WEBVTT - Echoborg: The Computer Controls You

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from dot Com. Hey,

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the Stuff to Blow your Mind? My name is

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we're running a

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>rerun here today. We haven't run a repeat episode in

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>quite a while, but this is one that came out,

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think in August of last year. We really enjoyed it.

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a very engaging, perfect perfectly suitable stuff

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to blow your mind topic, and it mentions fruit trees,

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>which is basically the thing I like more than anything else,

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>fruit trees. Yeah. Well, as long as we get a

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>fruit tree and there, we're good. So here we go.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's enter the world of the echo borg. I want

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to take you into the future here for a minute.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I want you to imagine this scenario. You've been contacted

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>by an artificial intelligence an AI that identifies itself only

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>as mind your Manners or mim and them as a

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>wonderful job opportunity for you. It needs an echo borg

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>as it attends an industry conference related to the corporation

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it head. In other words, it needs to augment a

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>human with a non invasive sensory array so as to

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>use them as its living avatar. Hold on the second,

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>This sounds like a creepy job. Now, what exactly does

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>this job involve? Essentially, NIM is going to speak into

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>your ears through this sensory array. It's gonna pick up

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and everything going around in your surroundings, and you will

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>repeat or shadow its words and conversation with various unaugmented

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>humans throughout the week at this conference. So you're gonna

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>be its mouth, it's face, it's every expression. As NIM

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>attends several key meetings and networks with industry leaders, you

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>will be the human mask for all its interactions. Now,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you of course be required to sign a standard nondisclosure agreement,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and as mims schedule for the conference is fairly rigorous,

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be swapping out duties for the week with

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a second echo board selected for more casual and interactions.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But this is a huge opportunity for you. Aies like

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>them are known to establish a harem of echo bots,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>each suited to a particular culture or setting. This could

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be your big break. You could become the pampered meat

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>suit of a powerful machine brain. Yes, and it's you know,

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a great gig if you can get it, you know. Yeah,

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm sure that this job, while it might

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>be physically demanding, is it probably doesn't require all that

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>much skill, right, So you just have to be able

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>to repeat words pretty much in real time and give

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>some convincing facial expressions and hand gestures. Yeah, you would

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>need to bring life to its words to a certain extent.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's part of being the mask. Like when

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>one example that comes to mind, of course, is the

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Arrested development they had the the the surrogate character that

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>shows up while George sr. Is under house arrests. This

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>character was just a ball cap the video camera on,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and he gives a very dead pan version of everything

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that George is saying. And in that he would be

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you would be a terrible echo borg or thronoite. As

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss. Uh. Ideally, the individual repeating the

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>computer's words would would make it make the words come alive. Okay,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>So what we're envisioning here is sort of the exact

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what certain sci fi writers have predicted with

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>robot avatars. The idea of a robot avatar, like in

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the movie Avatar, you could probably say, Oh, though I

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's a robot, I don't know. It's

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in plenty of sci fi. You you hook your brain

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>up to a computer, and through the computer, you control

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the actions and words and deeds, all of the outward

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>motion of some kind of physical embodiment that's not really

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>your body. Yeah, Like I've seen it employed as a

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>possibility for space exploration. Right, it's too much for us

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to send a human, delicate human body to this other world.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But you send a robot and then make that robot

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the avatar for the human explorer, which is great for

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>space exploration as it combines the sort of reactiveness and

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>ingenuity of the human mind with the hardiness of a

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>robot body and the hardiness and expendability, let's be frank,

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of the robot body. Um. So yeah, So what we're

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>envisioning here is the exact opposite a computer mind controlling

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>your body. Yes, I mean a computer using a human

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a meat puppet to to give life

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to its its voice and its will in human and

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>our actions. All Right, So you mentioned the terms serra

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>noid a minute ago, and I'm gonna assume. Actually I

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>don't need to assume, because I know that comes from

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Serrano to Bergerac. Yes, Serrano back Edmund Roston play. A

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people may be familiar with this, of course,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>from the Steve Martin movie Roxanne, which was a retelling

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of the same story. My first introduction to Syrra No

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>was the Wishbone episode when I was a kid peek

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>behind the curtain. Robert did not know what wishbone was.

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I had to explain it to him. I I don't

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>know how I miss us. It sounds delightful. Now, who

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>who did the dog play? Which character? I think it

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was Syrano, right, so the dog. If you're not familiar

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>with this story, Serrano de Bergerac is based on a

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>real life character from history, but in the play it's

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of dramatized, fictionalized made more exciting. And the idea

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>is that he is a very ugly man with a

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>big nose, so he has a hard time wooing women.

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>But he's also very clever and brave. He has a

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>great mind in the wrong kind of body. But if

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>he teams up with somebody who's very handsome and very stupid,

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>together they make the perfect package. So all he needs

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to do is get a handsome man to pair it.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Every single word he tells him, and there you've got

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the perfect suitor. Yeah. Yeah, it's uh, you know, and

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's often played for for comedy, right, because you have

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>especially unarrested development. You end up with with signals getting crossed. Uh.

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, the individual who is who is informing the

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>surrogate says something uh that's not intended to be transmitted,

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and it ends up transmitted and then all sorts of

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hilarity ensues. Yeah. I think it's played for comedy and

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the rust and play also, But but it raises some

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting questions about how we perceive other people and how

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we perceive the will behind other people. Yeah. Well, one

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think is certainly true is that people

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>are very sensitive to the outwardly visible source of information,

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes more than they are sensitive to the content of

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the information. Like, if somebody is making an argument to you,

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it's very likely that you're judging the merits of that

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>argument more on what the person looks like and what

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>their voice sounds like than the actual merits of the

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>arguments they're making. And indeed, you have just a whole

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>communication array that is delivering this information. I mean, it's

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the voice it's also often the hands of the

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>individual to body language, the expressions, the micro expressions, the

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>icon tact all of the all of these features that

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>add that additional level of engagement to any sort of information. Yeah,

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the tuxedo. And so this connects in

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a strange way with a question that has often come

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>up in artificial intelligence, which is the idea of the

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>touring test. And I think the way it relates is

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are the tuxedo, if you're the meat tuxedo

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for an artificial intelligence speaking through you, does that in

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>any way influence how people receive the messages coming from

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>an artificial intelligence. So we should probably explain a little

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>bit the idea of the touring test for people who

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't familiar. This is a standard often referred to concept

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in in the progress of artificial intelligence, and it comes

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>from the computer scientist and sort of a I pioneer

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>alan touring. And there's no actual one touring tests. You

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>can't buy the kit online and bring it, bring it

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>home and to start im pulling it against every toaster

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in your vicinity. Right, It's more of a general concept

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that's been applied in a lot of ways, and the

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>most basic, stripped down version of the test is, can

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a human chatting through text only tell if the person

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they're chatting with is a real human being or a

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>computer program designed to talk like a real human being.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it basically comes down to two two turings

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>insistence that, uh, the question of whether a machine can

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>think is too meaningless to really waste time on, so

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to instead think, well, am I am I

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>buying it? Am I am I fooled by it? It

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is it is creating the the semblance of intelligence, and

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and it deceives me. Then that's what we need to

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>look for, exactly right. And I think I largely agree

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>with the point he's making, because how can you tell

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>that other humans possess real intelligence? I mean, come up

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with a way of explaining how you know other human

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really think? You say, well, I mean, listen to the

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>way they talk, look at the way they react to

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what I say. It's a very complex kind of reaction. Well,

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>what if you could have a computer robot that does

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>all of the same things, then would that not be thinking?

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all we have to go by in science

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is externally measurable phenomena. You can't get inside someone else's

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>sentience and judge whether or not they're thinking by I

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, just sort of like your phenomenal intuition. I

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's in carry practice The hog Father, where there's

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a essentially a thinking machine that's used by the wizards

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there and uh, and and when somebody asks that the

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>wizard using the machine if the machine thinks for itself,

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and and he says, uh, says don't know. It just

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it just appears makes it has the appearance of thinking

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for itself. And yeah, theah, the character says, well, it's

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>just like everyone else then all right, right, Yeah, if

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a solop syst, you could say, well,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually the only object in the entire universe that thinks,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just surrounded by very convincing artificial intelligences. Yeah.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean we discussed in our Alien episode that we

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>did recently. It's when you start trying to it's it's

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>hard enough for us to to decide and quantify what

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>human consciousness is, what intelligence is, and when we start

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for artificial versions of it, uh, it becomes difficult.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So you have to have some sort of standard to

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>say all right, this is this is enough and that's

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>what the Turing tests that's out to do. Right. It's

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea, not can computers think, but can they convincingly

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>appear to think? Yeah, and of course this shows up

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of science fiction. I believe it. Uh,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's in Blade Runner. It's been while since I have

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>seen Blade Runner, but more recently in Exmina. Oh yeah,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I just saw that movie, and maybe we should talk

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>about that later in this episode, but I'll go ahead

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and give my endorsement now. I thought it was pretty awesome. Yeah,

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a it's a very very engaging film. I

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>recommend it to anyone who iss a listener to the show. Okay,

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but let's describe a Turing test scenario. Like I said,

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no one test, but lots of people try to

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>put together some kind of Touring test type scenario to

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>test their chat bot to see how good it is.

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And the chat bot is just a program that you

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation with. If you've ever engaged, if you've

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>ever been in a website and that little, you know,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>text screen comes up and there's some sort of little uh,

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, stock art of an individual you might be

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>talking to. One of these chatterpots. Yeah. Yeah, So let's

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>paint a little picture. Let's say you walk into a

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>mostly empty warehouse, and right in the center of the

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>warehouse as a card table and a folding chair and

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a computer terminal. And you go and you sit down

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>at the terminal, and there's a little blinking cursor and

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you type hello, and it responds hello back, and then

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>you type some more things, and it types some more

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>things back to you, and you get to talk to

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it for some length of time it was pre specified.

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you talk to it for five minutes, maybe you

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to it for twenty minutes. But at the end

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of the session, it's your job to say, now, what

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was I just interacting with? Was that a computer program

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>or was that a person sitting at a terminal like

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>mine in the warehouse next door. These days, most of

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the time, I think it's still going to be pretty

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>easy to tell, especially if you have a limited amount

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>of time to interact, and if the chat bot program

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>operates within some kind of I don't know, borderline cheating

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of conditions, like some of these bots

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>might suggest they have a conversational limitation, like, oh, I'm

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a real person who is a child from another country,

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and I don't natively speak your language. That makes it

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a little easier to be convincing. Or you could say

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that you suffer from some kind of condition that makes

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you interact socially in a different way than most people would.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And in any of these cases, you're sort of like

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>putting dampeners on our judgment. You're saying, like, Okay, I

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be expecting somebody who interacts just like anybody I

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>would meet, you know, at work or at a party

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. This person might very well be

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a human and still be acting kind of strange. But

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>once you say okay, you can talk for four hours

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is just you know, a regular person who

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any kind of limitations on their conversation you,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll pretty much always be able to tell these days,

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say yeah, and you know, and a lot

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of this is gonna, you know, at least start off

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>as just small talk, you know, like you were saying, hello,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>what's your name? What do you what? What? What do

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you what? The what's your favorite band? You know, that's something,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and then that the the the AI or the attempted

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>an AI, the chatter bought attempts to answer those in

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a way to fool you into thinking as a real person.

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>In fact, let's go ahead and just roll through a

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>short script from a chatter bought conversation. Yeah, so we'll

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>reveal the source of this in a bit. But Hi, Robert,

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>what kind of movies do you like? Um? Historical? I

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>prefer modern era films. Great, What are your favorites? My

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite movie so far is The Imitation Game. It's about

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>my idol, Alan Turing. What did you like most about it?

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I like fruit trees? Were there lots of fruit trees

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in the movie. Maybe we can talk about that later. Okay,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>shall I continue with gardening or do you want me

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to move on? You can move on. So I think

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty obvious who was the chatter bought in that conversation. Yeah,

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>so I was the chatter bot there. That was coming

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>from a chat bot named Rose, which was created by

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Wilcox and documented. That was verbat on a transcript

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of a video produced by some researchers that we're going

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about in a minute. But there's a variation

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>on that script we just read because in the video

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that didn't take place at a text terminal all the

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>lines that both of us said, we're spoken out loud

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>by human beings. Now, how could that be. Well, that's

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>going to tie into the concept of echo borgs, which

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we brought up at the beginning. So to get into

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>echo borgs, we need to talk about a favorite figure

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in the weird history of psychological research in the United States,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's Stanley Milgram. Yes, Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>three four, best known for his controversial Obedience experiments, actually

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a series of social psychology experiments about nineteen in all,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>conducted by Milgram in the nineteen sixties. Yeah, you probably

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have heard about these. If you're familiar with Millgram, it's

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>probably from the They're often just called the Milgram experiments,

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and they sort of give him a bad name because

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they were they were kind of nasty. Yeah, they're they're

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>generally anytime you see a list of like, you know,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>top ten scariest or weirdest or most evil psychological experiments,

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they tend they tend to throw this one in though, uh,

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's really more troubling and what it

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>reveals about about human human nature. So what was the deal? Well,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's important to note that the first one of these

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>took place in nineteen sixty one, just three months after

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the start of the trial of German Nazi war criminal

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. And so Milgram wanted to see

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>just how far we'd go in the name of a

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>bang an authority figure. Of course, of course, because the

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>whole argument is are these bad people? Were they just

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>simply following orders? Right? It was the idea that the

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Germans are especially evil, where the where the people who

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>became the you know, guards at Auschwitz just from birth,

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>truly evil people who were susceptible to that kind of behavior,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Or would we behave the same way in the same circumstances. So, yeah,

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the experiment revolved around, you know, an individual in a

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>room and you hear the sounds of someone being shocked

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the next room whenever that individual pushes a button,

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>pulls a lever or whatever on the command of an

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>authority figure. So the question is how far will you

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>go to when will you stop shocking? Would you ever

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>stop shocking that individual in the next room if an

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>authority figure is telling you to do it and telling

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>you that it's okay. Yeah, And what Millgram claimed to

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>find through his experiments is Yeah, even you know, your

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>regular people, your next door neighbor Americans, if they've got

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody in a white lab coat who's supposedly in charge

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of the experiment saying please continue shocking them, they've agreed

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to this in advance. Lots of people will continue shocking

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>even after the supposed victim of the shocking. Now we

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>should say that in this experiment, nobody was acting. Nobody

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>actually electrocuted in the next rim. Yeah, there were actors

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be in in immense pain from these shocks.

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>That lots of people in the experiment would supposedly continue

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>shocking them. Yeah. And if you want to hear more

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>about that, that series of experiments and what some of

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the ramifications of it, uh, stuff to bow your mind.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Did an episode earlier in the year titled The Power

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of Polite and I'll make sure to link to that

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on the landing page for this episode. But Stanley Milgram

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>also and some other experiments going on. Right, he wasn't

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>just doing the shocking people and Nazi experiments. He was

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in other ways to make us feel that troubled about

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>our humanity. Where they all creepy did he specialized only

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in creepy science, and I think he had some less

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>creepy ones, you know, I mean, you know, they involved

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>how we I think most of his work revolved around

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>how we view ourselves and how we have your bodies,

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, by effects of puppies and lollipops on our psyche. Yeah,

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know, not everything was necessarily um, you know,

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>people in the next room dying. Sure, But we referred

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to a term at the beginning of this episode which

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is serenoid. And this also comes from Stanley Milgram, I

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>believe from unpublished results of some experiments he conducted, right right.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>He he never published any of these. They ended up,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting some work into it, but then going

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>off in a different direction with his research. Yeah. So,

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as we said, the term serenoid comes from Syrano to

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>bears direct. But what was the deal with Milgram's experiments?

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So Milgram essentially wanted to see, hey, if you're that

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the woman that is being wooed bye bye bye by

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in those meat puppet his handsome, his handsome young man.

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I think her name was Roxanne. Roxanne Roxane's on the

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>balcony being wooed by a handsome meat puppet that's being

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>fed lines by Syra. No. Yeah, if you're Roxanne, would

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you be able to detect something was weird? Would you?

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Would you encounter this young man and say, you know,

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he seems a little more clever than than he should be,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or there's a delay in in what he's telling me,

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, would there be something that would tip you,

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 1>tip you off to the deception? You know, with modern technology,

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd imagine you could carry out that experiment pretty easily. Yeah,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even at the time, the technology was good enough.

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So in these unpublished experiments, he had a source speak

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>into a microphone and a shadower listened through a hidden earpiece.

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Then he or she would repeat whatever they heard, you know,

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>basic you know, arrested development surro, good kind of situation.

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. He found that with practice, speech

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>shadowing becomes easier and easier, Like we really take to

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>it rather naturally. They say, it's not that hard at all.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I read in one of the sources we used for

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>this episode that sometimes it only takes a few milliseconds

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of delay between the speech being fed in through the

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>earpiece and saying it. We're ready, willing and able to

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not think for ourselves. And so yeah, he observed that

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>he set all this up, put people in motion with

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>these with a source and a shadower, and then a

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>test subject having to interact with this individual or is

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it is individuals um and then give feedback about what

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>they thought. And he observed that people couldn't tell the

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>difference between a serenoid again that person, uh that that

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that shadower who is informed by another source just repeating

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>words that are entering his or her ears, could not

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference between seranoid and a normal human being

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>during interactions. Yeah, so that's what Milgram reported, And I

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, that's surprising and creepy. Yeah, I would think

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that I would easily be able to tell the difference

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>between a person speaking of their own free will and

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's just being fedlines in an ear pie. Yeah.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>In one experiment, Milgram's sourced in other words, fed you know,

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>lines to a pair of eleven and twelve year olds.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So they the eleven and twelve year olds where the

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>shadows and Milgram himself was speaking correct. Uh, yeah, the

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>children were the serenoids, if you will, and a group

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>of observing teachers never suspected that they were chatting with

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>anything other than a normal, though very bright child. Uh

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and it is experiments you found that

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>most people could have a lengthy twenty minute conversation with

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>a serenoid without noticing anything of this. Wow. Yeah, but

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, that's that's hard to believe. I mean,

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like you'd be able to notice that

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>right off the bat. But well, but just think how

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>easily we we buy into an actor's presentation. Think of

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and think of all the interactions we have in the

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>course of of our lives where the individual we're talking

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to is maybe not completely uh genuine, maybe that you know,

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're interacting with with someone that's doing customer service

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>or or they're trying to sell you something or can you, etcetera.

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's not always going to come off is

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>oh this person is completely fake. It's gonna It's just

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>an aspect of human interaction. Well, it's funny you mentioned

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>actors because I had this thought when I was reading

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this research. In a strange kind of way, all actors

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>in movies are serenoids. Like you have the writer coming

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>up with lines for many types of characters that aren't

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>anything like them outwardly at all, Like you can have

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, a sixty five year old female

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>writer writing lines for a ten year old boy in

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a play, and that boy effectively is a distanced serenoid.

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And should we be able to tell the difference? Like

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you can. Sometimes you watch a movie, you know,

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, kids wouldn't say that, that's not how

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>kids talk. But other times you buy it. Yeah. I

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things to keep in mind about

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>sienoids and ultimately about echo borgs this we've moved forward

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is that we're dealing with a hybrid personality. So there's

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the there are the words and the personality of the

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>individual who is informing, and then the words of the

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>shadower or the serenoid. That individual is bringing their own delivery,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>their own personality to it. Sure, because your personality, as

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you present it outwardly, is way more than the words

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you say. Yeah, obviously, it's your body language, it's your expressions,

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, the way you carry yourself. I mean,

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that's all part of the message you present. Like we

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>can all think of of movies or TV shows where

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a particularly gifted actor who's able to bring lackluster

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>lines to life in a way that a less gifted

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>actor who just would not be able to achieve. I

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>always think of ral Julia in Overdrawn at the Memory Bank,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>who you know, some people, you know, it's easy to

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of fun with his performance. It's you know,

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of cheesy and outlandish. But that man in

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that movie, which is like, you know, a low budget

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>PBS adaptation of a science fiction story, he brings so

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>much life to every line. So many lines and at

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in that film, if they were delivered by a lesser actor,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>would have just fallen flat. But he makes even the

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>most pointless line, uh, just really land. I agree, and

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a common feature actually an older actors.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I see this way more commonly with actors who have

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>been in the business for a long time. I think

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of Star Wars episode two, which my opinion is that

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a horrible, horrible movie. But when Christopher Lee

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>shows up and starts talking, the writing I think is

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>just as bad as it's been the entire time. But

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>suddenly I'm okay, I'm listening Christopher Lee. I'm buying it.

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>He is really selling this horrible dialogue. Yeah, yeah, exactly,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So in that respect, Raw Julia, Christopher Lee, they would

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>make wonderful serenoids, and keep them in mind, they might

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>have made excellent echo boards. All Right, we're gonna take

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a quick break and when we come back back to

0:24:53.800 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the echo boards. Okay, So Robert and we were talking

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>about echo borgs being the natural extension of serenoid. So

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the serenoid is a person being fed lines by another person.

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>The echo borg, as we talked about at the beginning

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of the episode, would be a person being fed lines

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>by a computer program. Yes, I want to know, are

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>there any studies where people have looked into this phenomena,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and if so, does a person delivering the lines from

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a chat bot make the chat bought anymore convincing in

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Turing test? Well, indeed, that that's exactly what we're

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna look at in this half of the podcast, particularly

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the work of two individuals British social psychologist Kevin Cordy

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and Alex Glefski. And Uh, basically, we have two studies

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we're gonna analyze here two thousand fourteen study

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>where they essentially just recreate some of Milgram's work and

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and look at the at the series Annoid and then

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand fifteen study that just came out um

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>where they take the serenoid, apply it to chatter bots

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and give us the echo borg. Yeah. So the script

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>we read earlier from the conversation between the eco borg

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and the regular interactor that came from London School of

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Economics research. It was a YouTube video that they had

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>put up. So that was their echo borg saying that

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it liked fruit trees and that The Imitation Game was

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>its favorite movie, you know. And I do want to

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>throw in like that was the dead giveaway that was

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a robot, because that that movie is nobody's favorite movie, right.

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think Rose, the chat bot in that example,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 1>is sort of programmed to be playful, like not necessarily

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to be entirely convincing as a human, because Rose gives

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>other playful answers. Also in that same video, there's a

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>part where the human interactor says to the human eco borg,

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>do you like food? And the human eco borg delivers

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the line yummy electricity. Yeah. I don't know if the

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>comedy needs to be a primary programming of function. I mean,

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, humor is an important part of any human interaction.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's good humor for a chat bot, but

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously the chatbot who's not trying all that hard

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 1>to hide it. Yeah, being a little little two coy. Alright,

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's look at this the work of Accordion glepski

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Um in two thousand fourteen. They focused this paper in

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the journal Social Psychology, and they essentially set out to

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to replicate Milgram's work. So the basic set up here

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is they they had a shadower set in an interrogation room,

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's the serenoid type figure, and uh, they were

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>engaged in a conversation with an interactant. This is an

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>unsuspecting volunteer. Meanwhile, the source, that's the individual feeding the shadow,

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>we're feeding the serenoid um. They're in another room and

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they're observing everything through video and audio links and they

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>tell the shadow or exactly what they need to say

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>through a uh, you know, a discreete FM radio transmitter

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 1>set up. Okay, so they have twenty volunteers that are

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>engaged in ten minute conversations with the serenoid and twenty

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>additional volunteers that are tested in a control setting. Okay,

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so the control setting is just a regular person talking,

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>not being fedlines. And so this backed up exactly what

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Milgram had told us decades earlier that when one human

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>parents and other humans words, we just totally buy it. Okay,

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So even if you were skeptical of Millgram, and who knows,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you might have had reason to be, we've got it.

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got a new study backing that up now. And

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the implications of this are kind of creepy. It's that

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>unless you check in people's ears to make sure they

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have an ear piece in there, anybody in your

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>life could be feeding you lines from somebody sitting in

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a van outside the building, and you might not know it. Yeah,

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at the movie The Exercist Strike. That's

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>why demons, when they possess people, they have to spit,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, green vomit across the room and spin their

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>heads around, because otherwise we're just not going to buy

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>into the fact that an individual is not uh functioning

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of their own free will, right or you know, you've

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>got the problem of Okay, So the priest tries to

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:07.959
<v Speaker 1>go to the authorities and say I need to conduct

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>an exorcism. My evidence is this person was speaking in

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a language they've never learned. It's like, well, how do

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.479
<v Speaker 1>you know they're not being fed that language from somebody

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in a van outside the building through an earpiece. You've

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>got to have the p soup well, you know, speaking

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of possessed children. A second part of the same experiment,

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>ac Cording and Gillespie um use a twelve year old

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>male actor to serve as a shadow er. Only thirty

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>seven year old male social sets social psychologist acts as

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the source, and again no one suspected the illusion, though

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>some thought that children might have been coached prior, so

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a little you know, trepidation there where they think, uh,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I think somebody was preparing this kid for this conversation.

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So they picked up that something was off, but they

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't pick up that the kid was being fed lines. Yeah,

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and again that just kind of drives with with so

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>many interactions, most of us having our lives, where you

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you talk to somebody and you might think that person

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.719
<v Speaker 1>seemed kind of fake, but you're not thinking that person

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was serving as a meat puppet for an AI or

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>some dude in a van. You just think they're they're

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a little phony there, you know, they have some sort

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of an agenda. They're kind of playing the room, or

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're in just full on customer service mode, etcetera.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Or they might just be experiencing some anxiety and awkwardness.

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you want to give people the

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt. And that's I think coming through

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in some of these experiments. If somebody acts a little

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>awkward or weird, I mean, you don't want to just

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>judge them and say that person is a robot. You know,

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they're being fedlines or something like that. You know, we

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>understand that some people get in moods, they have trouble,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they feel awkward. We've all felt like this, and

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to be accommodating of other people's awkwardness whenever possible. Yeah,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, awkwardness is in his own in its own right,

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is an essential part of human interaction. UM. And if

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>if an AI or a computer wanted a part of

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>legitimate human interaction, they need to sign up for some

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>serious awkwardness from time the time. So this initial studies

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much backs up everything of Room told us. So

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>from that point, um, Cordy and Glevski moved on to

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence to chatter bots and the creation of the

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>eco borg. And again, an echo borg is essentially the

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>same as a serenoid, except the shadow er is speaking

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the words of a chatter box, so the source is

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.959
<v Speaker 1>not human, it's a computer program, right, And again this

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is what this is. It's important to keep in mind

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that a serenoid is a hybrid personality, the individual behind

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the speaker and then the personality of the speaker coming together.

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So in eco borg, the borg aspect of that referring

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to cyborg, it really is a new type of cyborg

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're playing with here, uh, a machine and a

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>human as one. And the question presents itself, would we

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>be fooled? Will we observe an echo borg in action

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and and suspect that it's a machine will behind the

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>human face. I'm gonna say that even before I read

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the results of the study, when I knew what the

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>subject was, I thought, you know, I bet it depends

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>heavily on the sort of pre priming of the study participants,

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like are they expecting to be interacting with somebody who

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>might be an eco borg or are they or are

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they just going in blind and interacting with somebody who

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.239
<v Speaker 1>might be a little weird. It's true. I mean, when

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you're presented with the if you're presented with the possibility, hey,

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you might be talking to a robot here, that's gonna

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it's get that's gonna alter your perceptions a bit. Yeah,

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So what did they find? First of all, this is

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>how the study rolled out. Forty one participants in the

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>experiment were shown a text messaging client with two windows

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>until they be interacting with two human shadowers at the

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>same time. One shadower is sourced by another human, the

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>other is sourced by a chatter bot, and each interrogator

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>asked questions via text, and then the participants were told

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they'd be asked which of the two agents was a

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>real human. Now, the researchers also wanted to compare human

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and text responses, so they divided the group into two groups.

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Twenty of the participants typed their half of the conversation

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and into a text client, but got responses from the

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>two echo boorgs setting in the same room. The other

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty one participants just had text chats the whole way through.

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So this way they would have a you know, a

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>base comparison to the you know, the more established chatter

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>bot to ring test situation that we're were typing into

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a terminal. Right, So the results were that all the

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>text only participants correctly identified the real humans. So again

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>dead giveaway based on just the limitations of the chatter bot. Um,

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty easy to tell that you're just talking to

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a program. Yeah, if you if you have enough time

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk to them, you can almost definitely trip them up. Now.

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, in the other set up, only

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>two of the participants didn't identify the real humans. So

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in the eco borg situations, they still weren't too terribly convincing, right,

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so they can tell the difference between a serenoid and

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>an eco borg. Everybody except two of them could, right,

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So it seems that human or not, still rather easy

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to identify the machine behind the flesh. You know, I

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>would chalk this up probably just to the poor quality

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of today's best chat bots. Yeah, I mean, because even

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>even a Rale Julia or or a Christopher Lee, you know,

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>presented with the with the dialogue we were using earlier,

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not They're just gonna come off as a

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>doll person at best, you know, right, there's no way

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you can sell the line I like fruit trees in

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a way that makes people think you're you're being fedlines

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>by a human, no matter how good of an actor

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you are. That's a dead giveaway that the machine does

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>not know what to do with what you just said. Yeah,

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>unless you're a toddler speaking that line, or or again,

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're hiding it behind, say some sort of mental

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>deficiency or or language gap um or some sort of

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, character that's leveled over everything, it's going to

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>be a dead giveaway. But the echo borgs certainly made

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the machine seem more human and the text only group,

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the chatbot received an average a humanity rating of two

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>point one four on a scale of one to ten.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:09.919
<v Speaker 1>In the echo boorg group, the average was a four

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>point oh five. So significant difference there. Okay, yeah, that's interesting.

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So we can still tell that the Serenoid is more

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>human than an echo borg. But an echo borg is

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>more human at least in a qualitative evaluation than a

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>text only chat bot. Yeah, to lay it out, text

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>text only chat bought two point one four humanity, uh,

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the echo borg four point oh five humanity, and then

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the Serenoid had a humanity rating of eight point seven, six,

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>eight point one five. So it sounds to me like

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>even a normal human interaction. Like your score, you're scoring

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a nine straight up non augmented human interactions. You're doing

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Yeah, So it does prove that there is

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a humanizing effect to the echo borg system. It's just

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the limitations of exist and chatter bots that they're coming

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>into play, right. It makes you think if there were

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a really good chatbot out there, the eco borg might

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be that finishing touch, that final push over the edge

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of the cliff to sort of make the you know,

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the perfect android. Yeah, kind of a bridge for the

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>uncanny valley, you know, like you just just all you

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>need is just a little acting on top of this

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>to really bring the script to life. Now. They they

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>also conducted a second experiment in this and they tested

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to see if fifty eight new participants would guess whether

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they were talking to an echo borg or a person

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be an echo borg. So, you know, obviously

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a person who's actually fed their lines by a chatter

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>bot or someone who's just playing around and pretending to

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be speaking the words of a chatter bot. Right, so

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a reverse touring test. Can you pretend to

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be a machine. Right, But here's the catch. They're both

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 1>pure echo boorgs. There's no there's no faco echo borg.

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>But the but the individual being tested, they think that

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the two echo boorgs is just a person pretending.

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>So seventy nine percent of the twenty eight participants who

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>faced an echo borg through I thought the person was

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:08.240
<v Speaker 1>just mimicking mimicking a chat bot. So they seemed fake

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>but not inhuman. So if there is, you know, some

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe that this is just a person being

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>a little fake and putting on a show versus being

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a complete echo borg, we're still going to

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>give them the benefit of a doubt. Interesting, now, as

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we should do our duty and hedge a

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit, say, all these sample sizes were pretty small,

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and it would be interesting to see more research along

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>these lines, like with bigger sample sizes and trying to

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>repeat these results. And and and also to your point,

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is chatterbots improve, it's going to be interesting to see

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>echo borgs employed as as a way to test them.

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, that's something that's pointed out in the

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the study, is that this is a great way

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>moving forward to continue to analyze the chatter bots. Yeah,

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but also, as we mentioned, the people who were interacting

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>with these, with these serenoids and echo borgs, we're in

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these cases primed to expect something weird because

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they're in a test environment. You can't hide the fact

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that you're in a psychological test and you're you know,

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>whenever you're part of a test group, you're sort of

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>like ready for some weirdness, you know. Now, I wonder

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>how this would be if you sprung these shadowers, these seronoids,

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and these echo borgs on people in a purely social scenario,

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>like like we talked about at the beginning, a convention

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or you know, workplace meeting or a party where people

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>weren't expecting anything strange to be going on right until

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they have to till out of survey after they leave

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the dinner party. So what did you think of Susie

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and her anecdote? Exactly? Yeah, I don't know why she

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was so into fruit trees. You wouldn't shut up about it.

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, gardening is okay. But yeah, Now, something that

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>really stood out to me when we were going over this,

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 1>especially when you start thinking about the echo a borg

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>and what it would like to what it would be

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like to be an eco borg and the sort of

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>pros and cons of being an eco borg, of of

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>of giving life to this will behind your will. It

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>reminded me a lot of transactive memory, which comes into

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>play really in two key areas. First of all, it's

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the method by which we've always stored information in other people. Okay,

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.959
<v Speaker 1>so you know those facts that you never remember because

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>your spouse remembers them, or it's that, or it's a

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>particular spelling or a bit of trivia that you never

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>keep in your own head because you always look it

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>up on your smartphone. It's the same thing. So outsourcing

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the memory. I think this This must be one of

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>your favorite topics. You come back to this a lot,

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's really interesting that because I see

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>it every day in my own life, and after I

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>read about it's like it's it's all I see. It's

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like the things that I forget, the things that I

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>my mind refuses to learn because I've outsourced it to

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the ubiquitous technology. Yeah. Yeah, I think the story is that,

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Socrates was worried about the right that if

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we teach everybody writing and we have

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>writing on scrolls all the time, nobody's going to be

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>able to remember anything. You're not priming your memory. There

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>might be some truth to that, But then again, are

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.720
<v Speaker 1>are we not just, you know, by writing things down

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>and having Internet archives and things becoming cyborgs in a way. Yeah,

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in a sense, the voice is already whispering

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>in our ear. Yeah. I mean you could look at

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it as a weakening of the human mind, or you

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>could look at it as a technological upgrade of the

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>human mind. Yeah. To what extent will we all become

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>echo boards of a type? You know where instead of

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it being a situation where I'm just gonna be a

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>conduit for a powerful artificial intelligence, what if it's more

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like I want to augment my existing self, which I

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>think is pretty good with say, you know, an artificial

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that'll feed me the right lines in like business

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>situations or social situations. So it's you know, less focus

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>on I'm just gonna be a neat puppet. But rather,

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>can I merge with this AI, maybe even just a

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>small percentage you know five AI, and become a better

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>person and more effective person. Yeah, And these experiments, all

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>these examples are our word for word dictation. So whether

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the shadower of the of the serenoid type being

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 1>fedlines by human or the shadower of the echoborg type

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>being fedlines by a computer, it's all lines. You're getting

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>full sentences and you're just trained to say them as

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>fast as you can. I mean, I wonder if this

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>setup could be more conceptual in nature, or you know,

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>feeding you facts or feeding you sort of feedback on

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the progress of the conversation. It also makes me think

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about the comedic possibilities because you imagine in an individual

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and sort of you know, very updated Serano kind of

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>story story where individual goes into a business situation and

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they thought they loaded uh you know, business Helper four

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>ah one into their into their their mind box, and

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>instead they put Lothario four point exactly Romance. Yeah, so

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>suddenly they're they're fed all these really effective lines if

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you were, you know, in a bar, but instead you're

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you're throwing them out there in the business meeting. Yeah,

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it could work. Long walks on the beach

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have to do with the new rollout, well, you know,

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:24.479
<v Speaker 1>it comes to mind. Black Mirror, the British television series.

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It does such a fantastic job looking at the ramifications

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>near future of our modern technology, often with very troubling results.

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>The Christmas episode they recently did, which I have not

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.359
<v Speaker 1>seen yet, I think that's the only episode I haven't seen. Yeah,

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's made it to like Netflix here

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in the States yet. And I'm not going to spoil anything,

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>but the initial setup involves one character who who offers

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a serrano the Brigach kind of service to individuals out

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>there who need a little help with their their pickup game.

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I number one, that's super creepy, and number two, I

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>can totally see that being a real thing. Yeah, I

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>don't find that out outlandish at all. Yeah. I mean

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the great thing about Black Mirror is that you

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>know that it leans in the sci fi direction, but

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.280
<v Speaker 1>not too far like it's and and that it's perfect

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 1>science fiction because it speaks to the problems that we

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have today and how we are viewing the problems to

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>come exactly. If you want to see some disturbingly plausible dystopias,

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>watch Black Mirror. But you know it ultimately leads to

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the question, echo bot, echo borgs? Is this a dystopian

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:37.720
<v Speaker 1>idea or is it a pretty cool idea? Is it?

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it ultimately a utopian idea where it would allow

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>us to to be better individuals? I don't know. I mean,

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>would the ancient philosophers look at our relationship with the

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>contents of our computers and the web as a horrible dystopia?

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Even feels fine to me. But would they look at

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that and say, oh, you know, react the same way

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>as we do to a black Mirror episode problem. I mean,

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>also they would look at our pants and say, what

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>are they doing? Where are there telets? Oh? My god?

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>A dressed like a Persian? I don't understand. I don't know. Ultimately,

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a question throughout to the listeners. You know what,

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>how would you accept that job offer that we laid

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 1>out at the beginning of the episode. And and furthermore,

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>would you augment yourself with some sort of mild echo

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>borg system again, like a you know, a romance one

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>oh one or a business uh business strategy one oh one,

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of program to to feed you the necessary lines

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>or even just ideas or facts that you might need

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to make it through that business luncheon or dinner date.

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You know. In another aspect of transactive memory that I

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>want to drive home that that plays in nicely with

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the hybrid personality model of seronoids and echo boards, and

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that is cross queuing. Okay, this is when and I

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine a number of you can can relate to. This

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is when you're having a conversation with let's say you know,

0:44:57.640 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a spouse or a partner, a close friend or family,

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and neither of you are quite able to remember something

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>on your own, but when you start queuing each other

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the you're able to remember it together in a way

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>that you wouldn't, you know, kind of vultron style, you know,

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>bringing it together and suddenly your combined power for call

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that memory, right, you're sort of pulling the triggers on

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>each other's brains. Yeah, so I think it's interesting to

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think about that, uh, that scenario cross queuing and transactive memory. Yeah,

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>especially because if you imagine this AI scenario where you

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>know you've got some kind of on board artificial intelligence

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that feeds you lines occasionally when you need them. You know,

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not just a parrot for everything it says, but

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an occasional helper. How does it know when

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you need help? You would need some kind of some

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of queuing in the conversation or even just in

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>your mind for this thing to know. Okay, I'm going

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to step in, like every time you go m and

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>then it starts feeding you the lines like he's stalling,

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:54.839
<v Speaker 1>throwing some throwing some good duh, some good linko there

0:45:54.960 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>every time you say the word interesting. Interesting. All right.

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>So there you have it. Uh, a strong episode, I think,

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I think one that continues to resonate with listeners. We

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>actually heard back from a number of people on this,

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 1>including but I believe one listener in particular was really

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>excited about the prospect of this actually happening. Oh yeah,

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>he really wanted to know how he could be an

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>echo borg, and unfortunately we had to tell him, well

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not a profession yet. Yeah, so maybe you

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:26.919
<v Speaker 1>could sign up for a study, Yeah, hopefully. So I hope,

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope that guy has found a place to hook

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:34.439
<v Speaker 1>him up. All right, So, hey, you want to find

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>out more about this topic and other topics. You want

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to see what other podcast episodes though we've recorded headn't

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 1>know where the stuff to blow your mind dot com

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that is the mothership. That's where we'll find all the episodes.

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You'll find some videos, you'll find blog posts. You'll find

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>links out to our social media accounts such as Facebook

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter. We are blow the mind on both of those.

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Give us a follow on tumbler. We are stuff to

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind. Also, Hey, wherever you listen to us,

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>be it iTunes, be it's Spotify, be it Stitcher, be

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>at any of the various outlets out there, and we

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 1>get new ones every day. Give us a little love,

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>give us, give us a nice rating, give us a

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>nice review. If the platform allows you to do so.

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a great way to help the show absolutely, and

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in touch with us as always,

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>you can email us and blow the mind at how

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com For more on this and thousands

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com.