1 00:00:01,280 --> 00:00:17,080 Speaker 1: The volume. All right, welcome to Hoops and I here 2 00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:19,200 Speaker 1: at the volume heavy Thursday, everybody. I hope all if 3 00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:21,239 Speaker 1: you guys are having an incredible week. As promise, we're 4 00:00:21,239 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 1: going to take our first look at the twenty twenty 5 00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:28,000 Speaker 1: six NBA drafts, specifically at the top two guys, Darren 6 00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 1: Peterson and aj Debonsa. Right now, those are the two 7 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:32,760 Speaker 1: guys that are competing for that number one spot, a 8 00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:34,159 Speaker 1: little bit of a drop off before you get to 9 00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:36,960 Speaker 1: cam Boozer. You gonna primarily be focusing on those two guys. 10 00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:39,360 Speaker 1: I want to talk about which guy I would pick first, 11 00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:42,479 Speaker 1: and why I want to dive deep into both players 12 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:45,600 Speaker 1: and what I expect from them as NBA players. Moving forward, 13 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:46,839 Speaker 1: you guys know the job. Before we get started, to 14 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:48,480 Speaker 1: subscribe to the Hoops and I YouTube channels you don't 15 00:00:48,479 --> 00:00:50,159 Speaker 1: miss any more of our videos. Make sure you like 16 00:00:50,200 --> 00:00:52,640 Speaker 1: this video and turn on our video notifications you don't 17 00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:55,560 Speaker 1: miss anymore. That actually helps us a lot within the 18 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:57,840 Speaker 1: algorithm as well. And then last, but at least, if 19 00:00:57,800 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: you guys want to get some mail bad questions into 20 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:01,960 Speaker 1: our drop them in the comments underneath this video as 21 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:04,240 Speaker 1: well as all of our other full episodes, but Mailbag Clent, 22 00:01:04,319 --> 00:01:06,720 Speaker 1: write your question. We'll get to them on Fridays throughout 23 00:01:06,760 --> 00:01:09,920 Speaker 1: the rest of the season. All right, let's talk some basketball. 24 00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:13,039 Speaker 1: So Hard Rock Bet, our partner who provides all of 25 00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 1: our lines, has Darren Peterson as the current favorite to 26 00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:20,040 Speaker 1: go number one. He's minus three hundred and aj Debonsa 27 00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:23,000 Speaker 1: is right behind him at plus three seventy five. That's 28 00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 1: a pretty substantial favor That's that's you know, that's Hard 29 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:28,759 Speaker 1: Rock Bet telling you they think that Darren's probably gonna 30 00:01:28,800 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 1: go number one. Now, before we go any further, as 31 00:01:31,760 --> 00:01:35,200 Speaker 1: we start to talk about this particular debate, I don't 32 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:37,760 Speaker 1: think you can go wrong with either of these guys. 33 00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:41,080 Speaker 1: I don't think this is a case of like one 34 00:01:41,120 --> 00:01:43,319 Speaker 1: of these guys is a star and one of these 35 00:01:43,360 --> 00:01:46,640 Speaker 1: guys is a bust. I think, barring injury, both of 36 00:01:46,680 --> 00:01:49,960 Speaker 1: these guys have first team All NBA potential, and I 37 00:01:49,960 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 1: think both of them are more likely than not to 38 00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:54,840 Speaker 1: make at least some version of an All NBA team 39 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:58,400 Speaker 1: in their careers. Now, it's interesting because I came into 40 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: this process thinking that I would lean towards Darren Peterson. 41 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:05,560 Speaker 1: The main reason why it has to do with my 42 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: general kind of ethos surrounding player archetypes. Do you guys 43 00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:12,399 Speaker 1: remember back in twenty twenty three when we were debating 44 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:16,960 Speaker 1: Scoot Henderson versus versus Brandon Miller for that second overall 45 00:02:16,960 --> 00:02:20,040 Speaker 1: pick in the Wemby draft. We were just thinking, you know, 46 00:02:20,560 --> 00:02:24,280 Speaker 1: which one of these two guys has more potential and 47 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:27,360 Speaker 1: should go number two. I ended up choosing Brandon Miller 48 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:30,760 Speaker 1: because of a similar kind of archetype belief. I thought 49 00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:34,960 Speaker 1: that the lanky wing scorer archetype was an archetype I 50 00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:40,520 Speaker 1: preferred over the undersized, hyper athletic guard kind of archetype 51 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:44,280 Speaker 1: which we've seen flame out at various points in NBA history. 52 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:47,960 Speaker 1: So in that particular case, I leaned towards the lanky wing. 53 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:52,400 Speaker 1: But in this particular case, Darren Peterson is this like 54 00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:56,120 Speaker 1: big guard, like a traditional two guard who's got a 55 00:02:56,160 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 1: really good frame and is super athletic and can really shoot. 56 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:05,160 Speaker 1: And then another kind of lanky forward scorer archetype. Right, 57 00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:08,600 Speaker 1: So I came in thinking, even though I prefer the 58 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 1: lanky forward score over the tiny, speed athleticism guard, I 59 00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:19,559 Speaker 1: do prefer the bigger, more athletic, you know, a stronger 60 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:23,560 Speaker 1: fire hydrant style, big traditional two guard that can shoot 61 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:25,960 Speaker 1: over the lanky wing. So I was like, Okay, I'm 62 00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:29,000 Speaker 1: gonna dig into this and I'm gonna like Darren Peterson, 63 00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:34,160 Speaker 1: and I actually ended up leaning ever so slightly towards 64 00:03:34,639 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: aj debantsa right. It was a surprise to me given 65 00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:42,040 Speaker 1: my kind of general belief surrounding archetypes. So there are 66 00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:45,839 Speaker 1: two differences that actually caused me to lean again ever 67 00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:48,800 Speaker 1: so slightly towards debouance, even though I think both of 68 00:03:48,840 --> 00:03:52,200 Speaker 1: these guys are stars. So one, Darren Peterson is an 69 00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:55,880 Speaker 1: elite athlete, but he's not a world beating athlete like 70 00:03:55,920 --> 00:04:00,360 Speaker 1: Anthony Edwards. Anthony Edwards is maybe the best athlete since 71 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: Michael Jordan at the two guard position. I think Darren 72 00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:06,720 Speaker 1: Peterson looks like an upper tier NBA athlete. I just 73 00:04:06,720 --> 00:04:10,520 Speaker 1: don't think he enters into that world beating athlete like 74 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:14,320 Speaker 1: Anthony Edwards. And then, secondly, for being a lanky forward, 75 00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:17,839 Speaker 1: we've seen lanky forwards like Paul George and Kevin Durant 76 00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:20,480 Speaker 1: in the past have an issue getting to the basket 77 00:04:20,520 --> 00:04:22,920 Speaker 1: because they're thin, Guys can beat them to spots, they 78 00:04:22,920 --> 00:04:25,640 Speaker 1: get physical up underneath them. They typically end up being 79 00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:29,880 Speaker 1: low volume at the rim, guys, there is a power 80 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:34,520 Speaker 1: and a relentlessness to Aj Debonce's attack of the basket 81 00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:37,080 Speaker 1: that I think will serve him really well in his 82 00:04:37,120 --> 00:04:39,840 Speaker 1: career and help him avoid some of the issues that 83 00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:42,840 Speaker 1: the lankier forwards have had. I actually look at de 84 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:45,839 Speaker 1: Bonsa as kind of a sort of hybrid between that 85 00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:51,080 Speaker 1: KD Paul George big Ford jump shooting archetype and like 86 00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:55,919 Speaker 1: that Jannis Zion Lebron style, big athletic basket attacker. To 87 00:04:55,960 --> 00:04:59,480 Speaker 1: be clear, he's not Yannis, he's not Lebron, he's not Zion. 88 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:02,400 Speaker 1: He's not anywhere near what those guys were as power 89 00:05:02,480 --> 00:05:05,840 Speaker 1: basket attackers. I just think he's got a little bit 90 00:05:05,880 --> 00:05:08,400 Speaker 1: more of that in his game. I should say a 91 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:10,680 Speaker 1: lot more of that in his game than some of 92 00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:13,599 Speaker 1: these other skinny forwards that have come before him. I 93 00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:16,000 Speaker 1: wanted to find a way to quantify what kind of 94 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:20,560 Speaker 1: escapes him from that specific archetype. AJ Debonsa attacks the 95 00:05:20,640 --> 00:05:23,040 Speaker 1: rim like crazy. We'll get into some of the numbers 96 00:05:23,279 --> 00:05:26,040 Speaker 1: when we dive deep into the players. So what essentially 97 00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:29,440 Speaker 1: drove me to take Debonsa's side ever so slightly is 98 00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:31,320 Speaker 1: I think he's gonna have a really high floor. He's 99 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:34,160 Speaker 1: gonna impact the game a ton as an athlete, possession 100 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:37,159 Speaker 1: to possession because he pressures the rim so much, because 101 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:40,039 Speaker 1: he can rebound. If he adds the defensive end and 102 00:05:40,120 --> 00:05:42,840 Speaker 1: kind of puts all of those things together, he has 103 00:05:42,839 --> 00:05:46,480 Speaker 1: a better natural feel for playmaking than Darren Peterson. If 104 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:48,600 Speaker 1: he can add the jump shot and the defensive end 105 00:05:48,640 --> 00:05:50,359 Speaker 1: to it, I actually think he has best player in 106 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:53,280 Speaker 1: the world potential. I think Darren Peterson is a star. 107 00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:57,200 Speaker 1: I just don't see quite as high of a floor 108 00:05:57,360 --> 00:05:59,919 Speaker 1: or ceiling because of the lack of towards the rims, 109 00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:02,440 Speaker 1: which we'll dig into in a little bit. Quick note here, 110 00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:07,600 Speaker 1: I did not factor in this Darren Peterson weirdness from 111 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:10,400 Speaker 1: this season really much at all. Maybe a tiny bit, 112 00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:13,200 Speaker 1: but not much at all. In this particular situation. There's 113 00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:15,360 Speaker 1: been a lot of concern about his availability this season. 114 00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:17,760 Speaker 1: I don't want to get too much into specifics because 115 00:06:17,760 --> 00:06:19,720 Speaker 1: there's a lot of like he said, she said, going on, 116 00:06:20,000 --> 00:06:21,760 Speaker 1: But the gist of it is he doesn't seem to 117 00:06:21,760 --> 00:06:24,240 Speaker 1: want to play unless he's one hundred percent healthy. He's 118 00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:26,880 Speaker 1: been quick to sit even within games if he's feeling 119 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:29,200 Speaker 1: even just a little bit off, and there may or 120 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:31,920 Speaker 1: may not be some attitude related stuff. There was some 121 00:06:32,200 --> 00:06:35,800 Speaker 1: internet sleuthing done surrounding the absence from the University of 122 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:38,680 Speaker 1: Arizona game because of some beef he had with Bill 123 00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 1: self surrounding his intensity in practice. So like, there's some 124 00:06:43,240 --> 00:06:46,760 Speaker 1: weirdness for sure. Now one bit of context. Darren's in 125 00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:49,279 Speaker 1: a weird phase of his career. He's very young, he's 126 00:06:49,279 --> 00:06:52,360 Speaker 1: on the precipice of general generational wealth. He's got a 127 00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:54,800 Speaker 1: lot of these grown ups, including an agent from Wasserman 128 00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:58,080 Speaker 1: that's like around him and influencing him a lot right now. 129 00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 1: So I say all that to say this, I won't 130 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:02,520 Speaker 1: sit here and pretend like all this stuff is a 131 00:07:02,520 --> 00:07:05,839 Speaker 1: good thing. I would certainly prefer it if Darren Peterson 132 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:08,560 Speaker 1: just loved playing basketball so much that he was out 133 00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:10,480 Speaker 1: there all the time, even when he's not quite one 134 00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:13,120 Speaker 1: hundred percent. I would prefer it if we didn't hear 135 00:07:13,200 --> 00:07:14,960 Speaker 1: some of the things that we've heard said about the 136 00:07:14,960 --> 00:07:18,240 Speaker 1: whole situation. But I don't think we know nearly enough 137 00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:21,440 Speaker 1: about the situation, certainly not in a concrete sense surrounding 138 00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:25,200 Speaker 1: his character to pass on the guy. It's very possible 139 00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 1: that Darren gets into the NBA, has the security of 140 00:07:27,800 --> 00:07:29,480 Speaker 1: a number one pick contract, you make a lot of money, 141 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:31,320 Speaker 1: like Cooper Flag is on a sixty three million dollar 142 00:07:31,400 --> 00:07:34,080 Speaker 1: contract right now is a rookie. It's very possible that 143 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:36,960 Speaker 1: he gets to that point and some of his sphere 144 00:07:36,960 --> 00:07:39,640 Speaker 1: of influence kind of chills out a little bit, backs 145 00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:41,640 Speaker 1: off a little bit, and he just settles into being 146 00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:44,360 Speaker 1: a Hooper and some of these issues pass away. So 147 00:07:44,400 --> 00:07:47,280 Speaker 1: I'm mainly looking at what I see in these two 148 00:07:47,320 --> 00:07:51,560 Speaker 1: guys as basketball players. Again, they're very different archetypes. I 149 00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:54,240 Speaker 1: thought I would lean towards Darren Peterson because I'm not 150 00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:57,080 Speaker 1: usually the guy that likes the lanky forwards. But there 151 00:07:57,160 --> 00:08:00,400 Speaker 1: is a physical downhill aggression with aj deboonm so that 152 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:03,520 Speaker 1: sold me when I dug in to my scout for this, 153 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:06,080 Speaker 1: and I ended up leaning ever so slightly towards him. 154 00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:08,600 Speaker 1: I would end up taking de bonsa number one if 155 00:08:08,640 --> 00:08:09,840 Speaker 1: I had to take a pick right now. A lot 156 00:08:09,840 --> 00:08:12,480 Speaker 1: of basketball left. Darren Peterson's got a lot more games 157 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 1: that he could get into this year and show more 158 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:16,560 Speaker 1: of the parts of his game that haven't flashed this year, 159 00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:19,520 Speaker 1: like his playmaking or his driving of the basketball. We'll 160 00:08:19,640 --> 00:08:24,119 Speaker 1: see if AJ Debonson makes improvements in some of his areas. 161 00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:27,040 Speaker 1: This could all change by the time we get to June. 162 00:08:27,120 --> 00:08:28,600 Speaker 1: But if I had to make a pick right now, 163 00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 1: I'd take Aj Debondson number one and Darren Peterson number two. 164 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:34,960 Speaker 1: So now let's talk about each of the players. Today's 165 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:36,760 Speaker 1: show is brought to you by a presenting sponsor, hard 166 00:08:36,800 --> 00:08:39,520 Speaker 1: Rock Bet, the official sportsbook partner of the Miami Heat 167 00:08:39,600 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 1: and the Orlando Magic. What's better than the sound of 168 00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:45,400 Speaker 1: the ball on the hardwood, sneakers squeaking, and the swish 169 00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:48,120 Speaker 1: of the net winning On hard rock Bet, you're home 170 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 1: for hoops action all season long, and if you want 171 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:51,959 Speaker 1: to score a major bucket, shoot your shot at the 172 00:08:51,960 --> 00:08:54,320 Speaker 1: same game parlay. Stack your picks on hard rock Bet 173 00:08:54,520 --> 00:08:56,760 Speaker 1: and see your odds grow. But if you mistip off, 174 00:08:56,760 --> 00:08:59,200 Speaker 1: don't worry. Hard Rock Bet lets you live bet all 175 00:08:59,240 --> 00:09:01,440 Speaker 1: game long, from the first bucket to the final buzzer, 176 00:09:01,640 --> 00:09:03,599 Speaker 1: so you're never too late to find a winner or 177 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:06,000 Speaker 1: grab the player prop that you had circled. If you 178 00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:08,200 Speaker 1: haven't signed up with hard rock Bet yet, there's never 179 00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:10,280 Speaker 1: been a better time. New sign ups can double their 180 00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:13,400 Speaker 1: winnings on their first ten bets max fifty dollars. That's right, 181 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:16,240 Speaker 1: If you've won one hundred bucks on your bet, make 182 00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:19,040 Speaker 1: that two hundred plus. Hard Rock Bet offers new promos 183 00:09:19,080 --> 00:09:21,720 Speaker 1: every single day, so whenever you're listening, just open up 184 00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:23,959 Speaker 1: the app and check out what you've got. Any day 185 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:25,960 Speaker 1: of the week, download the hard Rock Bet app and 186 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:28,920 Speaker 1: make your first deposit today. Offered by the Seminole Tribe 187 00:09:28,960 --> 00:09:32,079 Speaker 1: of Florida. In Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC. 188 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:34,480 Speaker 1: In all other states. Must be twenty one plus and 189 00:09:34,520 --> 00:09:39,679 Speaker 1: physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, 190 00:09:39,800 --> 00:09:43,280 Speaker 1: or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about 191 00:09:43,320 --> 00:09:46,880 Speaker 1: gambling in Florida, call one eight three to three play wise. 192 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:48,959 Speaker 1: In Indiana, If you or someone you know has a 193 00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:51,440 Speaker 1: gambling problem and wants help, call one eight hundred and 194 00:09:51,559 --> 00:09:55,280 Speaker 1: nine with it. In Ohio, call one eight hundred my 195 00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:59,520 Speaker 1: reset gambling problem called one eight hundred Gambler In Arizona, 196 00:09:59,720 --> 00:10:05,120 Speaker 1: color routto Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Tennessee, or Virginia individually 197 00:10:05,240 --> 00:10:07,760 Speaker 1: and more of a deeper scout a J. Dabas has 198 00:10:07,800 --> 00:10:09,600 Speaker 1: played in twenty five games this year. He's averaging twenty 199 00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:12,640 Speaker 1: four points per game, seven rebounds, and four assists. He's 200 00:10:12,679 --> 00:10:15,520 Speaker 1: shooting fifty four percent from the field, thirty six percent 201 00:10:15,520 --> 00:10:18,920 Speaker 1: from three to seventy five percent from the free throw line, 202 00:10:18,960 --> 00:10:23,280 Speaker 1: seven attempts at the rim per game, and sixty eight 203 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:27,720 Speaker 1: percent when he gets there. Those are amazing numbers for 204 00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:31,040 Speaker 1: a dribble drive kind of lanky wing. That is not 205 00:10:32,400 --> 00:10:35,319 Speaker 1: a stat to just make light of there. I think 206 00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:39,400 Speaker 1: that's super impressive. And on tape there is this physical 207 00:10:39,440 --> 00:10:43,160 Speaker 1: downhill aggression that screams off the screen. He gets into 208 00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 1: his high hesitation dribbles and he hits the gas and 209 00:10:46,080 --> 00:10:49,280 Speaker 1: he plays physical. He plays off of two feet. Even 210 00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 1: his counters are aggressive, like a lot of times when 211 00:10:52,040 --> 00:10:55,040 Speaker 1: guys get cut off, they'll spin into some sort of 212 00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:57,920 Speaker 1: distance shot like a hook over one of their shoulders 213 00:10:58,000 --> 00:10:59,679 Speaker 1: or a fade away. And don't get me wrong, to 214 00:10:59,760 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 1: Bot has got that in his game. He'll go to 215 00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 1: it sometimes, but Debutzov will like regularly go to that 216 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:09,040 Speaker 1: step through move, like he'll get turned around and try 217 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 1: to continue to go at you towards the basket. He 218 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:15,320 Speaker 1: uses that step through all the time, and so that's 219 00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:17,839 Speaker 1: what allows him to pump up his rim attempt numbers. 220 00:11:17,840 --> 00:11:21,360 Speaker 1: He is relentless both in his initial attacks and in 221 00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:25,800 Speaker 1: his counter moves to get towards the rim and the 222 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:29,040 Speaker 1: finishing the sixty eight percent. It's the ability to finish 223 00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:31,120 Speaker 1: above the rim. The dunks that he has that are 224 00:11:31,160 --> 00:11:34,280 Speaker 1: just you know, obviously earth shattering highlights, but there's also 225 00:11:34,360 --> 00:11:37,040 Speaker 1: a quality bit of rim finishing there in terms of layups. 226 00:11:37,040 --> 00:11:38,679 Speaker 1: He's got good soft touched around the rim, and it 227 00:11:38,720 --> 00:11:41,640 Speaker 1: helps that he's super athletic and big, so he's finishing 228 00:11:41,679 --> 00:11:43,840 Speaker 1: from closer to the rim than most people when they 229 00:11:43,840 --> 00:11:46,880 Speaker 1: get to that point. This is my favorite part of 230 00:11:46,920 --> 00:11:50,520 Speaker 1: his game. There's a nastiness to him at the rim, 231 00:11:50,840 --> 00:11:53,080 Speaker 1: even in his poor shooting nights like the Arizona game. 232 00:11:53,880 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 1: He missed a lot of jumpers in that game, but 233 00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:58,360 Speaker 1: he was also forcing his action towards the rim, and 234 00:11:58,400 --> 00:12:00,360 Speaker 1: he was getting a lot of shots that were close 235 00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:02,120 Speaker 1: to the basket, a lot of shots that he could 236 00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:04,840 Speaker 1: have made that he barely missed, little short floaters, little 237 00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 1: finishes around the basket. I think as he continues to 238 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:10,920 Speaker 1: build muscle, as he continues to improve with his reads 239 00:12:10,960 --> 00:12:12,560 Speaker 1: in the NBA right like we talked about this with 240 00:12:12,559 --> 00:12:16,640 Speaker 1: Cooper Flag yesterday, understanding angles, understanding spacing. As he improves 241 00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:19,680 Speaker 1: in those areas, I think he's going to improve even 242 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:23,000 Speaker 1: more as a rim finisher in the long run. And 243 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:25,040 Speaker 1: then he's got the advanced scoring moves in terms of 244 00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:27,720 Speaker 1: like short range, mid range, long range scoring. He's got 245 00:12:27,720 --> 00:12:29,800 Speaker 1: the fadaways, he's got the step backs, he's got the hooks, 246 00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:31,719 Speaker 1: he's got the step throughs, he's got the euros. We 247 00:12:31,760 --> 00:12:34,160 Speaker 1: talked about the step throughs going towards the basket earlier. 248 00:12:34,600 --> 00:12:36,920 Speaker 1: The pull up shooting is already pretty advanced for a 249 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:39,840 Speaker 1: player his age. She's shooting forty six percent on pull 250 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:42,319 Speaker 1: up twos off the dribble, really good close to the 251 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:44,880 Speaker 1: rim when he gets inside of seventeen feet thirty for 252 00:12:45,000 --> 00:12:47,840 Speaker 1: fifty eight. That's fifty two percent on pretty high volume 253 00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:52,240 Speaker 1: on short pull up twos. That's super impressive. Thirty four 254 00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:55,840 Speaker 1: percent on pull up threes that's not bad. Forty percent 255 00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:59,880 Speaker 1: on floaters not bad. If he can make mild improvements there, 256 00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:03,000 Speaker 1: like going from you know, getting rid of some of 257 00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:06,840 Speaker 1: the longer twos and getting that inside of seventeen feet 258 00:13:06,880 --> 00:13:08,959 Speaker 1: percentage from fifty two up to like fifty five to 259 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:11,760 Speaker 1: fifty six, from pull up threes from thirty four to 260 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 1: like thirty six, thirty seven on floaters from forty closer 261 00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:18,400 Speaker 1: to fifty. We're talking about one of the more dynamic 262 00:13:18,400 --> 00:13:20,439 Speaker 1: three level scores in the league. And what happens is 263 00:13:20,480 --> 00:13:24,600 Speaker 1: when you're as aggressive towards the basket as Debon sa is, 264 00:13:24,679 --> 00:13:26,880 Speaker 1: you end up getting some pretty high quality pull up 265 00:13:26,920 --> 00:13:29,680 Speaker 1: looks as defenders have to basically account for your downhill 266 00:13:29,720 --> 00:13:33,840 Speaker 1: aggressive aggressiveness. The ceiling with aj Debonnce is off the charts. 267 00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:36,680 Speaker 1: There are two things that are kind of like. Now, 268 00:13:36,679 --> 00:13:39,840 Speaker 1: I wouldn't call him red flags necessarily, but areas of opportunity. 269 00:13:40,040 --> 00:13:42,679 Speaker 1: Hasn't really become as much of an impact defender as 270 00:13:42,679 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 1: he's capable of. Yet he has the potential to be 271 00:13:44,920 --> 00:13:46,960 Speaker 1: an all defense guy, and I do think he'll be 272 00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:48,920 Speaker 1: a high level defender by the time he gets to 273 00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:52,520 Speaker 1: his late twenties. He has the competitive spirit, competitive spirit 274 00:13:52,559 --> 00:13:54,319 Speaker 1: forward and the tools, and this is what kind of 275 00:13:54,360 --> 00:13:58,240 Speaker 1: drives me back towards Kevin Durant. Kevin Durant never really 276 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:02,280 Speaker 1: committed to being like a super high level defender. Possession 277 00:14:02,320 --> 00:14:05,480 Speaker 1: of possession, of possession, and yet he was a high 278 00:14:05,559 --> 00:14:08,240 Speaker 1: level defender for the most part in his career because 279 00:14:08,240 --> 00:14:11,120 Speaker 1: he just has insane physical tools. And that's essentially what 280 00:14:11,160 --> 00:14:14,079 Speaker 1: I expect to have happen with Aj Debonsa, even as 281 00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:16,240 Speaker 1: a floor I expect him to be a guy that 282 00:14:16,280 --> 00:14:18,560 Speaker 1: can be an impact defender when he gets to the NBA. 283 00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:22,120 Speaker 1: The second piece of it is improving as a jump shooter. Again, 284 00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:25,520 Speaker 1: there's a fine line between being capable of making those 285 00:14:25,520 --> 00:14:28,560 Speaker 1: shots and actually being an elite jump shooter and how 286 00:14:28,600 --> 00:14:31,360 Speaker 1: that can change the way that you're guarded. If he 287 00:14:31,400 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 1: can put those two things together. What he has right 288 00:14:33,520 --> 00:14:37,200 Speaker 1: now is the aggressive of basket attacking the Polish as 289 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:40,440 Speaker 1: a score, the ability to make the reads. He's actually 290 00:14:40,440 --> 00:14:43,040 Speaker 1: a more willing passer than Darren Peterson is. He's averaging 291 00:14:43,080 --> 00:14:46,160 Speaker 1: about four assists per game this year. He's got a 292 00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:48,720 Speaker 1: decent little bit of margin between his number of assists 293 00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:52,240 Speaker 1: and turnovers, whereas Darren Peterson actually has more turnovers than assists. 294 00:14:52,600 --> 00:14:55,360 Speaker 1: When you look at Aj Debonsa, he's already got these 295 00:14:55,400 --> 00:14:58,360 Speaker 1: like kind of baseline skills. If you jump the jump 296 00:14:58,400 --> 00:15:00,360 Speaker 1: shot up to that next level, and if you add 297 00:15:00,360 --> 00:15:03,200 Speaker 1: the impact defense. We're talking about a guy who has 298 00:15:03,280 --> 00:15:06,080 Speaker 1: the potential to be a perennial MVP candidate in the NBA, 299 00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:07,760 Speaker 1: the potential to be the best player in the world. 300 00:15:07,840 --> 00:15:10,840 Speaker 1: I'm super super high on aj deponce, and the floor 301 00:15:10,880 --> 00:15:12,720 Speaker 1: is high. Like even if the jumper kind of hangs 302 00:15:12,720 --> 00:15:14,920 Speaker 1: around one point per shot, like you know, like Jason 303 00:15:14,960 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 1: Tatums has in his career, or even if he only 304 00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:20,120 Speaker 1: ever becomes an average defender, We're still talking about a 305 00:15:20,120 --> 00:15:22,360 Speaker 1: guy who's going to be in you know, third team 306 00:15:22,360 --> 00:15:24,840 Speaker 1: All NBA, second team All NBA type of discussions most 307 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:27,920 Speaker 1: most years when he gets into his mid to late twenties. 308 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:32,200 Speaker 1: Darren Peterson only played in fourteen games this season, twenty 309 00:15:32,200 --> 00:15:36,280 Speaker 1: eight minutes per game, twenty points per game, forty eight 310 00:15:36,320 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 1: percent from the field, forty one percent from three to 311 00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:42,280 Speaker 1: eighty percent from the line, more turnovers than assists. He's 312 00:15:42,280 --> 00:15:43,520 Speaker 1: been a little bit of a gunner this year. I'll 313 00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:45,080 Speaker 1: dive into the passing in a little bit. It's not 314 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:47,480 Speaker 1: really like an ability thing. It's more of just like 315 00:15:47,520 --> 00:15:49,400 Speaker 1: a forcing the issue kind of thing. We'll talk about 316 00:15:49,400 --> 00:15:51,600 Speaker 1: that in a minute. The jump shooting is the big 317 00:15:51,640 --> 00:15:55,160 Speaker 1: appeal here. He's just been completely ridiculous off the catch 318 00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:58,240 Speaker 1: this year, shooting forty six percent on catch and shoot threes. 319 00:15:58,640 --> 00:16:00,400 Speaker 1: In the degree of difficulty on the line of these 320 00:16:00,440 --> 00:16:03,119 Speaker 1: is off the charts. The majority of them are heavily contested, 321 00:16:03,160 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 1: a lot of them are on the move. He's not 322 00:16:05,240 --> 00:16:07,920 Speaker 1: getting like clean spot up threes. When he does, he's 323 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:10,000 Speaker 1: got a handful. He's got twenty five of them this 324 00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:12,240 Speaker 1: whole year, so a little over like one and a 325 00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:15,520 Speaker 1: half per game. Basically, he's fifteen for twenty five on that. 326 00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:17,800 Speaker 1: That's literally sixty percent, so like if you leave him 327 00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:20,240 Speaker 1: open and the thing's going in, but most of them 328 00:16:20,280 --> 00:16:23,480 Speaker 1: are on the move. He's shooting forty one percent on 329 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:26,200 Speaker 1: threes coming off of off ball screens like wide pin 330 00:16:26,320 --> 00:16:29,040 Speaker 1: downs things like that. He's shooting thirty eight percent on 331 00:16:29,080 --> 00:16:31,600 Speaker 1: threes coming off of handoffs. He's very athletic, so we 332 00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:33,280 Speaker 1: can get his feet set on the move and get 333 00:16:33,280 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 1: a good strong base up into his shot. His off 334 00:16:35,960 --> 00:16:39,600 Speaker 1: the dribble twos have been outrageously efficient. He's fifty percent 335 00:16:39,680 --> 00:16:42,720 Speaker 1: on all pull up twos, fifty nine percent on twos 336 00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:45,600 Speaker 1: inside of seventeen feet thirteen for twenty two. That's like 337 00:16:45,640 --> 00:16:48,480 Speaker 1: Shakila Alexander territory. Obviously super low volume, but that's the 338 00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:50,760 Speaker 1: kind of percentage in the high fifties that you're getting 339 00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:54,280 Speaker 1: from Shay on short twos inside of seventeen feet. The 340 00:16:54,280 --> 00:16:57,160 Speaker 1: only spot he's really struggled with his jump shot is 341 00:16:57,280 --> 00:17:00,440 Speaker 1: off the dribble from three. He's just nine for twenty 342 00:17:00,520 --> 00:17:02,960 Speaker 1: nine overall, and pull up threes off the dribble. One 343 00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:04,840 Speaker 1: of those is a pretty ugly bank shot that went 344 00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:08,240 Speaker 1: into He's two for twelve on threes in pick and 345 00:17:08,320 --> 00:17:10,720 Speaker 1: roll when like guys go underpicks or they die on 346 00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:13,360 Speaker 1: the screen, bigs too far back, that kind of thing. 347 00:17:13,840 --> 00:17:15,760 Speaker 1: He's been very good at the rim sixty six percent, 348 00:17:16,040 --> 00:17:18,920 Speaker 1: but really low volume, only two point seven attempts per game, 349 00:17:18,960 --> 00:17:20,640 Speaker 1: which for an athlete like him, you'd like to see 350 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:25,240 Speaker 1: that number consistently higher. He is a ridiculous athlete. Eight 351 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:27,600 Speaker 1: dunks this year. Most of them have been major highlights, 352 00:17:27,600 --> 00:17:30,000 Speaker 1: a variety of ways to driving dunks in the half court, 353 00:17:30,320 --> 00:17:33,080 Speaker 1: like the one he had against Byu, Transition dunks just 354 00:17:33,119 --> 00:17:36,040 Speaker 1: in the open floor, lob dunks like cutting back door 355 00:17:36,080 --> 00:17:38,080 Speaker 1: out of his own look tip dunks. He had this 356 00:17:38,160 --> 00:17:41,119 Speaker 1: ridiculous dunk against Colorado where he missed a floater curling 357 00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:43,320 Speaker 1: off of an off ball screen and then just beat 358 00:17:43,400 --> 00:17:46,000 Speaker 1: everyone in the gym off the floor and tip dunked 359 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:48,480 Speaker 1: it in with his right hand. This is the piece 360 00:17:48,520 --> 00:17:51,600 Speaker 1: that has the Anthony Edwards cop going around, and you 361 00:17:52,160 --> 00:17:54,679 Speaker 1: see it, right, because like you have this insane athlete 362 00:17:54,720 --> 00:17:57,080 Speaker 1: who's also a great jump shooter. And I do see 363 00:17:57,080 --> 00:17:59,199 Speaker 1: some of that, like his combination of the size and 364 00:17:59,240 --> 00:18:01,360 Speaker 1: strength at the position as well as the jump shot. 365 00:18:01,600 --> 00:18:04,840 Speaker 1: It's a part of why I like him. But I 366 00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:08,080 Speaker 1: actually don't see the Anthony Edwards comp as much because 367 00:18:08,080 --> 00:18:10,359 Speaker 1: I think Anthony Edwards is another level of defender and 368 00:18:10,359 --> 00:18:13,720 Speaker 1: where you really really saw that was attacking the basket. 369 00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:16,040 Speaker 1: What I see, I'm going to provide a different comp here. 370 00:18:16,040 --> 00:18:18,119 Speaker 1: What I see with Darren Peterson is more of like 371 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:21,879 Speaker 1: a young Ray Allen, kind of like that Seattle SuperSonics 372 00:18:21,960 --> 00:18:24,760 Speaker 1: era Ray Allen. And here's why I make that comp 373 00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:28,119 Speaker 1: instead of the Anthony Edwards comp. One. Young Ray Allen 374 00:18:28,200 --> 00:18:31,760 Speaker 1: was a great athlete, but not an Anthony Edwards level athlete, 375 00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:34,080 Speaker 1: and that's true of Darren Peterson. I think Darren Peterson 376 00:18:34,119 --> 00:18:36,920 Speaker 1: is an upper level NBA athlete, but Anthony Edwards is 377 00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:39,040 Speaker 1: probably the most athletic two guard since Michael Jordan. There's 378 00:18:39,040 --> 00:18:42,400 Speaker 1: a whole different level that you're getting there. Two Young 379 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:44,719 Speaker 1: Ray Allen didn't get to the rim very much. He 380 00:18:44,760 --> 00:18:47,080 Speaker 1: was efficient and explosive when he got there, but the 381 00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:50,520 Speaker 1: volume was generally low. And that lines up with Darren 382 00:18:50,520 --> 00:18:53,000 Speaker 1: Peterson's play style in the sense that he's more of 383 00:18:53,080 --> 00:18:55,120 Speaker 1: like an off the ball kind of jump shooter. Right. 384 00:18:55,640 --> 00:18:58,920 Speaker 1: Anthony Edwards was much higher volume and efficiency as a 385 00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:02,120 Speaker 1: driver of the basketball at Georgia, almost twice as often 386 00:19:02,480 --> 00:19:04,200 Speaker 1: getting to the rim when he was at Georgia, So 387 00:19:04,280 --> 00:19:06,880 Speaker 1: there's like a clear difference and shot profile between those 388 00:19:06,880 --> 00:19:10,640 Speaker 1: two guys. Three heavier emphasis on off ball jump shooting. 389 00:19:10,800 --> 00:19:13,159 Speaker 1: Ray Allen was one of the original high volume movement 390 00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:14,879 Speaker 1: shooters in the NBA. As a matter of fact, there 391 00:19:14,880 --> 00:19:16,680 Speaker 1: was a two year stretch with the SuperSonics where he 392 00:19:16,760 --> 00:19:19,359 Speaker 1: led the league in three pointers made per game both 393 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:22,479 Speaker 1: seasons and think it was six and seven. In those seasons, 394 00:19:22,480 --> 00:19:27,000 Speaker 1: he made ninety nine threes flying off of off ball screens. 395 00:19:27,040 --> 00:19:30,399 Speaker 1: That's like a whole element of his game that is 396 00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:33,080 Speaker 1: fundamentally different than what we see from like an Anthony Edwards. 397 00:19:33,119 --> 00:19:36,439 Speaker 1: For example, he was a catch and shoot player at heart, 398 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:39,360 Speaker 1: and so is Darren Peterson. Almost seventy percent of Darren 399 00:19:39,359 --> 00:19:41,600 Speaker 1: Peterson's attempts so far in college had been jump shots. 400 00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:44,240 Speaker 1: So again, I look at Darren as like an evolutionary 401 00:19:44,320 --> 00:19:47,040 Speaker 1: Ray Allen. I think he's got a stronger frame. I 402 00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:48,879 Speaker 1: do think he has on ball potential, Like that'd be 403 00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:50,960 Speaker 1: the difference. The difference between him having a Ray Allen 404 00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:54,080 Speaker 1: career and something more than that is gonna be him 405 00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:56,480 Speaker 1: tying together the on ball stuff, becoming a much better 406 00:19:56,480 --> 00:19:59,000 Speaker 1: on ball pull up jump shooter, him becoming a much 407 00:19:59,000 --> 00:20:02,160 Speaker 1: better dynamic d ivor of the basketball. Right like Ray 408 00:20:02,200 --> 00:20:05,639 Speaker 1: Allen's peak was second team All NBA during those years 409 00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:08,919 Speaker 1: with the Sonics, So as of peaking is like a 410 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:12,320 Speaker 1: fringe top ten guy. Right, If Darren Peterson can figure 411 00:20:12,320 --> 00:20:14,960 Speaker 1: out things on the ball, improve as a pull up 412 00:20:15,040 --> 00:20:18,639 Speaker 1: jump shooter, improve as at basket attacker, that's where he 413 00:20:18,640 --> 00:20:21,000 Speaker 1: can go from being a guy who's in that second 414 00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:23,600 Speaker 1: third team All NBA conversation for most of his prime 415 00:20:23,920 --> 00:20:26,359 Speaker 1: to being like a perennial first team All NBA MVP 416 00:20:26,560 --> 00:20:30,680 Speaker 1: candidate type of player. So again, he's thirty one percent 417 00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:33,359 Speaker 1: on pull up threes this year just thirty eight percent 418 00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:35,600 Speaker 1: on floaters. There's some like off the dribble parts of 419 00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:37,520 Speaker 1: his game that he needs to tie up, and then 420 00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:40,080 Speaker 1: an athlete like him should be getting more like four 421 00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:44,600 Speaker 1: or five attempts at the rim per game. Lastly, the 422 00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:47,639 Speaker 1: emphasis on taking easy reads when they're available. One of 423 00:20:47,680 --> 00:20:49,239 Speaker 1: the big gripes with Darren this year is that he's 424 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:51,480 Speaker 1: been a little bit of a tunnel vision scorer. Now 425 00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:56,919 Speaker 1: I've heard people close to the situation describe it as like, Oh, 426 00:20:57,040 --> 00:20:59,080 Speaker 1: he hasn't had as much opportunity on the floor, so 427 00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:00,640 Speaker 1: when he does get on the floor, he just wants 428 00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:02,480 Speaker 1: to show what he can do. And I get that 429 00:21:02,520 --> 00:21:04,639 Speaker 1: to a certain extent, and I actually agree when I 430 00:21:04,680 --> 00:21:07,800 Speaker 1: watch him, I think it's more about willingness. He's made 431 00:21:07,920 --> 00:21:10,280 Speaker 1: several really high level passing reads. He'll come off of 432 00:21:10,320 --> 00:21:12,359 Speaker 1: a screen a whip across court pass to the corner 433 00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:14,800 Speaker 1: off of a tagging low man and you're like, WHOA, 434 00:21:14,840 --> 00:21:17,560 Speaker 1: that was wild, Or he'll make a really impressive lob 435 00:21:17,600 --> 00:21:20,280 Speaker 1: pass or pocket pass. Like he can make these reads 436 00:21:20,960 --> 00:21:24,959 Speaker 1: and most of his turnovers are not like bad reads 437 00:21:25,080 --> 00:21:29,280 Speaker 1: or or I mean bad passing reads or or any 438 00:21:29,320 --> 00:21:31,480 Speaker 1: sort of like lack of passing skill. They tend to 439 00:21:31,520 --> 00:21:34,359 Speaker 1: be like over penetration turnovers, like him forcing the issue, 440 00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:37,600 Speaker 1: like he'll pick up charges, he'll dribble into double teams 441 00:21:37,640 --> 00:21:40,240 Speaker 1: and lose the basketball, Like he'll drive and a guy 442 00:21:40,240 --> 00:21:42,480 Speaker 1: will come over and openly double team and instead of 443 00:21:42,520 --> 00:21:44,359 Speaker 1: just like seeing it happen and making the swing pass, 444 00:21:44,359 --> 00:21:46,200 Speaker 1: he'll just dribble into the double team and then fumble 445 00:21:46,240 --> 00:21:49,200 Speaker 1: the ball away. So like he has more turnovers than assists. 446 00:21:49,520 --> 00:21:51,680 Speaker 1: But I don't think it's necessarily a skill issue. I 447 00:21:51,720 --> 00:21:54,000 Speaker 1: think it's mostly him just forcing the issue that tells 448 00:21:54,040 --> 00:21:57,680 Speaker 1: me it's an approach thing, like a less of court 449 00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:00,720 Speaker 1: vision passing feel more. Just like he needs to learn 450 00:22:00,720 --> 00:22:02,639 Speaker 1: how to balance the flow of the game better, and 451 00:22:02,680 --> 00:22:05,320 Speaker 1: I think he will. I think that again, like him 452 00:22:05,400 --> 00:22:07,440 Speaker 1: even just getting more reps will help him a lot 453 00:22:07,480 --> 00:22:11,320 Speaker 1: in that specific situation. Defensively, I think he actually projects 454 00:22:11,320 --> 00:22:14,120 Speaker 1: to be a better defender early in his career than 455 00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:17,399 Speaker 1: aj Debonsa. He's just great physical traits and he's got 456 00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:20,040 Speaker 1: a natural knack for positioning and like defensive aggression, so 457 00:22:20,040 --> 00:22:22,399 Speaker 1: he gets a lot of like deflections and steals and 458 00:22:22,440 --> 00:22:25,119 Speaker 1: things along those lines. He's been over two stocks per 459 00:22:25,160 --> 00:22:27,520 Speaker 1: thirty six minutes, which is always a really strong indicator, 460 00:22:27,520 --> 00:22:30,080 Speaker 1: and he's actually been better in that area than aj 461 00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:33,040 Speaker 1: Debonsa this season. So again, those are like just my 462 00:22:33,119 --> 00:22:35,320 Speaker 1: kind of initial scouts on those two guys. I'm going 463 00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:36,760 Speaker 1: to try to watch him a lot more over the 464 00:22:36,760 --> 00:22:38,879 Speaker 1: tail end of the season. We will certainly have this 465 00:22:38,960 --> 00:22:41,639 Speaker 1: debate again when we get to June. And I can't 466 00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:43,280 Speaker 1: promise that we'll get to June and I won't be 467 00:22:43,359 --> 00:22:46,160 Speaker 1: changing my mind and saying that I'll pick Darren Peterson 468 00:22:46,240 --> 00:22:47,680 Speaker 1: number one. But if I had to make a pick 469 00:22:47,760 --> 00:22:51,040 Speaker 1: right now, it's that basket attacking the overall kind of 470 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:53,400 Speaker 1: like higher ceiling that I see with Debonsa that has 471 00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:57,199 Speaker 1: me looking at him as number one. Lastly year, this 472 00:22:57,240 --> 00:22:58,560 Speaker 1: was Jackson's idea, and I thought it was kind of 473 00:22:58,560 --> 00:23:02,359 Speaker 1: an interesting idea. If Cooper Flag was available in this 474 00:23:02,440 --> 00:23:06,440 Speaker 1: year's draft, where would he land? Now this gets complicated 475 00:23:06,480 --> 00:23:09,719 Speaker 1: because we have more information. We have seen Cooper Flag 476 00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:14,520 Speaker 1: become already a successful NBA player. I mean we talked 477 00:23:14,520 --> 00:23:17,440 Speaker 1: about it, uh in yesterday's show. In his last six games, 478 00:23:17,440 --> 00:23:19,640 Speaker 1: he's averaging over thirty points per game on like really 479 00:23:19,720 --> 00:23:22,119 Speaker 1: high efficiency, like Cooper's hoop and his ass off. So 480 00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:26,000 Speaker 1: like there's like the if you're looking at Cooper flag 481 00:23:26,040 --> 00:23:29,680 Speaker 1: as a prospect as we saw him going into the draft, 482 00:23:30,560 --> 00:23:33,679 Speaker 1: I think still he's on the same tier. Like I 483 00:23:33,680 --> 00:23:36,800 Speaker 1: think that it'd be Cooper, Darren, and AJ would be 484 00:23:36,840 --> 00:23:39,240 Speaker 1: your three guys you'd be considering. Like I think he'd 485 00:23:39,520 --> 00:23:42,400 Speaker 1: clearly be over Cam Boozer, for example, But I think 486 00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:45,320 Speaker 1: based on what we knew last year, I think he's 487 00:23:45,400 --> 00:23:48,560 Speaker 1: probably third. But basing it off of what we know 488 00:23:48,840 --> 00:23:51,560 Speaker 1: now and how it already translates, I think i'd put 489 00:23:51,640 --> 00:23:54,160 Speaker 1: him second. I think i'd go AJ Debonsa, then Cooper, 490 00:23:54,440 --> 00:23:57,120 Speaker 1: then Darren Peterson. But again, all in the same tier. 491 00:23:57,200 --> 00:24:01,360 Speaker 1: These are extremely uh the these are all extremely high 492 00:24:01,440 --> 00:24:03,560 Speaker 1: level prospects. I don't think there's any sort of gap 493 00:24:04,320 --> 00:24:07,119 Speaker 1: in any direction between any of these three guys. Like 494 00:24:07,160 --> 00:24:10,640 Speaker 1: even me, picking AJ over Darren was a super tough 495 00:24:10,680 --> 00:24:13,520 Speaker 1: decision for me because I just think they're both awesome. Right, So, 496 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:15,720 Speaker 1: but yeah, I think Cooper's very much in that tier, 497 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:19,520 Speaker 1: not separated from that tier in either direction based on 498 00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:21,560 Speaker 1: what we saw of the draft, maybe third, based on 499 00:24:21,600 --> 00:24:24,919 Speaker 1: what we know now, probably second. All right, guys, it's 500 00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:26,920 Speaker 1: all I have for today is always a sincerely appreciate 501 00:24:26,920 --> 00:24:28,880 Speaker 1: you guys for supporting us and supporting the show. We'll 502 00:24:28,920 --> 00:24:31,360 Speaker 1: be back tomorrow with our weekly mail bag. I will 503 00:24:31,359 --> 00:24:32,120 Speaker 1: see you guys then