WEBVTT - Black, Bold & Building: A New Blueprint for Capitalism ft. Dr. Rachel Laryea

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>In so many ways. I think Dee and I heard

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it spoken this way really well at the Black Economic

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Alliance some that I went to recently. EI being really

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a consolation prize, it isn't the end goal for us

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>by any means, and so I think it's really kind

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of forcing us, as we live through this moment to

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>think about one all we have are ourselves and the

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>places that we find ourselves in. It's like, how do

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>we continue the work that so many of us have

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>already been doing and now maybe without the support, but

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>with certainly the scrutiny of this moment and how we're

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>experiencing that, but I think that the impact can still happen.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, via FAM, Welcome back to the Brown Table. I

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>am joined by a very special guest today who is

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.959
<v Speaker 2>somehow younger than me, but you just kind of get

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the feeling that they can be like president. Like I

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>imagine this is kind of like what it's like to

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>talk to Amanda Gorman, that poet whose parents have been

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>raising to be the president. I just feel like I'm

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>speaking to future Nobel Prize winner. It's fine. I'm very

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>secure in myself, so I can appreciate her light and

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>her light only shines on me, and I am so

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>grateful to have doctor Rachel Laery on Brown Ambition today.

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you about her. Not only does she

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 2>have a brand new book that is coming out by

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 2>the time you listen to this episode. You can probably

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 2>pre order it already, but you should definitely go to

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 2>the show notes and ground the link to purchase her book.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>And the book is called Now this is a huge title,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>but the book is called Black Capitalists, A Blueprint for

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>what is Possible. It's coming out this June. It should

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>be out soon by the time you're listening to this episode.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 2>But doctor, again, doctor Rachel lay is not just an author.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Before she put together this incredible book, she created her

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>really unique career path, which I'm going to dive into.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I haven't met many women who've managed to carve out entrepreneurship,

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 2>writing their own book and still working for a huge

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 2>financial institution like JP Morgan Chase. But again, doctor Laier,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 2>you talked to me saying that yet you earned it.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 2>She cut her teeth on Wall Street at Goldman Sachs

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>and then she went on to receive a dual PhD

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>in African American Studies and socio cultural anthropology at Yale University.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I've like heard of it cool. Her ethnographic research aims

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to understand nuanced forms of black participation in capitalist economies.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 2>She is a recipient of the National Science Foundation Research

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Fellowship Award, and she's also been name dropped by the

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Ford Foundation for her research, receiving an honorable mention. She's

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 2>held an adjunct professor appointment at the NYU Stern Business School,

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 2>and currently she's an asset wealth management researcher at JP

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Chase. And I don't know, just like in her

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>spare time or whatever, she's founded this company. It's called Kellela,

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 2>which is a lifestyle brand that's based in Brooklyn, where

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>she curates bespoke West and East African travel experiences and

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>has elevated the plantain to the platform. It's always deserved

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 2>by creative Vegan. And she's here on Brown Ambition because

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 2>duh have you heard her bio? If I'm not getting

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 2>doctor lay on my podcast? What are we doing? What

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>are we doing wrong? Brann and bish Well, welcome to

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the show, and congratulations on all of these milestones in

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 2>your career.

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Oh many, Thank you so much. That was such a beautiful,

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>gracious intro. I appreciate it. It's awesome to be here in

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>chow Now.

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I think what's more important for BA fan to know

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>is that she's actually at her brother's house right now

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>in the Midwest, babysitting for her three year old and

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>one year old? Is it niece and nephew. Yes, yes,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 2>what a good auntie. We love it.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I gotta be gotta show up.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>They got to show you from Brooklyn. They said you

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>better get on over here.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So it has been a whirl end. But so happy

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to have this moment to talk with you.

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, So God, Like, where do we start? I

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>guess before we get into the book black capitalist, I

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>want you to define it for me, black capitalists, because

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm someone who I can talk about capitalism

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and capitalists. I have an uncle who's like, I'm a capitalist,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>so I'm voting for Trump. We don't want to go there,

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 2>but black capitalists, Like, why do those two words together

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 2>make me feel weird?

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Exactly? And it's often the case that many people think

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of the term black capitalists as oxymeeronic, and so much

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of the reason for that is when you look at

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the creation of American capitalism and black people through the

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>implementation of legalized slavery. We built this capitalist system, but

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we're never really allowed to be the beneficiaries of what

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we built. And so the idea of being a black

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>capitalist presents for many an identity crisis. It's like, how

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>can you hold affinity to a system that you've been

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>excluded from systematically, And so oftentimes when people define capitalism itself,

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes that's very much kind of imbued with feelings of disgruntlement,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of financial anxiety, worry. People will talk about

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>capitalism is the root of all evil, the white man's

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>way of keeping us down, all of these different ways

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in which people will define it. But for me, I

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think what's really important, and part of the key argument

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of the book is if we take capitalism as a

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>political or economic system whereby private actors engage in economic

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>exchange for the purpose of yielding excess capital. In that sense,

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone can be a capitalist or a private actor, and

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that's both hopeful and also potentially problematic. Right hopeful in

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the sense that we kind of take away this racialized

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>aspects that we have around who the capitalist is, who

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the labor is, and it kind of opens up new

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>potentials around Okay, how can we use the tools of

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>capitalism to create new outcomes outside of the ones that

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we're so familiar with, namely being within the black community

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>in that labor position and experiencing the harms of capitalism

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>so deeply, whether it be exploitation, extraction, etc. But then,

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of course we also know that when you look at

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the racial wealth gap, who has predominantly been the capitalist,

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>who has predominantly been the beneficiary of capitalism has been

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>white people. And so when you then take black and

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>capitalists and you put it together overlaying that whole history

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that I kind of spoke to very quickly, then you

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 1>have that kind of visceral emotional reaction of this doesn't

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>quite sit right with me, you know, And so so

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>much of the book and the work that I do

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is around Okay, let's unpack all of this and then

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>let's get to a place of common ground and neutrality

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>about what is capitalism defined. But then also what I'm

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>offering about what black capitalists and what it means to

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>also black capitalism, which is definitionally to be a black

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>capitalist is to be someone who identifies as a black

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>person and strategically participates in the economy with the intent

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to produce social good. So what's really important about that

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>definition is not just about how can you create profitability

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>by strategically positioning yourself and participating in the economy, but

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it is that other really important part around social good

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of consistent orientation to community, which is

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what allows us to then rethink how the tools of

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>capitalism can be used outside of what we've seen them

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>be used for. And that's similar to black capitalism, which

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is very' agnostic, how anybody, private actors, individual are collective

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.119
<v Speaker 1>can resituate themselves within capitalism with the intention to create

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>social good. If you take a framework like black feminism,

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be a black person to practice

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>black feminism, but it is kind of an orientation around

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how you show up in support of others in supportive

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>community as well, and creating a distinction just in that

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of example, to be a black feminist versus practicing

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>black feminism. Similar concept to how you can someone can

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>be a black capitalist, but then also collective can practice

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>black capitalism.

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's all really interesting. I'm wondering, like, when you

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>talk about the importance of creating social good to be

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>a black capitalist? Does that social good need to impact us? Like?

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Is it what the intent that seems important here? It's

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>like who who in the social structure? Are we like benefits? Yes? Sure? So?

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Is this as simple as like, I mean, in an

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>ideal world where you've got a profitable business and then

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>you set up a nonprofit arm to then give back

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 2>into the community or fund grants for other entrepreneurs? Is

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 2>it dedicating a percentage of profits to certain causes that

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 2>benefit our communities? Is that the ideal that you're hoping

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>this book can help shine a light on.

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, in some ways. And I think what's so beautiful

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>about black capitalism is that it can be experienced and

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>practiced in so many different ways. Just as we know

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>blackness is not a monolith and it's not a monolithic experience,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the practice of black capitalism is also not a monolithic experience.

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And so the definition that I offer in the framework

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is robust enough to account for all the different positions

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that we might sit in in our daily lives. Some

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of us might be in corporate America, like myself, And

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so the questions then become within the seat that I'm

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>seated in what are the opportunities or the access channels

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.239
<v Speaker 1>that I can create for other folks in the institution

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>outside of it, And I can give examples for how

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we might think about that. If you're an entrepreneur, some

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of what you just described those are beautiful examples of

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>how you can reposition yourself within the economy to still

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>create a profitable business. But then also keeping in mind

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>it goes hand in hand how you create social good

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think it's the case that we all

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>have a slice of this capitalist pie, and it's really

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>up to us how we're going to use it and

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>how we're also going to feed each other in that

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of experience, And so regardless of where you sit,

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>there's always kind of a part to play. And I

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>think that it's less about adjudicating when is enough or

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>how much social goods should I do, but really from

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>just having it as a mindset kind of like a

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 1>way of life in terms of this is an ethos,

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a kind of consistent practice and orientation that I have

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>around always asking myself how can I be in service

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>of community, which also requires an abundance mindset, a belief

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and a trust in each other and that we can

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>really only get free through being in community with each other.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And so those are the kind of core building blocks

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to then really practice this and create effective change in

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the long term.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it just sounds very similar to the ethos

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 2>of Brown ambition, which is we're not just building wealth

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 2>because it's fun to get rich. It's how can we

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 2>use our economic power to influence change, to bring about change,

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 2>to protect ourselves, to protect our families, to build generational wealth,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 2>all those things. There's really like an empowerment element to it,

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>which sometimes I think you need because capitalism, ambition, these

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 2>are two words that tend to drop feelings of like, oh,

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 2>like you're just selfish, you're greedy, you're looking out for

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 2>number one. But it's like, no, let's look at these

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 2>terms and show that they can bring about good. It

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>just matters like who's controlling it. As long as you

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 2>control the wealth, you can have so much influence. One

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 2>of the things that I when I was kind of

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>reading through some of I know you talk to black

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>professionals who are working in corporate America, And one of

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 2>the stories that resonated with me was the guy who said,

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and he works in banking, I believe and he said

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 2>that he feels like he's a spy a little bit,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>like they think he's one of them. And by one

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 2>of them, I mean like we's kind of code switching.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>We all do that. We show up to work, we talk,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>we talk real good, and we make everybody feel good

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>that we have a black person on their team, but

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 2>like never exactly like owning our blackness necessarily because that

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>might be a little threatening, but just being there in

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the mix. But at the same time, he's like, but

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I've never forgotten who I am. I know why I'm here.

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>And it just resonated with me so much because in

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>my corporate career, when I got to a position where

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I was hiring someone, oh yeah, I mentioned that I

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 2>work with someone whose last name is Lia. I know

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 2>another LIAI shout out to Brittany, and she was the

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 2>first reporter that I was ever able to hire. Once

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I became a manager, it mattered to me that my

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>first hire was a black woman. I went on to

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 2>get the privilege to put together a team that ended

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 2>up including like I think, thirty staff and a bunch

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of contractors, and I used to say to myself, I'm

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 2>like a spy, Like nobody knows I'm taking all the

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>money that they're giving me for these hires, and I

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>am going and finding people of color and women like

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>and I just I love that there. I want more

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 2>of us to think of it that way, all here undercover,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 2>to create that change in incremental ways, like from within.

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love that. Because also after I graduated from college,

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, so many of my peers went on to

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>more like altruistic careers, and I faced quite a bit

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of criticism around like, oh, you're going to Goldman Sachs,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>like that's the belly of the beast, Like what's she

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go do there? You know? And also coming

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>from my undergraduate studies which was seeped in social and

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>cultural analysis and really understanding the harms of these structures,

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>generally capitalist structures. But for me, it's like it really

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>matters the orientation that you have when you're in those spaces,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>because surely, yes, you can exist in these corporate spaces

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that people have all of this criticism around, But if

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you have these subversive intentions like alex as you mentioned,

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that makes a difference. It's like the how and the

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>why can really shift outcomes. Because I think for him,

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>what was so important was like how can he channel

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>resources to his community by being at the firm that

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>he was, similar to how you're thinking about how can

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I create a pipeline of access for people to have

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>space in these spaces where otherwise maybe they wouldn't be

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>considered or overlooked or whatever it is. And so I

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think when you shift our mindset, it's like, Oh, there's

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a whole new set of opportunities I think that arise

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in that, and that to me is like the efficacy

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and the potential to create new outcomes.

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially at a time like this where that's like

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 2>DEI attacked, it almost makes me regret the resurgence or

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the surge of DEI as a term as an institution,

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 2>like as a categorization in corporate America, like in the

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>summer of twenty twenty, and all of a sudden, it's like, oh,

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 2>we're going to show that we are on board by

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>creating these DEI rolls or teams and initiatives. It almost

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 2>like gave a target. So the way that we were

0:14:58.000 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of being subversive and like the way that I

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 2>was being sneaky about it. I'm practicing d I in

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 2>my hiring, but I ain't telling nobody is that, you

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean? But it's like when we name it,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 2>we kind of give them a target. And I think

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what's happening. And so you're seeing now it's like, well,

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 2>let's just get rid of all these DEI programs. And

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that, you know, what we're talking about is

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>like a reminder that if you're still like we're a

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of people were in corporate like, you can still

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 2>have an impact even if you're not under that umbrella,

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe even more so because we can sneak by. Yes, yes,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>you know that's the Beverly Hills cop know what's the

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 2>emission impossible?

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Is that one?

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't know. James Bond, that's okay. Maybe if

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Lushana Lynch was the new Black James Bond like she

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 2>should have been, oh I would know.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with you. I think it creates and

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in so many ways I think d E and I

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I heard it spoken this way really well at the

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Black Economic Alliance Summit that I went to recently. EI

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>being really a consolation prize. It isn't the end goal

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>for us by any means, and so I think it's

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really kind of forcing us as we live through this

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>moment to think about one, all we have are ourselves

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and the places that we find ourselves in. It's like,

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>how do we continue the work that so many of

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>us have already been doing and now maybe without the support,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but with certainly the scrutiny of this moment and how

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we're experiencing that. But I think that the impact can

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>still happen. When I first joined JP Morgan Chase, I

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>was the Community Impact team, and that team was responsible

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for the thirty billion dollar racial equity commitment that came

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>out in twenty twenty after George Floyd's murder, where the

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>firm made very strong commitments around how it was going

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to really try to close this racial wealth gap. I

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was on that team starting in twenty twenty two and

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>really kind of a watch from the inside the kind

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of process and the journey of a Dee and I

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>effort and initiative go invoke and out of vogue within

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a period of time. And that was so striking to

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>me to see that to be a d and I

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>practitioner as a black woman, you know, really in service

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of our black and brown clients, and what that moment meant.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Layer on the affirmative action ruling that came out around

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that period as well, and it kind of really shifted,

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>not even just kind of the internal stakeholder conversations that

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>were happening around the work that we were doing, which

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>was already challenging because here you are trying to create

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>new ways of working within the business, but now there's

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of question around legal prudence and due diligence

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we're not making a firm liable

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to anything created another layer of complexity, and that prompt

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in my own kind of professional journey of what are

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>other places I could find myself in? Ultimately wound up

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>in ass wealth management. The work doesn't end. It's like

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I spend a lot of my time still thinking about

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>how can I create new outcomes for our black clients

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>within the wealth management space.

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 2>A couple of things I want to talk about. What's

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>your take on a couple of things? One in the

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 2>news right now? Of course, in my mind, I'm like

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 2>the met Gala to display I feel like of black

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 2>capitalism at work with the theme this year, and I

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 2>would love to get your take on it. Do you

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 2>think that that type of initiative is helpful? You have

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>like this largely white fashion industry who's obviously profited off

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 2>of our culture in so many ways, but still you

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 2>see so many few designers of color reach these prominent

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 2>levels as other mainstream brands and get as much access

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>to the resources as other brands and other fashion houses.

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 2>But then you have Vogue kind of centering blackness in

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the theme for this year, and Black Dandyism really celebrating

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 2>tailoring and the influence of a very specific time in

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 2>black culture in the fashion landscape, and which has then

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>given them this huge platform to spotlight black designers and

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 2>really celebrate that work. What's your perspective on that.

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, at the end of the day, I'm

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>always going to be in supportive of black people getting

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the visibility they deserve the money. But at the same time,

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important that we not rely on these

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>white institutions to be the savior or the means by

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>which we create access for ourselves. It's like great, taking

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>all the resources in whatever manner they come from, who

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they come but I think what's important is, like, especially

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those moments, they don't have the level

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of consistency or sustainability. It becomes a one and done unfortunately,

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or it becomes something of the zeitgeist. And so all

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of the more reason that when we're talking about sustainability

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and what's really going to hold this down in the

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>long term, it really needs to come from us. And

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's always how can we anchor on

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the tools that we can use for ourselves, create those

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of systems for ourselves. And sure it's like if

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>folks want to shine a light amazing, especially because those

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>spaces have capital and excess and all these other privileges

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that come with that. It's like leverage it. I'm all

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 1>about how can we leverage and service of our community.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think keeping that kind of maybe sobering

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>perspective in mind that we never know how long those

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunities will last. But what we do know is we

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have us at the end of the day, and so

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>we have to make sure that we're locked in on

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that and we're good and anything else is I think

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>additive to that.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, target, My perspective is like we just

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 2>all got it, and I don't even think we needed

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Al Sharpton, but like shout out out for you know,

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 2>doing reverend for putting his stamp on it. But this

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 2>like national agreement among black consumers that we don't f

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 2>with no MO. Do you talk about other examples of

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 2>these types of like collective boycotting and how we can

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 2>actually have an impact. You think about lunch counter boycotts

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and obviously the boycotts during the Civil rights movement, But

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 2>is this an example of how we can be black

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 2>capitalists and using it?

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, one thousand percent. I think what's so important is

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 1>that oftentimes when we collectively think about executing our agency

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>or the moments we feel most stagantic is when we're voting.

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's not something that only needs to happen every

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>four years, every two years, whenever there's an election. We

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>vote every day with our wallet, every single day, multiple

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>times a day, and that is as powerful a vote,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>if not more able, and really am the service of

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>getting us the things that we want, creating the outcomes

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>that we're wanting, and so so often and because of

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just the you know, the structures that have been in

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>place that have limited the access that we've had to

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>systems and opportunities around ownership, consumerism has really been the

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>avenue that's been available to us. And so when you

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>think about that. It's often been from a place of

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 1>a lack of agency. See, it's like, oh, this is

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>what we've been relegated to, this is what we've been given,

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and so this is how we'll participate in economy. But

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.959
<v Speaker 1>there's still agency to be realized even in a consumerist approach.

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like I choose where I will spend my dollars.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>And so I think what's so beautiful about this moment,

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>which I think is new, is that we have struggled

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>to really get to a unified place and really speaking

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>from one voice when it comes to how we use

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>our money within the community. And so you know, if

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>people don't want to, I'll put it this way, whether

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it be allies or not. I think white people have

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>an incredible ability to consume a lot of qualitative data

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about racism without changing their behaviors. But then when they

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>are presented with the effects of economics, like not having

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>access to our capital in different ways, that creates a

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>new paradigm where okay, we're listening in new ways, and

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's really important to keep in mind.

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And the more that we can come and connect from

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>a place of unification in that, the better and so

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's so important, especially because that hasn't always

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>been the case. And so even when you think about

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this from a global context and you want to say

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>something like pan Africanism. One of the people that I

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>interview in the book, he is based in Ghana. He

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>has an investment company and has built out a company

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>really focused on technology at the center of healthcare and

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>real estate across the African continent, and so much of

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 1>what he says is what's really important is when you

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think about how countries negotiate with each other. It's a

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>very different paradigm for Ghana right as a country to negotiate,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, political terms with say the United States. But

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>what's different is if you have fifty four African countries

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>with how many of our people, how much additional resources

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>in capital per person accounted for in that context to

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>then be negotiating terms. It's like when you move from

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a place unification it creates new outcomes, and I think

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that in this moment, but we can also

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>see it in a really global scale as well. It's

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>not just situated in an American context. And so I'm excited

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>about that, but I still think there's work to be

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>done when it comes to how we talk about consumerism,

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ownership and relating it back to our practice of capitalism

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and really reorienting our mindset around how we can be

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>capitalists and participate as capitalists within capitalism but from a

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>different place, and create new outcomes in that process.

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>So, with a little bit of time we have left,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about your career because it's so fascinating.

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's very multi layered. You're working for this

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 2>giant bank right now, Jamie Diamond said something about DEI

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't great. How do you balance working for such

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 2>a big brand? Are they cool with this book tour? Like?

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Do they know about your book?

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had to get the book approved actually,

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and especially especially because I worked on the community impact

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>team responsible for other racial equity commitment. So and I

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>write about that.

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I write about what.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It meant for me to be on that team during

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that moment and to see the swift changes and some

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>of the challenges of being at a bank and trying

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to do racial equity work. And so they're like, oh,

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we need to see what you said. So they're very

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>much aware. But it's interesting because I think, and especially

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I learned it when I was at Goldman. These institutions

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we know are not perfect by any means, But then

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for me, similar to what we were talking about before,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like, how can I use this in service of

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>myself and of my community. I know that, especially when

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>I was in grad school, I thought I was going

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>to become an academic, and I quickly became disillusioned with

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that idea, just seeing the quality of life, the challenges

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that come especially with being a black woman in academia,

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the standards that we were held to, the lack of

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>promotion we get so often, and of course so much

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of that translates into corporate America as well, but just

0:25:55.680 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to acquire resources for me personally, just more opportunity there.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I said, Okay, if I know that I'm

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going to make that trade off, it's like what are

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the what's the what's the dance that I'm always playing?

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's really what it is for me. Where it's

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not a perfect place, but I have

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>been able to find a really good team of people

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that I genuinely enjoy working with. And then of course

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I also have my motives of how can I create

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>new outcomes for black folks within the context of wealth

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>management and use pol do there exactly? As a researcher, Yeah,

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>So I cover within wealth management the research that allows

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>us to create mental models around our clients that then

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>informs the kinds of products that we create and ultimately

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>market to our clients. And so within wealth management, we

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>have advice services where someone might say I want to

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>work with a financial advisor, and there are different product

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>offerings for that. And we also have self directed investing

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>online investing where people can kind of self service and

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>we have a product for that. And so I and

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time I'll go to people's homes, I'll

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>interview them, I'll talk to them, hey, like, how do

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you think about wealth? How do you think about investing?

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>How has it changed over time? I, as a researcher,

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>listening and gathering all of this data across all of

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>these different people that I speak to then say to

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>our product partners and our other stakeholders, this should be

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the direction with which we strategically think about the buildout

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of the products that we have. So that's the kind

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of work that I do. And is unsurprising is that

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking with a bunch of really affluent, high

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>net worth folks. The majority of them historically have been

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>white men, And so when I say I'm going to

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people's homes, is usually white men's homes that I'm going to,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm talking to them. But I'm always thinking through

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>how can I create opportunities to interview black folks, to

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>bring them into the office so people can see them,

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to see that black wealth is also a reality, and

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to create just considerations for different experiences that have been

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>really just anchored on this one experience within the business.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 1>And so that for me is always my kind of

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>call to action while I'm in these spaces that are

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>make no mistake giving me resources to live the life

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 1>that I live, But it's really how can I use

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it in service of more than just myself?

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>You know, well, thank you. I know we have a

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>hard stop. I'm going to shout out the in the

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 2>in the show notes. Although we didn't get you have

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to come back. We can talk about your your passion

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 2>project with Kelly. But doctor Rachel Lay, thank you so much.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations on the book be a fam Go check it out.

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 2>The book is Black Capitalist a blueprint for what is possible?

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a great it's just a great book to get

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 2>you thinking and maybe like help help us all become

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 2>little corporate spies, because it matters, it really does. All right,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 2>go be anti anti because for real, that's the most

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I learned about you. I'm like, oh, you're good people.

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Attah No, this has been a pleasure.

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Six