WEBVTT - Amazon Union Win in NYC and Chinese Tech Stocks Rebounding

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily check in San Francisco, and this

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, a

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>water gen moment for Amazon and all of its workers.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>A vote to unionize at the second largest private employer

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in the country will drive a push for organized labor

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>across the United States. We will discuss plus a U

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>turn in China's tech delisting plan. Chinese authorities preparing to

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>give US regulators full access to auditing reports of the

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>majority of the two hundred plus companies Chinese companies listed

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York. We will break it down and Bractel

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is the new n f T gaming company in town,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>created by Twitch co founder Justin Kahn. Why does he

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>think n f T s or the future of gaming?

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Con joins us in an exclusive interview this hour, workers

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>at an Amazon warehouse in New York have voted to

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>join a union. It is a historic victory for organized labor.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has managed to keep unions out of its US

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>operations for more than a quarter century. The vote wasn't

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>even close. Those in favor of the union, winning by

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percentage points. We are joined now by Lynn Vincent,

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>assistant professor at the MJ. Whitman's School of Management at

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse University, along with our Bloomberg Senior executive editor Brad Stone,

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>who has been covering Amazon himself for decades. Brad, Amazon

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is the second largest private employer in the country, so

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this could potentially be huge. Just how remarkable do you

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>think this is? Well, it's certainly historic. As as you said,

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has been fighting union attempts in the US, probably

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>since the late nineties when it first started in a

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>customer service call center outside Seattle. And if you remember,

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon closed that facility and just moved the work elsewhere.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's fault these efforts bitterly. In Europe, there have

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>been unions there having work stoppages. Amazon typically kind of

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>routes around it, and so I think, look, it's historic,

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it's unusual for Amazon, but it's just the beginning. I mean,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>this is one facility. Amazon, as we reported today, is

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>going to contest it, probably in court. But then the

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>real work begins bargaining. And will Amazon even sit down

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>with this new and very untested union, And you know,

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and then will it renegotiate things that it does give employees,

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 1>like a fifteen hour wage. I think this this group

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>led by Chris Small, as a former Amazon employee, is

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>now going to be very, very much tested. Chris Smalls

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a huge character in this whole story. I

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>want to read Amazon statement here, Amazon saying we're disappointed

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>with the outcome of the election in Staten Island because

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>we believe having a direct relationship with the company is

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>best for employees. Were evaluating our options, including filing objections

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>based on the inappropriate and undue influence by the n

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>l r B that we and others witnessed in this election.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>When it sounds like Amazon is intending to make the

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>argument that basically President Biden's pick to run the labor

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>board swung list in an activist direction, does that argument

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>hold water? I don't know about the the legal implications there,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but historically, when we look at organizations and unionization attempts,

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the power imbalances in favor of organizations. So I would

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if that held a lot of water in court.

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But I wasn't on the ground. I didn't see what

0:03:54.240 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>happens specifically in the distribution center. So what is your

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>outlook on just how this could ripple across the United States,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>across other Amazon warehouses, but at other companies where employee

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>employees could look at this and say maybe we should

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>do this too. It could have enormous effects because Walmart

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon were the untouchable giants, and now they're not

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>so untouchable. It's still an uphill climb for other Amazon

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>distribution centers and other organizations. But the momentum is there,

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen the momentum continue through the the nation.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have movement at Starbucks, at ari I,

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>at Conde Nast alphabet workers. So it's there and I

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>don't see that this movement is going to go away

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>soon now, Brad. At the same time, you're looking at

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a similar vote in Alabama. This is a do over

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>vote because controversy around the first vote that one going

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point in the other direction. It's too close

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to call. It will likely be challenged. But so far

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.559
<v Speaker 1>in Alabama, it's looking like the Union is not coming

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>out on top. Why why are we seeing different outcomes here? Well,

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think look looking at Staten Island in

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>New York City is probably pretty important. I mean, this

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is I think the second most unionized state after Hawaii,

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and in the country. New York cities have even higher

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Staaten Island probably even higher just in terms of union membership.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>You had a group here with Chris Smalls and as

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>colleagues that employed the kind of community activists playbook in

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of using social media and getting arrested, a very

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>very innovative UM playbook, and also speaking as former Amazon employees,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think that had something to do with it. UM.

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Lin's right. There's some important, kind

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of symbolic victories here for a labor movement, an organized

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>labor movement that's probably been losing ground over the past

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>few decades just in terms of the sheer number of

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>union members. But I still think it's it's too soon

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to say that the tide is really turning. I think Amazon,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it has this immune system response to two unions in

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>its supply chain, and it fights them to the nail.

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think probably workers at other fulfillment centers are

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be watching and waiting to see if Chris

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Smalls and his colleagues can convert today's important and very

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>symbolic victory in the meaningful changes for Amazon workers. We're

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>actually looking at video of Chris Small's popping a bottle

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>of champagne on the back of this vote. Lynn, You know,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>do we need a character like that? If other pushes

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>for organized labor in other parts of the country, at

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>other Amazon warehouses, at other companies, is really going to succeed.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the case of Chris Smalls is particularly interesting

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>because he led that independent union. When we look at

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the tactics he used in terms of change management, coalition building,

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>he's really smart. Amazon has a particular playbook that they

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>use when it comes to fighting unions, and Christmas tactics

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of subverted them. It was really clever. It's the

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>next step will be negotiating, which is going to take

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of effort, a lot of resource allocation, um,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so the transition to that process will be harder. But

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be focusing on participation and bringing the

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>workers involvement in so if he continues to do that,

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he could be very successful. Brad, what kind of roadblocks

0:07:55.680 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think Amazon will throw up next here and elsewhere? Boy,

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we we we probably can't even conceive of what they'll

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>resort to. If you look back across the arc of

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon history. They've shut down facilities, They've walked away from

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the scissist facilities that have even attempted to organize. I

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think in under Andy Jasse, Amazon can or will

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>do that, although you know, Frankly, a couple of years ago,

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they shut down, as you remember Emily h the HQ

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>two project in Long Island City because basically it had

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>become about unions, and mayor at the time Bill Deblasio said, uh,

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>New York City is a union town. Amazon, You're gonna

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have to accept it. And they and the next day

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they close shop. So but you know, Jesse is a

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a different CEO than Bezos. I don't

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>think they'll do that, but I think they'll fight tooth

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and nail. I think these legal objections are just the beginning.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, bargaining tooth and nail for for everything

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>um with Chris Malt and his colleagues. We can certainly

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that and maybe don't reach a contract, and maybe

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a strike and maybe Amazon resorts to replacement labor

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and we have a big battle with the world watching.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I really don't think they're going to allow Smalls and

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>his union to kind of set an example because they

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>do view it as a little bit of an existential

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>challenge for the company and the relationship they have with

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>their million plus workers. Lann, I see you nodding your

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>head in agreement with what Brad is saying here. What

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think comes next from Amazon? I I think

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>they are going to fight to snything I'll just was said. Um,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>so they the location offers some challenges and benefits. Mean

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>they are it's in a pro labor town in a

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>pro labor state. Uh that, and they have a lot

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>invested in the area. They have multiple distribution centers, would

0:09:55.679 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be hard to shut those down easily. That being said,

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they are in a large urban area with a greater

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>labor supply possibility. So it's they have some things going

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for them in against them. Will be interesting to see

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>what they choose to do. While the scale of this

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is certainly potentially massive, Amazon employing one and a half

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>million workers in the United States alone. Lynn Vincent, assistant

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Professor at the M. J. Whitman School of Management at

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse University, along with our own senior executive editor Rad Stone,

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Both will continue to follow Sticking with Amazon,

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>The tech giant gave CEO Andy Jase a pay package

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>worth two hundred twelve million dollars last year. Almost all

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of that came in a stock award sixty one thousand shares.

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Those vests between next year and one. Jesse took over

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>from Amazon founder Jeff Bezos back in July. Coming up,

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple's four into fintech, how the iPhone maker plans to

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>develop its own pay it's processing technology, and what it

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>all means for the rest of the fintech world. Next,

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Bloomberg, you soon may be able to pay for

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>your iPhone or other Apple hardware in the same way

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that you pay for I Cloud, Apple TV Plus, or

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple Music. Apples working on a secret project to create

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone subscription service that would allow users to pay

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for their phone monthly via their app Store account. This

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>would differ from normal Apple and carrier insolvent plans, as

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the feet would be a proprietary price based on which

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I phone model the user chose, versus just the cost

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of the device, divide it up by twelve or twenty

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>four months. As part of the initiative, Apple would let

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>iPhone users replace their model each year. As new versions

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>are released over time. Of course, the recurring revenue would

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>generate even more money for Apple, but it would also

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>allow consumers to get new iPhones were frequently and not

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have to pay a thousand dollars outright for a new

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>high end model. Apple has also internally discussed tying the

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>program to Apple one its services bundles that include TV Plus,

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Music, Cloud Storage, News, Fitness Plus, and more, in

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>addition to Apple Care technical support plans. Similarly, Apples also

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>working on a widespread by now pay lead service for

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Pay it All goes to plan, Apple could launch

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the hardware subscription service later or sometime. I'm Mark German.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>This is power On, Mark German air for Bloomberg and

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to sign up for his weekly newsletter power

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>On at Bloomberg dot com. Seeking with Apple, Bloomberg and

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Mark reporting earlier this week that the Iphonemaker is developing

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>its own payments processing technology and infrastructure for future financial products.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>To talk about that and other fintech news, I want

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Jackie Racist, CEO and founder of post

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>House Capital. Jackie, great to have you back with us.

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what you're I'm curious. What your read is

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>on Apple digging even deeper into the financial services world

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and what this means for other fintech players, Well, I'm

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not at all surprised. I mean, for a few reasons. First,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>they process hundreds of billions of dollars worts of payments

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>throughout the entire Apple ecosystem, and so the skill with

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>which they operate is extraordinary for any type of payment

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>system to run throughout their network. The second thing is

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they've been in payments for eight years and they've already

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>shown interest in launching both himen and credit products. And

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing in particular with pay and for for example,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 1>is enabling consumers to just buy in another form. So

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a tender type, meaning it's a type of money

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that you can use. And what they do is make

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it easier to pay with your device and pay over

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a period of time. That makes it easier for consumers

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to control their monthly spend. And so it obviously is

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>helpful because from Apple's point of view, it creates engagement.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>It creates this relationship even after a transaction, because the

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>servicing relationship for a pay and four enables them to

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to build a relationship with a consumer on their phone.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's tons of utility there, both for the consumer

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>who wants to control monthly expenses, as well as for

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple who wants to continue to dig a little bit

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>deeper into the consumer's wallet. Who does this hurt the most?

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean for a PayPal for example. I

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna hurt anybody. I think it is

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a new form factor and way to pay, and you'll

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>see it proliferate across while it's everywhere, and so you'll

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>see the credit card providers do it, You'll see specialists

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>do it, like a firm after pay Klarna, and I

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>think you'll see it as just another payment vehicle for

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>consumers to use. And so maybe it changes the whether

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>someone uses debit, whether they use credit, or they use

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a digital form factor. But it's just another way to

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>expand the relationship and continue to give options amongst all

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of their products. We've seen a number of fintech stocks

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>take up beating this quarter. I mean we're looking at

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of red on the screen. There a firm.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you're on the board of a firm PayPal,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so Fi Block he used to work at Square for

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>many years. Why do you think fintech in particular is

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>taking this I know there's a broader down market. Fintech

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to be taking it pretty hard, you know it.

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Fintech had an unbelievable series of years between one where

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>funding and valuations reached fairly heady heights, and so you

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>see a reset back to valuations that are more standardized

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>levels of valuations. Particularly given the growth of these companies,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll always see them operate with disruptive multiples,

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning they'll operate with multiples that are higher than the

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>non technically advanced companies in the payments and financial sector.

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>But they came back to a more sustainable multiple level

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in this overall market reset. Having said that, the private

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>market also reset, and uh in one alone, you saw

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty increase in crypto investments, you saw a similar increase

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in fintech investing, and all of that had reached a

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>level of valuations and um levels of interest that really

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>had peaked, and it just kind of came back to earth.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I still see huge opportunities in this sector. It's one

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest sectors in the United States and around

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the world, and it's a sector where the traditional companies

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that operate in this market are for the majority of

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the public companies over fifty years and older as companies,

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and so there's incredible opportunity to be disruptive in this space.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>So I still see lots of opportunity and lots of investment. UM.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Even today, you're an investor in the crypto market, and

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm so curious how you're thinking about DEFY an adoption trends.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>The Inner Information just came out with a pretty explosive

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>headline talking about entries and Horowitz versus Jack Dorsey and

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the crypto quote unquote holy war that is brewing. Okay,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a little dramatic. Having said that, UM,

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it is entertaining. UM. I think Defy is fascinating because

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it changes the paradigm of who controls and who owns

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>companies and who who operates them, and so I do

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>think there's an opportunity to expand the aperture of how

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>these companies are run and created. I also think we're

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>only in the first inning of DEFY. We really are

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing tons of experimentation, whether it be an infrastructure or

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>even in vertical products, but you haven't really seen use

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>cases come to fruition and build significant scale companies where

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the broader use cases used in consumers day

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and day outlives. But the experimentation that's out there is

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty exciting and I think it, along with the rest

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of the crypto market and the fintech market, continues to

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>show the level of interest in investing in this area

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>of of the United States economy. Jackie, before you go,

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you quickly about your new book,

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Self Made Boss, which you co wrote and you talk

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>to entrepreneurs, owners of small and medium businesses. Really you

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 1>know some of your customers when you were working at

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Square Capital. What was the catalyst for this quickly um

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>catalysts is small businesses need help to start, run and

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>grow their business. They are half of the economy two

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thirds of job growth in the United States. Lauren Weinberg,

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>my co author, and I really saw the need to

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>create a pragmatic guide to help small businesses build their

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>companies through feedback from other small businesses, and it's a

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>helpful tool to help them again start run and grow

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>their business. Jackie reesis post House Capital and new author

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Self Made Boss. You can check it out on Amazon.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Jackie. For joining us. Welcome back to Blow Technology.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm emily changing in San Francisco. Potentially huge news from

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter today or is it news at all? Twitter tweeting

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>that the company is working on an edit button. Then again,

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it's April fools Day? Ed what do you think? Is

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it a joke? Reminding you m all day long it's

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>April Fool's Day. This is a joke, right, this is

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what the people want, but clearly this is a joke.

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>This is what I want. But I'm guessing this is

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a joke. Unfortunately Twitter has resisted for years and edit button, right,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so why would they do it now? And on April

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Fool's Day? Give us the edit button? And even investors

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's a joke because chet check. All right, well,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>well we'll have to see tomorrow. And yes, you were

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the one preparing all of us not to fall for it. Um,

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, i'd boodlow. Thank you. I want to talk

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>more about Chinese tech sos rallying now with Race Capital

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>partner Edith Young. If first of all, what do you

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>make of the Chinese government potentially taking a really unprecedented

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>step by that's given how secretive and protective the government

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is about its own companies. Well, I hope this is

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not a April four jokes from from the Chinese authority UM.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Who knows they also have a sense of humor as well.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Point And I think, you know, obviously, you know, based

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>on what you and I just discussed, you know, it's

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing to see to Stoff really rally up this morning.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, for the last twelve months all the

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese stock and the two plus companies been under a

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure and haven't been It's just been a really,

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>really tough time for them. So I think like this

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>particular announcement UM, from from my point of view, is

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the three implication. One is it's amazing to see the

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Chinese authority is willing to work with UM, the US

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to potentially open this up. We will see how it

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>goes during the summer. But this is really at the

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>government level UM in terms of cooperations, sort of amazing

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to see. And in this particular implication, in some sense

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very historic because it's been a lot of pushback,

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, for many, many years. So number two is

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>it's great news for the listed companies because compagned market

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>cap is almost over two point one trillion that we're

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about is really nervous for many many other investors,

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>for for all the CEOs in the public listed companies.

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So now it's you know, the Chinese authorities are willing

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>to sort of really sort of lead the charge. So

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's that's great news. And number three, from the point

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of view from a startups, there's so many different startups

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>really been wanting to go I p O in the US,

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and now there's light at the end of the tunnel,

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's great news overall. And last but not least,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I still have family and friends. Now is under complete lockdown,

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Shanghai now and it's just so bad. So economically,

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we really need some good news in China. Well. So

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if this is going to be part of

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a longer term strategy, given that the Chinese government has

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>been cracking down on its own tech companies for months

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>upon months now, are we going to see a broader

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>easing up? Um? I really hope. So it's I don't

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely not qualified to a comment on you know,

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>what Chinese authority and government would do, but one thing

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for sure, I think that Chinese government really wants to

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>know support the economy um, and think what happened without

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end grouped or of course it's not purely

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>just for regulatory with with ATTACH or or or or

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the fintech so sectors. It's just overall. I think the

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>whole economy because of COVID has been been, um really

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>going through self tough times. And I think right now

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the government really wants to sort of help and push

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this along. And at least you know, for us from

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>from an early stage investor, and that's from a startup

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>point of view, this is really really good news and

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I think they really wanted helped it, not to suppress it.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So what is your assessment now whether investors should be

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>getting into or staying in Chinese tech stocks public companies,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>and whether Chinese companies in general are smart from a

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>private market or venture capitalist investment perspective as well? Then well,

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think like from my private market, um, there are

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>many many areas. It's a little bit more. I don't

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>know one I want you go from healthcare or signmi

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>conductors um or any sort of electric cars. And you know, frankly,

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>China has been the one of the fastest growing market

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for companies like Tesla, so China actually as a whole

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is still the one of the second largest in terms

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of um GDP in the world, So it's a huge market,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think as much as so the ten Cent

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and end group of the world or Buy Do. Seems

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like the stock PLA hasn't been done so great, but

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>but still is huge, huge in terms of user base.

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>And I'm so really really bull about the Chinese market.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>We can predict what Chinese government wants to do, but

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, just in terms of the health

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and the future of the economy is still really really bright.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So in general, I take a very positive attitude. Now

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to turn the crypto now because you've backed

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest crypto names out there yet Salona

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>f t X. Why do you think we're seeing such

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>hesitance on the part of public market investors to double

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>down on crypto amidst this broader market downturn. There was

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>a thought that cryptocurrencies could potentially be decoupled from traditional equities,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but we're not really seeing that. Well. I actually, I mean,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess it really depends on the day. Um Emily,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you and I catch up December last year,

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and I actually predicted for the last five years that

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>three crypto winters and sort of got every January. There's

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>some sort of downturn, particularly with bitcoin um, but having

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>said that, in the last few days in the quarto

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>market really rally up once again. So in my head

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a few things. One is, you know, last it's

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>been red cut high in terms of early stage crypto

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>venture and just look at like f t X along

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the revenue has just been insane, and I think that

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>more and more where we're seeing. In some sense, I

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>think the Biden administration with the executive order, you certainly

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the White House can't say, um, I want certain things

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen, but they really have give their blessing. In

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>some sense, still need to wait for all the agency

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to give the officials to regularly regulate this. But at

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I do think that we're going in

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the right direction in sort of institution regardless in the

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowan of the world which invested in POL signed in

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of custodies, they are more and more institution

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>um offering actual products for so that the family offices

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so many many sort of consumer to get into the game,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>just starting with coin based being publish an f t

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>x I don't know when, but also going through the

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>right direction in terms of getting all the license regulatory compliance.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I think more or we will come in Young Price

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Capital partner, thank you as always for joining us. Coming up,

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of Twitch also getting into crypto and

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>n f T s, will speak with Justin Cohn, you know,

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>broadcast exclusive about his first adventure capital round for a

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:48.959
<v Speaker 1>new gaming and f T company, Fractal. This is Bloomberk

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the future of n f T s in gaming. Fractal,

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the new n f T gaming company founded by Twitch

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>co founder Justin Cohn, just raised an additional round of

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>funding from crypto focused investors like Paradigm and multi Coin Capital.

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Justin Cohn now for more

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on his vision. Justin, We know you so well for

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>experimenting with and popularizing early technologies from Justin TV too

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of course Twitch. What makes you think n f T

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>s in gaming are the future? Uh? Well, it makes

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>me it feels it feels like those early days of

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>live streaming, you know, fifteen years ago when I started

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>off on the Internet and we're building Justin TV, which

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is the company that turned into Twitch. There was a

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of experimentation on how are people going to interact

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, and today in crypto and n f

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>t S particularly, it feels like there's all this experimentation

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on how are people going to regard an exchange value

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>on your neet And that's what's really exciting to me.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>What is a successful game that uses n f t

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>S look like in your vision? Yeah, it looks like

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a game. You know, I think that n f t

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>s are the new is this model gaming? And in

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>ten years from now, you know, we won't think of

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>blockchain games or games with n f t s is

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>something completely separate. We're going to see it as like

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>these are games that have assets, and those assets are

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>worth something. People trade them, they own them, they take

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>them with them, and uh, it's just gonna be something

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of standardized. So today, if you look at

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the games that are most popular in the world, they

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>all have virtual assets, right, They sell skins, characters. You know,

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>these are games like Fortnite that everybody's heard over their

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>kids play. And I think the next step in the

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.239
<v Speaker 1>evolution of these digital assets is that they're gonna sit

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>on a blockchain and people are going to really have

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>ownership of them, and yet there's a huge debate about

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the future of n f t s and gaming. A

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks in the gaming industry don't want this

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the future. Why do you think there's so

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>much pushback? It reminds me a lot of free to play.

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you and I were both kind of around

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>when this came out, and free to play as a

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>business model came out gaming maybe around two thousand sight,

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and those early games and free to play were you know,

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they were like ZINGA games like farm Bill and Mafia Wars. Um.

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of pushback from gamers. Then they said,

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>these games aren't great. You know, they're not good, they're

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not fun, they're just viral, you know, something viral. They're

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>not I don't want to pay like incrementally, I just

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>want to pay upfront. And then, um, you know what

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>happened was there was more investment in the model. People

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>build better games, uh, people build games that they want

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to play in general. And then what happened was, you know,

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>ten years later, now it's like every game is a

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>free to play game in the markets, with like tens

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.479
<v Speaker 1>of billions of dollars a year in digital assets and

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think the same thing is you know, can

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>be said of crypto or crypto games. You know, people

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>are saying, uh, these games aren't good yet there you know,

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't need n f T s Like this is

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not something that gamers want, but I think it's it's

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>actually something that will become that predominant model as the

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>games become better. That said, where do you see hype

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in this industry, whether it's about n f T s

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>or crypto or play to earn? I know you're not

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of that in particular. I mean, are

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>their technologies that you see getting a disproported disproportionate amount

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of attention that shouldn't be well. I think that the

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of fundraising, like the the amounts that games are raising,

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is what capturing, is capturing the imagination of both the

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>game studios and players. And sometimes it's you know, people

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, it's ridiculous that these teams that haven't

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>launched yet or have very rude mentory gameplay compared to

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like a Triple A title, you know, the traditional world,

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, raising hundreds of millions of dollars or like

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>have these economies that are with billions of dollars you know,

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and they think it's overhyped. Into some extent that might

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be true, So I think that the fundraising aspect is

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit overhyped. What what's really exciting to me

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as a technologist is just this idea of like these

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>games becoming shifting from closed economies where you know, the

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>game company controls everything to really open economies where there's

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>an ecosystem of developers and players who control what happens

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in the economy. And to me, that's going to inspire

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>more people like these games to become platforms on top

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which many different developers build experiences, and um, these open

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems I think are going to be like much more

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>durable and worth a lot more in the future. Now

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we're saying a fight to own the future of deep

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>by among venture capitalists and bigger players like Jack Dorsey.

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>The Information just had a controversial headline talking about how

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Mark Entrieson and Jack Dorrisey are kind of starting off

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the Holy War of crypto. You know, what do you

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>think about the competition to invest in this space and

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it'll really be decentralized at all or whether it's

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just a different group of players owning it. Yeah, I

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>think the argument really is between them like kind of

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>how much decentralization is enough decentralization right and not? Jack

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on one side, it's like, you know, these vcs are

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>funding and owning a large portion of these protocols, it's

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not like truly decentralized. And um. I think Mark's position,

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, want speed for him would be like, well,

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>someone's got to fund these things, and it's like decentralized enough.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think it really depends how the answer the question.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It really depends on what your use case is. I

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>think so for something that's like bigcoin, which is a

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>store of value for this massive amount of people in

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the world, you really want like a huge amount of decentralization. Um.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think for you know, something that's maybe more

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:19.959
<v Speaker 1>like a game, uh, you know, might be variable how

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>much decentralization you really need, um, you know, because like

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>how much they like how important the assets are that

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.479
<v Speaker 1>there's like truecentralization and no one could ever you know,

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>take control over this or or or you know, Like

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that's it kind of depends on the use right,

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Like defied might be like much more security might be

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing for the game. It might fall

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the middle. Now you've made a choice fairly

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>early on to build on the Salona blockchain versus Ethereum.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Why yeah, Well, so you know what prevented me from

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>getting into crypto as a builder for longest time was usability.

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.479
<v Speaker 1>You know. I was like, I I saw Ethereum with

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>intry invested in the theorem. Actually I bought a fum,

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, like in Seen, I was like, this is

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, but I didn't really see how you could

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>build an application with the transaction through put of something

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like twitch, you know, um on it. And so what

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>really got me excited about Salana was, you know, for

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the first time, I really felt like, oh, you know,

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>normal people could build on top of this, and you

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>can build something that reached a mass audience because the

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of trans transaction speed and cost was low enough

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that it made sense for maybe something more like a

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>gaming use case where you might have like many different

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>n f T S n f T items in a

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 1>game and you might trade in and out of them

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 1>like very quickly within one playing session. You know. So

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it really was like a usability you know choice, But

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like at the end of the day, fractal wants to

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 1>be wherever game studios want to be, and so our

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>goal is to become multi chain and expand to everywhere

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that game companies want to build their products. All right,

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Justin Con, We'll be watching to see where this goes.

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You'll have to come back soon for a progress report.

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitch and Fractal co founder Justin Con thank you. Right Line,

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>which provides virtual behavioral and mental health services to kids

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and their family has just raised an additional hundred five

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in funding led by the private equity firm KKR,

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>along with earlier investors like alphabet What's to come? I

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Bright Lene, CEO and co founder

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Naomi Allen. Naomi, thank you so much for joining us.

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>We've been hearing a lot about the mental health crisis,

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>behavioral health crisis facing kids and teams across the country,

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in part as a result of the pandemic. What is

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the need you believe is not being met that you're

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to fill with technology, Emily, thanks for having me.

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>The need is a national, high quality, accessible and affordable

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>solution for families. So today, even pre COVID, one of

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 1>five kids had a diagnosipal behavioral health condition and eight

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't not get appropriate treatment. And that's because historically care

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>has been really hard to access and hard to pay

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for for families. So how does Brightline solve that problem

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that it's solving it with quality care?

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Great question. We've built a care delivery system where we

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>hire and manage our own team of pediatric trained coaches, therapists, psychiatrists,

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and speech language pathologists. We bring those services to insurance companies,

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and we contract with those insurance companies to make sure

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the services are affordable to families, and then we provide

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>those services virtually so that no matter where you sit

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in the country, you can access high quality behavioral healthcare

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for your kids. We've built this all through a model

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>which has been proven and tested to be effective, and

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we measure clinical outcomes every single week for the children

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that are in our care. How would you say the

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>pandemic has exacerbated this crisis? You said one in five

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:08.240
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic. What's that number now? The incidence rates

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of pediatric anxiety and depression have bokene up about and

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>there's new data that was just released last week by

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the CDC saying that one in five teams have considered

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>committing suicide in the past year. So what we're seeing

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is across the country and frankly even globally, a sharp

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>increase in terms of the need and the severity level

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of pediatric we here about hot conditions, and again that

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was building on already a point of crisis for the country.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think the other thing that we're seeing is

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>an acute shortage of clinicians and especially clinicians that are

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>willing to be in network with insurance companies, and so

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the affordability crisis is real as well. So with better

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>access and better care, how do you think those numbers

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>can change. Yeah, we believe that there's no reason for

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>kids all cross the United States not to be able

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to receive care within a few short days of seeking

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>care and treatment. Now, we have a long way to

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>go as a country, still working on stigma with parents

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and caregivers, but we're seeing actually stigma go down meaningfully

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>amongst the new generation of children, adolescents and teens. So

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's good news. We're seeing actually a lot more

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.439
<v Speaker 1>openness and so what we need to do is create

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 1>affordable and high quality access and that's really what bright

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Line is scaling across the country. You know, the other

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 1>thing that we think is critical is reducing the lack

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of equity and equitable access. Today, seventy of the counties

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States don't have a single child or

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.760
<v Speaker 1>adolescent psychiatrist. And so one of the ways you reduce

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that that lack of equity is by scaling using technology.

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So we've built a virtual solution to reach kids and

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.439
<v Speaker 1>families no matter where they are in the country. All right,

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll be watching, Naomi Allen, co founder and CEO of

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>bright Line. Thanks for sharing your story with us. And

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>that does it for the edition of Bloomberg Technology. Don't

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>forget to check out our new podcast find it anywhere

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. For our daily news round up,

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco. Have a wonderful weekend. Everyone.

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg