all seventeen games? That's a big ask for every quarterball,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>But I would say in half of the nine, now, yeah, maybe,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>well if if half of the nine, yeah, alright, so

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>then I'm saying two out of those. Actually, you know what,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, when you present it that way, that sounds reasonable.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to uh question number four. If this season

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we're played, how many times would Falcons tight end? I'll

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>pit score nine times, nine times, like exactly nine times

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or more nine or more times, because it's exactly it's

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>very hard to do. Pretty sweet. You can get a

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>sports book on that one. Uh. So let's operate on

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>nine or more. Um, let's look at how many total

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>tight ends have scored nine times or more over the

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>last four years. Last year there were four tight ends

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>who scored exactly nine times, and that was it we

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>scored more than that. UM in nineteen and twenty or sorry,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in it happened three times. In eighteen it only happened

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>twice each year. And in seventeen, by the way, going

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>back five years, it was only Jimmy Graham, the Seattle Seahawk.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham. I forgot that he had a ten touchdown

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>season as a must have been right after they got executed.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>That right, it must have been so as a whole.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Even with you know, legendary Travis Kelsey years and George

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Kittle and Mark Andrews and all these great players, it's

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a rarity that any tight end gets there. So I'm

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that three tight ends could get there this year.

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Three Okay, I bet Pits is in that group at

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>least twice. So I'm gonna evoke why cleft and say

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to time to time, UM, I think it's maybe a

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>little more than that, but not much. I think you're

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in the right ballpark here, two, three, four times out

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of nine. With Kyle, we're looking at times, we're looking

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>at maybe half a chance that any tight end gets there.

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And then which guy to be a guy who scored

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>one time last year and has a nine x increase

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in touchdowns behind the passing arm of Marcus Mariotte. Well,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever amount of touchdowns he gets this year, it's that

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>many X question number four. If this season we're played,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>how many times would Raiders wide receiver Davante Adams outscore

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>last year's Packers receiver Davante Adams. It's a very meta question, right,

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this year's Davante Adams versus last year Super Bowl prop

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that questions, um, well, he won't get the complete target

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>share he saw in Green Bay. I think that we

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>could agree on that, right. Renfrew and Waller are just

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>too good for them to be cast aside. Uh and

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and Derek carrs developed some good trust there. That means

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>either Derek Carr will have to throw a lot more

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>than Aaron Rodgers did last year, which he did, by

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, through like sixty more passes than Aaron Rodgers

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>did last day through the exact same amount of passes,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe each through the same amount. Uh or Davanta Adams

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to need to be extraordinarily efficient with the

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with the targets he does get. Um So, in order

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>for Adams to beat the target total, I think car

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>would probably have to throw six the thirty times next year,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>which would put him in the top five, and passes attempted,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not the top guy, not the bottom guy, he'd be

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>right in the top five there. I'm not sure that's

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>what Josh McDaniels will want to do with his offense.

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he will. He's got a lot of weapons there.

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But then you also have to think that twenty nine

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>year old Davante Adams, who turns thirty in December, will

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be more dynamic. And it's worth noting that

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Adams hasn't played a full season in three years. He's

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss a game or two or here there with injury.

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Too many special things need to happen for him to

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>beat last year. So I'm gonna say he'll only do

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it once out of nine times. We're gonna take a break.

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>We came back, you will. You gotta tell me what

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about I think that's about right. Okay, one

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or two times is about right. I mean, you know,

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously here in Rogers an amazing quarterback. I like, I'm

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>way higher and Derek Carr than other people are, you know,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>factoring that part, and I think Derek carrs is capable

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of being of of being a top seven eight quarterback

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>in this degree. So you know, I think that I

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>think the opportunities there, So I'd give him like two

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>out of two or three out of Stavante Adams. Last

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>year's pretty day. It's pretty good. Last year he was

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. Four more questions as we continue

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Nine Times Games. Fantasy Football Weekly, Segment number

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>two Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Churching Matt Harrison with you.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>We are playing the nine Times game. This is a

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>new game. Do you love it? Do you hate it?

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Let us know on Twitter. I'm at Paul Churching, You're

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>at explosive output and tweet us more than once, maybe

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>eight seven times? About nine If this season we're played,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this is question number six. If this season we're played,

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>turns how many times would Seattle running back Rashad Penny

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>outscore teammate rookie runner Kenneth Walker. Seattle is really weird

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>as a city now as a city. I love it,

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's it's weird. Just man Walker seems

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like the way better option. But they're just weirdly loyal

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to Penny there, who they could have just let go

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>at the end. Of last season. Penny must be like

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a big Pete Carroll guy, a big locker room guy,

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>just one of those guys that that Pete really loves. Frankly,

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 1>he's going to get the first crack. Is the starting

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>running back this year? I think? Um. And let's say

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Penny stays completely healthy for four of these nine seasons,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>because he doesn't have a very good track record of health,

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So completely healthy for ye, generous, that's generous out of

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>those four years. He maybe holds the job with his talent.

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Want maybe zero half a time? Alright, one half one,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>one half of a can you go a ninth of one?

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Ninth ninth? Very good time? Yes, I'm with you on that.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm not a big believer in Richard Penn,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>even though you know, he admittedly looked very good in

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>December last year, but that is it. The whole rest

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of his career has been disappointing for sure. Question number seven,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>if this season were played, how many times would Rob

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Gronkowski unretired? This was like this one. This was the

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>most ridiculous question that you asked of me, and so

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I gave you a ridiculous answer. What number would GROUNK

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>pair with nine six six question nine times. Question number eight.

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>If this season we're played nine times nine, how many

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>times would Ronald Jones lead the yeves backfield and fantasy points?

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>This question just makes me Sad's design I was Ronald

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Jones should make you sad. Okay, it just makes me.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Look at Clyde Edwards Hilaire and the NFL draft, and

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>if the Chiefs would have selected Jonathan Taylor, any of

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the next four skill players, they would have had Tee Higgins,

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pittman, DeAndre Swift or Jonathan Taylor, just any of

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the next four. Oh man, that's bad um. Unfortunately, Clyde

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Edwards Hilaire is just a guy. So the Chiefs went

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>out and got someone who might be even more of

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>just a guy. So here comes Ronald Jones. They're both

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so bland that there's an outside shot that Derek Gore

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or Jerick McKinnon or rookie Isaiah Pacheco caught one of

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>those nine years. I'm gonna say that each of those

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>guys in this fictitious nine times world, each of them

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>steal one year the top running back, and then there's

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>six years left and we're just gonna split it in

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>half between Clyde and Ronald Jones because they're both so

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'll say three times Ronald Jones finishes as a

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>as the top Chiefs runner. I think that might be generous.

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I wish I wish there was more

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>better competition so I could just zero. I wish so too,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>But this is not a strong backfield right now, and

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones I have very little confidence in. But so

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think do you think between Ronald Jones and

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards Hilaire like one of them is significantly better

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>than the other the way they've used Clyde Edwards a layer, No,

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but I think I swear they haven't used him to

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the best of his abilities. They never throw to a

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who's a good pass catcher, They never give him

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>any space to work with. He's elusive, but you know,

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>he's always finds himself trying to, you know, run behind

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>lines that don't give him much space. And it's so weird.

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>That's that's why I think that they just split there

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of those ugly times. All right, let's go

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for our our final, our ninth can we can we

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>use a different sounder for this question. Please, if this

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>season we're played nine times, how many times would nope,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Sad Trombone Ski, Yes, Mitch Drabinsky. How many times would

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Robinsky start seventeen games for the Pittsburgh Steelers. So, Church,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a sneaky schedule question, a little bit um.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The Steelers start this way at since oops, New England

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>at Cleveland, Jets at home at Buffalo Tampa. That's the

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>first six weeks. That feels like one win. They're gonna

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>start the season one in five if things play out

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.479
<v Speaker 1>as as just if the favorite wins, I think Trubisky

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>would have to go four and two to keep the job,

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>because if you want to get a rookie ready and

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>not feed them to the Wolves, you'd don't throw him

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in those first six games. You start him on Sunday

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Night Football against Miami in week seven, bright lights, big City.

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Then they get Philly the next week, followed by a

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>by to correct any issues and let Kenny Pickett kind

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of start his reign as the quarterback there. So I

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think true Bisky can go four and two in

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>those six games. So I'll say Sad Trombone Ski stays Sad.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>In every one of these nine seasons, he would start

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen games, zero out of nine times. You know, you

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>make a compelling case. This is uh we feel. I'm

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>optimistic that he's going to be better with a year

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>removed from Chicago and learning from in a good Buffalo

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>offense and a good system. I want to believe he's

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna be better. But man, you know, I hadn't factored

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in that schedule so much, and you're right those that

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is a brutal start to the season. I could see

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>him being out by the bye week or earlier. Yeah,

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird that true Bisky didn't end up in

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>New York with Brian Dable. Yeah, a little bit. But

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>know I think you wanted a chance to start. I

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think you would have had a chance to start New York.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah maybe, Danny, I don't know. It seems like they've

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>got a certain commitment to him for whatever we be.

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You're right, sooner or later there was a decent chance

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that at some point, Sad trombone, can we have the

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>extended one? Please? I really should have played it underneath

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. It's so bad. It's the worst trombone

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>recorded trombone solo in the history of mankind. Yeah, this

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is probably how we'll we'll take take this show out today. Huh,

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I think we should. Let's do it. Thank you for

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>listening to Fantasy Football Weekly, and we're glad to have

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you here. Kia teen leagues dot Com from my cheat

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>sheet available for free shock Fantasy for all them. That's

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>various doings and you've got you're gonna You've got a

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>bunch of cheat sheets and things there as well, Dynasty

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Empire stuff. I don't even get into it. And you

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get into that. That's crazy now probably not.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, everybody. We'll talk to you next week.

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart rate, you visit the

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I heart Radio app, Apple podcast, or wherever you listen

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows. MHM.