1 00:00:01,400 --> 00:00:06,480 Speaker 1: Broadcasting line from our nation's capital, Bloomberg to New York, 2 00:00:06,600 --> 00:00:11,920 Speaker 1: Bloomberg eleven Frio to San Francisco, Bloomberg to the country 3 00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:15,920 Speaker 1: Sirius XM General one ninety and around the globe the 4 00:00:15,920 --> 00:00:20,439 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is 5 00:00:20,480 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Sound On with Kevin Cirelli. President Joe Biden boosts 6 00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:31,880 Speaker 1: health education in one and a half trillion dollar budget request, 7 00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:34,640 Speaker 1: and that's in addition to the two and a quarter 8 00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:38,440 Speaker 1: trillion he wants for infrastructure. We check in with Congressman 9 00:00:38,479 --> 00:00:41,840 Speaker 1: Brendan Boyle, Democrat from outside of Philly. First, though, let's 10 00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:45,159 Speaker 1: get a market check from Shawley Pellet. All right, I'm 11 00:00:45,240 --> 00:00:48,280 Speaker 1: Kevin CURRELLI, Chief Washington correspondent for Bloomberg TV and for 12 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:52,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio. We begin tonight with the big story, which, 13 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:57,200 Speaker 1: of course, is that budget request coming in at more 14 00:00:57,360 --> 00:00:59,840 Speaker 1: than one and a half trillion dollars in at this 15 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 1: in to the infrastructure proposal. I've got sound on this 16 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:07,880 Speaker 1: infrastructure proposal from Secretary Pete buddhag Edge. He was answering 17 00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:11,360 Speaker 1: questions about the budget as well as about infrastructure and 18 00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:14,120 Speaker 1: how they're going to afford it. Take a listen to 19 00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 1: the sound on how they're going to afford it. Here 20 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 1: is I'm convinced that this is the best chance in 21 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:24,440 Speaker 1: our lifetimes to make a generational investment in infrastructure, and 22 00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:27,559 Speaker 1: that's what the American Jobs Plan does. The need is clear, 23 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:31,319 Speaker 1: it's growing by the day. After decades of under investment, 24 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 1: we have fallen to thirteenth place globally in infrastructure. He 25 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 1: went on to talk about raising taxes. Here's the sound 26 00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:43,280 Speaker 1: on taxes. I've heard the presidents say that this is 27 00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:45,800 Speaker 1: going to be a process of negotiation, that we're going 28 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:47,880 Speaker 1: to take ideas on board, that there's going to be 29 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:51,160 Speaker 1: a refinement as we go. Um, I haven't heard a 30 00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: proposal that I consider to be better than the one 31 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:57,160 Speaker 1: the President put forward. Joining us now with the All 32 00:01:57,200 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 1: Star Policy Panel team are Bloomberg contributors Rick Davis and 33 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:04,360 Speaker 1: Jeanie Schanzano and Congressman Brendan Boyle. He is a Democrat 34 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:08,239 Speaker 1: from Pennsylvania's second congressional district and represents parts of Philadelphia 35 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:10,920 Speaker 1: and the outskirts of the City of Brotherly Love as well. 36 00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:13,840 Speaker 1: All right, Congressman, great to have you on. How are 37 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:16,880 Speaker 1: we gonna pay for all this for all the infrastructure. 38 00:02:16,960 --> 00:02:19,440 Speaker 1: The budget and I know the budget typically is just 39 00:02:19,480 --> 00:02:22,200 Speaker 1: a messaging bill, but either way you slice and dice, 40 00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:25,800 Speaker 1: it's a lot of money. Yeah. Well, first, it's just 41 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:29,360 Speaker 1: always great to be on with you and and everyone 42 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,160 Speaker 1: else there, Kevin. I also just have to point out 43 00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:36,400 Speaker 1: that literally every Friday I have joined you guys, the 44 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:38,720 Speaker 1: down and the NASDAC have been opt I don't know 45 00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:41,560 Speaker 1: if you've noticed that. I think I think Bloomberg needs 46 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:45,360 Speaker 1: to start reporting on this the boil effect. Put it 47 00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:48,680 Speaker 1: in the terminal pull up the VICS boiled chart. Go ahead, 48 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:52,040 Speaker 1: boiled go that's the that's our terminal function. You least 49 00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:55,280 Speaker 1: have to call the boil on show effect, you know, 50 00:02:55,360 --> 00:03:00,960 Speaker 1: don't thank you know it also your business though. Look 51 00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:06,400 Speaker 1: I think that Pete in the clip that you played before, um, absolutely, 52 00:03:06,720 --> 00:03:08,399 Speaker 1: you know, nailed it on the head. I mean, this 53 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:12,080 Speaker 1: is a once in a generation opportunity to really go big. 54 00:03:12,120 --> 00:03:13,880 Speaker 1: And last time I was on, we were talking about 55 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:17,079 Speaker 1: the American Jobs Plan. You can see how the U 56 00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:19,560 Speaker 1: and just to be clear, I mean what was released 57 00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:22,600 Speaker 1: today as part of the annual budget process. It's separate 58 00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:24,960 Speaker 1: from the American Jobs Plan, but you can see how 59 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:28,040 Speaker 1: they're complementary. I mean, it is a big bill, It 60 00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:31,840 Speaker 1: is a lot of spending, and this moment is unique 61 00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:35,120 Speaker 1: because it's the first time in my lifetime that the 62 00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:39,000 Speaker 1: policy window is open for making these massive investments. I mean, 63 00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:42,280 Speaker 1: think about the nineteen eighties, was government is not the 64 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 1: solution to our problem? Government is the problem? Es even 65 00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:48,560 Speaker 1: the Democratic president saying the Arab the government is over 66 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:51,720 Speaker 1: two thousands. You have two rounds of Bush tax cuts, 67 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:54,920 Speaker 1: and even half of the Obama stimulus was tax cuts. 68 00:03:54,960 --> 00:03:59,200 Speaker 1: So at this moment, after COVID, there is an appetite 69 00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 1: among the America and people, even registered Republicans for this 70 00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:05,480 Speaker 1: sort of spending. You know, let me let me follow 71 00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:08,000 Speaker 1: up on this, because I think this is a really 72 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:12,119 Speaker 1: important point, folks. Is even the divide amongst Republicans. Uh, 73 00:04:12,320 --> 00:04:14,760 Speaker 1: they're saying they don't want to spend two and a 74 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:17,560 Speaker 1: quarter trillion dollars, They're still suggesting that they need to 75 00:04:17,600 --> 00:04:20,839 Speaker 1: make at least a you know, a trillion dollars worth 76 00:04:20,880 --> 00:04:25,039 Speaker 1: of an investment in infrastructure. So, just more broadly, taking 77 00:04:25,080 --> 00:04:28,279 Speaker 1: alf off the partisan analysis but talking about it in 78 00:04:28,320 --> 00:04:31,800 Speaker 1: a more geopolitical lens, America is in a position and 79 00:04:31,920 --> 00:04:34,159 Speaker 1: has been for the last year where they're willing to 80 00:04:34,240 --> 00:04:40,720 Speaker 1: spend and spend big for the first time in decades. Right, yeah, 81 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:42,320 Speaker 1: I mean, as I pointed out, this is the first 82 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:45,520 Speaker 1: time in my lifetime. Um, I mean I cited the 83 00:04:45,560 --> 00:04:50,120 Speaker 1: history from you know, January all the way up until 84 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:52,920 Speaker 1: this past year. This is the first time we've really 85 00:04:52,920 --> 00:04:54,880 Speaker 1: seen it. I also want to point out that when 86 00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:57,360 Speaker 1: we talk, when we say and use the word Republicans, 87 00:04:57,839 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 1: I think we have to be clear are we talking 88 00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:04,680 Speaker 1: about Republican elected officials or Republican voters Because right now 89 00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 1: the point they are at odds, Republican voters agree with 90 00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:13,680 Speaker 1: us on the infrastructure bill, agreed with us on the 91 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 1: American Jobs Plan. UM. Polling obviously hasn't come out yet 92 00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:20,400 Speaker 1: on on this budget, but I assume it would show 93 00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:23,760 Speaker 1: something similar. So we might not be getting support from 94 00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:26,919 Speaker 1: elected Republicans in Congress, but boy, if there are a 95 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,080 Speaker 1: lot of Republicans throughout the country that are also are 96 00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:34,080 Speaker 1: on board with this kind of spending, well, you know, 97 00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 1: let's talk a little bit about that spending because with 98 00:05:36,680 --> 00:05:40,279 Speaker 1: spending requires revenue, you know, and I think if Joe 99 00:05:40,279 --> 00:05:42,560 Speaker 1: Biden had come out, you know, prior to the election, 100 00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:45,360 Speaker 1: and said, look, my first hundred days, I'm going to 101 00:05:45,440 --> 00:05:51,080 Speaker 1: announce six trillion dollars in new domestic spending. UM. I 102 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 1: think that would have been a big campaign issue and 103 00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:57,080 Speaker 1: and the question would have been asked if at that time, So, Joe, 104 00:05:57,200 --> 00:05:59,480 Speaker 1: how are you going to pay for that? We we've 105 00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:02,640 Speaker 1: we bay sickly saw. The stimulus was just all, you know, 106 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:07,039 Speaker 1: sort of deficit spending. UH. Now we have a two 107 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:11,000 Speaker 1: point to five trillion dollar infrastructure bill, which is going 108 00:06:11,080 --> 00:06:14,800 Speaker 1: to come out of fifteen years of increased corporate UH 109 00:06:14,839 --> 00:06:18,240 Speaker 1: taxes at a higher rate UM. And and now an 110 00:06:18,240 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 1: additional one point five to trillion that's gonna come right 111 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:24,360 Speaker 1: out of tax revenue, which isn't going to be able 112 00:06:24,400 --> 00:06:27,680 Speaker 1: to cover that amount unless we have some huge increase 113 00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:30,360 Speaker 1: in in revenue to the I R S. So so 114 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:32,799 Speaker 1: the question I would have is, like, all these things 115 00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 1: sound great as you say. I mean, people when they 116 00:06:35,240 --> 00:06:37,400 Speaker 1: hear a program like, oh, yeah, that'll be great for 117 00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 1: my schools and absolutely for healthcare, But like when they 118 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:43,839 Speaker 1: find out that they've just had you know, six trillion 119 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:47,159 Speaker 1: dollars a debt pile up on top of the deficit, UM, 120 00:06:47,240 --> 00:06:48,800 Speaker 1: what what do you think the reaction is gonna be then, 121 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 1: because that really hasn't become part of the debate at 122 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 1: this stage. Yeah, it's not just great for the things 123 00:06:55,680 --> 00:06:58,839 Speaker 1: you cited. I would also point out it's it's obviously 124 00:06:58,880 --> 00:07:01,440 Speaker 1: been great for the market as well and well received 125 00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:03,279 Speaker 1: by them. As much as I made the implication it 126 00:07:03,279 --> 00:07:05,800 Speaker 1: was somehow me appearing on the show, in fact, I 127 00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:08,520 Speaker 1: think all of the stimulus spending that we're seeing it 128 00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 1: clearly had a you know, positive effect on on what's 129 00:07:11,640 --> 00:07:14,240 Speaker 1: been going on on the street. Now you raise, I 130 00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:17,800 Speaker 1: think an intellectually honest question, which is how do we 131 00:07:17,880 --> 00:07:21,080 Speaker 1: pay for it? And if you're coming from a traditional 132 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:26,960 Speaker 1: economic conservative viewpoint, I understand the heartburn there. Um in 133 00:07:27,040 --> 00:07:30,720 Speaker 1: my view, doing this in a blended way in which 134 00:07:30,840 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 1: some of it is debt finance. I'm talking about infrastructure 135 00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: in which some of it is debt finance, knowing that 136 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:40,120 Speaker 1: there is a demonstrated return on investment, while at the 137 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:43,880 Speaker 1: same time we raise revenue not to meet the entire 138 00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 1: total sum, but to meet part of it. So, you know, 139 00:07:47,240 --> 00:07:50,040 Speaker 1: you cited it before the campaign. You know, someone said 140 00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:52,640 Speaker 1: or Joe Biden were to say, well, I'm gonna raise 141 00:07:52,760 --> 00:07:55,880 Speaker 1: spending by six trillion that in the abstract, You're right, 142 00:07:55,960 --> 00:07:58,840 Speaker 1: probably wouldn't have you won a lot of votes. But 143 00:07:58,960 --> 00:08:01,800 Speaker 1: if you say, I'm going to make historic investments in 144 00:08:01,840 --> 00:08:05,560 Speaker 1: our infrastructure which have been neglected for decades, Donald Trump 145 00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 1: talked about it, failed to do it. I'm actually going 146 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:10,000 Speaker 1: to do it and work with Congress. And here's how 147 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:14,200 Speaker 1: we're gonna pay for it. That cut in corporate tax 148 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:17,400 Speaker 1: rates that corporations got, dropping from the thirty percent rate, 149 00:08:18,840 --> 00:08:21,280 Speaker 1: We're simply going to put that back somewhere in the middle, 150 00:08:21,440 --> 00:08:25,920 Speaker 1: probably at the range that alone raises one trillion dollars 151 00:08:25,920 --> 00:08:28,560 Speaker 1: over fifteen years. I think that would have won him 152 00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:30,760 Speaker 1: a lot of votes, and I think did in November. 153 00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:34,560 Speaker 1: And I think that particular aspect, especially when you combine 154 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:36,760 Speaker 1: it with the data out there that so many corporations 155 00:08:36,800 --> 00:08:41,800 Speaker 1: haven't paid anything in taxes. Boy, that is pretty popular 156 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:45,280 Speaker 1: right now. And again that's sort of populism, even has 157 00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:50,679 Speaker 1: support among some registered Republicans. So representative Boile, Um, I 158 00:08:50,720 --> 00:08:52,640 Speaker 1: wish you were as good luck a charm on me 159 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:56,079 Speaker 1: as you are in the market. So I'm thrilled to 160 00:08:56,160 --> 00:08:59,760 Speaker 1: talk to you. UM. As we know these um the 161 00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 1: presidential budgets, even when you have a party that controls 162 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:09,319 Speaker 1: Congress UM in larger numbers than Democrats do today. Always 163 00:09:09,640 --> 00:09:12,320 Speaker 1: go through a lot of you know, a lot of 164 00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:14,760 Speaker 1: machin nations before they come out on the other side. 165 00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:18,280 Speaker 1: So while we hear what Joe Biden and his team 166 00:09:18,360 --> 00:09:22,520 Speaker 1: would like, what do you betting happens in Congress with 167 00:09:22,559 --> 00:09:26,080 Speaker 1: this budget? What particularly do you think they are going 168 00:09:26,160 --> 00:09:28,720 Speaker 1: to add to For instance, you know there's been a 169 00:09:28,720 --> 00:09:31,800 Speaker 1: lot of talk today in terms of defense spending. Do 170 00:09:31,880 --> 00:09:35,480 Speaker 1: you think Congress uh pushes back against that? Where do 171 00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:39,960 Speaker 1: you think this thing changes as it goes through Congress? Yeah, well, 172 00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:42,920 Speaker 1: let me speak about the House and and sent it separately. 173 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:46,360 Speaker 1: On this first. As far as the House, you're right, 174 00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:49,719 Speaker 1: I mean, this is an incredibly narrow majority, one of 175 00:09:49,760 --> 00:09:53,640 Speaker 1: the most narrow in our nation's history. Um. But there's 176 00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:58,199 Speaker 1: something counterintuitive about that in some ways, believe it or not, 177 00:09:58,520 --> 00:10:02,280 Speaker 1: it is easier to keep your team, so to speak, 178 00:10:02,440 --> 00:10:06,280 Speaker 1: on the same page and voting the same way when 179 00:10:06,360 --> 00:10:10,160 Speaker 1: everyone knows there really are no free passes, that everyone 180 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:12,440 Speaker 1: has to vote for it, and if you don't vote 181 00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:15,720 Speaker 1: for it, you would be the one who is thinking it. Um. 182 00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:17,640 Speaker 1: I was part of the first term I served in 183 00:10:17,679 --> 00:10:20,400 Speaker 1: Harrisburg in the state House a dozen years ago. I 184 00:10:20,480 --> 00:10:22,559 Speaker 1: was part of a one oh three to one hundred 185 00:10:23,080 --> 00:10:25,720 Speaker 1: majority then, and it was exactly the same thing. We 186 00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:28,880 Speaker 1: knew that we couldn't lose one person really on any 187 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:33,080 Speaker 1: vote UM and it ended up helping leadership enforced that 188 00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 1: sort of discipline. Sometimes it's more difficult when you have 189 00:10:35,800 --> 00:10:38,880 Speaker 1: a bigger majority and people feel like, um, they can 190 00:10:38,920 --> 00:10:42,440 Speaker 1: go off and freelance. Now, the Senate has its own 191 00:10:42,520 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 1: unique situation which gets a lot of attention because of 192 00:10:45,960 --> 00:10:51,080 Speaker 1: the filipbuster. It does seem both for the infrastructure bill 193 00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:54,600 Speaker 1: as well as for the budget. You know, the reconciliation 194 00:10:54,720 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 1: route will probably UM solve most of that. I got 195 00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:00,640 Speaker 1: one more question for you. This is an orton questions. 196 00:11:00,640 --> 00:11:04,400 Speaker 1: So we're gonna blow the break, Chris Um. So you 197 00:11:04,440 --> 00:11:06,840 Speaker 1: know recently there was an article by my buddy Al 198 00:11:06,960 --> 00:11:13,199 Speaker 1: Weaver in The Hill. Representative Brendan Boyle decides against Pennsylvania 199 00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:18,199 Speaker 1: Senate bid. And I know that you were carefully, carefully 200 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:20,840 Speaker 1: weighing a decision to run for Senate. You're obviously a 201 00:11:20,880 --> 00:11:23,640 Speaker 1: young politician, so it's not the first time you're It's 202 00:11:23,640 --> 00:11:26,120 Speaker 1: gonna be spect there's gonna be speculation about you running 203 00:11:26,120 --> 00:11:31,319 Speaker 1: for higher office. But in all honesty, I remember asking 204 00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:34,520 Speaker 1: this question several years ago to Senator Elizabeth Warren when 205 00:11:34,559 --> 00:11:38,720 Speaker 1: I interviewed her as she was weighing running for president, 206 00:11:39,160 --> 00:11:42,640 Speaker 1: And I said, too many times we in the media 207 00:11:42,760 --> 00:11:45,080 Speaker 1: we just asked a politician. Oh, it's like it's like 208 00:11:45,120 --> 00:11:47,200 Speaker 1: a it's almost like a cute question that you have 209 00:11:47,280 --> 00:11:49,559 Speaker 1: to check the box that you ask. Take us into 210 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:54,479 Speaker 1: the window of how an actual legislator, an actual policy 211 00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:58,880 Speaker 1: wonk like yourself, makes a decision about whether or not 212 00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:05,040 Speaker 1: to run for office. Boy, that's that's a great question. Um. So, 213 00:12:05,640 --> 00:12:07,920 Speaker 1: you know, it would be too long to describe kind 214 00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:10,040 Speaker 1: of how I originally made the decision that I was 215 00:12:10,200 --> 00:12:13,640 Speaker 1: literally going to devote my life to public policy and 216 00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:18,160 Speaker 1: public service. It actually revolves around nine eleven and I 217 00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:21,839 Speaker 1: was working in management consulting in the private sector, and 218 00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:25,240 Speaker 1: that afternoon was the day I decided that I would 219 00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:27,439 Speaker 1: go back to school for public policy and move back 220 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:31,160 Speaker 1: home to Philly. Um So, probably, like a lot of 221 00:12:31,160 --> 00:12:34,280 Speaker 1: people my age, nine eleven had had a real impact 222 00:12:34,600 --> 00:12:38,280 Speaker 1: now specifically on on the Senate. UM. It was a 223 00:12:38,280 --> 00:12:42,160 Speaker 1: tough decision because you know, an open sea for the 224 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:45,840 Speaker 1: United States Senate does not come around UM all that often, 225 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:48,000 Speaker 1: and obviously it was something I was very interested in. 226 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:50,679 Speaker 1: On the other hand, I really enjoy what I'm doing now. 227 00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:52,679 Speaker 1: I'm in my fourth term. I'm on the Ways and 228 00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:56,360 Speaker 1: Means Committee, Vice Chair of Budget. I played a really 229 00:12:56,400 --> 00:13:00,240 Speaker 1: active role in the various COVID measures that passed over 230 00:13:00,280 --> 00:13:03,320 Speaker 1: the last twelve months. But when you combine that with 231 00:13:03,400 --> 00:13:06,480 Speaker 1: the fact that I have a pretty young family, UM, 232 00:13:06,760 --> 00:13:09,600 Speaker 1: spend the next year and a half either on the 233 00:13:09,679 --> 00:13:12,360 Speaker 1: road or even then when I'm home, spending my whole 234 00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:16,320 Speaker 1: time on a campaign and fundraising. UM, it was not 235 00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:19,400 Speaker 1: something I wanted to do. My daughter, seven, is in 236 00:13:19,440 --> 00:13:22,480 Speaker 1: first grade, and I'm young enough that I feel like 237 00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 1: there will be other opportunities down the road. There definitely 238 00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:30,680 Speaker 1: will be. Congressman Brendan Boyle, it is a privilege, my 239 00:13:30,760 --> 00:13:34,120 Speaker 1: friend to interview you on this day. In particular, is 240 00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:40,000 Speaker 1: a Democrat from uh Philly, uh and from montcou Philadelphia, 241 00:13:40,000 --> 00:13:41,599 Speaker 1: City of brotherly Love. Thank you. I'll catch up with 242 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:44,800 Speaker 1: you next week. That's Congressman Brendan Boyle. Let's reset here. 243 00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:47,079 Speaker 1: My name is Kevin Sireli. I'm the Chief Washington correspondent 244 00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:50,960 Speaker 1: for Bloomberg Television and for Bloomberg Radio. I'm accompanied by 245 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:54,920 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Politics Policy All Star panel team, Rick Davis 246 00:13:55,080 --> 00:13:57,360 Speaker 1: and Jennie shoon Zano. Genie. You know, it really is 247 00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:00,720 Speaker 1: fascinating to hear from an actual led a later who's 248 00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:03,920 Speaker 1: in the meetings, not trying to go viral, but actually 249 00:14:03,960 --> 00:14:06,600 Speaker 1: doing the legislative works. You get a really fascinating glimpse 250 00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: into how they're actually getting the negotiations through. It is 251 00:14:11,880 --> 00:14:13,600 Speaker 1: and I you know, I know he had to run. 252 00:14:13,679 --> 00:14:16,240 Speaker 1: I wanted to ask him about some of that because, 253 00:14:16,480 --> 00:14:18,640 Speaker 1: you know, one of one of the representatives from New 254 00:14:18,720 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 1: York where I live is Tom Swazi, also on Ways 255 00:14:21,560 --> 00:14:24,200 Speaker 1: and Means, and I am curious, as you know, Tom 256 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:27,200 Speaker 1: Swazzi one of the people who says no salt, you know, 257 00:14:27,360 --> 00:14:32,120 Speaker 1: no infrastructure bill. Um, I'm curious. I'm curious as of 258 00:14:32,120 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 1: course important to people in blue states, not everybody around 259 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:37,640 Speaker 1: the country. But I'm to your point, it's fascinating to 260 00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:42,440 Speaker 1: hear how these negotiations, you know, unfold over something as big. 261 00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:44,560 Speaker 1: I mean, we're talking about the budget today, but of 262 00:14:44,600 --> 00:14:48,080 Speaker 1: course they've got this massive infrastructure bill to get through, 263 00:14:48,240 --> 00:14:51,400 Speaker 1: so an enormous amount of work to do in Congress. 264 00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:54,000 Speaker 1: And I thought it was also fascinating your last question 265 00:14:54,080 --> 00:14:57,600 Speaker 1: to to Representative Oil about his decision, because of course 266 00:14:57,600 --> 00:15:01,480 Speaker 1: there's a number of seats that are open two and 267 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:04,840 Speaker 1: a lot of representatives in his position, making this tough 268 00:15:04,880 --> 00:15:08,120 Speaker 1: decision to run or not. And I'm always curious about 269 00:15:08,160 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 1: the amount of time they have to raise money to 270 00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:13,160 Speaker 1: do that. You know, he's kind of like the rocky politician. 271 00:15:13,280 --> 00:15:16,080 Speaker 1: I mean, he upset Do you remember this, He upset 272 00:15:16,120 --> 00:15:19,880 Speaker 1: the mother in law of Chelsea Clinton? Remember that. I 273 00:15:19,880 --> 00:15:22,960 Speaker 1: mean he pulled off an upset back to Clinton. A 274 00:15:22,960 --> 00:15:26,320 Speaker 1: lot of Republicans would have liked to see that happen. Yeah, 275 00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:28,320 Speaker 1: he'll be a comer in in the future. I think 276 00:15:28,320 --> 00:15:32,120 Speaker 1: that we haven't heard the last of of Congress and 277 00:15:32,200 --> 00:15:37,200 Speaker 1: Boyle and his political aspirations. He's right though, I mean, 278 00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:40,280 Speaker 1: you know, you got to take the opportunities when they 279 00:15:40,320 --> 00:15:43,400 Speaker 1: present themselves, because you never know, somebody wins his seat 280 00:15:43,480 --> 00:15:45,000 Speaker 1: and has it for the rest of their life, you know, 281 00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:48,280 Speaker 1: And so um, it's it's a very difficult decision for 282 00:15:48,320 --> 00:15:50,560 Speaker 1: these guys because you know, he's good at what he does, 283 00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:52,760 Speaker 1: right and he loves his district, and he's having a 284 00:15:52,800 --> 00:15:55,160 Speaker 1: big impact in the majority in the House. I mean, 285 00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:57,520 Speaker 1: it's hard to say, I'm gonna, you know, take a 286 00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:00,120 Speaker 1: shot at potentially not being in Congress next year if 287 00:16:00,200 --> 00:16:04,560 Speaker 1: I don't win this election. And um, and so I don't, 288 00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:08,360 Speaker 1: I don't. I don't minimize the impact that those kinds 289 00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:11,280 Speaker 1: of things have on the family and their decision making. 290 00:16:11,600 --> 00:16:13,840 Speaker 1: It's a it's a tough call. But can I ask 291 00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:15,520 Speaker 1: you a quick question, for having run so many of 292 00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:18,640 Speaker 1: these campaigns, what would you say percentage why somebody like 293 00:16:18,920 --> 00:16:22,400 Speaker 1: Boyle would have to spend raising money if he decided 294 00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:26,680 Speaker 1: to run for a Senate trillions, not as much as 295 00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:33,000 Speaker 1: what's currently in the budget and the Biden administration. Wells, 296 00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:36,720 Speaker 1: I mean, especially in Pennsylvania. Sentence a sentence seat in 297 00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:39,720 Speaker 1: in in Pennsylvania is a twenty five million dollar fundraise, 298 00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:45,960 Speaker 1: not counting pack money in super packs. So about time. No, No, 299 00:16:46,080 --> 00:16:50,320 Speaker 1: it's basically committing the next year, uh, this year uh 300 00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:54,000 Speaker 1: to being out on the rubber chicken circuit, assuming you 301 00:16:54,040 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 1: were still at to do circuits, uh, to raise money. 302 00:16:58,040 --> 00:17:00,760 Speaker 1: And it's even harder, you know in sort this you know, 303 00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:03,920 Speaker 1: pandemic period where you know you gotta do a lot 304 00:17:03,960 --> 00:17:06,360 Speaker 1: of this stuff virtual fundraisers. Is there's only one thing 305 00:17:06,359 --> 00:17:08,560 Speaker 1: more awkward to go into fundraise. He's going to a 306 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:11,680 Speaker 1: zoom fundraiser. And by the way, Matt Shirley, our producer, 307 00:17:11,760 --> 00:17:15,040 Speaker 1: is very confused. He means the rubber chicken dinners. When 308 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:17,840 Speaker 1: you go to a dinner, Matt, he's our producer. He's 309 00:17:17,840 --> 00:17:19,800 Speaker 1: looking at He's like, he's thinking of like the comedic 310 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:23,040 Speaker 1: tool of a rubber chicken. It doesn't squeak when you 311 00:17:23,240 --> 00:17:26,560 Speaker 1: squeeze it. It doesn't squeak. It's just the thing you 312 00:17:26,600 --> 00:17:29,000 Speaker 1: put in your ballet. Glad we clear that up. Ups, 313 00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:32,080 Speaker 1: All right, let's go back to Amazon because that's also 314 00:17:32,320 --> 00:17:36,960 Speaker 1: done dominating. How's that for a pivot? Uh dominating the conversation? Today, 315 00:17:36,960 --> 00:17:41,080 Speaker 1: the National Labor Relations Board has not yet released an 316 00:17:41,080 --> 00:17:45,400 Speaker 1: official final decision on the employee lead push to unionize 317 00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:51,160 Speaker 1: the Amazon plants in Alabama, but experts told ABC News 318 00:17:51,200 --> 00:17:54,800 Speaker 1: that a vote outcome in favor of unionizing is an 319 00:17:54,880 --> 00:17:59,280 Speaker 1: uphill battle. Earlier today, White House Press Secretary Jen Saki 320 00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:03,640 Speaker 1: was asked point blank, point blank about Amazon at the briefing. 321 00:18:04,280 --> 00:18:06,919 Speaker 1: Take a listen, uh to to to the sound on 322 00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:11,480 Speaker 1: Amazon from White House Press Secretary Jensaki. The President has 323 00:18:11,480 --> 00:18:14,720 Speaker 1: said that whether to organize a union is a worker's choice, 324 00:18:14,920 --> 00:18:17,960 Speaker 1: and the National Labor Relations for It has a process 325 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:20,399 Speaker 1: for ensuring there is an accurate acount of the votes 326 00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:23,000 Speaker 1: cast in selection, so that we can know what choice 327 00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:26,359 Speaker 1: the workers have made. Jennie, I think that we in 328 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:28,399 Speaker 1: the media have to do a much better job of 329 00:18:28,480 --> 00:18:34,760 Speaker 1: explaining the differences and similarities within the labor movement. For example, 330 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:37,040 Speaker 1: teachers unions are a lot different than the debate that's 331 00:18:37,080 --> 00:18:41,199 Speaker 1: being had in Alabama. Right, It's true, and you know, 332 00:18:41,359 --> 00:18:43,639 Speaker 1: I think it's one of the areas that the media 333 00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:46,040 Speaker 1: doesn't give a lot of focus to, which is the 334 00:18:46,080 --> 00:18:49,680 Speaker 1: whole area of labor. And of course unionization puts throughs 335 00:18:49,800 --> 00:18:53,040 Speaker 1: like this can be complicated. You know. One area that 336 00:18:53,080 --> 00:18:55,600 Speaker 1: you know, Rick mentioned yesterday the fact that they're doing 337 00:18:55,600 --> 00:18:58,240 Speaker 1: this in a state, in an area in which it's 338 00:18:58,280 --> 00:19:00,919 Speaker 1: it's not a huge surprise that a union may not 339 00:19:01,080 --> 00:19:04,000 Speaker 1: prevail the other you know, another side of this story 340 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:07,520 Speaker 1: is that there is a structural advantage for employers in 341 00:19:07,560 --> 00:19:10,879 Speaker 1: this country when it comes to unionization because of the 342 00:19:10,920 --> 00:19:13,879 Speaker 1: way our labor laws have been written. And that's something 343 00:19:13,960 --> 00:19:17,640 Speaker 1: speaking of Congress, that Democrats can step in and try 344 00:19:17,680 --> 00:19:19,960 Speaker 1: to change while they're in control of Congress. I'm not 345 00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:22,680 Speaker 1: convinced they will given everything on their plate. But it's 346 00:19:22,720 --> 00:19:27,040 Speaker 1: those kind of structural disadvantages and the geography here that 347 00:19:27,080 --> 00:19:29,879 Speaker 1: help explain a loss like this UM and that's what 348 00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:32,360 Speaker 1: you have to address as you move forward. If this 349 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:35,520 Speaker 1: is where people want to take the country. Rick Josh 350 00:19:35,760 --> 00:19:38,960 Speaker 1: Edison reports on the Bloomberg Terminal. Amazon's win is defeat 351 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:42,000 Speaker 1: for labor movement now grown used to them. Unionizing the 352 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:46,919 Speaker 1: company's Bessemer, Alabama warehouse became a rallying cry for worker advocates, 353 00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:49,800 Speaker 1: but that wasn't enough. Is this a trend or is 354 00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:52,480 Speaker 1: just a one off? No? I mean look, Alabama, we 355 00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:55,080 Speaker 1: talked about this, Yes, say I stuck my neck out 356 00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:58,840 Speaker 1: saying no, no way, what a union penetrate Bessemer Alabama 357 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:01,840 Speaker 1: workforce right, and whether it's Amazon or any other Look, 358 00:20:01,880 --> 00:20:03,840 Speaker 1: I mean Alabama's the right to work state. I mean 359 00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:08,919 Speaker 1: they what that means is there are actually statutes on 360 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:12,520 Speaker 1: the books, uh, saying that you can't require union membership 361 00:20:12,560 --> 00:20:14,800 Speaker 1: in order to be an employee. They go out of 362 00:20:14,800 --> 00:20:18,959 Speaker 1: their way to dissuade you from being UH union employee. 363 00:20:19,040 --> 00:20:21,720 Speaker 1: It's it's, it's and and and so we've seen the 364 00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:25,800 Speaker 1: decline in union membership over the last two decades pretty consistently. 365 00:20:25,840 --> 00:20:29,199 Speaker 1: And so the question is can the Biden administration, I guess, 366 00:20:29,280 --> 00:20:33,840 Speaker 1: you know, rebound the union bug and make it more popular. Well, 367 00:20:33,880 --> 00:20:36,480 Speaker 1: I wouldn't. I wouldn't have staked out my my, my 368 00:20:36,640 --> 00:20:39,680 Speaker 1: first big challenge in in a right to work state 369 00:20:39,760 --> 00:20:42,560 Speaker 1: like Alabama. So I don't think you can make any 370 00:20:42,560 --> 00:20:45,640 Speaker 1: conclusions other than Alabamas the right to work state last year, 371 00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:47,480 Speaker 1: It's gonna be one this year, and it will probably 372 00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:50,600 Speaker 1: be one next year. And just to be clear, UH, 373 00:20:50,800 --> 00:20:54,680 Speaker 1: the vote counting is still underway. Amazon had one thousand, 374 00:20:54,760 --> 00:20:58,520 Speaker 1: six hundred and eight no votes, which is a majority 375 00:20:58,560 --> 00:21:01,719 Speaker 1: of the more than thirty two hundred ballots that were cast, 376 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:05,879 Speaker 1: and so the loss with Amazon already well ahead in 377 00:21:05,920 --> 00:21:08,720 Speaker 1: the tally, UH, the union is pledging to appeal the 378 00:21:08,840 --> 00:21:13,240 Speaker 1: results and the stored Apple bomb r w DSU president. 379 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:16,520 Speaker 1: The union president said, quote, our system has broken. Amazon 380 00:21:16,720 --> 00:21:19,240 Speaker 1: took full advantage of that, and we will be calling 381 00:21:19,280 --> 00:21:22,280 Speaker 1: on the Labor Board to hold Amazon accountable for its 382 00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:25,320 Speaker 1: illegal and egregious behavior during the campaign, but make no 383 00:21:25,359 --> 00:21:28,080 Speaker 1: mistake about it, this still represents an important moment for 384 00:21:28,119 --> 00:21:32,320 Speaker 1: working people and their voices will and this is such 385 00:21:32,359 --> 00:21:34,520 Speaker 1: an important point speaking of what the media can do 386 00:21:34,640 --> 00:21:37,639 Speaker 1: is just what you're doing, which is to underscore how 387 00:21:37,920 --> 00:21:40,920 Speaker 1: these companies and I'm not you know, nothing against Amazon, 388 00:21:41,000 --> 00:21:44,199 Speaker 1: but how these companies have the upper hand when it 389 00:21:44,240 --> 00:21:47,840 Speaker 1: comes to punishing, threatening, retaliating against workers who try to 390 00:21:47,920 --> 00:21:53,040 Speaker 1: organize and working aggressively to campaign against these unions. Workers 391 00:21:53,080 --> 00:21:56,160 Speaker 1: are you know, really really on the losing end when 392 00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:59,359 Speaker 1: it comes to the power here, hence the need to unionize. 393 00:21:59,640 --> 00:22:02,480 Speaker 1: And the media can do a good job of showing 394 00:22:02,520 --> 00:22:05,800 Speaker 1: how this works so that there is a push potentially 395 00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:09,159 Speaker 1: to change these laws which allow this. Where where's the 396 00:22:09,200 --> 00:22:11,879 Speaker 1: next do we know? I mean, where is the next 397 00:22:12,200 --> 00:22:15,000 Speaker 1: union fight? Rick? And I'm not I'm not trying to 398 00:22:15,280 --> 00:22:17,200 Speaker 1: you know, I know it's a tough question, but are 399 00:22:17,200 --> 00:22:20,840 Speaker 1: there other potential dynamics of plays? It seems that Amazon 400 00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:24,520 Speaker 1: has really become for the far left, uh where they're 401 00:22:24,560 --> 00:22:27,040 Speaker 1: putting their focus on in terms of the union issue, 402 00:22:27,119 --> 00:22:30,040 Speaker 1: not just in Bessemer, Alabama, but elsewhere as well. Yeah, 403 00:22:30,040 --> 00:22:32,440 Speaker 1: I think that's actually the reverse. I think you look 404 00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:36,879 Speaker 1: at states like Michigan, UM where they unions around the 405 00:22:36,920 --> 00:22:42,040 Speaker 1: automobile manufacturing business have been so strong historically, but as 406 00:22:42,080 --> 00:22:45,520 Speaker 1: that industry has changed and and frankly taken a lot 407 00:22:45,560 --> 00:22:47,760 Speaker 1: of its labor force out of the state of Michigan, 408 00:22:47,880 --> 00:22:52,080 Speaker 1: not in small reason because of increased costs of union 409 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:54,800 Speaker 1: workers um UH as to whether or not they will 410 00:22:54,920 --> 00:22:58,920 Speaker 1: not be able to attract additional UH employment opportunities where 411 00:22:58,920 --> 00:23:01,159 Speaker 1: corporations would come in or and and don't want to 412 00:23:01,200 --> 00:23:04,200 Speaker 1: be required to have a union. And so I think 413 00:23:04,240 --> 00:23:08,119 Speaker 1: that's actually going to really test the system. Can unions 414 00:23:08,480 --> 00:23:12,000 Speaker 1: keep hold of the territory that they already have as 415 00:23:12,080 --> 00:23:16,880 Speaker 1: industries change and manufacturing changes, you know where in many 416 00:23:16,920 --> 00:23:19,760 Speaker 1: of these places robotics is starting to take over this 417 00:23:19,840 --> 00:23:23,639 Speaker 1: supply chain and UH and and and the jobs that 418 00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:26,280 Speaker 1: that would have been a union job before, which were 419 00:23:26,359 --> 00:23:30,520 Speaker 1: manual labor, are now becoming more technically you know superior. Alright, 420 00:23:30,520 --> 00:23:32,920 Speaker 1: coming up, we're gonna head across the pond and talk 421 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:35,800 Speaker 1: about the analysis of the U s UK special relationship. 422 00:23:35,880 --> 00:23:39,520 Speaker 1: Of course, is the passing a Prince Philip at Windsor Castle. 423 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:49,520 Speaker 1: I'm Kevin Surley. This is Bloomberg. I'm Kevin Surley, chief 424 00:23:49,560 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 1: Washington correspondent for Bloomberg TV and for Bloomberg Radio, accompanied 425 00:23:53,560 --> 00:23:57,040 Speaker 1: by the Bloomberg Politics contributors Rick Davis and Jeanie Shanz. 426 00:23:57,080 --> 00:24:01,560 Speaker 1: They know really sad news today as Prince Philip Rick 427 00:24:01,640 --> 00:24:06,040 Speaker 1: passed away UH at Windsor Palace reading from the sun. Uh. 428 00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:08,720 Speaker 1: The Queen has expressed her quote deep sorrow end quote 429 00:24:08,760 --> 00:24:12,560 Speaker 1: after her beloved husband, the Duke of Edinburgh, passed away 430 00:24:12,560 --> 00:24:16,879 Speaker 1: peacefully at Windsor Castle. Just. I mean, the Royals have 431 00:24:16,920 --> 00:24:21,919 Speaker 1: obviously been in uh the global conversation, especially in the 432 00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:26,920 Speaker 1: culture in recent years candidly UH as a new generation 433 00:24:27,000 --> 00:24:30,600 Speaker 1: it seems, becomes familiar with them. But is today is 434 00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:33,400 Speaker 1: really an opportunity to just look and examine the special 435 00:24:33,440 --> 00:24:36,520 Speaker 1: relationship between the United States and the UK. But also 436 00:24:36,560 --> 00:24:40,280 Speaker 1: it's just honor the legacy of this current leadership of 437 00:24:40,480 --> 00:24:45,679 Speaker 1: the monarchy. Yeah. I think that it's really interesting to 438 00:24:45,800 --> 00:24:50,120 Speaker 1: look back on the trajectory of Prince Philip's life nine 439 00:24:50,440 --> 00:24:55,040 Speaker 1: nine years of of of really service is a royal 440 00:24:55,440 --> 00:24:58,199 Speaker 1: uh and UH, and what the relationship has been like 441 00:24:58,280 --> 00:25:01,600 Speaker 1: over that ninety nine years with the United States. And 442 00:25:01,640 --> 00:25:05,159 Speaker 1: it's really been transformational for the world. Right, if we 443 00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:08,800 Speaker 1: had not had uh a relationship with Great Britain before 444 00:25:08,800 --> 00:25:11,760 Speaker 1: World War Two, what would have been the outcome? Uh? 445 00:25:11,800 --> 00:25:15,720 Speaker 1: If we hadn't had the close relationship between Margaret Thatcher 446 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:19,160 Speaker 1: and Ronald Reagan against the Soviet Union and the spread 447 00:25:19,200 --> 00:25:22,680 Speaker 1: of communism, what would have happened? Um? You know our 448 00:25:22,800 --> 00:25:25,920 Speaker 1: best ally on the War on Terror? If if we 449 00:25:25,920 --> 00:25:29,080 Speaker 1: weren't allies, what would have happened with the War on Terror? 450 00:25:29,119 --> 00:25:33,159 Speaker 1: So you look at these big, chunky, you know, geopolitical 451 00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:38,159 Speaker 1: events of our lifetime, of Prince Philip's lifetime, and you wonder, wow, Uh, 452 00:25:38,200 --> 00:25:41,879 Speaker 1: he's really overseen a relationship been a part of it 453 00:25:41,960 --> 00:25:45,639 Speaker 1: that has been the most transformational in modern history of 454 00:25:45,680 --> 00:25:49,760 Speaker 1: the world. Jennie US President Joe Biden joined world leaders 455 00:25:49,800 --> 00:25:54,720 Speaker 1: and paying tribute to Prince Philip. He was nine years old. UH. 456 00:25:54,880 --> 00:25:57,760 Speaker 1: President Biden praised his decades of public service. That Rick 457 00:25:57,880 --> 00:26:02,480 Speaker 1: was just uh eloquently scribing and sent condolences to Queen 458 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:06,080 Speaker 1: Elizabeth the Second, he said in a statement are he 459 00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:08,960 Speaker 1: said in a joint statement with First Lady Jill Biden quote, 460 00:26:09,200 --> 00:26:12,320 Speaker 1: Prince Philip gladly dedicated himself to the people of the UK, 461 00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:15,560 Speaker 1: the Commonwealth and to his family. His legacy will live 462 00:26:15,720 --> 00:26:18,560 Speaker 1: on not only through his family, but in all the 463 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:22,840 Speaker 1: charitable endeavors that he shaped. Other leaders who paid tribute 464 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:28,439 Speaker 1: included German Chancellor Angela Merkel and EU President Ursula vonder 465 00:26:28,520 --> 00:26:31,880 Speaker 1: Land and French President Emmanuel Macrone said that the Duke 466 00:26:31,960 --> 00:26:37,160 Speaker 1: lived quote an exemplary life defined by bravery. Wow. And 467 00:26:37,200 --> 00:26:39,480 Speaker 1: one of the things I think we forget about Prince 468 00:26:39,520 --> 00:26:43,639 Speaker 1: Philip was his dedication to a cause that really many 469 00:26:43,680 --> 00:26:46,680 Speaker 1: people didn't embrace, at least in our country until maybe 470 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:50,280 Speaker 1: the nineteen sixties nineteen seventies, and that's the environment. He 471 00:26:50,440 --> 00:26:53,040 Speaker 1: was somebody who came out very very early, and we 472 00:26:53,080 --> 00:26:55,879 Speaker 1: see this in his son as well as you know, 473 00:26:56,000 --> 00:27:00,800 Speaker 1: a really strong environmentalist. He warned about green house gasses 474 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:03,800 Speaker 1: and other things. And on a you know, a personal 475 00:27:03,840 --> 00:27:06,440 Speaker 1: note about his personal life. I did not realize until 476 00:27:06,480 --> 00:27:10,040 Speaker 1: I read his obituary in one of the newspapers that 477 00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:12,959 Speaker 1: he and the Queen met when they were thirteen or 478 00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:17,159 Speaker 1: fourteen years old. And you know what a love story 479 00:27:17,320 --> 00:27:20,280 Speaker 1: that is. Um. You know, there's been, you know, some 480 00:27:20,400 --> 00:27:23,920 Speaker 1: great political love stories that we talked about. Ronald Reagan 481 00:27:24,040 --> 00:27:26,760 Speaker 1: of course, and and Nancy Reagan. But you know, from 482 00:27:26,800 --> 00:27:30,560 Speaker 1: the age of thirteen or fourteen to nine nine, um, 483 00:27:30,680 --> 00:27:33,320 Speaker 1: what a relationship they have had. And of course the 484 00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:36,639 Speaker 1: work he has done both publicly and privately, um, you know. 485 00:27:36,720 --> 00:27:39,600 Speaker 1: And and of course transitioning now with his children and 486 00:27:39,600 --> 00:27:42,280 Speaker 1: his grandchildren to a time he probably couldn't have imagined 487 00:27:42,320 --> 00:27:47,679 Speaker 1: when he was born. Rick, this comes at a time 488 00:27:48,080 --> 00:27:51,320 Speaker 1: of as Thomas Penny on the Bloomberg Terminal, I really 489 00:27:51,359 --> 00:27:55,879 Speaker 1: think Penny's article captures captures the sentiment of what's in 490 00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:59,119 Speaker 1: the zeitgeist, to quote Tom Keane right now for for 491 00:27:59,160 --> 00:28:03,119 Speaker 1: the monarchy, phil ups death, Penny reports quote comes at 492 00:28:03,160 --> 00:28:08,240 Speaker 1: a moment of profound change for the royal family. He 493 00:28:08,320 --> 00:28:10,320 Speaker 1: goes on to allude to to some of the other 494 00:28:10,960 --> 00:28:15,000 Speaker 1: uh items that are in the conversation about the monarchy. 495 00:28:15,119 --> 00:28:17,440 Speaker 1: I don't want to link the troubles of the monarchy 496 00:28:17,480 --> 00:28:20,040 Speaker 1: to to Prince Philip, but I do want to talk 497 00:28:20,080 --> 00:28:23,800 Speaker 1: about this crossroads for the monarchy as it looks at 498 00:28:23,800 --> 00:28:28,040 Speaker 1: the decade ahead. Where where is the monarchy ten years 499 00:28:28,040 --> 00:28:30,480 Speaker 1: from now? And what role did they play in geopolitics? 500 00:28:32,280 --> 00:28:35,680 Speaker 1: You know, it's hard to say. Um, there's a school 501 00:28:35,760 --> 00:28:39,760 Speaker 1: that says, hey, they're the greatest chamber of commerce ever 502 00:28:39,800 --> 00:28:42,160 Speaker 1: created by man. Right. I mean, like, you know, the 503 00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:45,479 Speaker 1: reason people come to go to visit the UK in 504 00:28:45,520 --> 00:28:49,320 Speaker 1: London is not up for the fantastic food there. I 505 00:28:49,320 --> 00:28:52,480 Speaker 1: mean it's British, right, never really fish and chips. To 506 00:28:52,560 --> 00:28:55,840 Speaker 1: me candidly, you know, I'd rather I just don't get it, 507 00:28:55,880 --> 00:28:58,120 Speaker 1: but go ahead. Yeah. The first thing somebody asked you 508 00:28:58,160 --> 00:28:59,720 Speaker 1: to say, oh I was did you go by the 509 00:28:59,720 --> 00:29:01,640 Speaker 1: path Us did you see the Queen? Right? I mean 510 00:29:01,720 --> 00:29:08,920 Speaker 1: like and yeah you have that too, Penny Lane, those places. 511 00:29:09,400 --> 00:29:13,520 Speaker 1: But but I would say this queen really is the 512 00:29:13,640 --> 00:29:17,120 Speaker 1: transformational queen. You think about when she took over for 513 00:29:17,280 --> 00:29:22,200 Speaker 1: the her father, the king, and what a different monarchy 514 00:29:22,280 --> 00:29:25,320 Speaker 1: that was where they actually still had some level of 515 00:29:25,360 --> 00:29:30,480 Speaker 1: constitutional power, and and and she oversaw the more modern 516 00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:35,040 Speaker 1: monarchy and and and and the future is the younger generation. 517 00:29:35,120 --> 00:29:38,000 Speaker 1: And so you know, this is something that I think 518 00:29:38,360 --> 00:29:42,240 Speaker 1: is will be fascinating to watch in real time. Our 519 00:29:42,240 --> 00:29:44,920 Speaker 1: hearts go out to the royal family, all of them, uh, 520 00:29:45,160 --> 00:29:48,479 Speaker 1: every generation over the loss of Prince Philip. But it 521 00:29:48,520 --> 00:29:52,920 Speaker 1: does make us stop and think about their contribution, which is, 522 00:29:53,200 --> 00:29:57,320 Speaker 1: you know, been very favorable for the United Kingdom and 523 00:29:57,480 --> 00:30:00,680 Speaker 1: many of the other UH countries that have aociate with 524 00:30:00,920 --> 00:30:04,320 Speaker 1: the British um Um monarchy. Genie, I'll give you the 525 00:30:04,360 --> 00:30:06,760 Speaker 1: last word on this. Well, I think we're in a 526 00:30:06,840 --> 00:30:11,360 Speaker 1: real test to see can a monarchy survive in this 527 00:30:11,440 --> 00:30:15,440 Speaker 1: sort of you know, twenty one century speaking of the media, 528 00:30:15,560 --> 00:30:18,560 Speaker 1: in this media environment. That was something that Philip, Prince 529 00:30:18,560 --> 00:30:21,880 Speaker 1: Philip had a lot of difficulty with, understandably so as 530 00:30:21,920 --> 00:30:23,959 Speaker 1: does the rest of the family. And you know they 531 00:30:24,000 --> 00:30:25,560 Speaker 1: are going to have to work hard to make the 532 00:30:25,600 --> 00:30:29,200 Speaker 1: case that as as Rick said that the monarchy is 533 00:30:29,280 --> 00:30:32,680 Speaker 1: good for for Britain. UM Unable to make that case, 534 00:30:32,680 --> 00:30:37,000 Speaker 1: it's hard to see why they keep investing in it. Fascinating, fascinating. 535 00:30:37,120 --> 00:30:39,280 Speaker 1: The only thing my family on the serely text chain 536 00:30:39,360 --> 00:30:43,520 Speaker 1: today was blowing up over all of the dynamics of 537 00:30:43,560 --> 00:30:46,440 Speaker 1: the monarchy. They have definitely captured the interest of the 538 00:30:46,440 --> 00:30:49,440 Speaker 1: world these past few weeks. I'm Kevin surreally much more 539 00:30:49,480 --> 00:30:53,920 Speaker 1: with the All Star Policy panel coming up. This is Bloomberg. 540 00:31:05,920 --> 00:31:08,520 Speaker 1: My name is Kevin Curreli. I'm the chief Washington correspondent 541 00:31:08,560 --> 00:31:12,080 Speaker 1: for Bloomberg Television and for Bloomberg Radio. Shout out to 542 00:31:12,280 --> 00:31:15,960 Speaker 1: the legendary team, our executive producer Christine Barata and our 543 00:31:16,040 --> 00:31:20,120 Speaker 1: producer Matthew Shirley. Uh. I want to welcome to the 544 00:31:20,160 --> 00:31:27,720 Speaker 1: all Star policy panel Bloomberg Politics contributors Genie, Sean Dave, Genie, Genie, 545 00:31:27,760 --> 00:31:30,400 Speaker 1: I'm tongue tied, Genie Shan Zan know as well as 546 00:31:30,520 --> 00:31:32,840 Speaker 1: Rick Davis. And We're gonna go old school for a 547 00:31:32,880 --> 00:31:35,600 Speaker 1: minute and uh and end this with what is on 548 00:31:35,640 --> 00:31:37,600 Speaker 1: your radar? I want you to tell me one thing 549 00:31:37,640 --> 00:31:41,680 Speaker 1: that is coming up, Genie, that is on your radar. Well, 550 00:31:41,760 --> 00:31:44,680 Speaker 1: I am fascinated and um, you know, Rick and I 551 00:31:44,760 --> 00:31:48,880 Speaker 1: are not married, so I see that it happened to 552 00:31:52,720 --> 00:31:59,760 Speaker 1: I'm I'm again tongue tied. I don't know what to say. Yeah, Rick, 553 00:31:59,840 --> 00:32:01,959 Speaker 1: and you have to admit I have been called your 554 00:32:02,040 --> 00:32:08,360 Speaker 1: last name many times, right An, Oh my gosh, yes, 555 00:32:08,520 --> 00:32:11,520 Speaker 1: let me explain. It's just you know, um, so back 556 00:32:11,560 --> 00:32:15,880 Speaker 1: to seriousness. Um, I am fascinated by, um, the calls 557 00:32:16,040 --> 00:32:19,840 Speaker 1: that have been coming for the retirement of the Supreme 558 00:32:19,880 --> 00:32:23,960 Speaker 1: Court justice and this is something that is you know, 559 00:32:24,080 --> 00:32:26,600 Speaker 1: something I watch I teach a lot of Supreme Court 560 00:32:27,040 --> 00:32:30,760 Speaker 1: and the fact that we have seen a concerted push 561 00:32:30,840 --> 00:32:34,360 Speaker 1: now not just to pack the court, but for a 562 00:32:34,520 --> 00:32:39,120 Speaker 1: retirement on the court amongst democrats. UM, this is something 563 00:32:39,160 --> 00:32:42,160 Speaker 1: that as we all remember, there was a push during 564 00:32:42,320 --> 00:32:46,400 Speaker 1: the Obama administration for Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire. She 565 00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:50,800 Speaker 1: obviously did not, and that of course became something that um, 566 00:32:50,880 --> 00:32:54,160 Speaker 1: you know, democrats UM have you know, talked a lot 567 00:32:54,200 --> 00:32:57,920 Speaker 1: about in the aftermath, and having seemingly decided that they're 568 00:32:57,960 --> 00:32:59,880 Speaker 1: not going to let this happen, they have been pushing 569 00:33:00,320 --> 00:33:03,880 Speaker 1: Stephen Bryer to resign. So it I'm curious and going 570 00:33:03,920 --> 00:33:06,240 Speaker 1: to be watching how that pans out. And of course 571 00:33:06,280 --> 00:33:10,560 Speaker 1: the President's new commission on potentially packing the court or 572 00:33:10,640 --> 00:33:13,120 Speaker 1: at least investigating it. And we have sound on that 573 00:33:13,200 --> 00:33:16,200 Speaker 1: from White House Press Secretary Jen Saki. She was asked 574 00:33:16,200 --> 00:33:19,440 Speaker 1: about President Biden's taving a panel to look at whether 575 00:33:19,600 --> 00:33:22,240 Speaker 1: there should be more seats on the U. S. Supreme Court. 576 00:33:22,440 --> 00:33:25,280 Speaker 1: Saki denied that there are any immediate plans to add 577 00:33:25,320 --> 00:33:28,000 Speaker 1: more justices. Take a listen to the sound on scotists. 578 00:33:28,640 --> 00:33:30,960 Speaker 1: The panels being asked to do a number of take 579 00:33:30,960 --> 00:33:33,400 Speaker 1: a number of steps, including the pros and cons on 580 00:33:33,480 --> 00:33:36,760 Speaker 1: exactly that issue. But they will also be looking at 581 00:33:37,040 --> 00:33:40,120 Speaker 1: the Court's role in the constitutional system, the length of 582 00:33:40,160 --> 00:33:42,840 Speaker 1: service and turnover of justice on the Court, justices on 583 00:33:42,880 --> 00:33:46,720 Speaker 1: the court, the membership and size of the Court. Reck 584 00:33:46,760 --> 00:33:48,680 Speaker 1: I mean, I don't think that he's going to ever 585 00:33:48,760 --> 00:33:52,800 Speaker 1: be able to add Supreme Court justices in his term. 586 00:33:52,880 --> 00:33:55,760 Speaker 1: Uh yeah, I I would doubt it. I mean, you know, 587 00:33:55,800 --> 00:34:00,480 Speaker 1: with these slim majorities in the Senate um it I think, 588 00:34:00,520 --> 00:34:04,360 Speaker 1: I think it just functionally becomes a problem. I would say, 589 00:34:04,440 --> 00:34:06,120 Speaker 1: I think this is just a nod to the left 590 00:34:06,120 --> 00:34:08,200 Speaker 1: to keep them happy about the idea that they can 591 00:34:08,239 --> 00:34:13,320 Speaker 1: somehow overturned the number of Supreme Court justices that Donald 592 00:34:13,320 --> 00:34:17,440 Speaker 1: Trump put on the the Supreme Court and potentially have 593 00:34:17,560 --> 00:34:21,000 Speaker 1: some impact later on on the federal court system. But 594 00:34:21,320 --> 00:34:23,160 Speaker 1: I agree with you, I think that this is a 595 00:34:23,680 --> 00:34:25,600 Speaker 1: this is a long shot, But I think it's just 596 00:34:25,680 --> 00:34:28,560 Speaker 1: a political nod to the to the rattle of the 597 00:34:28,560 --> 00:34:30,920 Speaker 1: sabers on the left. And I also I was just 598 00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:33,320 Speaker 1: also going to add it's also what it was in 599 00:34:33,320 --> 00:34:35,759 Speaker 1: in FDR's time when he made this threat. It's a 600 00:34:35,760 --> 00:34:39,280 Speaker 1: warning to the court. Stephen Brier is right, you lose 601 00:34:39,360 --> 00:34:42,799 Speaker 1: legitimacy potentially if you do this. But what happened when 602 00:34:42,840 --> 00:34:45,040 Speaker 1: FDR did it, there was no packing of the court, 603 00:34:45,320 --> 00:34:47,680 Speaker 1: but there was the switch in time. And this is 604 00:34:47,719 --> 00:34:50,440 Speaker 1: a warning to the federal bench, in my view, that 605 00:34:50,480 --> 00:34:53,440 Speaker 1: they better be very careful to be above politics. And 606 00:34:53,480 --> 00:34:56,640 Speaker 1: so I think that's what we're seeing here as well. Yeah, No, 607 00:34:56,719 --> 00:34:59,680 Speaker 1: I think it's it's fascinating the Supreme Court has has 608 00:34:59,680 --> 00:35:02,600 Speaker 1: define only become one of those lightning rod issues for 609 00:35:02,800 --> 00:35:06,520 Speaker 1: progressives and and it's it's really an incredible debate. That's 610 00:35:06,560 --> 00:35:09,120 Speaker 1: a robust debate that's being had, and no doubt we'll 611 00:35:09,160 --> 00:35:11,400 Speaker 1: be discussed in any type of primary season for the 612 00:35:11,400 --> 00:35:16,080 Speaker 1: next cycle and beyond. I think Senator Joe Mansion's column, though, 613 00:35:16,120 --> 00:35:19,360 Speaker 1: in which you call it for bipartisanship, is really where 614 00:35:19,360 --> 00:35:21,080 Speaker 1: he is at on this and and so it'll be 615 00:35:21,160 --> 00:35:24,800 Speaker 1: fascinating to see where all of that is headed. Rick Davis, 616 00:35:25,000 --> 00:35:27,680 Speaker 1: what is on your radar? You know? I, as a 617 00:35:27,719 --> 00:35:30,840 Speaker 1: defense hawk, I have to say that the president you know, 618 00:35:30,920 --> 00:35:35,879 Speaker 1: presented this huge budget UH today UH at one point 619 00:35:35,960 --> 00:35:40,880 Speaker 1: nine trillion dollars of UH domestic and UH spending and 620 00:35:40,880 --> 00:35:44,360 Speaker 1: and in a flat UH defense budget. So at a 621 00:35:44,440 --> 00:35:49,680 Speaker 1: time when we are all looking at UH this competition 622 00:35:49,840 --> 00:35:53,640 Speaker 1: with China, and Russia. We've talked on this pro program 623 00:35:53,640 --> 00:35:58,479 Speaker 1: repeatedly about issues related to our defense posture in uh 624 00:35:58,560 --> 00:36:04,359 Speaker 1: in in regards those two what they call near peer adversaries. Um, 625 00:36:04,400 --> 00:36:07,680 Speaker 1: it's shocking to me that that that we're going about 626 00:36:07,719 --> 00:36:10,799 Speaker 1: this by basically signaling to Russia into China that we're 627 00:36:10,800 --> 00:36:13,600 Speaker 1: not gonna we're not gonna increase our investment defense spending 628 00:36:13,600 --> 00:36:17,440 Speaker 1: and in a sixtent increase in domestic spending, but basically 629 00:36:17,440 --> 00:36:21,200 Speaker 1: a flat uh do o D budget. I'm I'm watching 630 00:36:21,239 --> 00:36:24,040 Speaker 1: the storyline on that because I think it's going to 631 00:36:24,160 --> 00:36:29,560 Speaker 1: hand Republicans a foreign policy tool that they didn't otherwise have. Well, Rick, 632 00:36:29,640 --> 00:36:31,359 Speaker 1: let me ask you that I mean to follow up 633 00:36:31,400 --> 00:36:33,920 Speaker 1: on that. Is that a political trap for the Democrats 634 00:36:33,960 --> 00:36:36,560 Speaker 1: heading in some midterms where on one hand they want 635 00:36:36,560 --> 00:36:39,520 Speaker 1: to have they want to cut funding for defense, but 636 00:36:39,560 --> 00:36:42,160 Speaker 1: they want to you know, increase it for initiatives that 637 00:36:42,200 --> 00:36:44,960 Speaker 1: are more controversial to be candid domestically or I want 638 00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:48,640 Speaker 1: to say controversial or more political domestically. Yeah, I think 639 00:36:48,680 --> 00:36:50,600 Speaker 1: this is We talked a little bit about this earlier 640 00:36:50,600 --> 00:36:53,680 Speaker 1: in the show, where the Congressman Boyle was talking about 641 00:36:53,680 --> 00:36:56,680 Speaker 1: how popular these spending programs are when you present them 642 00:36:56,680 --> 00:36:58,879 Speaker 1: to voters. And that's true, you know, I mean when 643 00:36:58,880 --> 00:37:01,520 Speaker 1: you take free month, I mean we're gonna we're gonna 644 00:37:01,560 --> 00:37:03,880 Speaker 1: fund all sorts of different things in your life. Uh, 645 00:37:04,239 --> 00:37:08,960 Speaker 1: it's attractive. But when the administration takes a position that says, hey, 646 00:37:09,080 --> 00:37:11,560 Speaker 1: you know, we're in a competition with these these countries 647 00:37:11,600 --> 00:37:13,960 Speaker 1: like China, and we have to do everything we can 648 00:37:14,040 --> 00:37:18,760 Speaker 1: to ensure that they don't uh mess up our supply chain, 649 00:37:19,160 --> 00:37:23,319 Speaker 1: um uh threaten our neighbors and otherwise make the world 650 00:37:23,360 --> 00:37:25,480 Speaker 1: an unsafe place. But we're not going to invest in 651 00:37:25,520 --> 00:37:27,759 Speaker 1: that at all. I think that's a political issue at 652 00:37:27,760 --> 00:37:30,160 Speaker 1: the end of the day. I think it's more importantly 653 00:37:30,320 --> 00:37:33,480 Speaker 1: a public policy issue that doesn't square with their rhetoric, 654 00:37:33,560 --> 00:37:35,000 Speaker 1: and I think that's going to be an issue on 655 00:37:35,080 --> 00:37:38,320 Speaker 1: Capitol Hill. But Rick, do you think that this sets 656 00:37:38,360 --> 00:37:40,399 Speaker 1: up what I think has been coming for a long time, 657 00:37:40,400 --> 00:37:43,440 Speaker 1: which is a debate on how best to combat China. 658 00:37:43,800 --> 00:37:46,600 Speaker 1: You know, Republicans have long said that it is investment 659 00:37:46,680 --> 00:37:50,160 Speaker 1: in defense, as you've been talking about. What Democrats are 660 00:37:50,200 --> 00:37:53,640 Speaker 1: saying is, you know, we need to also invest, as 661 00:37:53,680 --> 00:37:57,239 Speaker 1: you know, in infrastructure. You know, China is prepared, you 662 00:37:57,239 --> 00:37:59,440 Speaker 1: know a much better prepared as we go forward in 663 00:37:59,520 --> 00:38:02,000 Speaker 1: terms of ISU. Was like broadband and how can we 664 00:38:02,000 --> 00:38:04,319 Speaker 1: we just can't compete with defense but also have to 665 00:38:04,320 --> 00:38:06,200 Speaker 1: do it in these other ways. Well, that's that's what 666 00:38:06,239 --> 00:38:08,080 Speaker 1: brings me to what's on my radar, which is Eric 667 00:38:08,120 --> 00:38:12,120 Speaker 1: Martin's reporting on the Bloomberg terminal. US blacklists seven Chinese 668 00:38:12,200 --> 00:38:16,840 Speaker 1: supercomputing firms firms involved UH in information and technology. The 669 00:38:16,880 --> 00:38:21,120 Speaker 1: Commerce Department says that the entities are related to military efforts. 670 00:38:21,160 --> 00:38:23,640 Speaker 1: This is again just a thread that the three of 671 00:38:23,680 --> 00:38:26,680 Speaker 1: US have been chronicling for the past several months. A 672 00:38:26,719 --> 00:38:31,359 Speaker 1: continuation of American policy, not of a partisan policy, continuation 673 00:38:31,400 --> 00:38:34,160 Speaker 1: of the previous administration, and a continuation for this one. 674 00:38:34,239 --> 00:38:37,719 Speaker 1: The US added seven Chinese supercomputing firms to a list 675 00:38:37,719 --> 00:38:42,040 Speaker 1: of entities banned from receiving exports from American companies citing 676 00:38:42,080 --> 00:38:46,680 Speaker 1: activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests 677 00:38:46,680 --> 00:38:49,080 Speaker 1: of the US. The companies were added to the so 678 00:38:49,160 --> 00:38:52,600 Speaker 1: called entity list that of course prohibits American firms from 679 00:38:52,640 --> 00:38:57,640 Speaker 1: doing business with them without first obtaining a US government license. 680 00:38:57,960 --> 00:39:01,839 Speaker 1: Secretary of Commerce Gina Ramundo having jurisdiction over that, so 681 00:39:01,920 --> 00:39:05,960 Speaker 1: that right there again. We talked about this yesterday with 682 00:39:06,000 --> 00:39:09,680 Speaker 1: the National Intelligence Council report. A continuation of of a 683 00:39:09,760 --> 00:39:15,200 Speaker 1: non partis an issue for American policy. Alright, folks, I 684 00:39:15,239 --> 00:39:19,799 Speaker 1: have a programming note, Rick and Genie, uh, sound on? 685 00:39:19,960 --> 00:39:24,040 Speaker 1: Is yours? I really appreciate everything. Today is my last 686 00:39:24,120 --> 00:39:27,319 Speaker 1: day at Bloomberg after nearly six years. I want to 687 00:39:27,360 --> 00:39:30,160 Speaker 1: thank everyone who has listened and watched and supported me 688 00:39:30,840 --> 00:39:33,000 Speaker 1: on this journey. It really was a journey over these 689 00:39:33,040 --> 00:39:35,520 Speaker 1: past six years. And I especially want to thank every 690 00:39:35,560 --> 00:39:40,239 Speaker 1: single one of my colleagues for this incredible, incredible experience. 691 00:39:40,520 --> 00:39:42,640 Speaker 1: It's time for me to try something new with a 692 00:39:42,680 --> 00:39:45,200 Speaker 1: new project and a new role soon and more to come. 693 00:39:45,680 --> 00:39:47,719 Speaker 1: But I really Rick and Genie, I want to thank 694 00:39:47,760 --> 00:39:51,960 Speaker 1: each of you. Genie first for for just really supporting 695 00:39:52,000 --> 00:39:54,880 Speaker 1: me on this endeavor. It has been something that I 696 00:39:54,880 --> 00:39:59,279 Speaker 1: am incredibly, incredibly grateful for. Casey. I just can't imagine 697 00:39:59,360 --> 00:40:02,400 Speaker 1: not having you on the show. Um, And thank you 698 00:40:02,440 --> 00:40:04,920 Speaker 1: so much for you've been so welcoming and supportive to me, 699 00:40:05,200 --> 00:40:07,719 Speaker 1: and and and of course I'm so excited to see 700 00:40:07,719 --> 00:40:10,680 Speaker 1: about your next project, UM and what you're doing. And 701 00:40:10,719 --> 00:40:13,920 Speaker 1: when I am in d C, you're still there. We 702 00:40:14,000 --> 00:40:15,880 Speaker 1: are going to go out for a coke or something 703 00:40:15,960 --> 00:40:19,600 Speaker 1: wherever I am. We will we will meet up. Rick. 704 00:40:19,640 --> 00:40:22,000 Speaker 1: I really want to thank you as well for everything. 705 00:40:22,000 --> 00:40:24,120 Speaker 1: I told the team before, I said, I'm not Tom Sawyer. 706 00:40:24,239 --> 00:40:26,680 Speaker 1: I feel like I'm Tom Sawyer watching my funeral. But 707 00:40:26,719 --> 00:40:28,960 Speaker 1: it's not that serious. But I do want to say 708 00:40:28,960 --> 00:40:31,160 Speaker 1: thank you Rick for everything as well. Well. Kevin, I 709 00:40:31,200 --> 00:40:33,839 Speaker 1: can't say how much I've enjoyed working with you. It's 710 00:40:33,880 --> 00:40:37,280 Speaker 1: been an interesting path, like I will remember this period 711 00:40:37,280 --> 00:40:40,920 Speaker 1: of time during the elections and uh and in this 712 00:40:41,120 --> 00:40:44,040 Speaker 1: COVID period UH for the rest of our lives. And 713 00:40:44,040 --> 00:40:45,719 Speaker 1: and You've played an important part of it. I've learned 714 00:40:45,719 --> 00:40:49,000 Speaker 1: a lot from you, your consummate professional, and I know 715 00:40:49,120 --> 00:40:51,000 Speaker 1: you'll just knock it out of the park with whatever 716 00:40:51,080 --> 00:40:53,719 Speaker 1: endeavor you you continue to do well. I appreciate that. 717 00:40:53,800 --> 00:40:56,280 Speaker 1: And you guys make it fun and uh, just have fun. 718 00:40:56,480 --> 00:40:59,360 Speaker 1: That's the best advice I ever got was to just 719 00:40:59,840 --> 00:41:02,240 Speaker 1: be allow yourself to have some fun. But I don't 720 00:41:02,280 --> 00:41:04,600 Speaker 1: really all right enough of that. We still have a minute. 721 00:41:04,640 --> 00:41:07,120 Speaker 1: We finished. We finished early. See, I was so nervous. 722 00:41:07,160 --> 00:41:09,319 Speaker 1: I told Christie Robata, I said, I really hate being 723 00:41:09,360 --> 00:41:11,200 Speaker 1: the story. I don't want to do this. Heaven, we 724 00:41:11,200 --> 00:41:15,080 Speaker 1: should have said nicer things that took longer. I guess, 725 00:41:15,360 --> 00:41:19,960 Speaker 1: I guess it's hard to fill dead air. G D. 726 00:41:20,560 --> 00:41:23,200 Speaker 1: I'll give you the last word, Casey, I am going 727 00:41:23,239 --> 00:41:25,399 Speaker 1: to miss you so much. And as Rick said, you 728 00:41:25,440 --> 00:41:28,400 Speaker 1: have been the voice of the radio TV at Bloomberg 729 00:41:28,440 --> 00:41:31,800 Speaker 1: Politics for so long and reported on so many things, 730 00:41:31,840 --> 00:41:35,200 Speaker 1: and you know, imagining it without your voice every day 731 00:41:35,280 --> 00:41:38,400 Speaker 1: is just hard for me to sort of everyone's replaceable. 732 00:41:38,400 --> 00:41:40,600 Speaker 1: And Levin, can I ask you a question? I mean, 733 00:41:40,640 --> 00:41:43,520 Speaker 1: it's so exciting. What's the one moment that you remember 734 00:41:43,560 --> 00:41:48,080 Speaker 1: most about your tenure. I got to take my mom 735 00:41:48,080 --> 00:41:52,600 Speaker 1: to the White House. Oh. That that's a very special memory. 736 00:41:52,600 --> 00:41:54,879 Speaker 1: And it's a blessing to have that memory. So thank 737 00:41:54,920 --> 00:41:57,200 Speaker 1: you to everyone for supporting me, and thank you to 738 00:41:57,239 --> 00:41:59,960 Speaker 1: my parents as well. I'm Kevin Sally. This is Bloomberg 739 00:42:09,760 --> 00:42:14,839 Speaker 1: broadcasting live from our nation's capital, Bloomberg to New York, 740 00:42:14,960 --> 00:42:20,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg eleven Frio to San Francisco, Bloomberg to the country 741 00:42:20,480 --> 00:42:24,840 Speaker 1: Sirius XM Channel one, and around the globe, the Bloomberg 742 00:42:24,880 --> 00:42:29,480 Speaker 1: Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg 743 00:42:29,640 --> 00:42:31,400 Speaker 1: Sound on with Kevin Cirelli